Hubbry Logo
Cent (music)Cent (music)Main
Open search
Cent (music)
Community hub
Cent (music)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cent (music)
Cent (music)
Cent (music)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
One cent compared to a semitone on a truncated monochord.
Octaves increase exponentially when measured on a linear frequency scale (Hz).
Octaves are equally spaced when measured on a logarithmic scale (cents).

The cent is a logarithmic unit of measure used for musical intervals. Twelve-tone equal temperament divides the octave into 12 semitones of 100 cents each. Typically, cents are used to express small intervals, to check intonation, or to compare the sizes of comparable intervals in different tuning systems. For humans, a single cent is too small to be perceived between successive notes.

Cents, as described by Alexander John Ellis, follow a tradition of measuring intervals by logarithms that began with Juan Caramuel y Lobkowitz in the 17th century.[a] Ellis chose to base his measures on the hundredth part of a semitone, , at Robert Holford Macdowell Bosanquet's suggestion. Making extensive measurements of musical instruments from around the world, Ellis used cents to report and compare the scales employed,[1] and further described and utilized the system in his 1875 edition of Hermann von Helmholtz's On the Sensations of Tone. It has become the standard method of representing and comparing musical pitches and intervals.[2][3]

History

[edit]

Alexander John Ellis' paper On the Musical Scales of Various Nations,[1] published by the Journal of the Society of Arts in 1885, officially introduced the cent system to be used in exploring, by comparing and contrasting, musical scales of various nations. The cent system had already been defined in his History of Musical Pitch, where Ellis writes:

"If we supposed that, between each pair of adjacent notes, forming an equal semitone [...], 99 other notes were interposed, making exactly equal intervals with each other, we should divide the octave into 1200 equal hundrecths [sic] of an equal semitone, or cents as they may be briefly called."[4]

Ellis defined the pitch of a musical note in his 1880 work History of Musical Pitch[5] to be

"the number of double or complete vibrations, backwards and forwards, made in each second by a particle of air while the note is heard".[6]

He later defined musical pitch to be "the pitch, or V [for "double vibrations"] of any named musical note which determines the pitch of all the other notes in a particular system of tunings."[7] He notes that these notes, when sounded in succession, form the scale of the instrument, and an interval between any two notes is measured by "the ratio of the smaller pitch number to the larger, or by the fraction formed by dividing the larger by the smaller".[8] Absolute and relative pitches were also defined based on these ratios.[8]

Ellis noted that

"the object of the tuner is to make the interval [...] between any two notes answering to any two adjacent finger keys throughout the instrument precisely the same. The result is called equal temperament or tuning, and is the system at present used throughout Europe.[9]

He further gives calculations to approximate the measure of a ratio in cents, adding that

"it is, as a general rule, unnecessary to go beyond the nearest whole number of cents."[10]

Ellis presents applications of the cent system in this paper on musical scales of various nations, which include: (I. Heptatonic scales) Ancient Greece and Modern Europe,[11] Persia, Arabia, Syria and Scottish Highlands,[12] India,[13] Singapore,[14] Burmah[15] and Siam,;[16] (II. Pentatonic scales) South Pacific, [17] Western Africa,[18] Java,[19] China[20] and Japan.[21] And he reaches the conclusion that

"the Musical Scale is not one, not 'natural', nor even founded necessarily on the laws of the constitution of musical sound, so beautifully worked out by Helmholtz, but very diverse, very artificial, and very capricious".[22]

Use

[edit]
Comparison of equal-tempered (black) and Pythagorean (green) intervals showing the relationship between frequency ratio and the intervals' values, in cents.

A cent is a unit of measure for the ratio between two frequencies. An equally tempered semitone (the interval between two adjacent piano keys) spans 100 cents by definition. An octave—two notes that have a frequency ratio of 2:1—spans twelve semitones and therefore 1200 cents. The ratio of frequencies one cent apart is precisely equal to 21⁄1200 = 1200√2, the 1200th root of 2, which is approximately 1.0005777895. Thus, raising a frequency by one cent corresponds to multiplying the original frequency by this constant value. Raising a frequency by 1200 cents doubles the frequency, resulting in its octave.

If one knows the frequencies and of two notes, the number of cents measuring the interval from to is:

Likewise, if one knows and the number of cents in the interval from to , then equals:

Comparison of major third in just and equal temperament

[edit]

The major third in just intonation has a frequency ratio 5:4 or ~386 cents, but in equal temperament is 400 cents. This 14 cent difference is about a seventh of a half step and large enough to be clearly audible, and noticeably dissonant to musicians trained in meantone scales for period-authentic performance.[citation needed]

Piecewise linear approximation

[edit]

As x increases from 0 to 1⁄12, the function 2x increases almost linearly from 1.00000 to 1.05946, allowing for a piecewise linear approximation. Thus, although cents represent a logarithmic scale, small intervals (under 100 cents) can be loosely approximated with the linear relation 1 + 0.0005946  instead of the true exponential relation 2c⁄1200. The rounded error is zero when is 0 or 100, and is only about 0.72 cents high at =50 (whose correct value of 21⁄24 ≅ 1.02930 is approximated by 1 + 0.0005946 × 50 ≅ 1.02973). This error is well below anything humanly audible, making this piecewise linear approximation adequate for most practical purposes.

Human perception

[edit]
The waveforms of a unison (blue) vis-à-vis a cent (red) are practically indistinguishable.

It is difficult to establish how many cents are perceptible to humans; this precision varies greatly from person to person. One author stated that humans can distinguish a difference in pitch of about 5–6 cents.[23] The threshold of what is perceptible, technically known as the just noticeable difference (JND), also varies as a function of the frequency, the amplitude and the timbre. In one study, changes in tone quality reduced student musicians' ability to recognize, as out-of-tune, pitches that deviated from their appropriate values by ±12 cents.[24] It has also been established that increased tonal context enables listeners to judge pitch more accurately.[25] "While intervals of less than a few cents are imperceptible to the human ear in a melodic context, in harmony very small changes can cause large changes in beats and roughness of chords."[26]

When listening to pitches with vibrato, there is evidence that humans perceive the mean frequency as the center of the pitch.[27] One study of modern performances of Schubert's Ave Maria found that vibrato span typically ranged between ±34 cents and ±123 cents with a mean of ±71 cents and noted higher variation in Verdi's opera arias.[28]

Normal adults are able to recognize pitch differences of as small as 25 cents very reliably. Adults with amusia, however, have trouble recognizing differences of less than 100 cents and sometimes have trouble with these or larger intervals.[29]

Other representations of intervals by logarithms

[edit]

Octave

[edit]

The representation of musical intervals by logarithms is almost as old as logarithms themselves. Logarithms had been invented by Lord Napier in 1614.[30] As early as 1647, Juan Caramuel y Lobkowitz (1606-1682) in a letter to Athanasius Kircher described the usage of base-2 logarithms in music.[31] In this base, the octave is represented by 1, the semitone by 1/12, etc.

Heptamerides

[edit]

Joseph Sauveur, in his Principes d'acoustique et de musique of 1701, proposed the usage of base-10 logarithms, probably because tables were available. He made use of logarithms computed with three decimals. The base-10 logarithm of 2 is equal to approximately 0.301, which Sauveur multiplies by 1000 to obtain 301 units in the octave. In order to work on more manageable units, he suggests to take 7/301 to obtain units of 1/43 octave.[b] The octave therefore is divided in 43 parts, named "merides", themselves divided in 7 parts, the "heptamerides". Sauveur also imagined the possibility to further divide each heptameride in 10, but does not really make use of such microscopic units.[32]

Prony

[edit]

Early in the 19th century, Gaspard de Prony proposed a logarithmic unit of base , where the unit corresponds to a semitone in equal temperament.[33] Alexander John Ellis in 1880 describes a large number of pitch standards that he noted or calculated, indicating in pronys with two decimals, i.e. with a precision to the 1/100 of a semitone,[34] the interval that separated them from a theoretical pitch of 370 Hz, taken as point of reference.[35]

Centitones

[edit]

A centitone (also Iring) is a musical interval (21⁄600, ) equal to two cents (22⁄1200)[36][37] proposed as a unit of measurement (Playⓘ) by Widogast Iring in Die reine Stimmung in der Musik (1898) as 600 steps per octave and later by Joseph Yasser in A Theory of Evolving Tonality (1932) as 100 steps per equal tempered whole tone.

Iring noticed that the Grad/Werckmeister (1.96 cents, 12 per Pythagorean comma) and the schisma (1.95 cents) are nearly the same (≈ 614 steps per octave) and both may be approximated by 600 steps per octave (2 cents).[38] Yasser promoted the decitone, centitone, and millitone (10, 100, and 1000 steps per whole tone = 60, 600, and 6000 steps per octave = 20, 2, and 0.2 cents).[39][40]

For example: Equal tempered perfect fifth = 700 cents = 175.6 savarts = 583.3 millioctaves = 350 centitones.[41]

Centitones Cents
1 centitone 2 cents
0.5 centitone 1 cent
21⁄600 21⁄1200
50 per semitone 100 per semitone
100 per whole tone 200 per whole tone

Savart

[edit]

The savart[42] was proposed by Auguste Guillemin in 1902,[43] named after Félix Savart (1791-1841), who however had never considered the possibility of measuring intervals by logarithms. The attribution to Savart himself appeared later in several Anglo-Saxon sources.[44][45]

Guillemin first defined the savart as the decimal logarithm itself, 1 savart being the logarithm of the decade (10/1), and the millisavart as the base-10 logatrithm times 1000. This later was taken to be the savart itself.[46]

The savart has been described without limiting the number of decimals, so that the value of his unit varies according to sources. With five decimals, the base-10 logarithm of 2 is 0.30103, giving 301.03 savarts in the octave.[47] This value often is rounded to 1/301 or to 1/300 octave.[48][49]

Sound files

[edit]

The following audio files play various intervals. In each case the first note played is middle C. The next note is sharper than C by the assigned value in cents. Finally, the two notes are played simultaneously.

Note that the JND for pitch difference is 5–6 cents. Played separately, the notes may not show an audible difference, but when they are played together, beating may be heard (for example if middle C and a note 10 cents higher are played). At any particular instant, the two waveforms reinforce or cancel each other more or less, depending on their instantaneous phase relationship. A piano tuner may verify tuning accuracy by timing the beats when two strings are sounded at once.

Play middle C & 1 cent aboveⓘ, beat frequency = 0.16 Hz
Play middle C & 10.06 cents aboveⓘ, beat frequency = 1.53 Hz
Play middle C & 25 cents aboveⓘ, beat frequency = 3.81 Hz

One Cent Interval
Sine wave plays at middle C, middle C 1 cent sharp, then both at the same time.
Problems playing this file? See media help.
Twelve Cent Interval
Sine wave plays at middle C, middle C 12 cents sharp, then both at the same time.
Problems playing this file? See media help.
Twenty-four Cent Interval
Sine wave plays at middle C, middle C 24 cents sharp, then both at the same time.
Problems playing this file? See media help.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cent (music)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In music theory and acoustics, the cent is a logarithmic unit used to quantify the size of musical intervals, defined as one hundredth (1/100) of an equal-tempered or equivalently 1/1200 of an . This unit facilitates precise comparisons of pitch differences across various tuning systems, as the interval in cents between two frequencies f1f_1 and f2f_2 is calculated as 1200×log⁡2(f2/f1)1200 \times \log_2(f_2 / f_1). The cent was introduced in 1885 by British mathematician and philologist Alexander J. Ellis in his article "On the Musical Scales of Various Nations," published in the Journal of the Society of Arts, as a standardized way to analyze and compare intervals from diverse musical traditions using logarithmic scales. Ellis's innovation built on earlier work in acoustics, such as Hermann von Helmholtz's logarithmic approaches to pitch perception, enabling ethnomusicologists and acousticians to transcribe non-Western scales into a universal metric. Cents are particularly valuable for expressing fine distinctions in tuning, such as deviations in (e.g., a is approximately 701.96 cents, versus 700 cents in ) or in microtonal compositions that divide the into more than 12 steps. In human auditory perception, the for pitch is approximately 5 cents, though it varies with , intensity, and context, allowing musicians and tuning software to detect subtle variations in performance or instrument intonation. This precision underpins applications in digital audio workstations, synthesizer design, and research on .

Fundamentals

Definition

In music theory, the cent is a logarithmic unit used to quantify musical intervals, defined as one hundredth (1/100) of an in the twelve-tone system. This makes one cent equivalent to 1/1200 of an , allowing for precise subdivision of pitch differences beyond the coarser semitone scale. The logarithmic basis of the cent arises from the multiplicative nature of musical intervals, where pitch intervals are ratios of rather than absolute differences. Human perception of pitch tends to follow a , meaning that equal perceived intervals correspond to constant frequency ratios across the audible range; thus, cents employ base-2 logarithm scaling to convert these ratios into additive units, ensuring perceptual uniformity. The fundamental conversion formula for the interval between two frequencies f1f_1 and f2f_2 (with f2>f1f_2 > f_1) is: number of cents=1200×log⁡2(f2f1)\text{number of cents} = 1200 \times \log_2 \left( \frac{f_2}{f_1} \right) This equation scales the octave (a frequency ratio of 2) to exactly 1200 cents, with each semitone spanning 100 cents. In contrast to linear units like Hertz, which measure absolute frequency in cycles per second and yield varying differences for equal intervals at different pitch heights (e.g., the Hertz span of a semitone doubles from low to high registers), cents maintain consistent values for equivalent intervals regardless of absolute pitch. This perceptual alignment makes cents essential for analyzing tuning systems, intonation deviations, and microtonal music, where subtle pitch variations—often as small as a few cents—are musically significant.

Mathematical Formulation

The cent is derived from the system, where the is divided into 12 s, with each semitone subdivided into 100 equal parts called cents, resulting in 1200 cents per . This subdivision provides a fine-grained for measuring pitch intervals, where the r=f2/f1r = f_2 / f_1 (with f2>f1f_2 > f_1) corresponds to an interval of cc cents given by the formula c=1200⋅log⁡2r=1200⋅log⁡2(f2f1).c = 1200 \cdot \log_2 r = 1200 \cdot \log_2 \left( \frac{f_2}{f_1} \right). The base-2 logarithm is chosen to ensure octave equivalence: a frequency doubling (r=2r = 2) yields log⁡22=1\log_2 2 = 1, so c=1200c = 1200 cents, aligning the scale such that each octave spans exactly 1200 cents regardless of the absolute frequencies involved. This formulation exhibits additivity for concatenated intervals, a key property stemming from the logarithm's . For intervals from frequency fAf_A to fBf_B (ratio r1=fB/fAr_1 = f_B / f_A, cents c1=1200log⁡2r1c_1 = 1200 \log_2 r_1) and from fBf_B to fCf_C (ratio r2=fC/fBr_2 = f_C / f_B, cents c2=1200log⁡2r2c_2 = 1200 \log_2 r_2), the combined interval from fAf_A to fCf_C has ratio r=r1r2r = r_1 r_2, so c=1200log⁡2r=1200(log⁡2r1+log⁡2r2)=c1+c2c = 1200 \log_2 r = 1200 (\log_2 r_1 + \log_2 r_2) = c_1 + c_2. In contrast, frequency ratios multiply under concatenation (r=r1r2r = r_1 r_2), lacking this linear additivity. The cent measure can be expressed using other logarithmic bases via the change-of-base formula. For the natural logarithm, c=1200⋅ln⁡rln⁡2≈1731.233⋅ln⁡rc = 1200 \cdot \frac{\ln r}{\ln 2} \approx 1731.233 \cdot \ln r, where the constant 1200/ln⁡2≈1731.2331200 / \ln 2 \approx 1731.233 follows directly from the base conversion. Similarly, for base-10 logarithms, c=1200⋅log⁡10rlog⁡102≈3986.312⋅log⁡10rc = 1200 \cdot \frac{\log_{10} r}{\log_{10} 2} \approx 3986.312 \cdot \log_{10} r.

Historical Development

Invention by Alexander J. Ellis

The cent, a logarithmic unit for measuring musical intervals, was invented in 1885 by British mathematician and philologist (1814–1890) as part of the second edition of his English translation and expansion of Hermann von Helmholtz's seminal work On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music. In Appendix XX of this translation, Ellis introduced the cent to address the limitations of existing interval , such as terms like "" or Pythagorean fractions, which were inherently tied to specific historical tuning systems and hindered objective cross-cultural analysis. His motivation stemmed from a need for a neutral, precise, and universally applicable measure that could quantify pitch differences independently of any particular , enabling systematic comparisons of musical scales from diverse traditions and facilitating advancements in physiological acoustics and comparative musicology. Ellis's original proposal defined the cent as one-hundredth of an equal-tempered , allowing for fine-grained expression of intervals—for instance, rendering the 's structure in readily computable units—while emphasizing logarithmic scaling to reflect the perceptual nature of pitch. Although initially framed within , Ellis noted its adaptability to other systems, and the unit was recognized for broader utility, standardizing around where each of the 12 comprises 100 cents, totaling 1200 cents per . The mathematical basis, involving base-2 logarithms of ratios, provided a rigorous foundation but was presented primarily for theoretical clarity rather than exhaustive computation in the original work (detailed further in the encyclopedia's Mathematical Formulation section). The cent's introduction gained early traction through Ellis's 1885 paper "On the Musical Scales of Various Nations," delivered to the Society of Arts in on March 25 and published in the Journal of the Society of Arts. There, applied cents to dissect and compare scales from over 70 global traditions, including , Indian, and ancient Greek systems, demonstrating the unit's practicality for empirical measurements derived from instruments like monochords. The paper received positive reception among acoustical and musical scholars, with discussions highlighting its potential to unify disparate ethnomusicological data and advance objective studies of tone sensations, marking the cent as a foundational tool in 19th-century acoustics.

Adoption in the 20th Century

Following Alexander J. Ellis's introduction of the cent as a unit for measuring musical intervals in 1885, its adoption accelerated in the early among acousticians and music scholars seeking a standardized for pitch analysis. The founding of the in 1929 and the subsequent launch of the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America provided a key platform for promoting the cent's application in acoustics research, with early articles employing it to quantify musical intervals and pitch deviations in experimental settings. This promotion extended through contributions from figures influenced by 19th-century pioneers like , whose resonance theories informed 20th-century studies of consonance and interval perception expressed in cents. By the 1930s and 1940s, the cent achieved greater standardization in through influential texts and institutional efforts, including analyses of historical pitch standards that converted data into cent deviations from equal . Arthur Mendel's seminal work, Studies in the History of Musical Pitch (), co-edited with Ellis's original appendix, exemplified this by systematically applying cents to re-examine Western pitch evolution from 1500 onward, establishing it as a core tool for temperament analysis in academic . Although the (ISO) formalized at A=440 Hz in (ISO 16), this indirectly supported cent-based measurements by providing a reference for interval calculations in acoustic standards. In , the cent proved invaluable for dissecting non-Western scales during the 1940s, particularly in Jaap Kunst's detailed analyses of Indonesian tunings. In his landmark book Music in (1949, third edition), Kunst measured and scale intervals in cents—such as approximating the Javanese "large" whole tone at around 240–250 cents—drawing on wax cylinder recordings to compare them against , thus pioneering quantitative cross-cultural tuning studies. These measurements highlighted subtle microtonal variations, like octave equivalents spanning 1180–1220 cents, fostering the cent's role in global music scholarship. The mid-20th century also saw a shift toward computational tools for cent calculations, as logarithmic slide rules and early electronic calculators enabled rapid conversion of ratios to cent values via the c=1200log⁡2(f2/f1)c = 1200 \log_2 (f_2 / f_1), where f1f_1 and f2f_2 are . This facilitated precise interval analysis in acoustic laboratories during the and , such as in psychoacoustic experiments measuring just noticeable differences, transitioning from manual approximations to data-driven precision in tuning research.

Practical Applications

Measuring Musical Intervals

Cents provide a standardized logarithmic measure for quantifying the size of musical intervals, calculated as 1200 times the base-2 logarithm of the between two pitches, allowing precise comparisons across different tuning systems. This unit divides the equal-tempered into 100 cents, facilitating the expression of both large-scale intervals and subtle microtonal adjustments. In , common intervals are expressed as multiples of 100 cents per ; for instance, a spans seven s and thus measures exactly 700 cents, while a minor second covers one at approximately 100 cents. In , these values deviate slightly: the (3:2 ratio) equals about 701.96 cents, highlighting the small but perceptible difference from . Such calculations enable musicians to assess interval purity relative to acoustic ideals or tempered approximations. In score analysis, particularly for microtonal music, staff notation intervals—traditionally representing equal-tempered steps—are converted to cents to specify exact pitch deviations, often using extended that denote fractional adjustments like 25 or 50 cents. This process involves mapping the notated interval to its frequency ratio and then to cents, allowing composers and analysts to document non-standard tunings precisely without altering the visual of the score. Analyses of Western classical repertoire, such as Beethoven's works when performed on period instruments tuned to quarter-comma meantone, quantify deviations from in cents; for example, the measures approximately 386 cents—about 14 cents flatter than the 400 cents of —revealing how such tunings affect harmonic color in pieces like sonatas. These measurements help performers recreate historical sonorities by adjusting intervals to align with the temperament's characteristic "sweet" thirds at the expense of some fifths being 5 to 6 cents flat. In composition, cents specify detunings for acoustic instruments emulating natural overtones; for natural trumpets, the fourth (top-space E) is inherently about 14 cents flat relative to , requiring composers to notate compensatory sharpenings to achieve intended intonation in ensemble contexts. This precise notation ensures that series-based instruments integrate seamlessly with tuned ensembles, preserving the intended intervallic relationships.

Tuning and Temperament Analysis

Cents provide a standardized for quantifying deviations in tuning systems, enabling precise comparisons between intervals in different . In , the spans approximately 407.82 cents, derived from stacking two major seconds of 203.91 cents each, which exceeds the of exactly 400 cents by about 7.82 cents. This discrepancy highlights the "wolf" intervals inherent in , such as the diminished sixth (e.g., G♯ to E♭) measuring roughly 678.54 cents—flat by 23.46 cents relative to a pure fifth of 701.96 cents—arising from the of 23.46 cents that prevents perfect circle-of-fifths closure without tempering. Circulating temperaments, such as those in the well-tempered family, distribute small cent deviations across intervals to achieve approximate closure of the circle of fifths while allowing modulation across all keys. In Werckmeister III , four fifths (C-G, G-D, D-A, and B-F♯) are narrowed by about 5.87 cents from the Pythagorean value of 701.96 cents to approximately 696.09 cents, while the remaining eight retain the pure 3:2 ratio; this tempering, equivalent to one-quarter of the , ensures the overall circle closes exactly without a prominent . Such deviations, typically on the order of 2 to 6 cents per affected fifth, create subtle variations in consonance that characterize the expressive qualities of these systems compared to the uniform 700 cents of fifths. In microtonal extensions beyond the 12-tone framework, cents measure the granularity of equal divisions finer than the . For instance, 19-tone divides the into steps of approximately 63.16 cents each (1200/19), yielding a of about 11 steps or 694.74 cents—close to the fifth of 701.96 cents but with reduced error in approximating the syntonic . Cent-based diagrams, such as circle-of-fifths visualizations annotated with deviation values, serve as analytical tools for measuring —the small intervals tuned out in temperaments. The , for example, measures -21.51 cents as the difference between the Pythagorean (407.82 cents) and the just (386.31 cents), representing the interval eliminated in meantone tunings to align stacked fifths with thirds. These diagrams facilitate the identification of tempering strategies by plotting cumulative cent offsets around the circle, revealing how systems like Werckmeister distribute comma fractions to balance intonation across keys.

Digital Audio and Software Tools

In digital audio workstations (DAWs), the cent serves as a standard unit for precise pitch adjustments and detuning. For instance, Live's instrument devices, such as Operator and Wavetable, include Detune knobs that allow users to adjust oscillator pitch in one-cent increments, with a range up to ±300 cents (three semitones), enabling fine-tuned timbral variations without altering the fundamental note. Similarly, provides a Tune slider in its project settings for global software instrument detuning in cent steps from the concert pitch of A=440 Hz, and supports custom tuning tables where intervals are defined and analyzed in cents for non-standard temperaments. Spectral analysis software leverages cents to visualize and quantify pitch deviations in audio recordings. Sonic Visualiser, an open-source tool for music audio examination, displays pitch tracks using plugins like pYIN, where deviations from equal temperament are shown in cents relative to a reference frequency, facilitating detailed intonation analysis in performances. , a phonetics-focused application, extracts pitch contours from audio in Hz, which users commonly convert to cents for musical applications, such as measuring interval accuracy in singing or speech prosody. In , cents enable the creation and management of custom scales beyond . The Scala software, designed for microtonal experimentation, represents scale degrees and intervals in cents (with an as 1200 cents), allowing composers to generate and export tuning files compatible with synthesizers and notation programs for precise microtonal music production. Post-2000 advancements in AI-assisted tuning tools have integrated cents for automated pitch correction, enhancing efficiency in music production. Pro, evolving from its 1997 origins, incorporates a adjustable from -100 to +100 cents to shift reference pitches, and uses AI-driven tracking for real-time correction that snaps vocals to the nearest scale degree in cent increments, minimizing artifacts in professional workflows. Melodyne, introduced in 2001, employs cents in its Pitch Tool for editing note centers independently of , with macros that correct deviations to within ±50 cents or less, supporting polyphonic audio and AI-enhanced detection for natural-sounding results in DAWs.

Comparisons and Approximations

Just Intonation vs. Equal Temperament

In , musical intervals are derived from simple whole-number frequency ratios, producing pure consonances without beats, whereas distributes the 1200 cents of an evenly across 12 semitones of 100 cents each, enabling modulation across all keys at the cost of slight impurities in most intervals. The cent unit quantifies these discrepancies precisely, revealing how equal temperament systematically sharpens or flattens intervals relative to just intonation. A key example is the , with a just intonation value of 386.31 cents (frequency ratio ) compared to 400 cents in equal temperament, yielding a 13.69-cent sharpness that introduces audible dissonance. The differences extend across the , where prioritizes harmonic purity in a single key, while maintains consistent steps. The table below enumerates cumulative cent values from the tonic for the degrees in both systems, highlighting representative deviations such as the (e.g., from the tonic to the flat third degree, 315.64 cents just vs. 300 cents equal, a 15.64-cent flatness).
Scale DegreeJust Intonation (cents)Equal Temperament (cents)Deviation (equal minus just, cents)
1 (tonic)0.0000.00
2203.91200-3.91
3 (major third)386.31400+13.69
4 (perfect fourth)498.04500+1.96
5 (perfect fifth)701.96700-1.96
6 (major sixth)884.36900+15.64
7 (major seventh)1088.271100+11.73
8 (octave)1200.0012000.00
These cent deviations manifest in auditory effects through beating, where misaligned frequencies in equal temperament cause amplitude fluctuations perceivable as roughness or wavering. For the major third at A440 pitch standard, the 13.69-cent deviation results in the fifth partial of the lower note and fourth partial of the upper note beating at approximately 10 Hz in the middle register, enhancing consonance in just intonation but adding subtle tension in equal temperament; smaller deviations, such as the 1.96 cents in the perfect fifth, produce slower beats around 0.74 Hz for intervals like A3-E4. Historically, such comparisons informed practical tunings, as seen in Johann Sebastian Bach's The Well-Tempered Clavier (1722 and 1742), where the advocated "well-tempered" system approximates equal temperament with major thirds varying within ±6 cents across keys, balancing purity and usability better than earlier unequal temperaments while avoiding extreme dissonances.

Piecewise Linear Approximations

Piecewise linear approximations provide a computationally efficient way to model the logarithmic relationship between cents and frequency ratios by dividing the octave into a small number of linear segments that closely follow the log₂ curve with small errors below human perception thresholds. This approach exploits the convex nature of the exponential function 2^{c/1200} (where c is the cent value), allowing linear segments to capture the curve's behavior without requiring full exponential computations. Such methods were particularly valuable in early digital audio systems where floating-point operations were limited. The algorithm involves defining piecewise functions for the frequency ratio r as a function of c, using between carefully chosen anchor points that align with musically significant intervals, such as 0 cents (r = 1), 200 cents (r ≈ 1.1225), 700 cents (r ≈ 1.4983), and cents (r = 2). Between these points, the computes r as a weighted of the exact ratios at the anchors, based on the proportional in cents. This technique approximates the core cent c = 1200 \log_2(r), enabling fast bidirectional conversions for pitch adjustment in software and hardware. Optimized anchor selection minimizes interpolation error, making it suitable for real-time applications. These methods remain relevant in contemporary processing, including implementations and real-time pitch correction software. In the and , early digital synthesizers often relied on lookup tables for cent-to-ratio conversions to handle logarithmic pitch control, as seen in FM synthesis implementations where exponential tables converted log-scale inputs to linear values for oscillators. Piecewise linear schemes complemented these tables by providing low-memory alternatives for fine cent-level tuning, reducing computational load in polyphonic systems. For instance, systems using logarithmic representation interpolated linearly across segments to generate precise interval ratios without dedicated log/exp hardware.

Human Perception

Psychoacoustic Sensitivity to Cents

The human ear's sensitivity to small deviations in pitch, as measured in cents, follows the principles of the Weber-Fechner law, which posits that the just noticeable difference in stimulus intensity is proportional to the stimulus magnitude itself. In pitch , this manifests as a relative discrimination where the smallest detectable change (Δf) is a constant fraction of the base (f), approximately 0.3-0.5% across audible ranges, aligning directly with the logarithmic nature of the cent scale. This proportionality ensures that cents provide a perceptually uniform measure of interval deviations, as equal cent differences correspond to roughly equal perceived pitch steps regardless of absolute . Pitch resolution in cents also varies with frequency due to the auditory system's critical bandwidth, the frequency range within which the ear integrates spectral information. The critical bandwidth widens with increasing frequency, leading to coarser resolution at extremes but finer discrimination in the mid-range; at around 1000 Hz, the just noticeable difference typically spans 5-10 cents, reflecting optimal selectivity in this vocal and musical core region. This frequency-dependent variation underscores why cents, being logarithmic, better capture the ear's non-linear sensitivity than linear frequency units. Seminal research by Stevens and Volkmann (1940) on pitch scaling empirically validated this logarithmic uniformity, finding that subjective pitch height scales approximately linearly with the logarithm of over a wide range. Their experiments, involving magnitude estimations of pitch halves and doubles, confirmed that equal intervals on a log-frequency axis—like cents—elicit consistent perceptual responses, laying foundational support for using cents in psychoacoustic studies of musical intervals. Listener expertise markedly affects cent sensitivity, with trained musicians achieving detection thresholds around 20-30 cents, surpassing untrained individuals who require 30 cents or more to notice deviations. This enhancement stems from auditory training that refines neural processing of fine pitch cues, as evidenced in comparative tasks.

Just Noticeable Differences

The (JND) for pitch, expressed in cents, represents the smallest change in that a listener can reliably detect under controlled conditions. For pure tones at optimal frequencies around 1000 Hz and moderate sensation levels, empirical thresholds average approximately 5-10 cents, corresponding to a relative frequency difference (Δf/f) of about 0.3-0.6%. This value aligns with classic measurements showing minimal discriminability in the mid-frequency range, where auditory sensitivity peaks. These thresholds vary significantly with , increasing at the extremes of the audible due to reduced neural resolution. At low frequencies near 100 Hz, JNDs rise to around 50 cents, while at high frequencies like 8000 Hz, they are approximately 10-20 cents, reflecting broader relative frequency changes needed for detection (Δf/f ≈ 3% at lows and 0.6-1% at highs). Such frequency dependence underscores the logarithmic nature of pitch , where cents provide a consistent scale despite absolute Δf variations. Experimental determination of these JNDs typically employs two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigms, in which listeners compare a standard tone to a comparison tone differing by a variable amount, adapting the difference until performance reaches 75% correct. Wier et al. (1977) used pulsed sinusoids across a wide range (200-8000 Hz) and sensation levels (5-80 dB), revealing the aforementioned patterns through adaptive tracking to minimize bias. Similar 2AFC methods, often with psychometric function fitting, confirm these results in subsequent studies, emphasizing the role of stimulus duration (typically 200-500 ms) and inter-stimulus intervals to isolate pitch cues. In musical contexts, JNDs broaden due to acoustic interactions. For chords or harmonic complexes, mistuning detection thresholds increase to 10-15 cents per component, attributed to forward and backward masking that obscures subtle deviations amid concurrent partials. In melodies, cumulative intonation errors can accumulate unnoticed up to 50 cents across phrases, as contextual expectations and melodic contour reduce sensitivity to progressive drifts compared to isolated tones. Recent studies in the , combining fMRI and protocols, demonstrate that intensive perceptual learning can refine thresholds to approximately 10-17 cents in trained listeners, with reduced activation in regions like Heschl's gyrus correlating to improved discrimination. These findings highlight neuroplasticity's role in pushing limits beyond baseline JNDs for pure tones.

Alternative Interval Units

Logarithmic Scales like Savarts

The savart is a logarithmic unit for measuring musical intervals, defined as approximately 1/301 of an , equivalent to about 3.986 cents. It was originally proposed by the French mathematician Joseph Sauveur in 1696 as the eptaméride, a subdivision of his méride system for , and later renamed the savart in honor of the French physicist Félix Savart (1791–1841). The conversion between savarts and cents arises from the differing bases of their logarithmic scales: one savart equals 1200/301.03≈3.9861200 / 301.03 \approx 3.986 cents, where 301.03 reflects the base-10 logarithm of 2 multiplied by 1000. The savart can be calculated using the s=1000⋅log⁡10(f2f1),s = 1000 \cdot \log_{10} \left( \frac{f_2}{f_1} \right), where ss is the interval in savarts and f2/f1f_2 / f_1 is the ratio; this contrasts with the cent c=[1200](/page/1200)⋅log⁡2(f2/f1)c = [1200](/page/1200) \cdot \log_2 (f_2 / f_1), detailed in the Mathematical Formulation section. Equivalently, in terms of base-2 logarithms, s≈301.03⋅log⁡2(f2/f1)s \approx 301.03 \cdot \log_2 (f_2 / f_1). Historically, the savart found application in French acoustics during the , particularly for achieving finer resolution in organ tuning and analyzing subtle pitch variations beyond coarser traditional divisions. Savart himself employed related devices, such as toothed wheels, to measure vibration rates and compound musical tones precisely. Compared to the cent, the savart offers higher precision in contexts requiring decade-based logarithmic analysis, such as early , due to its alignment with base-10 computations common in 19th-century science. However, it is less intuitive for systems, as the octave's 301.03 savarts do not divide evenly into 12 s (yielding irregular values like approximately 25.09 savarts per semitone), whereas the cent's 1200 units per align neatly with 100 cents per semitone. This makes the savart better suited for theoretical acoustical work than practical tuning in 12-tone .

Fractional Divisions such as Centitones

In microtonal , finer subdivisions of the cent enable precise measurement of intervals beyond the standard 1/1200 unit, particularly for analyzing complex tuning systems and digital implementations. The centitone, also known as the iring, represents one such division, defined as one-hundredth of an equal-tempered whole tone (200 cents), equating to 2 cents or 1/600 of an . This unit was first proposed by Widogast Iring in his 1898 work Die reine Stimmung in der Musik and later elaborated by Joseph Yasser in (1932), where it facilitates detailed comparisons of intervals against tempered approximations, such as expressing a as approximately 350 centitones. Smaller fractions, such as the millitone (0.2 cents or 1/6000 ), extend this precision for theoretical explorations, also originating from Yasser's framework to dissect subtle evolutions in evolving tonalities. This supports the of high-division equal temperaments, such as 118edo, where the basic step measures approximately 10.17 cents (precisely /118 cents) and requires subdivision into tenths or hundredths of a cent to evaluate deviations from just ratios. For instance, converting a centitone in this context yields 2/ = 1/600 parts, underscoring their utility in microtonal scale design.

Specialized Units like Heptamerides and Prony

The heptameride is an obsolete logarithmic unit of musical interval measurement, defined as one-seventh of a meride and equivalent to 1/301 of an . This division yields an interval of approximately 3.987 cents, calculated as 1200×log⁡2(21/301)1200 \times \log_2(2^{1/301}). Coined by the French acoustician Joseph Sauveur in , the term facilitated computations involving common (base-10) logarithms by aligning the octave's logarithmic value—roughly 0.3010—with a division into 301 parts, where 1000 × log₁₀(2) ≈ 301. Sauveur introduced it alongside the meride (1/43 octave, or about 27.907 cents), as 43 × 7 = 301, to support analyses of heptatonic scales in equal divisions. In practice, the heptameride served theoretical purposes in early acoustics, allowing interval ratios to be expressed without direct logarithmic evaluation; for instance, a (3:2 ratio) spans about 75.4 heptamerides. Its finer granularity compared to the cent (which divides the into 1200 parts) made it suitable for precise dissections of scale steps in non-decimal systems, though it assumed an equal-tempered framework for the . Historically, it paralleled the savart (nearly identical at ~3.986 cents) but emphasized heptatonic subdivisions, reflecting 18th-century French efforts to rationalize musical through . The Prony unit, named after the French and Gaspard Riche de Prony, represents a logarithmic measure where the equal-tempered serves as the base unit. Proposed in his 1832 treatise Instruction élémentaire sur les moyens de calculer les intervalles musicaux, it employs base 21/122^{1/12} logarithms to quantify intervals in decimal fractions of the , enabling straightforward arithmetic for tuning calculations. One Prony unit thus equals 100 cents, with subdivisions like 0.01 Prony corresponding to 1 cent, building on earlier acoustic logarithm ideas to standardize pitch measurement for instruments and harmonics. De Prony's system aimed at practical applications in acoustics and instrument design, providing formulas to convert ratios to interval values without complex tables, as in his analytical expressions for progressions. For example, an spans 12 Prony units, while a major third equates to about 3.863 units. Though influential in 19th-century French acoustics, it was later refined into the cent by Alexander J. Ellis, who subdivided the Prony into 100 parts for greater precision. Both units exemplify niche historical approaches to logarithmic scaling, with the heptameride favoring fine divisions for scale theory (≈4 cents per unit) and the Prony emphasizing semitone-based decimals (100 cents per unit). Their modern relevance is confined to scholarly discussions of microtonal and xenharmonic systems, where they illustrate pre-cent alternatives for equal divisions beyond 12-tone .

References

  1. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Music/cents.html
  2. https://www.huygens-fokker.org/docs/measures.html
  3. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/introduction-music-theory-2-pitch-and-notation/content-section-6
  4. https://symposium.music.org/18/item/1792-mathematic-techniques-in-music-history.html
  5. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/pitch.html
  6. https://www.math.ksu.edu/research/artmathfiles/Scales-ArtMathsseminar.pdf
  7. https://www.math.wustl.edu/~wright/Math109/M&MCh05.pdf
  8. https://archive.org/details/onsensationsofto00helmrich
  9. http://www.robertcunninghamsmusic.com/PDFs/Helmholtzs_Theory_of_Consonance.pdf
  10. https://www.scribd.com/document/440379829/Musical-pitch-history
  11. https://dokumen.pub/tuning-the-world-the-rise-of-440-hertz-in-music-science-and-politics-18591955-0226823261-9780226823263.html
  12. https://www.math.wustl.edu/~wright/Math109/M&MCh04
  13. https://music.arts.uci.edu/abauer/3.1/notes/Hasegawa_tone_rep.pdf
  14. https://masa.plainsound.org/pdfs/notation.pdf
  15. https://bolprocessor.org/microtonality/
  16. http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/number/1-4cmt.aspx
  17. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=qc_etds
  18. https://blog.utc.edu/erika-schafer/trumpet-tuning-tendencies-relating-to-the-overtone-series-with-solutions-2/
  19. https://pressbooks.palni.org/brasstechniquesandpedagogy/chapter/brass-acoustics/
  20. https://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.98.4.4/mto.98.4.4.scholtz.html
  21. http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/m/major-3rd.aspx
  22. http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/w/werckmeister.aspx
  23. https://sethares.engr.wisc.edu/tet19/guitarchords19.html
  24. http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/s/syntonic-comma.aspx
  25. https://jazzmodes.wordpress.com/2018/10/26/circle-of-fifths-part-3-tunings-and-temperaments/
  26. https://www.ableton.com/en/manual/live-instrument-reference/
  27. https://support.apple.com/en-sg/guide/logicpro/lgcp452f2693/mac
  28. https://charm.rhul.ac.uk/analysing/p9_1.html
  29. https://calc.hypotheses.org/7390
  30. https://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/help.htm
  31. https://antaresaudiotechnologies.my.site.com/s/article/What-does-Tracking-and-other-knobs-do-in-Auto-Tune-Pro
  32. https://helpcenter.celemony.com/M5/doc/melodyneStudio5/en/M5tour_ToolPitch_2?env=standAlone
  33. https://www.sfu.ca/sonic-studio-webdav/handbook/Just_Tuning.html
  34. http://chromatone.center/theory/intervals/third-sixth/
  35. https://sengpielaudio.com/calculator-centsratio.htm
  36. https://www3.nd.edu/~ablachly/MUS20101/20101JustIntonationFrame.html
  37. https://www.bach-cantatas.com/Articles/Das_Wohltemperirte_Clavier.htm
  38. https://msp.ucsd.edu/techniques/latest/book.pdf
  39. http://depts.washington.edu/sphsc461/pitch/pitch.pdf
  40. https://www.phys.uconn.edu/~gibson/Notes/Section7_2/Sec7_2.htm
  41. https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article/152/1/31/2838323/Pitch-discrimination-is-better-for-synthetic
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9751439/
  43. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3122690/1/201171708_Jan2021.pdf
  44. https://www.dmg-lib.org/dmglib/main/biogrViewer_content.jsp?id=24595004&skipSearchBar=1
  45. https://www.calcsimpler.com/units-and-measures/savart-logarithmic-pitch-unit
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24620718
  47. http://www.huygens-fokker.org/docs/measures.html
  48. https://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/
  49. http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/h/heptameride.aspx
  50. http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/m/meride.aspx
  51. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1083022.texteImage
  52. http://nicolas.meeus.free.fr/Organo/Oannexe2.pdf
  53. http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/u/unit-of-interval-measurement.aspx
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.