Hubbry Logo
Continental fragmentContinental fragmentMain
Open search
Continental fragment
Community hub
Continental fragment
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Continental fragment
Continental fragment
Continental fragment
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Continental crustal fragments, partly synonymous with microcontinents,[1] are pieces of continents that have broken off from main continental masses to form distinct islands that are often several hundred kilometers from their place of origin.[2]

Causes

[edit]

Continental fragments and microcontinent crustal compositions are very similar to those of regular continental crust. The rifting process that caused the continental fragments to form most likely impacts their layers and overall thickness along with the addition of mafic intrusions to the crust. Studies have determined that the average crustal thickness of continental fragments is approximately 24.8 ± 5.7 kilometres (15.4 ± 3.5 mi).[3] The sedimentary layer of continental fragments can be up to 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) thick and can overlay two to three crustal layers. Continental fragments have an average crustal density of 2.81 g/cm3 (0.102 lb/cu in) which is very similar to that of typical continental crust.

Strike-slip fault zones cause the fragmentation of microcontinents. The zones link the extensional zones where continental pieces are already isolated through the remaining continental bridges. Additionally, they facilitate quick crustal thinning across narrow zones and near-vertical strike-slip-dominated faults. They develop fault-block patterns that slice the portion of continent into detachable slivers. The continental fragments are located at various angles from their transform faults.[4]

History

[edit]

Some microcontinents are fragments of Gondwana or other ancient cratonic continents; examples include Madagascar; the northern Mascarene Plateau, which includes the Seychelles Microcontinent; and the island of Timor.[5] Other islands, such as several in the Caribbean Sea, are composed largely of granitic rock as well, but all continents contain both granitic and basaltic crust, and there is no clear dividing line between islands and microcontinents under such a definition. The Kerguelen Plateau is a large igneous province formed by a volcanic hotspot; however, it was associated with the breakup of Gondwana and was for a time above water, so it is considered a microcontinent, though not a continental fragment.[6][7] Other hotspot islands such as the Hawaiian Islands and Iceland are considered neither microcontinents nor continental fragments. Not all islands can be considered microcontinents: Borneo, the British Isles, Newfoundland, and Sri Lanka, for example, are each within the continental shelf of an adjacent continent, separated from the mainland by inland seas flooding its margins.[8]

Several islands in the eastern Indonesian Archipelago are considered continental fragments, although this designation is controversial. The archipelago is home to numerous microcontinents with complex geology and tectonics. This makes it complicated to classify landmasses and determine causation for the formation of the landmass.[9] These include southern Bacan, Banggai-Sulu Islands (Sulawesi), the Buru-Seram-Ambon complex (Maluku), Obi, Sumba, and Timor (Nusa Tenggara).[10]

List of continental fragments and microcontinents

[edit]

Continental fragments (pieces of Pangaea smaller than Australia)

[edit]
Azores Plateau, a continental fragment located in the North Atlantic Ocean

Other microcontinents (formed post-Pangaea)

[edit]

Future microcontinents

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Continental fragment

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A continental fragment, also known as a microcontinent in some contexts, is a discrete piece of continental that has detached from a larger continental mass through tectonic extension and breakup, typically remaining connected via thinned crust in early stages or becoming fully isolated and surrounded by oceanic . These fragments are characterized by continental crustal thickness (often 10–30 km or more), distinct from the thinner , and they play a key role in by influencing dynamics and continental margin evolution. Unlike full continents, such as —which spans 4.9 million km² and maintains coherent geological provinces—continental fragments are smaller and often result from inherited structural weaknesses that facilitate rifting. The formation of continental fragments primarily occurs in subduction settings where rotational stresses from trench retreat and slab dynamics exploit pre-existing weak zones in the , such as ancient suture lines or rheological contrasts with viscosity differences of at least one . This process is enhanced by narrow weak zones (e.g., ~66 km wide) that promote efficient extension, leading to development and partial detachment from the parent . In divergent settings, fragments can also arise from failed rifts or spreading center jumps, as seen in passive continental margins where intrudes between separating blocks. Notable examples include the microcontinent in the , which separated from the Indian plate during the breakup of around 65–84 million years ago and is now fully surrounded by ; the Jan Mayen microcontinent in the North Atlantic, formed during rifting between and ; and the Corsica-Sardinia block in the Mediterranean, a fragment still linked to via extended crust. Other instances, such as the in the , represent elongated fragments that transect oceanic basins, preserving ancient continental signatures amid polar ice. These features highlight the fragmented nature of continental evolution, contributing to global tectonics, resource potential (e.g., hydrocarbons), and paleogeographic reconstructions.

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

A continental fragment is a piece of that has rifted off from a larger continental mass, often initially remaining connected via thinned crust and potentially becoming a fully isolated block surrounded by . These fragments often manifest as landmasses, elevated plateaus, or submerged features within ocean basins. To understand continental fragments, it is essential to distinguish from : the former is thicker, averaging 30 to 50 kilometers, less dense at about 2.7 g/cm³, and composed primarily of rocks such as , while is thinner at 5 to 10 kilometers, denser at around 2.9 g/cm³, and dominated by basaltic rocks. This compositional difference allows continental fragments to "float" higher in compared to surrounding oceanic material, often leading to their emergence as topographic highs. The term "continental fragment" is partly synonymous with "microcontinent," with the latter specifically denoting fully isolated blocks surrounded by , while fragments may include those still connected via thinned continental . Continental fragments are typically smaller than full continents but larger than typical oceanic islands or seamounts, with areas often ranging from 10,000 to 100,000 km². Their continental affinity is confirmed by diagnostic rock types like and a crustal thickness intermediate between oceanic and main continental values. In scale, continental fragments are comparable to island groups or seamount chains but differ in their geological origin and composition, primarily forming through rifting that separates them from parent continents.

Key Geological Features

Continental fragments are characterized by their predominantly composition, consisting primarily of rocks such as granites and gneisses, which contribute to their low average of ~2.7 g/cm³. This contrasts sharply with the surrounding , which has a higher of approximately 2.9 g/cm³ and is composed mainly of basalts and gabbros. Additionally, these fragments possess relatively thick crusts, typically 20–40 km in depth, far exceeding the 5–10 km thickness of . Structurally, continental fragments are often delimited by normal faults inherited from initial ing, which define their boundaries and facilitate their isolation. These structures may incorporate rift basins filled with sediments, volcanic arcs from associated , or overlying sedimentary layers up to several kilometers thick. Due to their lower and isostatic equilibrium, fragments exhibit notable variations, commonly forming plateaus that rise 1–2 km above the adjacent seafloor, creating shallower bathymetric features compared to typical oceanic depths. Identification of continental fragments relies on several geophysical and geochemical techniques. Seismic profiling reveals their distinctive crustal thickness and velocity structures, distinguishing them from thinner oceanic layers. Geochemical detects continental signatures, such as elevated silica content (>65% SiO₂ in rocks) and stable ratios (e.g., Nd and Sr isotopes indicative of ancient crustal sources). Magnetic anomalies further aid detection by highlighting the presence of continental basement rocks with contrasting magnetic properties to oceanic . Recent examples include the 2024 identification of the proto-microcontinent between and using integrated seismic profiling and gravity data. The evolutionary stages of continental fragments begin with proto-fragments during early rifting, where extension thins and segments the continental lithosphere. These progress to mature isolated blocks fully detached and surrounded by , maintaining structural integrity over geological time. Eventually, many fragments may accrete to other continental margins through tectonic processes, incorporating into larger landmasses.

Formation Mechanisms

Rifting and Extension Processes

Continental rifting initiates with a phase of initial extension, during which the undergoes thinning primarily through the development of normal faults that accommodate extensional deformation and form subsiding rift basins. This involves distributed faulting across the continental crust, leading to crustal thicknesses reduced by factors of up to 50% in some systems. As extension progresses, the process transitions to continental , characterized by focused strain and magma intrusion from the , which intrudes the lower crust and eventually forms new at the rift axis. The final drift follows successful breakup, where the detached continental fragment becomes isolated as the newly formed plates diverge, often accompanied by thermal subsidence and the onset of . The driving forces behind these rifting stages primarily involve mantle plumes and far-field tectonic stresses. Mantle plumes induce upwelling of hot asthenospheric material, which weakens the through thermal erosion and magmatic intrusions, thereby localizing extension and enhancing rift propagation; for instance, plumes have been linked to the rapid maturation of rifts like the . Concurrently, far-field stresses arising from distant plate boundary forces, such as slab pull or continental collisions, impose tensional forces that pull the continents apart, with magnitudes up to several tens of teranewtons per meter sufficient to overcome lithospheric resistance in weakened zones. Analogue and numerical models provide insights into the mechanics of rifting and fragment detachment. Laboratory experiments using scaled brittle-viscous multilayer setups simulate the "unzipping" of continental lithosphere, revealing how pre-existing weaknesses and strain localization lead to progressive rift and fault interactions that mimic natural systems. Numerical thermo-mechanical models further demonstrate that asymmetric rifting, driven by oblique extension or rheological contrasts, results in differential thinning and the stranding of continental fragments, as seen in simulations of hyper-extended margins where one side experiences greater crustal excision. Geophysical evidence supports these processes through observations of thinned crust during extension. Gravity anomalies, often negative due to isostatic compensation from crustal unloading, and elevated heat flow patterns (typically 60–90 mW/m² in active rifts) indicate lithospheric thinning and asthenospheric upwelling; for example, in the southern , such anomalies align with extension factors of 1.1–1.5, reflecting 10–30% crustal reduction. In broader contexts, like the , integrated seismic and gravity data reveal extension factors of 1.5–3, underscoring the scale of deformation required for fragment isolation.

Role of Subduction and Plate Relocation

Subduction zones play a pivotal role in the isolation of continental fragments by driving dynamic processes that extend and detach portions of , particularly through slab pull and mechanisms. Slab pull, exerted by the negative buoyancy of the descending oceanic , initiates retreat, which in turn induces extension in the overriding plate, often forming back-arc basins where slivers of can detach along weak zones. exacerbates this by causing rotational stresses that localize deformation, leading to the breakup of continental margins in orogenic belts; for instance, in the Mediterranean, rollback of the Apennines slab contributed to the detachment of the Corsica-Sardinia block around 21 million years ago, where back-arc extension reached up to 1,800% in narrow weak zones with contrasts of at least one . Plate boundary relocation further facilitates fragment isolation by shifting subduction zones or transform faults, effectively stranding continental blocks in oceanic domains. Jumps in subduction hinges, such as the relocation from the Liguro-Provençal basin to the Tyrrhenian basin approximately 10 million years ago, occur when slab tearing or differential retreat isolates blocks, often inheriting pre-existing structures like ancient sutures that act as reactivation sites for extension. These relocations contrast with passive rifting by incorporating active subduction forces that amplify isolation through rapid migration rates of up to 1.6 cm/year. In subduction settings, structural inheritance from prior tectonic events significantly influences fragment formation by providing zones of weakness that guide deformation. Weak structures, such as sutures from ancient collisions or rifted margins, lower the threshold for breakup, enabling where portions of the overriding peel away due to slab-induced stresses, or of the subducting slab upon reaching the 660 km discontinuity, which redirects forces to promote upper-plate extension. System evolution, including slab rotation and tearing, further enhances this by creating asymmetric extension patterns that detach continental slivers, as seen in numerical models where inherited heterogeneities increase fragmentation efficiency by localizing strain in zones as narrow as 66 km. Numerical models of dynamics demonstrate how these processes amplify continental fragmentation beyond , with two- and three-dimensional simulations showing that rotational back-arc stresses, combined with a continental indenter, produce basins up to 650 km wide and detach fragments through contrasts, distinct from the uniform thinning in rifting. These models, incorporating realistic rheologies, reveal that slab velocities of 0.6 cm/year and angles of -15° replicate observed fragment isolation, underscoring the role of convergent margins in generating slivers that become isolated microcontinents.

Historical Context

Involvement in Supercontinent Cycles

Continental fragments play a pivotal role in the cycles, which describe the periodic assembly and disassembly of Earth's landmasses driven by . These cycles are closely tied to the , a conceptual framework outlining the lifecycle of ocean basins through phases of rifting, drifting, and collision. During the rifting phase, extensional forces fragment supercontinents into smaller continental blocks, initiating the formation of new ocean basins via . As continents drift apart, these fragments migrate independently, potentially re-accreting during later collision phases when zones converge and orogenic belts form along their margins. The process repeats approximately every 300–500 million years, with fragments serving as the dispersed components that are later reassembled into new supercontinents. Fragments from the breakup of (~1.1–0.75 Ga) were incorporated into (~650–530 Ma), which contributed to the formation of Pangea during the late through successive collisional events. This fragmentation and reassembly reshape continental configurations and influence global environmental dynamics, such as by altering atmospheric CO₂ levels through during assembly and increased during breakup, which affects long-term variability via changes in ocean circulation and nutrient distribution. Over geological timescales, continental fragments function as fundamental building blocks in supercontinent reconstructions, with paleomagnetic evidence revealing their latitudinal drifts and independent motions prior to reassembly. Paleomagnetic studies of rock magnetizations from these isolated blocks demonstrate rapid paths, indicating that fragments can traverse significant latitudes—sometimes exceeding 30 degrees—during drift phases, which supports models of their role in cyclical continental evolution. This pattern underscores the fragments' persistence as stable cratonic cores that accrete juvenile material, gradually enlarging continents while preserving ancient geological signatures. The formation of continental fragments during breakup phases has profound implications for future supercontinent cycles, as these blocks will inevitably converge again under ongoing plate motions. Current tectonic models predict that extroversion—closure of the encircling —will dominate the next assembly, potentially forming Amasia (a merger of , , and near the ) or Ultima (reuniting around the ) within 200–250 million years, with existing fragments like and playing key roles in the convergence. This cyclical process highlights how fragment dispersal today sets the stage for renewed collisional in the distant future.

Significant Geological Events

One of the earliest significant geological events involving continental fragments occurred during the breakup of the Columbia (also known as ) between approximately 1.6 and 1.2 Ga in the Era. Recent studies suggest a stepwise process associated with rifting and voluminous from large igneous provinces, dispersing key proto-cratons including , , Ukrainian, , and Kalahari, forming isolated continental blocks that would later reassemble into younger supercontinents. In the Neoproterozoic Era, the rifting and breakup of Rodinia around 750 Ma scattered numerous continental fragments later incorporated into Gondwana; peri-Gondwanan terranes like Avalonia, with arcs active from 750 to 500 Ma and originating from the Gondwana margin, rifted away ~490 Ma. This event, linked to the emplacement of large igneous provinces such as the ~825 Ma Guibei-Willouran LIP and ~800 Ma Suxiong-Xiaofeng LIP, initiated the dispersal of such blocks across the widening Iapetus Ocean. The breakup of Pangea from 200 to 150 Ma, triggered by the (CAMP) at ~201 Ma, represented a major episode of fragmentation, separating and while isolating smaller blocks along the nascent Atlantic margins. The closure of Paleo-Tethys in the (~230 Ma) accreted Cimmerian continental fragments—derived from northern —to the southern Eurasian margin amid and collision dynamics. Cenozoic events further highlight fragment isolation, including the India-Eurasia collision around 50 Ma, which closed the Neo-Tethys Ocean and incorporated Indian continental slivers into the Himalayan orogen, while ongoing rifting in the System—particularly in the since the late —has begun separating new fragments like the Danakil through magma-rich extension. These episodes are evidenced by distributions revealing biogeographic affinities between fragments and parent landmasses (e.g., Gondwanan flora in ) and U-Pb dating that constrains assembly-breakup timelines, such as ~750 Ma ages in Rodinia-derived blocks linking them to original cratons.

Notable Examples

Fragments from Pangaea and Earlier Supercontinents

The breakup of the , which began around 200 million years ago during the , resulted in the dispersal of various continental fragments, including larger blocks and microcontinents that retained basement rocks. These fragments, often isolated by rifting and subsequent , provide key evidence for reconstructing ancient plate configurations. Among the notable Pangea-derived examples are the and the microcontinent, each exhibiting distinct geological signatures of their Gondwanan origins within the assembled Pangaea. The represents a major continental fragment that rotated counterclockwise during the early stages of 's disassembly, separating from the North American along the opening around 126 million years ago in the . This motion, driven by extension between and Iberia, preserved Variscan orogenic belts formed during the Late assembly of from earlier Gondwanan and Laurentian margins. Seismic and paleomagnetic data confirm its role as a bridge between Gondwanan and Laurasian elements, with crustal thicknesses averaging 30-40 km indicative of stable continental . The Seychelles microcontinent, covering approximately 50,000 km², is a classic example of a granitic fragment rifted from the eastern margin of during the breakup of East , but isolated as a distinct block around 65 million years ago amid the northward drift of . Its core consists of to granites and gneisses, exposed on islands like Mahé, overlain by Deccan-related volcanics, with seismic studies revealing a continental crustal thickness of 30-33 km featuring high-velocity lower crust. This structure underscores its preservation as an "in situ" Gondwanan sliver amid the Indian Ocean's expansion. Fragments from earlier supercontinents, predating 's assembly around 300 million years ago, include and Mauritia, which were incorporated into but later dispersed. , a peri-n terrane rifted from the northern margin of during the Late to Early , comprises Cambrian-Ordovician volcanic arcs and sedimentary basins now distributed across southern Britain, , Newfoundland, and parts of . Its drift across the led to accretion to by the , with paleomagnetic and faunal evidence confirming its affinity through shared peri- assemblages. Mauritia, a reconstructed microcontinent in the , detached from the Madagascar-India nexus between 61 and 83 million years ago during the final stages of Gondwanan fragmentation inherited from Pangaea's breakup. Identified through marine magnetic anomalies and fracture zone analysis, it consists of Archean crustal slivers now underlying volcanic islands like and , with paleomagnetic data placing its components adjacent at around 750 million years ago along Rodinia's margins. Recent zircon geochronology from hotspot lavas supports its ancient continental basement, dating to 2,500-3,000 million years. Recent seismic investigations post-2020 have affirmed the continental nature of submerged blocks like the Knoll, a small fragment off rifted from East during the Jurassic-Cretaceous breakup phase that contributed to Pangaea's disassembly. Wide-angle seismic data reveal middle-to-lower crustal velocities of 6.0-7.2 km/s, diagnostic of thinned continental lithosphere, with the knoll positioned southwest of the Naturaliste Plateau in reconstructions of greater India-Australia separation. These findings, integrating gravity and tomographic models, highlight how such slivers preserve rift inheritance in oceanic settings.

Post-Pangaea and Modern Microcontinents

Following the breakup of Pangaea around 200 million years ago, subsequent tectonic processes in the Cenozoic era led to the formation of several microcontinents through rifting and extension of continental margins. These post-Pangaea fragments often exhibit thinned continental crust surrounded by oceanic lithosphere, resulting in partial or near-total submergence. Notable examples include the Jan Mayen Microcontinent, which detached during the separation of the North Atlantic margins. In the North Atlantic, the Microcontinent spans 400–450 km in length and up to 310 km in width, isolated between the Basin and the Kolbeinsey Ridge. It formed through two phases of rifting: an initial breakup from the Norwegian and East margins around 55–53 million years ago, accompanied by subaerial volcanism and seaward-dipping reflectors, followed by final isolation between 24 and 21.5 million years ago as the Ægir Ridge was abandoned in favor of the Kolbeinsey Ridge. The microcontinent's crust reaches thicknesses of 15–25 km, with Eocene plateau basalts and later intrusive complexes reflecting hotspot influence from the Iceland plume. Oceanic plateaus like the and Broken Ridge also incorporate continental fragments amid volcanic edifices. The , in the North Atlantic, features isolated blocks of embedded within predominantly oceanic lithosphere formed by the Azores hotspot, with rifting episodes from about 20 million years ago enhancing its fragmented structure. Similarly, Broken Ridge in the rifted from the between 118 and 79 million years ago as part of the Kerguelen , with final separation along the Southeast Indian Ridge after 43 million years ago; its elevated preserves thinned continental slivers up to 20 km thick beneath volcanic cover. Submerged examples include the proto-microcontinent and the Gilbert Ridge. The proto-microcontinent, identified in 2024 between and , consists of 19–24 km thick that failed to fully detach around 58–49 million years ago during a plate reorganization event; ongoing bathymetric and seismic studies reveal its isolation within the Davis Strait High, bounded by transform faults. In the equatorial Pacific, the Gilbert Ridge (or Seamount Complex) in the detached from the southern Lord Howe Rise around 79–77 million years ago during Gondwana's fragmentation, forming a submerged block of continental affinity approximately 200 km long with seamounts marking rift-related . These modern microcontinents remain tectonically active, with ongoing subsidence and minor seismicity.

Emerging and Future Fragments

The East African Rift System, particularly in the Afar Depression, represents an active zone of continental extension where the Nubian, Somali, and Arabian plates are diverging, potentially leading to the isolation of a new continental fragment within 5 to 100 million years as a nascent ocean basin forms. GPS measurements indicate extension rates of 1.8 to 2 cm per year across the rift, with higher localized rates up to 3.7 cm per year in magmatic segments like Dabbahu-Manda-Hararo, signaling progression toward breakup. Similarly, ongoing extension in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden continues to widen the rift separating the Arabian Plate from Africa at rates of 1 to 1.6 cm per year, further refining the boundaries of the already isolated Arabian block through oblique spreading. In the West Antarctic Rift System, current tectonic activity is delineating smaller crustal blocks, including , , and the Ellsworth-Whitmore Mountains, through extension that separates these proto-fragments beneath the . GPS networks detect ongoing motion along these boundaries, with from rifting influencing ice stability but not yet fully isolating new fragments. Iceland serves as a transitional feature in the North Atlantic rift, underlain by snippets of —a 350 km by 70 km sliver detached from East in the Early Eocene—embedded within and interacting with the to produce hybrid magmatic systems. Geodynamic models project that continued widening of the North Atlantic, at rates of 2 to 2.5 cm per year, could evolve existing microcontinents like the Rockall Plateau through further margin extension, potentially isolating additional slivers over tens of millions of years. In the longer term, fragments from ongoing rifts may contribute to the assembly of a future such as Ultima around 250 million years from now, where superplume activity could preserve dispersed pieces amid continental collision. Contemporary monitoring relies on GPS networks, which reveal extension rates of 1 to 5 cm per year across these , enabling precise tracking of strain accumulation and rift propagation. These dynamics enhance by facilitating ascent, as seen in Afar's magmatic segments, and may indirectly influence local sea-level changes through crustal subsidence and basin formation, though global effects remain tied to broader plate cycles.

References

  1. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019JB018370
  2. https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/27/3/article/GSATG321A.1.htm
  3. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/a-first-look-petroleum-geology-lomonosov-ridge-microcontinent-arctic-ocean
  4. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020TC006063
  5. https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/physical/ocean-floor/oceanic-crust-and-seafloor
  6. https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/tectonic.html
  7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018370
  8. https://www2.oberlin.edu/faculty/swojtal/SFWpage/161Stuff/161Lect4/tsld013.htm
  9. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00904-x
  10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006063
  11. https://phys.org/news/2024-07-incompletely-rifted-microcontinent-greenland-canada.html
  12. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014TC003760
  13. https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04238792/document
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361738286_Analogue_Modeling_of_Continental_Rifting_An_Overview
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4059923/
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004019519090382I
  17. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/SP470-2019-58
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9796656/
  19. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/3/6/511/31187/New-directions-in-Wilson-Cycle-concepts
  20. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz8670
  21. https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/9/12/nwac205/6726649
  22. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/53/7/562/653481/Stepwise-breakup-of-supercontinent-Nuna-A
  23. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600983
  24. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64253-w
  25. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-023-01191-9
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X13001032
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-99943-4
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02356-4
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90578-9
  30. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/pp1888/full
  31. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022TC007489
  32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-59461-x
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825221003421
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X13004494
  35. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL066036
  36. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-00248-y
  37. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/sp470.12
  38. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/1689/chapter/107526297/avaloniaa-long-lived-terrane-in-the-lower
  39. https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2013/02/28/ancient-micro-continent-under-the-indian-ocean-identified/
  40. https://www.livescience.com/27422-ancient-microcontinent-found.html
  41. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gssa/sajg/article/122/4/397/579543/Wandering-continents-of-the-Indian-Ocean
  42. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14086
  43. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020GC009144
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265909562_Discovery_of_a_microcontinent_Gulden_Draak_Knoll_offshore_Western_Australia_Implications_for_East_Gondwana_reconstructions
  45. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/full/10.1144/SP447.5
  46. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021GC009948
  47. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-76691-1
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012821X00001576
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X24001023
  50. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/books/edited-volume/540/chapter/3802138/Microcontinent-formation-around-Australia
  51. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JB016799
  52. https://eos.org/articles/are-we-seeing-a-new-ocean-starting-to-form-in-africa
  53. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020JB021542
  54. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/135/2/313/776128
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234039048_On_the_Extent_of_the_Active_West_Antarctic_Rift_System
  56. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1423099112
  57. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022GC010373
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0262407911622550
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-23264-9
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.