Hubbry Logo
Reserve currencyReserve currencyMain
Open search
Reserve currency
Community hub
Reserve currency
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Reserve currency
Reserve currency
Reserve currency
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Worldwide use of the US dollar:
  United States
  External adopters of the US dollar
  Currencies pegged to the US dollar
  Currencies pegged to the US dollar w/ narrow band
Worldwide use of the euro:
  Eurozone
  External adopters of the euro
  Currencies pegged to the euro
  Currencies pegged to the euro w/ narrow band
Currency symbols of the four most widely held reserve currencies, L–R: United States dollar, euro, Japanese yen, pound sterling

A reserve currency is a foreign currency that is held by governments, central banks or other monetary authorities as part of their foreign exchange reserves.[1] The reserve currency can be used in international transactions, international investments and all aspects of the global economy. It is often considered a hard currency or safe-haven currency.

The United Kingdom's pound sterling was the primary reserve currency of much of the world in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century.[2] However, by the middle of the 20th century, the United States dollar had become the world's dominant reserve currency.[3]

History

[edit]

Reserve currencies have come and gone with the evolution of the world's geopolitical order. International currencies in the past have (in addition to those discussed below) included the Greek drachma, coined in the fifth century BC, the Roman denarius, the Byzantine solidus, the Islamic dinar of the Middle Ages, and the French franc.

The Venetian ducat and the Florentine florin was the gold-based currency of choice between Europe and the Arab world from the 13th to the 16th centuries, since gold was easier than silver to mint in standard sizes and transport over long distances. It was the Spanish silver dollar, however, which created the first true global reserve currency recognized in Europe, Asia and the Americas from the 16th to the 19th centuries due to abundant silver supplies from Spanish America.[4]

While the Dutch guilder was a reserve currency of somewhat lesser scope, used between Europe and the territories of the Dutch colonial empire from the 17th to 18th centuries, it was also a silver standard currency fed with the output of Spanish-American mines flowing through the Spanish Netherlands. The Dutch, through the Bank of Amsterdam, were the first to establish a reserve currency whose monetary unit was stabilized using practices familiar to modern central banking (as opposed to the Spanish dollar stabilized through American mine output and Spanish fiat) and which can be considered as a precursor to modern-day monetary policy.[5][6]

The Bank of England was established in 1694, and the Bank of France in the 18th century. The British pound sterling, in particular, was poised to dislodge the Spanish dollar's hegemony as the rest of the world transitioned to the gold standard in the last quarter of the 19th century. At that point, the United Kingdom was the primary exporter of manufactured goods and services, and over 60% of world trade was invoiced in pounds sterling. British banks were also expanding overseas; London was the world centre for insurance and commodity markets and British capital was the leading source of foreign investment around the world; sterling soon became the standard currency used for international commercial transactions.[7] On continental Europe, the bimetallic standard of the French franc remained the unifying currency of several European countries and their colonies under the Latin Monetary Union, which was established in 1865. Peru, Colombia and Venezuela also adopted the system in the 1860s and 1870s.[8]

Attempts were made in the interwar period to restore the gold standard. The British Gold Standard Act reintroduced the gold bullion standard in 1925,[9] followed by many other countries. This led to relative stability, followed by deflation, but because of the onset of the Great Depression and other factors, global trade greatly declined and the gold standard fell. Speculative attacks on the pound forced Britain entirely off the gold standard in 1931.[10][11]

John Maynard Keynes (right) and Harry Dexter White helped to draft the provisions of the post-war financial system. Here, they meet at the inaugural meeting of the International Monetary Fund, 1946.

After World War II, the international financial system was governed by a formal agreement, the Bretton Woods system. Under this system, the United States dollar (USD) was placed deliberately as the anchor of the system, with the US government guaranteeing other central banks that they could sell their US dollar reserves at a fixed rate for gold.[12]

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the system suffered setbacks ostensibly due to problems pointed out by the Triffin dilemma—the conflict of economic interests that arises between short-term domestic objectives and long-term international objectives when a national currency also serves as a world reserve currency.[13]

Additionally, in 1971 President Richard Nixon suspended the convertibility of the USD to gold, thus creating a fully fiat global reserve currency system. However, gold has persisted as a significant reserve asset since the collapse of the classical gold standard.[14]

Following the 2020 economic recession, the IMF opined about the emergence of "A New Bretton Woods Moment" which could imply the need for a new global reserve currency system.[15]

Global currency reserves

[edit]

The IMF publishes the aggregated Currency Composition of Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) each quarter.[16] In 2022, IMF researchers reported that while the dollar remains dominant, its share has declined over two decades as central banks diversified into “nontraditional” reserve currencies such as the Australian and Canadian dollars, the Swedish krona, and the South Korean won.[17] The reserves of the individual reporting countries and institutions are confidential.[18] Thus the following table is a limited view about the global currency reserves that only deals with allocated (i.e. reported) reserves:[needs update]

Currency composition of official foreign exchange reserves (1965–2024, fourth quarters)
2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1995 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970 1965
US dollar 57.80% 58.42% 58.52% 58.80% 58.92% 60.75% 61.76% 62.73% 65.36% 65.73% 65.14% 61.24% 61.47% 62.59% 62.14% 62.05% 63.77% 63.87% 65.04% 66.51% 65.51% 65.45% 66.50% 71.51% 71.13% 58.96% 47.14% 56.66% 57.88% 84.61% 84.85% 72.93%
Euro (until 1999—ECU) 19.83% 19.95% 20.37% 20.59% 21.29% 20.59% 20.67% 20.17% 19.14% 19.14% 21.20% 24.20% 24.05% 24.40% 25.71% 27.66% 26.21% 26.14% 24.99% 23.89% 24.68% 25.03% 23.65% 19.18% 18.29% 8.53% 11.64% 14.00% 17.46%
Japanese yen 5.82% 5.69% 5.54% 5.52% 6.03% 5.87% 5.19% 4.90% 3.95% 3.75% 3.54% 3.82% 4.09% 3.61% 3.66% 2.90% 3.47% 3.18% 3.46% 3.96% 4.28% 4.42% 4.94% 5.04% 6.06% 6.77% 9.40% 8.69% 3.93% 0.61%
Pound sterling 4.73% 4.86% 4.90% 4.81% 4.73% 4.64% 4.43% 4.54% 4.35% 4.71% 3.70% 3.98% 4.04% 3.83% 3.94% 4.25% 4.22% 4.82% 4.52% 3.75% 3.49% 2.86% 2.92% 2.70% 2.75% 2.11% 2.39% 2.03% 2.40% 3.42% 11.36% 25.76%
Canadian dollar 2.77% 2.59% 2.39% 2.38% 2.08% 1.86% 1.84% 2.03% 1.94% 1.77% 1.75% 1.83% 1.42%
Chinese renminbi 2.18% 2.29% 2.61% 2.80% 2.29% 1.94% 1.89% 1.23% 1.08%
Australian dollar 2.06% 2.14% 1.97% 1.84% 1.83% 1.70% 1.63% 1.80% 1.69% 1.77% 1.59% 1.82% 1.46%
Swiss franc 0.17% 0.19% 0.23% 0.17% 0.17% 0.15% 0.14% 0.18% 0.16% 0.27% 0.24% 0.27% 0.21% 0.08% 0.13% 0.12% 0.14% 0.16% 0.17% 0.15% 0.17% 0.23% 0.41% 0.25% 0.27% 0.33% 0.84% 1.40% 2.25% 1.34% 0.61%
Deutsche Mark 15.75% 19.83% 13.74% 12.92% 6.62% 1.94% 0.17%
French franc 2.35% 2.71% 0.58% 0.97% 1.16% 0.73% 1.11%
Dutch guilder 0.32% 1.15% 0.78% 0.89% 0.66% 0.08%
Other currencies 4.64% 3.87% 3.48% 3.09% 2.65% 2.51% 2.45% 2.43% 2.33% 2.86% 2.83% 2.84% 3.26% 5.49% 4.43% 3.04% 2.20% 1.83% 1.81% 1.74% 1.87% 2.01% 1.58% 1.31% 1.49% 4.87% 4.89% 2.13% 1.29% 1.58% 0.43% 0.03%
Source: World Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves. International Monetary Fund.

The percental composition of currencies of official foreign exchange reserves from 1995 to 2024.[19][20][21]
Share of total (%)Year01020304050607080199520002005201020152020US dollarEuroGerman markFrench francSterlingJapanese yenRenminbiSwiss francAustralian dollarCanadian dollarOtherGlobal reserve currency shares

Theory

[edit]

Economists debate whether a single reserve currency will always dominate the global economy.[22] Many have recently argued that one currency will almost always dominate due to network externalities (sometimes called "the network effect"), especially in the field of invoicing trade and denominating foreign debt securities, meaning that there are strong incentives to conform to the choice that dominates the marketplace. The argument is that, in the absence of sufficiently large shocks, a currency that dominates the marketplace will not lose much ground to challengers.

However, some economists, such as Barry Eichengreen, argue that this is not as true when it comes to the denomination of official reserves because the network externalities are not strong.[citation needed] As long as the currency's market is sufficiently liquid, the benefits of reserve diversification are strong, as it insures against large capital losses. The implication is that the world may well soon begin to move away from a financial system dominated uniquely by the US dollar. In the first half of the 20th century, multiple currencies did share the status as primary reserve currencies. Although the British Sterling was the largest currency, both the French franc and the German mark shared large portions of the market until the First World War, after which the mark was replaced by the dollar. Since the Second World War, the dollar has dominated official reserves, but this is likely a reflection of the unusual domination of the American economy during this period, as well as official discouragement of reserve status from the potential rivals, Germany and Japan.

The top reserve currency is generally selected by the banking community for the strength and stability of the economy in which it is used. Thus, as a currency becomes less stable, or its economy becomes less dominant, bankers may over time abandon it for a currency issued by a larger or more stable economy. This can take a relatively long time, as recognition is important in determining a reserve currency. For example, it took many years after the United States overtook the United Kingdom as the world's largest economy before the dollar overtook the pound sterling as the dominant global reserve currency.[2] In 1944, when the US dollar was chosen as the world reference currency at Bretton Woods, it was only the second currency in global reserves.[2]

The G8 also frequently issued public statements as to exchange rates. In the past due to the Plaza Accord, its predecessor bodies could directly manipulate rates to reverse large trade deficits.

Major reserve currencies

[edit]
Distribution of global reserve currencies

United States dollar

[edit]
Further information: International use of the U.S. dollar and Dedollarisation

The United States dollar is the most widely held currency in the allocated reserves. As of the fourth quarter of 2022, the USD accounted for 58.36% of official foreign exchange reserves.[23][24][needs update] This makes it somewhat easier for the United States to run higher trade deficits with greatly postponed economic ramifications or even postponing a currency crisis. Central bank US dollar reserves, however, are small compared to private holdings of such debt. If non-United States holders of dollar-denominated assets shifted holdings to assets denominated in other currencies, there could be serious consequences for the US economy. The decline of the pound sterling took place gradually over time, and the markets involved adjusted accordingly.[2] However, the US dollar remains the preferred reserve currency because of its stability due to scale and liquidity.[25]

The US dollar's position in global reserves is often questioned because of the growing share of unallocated reserves, and because of the doubt regarding dollar stability in the long term.[26][27] However, the dollar's share in the world's foreign-exchange trades rose slightly from 85% in 2010 to 87% in 2013.[28][better source needed][needs update]

The dollar's role as the largest reserve currency allows the United States to impose unilateral sanctions against actions performed between other countries, for example the American fine against BNP Paribas for violations of U.S. sanctions that were not laws of France or the other countries involved in the transactions.[29] In 2014, China and Russia signed a 150 billion yuan central bank liquidity swap line agreement to get around European and American sanctions on their behaviors.[30]

In 2025, after the implementation of tariffs in the second Trump administration, financial institutions began to rethink the role of US Dollar as reserve currency.[31][32][33]

Euro

[edit]
Further information: International status and usage of the euro

The euro is currently the second most commonly held reserve currency, representing about 20% of international foreign currency reserves. After World War II and the rebuilding of the German economy, the German mark gained the status of the second most important reserve currency after the US dollar. When the euro was introduced on 1 January 1999, replacing the mark, French franc and ten other European currencies, it inherited the status of a major reserve currency from the mark. Since then, its contribution to official reserves has risen continually as banks seek to diversify their reserves, and trade in the eurozone continues to expand.[34]

After the euro's share of global official foreign exchange reserves approached 25% as of year-end 2006 (vs 65% for the U.S. dollar; see table above), some experts have predicted that the euro could replace the dollar as the world's primary reserve currency. See Alan Greenspan, 2007;[35] and Frankel, Chinn (2006) who explained how it could happen by 2020.[36][37] However, as of 2022 none of this has come to fruition due to the European debt crisis which engulfed the PIIGS countries from 2009 to 2014. Instead the euro's stability and future existence was put into doubt, and its share of global reserves was cut to 19% by year-end 2015 (vs 66% for the USD). As of year-end 2020 these figures stand at 21% for EUR and 59% for USD.

Pound sterling

[edit]

The United Kingdom's pound sterling was the primary reserve currency of much of the world in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century.[2] That status ended after the UK almost bankrupted itself fighting World War I[38] and World War II,[39] and its place was taken by the United States dollar.

In the 1950s, 55% of global reserves were still held in sterling; but the share was 10% lower within 20 years.[2][40]

The establishment of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913 and the economic vacuum following the World Wars facilitated the emergence of the United States as an economic superpower.[41]

As of 30 September 2021, the pound sterling represented the fourth largest proportion (by USD equivalent value) of foreign currency reserves and 4.78% of those reserves.[42]

Japanese yen

[edit]

Japan's yen is part of the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) special drawing rights (SDR) valuation. The SDR currency value is determined daily by the IMF, based on the exchange rates of the currencies making up the basket, as quoted at noon at the London market. The valuation basket is reviewed and adjusted every five years.[43]

The SDR Values and yen conversion for government procurement are used by the Japan External Trade Organization for Japan's official procurement in international trade.[44]

Chinese renminbi

[edit]
The currency of China is the renminbi; the yuan is its primary unit
See also: Internationalization of the renminbi

The Chinese renminbi officially became a supplementary forex reserve asset on 1 October 2016.[45] It represents 10.92% of the IMF's Special Drawing Rights (SDR) currency basket.[46][47] The Chinese renminbi is the third reserve currency after the U.S. dollar and euro within the basket of currencies in the SDR.[46] (As shown in the table above, the renmimbi is the sixth largest component of international currency reserves.)

Canadian dollar

[edit]

A number of central banks (and commercial banks) keep Canadian dollars as a reserve currency. In the economy of the Americas, the Canadian dollar plays a similar role to that played by the Australian dollar (AUD) in the Asia-Pacific region. The Canadian dollar (as a regional reserve currency for banking) has been an important part of the British, French and Dutch Caribbean states' economies and finance systems since the 1950s.[48] The Canadian dollar is also held by many central banks in Central America and South America. It is held in Latin America because of remittances and international trade in the region.[48]

Because Canada's primary foreign-trade relationship is with the United States, Canadian consumers, economists, and many businesses primarily define and value the Canadian dollar in terms of the United States dollar. Thus, by observing how the Canadian dollar floats in terms of the US dollar, foreign-exchange economists can indirectly observe internal behaviours and patterns in the US economy that could not be seen by direct observation. Also, because it is considered a petrodollar, the Canadian dollar has only fully evolved into a global reserve currency since the 1970s, when it was floated against all other world currencies.

The Canadian dollar, from 2013 to 2017, was ranked fifth among foreign currency reserves in the world, overtaking the Australian dollar, but is then being[clarification needed] overtaken by the Chinese Yuan.[49]

Swiss franc

[edit]

The Swiss franc, despite gaining ground among the world's foreign-currency reserves[50] and often being used in denominating foreign loans,[51] cannot be considered as a world reserve currency, since the share of all foreign exchange reserves held in Swiss francs has historically been well below 0.5%. The daily trading market turnover of the franc, however, ranked fifth, or about 3.4%, among all currencies in a 2007 survey[needs update] by the Bank for International Settlements.[52]

Calls for an alternative reserve currency

[edit]

John Maynard Keynes proposed the bancor, a supranational currency to be used as unit of account in international trade, as reserve currency under the Bretton Woods Conference of 1945. The bancor was rejected in favor of the U.S. dollar.

A report released by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development in 2010, called for abandoning the U.S. dollar as the single major reserve currency. The report states that the new reserve system should not be based on a single currency or even multiple national currencies but instead permit the emission of international liquidity to create a more stable global financial system.[53][54][55][56]

Countries such as Russia and China, central banks, and economic analysts and groups, such as the Gulf Cooperation Council, have expressed a desire to see an independent new currency replace the dollar as the reserve currency. However, it is recognized that the US dollar remains the strongest reserve currency.[57]

On 10 July 2009, Russian President Medvedev proposed a new 'World currency' at the G8 meeting in London as an alternative reserve currency to replace the dollar.[58]

At the beginning of the 21st century, gold and crude oil were still priced in dollars, which helps export inflation and has brought complaints about OPEC's policies of managing oil quotas to maintain dollar price stability.[59]

Due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and international sanctions, Russia has used the United Arab Emirates dirham as a neutral currency when selling oil to India.[60][61]

Special drawing rights

[edit]

Some have proposed the use of the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) special drawing rights (SDRs) as a reserve. The value of SDRs are calculated from a basket determined by the IMF of key international currencies, which as of 2016 consisted of the United States dollar, Euro, Japanese yen, Pound sterling and PRC Renminbi.

Ahead of a G20 summit in 2009, China distributed a paper that proposed using SDRs for clearing international payments and eventually as a reserve currency to replace the U.S. dollar.[62]

On 3 September 2009, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) issued a report calling for a new reserve currency based on the SDR, managed by a new global reserve bank.[63] The IMF released a report in February 2011, stating that using SDRs "could help stabilize the global financial system."[64] The SDR itself is only a minuscule fraction of global currency reserves.[65]

Cryptocurrencies

[edit]

According to some cryptocurrency proponents, digital cryptocurrencies could potentially replace fiat currencies as a possible global reserve currency.[66]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Reserve currency

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A reserve currency is a foreign currency held in substantial quantities by central banks and monetary authorities as part of their , primarily to facilitate international transactions, provide , and serve as a amid volatility. The has dominated this role since the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944, which pegged other currencies to the dollar and the dollar to , accounting for approximately 58 percent of allocated global reserves as of 2024 despite gradual diversification toward the and other currencies. This status yields the issuing nation an "exorbitant privilege," including gains from global demand for its currency, reduced borrowing costs on persistent current account deficits, and enhanced geopolitical leverage through financial sanctions, though it imposes the —wherein supplying sufficient dollars for world requires trade imbalances that undermine long-term confidence in the currency's stability. Historically, reserve primacy has shifted from commodities like and early coins such as the Florentine florin or Spanish piece of eight to fiat currencies tied to economic and military hegemony, with the British pound preceding the dollar in the 19th and early 20th centuries before the U.S. ascent amid financing and postwar reconstruction. Empirically, dollar dominance endures due to the depth and of U.S. financial markets, institutional trust, and network effects in trade invoicing, resisting displacement even as emerging economies like advocate alternatives amid U.S. fiscal expansion. Reserve currency configurations reflect underlying causal drivers such as openness, geopolitical stability, and relative economic size, rather than mere policy declarations, with data from sources like the IMF's COFER revealing slow erosion of the 's share—from over 70 percent in the to current levels—while nontraditional currencies gain modestly but lack the scale to challenge primacy. The holds about 20 percent, the around 5 percent, and the Chinese under 3 percent, underscoring persistent inertia in reserve holdings driven by and transaction frictions over ideological diversification pushes. Controversies arise from sanctions weaponizing , prompting de-dollarization efforts in forums like , yet these have yielded negligible shifts in empirical reserve data, as alternatives falter on capital controls, convertibility limits, and underdeveloped bond markets. Ultimately, sustaining reserve status demands credible commitment to low inflation and rule-based , privileges that historically accrue to issuers with unmatched sovereign credit but risk reversal if fiscal profligacy erodes backing assets like U.S. Treasuries.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition and Functions

A is a foreign held in significant quantities by central banks and monetary authorities as part of their official , enabling them to meet needs, intervene in currency markets, and maintain economic stability. These reserves consist primarily of highly liquid assets denominated in the reserve currency, such as government securities, deposits, and , which allow countries to address short-term shortages without disrupting domestic markets. The designation arises from the currency's widespread acceptance in global trade, investment, and finance, reducing transaction costs and risks for users. The primary functions of a reserve currency include serving as a medium for international payments and settlements, where it facilitates cross-border trade by minimizing the need for multiple currency conversions; for instance, as of 2024, over 80% of global trade invoices are denominated in the dominant reserve currency, the U.S. dollar. Central banks utilize these holdings to intervene in markets, buying or selling the reserve currency to influence their domestic and counteract volatility, as evidenced by interventions during the and the 2008 global financial crisis. Additionally, reserve currencies act as a , preserving over time due to the issuing country's economic stability and deep financial markets, allowing reserves to hedge against or domestic currency depreciation. Another key role is providing during external shocks, enabling governments to repay foreign debts or import essentials without immediate of illiquid assets; empirical from IMF Currency Composition of Official (COFER) shows that reserve currencies comprised about 90% of allocated global reserves in Q1 2025, underscoring their buffer function. Reserve status also confers benefits to the issuing nation, as foreign demand for its allows low-cost borrowing through securities, with U.S. held abroad exceeding $8 trillion in mid-2025. These functions collectively enhance the reserve currency's network effects, where its dominance perpetuates further adoption due to and reduced risk premiums in transactions.

Essential Criteria for Reserve Status

A currency attains reserve status when it is widely held by central banks and monetary authorities for purposes such as transaction facilitation, , and hedging against domestic economic shocks, requiring attributes that ensure long-term value preservation and ease of use. Essential criteria include the issuing economy's scale and integration into global , as larger economies generate greater for their in cross-border settlements. For example, currencies like the US dollar benefit from the ' approximately 15-25% share of global GDP and merchandise exports, fostering habitual use in invoicing and reserves. Institutional credibility forms another core pillar, encompassing sound , fiscal discipline, and transparent governance that minimize default and volatility. Issuers must demonstrate consistent policy frameworks, such as independent central banks committed to , to build investor trust; the US Federal Reserve's mandate for dual objectives of and maximum employment has underpinned dollar holdings since 1913, despite periodic deficits. Political stability and further reinforce this by safeguarding property rights and contract enforcement, deterring ; historical shifts, like the British pound's decline post-World War II, illustrate how geopolitical disruptions erode reserve appeal absent robust legal foundations. Financial market depth and are indispensable, enabling the issuance of high volumes of safe, marketable assets like bonds that serve as collateral in global finance. Deep markets allow reserves to be parked productively with minimal transaction costs or price impact; the US Treasury market, with over $27 trillion in outstanding debt as of 2023, exemplifies this, far exceeding alternatives like bonds which constitute less than 50% of GDP in safe assets. Full and minimal capital controls ensure usability, while network effects—arising from widespread adoption—amplify these traits, though they depend on initial fulfillment of fundamentals rather than vice versa. Currencies failing these, such as the Chinese renminbi with its capital restrictions, have seen limited reserve uptake despite economic size, holding only about 2.5% of global reserves as of 2023.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern and Classical Periods

In classical antiquity, coinage emerged as a medium facilitating trade across regions, with certain issues gaining prominence due to their standardized weight, purity, and the issuing polity's economic influence. The Athenian tetradrachm, featuring an owl emblem and minted from high-purity silver sourced from the Laurion mines, circulated widely throughout the Mediterranean from the 5th century BCE, serving as a de facto standard for international commerce owing to Athens' naval dominance and reliable minting practices. These coins, weighing approximately 17 grams at 95% fineness, were accepted from the Black Sea to Sicily, functioning analogously to reserves by enabling cross-border payments and hoarding as stores of value. The Roman denarius, introduced around 211 BCE as a of about 4 grams initially at near-pure , became the empire's principal and extended its utility in trade networks spanning , , and the . Its widespread acceptance stemmed from Rome's centralized authority and military enforcement of economic standards, allowing it to underpin transactions from provincial markets to exchanges, though progressive from the CE eroded its reliability over time. During the early medieval period, the Byzantine gold solidus, first struck by Emperor Constantine I in 312 CE at 4.5 grams of pure gold, maintained exceptional stability for over seven centuries, underpinning international trade centered on . Known as the in and in the West, it circulated across and , prized for its unchanging weight and until debasements in the , thus acting as a benchmark for merchants and treasuries alike. In late medieval Europe, filled the vacuum left by Byzantine decline with high-quality coins that dominated Eurasian trade. The Florentine florin, inaugurated in 1252 with 3.5 grams of fine and a lily-fleur-de-lis design, achieved ubiquity due to Florence's banking prowess and the coin's consistent purity, serving as a and reserve asset from to the until the 16th century. Similarly, the Venetian , minted from 1284 onward with identical content and a Christ-in-mandorla motif, leveraged Venice's maritime to become a staple in Mediterranean and overland commerce, retaining prestige into the early .

Gold Standard Era (19th-early 20th Century)

The classical gold standard emerged in the late 19th century, with major economies adopting fixed convertibility of their currencies into gold at par values, enabling predictable exchange rates and supporting expansive global trade volumes that grew from $1.9 billion in 1850 to $19.7 billion by 1913 in constant dollars. This system relied on gold reserves to back domestic money supplies, but international settlements often utilized key currencies like the British pound sterling, which served as the dominant reserve asset due to London's role as the world's financial hub and Britain's command of over 25% of global industrial output by 1880. The pound's reserve status stemmed from its full convertibility into gold at £3 17s 10½d per ounce since 1717, reinforced by Britain's naval supremacy and vast colonial trade networks that funneled sterling-denominated bills of exchange for commodities like cotton and tea. Britain formalized the gold standard in 1821 following the resumption of specie payments after the , becoming the first major power to do so and setting a model emulated by others. adopted it in after unifying and demonetizing silver from its prior bimetallic system, while the effectively joined in 1879 upon Treasury gold reserves exceeding the greenback liability under the Resumption Act of 1875. aligned in 1878 via the , and by 1900, over 50 countries, including in 1897 and in 1897 (though with interruptions), had adopted gold convertibility, covering roughly 80% of world trade. Central banks and governments held reserves primarily in gold bars or coin, but increasingly comprised sterling balances, which by 1900 constituted about 62% of allocated global reserves, far outpacing the U.S. dollar at 0%. This era featured low inflation averaging under 1% annually across gold-standard countries from to , attributed to 's supply constraints balancing monetary expansion with mining discoveries like South Africa's output surging from 0.3 million ounces in 1886 to 7.5 million by 1898. The pound facilitated efficient clearing through the London bill market, where acceptance houses discounted short-term trade credits, reducing the need for physical shipments and leveraging network effects from sterling's in 60% of global merchant shipping by 1913. Yet, adherence required fiscal discipline, as balance-of-payments deficits triggered automatic outflows of reserves, enforcing adjustments via higher interest rates or , a mechanism that maintained parity but amplified recessions, as seen in Britain's 1890 . The system's stability unraveled with in 1914, when Britain and most adherents suspended convertibility to finance deficits through inflationary note issuance, with the Bank of England's gold exports banned and the pound temporarily floating off until partial restoration in 1925 at prewar parity. This interwar revival proved fragile, collapsing amid the by 1931 for Britain, highlighting vulnerabilities to political pressures overriding metallic discipline.

Bretton Woods System (1944-1971)

The Bretton Woods Conference, convened from July 1 to 22, 1944, in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, brought together delegates from 44 Allied nations to design a postwar international monetary framework aimed at fostering economic stability and reconstruction after World War II. The agreement established fixed but adjustable exchange rates, with participating currencies pegged to the U.S. dollar at par values within a 1% band, and the dollar itself convertible to gold at a fixed rate of $35 per troy ounce. This structure positioned the U.S. dollar as the system's anchor, leveraging America's vast gold reserves—holding about two-thirds of the world's monetary gold by 1944—and its economic dominance, which accounted for roughly half of global industrial output. The conference also created the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to oversee exchange rate parities, provide short-term loans to countries facing balance-of-payments deficits, and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD, later World Bank) to finance long-term reconstruction projects. ![Harry Dexter White and John Maynard Keynes at Bretton Woods][float-right] Under the system, central banks accumulated U.S. dollars as primary reserves for international transactions and to defend their pegs, marking the dollar's ascent as the preeminent global reserve currency. Countries maintained convertibility of their currencies into dollars for current account transactions, while the U.S. committed to redeeming official dollar holdings for upon request, though in practice, this gold window was increasingly strained by growing U.S. and fiscal deficits in the . The framework promoted liberalization by reducing volatility, with IMF lending facilities—drawing on subscribed quotas primarily in dollars—enabling deficit nations to avoid abrupt devaluations that had exacerbated the . By 1958, as European and Japanese economies recovered, the system facilitated a surge in global reserves, with dollars comprising over 70% of allocated reserves by the late , reflecting network effects from the U.S.'s deep financial markets and presence underpinning dollar confidence. Tensions inherent in the arrangement, later formalized as the Triffin dilemma, emerged as U.S. liquidity provision via deficits flooded the world with dollars exceeding America's gold backing, eroding convertibility credibility. Speculative pressures mounted, exemplified by the 1961 London Gold Pool's failure to stabilize prices and runs on U.S. gold stocks, which fell from 20,000 metric tons in 1949 to about 8,100 tons by 1971. On August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon unilaterally suspended dollar-to-gold convertibility in what became known as the "Nixon Shock," imposing a 10% import surcharge and wage-price controls to address inflation and a weakening dollar amid Vietnam War spending and domestic programs. This effectively dismantled the fixed-rate core of Bretton Woods, transitioning the world toward floating exchange rates by 1973, though the dollar retained reserve dominance due to entrenched use in trade invoicing and oil markets. The IMF adapted by amending its Articles of Agreement in 1976 to accommodate flexible rates, but the original gold-dollar peg's collapse highlighted the unsustainable asymmetry of relying on one nation's currency for global liquidity.

Post-Bretton Woods and USD Hegemony (1971-Present)

On August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon suspended the convertibility of the United States dollar into gold for foreign governments, an action known as the "Nixon Shock," which dismantled the Bretton Woods system's fixed exchange rate regime and ushered in an era of floating currencies and fiat money. This decision addressed mounting U.S. balance-of-payments deficits, inflationary pressures from Vietnam War spending, and foreign demands for gold redemption that depleted U.S. reserves from 574 million ounces in 1945 to about 280 million by 1971. Despite predictions of diminished U.S. influence, the dollar's role as the preeminent reserve currency persisted and intensified, supported by the depth of U.S. financial markets, military power, and institutional trust in American governance. In the ensuing years, the U.S. reinforced dollar hegemony through the petrodollar system, originating from agreements in 1973-1974 between the U.S. and , whereby oil exports by nations—particularly —were denominated and settled exclusively in dollars. This arrangement, incentivized by U.S. guarantees and arms sales, compelled oil-importing countries to accumulate dollars for purchases, while petrodollar surpluses were recycled into U.S. Treasury securities, sustaining demand and low borrowing costs for the U.S. By 1975, alone held over $25 billion in dollar-denominated assets, amplifying global liquidity in USD and embedding it in energy trade. The dollar's reserve share remained robust throughout the late 20th century, comprising over 70% of allocated global foreign exchange reserves by the 1990s, bolstered by the Eurodollar market's expansion and the absence of viable alternatives amid the Soviet ruble's inconvertibility and European fragmentation pre-euro. Empirical data from the (IMF) Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) indicate the USD's share hovered around 65-70% from the 1980s through the early 2000s, reflecting its use in 88% of foreign exchange transactions and as the pricing currency for commodities beyond oil. Into the , USD dominance faced scrutiny amid rising multipolarity, with China's yuan internationalization efforts, BRICS initiatives for local-currency trade, and responses to U.S. sanctions on post-2014 and 2022 prompting some diversification— reduced its dollar reserves from 40% in to under 10% by 2023. However, these shifts have been marginal; as of Q1 , the dollar accounted for 58% of global allocated reserves, down modestly from 66% in but far exceeding the euro's 20% and others' shares under 6% each. Adjusted for fluctuations, the Q2 share stabilized at approximately 58%, underscoring resilience driven by the dollar's liquidity premium and the U.S. economy's 25% share of global GDP. U.S. financial sanctions, wielded via dollar-clearing systems like SWIFT, have paradoxically reinforced by deterring alternatives, as non-compliant actors face exclusion from dollar access, though they accelerate bilateral non-dollar swaps limited to 5-10% of global trade volumes. As of 2025, over 90% of forex transactions and 50% of issuance remain dollar-denominated, affirming the "exorbitant privilege" of and deficit financing without immediate inflationary backlash. Despite geopolitical strains, no rival currency matches the dollar's combination of , , and market infrastructure, sustaining its central role absent a systemic U.S. fiscal collapse.

Allocation of Global Foreign Exchange Reserves

The allocation of global is tracked primarily through the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) dataset, which compiles self-reported data from central banks and monetary authorities representing over 90 percent of total global reserves. As of the second quarter of 2025, total official stood at approximately $12.945 trillion, with allocated reserves—those broken down by specific currencies—comprising the majority. The U.S. maintains the largest share, for 56.32 percent of allocated reserves on an unadjusted basis at the end of Q2 2025, down from 57.79 percent in Q1 due largely to a 7.9 percent of the against the during the quarter. When adjusted for these effects to reflect changes in underlying holdings, the 's share remained relatively stable at around 57.67 percent, indicating minimal shifts in actual reserve managers' preferences. The ranked second with an unadjusted share of 21.13 percent in Q2 2025, up from 20.00 percent in Q1, again primarily attributable to valuation changes from the dollar's weakening rather than net purchases or sales. Exchange-rate-adjusted figures show the euro's share edging slightly lower to 19.96 percent, underscoring the distorting impact of currency fluctuations on reported compositions. Remaining allocated reserves are distributed among other currencies, including the Japanese yen (typically 5-6 percent), British pound (around 4-5 percent), and smaller portions in the Chinese renminbi (approximately 2 percent), Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, and Swiss franc, with the balance in miscellaneous currencies. Unallocated reserves, not specified by currency, constitute about 10-15 percent of the total, reflecting non-disclosed holdings that central banks choose not to report in detail. This structure highlights the dollar's enduring primacy, supported by its liquidity and institutional depth, despite gradual diversification efforts by some reserve holders.

Recent Shifts and Empirical Data (Up to 2025)

In response to geopolitical events, including the freezing of Russian assets following the 2022 invasion of , some nations accelerated diversification of away from U.S. dollar-denominated assets to mitigate sanction risks. This prompted increased allocations to and, to a lesser extent, non-traditional currencies, though empirical indicates no abrupt collapse in dollar dominance. The International Monetary Fund's Currency Composition of Official (COFER) dataset, aggregating self-reported holdings from over 140 countries, reveals that the US dollar accounted for 58.4% of allocated global foreign exchange reserves in Q4 2023, a slight decline from 59.2% in Q3 2023; the dollar's share hovered around 58 percent through 2024, down modestly from 59 percent in 2020 but stabilizing when adjusted for fluctuations. Central banks' net gold purchases reached record levels from 2022 to 2025, totaling over 1,000 metric tons annually in peak years, driven by institutions seeking hedges against currency volatility and geopolitical weaponization of reserves. By mid-2025, surpassed U.S. Treasuries as the second-largest reserve component after currencies, comprising approximately 18 percent of global reserves—up from 11 percent in 2015—with holdings exceeding 36,000 tons worldwide. This shift reflects causal factors like distrust in sanction-vulnerable assets rather than a coordinated de-dollarization, as 's non-yielding nature limits it to portfolio insurance rather than transactional use. The Chinese (RMB) saw incremental gains in reserve status, with its share in rising to 3.17 percent by September 2025, ranking fourth behind the , , and pound, amid China's bilateral swap lines and trade settlement pushes. However, COFER data pegs RMB's reserve allocation at under 3 percent through 2024, constrained by capital controls and limited , despite over 80 central banks holding modest positions totaling around $274 billion as of 2022 (with slower subsequent growth). Euro holdings edged up to 20.1 percent by end-2024 from 19.8 percent prior, reflecting safe-haven demand, while other currencies like the yen and pound remained stable below 6 percent combined.
CurrencyShare of Allocated Reserves (Q4 2020)Share (End 2024)Key Driver of Change (2023-2025)
U.S. Dollar59.0%57.8%Geopolitical diversification offset by liquidity needs
Euro20.5%20.1%Marginal safe-haven inflows
Renminbi~2.0%~2.5%Trade finance expansion in Asia
Others (Yen, Pound, etc.)~10%~10%Stable
BRICS initiatives and rhetoric from and amplified de-dollarization narratives, yet aggregate data through Q2 2025 shows only gradual rebalancing, with dollar usage in trade invoicing and SWIFT transactions exceeding 80 percent and 40 percent, respectively, underscoring persistent network effects. IMF COFER revisions in July 2025 for Q1 data confirmed minor adjustments for currencies like the Australian dollar but no systemic upheaval. Overall, while diversification pressures have intensified since , the dollar's reserve primacy endures due to deep markets and institutional inertia, with shifts more attributable to than ideological rejection.

Theoretical Foundations

Network Effects and Liquidity Premiums

The adoption of a currency as a reserve asset generates network effects, where its rises with the scale of its usage across , invoicing, and central bank holdings. As more entities incorporate the currency into their portfolios and transactions, financial markets deepen, transaction costs decline due to standardized and reduced risk, and information efficiencies improve, fostering further in a loop. This dynamic explains the observed in the , where incumbent currencies maintain dominance despite economic shifts; for instance, econometric analyses of trade invoicing reveal that a currency's share in exhibits increasing , with network externalities accounting for up to 20-30% of the variance in patterns across commodities like . Empirical evidence from BIS Triennial Central Bank Surveys underscores these effects, showing that the U.S. dollar's 88% share in foreign exchange turnover as of 2022 correlates with its entrenched role in cross-border settlement, creating for challengers through coordination failures among users. Similarly, regressions on reserve compositions from 1990-2020 indicate that a 1% increase in a currency's global usage predicts a 0.5-1% rise in subsequent reserve allocations, net of macroeconomic fundamentals like GDP share, highlighting lock-in mechanisms that perpetuate inertia. These network externalities not only amplify the currency's role in unit-of-account functions but also deter diversification, as switching costs—such as repricing contracts or rebuilding pools—escalate nonlinearly with the system's scale. Complementing network effects, reserve currencies command a liquidity premium, reflecting the high convertibility and depth of their associated markets, which allow holders to execute large transactions with minimal price impact. This premium manifests as lower bid-ask spreads and yield discounts on the issuer's sovereign debt; for the U.S., global for securities has suppressed 10-year yields by an estimated 0.5-1 percentage points relative to fundamentals since the , enabling cheaper external financing equivalent to 0.2-0.5% of GDP annually in seigniorage-like benefits. Models incorporating frictions further quantify this as a wedge where dollar-denominated assets yield lower returns yet attract during stress, as evidenced by the 2020 "dash for cash" episode when offshore dollar funding rates spiked 200-300 basis points amid shortages. The interplay between network effects and liquidity reinforces dominance: broader adoption begets deeper markets, elevating the premium and entrenching the currency against erosion, though empirical tests suggest diminishing marginal returns beyond thresholds around 40-50% global share. These liquidity advantages contrast with gold, whose limitations—including poor liquidity for large-scale transactions due to physical handling requirements, absence of interest yield, and high storage costs—prevent it from fully supplanting the USD, which provides efficient, interest-bearing liquidity through deep financial markets and systems like SWIFT, reinforced by network effects and arrangements such as petrodollar recycling.

Triffin Dilemma and Inherent Tensions

The , named after Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin, identifies a core instability in systems where a national currency serves as the primary global reserve asset. Triffin argued in his 1960 testimony to the U.S. Joint Economic Committee that, under the Bretton Woods regime, the was compelled to run persistent balance-of-payments deficits to supply the world with sufficient dollar liquidity for trade and reserves. However, these deficits inevitably accumulated foreign-held dollars exceeding the U.S. backing, eroding international confidence in the dollar's convertibility at the fixed $35 per ounce rate and risking a speculative run on U.S. reserves. This created an inescapable tension: insufficient deficits stifled global growth through liquidity shortages, while excessive deficits undermined the reserve currency's credibility. The dilemma manifested empirically during the 1960s, as U.S. deficits—reaching $1.7 billion in 1958 and escalating amid spending and domestic programs—doubled foreign dollar claims to over $40 billion by 1970, surpassing U.S. gold stocks of $11 billion. Foreign central banks, particularly under , converted dollars to gold, draining U.S. holdings from 574 million ounces in 1945 to 261 million by August 1971. On August 15, 1971, President suspended dollar-gold convertibility in the "," effectively ending Bretton Woods and validating Triffin's prediction of systemic collapse due to inherent liquidity-confidence trade-offs. Beyond the gold-exchange standard, the underscores broader inherent tensions for any reserve currency issuer. A dominant currency demands sound to preserve value—low , fiscal restraint, and institutional trust—to sustain foreign holdings, yet global demand requires the issuer to export its currency via current-account deficits, exposing it to external imbalances and policy pressures from abroad. This conflict pits domestic economic priorities, such as or growth stimulus, against international obligations for stability, potentially amplifying boom-bust cycles as the issuer absorbs global savings gluts or faces sudden stops in demand. Post-1971 floating rates mitigated gold runs but perpetuated the paradox, with the U.S. dollar's 59% share of allocated reserves as of 2023 reflecting ongoing deficits that, while providing , heighten vulnerability to crises if fiscal profligacy erodes perceived solvency. Empirical analyses, including BIS studies, affirm that no national currency can indefinitely reconcile these roles without reforms like supranational assets, though Triffin's proposed composite reserve unit faced political resistance.

Benefits to the Issuing Nation (Exorbitant Privilege)

The exorbitant privilege denotes the economic advantages conferred upon a nation issuing the dominant global reserve currency, primarily through the ability to sustain external imbalances and access cheaper financing without immediate disciplinary pressures from international markets. This concept, articulated by French Finance Minister in 1965, highlights how the issuing country can export its currency in exchange for real , effectively running persistent deficits financed by foreigners' willingness to accumulate its liabilities as reserves. Empirical analyses confirm that reserve currency status correlates with lower sovereign borrowing costs, as foreign official holdings—often comprising a significant share of the issuer's —increase demand and suppress yields. For instance, econometric models estimate that the benefits from a yield reduction of 10 to 30 basis points on its securities attributable to the dollar's reserve role, translating to annual interest savings of roughly $30 billion to $90 billion given federal levels around $35 trillion as of 2025. A core component is , the derived from the difference between the of issued and its production cost, amplified when foreigners hold non--bearing notes or deposits. For the , foreign demand for —estimated at over $2 trillion in physical alone held abroad as of recent data—provides an implicit interest-free loan, as the U.S. government incurs minimal costs to produce these assets while avoiding the need to pay that domestic holders might demand. This generates fiscal gains equivalent to the of funds, with historical empirical tests indicating from international status adding 0.2% to 0.5% of GDP annually for dominant issuers like the in the post-Bretton Woods . Such benefits extend beyond direct to indirect effects, including reduced rollover risks on short-term , as global preferences favor the reserve currency's instruments. Reserve status further bolsters domestic financial markets by enhancing liquidity and depth, lowering transaction costs for U.S. entities and facilitating easier capital access for corporations and households. This perpetuates the privilege, as incumbency advantages—rooted in historical and institutional trust—sustain high foreign holdings despite alternatives. However, causal realism underscores that these gains are not costless; they incentivize fiscal profligacy, potentially inflating asset bubbles or eroding long-term competitiveness through chronic deficits, though the immediate benefits manifest as elevated living standards funded by global savers. Quantifications from balance-of-payments data show the U.S. current account deficit averaging 3-6% of GDP since 1980, largely sustainable due to reserve absorbing dollar outflows without precipitating currency or .

Dominant Reserve Currencies

United States Dollar

The (USD) has served as the world's preeminent reserve currency since the establishment of the in 1944, retaining this status even after the system's collapse in 1971 when the USD's convertibility to ended. Post-1971, the USD's role expanded due to the depth and of U.S. financial markets, which facilitated its use in international transactions without the need for fixed exchange rates. As of 2024, the USD comprised approximately 58 percent of disclosed global official , surpassing all other currencies combined and declining only modestly from a peak of 72 percent in 2001. In foreign exchange reserves reported to the (IMF) via its Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) dataset, the USD's share stood at 57.7 percent in the first quarter of 2025, with exchange-rate-adjusted figures showing stability around 58 percent through the second quarter despite raw data fluctuations driven by currency valuation effects. This dominance reflects central banks' preferences for USD-denominated assets, such as U.S. Treasury securities, which offer high liquidity and low transaction costs; for instance, foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries exceeded $8 trillion as of mid-2025. The USD also predominates in global payment systems, accounting for about 40 percent of international payments via in 2024, far exceeding the euro's 35 percent share. Beyond reserves, the USD's role in trade invoicing underscores its entrenchment, with empirical data indicating it priced 96 percent of trade in the , 74 percent in the , and 79 percent in other regions between 1999 and 2019, patterns that persisted into the due to invoicing inertia and risk hedging. In foreign exchange markets, the USD was involved in nearly 90 percent of global transactions as of 2022, enabling efficient settlement and reducing risks for non-U.S. trade partners. This usage stems from causal factors including the scale of U.S. capital markets—totaling over $50 trillion in and equity as of 2024—and the perceived stability of U.S. institutions, where rule-of-law indices rank the U.S. among the highest globally, fostering trust in USD assets during crises. Geopolitical elements reinforce this position, as over 70 percent of USD reserve holdings are by countries with formal alliances or ties to the U.S., mitigating risks of asset freezes compared to alternatives like the , which faces capital controls. Despite narratives of de-dollarization, empirical trends show limited erosion; nontraditional currencies' combined reserve share rose to only 3-4 percent by , insufficient to challenge USD liquidity premiums. The USD's "exorbitant privilege" allows the U.S. to deficits at lower costs, with foreign suppressing U.S. rates by an estimated 0.5-1 annually. However, vulnerabilities persist, including reliance on foreign willingness to hold USD assets amid U.S. fiscal expansion, which reached a $1.8 trillion deficit in 2024.

Eurozone Euro

The euro, introduced as an accounting currency on , 1999, and in physical form on , 2002, serves as the common for 20 member states comprising the , representing a combined of approximately 340 million people and about 22% of global GDP as of 2024. As the world's second-most held reserve after the US dollar, it accounts for roughly 20% of allocated global according to IMF Currency Composition of Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) data through the second quarter of 2025. This share has remained relatively stable over the past decade, fluctuating between 19% and 21%, despite initial post-launch optimism that it might challenge dollar dominance more aggressively. The euro's reserve status stems from the Eurozone's deep and liquid financial markets, which facilitate large-scale transactions, and the European Central Bank's (ECB) mandate for , enabling predictable independent of national politics. It benefits from network effects inherited from predecessor currencies like the , which held about 15% of global reserves pre-euro, and offers issuers gains estimated at 0.3-0.5% of Eurozone GDP annually from international demand. Foreign central banks hold euro assets for diversification, with advantages including lower external financing costs for Eurozone governments and firms due to global demand for euro-denominated safe assets like German bunds. However, the currency's international role is constrained by the absence of a unified fiscal authority, leading to asymmetric shocks across member states without automatic stabilizers like federal transfers. The 2010-2012 debt crisis significantly undermined confidence in the as a reserve asset, as peripheral countries like , , , and faced spiking yields on government bonds exceeding 7%, prompting ECB interventions such as the Long-Term Refinancing Operations and outright monetary transactions. Reserve managers reduced holdings amid fears of fragmentation or exit risks, with the currency's global reserve share dropping from a peak of 28% in to below 20% by , reflecting perceived vulnerabilities from divergent national fiscal policies and lack of mutualized debt issuance. Post-crisis reforms, including the and Banking Union, mitigated some risks but did not fully resolve underlying tensions, as evidenced by persistent sovereign-bank loops where national debts indirectly burden the ECB balance sheet. In recent years through 2025, the has seen modest gains in reserve allocation, rising to 20.1% by end-2024 from 19.8% prior, partly as central banks diversified away from a weakening amid fiscal deficits and policy uncertainty. Yet, its share in and invoicing lags at around 19% and 30% respectively, limited by imports predominantly priced in dollars and geopolitical events like Russia's invasion of , which highlighted energy dependencies without boosting euro internationalization. Proposals to enhance its status, such as expanding euro-denominated safe assets via joint debt or , face political hurdles from fiscal conservatives in northern member states wary of . Empirical evidence suggests the euro functions more as a regional than a seamless global medium, with premiums inferior to the dollar due to fragmented markets and no single sovereign guarantor.

Other Notable Currencies (Yen, Pound, Swiss Franc)

The (JPY) ranks as the third-largest reserve currency by share in official , comprising approximately 5.3% of allocated global reserves as of the first quarter of 2025, according to IMF Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) data. Its role emerged prominently in the post-World War II era, bolstered by Japan's export-driven and accumulation of vast current account surpluses, which elevated the yen's international usage in the and ; by 1991, its reserve share peaked near 9%, reflecting the country's status as the world's second-largest economy at the time. However, prolonged deflationary pressures, banking crises in the , and the Bank of Japan's zero-interest-rate policies since 1999 have eroded its appeal, leading to a steady decline to current levels, as central banks prioritize higher-yield, more liquid alternatives amid Japan's persistent current account imbalances and frequent yen interventions to curb depreciation—such as multiple rounds in 2022-2024 totaling over $60 billion to support the currency against the U.S. . Despite these challenges, the yen retains safe-haven attributes during global risk-off events due to Japan's net creditor position and low volatility, though its reserve status is constrained by shallow relative to the or and domestic policies that suppress returns for foreign holders. The British (GBP) holds about 4.8% of global allocated reserves as of early 2025, a diminished role from its historical dominance as the preeminent reserve currency under the gold standard until , when it accounted for over 60% of reserves before yielding to the U.S. dollar amid Britain's war debts and imperial overextension. Post-1945, the pound's internationalization persisted through the City of London's enduring status as a global financial hub, facilitating trade invoicing and asset holdings, but its share has contracted due to the U.K.'s relative economic decline—GDP now at 3% of global output versus 25% in 1870—and events like the 1992 ERM crisis, in 2016, and resulting capital outflows that heightened volatility. Empirical evidence from COFER tracks shows stability around 4-5% since the , supported by the pound's use in 7-8% of global forex turnover and its role in commodity pricing, yet causal factors such as the Bank of England's less predictable compared to peers and geopolitical risks have limited diversification into GBP by central banks. The currency's reserve utility derives from network effects in London's clearing systems, but lacks the military-backed stability or fiscal depth of the dollar, contributing to its niche positioning for European and Commonwealth-linked reserves. The Swiss franc (CHF) maintains a marginal reserve share of roughly 0.2% as of Q1 2025, far below major currencies due to Switzerland's small economy—representing under 0.5% of global GDP—despite its reputation as a premier safe-haven asset rooted in centuries of political neutrality, , and conservative fiscal policies that have yielded average below 1% since 1990. This status intensified post-2008 , with CHF appreciating over 20% against the amid flows, prompting (SNB) interventions exceeding 500 billion CHF in balance sheet expansion by 2015 to enforce a peg, later abandoned, highlighting tensions between haven demand and export competitiveness. In 2025, ongoing geopolitical uncertainties have driven nine consecutive weekly gains in the franc versus the as of October, fueled by safe-haven inflows, though the SNB's negative interest rates until 2022 and current efforts to cap appreciation underscore limits to its reserve scalability—low bond issuance volumes and reliance on franc-denominated assets deter broad central bank adoption beyond diversification portfolios. Empirical correlations show CHF strengthening during equity market drawdowns, with beta coefficients to global risk indices near -0.5, affirming its causal role as a , yet its reserve footprint remains constrained by the absence of deep capital markets and Switzerland's non-EU status, positioning it more as a tactical than a systemic alternative.

Emerging Challengers

Chinese Renminbi Internationalization

China has pursued renminbi (RMB) internationalization since the late 2000s to reduce reliance on the US dollar and enhance its global financial influence, primarily through gradual liberalization measures, offshore market development, and bilateral agreements. Key initiatives include establishing offshore RMB centers, such as in , and launching the (CIPS) in 2015 to facilitate RMB-denominated transactions outside . The (PBOC) has signed bilateral agreements with over 40 central banks, providing access to approximately $500 billion in RMB liquidity as of early 2025, including a three-year extension with the in September 2025 for euro-RMB swaps. Despite these efforts, the RMB's role in global reserves remains limited. According to IMF COFER data for Q2 2025, the RMB's allocated share in official stood at just over 2%, a modest increase of 0.03 percentage points from the prior quarter, far behind the US 's approximately 58%. In international payments, SWIFT data indicate the RMB accounted for 3.17% of global value in September 2025, ranking sixth behind the , , pound, yen, and , up from 2.93% in August but still reflecting volatility and slow adoption. shows slightly higher usage at 5.5% globally in 2024, with RMB cross-border receipts and payments involving (BRI) partners reaching 16.7% of China's total such flows by September 2023, though BRI settlements remain predominantly -denominated due to entrenched network effects.
MetricRMB ShareSource/Period
Global Reserves (Allocated)>2%IMF COFER, Q2 2025
International Payments3.17%SWIFT, September 2025
Trade Finance5.5%SWIFT/IMF, 2024
Progress has been constrained by structural barriers, notably persistent capital controls that restrict full convertibility on the , limiting investors' ability to freely enter or exit RMB assets and undermining its appeal as a . Exchange rate management by the PBOC, which intervenes to stabilize the RMB against volatility, further erodes confidence in its autonomy, as reserve currencies typically require market-determined pricing to absorb global shocks. Additional hurdles include underdeveloped domestic financial markets lacking the depth and liquidity of established centers like or New York, and geopolitical risks stemming from opaque and potential state intervention, which deter foreign central banks from accumulating significant holdings. analysis attributes stalled internationalization largely to these controls and managed rates, noting that without deeper reforms, the RMB's global role will remain niche despite state-driven pushes via BRI lending and swaps.

BRICS De-Dollarization Initiatives

The grouping, comprising , , , , and since 2009, along with newer members , , , and the effective January 1, 2024, has pursued de-dollarization through summit declarations emphasizing alternatives to U.S. dollar reliance in trade and finance. At the 2024 Kazan Summit hosted by , the joint declaration advocated for "more efficient, transparent, safe, and inclusive cross-border payment instruments" to reduce dependency on existing systems like , while rejecting unilateral sanctions as tools of coercion. Proposals for a unified BRICS currency, including - or commodity-backed variants, have surfaced repeatedly but remain exploratory as of mid-2025, with no formal adoption due to divergent economic interests among members. Practical initiatives center on bilateral and multilateral use of local currencies for trade settlement. reported that 90% of its trade with occurred in rubles and by 2024, driven by Western sanctions post-2022 invasion. Similarly, intra- trade volumes have grown, with expanded BRICS projected to account for 28% of global GDP and increased shares in world trade by 5% following 2024-2025 accessions, though commodity pricing remains predominantly dollar-denominated. The (NDB), established in 2014, has issued bonds in local currencies and supported projects bypassing dollar funding, but its lending totals approximately $32 billion as of 2023, a fraction of global development finance. Development of alternative payment infrastructures includes Pay, a decentralized messaging system demonstrated in prototype form in in October 2024, aimed at facilitating transactions in member currencies without intermediaries. Related efforts like Project mBridge, a multi-CBDC platform initially involving central banks and others, achieved status in mid-2024 before the withdrew in October 2024 amid geopolitical tensions, leaving it as a China-led initiative. Despite rhetorical momentum, de-dollarization progress is constrained by internal heterogeneities and economic realities. Countries like and continue substantial dollar usage for stability and integration with global markets, with no collective mechanism supplanting dollar invoicing in key sectors. Carnegie analyses highlight that efforts have not significantly eroded the dollar's 58% share of global reserves as of late 2023, underscoring limited systemic impact amid members' varying sanction exposures and currency convertibility issues.

Alternative Proposals

Special Drawing Rights (SDRs)

The (SDR) is an international reserve asset created by the (IMF) in 1969 to supplement the official reserves of member countries, particularly amid concerns over the adequacy of gold and national currency reserves under the . Unlike a traditional currency, the SDR functions as a and , with its worth determined by a basket of five major currencies: the U.S. dollar (weight: 43.38%), (29.31%), Chinese (10.82%), (7.59%), and British pound (7.44%), as revised in 2022 and effective until 2027. This composition aims to reflect the relative importance of these currencies in global trade and reserves, providing a diversified and relatively stable valuation mechanism immune to unilateral policy decisions by any single issuer. SDR allocations occur through general or special decisions by the IMF's Board of Governors, requiring an 85% vote, and are distributed to members in proportion to their IMF quota shares, which approximate economic size and position. The first allocation totaled SDR 9.3 billion in 1970-1972; subsequent rounds brought the cumulative total to approximately SDR 660 billion by September 2025, equivalent to about $900 billion at prevailing exchange rates. The largest single allocation, SDR 456.5 billion (roughly $650 billion), was approved in August 2021 to bolster global liquidity during the , representing nearly 70% of all SDRs ever issued and disproportionately benefiting advanced economies with ample reserves, such as the (which received SDR 113 billion). In practice, SDRs earn interest for holders (based on a short-term tied to the basket currencies) and can be used to settle international balance-of-payments obligations directly with the IMF or exchanged among members for freely usable currencies like the or , subject to IMF designation plans that compel surplus countries to provide currency in return. However, SDRs constitute only a minor fraction of global official reserves—around 2-3% compared to the $12 trillion in holdings dominated by the U.S. —due to their restricted usability: they cannot be traded markets, lack a for intervention or lending, and are inaccessible to non-IMF members or private entities. Proposals to elevate SDRs as a principal reserve asset, to their inception as a potential hedge against the Triffin dilemma's pressures on the , have faltered owing to inherent structural constraints: the absence of an elastic supply mechanism responsive to global demand (allocations are infrequent and politically contested), limited for transactions beyond IMF channels, and no established SDR-denominated or financial instruments to foster depth akin to national currencies. While the 2021 allocation temporarily eased strains for some emerging markets, shows minimal substitution for reserves, as recipients often converted SDRs to dollars for practical use, underscoring the SDR's role as a supplementary rather than competitive asset amid entrenched network effects favoring established currencies.

Cryptocurrencies and Digital Assets

Cryptocurrencies, led by , have been advocated as potential reserve assets due to their decentralized protocols, , and resistance to inflationary monetary policies, with 's supply algorithmically capped at 21 million coins. Proponents, including some policymakers, argue this positions as "digital gold" for hedging against fiat debasement, evidenced by its historical outperformance against traditional assets in bull markets. However, empirical data underscores its unsuitability for reserve roles: 's price volatility remains approximately 10 times higher than major exchange rates like the USD/EUR pair, with annualized standard deviations often exceeding 50-80% compared to under 10% for reserve currencies. This instability, coupled with high correlation to risk assets during downturns, amplifies drawdowns—such as the 70%+ declines in 2018 and 2022—making it unreliable for or value preservation in official reserves. Sovereign adoption remains marginal, confined to a handful of nations experimenting amid domestic economic pressures. adopted as on June 7, 2021, and maintains a of approximately 6,350 BTC, valued at over $715 million as of October 2025, accumulated via daily purchases and mining volcano-powered facilities. holds around 6,371-13,029 BTC, worth $717 million to $1.4 billion, primarily from state-directed mining operations leveraging hydroelectric resources. Other entities, such as the UAE with 6,451 BTC, reflect opportunistic holdings rather than systematic reserve strategies, while larger economies like the hold seized (over 200,000 BTC) but classify it as non-strategic assets pending auctions. These cases highlight causal challenges: small-scale implementations yield limited global impact, and 's energy-intensive proof-of-work consensus—consuming electricity equivalent to mid-sized nations—raises sustainability concerns without offsetting reserve benefits like yield or . Stablecoins, a subset of digital assets, predominantly reinforce rather than challenge USD , with over 90% pegged to the dollar and facilitating crypto trading volumes exceeding $100 billion daily. The stablecoin surpassed $300 billion in October 2025, up from $205 billion earlier in the year, driven by (USDT) commanding 58% share at over $170 billion. These instruments extend USD liquidity into (DeFi) but expose reserves to counterparty risks, as seen in de-pegging events like TerraUSD's 2022 collapse, which erased $40 billion. Projections estimate growth to $500-750 billion, yet regulatory scrutiny—evident in EU MiCA rules and proposals—emphasizes their role as USD extensions, not independent reserves. International financial authorities concur on cryptocurrencies' reserve inadequacy. The IMF and FSB recommend minimizing official crypto exposure due to financial stability threats, including liquidity mismatches and systemic contagion risks, absent evidence of efficiency gains over traditional reserves. The BIS notes crypto's limited role in next-generation systems, prioritizing tokenized fiat over volatile tokens for cross-border use. Institutional inflows, such as $20+ billion into Bitcoin ETFs since 2024 approvals, signal portfolio diversification but not reserve substitution, as central banks favor —reaching $3,703 per ounce highs in 2025—for its lower volatility and historical precedence. Broader digital assets, including tokenized real-world assets, promise efficiency in settlement but lack the scale, status, and stability required for reserve functions, with adoption hindered by interoperability gaps and jurisdictional fragmentation.

Geopolitical and Institutional Factors

Role of Military Power and Rule of Law

The preeminence of a national currency as a global reserve asset has historically been reinforced by the issuing country's military capabilities, which secure international trade routes, deter aggression, and provide implicit guarantees against systemic disruptions. During the 19th century, the British pound sterling achieved reserve dominance partly due to the Royal Navy's enforcement of maritime security, enabling merchants worldwide to conduct transactions in pounds without pervasive fears of piracy or blockade. Post-World War II, the United States supplanted sterling through its military hegemony, formalized in the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement, where 44 Allied nations anchored their currencies to the dollar amid U.S. commitments to European reconstruction and global stability via institutions like NATO. In the modern context, U.S. military alliances directly influence reserve currency preferences, with countries receiving security guarantees—such as , , and members—holding disproportionately higher shares of their in dollar-denominated U.S. Treasuries, often exceeding 70% of total holdings. This pattern persists because military pacts signal credible U.S. deterrence against threats, reducing the perceived risk of dollar devaluation or default during geopolitical crises; econometric studies confirm that nations without such ties diversify away from dollars to mitigate exposure to U.S. volatility. The interplay creates a virtuous cycle: dollar demand lowers U.S. borrowing costs, funding military expenditures estimated at $877 billion in fiscal year 2022, which in turn sustains the framework underpinning global dollar usage. A strong rule of law regime complements military power by ensuring the institutional predictability essential for reserve status, including enforceable contracts, secure property rights, and an independent judiciary that minimizes expropriation risks for foreign investors. The U.S. legal system's emphasis on and transparency has historically drawn capital inflows, with the dollar's safe-haven appeal evident in its appreciation during events like the , when global central banks increased holdings by 10-15% amid . World Bank data ranks the U.S. among the top quartiles for indicators, correlating with the dollar comprising approximately 58% of allocated global reserves as of 2023 IMF COFER statistics, far outpacing alternatives lacking comparable legal safeguards. In challengers like the Chinese renminbi, deficiencies in —manifest in opaque judicial processes, state-directed capital controls, and episodes of arbitrary asset seizures—constrain reserve adoption, as evidenced by RMB's mere 2.3% share of global reserves despite China's economic size. Empirical models link higher scores to greater internationalization, underscoring why even U.S. rivals maintain substantial exposures for transactional reliability rather than shifting to less predictable alternatives. This dual foundation of military projection and legal integrity explains the dollar's resilience, though erosion in either could accelerate diversification pressures.

Sanctions, Weaponization, and Counterparty Risks

The preeminence of the in global reserves and payments systems has allowed the to impose financial sanctions with exceptional reach, by denying access to dollar clearing, freezing assets, and excluding entities from networks like . This weaponization exploits the dollar's role as the primary vehicle for international transactions, where over 80% of global involves the dollar despite the accounting for only about 10% of world trade. Such measures derive coercive power from the extraterritorial enforcement of jurisdiction over dollar-based activities worldwide, compelling even non-US entities to comply to avoid secondary sanctions. A prominent example occurred in February 2022, when the , , and allies froze approximately $300 billion of Russia's central bank reserves—roughly half of its pre-invasion foreign holdings—primarily in euro-denominated securities but including significant dollar assets held in Western custodians. These actions, coordinated via the Treasury's , immobilized assets in jurisdictions like the ($5-7 billion directly) and (two-thirds of the total), while also disconnecting major Russian banks from , disrupting cross-border payments. Prior instances include the 1979 freezing of Iranian assets post-hostage crisis (over $10 billion at the time) and repeated Venezuelan oil revenue blocks since 2017, totaling billions in impounded funds. These cases illustrate how sanctions target sovereign reserves to exert economic pressure, often without formal asset confiscation but through indefinite holds pending policy resolution. For foreign sovereigns and institutions, this introduces acute risks, as holdings become vulnerable to unilateral decisions influenced by geopolitical conflicts rather than contractual defaults. Central banks in non-aligned nations now weigh the benefits of reserves against the hazard of sudden illiquidity or value erosion, akin to a "sanction-proofing" where even neutral custodians may hesitate to transact with restricted parties. Empirical analyses indicate that while immediate sanction shocks reduce targeted economies' reserve usability, they heighten global incentives for diversification, with sanctioned states like boosting gold holdings (from 20% to over 25% of reserves by 2023) and pursuing non-dollar settlement systems. Nonetheless, data show the 's allocated reserve share holding steady at 58% through mid-2025, suggesting limited aggregate flight despite vocal de-dollarization rhetoric. These risks have spurred countermeasures, including bilateral currency swaps (e.g., Russia-China deals exceeding $100 billion in local-currency capacity) and explorations of alternative payment infrastructures to bypass dollar intermediaries. Proponents of de-dollarization argue that repeated weaponization erodes the dollar's "safe haven" status by prioritizing US strategic aims over neutral store-of-value reliability, potentially accelerating shifts toward multipolar reserves if trust further declines. Critics, including some surveys, contend the effects remain marginal, as no viable alternative matches the dollar's depth, , and rule-of-law backing, with sanctions' costs borne disproportionately by targets rather than the system's core users. Long-term, however, the precedent of reserve immobilization could deter reserve accumulation in dollars for politically sensitive holders, fostering gradual fragmentation in global finance.

Future Outlook

Scenarios for Currency Shifts

Reserve currency transitions have historically unfolded gradually over decades rather than abruptly, as evidenced by the shift from the British pound to the US dollar, which began with the UK's economic relative decline around 1914-1919 and culminated in dollar dominance by the 1940s-1950s following the Bretton Woods agreement. This process lagged underlying changes in economic size and trade shares by approximately 5-10 years, with the pound retaining influence through institutional legacies like the until the 1960s. Such patterns underscore that reserve status erodes through erosion of the issuing economy's financial depth, openness, and geopolitical stability, rather than sudden displacements absent catastrophic failure. A primary contemporary scenario involves orderly, gradual diversification away from the USD, with its share in allocated global declining modestly from 71% in 2000 to an exchange-rate-adjusted 57.7% as of Q2 2025. This trajectory reflects central banks' incremental rebalancing toward the (around 20%), , and non-traditional currencies like the , driven by emerging markets' growth and diversification motives, yet constrained by the USD's unmatched liquidity, rule-of-law protections, and role in 88% of transactions as of 2022. In this baseline, no single challenger supplants the dollar, leading to a multi-currency reserve system over 20-30 years, provided US fiscal policies avoid exacerbating sustainability concerns, which stood at a public of 123% in 2024. An alternative risk scenario entails a geopolitically accelerated shift, where widespread sanctions or alliance fractures prompt emerging and developing economies (EMDEs) to abandon USD trade invoicing among themselves, potentially reducing the dollar's reserve share by 6.2 percentage points—or about $800 billion based on 2023 reserve levels. This could intensify if major actors like deepen internationalization via swap lines (totaling over $500 billion by 2023) and commodity pricing in RMB, though it hinges on overcoming China's restrictions and shallow bond markets, which limit RMB's appeal as a . Historical analogies, such as sterling's post-WWI retention despite trade shifts, suggest even this scenario would unfold over a , not instantaneously, absent coordinated global adoption of alternatives. Disorderly scenarios, involving sudden USD collapse from triggers like a US sovereign debt default or hyperinflation eroding confidence, appear improbable given the lack of historical precedents for rapid reserve currency implosions without the issuer's total economic disintegration, as occurred with hyperinflating currencies like the 1920s German mark. Such events could spike global financial volatility, with USD depreciation estimates of 10-20% in stress cases, but are mitigated by the dollar's safe-haven status during crises and the high switching costs for reserves, including FX intervention needs. Analysts from institutions like the view these as tail risks rather than modal outcomes, emphasizing that USD persistence aligns with causal factors like military-backed stability and market infrastructure superiority over rivals.

Structural Factors Favoring Persistence of USD Dominance

The persistence of the US dollar (USD) as the dominant global reserve currency is underpinned by enduring structural economic features of the , including the unparalleled depth and of its financial markets. US Treasury securities, for instance, represent the world's largest and most liquid government bond market, with daily trading volumes exceeding $600 billion as of 2023, enabling central banks and investors to execute large-scale transactions with minimal price impact. This advantage stems from the transparency and of US markets, which facilitate the holding of approximately 58% of allocated global in USD-denominated assets as of the end of 2024. In contrast, alternative markets like those for bonds suffer from fragmentation across multiple sovereign issuers, limiting their scalability for reserve purposes. Network effects further entrench USD dominance through path-dependent inertia in , where widespread adoption reduces transaction costs and creates self-reinforcing usage patterns. As the for over 88% of transactions and 54% of global trade invoices in 2022, the USD benefits from that make switching to alternatives prohibitively expensive for market participants. These effects manifest in reduced hedging costs and improved for USD-denominated assets, discouraging diversification even amid calls for de-dollarization; for example, despite efforts by nations, non-USD reserve shares have risen only modestly from 40% in 2015 to about 42% by 2024. Empirical models of international currency choice highlight how such network externalities create lock-in, as incumbency advantages amplify with greater usage, rendering challengers like the —hampered by China's capital controls—unable to achieve . The USD's role as the pricing medium for key commodities, particularly , reinforces its structural primacy, with petrodollars recycling trade surpluses into US assets and stabilizing demand. Over 80% of global trades are invoiced in USD, a convention dating to the that links energy markets to dollar liquidity and sustains foreign holdings of US Treasuries, which totaled $8.1 trillion at the end of 2023. This invoicing dominance extends to other commodities and extends to cross-border banking, where USD claims comprise about 60% of international liabilities. The openness of the US , with its flexible and rule-based , supports this by attracting inflows during global uncertainty, as evidenced by the USD's appreciation and reserve inflows during the 2022 energy crisis. Without comparable structural openness in peers like the or , these factors perpetuate a virtuous cycle of demand for USD assets.

References

  1. https://www.bis.org/review/r160511c.pdf
  2. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2015/pdf/15-14.pdf
  3. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/the-international-role-of-the-u-s-dollar-2025-edition-20250718.html
  4. https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/206/Appendix1FinalOctober152009.pdf
  5. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/dollar-worlds-reserve-currency
  6. https://www.bis.org/review/r250708b.htm
  7. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~eichengr/rise_fall_dollar_temin.pdf
  8. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2024/06/11/dollar-dominance-in-the-international-reserve-system-an-update
  9. https://www.bis.org/review/r220620i.htm
  10. https://data.imf.org/en/news/october%25201%25202025%2520cofer
  11. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2025/10/01/dollars-share-of-reserves-held-steady-in-second-quarter-when-adjusted-for-fx-moves
  12. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Departmental-Papers-Policy-Papers/Issues/2020/11/17/Reserve-Currencies-in-an-Evolving-International-Monetary-System-49864
  13. https://www.bis.org/publ/econ18.pdf
  14. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/DP/2020/English/RCEIMSEA.ashx
  15. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2025/html/ecb.sp250526~d8d4541ce5.en.html
  16. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2022/06/01/blog-dollar-dominance-and-the-rise-of-nontraditional-reserve-currencies
  17. https://www.bis.org/publ/work828.pdf
  18. https://learn.apmex.com/learning-guide/coin-collecting/greek-athenian-owl-silver-tetradrachm/
  19. https://rg.ancients.info/owls/
  20. https://coinweek.com/being-wise-about-owls-the-athenian-owl-tetradrachm/
  21. https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/153493-153493/
  22. https://www.usgoldbureau.com/news/post/exploring-ancient-coins-history-behind-roman-denarius
  23. https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/these-guys-used-to-issue-the-worlds-reserve-currency-too-14845/
  24. https://www.bundesbank.de/en/bundesbank/numismatics/selected-objects/sign-of-the-lily-616530
  25. https://thomasnumismatics.com/en/blog/ducat/
  26. https://encyclopedia-of-money.blogspot.com/2015/09/venetian-ducat.html
  27. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/GoldStandard.html
  28. https://aier.org/article/the-economics-of-the-classical-gold-standard/
  29. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/09/gold-standard.asp
  30. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w9233/w9233.pdf
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022199604001187
  32. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/how-reserve-currencies-evolved-over-120-years/
  33. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/end-gold-standard-and-beginning-recovery-great-depression
  34. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/wwii/98681.htm
  35. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/bretton-woods-created
  36. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1937-1945/bretton-woods
  37. https://www.gold.org/history-gold/bretton-woods-system
  38. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/bretton-woods-launched
  39. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2021/08/16/from-the-history-books-the-rethinking-of-the-international-monetary-system
  40. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/nixon-shock
  41. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gold-convertibility-ends
  42. https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/how-the-nixon-shock-remade-the-world-economy
  43. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nixon-shock.asp
  44. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/09/us-dollar-dominance-both-cause-and-consequence-us-power
  45. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/072915/how-petrodollars-affect-us-dollar.asp
  46. https://ingoldwetrust.report/timeline-posts/the-nixon-shock-and-the-birth-of-the-petrodollar/?lang=en
  47. https://mineglobal.medium.com/oil-dollars-and-dominance-the-story-behind-the-petrodollar-power-play-64236c0e990e
  48. https://www.avatrade.com/education/market-terms/what-is-the-petrodollar
  49. https://www.banque-france.fr/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/hegemony-dollar-two-century-perspective
  50. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/currencies/de-dollarization
  51. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/atlantic-council-strategy-paper-series/why-the-us-cannot-afford-to-lose-dollar-dominance/
  52. https://www.tiaa.org/public/pdf/cio-focuspoint-us-dollar-losing-its-luster-aug-2025.pdf
  53. https://www.gspublishing.com/content/research/en/reports/2025/09/23/6609889f-e50e-4f3c-8222-5337fee64dfb.html
  54. https://www.bestbrokers.com/forex-trading/us-dollar-share-of-global-currency-reserves/
  55. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/28/02/2024/us-dollar-hegemony-ending
  56. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/what-is-bretton-woods-the-contested-pasts-and-potential-futures-of-international-economic-order?lang=en
  57. https://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/whats-behind-the-u-s-dollars-dominance-and-why-it-matters/
  58. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/317912/1/vaw-2025-1457703.pdf
  59. https://data.imf.org/en/datasets/IMF.STA:COFER
  60. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/yuan-aussie-dollar-gain-share-global-reserves-dollar-dips-imf-data-shows-2025-10-01/
  61. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ifdp/files/ifdp1420.pdf
  62. https://www.gold.org/goldhub/research/central-bank-gold-reserves-survey-2025
  63. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/central-banks-now-hold-more-gold-than-u-s-treasuries/
  64. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/golds-rise-central-bank-reserves-appears-unstoppable-2025-09-04/
  65. https://www.omfif.org/2025/09/central-banks-are-turning-back-to-gold/
  66. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202510/1346329.shtml
  67. https://www.swift.com/products/renminbi-tracker/document-centre
  68. https://thediplomat.com/2025/07/chinas-accelerating-efforts-to-internationalize-the-renminbi/
  69. https://www.reuters.com/business/dollar-cedes-ground-euro-global-reserves-imf-data-shows-2025-07-09/
  70. https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Riding-the-waves-Stocktaking-RMB-Internationalization-Development_edi.pdf
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165176524001484
  72. https://am.gs.com/en-us/advisors/insights/article/2025/dollars-shifting-landscape-from-dominance-to-diversification
  73. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1651.pdf
  74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjoe.12554
  75. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hkm/wpaper/242014.html
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376571675_Network_effect_and_international_currency
  77. https://researchdatabase.minneapolisfed.org/downloads/qz20ss644
  78. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29457/w29457.pdf
  79. https://www.stlouisfed.org/open-vault/2017/november/why-us-no-longer-follows-gold-standard
  80. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/center/mm/eng/mm_sc_03.htm
  81. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2011/html/sp111003.en.html
  82. https://www.bis.org/publ/work684.pdf
  83. https://www.bis.org/publ/work684.htm
  84. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/whats-behind-the-u-s-dollars-dominance-and-why-it-matters/
  85. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/ire/article/ecb.ireart201906_02~9c8301aace.en.pdf
  86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1885935
  87. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-changing-role-of-the-us-dollar/
  88. https://brics-plus-analytics.org/us-perspectives-on-dollars-exorbitant-privilege/
  89. https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2212x.htm
  90. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ifdp/files/ifdp1359.pdf
  91. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/other-publications/ire/html/ecb.ire202506.en.html
  92. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/ire/article/ecb.ireart201906_01~b4906a4aa3.en.pdf
  93. https://www.bis.org/publ/work218.htm
  94. https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2024RP02/
  95. https://www.omfif.org/2021/01/outlook-2021-sovereign-debt-can-boost-euros-reserve-currency-status/
  96. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/european-sovereign-debt-crisis.asp
  97. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/The-Euros-Challenge-to-the-Dollar-Different-Views-from-Economists-and-Evidence-from-COFER-19253
  98. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2024/html/ecb.pr241120~63b6e2f737.en.html
  99. https://www.ceps.eu/for-the-euro-to-go-global-the-eu-must-match-its-ambition-with-real-action/
  100. https://www.nber.org/digest/apr20/why-euro-hasnt-become-international-currency-stature
  101. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/JAPAN-YEN/EXPLAINER/xmvjnxjmbvr/
  102. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/foreign-exchange/japanese-yen-jpy/
  103. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-ignores-three-lessons-from-britain-for-preserving-dollar-supremacy-by-barry-eichengreen-2025-04
  104. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/04/swiss-franc-why-a-strong-currency-is-causing-problems-for-switzerland.html
  105. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-24/swiss-franc-s-haven-run-seen-nearing-snb-intervention-threshold
  106. https://smzh.ch/en/artikel/swiss-franc-haven-currency
  107. https://www.fairobserver.com/economics/the-long-term-dangers-of-chinas-expanding-swap-line-strategy-financial-dependence-and-geopolitical-influence/
  108. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2025/html/ecb.pr250908~e6b13aaf11.en.html
  109. https://pic.bankofchina.com/bocappd/rareport/202506/P020250606660020317918.pdf
  110. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/internationalization-of-the-chinese-renminbi-progress-and-outlook-20240830.html
  111. https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap61i.pdf
  112. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-brics-group-and-why-it-expanding
  113. https://sites.tufts.edu/fletcherrussia/russias-landmark-brics-summit-and-the-specter-of-de-dollarization/
  114. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/10/26/the-kazan-declaration-and-brics-redefining-global-power-dynamics/
  115. https://investingnews.com/brics-currency/
  116. https://blog.bluebulb.co.uk/a-new-brics-currency-threat-or-opportunity-for-the-us-dollar/
  117. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/brics-payment-system/
  118. https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/139877/
  119. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/12/the-difficult-realities-of-the-brics-dedollarization-effortsand-the-renminbis-role?lang=en
  120. https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/topics/cbdc/mcbdc_bridge.htm
  121. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/bis-leave-cross-border-payments-platform-project-mbridge-2024-10-31/
  122. https://www.cadtm.org/The-BRICS-and-de-dollarisation
  123. https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2023/special-drawing-rights-sdr
  124. https://www.imf.org/en/About/FAQ/special-drawing-right
  125. https://www.imf.org/external/np/fin/tad/extsdr1.aspx
  126. https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/special-drawing-right/2021-SDR-Allocation
  127. https://www.suerf.org/publications/suerf-policy-notes-and-briefs/has-the-imfs-2021-general-sdr-allocation-been-useful-for-what-and-for-whom/
  128. https://www.clevelandfed.org/publications/economic-commentary/2009/ec-20090309-replacing-the-dollar-with-special-drawing-rights-will-it-work-this-time
  129. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2023/08/28/2021-Special-Drawing-Rights-Allocation-Ex-Post-Assessment-Report-538583
  130. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/crisis-capital-rethinking-role-sdrs-global-development
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7783506/
  132. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/allaboutfinance/crypto-assets--unfit-for-central-bank-reserves-today
  133. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/5208070.pdf?abstractid=5208070&mirid=1
  134. https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RI-PROD/PROD0000000000603643/Bitcoin_vs__Gold%253A_The_Future_of_Central_Bank_Reser.PDF
  135. https://www.ccn.com/news/crypto/bhutan-top-crypto-nations-full-list-of-countries/
  136. https://bitbo.io/treasuries/countries/
  137. https://web3.career/learn-web3/top-countries-holding-bitcoin
  138. https://www.theblock.co/post/373314/stablecoin-market-cap-surpasses-300-billion-for-first-time-amid-crypto-rebound
  139. https://info.arkm.com/research/how-stablecoins-reached-a-300-billion-market-cap-in-2025
  140. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/currencies/stablecoins
  141. https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-au/institutional-investor/insights/articles/modernizing-financial-infrastructure.html
  142. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/R070923-1.pdf
  143. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/02/23/sp022324-changing-landscape-crypto-assets-considerations-regulatory-and-supervisory-authorities
  144. https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2025e3.htm
  145. https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/stories/2025/what-to-expect-in-crypto-in-2025.html
  146. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/06/reserverequirements.asp
  147. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5611990
  148. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/how-to-dismantle-a-reserve-currency/
  149. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/us-military-strength-secures-financial-dominance
  150. https://rsmus.com/insights/economics/why-the-dollar-remains-the-worlds-reserve-currency.html
  151. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/exorbitant-pillage-lael-brainard
  152. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/dollar-dominance-and-trump-administration
  153. https://www.investopedia.com/dollar-weaponization-11753104
  154. https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/updates/LSE-IDEAS-Weaponisation-Dollar.pdf
  155. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-is-the-status-of-russias-frozen-sovereign-assets/
  156. https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/three-years-war-ukraine-are-sanctions-against-russia-making-difference
  157. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/what-where-are-russias-frozen-assets-west-2025-09-22/
  158. https://www.moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/02/19/weaponization-of-dollar-the-growing-trend-towards-de-dollarization/
  159. https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-comments/2023/sanctions-on-russias-central-bank/
  160. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29943/w29943.pdf
  161. https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/21808194/can-foreign-currency-reserves-be-sanction-proofed/21808194
  162. https://www.invesco.com/content/dam/invesco/igsams/en/docs/The-weaponization-of-money.pdf
  163. https://paymentscmi.com/insights/global-de-dollarization-us/
  164. https://www.centralbanking.com/benchmarking/reserves/7962220/central-banks-split-over-impact-of-us-sanctions-on-dollar-reserves
  165. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2420.pdf
  166. https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/wp/wp11-14.pdf
  167. https://allucgroup.ucdavis.edu/uploads/5/6/8/7/56877229/deathofareservecurrency.pdf
  168. https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/nam/en/insights/markets-and-investing/is-this-the-downfall-of-the-us-dollar
  169. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/commentary/testimony/dollar-dominance-preserving-the-us-dollars-status-as-the-global-reserve-currency/
  170. https://data.imf.org/en/news/4225global
  171. https://corporate.vanguard.com/content/corporatesite/us/en/corp/articles/why-us-dollar-remains-reserve-currency-leader.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.