Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Green Line (MBTA)
View on Wikipedia
The Green Line is a light rail system[4][5] run by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) in the Boston, Massachusetts, metropolitan area. It is the oldest MBTA subway line, and with tunnel sections dating from 1897, the oldest subway in North America.[6] It runs underground through downtown Boston, and on the surface into inner suburbs via six branches on radial boulevards and grade-separated alignments. With an average daily weekday ridership of 101,000 in 2023, it is among the most heavily used light rail systems in the country. The line was assigned the green color in 1967 during a systemwide rebranding because several branches pass through sections of the Emerald Necklace of Boston.[7][8][9]
The four branches are the remnants of a large streetcar system, which began in 1856 with the Cambridge Horse Railroad and was consolidated into the Boston Elevated Railway several decades later. The branches all travel downtown through the Tremont Street subway, the oldest subway tunnel in North America. The Tremont Street subway opened its first section on September 1, 1897, to take streetcars off overcrowded downtown streets; it was extended five times over the next five decades. The streetcar system peaked in size around 1930 and was gradually replaced with trackless trolleys and buses, with cuts as late as 1985. The new D branch opened on a converted commuter rail line in 1959. The Green Line Extension project extended two branches into Somerville and Medford in 2022.
Route description
[edit]The Green Line's core is the central subway, a group of tunnels which run through downtown Boston.[10] The Tremont Street subway runs roughly north–south through downtown, with stations at Boylston, Park Street, Government Center, Haymarket, and North Station – all with connections to other lines of the MBTA subway system. The Boylston Street subway runs roughly east–west through the Back Bay neighborhood, with stations at Arlington, Copley, Hynes Convention Center, and Kenmore; it connects to the Tremont Street subway at Boylston. The Huntington Avenue subway diverges from the Boylston Street subway at a flat junction west of Copley, running southwest, with stations at Prudential and Symphony.[11]: 96 A branch of the Tremont Street subway, disused since 1962, runs south from Boylston to the former Pleasant Street incline.
The Green Line has four western surface branches, each with a letter designation:
- The B branch runs west in a tunnel from Kenmore, surfacing in the median of Commonwealth Avenue at Blandford Street. It runs 4.2 miles (6.8 km) on Commonwealth Avenue through Boston University, Allston, and Brighton to Boston College station.
- The C branch runs southwest in a tunnel from Kenmore, surfacing in the median of Beacon Street at Saint Mary's Street. It runs 2.9 miles (4.7 km) on Beacon Street through Brookline to Cleveland Circle station.
- The D branch diverges from the C branch tunnel southwest of Kenmore, surfacing at Fenway station. It runs 9.7 miles (15.6 km) though Brookline and Newton along the grade-separated Highland branch (a former Boston and Albany Railroad commuter rail line) to Riverside station.
- The E branch runs southwest through the Huntington Avenue subway from Copley, surfacing in the median of Huntington Avenue at Northeastern University station. It runs 2.6 miles (4.2 km) along Huntington Avenue and South Huntington Avenue to Heath Street, with the outer 0.7 miles (1.1 km) (west of Brigham Circle) in mixed traffic rather than a dedicated median. Until 1985, the line continued south through Jamaica Plain to Arborway.[7]
B and C branch service terminates at Government Center, while D and E branch service continues north from downtown Boston. North of North Station, the line inclines up to the Lechmere Viaduct, which crosses the Charles River with an elevated station at Science Park. The elevated Lechmere station is located on the Green Line Extension viaduct, which continues north to a flying junction with two branches:
- The Union Square Branch runs 0.7 miles (1.1 km) west to Union Square station via the Fitchburg Line right-of-way. It is operated as part of the D branch.
- The Medford Branch runs 3.0 miles (4.8 km) northwest to Medford/Tufts station via the Lowell Line right-of-way. It is operated as part of the E branch.
Former branches
[edit]The Green Line A branch was the northernmost of the branches, running from the Blandford Street portal (still used by the B branch), west to Watertown, mostly street-running. The 57 bus replaced the streetcar line in 1969. The A branch diverged from Commonwealth Avenue west of Boston University and ran to a terminus in Watertown, across the Charles River from Watertown Square, until 1969. Although the route-letter scheme had been introduced two years prior to its closure, the "A" designation was never signed on streetcars to Watertown. It was, however, included in the destination signs on the Boeing-Vertol LRVs ordered in the mid-1970s, when reopening service to Watertown was under consideration. The "A" line tracks remained in non-revenue service to access maintenance facilities at Watertown until 1994.
The Pleasant Street portal hosted two services in its final days. The 9 to City Point ended in 1953, and the 43 to Egleston was cut back to Lenox Street in 1956, cut back to the portal in 1961, and ended operation in 1962. Prior to that, the 48 serviced Tremont Street to Dover Street and Washington Street, ending at Dudley, and last running in 1938.
The last two routes to continue beyond the Canal Street portal both ran to Sullivan. The 92 ran via Main Street, last running in 1948, and the 93 via Bunker Hill Street last ran in 1949. Until 1997, trains continued to use the portal and its North Station surface station as a terminal.
In addition to the lines that later became the E branch, the predecessors to the 58 and 60 split in Brookline, one branch running into the current "E" tracks and into the Boylston Street portal, and the other running up Brookline Street to end at Massachusetts Avenue station. These were truncated in 1932 into a shorter route from Brookline Village to the subway via the Boylston Street portal, which itself stopped running in 1938 (being cut back to Brigham Circle short-turn trips), three years before the closure of that portal.
The last "foreign" cars to operate in the subway were those of the Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway, running from the Canal Street portal to the Brattle Loop at Scollay Square until 1935. It was then that the old Mystic River Bridge to Chelsea was closed to streetcars and the lines were replaced by bus service; the next year the Boston Elevated Railway (BERy) bought the Eastern Mass Chelsea Division and through-routed it with its lines connecting to the East Boston Tunnel at Maverick.
Rolling stock
[edit]Like the three other MBTA subway lines, the line uses standard gauge tracks. However, instead of heavy rail metro rolling stock, the Green Line uses modern streetcars (light rail vehicles) as heavy rail stock would be inappropriate for the surface branches with their numerous grade crossings.
Listing
[edit]Active fleet
[edit]Rolling stock as of September 2025[update]:[2][12]
| Year Built | Manufacturer | Model | Image | Length | Width | Fleet Numbers | Quantity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1986–1988 | Kinki Sharyo | Type 7 LRV | 72 ft (22 m) | 104 in (2.64 m) | 3600–3699 | 100 (69 active, all overhauled) | |
| 1997 | 3700–3719 | 20 (14 active, all overhauled) | |||||
| 1998–2007 | AnsaldoBreda | Type 8 LRV | 74 ft (23 m) | 3800–3894 | 95 (76 active) | ||
| 2018–2020 | CAF USA | Type 9 LRV | 3900–3923 | 24 (all active) |
Non-revenue work cars include #3615 and #3669.[13]
Retired fleet
[edit]Only MBTA operated vehicles are included here, not cars from the Boston Elevated Railway era.
| Years in Service | Manufacturer | Model | Image | Length | Width | Fleet Numbers | Quantity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1976–2007 | Boeing Vertol | US Standard Light Rail Vehicle | 71 ft (22 m) | 104 in (2.64 m) | 3400–3543 | 144 (31 units cancelled) | |
| 1937–1985[a] | Pullman Standard | PCC streetcar | 48 ft (15 m) | 100 in (2.54 m) | 3000–3346 | 344 (2 cars scrapped before 1964) |
- ^ 10 PCC streetcars are currently in revenue service on the Mattapan Line.
History
[edit]Early rolling stock
[edit]
When it opened at the end of the 19th century, the Tremont Street subway was not intended as a full-scale rapid transit line, but to allow ordinary streetcars to bypass the worst street congestion in downtown Boston.[6][14] Operations by several different companies were eventually consolidated into the Boston Elevated Railway, which ran a mixture of car types. After receiving a test unit in 1937, the BERy began to standardize on PCC streetcars, acquiring 320 units between 1941 and 1951 plus an additional 25 in 1959 to phase out the last older cars.[12] Beginning in 1923, all streetcars on the system were painted orange for maximum visibility in traffic. In 1971, the MBTA began painting Green Line streetcars in a green and white scheme to match the new line name.[15]
Two older streetcars are on display on the unused outer inbound track at Boylston station, which formerly carried cars coming from the Pleasant Street portal. Car #5734, a Type 5 A-1 car built in 1924 and retired in 1959, is owned by the Seashore Trolley Museum, but resides semipermanently in Boston. PCC #3295, built in 1951 and retired in 1986, is owned by the MBTA.[12] The cars were formerly used for fantrips, the most recent one being in 1998.
Boeing LRV
[edit]
In the early 1970s, light rail—which had largely disappeared from North America after the slow decline of streetcar systems from the 1920s to the 1950s—was reintroduced as a method of urban renewal less expensive than conventional metro systems.[16] In 1971, as part of a program to supply further work to defense contractors as the Vietnam War wound down, the Urban Mass Transit Administration selected Boeing Vertol as systems manager for a project to design a new generic light rail vehicle. The UMTA hoped that this "US Standard Light Rail Vehicle" would jumpstart the development of transit lines just as the standardized PCC streetcars had done decades prior.[17]
Boston (with its older streetcar tunnel systems) and San Francisco (with a new Muni Metro streetcar tunnel being built as part of BART construction) were chosen as the testbeds for this new rolling stock.[16][18] The vehicle was designed as the largest rolling stock that would fit through the Tremont Street tunnel, the Muni Metro's Twin Peaks Tunnel, and SEPTA's subway–surface lines tunnel.[14] The new cars were faster—a top speed of 50 miles per hour (80 km/h) versus the PCC's 36 miles per hour (58 km/h)—and had an articulated middle section for higher capacity.[14]
Boeing began construction of 175 cars for the MBTA in May 1973.[17] The first LRVs entered service on the D branch in December 1976 but were immediately beset with problems. Certain cars frequently derailed on tight turns in the Riverside, Boston College and Lechmere yards. Battery trays, air conditioners—mounted under the cars, continually drawing in dirt and debris from under the car when in the tunnels—and air compressors all suffered numerous failures; the plug-style doors had trouble sealing properly; and traction motors failed sooner than expected.[19]
Desperate for reliable rolling stock, in 1977 MBTA launched an overhaul program to extend the availability of its older PCC cars. A total of 34 cars, primarily out-of-service wrecks and parts cars, were rebuilt to as-new condition.[19] As of 2022[update], some of these rebuilt PCC cars still run on the Mattapan Line.[12][19]
After years of fighting between the MBTA and Boeing-Vertol, both sides reached a settlement in 1979. MBTA was allowed to reject the final 40 SLRVs, and Boeing would return $40 million to MBTA for the cost of repairs and modifications to several cars.[20][21]
Modern fleet
[edit]In the early 1980s, with a final settlement with Boeing in place, MBTA started looking for new equipment to supplement and replace the problematic LRVs.
In 1980, the MBTA tested Canadian Light Rail Vehicles for three months to determine whether they could be used on the Green Line.[22] The MBTA ultimately found them unsuitable.
Ultimately, the MBTA purchased LRVs from the Japanese firm Kinki Sharyo. These Type 7 were designed with the best features of the US SLRV, the Canadian LRV, and the PCC cars. A total of 120 Type 7 vehicles were purchased, 100 were delivered between 1986 and 1988, and an additional 20 cars ordered and delivered in 1997.[23]
Low-floor LRVs were added starting in 1998, allowing for accessible boarding directly from slightly raised platforms. MBTA ordered 100 of these Type 8 cars from Italian company AnsaldoBreda.[12] The first Type 8s entered revenue service in March 1999, and quickly proved problematic and difficult to maintain: the first cars failed every 400 miles (640 km), far short of the 9,000 miles (14,000 km) specified by the MBTA, and were prone to derailment at higher speeds as well as brake problems, echoing the problems with the Boeing stock. In December 2004, the MBTA canceled orders for the cars still to be delivered as part of the authority's nine-year, US$225 million deal with Breda.[24] One year later, in December 2005 the MBTA announced that it had entered into a restructuring of the deal, reducing the order to 85 cars (with spare parts to be provided in lieu of the 15 remaining cars), and providing for the remaining payment under the original deal only if the cars met performance requirements.[25] Construction of the last car under the order was completed on December 14, 2006.[26] Ultimately, 10 additional cars would be assembled and delivered in late 2007, with five spare shells retained (95 cars in service). The MBTA was criticized for their failure to assess Bredas' reliability before entering into the deal, and during delivery. The agency was also forced to spend an additional US$9.5 million to modify tracks to prevent derailments and the Type 8 fleet was unable to be used on the D branch (where cars reach full speed) after those modifications were complete in 2008.[7]
As the final Type 8s were delivered, the last of the Boeing-Vertol cars were retired in March 2007 and all except ten of the cars were scrapped.[27] Of the remaining cars, six were sold to the US Government and are now in Pueblo, Colorado for testing purposes, one was given to the Seashore Trolley Museum, and three were retained by the MBTA for work service.
In 2006, as part of a legal settlement, the MBTA committed to always operate at least one low-floor car in each train, with no trains consisting only of Type 7 cars.[28]
Of the 120 Type 7 cars, 103 were overhauled by Alstom in Hornell, New York. The work includes new propulsion systems, climate control systems and interiors as well as exterior work. The pilot car for the program left in October 2012 and was returned in November 2014, with the last car overhauled in April 2019.[29][12]
Type 9
[edit]
Twenty-four new Type 9 Green Line cars were delivered between 2017 and 2020. Revenue service began in late 2018 and all 24 cars were planned to enter service by the fall of 2019, although actual acceptance continued through 2021. The Type 9 cars will provide additional rolling stock to allow for Green Line Extension operations, and will not replace any of the existing fleet.[30] The cars were made by CAF USA, Inc., with the shells and frames made in Spain, and final assembly and testing done at their plant in Elmira, New York.[31] As of March 2017[update], the first unit had been expected to enter passenger service in Spring 2018, with all 24 cars in service by the end of the year.[32] The first Type 9 car, #3900, began revenue service on December 21, 2018.[33]
Future fleet
[edit]
Planning for a Type 10 fleet—which would replace all Type 7 and Type 8 cars in the mid-2020s—began in 2018 with plans for a fully low floor fleet.[34][35] At 113 feet (34 m) long, Type 10 cars would be significantly longer than the existing fleet, and carry twice as many passengers as existing cars.[36] The MBTA released a request for proposals in December 2019, with notice to proceed expected to be given in 2021. In June 2021, the MBTA indicated that the initial order would be for 102 LRVs operating as single cars, with two-car trains deferred for a later project with federal funding. Manufacturer bids were due in July 2021.[37]
The MBTA awarded an $811 million contract to CAF USA on August 31, 2022, to manufacture 102 seven-segment Type 10 "Supercar" LRVs. Four pilot vehicles are to be delivered in spring 2026, with deliveries of two LRVs per month from spring 2027 to spring 2031.[38] The contract included options for additional LRVs.[39] As a separately-funded project, Lake Street Yard will be fully reconstructed to support Type 10 vehicles, with Riverside Yard and the GLX Vehicle Maintenance Facility also modified.[40] When the Type 10 cars are delivered, the Type 9 fleet is expected to be transferred over to the Mattapan Line, replacing the PCC streetcars.[36]
Accessibility
[edit]
The Red Line, Blue Line, and Orange Line run rapid transit cars and use stations with high platforms level with the car floor providing easy access for the disabled. The Green Line originated as a streetcar line, and used a variety of streetcars before converting to light rail vehicles.
Originally all the Green Line stations had platforms at track level, and passengers had to ascend several steps up into the vehicles. This limited accessibility for persons with disabilities. To address this issue and comply with changing federal and state laws, additional facilities have been added:[41]
- Wheelchair lifts have been provided at some stops. They are rolled up to the car door and the lift mechanism is operated using a hand crank. They are quite time-consuming to operate, causing significant delays when used during peak periods.
- Short platforms level with car floors, accessed by ramps, were installed just before or after selected stations. Because the car door arrangement required a large gap between the platform and the car, a bridge plate attached to the raised platform had to be positioned after the train stopped with a door at that platform.
- The MBTA has followed the worldwide trend of operating low-floor streetcars. Platforms are being raised slightly to about the height of a street curb. Low-floor cars have remotely controlled bridge plates at the center doors to allow wheelchairs and strollers to reach the car floor a few inches higher.[citation needed] As of 2022[update], the D branch will be the first branch to be completely retrofitted with raised platforms as part of this program.[42]
History
[edit]Beginning in the 1850s, Boston sprouted a large network of horsecar lines, the first public transit in the city. The West End Street Railway was created by the state legislature in 1887 to build a single line, but soon consolidated many of the existing lines into a single privately owned system with consistent fares and route designations. The Allston – Park Square line (which served the general area of the A branch) was the first section to be converted to electric traction in 1889. It used modified existing horsecars outfitted with Frank J. Sprague's revolutionary electrical equipment, which had first been demonstrated the previous year in Richmond, Virginia.[43]: 9–10 In 1897, the West End Street Railway property was handed over to the Boston Elevated Railway in the form of a 24-year lease, and the companies were ultimately combined.
By the early 1890s, the sheer quantity of streetcars during peak periods was clogging the streets of downtown Boston. The Tremont Street subway, the first passenger subway in North America, was opened in stages in 1897 and 1898, with underground stations at Boylston, Park Street, Scollay Square, Adams Square, and Haymarket. The Main Line Elevated was run through the tunnel from 1901, displacing through-running streetcars,[43]: 19–21 until it was rerouted to its own Washington Street Tunnel in 1908, and the streetcars were returned to the Tremont tunnel.[43]: 27
Though initially intended merely to clear streetcars from the busiest sections of downtown streets, the Tremont Street subway became useful as a rapid transit service in its own right. The 1912 completion of the Causeway Street Elevated and Lechmere Viaduct extended grade-separated service to Lechmere Square in Cambridge, and in 1922 the Lechmere transfer station was built. In 1914, the Boylston Street subway opened as a westward extension to just short of Kenmore Square, and in 1933 Kenmore station and short tunnel extensions towards two surface lines were added. In 1941, the Huntington Avenue subway and its two additional underground stations removed the last surface streetcars from downtown Boston.
Beginning in the 1930s, the massive surface streetcar system was "bustituted" with buses and trackless trolleys which had lower operating costs and more flexible routes. As the 1950s closed out, the only remaining streetcar lines were the Watertown Line, Commonwealth Avenue Line, Beacon Street Line, Arborway Line, and the Lenox Street Line plus several short turn services. In 1959, the Boston and Albany Railroad's Highland Branch was converted to the Riverside Line, a fully grade-separated suburban service. In 1961, the last through service to Lenox Street via the Pleasant Street portal ended, though a Pleasant Street – Boylston shuttle continued for one more year. In 1963, part of the original subway was rebuilt under Government Center, abandoning and partially demolishing Adams Square station.
In 1947, the now-bankrupt BERy was replaced by the public Metropolitan Transit Authority (M.T.A.). The new agency was unpopular, even spawning a popular protest song; in 1964, it was replaced with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority which had an expanded funding area to preserve suburban commuter rail lines. In 1967, as part of a systemwide rebranding that included new station names and color names for the transit lines, the remaining streetcar services were designated the "Green Line" because several of them traveled near the Emerald Necklace park system. The streetcar lines were given letter designations: "A" to the Watertown Line, "B" to the Commonwealth Avenue Line, "C" to the Beacon Street Line, "D" to the Riverside Line, and "E" to the Arborway Line.
The Watertown Line ran mostly in mixed traffic after diverging from Commonwealth Avenue; it was permanently replaced with buses in 1969. The section of the Arborway Line past Heath Street was "temporarily" – ultimately permanently – bustituted in 1985. In 2001, with new low-floor streetcars entering service, the MBTA began retrofitting underground stations and major surface stops with low raised platforms for accessibility for all. In 2004, the Causeway Street Elevated was replaced with a new tunnel under the Boston Garden, which consolidated the Orange Line and Green Line at a new North Station "superstation", while continuing to connect to Commuter Rail service north of Boston.
The name "Green Line" was assigned in 1967 as part of a major reorganization of the MBTA system's branding.[7] In the 1970s, the Green Line and all other MBTA lines were re-evaluated by the Boston Transportation Planning Review for region-wide efficacy and future modernization alternatives initiated as far as physical plant and operating measures.
Operations and signaling
[edit]
As of February 2023[update], each of the four branches operate on 7- to 9-minute headways during weekday peak hours, and 8- to 12-minute headways at other times. Vehicle usage ranges from 45 trains (90 cars) to 62 trains (124 cars).[44]
Unlike the MBTA's heavy rail subway lines, the Green Line has only limited central control and monitoring. This also means that it has lagged behind the other three rail lines in the availability of countdown signs and "next train" arrival information. The line is signalled with advisory wayside signals, except on surface portions in street medians or in-street running. Wayside signal territory stretches from Lechmere to the surface portals at Kenmore, and along the entire length of the D–Riverside branch. There are no automatic protection devices, but the cars have track brakes, giving the ability to stop quickly under control of the operator. Interlockings are controlled through a wayside Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) system that relies on the operator properly entering the destination manually on a roto-wheel in the train cab at the beginning of a run.
The line is monitored from the Operations Control Center (OCC). Responsibility for controlling service is shared by the control room and field personnel along the right of way. Track circuit and signal indications are not transmitted to the operational personnel sites. In lieu of track circuit indications, the AVI system is displayed in the control room to provide a periodic update to train position wherever AVI detectors exist. The AVI system user interface was solely text based until the current control room was opened, in which a new schematic display based on AVI data was instituted. Track circuit indications are available digitally in signal houses at the Park Street interlocking, at the new North Station interlocking, and at the new Kenmore interlocking, but are not transmitted to OCC. In January 2013, the MBTA announced plans to add full vehicle location tracking on the Green Line for countdown signs and smartphone applications, including using AVI data in the tunnels and GPS receivers on the surface lines.[45] The first real-time data—location data on the surface lines—became available in October 2014. Full tracking was expected by early 2015.[46]
The MBTA typically runs two-car trains at all times. The last scheduled use of one-car trains on weekdays was in March 2007.[7] Three-car trains were added on the B and D branches in 2010 – their first use since 2005 – and a four-car train was tested in April 2011.[7] In March 2011, the number of three-car trains was substantially increased, including use on the E branch.[7][47] However, three-car trains suffered from reliability problems and slow boarding.[48] The use of three-car trains ended in March 2016.[7]
Positive train control
[edit]The MBTA approved an $82.6 million contract in May 2019 for a train protection system for the Green Line. The system would enforce red signals and automatically stop a train if it approached another train too closely.[49] The project was 28% complete by December 2021; installation of in-vehicle electronics was scheduled to be complete by September 2023, with wayside installation complete in June 2024 and full operation that December.[50] A reallocation of funds in January 2022 shortened the project timeline, with completion expected in 2023.[51] However, in January 2023, an NTSB report found that the project had been delayed to June 2025.[52] The MBTA cancelled the contract in June 2024 citing a lack of progress and an inability by the contractor to complete the project.[53]
The MBTA worked with a different contractor to develop the GLTPS-2 system in two phases. Phase 1, expected to be installed on the existing Type 7, Type 8, and Type 9 fleet by the end of 2025, will be an operator warning system with alarms that trigger when a train is exceeding speed limits or is at risk of imminent collision with another train. Phase 2, which will be installed only on the Type 9 and future Type 10 fleet, adds automatic enforcement by braking and is planned to be finished by June 2028. A $112.5 million contract to install the system was approved in February 2025.[54]
Turnarounds
[edit]
Aside from the terminal stations, several locations have turnaround loops or crossover switches where trains can reverse direction for short turns. One of these, where northbound trains can turn southbound, is regularly used as the downtown terminal for two of the branches:
- At Government Center, a loop under City Hall Plaza. As of 2022[update], this is the terminal of the B and C branches.
Several other loops and crossovers are not used in regular revenue service but may be used during construction work or service disruptions, or for non-revenue trains, with some having been regularly used as terminals in the past:[2][7]
- At North Station, a pair of pocket tracks allow reversing.
- At Government Center, the Brattle Loop allows southbound trains to turn northbound, however, this loop is currently only used during service disruptions.
- At Park Street, a loop connects the inner tracks. The MBTA plans to add a crossover to allow through movements from the terminating (inner) northbound platform at Park Street are expected to increase capacity and reliability.[55]
- At Kenmore, a loop allows eastbound (inbound) C and D branch trains to turn westbound.
- On the B branch, a pocket track at Blandford Street allows trains to reverse in either direction. It is sometimes used to reverse westbound trains to provide extra service in the subway. Occasionally-used crossovers are located at Babcock Street, Washington Street, and east of Boston College.
- On the C branch, occasionally-used crossovers are located at St. Mary's Street and Coolidge Corner.
- On the D branch, occasionally-used crossovers are located west of Fenway, Brookline Hills, Beaconsfield, Reservoir, Newton Highlands, and Waban. At Reservoir, the spur tracks to Reservoir Carhouse have platforms for short turn trains.
- On the E branch, crossovers are located at Prudential, Northeastern University, and Brigham Circle, along with a siding at Northeastern. The Brigham Circle crossover is frequently used for short turns during traffic congestion on the street-running section of the line.
Location tracking
[edit]The Red, Orange, and Blue lines have block signalling systems that make tracking the location of trains easier. Signs in most station on those lines began to display real-time train information in late 2012 and early 2013, while data feeds have been available for smartphone applications since 2010.[45] However, the wayside signalling system used in the Green Line's tunnels and the D branch does not provide for that level of tracking, nor do the basic stop/go signals used on the street-level branch lines. In January 2013, the MBTA announced plans to provide full tracking data for the Green Line by 2015, allowing use of smartphone applications and in-station countdown signs.[45] The $13.4 million system is funded by MassDOT; it uses existing Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) systems plus additional sensors in the tunnels, and GPS receivers on the surface sections.[56]
In September 2013, the MBTA announced that "Next Train" signs would be unveiled at Kenmore that month.[57] On October 23, 2014, location tracking data became available for Green Line trains above ground. Arrival predictions for surface stations – including the activation of countdown signs along the D branch – and underground tracking and predictions were to be rolled out in two phases by early 2015.[46] In March 2015, the MBTA announced that enough AVI equipment had been installed to allow the release of some underground data by April.[56] Most underground data was live by August, but trains near Park Street and Boylston waited until September.
The first predictive countdown signs on the Green Line were activated at Newton Centre and Newton Highlands on April 24, 2015, followed shortly by other D branch stations.[58] Countdown signs at Kenmore and Hynes were activated in August 2015. Signs at Copley and Arlington plus eastbound-only signs from Boylston through Science Park were activated in October 2015.[59] The final set of signs – those on the westbound platforms of Science Park through Boylston – were activated in January 2016. Because holding and short-turning trains at the downtown terminals makes time-based predictions unreliable, the signs instead show how many stops away a train is.[60]
Projects
[edit]Somerville/Medford extension
[edit]
The Green Line Extension (GLX) project added two new branches into the northern suburbs of Somerville and Medford. The project opened in two phases in 2022 at a total cost of $2.28 billion. The rebuilt Lechmere station and the Union Square Branch to Union Square opened on March 21, 2022, as an extension of the D branch (briefly the E branch). The Medford Branch opened to Medford/Tufts on December 12, 2022, as an extension of the E branch, with intermediate stations at East Somerville, Gilman Square, Magoun Square, and Ball Square.[61][62] The total project cost is estimated to be $2.28 billion: $0.996 billion from the federal government and $1.28 billion from the state. Daily ridership on the extension is projected to be 45,000 by 2030.[63]
The GLX begins at the north end of the Lechmere Viaduct, with a new elevated line continuing north for about 0.6 miles (0.97 km) parallel to the O'Brien Highway. The former surface-level Lechmere station was replaced by an elevated station on the new alignment. The two branches split with an aerial flying junction on the Red Bridge viaduct in the Inner Belt area. The Union Square Branch runs 0.7 miles (1.1 km) west from Red Bridge, sharing the Fitchburg Line right of way. The Medford Branch runs 3.0 miles (4.8 km) northwest from Red Bridge, sharing the Lowell Line right of way. Like the existing D branch, the new branches are fully grade-separated, with no level crossings. A new vehicle storage yard and maintenance facility is located in the Inner Belt area, with leads from both branches at Red Bridge. An extension of the Somerville Community Path runs along the Medford Branch south of Lowell Street, with a high bridge carrying it above the Red Bridge viaduct.
An extension north from Lechmere was first proposed in the 1920s, and again several times during the 20th century. To settle a lawsuit with the Conservation Law Foundation to mitigate increased automobile emissions from the Big Dig, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts agreed in 1990 to extend the Green Line from Lechmere to Medford Hillside through Somerville and Medford, two suburbs underserved by the MBTA relative to their population densities, commercial importance, and proximity to Boston. After delays in planning, the state agreed in 2006 to complete the project by 2014.[64] The preferred alternative from the 2009 Draft Environmental Impact Report added the Union Square Branch; the Medford Branch terminus was set as College Avenue, with a potential future extension to Mystic Valley Parkway.
The planned completion was delayed to 2018 in 2011, and to 2020 in 2014.[65][66] A groundbreaking ceremony was held in December 2012.[67] The project was expected to cost about $2.2 billion, with half of that paid by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). However, in 2015 it became clear that the project would cost $3 billion, putting its future in doubt.[68] The project was value engineered to reduce its cost: station designs were simplified, several bridge reconstructions eliminated, the Community Path extension shortened, and the maintenance facility reduced in size.[69][70] The FTA approved the modified $2.3 billion plan on April 4, 2017.[71] The contract was rebid with a provision for the optional restoration of six of the elements deleted in the 2016 plan. The winning bid, selected in November 2017, included six optional elements, including canopies and additional elevators at stations, public art, a full-size vehicle maintenance facility, and the full extension of the Community Path to East Cambridge.[72][73] Construction reached 20% completion in November 2019; it was over 50% completed by October 2020, and 80% by June 2021.[74][75][76]
Accessibility renovations
[edit]
The majority of the Green Line opened by 1959, long before the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act mandated that new construction be fully accessible. The MBTA began modifying Red, Orange, and Blue Line stations for accessibility in the late 1980s; however, Green Line stations were not modified until the late 1990s, when the Type 8 vehicles were under construction. The MBTA began the Light Rail Accessibility Program in 1996.[77]: 30 Because modifying the numerous stations all at once would be prohibitively expensive, the MBTA designated "key stations" – largely those with high ridership or bus connections – for prioritization.[78]
Riverside station was completely rebuilt with raised accessible platforms around 1998. North Station and Park Street (both of which already had elevators from previous projects) were outfitted with portable lifts for temporary accessibility around 2000, as were Lechmere and ten surface stations.[78] Between 2001 and 2003, 16 surface stations (4 on the B branch, 4 on the C branch, 3 on the D branch, and 5 on the E branch) were retrofitted with raised platforms.[79] The 13 B, C, and E branch stations collectively cost $32 million.[80] Construction of raised platforms was completed at Park Street and Haymarket around 2003; Prudential was also reconstructed that year by the developer of 111 Huntington Avenue. The fully accessible underground "superstation" at North Station opened in 2004.[7] Wooden mini-high platforms, allowing level boarding on older Type 7 LRVs, were installed at eight Green Line stations in 2006–07 as part of the settlement of Joanne Daniels-Finegold, et al. v. MBTA.[28][81]
Renovations for accessibility were completed at Arlington in 2009,[82] Kenmore and Copley in 2010,[83][84] and Science Park in 2011.[85] A two-year closure of Government Center ended in 2016 with the opening of the accessible transfer station.[86] As part of the Green Line Extension, Lechmere was replaced by a fully accessible elevated station in 2022.[87] Reconstruction work on Symphony is expected to take place from 2025 to 2028.[88] Hynes Convention Center (with renovations in design) and Boylston are the other remaining inaccessible stations in the central subway.[87] As of 2025[update], the MBTA does not expect to make Boylston accessible by 2030, while Hynes is dependent on funding availability.[89]
Other projects have moved towards full accessibility of the surface branches. Woodland was made accessible in 2006.[90] Renovations completed in 2009 made Longwood accessible for the first time, and replaced the lifts at Boston College and Brookline Village.[91][92] A reconstruction of Brookline Hills (replacing lifts) was completed in 2022.[93] Construction of two accessible stations (Babcock Street and Amory Street) on the B branch to replace four non-accessible stations took place in 2021.[94] Temporary work to make Newton Highlands accessible was done in 2019, followed by the four remaining D branch stations in 2024; larger reconstructions of the five stations are planned for later in the 2020s.[88] Several other surface accessibility projects are planned, which will make all surface stations accessible:[89]
- The nine remaining non-accessible B branch stations are to be reconstructed in 2025–2027. Consolidations will reduce the nine stops to six.[88]
- The nine remaining non-accessible C branch stations are to be reconstructed in 2025–2026. Consolidations will reduce the nine stops to seven.[88]
- The four remaining non-accessible E branch stations are to be reconstructed in 2027–2029. Consolidations will reduce the four stops to two.[88]
Core Capacity Program
[edit]In the late 2010s, the MBTA began planning a capital project to meet future capacity needs that year on the Green Line. A study completed in 2018 settled on the size for Type 10 vehicles and evaluated infrastructure needed to support the new vehicles. In 2022, the MBTA entered the project development phase for the Federal Transit Administration Capital Investment Grants Program, which provides funding for "core capacity" projects on crowded sections of existing transit systems. As of April 2025[update], the MBTA intends to enter the engineering phase by mid-2025, with the full funding grant agreement expected in late 2028 and construction lasting through the mid-2030s. In April 2025, the MBTA Board approved plans for the $3.8 billion Core Capacity Program, of which half ($1.9 billion) would be federally funded. It includes:[95]
- Signal upgrades, new crossovers, and other work in the Central Subway
- Systemwide overhead catenary relocation
- Traction power improvements on the D Branch
- Modifications to the Riverside, Reservoir, Lake Street, and Inner Belt yards
- Accessibility and infrastructure work on the B and E branches
- 58 additional Type 10 vehicles
- A test track between Chestnut Hill and Newton Centre for Type 10 vehicles
- Upgrades to a Type 10 simulator for operators
Station listing
[edit]This listing includes only the Green Line section between Lechmere and Kenmore, which are served by multiple branches. For stops served by only one branch, see Green Line B branch § Station listing, Green Line C branch § Station listing, Green Line D branch § Station listing, and Green Line E branch § Station listing. All stations in the central subway have prepaid fare areas (fare control).
| Location | Station | Branches | Opened | Notes and connections |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Cambridge | D, E | March 21, 2022 | The Lechmere Viaduct opened on June 1, 1912, with a direct connection to surface lines until July 9, 1922. The surface station was open from July 10, 1922, to May 23, 2020. | |
| West End | August 20, 1955 | |||
| North End | June 28, 2004 | Original surface station was open from September 3, 1898, to March 27, 1997. Elevated station was open from June 1, 1912, to June 24, 2004. | ||
| September 3, 1898 | ||||
| Downtown Boston | B, C, D, E | |||
| September 1, 1897 | At Downtown Crossing: | |||
| Boylston | ||||
| Back Bay | November 13, 1921 | |||
| October 3, 1914 | ||||
| Hynes Convention Center | B, C, D | |||
| Fenway–Kenmore | October 23, 1932 | At Lansdowne: |
Incidents and collisions
[edit]
On May 28, 2008, two D branch trains collided in Newton. The operator of one of the trains was killed and numerous riders were taken to area hospitals with injuries of varying degrees of seriousness. While it was originally thought that cell phone use was responsible for the crash, the cause was officially determined to be an episode of micro-sleep caused by the driver's sleep apnea.[96]
On May 8, 2009, two trolleys rear-end collided underground between Park Street and Government Center when the driver of one of the trolleys, 24-year-old Aiden Quinn, was text messaging his girlfriend while driving.[97] Quinn had run through a red light before the crash, which injured 46 people. MBTA officials estimated that the cost of the crash was $9.6 million.[98] A strict ban on cell phone usage by MBTA operators was later enacted.[99]
On October 8, 2012, two E branch trolleys collided in the 700 block of Huntington Avenue near Brigham Circle when one derailed into the other, injuring three people including a train operator.[100] The next month on November 29, two trolleys collided at low speed at Boylston, injuring several dozen passengers.[101]
On March 10, 2014, a D branch trolley with passengers aboard derailed in the tunnel just west of Kenmore Station, near the flat junction between the "D" and "C" branches. A second train had to brake suddenly to avoid hitting the derailed train.[102] Ten people were treated for moderate injuries.[103]
In October 2016, The Boston Globe reported that the Green Line had the highest number of derailments and collisions on light rail lines in the United States in 2015. The number of incidents had been increasing for several years due to deferred maintenance on tracks and wheels, which resulted in more low-speed derailments of Type 8 cars.[104]
On July 30, 2021, two B branch trains collided at Babcock Street, causing 25 injuries.[105]
On October 1, 2024, a train derailed near Lechmere, injuring seven people and disrupting service on the Green Line Extension.[106][107] Regular service resumed on October 3. The National Transportation Safety Board, Federal Transit Administration, and Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities are investigating the derailment.[108] A preliminary NTSB report noted the train was going 36 mph (58 km/h) in a 10 mph (16 km/h) zone and passed through a double red signal that required a stop. The train passed through a switch that was still moving into position, causing part of the first truck of the lead car to go straight and the rest of the train into the diverging track and causing the derailment.[109]
On February 9, 2025, a E branch train crashed into an out of service train at East Somerville, injuring five people.[110]
In 2009, the National Transportation Safety Board recommended that the Green Line be outfitted with positive train control to prevent collisions as part of its various crash investigations. The MBTA decided in 2012 not to implement PTC, estimating the cost at $645 million to $721 million. In 2015, as crashes continued to happen, the NTSB complained the agency was moving too slowly identifying a feasible alternative. In 2019, the MBTA awarded a contract to implement a similar safety system by 2024, at a cost of $170 million. A train would automatically brake if a driver violated a traffic signal, or if cameras or radar detected an obstacle.[111] That contract was cancelled in June 2024.[53] A new contract was awarded in February 2025 for a new system that would provide warnings to operators by the end of 2025, and enforce violations with automatically braking by mid-2028.[54]
References
[edit]- ^ O'Hara, Mary Ann; Turners, Pat (August 22, 2024). "History of Funding Update" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. p. 2.
- ^ a b c "Ridership and Service Statistics" (PDF) (14th ed.). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. 2014.
- ^ Booz • Allen & Hamilton Inc. (1995). "Applicability of Low-Floor Light Rail Vehicles in North America" (PDF). Transit Cooperative Research Program. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ "Green Line Transformation (GLT) Program Project Development Profile: FY 2024 Annual Report". Federal Transit Administration.
- ^ "Green Line D Track and Signal Replacement | Projects | MBTA". www.mbta.com. Retrieved April 5, 2025.
- ^ a b Most, Doug (January 26, 2014). "The bigger dig". Boston Globe. Retrieved January 22, 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Belcher, Jonathan. "Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district" (PDF). Boston Street Railway Association.
- ^ Sanborn, George M. (1992). A Chronicle of the Boston Transit System. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Archived from the original on November 27, 2019. Retrieved January 21, 2016 – via MIT.
- ^ "Curiosity Carcards" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 18, 2017. Retrieved January 21, 2016.
- ^ Malikova, Alexandra A. (June 2012). "MBTA Green Line 3-Car Train Operating Plans to Enhance Reliability and Capacity (Master's Thesis)" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ Clarke, Bradley H. (2003). Streetcar Lines of the Hub – The 1940s. Boston Street Railway Association. ISBN 0938315056.
- ^ a b c d e f "The MBTA Vehicle Inventory Page". NETransit. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
- ^ Pugh, John (September–October 2024). "MBTA & Regional Transit News". Rollsign. Vol. 61, no. 9–10. Boston Street Railway Association. p. 3. ISSN 0035-7898.
- ^ a b c Diamant, Emanuel S.; et al. (Spring 1976). "Light Rail Transit : A State of the Art Review". United States Department of Transportation. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ "This Time In History". Rollsign. Vol. 58, no. 9/10. Boston Street Railway Association. September–October 2021. p. 14. ISSN 0035-7898.
- ^ a b Thompson, Gregory L. (November 2003). "Defining an Alternative Future: Birth of the Light Rail Movement in North America" (PDF). Transportation Research Board. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ a b "History: Light Rail Vehicle/Rapid Transit Car". Boeing. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ Vuchic, Vukan R. (October 1972). Light Rail Transit Systems: A Definition and Evaluation (Report). Urban Mass Transportation Administration, US Department of Transportation. Retrieved December 20, 2018.
- ^ a b c Moore, Scott. "Boston's Green Line Crisis". NETransit. Archived from the original on April 6, 2004. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ Sheley Jr., W. H. (November 10, 1980). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority's Termination of Contract for Light Rail Vehicles PSAD-81-11 (PDF) (Report). United States General Accounting Office. Retrieved December 22, 2018.
- ^ Sullivan, Kathleen (September 14, 1998). "Muni knew about trolley lemons in '70s: Test runs in Boston found major trouble in many systems". The San Francisco Examiner. p. A. Retrieved December 7, 2012.
- ^ A Chronicle of the Boston Transit System. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. 1981. p. 14 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ "Boston – MBTA: Green Line – Technical Data" (PDF). Kinki-Sharyo. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 20, 2014. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ Flint, Anthony. "MBTA Halts Purchase of Green Line 'Lemons'" (mirrored copy). The Boston Globe. December 12, 2004.
- ^ Daniel, Mac (December 17, 2005). "Green Line seeks zippier service with upgrade plan". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on January 25, 2007., archived as of January 25, 2007
- ^ "Bredas". The Boston Globe. December 14, 2006. Archived from the original on January 24, 2007. archived as of January 24, 2007
- ^ "End of the line for T pioneers". The Boston Globe. March 16, 2007. Archived from the original on March 19, 2007. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ a b "Settlement Agreement" (PDF). Joanne Daniels-Finegold et al. v. MBTA. April 10, 2006. pp. 10–11.
- ^ Annear, Steve (November 18, 2014). "First of Refurbished Green Line Trolleys Heads Back Home". Boston. Archived from the original on February 6, 2017. Retrieved November 25, 2014.
- ^ Annear, Steve (May 13, 2014). "New Green Line Trains Will Hit the Tracks by 2017". Boston. Archived from the original on July 13, 2017. Retrieved May 20, 2014.
- ^ "CAF wins Boston Green Line order". Railway Gazette. May 16, 2014. Archived from the original on August 7, 2020. Retrieved May 20, 2014.
- ^ "Green Line Type 9 Project Update" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. March 27, 2017. p. 11. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 29, 2017. Retrieved March 29, 2017.
- ^ "New MBTA Green Line Car goes into Passenger Service" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. December 21, 2018.
- ^ "Green Line Transformation Program: Future Capacity Study Update - Fiscal & Management Control Board" (PDF). MBTA. May 7, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
- ^ Brelsford, Laura (May 26, 2020). "SWA Initiatives—May 2020" (PDF). p. 18.
- ^ a b Vaccaro, Adam (January 31, 2020). "Next on the MBTA spending spree: bigger Green Line cars". Boston Globe. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
- ^ Peña, Angel (June 21, 2021). "Green Line Transformation (GLT) Update" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. p. 9.
- ^ Peña, Angel; Wolfgang, Bill (August 31, 2022). "RFP No 367F-19 Type 10 Supercar Update and Procurement Award" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.
- ^ "System-Wide Accessibility Initiatives—December 2022" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Department of System-Wide Accessibility. December 6, 2022.
- ^ "Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority FY23-27 Capital Investment Plan (CIP): Proposed" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. March 2022. pp. 66, 67.
- ^ "MBTA > About the MBTA > Transit Projects > Transit Projects and Accessibility". Archived from the original on January 18, 2012. Retrieved October 23, 2018.
- ^ "MBTA reaches 75 percent design completion on Green Line D branch accessibility improvements project". Mass Transit Magazine. June 3, 2022. Retrieved September 26, 2022.
- ^ a b c Cudahy, Brian J. (1972). Change at Park Street Under; the story of Boston's subways. Brattleboro, Vt.: S. Greene Press. ISBN 0-8289-0173-2.
- ^ Belcher, Jonathan (January–February 2023). "MBTA Vehicle Inventory as of February 28, 2023". Rollsign. Vol. 60, no. 1–2. Boston Street Railway Association. p. 10.
- ^ a b c Rocheleau, Matt (January 22, 2013). "MBTA: Mobile apps will be able to track Green Line trains by 2015". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on January 25, 2013. Retrieved January 22, 2013.
- ^ a b "CUSTOMERS ARE NOW ABLE TO TRACK GREEN LINE TRAINS" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. October 23, 2014. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
- ^ "Green Line to nearly triple the number of 3-car trains" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. March 16, 2011.
- ^ Vaccaro, Adam (May 3, 2016). "Why is the Green Line so crowded?". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on May 4, 2016.
- ^ "Green Line Train Protection System (GLTPS) System Integration Contract" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. May 20, 2019.
- ^ "GLTPS Monthly Review and Lookahead" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. December 15, 2021.
- ^ "New Funding Accelerates Green Line Train Protection System Project Timeline" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. February 25, 2022.
- ^ Dolven, Taylor (January 5, 2023). "Green Line crash "would have been prevented" if MBTA had installed train tech earlier, NTSB finds". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on January 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Dolven, Taylor (June 7, 2024). "T scraps Green Line crash-prevention contract recommended by NTSB in 2009". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on June 7, 2024.
- ^ a b Wolfgang, William G.; Wise, Raymond F. (February 25, 2025). "Green Line Train Protection System (GLTPS-2) Procurement" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.
- ^ "MBTA Capital Investment Program FY15-FY19" (PDF). MBTA. March 12, 2014. p. 124. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 25, 2014. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
- ^ a b "MBTA installing underground tracking system for Green Line trolleys" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. March 3, 2015. Retrieved March 12, 2015.
- ^ Annear, Steve (September 18, 2013). "The MBTA's Green Line Is Getting 'Next Train' Electronic Information Boards". Boston Magazine. Archived from the original on April 8, 2016. Retrieved September 18, 2013.
- ^ "Green Line's First Countdown Signs Go Live in Newton" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. April 24, 2015. Retrieved April 25, 2015.
- ^ Roberts, Sarah (October 6, 2015). "Green Line to get countdown clocks in downtown stations". Boston Globe. Retrieved October 6, 2015.
- ^ Levenson, Eric (January 20, 2016). "Why the Green Line's new countdown clocks measure 'stops away' instead of time". Boston Globe. Retrieved January 20, 2016.
- ^ MacCormack, Terry (March 21, 2022). "Baker-Polito Administration Celebrates Opening of the Green Line Extension" (Press release). Government of Massachusetts. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved December 13, 2022.
- ^ "MBTA Celebrates Opening of the Green Line Extension Medford Branch" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. December 12, 2022.
- ^ "About the Green Line Extension Project". Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 28, 2020.
- ^ Cummings, Claire (August 9, 2007). "Proponents rap delay to extend Green Line". The Boston Globe. Retrieved August 26, 2007.
- ^ Byrne, Matt (August 1, 2011). "State: Green Line extension will be delayed til 2018". boston.com (The Boston Globe). Retrieved August 1, 2011.
- ^ Metzger, Andy (September 13, 2014). "Green Line Extension Cost Rises To $2 Billion". WBUR. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
- ^ "Green Line Extension Phase 1 Construction Begins". Commonwealth Conversation: Transportation. Massachusetts Department of Transportation. December 11, 2012. Archived from the original on June 22, 2013. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
- ^ Vaccaro, Adam (December 14, 2015). "Transit officials won't commit additional state money to Green Line extension". Boston Globe. Retrieved December 15, 2015.
- ^ Interim Project Management Team Report: Green Line Extension Project – Report to the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board and the MassDOT Board of Directors Archived August 29, 2017, at the Wayback Machine Submitted May 9, 2016
- ^ Vaccaro, Adam (May 13, 2019). "Somerville's getting a brand new bike path with the Green Line extension. Is it wide enough?". The Boston Globe.
- ^ Dungca, Nicole (April 4, 2017). "Feds OK Green Line extension costs, securing project's future". Boston Globe. Retrieved April 4, 2017.
- ^ Jessen, Klark (November 17, 2017). "Green Line Extension Project Design-Build Team Firm Selected" (Press release). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
- ^ "MBTA chooses winning bidder for Green Line extension and awards its biggest contract ever". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on April 6, 2019. Retrieved November 22, 2017.
- ^ Thompson, Katie (November 15, 2019). "Construction on Green Line extension 20 percent complete". WCVB.
- ^ "Baker-Polito Administration, Transportation Officials Visit Green Line Extension Project" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. October 1, 2020.
- ^ Dalton, John (June 21, 2021). "Green Line Extension Update" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. p. 19.
- ^ Official Audit Report – Issued June 16, 2014: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, For the period January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2012 (PDF) (Report). Auditor of the Commonwealth. June 16, 2014.
- ^ a b "Executive Summary" (PDF). Program of Mass Transportation. Boston Regional Metropolitan Planning Organization. January 2004. pp. 2–9. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 20, 2012.
- ^ Ridership & Service Statistics (9 ed.). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. 2004. p. 2.19 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ "Planned Accessibility Projects – On Board the Green Line". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Archived from the original on August 10, 2004.
- ^ "Green Line Stations Upgraded to Improve Accessibility" (PDF). TRANSReport. Boston Regional Metropolitan Planning Organization. June 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 16, 2011.
- ^ Bierman, Noah (June 2, 2009). "Arlington T station reopens with disabled access". Boston Globe. Retrieved May 23, 2012.
- ^ Rocheleau, Matt (September 14, 2010). "Copley station project nears end; historic church plans repairs". Boston Globe. Retrieved May 23, 2012.
- ^ Moskowitz, Eric (April 25, 2010). "Kenmore station upgrades done, finally". Boston Globe. p. B2 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Trolley service to resume as project end". Boston Globe. November 3, 2011. Archived from the original on May 31, 2012. Retrieved May 23, 2012.
- ^ Moskowitz, Eric (March 21, 2016). "Government Center reopens". Boston Globe. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- ^ a b "Accessibility Initiatives—June 2024" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. June 25, 2024. pp. 2–5.
- ^ a b c d e "Accessibility Initiatives—December 2024" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. December 6, 2024. pp. 3–6.
- ^ a b "Advancing Accessibility: Honoring the 35th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. July 24, 2025. pp. 8, 9.
- ^ "MPO Agency Notes" (PDF). TRANSreport. Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. April 2006 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Rocheleau, Matt (September 28, 2012). "MBTA to hold meeting on $20m project to rebuild Boston College Station". Boston Globe.
- ^ "Access in Motion: 2009 Calendar" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 2, 2010.
- ^ "Brookline Hills Station Accessibility Improvements". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. January 10, 2022.
- ^ "New Babcock Street and Amory Street Stations Open November 15" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. November 12, 2021.
- ^ "Green Line Transformation (GLT) Core Capacity Program: Overview and status of the Core Capacity Program" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. April 24, 2025.
- ^ Collision Between Two Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Green Line Trains, Newton, Massachusetts, May 28, 2008 (NTSB/RAR-09-02) (PDF) (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. July 14, 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2011.
- ^ "Trolley Driver Was Texting Girlfriend At Time Of Crash: 46 Injured In Green Line Crash" Archived February 22, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, WCVB, Boston, May 8, 2009.
- ^ Texting Trolley Driver Is Transgendered Male, ABC News, May 11, 2009
- ^ "Trolley Crash Inspires Tougher Cell Phone Policy: NTSB Still Investigating Crash" Archived February 22, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, WCVB, May 9, 2009
- ^ "MBTA: Human error caused Green Line collision, derailment". WCVB. October 8, 2012. Retrieved September 17, 2024.
- ^ Moskowitz, Erik; et al. (November 29, 2012). "35 taken to hospital after two trolleys collide at Boylston MBTA station". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on December 2, 2012. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ Tempera, Jacqueline; Martine Powers (March 10, 2014). "Seven injured as MBTA Green Line train derails near Kenmore Station". Boston.com. Archived from the original on March 11, 2014. Retrieved March 11, 2014.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Green Line train derails; 'it was intense'". Boston Herald. March 10, 2014. Archived from the original on March 11, 2014. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
- ^ Dungca, Nicole (October 13, 2016). "The Green Line had the most derailments in the nation last year". The Boston Globe. Retrieved October 13, 2016.
- ^ Crimaldi, Laura (July 31, 2021). "NTSB investigating Green Line crash that left 25 injured; MBTA operator placed on leave". Boston Globe.
- ^ Becker, Kaitlin McKinley (October 1, 2024). "Green Line train derails near Cambridge MBTA station; 7 people injured". NBC Boston. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
- ^ "Shuttle Buses Continue to Replace Green Line Service between North Station and Union Square and Medford/Tufts". www.mbta.com. October 2, 2024. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
- ^ "Green Line Service Has Resumed between North Station and Union Square and Medford/Tufts". www.mbta.com. October 3, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2024.
- ^ "Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority Derailment". National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
- ^ Glaun, Dan (February 9, 2025). "Five taken to hospital after Somerville Green Line collision". The Boston Globe. Retrieved February 9, 2025.
- ^ Laura Crimaldi; Elizabeth Koh Globe (August 15, 2021). "On the T's Green Line, another serious crash and questions about the lack of safety technology". The Boston Globe.
External links
[edit]Green Line (MBTA)
View on GrokipediaThe line traces its origins to 1897, when the Tremont Street Subway opened as North America's first subway tunnel, with portions still in operation today.[2]
Extending approximately 25 miles in total, the Green Line serves as the MBTA's most heavily used light rail route, connecting suburbs like Newton, Brookline, and Medford to central hubs such as Park Street and Government Center.[3][4]
Recent expansions, including the 2022 Green Line Extension adding branches to Union Square in Somerville and College Avenue in Medford, aim to boost capacity amid growing demand.[5]
However, the system's aging infrastructure has contributed to persistent reliability issues, including signal failures and service delays, addressed through ongoing investments like track replacements and new Type 10 vehicles.[4][6][7]
Overview
Route and Service Summary
The MBTA Green Line operates as a light rail system with a central trunk running underground through downtown Boston, connecting six branches that extend to surrounding neighborhoods and suburbs. The trunk spans from Kenmore station inbound through Copley, Arlington, Boylston, and Park Street stations to Government Center, Haymarket, and North Station, covering key transfer points with other MBTA lines. Outbound service follows the reverse path, with western branches diverging at Kenmore on surface rights-of-way, while northern service continues beyond North Station via the Green Line Extension to Union Square in Somerville and Medford/Tufts University.[8][5] The four western branches include the B Branch from Boston College through Allston and Brighton, the C Branch to Cleveland Circle via Brookline, the D Branch to Riverside in Newton along a grade-separated alignment, and the E Branch to Heath Street in Jamaica Plain, passing through areas like Symphony Hall and Mission Hill. The two northern branches, added with the Green Line Extension opened on March 21, 2022, serve Union Square and Medford/Tufts, enhancing connectivity to Somerville and Medford. These branches operate on dedicated tracks where possible, with street-running sections on some alignments, and connect eight municipalities including Boston, Brookline, Newton, and Somerville.[8][5][9] Service runs daily, serving approximately 93,000 passengers, with trains stopping at all underground stations and requiring passengers to signal for street-level stops. Operating hours typically begin around 5:00 a.m. and end near 12:30 a.m., though recent changes have extended some evening service to 1:00 a.m. Frequencies vary by branch and time of day, generally ranging from 5 to 8 minutes during peak hours to 10 to 15 minutes off-peak, as detailed in official schedules; specific patterns include through-routing from western branches to northern extensions to optimize capacity.[8][1][10]Ridership and Economic Role
The Green Line serves as a high-capacity light rail network averaging 101,000 weekday passengers as of July 2025, making it one of the busiest such systems in the United States.[11] This figure reflects ongoing recovery from pandemic-era declines, with system-wide MBTA ridership showing year-over-year increases of about 6% into 2024, though Green Line usage remains below pre-2019 peaks exceeding 240,000 daily boardings due to persistent service reliability issues and remote work trends.[12] Fare validation data from independent monitoring indicates current weekday levels around 50,000 validations with 66% recovery relative to historical maxima as of October 2025, underscoring underutilization tied to factors like slow speeds averaging 11.4 mph and frequent delays.[13] Economically, the Green Line underpins regional productivity by linking dense residential neighborhoods and suburbs to Boston's core employment hubs, including financial districts in Back Bay, medical centers like Massachusetts General Hospital, and educational anchors such as Boston University along the B branch and Harvard University via the E branch.[14] Its branches facilitate daily commutes for workers in tech, healthcare, and academia, contributing to the broader MBTA system's estimated $11.4 billion annual economic value through reduced automobile dependency and enabled labor mobility in Greater Boston as of 2018 analyses.[15] Modernization efforts, including the 2022 Green Line Extension to Medford and Union Square, have directly supported urban development by improving access to underserved areas, fostering new housing, retail, and job creation in Somerville while addressing capacity constraints that previously bottlenecked growth.[16] Delays in full recovery, however, impose costs on businesses via employee access limitations and contribute to fiscal strains, with low ridership exacerbating the MBTA's projected $400 million shortfall in 2026.[17]History
Origins and Early Expansion (1890s–1920s)
The Green Line originated from Boston's burgeoning streetcar network, which transitioned from horse-drawn cars to electric trolleys in the late 19th century. The West End Street Railway, formed in 1887 through consolidation of numerous private horse-car operators, introduced the city's first electric streetcar line on January 1, 1889, running approximately 5 miles from the Allston depot via Beacon Street and Coolidge Corner to Park Square; this alignment later evolved into the core of the Green Line C branch.[2] By the early 1890s, rapid electrification and route expansions under the West End Railway served over 100 miles of track, but severe surface congestion on Tremont Street—exacerbated by growing ridership of up to 200,000 daily passengers—prompted calls for underground infrastructure.[2] In response, the Massachusetts legislature created the Boston Transit Commission in 1894, leading to the construction of the Tremont Street Subway, North America's inaugural underground rapid transit tunnel, which opened on September 1, 1897. Initial operations spanned 1.1 miles from the Public Garden portal inbound to a stub at Haymarket, with streetcars from surface lines entering via portals at either end; the Boylston and Park Street stations commenced service the same day, handling up to 35,000 passengers on opening day.[18][19] The subway, built at a cost of $3.5 million by the city using cut-and-cover methods, was immediately leased to the newly chartered Boston Elevated Railway (BERy) for operation, integrating streetcar feeds from western suburbs and alleviating downtown gridlock by diverting trolleys underground.[2] Early 20th-century expansions focused on extending subway capacity and surface feeders to accommodate surging demand, which reached 300 million annual rides by 1910. The BERy opened an outbound tunnel under Boylston Street in 1901, linking to surface tracks on Huntington Avenue and enabling through service to emerging branches like the precursors to the B and E lines.[2] Further surface extensions proliferated: tracks along Commonwealth Avenue, laid in 1896, supported B branch development, while Huntington Avenue service reached Brookline Village by 1900 and Jamaica Plain extensions followed in the 1900s via a 1903 South Huntington connector.[2] To boost efficiency, BERy deployed articulated "Peter Witt" streetcars in 1913, each carrying up to 60 passengers—double prior models—across the growing network.[2] By the 1920s, the system had matured into a radial light rail operation with four primary western branches converging downtown, though ridership pressures led to innovations like the 1922 Lechmere Viaduct, which rerouted northern services and added 0.8 miles of elevated structure to link East Cambridge.[20] These developments under BERy private management laid the foundation for the Green Line's enduring structure, prioritizing empirical traffic relief over expansive new builds amid post-World War I fiscal constraints.[2]Mid-20th Century Changes and Decline
In 1947, the Boston Elevated Railway (BERy), which operated the Green Line streetcar service, faced bankruptcy amid postwar declines in ridership driven by the rise of automobiles and suburbanization, prompting the Massachusetts legislature to establish the publicly owned Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) to assume control of BERy's assets, including the Green Line.[21][22] The takeover addressed chronic underinvestment and financial losses, as streetcar patronage fell sharply after World War II when gasoline rationing ended and personal vehicle ownership surged, reducing daily systemwide ridership from wartime peaks of over 300,000 to lower levels by the early 1950s.[23] Despite the Green Line's retention as a core rail service in subway tunnels and dedicated medians, the MTA accelerated the conversion of peripheral streetcar routes to buses across the broader network to cut costs and adapt to traffic congestion, though the main Green Line branches persisted due to their central urban role.[2] The MTA's operations in the 1950s included limited modernization efforts, but aging infrastructure and equipment shortages plagued the Green Line, with wooden streetcars prone to fires and mechanical failures contributing to service reliability issues.[23] A notable change came in 1959 with the opening of the D branch extension from Newton Highlands to Riverside along former Boston and Albany Railroad right-of-way, introducing PCC streetcars on a light rail alignment to serve growing suburban demand, though this was offset by broader system strains.[2] In 1964, the MTA was reorganized into the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), expanding its service district from 14 to 78 municipalities and subsidizing operations with state funds, yet the Green Line faced ongoing challenges from deferred maintenance and competition from highways.[2] Decline accelerated in the late 1960s with the closure of the A branch from Packards Corner to Watertown Square on June 21, 1969, replaced by bus route 57 due to severe street traffic interference, acute streetcar shortages, and conflicts with Massachusetts Turnpike ramp construction that made rail operations untenable.[24][25] This reduced the Green Line's surface branches from ten in 1938 to fewer options, reflecting a pattern of contractions amid low off-peak ridership and rising operational deficits, as buses offered greater routing flexibility in expanding suburban areas.[23] By the early 1970s, the line's fleet and tracks showed signs of deterioration, with frequent breakdowns and safety concerns foreshadowing later crises, though temporary ridership upticks from 1970s fuel shortages provided brief relief before structural issues intensified.[23]Late 20th to Early 21st Century Modernization
In the 1980s, the MBTA sought to resolve persistent reliability problems stemming from its Boeing-Vertol light rail vehicles (LRVs), which began delivery in the late 1970s but exhibited frequent mechanical failures, including wheel and truck defects that led to suspensions in production by 1978. To replace them, the agency introduced Type 7 LRVs manufactured by Japan's Kinki Sharyo, with the first cars entering revenue service in 1986; these second-generation vehicles featured improved design for better performance on the Green Line's mixed subway-street alignment and proved substantially more dependable over decades of operation.[26][27] By 1997, amid growing ridership, the MBTA supplemented the fleet with 20 additional Type 7 cars from the same manufacturer. Concurrently, in 1996, it awarded a contract to AnsaldoBreda (later Hitachi Rail) for 100 low-floor Type 8 LRVs intended to enhance accessibility through step-free boarding, but the order encountered severe manufacturing defects, supply chain delays, and quality control failures, resulting in staggered deliveries from 1998 to 2007 and chronic service disruptions that extended Boeing LRV operation until their final retirement in March 2007.[27][27] Infrastructure modernization gained momentum post-1990 with the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting the MBTA to formulate a Key Station Plan prioritizing elevator installations, platform reconstructions, and tactile warnings at high-usage stops; surface-level branches received raised platforms and sloped walkways to facilitate low-floor vehicle access, though progress was incremental due to funding constraints and the line's at-grade constraints.[28][29] Early planning for capacity expansions, including alternatives analysis for the Northwest Corridor in 1980, laid groundwork for future extensions like the Green Line to Tufts, though construction delays pushed implementation beyond the early 2000s.[30] Targeted track renewals, such as on the D branch in summer 2007, addressed wear from heavy usage and supported temporary service boosts during fleet transitions.[30]Route Description
Current Branches and Alignment
The MBTA Green Line's central alignment consists of an underground trunk through downtown Boston, shared by all branches, extending approximately 2.5 miles from Copley station to Science Park station. Inbound trains from the western branches enter the trunk via the Boylston Street subway portal near Kenmore, traveling underground through Copley, Arlington, and Boylston stations to Park Street, then northward via the original 1890s Tremont Street subway to Government Center (opened 2021), North Station, and Science Park before ascending to an elevated viaduct toward Lechmere.[4] At Lechmere, the alignment transitions to surface running on the completed Green Line Extension (GLX), which splits into two northern branches utilizing converted commuter rail corridors: the Union Branch to Union Square (opened March 21, 2022) and the Medford Branch to Medford/Tufts (opened December 12, 2022).[5] The B, C, and D branches operate from western suburbs, converging at Kenmore station after surface or grade-separated travel along radial parkways and dedicated rights-of-way. The B Branch extends 5.8 miles northwest from Park Street via the trunk to Boston College, serving Allston and Brighton with 17 stations on a mix of street-running and private right-of-way alignment.[31] The C Branch runs 4.5 miles to Cleveland Circle, paralleling the B Branch initially before diverging north along Beacon Street and South Street in Brookline, with 14 stations primarily on reservation. The D Branch, the longest at 9.0 miles to Riverside, heads southwest from Kenmore through Brookline and Newton along the Highland branch alignment, featuring 13 stations on elevated and surface sections.[32] The E Branch diverges eastward from the trunk at Copley, utilizing the separate 3.3-mile Huntington Avenue subway from Northeastern University station before emerging to surface running along Huntington Avenue and Heath Street to Heath Street terminus (8 stations total from Park Street), with a further 2.6-mile streetcar extension on the Ashmont–Mattapan High-Speed Line alignment to Mattapan (8 additional stations).[33] This configuration allows E Branch trains to join the main trunk inbound at Copley for shared service to the north, while outbound operations maintain separation until the Huntington portal. Service patterns interline western branches with northern extensions, with D Branch trains typically assigned to Medford/Tufts and others to Union Square, though subject to operational adjustments.[34]Former and Abandoned Branches
The A Branch extended from Lechmere Junction (now Science Park) along Main Street, Somerville, and North Beacon Street in Brighton to Watertown Square, serving as the northernmost Green Line branch from its integration into the subway system in the early 20th century.[24] Service originated from horsecar lines consolidated under the Boston Elevated Railway, with electric streetcar operation beginning in 1897 and subway connection via the Lechmere Viaduct by 1912.[25] The branch operated with two-car trains until facing declining ridership and infrastructure deterioration; by the late 1960s, acute shortages of serviceable streetcars due to mechanical failures and lack of maintenance forced the MBTA to suspend rail service on March 21, 1969, replacing it with bus route 57.[24] Tracks remained in place for non-revenue equipment movements to Watertown Carhouse until their removal in 1994, after which the right-of-way was partially repurposed or abandoned, with vestiges like embedded rails still visible in some streets as of 2024.[35] The Arborway Branch, an extension of the E Branch beyond Heath Street station, ran surface-level along Centre and South Streets in Jamaica Plain to Arborway Yard near Forest Hills, providing rail service from 1870 until its truncation.[36] This 1.4-mile segment, characterized by mixed street running on two-lane roads, encountered operational challenges including frequent stops blocking traffic, tight curves limiting train speeds to 10-15 mph, and vulnerability to automobile interference, which compromised safety and efficiency.[36] Service was suspended on December 28, 1985, ostensibly for track reconstruction amid Northeast Corridor improvements nearby, but restoration efforts failed due to escalating costs estimated at $50-100 million in 1980s dollars and persistent low ridership of under 1,000 daily passengers; it was permanently replaced by bus route 39, with tracks removed by the early 2000s.[36] The abandoned corridor, now overgrown and partially used for bus layovers, has seen intermittent proposals for reactivation, though none have advanced beyond planning as of 2023, reflecting broader challenges in reviving low-density streetcar extensions amid urban roadway prioritization.[37]Stations
Branch-by-Branch Listing
B BranchThe B branch provides service from Boston College station in Brighton to Government Center station in downtown Boston, primarily along the median of Commonwealth Avenue between Kenmore and Boston College, before joining the central subway trunk. The stations, listed from the outer terminus to the inner, are: Boston College, South Street, Chestnut Hill Avenue, Chiswick Road, Sutherland Road, Washington Street, Warren Street, Allston Street, Griggs Street, Harvard Avenue, Packard's Corner, Babcock Street, Pleasant Street, St. Paul Street, Boston University West, Boston University Central, Boston University East, Blandford Street, Kenmore, Hynes Convention Center, Copley, Arlington, Boylston, Park Street, and Government Center.[31] C Branch
The C branch operates from Cleveland Circle in Brighton to Government Center, running along Beacon Street between Kenmore and Cleveland Circle. The stations, from outer to inner, include: Cleveland Circle, Englewood Avenue, Dean Road, Tappan Street, Kent Street, Hawes Street, Carlton Street, Saint Mary's Street, Kenmore, Hynes Convention Center, Copley, Arlington, Boylston, Park Street, and Government Center. D Branch
The D branch extends from Riverside station in Newton to Union Square in Somerville, utilizing the Highland line west of Brookline Hills and sharing segments of the Beacon Street alignment with the C branch between Kenmore and Tappan Street, before connecting to the central trunk and northern extension. Stations from outer terminus to inner are: Riverside, Woodland, Waban, Eliot, Newton Highlands, Newton Centre, Chestnut Hill, Reservoir, Beaconsfield, Brookline Hills, Tappan Street, Kent Street, Hawes Street, Carlton Street, Saint Mary's Street, Kenmore, Hynes Convention Center, Copley, Arlington, Boylston, Park Street, Government Center, Haymarket, North Station, Science Park/West End, Lechmere, and Union Square.[32] E Branch
The E branch runs from Heath Street in the Fenway–Longwood Medical Area to Medford/Tufts station via Huntington Avenue between Kenmore and Heath Street, the central trunk, and the Medford extension beyond Lechmere. The stations, listed from outer to inner, are: Heath Street, Back of the Hill, Riverway, Mission Park, Brigham Circle, Prudential, Symphony, Northeastern University, Museum of Fine Arts, Fenway, Kenmore, Hynes Convention Center, Copley, Arlington, Boylston, Park Street, Government Center, Haymarket, North Station, Science Park/West End, Lechmere, East Somerville, Gilman Square, Magoun Square, Ball Square, and Medford/Tufts.
Key Interchange Points
Park Street station serves as a primary interchange between the Green Line and the Red Line, with direct platform connections facilitating transfers for inbound and outbound services on both lines.[8] A pedestrian concourse links Park Street to the adjacent Downtown Crossing station, enabling connections to the Orange Line and additional Red Line platforms approximately 0.1 miles away.[9] Government Center station provides the sole direct transfer point between the Green Line and the Blue Line, where passengers can move between platforms to access Aquarium and Airport stations on the Blue Line or continue on Green Line branches toward North Station or Boylston.[8] Haymarket station connects the Green Line to the Orange Line, allowing transfers to stations such as State and Chinatown, with the platforms separated by a short walk across Congress Street.[8] North Station functions as a major multimodal hub, offering Green Line transfers to the Orange Line for service to Oak Grove and Forest Hills, as well as direct access to MBTA Commuter Rail platforms serving the Lowell Line, Fitchburg Line, and Haverhill/Reading Line.[8] This station handles high volumes of interline traffic, with over 20,000 daily boardings reported across connected services as of 2023 MBTA data.[8]Rolling Stock
Active Vehicles and Specifications
The MBTA Green Line's active fleet comprises Type 7, Type 8, and Type 9 light rail vehicles, totaling 183 cars in revenue service as of October 2025. These vehicles operate across all branches, with Type 7 and Type 8 forming the bulk of the fleet and Type 9 providing supplementary modern capacity added during the 2010s.[38] Type 7 cars, built by Kinki Sharyo from 1986 to 1988, include 83 active units following overhauls completed between 2015 and 2019. These high-floor vehicles measure 72 feet in length, accommodate 46 seated passengers, and feature a width of 104 inches. Originally numbering 150, retirements due to accidents and age have reduced the active count, with remaining cars compatible for coupling with Type 8 units.[38][39] Type 8 cars, manufactured by AnsaldoBreda between 1999 and 2007, consist of 76 active high-floor units measuring 74 feet long with 44 seats. Of the original 95 cars, some have been retired following collisions or for training purposes, leaving the fleet to handle peak demands despite ongoing reliability concerns.[38] Type 9 cars, delivered by CAF from 2018 to 2020, number 24 low-floor units designed for enhanced accessibility and capacity. These vehicles feature sliding doors for faster boarding, digital displays for real-time information, and space for approximately 10% more passengers than Type 7 or 8 cars. Measuring around 74 feet, they support level boarding at select low-platform stops and represent an incremental modernization effort.[38][40]| Type | Manufacturer | Build Years | Active Units | Length | Floor Type | Seated Capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Kinki Sharyo | 1986–1988 | 83 | 72 ft | High | 46 |
| 8 | AnsaldoBreda | 1999–2007 | 76 | 74 ft | High | 44 |
| 9 | CAF | 2018–2020 | 24 | 74 ft | Low | 44+ |
Retired and Problematic Fleets
The MBTA's Pullman-Standard PCC streetcars, introduced in 1937, served the Green Line until their retirement in 1985, marking the end of high-floor streetcar operations on the main branches as newer light rail vehicles were procured.[41] The Boeing Vertol US Standard Light Rail Vehicles (USLRVs), delivered between 1976 and 1981, suffered from chronic mechanical unreliability and design flaws, including frequent failures, stability issues, and derailments due to track jumping, which fell far short of contract specifications for performance.[42][43] These problems persisted despite rebuild efforts in the 1980s and 1990s that temporarily improved availability through unique part sourcing, but supply constraints ultimately rendered maintenance unsustainable.[43] The fleet was fully retired by early 2007, with the last revenue runs occurring that year as Type 7 and Type 8 cars took over.[44] Among active but problematic fleets, the AnsaldoBreda Type 8 low-floor cars, entering service in 1999, experienced severe initial brake failures that led to their withdrawal from revenue operations until April 2000.[45] Subsequent issues included a pattern of derailments, such as three incidents involving Type 8 vehicles between July and August 2015, attributed in part to wheel-rail interface flaws requiring track geometry adjustments across the system.[46][47] These cars have continued to face criticism for poor reliability and higher derailment risk at elevated speeds compared to predecessors.[48] The Kinki Sharyo Type 7 cars, operational since 1986, remain hampered by high-floor design lacking accessibility ramps and the absence of event data recorders, which has delayed implementation of positive train control and anti-collision systems.[49] While more reliable than Type 8s in daily operations, their age-related maintenance demands contribute to broader fleet inefficiencies.[49] Both Type 7 and Type 8 fleets are slated for full replacement by CAF Type 10 vehicles, with service introduction beginning in 2027 and completion by 2031.[50]Procurement History and Future Orders
In 1983, the MBTA contracted Kinki Sharyo to build 150 Type 7 high-floor light rail vehicles for the Green Line, with deliveries beginning in 1986 and continuing through 1987; these cars formed the backbone of the fleet until the 2020s.[38] In 1996, the agency awarded AnsaldoBreda a contract for 100 Type 8 high-floor vehicles, intended as a follow-on procurement to modernize the fleet, though deliveries were delayed and occurred between 1998 and 2001 amid manufacturing issues.[45] For the Green Line Extension project, the MBTA procured 24 low-floor Type 9 vehicles from Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) under a $170 million contract awarded in May 2014, with the cars entering revenue service on the extension branches starting in March 2018 after final assembly in the United States.[40] To address the aging Type 7 and Type 8 fleets—many exceeding 35 years of service by the early 2020s—the MBTA board approved an $810–811 million contract in August 2022 with CAF USA for at least 102 Type 10 high-capacity, fully accessible vehicles, each approximately 54% longer than existing cars to enable single-unit operations replacing two-car consists.[51][52] Pilot vehicles are projected for delivery in 2026–2027, with production at two cars per month thereafter and full fleet completion by 2031; the procurement includes options for additional units and requires infrastructure upgrades for compatibility.[6] As of October 2025, no further orders beyond the initial Type 10 batch have been announced, though state funding allocations in late 2025 support related power, signal, and track enhancements to accommodate the new fleet.[53]Operations and Infrastructure
Signaling, Train Control, and Safety Protocols
The MBTA Green Line operates under a wayside signaling system using fixed-block signals to indicate track occupancy and control train speeds, with operators manually enforcing movements based on visual cues from semaphore or color-light signals along the route.[7] This setup, inherited from early 20th-century infrastructure, divides tracks into blocks and permits only one train per block, but lacks automatic speed enforcement or precise train location tracking in most sections, relying instead on operator judgment to maintain safe following distances.[54] Signal replacements, such as those completed on the D branch between Beaconsfield and Riverside in 2023–2024, modernized 6.5 miles of cabling and hardware but retained the basic fixed-block architecture without introducing cab signaling.[7] To address vulnerabilities exposed by collisions—such as the February 2025 incident prompting urgent reforms—the MBTA implemented the Green Line Train Protection System (GLTPS) starting in early 2025.[55] GLTPS integrates vehicle-mounted sensors (on train fronts, rears, and roofs) with wayside transponders and anchors to enforce three core functions: train-to-train collision avoidance by monitoring proximity and halting non-compliant movements, overspeed protection by capping velocities in restricted zones, and stop signal overrun prevention by automatically braking if an operator passes a red signal.[56][57] This overlay does not constitute full automatic train control but augments manual operation with fail-safe interventions, similar to Positive Train Control adaptations for light rail, and requires ongoing installation coordinated with service disruptions as of October 2025.[9][54] Safety protocols emphasize operator training and procedural redundancies, including visual and audio alerts from GLTPS for impending violations, mandatory adherence to speed postings at grade crossings (activated fully by the system), and emergency stop procedures triggered by onboard systems if human response lags.[56] Pre-GLTPS operations depended heavily on these human elements, with protocols mandating immediate halts for signal violations or unusual track conditions, though audits have highlighted enforcement gaps contributing to derailments and rear-end events.[58] The Central Tunnel Signal Project, initiated in September 2025, further upgrades core infrastructure to support GLTPS compatibility and future Type 10 vehicles, aiming to reduce dwell times and enhance block clearance reliability without altering fundamental train control paradigms.[59]Scheduling, Turnarounds, and Capacity Constraints
The MBTA Green Line schedules trains across its four branches (B, C, D, and E) with headways of 6–8 minutes during weekday peak periods and 7–12 minutes off-peak, though actual performance varies due to delays and bunching.[1] In summer 2025, the MBTA reduced scheduled trips starting June 15, resulting in extended intervals between trains to accommodate maintenance and operational adjustments.[60] Fall 2025 updates refined weekend timetables to align more closely with observed travel durations, reflecting ongoing efforts to mitigate variability from infrastructure limitations.[61] Turnaround procedures at terminal stations require operators to verify that all cars are cleared of passengers before reversing direction, a process enforced by MBTA operating rules to ensure safety.[62] At inner endpoints such as Government Center, B and D branch trains execute turnarounds without dedicated recovery time, as no layover space exists, which compresses schedules and propagates delays into subsequent runs.[63] Outer terminals like Riverside (D branch) or Heath Street (E branch) allow brief dwells for crew changes and inspections, typically limiting turnaround durations to minutes but still constraining frequency when coupled with signal blocks or dwell overruns. Capacity on the Green Line trunk—where branches converge between Park Street and Boylston—faces inherent bottlenecks from interleaved merging, restricting total throughput to fewer trains per hour than parallel heavy rail lines despite high demand.[64] Track deterioration has compounded these limits, with speed restrictions persisting into 2024 and reducing effective capacity by forcing slower operations and increasing headway variability.[65] Even after removing over 220 system-wide speed curbs by late 2024, median travel times from North Station to Kenmore remained elevated at around 19 minutes in early 2024 samples, underscoring unresolved constraints from aging signals and geometry.[66] Scheduling models incorporating these factors, such as those for the B branch, explicitly account for passenger loading limits on expresses to avoid overloads in the shared core.[63]Maintenance and Track Conditions
The MBTA Green Line has historically suffered from deferred maintenance, resulting in widespread track deterioration that necessitated numerous speed restrictions, or "slow zones," to ensure safety. As of early 2024, the system had 67 such restrictions on the Green Line, contributing to reduced service speeds and increased travel times across its branches. These conditions stemmed from aging infrastructure, including worn rails and inadequate inspections, exacerbated by years of underfunding relative to needs.[67][68] Efforts to address these issues intensified under the Track Improvement Program, which by December 2024 had eliminated over 220 system-wide speed restrictions, including several on the Green Line through rail replacements totaling more than 250,000 feet across the MBTA network. Specific Green Line initiatives included the removal of 11 speed restrictions in early 2024 via targeted track work on branches like the C Branch, enabled by service suspensions that provided unobstructed access. The D Branch Track and Signal Replacement project further upgraded 25,000 feet of track and 6.5 miles of signaling, aiming to enhance reliability and permit higher operational speeds.[69][70][71] Track conditions have been linked to safety incidents, such as the October 2024 derailment near Packard's Corner, where a train exceeded a 10 mph speed restriction, traveling at 36 mph due to operator error in a degraded section. In response, the MBTA accelerated installation of a train protection system—similar to positive train control—designed to automatically enforce speed limits and prevent overspeeding, with deployments ongoing into 2025 despite prior delays. This technology addresses vulnerabilities in manually enforced restrictions, which audits have identified as insufficient given the line's light rail characteristics and frequent tight curves.[72][57][73] Maintenance protocols rely on standards classifying track defects into green, yellow, and red severity levels, with mandatory repairs for higher-risk categories, though a state audit noted inconsistencies in application and ongoing revisions expected by summer 2025. Annual programmed maintenance, including tunnel inspections and catenary repairs, necessitates periodic closures, such as those planned for November 2025 on the E Branch and December 2024 shutdowns between Park Street and Union Square/Medford/Tufts for comprehensive track overhauls. These interventions, part of the broader Green Line Program, prioritize signal and track upgrades to mitigate flood risks and wear, but persistent challenges like funding constraints and coordination delays have slowed full restoration.[74][75][76]Accessibility and User Experience
Current Accessibility Levels
As of October 2025, 44 of the MBTA Green Line's approximately 70 stations are fully accessible to passengers with mobility impairments, enabling independent access via elevators, ramps, or level platforms from street to train.[77] This includes most underground downtown stations, such as Park Street, Government Center, and Boylston, where multiple elevators connect entrances to platforms, though temporary outages occur frequently due to maintenance or mechanical failures.[78] Surface-level stations on branches like the E Line to Heath Street feature accessible stops at Heath Street, Back of the Hill, and Riverway, while the core segment from North Station to Kenmore is largely compliant.[79] Accessibility varies significantly by branch: the B, C, and D branches have fewer compliant stops outside the central area, with recent consolidations at Babcock Street and Amory Street on the B Branch providing new level-boarding platforms completed in prior years.[77] Green Line trains incorporate low-floor Type 8 and Type 9 cars, which facilitate gap-free boarding at equipped stations using deployable bridge plates, though every consist includes a mix of low- and high-floor vehicles, requiring operator-assisted portable lifts for the latter at non-level stops.[79] Elevator reliability remains a challenge, with ongoing alerts reporting closures at key interchanges like North Station and Haymarket, impacting end-to-end accessible trips.[80] High-ridership surface stops without elevators, such as those on Beacon Street (C Branch) and Commonwealth Avenue (B Branch), rely on low platforms that align partially with low-floor cars but expose users to weather and uneven street crossings, limiting usability for wheelchair users without assistance.[79] The MBTA's Plan for Accessible Transit Infrastructure (PATI) prioritizes remaining gaps, but as of late 2025, over 25 stations lack full compliance, constraining system-wide accessibility to about 63 percent.[77] Audio-visual announcements and call boxes aid navigation at accessible stations, though tactile paving and clear signage are inconsistent across the network.[79]Renovation Efforts and Challenges
The MBTA's Plan for Accessible Transit Infrastructure (PATI) targets full system accessibility, with the Green Line identified as the oldest and most challenging branch due to its elevated structures, street-level platforms, and century-old design requiring extensive retrofits like elevator installations and platform raising.[77] Efforts include completing accessibility upgrades at stations such as Amory Street, Babcock Street (B branch), Brookline Hills, Waban, Eliot, Chestnut Hill, and Beaconsfield (D branch), featuring new elevators, raised platforms, and improved pathways.[77] Ongoing projects encompass multiple stations across branches: on the C branch, Englewood Avenue, Dean Road, Tappan Street, Fairbanks Street, Brandon Hall, Summit Avenue, Saint Paul Street, Kent Street, and Hawes Street; on the B branch, South Street, Chestnut Hill Avenue, Chiswick Road, Sutherland Road, Warren Street, Allston Street, Griggs Street, Packard's Corner, and Blandford Street; on the D branch, Newton Highlands; and on the E branch, Symphony, alongside Hynes Convention Center serving B, C, and D branches.[77][4] Federal funding has supported these initiatives, including a $67 million grant from the Federal Transit Administration in 2024 for platform improvements along the Green Line, and an additional $66.6 million allocated in 2022 specifically for Symphony station elevators and modifications.[81][82] The introduction of new Type 9 low-floor vehicles, completed as part of the Green Line Program, enhances boarding accessibility systemwide by eliminating high-floor mismatches at renovated stations.[4] In October 2025, $850 million from Fair Share Amendment revenues was directed toward backlogged accessibility projects, including Green Line station upgrades.[83] Construction on the C branch, aimed at ADA-compliant elevators and platforms, began in fall 2025, with planned closures through 2025 supporting work at Symphony and other sites.[84][75] Challenges persist from the line's legacy infrastructure, including coordination with the City of Boston for street-level stations and the technical difficulties of retrofitting elevators into narrow tunnels and elevated viaducts without disrupting service.[77] The Symphony station project, originally funded at $66.6 million, faced significant delays by September 2024, with completion pushed back and costs expected to exceed estimates due to unforeseen construction complexities reported by the Construction Industries of Massachusetts.[85] These efforts have required frequent service diversions and shutdowns, contributing to rider disruptions, as seen in 13 Green Line diversions in 2024, eight lasting over a week, though yielding travel time gains in some segments.[86] Despite progress, the Green Line remains the least accessible heavy rail line, with retrofits lagging behind other branches owing to higher per-station costs and engineering hurdles in historic urban settings.[87][77]Projects and Extensions
Green Line Extension (GLX) Development and Issues
The Green Line Extension (GLX) project extends the MBTA Green Line northward from the existing Lechmere station by approximately 4.3 miles, adding three new stations along the Union Square Branch in Somerville and four stations along the Medford Branch serving Somerville and Medford, Massachusetts. It includes dedicated light rail tracks paralleling existing commuter rail rights-of-way, six new stations designed for accessibility, and an adjacent Community Path for pedestrians and cyclists. The extension aims to support over 50,000 daily trips, reduce regional vehicle miles traveled by 57 million annually, and lower emissions in underserved areas previously lacking rapid transit.[5] Planning for the GLX originated as an environmental mitigation measure tied to the Big Dig highway project in the early 2000s, with advocacy efforts spanning over 30 years from community groups in Somerville and Medford. Federal funding of $996 million was committed in 2014 toward an initial estimated cost of around $2.2 billion, but projected expenses rose to $3.3 billion by 2015, prompting a redesign that scaled back some elements like station features to secure approval and maintain viability. The project adopted a design-build delivery method to accelerate timelines, with the contract awarded to GLX Constructors—a joint venture including firms like Herzog—for $954 million in core construction plus $127.5 million in options, in November 2017. Groundbreaking occurred in 2018.[88] [89] [90] The Union Square Branch opened to passengers on March 21, 2022, followed by the Medford Branch on December 12, 2022, marking the project's completion at a final budget of $2.3 billion. The adjacent Community Path extension opened in June 2023. These openings fulfilled a vision dating to early 20th-century proposals but were delayed from an original target of 2021 due to construction complexities, including coordination with active commuter rail operations and utility relocations.[5] [91] Cost overruns plagued the project from early stages, with bid awards exceeding budgeted scopes by approximately 44% relative to a $1.99 billion baseline, driven in part by the design-build approach's risks and MBTA's history of similar issues in prior contracts. Estimates in 2016 suggested the project could exceed budgets by up to $1 billion, necessitating updates to construction plans and contributing to the 2015 near-cancellation before redesign. Critics, including policy analysts, attributed escalations to inadequate risk allocation in contracts and insufficient pre-bid scrutiny, contrasting with lower-cost light rail extensions elsewhere.[92] [93] [94] Delays extended beyond initial projections, with the Medford Branch postponed multiple times—from summer 2022 to late November, then to December—due to unresolved construction defects and safety testing. The Union Branch also faced pre-opening setbacks, including incomplete station access points. These postponements stemmed from permitting hurdles, funding reallocations, and integration challenges with legacy infrastructure, though community pressure and state oversight prevented abandonment.[95] [88] Post-opening technical issues emerged prominently with track gauge deficiencies, where rails were installed narrower than the required 56.5-inch standard, affecting over 24,000 feet—about 70% of the Medford Branch—prior to December 2022 inauguration. Problems were flagged as early as April 2021 in subcontractor reports from rail yard testing and confirmed in an October 2021 laser scan of nearly 400 sections between Science Park and branch endpoints, yet construction proceeded without full remediation. Investigations attributed defects to prefabricated rail ties manufactured to incorrect specifications, resulting in ties spaced too closely and subsequent narrowing under load; this led to 3 mph slow orders imposed in June and September 2023 across affected segments for safety.[88] [96] [97] Oversight lapses compounded these flaws, as MBTA officials disregarded or failed to reconcile conflicting gauge data, allowing opening despite known risks—a pattern cited by the MBTA board chair as reflective of broader institutional issues in problem concealment. Repairs, including track widening, were underway by late 2023, with contractors addressing the most severe out-of-gauge sections pre-opening but underestimating ongoing degradation. By 2025, while the line operated without major publicized disruptions tied to initial defects, related signal and infrastructure upgrades continued amid MBTA-wide modernization efforts.[88] [98] [9]Core Capacity and Branch Upgrades
![MBTA Green Line Type 9 train][float-right] The Green Line Transformation (GLT) program includes core capacity enhancements targeting the central tunnel and shared infrastructure to accommodate higher train volumes and frequencies. These upgrades encompass power system modernizations, replacement of the century-old signal infrastructure with advanced systems, track reconfigurations, and integration of new low-floor vehicles to reduce dwell times and support headways under five minutes.[99][100] The GLT Core Capacity initiative consolidates 17 ongoing projects aimed at increasing throughput by up to 20,000 riders per hour through improved operations and boarding efficiency.[101][4] Infrastructure modifications are required to deploy Type 10 vehicles, which feature designs optimized for higher capacity and compatibility with upgraded tracks and signals.[102] In October 2025, the MBTA allocated $850 million for these reliability-focused improvements, prioritizing signal and power upgrades to enable denser service patterns without compromising safety.[99] Branch upgrades have emphasized track rehabilitation to enhance speeds and reliability, indirectly boosting effective capacity by minimizing slowdowns. Between June and October 2022, the MBTA completed upgrades to over 14,000 feet of track across the B, C, D, and E branches.[103] In 2021, efforts replaced 10.8 miles of track—representing 24% of the Green Line's total—and upgraded 14 intersections, or 26%, primarily on the B, C, and E branches.[104] These interventions address wear from high usage, allowing sustained higher velocities and fewer service disruptions on the spokes feeding the core.[4] Ongoing branch work includes signal and protection system installations on extensions like Union Square and Medford/Tufts, which integrate with core enhancements to optimize end-to-end flows.[9] For the D branch, interim accessibility modifications completed in December 2024 at stations including Waban, Eliot, Chestnut Hill, and Beaconsfield incorporate platform adjustments that support quicker passenger handling.[105] Similar track and structural improvements on B and C branches continue, focusing on durable materials to withstand increased service demands post-core upgrades.[106][107]Recent Infrastructure Initiatives (2024–2025)
In 2024, the MBTA completed the Track Improvement Program, which removed over 220 speed restrictions and replaced more than 250,000 feet of rail system-wide, including on the Green Line, thereby enhancing safety and reducing delays.[69] This effort involved 23 planned closures across multiple lines, returning an estimated 2.4 million minutes of daily service to riders through faster operations.[69] Concurrently, the D Branch Track and Signal Replacement project concluded, contributing to broader Green Line Program goals of mitigating derailments and collisions via upgraded rails and a new train protection system.[4] State funding announced on October 24, 2025, allocated resources for additional Green Line infrastructure, encompassing power and signal enhancements alongside track reconfiguration.[108] Accessibility upgrades advanced significantly in 2024, with full reconstructions at Amory Street and Babcock Street stations on the B Branch, and Brookline Hills on the D Branch.[77] Interim improvements rendered Waban, Eliot, Chestnut Hill, and Beaconsfield stations on the D Branch accessible by December 2024.[77] Ongoing work targeted multiple stations across B, C, D, and E branches, including Hynes Convention Center, Newton Highlands, and Symphony, involving platform raising, widening for level boarding, and elevator installations to align with incoming low-floor vehicles.[77] By late 2024, 188 high-priority stops system-wide had been reconstructed, with 133 more under design or construction, though Green Line-specific challenges persisted due to street-level configurations.[77] The procurement of 102 Type 10 light rail vehicles progressed, with a public mockup unveiled on October 30, 2024, at Boston City Hall Plaza to gather rider feedback on features like wider doors, four priority mobility spaces, hearing loops, and dynamic digital displays.[51] [6] Design reached 75% completion by mid-2025, under an $810 million contract awarded in 2022, with initial revenue service slated for spring 2027 and full fleet delivery by 2031 to replace aging Type 7 and 8 cars.[51] These vehicles form a core component of the Green Line Transformation Program, enabling capacity increases and tying into signal and track upgrades for improved reliability, targeting 90% on-time performance.[109] Planned 2025 closures will support related maintenance, including tunnel inspections, catenary trough removal, and Symphony Station work.[75]Performance and Reliability
Metrics and Historical Trends
The MBTA Green Line's reliability has historically been measured through indicators such as on-time performance (OTP), excess trip time (ETT), and passenger delay minutes, though standardized metrics for light rail were limited until recent policy updates. Prior to 2024, OTP calculations often underrepresented delays by excluding factors like speed restrictions and slower schedules, leading to inflated reliability figures; for example, a 2017 analysis critiqued the MBTA's wait time reliability metric for failing to capture frequent service disruptions adequately.[110] [111] In 2024, the MBTA adopted ETT as the primary metric for the Green Line, defining a trip as reliable if actual travel time exceeds scheduled time by no more than 5 minutes; this shift aimed to better reflect real-world delays from infrastructure constraints.[112] Historical data from independent trackers indicate average delays of approximately 6.4 minutes per trip, with the B branch experiencing the highest frequency.[113] Ridership trends reflect pandemic impacts followed by partial recovery, with average weekday boardings dropping sharply in 2020 due to COVID-19 restrictions and service reductions. By 2023, Green Line ridership had risen above 2022 levels, signaling increased usage amid broader system rebound, though remaining below pre-2019 peaks; monthly averages are tracked via automated fare collection and passenger counters, excluding weekends.[114] [115] Speed metrics, compared against historical maxima, show persistent subpar performance, with median speeds elevated anomalously in mid-2020 due to reduced congestion but declining thereafter amid ongoing track issues.[116]| Year | Key Reliability Trend | Source Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 2017–2019 | Frequent delays from signal and door failures; OTP often below 70% on branches | Critiqued metrics underestimated issues[110] |
| 2020–2021 | Ridership fell >80% from pre-pandemic; speeds temporarily improved due to low volume | COVID-driven service cuts amplified unreliability[117] |
| 2022–2023 | Partial ridership recovery; persistent weekly delays, especially on western branches | Speed restrictions widespread[118] |
| 2024–2025 | ETT metric introduced; minimal delay reductions post-shutdowns (e.g., ~1 min savings on some segments) | Ongoing infrastructure lags hinder trends[111] [119] |
