Hubbry Logo
Deutsche MarkDeutsche MarkMain
Open search
Deutsche Mark
Community hub
Deutsche Mark
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Deutsche Mark
Deutsche Mark
Deutsche Mark
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Deutsche Mark
D-Mark
Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1989
ISO 4217
CodeDEM
Unit
UnitMark
PluralMark
SymbolDM‎
Denominations
Subunit
 1⁄100Pfennig
Plural
 PfennigPfennig
Symbol
 Pfennigpf
Banknotes
 Freq. usedDM5, DM10, DM20, DM50, DM100, DM200
 Rarely usedDM500, DM1,000
Coins
 Freq. used1pf, 2pf, 5pf, 10pf, 50pf, DM1, DM2, DM5
Demographics
Official user(s)None, previously:
List
Unofficial users
List
Issuance
Central bankDeutsche Bundesbank
 Websitewww.bundesbank.de
Printer
 Website
Mint
List
 Website
List
Valuation
Inflation1.4%, December 2001
Pegged byBosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark, Bulgarian lev at par
EU Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM)
Since13 March 1979
Fixed rate since31 December 1998
Replaced by euro, non cash1 January 1999
Replaced by euro, cash1 March 2002
1 € =DM 1.95583
This infobox shows the latest status before this currency was rendered obsolete.

The Deutsche Mark (German: [ˈdɔʏtʃə ˈmaʁk] ⓘ; "German mark"), abbreviated "DM" or "D-Mark" ([ˈdeːˌmaʁk] ⓘ), was the official currency of West Germany from 1948 until 1990 and later of unified Germany from 1990 until the adoption of the euro in 2002. In English, it was typically called the "Deutschmark" (/ˈdɔɪtʃmɑːrk/ DOYTCH-mark). One Deutsche Mark was divided into 100 pfennigs.

It was first issued under Allied occupation in 1948 to replace the Reichsmark and served as the Federal Republic of Germany's official currency from its founding the following year. On 31 December 1998, the Council of the European Union fixed the irrevocable exchange rate, effective 1 January 1999, for German mark to euros as DM 1.95583 = €1.[3] In 1999, the Deutsche Mark was replaced by the euro; its coins and banknotes remained in circulation, defined in terms of euros, until the introduction of euro notes and coins on 1 January 2002. The Deutsche Mark ceased to be legal tender immediately upon the introduction of the euro—in contrast to the other eurozone states, where the euro and legacy currency circulated side by side for up to two months. Mark coins and banknotes continued to be accepted as valid forms of payment in Germany until 1 March 2002.

The Deutsche Bundesbank has guaranteed that all German marks in cash form may be changed into euros indefinitely, and one may do so in person at any branch of the Bundesbank in Germany. Banknotes and coins can even be sent to the Bundesbank by mail.[4] In 2012, it was estimated that as many as 13.2 billion marks were in circulation, with one poll from 2011 showing a narrow majority of Germans favouring the currency's restoration (although only a minority believed this would bring any economic benefit).[5][6] Polls in the early 2020s indicated only a minority of Germans supported reintroduction of the Deutsche Mark.[7]

History

[edit]

Before 1871

[edit]
See also: North German thaler, South German gulden, and German gold mark

A mark had been the currency of Germany since its original unification in 1871. Before that time, the different German states issued a variety of different currencies, the most common being the North German thaler and the South German gulden. By 1857, both currencies were linked to the Vereinsthaler, a silver coin containing 16+2⁄3 grams of pure silver. Although the German gold mark was based on gold rather than silver (at 2.79 marks per gram of fine gold), a fixed exchange rate between the Vereinsthaler and the mark of 3 marks = 1 Vereinsthaler was used for the conversion.

1873–1948

[edit]

The first mark, known as the Goldmark, was introduced in 1873. With the outbreak of World War I, the mark was taken off the gold standard. The currency thus became known as the Papiermark, especially as high inflation, then hyperinflation occurred and the currency became exclusively made up of paper money. The Papiermark was replaced by the Rentenmark (RM) from 15 November 1923, and the Reichsmark (ℛ︁ℳ︁) in 1924.

Early military occupation following WWII

[edit]

During the first two years of occupation the occupying powers of France, United Kingdom, United States, and the Soviet Union were not able to successfully negotiate a possible currency reform in Germany. Due to the strains between the Allies each zone was governed independently as regards monetary matters. The US occupation policy was governed by the directive JCS 1067 (in effect until July 1947), which forbade the US military governor "to take any steps to strengthen German financial structure".[8] As a consequence a separate monetary reform in the U.S. zone was not possible.[8] Each of the Allies printed its own occupation currency.

Currency reform of June 1948

[edit]
Main article: Currency Reform of 1948

The Deutsche Mark was officially introduced on Sunday 20 June 1948 by Ludwig Erhard. Large amounts were exchanged for 10 ℛ︁ℳ︁ to 65pf. In addition, each person received a per capita allowance of DM 60 in two parts, the first being DM 40 and the second DM 20.[9] Edward A. Tenenbaum managed the group of 11 experts that devised the currency reform, and also created "Deutsche Mark", a temporary name that became permanent.[10]

A few weeks later Erhard, acting against orders, issued an edict abolishing many economic controls which had been originally implemented by the Nazis, and which the Allies had not removed. He did this, as he often confessed, on Sunday because the offices of the American, British, and French occupation authorities were closed that day. He was sure that if he had done it when they were open, they would have countermanded the order.[11]

The introduction of the new currency was intended to protect western Germany from a second wave of hyperinflation and to stop the rampant barter and black market trade (where cigarettes were used as currency). Although the new currency was initially only distributed in the three western occupation zones outside Berlin, the move angered the Soviet authorities, who regarded it as a threat.[citation needed] The Soviets promptly cut off all road, rail and canal links between the three western zones and West Berlin, starting the Berlin Blockade. In response, the U.S. and Britain launched an airlift of food and coal and distributed the new currency in West Berlin as well.

Economics of 1948 currency reform

[edit]

Since the 1930s, prices and wages had been controlled, but money had been plentiful. That meant that people had accumulated large paper assets, and that official prices and wages did not reflect reality, as the black market dominated the economy and more than half of all transactions were taking place unofficially. The reform replaced the old money with the new Deutsche Mark at the rate of one new per ten old. This wiped out 90% of government and private debt, as well as private savings. Prices were decontrolled, and labor unions agreed to accept a 15% wage increase, despite the 25% rise in prices. The result was the prices of German export products held steady, while profits and earnings from exports soared and were poured back into the economy. The currency reforms were simultaneous with the $1.4 billion in Marshall Plan money coming in from the United States, which primarily was used for investment. In addition, the Marshall plan forced German companies, as well as those in all of Western Europe, to modernize their business practices, and take account of the wider market.

Marshall plan funding overcame bottlenecks in the surging economy caused by remaining controls (which were removed in 1949), and opened up a greatly expanded market for German exports. Overnight, consumer goods appeared in the stores, because they could be sold for higher prices.[12][13] While the availability of consumer goods is seen as a giant success story by most historians of the present, the perception at the time was a different one: prices were so high that average people could not afford to shop, especially since prices were free-ranging but wages still fixed by law. Therefore, in the summer of 1948 a giant wave of strikes and demonstrations swept over West Germany, leading to an incident in Stuttgart where strikers were met by US tanks ("Stuttgarter Vorfälle"). Only after the wage-freeze was abandoned, Deutschmark and free-ranging prices were accepted by the population.[14]

Currency reform in the Soviet occupation zone

[edit]

In the Soviet occupation zone of Germany (later the German Democratic Republic), the East German mark (also named "Deutsche Mark" from 1948 to 1964 and colloquially referred to as the Ostmark—literally Eastmark) was introduced a few days afterwards in the form of Reichsmark and Rentenmark notes with adhesive stamps to stop the flooding in of Reichsmark and Rentenmark notes from the West. In July 1948, a completely new series of East German mark banknotes was issued.

Bank deutscher Länder and the Deutsche Bundesbank

[edit]

Later in 1948, the Bank deutscher Länder ("Bank of the German States") assumed responsibility, followed in 1957 by the Deutsche Bundesbank. The Deutsche Mark earned a reputation as a strong store of value at times when other national currencies succumbed to periods of inflation.[citation needed] It became a source of national pride and an anchor for the country's economic prosperity,[citation needed] particularly during the years of the Wirtschaftswunder in the 1950s.

Currency union with the Saarland

[edit]

The population in the Saar Protectorate rejected in a referendum the proposal to turn it into a "European territory". Despite French pre-referendum claims that a "no" vote would mean that the Saar would remain a French protectorate it in fact resulted in the incorporation of the Saar into the Federal Republic of Germany on 1 January 1957. The new German member state of the Saarland maintained its currency, the Saar franc, which was in a currency union at par with the French franc. On 9 July 1959 the Deutsche Mark replaced the Saar franc at a ratio of 100 francs = DM 0.8507.

German reunification

[edit]

The Deutsche Mark played an important role in the reunification of Germany. It was introduced as the official currency of East Germany in July 1990, replacing the East German mark (Mark der DDR), in preparation for unification on 3 October 1990.[15] East German marks were exchanged for Deutsche Marks at a rate of 1:1 for the first M 4,000 and 2:1 for larger amounts. Before reunification, each citizen of East Germany coming to West Germany was given Begrüßungsgeld (welcome money),[16] a per capita allowance of DM 100 in cash. The government of Germany and the Bundesbank were in major disagreement over the exchange rate between the East German mark and the German mark.

France and the United Kingdom were opposed to German reunification, and attempted to influence the Soviet Union to stop it.[17] However, in late 1989 France extracted German commitment to the Monetary Union in return for support for German reunification.[18]

Stability

[edit]

The German mark had a reputation as one of the world's most stable currencies; this was based on the monetary policy of the Bundesbank. The policy was "hard" in relation to the policies of certain other central banks in Europe. The "hard" and "soft" was in respect to the aims of inflation and political interference. This policy was the foundation of the European Central Bank's present policy[clarification needed] towards the euro. The German mark's stability was greatly apparent in 1993, when speculation on the French franc and other European currencies caused a change in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. However, it should be remembered that "hard" is relative only if it is compared to other currencies, as in its 53-year history, the purchasing power of the German mark was reduced by over 70%.

Coins

[edit]

The first Deutsche Mark coins were issued by the Bank deutscher Länder in 1948 and 1949. From 1950, the inscription Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Federal Republic of Germany) appeared on the coins. These coins were issued in denominations of 1pf, 2pf, 5pf, 10pf, and 50pf. The 1pf and 2pf coins were struck in bronze clad steel (although during some years the 2pf was issued in solid bronze) while 5pf and 10pf were brass clad steel and the 50-pfennig was in cupronickel. In 1950, cupronickel DM1 coins were released, while a cupronickel DM2 and a .625 silver DM5 were released in 1951. Cupronickel replaced silver in the DM5 in 1975. The DM2 and DM5 coins have often been used for commemorative themes, though typically only the generic design for the DM5 is intended for circulation. Commemorative silver DM10 coins have also been issued which have periodically found their way into circulation. Unlike other European countries, Germany retained the use of the smallest coins (1pf and 2pf) until adoption of the euro.

Coins of the Deutsche Mark[19]
Image Value Technical parameters Description Issued
from
Diameter
(mm) 		Mass
(g) 		Composition Edge Obverse[20] Reverse
[19] 1 pf 16.5 2.00 Bronze-plated
steel 		Smooth Rye stalks; value Oak branch; lettering:
Bundesrepublik Deutschland;
value 		1948–1949
Copper-plated
steel 		1950–2001
2 pf 19.25 3.25 Bronze 1949–1968
2.90 Copper-plated
steel 		1968–2001
5 pf 18.50 3.00 Brass-plated
steel 		1949–2001
10 pf 21.50 4.00
50 pf 20.00 3.50 Cupronickel Reeded Value; lettering:
Bundesrepublik Deutschland 		Sower with an oak seedling[21] 1949–1971
Smooth 1972–2001
DM 1 23.50 5.50 Ornamental Oak leaves;
value; year of issue 		German eagle; lettering:
Bundesrepublik Deutschland 		1950–2001
DM 2 25.50 7.00 Lettering:
EINIGKEIT UND
RECHT UND
FREIHEIT;
oak leaves 		Rye stalks and grapes; value 1951–1956
26.75 Max Planck German eagle; value;
year of issue; lettering:
Bundesrepublik Deutschland 		1957–1971
Magnimat:
Cupronickel-
plated nickel 		Konrad Adenauer 1969–1987
Theodor Heuss 1970–1987
Kurt Schumacher 1979–1993
Ludwig Erhard 1988–2001
Franz Josef Strauss 1990–2001
Willy Brandt 1994–2001
DM 5 29.00 11.20 Silver: 62.5%
Copper: 37.5% 		Value; year of issue;
lettering:
Bundesrepublik Deutschland 		German eagle 1951–1974
10.00 Magnimat:
Cupronickel-
plated nickel 		Lettering:
EINIGKEIT UND
RECHT UND
FREIHEIT;
eagles 		Value; lettering:
Bundesrepublik Deutschland 		German eagle; year of issue 1975–2001

Unlike other countries (such as Australia) there was no attempt or proposal suggested for the withdrawal of the 1pf and 2pf coins. Both coins were still in circulation in 2001 and supermarkets in particular still marked prices to the nearest pfennig. This penchant for accuracy continues with the euro (while Finland or the Netherlands for example, price to the nearest 5 cents) with the 1-cent coin still encountered in Germany.

There were a considerable number of commemorative silver DM 5 and DM 10 coins, which actually had the status of legal tender but were rarely seen outside of collectors' circles.

Obverse view of the 2001 special gold issue of the DM1 coin

On 27 December 2000, the German government enacted a law authorizing the Bundesbank to issue, in 2001, a special .999 pure gold DM 1 coin commemorating the end of the German mark. The coin had the exact design and dimensions of the circulating cupro-nickel DM 1 coin, with the exception of the inscription on the reverse, which read Deutsche Bundesbank (instead of Bundesrepublik Deutschland), as the Bundesbank was the issuing authority in this case. A total of one million gold DM 1 coins were minted (200,000 at each of the five mints) and were sold beginning in mid-2001 through German coin dealers on behalf of the Bundesbank. The issue price varied by the dealer but averaged approximately US$165.

German coins bear a mint mark, indicating where the coin was minted. D indicates Munich, F Stuttgart, G Karlsruhe and J Hamburg. Coins minted during the Second World War include the mint marks A (Berlin) and B (Vienna). The mint mark A was also used for German mark coins minted in Berlin beginning in 1990 following the reunification of Germany. These mint marks have been continued on the German euro coins.

Between 1 July 1990 (the currency union with East Germany) and 1 July 1991, East German coins in denominations up to 50 pfennigs continued to circulate as Deutsche Mark coins at their face value, owing to a temporary shortage of small coins. These coins were legal tender only in the territory of the former East Germany.

Colloquial expressions

[edit]

In colloquial German the 10pf coin was sometimes called a groschen (compare: groat). Likewise, sechser ('sixer') could refer to a coin of 5pf. Both colloquialisms refer to several pre-1871 currencies of the previously independent states (notably Prussia), where a groschen was subdivided into 12 pfennigs, hence half a groschen into 6. After 1871, 12 old pfennigs would be converted into 10pf of the mark, hence 10pf coins inherited the groschen name and 5pf coins inherited the sechser name. Both usages are only regional and may not be understood in areas where a groschen coin did not exist before 1871. In particular, the usage of sechser is less widespread. In northern Germany the DM 5 coin used to be also called a Heiermann, whereas in Bavaria the DM 2 coin was called Zwickl and this expression is now used for the €2 coin in the region.

Banknotes

[edit]

Spelling and pronunciation

[edit]

The German name of the currency is Deutsche Mark (fem., German pronunciation: [ˈdɔʏtʃə ˈmaʁk]); its plural form in standard German is the same as the singular. In German, the adjective "deutsche" (adjective for "German" in feminine singular nominative form) is capitalized because it is part of a proper name, while the noun "Mark", like all German nouns, is always capitalized. The English loanword "Deutschmark" has a slightly different spelling and one syllable fewer (possibly due to the frequency of silent e in English, or due to English's lack of adjectival endings), and a plural form in -s.

In Germany and other German speaking countries, the currency's name was often abbreviated as D-Mark (fem., [ˈdeːmaʁk]) or simply Mark (fem.) with the latter term also often used in English. Like Deutsche Mark, D-Mark and Mark do not take the plural in German when used with numbers (like all names of units), the singular being used to refer to any amount of money (e.g. eine (one) Mark and dreißig (thirty) Mark). Sometimes, a very colloquial plural form of Mark, Märker [ˈmɛʁkɐ] was used either as hypocoristic form or to refer to a small number of D-Mark coins or bills, e.g. Gib mir mal ein paar Märker ("Just give me a few marks") and Die lieben Märker wieder ("The lovely money again", with an ironic undertone).

The subdivision unit is spelled Pfennig (masc.; [ˈpfɛnɪç]), which unlike Mark does have a commonly used plural form: Pfennige ([ˈpfɛnɪɡə]), but the singular could also be used instead with no difference in meaning. (e.g.: ein (one) Pfennig, dreißig (thirty) Pfennige or dreißig (thirty) Pfennig). The official form is singular.

Reserve currency

[edit]
Main article: Reserve currency

Before the switch to the euro, the Deutsche Mark was the largest international reserve currency after the United States dollar.

The percental composition of currencies of official foreign exchange reserves from 1995 to 2024.[27][28][29]
Share of total (%)Year01020304050607080199520002005201020152020US dollarEuroGerman markFrench francSterlingJapanese yenRenminbiSwiss francAustralian dollarCanadian dollarOtherGlobal reserve currency shares

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Deutsche Mark

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![Series 4 Deutsche Mark banknotes][float-right] The Deutsche Mark (DM; German: Deutsche Mark, plural: Deutsche Mark or Marks) was the official of from 20 June 1948 until in 1990, thereafter serving as the of unified Germany until its replacement by the in 2002. Subdivided into 100 pfennigs, it was introduced through a in the western occupation zones to replace the hyperinflationary and restore monetary stability amid post-World War II economic collapse. The reform, overseen by and implemented by the Bank Deutscher Länder (predecessor to the ), involved a 10:1 conversion for most assets but a 1:1 rate for wages and daily transactions, effectively wiping out wartime savings while incentivizing production and trade. This laid the foundation for the (economic miracle), as the DM's soundness—bolstered by strict and independence—fostered low , export-led growth, and West Germany's emergence as Europe's largest economy. The currency's reputation for reliability made it a de facto reserve asset in Europe, influencing the and serving as a benchmark for stability until the late . Upon reunification, the DM extended to at parity despite disparities in productivity, aiding integration but straining fiscal resources. It was phased out with the 's introduction: non-cash transactions converted on 1 January 1999 at a fixed rate of 1.95583 DM per , while banknotes and coins remained until 28 February 2002, after which they can be exchanged indefinitely at the Bundesbank without fee. Despite nostalgia for its stability amid perceived volatility, the DM's legacy endures as a symbol of prudent monetary governance.

Historical Origins

Pre-1948 German Monetary Systems

The Reichsmark was introduced on November 15, 1924, as a stable currency to replace the amid the Weimar Republic's crisis, which peaked in 1923 with monthly inflation rates exceeding 29,000 percent and prices doubling approximately every two days. This stemmed from , the French-Belgian industrial region in January 1923, fiscal deficits financed by money printing, and a collapse in tax revenues, rendering the worthless as a or by late 1923, when wheelbarrows of notes were needed for basic purchases. The episode's traumatic legacy fostered a enduring German policy preference for monetary restraint, viewing unchecked fiat expansion as a direct path to economic disorder and social instability, a mindset that persisted into post-war frameworks. Following Germany's defeat in , the continued as the nominal across the four Allied occupation zones—American, British, French, and Soviet—from May 1945 onward, despite its severe from wartime overprinting and destruction of productive capacity. Each zone introduced supplementary occupation-specific currencies to manage military needs and local circulation: the Western Allies issued Allied Military Marks (Alliierte Militär-Mark) imprinted with zone-specific markings and minted coins bearing Allied control stamps from 1946 to 1948, while the Soviet zone relied on augmented by and, from late 1947, preliminary East German . This fragmented system exacerbated monetary disarray, as flooded from the east into western zones, fueling hoarding and speculation, while Allied scrip circulated alongside but often supplanted the Reichsmark in practice due to its perceived stability for official transactions. Allied-imposed price and wage controls, inherited from Nazi-era policies and rigidly enforced from 1945, artificially suppressed official rates—holding them near zero on paper—but distorted and incentivized evasion through black markets and networks. By mid-1948, the German population had endured nine years of and twelve years of controls, resulting in chronic shortages of consumer goods, where official prices bore little relation to ; for instance, black-market reached 10 to 20 times controlled levels, with cigarettes (often American-supplied) functioning as a equivalent to 10-50 Reichsmarks each in urban trading hubs like . These underground economies, peaking in volume during 1945-1947, absorbed up to 50 percent of transactions in some sectors, undermining incentives and perpetuating a -dominated chaos that reflected the Reichsmark's failure to restore trust or facilitate exchange amid zonal divisions and suppressed price signals.

1948 Currency Reform and Economic Liberalization

The 1948 currency reform, enacted on June 20 in the Western occupation zones of Germany, replaced the inflated Reichsmark with the Deutsche Mark to address the postwar monetary overhang that had rendered the Reichsmark nearly worthless and sustained a barter-dominated shortage economy. This reform reduced excess liquidity by converting cash and bank deposits at a ratio of 100 Reichsmarks to 6.5 Deutsche Marks, while debts were revalued at 100:10, and initial per capita allocations provided 40 Deutsche Marks per adult (plus 20 for children) effectively at parity for limited amounts to facilitate immediate transactions. The measure aimed to restore money's role as a medium of exchange by aligning the currency supply with productive capacity, thereby eliminating the distortions from twelve years of price controls and nine years of rationing that had suppressed output incentives. Ludwig Erhard, as director of the Bizonal Economic Council, complemented the currency swap by dismantling most on June 24, 1948—acting against initial Allied reservations—to prevent the hoarded Reichsmarks from fueling post-conversion. This liberalization enabled market prices to signal and allocate resources efficiently, prompting an immediate surge in supply as suppressed goods flooded shelves and producers responded to profit opportunities. Empirical data reflect this causal link: by late 1948, coal production exceeded 1946 levels by 80 percent, steel output tripled, and industrial production overall rebounded sharply from its postwar nadir of under 60 percent of prewar capacity, marking the onset of the through restored incentives rather than exogenous aid alone. ended abruptly as voluntary exchange supplanted coerced distribution, underscoring how monetary stability paired with resolved at its root. In contrast, the Soviet zone's parallel introduction of the Deutsche Mark on accepted nearly all outstanding Reichsmarks without equivalent or , preserving central planning's rigid allocations and perpetuating shortages despite the nominal currency change. This approach, coupled with state monopolies on production decisions, failed to incentivize output expansion, as prices remained administratively fixed and resources misdirected by bureaucratic fiat rather than consumer demand. The resulting economic divergence—evident in West Germany's rapid recovery versus East Germany's enduring privation—demonstrated central planning's inability to mimic market-driven coordination, with mass emigration from East to West further straining the zone's labor supply. The Western reform's success thus hinged on integrating sound money with deregulated prices to harness decentralized knowledge and effort, a mechanism absent in the East.

Institutional Framework

Central Banking Evolution: Bank Deutscher Länder to Bundesbank

The Bank deutscher Länder (BdL) was established on 1 March 1948 by the United States and British military governments as the central banking authority for the western occupation zones of , tasked with issuing the newly introduced Deutsche Mark and restoring monetary order amid post-war hyperinflationary legacies. This institution operated as a federation of the Landeszentralbanken in the western states, coordinating under Allied oversight while prioritizing currency stabilization through restrictive controls and balanced budgets, which facilitated rapid economic recovery by curbing excess liquidity from the defunct system. With the founding of the Federal Republic of in 1949 and gradual restoration of sovereignty, the BdL evolved toward fuller autonomy, but its structure remained decentralized until the Deutsche Bundesbank Act of 26 July 1957 centralized authority under the newly created , effective 1 August 1957. The integrated the BdL and Land central banks into a unified system headquartered in , enshrining statutory independence from federal government instructions to safeguard currency stability as its paramount objective, explicitly prioritizing over employment or growth targets. This legal framework, influenced by historical aversion to Weimar-era fiscal monetization, empowered the to conduct policy via monetary targeting—initially focused on central bank stock—from the onward, aiming to anchor expectations without direct gold convertibility, as the Deutsche Mark operated under Bretton Woods fixed exchange rates until 1973 rather than a domestic . The Bundesbank's independence manifested in resolute resistance to fiscal dominance, exemplified during the 1970s oil price shocks when it raised discount rates—reaching 7% by late 1974 despite recessionary pressures and Chancellor Helmut Schmidt's expansionary demands—to counteract imported exceeding 7% annually, refusing to accommodate government borrowing through . This approach, rooted in empirical lessons from interwar hyperinflations, sustained low long-term averaging under 3% through the decade by enforcing monetary restraint over short-term political imperatives, thereby preserving the Deutsche Mark's credibility as a stable anchor in . Such policies underscored a commitment to causal mechanisms of price determination via control, independent of exogenous shocks or electoral cycles.

Currency Integrations: Saarland and German Reunification

The Saarland's political reintegration into the Federal Republic of Germany occurred on January 1, 1957, following the rejection of the proposed Saar Statute in a referendum on October 23, 1955, where 67.7% of voters opposed the plan for a Europeanized territory under French influence. Economic union, including customs alignment, followed on July 6, 1959, when the French franc—used as legal tender since 1947—was replaced by the Deutsche Mark at a fixed rate of 100 francs to 0.8507 DM. This transition involved minimal monetary disruption, as the Saar franc had historically been pegged closely to the Reichsmark and the French franc maintained relative stability through convertibility agreements, facilitating seamless absorption into West Germany's monetary framework without significant inflationary pressures or exchange controls. German monetary union with the German Democratic Republic (GDR) was formalized by the Treaty on the Creation of a Monetary, Economic and Social Union, signed on May 18, 1990, and effective July 1, 1990, establishing the as throughout the GDR and rapidly phasing out the Ostmark. The conversion applied a 1:1 rate for wages, salaries, pensions, and social benefits, while household savings were exchanged at 1:1 up to DM 4,000 per adult (aged 15 and over) and DM 2,000 per minor, with excess amounts converted at 2:1 to mitigate fiscal strain from the Ostmark's overvaluation relative to market realities. This structure enabled immediate access to DM liquidity for everyday transactions, with Ostmark notes withdrawn from circulation by the end of 1990, though larger enterprise debts and financial assets faced tiered rates to reflect underlying economic disparities. Post-conversion wage alignments occurred through under West German labor laws, initially pegging East German pay scales at approximately 40-60% of Western equivalents despite the 1:1 parity, prompting market-driven upward adjustments as data and influenced negotiations. Property evaluations shifted to market-based valuations via institutions like the , which appraised state-owned assets using DM-denominated appraisals and auctions, replacing Ostmark-era fixed prices with competitive bidding that revealed true values through supply-demand dynamics rather than administrative fiat. These mechanics underscored the DM's role in enforcing causal economic realism, as the parity conversion accelerated price liberalization and exposed inefficiencies in the without compensatory subsidies distorting initial market signals.

Denominations and Design

Coinage: Materials, Values, and Cultural Expressions

The coinage of the encompassed denominations from 1 to 5 Marks, with serving as subunits equivalent to 1/100 of a Mark. Standard issues included 1, 2, 5, 10, and 50 for smaller transactions, alongside 1, 2, and 5 Mark coins for higher values. Materials shifted over time to balance durability, cost, and metal availability; early post-1948 low-denomination used or , while 5 and 10 employed with brass plating, and 50 utilized copper-nickel. Mark denominations predominantly adopted copper-nickel alloys, with the 1 Mark coin specifically comprising 75% and 25% , weighing 5.5 grams and measuring 23.5 mm in diameter. Higher-value 5 Mark circulation coins minted from to contained 625/1000 silver before transitioning to copper-nickel in response to rising prices. Cultural expressions of the Deutsche Mark coinage appeared in persistent colloquial terms rooted in historical precedents. The 10 Pfennig coin was routinely called a "Groschen," a designation originating from pre-decimal currencies in fragmented German states where it denoted roughly 1/10 of a Mark equivalent. This usage endured as a linguistic holdover, illustrating continuity with traditions predating the 1871 unification and the Reichsmark's decimalization. The 5 Pfennig piece occasionally bore the informal name "Sechser," further evoking older coinage subdivisions. Such terms facilitated everyday discourse but waned with the euro's introduction. Production of Deutsche Mark coins occurred at five state mints, yielding billions of pieces across denominations to meet circulation demands, with detailed mintage statistics documented by the . Regular issue minting halted following the euro's launch as on 1 2002, rendering DM coins non-circulating thereafter. However, they retain perpetual exchangeability at Bundesbank branches for euros at the irrevocable rate of 1 EUR = 1.95583 DEM, ensuring no loss of nominal value despite discontinuation.

Banknote Series: Security Features and Iterations

The third series of Deutsche Mark banknotes (BBk III), introduced progressively from 1969, encompassed denominations of 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 marks, featuring portraits of prominent German historical and cultural figures on the obverse, such as the Brothers Grimm on the 1000-mark note and Carl Friedrich Gauss on the 10-mark note, paired with landscape or architectural reverses. These notes incorporated foundational anti-counterfeiting measures including multi-tonal watermarks replicating the central portrait, embedded metallic security threads inscribed with microtext reading "DEUTSCHE MARK," intricate guilloche patterns resistant to reproduction, and raised intaglio printing detectable by touch. Responding to evolving photocopier and technologies that facilitated , the iterated on the series in the early by issuing updated versions (BBk IIIa) with enhanced security elements, particularly for higher denominations. These included optically variable devices, such as Kinegram holograms—a diffractive foil strip displaying shifting colors and images when tilted—applied to the 100-, 200-, 500-, and 1000-mark notes starting in 1990, alongside improved UV-fluorescent inks and refined to sub-millimeter scales. The design themes shifted subtly toward broader cultural icons, exemplified by figures like on the 100-mark note, emphasizing scientific and artistic contributions over purely historical statesmen. Higher-denomination notes like the 500- and 1000-mark bills, issued in limited volumes—approximately 1.3 billion 1000-mark notes total—were withdrawn from production earlier due to vulnerabilities and declining usage, with issuance ceasing by ; post-euro conversion in 2002, outstanding amounts for these values remained low, reflecting their rarity in circulation compared to lower denominations. These iterations maintained the Deutsche Mark's reputation for robustness against , with Bundesbank records indicating minimal detections relative to circulation volume during the series' lifespan.

Economic Attributes

Monetary Stability and Anti-Inflation Policies

The Deutsche Mark's monetary regime, anchored by the Bundesbank's commitment to , maintained an average annual consumer price rate of approximately 2.7% in from 1950 to 1990, far below the double-digit peaks experienced in many fiat currencies during the same period, such as the U.S. dollar's erosion amid 1970s . This stability stemmed from a causal emphasis on controlling growth rather than accommodating demand pressures, enabling sustained real without the debasement cycles that plagued other economies post-Bretton Woods. The Bundesbank, established in 1957, prioritized positivity by targeting monetary aggregates and adjusting discount rates to exceed expected , eschewing the fine-tuning of output gaps favored in Keynesian frameworks. This approach critiqued overreliance on expansionary policies, as evidenced by the bank's restraint in not fully offsetting wage-push or cost inflations, which preserved the DM's and discouraged speculative bubbles. During the 1970s oil shocks, the Bundesbank resisted imported by tightening policy—raising the Lombard rate and curbing money growth despite unemployment rises—limiting CPI acceleration to an average 4.8% over the decade, compared to over 10% in the U.S. and U.K. This resolve, rooted in historical aversion to Weimar-era , validated the causal efficacy of credible anti-inflation commitments over accommodative stimulus, as subsequent real GDP growth averaged 2.5% annually through the without entrenched price spirals. The DM's hard-money profile bolstered export competitiveness by stabilizing unit labor costs and fostering long-term investment horizons, with Germany's world export share rising from 5% in 1950 to over 10% by 1990, as low precluded the currency depreciations that eroded rivals' pricing power. Empirical evidence links this to the Bundesbank's independence, which deterred political monetization and supported the 's prosperity, contrasting with higher- peers where stimulus-induced booms yielded short-lived gains followed by adjustments.

Reserve Currency Status and International Influence

The Deutsche Mark's status as a gained prominence following the collapse of the in 1971, with central banks' holdings peaking at approximately 18% of global allocated by the late . This share had risen substantially from the mid-1970s onward, reflecting the currency's appeal amid Germany's consistent current account surpluses, which averaged over 4% of GDP in the and generated sustained demand for DM-denominated assets among foreign monetary authorities. These surpluses stemmed primarily from high domestic saving rates and robust export demand for German goods, bolstering the DM's role as a second only to the dollar. In the European context, the DM served as the de facto nominal anchor in post-Bretton Woods exchange rate arrangements, first within the Snake mechanism from 1972 to 1979, which limited fluctuations among participating currencies and effectively formed a DM-centered bloc including countries and . This evolved into the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) of the (EMS) launched in 1979, where the DM's stability influenced the parity grid for other currencies until 1998, enforcing discipline and reducing inflation differentials across members—evidenced by converging consumer price indices in ERM countries during the . Critics highlighted asymmetries in these systems, arguing that the Bundesbank's tight —prioritizing DM stability—often transmitted contractionary shocks to neighbors, compelling devaluations or in countries like and to maintain ERM bands, as seen in multiple realignments between 1981 and 1987. However, quantitative assessments indicate mutual benefits, with DM anchoring spilling over anti-inflation credibility and lowering long-term interest rates in peripheral ERM states by 1-2 percentage points relative to non-participants during the , fostering broader regional stability without systemic crises until German unification in 1990.

Transition and Legacy

Shift to the Euro: Process and Immediate Effects

The was established as the official on 1 January 1999, initially for non-cash transactions, while the Deutsche Mark remained the sole for physical payments. This phase allowed banks, businesses, and electronic systems to convert accounts and contracts at the irrevocably fixed conversion rate of €1 = 1.95583 DM, determined by the based on prior market rates and stability criteria. On 1 January 2002, and coins entered circulation across the , including , marking the start of a dual-currency period during which both euros and Deutsche Marks were accepted as . The Bundesbank and commercial banks facilitated widespread exchanges, with automated teller machines dispensing euros from the outset and retailers trained to handle both currencies. This dual phase lasted until 28 February 2002, after which the Deutsche Mark lost status, though the Bundesbank continued free exchanges indefinitely. The transition encountered minimal operational disruptions, as transaction volumes at point-of-sale terminals and banks remained stable, reflecting extensive pre-changeover preparations by the Bundesbank and . Public hoarding of Deutsche Marks proved limited in the immediate aftermath, with over 99% of circulating DM notes and coins returned for conversion within the first year, averting significant shortages. Short-term spikes in monetary velocity occurred as households and firms accelerated spending to utilize remaining DM holdings, contributing to a transient uptick in retail turnover. Seigniorage revenues for the Bundesbank diminished temporarily due to the exchange of high-denomination DM notes without recouping full issuance profits on returned currency, though this was offset by the issuance of euro equivalents. Overall, the process unfolded seamlessly, with no widespread reports of payment system failures or economic halts, underscoring the effectiveness of coordinated logistical planning across the eurozone.

Enduring Nostalgia and Retrospective Evaluations

In the years following the euro's adoption, surveys consistently revealed significant nostalgia among Germans for the Deutsche Mark, particularly during periods of eurozone instability. A 2010 poll found that 51% of respondents favored returning to the Deutsche Mark, reflecting unease over costs and perceived risks to . Similarly, a Bild-commissioned survey that year indicated 49% support for reinstating the mark, with preferences linked to memories of its reliability amid the . These sentiments peaked in the early , as fears from expansive monetary policies amplified retrospective appreciation for the Bundesbank's stringent anti-inflation stance under the mark. Economic analyses attribute the Deutsche Mark's enduring positive evaluation to its role in fostering long-term stability and growth. From the 1948 currency reform to 2002, West Germany's GDP expanded dramatically, rising from approximately $1,800 in 1950 to over $27,000 by 2001 in constant terms, driven by low averaging under 2.5% annually and policies that prioritized sound money to encourage and exports. This stability contrasted with the euro's higher volatility during crises, such as the 2010-2012 turmoil, where the European Central Bank's more accommodative approach led to temporary spikes and divergent member-state outcomes. Proponents argue the mark's credibility as a —holding steady against the dollar and serving as an anchor in the —causally supported this prosperity by minimizing uncertainty and bolstering confidence. Critics, however, contend that the mark's rigidity, enforced through high interest rates to combat , occasionally exacerbated downturns, as seen in the when Bundesbank policies contributed to output contraction amid reunification costs. Empirical data, including lower long-term rates (averaging 5-7% under the mark versus euro-era peaks above 10% in some periods) and sustained gains, nonetheless indicate net benefits from its discipline, outweighing short-term adjustment pains. Retrospective studies emphasize that while the enabled trade integration, the mark's independent framework better insulated from peripheral imbalances, validating nostalgia as grounded in verifiable superior macroeconomic outcomes rather than mere sentiment.

Controversies and Criticisms

Debates on 1948 Reform's Social Costs

The 1948 currency reform, implemented on June 20, replaced the with the Deutsche Mark through an exchange mechanism that allocated each adult 60 Reichsmarks converted at a 1:1 rate (40 initially and 20 later), while most other holdings were converted at 10:1 or blocked, effectively invalidating approximately 93% of the existing and private cash savings. Critics, particularly from social democratic and labor circles, contended this "savings haircut" acted as a regressive , disproportionately burdening middle-class households, widows, and pensioners reliant on wartime-accumulated cash amid and controls, thereby exacerbating short-term inequities by favoring industrialists and operators who held physical goods over depreciated . Such views framed the reform as a blunt instrument that prioritized macroeconomic reset over , potentially entrenching elite advantages in the nascent West German economy. Proponents, including U.S. occupation authorities and Economics Minister , argued the devaluation was causally indispensable to accumulated wartime liquidity distortions—estimated at over 300 billion Reichsmarks in circulation against minimal output—averting perpetuated scarcity and incentivizing production by dissolving and black markets that had suppressed official wages to near-worthlessness. This perspective emphasized that without such a decisive , ongoing would have sustained inefficiency, as evidenced by pre-reform where goods circulated informally at 10-50 times official prices, rendering savings illusory for the working population. Empirical outcomes refute claims of mass pauperization or enduring regressivity: real consumption rebounded 20-30% by late 1948, with official s gaining substantial as black market premia evaporated, benefiting the 80% of households previously excluded from formal exchange. Industrial production surged 50% within six months and tripled by 1950, driving broad increases averaging 40-50% in real terms by 1949, which outpaced any measured disparities from the haircut, as productivity gains—fueled by freed markets and inflows—lifted median incomes without corresponding spikes in Gini coefficients beyond pre-war norms. Assertions of elite favoritism falter against data showing employment rising from 13 million in mid-1948 to 14.5 million by 1949, with union-negotiated hikes distributing gains across labor, underscoring the reform's net egalitarian effect through restored incentives rather than redistributive fiat.

Reunification Currency Shock: East-West Disparities

The adoption of the Deutsche Mark in the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) on July 1, 1990, involved converting East German marks to Deutsche Marks at a 1:1 rate for most household financial assets, wages, and pensions, despite the GDR's markedly lower productivity levels. This parity exchange, intended to facilitate rapid integration and social stability, effectively raised East German wage costs to West German levels overnight, rendering much of the GDR's industrial base uncompetitive in a market economy. Pre-reunification estimates placed East German labor productivity at approximately one-third to one-quarter of West German levels, a disparity rooted in decades of central planning, resource misallocation, and technological lag under socialism. The immediate aftermath saw a severe contraction in East German output, as firms faced inflated labor costs alongside obsolete production methods and sudden exposure to Western competition. Industrial production plummeted to below 50% of 1989 levels by the end of 1990, with overall GDP contracting by about one-third in the initial transition year. This led to widespread insolvencies, particularly in state-owned enterprises reliant on subsidized inputs and guaranteed domestic markets, exacerbating non-employment rates that spiked to around 20% in the early 1990s. Critics, often from left-leaning perspectives emphasizing the abruptness of market liberalization, have labeled the process "shock therapy" and attributed the dislocations primarily to the currency union's rigidity, arguing it prioritized West German interests over gradual adjustment. However, the underlying causal factors trace more directly to the GDR's structural inefficiencies—such as low capital stock quality and suppressed innovation under communist rule— which made sustained operation under market pricing untenable regardless of conversion rate; a lower ratio might have delayed but not averted the necessary restructuring. Over the longer term, the currency shock enabled deeper integration into the West German social market economy, fostering convergence despite persistent gaps. East German GDP per capita, at roughly 40% of West German levels in 1991, rose to over 60% by the mid-1990s and approached 75% by the 2010s through substantial transfers exceeding 2 trillion euros, infrastructure investment, and labor mobility. Unemployment, while initially acute, declined steadily post-2000 amid privatization and new firm formation, averting the balkanization risks evident in other post-communist transitions. This outcome underscores how the DM's imposition, though painful, leveraged West Germany's institutional strengths to restructure an economy crippled by prior socialist mismanagement, yielding unified national resilience over fragmented stagnation.

References

  1. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/deutschmark.asp
  2. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/press/contributions/the-economic-and-currency-reform-of-1948-the-basis-for-stable-money-915302
  3. https://www.cato.org/cato-journal/fall-2019/1948-german-currency-economic-reform-lessons-european-monetary-policy
  4. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/topics/30-years-and-three-currencies-anniversary-of-german-monetary-union-836088
  5. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/cash-management/dem-banknotes-and-dem-coins/-/exchanging-dem-for-euro-616928
  6. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/topics/inflation-lessons-learnt-from-history-666006
  7. https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/1923-hyperinflation/
  8. https://mises.org/mises-daily/hyperinflation-germany-1914-1923
  9. https://safe-frankfurt.de/news-latest/safe-finance-blog/details/enduring-lessons-from-the-german-hyperinflation-1923-2023.html
  10. https://fee.org/articles/how-hyperinflation-shattered-german-society/
  11. https://www.ddr-museum.de/en/blog/2016/money-in-the-gdr
  12. http://www.worldofcoins.eu/forum/index.php?topic=46863.0
  13. https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/occupation-and-reconstruction-germany-1945-48
  14. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/022/0027/001/article-A002-en.xml
  15. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/GermanEconomicMiracle.html
  16. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2002/fall/berlin-black-market-1.html
  17. https://postwargermany.com/2012/10/09/shopping-on-the-black-market/
  18. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_archive/searchable_archive/1948_WESS_Supplement2.pdf
  19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/kykl.12359
  20. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/topics/dates-of-the-german-monetary-policy-summary--626902
  21. https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/lessons-bundesbank-occasion-its-40th-and-second-last-birthday
  22. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c8890/c8890.pdf
  23. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1020.pdf
  24. https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/703498/ec2175c2d17383a8eaac23de524622ce/mL/2009-05-19-dkp-12-data.pdf
  25. https://www.cvce.eu/en/recherche/unit-content/-/unit/5cc6b004-33b7-4e44-b6db-f5f9e6c01023/6ab611e4-b37f-4d33-a1e0-ba8869997c9e
  26. https://www.picture-alliance.com/en/webseries/2025-10-23-70th-anniversary-of-the-referendum-on-the-saar-statute-1955-w410647
  27. https://www.coins-of-germany.com/Coins/Germany-from-1945/Saarland
  28. https://artsandculture.google.com/story/das-saarland-teil-ii-staatskanzlei-saarland/hwUxArXoHwcA8A?hl=en
  29. http://www.worldofcoins.eu/forum/index.php?topic=47466.0
  30. https://en.numista.com/catalogue/sarre-1.html
  31. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/topics/german-monetary-union-historical-background-666890
  32. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-03-mn-442-story.html
  33. https://www.dw.com/en/german-german-monetary-union-caused-economic-shockwaves/a-5769854
  34. https://qz.com/442497/lessons-from-the-25th-anniversary-of-germanys-own-rocky-fiscal-unification
  35. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/topics/no-blueprint-for-reunification-869150
  36. https://www.muenzenwert.de/EN/Informationen/deutsche_mark_dm_muenzen.php
  37. https://en.numista.com/846
  38. https://new.coinsweekly.com/coins-medals-more/marks-and-pfennigs-in-your-inheritance-what-should-heirs-do-with-old-dm-coins/
  39. http://www.exchangerate.com/currency-information/german-mark.html
  40. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/cash-management/dem-banknotes-and-dem-coins/-/dem-banknotes-623628
  41. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/bundesbank/numismatics/pictures-archive/banknotes-of-the-bbk-iii-iiia-series-616554
  42. https://en.numista.com/204837
  43. https://www.pmgnotes.com/news/article/6566/clara-schumann-german-mark
  44. https://www.officialdata.org/germany/inflation
  45. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5581/w5581.pdf
  46. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/kroszner20061116a.htm
  47. https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/529/1989-Lessons%2520from%2520West%2520German%2520Monetary%2520Policy.pdf
  48. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/wp00131.pdf
  49. https://www.bis.org/publ/econ18.pdf
  50. https://www.dallasfed.org/-/media/Documents/institute/wpapers/2014/0176.pdf
  51. https://academic.oup.com/economicpolicy/article/30/81/47/2392357
  52. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781557754196/ch005.xml
  53. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-bulletin/1991/the-exchange-rate-mechanism-of-the-european-monetary-system-a-review-of-the-literature.pdf
  54. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781557751331/ch008.xml
  55. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/1993/01/1993a_bpea_eichengreen_wyplosz_branson_dornbusch.pdf
  56. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/euro/eu-countries-and-euro/germany-and-euro_en
  57. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2003/html/sp031113.en.html
  58. https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/706190/ddf80f46a063f36065177cb012577e6e/mL/2002-03-circulation-mark-data.pdf
  59. https://www.bsi.si/en/cash/the-story-of-the-euro
  60. https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/706228/cf09a43e4fa85b857f8a29230a831e04/mL/2002-07-consumer-price-data.pdf
  61. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/mb200109_focus01.en.pdf
  62. https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2019-09/cj-v39n3-7.pdf
  63. https://www.bundesbank.de/de/aufgaben/themen/waehrungsreform-1948-614040
  64. https://www.studysmarter.de/schule/geschichte/geteiltes-deutschland/waehrungsreform-1948/
  65. https://www.economicsobservatory.com/germanys-reunification-what-lessons-for-policy-makers-today
  66. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.471140.de/dp44.pdf
  67. https://www.marketplace.org/story/2019/11/04/30-years-after-the-fall-of-the-berlin-wall-germany-recalls-the-economic-gulf-between-east-and
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147596722000208
  69. https://population-europe.eu/research/popdigests/post-reunification-economic-crisis-east-germany-and-its-long-term-health
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147596708000450
  71. https://jacobin.com/2020/10/deutsch-mark-east-germany-gdr
  72. https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication1878_en.pdf
  73. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/11/06/east-germany-has-narrowed-economic-gap-with-west-germany-since-fall-of-communism-but-still-lags/
  74. https://www.iwh-halle.de/en/topics/east-germany
  75. https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2019/number/6/article/the-eastern-german-growth-trap-structural-limits-to-convergence.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.