Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Mycenaean pottery
View on Wikipedia
Key Information
Mycenaean pottery is the pottery tradition associated with the Mycenaean period in Ancient Greece. It encompassed a variety of styles and forms including the stirrup jar. The term "Mycenaean" comes from the site Mycenae, and was first applied by Heinrich Schliemann.
Chronology
[edit]The Mycenaean era corresponds to the period known as Late Helladic, often abbreviated LH, in the standard relative chronology for mainland Greece. This period is divided into sub-periods using Roman numerals (e.g. LH I, LH II, LH III) which are further divided into sub-sub-periods using capital letters (e.g. LH IIIA, LH IIIB, LH IIIC).[citation needed] This divisions are useful because archaeologists typically use changes in pottery styles as an indication of broader changes in culture.[1] Many writers compare prehistory to a stage on which different ceramic characters appear and play a role.[citation needed]
In absolute dating, the Mycenaean period corresponds to c. 1600 - 1000 BC.[citation needed]
An alternative periodization divides the Mycenaean era into Early Mycenaean, Middle Mycenaean, Palatial Mycenaean, and Postpalatial Mycenaean.[citation needed][clarification needed]
Early Mycenaean
[edit]The Early Mycenaean era covers the Late Helladic I-IIA ceramic periods. Pottery from this era can be distinguished by the use of a more lustrous paint than its Middle Helladic predecessors. There is some question as to how much of the pottery of this age relies on Minoan pottery for both their shapes and the patterns. For at least the first half of the seventeenth century BC there is only a small portion of all pottery produced that is in the Minoan style.
Where the first recognizably Mycenaean pottery emerged is still under debate. Some believe that this development took place in the northeast Peloponnese (probably in the vicinity of Mycenae). There is also evidence that suggests that the style appeared in the southern Peloponnese (probably Laconia) as a result of Minoan potters taking up residence at coastal sites along the Greek mainland.[2]
LH I (c. 1675/1650 – 1600/1550 BC)
[edit]The pottery during this period varies greatly in style from area to area. Due to the influence of Minoan Crete, the further south the site, the more the pottery is influenced by Minoan styles.
The easiest way to distinguish the pottery of this period from that of the late Middle Helladic is the use of a fine ware that is painted in a dark-on-light style with lustrous paints. This period also marks the appearance of a fine ware that is coated all over with paint varying from red and black in color. This ware is monochrome painted and is directly descended from grey and black Minyan ware (which disappear during LH I). A form of the yellow Minyan style also appears in this period, merging into Mycenaean unpainted wares.
Additionally, Mycenaean art is different from that of the Minoans in that the different elements of a work are distinguished from each other much more clearly, whereas Minoan art is generally more fluid.[3]
There is also some carry-over of matte-painted wares from the Middle Helladic period into LH I. The majority of large closed vessels that bear any painted decorations are matte. They are generally decorated in two styles of matte paints known as Aeginetan Dichrome and Mainland Polychrome.
Some of the preferred shapes during this period were the vapheio cup, semi globular cup, alabastron, and piriform jar.
| Shape | Example |
|---|---|
| Vapheio cup | |
| Semi globular cup | |
| Alabastron | |
| Piriform jar |
LH IIA (c. 1600/1550 – 1490/1470 BC)
[edit]During this period there is a drastic increase in the amount of fine pottery that is decorated with lustrous paints. An increase in uniformity in the Peloponnese (both in painting and shape) can be also seen at this time. However, Central Greece is still defined by Helladic pottery, showing little Minoan influence at all, which supports the theory that Minoan influence on ceramics traveled gradually from south to north.
By this period, matte-painted pottery is much less common and the Grey Minyan style has completely disappeared. In addition to the popular shapes of LH I goblets, jugs, and jars have increased in popularity.[2]
Middle Mycenaean
[edit]During this phase, Minoan civilization slowly decreased in importance and eventually the Mycenaeans rose in importance, possibly even temporarily being in control of the Cretan palace of Knossos. The mainland pottery began to break away from Minoan styles and Greek potters started creating more abstract pottery as opposed to the previously naturalistic Minoan forms. This abstract style eventually spread to Crete as well.
LH IIB (c. 1490/1470 – 1435/1405 BC)
[edit]During this period the most popular style was the Ephyraean style; most commonly represented on goblets and jugs. This style is thought to be a spin-off of the Alternating style of LM IB. This style has a restricted shape range, which suggests that potters may have used it mostly for making matching sets of jugs, goblets and dippers.
It is during LH IIB that the dependence on Minoan ceramics is completely erased. In fact, looking at the pottery found on Crete during this phase suggests that artistic influence is now flowing in the opposite direction; the Minoans are now using Mycenaean pottery as a reference.
Ivy, lilies, and nautili are all popular patterns during this phase and by now there is little to no matte painting.
LH IIIA1 (c. 1435/1405 – 1390/1370 BC)
[edit]During LH IIIA1, there are many stylistic changes. Most notably, the Mycenaean goblet begins to lengthen its stem and have a more shallow bowl. This stylistic change marks the beginning of the transformation from goblet to kylix. The vapheio cup also changes into an early sort of mug and becomes much rarer. Also during this period, the stirrup jar becomes a popular style and naturalistic motifs become less popular.
Palatial Period
[edit]Not long after the beginning of this phase there is evidence of major destruction at the palace at Knossos on Crete. The importance of Crete and Minoan power decreases and Mycenaean culture rises in dominance in the southern Aegean. It was during this period that the Levant, Egypt and Cyprus came into close and continuous contact with the Greek world. Masses of Mycenaean pottery found in excavated sites in the eastern Mediterranean show that not only were these ancient civilizations in contact with each other, but also had some form of established trade.
The Koine style (from Greek koinos = "common") is the style of pottery popular in the first three quarters of this era. This form of pottery is thus named for its intense technical and stylistic uniformity, over a large area of the eastern and central Mediterranean. During LH IIIA it is virtually impossible to tell where in Mycenaean Greece a specific vase was made. Pottery found on the islands north of Sicily is almost identical to that found in Cyprus and the Levant. It is only during the LH IIIB period that stylistic uniformity decreased; around the same time that the amount of trade between the Peloponnese and Cyprus dramatically decreased.
LH IIIA2 (c. 1390/1370 – 1320/1300 BC)
[edit]It is in this period that the kylix truly becomes the dominant shape of pottery found in settlement deposits. The stirrup jar, piriform jar, and alabastron are the shapes most frequently found in tombs from this era. Also during LH IIIA2 two new motifs appear: the whorl shell and LH III flower. These are both stylized rather than naturalistic, further separating Mycenaean pottery from Minoan influence.
Excavations at Tell el-Amarna in Egypt have found large deposits of Aegean pottery. These findings provide excellent insight to the shape range (especially closed forms) of Mycenaean pottery. By this time, monochrome painted wares were almost exclusively large kylikes and stemmed bowls while fine unpainted wares are found in a vast range of shapes.
LH IIIB (c. 1320/1300 – 1190 BC)
[edit]The presence of the deep bowl as well as the conical kylix in this age is what allows one to differentiate from LH IIIA. During LH IIIB paneled patterns also appear. Not long into this phase the deep bowl becomes the most popular decorated shape, although for unpainted wares the kylix is still the most produced.
One can further distinguish the pottery from this period into two sub-phases:
- LH IIIB1: this phase is characterized by an equal presence of both painted deep bowls and kylikes. The kylikes at this time are mostly Zigouries.
- LH IIIB2: during this phase there is an absence of decorates kylikes and deep bowl styles further develop into the Rosette form.
It is unknown how long each sub-phase lasted, but by the end of LH IIIB2 the palaces of Mycenae and Tiryns and the citadel at Midea had all been destroyed. The palace of Pylos was also destroyed at some point during this phase, but it is impossible to tell when in relation to the others the destruction took place.
Post-palatial period
[edit]During this period, the differences in ceramics from different regions become increasingly more noticeable, suggesting further degradation of trade at this time. Other than a brief 'renaissance' period that took place mid-twelfth century that brought some developments, the pottery begins to decline in quality.
Submycenaean is now generally regarded as the final stage of Late Helladic IIIC (and perhaps not even a very significant one), and is followed by Protogeometric pottery (1050/25–900 BC).[4]
The shapes and decorations of the ceramics discovered during this final period show that the production of pottery was reduced to little more than a household industry, suggesting that this was a time of poverty in Greece.
It is possible to divide this phase into several different sub-phases.
Early phase
[edit]At this time, the 'medium band' form of deep bowl appears and most painted shapes in this phase have linear decoration. Occasionally new shapes (like the 'carinated cup') and new decorations appear, helping to distinguish wares from this period from those of earlier phases.
Around the same time as the destruction of the great palaces and citadels is recovered an odd class of handmade pottery lacking any ancestry in the Mycenaean world. Similar pottery is also found in other areas both to the East (e.g. Troy, Cyprus and Lebanon) and to the West (Sardinia and Southern Italy). Most of the scholars in recent times agree that such a development is probably to be interpreted as the result of long-range connections with the Central Mediterranean area (and in particular with southern Italy),[5] and some have connected this with the appearance in the Eastern Mediterranean of the so-called Sea Peoples[6]
Developed phase
[edit]In this sub-phase there is increased development in pattern painted pottery. Scenes of warriors (both foot soldiers and on chariots) become more popular. The majority of the developments however are representational motifs in a variety of regional styles:
| Style | Region | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Closed style | Argolid | |
| Octopus style | eastern Attica, Cyclades, Dodecanese | |
| Pictorial or Fantastic style | Lefkandi | |
| Fringed style | Crete |
Late phase
[edit]There is very little pottery found during this phase, thus not providing much information. It is clear, however, that the bountiful decorations of the developed phase are no longer around. When patterns did occur in this phase, they were very simple; most of the pottery was decorated with a simple band or a solid coat of paint.
Mycenaean pottery as commodities
[edit]Manufacture
[edit]Mycenaean ceramics included pots made with the potter's wheel, a technology originally invented millenia earlier in the Near East.
Many historians question how Mycenaean potter's developed the technique of glossing their pottery. Some speculate that there is an "elite or a similar clay mineral in a weak solution"[7] of water. This mixture is then applied to the pottery and placed in the kiln to set the surface. Art Historians suggest that the "black areas on Greek pots are neither pigment nor glaze but a slip of finely sifted clay that originally was of the same reddish clay used."[8]
Considering the appearance of the pottery, many Mycenaean fragments of pottery that have been uncovered, has indicated that there is colour to the pottery. Much of this colouring comes from the clay itself; pigments are absorbed from the soil. Vourvatsi pots start off with a pink clay "due merely to long burial in the deep red soil of the Mesmogia". "The colours of the clay vary from white and reds to yellows and browns. The result of the pottery is due to the effects of the kiln; this ties in the three-phases of firing."[9]
- Phase One: Oxidizing. Oxygen is added to the kiln, thus creates the slip and pot to turn red
- Phase Two: Reducing. The shutter in the kiln is closed, reducing the amount of oxygen the pottery receives, this causes both the slip and pot to turn black.
- Phase Three: Re-oxidizing. Oxygen is then released back into the kiln, causing the coarser material to turn red and the smother silica-laden slip to remain black.[10]
Production centers
[edit]The two main production centers during Mycenaean times were Athens and Corinth. Attributing pottery to these two cities is done based on two distinct and different characteristics: shapes (and color) and detailed decoration.
In Athens the clay fired rich red and decorations tended towards the geometric style. In Corinth the clay was light yellow in color and they got their motifs from more natural inspirations.
Anatomy
[edit]
The anatomy of a vessel can be separated into three distinct parts: orifice, body and base. There are many different shapes depending on where the vessel was made, and when.
The body is the area between the orifice (opening) and base (bottom). The maximum diameter of a vessel is usually at the middle of the body or a bit higher. There are not many differences in the body; the shape is pretty standard throughout the Mycenaean world.
The orifice is mouth of the vessel, and is subject to many different embellishments, mostly for functional use. The opening is further divided into two categories:
- Unrestricted: an unrestricted orifice is when the opening is equal to or greater than the maximum diameter.
- Restricted: contrarily, is when the opening is less than the maximum diameter.
The space between the orifice and the body can be divided into two specific shapes:
- Neck: a restriction of the opening that is above the maximum diameter.
- Collar: an extension of the opening that does not reduce the orifice.
The base is the underside of the vessel. It is generally flat or slightly rounded so that it can rest on its own, but certain wares (especially of the elite variety) have been known to be extremely rounded or pointed.
Utilization of pottery
[edit]There are many different and distinct forms of pottery that can have either very specific or multi-functional purposes. The majority of forms, however are for holding or transporting liquids.
The form of a vessel can help determine where it was made, and what it was most likely used for. Ethnographic analogy and experimental archaeology have recently become popular ways to date a vessel and discover its function.
Analysis of function
[edit]
Vessel function can be broken down into three main categories: storage, transformation/processing and transfer. These three categories can be further broken down by asking questions such as:
- hot or cold?
- liquid or dry?
- frequency of transactions?
- duration of use?
- distance carried
The main problem with pottery is that it is very fragile. While well-fired clay is virtually indestructible in terms of decay, if bumped or dropped it will shatter. Other than this, it is very useful in keeping rodents and insects out and as it can be set directly into a fire it is very popular.
There are a few different classes of pottery, generally separated into two main sections: utilitarian and elite. Utilitarian pottery is generally plainwares, sometimes with decorations, made for functional, domestic use, and constitutes the bulk of the pottery made. Elite pottery is finely made and elaborately decorated with great regard for detail. This form of pottery is generally made for holding precious liquids and for decoration.
Throughout the different phases of Mycenaean pottery different shapes have risen and fallen in prominence. Others evolve from previous forms (for example, the Kylix (drinking cup) evolved from the Ephyraean goblet).[11]
There are many different shapes of pottery found from the Mycenaean world. They can serve very specific tasks or be used for different purposes. Some popular uses for pottery at this time are: saucepans, storage containers, ovens, frying pans, stoves, cooking pots, drinking cups and plates.
Documented types
[edit]Ancient pottery differs from modern in the fundamental prevalence of utilitarian intent. Where a potter or glass-blower today would spend time creating ceramics or glassware that are individual works of art, or a small class of elite decorative ware, which have no other purpose than display as art, and serving as a repository of stored wealth, the ancient Greeks and Romans seldom had resources to spend on that sort of craftsmanship. They concentrated instead on the mass production of pottery for sale to the general population, either locally, or after export. Thus standard utilitarian types developed, as described above.
Scholars refer to many types of Mycenaean pots using classical-era terms such as kylix and amphora. Some native Mycenaean Greek terms are known from Linear B records, but it is not always possible to definitively match these terms to known objects. In their study of the Linear B tablets, Michael Ventris and John Chadwick listed 14 types of pottery ideogram, numbers 200-213, whose presence in a tablet signified a record of the pottery on the shelf.[12] A few, such as the stirrup jar, can easily be matched to a type still extant. Most cannot be, but are subject to debate. There are usually variants of each one. The Linear B nouns are given. Some remain unknown or possibly incomplete. Others are obviously the prototypes of Iron Age names. There is no guarantee, however, that the pottery remained the same during the interim.[citation needed]
Numbers 200-208 are qualified in the tablets with the BRONZE ideogram, signifying that they were of metal. Apparently the same form was often used for metal as for terracotta. The ideograms are included here for that reason, with terracotta possible instances. The table below displays representative instances of the ideograms and includes possible matches in the real pottery. Usually exact matches are not considered possible, but in a few instances, such as the easily identifiable stirrup jar, there is clarity.
Other types known from archaeology
[edit]The possible types associated with the Linear B documents do not cover all the pottery found in the palaces. There are a few possible reasons: perhaps only some jars got recorded, or perhaps the ideograms are more general than known. Faced with uncertainty the theorists naturally applied classical names to them. There is no guarantee that the Mycenaean pots have the same or similar functions as the classical ones, or that the classical names exist in Linear B form. As with the ideograms, some types are clearly represented by prototypes in the Bronze Age; others are only guesswork.
Some shapes with specific functions are:
- Stamnos: a wine jar
- Krateriskos: miniature mixing bowl
- Aryballos, Lekythoi, Alabastra: for holding precious liquids
Many shapes can be used for a variety of things, such as jugs (oinochoai) and cups (kylikes). Some, however, have very limited uses; such as the kyathos which is used solely to transfer wine into these jugs and cups.
Ephyrean goblet
[edit]This goblet is the finest product of a Mycenaean potter's craft. It is a stout, short stemmed goblet that is Cretan in origin with Mycenaean treatment. Its decoration is confined to the center of each side and directly under the handles.
Stirrup jar
[edit]The stirrup jar is used for storage and transportation, most commonly of oil and wine that was invented in Crete. Its body can be globular, pear-shaped or cylindrical. The top has a solid bar of clay shaped in two stirrup handles and a spout.
Alabastron
[edit]The alabastron is the second most popular shape (behind the stirrup jar). It is a squat jar with two to three ribbon-handles at the opening.
Decoration of Mycenaean pottery
[edit]Artists used a variety of tools to engrave designs and pictures onto the pottery. Most of the tools used were made up of stones, sticks, bones and thin metal picks. Artists used boar-hair brushes and feathers used to distribute the sifted clay evenly on the pottery.
Geometric style
[edit]The geometric style of decorating pottery has been popular since Minoan times. Although it did decrease in abundance for some time, it resurfaced c. 1000 BC. This form of decoration consists of light clay and a dark, lustrous slip of design. Around 900 BC it became very popular in Athens and different motifs; such as abstract animals and humans began to appear. Among the popular shapes for geometric pottery are:
- Circles
- Checkers
- Triangles
- Zigzags
- Meander (art)
Lustrous painted wares
[edit]Lustrous painted wares slowly rise in popularity throughout the Late Helladic period until eventually they are the most popular for of painted wares. There are four distinct forms of lustrous decorations:
- The first style sees the ware covered entirely with brilliant decoration, with red or white matte paint underneath.
- This form consists of wares with a yellower tone with black lustrous decorations.
- In the third style, the yellow clay becomes paler and floral and marine motifs in black paint are popular.
- The final style has matte red clay with a less lustrous black paint. Human and animal decorations that are geometric in form.
Fine wares vs. common wares
[edit]Fine wares are made from well purified clay of a buff color. They have thin, hard walls and a smooth, well polished slip. The paint is generally lustrous and the decorations can be:
- Birds
- Fish
- Animals (commonly oxen and horses)
- Humans
This form of ware is generally of a high class; making it more expensive and elite.
Common wares are plain and undecorated wares used for everyday tasks. They are made from a red coarse and porous clay and often contain grit to prevent cracking. Later on in the Helladic period the tendency to decorate even common wares surfaces.[13]
Pattern vs. pictorial style
[edit]Pattern
[edit]The pattern style is characterized by motifs such as:
- scales
- spirals
- chevrons
- octopuses
- shells
- flowers
Throughout the Late Helladic era, the patterns become more and more simplified until they are little more than calligraphic squiggles. The vase painter would cover the majority of the vase with horizontal bands, applied while the pottery was still on the wheel. There is a distinct lack of invention in this form of decoration. [14]
Pictorial
[edit]The majority of pictorial pottery has been found on Cyprus, but it originates in the Peloponnese. It is most likely copied or inspired from the palace frescoes but the vase painters lacked the ability at this time to recreate the fluidity of the art.
The most common shape for this form of decoration are large jars, providing a larger surface for the decoration; usually chariot scenes.
Society and culture
[edit]Much of the finest Mycenaean pottery used or adapted styles from the very well-established tradition of Minoan pottery, especially in areas closer to Crete. Conversely, an abundance of Mycenaean pottery is found in Italy and Sicily, suggesting that they were in contact and traded with the Mycenaeans.[15]
The remnants of Mycenaean pottery allow archaeologists to date the site they have excavated. With the estimated time of the site, this allows historians to develop timelines that contribute to the understanding of ancient civilization. Furthermore, with the extraction of pottery, historians can determine the different classes of people depending on where the pottery shards were taken from. Due to the large amount of trading the Mycenae people did, tracking whom they traded with can determine the extent of their power and influence in their society and others. Historians then can learn the importance of who the Mycenae people were, where pottery mainly comes from, who was reigning at that time and the different economic standards.
Through the excavation of tombs in Greece, archaeologists believe that much of the pottery found belongs to the upper class. Pottery was seen as slave work or that of the lower class. Graves with few pots or vessels indicate the burial was for a poorer family; these are usually not of much worth and are less elaborate than that of the higher class. Pottery was used for ceremonies or gifts to other rulers in the Mycenaean cities.[citation needed]
For historians to decipher what pottery was used for, they have to look for different physical characteristics that would indicate what it was used for. Some indicators can be:
- Where the pottery was extracted from (i.e., houses, graves, temples)
- Dimension and shape: what the capacity is, stability, manipulation and how easy it is to extract its content
- Surface wear: scratches, pits or chips resulting from stirring, carrying, serving and washing
- Soot deposit: if it was used for cooking
Pottery was mainly used for the storage of water, wine and olive oil and for cooking. Pottery was also "used as a prestige object to display success or power".[16] Most grave sites contain pottery to serve as a passing into another life. Along with burial rituals and gifts, pottery was widely traded.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Dickinson 1970, p. 16
- ^ a b c "Mycenaean Pictorial Art and Pottery". Archived from the original on 2009-05-06. Retrieved 2011-10-17.
- ^ Neer, Richard T. (2012). Greek art and archaeology: a new history, c. 2500-c. 150 BCE. New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-28877-1. OCLC 745332893.
- ^ Oliver Dickinson, The Aegean from Bronze Age to Iron Age, London 2006, 14–15
- ^ Kilian, K. 2007. Tiryns VII. Die handgemachte geglättete Keramik mykenischer Zeitstellung. Reichert, Wiesbaden.
- ^ Boileau, M.-C.; Badre, L.; Capet, E.; Jung, R.; Mommsen, H. (2010). "Foreign ceramic tradition, local clays: the Handmade Burnished Ware of Tell Kazel (Syria)". Journal of Archaeological Science. 37 (7): 1678–1689. Bibcode:2010JArSc..37.1678B. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.028.
- ^ "A History of Pottery - Artistic Tile and Stone - Library".
- ^ Stubbings, F. H. (1947). "The Mycenaean Pottery of Attica". The Annual of the British School at Athens. 42: 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0068245400007267. JSTOR 30096719. S2CID 161673584.
- ^ [Kleiner, Fred S. Gardner's Art Through the Ages. 13 ed. Boston, 2010. Print.]
- ^ Stubbings, F. H. (1947). "the Mycenaean Pottery of Attica". The Annual of the British School at Athens. 42: 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0068245400007267. JSTOR 30096719. S2CID 161673584.
- ^ Lacy, A. D. Greek Pottery in the Bronze Age. London: Methuen, 1967. Print.
- ^ Chadwick 1973, p. 324
- ^ French, Elizabeth B., and Alan J. Wace. Excavations at Mycenae: 1939-1955. [London]: Thames and Hudson, 1979. Print.
- ^ Higgins, Reynold Alleyne. Minoan and Mycenaean Art. London: Thames and Hudson, 1967. Print.
- ^ Lane, Arthur. Greek Pottery. London: Faber, 1971. Print.
- ^ Tite, M.S. Ceramic Production, Provenience And Use — A Review. dcr.webprod.fct.unl.pt/laboratorios-e-atelies/4.pdf
References
[edit]- Chadwick, John (1973). Documents in Mycenaean Greek (Second ed.). Cambridge: University Press. Chadwick's second edition includes the first edition by Chadwick and Michael Ventris, which is considered the "Constitution" of Linear B studies. It contains a Foreword by A. J. B. Wace, deceased by the second edition.
- Dickinson, Oliver Thomas Pilkington Kirwan (1970). The Origin and Development of Early Mycenaean Culture (PhD). Vol. I. Oxford: Pembroke College.
- Edgar, C.C. (1904). "Chapter IV. - The Pottery". In The Editorial Committee (ed.). Excavations of Phylakopi in Melos conducted by the British School at Athens. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Supplementary Paper No. 4. London: MacMillen and Co. Limited.
- Evans, A.J. (1894). "Primitive Pictographs and a Prae-Phoenician Script from Crete and the Peloponnese". The Journal of Hellenic Studies. XIV: 270–372. doi:10.2307/623973. JSTOR 623973. S2CID 163720432.
- Evans, A.J. (1901). "Knossos: I The Palace (Plates XII and XIII)". The Annual of the British School at Athens (VI): 3–69.
- Evans, A.J. (1902). "The Palace of Knossos". The Annual of the British School at Athens. 8 (VII): 1–120. doi:10.1017/S0068245400001404. S2CID 222647716.
- A. Furumark, Mycenaean Pottery I: Analysis and Classification (Stockholm 1941, 1972)
- Reynold Higgins. Minoan and Mycenaean Art. (London, 1967)
- Kleiner, Fred S. Gardner's Art Through the Ages. (Boston, 2010)
- MacKenzie, Duncan (1903). "The Pottery of Knossos". The Journal of Hellenic Studies. XXIII: 157–205. doi:10.2307/623763. JSTOR 623763. S2CID 163635733.
- Spyridon Marinatos. Crete and Mycenae. (London, 1960)
- P. A. Mountjoy, Mycenaean Decorated Pottery: A Guide to Identification (Göteborg 1986)
- Schliemann, Heinrich (1878). Mycenae: a narrative of researches and discoveries at Mycenae and Tiryns. New York: Scribner, Armstrong. Includes a Preface by William Ewart Gladstone, then MP.
- Lord William Taylour. The Mycenaeans. (London, 1964)
- Wace, Alan (1956). Foreword (to the first edition of Documents in Mycenaean Greek).
Further reading
[edit]- Betancourt, Philip P. 2007. Introduction to Aegean Art. Philadelphia: INSTAP Academic Press.
- Preziosi, Donald, and Louise A. Hitchcock. 1999. Aegean Art and Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Karageorghis, V. "Deux peintres de vases « mycéniens »", in: Syria 34 (1-2), 1957, pp. 81–92
External links
[edit]
Media related to Mycenaean pottery at Wikimedia Commons
Mycenaean pottery
View on GrokipediaIntroduction
Definition and characteristics
Mycenaean pottery encompasses the ceramic vessels produced by the Mycenaean civilization during the Late Bronze Age, spanning approximately 1600–1100 BC, primarily in mainland Greece, Crete, and the Aegean islands. This tradition is defined by its wheel-thrown construction, which facilitated the creation of symmetrical and standardized forms, distinguishing it as a hallmark of Mycenaean technological advancement in ceramics. These vessels served diverse functions, from storage and transport to ritual and domestic use, and were widely distributed through trade networks across the eastern Mediterranean.[5][6] Key characteristics include the use of fine, well-levigated clay incorporating mineral inclusions such as quartz, mica, and schist, which contributed to the pottery's durability and aesthetic quality. The clay was typically low in calcareous content, resulting in a range of colors from light buff to pink or reddish hues after firing. Firing occurred at temperatures between 800 and 1050°C, often in kilns that allowed for controlled atmospheres, producing hard, vitrified surfaces on high-quality wares. The signature decoration employed lustrous paint ranging from red to black, derived from iron-rich slips applied before firing; this paint achieved its glossy finish through alternating reducing and oxidizing conditions in the kiln, enabling metallic-like effects on the surface.[6][5] Among the principal vessel categories are stirrup jars, designed for containing and pouring liquids like oil; kylikes, shallow stemmed drinking cups suited for communal use; pithoi, large coarse storage jars for bulk goods; and alabastra, small lidded containers for perfumes or unguents, highlighting the pottery's adaptability to both practical and luxury needs. These forms evolved under early influences from Minoan Crete but developed uniquely Mycenaean traits. In contrast to Minoan pottery's emphasis on curvilinear, naturalistic marine and vegetal motifs, Mycenaean designs shifted toward more abstract geometric patterns, linear compositions, and figurative elements such as animals or humans, reflecting a distinct cultural and artistic identity.[5][6]Historical context
Mycenaean pottery first emerged around 1700 BC during the Shaft Grave period, a time of increasing social complexity and elite burial practices at sites like Mycenae, where rich grave goods including early decorated ceramics signal the rise of a distinct mainland culture.[7] Initially, this pottery drew heavily from Minoan Crete, adopting forms, motifs, and techniques such as lustrous dark-on-light decoration that echoed Neopalatial styles from the island.[7] However, following the disruption of Minoan centers around 1450 BC—likely due to Mycenaean incursions or natural catastrophes—mainland potters developed more independent styles, incorporating local innovations while maintaining Aegean interconnections.[8] The pottery became closely tied to the socio-political fabric of Mycenaean palaces, such as those at Mycenae, Pylos, and Tiryns, where it played a key role in the Linear B administrative systems that managed resources and labor.[9] In these centralized economies, vessels like stirrup jars and transport amphorae often bore incised or painted marks, functioning as trade identifiers that facilitated the redistribution of goods across the eastern Mediterranean and underscored palatial control over exchange networks.[9] The tradition endured into the post-palatial era after the dramatic collapse of Mycenaean palaces around 1200 BC, a crisis that dismantled centralized authority through destructions, migrations, and economic upheaval across the Aegean.[10] Post-palatial pottery exhibits shifts toward simpler forms and regional variations, mirroring societal fragmentation and the loss of elite patronage, though core Mycenaean elements persisted amid broader cultural transformations.[10] Recent scholarship between 2020 and 2025 has enriched this context, with the 2025 Getty Villa exhibition "The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece" showcasing over 230 Messenian artifacts, including administrative clay tablets, to highlight pottery's integration into palatial life and regional identity.[11] Similarly, 2024 excavations on Mount Ellanio at Aegina uncovered more than thirty Mycenaean ceramic vessels dating to 1200–1050 BC, suggesting localized workshops that adapted production during the turbulent post-palatial phase and revealing overlooked regional dynamics in pottery distribution.[12]Chronological Development
Early and Middle Helladic phases (LH I–IIB)
The Early and Middle Helladic phases of Mycenaean pottery, corresponding to Late Helladic (LH) I–IIB (c. 1675/1650–1435/1405 BC), represent the formative pre-palatial period on the Greek mainland, marked by the initial adoption and adaptation of Minoan ceramic traditions amid a transition from coarser Middle Helladic wares to semi-fine decorated pottery.[7][13] This era saw the emergence of lustrous painted wares using iron-rich slips that fired to red-to-black tones, applied over a light ground, with designs reflecting strong influences from Cretan Neopalatial styles while incorporating local geometric simplicity.[7] Key developments included the expansion of wheel-throwing techniques and a shift toward standardized vessel forms, evident in grave goods and settlement deposits that highlight growing cultural consolidation and trade networks.[14] In LH I (c. 1675/1650–1600/1550 BC), pottery production focused on a limited repertoire of wheelmade shapes, comprising less than 1% of total assemblages, with prominent forms including Vapheio cups—stemmed, two-handled vessels often decorated with a single large rosette—and tumblers featuring shallow bowls and flaring lips.[15][14] Early painted motifs imitated aspects of Minoan Kamares ware through simple geometric patterns, such as bands and spirals, combined with bichrome decoration in dark-on-light schemes, though executed in a more provincial style with mottled slips.[7] These innovations, heavily influenced by Minoan imports from sites like Knossos, marked the onset of fine decorated pottery at key mainland centers such as Mycenae and Lerna, where they coexisted with residual coarse Middle Helladic types like matt-painted wares.[7][14] LH IIA (c. 1600/1550–1490/1470 BC) witnessed refinement in craftsmanship, with finer wheel-throwing enabling over 25 distinct shapes and the integration of most LH I plain forms into decorated versions.[7] Decoration evolved to include more elaborate motifs like stylized octopuses with twisting tentacles and floral elements such as lilies and ivy, filling vessel surfaces in a manner that followed contours, reflecting sustained Minoan inspiration from Marine and Floral styles.[15] Bridge-spouted jars, adapted from Cretan prototypes, emerged alongside these, often used for liquids and found in grave goods at Mycenae, underscoring elite burial practices and increasing inter-island exchange.[15] At Lerna, this phase shows a clear progression to semi-fine fabrics with polished surfaces, displacing earlier coarse wares and signaling technological advancement.[14] During LH IIB (c. 1490/1470–1435/1405 BC), pottery styles asserted a distinct Mycenaean identity, with reduced reliance on direct Minoan copying and the rise of abstract patterns like the Ephyraean style on drinking vessels.[7] Standardized forms proliferated, including squat alabastra—low, wide-mouthed jars with three handles for ointments—alongside goblets, beaked jugs, and conical cups, often deposited in chamber tombs that attest to heightened trade with Crete, as seen in mixed assemblages at Mycenae and Lerna.[15][14] This period's deposits reveal intensified cultural exchange, with Mycenaean exports reaching the Cyclades and beyond, while local production at these sites evolved fully from coarse to semi-fine wares, featuring slipped and burnished surfaces that enhanced durability and aesthetics.[7][13]Palatial period (LH IIIA–B)
The Palatial period of Mycenaean pottery, corresponding to Late Helladic (LH) IIIA–B (c. 1435/1405–1190 BC), represents the zenith of production and stylistic uniformity under palace influence, with widespread standardization across the mainland and islands that facilitated extensive trade networks. This era saw the maturation of the Mycenaean koine, a shared ceramic repertoire characterized by wheel-thrown vessels in fine, lustrous-painted wares, often imitating metal prototypes. Key innovations included the proliferation of kylikes and deep bowls for drinking, alongside closed shapes like stirrup jars for storage and transport, reflecting palatial oversight of elite consumption and exchange.[3][7] In LH IIIA1 (c. 1435/1405–1390/1370 BC), vessel forms emphasized deep bowls, shallow angular bowls, and ephyraean goblets with lengthening stems and shallower profiles, marking a shift toward more refined open shapes suitable for symposia. Decorations featured a close style of dense, stylized patterns, including floral motifs like lilies and marine elements such as fish scales and nets, applied in a pale yellow clay with red-brown paint, though naturalistic representations waned in favor of geometric precision. These developments built on earlier experimental phases but achieved greater consistency, as seen in deposits from sites like Mycenae and Tiryns.[16][17][3] LH IIIA2 (c. 1390/1370–1320/1300 BC) introduced prominent export-oriented forms, notably octopus stirrup jars with stylized marine decorations flanking the body, alongside kylikes and small piriform jars; these vessels, often inscribed with Linear B, indicate palace-controlled production and distribution for commodities like oil. The motifs shifted to more formulaic designs, such as the whorl shell and LH III flower, enhancing the koine's recognizability in international contexts. Linear B records from Knossos and Thebes document transport amphoras and stirrup jars as part of administrative logistics, underscoring palatial regulation.[7][18][19] During LH IIIB (c. 1320/1300–1190 BC), the repertoire expanded to include large pictorial kraters with figural scenes of warriors, chariots, and animals, alongside deep bowls in Group B and rosette variants, decorated in panelled patterns that emphasized symmetry and scale. These wares achieved broad distribution, with significant exports to the Levant (e.g., Ugarit, Lachish) and Cyprus (e.g., Enkomi), where pictorial kraters served elite functions, forming a small but archaeologically significant portion of the ceramic assemblages at key ports. Archives from Pylos and Knossos link pottery ideograms—such as kraters, kylikes, and basins—to feasting preparations and tribute collections, as in the Ta series tablets auditing banqueting equipment for communal sacrifices. Recent 2025 analysis of Messenian clays via petrography and NAA reveals decentralized potting communities supplying both palaces and rural sites, challenging models of fully centralized control and highlighting regional autonomy within the palatial economy.[7][20][21][22][23]Post-palatial period (LH IIIC)
The post-palatial period, encompassing Late Helladic (LH) IIIC (c. 1200–1025 BC), represents a phase of transformation in Mycenaean pottery following the collapse of the centralized palatial systems around 1200 BC, characterized by a shift from uniform production to regional diversification and reduced technical refinement. Pottery styles initially retained elements of the preceding LH IIIB phase, such as painted deep bowls and kylikes, but exhibited increasing variability in decoration and form, reflecting decentralized workshops and possible population movements. This era saw the persistence of Mycenaean traditions amid broader disruptions, including potential influences from external migrations, leading to a gradual transition toward Early Iron Age ceramics.[24][25] In the Early LH IIIC phase (c. 1190–1150 BC), pottery maintained close stylistic continuity with LH IIIB, including the prevalence of monochrome deep bowls and stemmed kylikes, but introduced distinctive motifs such as multiple stems on kylikes and disrupted decorative schemes that may indicate social upheavals or migrations. These changes are evident in assemblages from sites like Mycenae and Tiryns, where wheel-made vessels showed a loss of the precise, standardized painting of the palatial era, replaced by more improvisational patterns. The appearance of such motifs has been linked to broader Aegean instabilities, potentially tied to the activities of the Sea Peoples or internal displacements, though direct causation remains debated. Regional workshops emerged, producing pottery with local clay sources and varying firing techniques, as seen in neutron activation analyses of Boeotian examples.[26][25][19] During the Developed LH IIIC (c. 1150–1100 BC), influences from bichrome and matt-painted wares, associated with the emerging Submycenaean style, became more pronounced, blending with traditional lustrous decoration to create hybrid forms like stirrup jars featuring abstract patterns such as spirals and curvilinear motifs. Evidence from Lefkandi in Euboea and Cypriot sites highlights this phase's eastern connections, where stirrup jars with geometric abstractions served as export vessels, suggesting continued but fragmented trade networks. Local production intensified, with workshops in areas like East Lokris producing vessels that incorporated matt-painted elements on coarse fabrics, indicating adaptation to resource scarcity and reduced elite patronage. These developments underscore a loss of standardization, as potters prioritized functional, regionally distinct wares over the elaborate palatial aesthetics.[27][28][29] The Late LH IIIC (c. 1100–1070 BC) saw coarse wares dominate assemblages, with painted decoration simplifying into broader bands and fewer figural elements, marking a clear transition toward Protogeometric styles characterized by compass-drawn semicircles and linear patterns. At sites like Mitrou in East Lokris, this phase is represented by mixed deposits showing the coexistence of residual LH IIIC forms and early Protogeometric innovations, reflecting cultural continuity amid decline. A 2025 excavation at Archanes on Crete uncovered fire-destroyed Mycenaean layers containing LH IIIC pottery. Key themes include the proliferation of local workshops, evident in fabric analyses from multiple regions, and interpretive links to Dorian migrations or Sea Peoples' impacts, though these are inferred from ceramic disruptions rather than direct evidence. Overall, LH IIIC pottery illustrates resilience through adaptation, paving the way for the Greek Dark Ages.[30][31][32][33]Production and Manufacture
Techniques and materials
Mycenaean potters primarily utilized local clays, often illite-rich or marl-based, sourced from deposits near production sites in the Argolid and Corinthia regions, which provided the base paste for vessels.[34] These clays were typically tempered with non-plastic additives such as sand, crushed pottery fragments known as grog, or calcareous materials like calcite to enhance workability, reduce shrinkage during drying, and improve structural integrity.[6] For creating lustrous slips, potters employed pigments derived from iron oxides, which could produce red or black finishes depending on firing conditions.[35] In the early phases of Mycenaean pottery production, vessels were predominantly hand-built using techniques such as coiling or pinching, but by Late Helladic (LH) II, there was a widespread transition to fast-wheel throwing for more standardized forms.[36] Coiling remained essential for constructing large storage jars like pithoi, where successive coils were added and smoothed to form the body. This shift to wheel-based methods, including wheel-coiling hybrids, reflects broader technological advancements in the palatial period, though hand-building persisted for certain coarse wares.[37] Firing processes involved open bonfires or simple updraft kilns, achieving temperatures between 850°C and 950°C to vitrify the clay and develop durable surfaces.[38] Potters manipulated atmospheres during firing—oxidizing for orange-red hues or reducing (oxygen-poor) for black finishes—by controlling fuel and air flow, as evidenced by experimental reconstructions and the color variations in surviving sherds.[35] Waste heaps of misfired pottery, or wasters, discovered at sites like Korakou, indicate localized production and occasional firing failures due to inconsistent kiln conditions. Surfaces were finished using bone burnishers to smooth and compact the clay, enhancing sheen and impermeability before decoration or firing, a technique particularly common on fine wares.[29] There is no archaeological evidence for the use of molds in mass-producing Mycenaean pottery, suggesting reliance on skilled manual and wheel techniques rather than templated forming. Recent experimental work highlighted in the 2025 "Mycenaean Alchemists" exhibition at the National Archaeological Museum in Athens has demonstrated how potters achieved metallic-like effects through specialized firing of iron-rich slips, evoking the luster of precious metals.[39]Production centers and organization
Mycenaean pottery production was centered primarily on the Greek mainland and nearby islands, with key sites including the palatial complexes at Mycenae and Tiryns in the Argolid, and Pylos in Messenia, where archaeological evidence indicates local manufacturing tied to regional economies.[38] Island centers such as Aegina, particularly at Kolonna, hosted specialized workshops producing distinctive cooking and storage vessels using local red clays tempered with volcanic fragments, which were widely exported across the Aegean.[40] Kythera served as another significant production hub, with petrographic analyses identifying its fabrics in assemblages from sites like Khania on Crete, reflecting ongoing Minoan-Mycenaean interactions and the island's role in inter-regional exchange.[41] At Khania itself, Cretan influences are evident in Late Bronze Age cooking wares, analyzed through petrography to trace local adaptations of Mycenaean styles.[42] A notable recent discovery is the 2024 excavation at Mount Ellanio on Aegina, the island's highest peak, where a LH IIIA/B building yielded over 30 ceramic vessels, suggesting a workshop or refuge site involved in pottery production during the palatial period.[12] During the LH III palatial phase, production organization involved palace oversight, as documented in Linear B tablets from Pylos that record allocations of stirrup jars for perfumed oil, indicating centralized monitoring of specialized vessels for elite and trade purposes.[43] However, a 2025 study by Day and Kardamaki reveals a more decentralized model in Messenia, where community-based potting supplied both palatial and peripheral sites, with limited direct palace intervention despite occasional large orders, challenging notions of strict top-down control.[23] The scale of production varied by ware type, with petrographic evidence from the Saronic Gulf demonstrating specialized workshops near palaces for fine painted pottery, while common utilitarian wares were manufactured in rural settings using local clays, facilitating widespread distribution.[44] Labor was likely organized through family units or informal guilds, as inferred from ethnographic parallels in traditional pottery-making societies where extended kin groups handled training and production.[45] Gender roles appear balanced, with Linear B terms like ke-ra-me-u (male potter) and ke-ra-me-ja (female potter) suggesting both men and women participated, potentially divided by tasks such as forming versus decorating, supported by fingerprint analyses from Aegean ceramics indicating mixed adult and juvenile involvement.[45]Vessel forms and typology
Mycenaean pottery vessels are classified using the comprehensive typology established by Arne Furumark, who cataloged over 100 distinct shapes (denoted as FS numbers) based on form, proportion, and functional attributes in his 1941 analysis.[46] This system remains the foundational reference for identifying vessel morphology across the Late Bronze Age Aegean, emphasizing standardized profiles while allowing for subtle variations in regional production.[7] Vessels are broadly divided into open and closed categories, reflecting their primary containment functions. Open forms, designed for serving and consumption, include deep bowls (e.g., FS 284 with slightly incurving rims and horizontal handles), shallow angular bowls (e.g., FS 295 with offset rims), one-handled cups (e.g., FS 164 with rounded bodies), stemmed kylikes (e.g., FS 257 featuring tall stems and flaring bowls for drinking), and kraters (e.g., FS 281 with wide mouths and vertical handles for mixing). Closed forms, suited for storage and liquid transport, encompass jugs (e.g., FS 106-110 with narrow necks and single vertical handles), amphorae (e.g., FS 66 with two vertical handles and elongated bodies), stirrup jars (e.g., FS 171 with a distinctive spout flanked by stirrup-shaped handles), alabastra (e.g., FS 80 as flattened, handle-less flasks), and large pithoi (e.g., FS 28, coarse storage jars reaching up to 1.5 meters in height with wide mouths and multiple handles).[47][48][49] Key anatomical features define these shapes and their evolutions. Handles vary from horizontal loop types on bowls for grasping, to vertical strap handles on amphorae and jugs for suspension or pouring, and rising handles on kylikes for stability. Spouts include bridge-spouted designs on jugs (arching over the mouth) and false spouts integrated into stirrup jars (with a separate true spout for controlled pouring). Bases range from simple flat or splayed forms on everyday vessels to ring bases for elevation and pedestal bases on ceremonial kylikes, enhancing balance and aesthetic proportion.[7][15][47] Regional variations introduce localized adaptations within the Furumark framework, often tied to specific workshops. For instance, deep bowls (FS 284) from Messenia exhibit broader profiles and coarser fabrics suited to local clays, as seen in assemblages from Pylos. Similarly, cooking pots from Aegina feature tripod legs and incised bases, reflecting a specialized tradition that persisted into the post-palatial phase.[50]| Category | Examples (FS Numbers) | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Open Vessels | Deep bowl (FS 284), Kylix (FS 257), Krater (FS 281) | Wide mouths, horizontal or vertical handles, ring or pedestal bases for serving and drinking. |
| Closed Vessels | Stirrup jar (FS 171), Jug (FS 106), Pithos (FS 28) | Narrow necks or spouts, vertical handles, flat or ring bases for storage and transport. |



