Hubbry Logo
NishadNishadMain
Open search
Nishad
Community hub
Nishad
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nishad
Nishad
Nishad
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Nishad are a Hindu caste, found in the Indian states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.

In Bihar, the term refers to a group of around 20 communities whose traditional occupations centre on rivers, such as the Mallaah. There have been demands for these communities to be reclassified from Other Backwards Classes (OBC) to Scheduled Tribes.[1]

Key Information

In Uttar Pradesh, the term "Nishad" represents 17 OBC communities that have been proposed for Scheduled Caste status by the Samajwadi Party-controlled Government of Uttar Pradesh. However, this proposal, which relates to votebank politics and has been made in the past, has been stayed by the courts; a prior attempt was also rejected by the Government of India.[2][3]

Formation of Nishad identity

[edit]

Nishads, according to Badri Narayan is a term denoting various communities whose traditional occupations has remained water-centric including sand dredging, Boating and Fishing. Since 1930s various caste organisation claiming to represent these communities started holding conferences with the central aim of uniting all these communities under the umbrella term "Nishad". Earlier these communities were classified as "Most Backward Caste", but in socio-economic status they were more close to Scheduled Castes. The organisation like Rashtriya Nishad Sangh,Shri ramasakha guhraj nishad seva samiti dholpur (Raj.), Nishad Kalyan Sabha, Maharaja Nishadraj Guhya Smarak Samiti were some of the organisation based in Uttar Pradesh which are hosting numerous Ekta Rally (unity conferences) to unify these caste groups.[4]

In 2001, the writer E.S.D Bind argued that various subcaste of Nishad community together comprises 18% of the population of Uttar Pradesh, which were instrumental in affecting the electoral politics of the state. As a result, various political parties pitched for having a share of this large vote bank by manipulating the legends of mythical heroes of the community in a way to suit their agenda. This process became more swift after the publication of a pamphlet called Nishad Jati Sankhya Bal in a magazine called Nishad Jyoti. One of the earliest proponent of Nishad identity was Ram Chandr Vakil who was elected as a member of United Province legislative council in 1936. In the later years, the push to this identity politics was given by various political parties which included Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party and Bhartiya Janata Party.[4]

Origin

[edit]
The gateway at the entrance of a Nishad (Mallaah) caste dominated village in Bihar, commemorating Eklavya, the mythological character from Mahabharata.

Magazines such as Nishad Jyoti and Jheel Putra Smarika claimed that before the advent of Aryans in Indian subcontinent, there was a well developed kingdom of Nishads, which was fortified. These claims sought to recognise them as one of the earliest inhabitants of the subcontinent. Some of these magazines also claimed that, [they] were forefathers of Indus Valley civilization. In a bid to strengthen their claim, the various organisation affiliated to the Nishad community quoted the scholars such as Hall, Keith and William Crooke as well as scriptures like Rig Veda to prove that there used to be a well developed civilization before the advent of Aryans which had trade links to the rest of the world and Nishad were the founder of Ganga River Culture.[4]

The genealogy made by the Nishads declares them to be the descendants of Nishadraj Guhya who befriended Rama when he was exiled from the Ayodhya. Their Gaurav Gathas or tales of glory features Maharishi Kalu (Guru of Narada), Nala, Damayanti, Matasyagandha as well as Ved Vyas (the composer of epic Mahabharata) as members of Nishad caste. In order to claim Nishadraj as their forefather they refer to a passage from Ramcharitmanas which says:

"Uttari thari bhae sursarireta
Siya Ram Guhya Lakhan Sameta"
(Disembarking from the boat, on the sand of Ganga
stood Sita and Ram with Guhya and Laxman.)[4]

Besides claiming the mythological character Eklavya as a member of Nishad community, they also associate themselves with Bhai Himmat Rai Dheewar, one of the member of Panj Pyare, the five associates of Guru Govind Singh.

These legends were popularised by the Arya Samajists too who wanted to bring more and more castes within Brahmanical fold. The caste histories connected them to Rama through Nishadraj and popularised various Brahmanical rituals among them to form a meta Puranic Hindu identity.[4] Some of the Mallaah also worship Gauriya Baba, a folk hero who according to popular belief primarily belonged to the Dusadh caste but protected the people from Mallaah, Dhanuk and even Rajput caste from the Mughal onslaught and forcible conversions. According to the beliefs he used to bury a pig's head in front of his house which was situated at the entry of the village. Since the pig were anathema for the Muslims, they did not dare to enter these villages. He also rode up and down at the entry of his village and fought Mughal soldiers. Consequently, some of the Mallaahs started worshipping him as their family god.[5]

Classification as Criminal Tribe

[edit]
See also: Criminal Tribes Act

The association with the term Nishad had a positive connotation for various boatmen and fishermen caste who attempted to get registered as Nishad in 1921 census. This Sanskritizing attempt could not rule out the criminal reputation of Mallaah and other water centric communities which formed the basis for classification in colonial census. The British authorities developed two sets of rule or categories to classify various caste groups, first being those of martial race and other one being Criminal Tribes Act. According to Metcalf, the census exercise further rigidified the caste status and caste mobility was made unchangeable. The classification of some of the low caste (who were considered as uncivil) in one of the aforementioned category could lead to exclusion of whole community from government jobs including military, police and administrative services. In census 1931, Mallaah and its subcaste were tabulated as recalcitrant and people in need of domestication. The diverse occupations of the sub-castes of Nishad community were standardized and they were perceived as people thriving on boating and fishing only.[6]

The process of equating caste with occupation was though considered as misleading now, as by the late 19th century the Mallaah and its sub-castes were moving towards cities and were getting employed as labourers in the burgeoning weaving industry. But, this distinction between caste and occupation hardly changed the stance of the authorities, for whom Mallaah were already perceived as criminals.[6] According to Bernstein who documented the introduction of steamboat on the Ganges, the control of river's navigational route was very important for the British colonizers for transport of raw materials and revenue proceeds from the countrysides to urban centres. The classification as Criminal Tribes helped them to track the movement of these boatmen who were made to produce a detail of their caste, patrilineal descent, and residence or else were made to pay fine.[7]

For the purpose of having a seamless river transport system to fulfill their commercial motives, the British recruited a number of boatman who were placed at important spots along the rivers. This policy had both social and economic implication for the Nishad community members who would leave their homes for long period of time to work under East India Company as wage labourers, transporting their riches.[7]

Retriever of corpses

[edit]

Mallaah all across Ganges are known for their capabilities of diving deep underwater for an extended period of time. This ability is used up by the regional authorities of many river front cities who use them as retriever of corpses. The unique capability to hold the breath for a long period of time in search of coins inside the rivers (throwing coin in river is considered as a popular belief in Hinduism) makes them capable to perform this arduous task perfectly. The "diving for coins" is not considered as legal occupation by the states which leads to harassment of people involved in it by the authorities. As a response to it at many places like Raj Ghat in Varanasi the "coin divers" have set up formal association with organizational structure to protect themselves from being harassed. The underwater capabilities of these people are often used in dangerous resque missions. The Mallaah also prefer Alcoholism which they claim as the best way to keep their body temperature stable inside the water and keeping themselves psychologically prepared for the extreme situations.[8]

Changing colonial perception

[edit]
Mallaah people in a local fish market (Bihar) 2020

In the recent years, due to frequent contact with the politicians and journalists, the boatmen community has increasingly become aware of the problem of river pollution and challenges to biodiversity of the Ganges due to contamination by point and non point sources. Various organizations affiliated with the Nishad community are now engaged in awareness generation for the conservation of riverine ecosystem. The organisation such as Rashtriya Nishad Jagran Mahasabha have released pamphlets declaring the Nishad community as the protector of sacred water bodies. These magazines and pamphlets have helped to arise consciousness among the water centric communities to come forward for the cause of environment by invoking caste solidarity. The slogans raised by these caste associations like:

Maa Ganga Ki sewa ab Mallah krega (Mallaah will perform the service for mother Ganga)

and increased collaboration with the state for river cleansing projects with devotive motives have challenged the James Scott's notion of "public transcript". At one end the boatmen comply with the things to ensure how the dominant groups would want the things to appear, at the other hand they are also rising voices of resistance without being branded as violators of law.[9]

In the period of passive egalitarianism

[edit]

In the 1990s, with the rise of Lalu Prasad Yadav in Bihar, de-elitizing of politics took place which made it an affair of masses, specially the lower castes. The crime and politics went hand in hand during this period, because in order to gain the support of his backward caste followers, Lalu did not hesitated in extending supports to OBCs, even if they went against law. This period witnessed the least number of police firing and public-police clash. In those circumstances the Bind, one of the community which are part of larger Nishad community and Yadavs turned several areas of Bihar into their crime capitals. They replaced the upper caste gangsters in high value organized crimes like automobile theft, Timber logging, Kidnapping, smuggling and contract killing. The strategic use of violence by the OBCs, and illegality along with patronage to criminals in politics broke upper caste dominance not only in politics but also in day-to-day affairs of the lower castes. The middle class, the upper caste criticised the breaking down of the tradition of liberal democracy while the OBCs supported the status-quo as the erstwhile system did not ensure them freedom and dignity even after four decades of independence.[10]

Identity politics in Uttar Pradesh

[edit]

By 1990, many political parties of Uttar Pradesh started supporting the campaign of Nishad community to commemorate their ideals like Nishadraj and Eklavya. These small organisation organized Shobha Yatras and also built small statues of their folk heroes in parts of Uttar Pradesh. The legend of Nishadraj was manipulated more proactively by the Bharatiya Janata Party which urged the Nishads as the rightful heir of the Nishadraj to ferry the BJP in the elections as did Nishadraj for lord Rama. The BJP according to social historian Badri Narayan connected Rama to Nishadraj because the party chose Rama as its icon and Nishadraj could be easily associated with him which could have reaped the votes of large community comprising numerous sub-castes of this water centric community.[11]

The other political parties also stepped into this fray and chose the other heroes who symbolised the victory of lower castes on the upper castes to manipulate the votes of Nishads. The Samajwadi Party which relied upon the votes of middle peasant castes like Yadavs and Patels found the one in Phoolan Devi, a bandit who had been symbolised as the might of the downtrodden people over the upper castes. Phoolan who was raped by the other bandits belonging to the Thakur caste perpetrated the Behmai massacre in retaliation. After she surrendered, the state government under Mulayam Singh Yadav ensured her release and also gave her ticket from the Mirzapur constituency as the Samajwadi Party candidate. This made a section of Nishad obliged to SP, who voted for it.[11]

The Bahujan Samaj Party which symbolised the Dalits, thus started associating itself with Eklavya, another folk hero of the community who being highly talented was discriminated by a Brahmin guru. Since the BJP was looked upon as the party of upper castes, BSP got a counter to the Nishadraj Guhya and to the BJP. During the tenure of Mayawati a stadium was built at Agra, which was named after Eklavya while the local committees of her party also erected numerous statues of Eklavya in various parts of the Uttar Pradesh. Despite the attempts of the political parties whose core base remained the "lower caste ", BJP also remained successful in getting support from a large chunk of Nishad community who were successfully exhorted by the party in the name of Rama. It was reported that when Mulayam Singh Yadav government stopped the volunteers of the Ram Temple movement from reaching Agra through the land route, Nishads were compelled to transport as many as 50,000 volunteers through river route across Ghaghara. The BJP also harnessed the service of 50,000 Nishads who went to Ayodhya as volunteers to participate in Ram Temple movement.[11]

[edit]

In 2020 "Nishad", a character in the movie Article 15 was played by Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub which was said to be inspired by the founder of Bhim Army, Chandrashekhar Azad Ravan. The said character was portrayed fighting for the rights of Dalits through an organisation called Bhim Sangharsh Samiti.[12][13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nishad

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Nishad are a Hindu predominantly residing in the Indian states of and , traditionally occupied in river-based livelihoods such as , boating, ferrying passengers, and .
Their historical antecedents trace to the , ancient tribal groups referenced in Hindu epics including the , where a Nishad boatman aided in crossing the , and the , depicting them as forest-dwelling hunters and fishermen often allied with or in conflict with kingdoms.
Comprising around 22 sub-castes in , where they form approximately 8 percent of the population, and recognized under 17 OBC groupings in , the Nishad have experienced socio-economic disadvantage stemming from their dependence on depleting river resources and exclusion from land-based agriculture.
In recent decades, the community has mobilized politically, shifting allegiances between alliances like the NDA and bloc while demanding reclassification from OBC to Scheduled Caste status for enhanced quotas, highlighting persistent causal factors of occupational precarity and limited upward mobility despite electoral leverage in Gangetic regions.

Origins and Early History

Mythological Associations

In the , the are portrayed as a tribal group inhabiting forested regions along riverbanks, with Guha identified as their king ruling from Śṛṅgiverapura. Guha demonstrates loyalty to during the prince's by providing boats to ferry , , and across the , while also offering provisions and intelligence on potential threats from Bharata's pursuing army. This episode, detailed in the Ayodhya Kanda, positions the Nishadas as skilled boatmen and hunters capable of mobilizing for defense, reflecting their ecological adaptation to riverine and woodland environments. The features as a Nishada prince, son of the Hiranyadhanu, who achieves exceptional proficiency through self-instruction by venerating a clay image of Dronacharya. Denied formal training due to his tribal status, offers his right thumb as guru dakshina upon Drona's demand, ensuring Arjuna's unrivaled skill while symbolizing themes of dedication amid . Later texts extend 's narrative to his role as a warrior allied with the Kauravas, where he engages the in battle until felled by Krishna. Contemporary Nishad communities invoke these epic figures—Guha for fraternity across varna lines and for martial prowess—to assert ancient precedence and cultural resilience, often erecting memorials that link their fishing and boating traditions to these archetypes. Such associations, rooted in Vedic-era classifications of as mleccha or frontier dwellers, persist in caste journals and oral histories emphasizing pre-Aryan indigeneity, though epic texts treat them variably as autonomous kingdoms rather than strictly servile groups.

Pre-Colonial Occupations and Social Role

In ancient India, the Nishada tribes, from which modern Nishad communities trace their ethnonym, inhabited forested and riverine areas, engaging primarily in hunting, fishing, and rudimentary boating as means of sustenance. These groups were described in Vedic and epic literature as non-Aryan or tribal peoples, often dwelling in hills and forests, with occupations centered on exploiting natural resources like birds, fish, and aquatic life. Literary depictions, such as in the , portray Nishad chieftains like Guha (Nishadraj), king of the Kevati region on the Ganga's banks, as adept boatmen who facilitated river crossings for travelers, including the exiled , , and . Guha's role extended beyond mere ferrying to offering and , illustrating the strategic social utility of Nishad leaders in pre-urban, river-dependent societies. This narrative underscores their position as allies to figures despite tribal origins, blending practical skills with demonstrations of loyalty and bravery. Through the medieval period up to early modern times, Nishad and related communities like Mallah maintained water-centric livelihoods, serving as essential boatmen for , pilgrimage, and troop movements along rivers such as the Ganga and . Their expertise in supported the agrarian economy of the Gangetic plains, enabling the transport of goods, passengers, and even royal processions, though they remained tied to seasonal and environmentally vulnerable occupations. Socially, Nishads occupied a subordinate status within the varna system, often classified as or mixed castes arising from inter-varna unions, such as between Shudra males and females, which relegated them to service roles deemed impure or manual. Despite this marginalization, their indispensability in riverine afforded some and occasional through service to rulers, as evidenced by epic kingships and practical necessities in pre-colonial hydrology-dependent kingdoms. However, rigid hierarchies limited upward mobility, confining most to hereditary trades amid broader societal stratification.

Colonial Encounters

Initial British Perceptions

During the establishment of British control in eastern following the in 1757, Company officials quickly identified boatmen from communities later encompassed under the Nishad or Mallah rubric as essential intermediaries for navigating the river system, which served as the primary artery for commerce and until railway expansion in the mid-19th century. These groups, numbering in the tens of thousands, operated under ad hoc contracts to ferry revenue-generating goods like , salt, and , with records from the in the 1770s-1790s highlighting their role in sustaining an estimated 80-90% of internal trade volume by water. British administrators, such as collectors in and districts, perceived them as robust and adept seafarers indispensable to revenue collection, yet prone to opportunistic pricing and collective withholdings during monsoons or famines, prompting early regulatory attempts like fixed rate schedules in 1793 to curb perceived unreliability. Ethnographic surveys in the early 19th century, including those by revenue officers in the , depicted Mallah boatmen as occupational specialists of status, residing in semi-nomadic hamlets along riverbanks and supplementing ferrying with using rudimentary nets and coracles. They were noted for physical resilience—capable of poling heavy barges upstream against currents—but also for cultural practices like clan-based and rituals invoking river deities, which colonial observers interpreted as superstitious vestiges hindering modernization. By the 1830s-1840s, as permanent settlements expanded under the of 1793, perceptions shifted slightly toward viewing their riverine lifestyle as obstructive to fixed land revenue systems, with some district reports associating scattered Mallah groups with petty theft or evasion of tolls, foreshadowing later criminal categorizations without yet formalizing them as inherently predatory. These initial encounters, documented in administrative dispatches rather than systematic censuses, treated the communities primarily through a utilitarian lens—valuable for their specialized knowledge of seasonal floods and shoals, yet emblematic of the "disorderly" indigenous requiring oversight—rather than as a rigidly bounded , a conceptualization that solidified only post-1871 with ethnographic codification. Sources like early gazetteers emphasized their diversity across sub-groups (e.g., in , Bind in ), reflecting localized alliances rather than unified identity, though British reliance bred mutual interdependence, as boatmen leveraged scarcity to negotiate terms amid expanding colonial trade demands.

Criminal Tribes Act Classification (1871-1947)

The empowered British colonial authorities to designate specific communities as "criminal tribes" based on perceptions of inherent criminal propensity, mandating their registration, , and restrictions on movement to prevent supposed hereditary offenses such as and . Communities linked to the Nishad, particularly the Mallah (boatmen and fishermen), , and sub-groups prevalent in northern , were notified under this legislation due to their semi-nomadic lifestyles along rivers, which officials viewed as facilitating smuggling, dacoity, or support for anti-colonial rebels. By 1872, the Mallah caste was explicitly added to the list of criminal tribes in regions like the (present-day ), reflecting colonial anxieties over their mobility and access to waterways rather than comprehensive empirical evidence of disproportionate criminality. This classification imposed stringent controls, including mandatory police roll calls, settlement in designated villages, and prohibitions on leaving habitual residences without permission, severely disrupting traditional occupations like and ferrying that defined Nishad livelihoods. Amendments in 1876 and 1911 expanded the Act's scope, incorporating more sub-castes and justifying measures through flawed ethnographic surveys that conflated and occupational nomadism with innate criminality, a notion influenced by contemporaneous pseudoscientific theories but lacking rigorous causal data on offense rates. For instance, Mallah communities in and faced routine harassment, with colonial records documenting over 127 tribes notified by 1908, including riverine groups suspected of aiding 1857 Mutiny remnants. The Act's application persisted until India's independence in , entrenching that persisted beyond formal repeal, as affected groups comprised part of the 127 notified tribes totaling around 13 million people by the 1940s. Critiques from within the colonial administration, such as those in the by Indian reformers, highlighted the Act's ineffectiveness in reducing crime—official statistics showed no significant decline in offenses attributable to notified tribes—yet enforcement continued, prioritizing administrative control over evidence-based policing. For Nishad-related communities, this era solidified a narrative of inherent unreliability, with ethnographic classifications in censuses from onward reinforcing their grouping as "wandering" or "vagabond" castes, despite primary occupations being legitimate riverine trades essential to regional economies. The policy's legacy included economic marginalization, as restrictions limited access to fishing grounds and markets, contributing to cycles of poverty that colonial reports themselves linked more to systemic exclusion than predisposition.

Post-Independence Trajectory

Denotification and Rehabilitation (1947-1952)

Following 's independence on August 15, 1947, the interim government began reviewing colonial-era laws, including the of 1871, which had classified communities like the Mallah (a key sub-group within the Nishad) as inherent criminals subject to mandatory registration, surveillance, and settlement. The process accelerated with the formation of the Criminal Tribes Enquiry Committee in 1949, which investigated the Act's impacts and recommended its repeal to end . This led to the Act's formal repeal in August 1949, initially denotifying communities in provinces like Madras, and progressively across , decriminalizing approximately 2.3 million individuals from over 120 tribes. By 1950, the committee's report emphasized rehabilitation over punitive measures, advocating for land grants, vocational training, and integration into mainstream society to address generational disenfranchisement. For the Nishad, whose riverine occupations as boatmen and fishermen had been stigmatized under the Act, denotification theoretically removed restrictions on movement and residence, allowing potential shifts from reformatory settlements to self-sustained livelihoods. However, implementation varied by region; in and —core Nishad areas—colonial-era settlements persisted into the early 1950s, with limited new resources allocated for economic upliftment amid post-Partition priorities. Full denotification culminated on August 31, 1952, when the government lifted lifelong police oversight from the remaining "criminal tribes," including Nishad sub-groups like Mallah and Kewat. Yet, this reform was tempered by the introduction of the Habitual Offenders Act in 1952, which shifted focus to individual recidivism but retained provisions for surveillance of those with prior convictions, effectively perpetuating suspicion toward denotified groups. Empirical data from the period indicate a surge in reported crimes attributed to denotified tribes, prompting public and official concerns over inadequate rehabilitation; for instance, without sustained land reforms or skill programs, many Nishad families remained tied to precarious fishing and ferrying, exacerbating poverty and social exclusion. Rehabilitation outcomes for the Nishad were marginal, as state efforts prioritized urban refugees over rural castes, leaving systemic barriers intact—such as restricted access to and credit—that hindered transition from stigmatized trades. By 1952, while legal bondage ended, the inherited criminal label fostered ongoing , with police manuals in some regions continuing to reference community profiles, underscoring the limits of denotification without broader socio-economic interventions.

Consolidation of Collective Identity (1950s-1990s)

Following denotification under the in 1947-1952, the Nishad community—encompassing sub-castes such as Mallah, , , and others traditionally linked to , , and riverine livelihoods—initiated organized efforts to unify fragmented identities and rehabilitate social standing. associations, building on pre-independence foundations, played a central role; the All India Nishad Mahasabha, active since the 1920s, convened the Kashyap Dheewar Milan Nishad Sammelan in 1952 at Rajghat, , to promote inter-sub-caste solidarity and address post-colonial marginalization. Similar gatherings in 1956 further emphasized collective grievances, including economic displacement from dam constructions and irrigation projects that disrupted traditional occupations. These initiatives drew on sanskritization strategies to elevate ritual status, with community leaders invoking mythological narratives from the , such as the alliance between Lord Rama and Nishadraj (King Guha), a ferryman ruler portrayed as a loyal ally and symbol of martial virtue. This reframing countered lingering colonial-era criminal associations by asserting ancient Kshatriya-like heritage, evidenced in sabha s and conferences that disseminated vanshavalis (genealogical texts) tracing descent from Vedic-era water guardians. Sub-caste unification accelerated in the 1960s-1970s amid and mechanization, which marginalized manual ferrying; associations like regional Nishad Sabhas advocated for shared symbols, including Ganga worship and boatman iconography, to foster pan-Nishad consciousness in and . By the 1980s, rising literacy rates—reaching approximately 20-30% among Nishads in eastern Uttar Pradesh by 1991 census data—and exposure to broader Bahujan movements amplified these efforts, leading to demands for aggregated OBC classification rather than disparate listings. Political engagement intensified, with sabhas petitioning for recognition of Nishad as a unified category, culminating in the 1990s when parties in Uttar Pradesh began endorsing cultural campaigns honoring figures like Eklavya, a Nishad archer from the Mahabharata, to symbolize resilience against upper-caste dominance. This period marked a shift from fragmented sub-caste loyalties to a cohesive identity, though internal divisions persisted over resource allocation and leadership.

Demographic and Socio-Economic Realities

Population Distribution and Sub-Castes

The Nishad community is primarily concentrated in the northern Indian states of and , particularly in riverine and floodplain regions such as the Gangetic plains, where traditional livelihoods tied to water bodies have shaped settlement patterns. In , the community forms a significant portion of the Other Backward Classes (OBC), estimated at 12-18% of the OBC , which itself comprises roughly half of the state's total populace based on prior surveys. In , Nishad-related groups account for approximately 9-12% of the state's , classified under Extremely Backward Classes (EBC) in the 2023 caste census data, with higher densities in eastern districts like those along the and its tributaries. Smaller populations exist in neighboring states like and , but these lack the electoral and demographic heft seen in the core regions. The Nishad designation functions as an umbrella identity uniting diverse sub-castes, many of which were historically linked to , ferrying, and allied occupations but have diversified into and labor. Key sub-castes include Mallah (the largest group, often synonymous with Nishad in ), , , Kashyap, Manjhi, Turha, Batham, , Noniya, and Raikwar, with regional variations yielding 17-22 recognized subgroups in and up to 22 in . These divisions reflect endogamous practices and localized occupational specializations, such as the 's focus on or the 's on nets, though inter-sub-caste marriages have increased amid identity consolidation efforts since the . Some sub-castes, like certain Mallah subgroups, hold (SC) status in specific districts, while most remain OBC or EBC, fueling ongoing demands for uniform classification.

Traditional and Modern Occupations

The Nishad community, primarily residing in the riverine regions of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, has historically derived its livelihood from water-centric occupations such as fishing, boating, and ferrying passengers across rivers like the Ganges. These activities, often viewed as a sacred duty linked to mythological associations with the river, formed the core of their economic and social roles in pre-colonial and colonial eras. Sub-castes within the Nishad umbrella, including Mallah and related groups, also engaged in sand dredging and riverbank-related manual tasks, reinforcing their dependence on fluvial ecosystems. In contemporary settings, traditional pursuits persist but face challenges from environmental degradation, modernization of transport, and river pollution, leading to a decline in viability for full-time engagement. Many Nishads supplement or shift to small-scale agriculture, daily-wage labor in sand mining, and manual unskilled work in rural areas. Urban migration has increased, with community members taking up low-skill jobs such as construction labor or petty vending. Among younger generations, particularly in pilgrimage sites like the Kumbh Mela, occupations include driving e-rickshaws, selling bottled Ganga water, snacks, and trinkets, reflecting adaptive diversification amid persistent socio-economic marginalization. Government initiatives, such as the Uttar Pradesh Nishadraj Boat Subsidy Yojana launched to support 17 sub-castes in acquiring boats and nets, aim to sustain fishing-based livelihoods. Overall, the community's employment remains characterized by low literacy and economic vulnerability, with limited upward mobility despite numerical significance in states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

Political Mobilization

Rise in Uttar Pradesh Politics

The formation of the in 2016 by marked a pivotal step in the political assertion of the Nishad community in , aiming to consolidate the votes of riverine occupational castes such as Mallah, Kevat, and others previously fragmented across sub-castes. This party emerged amid growing demands for enhanced representation, building on earlier sporadic mobilizations, including the Samajwadi Party's elevation of figures like , a Mallah community member elected to Parliament from in 1996 and 1999. The community's estimated 4.3% share of 's population, concentrated in eastern riverine belts, positions it as a swing factor in approximately 37 assembly constituencies, particularly in divisions like , , and . In 2019, the allied with the Bharatiya Janata Party-led ahead of the elections, with the BJP committing to pursue Scheduled Caste status for 17 Nishad sub-castes then classified under Other Backward Classes. This partnership yielded initial gains, including cabinet positions for as for Fisheries and Animal Husbandry following the 2021 portfolio allocations. The alliance deepened during the 2022 elections, where the contested 10 seats and secured victories in 6, with 5 of those on the BJP symbol, contributing to the NDA's consolidation of OBC votes in central and eastern . These outcomes elevated Nishad representation in the state assembly and executive, exemplified by 's promotion to full cabinet minister for fisheries in subsequent years. Central to this rise have been persistent demands for reclassification from OBC to SC status, citing historical stigmatization under the and economic marginalization in fishing and boating occupations, alongside control over river resources like . Political strategies by major parties have intensified competition for Nishad support, with the BJP organizing "Kamal Nauka" boat rallies to highlight welfare schemes, the employing its PDA (Pichhda, Dalit, Alpsankhyak) formula to field Nishad candidates, and the initiating "Nadi Adhikar Yatra" marches for river rights. However, unfulfilled promises on reservations have strained alliances, as seen in the NISHAD Party's threats to reassess ties ahead of 2027 elections and partial vote shifts to the bloc during the 2024 polls, where Nishad-backed candidates like those from the won seats such as Sant Kabir Nagar.

Key Organizations and Alliances

The , led by , emerged as the primary political vehicle for Nishad community interests in , targeting empowerment of riverine groups including Mallahs, Kewats, and Binds through advocacy for Scheduled Caste status and fisheries development. The party allied with the in the framework, with formal seat-sharing agreements announced on September 24, 2021, ahead of the 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly elections, enabling contests in 12-15 seats across eastern 's 37 Nishad-influenced constituencies. This partnership, rooted in mutual electoral benefits and shared orientation, positioned the as a junior ally contributing to NDA victories in regions like , where Nishads form 5-10% of voters in key assembly segments. Sanjay Nishad's appointment as Minister of Fisheries in March 2017, later expanded to include and Environment portfolios by 2021, exemplified the alliance's tangible gains, facilitating policies like boat registration reforms and fish farmer subsidies aimed at community upliftment. Tensions within the alliance surfaced by mid-2025, as evidenced by Sanjay Nishad's calls for assembly protests over unfulfilled promises like SC inclusion, alongside intra-NDA rivalries with figures like Jai Prakash Nishad, a former BJP MP claiming stronger community ties. Despite such frictions, the retained its NDA affiliation for the 2024 polls, underscoring its role in consolidating Nishad votes against opposition fragmentation. In , parallel mobilization occurred through the (VIP), established in 2015 by to represent Mallah-Nishad interests, which allied variably with NDA before shifting toward the bloc by 2024, reflecting distinct regional dynamics from Uttar Pradesh's BJP-centric integration. Grassroots entities like youth support groups have supplemented these parties by amplifying demands for reclassification, though they lack the electoral infrastructure of formal outfits.

Controversies and Debates

The Mallah community, closely associated with the Nishad identity as traditional boatmen and fishermen along the , was designated a criminal tribe under the British of 1871, which branded over 200 communities as inherently predisposed to habitual crime based on colonial administrative needs to surveil mobile populations resistant to settled governance. This classification imposed mandatory police registration, movement restrictions, and surveillance, with penalties such as up to three years' imprisonment for non-compliance, often justified by sparse incidents like isolated acts of riverine rather than of community-wide criminality. By 1872, the Mallah caste was explicitly added to the registry of "well-known criminal tribes" in the United Provinces, reflecting a rooted in their nomadic river lifestyles that evaded colonial revenue collection and policing, rather than verified patterns of offense. Post-independence, the Act was repealed in 1949 and communities denotified by 1952, reclassifying groups like the Nishad and related Mallah subgroups as non-criminal, though the stigma endured in social perceptions and administrative biases, contributing to ongoing marginalization in and . This historical labeling has been critiqued as a mechanism of colonial control over subaltern groups, with limited pre-1871 documentation of systemic criminality, and its legacy manifests in persistent that hinders access to , , and . In modern contexts, while no comprehensive data indicates disproportionate criminality among Nishads attributable to inherent traits, economic pressures from declining traditional occupations—such as restricted fishing due to environmental regulations—have drawn some members into illicit riverine activities, notably illegal sand dredging and mining in Uttar Pradesh, where high demand for construction aggregates fuels a shadow economy estimated to evade billions in revenue annually. Nishad boatmen, leveraging their expertise in Ganges navigation, often participate as small-scale operators in this trade, leading to frequent clashes with authorities during crackdowns; for instance, in 2021 Prayagraj enforcement actions, police targeted Nishad vessels, resulting in reported beatings and boat damage, exacerbating community grievances against perceived selective policing favoring larger mining syndicates. Such involvement stems from socio-economic desperation, with rural Nishads facing landlessness and migration for wage labor, rather than cultural continuity from colonial stereotypes, as evidenced by inter-community resource conflicts over scarce river access rather than organized crime. Political mobilization, including demands for regulated access to sand mining and fishing rights, reflects efforts to decouple economic survival from criminalization. Isolated high-profile cases, such as convictions of individual Nishads for unrelated violent crimes, do not substantiate broader community patterns and often highlight investigative flaws or poverty-driven offenses.

Reservation Claims: SC Status Demands and Rationales

The Nishad community, encompassing sub-castes such as Mallah, , Majhwar, and , primarily in , has persistently demanded inclusion in the Scheduled Castes (SC) category since the early 2010s, seeking enhanced reservation benefits beyond their current Other Backward Classes (OBC) classification. Proponents argue that OBC quotas, which constitute about 27% of seats in but are divided among numerous castes, fail to deliver proportional gains due to intra-category competition and the exclusion criterion, which disqualifies relatively affluent OBC members from benefits—unlike SC reservations, which apply without such cutoffs and allocate 21% of quotas exclusively. This push gained momentum through the , founded in 2016, which organized events like the January 13 "Sankalp Diwas" for annual reaffirmation of the demand and a 2023 statewide to collect signatures for submission to the . Rationales for SC status center on empirical indicators of extreme backwardness, including high rates, limited , and reliance on precarious riverine livelihoods like and , which expose the community to seasonal income volatility, of rivers, and from occupations associated with impurity in traditional Hindu hierarchies. Community leaders, including Uttar Pradesh Cabinet Minister , cite data from rural surveys showing disproportionate underrepresentation in government jobs and higher education despite OBC provisions, attributing this to inadequate in settlements and historical neglect by state policies favoring agrarian castes. In , where some Nishad sub-groups are classified as Most Backward Classes within OBC, similar grievances of state neglect and violence against marginalized riverine groups underscore the claim that SC designation would enable targeted akin to that for castes historically subjected to , though without direct evidence of such practices against Nishads. These demands have faced legal rebuffs, as SC lists are defined by presidential orders under Article 341 of the , requiring proof of historical rather than mere backwardness, which qualifies castes for OBC status. In September 2022, the invalidated a government directive from June 2022 to issue SC certificates to 17 OBC sub-castes, including Nishad-linked groups like Mallah and , ruling it unconstitutional as states cannot unilaterally alter central SC notifications. Despite alliances with the BJP, as evidenced by Sanjay Nishad's July 2025 warning of electoral repercussions in 2027 polls absent fulfillment, no central inclusion has occurred, with demands persisting amid claims of vote shifts in the 2024 elections due to unaddressed grievances.

Cultural and Symbolic Dimensions

In Folklore and Media

In Hindu folklore, the Nishad are prominently featured in the Ramayana as the tribal kingdom ruled by Guha, also known as Nishadraj, who ferried Rama, Sita, and Lakshmana across the Ganges during their exile from Ayodhya, exemplifying loyalty, hospitality, and martial vigilance against potential threats. In the original Valmiki Ramayana, Guha holds the status of a sovereign king of the Nishada people—described as forest-dwelling hunters, fishermen, and boatmen—rather than a mere low-status ferryman, a distinction often overlooked in later retellings that impose varna hierarchies absent from the text. The Nishadas symbolize ideals of bravery, cooperation, and riverine prowess across epics, with figures like Ekalavya, a Nishada prince and archer in the Mahabharata, representing exceptional skill and resilience despite social marginalization. Nishad lore also ties to the epic's genesis, as the community's traditional bird-hunting practices are held in some traditions to have indirectly inspired Valmiki's composition of the , when he witnessed a hunter felling a krauncha , evoking his first of grief. Local oral traditions among riverine communities further portray Nishads as custodians of sacred waters, integral to festivals like the , where their ancestral roles in boating pilgrims and fishing sustain mythological narratives of divine origins and ecological harmony. These depictions underscore causal ties between their occupational ecology—tied to rivers like the —and cultural symbolism of service, survival, and symbiosis with nature. In media adaptations, Nishad figures appear primarily through Ramayana retellings, such as television serials that dramatize Guha's alliance with to emphasize themes of cross-varna devotion, though some productions controversially recast him as a or untouchable to align with modern interpretations, diverging from the epic's portrayal of tribal . Feature films and documentaries on the community are rare, with representations often subsumed under broader Mallah or archetypes in regional cinema, focusing on socio-economic struggles rather than ; for instance, political narratives invoking Nishadraj's legacy have been used by community leaders in to frame identity, but without dedicated cinematic vehicles. Contemporary media, including coverage of Kumbh events, occasionally highlights Nishad traditions, portraying their decline in traditional roles amid modernization, yet preserving mythological motifs of resilience.

Contemporary Symbolism

The Nishad community, traditionally linked to riverine occupations, employs the as a prominent political symbol in contemporary , reflecting their historical role in and ; parties such as the Nirbal Indian Shoshit Hamara Aam Dal (), founded in 2016, and the Vanchit Vikas aur Vikash Party (VVIP), allotted a ship symbol in 2025, use these icons to represent water-centric identities and mobilize voters in and . This symbolism underscores efforts to consolidate sub-castes like Mallah and Nishad under a unified OBC banner for reservation demands, often contrasting with (machhli) motifs in Bihar's electoral rhetoric that evoke community pride and economic stakes. Mythical ties to Nishadraj Guh, the legendary ally of Lord in the , have been revived as a symbol of loyalty and cultural integration in modern Hindu nationalist narratives; a statue in depicting Guh embracing Rama, erected in recent decades, serves as a focal point for political rallies and identity assertion amid reservation agitations. This reclamation counters historical marginalization, positioning Nishads as integral to epic heritage rather than mere service providers. Phoolan Devi, the Nishad-born dacoit-turned-MP assassinated in 2001, endures as an emblem of subaltern defiance and empowerment, frequently invoked in party propaganda and media covers—such as those in Nishad Jyothi featuring her alongside boat imagery—to rally against perceived caste injustices, though her legacy sparks debate over glorification of criminality versus resistance symbolism. In urban spaces like Banaras ghats, Nishad labor and presence symbolize the production of sacred riverine landscapes, blending traditional materiality with modern claims to spatial and cultural authority.

References

  1. https://indianexpress.com/article/research/from-margins-to-political-mobilisation-the-story-of-the-nishad-community-10092119/
  2. https://www.studyiq.com/articles/politics-of-nishad-community/
  3. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/17432/in
  4. https://abknamindia.cfsites.org/custom.php?pageid=33249
  5. https://www.theindiaforum.in/article/making-vip-understanding-small-caste-based-parties-india
  6. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/varanasi/bjp-will-win-2027-polls-if-it-acts-on-sc-quota-for-nishads/articleshow/117002800.cms
  7. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/on-the-politics-of-the-nishad-community-explained/article68407882.ece
  8. https://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/ayodhya/sarga84/ayodhya_84_prose.htm
  9. https://abhipedia.abhimanu.com/Article/State/MTMyNjg0/Nishada-Kingdom--Madhya-Pradesh-State
  10. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/ekalavya
  11. https://storiesofindiaretold.com/stories-from-mahabharata/ekalavya-life-and-death-of-the-prince-of-nishadas/
  12. https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/nishada
  13. https://blog.sagarworld.com/itihaas/ramayan/nishadraj-guha-king-of-tribals/
  14. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/the-vantage-viewpoint/sabari-guha-and-hanuman-reigniting-indias-adivasi-discourse/
  15. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/nishada
  16. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/21344/IN
  17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26394709
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/F839EA9C4FFBB04A9DC2F6A9145CD0E8/S002085901400039Xa.pdf/contract_work_and_resistance_boatmen_in_early_colonial_eastern_india_1760s1850s.pdf
  19. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.149957
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249765221_Caste_and_the_colonial_state_Mallahs_in_the_census
  21. https://www.academia.edu/61403559/Caste_and_the_Colonial_State_Mallahs_In_the_Census
  22. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/74620/pg74620-images.html
  23. https://countercurrents.org/2024/02/criminal-tribes-act-1871-denying-dignity-to-anti-british-rebels/
  24. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/006996670103500302
  25. https://www.epw.in/engage/article/criminalisation-and-political-mobilisation-nomadic
  26. https://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2504287.pdf
  27. https://countercurrents.org/2020/12/denotified-and-nomadic-tribes/
  28. https://www.nytimes.com/1952/09/01/archives/india-frees-criminal-tribes-of-lifelong-control-by-police-2500000.html
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5414894/
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231853658_Caste_Away_Subaltern_Engagement_with_the_Modern_Indian_State
  31. https://vishnuias.com/denotified_68_years_ago_criminal_tribes_still_fight_stigma_poverty/
  32. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/fascinating-hindutva/chpt/legend-war-mapping-political-mobilisation-the-nishads
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/caste-away-subaltern-engagement-with-the-modern-indian-state/7534731ADB82A9C3C4AD3F17D23F578E
  34. https://www.academia.edu/129789152/Nishads_in_Indian_Democracy_and_Their_Political_Aspirations
  35. https://www.academia.edu/42643705/Caste_and_the_colonial_state_Mallahs_in_the_census_Acknowledgements_The_author_warmly_thanks
  36. https://www.bhaskarenglish.in/bihar-election/news/vikassheel-party-chief-mukesh-sahani-interview-bihar-elections-party-will-support-nda-targets-nishad-reservation-135899956.html
  37. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/bjp-ally-nishad-party-seeks-caste-census-in-state/articleshow/104202064.cms
  38. https://www.ijaresm.com/an-ethnographic-study-on-the-nishad-community-of-prayagraj-district-in-uttar-pradesh
  39. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/print/17624/IN
  40. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/once-nishads-told-stories-about-kumbh-today-kumbh-tells-a-story-about-their-decline-9829654/
  41. https://www.nitiforstates.gov.in/policy-viewer?id=SSSNAA000614
  42. https://www.indiatoday.in/india-today-insight/story/why-nishad-party-has-joined-bjps-list-of-uneasy-allies-in-up-2753219-2025-07-09
  43. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/others/nishads-key-players-as-riversutra-flows-through-u-p-s-poll-terrain-101716401756280.html
  44. https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/up-2022-bjp-announces-alliance-with-nishad-party
  45. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/bjp-nishad-party-are-natural-allies-cemented-by-shared-hindutva/article65024540.ece
  46. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/lok-sabha-elections-2019/uttar-pradesh/how-nishads-banded-together-to-find-a-political-foothold-in-east-up/articleshow/69366083.cms
  47. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/electorally-relevant-nishad-community-demand-inclusion-in-sc-category-101706606906060.html
  48. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/bjp-uttar-pradesh-allies-backward-classes-nda-meetinh-delhi-10203959/
  49. https://theprint.in/politics/its-nishad-vs-nishad-in-nda-as-bjp-ally-former-mp-battle-to-represent-key-up-community/1682816/
  50. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00699659231205438
  51. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/crackdown-against-illegal-sand-mining-priyanka-to-meet-boatmen-beaten-by-cops/articleshow/81129266.cms
  52. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/up-day-after-police-action-against-sand-mining-locals-target-two-nishad-leaders-7177920/
  53. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/up-court-sentences-trader-death-rape-murder-minor-rarest-of-rare-case-10239369/
  54. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/in-run-up-to-2024-polls-bjp-ally-raises-sc-status-demand-launches-yatra-101697388045874.html
  55. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/sanjay-nishad-sc-quota-bjp-up-assembly-polls-10112415/
  56. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/seeking-sc-reservation-nishads-demand-their-pound-of-flesh-from-bjp/article67443247.ece
  57. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/nishad-party-to-commemorate-kasarwal-andolan-which-helped-it-gain-relevance/articleshow/121683756.cms
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385303268_Why_Do_the_Most_Backward_Classes_Want_Scheduled_Caste_Status
  59. https://legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/allahabad-hc-strikes-down-inclusion-of-obc-castes-in-sc-list/93916038
  60. https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/national/allahabad-hc-strikes-down-yogis-move-to-shift-17-obcs-to-sc-list
  61. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/warning-to-bjp-nishad-threatens-to-rethink-alliance-in-2027-if-fishermen-don-t-get-sc-quota-101751989548638.html
  62. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/21346/IN
  63. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/print/21343/NP
  64. https://www.quora.com/Is-Nishadraj-a-Shudra-friend-of-Shri-Ram-mentioned-in-the-original-Valmiki-Ramayana
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384082052_Nishad_History_of_the_origin_of_primitive_man
  66. https://knowledgeableresearch.com/index.php/1/article/view/286
  67. https://www.timesnownews.com/india/bihar-assembly-election-2025-political-thriller-the-rise-of-mukesh-sahani-from-bollywood-to-mahagathbandhans-no-2-article-153043902
  68. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/who-is-mukesh-sahani-bihar-mahagathbandhan-deputy-cm-face-10322478/
  69. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/tej-pratap-yadav-bihar-polls-coalition-five-small-parties-10179344/
  70. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bihar-election-2025-the-political-power-of-machhli-makhana-paan-in-bihar-9411871
  71. https://www.academia.edu/117980434/Phoolan_Devi_A_Subaltern_Icon_And_An_Emblem_Of_Empowerment_Following_her_death_Phoolan_Devi_has_been_becoming_a_part_of_the_political_cultural_and_social_memory_repository_of_the_Nishad_community
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Phoolan-Devi-on-the-cover-of-the-Nishad-Jyothi-Note-the-symbolism-of-the-boat-on-the_fig2_231853658
  73. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.13317?af=R
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.