Hubbry Logo
MegophrysMegophrysMain
Open search
Megophrys
Community hub
Megophrys
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Megophrys
Megophrys
Megophrys
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
"Asian horned frog" redirects here. This may also refer specifically to Megophrys montana.

Megophrys
Megophrys montana
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Megophryidae
Subfamily: Megophryinae
Genus: Megophrys
Kuhl & van Hasselt, 1822
Type species
Megophrys montana
Kuhl & van Hasselt, 1822
Species

Several, see text

Synonyms
  • Ceratophryne Schlegel, 1858

Megophrys is a genus of frogs in the family Megophryidae. They are endemic to Indonesia, where they are found on the islands of Java and Sumatra. They commonly have elongated upper "eyebrows" and are thus known as Indonesian horned toads. This group was thought to contain many more species and have a much wider distribution prior to recent taxonomic revisions.[1]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The following species are recognised in the genus Megophrys:[2]

Megophrys formerly contained over a hundred species, but significant taxonomic revisions have led to the vast majority of these species being moved to other genera, such as Xenophrys, Boulenophrys, Atympanophrys and Pelobatrachus. However, there is a divide between studies over this, with most Indian-published studies preferring to classify all these taxa within Megophrys, while Chinese-published studies classify them in their own genera; the IUCN Red List follows the former, while Amphibian Species of the World and AmphibiaWeb follow the latter.[3]

Endemic ranges

[edit]

Many Megophrys species are endemic to highly restricted geographical areas.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Megophrys

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Megophrys is a of frogs in the family Megophryidae, subfamily Megophryinae. As of 2025, it comprises 5–8 recognized depending on taxonomic classification, primarily endemic to the in . These amphibians, commonly known as Asian horned frogs, are distinguished by their distinctive horn-like tubercles or projections above the eyes, a broad and flattened body form, and mottled brown or gray coloration that provides excellent against leaf litter on the . Species of Megophrys inhabit humid, lowland to montane tropical rainforests of (Sumatra, Java, Borneo), where they lead largely terrestrial and nocturnal lifestyles, relying on and short hops for movement due to their large heads, wide bodies, and relatively short limbs. Examples include M. montana on Java, M. parallela on Borneo, and Sumatran species such as M. acehensis, M. selatanensis, and M. lancip. These frogs breed in streams or forested areas, with males exhibiting territorial calls during the rainy season, and many species face threats from and fragmentation, leading to conservation statuses ranging from Least Concern to on the . The genus has undergone significant taxonomic revisions since 2017, with numerous former Megophrys species reassigned to related genera such as Boulenophrys, Brachytarsophrys, and Xenophrys based on molecular phylogenetics. Some classifications retain a broader Megophrys including species from northeastern India (e.g., formerly M. awuh, now often Xenophrys awuh), but the core genus emphasizes Sundaic endemics. Despite their morphological conservatism, Megophrys species exhibit localized endemism and cryptic diversity, underscoring the importance of ongoing field surveys in biodiverse hotspots like Sundaland for conservation and systematic studies.

Taxonomy

Etymology and history

The genus name Megophrys is derived from words "megas" (large) and "ophrys" (eyebrow), alluding to the prominent horn-like supraocular projections that resemble exaggerated s in many species. The was established by Kuhl and Van Hasselt in 1822, with the Megophrys montana described from , , based on specimens collected during early European explorations of . Early taxonomic work treated Megophrys broadly, incorporating diverse Asian horned frogs under a single that eventually encompassed over 100 species across mainland and insular , reflecting limited morphological distinctions and regional collecting biases. An early synonym was Ceratophryne Schlegel, 1858, proposed for Bornean forms with pronounced cranial crests, later subsumed under Megophrys. Major taxonomic revisions began in earnest after 2010, driven by molecular phylogenetic analyses using markers such as 16S rRNA and combined with morphological traits, which revealed the paraphyly of Megophrys sensu lato and prompted the elevation of subgenera to distinct genera including Xenophrys, Boulenophrys, Atympanophrys, and Panophrys. These splits, detailed in studies like Mahony et al. (2017) and subsequent works, narrowed Megophrys to its core clade. Taxonomic classifications differ among authorities: AmphibiaWeb recognizes approximately 8 species as of 2025, including those in subgenus Xenophrys, primarily in the nominotypical subgenus restricted to (Java and ) and the subgenus Xenophrys in ; in contrast, Amphibian Species of the World (ASW) recognizes 5 species in Megophrys proper, placing Northeast Indian forms in the separate genus Xenophrys. Key events included ongoing debates between Indian and Chinese taxonomic perspectives, with Indian studies emphasizing South Asian endemics and Chinese research focusing on mainland diversity, leading to contested generic boundaries until integrative resolved many conflicts. Recent papers from 2021 to 2025, such as those describing M. acehensis and M. selatanensis, have further confirmed these delimitations through multilocus phylogenies, solidifying the genus's reduced scope.

Phylogenetic relationships

Megophrys belongs to the family Megophryidae, the Asian toad family, and is classified within the subfamily Megophryinae, commonly known as the horned toads. This subfamily encompasses species characterized by distinctive horn-like projections over the eyes, adapted to leaf-litter habitats in . Phylogenetic analyses place Megophryidae as part of the clade within Anura, with Megophryinae representing a monophyletic group supported by both morphological and molecular data. The genus Megophrys originated in approximately 48 million years ago during the Eocene, with subsequent dispersal northward into and an ancient around 20 million years ago in the early , which greatly contributed to its diversification. This timeline is derived from timetree analyses integrating calibrations and methods. Within Anura, Megophryidae occupies a relatively basal position among neobatrachian frogs, highlighting its evolutionary antiquity. Molecular evidence from multilocus phylogenies, including mitochondrial genes (12S and 16S rRNA) and nuclear loci such as and , confirms the monophyly of and supports its delimitation from broader groupings previously encompassed under Megophrys sensu lato. Sister relationships within Megophryinae include close affinities to Borneophrys and Brachytarsophrys in the tribe Megophryini, while at the subfamily level, Megophryinae is sister to Leptobrachiinae, which includes Leptobrachium. These analyses have resolved paraphyletic arrangements in prior taxonomies, leading to the recognition of distinct within the subfamily Megophryinae, with delimited as a monophyletic that may include subgeneric divisions in some classifications. Subgeneric divisions within Megophrys include the nominotypical Megophrys, comprising species such as M. montana, and the Xenophrys, which tentatively includes species like M. awuh, though ongoing studies seek further resolution of these boundaries using expanded genomic data and note taxonomic debate over whether Xenophrys warrants generic status. High levels of cryptic diversity have been uncovered through genetic assessments, revealing deeply divergent lineages that were morphologically indistinguishable, and this has driven the description of numerous new in Megophryinae, with over 40 additions since 2010.

Recognized species

As of 2025, the Megophrys comprises approximately eight valid species per AmphibiaWeb, primarily distributed across and parts of , though classifications differ (e.g., ASW recognizes five in Megophrys and places Northeast Indian species in Xenophrys). These species are characterized by leaf-litter , horn-like projections over the eyes, and adaptations for montane forest habitats, though specific traits vary. The recognized species include:
  • M. montana Kuhl & Van Hasselt, 1822, the type species endemic to , notable for its large size with females reaching up to 111 mm snout-vent length (SVL).
  • M. parallela Inger & Iskandar, 2005, from , distinguished by parallel dorsal ridges and a relatively smooth skin texture compared to congeners.
  • M. lancip Munir, Hamidy, Farajallah & Smith, 2018, from southwestern , featuring an extremely pointed rostral appendage and medium body size (SVL 35–45 mm in males).
  • M. acehensis Munir, Nishikawa, Hamidy & Smith, 2021, endemic to northern , with a rounded snout and lacking prominent flank folds.
  • M. selatanensis Munir, Nishikawa, Hamidy & Smith, 2021, from southern , similar to M. acehensis but with distinct genetic markers and subtle dorsal wart patterns.
  • M. awuh Mahony, Kamei, Teeling & Biju, 2020 (subgenus Xenophrys), from ( and ), with a flat head and small eye tubercles.
  • M. dzukou Mathew & Sen, 2009 (subgenus Xenophrys), restricted to , , known for its depressed body and short limbs.
  • M. numhbumaeng Lalremsanga, Sailo, Hooroo, Wilkinson & Das, 2019 (subgenus Xenophrys), from , , characterized by a prominent supratympanic ridge and SVL up to 50 mm.
Recent taxonomic revisions have added species like M. acehensis and M. selatanensis based on molecular and morphological analyses, while numerous former Megophrys taxa from China and Vietnam have been transferred to the genus Boulenophrys following phylogenetic studies that resolved paraphyly in the group. Identification of Megophrys species is challenging due to morphological overlap and cryptic diversity, often requiring bioacoustic analysis of advertisement calls and genetic sequencing (e.g., 16S rRNA gene) to distinguish closely related forms.

Description

External morphology

Members of the genus Megophrys exhibit a robust, stocky body form with a broad head, short hind limbs relative to body size, and a depressed profile that aids in their leaf-litter . -vent lengths (SVL) vary across but generally fall between approximately 30 and 110 mm, with males often smaller than females; for example, M. montana reaches up to 111 mm in females. The head is wide, featuring a triangular or acutely pointed that projects forward, often shield-like in shape. A key diagnostic trait of Megophrys is the presence of prominent horn-like tubercles or projections above the eyes, forming eyebrow-like ridges that vary in size and sharpness among but are consistently developed. The tympanum is typically small and partially or fully concealed beneath a distinct supratympanic fold, rendering it indistinct or hidden under the skin. Vomerine teeth are present in most , arranged in transverse or V-shaped rows behind the choanae, though absent in some. The skin texture is distinctly warty and glandular, with longitudinal ridges running along the dorsum and limbs, scattered tubercles, and prominent pectoral glands visible as swollen areas on the chest. The limbs are relatively short, with fingers free of and lacking adhesive discs or expanded tips. Toes show partial basal , typically one-third to half webbed, and feature an elongate inner metatarsal resembling a but not a true structure as in spadefoot toads; the outer metatarsal is small and rounded. Males possess a single, subgular that is simple and median. Coloration patterns, while variable, often include dorsal ridges that align with cryptic leaf mimicry.

Coloration and adaptations

Species of the genus Megophrys typically display base coloration in mottled shades of brown, gray, or reddish tones that closely resemble the leaf litter and decaying vegetation of their habitats, enhancing their overall cryptic appearance. For instance, Megophrys montana exhibits light to reddish brown dorsally, with adults ranging from reddish to dark or yellowish brown, while the venter is mottled in brown and dark cream. These tones are produced by a distribution of melanophores in the skin, which are denser on dorsal surfaces. Dorsal patterns often include irregular blotches and darker markings, such as a triangular dark blotch behind the eyes in M. montana, along with subtle ridges and stripes that align with for added textural of crumpled leaves. The prominent eye projections, formed by elongated supraciliary or "horns," are typically darker than the surrounding skin, further disrupting the outline and contributing to leaf-like when viewed from above. This cryptic patterning serves a primary antipredator function by enabling to remain motionless and undetected on the , with dermal tubercles and bones mimicking leaf veins and edges. Sensory adaptations support their nocturnal, litter-dwelling lifestyle, including large eyes with vertical pupils and dark brown irises that facilitate low-light vision in dim conditions. These vertical pupils help control light intake in low ambient light, aiding detection of prey and threats. Despite a tympanum that is often small, indistinct, or concealed by to preserve , Megophrys maintain acute hearing sensitivity, likely through extratympanic pathways common in anurans for detecting conspecific calls and environmental sounds. Defensive features include scattered spines or tubercles on the flanks and dorsal surfaces, which in M. montana bear paired black spots near the arm insertions; these structures house mucous and serous glands that secrete protective substances, deterring predators while also aiding in moisture regulation and resistance.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic distribution

The genus Megophrys is primarily distributed across , with its core range centered on the Indonesian islands of , , and , where multiple species occur in montane forests. Extensions of the genus's range reach into , including regions such as and , though these populations represent isolated outliers compared to the Sundaic core. Endemism within Megophrys is notably high, with most species confined to specific islands or localized montane areas; for instance, M. montana is restricted to Java, while M. dzukou is known only from the Dzukou Valley along the Nagaland-Manipur border in Northeast India. This pattern of narrow ranges underscores the genus's sensitivity to geographic barriers and habitat fragmentation. Historically, the genus was considered to have a much broader distribution extending from the Himalayas through southern China and into mainland Southeast Asia, based on earlier taxonomic classifications that lumped diverse lineages under Megophrys sensu lato. However, recent phylogenetic revisions have narrowed the strict circumscription of Megophrys (sensu stricto) to exclude mainland Southeast Asian records, attributing those to distinct genera or subgenera following molecular and morphological analyses. Biogeographically, the distribution of the Sundaic species of Megophrys is tied to the , where Pleistocene sea-level fluctuations isolated populations on islands like , , and , promoting through vicariance. These events contributed to the genus's current fragmented ranges, with no confirmed occurrences in under the updated .

Preferred habitats

Species of the genus Megophrys primarily inhabit humid tropical and subtropical forests across , favoring environments with high moisture levels and dense vegetation cover. These frogs are adapted to shaded understories where they can maintain among foliage and debris, enhancing their survival in predator-rich ecosystems. They occupy a range of forest types, including primary and secondary humid tropical rainforests as well as montane forests, typically at elevations from to over 2,000 meters. For instance, Megophrys montana thrives in dense tropical rainforests up to 2,200 meters. These habitats provide the high and moderate temperatures (often 22–24°C) essential for their , with species exhibiting tolerance to varying ambient conditions within vegetated areas, indicating adaptability across microclimatic gradients in their forest habitats. Within these forests, Megophrys species prefer microhabitats on the near or damp areas, avoiding open or arid zones. They are commonly observed in leaf litter layers, where the accumulation of decaying leaves creates sheltered, moist refuges. Proximity to sources, such as slow-moving or pools, supports their need for constant , though they remain largely terrestrial. Substrate preferences center on moist, loose materials like decaying vegetation and leaf litter, which allow for burrowing and concealment. This loose substrate facilitates hiding from predators and regulates moisture levels around the frogs. Such preferences underscore their reliance on undisturbed integrity for suitability.

Biology and ecology

Diet and foraging behavior

Species of the genus Megophrys are primarily insectivorous, with their diet consisting mainly of invertebrates such as (Hymenoptera), (Isoptera), beetles (Coleoptera), orthopterans, lepidopterans, spiders (Araneae), gastropods, and isopods. Arthropods make up the vast majority of the diet in studied populations of closely related megophryids. Anecdotal reports suggest occasional consumption of small vertebrates, but this is rare and unconfirmed in quantitative studies. Earthworms are rarely documented in wild diets but may be consumed opportunistically. Megophrys frogs employ a sit-and-wait strategy, relying on their leaf-like to blend into the forest floor leaf litter during nocturnal . They remain motionless for extended periods, striking at passing prey with a rapid projection, a mechanism facilitated by specialized tongue surface microstructures that ensure to diverse prey surfaces. Prey size is gape-limited, typically not exceeding 30% of the frog's snout-vent length (SVL), though larger individuals with SVL up to 72 mm can consume items up to 21 mm long; juveniles target smaller arthropods like fruit flies or pinhead crickets to match their limited gape. Detailed dietary studies are limited for the current Megophrys species, many of which were described recently, with most available data derived from the broader Megophryidae family.

Reproduction and life cycle

Breeding in Megophrys occurs primarily during the rainy season, when adults migrate to aquatic sites such as stream edges or temporary pools in forested habitats. Males position themselves in concealed locations, often under leaf litter, boulders, or vegetation along banks, and produce advertisement calls to attract females; these calls are typically low-frequency sounds suited to humid, vegetated environments, including single notes or short series of pulses. For instance, males of Megophrys montana emit a loud, single "kang" note, particularly under full moon conditions. is inguinal, with pairs observed clasping for extended periods before egg deposition. Most Megophrys species are oviparous, laying eggs in rather than exhibiting direct development, though some closely related megophryids show reduced larval stages. Eggs are deposited in adhesive gelatinous clusters or strings, attached to submerged substrates like rocks, logs, or to avoid strong currents. Clutch sizes vary by species and conditions, ranging from approximately 50 to over 300 eggs. No foam nests are typically formed, and eggs hatch within 1 week into aquatic tadpoles. Tadpoles of Megophrys are adapted to lotic (flowing-water) habitats, featuring streamlined bodies, suctorial oral discs for attachment to surfaces, and often neustonic (surface-dwelling) behaviors to exploit oxygen-rich riffles. Their diet is primarily herbivorous or detritivorous, consisting of , diatoms, and organic scraped from substrates, though some incorporate carnivorous elements like small . occurs in 2–3.5 months under natural temperatures (around 24–27°C), with juveniles emerging as miniature adults lacking pronounced horns initially; triangular eyelid projections develop shortly after. is reached at 1–2 years, with males generally smaller than females ( in size), and no has been observed in the genus. Biological data for and life cycle remain sparse for many recently described Megophrys , underscoring knowledge gaps that require further .

Conservation

IUCN status

The Megophrys comprises eight recognized , most of which (six ) are not yet assessed on the , resulting in significant knowledge gaps for evaluating their . Of the assessed , Megophrys montana is listed as Least Concern owing to its occurrence in protected areas across , , despite a fragmented range. Similarly, Megophrys parallela is classified as Least Concern. For species in the subgenus Xenophrys, such as M. awuh (now often treated as Xenophrys awuh), the assessment is Vulnerable, reflecting a restricted extent of occurrence combined with habitat degradation in northeastern . IUCN assessments for assessed Megophrys species are based on criteria such as extent of occurrence (e.g., less than 5,000 km² qualifying for Critically Endangered status) and observed or projected declines in quality or area. These evaluations have been updated periodically, with the most recent for assessed species between 2017 and 2020. Specific examples of unassessed species include Megophrys dzukou, which has a narrow distribution in high-elevation habitats of the region, highlighting the need for urgent assessments. Overall, Megophrys populations exhibit potential declining trends attributed to habitat loss, with broader trends in the subfamily Megophryinae showing approximately 40-50% of assessed species considered threatened across their ranges.

Major threats and efforts

Populations of Megophrys species face primary threats from , primarily through and conversion to , which encroaches on the forested montane and lowland habitats essential for their survival. For instance, in , species like M. montana are impacted by small-scale farming for , , and , as well as logging for timber, leading to ecosystem degradation and fragmentation. Climate change poses an additional risk by altering montane environments through shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns, potentially restricting suitable habitats for high-elevation species in regions like Indochina. Collection for the international trade affects some related megophryid species, but remains a minor threat compared to habitat loss. Secondary threats include from agricultural runoff and activities, which contaminate breeding streams, and the introduction of that disrupt local ecosystems. The cryptic morphology and behavior of Megophrys complicate population monitoring and assessment, as many remain undetected or misidentified, hindering effective threat evaluation. Conservation efforts for Megophrys include protection within designated areas, such as M. montana in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park in , where subpopulations benefit from enforced forest preservation. The IUCN Specialist Group conducts ongoing assessments to update threat statuses and guide interventions across the genus. trials have been successful for related megophryid at institutions such as Cologne Zoo, providing insights into reproduction and potential reintroduction strategies. Research priorities emphasize genetic surveys to delineate cryptic diversity and restoration initiatives in key areas like and to mitigate impacts. Some populations remain stable within national parks, and ongoing field surveys in underscore the importance of community involvement in monitoring and protection for northeastern .

References

  1. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/Amphibia/Anura/Megophryidae/Megophryinae/Megophrys
  2. https://amphibiaweb.org/lists/Megophryidae.shtml
  3. https://amphibiaweb.org/species/2497
  4. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/34/3/744/2919384
  5. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/50343/
  6. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/Amphibia/Anura/Megophryidae/Megophryinae/Pelobatrachus
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790316302299
  8. https://mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.4523.1.1
  9. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/Previous-running-logs-2014-2024/Running-log-of-additions-and-changes-2021
  10. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/57119/
  11. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/Amphibia/Anura/Megophryidae
  12. https://amphibiaweb.org/species/9225
  13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.11.011
  14. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/61097/
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7557532/
  16. https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.4413.2.5
  17. https://jssm.umt.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2019/08/4.pdf
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7596021/
  19. https://amphibiaweb.org/species/9226
  20. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4523.1.1
  21. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Megophrys_nasuta/
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359107513_HABITAT_PREFERENCES_OF_THE_BORNEAN_HORNED_FROG_Megophrys_nasuta_SCHLEGEL_1858_ANURA_MEGOPHRYIDAE_IN_SARAWAK
  23. https://www.isca.me/IJBS/Archive/v2/i10/9.ISCA-IRJBS-2013-170.pdf
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323119467_Diet_habits_of_frogs_Family_Megophryidae_in_Kubah_National_Park
  25. https://www.herpconbio.org/Volume_13/Issue_1/Le_etal_2018.pdf
  26. https://reptilesmagazine.com/malayan-horned-frog-care-and-breeding/
  27. https://reptichip.com/blogs/animals/malayan-leaf-frog
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4979896/
  29. https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/216859/1/hsj.34.51.pdf
  30. https://amphibian-reptile-conservation.org/pdfs/Volume/Vol_5_no_3/ARC_5_3_15-28_e43_low_res.pdf
  31. https://www.biotaxa.org/hn/article/view/67068/67367
  32. http://blogs.thatpetplace.com/thatreptileblog/2013/02/20/best-tadpole-foods-based-on-my-experiences-seeking-additional-suggestions/
  33. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/57898/114918668
  34. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/57899/11527279
  35. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/177947/19861225
  36. https://www.iucnredlist.org
  37. https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4508.3.1
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790318300010
  39. https://conservationevidencejournal.com/individual-study/5141
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.