Hubbry Logo
Nicholas BarbonNicholas BarbonMain
Open search
Nicholas Barbon
Community hub
Nicholas Barbon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nicholas Barbon
Nicholas Barbon
Nicholas Barbon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Nicholas Barbon (c. 1640 – c. 1698) was an English economist, physician, and financial speculator. Historians of mercantilism consider him to be one of the first proponents of the free market.

In the aftermath of the Great Fire of London, he became an active London property developer and helped to pioneer fire insurance and mortgages as a means of financing such developments.

Early life

[edit]

Nicholas Barbon was born in London in either 1637[1] or 1640.[2][3] He was the eldest son of Praise-God Barebone (or Barbon), the namesake of Barebone's Parliament of 1653, the predecessor of Oliver Cromwell's Protectorate. Praise-God Barebone was a Fifth Monarchist who purportedly gave Nicholas the baptismal name "If-Jesus-Christ-had-not-died-for-thee-thou-hadst-been-damned," an example of a hortatory name, a type of virtue name that was common among some Dissenting families in 17th-century England.[2] Conflicting sources claim the name "Unless-Jesus-Christ-Had-Died-For-Thee-Thou-Hadst-Been-Damned" was given to Nicholas' father[4] or to his uncle[5] and Nicholas' hortatory name was supposedly a variant on this name.

Barbon became a religious separatist with Millenarianist beliefs, including fervent advocacy of infant baptism in particular.[1][6] He studied medicine at the Universities of Leiden and Utrecht in the Netherlands, and received his Doctor of Medicine qualification from the latter in 1661. Three years later, he became an honorary fellow of the Royal College of Physicians in London.[1][3]

Property development

[edit]

He soon turned from the medical profession to the building trade, which suddenly became important in 1666 when the Great Fire of London devastated most of the City of London which at the time was separated from Westminster, the seat of Britain's government, by two miles of countryside, dotted with grand mansions. Within a few years he was "the most prominent London builder of his age".[1] He built houses streets at a time, often around squares, and his developments were mostly to the west of the City of London, where land was plentiful.

Barbon was responsible for joining the city to the seat of government at Westminster for the first time as a result of developments along the Strand, Bloomsbury, St Giles and Holborn.[3][7] Barbon did this despite long-established restrictions on new buildings associated with various Acts of Parliament and royal declarations in the late 16th century: he often simply disregarded legal and local objections, demolished existing buildings without permission and rebuilt speculatively in search of a quick profit.[3][7]

On 11 June 1684, Barbon's expansionary speculation brought him and his building tradesmen into conflict with lawyers based at Gray's Inn. Barbon started his largest project yet,[8] the redevelopment of Red Lion Square, and environs in Holborn without being authorised to do so. The Gray's Inn lawyers, Inns of Court adjacent saw their rural outlooks jeopardised, and started physical fist fights with Barbon's workmen, but the developer and his men fought back. The lawyers subsequently obtained warrants for his arrest but Barbon had these set aside and the development scheme was completed.[3] Another setback came when houses he had built at Mincing Lane collapsed because of inadequate foundations.[1][3]

"He was unique in the unscrupulousness and brazenness of his business tactics" and his contemporary Roger North, who studied his dealings and interviewed him on the subject, called him "an exquisite mob master" in recognition of his ability to manipulate people to carry out his schemes.[9][2][4]

Insurance and mortgages

[edit]

At the same time, Barbon took an interest in the development of insurance and the banking industry, and helped to pioneer both.[8] In 1680–81, with 11 associates, he founded an "Insurance Office for Houses" which offered fire insurance for up to 5,000 households in London.[3][10] Fires were a major danger in London at the time: the Great Fire destroyed more than 13,000 houses and displaced about 100,000 people,[11] and another conflagration in 1678 damaged the Middle Temple, one of the Inns of Court.[1] In 1690, together with John Asgill, he founded the National Land Bank.[3] This was Britain's first land bank—a financial institution which issued loans in the form of mortgages against real estate.

These were popular with landowners because they could now raise money against the value of their main asset.[12] The bank was moderately successful, and even threatened to usurp the Bank of England in 1696. The government budget deficit had grown to an unsustainable level; Barbon merged the National Land Bank with another institution (founded by John Briscoe) to form Land Bank United, and offered the government a £2 million loan (£351 million as of 2023).[13] The scheme foundered when Barbon and Briscoe could not raise enough money, and Land Bank United was demerged.[3][12]

Barbon was also active in other fields during the 1690s. Largely in order to take advantage of Parliamentary privilege and thus gain immunity from prosecution by his creditors[3] he bought a number of burgages[14] in the rotten borough of Bramber in Sussex, which enabled him to be elected one of its Members of Parliament in 1690 and 1695. Another project involved trying to pump drinking water from the River Thames, to be piped to his new building developments. He patented a design in 1694, and tried to sell pumping rights alongside fire insurance contracts.[12]

Economic theory

[edit]
A Discourse of Trade (1690)

During the later part of his life, Nicholas Barbon wrote extensively on economic theory. His pamphlets and books on political economy are considered important because of their innovative views on money, trade (especially free trade) and supply and demand.[3][15] His works, especially A Discourse of Trade (written in 1690), influenced and drew praise from 20th-century economists such as John Maynard Keynes (in The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money)[16] and Joseph Schumpeter.[15] Karl Marx cites his work, notably A Discourse on Coining the New Money Lighter of (1696) in Das Capital.[17] He was one of several late 17th-century economic, social and political theorists with a medical education background; contemporaries included Benjamin Worsley, Hugh Chamberlen, William Petty and John Locke.[18]

His early writings sought to explain and advertise his insurance and mortgage schemes and his building developments; for example, in his Apology for the Builder: or a Discourse showing the Cause and Effects of the Increase of Building of 1685—written in the aftermath of his fight with the lawyers of Gray's Inn—Barbon justified (anonymously) his expansionary building policy by describing the benefits it would bring to London and Britain as a whole.[19] His A Discourse of Trade, written five years later, was much more significant, however. As a broad explanation of his economic and political views, it brought together all of his ideas and became the basis for his reputation as an economic theorist.[20]

Barbon observed the power of fashion and luxury goods to enhance trade. Fashion demanded the replacement of goods before they had worn out; he believed this directed people towards the continuous purchasing of goods, which therefore created constant demand. These views were contrary to standard moral values of the time, influenced by the government and the church. He was one of the earliest writers to draw this distinction between the moral and economic aspects of purchasing.[3][21]

His views on interest were praised by Joseph Schumpeter. Barbon described as a "mistake" the standard view that interest is a monetary value, arguing that because money is typically borrowed to buy assets (goods and stock), the interest that is charged on the loan is a type of rent—"a payment for the use of goods".[15] From this, Schumpeter extrapolated the argument that just as rent is the price paid for the use of what he called "unwrought stock, or the natural agents of [economic] production", interest is the price paid for "wrought stock—the produced means of production".[22]

One of the main arguments in A Discourse of Trade[3] was that money did not have enough intrinsic value to justify a government's hoarding of it; policies intended to help accumulate supposedly "valuable" commodities such as silver and gold were not appropriate, because the laws of supply and demand were the main determiner of their value.[21] Such criticism of mercantilism—the view that a country's prosperity can be measured by its stock of bullion—helped to lay the foundation for classical economics, and was unusual at the time. Along with John Locke, with whom he debated his theories, Barbon was one of the first theorists to argue that money's value was principally symbolic and that its main function was to assist trade. These views were expanded upon in his 1696 pamphlet, A Discourse Concerning Coining the New Money Lighter.[3][23]

Barbon was influenced by populationism; he identified a country's wealth with its population. He also advocated the use of paper and credit money, and postulated the reduction of interest rates, which he thought impeded the growth in manufacturing and trade.[21][24] He discussed these issues in his 1696 pamphlet, which also considered the effects of the Recoinage of that year, in which the Royal Mint recalled large quantities of silver coins, melted them down and reminted them, resulting in a temporary fall in the supply of money.[3]

Despite the importance of some of his theories, Barbon's work (especially A Discourse of Trade) has been criticised for an excess of "definition and classification" instead of analysis and a disjointed style which lacked rigour.[4][25] This has been attributed to the early period in which he wrote, when economic thought was not yet fully developed.[16]

Later life and death

[edit]

Barbon built a house for himself and his business interests in Crane Court, off Fleet Street, but later moved to Osterley House, a large 16th-century mansion west of London.

By the time of his death, Barbon had built or financed developments to the value of £200,000 (£33 million as of 2023)[13] according to Sir John Lowther, 1st Viscount Lonsdale.[8]

He died at Osterley in 1698 or 1699. His will was written in May 1698 and his executors received probate on 6 February 1699.[3][26]

Memorial

[edit]

Barbon Close, opposite Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital in central London, is named after him, as is Barbon Alley off Devonshire Square.[27]

Works

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nicholas Barbon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Nicholas Barbon (c. 1637–1698) was an English physician, property developer, economist, and financial pioneer best known for establishing the Fire Office, one of the earliest joint-stock fire insurance companies, in the aftermath of London's Great Fire of 1666, and for advancing proto-modern economic ideas on value, trade, and consumption in his treatise A Discourse of Trade (1690). Born in to the Puritan leather merchant and preacher , Barbon pursued medical studies in the , obtaining his M.D. from in 1661 and admission to the Royal College of Physicians in 1664. Soon abandoning clinical practice, he turned to amid the widespread destruction caused by the 1666 fire, founding a firm that rebuilt structures within the walls and spearheaded speculative development in suburban expanses between Westminster and the . In 1680, Barbon launched the Fire Office from premises near the Royal Exchange, initially insuring brick buildings at a 2.5% premium and wooden ones at 5%, thereby distributing fire risks across subscribers and employing liveried "watermen" to aid in at insured properties—a model that laid foundational principles for modern . His ventures extended to mortgages and, in 1695, co-founding the short-lived Barbon-Asgill Land Bank, reflecting his broader innovations in and . Barbon's economic contributions critiqued mercantilist emphases on accumulation and production costs; he posited that values stem from and human desire (or "fancy") coupled with , rather than labor or intrinsic worth, and contended that savings stifle by reducing circulation, whereas luxury spending and fashion-driven consumption foster , , and national wealth. He further advocated lowering rates to encourage borrowing and , viewing as a medium akin to "rent on stock," ideas that anticipated demand-side analyses and subjective valuation in later economic schools.

Early Life and Background

Family and Origins

Nicholas Barbon was born in circa 1637, the eldest son of Praise-God Barbon, a merchant based on and a prominent dissenting preacher affiliated with the . His father, whose full given name reflected Puritan zealotry as Unless-Jesus-Christ-Had-Died-For-Thee-Thou-Hadst-Been-Damned Barebone, operated a successful trade in goods while advocating radical religious and political reforms during the English and . Praise-God Barbon's activism included preaching against perceived moral decay and serving as a member of in 1653, a short-lived assembly of Puritan saints convened by as an alternative to the . This body, named after him in derisive shorthand, embodied the family's immersion in sectarian dissent and opposition to established ecclesiastical authority, though it dissolved amid internal divisions over reforms like abolishing tithes and the . The Barbon family's origins trace to modest mercantile roots in , with Praise-God having relocated there from and built wealth through amid the upheavals of the 1640s and 1650s. No definitive records detail Barbon's mother or precise sibling composition, though the household reflected the broader Puritan emphasis on piety, industry, and resistance to Restoration-era conformity under Charles II. This non-conformist milieu likely influenced Barbon's later pragmatic shift toward commercial innovation, diverging from his father's ideological fervor.

Education and Medical Training

Barbon, born around 1640 as the son of the nonconformist preacher and parliamentarian Praise-God Barbon, pursued medical studies abroad due to religious restrictions barring Dissenters from English universities such as and . He initially attended the University of in the , enrolling in the faculty of medicine on July 2, 1661, at approximately age 21. Shortly thereafter, he transferred to the University of Utrecht, where he earned his degree on October 17, 1661. Following his continental training, Barbon returned to and was admitted as an honorary fellow of the Royal College of Physicians in December 1664, a status granted to qualified foreign practitioners without the need for further examination. This affiliation underscored the recognition of his credentials within London's medical establishment, though his subsequent career diverged toward and speculation.

Medical Career

Professional Practice

Barbon returned to in 1664 following his continental medical studies and was admitted as an honorary fellow of the Royal College of Physicians in December of that year. He established a medical practice in , though contemporary accounts indicate limited success and a brief engagement with clinical work. During the Great Plague of 1665, Barbon participated in treating patients in quarantined plague houses, demonstrating practical involvement in epidemic response amid London's public health crisis. The precise scope of his routine practice remains uncertain, with no records of extensive publications, lectures, or specialized contributions to medical theory or procedure during this period. Barbon's medical career effectively concluded shortly after the in 1666, as he pivoted to entrepreneurial pursuits in property development and , abandoning sustained clinical or academic . This transition aligned with his nonconformist family background and broader ambitions for wealth accumulation, rather than persistence in the profession despite formal qualifications.

Royal and Elite Connections

Barbon gained entry into London's medical establishment through his admission as an honorary fellow of College of Physicians in December 1664, a distinction typically reserved for physicians of notable achievement or foreign qualification. The college, holding a originally granted by in 1518 and operative under the Restoration monarchy, represented the pinnacle of professional medical authority, with its fellows licensed to treat patients across social strata, including the and in the capital. This status underscored Barbon's alignment with institutional elites, despite lacking the standard or prerequisites for full fellowship. His professional resolve was evident during the Great Plague of 1665, when he remained in to attend patients, including work in quarantined pest houses on the city's outskirts, while many physicians fled. This service amid widespread mortality—estimated at 68,000 to 100,000 deaths in alone—positioned him among a small cadre of committed practitioners, though such duties often involved the indigent rather than high-status clients. Contemporary records note limited commercial success in Barbon's practice, which he abandoned by the late 1660s for property speculation, suggesting his affiliations did not translate to a sustained high-end clientele. No direct evidence links him to royal attendance, unlike court physicians such as those serving Charles II, though his fellowship facilitated networks within Restoration London's professional and mercantile circles.

Response to the Great Fire of London

Involvement in Rebuilding Efforts

Barbon entered the field of property development in the immediate aftermath of the on September 2–6, 1666, beginning with the reconstruction of his father's properties on , which had been destroyed in the conflagration. This initial project marked his transition from to speculative building, leveraging the urgent need for housing amid the displacement of over 70,000 residents and the destruction of approximately 13,200 houses. As one of the era's leading developers, Barbon undertook large-scale projects, constructing entire streets and squares of uniform terraced brick houses, often financed through personal capital and credit arrangements. His efforts focused on high-demand areas such as and St. Giles-in-the-Fields, where he transformed open fields and ruined sites into residential developments, including (laid out around 1684) and expansions south of the Strand in Red Lion Fields. These initiatives accelerated the city's repopulation, with Barbon's output contributing to the erection of thousands of new structures by the 1690s, emphasizing practicality over ornate design to minimize costs and expedite rebuilding. Barbon's approach prioritized speed and volume, often involving the demolition of surviving medieval structures to create cohesive blocks, which helped establish the terraced urban form that defined London's post-fire landscape. Despite occasional disputes with authorities over building regulations and encroachments on , his developments played a pivotal role in restoring commercial vitality, particularly along key thoroughfares, by providing affordable middle-class housing and supporting trade resumption within a decade of the fire.

Advocacy for Deregulated Development

In the wake of the on September 2–6, 1666, which destroyed over 13,000 houses and 87 churches, enacted the Rebuilding of London Act 1667 to standardize reconstruction and enhance . The legislation required all new buildings to use brick or stone exteriors, banned except for internal elements, mandated non-combustible party walls, and prescribed four classes of building designs with restrictions on projections and heights to facilitate access. Nicholas Barbon emerged as a vocal proponent of easing these and preexisting restrictions on urban development, which dated back to Elizabethan-era proclamations limiting new builds to curb suburban sprawl and maintain density. As a physician-turned-developer who constructed hundreds of properties, including over 100 brick houses in areas like Mincing Lane and along the Thames, Barbon argued that excessive regulation inflated costs, delayed rebuilding, and deterred investment, thereby prolonging in a housing approximately 500,000 people pre-fire. In his anonymously published 1685 pamphlet An Apology for the Builder, or a Shewing the Cause and Effects of the Increase of Building, Barbon systematically refuted mercantilist concerns that unchecked construction depleted rural populations and other towns by drawing workers to . He maintained that population shifts followed economic opportunity, not building per se, and that prohibiting new houses ignored underlying demand driven by expansion and . Barbon emphasized that building served as a productive employing thousands in labor, materials, and ancillary sectors like lime production and , generating equivalent to exporting without the risks of overseas ventures. Barbon further contended that regulatory bans on suburban development, such as those reinforced post-fire to prioritize inner-city repair, were counterproductive, as they forced and higher rents while encouraging to unregulated colonial outposts. He advocated treating as a commodity, where supply responded to demand without state-imposed limits, asserting that "the of building ought to be allowed as a " to foster , such as his own use of imported Dutch bricks for durable, cost-effective structures. This position directly challenged the Act's prescriptive uniformity, which he viewed as favoring elite architects like over practical builders, and aligned with his entrepreneurial model of speculative development financed through mortgages and insurance. Barbon's arguments influenced partial by the 1690s, as mounting pressure from developers and the need to house a rebounding population—reaching pre-fire levels by —led to eased prohibitions on outward expansion, enabling projects like his Essex Street development off the Strand. Critics, including city officials wary of recurrence and infrastructure strain, dismissed his views as self-interested, given his documented disputes over lease enhancements under new codes, but empirical outcomes supported his causal logic: London's rapid rebuilding, with over 9,000 houses completed by 1678, demonstrated that moderated freedoms accelerated recovery without proportionally increasing incidence beyond isolated events.

Financial and Entrepreneurial Ventures

Establishment of Fire Insurance

In the aftermath of the in , which destroyed over 13,000 houses and numerous public buildings, Nicholas Barbon initiated personal fire insurance operations as early as 1667 to mitigate rebuilding risks for property owners. This informal venture evolved into a structured enterprise, reflecting Barbon's recognition that systematic risk pooling could facilitate urban reconstruction amid frequent fire hazards in wooden-built . By early May 1680, Barbon formalized his efforts by co-founding the Insurance Office for Houses, located behind the Royal Exchange, as London's first joint-stock fire insurance company, initially with three associates. The company, later known as the Fire Office, started with a capital fund of £40,000, expandable by £20,000 increments for every additional 10,000 insured houses, enabling coverage for , stone, or tiled structures up to a value of £5,000 per . Premiums were calculated at rates such as 2 shillings per £100 for houses and higher for timber-framed ones, with policies renewable annually; Barbon's office issued distinctive fire marks—lead plaques affixed to insured buildings—to identify properties and deploy proprietary firefighting teams during outbreaks. The venture expanded rapidly, insuring thousands of properties within its first year and competing with informal insurers, though it faced challenges from rival schemes like the City of London's proposed corporation-backed office in 1681, which materialized as the in 1684. Barbon promoted the office through printed pamphlets emphasizing over mercantilist restrictions, arguing that redistributed losses collectively rather than burdening individuals. By the 1690s, disputes among trustees prompted Barbon to divest his stake around 1694, after which the company persisted under new management while influencing subsequent insurers like the Hand-in-Hand Fire Office. This establishment marked a pivotal shift toward commercial , predating widespread state intervention in .

Mortgage and Credit Innovations

Barbon pioneered the systematic use of to development and acquisition in post-Fire , integrating them with his building ventures to enable speculative construction on leased or purchased land. By the late 1670s, he offered loans to buyers of his terrace houses, allowing deferred payments secured against the itself, which lowered barriers to ownership amid high rebuilding costs estimated at over £10 million. These arrangements departed from traditional strict under English , where lenders often retained legal title and possession rights until full repayment; Barbon's model emphasized borrower occupancy and periodic interest payments, akin to modern amortizing loans, to stimulate demand. His practices were advertised in early writings, such as those justifying builder incentives and financial mechanisms for urban expansion, positioning as essential to and improvement. Barbon himself secured large for projects, including a substantial loan from goldsmith-banker Francis Child in 1684 for the Osterley estate redevelopment, demonstrating reciprocal use of networks among developers. This approach facilitated rapid development of over 300 houses in areas like Mincing Lane and Essex Street, funded partly through short-term convertible to long-term . In the 1690s, Barbon advanced credit innovation through , co-founding the National Land Bank in 1690 and another with lawyer John Asgill in 1695, which merged into a larger entity issuing notes backed by subscriber land pledges. These institutions provided loans secured by mortgages at 3.5 percent annual —below prevailing rates of 6 percent—while paying depositors 2 percent, aiming to expand circulating via real estate collateral rather than specie. The 1695 scheme targeted landowners and developers, proposing to lend up to two-thirds of property value, but faced parliamentary scrutiny and competition from established bankers, limiting longevity yet establishing precedents for . These efforts reflected Barbon's view of land as undervalued for creation, countering mercantilist hoarding of and advocating lower to spur investment; however, high default risks in speculative builds led to failures, underscoring early challenges in without standardized appraisals. Despite collapses, Barbon's models influenced subsequent building societies and markets, enabling London's transformation into a -fueled by the early .

Economic Theories and Publications

Key Writings and Their Context

Nicholas Barbon's most significant economic publication, A of Trade, appeared in 1690, printed in by Thomas Milbourn for the author. This tract critiqued mercantilist policies, asserting that unrestricted enriched nations by satisfying human "Fancy or Agreeableness to the Mind," rather than accumulating bullion or balancing trade ledgers. Barbon drew from his ventures in , building, and to argue that economic value stemmed from subjective , not inherent or , prefiguring later subjective theories of value. The work responded to contemporary English debates on commerce amid post-Revolution monetary instability and colonial expansion, where protectionist measures like the dominated policy. In 1696, Barbon published A Discourse Concerning Coining the New Money Lighter, advocating lighter coinage to expand the money supply and alleviate economic pressures from war debts and clipped currency. This pamphlet supported William Lowndes' recoinage proposals, contending that reducing silver content in coins would maintain circulation velocity without eroding trust in money's role as a medium of exchange. It reflected the 1690s crisis of the Great Recoinage, where England grappled with deflationary effects from worn coinage, and Barbon's position aligned with expansionist views against orthodox metallism. Barbon also penned shorter pamphlets, including An Answer to a Paper Entitled Reasons Urging the Necessity of Putting a Stop to the Running of Foreign Coin and defenses of low interest rates, directly engaging critics of his and innovations. These writings, often reactive to policy disputes, underscored Barbon's advocacy for in and , composed during his parliamentary service under William III's regime. Collectively, his publications challenged prevailing doctrines by emphasizing empirical observations from London's rebuilding and commercial boom over abstract balance-of-trade metrics.

Rejection of Mercantilist Doctrines

In his 1690 pamphlet A Discourse of Trade, Nicholas Barbon systematically critiqued core mercantilist tenets, particularly the obsession with accumulating and achieving chronic surpluses as measures of national prosperity. He argued that wealth derives primarily from the abundance of consumable provisions and goods rather than hoards of or silver, which mercantilists treated as the ultimate store of riches; , Barbon contended, serves merely as a medium for exchange and holds value only insofar as it facilitates , not as an end in itself. This rejected the bullionist doctrine that nations should restrict imports and maximize exports to drain specie from trading partners, a view Barbon dismissed as misguided since it ignored how money's utility lies in circulation, not accumulation. Barbon further challenged the mercantilist balance-of-trade doctrine by portraying international commerce as a self-sustaining cycle where enable imports, and imports in turn stimulate further exports through heightened consumption. He opposed prohibitions on foreign goods, asserting that such restrictions impoverish domestic economies by suppressing ; instead, importing luxuries and novelties expands trade by catering to "the wants of the Mind, , and desire of Novelties, and Things scarce," which drive industry and more effectively than protectionist barriers. This underconsumptionist perspective inverted mercantilist advocacy for and export prioritization—often termed "sparing exportation"—by warning that parsimony hoards out of circulation, leading to stagnation, whereas robust consumption circulates and sustains production. Barbon also denounced trade monopolies and regulatory interventions as artificial constraints that distort economic flows, arguing they benefit narrow interests at the expense of broader ; free exchange, he maintained, allows and labor—the true sources of value—to be directed efficiently toward satisfying human desires, rather than being shackled by state-enforced privileges common under . His emphasis on subjective as the origin of value, derived from psychological and fashionable wants rather than intrinsic or labor costs alone, prefigured later critiques of mercantilist while aligning with empirical observations of thriving in luxury-driven markets.

Concepts of Value, Trade, and Money

In A Discourse of Trade (1690), Nicholas Barbon articulated a , positing that commodities derive their worth not from intrinsic properties or labor input but from human perception, , and driven by and mental desires rather than mere necessity. He rejected the mercantilist emphasis on or fixed measures of value, arguing instead that "it is the wants of the Mind, Fashion, and desire of Novelties, and Things scarce, that causeth ," highlighting consumption of luxuries as a key economic driver. This view anticipated later developments in economic thought by emphasizing subjective over objective costs. Barbon advocated for unrestricted as essential to national prosperity, criticizing mercantilist policies like sumptuary laws and balance-of-trade obsessions that stifled . He contended that 's potential was effectively infinite for nations, unlike finite individual resources, and that prohibiting imports or luxuries harmed domestic industry by reducing demand. By promoting free exchange, Barbon argued, societies could expand wealth through ongoing circulation of goods, dismissing or export surpluses as misguided. Regarding money, Barbon viewed it primarily as a conventional medium and measure of commerce rather than a store of intrinsic wealth, challenging notions that silver's weight alone determined its value. In A Discourse Concerning Coining the New Money Lighter (1696), he maintained that money's role was facilitative, deriving effectiveness from legal acceptance and public confidence, not inherent material worth, thus supporting lighter coinage to boost circulation without eroding trade. This instrumental perspective aligned with his broader rejection of money as the ultimate economic end, prioritizing active exchange over accumulation.

Political Activities

Parliamentary Role

Nicholas Barbon was elected to the as for the borough of Bramber in the of 1690, retaining the seat until his death in July 1698. He was re-elected for Bramber in the 1695 . Barbon's pursuit of a parliamentary seat appears to have been driven chiefly by opportunities to advance his entrepreneurial ventures and to secure immunity from arrest for debt through . In the Commons, Barbon contributed to maintenance of the House's physical infrastructure, reporting on the chamber roof's condition on 9 1692 and serving on a to inspect its structure on 18 1692. He acted as teller in divisions concerning ' right to affirm oaths on 12 February 1692 and the appointment of commissioners of assessment on 9 1693. Barbon proposed a on chimneys on 18 December 1694, reflecting his interest in fiscal innovations. Barbon actively promoted legislation tied to his property developments, serving on the drafting committee for a bill to establish a new parish at in 1695 and presenting the measure on 11 February 1696, though it ultimately failed to pass. He introduced a bill aimed at reducing interest rates on 13 January 1698 and proposed reforms to the administration of tallies on 29 December 1696. Additionally, he participated in the second-reading committee for the Recoinage Acts bill on 2 May 1698. Barbon's voting aligned variably with Court interests, including support for government army estimates on 5 December 1693 and a guinea coin price of 22 shillings in March 1696, but opposition to expanding the Bank of England on 3 February 1697 and to maintaining a standing army on 8 January 1698. He invoked parliamentary privilege to shield himself from creditors, as in proceedings during May 1693 and on 2 May 1698. Barbon also engaged in the short-lived National Land Bank scheme of 1696, which collapsed amid disputes over low interest rates.

Alignment with William III's Regime

Nicholas Barbon served as a for the borough of Bramber in during the Convention Parliament of 1689 and subsequent assemblies under William III, beginning in January 1690 and continuing until his death in 1698. His entry into aligned with the establishment of the post-Glorious government, as Bramber's representation reflected the shift toward supporters of the following the deposition of James II in 1688. Barbon was identified as a Whig in early lists, such as Lord Carmarthen's 1690 classification, and as a supporter of the in Robert Harley's 1691 assessment and other 1693 rosters, indicating his initial backing of William III's administration against Jacobite threats and opposition. He demonstrated loyalty by signing in 1696, a widespread pledging defense of the king against and , which served as a public affirmation of allegiance to the regime amid ongoing plots like those uncovered in the same year. In parliamentary divisions, Barbon voted with the on the guinea coinage rate at 22 shillings in March 1696, supporting the government's during the Great Recoinage. While Barbon's parliamentary interventions often advanced personal business interests—such as proposing a chimney tax in December 1694 or reforms to tally payments in December 1696—his consistent Court alignment in the early 1690s and underscored pragmatic support for William III's regime, which facilitated economic deregulation and favorable to his ventures in and . Toward the end of his tenure, he opposed the maintenance of a on 8 January 1698, aligning briefly with Country critics, though this did not indicate broader disloyalty to . Overall, Barbon's record reflects alignment with the Whig-Court faction that solidified William III's rule, leveraging to shield his speculative enterprises from creditors while endorsing policies stabilizing the post-revolutionary order.

Controversies and Criticisms

Speculative Risks and Business Failures

Barbon engaged in extensive speculative building after the in 1666, developing areas including Mincing Lane, Essex House on the Strand, , , and the Temple, while rebuilding his Crane Court residence. These ventures involved high financial risks, as he often constructed properties without pre-arranged buyers or tenants, relying on credit and delaying payments to creditors at compounded interest rates of 4-5 percent until legal enforcement. Incomplete projects, such as the stalled Temple rebuilding and Well Close development, led to legal disputes with stakeholders and exacerbated his overtrading, drawing criticism from contemporaries like Roger North for prolonging works to strain creditors. A 1695 parish bill for failed amid riots involving residents, who opposed Barbon's encroachments on and rights of way. Similarly, his 1693 project obstructed light and access for neighbors, prompting complaints that he resolved through rather than accommodation. By February 1698, Barbon had invested an estimated £200,000 in building speculations, yet persistent debts forced him to invoke multiple times, including in May 1693 and May 1698, to evade creditor actions. In 1695, Barbon co-founded a private land bank with John Asgill to issue credit against mortgages, which merged in 1696 with John Briscoe's scheme to raise a £2,564,000 at 5 percent . The venture collapsed due to insufficient subscriptions despite parliamentary authorization, operating with declining viability until its wind-up in 1700. An associated 1694 for a Thames water-raising was assigned to trustees but ultimately failed to materialize. Barbon's will prioritized creditor repayment from assets, underscoring the cumulative strain from these speculative failures.

Disputes Over Practices and Regulations

Barbon's fire insurance operations, initiated in 1667 and formalized as the Fire Office in 1680, faced competitive challenges that highlighted tensions over business practices. A rival entity, the , was established by the in 1684, reflecting dissatisfaction among some stakeholders with Barbon's proprietary model, which prioritized personal and joint-stock profits over mutual arrangements. Barbon sold his interest in the company by 1694, potentially linked to ongoing disputes concerning insured properties at Well Close Square. In property development, Barbon's aggressive rebuilding efforts post-Great Fire of 1666 provoked regulatory and legal conflicts. In 1693, he was indicted for obstructing ancient lights and rights of way during construction in and Fickett's Fields, violating established norms intended to preserve access and illumination; Barbon invoked to evade the indictment and proceed with building. Similar practices at , developed from purchased fields in 1684, incited local opposition, including riots in the 1690s from aggrieved residents and professionals, underscoring disputes over unchecked speculative expansion amid post-fire reconstruction guidelines. Barbon's financial practices drew widespread criticism for evading creditor claims through legal maneuvers. Contemporaries, including jurist Roger North, accused him of overtrading—expanding ventures beyond sustainable means—and chronically delaying payments, fostering creditor discontent and frequent lawsuits, often compounded by interest rates of 4-5% post-judgment. In 1690, he claimed to avoid paying rent owed to Sir Thomas Draper, a tactic satirized in pamphlets as emblematic of speculative entrepreneurs flouting contractual obligations. These episodes exemplified broader regulatory gaps in Restoration-era , where shielded developers from enforcement of building codes and debt recovery, prioritizing innovation over accountability.

Later Years and Legacy

Final Ventures and Death

In the mid-1690s, Barbon divested his interest in the Fire Office amid disputes over building projects at Well Close and established a new initiative in 1694, leveraging a for a Thames water-raising engine assigned to trustees including Members of Parliament; the scheme ultimately failed to materialize. He then co-founded a land bank in 1695 with John Asgill, which merged the following year with John Briscoe's institution to underwrite a £2,564,000 at 5 percent ; subscriptions proved inadequate, causing the joint effort to collapse, though Barbon's land bank persisted independently until its liquidation in 1700. Barbon continued advocating for infrastructure and fiscal reforms, proposing on 29 December 1696 a plan to overhaul the administration of tallies— instruments—which garnered parliamentary scrutiny but no implementation, and pushing in 1695–1696 for to gain separate parish status, a bill that stalled at committee. By February 1698, he had committed an estimated £200,000 to building speculations, while mounting debts prompted him to invoke on 2 May 1698 to shield his house and goods from seizure. Barbon fell ill in April 1698 but appeared to recover briefly before dying toward the end of July that year at , . He was buried on 31 July 1698 at St Leonard's Church, , . His will directed that assets be applied to settle creditors, countering contemporary assertions that he had forbidden debt repayment.

Memorials and Historical Recognition

A commemorating Nicholas Barbon's development of Essex Street is installed by , noting that the street was laid out in the grounds of Essex House by Barbon in 1675. This rectangular plaque, originally at No. 7 Essex Street, highlights Barbon alongside other historical figures associated with the area, recognizing his role in post-Great Fire reconstruction. Barbon's contributions to London's are preserved in surviving structures from his speculative developments, such as the Grade II-listed at the end of Essex Street, constructed in 1676 to terminate his layout. Additional Grade II listings by reference Barbon's involvement in properties like 1 Essex Court (dated 1685) and buildings in Gerrard Street (begun 1677), underscoring his pioneering urban development practices. In the field of , Barbon received formal recognition through induction into the Insurance Hall of Fame for establishing the Fire Office in 1680, the world's first joint-stock fire insurance company, which facilitated rebuilding after the 1666 . His legacy as an early economist and property speculator is documented in historical plaques and sites via platforms like London Remembers and Open Plaques, which catalog his key projects including the redevelopment of Red Lion Fields. No statues or dedicated personal memorials to Barbon are recorded, with recognition primarily tied to his tangible impacts on 's infrastructure and financial innovations rather than posthumous monuments.

Enduring Influence on Economics and Finance

Barbon's establishment of the "Fire Office" in 1680, the world's first private fire company, introduced systematic risk-sharing mechanisms that became foundational to the industry. By insuring properties against fire damage following the in 1666, his model distributed losses across a broad base of policyholders, enabling rapid rebuilding and influencing subsequent insurers like the Hand-in-Hand Fire Office founded in 1696. This innovation shifted from charitable relief to commercial enterprise, paving the way for modern property and practices. In A Discourse of Trade (1690), Barbon articulated an early demand-driven theory of value, asserting that "the Value of all Wares... [arises] from their use to the Life of Man" and is determined by "Desires, and Fancies of Men," rather than intrinsic qualities or production costs. This perspective prefigured subjective theories of value later developed by economists such as those in the marginalist tradition, emphasizing consumer utility over labor or material inputs. Barbon's rejection of as the of wealth in favor of circulating goods and also challenged mercantilist , advocating policies to stimulate consumption and to counteract . Barbon's monetary writings, including A Discourse Concerning Coining the New Money Lighter (1696), critiqued rigid specie standards by arguing for flexible adjustments to match trade volumes, influencing debates on and expansion. His proposals for lowering rates to boost and consumption anticipated underconsumptionist arguments, though his speculative ventures underscored risks in unchecked . These ideas contributed to the evolution of , with echoes in Smith's discussions of and division of labor, despite Barbon's marginal status in mainstream histories due to his practitioner-oriented rather than abstract approach.

References

  1. https://www.hetwebsite.net/het/profiles/barbon.htm
  2. https://www.insurancehalloffame.org/nicholas-barbon-simple
  3. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1690-1715/member/barbon-nicholas-1637-98
  4. https://www.britannica.com/money/Nicholas-Barbon
  5. https://tontinecoffeehouse.com/2022/08/29/nicholas-barbon/
  6. https://history.rcp.ac.uk/inspiring-physicians/nicholas-barbon
  7. http://www.histparl.ac.uk/volume/1690-1715/member/barbon-nicholas-1637-98
  8. https://londonsociety.org.uk/book-review-nicholas-barbon-developing-london/
  9. https://squaremilechurches.co.uk/resources/online-exhibition/people/person/dr-nicholas-barbon/
  10. https://www.strandlines.london/2021/02/01/urban-planning-great-fire/
  11. https://squaremilehealthwalks.wordpress.com/2015/12/14/dr-nicholas-barbon-red-lion-square/
  12. https://www.sas.ac.uk/news-events/events/nicholas-barbon-developing-london-1667-1698
  13. https://ibp.org.uk/2020/10/09/the-annual-wren-talk-nicholas-barbon-the-man-who-transformed-london/
  14. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-36774166
  15. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/London-After-The-Great-Fire/
  16. https://londonhistorians.wordpress.com/2011/02/27/restoration-wheeler-dealers-nicholas-barbon-and-thomas-neale/
  17. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A30880.0001.001
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1053166
  19. https://www.createstreets.com/the-long-history-of-british-land-use-regulation/
  20. https://leohollis.medium.com/imaginary-city-99ec7bd7329a
  21. https://londonsociety.org.uk/book-review-nicholas-barbon-developing-london-2/
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40483481
  23. https://www.irmi.com/articles/expert-commentary/the-worlds-first-insurance-company
  24. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526158659.00011/html
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4127797
  26. https://collections.soane.org/drawings?ci_search_type=ARCI&mi_search_type=adv&sort=7&t=SCHEME929
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought/article/william-petty-nicholas-barbon-multiples-and-a-new-hypothesis-of-inevitable-discovery/E7FC82D1B37B72D1014E1EFFDB616254
  28. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1690-1715/member/asgill-john-1659-1738
  29. https://archive.org/details/discourseoftrade00barb
  30. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/barbon-a-discourse-of-trade
  31. https://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Barbon/brbnDT.html
  32. http://files.libertyfund.org/files/982/0425_Bk.pdf
  33. https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Works-Nicholas-Barbon-modernised/dp/B0CJSXLJY3
  34. https://historyofeconomicthought.mcmaster.ca/barbon/barbon.html
  35. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-1-349-58802-2_97
  36. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b9b0/6c270708a3f3a79ed1c9b17151e2ade430a1.pdf
  37. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004443075/BP000007.pdf
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31330878_Nicholas_Barbon_and_the_Quality_of_Infinity
  39. https://www.eshet-conference.net/madrid/ed2018/papers/218/
  40. https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/nicholas-barbon
  41. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barbon-22
  42. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/blue-plaques/essex-street/
  43. https://openplaques.org/plaques/625
  44. https://alondoninheritance.com/tag/strand/
  45. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1286024
  46. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1357045
  47. https://www.londonremembers.com/subjects/nicholas-barbon
  48. https://openplaques.org/people/1693
  49. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/barbon/trade.htm
  50. https://academic.oup.com/book/10464/chapter/158347327
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.