Hubbry Logo
GannetGannetMain
Open search
Gannet
Community hub
Gannet
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gannet
Gannet
Gannet
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
For other uses, see Gannet (disambiguation).
For the plant genus, see Morus (plant).
Not to be confused with Moros or Moros intrepidus.

Gannet
Temporal range: Early Miocene to recent 20–0 Ma
Northern gannets (Morus bassanus) on Heligoland
Northern gannet calls recorded on Grassholm Island, Wales
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Suliformes
Family: Sulidae
Genus: Morus
Vieillot, 1816
Type species
Pelecanus bassanus
Linnaeus, 1758
Species
Synonyms

Moris

Gannets are seabirds comprising the genus Morus in the family Sulidae, closely related to boobies. They are known as 'solan' or 'solan goose' in Scotland. A common misconception is that the Scottish name is 'guga' but this is the Gaelic name referring to the chicks only.

Gannets are large white birds with yellowish heads, black-tipped wings and long bills. Northern gannets are the largest seabirds in the North Atlantic, having a wingspan of up to two metres (6+1⁄2 feet). The other two species occur in the temperate seas around southern Africa, southern Australia, and New Zealand.

Etymology

[edit]

"Gannet" is derived from Old English ganot, meaning "gander."[1]

Taxonomy

[edit]

Morus is derived from Ancient Greek μωρός moros "stupid"[2] or "foolish" due to lack of fear shown by breeding gannets and boobies, allowing them to be easily killed.[3]

Behaviour

[edit]

Hunting

[edit]

Gannets hunt fish by diving into the sea from a height of 30 m (100 ft) and pursuing their prey underwater, and have a number of adaptations:

  • They have no external nostrils; they are located inside the mouth, instead.
  • They have air sacs in the face and chest under the skin, which act like bubble wrap, cushioning the impact with the water.
  • The position of their eyes is far enough forward on the face for binocular vision, allowing them to judge distances accurately.[4]

Gannets can achieve speeds of 100 km/h (62.13 mph) as they strike the water, enabling them to catch fish at a much greater depth than most airborne birds.[5]

The gannet's supposed capacity for eating large quantities of fish has led to "gannet" becoming a description of somebody with a voracious appetite.[6]

Mating and nesting

[edit]

Gannets are colonial breeders on islands and coasts, normally laying one chalky-blue egg. They lack brood patches and use their webbed feet to warm the eggs.[7] They reach maturity around 5 years of age. First-year birds are completely black, and subsequent subadult plumages show increasing amounts of white.

Northern gannets

[edit]

The most important nesting ground for northern gannets is the United Kingdom, with about two-thirds of the world's population. These live mainly in Scotland, including the Shetland Isles. The rest of the world's northern-gannet population nests in Canada, Ireland, the Faroe Islands, and Iceland, with small numbers in France (they are present in the Bay of Biscay), the Channel Islands, Norway, and a single colony in Germany on Heligoland. The biggest northern-gannet colony is on Scotland's Bass Rock in the Firth of Forth; in 2014, this colony contained some 75,000 pairs.[8] Sulasgeir off the coast of the Isle of Lewis, St Kilda, Grassholm in Pembrokeshire, Bempton Cliffs in the East Riding of Yorkshire, Sceilig Bheag, Ireland, Cape St Mary's, Newfoundland, and Bonaventure Island, Quebec, are also important northern-gannet breeding sites.

Systematics and evolution

[edit]

The three gannet species are now usually placed in the genus Morus, Abbott's booby in Papasula, and the remaining boobies in Sula. However, some authorities believe that all nine sulid species should be considered congeneric, in Sula. At one time, the various gannet species were considered to be a single species.

Genus Morus – Vieillot, 1816 – three species
Common name Scientific name and subspecies Range Size and ecology IUCN status and estimated population
Northern gannet (also known as "solan goose")

Morus bassanus
(Lichtenstein, MHC, 1823) 		North Atlantic on coasts influenced by the Gulf Stream
Map of range 		Size:

Habitat:

Diet: 		 LC 


Cape gannet

Morus capensis
Milne-Edwards, 1882 		Southern Africa in three islands off Namibia and three islands off South Africa
Map of range 		Size:

Habitat:

Diet: 		 EN 


Australasian gannet

Morus serrator
(Gray, GR, 1843) 		Coasts of New Zealand, Victoria, and Tasmania
Map of range 		Size:

Habitat:

Diet: 		 LC 


A northern gannet in Bonaventure Island's colony
Gannet, Bempton Cliffs, Yorkshire
Gannet in the Celtic Sea – Ireland

Most fossil gannets are from the Late Miocene or Pliocene, when the diversity of seabirds in general was much higher than today. The cause the decline in species at the end of the Pleistocene is not clear; increased competition due to the spread of marine mammals may have played a role.

The genus Morus is much better documented in the fossil record than Sula, though the latter is more numerous today. The reasons are not clear; boobies possibly were better adapted or simply "lucky" to occur in the right places for dealing with the challenges of the Late Pliocene ecological change, or many more fossil boobies could still await discovery. Notably, gannets are today restricted to temperate oceans, while boobies are also found in tropical waters, whereas several of the prehistoric gannet species had a more equatorial distribution than their congeners of today.

Fossil species of gannets are:

  • Morus loxostylus (Early Miocene of EC USA) – includes M. atlanticus
  • Morus olsoni (Middle Miocene of Romania)
  • Morus lompocanus (Lompoc Late Miocene of Lompoc, USA)[9]
  • Morus magnus (Late Miocene of California)
  • Morus peruvianus (Pisco Late Miocene of Peru)
  • Morus vagabundus (Temblor Late Miocene of California)[9]
  • Morus willetti (Late Miocene of California) – formerly in Sula[9]
  • Morus sp. (Temblor Late Miocene of Sharktooth Hill, US: Miller 1961) – possibly M. magnus
  • Morus sp. 1 (Late Miocene/Early Pliocene of Lee Creek Mine, US)
  • Morus sp. 2 (Late Miocene/Early Pliocene of Lee Creek Mine, US)
  • Morus peninsularis (Early Pliocene)
  • Morus recentior (Middle Pliocene of California, US)
  • Morus reyanus – Del Rey gannet (Late Pleistocene of W US)[9]

Cultural references

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gannet

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Gannets are large seabirds belonging to the genus Morus in the family Sulidae, distinguished by their predominantly white plumage, black primaries and secondaries on the wings, pointed bills, and specialized adaptations for high-speed plunge-diving to capture prey such as schooling fish like herring and mackerel. Three living species exist: the northern gannet (Morus bassanus), which inhabits the North Atlantic and maintains a global population of 1.5 to 1.8 million mature individuals classified as Least Concern by the IUCN; the Cape gannet (Morus capensis), restricted to coastal islands off Namibia and South Africa with breeding sites limited to six locations; and the Australasian gannet (Morus serrator), breeding along the coasts of New Zealand, Australia, and nearby islands. These birds breed in dense, often massive colonies on cliffs or islands, exhibiting lifelong monogamy, elaborate courtship displays involving sky-pointing and synchronized fencing with bills, and both parents sharing incubation and chick-rearing duties over a protracted nestling period. Gannets achieve foraging dives from heights up to 40 meters at speeds exceeding 90 kilometers per hour, folding wings just before impact to pursue prey underwater for brief periods, a technique enabled by air sacs cushioning the skull and robust skeletal structure. Conservation status varies, with the northern and Australasian species stable or increasing due to protected breeding grounds and abundant forage, while the Cape gannet faces endangerment from shifting sardine distributions, competition with fisheries, and historical guano mining disturbances at colonies.

Taxonomy and etymology

Classification and species

Gannets comprise the genus Morus within the family and order , encompassing medium-to-large seabirds specialized for plunge-diving. This placement reflects their close relation to boobies (genus Sula), from which gannets are distinguished morphologically by features such as the extending forward from the bill base, feathers projecting anterior to the eyes, and a heavier build facilitating dives from greater heights; behaviorally by breeding displays like sky-pointing; and genetically by sequence divergences confirming generic separation. The genus Morus includes three extant species, whose monophyly is supported by multilocus phylogenetic analyses and control region DNA sequences showing distinct, well-supported clades with minimal interspecific despite ecological similarities. These species exhibit subtle morphological variances, such as bill proportions and nuances, alongside genetic markers indicating ancient divergence, with low population structuring within species but clear species-level boundaries. The (Morus bassanus) represents the temperate North Atlantic lineage, characterized by genetic haplotypes clustering separately from southern congeners. The gannet (M. capensis) is endemic to southern African waters, distinguished by mitochondrial and nuclear markers reflecting isolation and to upwelling zones. The (M. serrator) occupies southern oceanic realms around and , with DNA evidence affirming its divergence and limited hybridization potential with other Morus taxa. Historically, gannets were subsumed under Sula following Linnaeus's designation of Sula bassanus in 1758, but osteological studies revealed consistent skeletal disparities—such as cranium and morphology—prompting generic reinstatement of Morus in the , later corroborated by molecular data rejecting a monotypic genus. This revision underscores the role of integrated evidence in avian , prioritizing empirical distinctions over prior lumping based on superficial ecological convergence.

Etymology and nomenclature

The English word "gannet" derives from Old English ganot, denoting a sea-bird and ultimately tracing to Proto-Germanic *ganatuz or *ganutô, a term for "gander" or robust waterfowl, linked to the Indo-European root *ghans- signifying "" and evoking the bird's large, sturdy build. This nomenclature reflects early Germanic observations of the bird's goose-like form and vigor, with cognates appearing in *ganet and gent, emphasizing phonetic and semantic continuity across related languages. Regional variants include the Scottish "solan goose," where "solan" stems from Old Norse súla (gannet) combined with ǫnd (duck), a designation recorded as early as 1450 in Older Scots texts and tied to North Atlantic breeding sites like the Bass Rock. In scientific nomenclature, Carl Linnaeus formalized the northern gannet's binomial as Pelecanus bassanus in his 1758 Systema Naturae, with "bassanus" likely referencing the Bass Rock colony in Scotland as the type locality; subsequent reclassifications placed it under Sula and then Morus (from Greek môros, "foolish," alluding to terrestrial clumsiness), reflecting evolving ornithological understanding without altering the species descriptor.

Physical description

Morphology and adaptations for diving

Gannets of the genus Morus exhibit a large body size optimized for aerial spotting and plunge-diving, with adults typically measuring 80–110 cm in length, possessing a wingspan of 170–200 cm, and weighing 1–2.2 kg depending on species and sex. This robust build includes a streamlined fuselage with a tapered profile that minimizes hydrodynamic drag upon water entry, complemented by a dagger-like bill averaging 10–12 cm long, reinforced for piercing fish at high velocities without fracturing. The skeletal structure features a reinforced cranium and a specialized bone plate at the bill's base to distribute impact forces, while the humerus and coracoid bones in the shoulder girdle are proportionally robust to withstand deceleration stresses exceeding 10 g-forces during dives. Powerful neck musculature, comprising hypertrophied sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis muscles, enables rapid head tucking to align with the body's trajectory and absorb shocks up to 24 m/s entry speeds, preventing vertebral injury as modeled in biomechanical analyses of Morus bassanus. Subcutaneous air diverticula—extensive, intercommunicating sacs extending from the cervical and thoracic regions—function as pneumatic cushions, compressing on impact to mitigate trauma from dives reaching depths of 10–22 m, with rare excursions to 35 m. These adaptations reflect selective pressures for efficient energy transfer in piscivorous pursuits, prioritizing structural integrity over flight economy in evolution. Respiratory modifications include valvular nostrils that seal prior to immersion, preventing water ingress and facilitating rapid recovery, alongside expanded facial and pectoral that further buffer deceleration. Ocular features encompass a prominent for corneal protection and lens accommodation mechanisms enabling swift focus shifts from aerial to aqueous media, sustaining underwater immediately post-entry. Such traits collectively enable gannets to execute precision-oriented dives, with the absence of dense marrow in select long bones reducing overall mass while maintaining rigidity against compressive loads.

Plumage, dimorphism, and identification

Adult gannets of the genus Morus exhibit predominantly white plumage with primaries forming distinct wingtip patches, a feature shared across the three species: (M. bassanus), (M. capensis), and (M. serrator). The head and display a yellowish-buff wash, most pronounced in the , subtler in the , and minimal or absent in the . Bills are pale blue to bluish-gray with cutting edges, and eyes are pale blue surrounded by bare . Sexual dimorphism is minimal, with males averaging slightly larger in body mass, wing length, and bill dimensions than females, but no differences in coloration or pattern. This contrasts with some relatives, such as certain boobies, where males may display ornamental plumes or brighter facial skin during breeding. Juveniles fledge with mottled gray-brown , featuring sooty brown upperparts speckled with and paler underparts, gradually molting toward adult over 3–5 years through intermediate subadult stages. First-year birds are largely dark with fine flecks, while second- and third-year individuals show increasing on the body and head but retain more extensive black on wings and tail. Full adult is typically attained by the fourth or fifth year. Field identification relies on subtle species-specific traits: Northern and Australasian gannets have white secondaries and tails white with a black terminal band, whereas gannets show black secondaries (except innermost) and an all-black . Australasian gannets additionally feature a longer black gular stripe and darker tail feathers compared to Northern. Age determination in the field uses progression from uniform juvenile brown to patchy subadult mosaics, with diagnostic bill color gradients (darker in juveniles) and shape (wedge-shaped in adults). Banding studies confirm regional plumage variations are minimal, supporting these morphological markers for accurate identification.

Distribution and habitat

Global range across species

The Northern gannet (Morus bassanus) breeds exclusively in the North Atlantic Ocean across approximately 48 colonies, distributed from the British Isles and Iceland southward to about 47°N and northward to 74°N, including sites in Scandinavia and eastern Canada such as Newfoundland and the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Post-breeding dispersals, tracked via geolocators and satellite tags, reveal oriented chain migrations southward to wintering areas off northwest Africa, the Mediterranean, and western Atlantic regions, with birds exhibiting fidelity to continental shelf waters rather than random vagrancy. The Cape gannet (Morus capensis) is endemic to , breeding on six islands off and : Mercury, Ichaboe, and Possession Islands off ; and Malgas Island, Bird Island ( guano islands), and Bird Island (). Juveniles undertake long-distance dispersals during the non-breeding season, extending from waters off the eastward to near in the southwest . The (Morus serrator) maintains breeding colonies numbering over 30 along the southeastern coasts of , , and , predominantly on offshore islands but with some mainland sites; a minor colony exists on further north. Non-breeding ranges encompass adjacent shelf waters, with northward extensions along western and eastern Australian coasts. These species exhibit largely non-overlapping distributions, segregated by ocean basins: M. bassanus in the northern Atlantic, M. capensis in southern Atlantic and western Indian Ocean waters, and M. serrator in the southwestern Pacific and southern oceans. Vagrancy remains exceptional, with M. bassanus documented in central and eastern European countries, the , , and , while M. capensis occurs rarely in , , and . Tracking studies confirm post-breeding movements follow structured patterns, reinforcing geographic isolation and oceanic specialization across the genus. In the , historical range expansions over the past century have included eastward shifts in and the North Atlantic, driven by population increases, with notable colonization of previously unoccupied sites in the region.

Habitat requirements and environmental preferences

Gannets require breeding sites characterized by steep cliffs, sea stacks, or offshore islands that provide protection from terrestrial predators and facilitate aerial launch into . These locations typically feature bare rock ledges positioned above the splash zone and up to elevations exceeding 200 meters, minimizing ground-based threats while optimizing takeoff conditions. Such habitats correlate empirically with reduced mammalian predation pressure, as observed across colonies where nesting density is high on exposed, inaccessible substrates. For foraging, gannets preferentially exploit waters where or nutrient-rich currents concentrate schooling fish prey, enabling plunge-diving from heights up to 30 meters. Northern gannets (Morus bassanus) favor temperate to shelf regions with cold-water productivity, avoiding deep pelagic zones beyond 200 meters depth except during non-breeding migrations. Cape gannets (Morus capensis) target subtropical zones off , where and schools aggregate seasonally, with foraging radii extending up to 350 kilometers from colonies but centered on shelf edges. Australasian gannets (Morus serrator) similarly prioritize shelf habitats in temperate to subtropical southern waters, adapting dives to detect prey via visual cues in productive nearshore environments. Gannets demonstrate tolerance for moderate environmental variability, including temperature ranges from subtropical to latitudes tied to prey distribution rather than absolute thermal limits. They exhibit resilience by occasionally utilizing human-modified sites, such as disused structures on islands, provided these mimic natural cliff exposures and support nest construction without excessive disturbance. This adaptability underscores a primary dependence on prey availability over strict climatic niches, with declining in depleted shelf waters.

Behavior and ecology

Foraging strategies and diet

Gannets forage primarily through plunge-diving, in which they spot prey from flight altitudes of up to 30 meters before folding their wings and impacting the water at speeds exceeding 100 km/h to pursue targets in shoals. This technique targets small- to medium-sized aggregated near the surface, with dives typically lasting 5–10 seconds and reaching depths of 5–15 meters, supplemented occasionally by pursuit diving or surface pecking for accessible items. Dive frequency averages 20–100 per foraging trip, adjusted to prey patch quality rather than fixed patterns. The diet is overwhelmingly piscivorous, with over 90% consisting of such as (Scomber scombrus), (Mallotus villosus), (Clupea harengus), and sardines (Sardinops sagax), varying regionally by local abundance; for instance, in Newfoundland waters, mackerel comprised 41%, 20%, and 11% of regurgitated items. Short-finned squid (Illex illecebrosus) and other cephalopods constitute an opportunistic 5–17% of intake, exploited during fish scarcity or in overlapping distributions. Prey selection favors energy-dense species forming dense schools, as evidenced by and chick-provisioning studies across North Atlantic colonies. Foraging ranges from breeding colonies typically span 35–540 km, with mean maximum distances of 100–250 km per trip, determined by GPS tracking of hundreds of individuals; trip durations and extents correlate positively with colony size due to around large aggregations but show inter-annual fluctuations linked directly to prey rather than broad climatic trends. Northern colonies exhibit shorter commutes (e.g., 70–85 km) owing to higher polar-front , minimizing flight costs estimated at 10–15 times basal metabolic rates during extended bouts. Colony placement near zones or shelf edges optimizes net intake by balancing high plunge-dive expenditures—up to 20–30 kJ per dive inclusive of aerial search—against caloric returns from lipid-rich prey, consistent with models predicting selection for maximal profitability over . This strategy yields daily intakes of 500–1000 g for breeding adults, sufficient to offset 2–3 times field metabolic rates during chick-rearing, as quantified via techniques.

Social structure, migration, and interactions

Gannets are highly gregarious seabirds that form large, dense , or gannetries, supporting tens of thousands of pairs in close proximity; the Northern Gannet's colony, the world's largest, historically held approximately 75,000 pairs. within colonies relies on ritualized displays and agonistic behaviors to defend nest sites and maintain minimal inter-nest distances of about 0.7–1 meter. These structures facilitate collective vigilance but also for limited space on cliff ledges or rocky islands. Migration is partial and age-dependent across species. Northern Gannet juveniles disperse southward post-fledging via oriented chain migration along the Atlantic at 24–32 km/day, reaching tropical wintering grounds, while many adults remain nearer breeding sites. Cape and Australasian Gannets exhibit more sedentary behavior, with adults foraging locally year-round and immatures undertaking regional dispersals, such as New Zealand-origin birds crossing the to Australian waters. Tracking studies confirm high individual consistency in non-breeding routes over years. Conspecific interactions emphasize social foraging benefits over conflict. Gannets exploit local enhancement by aerially following successful divers to prey patches, improving capture efficiency through transferred information without cooperative hunting. Intraspecific remains rare, with isolated observations during plunge dives but no widespread impact on energy budgets. Predation on adults is infrequent, supported by annual rates of 91–92%, bolstered by aggressive defense, group vigilance in colonies, and low vulnerability at due to rapid flight and diving escapes from threats like sharks. Alloparental care is absent, limiting cooperative rearing to monogamous pairs.

Reproduction and life history

Mating behaviors and pair bonding

Gannets are socially monogamous, forming long-term pair bonds that often persist for life, with pairs typically returning to the same nest site annually; studies of northern gannets (Morus bassanus) report 88–94% of individuals exhibiting this nest-site fidelity. Pair retention enhances breeding success, as established partners show higher reproductive output compared to newly formed pairs, though rates vary widely (13–46% annually, averaging 22%) and correlate negatively with prior-year breeding performance and prey availability. appears adaptive under poor conditions, allowing birds to seek more compatible mates, but divorced individuals often experience reduced success in subsequent seasons until re-pairing stabilizes. Courtship rituals reinforce pair bonds through synchronized displays, including sky-pointing—where one or both partners extend the neck, point the bill skyward, and spread wings—and , involving rapid bill-thrusting and mutual touching to establish or reaffirm compatibility. These behaviors, observed primarily upon site return in spring, minimize and facilitate before egg-laying. No evidence supports across gannet ; breeding sex ratios approach 1:1, consistent with genetic and observational data on monomorphic adults pairing monogamously without multiple mates. Northern gannets typically first at 3–5 years of age, after acquiring in subadult attendance at colonies, with males often securing sites slightly earlier than females to attract partners. Initial pairings may dissolve more readily due to inexperience, but surviving bonds contribute to lifetime fitness by reducing energetic costs of mate-searching and improving chick-rearing efficiency. Similar patterns hold for (M. capensis) and Australasian (M. serrator) gannets, though data are sparser.

Nesting colonies and parental investment

Gannets form large, dense nesting colonies on coastal cliffs, sea stacks, or islands, with northern gannets (Morus bassanus) occupying sites such as those in the or , where tens of thousands of pairs breed in close proximity, often within pecking distance of neighboring nests. Nests are constructed primarily by males using materials like , grass, , and debris, forming a low, conical or cup-shaped mound compacted by and droppings, which accumulates over multiple seasons to create a pyramid-like structure on narrow ledges. This dense packing defends against predators but intensifies for space and resources. Females lay a single per , rarely two, with incubation lasting 42-46 days and shared approximately equally between both parents, who take turns covering the with their brood patch to maintain temperature. Parental investment during this phase involves continuous attendance to prevent chilling or predation, with no evidence of significant sex bias in effort allocation. Similar patterns occur in (M. capensis) and Australasian (M. serrator) gannets, though colony-specific environmental factors influence exact durations. Post-hatching, both parents provide biparental care through alternating trips, regurgitating partially digested directly into the chick's mouth during frequent nest visits, which sustains rapid growth over the 82-99 day nestling period. Provisioning rates vary with prey availability, but chicks face high mortality from , with breeding success often ranging from 50-70% in average years, dropping lower during food shortages due to density-dependent depletion around large colonies. Colony dynamics exhibit , where edge nests experience elevated failure rates from increased predation and exposure, while central nests benefit from collective vigilance but suffer from intensified for nearby , leading to longer parental trips in larger aggregations. Small colonies often achieve higher per-nest success due to reduced intraspecific , contributing to variable across sites.

Development and fledging

Gannet chicks exhibit rapid post-hatch growth, reaching near-adult body size within about 10 weeks through continuous parental provisioning of lipid-rich meals that meet their high energetic demands. In Northern Gannets (Morus bassanus), nestling mass increases over 40-fold during the approximately 13-week nestling period, with energy density rising due to lipid accumulation that eventually comprises about 60% of tissue energy. are brooded and fed frequently by at least one parent throughout rearing, supporting physiological milestones such as feather development from initial coverage to full by fledging. Fledging typically occurs at 82–99 days of age, with Northern Gannet chicks departing nests around 90–95 days by leaping from cliffs or platforms, often remaining nearby for additional days before sustained flight. Towards the end of this period, parents progressively reduce feeding frequency to induce independence, prompting chicks to forage autonomously at sea. Cape Gannet (M. capensis) chicks follow a comparable timeline, achieving fledging masses after 12 weeks of growth, though rates can vary with local prey availability. Post-fledging survival remains challenging, with juvenile s experiencing high mortality; approximately 30% of fledged young survive to breeding age around 5 years, amid a potential lifespan exceeding 20 years supported by high adult annual survival rates of 92%. Variations across are minimal, though Northern Gannet chicks in colder northern climates may exhibit slightly extended nestling durations compared to subtropical Cape Gannets, reflecting adaptive responses to environmental provisioning constraints.

Conservation and threats

The Northern gannet (Morus bassanus) is classified as Least Concern by IUCN criteria, with an estimated global population of 1,500,000–1,800,000 mature individuals derived from colony censuses across the North Atlantic. Overall trends indicate sustained increase since early 20th-century protections curtailed egg harvesting, with breeding colonies expanding from fewer than 20 sites to 54 by the 2020s and annual growth rates averaging 3% in major strongholds like British waters. Metrics from aerial photography, ground counts, and color-banding returns confirm this rebound, though short-term fluctuations occur, such as a 6.7% decline in apparently occupied sites at Bass Rock from 2023 to 2024 and 51% at Funk Island in 2023. These patterns reflect localized prey dynamics rather than overarching declines. The Cape gannet (Morus capensis) holds Endangered status under IUCN assessments, based on a global breeding population of 123,080 pairs equating to roughly 246,000 mature individuals from synchronized colony surveys in and . Trends show ongoing decrease, with rates accelerating in recent generations to exceed 1% annually in regional subsets, resulting in over 50% loss at key sites like 's colonies since the . Annual aerial and boat-based censuses, supplemented by Bayesian state-space modeling for generational trends, underpin these estimates, highlighting vulnerability without implying uniform causation across populations. The (Morus serrator) is assessed as Least Concern globally, with breeding pairs totaling around 80,000–100,000 individuals across and based on periodic island surveys. Populations remain stable overall, featuring increases in Australian colonies from 6,600 pairs in 1980 to approximately 20,000 by 2000, though some New Zealand sites exhibit declines tied to episodic food shortages. Banding recoveries and at-sea counts provide longevity data supporting resilience, with no evidence of rapid contraction despite localized variability from prey cycles.
SpeciesIUCN StatusEstimated Mature IndividualsTrendKey Data Sources
Northern gannetLeast Concern1,500,000–1,800,000Increasing overallAerial surveys, banding
Cape gannetEndangered~246,000DecreasingColony censuses, modeling
Australasian gannetLeast Concern~160,000–200,000StableIsland counts, recoveries
Across species, assessments emphasize empirical census variability, cautioning against extrapolating local fluctuations—often linked to sardine or anchovy abundance cycles—as indicative of species-wide trajectories.

Anthropogenic impacts including bycatch

Bycatch in commercial fisheries represents a significant anthropogenic mortality factor for gannets, particularly in trawl and gillnet operations targeting pelagic fish. For the Northern Gannet (Morus bassanus), entanglement in midwater trawls accounts for the majority of incidents in the North Atlantic, with estimates indicating hundreds to thousands of individuals annually across monitored fisheries; for instance, U.S. east coast waters report fewer than 500 birds per year, deemed insufficient to drive population-level declines in this region. Globally, trawl bycatch affects over 44,000 seabirds yearly across 27 fisheries, with Northern Gannets among the most frequently captured species due to their foraging overlap with fishing grounds. Cape Gannets (Morus capensis) face similar risks in southern African purse-seine and trawl fisheries, where incidental capture contributes to overall mortality alongside prey depletion, though quantitative estimates remain limited compared to northern populations. Historical exploitation exacerbated these pressures; prior to early 20th-century protections, intensive egg collection and adult harvesting—such as on remote islands like St. Kilda—severely depleted colonies, reducing breeding pairs to historic lows by the late 1800s. Subsequent legal safeguards enabled marked recoveries, underscoring population resilience to targeted removal when ceased. Modern shows variable integration of data; while some quotas overlook thresholds, others mandate monitoring, yet inconsistent enforcement persists across jurisdictions. Mitigation strategies, including bird-scaring lines (streamers) on trawls and discard management protocols, have demonstrated reductions in gannet interactions by 47-80% in tested scenarios, primarily by deterring near nets and minimizing haul-back attraction. For longlines, weighted lines bait faster, curbing access, though gannets' plunge-diving renders them less vulnerable than albatrosses to this gear. Empirical evidence from protected colonies indicates that, despite ongoing , numbers have expanded substantially since the mid-20th century—exceeding 500,000 pairs—suggesting fishing mortality alone does not overwhelm intrinsic growth rates where and prey remain viable, though cumulative effects warrant scrutiny in declining subpopulations like Cape Gannets.

Natural threats, disease, and resilience factors

Northern gannets face predation primarily on eggs and chicks from avian predators such as great black-backed gulls (Larus marinus), herring gulls (Larus argentatus), and skuas (Stercorarius spp.), which target vulnerable nests in dense colonies. Nestling losses also occur to mammals like red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and short-tailed weasels (Mustela erminea) at accessible sites, though adults experience low predation risk due to aggressive defense and size. At sea, sharks and large predatory fish occasionally take fledglings or water-landed adults, but such events remain infrequent relative to colony-based threats. Severe weather, including storms, contributes to nest failures by dislodging eggs or chicks from cliff ledges, though gannet colonies are typically established on exposed, wind-resistant rock stacks and islands that minimize widespread structural collapse. Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 emerged as a significant pathogen in 2022, affecting 41 of 53 Northern gannet colonies worldwide and causing elevated adult and nestling mortality, with estimates of over 13,000 deaths in Newfoundland alone and up to 11% of the Canadian breeding population lost. Parasitic infections, such as renal coccidiosis (Eimeria spp.) and Sarcocystis meningoencephalitis, occur sporadically but lack evidence of population-level impacts or clinical significance in most cases. Gannet populations exhibit resilience through high reproductive output, with breeding success often reaching 75% in stable colonies, enabling numerical recovery via density-dependent regulation where reduced competition post-mortality boosts subsequent fledging rates. Survivors of HPAI events have demonstrated capacity for renesting, though short-term declines of 20-40% in affected areas underscore limits to immediate rebound without broader ecological buffers.

Evolutionary history

Fossil record and phylogenetic relationships

The fossil record of gannets (genus Morus) primarily dates to the Miocene epoch, with the family's main evolutionary radiation occurring between 15 and 25 million years ago. A key specimen, representing an extinct sulid species closely allied to Morus, consists of a partial humerus from the Langhian stage (middle Miocene, approximately 15 million years ago) at Penedo beach, Setúbal Peninsula, southwestern Portugal; this fossil exhibits osteological features indicative of plunge-diving adaptations akin to those in extant gannets, such as a robust deltopectoral crest for enhanced flight muscle attachment during aerial pursuits of prey. Miocene sulid fossils from other regions, including Peru along the Pacific coast of South America, further document early diversification of the group, with morphologies emphasizing specialized aquatic foraging. Subfossil and archaeological evidence extends prehistoric records of Morus into more recent periods. In the , the earliest confirmed remains from Palagruža Island, dated to the , mark the first fossil occurrence of the genus in the region and imply potential breeding activity in a warmer paleoenvironment than today. Around the , prehistoric coastal sites yield bones of the (Morus bassanus), often alongside those of extirpated seabirds like the , reflecting exploitation or natural deposition in now-abandoned nesting areas. Such finds, spanning the to historic times, indicate persistence in North Atlantic localities without evidence of genus-wide events, unlike some lineages. Phylogenetically, Morus comprises a monophyletic within , sister to the boobies (Sula and Papasula), with divergence from this lineage estimated at approximately 23 million years ago based on -calibrated molecular clocks applied to multilocus data. These analyses, incorporating strict and relaxed clock models, align the split with early marine transgressions that expanded piscivorous niches, preserving core sulid traits like streamlined bodies and precise plunge-diving via conserved skeletal proportions. Unlike Sula, which shows greater species turnover in the record, Morus lacks documented post- extinctions, suggesting relative stability tied to temperate-cold specialization.

Human interactions

Historical exploitation and management

Northern gannets (Morus bassanus) faced significant exploitation prior to the 20th century, primarily through egg collection, hunting for meat and feathers, and localized trade in Scotland. Colonies such as Bass Rock and Ailsa Craig supplied "solan geese" to Edinburgh markets, where birds fetched prices around 20 pence each in the 18th and 19th centuries, with tenants on Ailsa Craig historically paying rents in harvested gannets. Egging practices involved systematic removal during breeding seasons, disrupting reproduction, while limited shooting targeted adults for food and plumage. These activities contributed to drastic global population declines in the 19th century, reducing breeding pairs to critically low levels across North Atlantic sites. Regulatory responses emerged in the early , with formal protections accelerating post-World War II through the establishment of bird reserves and legal safeguards in the UK and . In the UK, sites like the became managed reserves under organizations such as the , prohibiting unauthorized harvesting while allowing monitored access; similar measures in protected key colonies like Bonaventure Island starting in the mid-1900s. also included targeted of invasive predators, such as rats or mammals on peripheral islands, to safeguard nest sites, though colonies on remote sea stacks often required minimal intervention due to natural isolation. These measures proved empirically effective, enabling steady population recovery throughout the 20th century from historic lows to over 263,000 breeding pairs by the 1980s, with adult survival rates stabilizing at approximately 92%. The rebound, driven by cessation of direct persecution rather than intensive modern techniques like habitat engineering, underscores the sufficiency of core protections in restoring viability without expansive ongoing interventions.

Cultural and symbolic references

In , the (Morus bassanus) is traditionally known as the "solan goose," a term derived from súla, evoking its pillar-like stance or keen for spotting prey through water surfaces. This appears in historical accounts of Hebridean island life, where the bird's colonies on sites like influenced local place names and seasonal harvesting practices, though without documented prophetic or supernatural omens beyond practical associations with maritime abundance. In heraldry, the gannet serves as a symbol of the , linked to its dramatic plunging dives interpreted as emblematic of divine insight or descent. Among , the (Morus serrator), termed tākapu, holds cultural recognition as a coastal integral to traditional observations of marine ecosystems, though lacking elevated mythological status. Gannets feature peripherally in Anglo-Saxon literature, referenced alongside other seabirds in glosses and riddles denoting maritime peril or vigilance, as in entries equating ganot with predatory sea fowl. The gannet's high-velocity plunge-diving have inspired modern , particularly in biomimetic designs for aerial-to-aquatic vehicles; studies replicate its streamlined head and skeletal adaptations to mitigate impact forces during water entry, informing prototypes and safer crash structures. No major religious attaches to gannets across traditions, distinguishing them from more symbolically laden birds like eagles or doves.

References

  1. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Morus_bassanus/
  2. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/northern-gannet-morus-bassanus
  3. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/cape-gannet-morus-capensis
  4. https://birdlife.org.au/bird-profiles/australasian-gannet/
  5. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/introduction
  6. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/zoology/northern-gannet
  7. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/sulida1/cur/introduction
  8. http://losbird.org/article.php?articleHtml=Identifying%2520sulids.html
  9. https://www.oiseaux-birds.com/page-family-sulidae.html
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790310004604
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Unrooted-gene-tree-for-gannet-control-region-sequences-from-MrBayes-for-Northern-Morus_fig1_355127302
  12. http://marineornithology.org/PDF/49_2/49_2_275-291.pdf
  13. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/systematics
  14. https://www.birdsnz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Notornis_35_1-1988-pp35-57.pdf
  15. https://www.etymonline.com/word/gannet
  16. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gannet
  17. https://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/solan
  18. https://www.wordreference.com/definition/solan
  19. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1608628113
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5087068/
  21. https://abcbirds.org/bird/northern-gannet/
  22. http://seabirdgroup.org.uk/journals/seabird-21/seabird-21-64.pdf
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227604225_Between_air_and_water_The_plunge_dive_of_the_Cape_Gannet_Morus_capensis
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3441088/
  25. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Northern_Gannet/id
  26. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/appearance
  27. https://www.birdguides.com/articles/species-profiles/focus-on-identification-of-cape-gannet/
  28. https://www.nzbirdsonline.org.nz/species/australasian-gannet
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4670122/
  30. https://bioone.org/journals/waterbirds/volume-25/issue-2/1524-4695_2002_025_0230_SNGFDM_2.0.CO_2/Sexing-Northern-Gannets-from-DNA-Morphology-and-Behavior/10.1675/1524-4695%282002%29025%5B0230:SNGFDM%5D2.0.CO%3B2.short
  31. https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/northern-gannet
  32. https://www.seabird.org/wildlife/gannet
  33. https://www.birdlife.org/news/2021/07/06/seabird-month-northern-gannet-morus-bassanus/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Gannet-plumage-types-with-age-from-Nelson-1978b-modified-Type-1-A-Juvenile-plumage_fig22_287643766
  35. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/79/1/50/6453071
  36. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/110194
  37. https://www.seabirdgroup.org.uk/journals/seabird-22/seabird-22-37.pdf
  38. https://www.namcob.org.na/sites/default/files/red-data-account/Cape_Gannet.pdf
  39. https://speciesstatus.sanbi.org/assessment/last-assessment/03094/
  40. http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/44_1/44_1_1-2.pdf
  41. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/australasian-gannet-morus-serrator
  42. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/ausgan1/cur/introduction
  43. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/284841.pdf
  44. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/habitat
  45. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Northern_Gannet/lifehistory
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4958272/
  47. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/foodhabits
  48. https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/262107/1/Bennison_et_al_2022.pdf
  49. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01549.x
  50. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/20556/
  51. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.240708
  52. https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/11427/11222/1/thesis_sci_2010_navarro_canas_r_a.pdf
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240809605_Energetic_costs_of_foraging_in_breeding_Cape_gannets_Morus_capensis
  54. https://group.rspb.org.uk/belfast/news-blogs/blog/the-bass-rock-largest-gannetry-in-the-world/
  55. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/movement
  56. https://creamontblanc.org/files/pub/fort_et_al-2012-frontiers_in_ecology_and_the_e_0.pdf
  57. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2019.00214/full
  58. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0214
  59. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13052
  60. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00063657.2016.1213792
  61. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/behavior
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8997194/
  63. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1108293/full
  64. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/demography
  65. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Northern_Gannet/overview
  66. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/breeding
  67. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Morus_capensis/
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271758974_Growth_and_Thermal_Development_of_Northern_Gannets_Sula_bassanus_in_Atlantic_Canada
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1095643314002487
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2602693/
  71. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306525.2013.830652
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371433/
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232663155_How_Small_Northern_Gannet_Colonies_Grow_Faster_than_Big_Ones
  74. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=21104&context=auk
  75. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/northern-gannet
  76. https://binocularbase.com/gannet-life-cycle/
  77. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Summary-statistics-of-Cape-gannet-chick-survival-until-12-weeks-old_tbl1_249284151
  78. https://www.seabird.org/uploads/store/mediaupload/2780/file/2024%2520Count%2520of%2520Northern%2520Gannets%2520-%2520Final%2520Report.pdf
  79. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13390?af=R
  80. https://mapru.mandela.ac.za/apex/media/Store/images/Arcticles/Sherley-et-al-2019-status-of-gannet.pdf
  81. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/ndownloader/files/56789858
  82. https://animalia.bio/australasian-gannet
  83. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/conservation/marine-and-coastal/marine-conservation-services/reports/pre-2019-annual-plans/status-and-trends-non-procellariform-seabirds-final.pdf
  84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226763123_Long-term_trends_in_the_Australasian_gannet_Morus_serrator_population_in_Australia
  85. https://www.seabirdtracking.org/new-study-finds-at-least-44000-seabirds-are-killed-each-year-due-to-bycatch-in-trawl-fisheries-worldwide/
  86. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/60659/noaa_60659_DS1.pdf
  87. https://gannetresearch.wordpress.com/tag/immature-gannets/
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125002297
  89. https://polar-latitudes.com/discover/wildlife/northern-gannet/
  90. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13275
  91. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjz-2024-0012
  92. http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/52_1/52_1_121-128.pdf
  93. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37490410/
  94. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12038144/
  95. https://www.seabird.org/press-releases/resilient-gannets-can-breed-again-after-bird-flu-but-low-reproduction-rate-causes-concern
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072500583X
  97. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41513-022-00203-5
  98. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959683617693897
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229995606_The_great_auk_and_the_gannet_A_prehistoric_perspective_on_the_extinction_of_the_great_auk
  100. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1062359016090089
  101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21144905/
  102. http://www.northberwick.org.uk/bass.html
  103. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/annual-rescue-mission-free-northern-gannets-tangled-plastic-trash
  104. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norgan/cur/conservation
  105. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/ec/CW69-5-528-eng.pdf
  106. https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/special-protection-area/8500/conservation-and-management-advice.pdf
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240543898_Survival_of_Gannets_Morus_bassanus_in_Britain_and_Ireland_1959-2002
  108. https://stateofthebirds.nhaudubon.org/bird_database/northern-gannet/
  109. https://warofnature.com/2018/01/05/the-bass-pelican-and-other-names/
  110. https://www.academia.edu/36275612/Scots_solan_and_Gaelic_s%25C3%25B9laire_two_names_for_the_island_dwelling_gannet_loaned_from_Latin
  111. https://www.heraldryclipart.com/symbolism/g.html
  112. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11431-013-5437-5
  113. https://www.aa.washington.edu/news/article/2025-08-06/natures-shock-absorbers-lessons-gannet-seabirds
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.