Hubbry Logo
ObjectivismObjectivismMain
Open search
Objectivism
Community hub
Objectivism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Objectivism
Objectivism
Objectivism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Objectivist movement
Photo of Ayn Rand
Ayn Rand
Philosophy
Organizations
Theorists
Ayn Rand Institute
Other
Literature
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
For the New Intellectual
Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology
The New Left
Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand
Philosophy: Who Needs It
The Romantic Manifesto
The Virtue of Selfishness
Objectivist periodicals
The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies
The Fountainhead
Atlas Shrugged
Related topics

Objectivism is a philosophical system named and developed by Russian-American writer and philosopher Ayn Rand. She described it as "the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute".[1]

Rand first expressed Objectivism in her fiction, most notably The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957), and later in non-fiction essays and books.[2] Leonard Peikoff, a professional philosopher and Rand's designated intellectual heir,[3][4] later gave it a more formal structure. Peikoff characterizes Objectivism as a "closed system" insofar as its "fundamental principles" were set out by Rand and are not subject to change. However, he stated that "new implications, applications and integrations can always be discovered".[5]

Objectivism's main tenets are that reality exists independently of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception (see direct and indirect realism), that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness (see rational egoism), that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism, and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally.

Academic philosophers have mostly ignored or rejected Rand's philosophy.[6] Nonetheless, Objectivism has been a persistent influence among right-libertarians and American conservatives.[7] The Objectivist movement, which Rand founded, attempts to spread her ideas to the public and in academic settings.[8]

Philosophy

[edit]
Photo of Rand
Ayn Rand in 1957

Rand originally expressed her ideas in her novels—most notably, in both The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. She further elaborated on them in her periodicals The Objectivist Newsletter, The Objectivist, and The Ayn Rand Letter, and in non-fiction books such as Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology and The Virtue of Selfishness.[9]

The name "Objectivism" derives from the idea that human knowledge and values are objective: they exist and are determined by the nature of reality, to be discovered by one's mind, and are not created by the thoughts one has.[10] Rand stated that she chose the name because her preferred term for a philosophy based on the primacy of existence—"existentialism"—had already been taken.[11]

Rand characterized Objectivism as "a philosophy for living on earth", based on reality, and intended as a method of defining human nature and the nature of the world in which we live.[9]

My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.

— Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged[1]

Metaphysics: objective reality

[edit]

Rand's philosophy begins with three axioms: existence, consciousness, and identity.[12] Rand defined an axiom as "a statement that identifies the base of knowledge and of any further statement pertaining to that knowledge, a statement necessarily contained in all others whether any particular speaker chooses to identify it or not. An axiom is a proposition that defeats its opponents by the fact that they have to accept it and use it in the process of any attempt to deny it."[13] As Objectivist philosopher Leonard Peikoff argued, Rand's argument for axioms "is not a proof that the axioms of existence, consciousness, and identity are true. It is proof that they are axioms, that they are at the base of knowledge and thus inescapable."[14]

Rand said that existence is the perceptually self-evident fact at the base of all other knowledge, i.e., that "existence exists". She further said that to be is to be something, that "existence is identity". That is, to be is to be "an entity of a specific nature made of specific attributes".[15] That which has no nature or attributes does not and cannot exist. The axiom of existence is conceptualized as differentiating something from nothing, while the law of identity is conceptualized as differentiating one thing from another, i.e., one's first awareness of the law of non-contradiction, another crucial base for the rest of knowledge. As Rand wrote, "A leaf ... cannot be all red and green at the same time, it cannot freeze and burn at the same time... A is A."[16] Objectivism rejects belief in anything alleged to transcend existence.[17]

Rand argued that consciousness is "the faculty of perceiving that which exists". As she put it, "to be conscious is to be conscious of something", that is consciousness itself cannot be distinguished or conceptualized except in relation to an independent reality.[18] "It cannot be aware only of itself—there is no 'itself' until it is aware of something."[19] Thus, Objectivism posits that the mind does not create reality, but rather, it is a means of discovering reality.[20] Expressed differently, existence has "primacy" over consciousness, which must conform to it. Any other type of argument Rand termed "the primacy of consciousness", including any variant of metaphysical subjectivism or theism.[21]

Objectivist philosophy derives its explanations of action and causation from the axiom of identity, referring to causation as "the law of identity applied to action".[22] According to Rand, it is entities that act, and every action is the action of an entity. The way entities act is caused by the specific nature (or "identity") of those entities; if they were different, they would act differently. As with the other axioms, an implicit understanding of causation is derived from one's primary observations of causal connections among entities even before it is verbally identified and serves as the basis of further knowledge.[23]

Epistemology: reason

[edit]

According to Rand, attaining knowledge beyond what is given by perception requires both volition (or the exercise of free will) and performing a specific method of validation by observation, concept-formation, and the application of inductive and deductive reasoning. For example, a belief in dragons, however sincere, does not mean that reality includes dragons. A process of proof identifying the basis in reality of a claimed item of knowledge is necessary to establish its truth.[24]

Objectivist epistemology begins with the principle that "consciousness is identification". This is understood to be a direct consequence of the metaphysical principle that "existence is identity".[25] Rand defined "reason" as "the faculty that identifies and integrates the material provided by man's senses".[26] Rand wrote "The fundamental concept of method, the one on which all the others depend, is logic. The distinguishing characteristic of logic (the art of non-contradictory identification) indicates the nature of the actions (actions of consciousness required to achieve a correct identification) and their goal (knowledge)—while omitting the length, complexity or specific steps of the process of logical inference, as well as the nature of the particular cognitive problem involved in any given instance of using logic."[27]

According to Rand, consciousness possesses a specific and finite identity, just like everything else that exists; therefore, it must operate by a specific method of validation. An item of knowledge cannot be "disqualified" by being arrived at by a specific process in a particular form. Thus, for Rand, the fact that consciousness must itself possess identity implies the rejection of both universal skepticism based on the "limits" of consciousness, as well as any claim to revelation, emotion or faith-based belief.

Objectivist epistemology maintains that all knowledge is ultimately based on perception. "Percepts, not sensations, are the given, the self-evident."[28] Rand considered the validity of the senses to be axiomatic and said that purported arguments to the contrary all commit the fallacy of the "stolen concept"[29] by presupposing the validity of concepts that, in turn, presuppose the validity of the senses.[30] She said that perception, being determined physiologically, is incapable of error. For example, optical illusions are errors in the conceptual identification of what is seen, not errors of sight itself.[31] The validity of sense perception, therefore, is not susceptible to proof (because it is presupposed by all proof as proof is only a matter of adducing sensory evidence) nor should its validity be denied (since the conceptual tools one would have to use to do this are derived from sensory data). Perceptual error, therefore, is not possible. Rand consequently rejected epistemological skepticism, as she said that the skeptics' claim to knowledge "distorted" by the form or the means of perception is impossible.[31]

The Objectivist theory of perception distinguishes between the form and object. The form in which an organism perceives is determined by the physiology of its sensory systems. Whatever form the organism perceives it in, what it perceives—the object of perception—is reality.[32] Rand consequently rejected the Kantian dichotomy between "things as we perceive them" and "things as they are in themselves". Rand wrote:

The attack on man's consciousness and particularly on his conceptual faculty has rested on the unchallenged premise that any knowledge acquired by a process of consciousness is necessarily subjective and cannot correspond to the facts of reality, since it is processed knowledge … [but] all knowledge is processed knowledge—whether on the sensory, perceptual or conceptual level. An "unprocessed" knowledge would be a knowledge acquired without means of cognition.[33]

book cover
Rand's Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology explains her theory of concept formation.

The aspect of epistemology given the most elaboration by Rand is the theory of concept-formation, which she presented in Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. She argued that concepts are formed by a process of measurement omission. Peikoff described this as follows:

To form a concept, one mentally isolates a group of concretes (of distinct perceptual units), on the basis of observed similarities which distinguish them from all other known concretes (similarity is 'the relationship between two or more existents which possess the same characteristic(s), but in different measure or degree'); then, by a process of omitting the particular measurements of these concretes, one integrates them into a single new mental unit: the concept, which subsumes all concretes of this kind (a potentially unlimited number). The integration is completed and retained by the selection of a perceptual symbol (a word) to designate it. "A concept is a mental integration of two or more units possessing the same distinguishing characteristic(s), with their particular measurements omitted."[34]

According to Rand, "the term 'measurements omitted' does not mean, in this context, that measurements are regarded as non-existent; it means that measurements exist, but are not specified. That measurements must exist is an essential part of the process. The principle is: the relevant measurements must exist in some quantity, but may exist in any quantity."[35]

Rand argued that concepts are organized hierarchically. Concepts such as 'dog,' which bring together "concretes" available in perception, can be differentiated (into the concepts of 'dachshund,' 'poodle,' etc.) or integrated (along with 'cat,' etc., into the concept of 'animal'). Abstract concepts such as 'animal' can be further integrated, via "abstraction from abstractions", into such concepts as 'living thing.' Concepts are formed in the context of knowledge available. A young child differentiates dogs from cats and chickens but need not explicitly differentiate them from deep-sea tube worms, or from other types of animals not yet known to him, to form a concept 'dog'.[36]

Because of its characterization of concepts as "open-ended" classifications that go well beyond the characteristics included in their past or current definitions, Objectivist epistemology rejects the analytic-synthetic distinction as a false dichotomy[37] and denies the possibility of a priori knowledge.[38]

Rand rejected "feeling" as sources of knowledge. Rand acknowledged the importance of emotion for human beings, but she maintained that emotions are a consequence of the conscious or subconscious ideas that a person already accepts, not a means of achieving awareness of reality. "Emotions are not tools of cognition."[39] Rand also rejected all forms of faith or mysticism, terms that she used synonymously. She defined faith as "the acceptance of allegations without evidence or proof, either apart from or against the evidence of one's senses and reason... Mysticism is the claim to some non-sensory, non-rational, non-definable, non-identifiable means of knowledge, such as 'instinct,' 'intuition,' 'revelation,' or any form of 'just knowing.'"[40] Reliance on revelation is like reliance on a Ouija board; it bypasses the need to show how it connects its results to reality. Faith, for Rand, is not a "short-cut" to knowledge, but a "short-circuit" destroying it.[41]

Objectivism acknowledges the facts that human beings have limited knowledge, are vulnerable to error, and do not instantly understand all of the implications of their knowledge.[42] According to Peikoff, one can be certain of a proposition if all of the available evidence verifies it, i.e., it can be logically integrated with the rest of one's knowledge; one is then certain within the context of the evidence.[43]

Rand rejected the traditional rationalist/empiricist dichotomy, arguing that it embodies a false alternative: conceptually based knowledge independent of perception (rationalism) versus perceptually based knowledge independent of concepts (empiricism). Rand argued that neither is possible because the senses provide the material of knowledge while conceptual processing is also needed to establish knowable propositions.

Criticism on epistemology

[edit]

The philosopher John Hospers, who was influenced by Rand and shared her moral and political opinions, disagreed with her concerning issues of epistemology.[44] Some philosophers, such as Tibor Machan, have argued that the Objectivist epistemology is incomplete.[45]

Psychology professor Robert L. Campbell writes that the relationship between Objectivist epistemology and cognitive science remains unclear because Rand made claims about human cognition and its development which belong to psychology, yet Rand also argued that philosophy is logically prior to psychology and in no way dependent on it.[46][47]

The philosophers Randall Dipert and Roderick Long [ar; arz; es; ru; zh] have argued that Objectivist epistemology conflates the perceptual process by which judgments are formed with the way in which they are to be justified, thereby leaving it unclear how sensory data can validate judgments structured propositionally.[48][49]

Ethics: self-interest

[edit]

Objectivism includes an extensive treatment of ethical concerns. Rand wrote on morality in her works We the Living (1936), Atlas Shrugged (1957) and The Virtue of Selfishness (1964). Rand defines morality as "a code of values to guide man's choices and actions—the choices and actions that determine the purpose and the course of his life".[50] Rand maintained that the first question is not what should the code of values be, the first question is "Does man need values at all—and why?" According to Rand, "it is only the concept of 'Life' that makes the concept of 'Value' possible", and "the fact that a living entity is, determines what it ought to do".[51] Rand writes: "there is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or non-existence—and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not: it depends on a specific course of action. [...] It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death".

Rand argued that the primary emphasis of man's free will is the choice: 'to think or not to think'. "Thinking is not an automatic function. In any hour and issue of his life, man is free to think or to evade that effort. Thinking requires a state of full, focused awareness. The act of focusing one's consciousness is volitional. Man can focus his mind to a full, active, purposefully directed awareness of reality—or he can unfocus it and let himself drift in a semiconscious daze, merely reacting to any chance stimulus of the immediate moment, at the mercy of his undirected sensory-perceptual mechanism and of any random, associational connections it might happen to make."[52] According to Rand, therefore, possessing free will, human beings must choose their values: one does not automatically have one's own life as his ultimate value. Whether in fact a person's actions promote and fulfill his own life or not is a question of fact, as it is with all other organisms, but whether a person will act to promote his well-being is up to him, not hard-wired into his physiology. "Man has the power to act as his own destroyer—and that is the way he has acted through most of his history."[53]

In Atlas Shrugged, Rand wrote "Man's mind is his basic tool of survival. Life is given to him, survival is not. His body is given to him, its sustenance is not. His mind is given to him, its content is not. To remain alive he must act and before he can act he must know the nature and purpose of his action. He cannot obtain his food without knowledge of food and of the way to obtain it. He cannot dig a ditch—or build a cyclotron—without a knowledge of his aim and the means to achieve it. To remain alive, he must think."[54] In her novels, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, she also emphasizes the importance of productive work, romantic love and art to human happiness, and dramatizes the ethical character of their pursuit. The primary virtue in Objectivist ethics is rationality, as Rand meant it "the recognition and acceptance of reason as one's only source of knowledge, one's only judge of values and one's only guide to action".[55]

The purpose of a moral code, Rand said, is to provide the principles by reference to which man can achieve the values his survival requires.[56] Rand summarizes:

If [man] chooses to live, a rational ethics will tell him what principles of action are required to implement his choice. If he does not choose to live, nature will take its course. Reality confronts a man with a great many "must's", but all of them are conditional: the formula of realistic necessity is: "you must, if –" and the if stands for man's choice: "if you want to achieve a certain goal".[57]

Rand's explanation of values presents the proposition that an individual's primary moral obligation is to achieve his own well-being—it is for his life and his self-interest that an individual ought to obey a moral code.[58] Ethical egoism is a corollary of setting man's life as the moral standard.[59] Rand believed that rational egoism is the logical consequence of humans following evidence to its logical conclusion. The only alternative would be that they live without orientation to reality.

A corollary to Rand's endorsement of self-interest is her rejection of the ethical doctrine of altruism—which she defined in the sense of Auguste Comte's altruism (he popularized the term[60]), as a moral obligation to live for the sake of others. Rand also rejected subjectivism. A "whim-worshiper" or "hedonist", according to Rand, is not motivated by a desire to live his own human life, but by a wish to live on a sub-human level. Instead of using "that which promotes my (human) life" as his standard of value, he mistakes "that which I (mindlessly happen to) value" for a standard of value, in contradiction of the fact that, existentially, he is a human and therefore rational organism. The "I value" in whim-worship or hedonism can be replaced with "we value", "he values", "they value", or "God values", and still, it would remain dissociated from reality. Rand repudiated the equation of rational selfishness with hedonistic or whim-worshiping "selfishness-without-a-self". She said that the former is good, and the latter bad, and that there is a fundamental difference between them.[61]

For Rand, all of the principal virtues are applications of the role of reason as man's basic tool of survival: rationality, honesty, justice, independence, integrity, productiveness, and pride—each of which she explains in some detail in "The Objectivist Ethics".[62] The essence of Objectivist ethics is summarized by the oath her Atlas Shrugged character John Galt adhered to: "I swear—by my life and my love of it—that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."[63]

Criticism on ethics

[edit]

Some philosophers have criticized Objectivist ethics. The philosopher Robert Nozick argues that Rand's foundational argument in ethics is unsound because it does not explain why someone could not rationally prefer dying and having no values, in order to further some particular value. He argues that her attempt to defend the morality of selfishness is, therefore, an instance of begging the question. Nozick also argues that Rand's solution to David Hume's famous is-ought problem is unsatisfactory. In response, the philosophers Douglas B. Rasmussen and Douglas Den Uyl have argued that Nozick misstated Rand's case.[64][65]

Charles King criticized Rand's example of an indestructible robot to demonstrate the value of life as incorrect and confusing.[66] In response, Paul St. F. Blair defended Rand's ethical conclusions, while maintaining that his arguments might not have been approved by Rand.[67]

Politics: individual rights and capitalism

[edit]
Part of a series on
Capitalism
Concepts
Systems
Theories
Ideologies
Origins
Development
Intellectuals
Related topics

Rand's defense of individual liberty integrates elements from her entire philosophy.[68] Since reason is the means of human knowledge, it is therefore each person's most fundamental means of survival and is necessary to the achievement of values.[69] The use or threat of force neutralizes the practical effect of an individual's reason, whether the force originates from the state or from a criminal. According to Rand, "man's mind will not function at the point of a gun".[70] Therefore, the only type of organized human behavior consistent with the operation of reason is that of voluntary cooperation. Persuasion is the method of reason. By its nature, the overtly irrational cannot rely on the use of persuasion and must ultimately resort to force to prevail.[71] Thus, Rand argued that reason and freedom are correlates, just as she argued that mysticism and force are corollaries.[72] Based on this understanding of the role of reason, Objectivists claim that the initiation of physical force against the will of another is immoral,[73] as are indirect initiations of force through threats,[74] fraud,[75] or breach of contract.[76] The use of defensive or retaliatory force, on the other hand, is appropriate.[77]

Objectivism claims that because the opportunity to use reason without the initiation of force is necessary to achieve moral values, each individual has an inalienable moral right to act as his own judgment directs and to keep the product of his effort. Peikoff, explaining the basis of rights, stated, "In content, as the founding fathers recognized, there is one fundamental right, which has several major derivatives. The fundamental right is the right to life. Its major derivatives are the right to liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness."[78] "A 'right' is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man's freedom of action in a social context."[79] These rights are specifically understood to be rights to action, not to specific results or objects, and the obligations created by rights are negative in nature: each individual must refrain from violating the rights of others.[80] Objectivists reject alternative notions of rights, such as positive rights,[81] collective rights, or animal rights.[82] Objectivism claims that the only social system which fully recognizes individual rights is capitalism,[83] specifically what Rand described as "full, pure, uncontrolled, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism".[84] Objectivism regards capitalism as the social system which is most beneficial to the poor, but does not consider this its primary justification.[85] Rather, it is the only moral social system. Objectivism maintains that only societies seeking to establish freedom (or free nations) have a right to self-determination.[86]

Objectivism describes government as "the means of placing the retaliatory use of physical force under objective control—i.e., under objectively defined laws"; thus, government is both legitimate and critically important[87] in order to protect individual rights.[88] Rand opposed anarchism because she considered that putting police and courts on the market is an inherent miscarriage of justice.[89] Objectivism claims that the proper functions of a government are "the police, to protect men from criminals—the armed services, to protect men from foreign invaders—the law courts, to settle disputes among men according to objective laws", the executive, and legislatures.[90] Furthermore, in protecting individual rights, the government is acting as an agent of its citizens and "has no rights except the rights delegated to it by the citizens"[91] and it must act in an impartial manner according to specific, objectively defined laws.[92]

Rand argued that limited intellectual property monopolies being granted to certain inventors and artists on a first-to-file basis are moral because she considered all property as fundamentally intellectual. Furthermore, the value of a commercial product derives in part from the necessary work of its inventors. However, Rand considered limits on patents and copyrights as important and said that if they were granted in perpetuity, it would necessarily result in de facto collectivism.

Rand opposed racism and any legal application of racism. She considered affirmative action to be an example of legal racism.[93] Rand advocated the right to legal abortion.[94] Rand believed capital punishment is morally justified as retribution against a murderer, but dangerous due to the risk of mistakenly executing innocent people and facilitating state murder. She therefore said she opposed capital punishment "on epistemological, not moral, grounds".[95] She opposed involuntary military conscription.[96] She opposed any form of censorship, including legal restrictions on pornography, opinion or worship, famously quipping; "In the transition to statism, every infringement of human rights has begun with a given right's least attractive practitioners".[97][98]

Objectivists have also opposed a number of government activities commonly endorsed by both liberals and conservatives, including antitrust laws,[99] the minimum wage, public education,[100] and existing child labor laws.[101] Objectivists have argued against faith-based initiatives,[102] displaying religious symbols in government facilities,[103] and the teaching of "intelligent design" in public schools.[104] Rand opposed involuntary taxation and believed government could be financed voluntarily, although she thought this could only happen after other reforms of government were implemented.[105][106]

Criticism on politics

[edit]

Some critics, including economists and political philosophers such as Murray Rothbard, David D. Friedman, Roy Childs, Norman P. Barry, and Chandran Kukathas, have argued that Objectivist ethics are consistent with anarcho-capitalism instead of minarchism.[107][108][109][110][111]

Aesthetics: metaphysical value-judgments

[edit]
See also: Romantic realism

The Objectivist theory of art derives from its epistemology, by way of "psycho-epistemology" (Rand's term for an individual's characteristic mode of functioning in acquiring knowledge). Art, according to Objectivism, serves a human cognitive need: it allows human beings to understand concepts as though they were percepts. Objectivism defines "art" as a "selective re-creation of reality according to an artist's metaphysical value-judgments"—that is, according to what the artist believes to be ultimately true and important about the nature of reality and humanity. In this respect Objectivism regards art as a way of presenting abstractions concretely, in perceptual form.[112]

The human need for art, according to this idea, derives from the need for cognitive economy. A concept is already a sort of mental shorthand standing for a large number of concretes, allowing a human being to think indirectly or implicitly of many more such concretes than can be kept explicitly in mind. But a human being cannot keep indefinitely many concepts explicitly in mind either—and yet, according to Objectivism, they need a comprehensive conceptual framework to provide guidance in life. Art offers a way out of this dilemma by providing a perceptual, easily grasped means of communicating and thinking about a wide range of abstractions, including one's metaphysical value-judgments. Objectivism regards art as an effective way to communicate a moral or ethical ideal.[113] Objectivism does not, however, regard art as propagandistic: even though art involves moral values and ideals, its purpose is not to educate, only to show or project. Moreover, art need not be, and usually is not, the outcome of a full-blown, explicit philosophy. Usually, it stems from an artist's sense of life (which is preconceptual and largely emotional).[114]

The end goal of Rand's own artistic endeavors was to portray the ideal man. The Fountainhead is the best example of this effort.[115] Rand uses the character of Roark to embody the concept of the higher man which she believes is what great art should do—embody the characteristics of the best of humanity. This symbolism should be represented in all art; artistic expression should be an extension of the greatness in humanity.

Rand said that Romanticism was the highest school of literary art, noting that Romanticism was "based on the recognition of the principle that man possesses the faculty of volition", absent which, Rand believed, literature is robbed of dramatic power, adding:

What the Romanticists brought to art was the primacy of values... Values are the source of emotions: a great deal of emotional intensity was projected in the work of the Romanticists and in the reactions of their audiences, as well as a great deal of color, imagination, originality, excitement, and all the other consequences of a value-oriented view of life.[116]

The term "romanticism", however, is often affiliated with emotionalism, to which Objectivism is completely opposed. Historically, many romantic artists were philosophically subjectivist. Most Objectivists who are also artists subscribe to what they term romantic realism, which is how Rand described her own work.[117]

Development by other authors

[edit]
See also: Objectivist movement
Philosophers such as Leonard Peikoff, Tibor Machan, Harry Binswanger and Tara Smith (clockwise from upper left) have worked on Objectivism since Rand's death.

Several authors have developed and applied Rand's ideas in their own work. Rand described Peikoff's The Ominous Parallels (1982), as "the first book by an Objectivist philosopher other than myself".[118] During 1991, Peikoff published Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, a comprehensive exposition of Rand's philosophy.[119] Chris Matthew Sciabarra discusses Rand's ideas and theorizes about their intellectual origins in Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical (1995). Surveys such as On Ayn Rand by Allan Gotthelf (1999), Ayn Rand by Tibor R. Machan (2000), and Objectivism in One Lesson by Andrew Bernstein (2009) provide briefer introductions to Rand's ideas.

Some scholars have emphasized applying Objectivism to more specific areas. Machan has developed Rand's contextual conception of human knowledge (while also drawing on the insights of J. L. Austin and Gilbert Harman) in works such as Objectivity (2004), and David Kelley has explicated Rand's epistemological ideas in works such as The Evidence of the Senses (1986) and A Theory of Abstraction (2001). Regarding the topic of ethics, Kelley has argued in works such as Unrugged Individualism (1996) and The Contested Legacy of Ayn Rand (2000) that Objectivists should pay more attention to the virtue of benevolence and place less emphasis on issues of moral sanction. Kelley's claims have been controversial, and critics Peikoff and Peter Schwartz have argued that he contradicts important principles of Objectivism.[5][120] Kelley has used the term "Open Objectivism" for a version of Objectivism that involves "a commitment to reasoned, non-dogmatic discussion and debate", "the recognition that Objectivism is open to expansion, refinement, and revision", and "a policy of benevolence toward others, including fellow-travelers and critics".[121] Arguing against Kelley, Peikoff characterized Objectivism as a "closed system" that is not subject to change.[5]

An author who emphasizes Rand's ethics, Tara Smith, retains more of Rand's original ideas in such works as Moral Rights and Political Freedom (1995), Viable Values (2000), and Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics (2006).[122] In collaboration with Peikoff, David Harriman has developed a theory of scientific induction based upon Rand's theory of concepts in The Logical Leap: Induction in Physics (2010).[123]

The political aspects of Rand's philosophy are discussed by Bernstein in The Capitalist Manifesto (2005). In Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics (1996), George Reisman attempts to integrate Objectivist methodology and insights with both Classical and Austrian economics. In psychology, Professor Edwin A. Locke and Ellen Kenner have explored Rand's ideas in the publication The Selfish Path to Romance: How to Love with Passion & Reason.[124] Other writers have explored the application of Objectivism to fields ranging from art, as in What Art Is (2000) by Louis Torres and Michelle Marder Kamhi, to teleology, as in The Biological Basis of Teleological Concepts (1990) by Harry Binswanger.

Impact

[edit]

One Rand biographer says most people who read Rand's works for the first time do it in their "formative years".[125] Rand's former protégé Nathaniel Branden referred to Rand's "especially powerful appeal to the young",[126] while Onkar Ghate [eo; sq] of the Ayn Rand Institute said Rand "appeals to the idealism of youth".[127] This appeal has alarmed a number of critics of the philosophy.[128] Many of these young people later abandon their positive opinion of Rand and are often said to have "outgrown" her ideas.[129] Endorsers of Rand's work recognize the phenomenon, but attribute it to the loss of youthful idealism and inability to resist social pressures for intellectual conformity.[127][129] In contrast, historian Jennifer Burns, writing in Goddess of the Market (2009), writes some critics "dismiss Rand as a shallow thinker appealing only to adolescents", although she thinks the critics "miss her significance" as a "gateway drug" to right-wing politics.[130]

Academic philosophers have generally dismissed Objectivism since Rand first presented it.[6] Objectivism has been termed "fiercely anti-academic" because of Rand's criticism of contemporary intellectuals.[4] David Sidorsky, a professor of moral and political philosophy at Columbia University, writes that Rand's work is "outside the mainstream" and is more of an ideology than a comprehensive philosophy.[131] British philosopher Ted Honderich notes that he deliberately excluded an article on Rand from The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Rand is, however, mentioned in the article on popular philosophy by Anthony Quinton).[132] Rand is the subject of entries in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,[2] The Dictionary of Modern American Philosophers,[133] the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy,[134] The Routledge Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Political Thinkers,[135] and The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy.[136] Chandran Kukathas writes in an entry about Rand in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "The influence of Rand's ideas was strongest among college students in the USA but attracted little attention from academic philosophers." Kukathas also writes that her defenses of capitalism and selfishness "kept her out of the intellectual mainstream".[109]

During the 1990s, Rand's works were more likely to be encountered in American classrooms.[4] The Ayn Rand Society, dedicated to fostering the scholarly study of Objectivism, is affiliated with the American Philosophical Association's Eastern Division.[137] Aristotle scholar and Objectivist Allan Gotthelf, late chairman of the society, and his colleagues argued for more academic study of Objectivism, considering the philosophy as a unique and intellectually interesting defense of classical liberalism that is worth debating.[138] In 1999, a refereed Journal of Ayn Rand Studies began.[139] Programs and fellowships for the study of Objectivism have been supported at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Texas at Austin and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.[140]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Objectivism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Objectivism is a comprehensive developed by Russian-American novelist and Ayn (1905–1982), positing that reality exists as an objective absolute independent of human consciousness, that reason is man's only means of acquiring knowledge, that rational constitutes the moral purpose of life, and that laissez-faire capitalism is the sole system compatible with individual rights. Rand formulated Objectivism primarily through her fiction, including the novels (1943) and (1957), which dramatize its principles via heroic individualists resisting collectivism, and through nonfiction essays compiling her views on metaphysics, , , , and . In epistemology, Objectivism upholds concept-formation based on perceptual awareness and measurement-omission, rejecting and intrinsicism as elaborated in Rand's (1967). Ethically, it advocates , where virtues like productivity, independence, and integrity serve one's own life as the standard of value, condemning as a doctrine subordinating the individual to others' needs or whims. Politically, it derives a limited to retaliatory force—protecting against initiation of force—thus endorsing a constitutional under , in opposition to both and . In aesthetics, Objectivism champions , wherein art concretizes an artist's metaphysical value-judgments, portraying man as he could and should be. Objectivism's influence extends to cultural advocacy for and free markets, propagated by institutions like the founded by , Rand's designated intellectual heir. While Rand's works have sold over 100 million copies and inspired policy debates, the philosophy has faced internal schisms, such as the 1960s break with libertarian associates over , and external critiques often rooted in academia's prevailing subjectivist and collectivist paradigms.

Core Philosophical Principles

Metaphysics: Objective Reality

Objectivism posits that reality exists as an objective absolute, independent of any that perceives or attempts to alter it. This metaphysical foundation, termed the primacy of existence, holds that facts are facts regardless of human feelings, wishes, hopes, or fears, and that the operates according to its own , unaltered by subjective claims or desires. The of —" exists"—serves as the irreducible starting point, self-evident and presupposed in all , as denying it requires the act of existing to formulate the . Correlative to is the of , which recognizes that a exists to be aware of something—namely, the objects of —but possesses no power to create, alter, or suspend the facts of that . Objectivism rejects the primacy of consciousness, the view that conforms to beliefs or perceptions, as seen in subjectivist where wishes are treated as causal agents; instead, identifies what exists but does not originate or dictate it. This distinction underscores causal realism: entities act according to their specific identities, not arbitrary volition. The , encapsulated in "A is A," integrates these axioms by affirming that to exist is to possess a specific —to be something distinguishable from non-existence or contradiction. Every has determinate attributes and causal powers derived from its identity, making intelligible and knowable through reason rather than or whim. Denials of this law, such as in mystical or collectivist doctrines that blur distinctions between entities, lead to epistemological , but Objectivism maintains that identity is metaphysically given and axiomatic, forming the basis for non-contradictory .

Epistemology: Reason as the Means of Knowledge

In Objectivism, reason is the faculty of the human mind that identifies and integrates the material provided by man's senses into concepts, serving as the only means of acquiring about reality. identified reason as volitional and non-automatic, requiring deliberate focus and adherence to logical principles, without which evasion leads to error or ignorance. She rejected , , emotions, or whims as cognitive tools, arguing they derive from or contradict perceptual evidence rather than validating it. Objectivist epistemology grounds knowledge in three axiomatic concepts: existence (the fact that something is), identity (that it is what it is), and consciousness (awareness of that which exists). These axioms are implicit in all cognition, self-evident through direct perception, and irreducible to proof, as any attempt to deny them presupposes their validity. Rand's theory emphasizes the primacy of existence, where reality is independent of any consciousness perceiving it, countering subjectivist claims that consciousness shapes or creates facts. Concept-formation, central to Rand's account in Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology (expanded 1979), involves isolating similarities among perceptual units, omitting measurements while retaining relationships, and integrating new concepts hierarchically with prior knowledge. This process ensures objectivity, defined not as passive mirroring of facts but as active conformity to them via logical structure, with definitions validated by reduction to ostensive referents. Knowledge remains contextual, expanding as context does, but always tied to evidence, rejecting skepticism's doubt of percepts or rationalism's detachment from sensory input.

Ethics: Rational Self-Interest and Virtue

In Objectivist , morality is defined as a code of rational , prescribing actions that enable an individual to survive and flourish as a rational being by pursuing their own life as the ultimate value. This system rejects , which Rand identified as the demand for self-sacrifice to others, arguing that it contradicts needs and leads to the destruction of the self and society. Instead, serves as a guide to achieve through objective, reason-based choices, with the actor always as the beneficiary of their actions. The foundation of this ethics stems from Objectivism's metaphysics of objective —independent of consciousness—and epistemology of reason as the sole means of acquiring . Rand argued that since humans lack automatic mechanisms, unlike other animals, they must use volitional reason to identify and produce the material values required for life, making rational action the essence of . The standard of value is thus "man's life qua man," meaning the requirements for sustaining a rational, productive , not mere animal or arbitrary desires. or whims cannot serve as ethical guides, as they are not tools of ; must be discovered through rational principles to avoid contradiction with . Rational , or rational , entails non-sacrificial trade with others—exchanging value for value—while pursuing one's hierarchical values: reason as the primary cognitive tool, purpose through productive work, and earned via consistent rational action. Rand emphasized that true aligns with objective laws, prohibiting , , or evasion, as these undermine long-term and . In her 1961 lecture "The Objectivist Ethics," later published in (1964), she derived this from the axiom that life is an end in itself, requiring rejection of intrinsicist duties or subjectivist in favor of contextually absolute principles. Objectivist virtues are the means to gain and keep these values, defined as "the action by which one gains and/or keeps [values]." The fundamental virtue is rationality, the relentless, unbreached commitment to perceiving and acting on without evasion or contradiction, as "thinking is man's basic virtue" and its refusal the root of all . Supporting virtues include:
  • Independence: Relying on one's own mind and judgment, rejecting dependence on others' thoughts or unearned support.
  • Integrity: Loyalty to one's rational convictions in action, integrating into consistent .
  • Honesty: Refusal to fake or permit illusions, as erodes one's grasp of facts.
  • Justice: Objective evaluation of individuals based on their actions and character, rewarding the good and condemning the without or for unearned claims.
  • Productiveness: The virtue of creating through purposeful work, transforming thought into as essential to self-sustenance.
  • Pride: Moral ambitiousness, striving for one's highest potential by earning through unbreached , viewing moral perfection as achievable via full use of one's mind.
These virtues integrate into a selfish ethics where happiness is the reward of life properly lived, achieved not by hedonistic impulse but by principled achievement, as Rand stated: "Life is the reward of virtue—and happiness is the goal and the reward of life."

Politics: Individual Rights and Laissez-Faire Capitalism

In Objectivism, the political philosophy derives from the ethical premise that each individual has an inalienable right to exist for their own sake, necessitating a social system that protects the freedom to act on rational judgment without physical coercion. Individual rights are defined as moral principles specifying the conditions under which initiation of force against others is forbidden, grounded in the metaphysical fact of man's need to produce and trade values to sustain life. The right to life entails the right to liberty—freedom from initiatory force—and the right to property, which is the right to gain, keep, use, and dispose of material values produced by one's effort. These rights are not derived from society, government, or divine authority but from the objective requirements of human survival qua man; they apply only to individuals, not collectives, as groups possess no rights apart from their members. Ayn Rand argued that violations of rights, such as fraud or breach of contract, constitute indirect initiations of force, which government must address to uphold a rights-respecting society. The proper role of is limited to the of through retaliatory , exercised objectively via three branches: police to safeguard against domestic criminals, the to defend against foreign invaders, and the courts to settle disputes and enforce contracts impartially. holds a monopoly on the legal use of physical within its to prevent the chaos of competing private agencies, which Rand deemed would lead to perpetual conflict rather than objective . It must neither initiate nor favor any group, prohibiting welfare redistribution, economic regulations, or as these infringe on voluntary and . Funding for services should ideally be voluntary, such as through contracts for or lotteries, rendering coercive taxation—a form of partial expropriation—incompatible with a fully free system, though Rand acknowledged its transitional use under mixed economies. Laissez-faire capitalism is the only political-economic system consistent with individual rights, characterized by the complete separation of state and , where all is privately owned and all interactions are based on voluntary without interference in production, trade, or . Rand contended that bans physical force from human relationships except in , enabling objective law, free competition, and the pursuit of rational , which historically correlated with unprecedented technological progress and wealth creation in approximations like 19th-century America. Unlike mixed economies or , which rely on force to override voluntary exchange, recognizes that no one may demand values from others without , rejecting altruism's premise that the individual exists to serve the collective. Rand emphasized that 's moral foundation lies in its protection of the mind's efficacy, allowing creators to retain the products of their thought and effort.

Aesthetics: Metaphysical Value-Judgments and Romantic Realism

In Objectivist aesthetics, art constitutes a selective re-creation of reality guided by the artist's metaphysical value-judgments, which encapsulate fundamental abstractions about the universe's intelligibility, human volition, and the efficacy of rational pursuit of values. These judgments form the core of an artist's "sense of life," a subconscious appraisal addressing whether existence supports human flourishing—such as viewing man as a heroic, self-made entity capable of achieving happiness through reason—or as a helpless victim in a chaotic, malevolent realm. Unlike subjective whims, these judgments derive from objective assessments of reality, rendering art a concretization of metaphysics that translates abstract philosophical principles into perceptual form for emotional comprehension and psychological reinforcement. The purpose of art, per this view, lies in fulfilling man's cognitive need to integrate concepts with sensory concretes, bridging the gap between reason's abstractions and volitional action; it thus serves survival by projecting a vision of life-as-it-might-and-ought-to-be, rather than mere reportage of the existential. articulated this in The Romantic Manifesto (1969), arguing that art evokes profound emotional responses precisely because it objectifies one's worldview, allowing individuals to grasp their non-conceptually and appraise their validity. For instance, an artwork embodying benevolent —depicting rational and moral heroism—elicits exaltation, while malevolent ones foster despair, with the artist's choices revealing their ethical stance implicitly. Objectivism endorses Romantic Realism as the esthetic style aligning with its metaphysics of objective reality and human volition, wherein artists selectively portray recognizable elements of the world to project purposeful, value-driven narratives emphasizing man's capacity for achievement. , in Rand's delineation, prioritizes volition by focusing on timeless human potentials and moral conflicts, depicting characters as agents of choice who triumph or fail based on rational virtues, in contrast to Naturalism's deterministic mimicry of unchosen events devoid of teleological judgment. Realism tempers this by grounding portrayals in perceptual verisimilitude—eschewing supernatural fantasy or abstraction for selective integration of observable facts—yet elevates them to idealize life as more luminous and integrated than average existence, thereby affirming reality's knowability and benevolence. Rand exemplified this in her novels, such as (1943), where architect Howard Roark embodies heroic through plot-driven actions rooted in real-world engineering and social dynamics, projecting metaphysical optimism without distorting causal laws. This framework rejects both modernist abstraction, which severs art from representational cognition, and photographic Naturalism, which denies volition's role in human ends; instead, demands plot, , and stylization to integrate metaphysics with , as seen in where heroes pursue via productive work, mirroring Objectivism's . Rand's theory, drawn from her analysis of historical movements like 19th-century (e.g., Victor Hugo's valorization of moral purpose), posits that such art fosters cultural affirmation of reason and individualism, countering irrationalist trends by demonstrating life's heroic potential through objective depiction. Empirical artistic output under this lens prioritizes efficacy: works succeeding in evoking integrated responses validate their premises' alignment with reality, while failures signal cognitive or volitional contradictions in the creator.

Historical Development

Ayn Rand's Formulation and Key Influences


formulated Objectivism as a comprehensive philosophical system emphasizing objective reality, reason as the absolute means of knowledge, as the foundation of , individual as the basis of , and in . She developed these ideas over decades, initially embedding them implicitly in her novels (1943) and (1957), where protagonists embody Objectivist virtues through productive achievement and rejection of . Rand explicitly outlined the philosophy in works beginning with her 1961 "For the New Intellectual" and the 1962 lecture "The Objectivist Ethics," later compiled in collections such as (1964), Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (1966), and (1967, expanded 1990). Rand's formulation drew from her personal experiences, including her birth as Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum on February 2, 1905, in , , and her direct observation of the Bolshevik Revolution's destructiveness, which she escaped by emigrating to the in 1926. These events reinforced her conviction in the causal efficacy of ideas and the primacy of individual reason over collectivist mysticism. Philosophically, she credited as the greatest influence, praising his metaphysics of objective reality—"A is A"—and logic as the rules of , which underpin Objectivism's rejection of and . Rand described 's philosophy as the nearest to her own in essentials, though she critiqued his errors, such as his of moderation over . Early in her career, Rand admired Friedrich Nietzsche for his portrayal of the heroic individual and critique of altruism, referring to him as her "favorite philosopher" in the 1930s and drawing stylistic inspiration for the Nietzschean "superman" archetype in early works. However, she later repudiated Nietzsche entirely for his irrationalism, elevation of whim over reason, and implicit subjectivism, viewing his influence as a temporary phase resolved by her commitment to Aristotelian objectivity. Other literary influences included Romantic authors like Victor Hugo, whose emphasis on the moral purpose of art as projecting an ideal man shaped Rand's aesthetic theory, though she integrated these selectively into her systematic philosophy without deriving core principles from them. Rand insisted Objectivism arose primarily from her independent reasoning applied to observed reality, not eclectic borrowing, positioning it as a closed system closed to further fundamental alterations.

Major Works and Their Publication Timeline

Ayn Rand's major works articulating Objectivism span her novels, which dramatize its principles, and her , where she systematically expounds , , , , and . The novels (published May 7, 1943) and (published October 10, 1957) integrate Objectivist themes—such as individualism, reason, and productive achievement—through fictional narratives portraying heroes who embody rational against collectivist antagonists. These works laid the groundwork, but Rand explicitly named and detailed Objectivism in post-1957 , often serialized first in periodicals like The Objectivist Newsletter (launched 1962, renamed The Objectivist in 1966). The following table outlines the primary publication timeline of Rand's key Objectivist works, focusing on those central to philosophical exposition:
WorkPublication DateKey Content
For the New Intellectual1961Essays contrasting reason-based with and collectivism, including "Philosophy: Who Needs It?" and excerpts from novels framing Objectivism's historical role.
1964Collection defining as the moral code of Objectivism, with essays on , , and the rejection of .
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal1966Defense of laissez-faire as the only system consistent with individual , including contributions from associates like .
Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology1967 (monograph; expanded 1979)Theory of concept-formation via measurement-omission, establishing reason as the absolute means of knowledge.
The Romantic Manifesto1969Essays on , defining as a selective re-creation of reality based on metaphysical value-judgments, advocating .
Subsequent publications, such as The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution (1971), extended applications to contemporary issues, while posthumous compilations like Philosophy: Who Needs It (1982) gathered later essays reinforcing core tenets. These works collectively form the canonical presentation of , with Rand emphasizing their derivation from first-hand observation and logical integration rather than prior traditions.

The Objectivist Movement and Organizational Foundations

The Objectivist movement emerged in the late 1950s following the publication of Ayn Rand's novel Atlas Shrugged in 1957, as Rand and a close circle of associates, including , began actively promoting her philosophy through lectures, discussions, and educational materials. In 1958, Branden established the Institute (NBI), initially through a series of lectures that evolved into a dedicated to disseminating Objectivist principles via live seminars, tape-recorded courses, and written materials. NBI expanded rapidly, offering courses in over 80 cities across the and internationally by the mid-1960s, reaching thousands of students and establishing Objectivism as an organized intellectual endeavor. To further propagate her ideas, Rand co-edited The Objectivist Newsletter with Branden starting in January 1962, a monthly publication that ran until December 1965 and featured essays on , , and current events from an Objectivist perspective. This transitioned into the larger-format The Objectivist magazine in January 1966, which continued monthly until September 1971, providing a platform for Rand's articles alongside contributions from associates like . The periodicals played a central role in intellectual outreach, with subscriptions growing to support the movement's expansion. The movement faced a major disruption in August 1968 when Rand publicly severed ties with Branden over personal and professional disagreements, leading to the immediate closure of NBI and a fragmentation among adherents. Rand then launched The Ayn Rand Letter, a biweekly , in 1971, which she published until February 1976 to continue expounding Objectivist views independently. Following Rand's death in 1982, , designated as her intellectual heir, co-founded the (ARI) in 1985 with businessman to systematically study, teach, and advocate Objectivism as Rand formulated it. Headquartered in , ARI operates as a nonprofit , producing educational resources, conferences, and campus outreach programs, marking the re-establishment of a primary organizational hub for the philosophy after the post-1968 vacuum.

Extensions and Internal Evolutions

Leonard Peikoff's Systematic Elaboration

, designated by as her intellectual heir upon her death in 1982, delivered the first comprehensive systematic exposition of Objectivism in his 1991 book Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. This work, derived from Peikoff's 1976 lecture course "The Philosophy of Objectivism" which Rand endorsed as fully accurate, organizes the philosophy hierarchically across its five branches: metaphysics, , , , and . Peikoff emphasizes the integration of principles, validating each from foundational axioms—existence exists, exists, and identity exists—while underscoring their practical application to human life. In metaphysics, Peikoff elaborates Rand's axiom of , asserting that is independent of any and that entities possess definite identities governed by the law of causality, where every effect has a cause rooted in the nature of existents. Epistemologically, he details reason as the absolute means of , defining objectivity as volitional adherence to through logical methods, including the theory of concepts as mental integrations formed by omission and differentiation. Peikoff stresses contextual over or infallibilism, arguing that builds hierarchically from percepts to abstractions without inherent contradictions in . Ethically, Peikoff systematizes as the pursuit of one's own life as the standard of value, deriving virtues like , , and from the requirements of qua man. In politics, he defends as protections of , advocating as the sole system consistent with reason and , where limits itself to retaliatory . Aesthetically, Peikoff presents as a selective re-creation of projecting metaphysical value-judgments, with as Objectivism's ideal style, concretizing man's potential in accordance with his nature. Peikoff's presentation treats Objectivism as a in its fundamentals, prohibiting alterations to core principles while allowing contextual applications. Through this elaboration, he aimed to clarify and defend Rand's ideas against misinterpretations, drawing on thirty years of direct philosophical discussions with her. His work has served as the authoritative reference for Objectivists, influencing educational courses and institutional efforts to propagate the philosophy.

Schisms: The Nathaniel Branden Break and Open Objectivism

In May 1968, Ayn Rand published the statement "To Whom It May Concern" in The Objectivist, formally announcing the end of her association with Nathaniel Branden, his wife Barbara Branden, and the Nathaniel Branden Institute (NBI), which had been the primary organizational vehicle for disseminating Objectivism through lectures and courses since its founding in 1958. Rand described Branden's behavior as involving years of evasion on key intellectual issues he had raised with her, including doubts about applying Objectivist principles to his personal life, coupled with a refusal to resolve them through reason, which she characterized as a form of psychological faking and moral default. The public announcement masked deeper personal factors: Branden had maintained a clandestine romantic and sexual relationship with Rand since , sanctioned by their spouses under a rational egoist framework, but from 1964 onward, he deceived her by pursuing and concealing with actress Patrecia Gullison (later his second wife) while repeatedly affirming his exclusive commitment to Rand. When confronted in 1968, Branden admitted the deception but declined to end the other relationship, leading Rand to view it as a profound of rational and ; she reportedly responded with intense anger, including physical confrontation. Barbara Branden, aware of her husband's infidelity but complicit in the initial arrangement with Rand, was also held accountable by Rand for failing to disclose it earlier. The rupture dissolved NBI abruptly, canceling ongoing lecture series and scattering its network of students and lecturers; Rand urged followers to reject any continued association with the Brandens, resulting in excommunications of several prominent figures, such as , who initially sided with Branden before recanting. This enforcement of intellectual loyalty intensified perceptions of dogmatism within Rand's circle, with dissenters facing public denunciation in The Objectivist. Branden, in response, issued statements through associates emphasizing philosophical independence, though he later attributed the split partly to emerging differences, such as his advocacy for as a distinct field integrated with Objectivism, which Rand resisted formalizing as a philosophical branch. Post-1968, Branden rebuilt his career in , authoring works like The Psychology of Self-Esteem (1969) that applied Objectivist to while critiquing Rand's limited treatment of and emphasizing empirical therapeutic methods over strict philosophical . He explicitly cautioned against self-identifying as an "Objectivist" without unqualified agreement with Rand's system, positioning his efforts as supportive study rather than authoritative extension, which fostered a less hierarchical approach. This legacy contributed to the distinction between "closed" Objectivism—upheld by and the as a complete, non-contradictable system requiring allegiance—and "open" Objectivism, which prioritizes individual reason, tolerates non-essential disagreements, and permits alliances with compatible ideologies like without . Advocates of open Objectivism, drawing from Branden's model of independent application, argue it aligns with Rand's own emphasis on thinking for oneself, though orthodox proponents counter that it dilutes the philosophy's precision by blurring essential boundaries. The thus marked a causal pivot: personal deception eroded trust, philosophical rigidity amplified division, and the resulting factions reflected enduring tensions between systemic closure for purity and for broader intellectual engagement.

Contributions from Other Proponents

Harry Binswanger advanced Objectivist by developing Rand's theory of concepts and volitional . In his 2014 book How We Know: on an Objectivist Foundation, Binswanger argues that human cognition involves active, goal-directed processes, emphasizing the role of propositions in integrating and distinguishing between analytic and synthetic judgments within an objective framework. His work addresses criticisms of Objectivism's rejection of by grounding in perceptual reality and logical integration, serving as a foundational text for advanced study at the . Tara Smith has elaborated Objectivist , focusing on the integration of rational with virtues like and benevolence. Her 2006 book Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: The Virtuous defends as a system of objective values derived from , arguing that virtues are not sacrifices but essential means to life as a standard of value. Smith extends this in Viable Values (2000), contending that moral principles must be contextually adaptable yet grounded in metaphysical facts, countering relativist challenges by showing how selfishness aligns with productive achievement rather than whim-worship. As holder of the Chair for the Study of Objectivism at the , her scholarship bridges with legal theory, advocating objective as a protector of individual rights. In economics, George Reisman integrated Objectivist principles with classical and Austrian insights in his 1996 treatise Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics, which spans 1,048 pages and refutes anticapitalist fallacies through a theory of profits as net consumption. Reisman demonstrates that laissez-faire capitalism maximizes production and wealth by protecting individual initiative, using data on historical growth rates under freer markets—such as U.S. GDP per capita rising from $1,300 in 1790 to over $30,000 by 1990 in constant dollars—to support causal claims of freedom's productivity. His framework reconciles Rand's epistemology with economic science, emphasizing objective measurement of value via costs and consumer satisfaction. Allan Gotthelf contributed to Objectivism's metaphysical and epistemological ties to , whom Rand credited as her primary influence. In On Ayn Rand (1999, expanded 2000), Gotthelf outlines how Rand's teleological ethics and objective reality echo Aristotelian final causes, applying this to where purposefulness in living organisms underpins . His scholarship on Aristotle's De Anima and , as in Teleology, First Principles, and in Aristotle's Biology (2012), reinforces Objectivism's rejection of mechanism by evidencing goal-directed action in nature, thus bolstering Rand's axiom that life is an end in itself. Gotthelf's work, through the Ayn Rand Society co-founded in 1985, facilitated academic engagement with Objectivism's Aristotelian roots. Tibor Machan extended Objectivist by defending as inherent to , independent of collective utility. In Individuals and Their Rights (1989), he argues for a teleological basis of , where protect volitional agency against aggression, aligning with Rand's non-initiation of principle but emphasizing derivations. Machan's Human Rights and Human Liberties (1975) critiques using empirical examples, such as post-World War II welfare states' growth correlating with reduced , to advocate minimal government. Though sometimes diverging toward with , his efforts promoted Objectivism in academia until his death in 2016.

Influence and Empirical Impact

On Libertarianism, Conservatism, and Economic Thought

Objectivism has exerted significant influence on libertarianism primarily through its ethical defense of rational self-interest and uncompromising advocacy for individual rights, though Ayn Rand explicitly rejected the libertarian label, viewing it as philosophically superficial and prone to anarchism. Rand argued that libertarianism's indifference to foundational metaphysics and epistemology undermined its defense of capitalism, equating it with "hippies of the right" who prioritized political tactics over principled reasoning. Despite this, her novels, particularly Atlas Shrugged published in 1957, inspired generations of libertarians by dramatizing the virtues of productive achievement and the consequences of statism, leading figures like Murray Rothbard initially to collaborate before ideological splits emerged in the 1960s. Objectivists maintain that true libertarian goals require Objectivism's full philosophical integration, rejecting anarcho-capitalist variants as incompatible with objective law. In relation to conservatism, Rand's Objectivism clashed fundamentally with traditional conservative elements, particularly their reliance on religious faith and altruism, which she deemed antithetical to reason and individual rights. She criticized conservatism as "intellectually bankrupt," incapable of mounting a rational defense of freedom due to its fusion of capitalism with mysticism and collectivist welfare policies, as articulated in her 1962 essay "The Fascist New Frontier." Rand opposed alliances like the conservative fusionism of Frank Meyer, which blended free-market economics with traditional moralism, insisting that religion in politics erodes secular governance. Nonetheless, her pro-capitalist rhetoric influenced some conservative thinkers on economic liberty, though she condemned figures like William F. Buckley Jr. for accommodating statism and theocracy. Objectivism frames economic thought through a lens, positing not merely as efficient but as the only system morally justifiable because it protects to and via objective law. Rand's 1966 book Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal argues that enables by rewarding voluntary production over coercive redistribution, deriving this from her axiom that human survival requires productive work. This perspective influenced free-market advocates by emphasizing 's alignment with human nature, contrasting with utilitarian defenses; for instance, Objectivists like extended this to critique mixed economies as initiations of force. Empirical impacts include bolstering arguments against , as seen in Objectivist analyses showing 's role in through self-interested incentives, though Rand contributed no formal economic models, focusing instead on philosophical preconditions for market efficacy.

In Technology, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

Objectivism's emphasis on rational , productive achievement, and resonates with the ethos of entrepreneurship, where innovators prioritize individual initiative and market-driven value creation over collectivist constraints. Entrepreneurs in have frequently cited Ayn Rand's works, such as and , as inspirational for fostering a mindset of uncompromised pursuit of technological breakthroughs. This alignment manifests in practices like rejecting regulatory overreach and emphasizing objective reality in product development, which Objectivism posits as essential for genuine innovation. Specific tech leaders have explicitly drawn from Objectivist principles. , founder and CEO of , hired an Objectivist philosopher in the late 1990s to lecture his executive staff on "the DNA of ," integrating Rand's ideas into corporate culture to promote rational productivity. Similarly, , co-founder of , has been identified among high-tech entrepreneurs embodying Objectivist values of independent innovation and rejection of altruism in business. , former CEO of , referenced Rand's influence in shaping his disruptive approach to transportation , prioritizing creator over established interests. Broader empirical patterns include ecosystems where Rand's advocacy for unfettered ambition informs investment in high-risk, high-reward tech ventures. For instance, founders like of and of have absorbed Rand's portrayal of heroic , applying it to scale user-centric platforms amid competitive markets. Contemporary examples persist, such as tech entrepreneur Elle Morrill, who in 2024 attributed her leadership edge in to Objectivism's focus on purpose-driven action and objective standards. These attributions suggest a causal link wherein Objectivist rejection of encourages persistence in entrepreneurial risk-taking, evidenced by sustained citations across decades despite critiques of selective application.

Cultural Penetration and Contemporary Applications

Objectivism has permeated American popular culture primarily through Ayn Rand's fiction, with achieving enduring commercial success, selling over 10 million copies since its 1957 publication and ranking among the top-selling novels of the . Sales accelerated amid economic uncertainty, reaching 500,000 copies in 2009—more than double the previous year's total—and tripling overall that year as readers sought Rand's defense of against collectivism. The novel's adaptations into three films (2011–2014) extended its reach, though they received poor critical reception, underscoring the philosophy's polarizing appeal in visual media. The (ARI), founded in 1985 to promote Objectivism, has amplified cultural dissemination via educational outreach, distributing over 300,000 copies of Rand's works to students by 2008 and hosting annual essay contests that garnered 115,000 submissions by 2004, engaging an estimated 250,000 high schoolers with her ideas. ARI's programs, including campus club support and professor resources, have reached hundreds of academics, fostering Objectivist study in non-academic settings where mainstream curricula often marginalize it. In 2021, ARI launched Ayn Rand University, an online platform offering structured courses on Objectivism to broaden access beyond traditional institutions. Contemporary applications manifest in and , where Objectivist principles of and productive achievement inform executive . John Allison, former CEO of (now Truist), attributed his firm's resilience during the 2008 crisis to applying Objectivism, emphasizing objective reality and independence in banking ethics. Startup founders draw on the philosophy to prioritize over , viewing self-interested pursuit of values as a driver of technological progress, as seen in Silicon Valley's admiration for Rand's heroic creator archetype despite critiques of its as overly atomistic. These applications persist amid broader cultural skepticism, with Objectivism influencing self-improvement literature and rationalist communities that echo its rejection of faith-based or collectivist alternatives.

Criticisms and Controversies

Epistemological and Metaphysical Challenges

Objectivism's metaphysical foundation rests on the that exists independently of any (the primacy of ), positing as objective and governed by the ("A is A"). This rejects both , which subordinates to , and intrinsicism, which views properties as inherent independently of human cognition. Critics contend that this framework assumes a naive realism vulnerable to challenges from perceptual illusions, hallucinations, and scientific anomalies like , which appear to blur strict identity at subatomic scales, though Objectivists counter that such phenomena are contextual and do not negate the axiom's validity in macroscopic human experience. Philosopher argues that Objectivism's metaphysical primacy overlooks Kantian , where objects conform to the structures of human cognition (e.g., space and time as forms of ), implying that we access phenomena rather than things-in-themselves, thus questioning the direct, unmediated access to objective reality Rand asserts. Huemer further notes that historical idealists like Hegel portray reality as unfolding through a dialectical , challenging the unidirectional primacy of over mind. These critiques suggest Objectivism's axioms, while presented as self-evident, beg the question by presupposing perceptual realism without addressing how might filter or constitute experiential data. Epistemologically, Objectivism maintains that reason—non-contradictory identification of facts via and conceptual integration—is the sole means of , rejecting , , or as arbiters. Rand's theory of , outlined in (1967, expanded 1979), describes abstraction as retaining essential similarities while omitting within a context, enabling hierarchical without floating abstractions or the stolen concept fallacy. Detractors, including cognitive psychologists influenced by , argue this model oversimplifies concept formation by ignoring from developmental studies showing innate perceptual biases and fuzzy boundaries in categorization, rather than precise measurement omission. A specific challenge targets the "arbitrary assertion" doctrine, where claims lacking evidence between possible and impossible are deemed neither true nor false; critics like Robert L. Campbell assert this conflates with , failing to resolve justificatory regress or Gettier-style problems where justified true lacks full contextual integration. Contextual , Rand's alternative to or infallibilism, is faulted for permitting knowledge claims provisional to , potentially undermining as new emerges, akin to but without probabilistic calibration. Huemer highlights that Objectivism's dismissal of innate ideas ignores , where basic conceptual structures may precede sensory integration, contradicting Rand's stance on the mind's conceptual level. These epistemological critiques often stem from analytic philosophy's emphasis on formal logic and empirical testing, areas where Rand's work, largely pre-1970s , is seen as underdeveloped, though proponents like Allan Gotthelf defend its foundational innovations against such charges.

Ethical Critiques from Altruistic and Collectivist Perspectives

Critics adhering to altruistic ethical frameworks, including and Kantian , argue that Objectivism's erroneously dismisses moral duties to others by defining solely as self-sacrificial obligation, thereby ignoring forms of benevolence or utility maximization that promote overall human flourishing. , a philosopher, contends that Rand's argument for begs the question by assuming values are agent-relative—tied exclusively to the individual's own —without refuting absolutist views where moral value resides in states of affairs benefiting sentient beings impartially, such as the existence of intelligent generally. He asserts that this leaves no substantive case against an altruist who, accepting as an ultimate value, seeks to preserve all human lives rather than prioritizing one's own. Such critiques highlight 's potential to endorse counterintuitive outcomes, like permitting the of others for trivial personal gain if it advances the agent's interests, which clashes with widespread moral intuitions against initiating harm to innocents. Ethical egoism's universal prescription also faces paradoxes: if all actors pursue without regard for others, erodes, undermining the long-term benefits Rand claims egoism yields through rational . Altruistic proponents, drawing from thinkers like , maintain that aligns with morality in many cases but diverges in conflicts requiring , such as aggregating utilities across agents rather than agent-specific maximization. Collectivist perspectives, often rooted in socialist or communitarian , charge that Objectivism's atomizes society, eroding reciprocal obligations and communal essential for addressing systemic inequalities. Democratic socialists have specifically critiqued Rand's for framing human interactions as zero-sum market transactions, which they claim rationalizes the exploitation of laborers by capital owners and dismisses welfare mechanisms like redistribution as immoral . These views posit that unchecked fosters , where the vulnerable are abandoned, contrasting with ethical systems viewing the group—whether class, nation, or humanity—as the proper locus of moral value, thereby justifying sacrifices for equitable outcomes. Critics from this tradition argue that empirical patterns of wealth concentration under validate their concerns, though Objectivists counter that such outcomes stem from prior interventions rather than pure .

Political Objections and Debates on Capitalism

Political objections to Objectivism's advocacy of often center on claims that it inherently produces exploitation, monopolies, and widening inequality without mechanisms for redistribution or social welfare. Critics, including economists like , argue that unchecked leads to r > g dynamics where returns on capital outpace economic growth, concentrating wealth and undermining . Objectivists counter that such outcomes result from prior interventions distorting markets, not pure , and emphasize that voluntary trade ensures mutual benefit, with historical evidence showing 19th-century America under relatively free markets achieving unprecedented and living standards. Empirical assessments challenge objections regarding , demonstrating that freer economies foster prosperity for all income levels. Between 1980 and 2018, as countries adopted market-oriented reforms, global fell from 42% to 8.6%, lifting over a billion people, with indices correlating positively with across nations. Objectivists attribute this to 's incentive structure rewarding productive effort, rejecting altruism-based welfare as demotivating and perpetuating dependency, as evidenced by persistent in high-welfare states despite resource abundance. Debates within pro-capitalist circles focus on the institutional prerequisites for sustaining systems. Objectivists defend minarchism—a monopoly on retaliatory limited to protection—as essential for objective adjudication of disputes and prevention of mafia-like competitions, arguing devolves into de facto collectivism by lacking a uniform legal standard. explicitly condemned libertarian anarchists as evading philosophy's role in validating , stating in 1971 that their rejection of minimal mocks and allies unwittingly with . This contrasts with libertarian tolerance for , which Objectivists view as philosophically eclectic and prone to subjectivist errors that erode rational . Conservative critics occasionally object that Objectivist capitalism divorces from traditional moral restraints like , potentially fostering amoral greed over communal virtues. Objectivists respond that reason, not faith, underpins ethical , with —not —historically justifying interventions that conservatives often tolerate, such as subsidies for favored industries. These debates underscore Objectivism's insistence on a fully integrated philosophy- nexus, where demands metaphysical realism and egoistic ethics to endure against collectivist encroachments.

Internal and Personal Controversies

The extramarital between and , spanning from 1954 to 1968, represented a significant personal controversy within Objectivist circles, as it intertwined romantic entanglement with philosophical collaboration. Branden, then a 25-year-old student, and Rand, 25 years his senior, initiated the relationship after convening their spouses— and —for a meeting to secure consent, framing it as a rational extension of their shared values that avoided sacrifice or evasion. The arrangement prescribed periodic sexual encounters without emotional demands, but it imposed psychological strain, including rules prohibiting Branden from pursuing other women and requiring spousal silence on resulting resentments. Firsthand accounts from , who endured the emotional toll despite initial agreement, highlight how the fostered hidden guilt and relational erosion, challenging claims of pure rationality. Critics within and outside the movement, including post-break analyses, contend this setup exemplified Rand's prioritization of abstract ideals over concrete personal consequences, contradicting her of unbreached . Rand's acceptance of Social Security payments and Medicare benefits after her 1974 diagnosis—totaling benefits from programs she had vociferously opposed as coercive redistribution—drew accusations of personal from detractors. Diagnosed at age 69 following decades of heavy , Rand enrolled under her married name, receiving approximately $11,000 in Social Security over eight years and Medicare coverage for treatments until her death in 1982. She rationalized this as rightful restitution for payroll taxes withheld throughout her career, maintaining opposition to the welfare state's initiation of force, a view echoed by defenders who argue it aligned with reclaiming one's own confiscated earnings. Nonetheless, opponents, citing her novels' portrayal of moochers as moral parasites, viewed the reliance on government aid amid financial dependence on associates like as inconsistent with her advocacy for uncompromised independence. Internally, the Objectivist inner circle exhibited dynamics of intense personal scrutiny and loyalty enforcement, fueling perceptions of authoritarian control over members' private lives. Known as "the ," this group of associates—including the Brandens and Allan Blumenthal—underwent mutual "moral checkups" where individuals disclosed psychological doubts or lapses, subjecting them to Rand's ; deviations, such as unapproved reading or friendships, prompted expulsion or public condemnation. documented Rand's proneness to explosive emotional responses, attributing them to unintegrated passions that amplified interpersonal conflicts, as seen in her vehement reactions to perceived disloyalty. Such practices, while defended by adherents as safeguards for intellectual consistency, alienated participants and bred resentment, with ex-members like later critiquing them as fostering a quasi-cultish antithetical to . These episodes underscore tensions between Objectivism's rationalist ideals and the human frailties evident in its founder's relationships.

References

  1. https://aynrand.org/ideas/philosophy/
  2. https://aynrand.org/ideas/overview/
  3. https://aynrand.org/novels/objectivism-the-philosophy-of-ayn-rand/
  4. https://aynrand.org/novels/introduction-to-objectivist-epistemology/
  5. https://courses.aynrand.org/works/conservatism-vs-objectivism/
  6. https://aynrandlexicon.com/ayn-rand-ideas/introducing-objectivism.html
  7. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/existence.html
  8. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/axioms.html
  9. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/identity.html
  10. https://courses.aynrand.org/works/the-metaphysical-versus-the-man-made/
  11. https://courses.aynrand.org/lexicon/reason/
  12. https://courses.aynrand.org/works/introducing-objectivism/
  13. https://courses.aynrand.org/works/axiomatic-concepts/
  14. https://courses.aynrand.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/OEIO-Transcript.pdf
  15. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/concepts.html
  16. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/self-interest.html
  17. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/virtue.html
  18. https://ari.aynrand.org/issues/government-and-business/individual-rights/
  19. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/government.html
  20. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/organized-government
  21. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/capitalism.html
  22. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/laissez-faire-capitalism
  23. https://aynrand.org/novels/capitalism-the-unknown-ideal/
  24. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/metaphysical_value-judgments.html
  25. https://aynrand.org/novels/the-romantic-manifesto/
  26. https://courses.aynrand.org/works/what-is-romanticism/
  27. https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/romanticism.html
  28. https://newideal.aynrand.org/adapting-the-fountainhead-to-film/
  29. https://aynrand.org/novels/the-ayn-rand-lexicon-objectivism-from-a-to-z/
  30. https://www.theobjectivestandard.com/p/ayn-rand-contra-nietzsche
  31. https://newideal.aynrand.org/real-philosophers-dont-just-reflect-the-trendy-consensus/
  32. https://www.addall.com/books-in-order/ayn-rand/
  33. https://aynrand.org/novels/the-objectivist/
  34. https://aynrand.org/about/timeline/
  35. https://www.amazon.com/New-Intellectual-Philosophy-Rand-Anniversary/dp/0451163087
  36. https://ari.aynrand.org/50-years-of-the-virtue-of-selfishness/
  37. https://www.amazon.com/Virtue-Selfishness-Fiftieth-Anniversary/dp/0451163931
  38. https://www.burnsiderarebooks.com/pages/books/140946819/ayn-rand-nathaniel-branden-alan-greenspan-robert-hessen/capitalism-the-unknown-ideal
  39. https://aynrandlexicon.com/ayn-rand-works/introduction-to-objectivist-epistemology.html
  40. https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?cm_sp=plpafe-_-coll-_-first&an=ayn%2Brand&ds=5&fe=on&n=&sortby=1&tn=introduction%2Bobjectivist%2Bepistemology
  41. https://www.abebooks.com/signed-first-edition/Romantic-Manifesto-philosophy-Literature-RAND-Ayn/31939859628/bd
  42. https://iep.utm.edu/rand/
  43. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ayn-Rand/The-Collective-and-the-Nathaniel-Branden-Institute
  44. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/download/libertarianism/chpt/branden-nathaniel-1930.pdf
  45. https://aynrand.org/novels/the-objectivist-newsletter/
  46. http://aynrandlexicon.com/ayn-rand-works/the-ayn-rand-letter.html
  47. https://ari.aynrand.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/198512.pdf
  48. https://ari.aynrand.org/
  49. https://www.amazon.com/Objectivism-Philosophy-Ayn-Rand-Library/dp/0452011019
  50. https://courses.aynrand.org/campus-courses/the-philosophy-of-objectivism/
  51. https://sobrief.com/books/objectivism
  52. https://kaue.me/meaning/awareness/leonard-peikoff-objectivism-the-philosophy-of-ayn-rand-summary/
  53. https://www.maxmednik.com/blog/notes-on-objectivism-the-philosophy-of-ayn-rand-by-leonard-peikoff
  54. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/99951.Objectivism
  55. https://www.amazon.com/Objectivism-Philosophy-Rand-Leonard-Peikoff/dp/1470891689
  56. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/peikoffs-summa
  57. https://peikoff.com/essays_and_articles/what-philosophy-is-and-how-to-study-it/
  58. https://objectivismphilosophyaynrand.com/reviews/
  59. https://courses.aynrand.org/people/leonard-peikoff/
  60. https://newideal.aynrand.org/forgotten-treasures-in-ayn-rands-three-periodicals/
  61. https://www.checkingpremises.org/towhom
  62. https://www.city-journal.org/article/neither-god-nor-devil
  63. https://www.quora.com/Does-the-Ayn-Rand-Institute-confirm-or-deny-Rands-purported-extramarital-affair-with-Nathaniel-Branden
  64. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-05-30-vw-1095-story.html
  65. https://www.barbarabranden.com/answer-nathaniel.html
  66. https://reason.com/1971/10/01/break-free/
  67. https://mises.org/articles-interest/sociology-ayn-rand-cult
  68. https://newideal.aynrand.org/of-schisms-public-and-private/
  69. https://www.facebook.com/groups/theaynrandgroup/posts/10161043318432932/
  70. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/nathaniel-branden-rip
  71. https://nathanielbranden.com/who-is-an-objectivist/
  72. https://www.atlassociety.org/objectivist-epistemology
  73. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/reason-enough
  74. https://capitalismmagazine.com/2020/09/how-we-know-epistemology-on-an-objectivist-foundation-by-harry-binswanger/
  75. https://newideal.aynrand.org/announcing-the-harry-binswanger-scholarship-fund-fostering-the-future-of-objectivism/
  76. https://reasonpapers.com/pdf/30/rp_30_5.pdf
  77. https://upittpress.org/authors/tara-smith/
  78. https://newideal.aynrand.org/tara-smith-defends-ayn-rands-morality-of-selfishness-on-philosophy-podcast/
  79. https://www.amazon.com/CAPITALISM-OP-George-Reisman/dp/0915463733
  80. https://fee.org/ebooks/capitalism-a-treatise-on-economics/
  81. https://upittpress.org/authors/allan-gotthelf/
  82. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/teleology-first-principles-and-scientific-method-in-aristotles-biology-9780199287956
  83. https://ari.aynrand.org/press-releases/internationally-known-philosopher-leaves-legacy-of-scholarship-on-aristotle-and-ayn-rand/
  84. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/rip-tibor-machan
  85. https://fee.org/articles/tibor-r-machan-on-the-questions-that-matter/
  86. https://ari.aynrand.org/faq/
  87. https://www.libertarianism.org/topics/rand-ayn-1905-1982
  88. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/libertarianism-and-objectivism-compatible
  89. https://newideal.aynrand.org/why-ayn-rand-rejected-conservatism/
  90. https://newideal.aynrand.org/what-was-ayn-rands-view-of-conservatism/
  91. https://history.stanford.edu/publications/goddess-market-ayn-rand-and-american-right-oxford-university-press-2009
  92. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/radical-for-capitalism-an-introduction-to-the-political-thought-of-ayn-rand
  93. https://capitalism.org/capitalism/philosophy-of-capitalism/
  94. https://capitalismmagazine.com/2011/10/objective-economics-the-implications-of-ayn-rands-philosophy-on-the-science-of-economics/
  95. https://www.forbes.com/sites/abdoriani/2023/02/14/three-ways-objectivism-the-philosophy-of-ayn-rand-can-benefit-startup-founders/
  96. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/10/silicon-valley-ayn-rand-obsession
  97. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ayn-rands-influence-silicon-valley-objectivism-tech-sambasivam-ssshc
  98. https://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/06/13/rand.tech.idg/
  99. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/honoring-ayn-rand-the-entrepreneurs-philosopher
  100. https://yesimozsoz.medium.com/exploring-the-nuances-of-ayn-rands-influence-on-vc-entrepreneurship-b700ddeabfef
  101. https://newideal.aynrand.org/tech-entrepreneur-elle-morrill-offers-inspirational-life-advice-in-ari-roundtable/
  102. https://www.quora.com/Has-Ayn-Rand-influenced-any-Silicon-Valley-startup-founders
  103. https://www.psychofuturia.com/ayn-rands-dangerous-legacy-why-silicon-valley-startups-and-politicians-still-worship-her/
  104. https://www.libertarianism.org/articles/how-influential-atlas-shrugged
  105. https://lithub.com/how-ayn-rand-became-the-spirit-of-our-time/
  106. https://www.aei.org/articles/atlas-shrugs-off-an-opportunity-alienates-viewers/
  107. https://ari.aynrand.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMPACT_200805_PRINT.pdf
  108. https://ari.aynrand.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Impact200401.pdf
  109. https://ari.aynrand.org/about-ari/programs/
  110. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBocGCl3y4g
  111. https://ari.aynrand.org/objectivism-as-a-competitive-advantage-in-business/
  112. https://www.atlassociety.org/post/ayn-rands-stamp-on-american-culture
  113. https://spot.colorado.edu/~huemer/papers/rand2.htm
  114. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ayn-rand/
  115. https://www.upress.pitt.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/9780822944249exr.pdf
  116. https://campber.people.clemson.edu/machanreview.pdf
  117. https://campber.people.clemson.edu/peikovianarbitrary.pdf
  118. https://spot.colorado.edu/~huemer/papers/rand5.htm
  119. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/concepts-and-their-role-in-knowledge-reflections-on-objectivist-epistemology/
  120. https://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/archives/2002/08/12/objections-to-objectivism-a-brief-critique-of-ayn-rands-ethical-egoism
  121. https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/1nin64t/what_are_the_best_arguments_against_the/
  122. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1989/11/9/objectivists-debate-socialists-pdemocratic-socialists-squared/
  123. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/judgesabo-ayn-rand-s-second-hand-ethics
  124. https://owlcation.com/humanities/the-virtue-of-stupidity-a-critique-of-ayn-rand-and-objectivism
  125. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/c2545734-aabe-5f20-9f0c-ad9d636b0c63
  126. https://ari.aynrand.org/issues/government-and-business/capitalism/
  127. https://www.heritage.org/poverty-and-inequality/commentary/economic-freedom-enables-great-escape-poverty
  128. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/168041468761746890/pdf/multi0page.pdf
  129. https://reason.com/2018/09/13/proposition-objectivists-are-n/
  130. https://www.twincities.com/2014/12/08/nathaniel-branden-84-was-acolyte-and-lover-of-ayn-rand/
  131. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/us/nathaniel-branden-ayn-rands-collaborator-and-paramour-dies-at-84.html
  132. http://www.barbarabranden.com/interview4.html
  133. https://forum.objectivismonline.com/index.php?/topic/12809-ayn-rand-and-her-adultery/
  134. https://www.openculture.com/2016/12/when-ayn-rand-collected-social-security-medicare.html
  135. https://newideal.aynrand.org/what-gave-ayn-rand-the-moral-right-to-collect-social-security/
  136. https://ari.aynrand.org/issues/government-and-business/individual-rights/the-myth-about-ayn-rand-and-social-security/
  137. https://jls.mises.org/article/143608-murray-rothbard-s-lost-letters-on-ayn-rand
  138. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-09-07-bk-12131-story.html
  139. http://www.barbarabranden.com/answer-nathaniel.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.