Hubbry Logo
Hashtag activismHashtag activismMain
Open search
Hashtag activism
Community hub
Hashtag activism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hashtag activism
Hashtag activism
from Wikipedia
A hashtag on a protest placard in 2019

Hashtag activism refers to the use of hashtags on social media platforms as a form of Internet activism.[1] It has become a significant tool for civic engagement and the advancement of social movements.[2] By attaching a hashtag to a post, users can share information and opinions on social or political issues, enabling others to engage in a broader online conversation that has the potential to drive change.[3] A hashtag typically consists of a word or phrase related to a specific cause, creating a space for public discourse.[4] Social media also serves as a critical platform for historically marginalized groups, allowing them to communicate, mobilize, and advocate for issues that may be overlooked by the mainstream media.[5]

Supporters of hashtag activism argue that it enables users to connect with global audience and disseminate information rapidly. Critics, however, question its effectiveness, suggesting that it often amounts to symbolic support rather than meaningful action, as users may simply post a hashtag without engaging in concrete efforts to create change.[6][1]

History

[edit]

The modern use of hashtag on social media was first proposed in 2007 by former Google developer Chris Messina on Twitter. His intention was to create a meta tag system that would allow users to track dynamic content related to specific event or topics. Initially, Twitter dismissed the idea, stating that, "these things were for nerds".[7] However, later that year, the hashtag #sandiegofire gained traction during the California wildfires, helping users share updates, locate loved ones and monitor safety information. This success demonstrated the hashtag's potential, leading to its broader adoption across platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.[2] Since then, hashtags have been widely used to coordinate conversations, build communities and organize protests, empowering users to actively participate in social and political movements.[8]

Notable examples

[edit]

The following notable examples are organized by categories: human rights, awareness, political, and trends.

Race

[edit]

United States origin

[edit]
#BlackLivesMatter
[edit]

The Black Lives Matter movement calls for an end to police brutality and the killings of African-Americans in the U.S. The #BlackLivesMatter hashtag was first started by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi as a response to the trial and later acquittal of George Zimmerman who shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.[9] The hashtag saw a revival in 2014, after the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and after a grand jury did not indict police officer Daniel Pantaleo in the death of Eric Garner.[10] During the summer of 2020, the hashtag saw another resurgence due to the deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor at the hands of police.[11]

#IStandWithAhmed
[edit]

I stand with Ahmed: In 2015, a teenage student named Ahmed Mohamed was arrested at his high school in Irving, Texas after his teacher mistook his reassembled clock for a bomb. Ultimately, he was not convicted of any crimes, but he was suspended from school. Shortly after his story hit the news, a tech blogger named Anil Dash tweeted a picture of Ahmed being arrested in his NASA(National Aeronautics and Space Administration) T-shirt along with the #IstandwithAhmed. His tweet went viral and drew accusations of racism and Islamophobia against the school. It sparked an online movement where many individuals, including scientists and engineers, tweeted their support for Ahmed under the same hashtag.

#TakeAKnee
[edit]

#TakeAknee has been a movement since 2016 and was created with the intention of calling attention to the police brutality and racial inequality taking place in America.[13] This movement was enacted primarily by NFL athletes, most notably Colin Kaepernick, through kneeling for the duration of the national anthem; this act has stirred significant controversy because it is interpreted by nationalists as being a disrespectful act that insults the American flag, veterans, and the values the flag represents. This movement ultimately led to #BoycottNFL and controversy that resulted in the NFL ban requiring players to stand for the national anthem, or stay in the locker room.[14] #TakeAKnee is often known as "the U.S. National Anthem Protest", and is often compared to protests during the civil rights era, lending to a chain of protests led by athletes in different sports.[15] While the police brutality being faced by African Americans was being protested, white American athletes were also seen taking a knee.[16] As a whole, the #TakeAKnee movement created controversy questioning the legal and constitutional rights of individuals and their ability to protest the U.S. National Anthem.[17][18]

#MyAsianAmericanStory
[edit]

In August 2015, "a 15-year-old high student named Jason Fong created #MyAsianAmericanStory to highlight immigration stories of Asian Americans after presidential candidate Jeb Bush made a remark about Asian people and their "anchor babies".[19][20] Fong stated that he started the hashtag to show that "Asian-Americans are part of the American narrative".[21] Users of the tag tweeted about their diverse family immigration histories and encounters with racism.[22] Fong said he was inspired to start #MyAsianAmericanStory in part by hashtags such as #BlackLivesMatter and participated in other hashtag campaigns such as #Asians4BlackLives in order to show his support for dismantling "a broken system that protects police misconduct".[19]

#thisis2016
[edit]

In October 2016, following an anti-Asian incident in New York City and the subsequent open letter to the victim from Michael Luo, The New York Times released a video entitled "#thisis2016: Asian-Americans Respond".[23] The video featured Asian Americans who had experienced racism.[24] #thisis2016 subsequently emerged as a hashtag to highlight racism Asian Americans faced.[25] Eventually, #BrownAsiansExist came to prominence following an open letter written to The New York Times expressing their disappointment in the lack of South and Southeast Asian Americans in their "#thisis2016" video.[26] #BrownAsiansExist more broadly highlights the erasure of South Asian and Southeast Asian Americans in the American media's portrayal of Asian Americans.[27]

#OscarsSoWhite
[edit]

#OscarSoWhite is a hashtag campaign started by BroadwayBlack.com managing editor April Reign and was sparked by the Oscars nominees in 2016.[28] All of the 20 actors nominated for lead and supporting actor categories were white, despite multiple films that year starring African American leads that had received critics' prizes and guild awards.[29] The campaign sparked a conversation about diversity, representation, and racism in the film industry.[30] The movement is connected to causing enough external pressure to significantly change the racial composition of academy membership.[31] Following the peak of the hashtag's popularity, the academy instated 41% minority voters and 46% female voters.[32] Production companies felt the pressure as well, and subsequently diversified their casting and staffing decisions as well, hiring Ava Duvernay, an African-American female director, to head the production of A Wrinkle in Time and hiring non-white actors in the traditionally white Star Wars series.[33]

#PublishingPaidMe
[edit]

Black Women's Rights

[edit]

United States origin

[edit]
#SayHerName
[edit]

#SayHerName originated in 2015 by the African American Policy Forum spearheaded by Kimberle Crenshaw. The purpose of #SayHerName was to bring media and public attention to the abuse and murder of Black women (both cis- and transgender) at the hands of the police.[34] The alleged suicide of Sandra Bland after being taken into police custody made the hashtag viral and allowed for the exposure, sharing, and investigation into the stories of other Black women who died as a result of police violence. #SayHerName was also associated with the deaths of Breonna Taylor, Aura Rosser, Tanisha Anderson, and many others.[35]

Women's rights

[edit]

United States origin

[edit]
#YesAllWomen
[edit]

YesAllWomen is a Twitter hashtag and social media campaign in which users share examples or stories of misogyny and violence against women.[36] #YesAllWomen was created in reaction to another hashtag #NotAllMen, to express that all women are affected by sexism and harassment, even though not all men are sexist. The hashtag quickly became used by women throughout social media to share their experiences of misogyny and sexism.[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The hashtag was popular in May 2014 surrounding discussions of the 2014 Isla Vista killings.[45][46][47]

#ShoutYourAbortion
[edit]

#ShoutYourAbortion is a hashtag and social media campaign used on Twitter that encourages women who have experience with abortion to break the silence surrounding it.[48][49][50] The hashtag was created by American writer Lindy West and friends Amelia Bonow and Kimberly Morrison in response to the US House of Representatives efforts to defund Planned Parenthood following the Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy.[51][52][53][54][55]

#ilooklikeanengineer
[edit]

In August 2015, the #ilooklikeanengineer campaign started. The movement was started by Isis Anchalee to promote discussion of gender issues.[56] Anchalee created the hashtag in response to backlash regarding her face being featured in an ad campaign for the company she works for. One year after the creation of #ilooklikeanengineer 250,000 people had used the hashtag.[57][58]

#MeToo
[edit]

#MeToo is a Twitter hashtag that raises awareness about sexual assault by encouraging survivors to share their stories.[59] The hashtag was initially first used in 2007 by Tarana Burke[60] but was later popularized and brought to the attention of the media on October 15, 2017, when Alyssa Milano, using Twitter, encouraged individuals[61] to speak up about their experience with assault and say 'Me Too'.[62] Initially meant to simply raise awareness, #MeToo developed into a movement and as of October 2018, the hashtag had been used 19 million times.[63] The movement has sparked many other movements like #HowIWillChange[64] and has also led to certain punishments towards the perpetrators.[62] As a reaction, the #HimToo hashtag was created. It that refers to the social media campaign for false rape allegation.

#WomensMarch
[edit]

On January 21, 2017, an estimated 2.6 million individuals marched around the world in response to the rhetoric of newly elected President Donald Trump.[65] The march was organized primarily online through Facebook.[66] Now occurring annually, the goal of the Women's March is to raise awareness and advocates for human rights through peaceful protest.[67]

Similar to other hashtag movements, #WomensMarch has an online presence. The movement has a Facebook page that is active, verified under the name Women's March, that was created on November 20, 2016.[68] As of April 2, 2019, the page is liked by over 800,000 individuals and has a following of more than 850,000 users.[68] Outside of the official page, there are multiple pages defined by geographic region including but not limited to Women's March on Connecticut, Women's March on San Diego, and Women's March Milan.[69][70][71] In addition to Facebook, the Women's March Movement has an active profile on Instagram and as of April 2019 the page has 1.2 million followers.[72]

International origin

[edit]
#EleNão
[edit]
Protester in Porto Alegre, Brazil, participating in the Ele Não movement.

On September 19, 2018, the Ele Não movement ("Ele Não" is Portuguese for "not him"), also known as the protests against Jair Bolsonaro, were demonstrations led by women which took place in several regions of Brazil and the world. The main goal was to protest against Bolsonaro and his presidential campaign and his sexist declarations.[73][74][75][76]

#WhereisPengShuai
[edit]

After the November 2021 disappearance of Chinese tennis player Peng Shuai, the hashtag #WhereisPengShuai appeared on Twitter[77] and was Tweeted by athletes such as Serena Williams[78] and Naomi Osaka.[79]

#MahsaAmini
[edit]

Amini's beating and death caused widespread anger among several social networks. The hashtag #MahsaAmini became one of the most repeated hashtags on Persian Twitter. The number of tweets and retweets of these hashtags exceeded 80 million.[80][81] Some Iranian women posted videos on social media of themselves cutting their hair in protest.[82] It was reported on 21 September that the Iranian government had blocked internet access to Instagram and WhatsApp and disrupted internet service in Kurdistan and other parts of Iran in an attempt to silence the unrest.[83] As of 24 September 2022, the hashtag #Mahsa_Amini and its equivalent in Persian broke the Twitter record with more than 80 million tweets.[84][85]

#MosqueMeToo
[edit]

In February 2018, the Mosque Me Too movement started, following the Me Too movement which gained worldwide prominence in October 2017 and the following months. Muslim women started sharing their experiences of sexual abuse at Muslim holy sites and on pilgrimages such as Hajj, Mecca, Saudi Arabia, using the hashtag #MosqueMeToo.[86][87][88]

Other examples
[edit]

A 2012 Twitter discussion among women working in games, collated under the hashtag #1reasonwhy, indicated that sexist practices such as the oversexualization of female video game characters, workplace harassment and unequal pay for men and women were common in the games industry.[89][90][91]

The hashtag #NotYourAsianSidekick was initiated by Suey Park and Juliet Shen in December 2013 on Twitter.[92] Suey Park is a freelance writer who is most known for her Twitter campaign to cancel the Colbert Show, while Juliet Shen ran a blog on Asian American feminism. They started the hashtag town hall as a way to create a platform for structured conversation around misogyny and issues specific to Asian American women.[93] In less than 24 hours, #NotYourAsianSidekick had been used over 45,000 times.[94]

DeafTalent is a hashtag used to highlight through social media the capabilities of the deaf and hard of hearing community. Prior to the hashtag's emergence, in the creative industry, hearing actors had been cast in deaf roles. The SAGE Deaf Studies Encyclopedia wrote, "In response to this, the social media hashtags #DeafTalent and #POCDeafTalent were created. The hashtags, while originally used to point out problematic portrayals of deaf characters and sign language in the media, are now also used to celebrate the wide breadth and multiplicity of deaf actors, artists, and other talent in the world."[95]

The hashtag, #Boymom, has taken to social media platforms in order to display the so-called "chaotic" and "messy" experiences mothers of boys go through. Instagram appears to be the platform with the most #Boymom hashtags, with nearly 12.9 million hashtags. #Girlmom falls significantly behind in numbers with only 4.8 million. Currently, there is much speculation surrounding this hashtag. People argue that it creates an environment for children where they feel unable to fully express their gender. Some people even go as far as to say that it perpetuates the sexist idea that sons are valued more than daughters.[96]

Overtourism, the phenomenon whereby certain places of interest are visited by excessive numbers of tourists, causing undesirable effects for the places visited has also become a widely used hashtag since 2016, when the phrase took off, after it gained significant momentum after a Skift, travel industry news and research company, article. Skift's use of the term brought global attention to a growing problem of perceptions of excessive tourism, sparking conversations about how to manage tourism more sustainably.[97] Based on a Twitter social network analysis, a paper found the #overtourism network is held together by a small number of experts, who play a key role in presenting, distributing and circulating information about the topic.[98]

Awareness

[edit]

United States origin

[edit]
#Kony2012
[edit]
A Kony 2012 poster

Kony 2012 is a short film produced by Invisible Children, Inc. (authors of Invisible Children). It was released on March 5, 2012.[99][100][101][102]

The film's purpose was to promote the charity's "Stop Kony" movement to make African cult and militia leader, indicted war criminal and the International Criminal Court fugitive Joseph Kony[103] globally known in order to have him arrested by the end of 2012,[104] when the campaign expired. The film spread virally through the #Kony2012 hashtag.[105][106][107]

#WhyIStayed
[edit]

In 2014, a media release of security camera footage that appeared to show NFL player, Ray Rice, punching his then-fiancée, Janay Rice, sparked public conversation on why victims of abuse stay in abusive relationships. In response to this question, writer and domestic abuse survivor Beverly Gooden started the #WhyIStayed campaign via Twitter in an effort to "change the tone of the conversation". The hashtag began to trend nationally five hours after its creation and was used more than 46,000 times that day.[108] Beverly appeared on NPR's All Things Considered to discuss hashtag activism.[109]

"Pope Francis shocks world, endorses Donald Trump for president"
#FakeNews
[edit]

While "fake news" or politically motivated disinformation (PMD) is not a new occurrence, the sentiment and spread of distrust of news coverage has become more notable since the 2016 U.S. elections cycle. The hashtag, #FakeNews, gained major popularity in 2016 when Donald Trump claimed that the negative press coverage he received was due to the spread of false stories. Since the emergence of this hashtag, there has been an increase in policy-related bills and laws regarding the proliferation of inaccurate information globally, which further politicized the issue and raised concerns of impending censorship. The emergence of social media has allowed for "fake news" to spread much quicker than regular news and information, pushing technology companies to take a more active role in detecting and removing "fake news".

An example of #FakeNews comes from a website named WTOF 5 News. The headline reads: "Pope Francis shocks world, endorses Donald Trump for president".[110] With the help from Facebook, this fake news article received over 960,000 engagements from the popular social media site, making it one of the post popular fake news articles of 2016.[111]

#ProtectOurWinters
[edit]

Protect Our Winters is a movement and a nonprofit organization started by snowboarder, Jeremy Jones[112] and other winter sport athletes to raise awareness about global warming and climate change. The movement started in 2016 as a response to it being one of the hottest years.[112][113] The movement demonstrates the effects of global warming with data about the winter sports industry and rise in carbon dioxide percentage.[112][114] Protect Our Winters or POW calls for people to not only be aware of the effects global warming but to take action by volunteering, voting for legislature or donating to the cause.

#FreeBritney
[edit]

In April 2019, the Britney Spears fan podcast Britney's Gram uncovered the first alleged abuses within her conservatorship arrangement and created the hashtag #FreeBritney. The term itself had been in use by certain fans since 2008.[115] Alongside advocating for the termination and investigation of Spears's conservatorship, the hashtag and accompanying social movement have been used to raise awareness of guardianship and conservatorship abuse across the United States.[116] The hashtag has led to legislative change in California surrounding legal procedures within conservatorship, and has inspired various bipartisan inquiries of guardianship and conservatorship law in Congress.[117][118]

#PublishingPaidMe
[edit]

Created in 2020 by L.L. McKinney, this hashtag was used by authors to discuss the pay differences received by publishers for black and non-black authors.[119]

#freeschlep
[edit]

The hashtag "#freeschlep" became popular on Twitter for several days, with users praising Schlep's actions and criticising Roblox for banning Schlep due to him being a vilgilante.[120]

International origin

[edit]
#BringBackOurGirls
[edit]
First Lady Michelle Obama initiated the #BringBackOurGirls hashtag.

Boko Haram kidnapped over 200 schoolgirls from Chibok, Nigeria in May 2014, refusing to return the girls.[121] The hashtag #BringBackOurGirls was created and used in hopes of keeping the story in the news and bringing international attention to it.[122] The hashtag was first used by a corporate lawyer named Ibrahim Abdullahi, and has also been used by the likes of First Lady Michelle Obama, who used it to raise awareness for the kidnapped girls.[123][124] The hashtag in itself has received 2 million retweets.[125]

#AmINext
[edit]

In the Fall of 2014, a Canadian Inuk woman named Holly Jarrett created the #AmINext hashtag campaign to raise awareness about the Canadian Government's lack of response to the high rate of violence against Indigenous women.[126] The campaign involves people taking photos of themselves with signs holding "#AmINext" and posting it to social media. The campaign was meant to encourage a national conversation about the invisibility and vulnerability of the female Indigenous demographic and call attention to the minimal efforts of the Government in investigating the murders and disappearances.[127][128] Holly was personally inspired to carry out the campaign as her cousin, Loretta Saunders, an Inuk woman from Labrador, went missing and was ultimately found dead on the side of a Canadian highway. After the campaign, the government filed a national DNA missing person's index and introduced 30 safety initiatives to help indigenous women.[129]

#PrayforParis
[edit]

The epicenter of Paris encountered unexpected terrorist attacks, leading to worldwide efforts to spread awareness about this incident. During this event, terrorists were wearing suicide belts and the subsequent violence was shocking. The terrorists were planning to enter the stadium along with other people.[130] Despite the person being prevented from entering, it demonstrated the severity of how people are risking their own lives, indirectly affecting others. Following the incident, more than 70 million people began to share this news on various social media platforms in order to reach a broader audience.[131] For example, Facebook enabled users to change their profile picture to a transparent overlay of the French flag to indicate support to the victims. Twitter was also utilized. However, rather than creating a transparent overlay on a Twitter's user profile, a hashtag was created to emphasize support. This simple hashtag of #PrayforParis allowed users to spread support so that audiences were not only informed about the event, but could also click on a hyperlink to learn more about the cause and other user's perspectives. Although social media platforms were useful in spreading awareness, the effect of younger individuals were just as notable. For example, a young child drew his thoughts on paper, including the message: "Shot after shot, bang after bang, wasting innocent lives!"[132]

#flygskam
[edit]

Flygskam is a Swedish word that literally translates as "flight shame". It is the name of an anti-flying movement that originated in Sweden last year, which encourages people to stop taking flights to lower carbon emissions. The idea was originally championed by Olympic athlete Bjorn Ferry and gained momentum after teenage activist Greta Thunberg's mother, the opera singer Malena Ernman, publicly announced she would stop flying, with various Swedish celebrities following suit. Thunberg herself traveled largely by train during her recent two-week tour of Europe.[133] The activism has seen real results in Sweden as the sales of airline ticket sales declined by 4% in January 2020 due to the increasing public awareness to the carbon footprint resulted by commercial flights.[134]

#CoronaVirus
[edit]

#Coronavirus, #COVID-19, and #Covid_19 represent a few of the most common hashtags referring to Coronavirus 2019 that started in Wuhan, China.[135][136] The Hashtag has increased rapidly with the World Health Organization's (WHO) declaration of the virus as pandemic on 11 March 2020.[137] Looking at the trajectory of this Hashtag on Twitter from Symplur, it shows a notable decrease in the number of Hashtags from 50763 on 13 April 2020 to 35795 on 18 April 2020.[138]

Political

[edit]

United States origin

[edit]
#HumanizeTheBadge
[edit]

Prior to 2020 #humanizethebadge was primarily circulating on Twitter and Facebook by organizations promoting stronger bonds between law enforcement and the communities they serve, such as the nonprofit group Humanizing the Badge.[139] This need for betterment was due to police brutality killing George Floyd on May 5, 2020. This ignited the public's want for change and placed the Black Lives Matter protests at the forefront of the media.[140] Behind the protest lines, the hashtag humanizing the badge popularized. The purpose of #humanizethebadge was for officers and officers' loved ones, to show their communities the person behind the police uniform. #humanizethebadge is mostly seen on TikTok with over 2 billion posts including the hashtag. These posts strive to humanize officers to reveal them as more relatable and trustworthy.[141] This relatability is an attempt to bring them closer to the citizens and communities they serve.[142] Through the use of TikTok officers are able to reach a wider audience. TikTok allows creators to jump from audience to audience and trend to trend.[143] These videos receive tens of millions of views promoting bureaucratic propaganda due to officers' supporting the appearance of institutional legitimacy.[144] Within the videos they are able to promote themselves as your average, relatable human, while being in uniform, thus associating themselves with the police department. Creating this link humanizes law enforcement as a whole, in an attempt to show police as the 'good guy'.

However, this hashtag is not universally promoted by police officers. A former police officer and current entrepreneur Autumn Clifford believe being a police officer is a great responsibility that needs to be represented by leaders. She notes historically society has never loved law enforcement, and citizens do not like being told what to do. Thus they need leaders to guide them in a positive direction. Civilians need to see police as leaders within their own communities. Clifford suggests this can be achieved by officers having real and honest conversations with civilians, and by going out of their way to relate to citizens. This can lead to a greater respect for law enforcement. She provides an example of being called to a troubled teen's group home and ending the encounter with a dance battle. This encounter changed the teen's perspective on her, and referred to her as the 'cool cop' for the rest of her time on the job. This one simple interaction humanized her to the group of teens.[145]

#NODAPL
[edit]
The #noDAPL hashtag used in real life, outside social media.
#NODAPL, also referred to as the Dakota Access Pipeline protests, is a Twitter hashtag and social media campaign for the struggle against the proposed and partially built Dakota Access Pipeline. The role social media played in this movement is so substantial that the movement itself is now often referred to by its hashtag: #NoDAPL. The hashtag reflected a grassroots campaign that began in early 2016 in reaction to the approved construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline in the northern United States. The Standing Rock Sioux and allied organizations took legal action aimed at stopping construction of the project, while youth from the reservation began a social media campaign which gradually evolved into a larger movement with dozens of associated hashtags. The campaign aimed to raise awareness on the threat of the pipeline on the sacred burial grounds as well as the quality of water in the area. In June 2021, a federal judge struck down the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's lawsuit, but left the option of reopening the case should any prior orders be violated.[146]
#NotOneMore
[edit]
A memorial service held at Harder Stadium after the Isla Vista killings

The hashtag #NotOneMore developed shortly after the May 23, 2014, shooting in Isla Vista, Santa Barbara, California. During this incident, six students attending the University of California, Santa Barbara, lost their lives. Richard Martinez, the father of one of the victims, quickly spoke out about gun control, calling for stricter gun control during memorial ceremonies and rallies, chanting "Not One More!" The phrase became a hashtag on social media afterwards. Richard also worked with Everytown's digital team to create a tool to allow participants to send postcards to their senators, congressional representatives, and governor containing the phrase "Not One More".

#MarchforOurLives
[edit]

The March for Our Lives protest began after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida on February 14, 2018.[147] In response to a surge of gun violence in schools and the 17 dead after the Parkland shooting, people began to rally around the hashtag #neveragain. The hashtag, indicative of the larger movement against gun violence, spread across social networks and went viral in early 2018.

Additionally, the movement organized walkouts in remembrance of the lives lost due to gun violence. In March 2018, hundreds of marches were organized across the country in support of stricter gun laws, many of which were met with resistance from anti-protesters.[147] Since February 2018 there have been 123 laws passed nationwide at the state-level to address concerns of gun control.[148]

On February 17, 2018, a Facebook page was started by students to encourage their participation in the movement; and as of April 2019 the page has been liked by more than 280,000 individuals and has a following of more than 300,000.[149] The Instagram page @marchforourlives is live and as of April 2019 has over 200 posts and just over 360,000 followers.[150]

#EndFathersDay
[edit]

In 2014, some editors spoofed being black feminists, spreading the meme, #EndFathersDay. Fox News picked the hoax to denounce.[151] After much research, the fake accounts were outed.[152]

#NoBanNoWall
[edit]

#NoBanNoWall is a hashtag and social media campaign created in response to Donald Trump's purported "Muslim ban" and 2016 presidential campaign promises to build a physical wall on the US-Mexico border.[153] In 2017, President Donald Trump issued multiple executive orders threatening to break up families and turn away refugees.[154] Saki Barzinji and Imraan Siddiqi started #NoBanNoWall in an effort to rally Muslim, Latino, and other communities to stand up against xenophobic immigration policies.[155] On January 25, 2017, protestors gathered at Washington Square Park and chanted, "No ban; no wall", which inspired the Twitter hashtag #NoBanNoWall to protest Trump's travel ban.[156] The impact of the movement was seen in airports immediately after the hashtag started trending.[157] A judge in New York accepted a request from the ACLU to provide a warrant blocking deportation in airports.[158] The movement became a platform for people to share stories of them or their families immigrating to the US, and worked to combat the growing public fear of certain foreigners.[159]

#FireDrillFridays
[edit]

Inspired by Greta Thunberg and started by Greenpeace and Jane Fonda, #FireDrillFridays brings awareness to the climate change crisis.[160] Calling for a Green New Deal in the United States government, the movement organized protests on the Capitol every Friday beginning in October 2019.[161] The campaign also advocates for complete stoppage of new fossil fuel projects and to phase out existing fossil fuel projects.[162][163] #FireDrillFridays gained popularity with celebrity arrests.[164] Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Fonda moved #FireDrillFridays online to continue rallying for government action.[165]

#WalkAway
[edit]
The #WalkAway campaign is a social-media campaign that was launched ahead of the United States 2018 mid-term elections with the stated purpose of encouraging voters to leave the Democratic Party.[166][167] The campaign, which also organized events to support Donald Trump, was noted and criticized[168] for its astroturfing methods and the claim that there was a popular movement of people leaving the party.[169][170][171]

International origin

[edit]
#ArabSpring
[edit]

#ArabSpring spread across social media early 2011, spreading awareness of the anti-government protest in the North Africa and the Middle East.[172] The #ArabSpring is Twitter hashtag used in anti-government protests across the Middle East in 2010.[173]

#Oromoprotests
[edit]

In 2014, IOYA (The International Oromo Youth Association) created the #Oromoprotests hashtag to bring awareness to Oromo student protests against the Ethiopian government's plan to expand Addis Ababa and annex areas occupied by Oromo farmers and residents. The hashtag was utilized again starting in late November/December 2015 to bring attention to renewed Oromo protests and the Ethiopian government's violent crackdown on students, journalists and musicians.[174][175] While the Oromo held protests before, this was the first time the Oromo could be united across the country by using new social media platforms.[176]

#Sosblakaustralia
[edit]

In March 2015, an activism campaign took hold in Australia. #Sosblakaustralia was a campaign started in a small aboriginal town in Western Australia. This campaign was to combat an initiative that would close down 150 rural aboriginal communities.[177] Though this movement started in a rural community of 200 #Sosblakaustralia with poor Internet connection, it eventually spread to thousands of followers including Australian celebrities such as Hugh Jackman, this caused the movement to expand as far as London. In 18 days this movement had over 50,000 followers and had reached over 1,000,000 people worldwide.[178]

#IdleNoMore
[edit]

In the Winter of 2012–2013, in Canada, a campaign was started by Canadian indigenous activists using #IdleNoMore in order to combat future legislation that would threaten indigenous land and water. The movement has continued to grow and unify native communities and the hashtag has made expansion possible. Idle No More started in Canada it has spread to native people around the world including the United States and Australia where indigenous people face similar issues.[179] The use of the hashtag and social media has been instrumental in spreading Idle No More's message to indigenous people around the world giving those who otherwise would be voiceless a means to participate in activism.[180]

#UmbrellaRevolution
[edit]
A sign of the Umbrella Revolution protest in Hong Kong

The response of the umbrella became a symbol in Admiralty, Mong Kok and Causeway Bay districts, Hong Kong to protest about the free election systems in China. The protestors had been camped on the streets and the public parks. The umbrella was used to protect the protesters in defence of the democratic political process in 2014 when police used tear gas in attempts to get them to leave. "Umbrella Revolution" and "Umbrella Movement" have been used to identify this event through British media outlet BBC. through social network services such as Twitter and Instagram made the events in Hong Kong reach many other people not directly involved with the protest with the use of #UmbrellaRevolution and created a worldwide social awareness to how Hong Kong was responding to support of the democratic process.[181][182][183]

#PutItToThePeople
[edit]

The United Kingdom-based People's Vote campaign group was launched in April 2018 and calls for a confirmatory public vote on the final Brexit deal between the United Kingdom and the European Union[184] and uses #PutItToThePeople as its activism hashtag.[185]

Other examples
[edit]

In September 2014, The Hokkolorob Movement (Let The Voice Raise Movement) started. It is a series of protests initiated by the students of Jadavpur University in Kolkata, India that began on September 3, 2014. The term "hok kolorob" ("make some noise") was first used as a hashtag on Facebook.[186]

#2019GantiPresiden
[edit]

In 2018, Indonesian politician Mardani Ali Sera introduced #2019GantiPresiden (Replace the President in 2019), in which he spreads this hashtag through social media to spread public awareness and pushing Indonesian netizens to elect another president in 2019 instead of Jokowi.[187] Mardani's statement was reinforced by the statement of the PKS president, Sohibul Iman.[188] Previously, a movement with the same name was also launched by Mardani on his personal Twitter account on March 27, 2018. According to Mardani in a tweet, the hashtag was the antithesis of Joko Widodo's campaign of supporters on social media.[189]

Many social media accounts began to retweet the hashtag. Within a short period of time, T-shirts were produced with the hashtag, with Mardani denying that the movement is a political campaign due to a lack of a supported replacement.[190] The movement garnered significant support from other opposition politicians, including Amien Rais (PAN)[191] and Yusril Ihza Mahendra (PBB).[192] Reasons cited include pressure on Islamic organizations,[192] influx of immigrant workers (mainly from China) due to relaxation of immigration rules[193] and economic issues such as a lack of available jobs and increased prices of necessities.[194]

Numerous rallies and supports for #2019GantiPresiden was spread across the country, such as in Jakarta,[195] Surakarta,[196] and Jogjakarta.[197] Even Ahmad Syaikhu and Sudrajat tell if they won the 2018 West Java gubernatorial election, they will support 2019 Ganti Presiden movement.[198][199]

However, the movement was flopped after President Joko Widodo won the election twice.[200]

[edit]

United States origin

[edit]
#icebucketchallenge and #ALS
[edit]
UC Berkeley's ex-chancellor Nicholas Dirks participates in the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge.

The #icebucketchallenge is an act where a bucket of ice water is dumped over the head of an individual and documented by videos or pictures, and a "challenge" is issued to another person (or persons) to do the same. The "challenged" individual then either has to respond by dumping ice water on their head, or donate money to a Motor neuron disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also referred to as Lou Gehrig's disease) charity. However, doing both is also an option. The encouragement of the challenge is to circulate the video or photo on social media websites and applications with their community, friends, and family to show their support in raising awareness of ALS/MND.[201] The involvement of #icebucketchallenge with the global audience of social media generated so much awareness and support that in early August 2014, the national ALS charity foundation president Barbara Newhouse, directly attributed the movement to a fundraising "surge" of $168,000 that accumulated in just a week. That figure contrasted with the $14,000 raised in the same time the year prior prompted the CEO and her 38 years in the industry to view the difference in support as "crazy".[202] A month after the August 2014 fundraising week the number of videos that were directly associated with the #icebucketchallenge was tallied on the Facebook website from June 1 to September 1 at 17 million, according to the Facebook Newsroom.[203] As the videos continued to climb, so did the challenges. Eventually, public figures such as James Franco, Charlie Rose, and even former president George W. Bush took an activist role in raising money for research and awareness of the ALS disease.[204]

International origin

[edit]
#Hallyu
[edit]

The Hallyu Wave, which literally translates to "flow of Korea" (or more commonly known as the Korean Wave) represents the social movement in connection to South Korean culture and entertainment. Economically, Hallyu is tremendously profitable, attracting millions of tourists and fans per year and produces many forms of entertainment, such as Korean pop music and television drama series, ultimately generating billions of US dollars in annual revenue which further strengthens its economic prosperity and stability.[205] Furthermore, being a powerful social movement in its own right, Hallyu holds considerable influence in politics as well. The ninth president of South Korea, Roh Moo-hyun, once stated that Hallyu can be used to improve or repair the tense relations between the Koreas.[206] Still, North Korea does not have its own rendition of Hallyu and even rejects it; for example, when Psy's "Gangnam Style" was released in 2012, North Korea viewed the song with contempt because while South Korea was attracting positive attention, it was also undermining the impoverished conditions of North Korea at the same time.[207]

LGBT rights

[edit]

In 2014, protests of the then-recently enacted anti-gay laws included targeting the corporate sponsors for the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi Russia. Among the sponsors was McDonald's, whose marketing included the hashtag #CheersToSochi, which was hijacked by the queer activist group Queer Nation.[208][209][210]

In June 2015, The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide.[211] This led to the creation of the hashtag #lovewins.[212] This hashtag earned over 4.5 billion impressions on Twitter. President Barack Obama joined in and tweeted using the hashtag.

United States origin

[edit]
#Girlslikeus
[edit]

Started by Janet Mock in 2012. This hashtag was used to support Jenna Talackova during the Miss Universe pageant.[213]

#DignidadLiteraria
[edit]
#OwnVoices
[edit]

This hashtag is used to showcase authors from marginalized or underrepresented groups who write characters from those same groups of people. This hashtag represents stories being told by people who have lived those experiences.[214]

Effectiveness

[edit]

Critics have often labeled hashtag activism as a form of slacktivism. A term used to describe minimal online engagement with political or social issues, such as posting hashtags, liking or sharing content without deeper involvement.[215]. These critics argue that such digital gestures offer superficial support, resulting in limited real world impact. The ease of participating has raised concerns about overuse and public fatigue, as some fear it may encourage a sense of symbolic involvement rather than genuine action[1] Furthermore, some argue that this passive approach lacks the intensity and commitment seen in earlier social movements.[3]

Another critique is that online movements are sometimes initiated by more privileged individuals, rather than those directly affected by the issues being addressed. Notable critics including former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, journalist Malcolm Gladwell, and writer Teju Cole, have argued that hashtag activism promotes lazy, ineffective participation with little capacity to generate meaningful change.[216][217][218]

Despite these criticisms, supporters view hashtag activism as a powerful tool for raising awareness, sharing personal stories, and fostering solidarity.[219] Hashtags enable users to connect and mobilize without being physically present, making activism more accessible. Because using hashtag requires minimal effort, more people can join conversations, helping to amplify marginalized voices and personal narratives.[220] Campaigns like #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter have allowed users to validate shared experiences, expand public discourse, and deepen understanding through multiple perspectives.[220]

Supporters such as Bev Goodman, who launched the #WhyIStayed movement about domestic violence, argue that hashtag activism can spark long term engagement and even influence policy.[221] For example, in 2012, when the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation announced it would stop funding mammograms referrals through Planned Parenthood, widespread backlash online, including hashtags like, #standwithpp, and #singon; led the organization to reverse its decision within the same week.[3] Although Planned Parenthood clinics do not perform any mammograms, they do provide referrals for the service.[222][223] The rapid pace of social media allows organizations to gauge public response quickly, sometimes prompting them to reconsider quickly, sometimes prompting them to reconsider or revise their decision.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Hashtag activism denotes the strategic deployment of hashtags on platforms to foster collective engagement around social, political, or cultural issues, enabling users to signal support, disseminate information, and coordinate digital protests through actions like posting, liking, and retweeting. This form of digital participation leverages the networked structure of platforms such as (now X) and to amplify voices and frame narratives, often bypassing traditional media gatekeepers. Emerging prominently in the early , it has characterized campaigns ranging from awareness-raising efforts on abuses to challenges against institutional power, though its scope remains confined largely to online spheres. While proponents highlight its role in rapidly scaling visibility and fostering community affiliation, empirical analyses reveal that hashtag activism frequently generates heightened discourse and transient solidarity but seldom translates into measurable offline mobilization or alterations. Studies grounded in connective action theory suggest it excels at personalizing narratives and forming networks, yet causal pathways to real-world impact are tenuous, with participation often correlating more with expressive signaling than sustained commitment. A defining controversy surrounds its characterization as "slacktivism," wherein low-cost online gestures provide participants with a sense of and moral gratification without incurring the risks or efforts of conventional , potentially diluting broader movements. Critics, drawing from observational data and user behavior patterns, contend that this performative dimension fosters illusionary progress, as viral spikes in hashtag usage rarely align with verifiable advancements in the underlying causes. Moreover, the format's vulnerability to algorithmic manipulation, echo chambers, and coordinated backlash underscores limitations in achieving diverse or enduring consensus. Despite these shortcomings, isolated instances demonstrate supplementary value when integrated with organizing, though such synergies remain the exception rather than the rule in peer-reviewed assessments.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Characteristics

Hashtag activism refers to the strategic use of hashtags on platforms to advocate for social, political, or cultural causes, primarily by raising and fostering among users. This practice leverages the hashtag's function as a metadata tag to aggregate related posts, enabling rapid dissemination of messages without reliance on traditional media gatekeepers. Originating with platforms like (now X) in the early , it allows individuals to signal support for issues such as violations or policy reforms through simple actions like posting, retweeting, or liking content. Key characteristics include its low entry barriers, which democratize participation by requiring minimal effort or resources—often just a keyboard and —thus enabling widespread engagement from diverse demographics. Hashtags facilitate viral amplification, where a single tag can connect disparate users into temporary networks, sometimes forming "counterpublics" that challenge dominant narratives. This connective potential has been observed in campaigns bypassing media inattention or perceived biases, allowing marginalized voices to gain visibility. However, it is frequently critiqued as "slacktivism," a portmanteau of "" and "," wherein low-cost digital gestures provide psychological satisfaction but rarely translate to sustained offline action or tangible outcomes. Empirical studies show mixed results: while some online hashtag efforts correlate with increased donations or protests, others indicate substitution effects where virtual participation displaces deeper commitment. Despite these limitations, hashtag activism's scalability distinguishes it from prior digital advocacy, as algorithms prioritize trending tags, potentially reaching millions instantaneously across global audiences. Its ephemeral nature, however, often leads to fleeting attention cycles, with peaks in usage driven by real-time events rather than long-term . Proponents argue it serves as an for broader , while skeptics, drawing from behavioral research, highlight how it exploits and virtue-signaling incentives without enforcing accountability. Overall, its efficacy hinges on integration with offline efforts, as isolated digital campaigns risk devolving into performative echo chambers.

Distinction from Other Forms of Activism

Hashtag activism differs from traditional forms of activism, such as street protests, petitions, , or institutional , primarily in its reliance on digital platforms for dissemination rather than physical or organizational structures. While conventional activism often requires coordinated efforts through hierarchical organizations, , and direct confrontation with authorities—evident in historical movements like the U.S. civil marches of the that involved sustained offline mobilization—hashtag activism operates via decentralized, low-barrier participation on , where individuals personalize messages and leverage algorithms for visibility. This connective action model, as opposed to , emphasizes networked sharing without centralized leadership, enabling rapid global scaling but often prioritizing symbolic expression over tangible outcomes. A core distinction lies in the commitment threshold and risk profile: hashtag campaigns demand minimal effort, such as posting or retweeting, which lowers participation costs but invites critiques of "slacktivism"—superficial engagement that substitutes for deeper involvement. Empirical studies indicate mixed translation to offline action; for instance, while some online efforts correlate with increased attendance, others fail to bridge the digital-offline gap due to the absence of accountability mechanisms inherent in traditional , where participants face physical risks or long-term dedication. Traditional methods, by contrast, foster causal chains through direct influence or , as seen in labor strikes achieving wage reforms via negotiations rather than viral trends. Furthermore, hashtag activism's effectiveness skews toward short-term awareness and agenda-setting, amplifying voices in echo chambers but struggling with sustained policy impact compared to conventional tactics that engage elites or institutions. Research highlights that while hashtags can mobilize short bursts of attention—such as during the 2011 Arab Spring where online calls spurred offline uprisings—their algorithmic dependency often dilutes long-term efficacy, unlike enduring offline strategies that build coalitions over years. This distinction underscores a causal realism in : digital tools excel in but rarely replicate the coercive power of embodied, resource-intensive actions.

Historical Development

Early Digital Precursors (Pre-2010)

The initial phases of digital activism in the relied on rudimentary tools such as lists, newsgroups, and early websites to amplify marginalized voices and organize supporters across borders, predating the interactive features of . These efforts emphasized information dissemination and petition drives rather than real-time coordination, often countering narratives through decentralized networks. Pioneering campaigns highlighted the potential for technology to enable "netwar," a form of conflict where networked actors challenge centralized powers via communication flows. A seminal example occurred with the (EZLN) uprising in , , on January 1, 1994, when indigenous rebels seized several towns to protest NAFTA's implementation and land rights abuses. Supporters in North America and Europe rapidly mobilized via postings, email relays, and listservs to flood global media with communiqués from , building an international network that pressured the Mexican government and sustained attention despite military responses. This "electronic fabric of struggle" marked one of the first instances of internet-enabled transnational activism, transforming a local into a symbol of anti-neoliberal resistance. In the late , platforms like MoveOn.org, founded in September 1998 by Joan Blades and Wes Boyd, illustrated the efficacy of online petitions for domestic political influence. Their inaugural "Censure President Clinton and Move On" campaign garnered over 250,000 signatures in days, urging Congress to forgo proceedings and opt for amid the Lewinsky scandal. Expanding into anti-war efforts by 2002-2003, MoveOn leveraged email blasts and web forms to coordinate millions in protests against the Iraq invasion, demonstrating scalable grassroots mobilization without physical infrastructure. The 1999 World Trade Organization (WTO) protests in further advanced digital tools through the Independent Media Center (), launched as an open-publishing website on November 24, 1999, to provide activist-generated coverage amid perceived corporate . Contributors uploaded photos, videos, and reports in real-time during the "Battle of Seattle," reaching global audiences and inspiring a network of over 150 centers worldwide by 2002. These pre-social media initiatives laid foundational tactics for and formation, though limited by uneven and lack of algorithmic amplification.

Rise and Popularization (2010-2015)

The period from 2010 to 2015 marked the initial surge in hashtag activism, coinciding with expanded adoption and the platform's hashtag functionality introduced in 2007. During the Arab Spring uprisings beginning in late 2010, protesters in , , and other nations employed hashtags such as #Jan25 to coordinate demonstrations and disseminate information amid government restrictions on traditional media. While social media did not initiate these revolts, hashtags facilitated real-time global awareness and participant mobilization, with Egyptian activists using # and related tags to rally support during the January 25, 2011, protests in Cairo's . In 2012, the #Kony2012 campaign exemplified the potential for hashtags to drive massive online engagement. Launched on March 5 by the nonprofit Invisible Children, a 30-minute video targeting Ugandan Joseph amassed over 100 million views within six days, propelled by shares on and under #Kony2012. The effort urged viewers to pressure policymakers for Kony's capture, highlighting hashtags' role in blending advocacy with , though it faced criticism for oversimplifying complex conflicts and sparking "slacktivism" debates. Domestically in the United States, hashtag activism gained traction amid issues. Following the July 13, 2013, acquittal of in the killing of , activists , , and Opal Tometi coined #BlackLivesMatter on , which rapidly evolved into a broader movement against racial injustice and police violence. The hashtag surged again in August 2014 after the police shooting of Michael Brown in , where #Ferguson and #MikeBrown amplified eyewitness accounts and protests, drawing international scrutiny to U.S. policing practices. Globally, #BringBackOurGirls emerged in April 2014 after abducted 276 schoolgirls from , on April 14. Originating from Nigerian activists, the hashtag trended worldwide within days, endorsed by figures including then-First Lady on May 7, pressuring governments for intervention and sustaining media focus on the crisis. By mid-2015, these campaigns had normalized hashtags as tools for rapid issue amplification, though empirical assessments often noted limitations in translating online momentum into sustained policy changes.

Maturation and Diversification (2016-Present)

From 2016 onward, hashtag activism evolved toward greater integration with offline mobilization and policy debates, exemplified by the #NoDAPL campaign against the Dakota Access Pipeline, which amplified indigenous protests and drew international scrutiny starting in early 2016. This period saw hashtags facilitate rapid scaling of movements, as with #BlackLivesMatter, which generated over 44 million tweets by 2023, peaking during 2020 protests following George Floyd's death. Empirical assessments, however, indicate mixed outcomes, with hashtags excelling in awareness but often failing to sustain long-term structural change due to algorithmic ephemerality and platform dependencies. The #MeToo movement, exploding in October 2017 after Alyssa Milano's tweet, amassed over 1.7 million posts across 85 countries by year's end, catalyzing legal actions against figures like Harvey Weinstein and prompting corporate policy shifts on harassment. Despite these tangible effects, critics note limitations, such as uneven accountability and backlash against accused individuals without due process, highlighting hashtag activism's vulnerability to performative participation over rigorous evidence-gathering. Diversification manifested in political spheres, with U.S. election-related tags like #MAGA and #Resist framing partisan narratives around Donald Trump's 2016 victory, influencing voter turnout and media cycles. Environmental causes diversified the landscape, as #FridaysForFuture, initiated by in , coordinated global strikes involving millions of youth by 2019, pressuring policymakers through viral school walkouts and UN speeches. Internationally, campaigns like Brazil's #EleNão in mobilized opposition to Jair Bolsonaro's presidential bid, generating widespread protests against perceived authoritarianism. Studies from this era underscore maturation via hybrid tactics—combining digital virality with street actions—but reveal causal challenges, where correlation between hashtag volume and policy wins often lacks direct attribution amid confounding offline factors. Post-2020, diversification extended to anti-racism variants like #StopAsianHate amid pandemic-related , which leveraged celebrity endorsements to amplify calls for federal investigations. Effectiveness research, including analyses, shows 59% of U.S. adults in 2023 viewed as somewhat effective for awareness but only 26% for driving change, reflecting maturation toward self-aware strategies yet persistent critiques of superficial engagement. This phase also witnessed platform adaptations, such as Twitter's (now X) algorithmic boosts for trending tags, enhancing reach but introducing risks of manipulation and echo chambers that undermine broader consensus-building.

Notable Campaigns

Identity and Social Justice Movements

#BlackLivesMatter emerged as a pivotal hashtag in racial justice activism following the July 13, 2013, acquittal of in the shooting death of , an unarmed Black teenager. coined the phrase "" in a post expressing grief and resolve, which her collaborator adapted into the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter to amplify calls against anti-Black violence and systemic . The hashtag gained traction amid subsequent high-profile deaths, including Michael Brown's fatal shooting by police in , on August 9, 2014, and Eric Garner's chokehold death by police on July 17, 2014, spurring nationwide protests and the formation of a decentralized network of chapters. By 2020, following George Floyd's death on May 25, it had mobilized millions globally, with over 30 million related posts on alone between May 26 and June 7, though analyses note its rhetorical power in challenging narratives of Black criminality often perpetuated in mainstream discourse. The #MeToo hashtag, originating from Tarana Burke's 2006 initiative to support survivors of —particularly young women of color from low-income communities—exploded into widespread use on October 15, 2017, when actress encouraged sharing personal experiences of with the phrase. Burke's phrase aimed at fostering empathy and solidarity among survivors, but Milano's tweet, posted amid revelations about Harvey Weinstein's abuses, generated over 12 million posts in the first 24 hours across platforms like and , leading to investigations and resignations of figures in , media, and . Scholarly examinations highlight how #MeToo facilitated collective and shifted public discourse on gender-based power imbalances, though its viral phase amplified predominantly white, celebrity-driven narratives, sometimes overshadowing Burke's focus on marginalized groups. Related hashtags extended racial justice efforts to specific demographics, such as #ICantBreathe, derived from Garner's final words during his 2014 arrest, which protesters chanted and hashtagged to decry police brutality and became a symbol sold on merchandise, raising over $1 million for related causes by late 2014. Similarly, #SayHerName, launched in 2014 by the African American Policy Forum, sought to visibilize Black women and girls killed by law enforcement, like Rekia Boyd in 2012 and Tanisha Anderson in 2014, countering erasures in broader narratives dominated by male victims. These tags fostered networked activism, enabling rapid information sharing and protest coordination, yet empirical studies indicate their influence often waned without sustained offline mobilization or policy reforms.

Political and Ideological Mobilization

Hashtag activism has enabled political mobilization by allowing ideological groups to coordinate supporters, amplify messaging, and influence electoral outcomes through viral dissemination on platforms like . In the United States, the #MAGA hashtag, shorthand for "," became central to Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, promoting nationalist and populist ideologies focused on economic , immigration restriction, and sentiment. From Election Day 2016 through May 1, 2018, #MAGA appeared in an average of 205,238 tweets daily, sustaining a base that contributed to Trump's victory and ongoing political engagement, including rallies and efforts. Opposing this, the #Resist hashtag emerged post-2016 election as a rallying cry for liberal and progressive opposition to Trump's administration, encompassing protests against policies on , healthcare, and . It symbolized a decentralized movement uniting activists, with usage spiking during events like the Women's March on January 21, 2017, where millions participated globally, partly coordinated via . While #Resist fostered awareness and local actions, analyses indicate limited direct policy reversals, often reinforcing partisan divides rather than broad persuasion. Internationally, hashtags played roles in ideological battles during the 2016 , where #VoteLeave mobilized pro-sovereignty advocates emphasizing national control over borders and laws, aiding the 51.9% vote to leave the on June 23, 2016. Pro-Remain counters like #StrongerIn used similar tactics but lagged in virality, highlighting how algorithmic amplification favored emotionally charged, ideological content. In Brazil's 2018 election, #EleNão (meaning "Not Him") galvanized anti-Bolsonaro protests on September 29, 2018, drawing over 3 million participants nationwide against perceived and , though Bolsonaro won with 55.1% of the vote, underscoring hashtags' capacity for mobilization without guaranteeing electoral success.

Global and Non-U.S. Instances

In Brazil, the #EleNão campaign emerged in September 2018 as a women-led opposition to presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro, mobilizing protests across the country on September 29 and 30 with millions participating in over 200 cities. The hashtag, meaning "not him," trended widely on social media, driven by concerns over Bolsonaro's statements on gender and social issues, and was amplified by celebrities and grassroots organizers. Despite generating significant online and offline engagement, the movement did not prevent Bolsonaro's victory in the October 28 runoff election, where he secured 55.1% of the vote. The in utilized hashtags like #UmbrellaRevolution starting September 28, 2014, to coordinate pro-democracy protests against restricted electoral reforms imposed by . Protesters employed platforms to share real-time updates, images of umbrella defenses against , and calls for , drawing global attention and sustaining occupations in key districts for 79 days. While the movement failed to achieve immediate political concessions, it heightened international scrutiny of Hong Kong's autonomy and inspired subsequent activism. ![Umbrella Revolution protesters](./assets/Umbrella_Revolution_(15841163278) In , #EndSARS began as a in 2017 to demand the disbandment of the () due to documented abuses including and extrajudicial killings. The campaign escalated in October 2020 following viral videos of police brutality, leading to nationwide protests from that combined online mobilization with street demonstrations in cities like , involving thousands and prompting temporary SARS dissolution on October 11. Government promises of reform were overshadowed by a violent crackdown at Toll Gate on October 20, where security forces fired on unarmed protesters, resulting in at least 12 deaths according to reports. The #NiUnaMenos movement originated in on May 31, 2015, as a response to femicides, culminating in a June 3 protest of 200,000 in following the murder of 14-year-old Chiara Páez. It rapidly expanded across , including , , and , fostering annual marches and policy advocacy against gender-based violence, with events drawing hundreds of thousands and influencing legal reforms like Argentina's 2018 gender violence protocol updates. Despite heightened awareness, rates in the region remained high, with reporting over 4,000 such cases annually as of 2020.

Mechanisms of Operation

Technical and Algorithmic Dynamics

Hashtags function as metadata tags prefixed by the "#" symbol, enabling social media platforms to index, categorize, and retrieve user-generated content through automated parsing of post text. Platforms like Twitter (now X) and Instagram scan incoming posts in real-time, treating hashtags as searchable keywords that link disparate content into thematic clusters, thereby facilitating algorithmic discovery without requiring formal user networks. This technical foundation allows hashtags to aggregate conversations across users, with platforms employing inverted indexes—data structures mapping hashtags to associated posts—for efficient querying and ranking based on factors such as post recency and geographic relevance. Social media algorithms amplify hashtags via recommendation systems that prioritize content based on engagement metrics, including retweets, likes, replies, and shares, which create loops for viral spread. On , the trending topics evaluates hashtag velocity (rate of new usages) and volume within localized windows, promoting those exceeding thresholds to the "Trends" section, which exposes them to non-followers and accelerates diffusion by an estimated in exposure reach. and integrate hashtags into feed-ranking models using , where co-occurrence with high-engagement terms boosts probabilistic relevance scores, directing content into users' "For You" or Explore feeds tailored to inferred interests from past interactions. In hashtag activism, these dynamics manifest as network cascades, where initial seeding by influential accounts triggers algorithmic escalation if engagement surpasses platform-specific tipping points, modeled in studies as susceptible-infected-recovered () epidemic processes adapted to digital graphs. Peer-reviewed analyses of campaigns like #BlackLivesMatter reveal that hashtag virality correlates with structural features such as bridging ties between clusters, amplified when algorithms favor emotionally charged content, though this can introduce biases toward over substantive discourse. Coordinated usage patterns, detectable via sudden spikes in hashtag adoption rates, further exploit these systems, as platforms' real-time monitoring inadvertently promotes emergent trends before manual moderation intervenes.

Strategies for Virality and Engagement

Hashtag activism relies on emotional appeals and narrative framing to drive virality, with campaigns crafting simple, relatable stories that evoke outrage or empathy to prompt shares. The #Kony2012 campaign, launched by Invisible Children on March 5, 2012, utilized a 30-minute documentary-style video highlighting child abductions by Joseph Kony's Lord's Resistance Army, amassing over 100 million views within six days through user retweets and algorithmic amplification on platforms like YouTube and Twitter. This approach leverages psychological factors such as moral urgency, where content positioning the audience as potential heroes—via calls to share or contact policymakers—facilitates rapid dissemination via network effects. Multimedia integration, especially videos and images, enhances engagement by increasing dwell time and shareability compared to text posts. Empirical analyses of climate-related hashtags indicate that visual content correlates with higher retweet volumes, as platforms' algorithms prioritize media-rich updates for broader reach. Campaigns like #BringBackOurGirls in April 2014 encouraged user-generated photos and videos of participants holding signs, which amplified participation after high-profile endorsements, including Michelle Obama's tweet on May 5, 2014, leading to millions of uses across . Influencer and celebrity involvement accelerates this by tapping into existing follower networks, though studies note that authenticity in endorsements sustains momentum beyond initial spikes. Timing and platform-specific tactics further optimize virality, with posts aligned to real-time events or peak user hours exploiting algorithmic boosts. For instance, spikes in #BlackLivesMatter usage followed incidents like the 2014 , where immediate hashtag deployment captured public attention and sustained discourse through threaded conversations. Encouraging interactive elements, such as challenges or story-sharing prompts, fosters low-barrier participation that builds and counters decay in attention. Campaigns monitor hashtag co-occurrences and sentiment via tools to adapt strategies, mitigating co-optation risks observed in cases where mocking uses diluted original intent. These methods, grounded in connective action frameworks, emphasize personalized, scalable sharing over centralized coordination.

Effectiveness and Empirical Assessment

Evidence of Positive Impacts

The , which went viral in summer 2014 through hashtags such as #IceBucketChallenge and #ALSicebucketchallenge, generated $115 million in donations to the in the United States, with global totals exceeding $220 million; these funds supported grants that yielded a 20% increase in scientific publications from recipients and attracted $7.01 in follow-on funding per initial dollar raised. By July 2014, the campaign had engaged over 17 million participants worldwide, demonstrating hashtag-driven virality's capacity to mobilize tangible financial support for disease-specific and care, independent of traditional fundraising channels that yielded only $2.8 million annually prior. The #MeToo movement, propelled by the hashtag's use starting October 2017, produced measurable shifts in sexual assault reporting and enforcement, with U.S. data revealing post-movement increases in both reported incidents and arrests, attributing these to heightened victim willingness to come forward amid reduced stigma. This online momentum translated into policy reforms, including passage of more than 80 workplace anti-harassment laws across 24 states and the District of Columbia by 2023, alongside extensions to statutes of limitations for filing assault claims in multiple jurisdictions. Such changes expanded employer liabilities, mandated harassment training, and improved rape kit processing, with legislators explicitly citing #MeToo's visibility as a catalyst for these measures. Broader empirical analyses link hashtag activism to amplified real-world outcomes, including positive associations between online participation and offline behaviors like protesting or donating, as facilitates information diffusion and collective coordination without evidence of a strict online-offline divide. In niche applications, such as campaigns, sustained hashtag use correlated with a 20-30% decline in euthanasias in U.S. cities from 2015-2020, tied to increased adoptions and policy advocacy. These instances highlight instances where hashtags have causally contributed to and institutional responses, though attribution requires isolating virality from media coverage.

Measurements of Failure and Limited Outcomes

Empirical assessments of hashtag activism often reveal discrepancies between online metrics of engagement—such as tweet volumes, shares, and views—and tangible real-world outcomes like reforms or behavioral changes. For instance, while campaigns generate surges in awareness, studies indicate these do not consistently translate to sustained offline action or structural shifts, with episodic "liveness" leading to sporadic participation that fades after initial peaks. Measuring failure typically involves tracking the absence of predefined goals, such as legislative changes or perpetrator , against high initial visibility; one analysis notes that heightened online discourse around issues like racial injustice peaks with specific incidents but fails to address underlying systemic problems persistently. The #Kony2012 campaign exemplifies limited outcomes despite massive virality, amassing over 100 million views in days and prompting calls for U.S. intervention against Joseph Kony's . However, Kony remained at large years later, with no capture or dismantlement achieved by the campaign's endpoint, when its producer, Invisible Children, ceased operations after expending millions without fulfilling its core objective of stopping Kony. Critics attribute this to overly simplistic goals and insufficient engagement with local contexts, rendering the effort politically naive and ultimately ineffective in delivering accountability. Slacktivism research further quantifies limitations, showing that low-effort actions like hashtag shares can fulfill participants' sense of moral obligation, thereby reducing willingness for costlier commitments such as donations or protests. An experimental study found that individuals who performed minimal supportive acts, akin to hashtag endorsement, exhibited decreased subsequent engagement compared to non-participants, supporting the slacktivism hypothesis over theories predicting escalation. Similarly, e-pledging trials demonstrated high initial sign-up rates but low follow-through on promised actions, confirming slacktivism's prevalence in diluting deeper involvement. Cases like in 2020 highlight counterproductive dynamics, where over 1 million Instagram posts under #BlackLivesMatter—primarily black squares—temporarily flooded feeds, obscuring substantive resources and advocacy content without advancing policy or awareness goals. Appropriation compounds these issues, as counter-hashtags dilute original messages; for example, responses like #AllLivesMatter fragmented #BlackLivesMatter's focus, shifting debates to semantics rather than reforms and eroding collective momentum. Overall, while some virality correlates with minor gains, the pattern across studies underscores hashtag activism's frequent shortfall in causal impact, often confined to transient visibility absent robust organizational follow-up.

Criticisms and Limitations

Slacktivism and Low-Commitment Participation

Slacktivism, combining "slacker" and "activism," denotes superficial online engagements that signal support for causes with negligible personal cost or risk, often supplanting substantive participation. Within hashtag activism, this typically involves actions like tweeting, liking, or sharing hashtags, which demand little beyond digital gestures and can foster an of contribution without translating to tangible efforts such as financial donations, , or sustained . Psychological mechanisms underpin this low-commitment dynamic, including moral licensing, where symbolic acts satisfy ethical impulses and reduce motivation for costlier behaviors. Public displays of support, common in hashtag campaigns, amplify this effect by providing social validation, allowing participants to virtue-signal alignment with a cause while avoiding deeper involvement. Empirical reviews indicate that such online actions sometimes correlate inversely with offline engagement, particularly when motivated by rather than prosocial intent. Experimental evidence reinforces the slacktivism critique. In a 2022 study involving three experiments on support, participants displaying low-cost symbols (e.g., wearing a or writing a ) driven by impression-management motives showed reduced actual rates (odds ratio = 0.10, p = 0.043), suggesting these acts fulfill social signaling needs at the expense of commitment. While prosocial motives yielded modest positive effects on in one trial (odds ratio = 4.07, p = 0.013), the overall meta-analytic pattern highlighted small negative or null impacts for impression-driven slacktivism (Hedges' g = -0.26). The #Kony2012 campaign illustrates slacktivism's pitfalls in hashtag-driven mobilization. Released on March 5, 2012, by Invisible Children, the video promoting the hashtag amassed over 100 million views and millions of shares within days, sparking global online fervor against warlord . However, this surge yielded minimal real-world outcomes, including no significant uptick in arrests, policy shifts, or sustained funding for Ugandan recovery efforts, as the viral momentum dissipated rapidly without converting digital participation into organized action. Critics attributed the fade to the campaign's reliance on low-barrier engagement, which prioritized awareness over strategic depth.

Polarization, Echo Chambers, and Backfire Effects

Hashtag activism contributes to the formation of echo chambers by concentrating discussions within ideologically homogeneous networks on platforms, where users primarily interact with content aligning with their preexisting views. Algorithms that prioritize high-engagement material, such as retweets and replies within specific hashtags, exacerbate this by surfacing reinforcing narratives while deprioritizing dissenting ones, limiting cross-ideological exposure. Empirical analyses of networks during hashtag-driven campaigns reveal high levels of , with participants following and amplifying like-minded accounts, which sustains insular communities and hinders broader consensus-building. This insularity intensifies , as sustained immersion in hashtag strengthens affective divides between groups. A controlled experiment exposing users to news posts with political hashtags like #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter found that such tags heightened perceptions of partisanship and controversy, reducing views of the issues' social importance and motivation for engagement, particularly among political moderates. In partisan settings, discussions yield greater policy and emotional polarization compared to mixed groups, with participants emerging more entrenched in their positions after interactions confined to hashtag threads. Backfire effects further complicate hashtag activism, where attempts to engage or counter opposing hashtag narratives often reinforce initial beliefs rather than persuade. Field experiments on demonstrate that deliberate exposure to views—such as those emerging in rival hashtag debates—prompted conservatives to adopt more extreme positions, shifting self-reported by up to 0.60 points on a 7-point scale, indicative of that solidifies partisan loyalty. In activism contexts, counter-hashtags like #AllLivesMatter in response to #BlackLivesMatter have illustrated this dynamic, with polarized retweet patterns showing minimal bridging between left- and right-leaning users, instead amplifying mutual distrust and entrenching divides. Such reactions underscore how hashtag confrontations, intended to challenge views, frequently provoke defensive retrenchment, widening societal cleavages without fostering dialogue.

Association with Misinformation and Manipulation

Hashtag activism facilitates the rapid dissemination of due to platform algorithms prioritizing viral content over verification, enabling false narratives to outpace corrections. A study analyzing networks in polarized debates, such as #Gunreformnow versus #NRA, identified articles embedded within these opposing hashtag ecosystems, where was interwoven to influence public discourse on . Similarly, during the , social bots promoted hashtags co-occurring with terms like "" or "vaccine hoax," amplifying discriminatory or false health claims through coordinated hashtag usage. Manipulation often occurs via , where inauthentic accounts simulate grassroots support to distort activist narratives. Network analysis of global data detected coordinated astroturfing in 74% of cases through synchronized co-tweeting and co-retweeting patterns, as seen in campaigns by entities like Russia's targeting U.S. and German elections via politically charged hashtags. These operations mimic organic activism but centralize control, eroding trust in genuine movements; detection methods reveal low false positives (<1%), highlighting scalable manipulation risks across platforms. A prominent example is the #SaveTheChildren hashtag, initially tied to child welfare advocacy, which QAnon conspiracy theorists co-opted starting in 2020 to propagate baseless claims of elite-led child sex trafficking rings. Analysis of 121,984 X (formerly ) posts from January 2022 to March 2023 showed conspiratorial content dominating, with such posts receiving twice the average reposts (458 versus 229) compared to non-conspiratorial ones, and top-liked content frequently invoking themes alongside anti-vaccine rhetoric. Techniques like hashtag poisoning further enable manipulation, as bots flood popular tags with irrelevant or inflammatory content to conversations, a tactic documented in efforts to undermine democratic worldwide. Such interventions not only spread falsehoods but also provoke backlash against legitimate , as bots induce shifts in user sentiment without necessarily reducing overall . Empirical assessments underscore that these dynamics exploit hashtags' virality, prioritizing emotional amplification over factual accuracy.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.