Hubbry Logo
Oil pullingOil pullingMain
Open search
Oil pulling
Community hub
Oil pulling
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Oil pulling
Oil pulling
from Wikipedia

Oil pulling is an alternative medical practice in which an edible oil is swished around the mouth for a period of time and then spat out, similar to mouthwash.[1] It originates from Ayurvedic medicine.

Practitioners of oil pulling claim it is capable of improving oral health.[2] Its promoters claim it works by pulling out toxins,[1] but there is no credible evidence to support this.[1][3][4][5]

History

[edit]

Oil pulling stems from traditional Ayurvedic medicine,[1][6][7][8] whose practitioners may use sunflower oil, olive oil, or other herbal oils instead of coconut oil.[1][9]

Criticism

[edit]

There is no high-quality research on oil pulling,[1][3][5] no understanding of a possible mechanism explaining how it would work,[10] and no evidence that it provides any benefit.[1][4][5] The American Dental Association agrees that there are no reliable scientific studies supporting the practice of oil pulling for any benefit to oral hygiene or overall wellbeing.[11]

The Canadian Dental Association assessed the practice of oil pulling in 2014 stating: "We sense oil pulling won't do any harm, we're not convinced there are any particular benefits to it."[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Oil pulling is an ancient Ayurvedic dental technique originating from , involving the swishing of edible oil, such as sesame or , in the mouth for 15–20 minutes to purportedly improve and reduce harmful . Documented in classical texts like the and as or gandoosha, it has been practiced for centuries as a holistic remedy believed to detoxify the body and treat various ailments, though modern interest surged in the 1990s through advocacy by Ukrainian physician F. Karach. Proponents claim oil pulling reduces plaque, , , and salivary bacterial counts like , while also whitening teeth and alleviating dry mouth, positioning it as a natural adjunct to conventional oral care. Systematic reviews and indicate low-quality evidence for modest oral benefits, particularly in reducing , with mixed results for plaque and bacterial counts. A of nine RCTs (344 participants) found significant reductions in salivary bacterial colony counts versus controls (mean difference: 17.55 CFU/mL; 95% CI: 2.56–32.55), but no notable effects on plaque index (mean difference: -0.10; 95% CI: -0.33–0.14) or gingival index (mean difference: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.12–0.02). However, a 2023 meta-analysis of 25 RCTs (1,184 participants) reported no significant bacterial reductions and superiority for plaque, with probable benefits for gingival versus non- mouthwashes; a 2025 meta-analysis of nine RCTs similarly showed significant gingival improvements versus but nonsignificant plaque effects. Earlier reviews noted comparable short-term plaque reductions to (up to 50% with over 30 days in some trials), emphasizing oil pulling's supplementary role. Oil pulling is one of several natural remedies studied for reducing plaque and gingivitis symptoms, alongside saltwater rinses, aloe vera mouthwash, tea tree oil, turmeric/curcumin, and green tea, with supportive evidence of similar modest efficacy often comparable to chlorhexidine in certain aspects, though evidence quality is generally low to moderate and no high-quality direct head-to-head comparisons establish superiority of any one remedy. Overall evidence remains low due to small sample sizes, short durations (1–45 days), high of , and inconsistent protocols, with calls for larger, longer-term RCTs. Despite these findings, potential risks include aspiration-induced , and the practice is generally safe for adults but not recommended for children under five due to risks. Oils like (rich in antimicrobial sesamol) and (containing ) are most studied, with no superior oil identified.

History

Origins in traditional medicine

Oil pulling, referred to as kavala graha or gandusha in ancient Ayurvedic literature, originates from traditional Indian medicine and is detailed in foundational texts such as the Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita, which date from approximately the 4th century BCE to the 2nd century CE. These practices involve retaining or swishing medicated oils or decoctions in the mouth to address oral and systemic imbalances, forming a core component of Ayurvedic oral hygiene rituals. In these texts, oil pulling is prescribed specifically for oral detoxification by drawing out accumulated toxins (ama) from the oral cavity and deeper channels, thereby purifying the mouth and preventing the buildup of harmful substances. It is also described as a method to strengthen teeth and gums, enhance jaw firmness, and avert oral diseases such as pyorrhea (periodontitis), bleeding gums, and dental decay by promoting tissue resilience and reducing inflammation. Within , oil pulling evolved as a recommended daily , particularly for balancing the vata dosha, which governs movement and dryness in the body; imbalanced vata is believed to contribute to oral dryness, tooth sensitivity, and degenerative conditions, and the practice's lubricating effects help mitigate these by nourishing oral tissues and stabilizing doshic harmony. Over time, it became integrated into broader Ayurvedic dinacharya (daily routines) to support preventive health, emphasizing its role in maintaining oral as part of holistic .

Modern adoption and popularization

The modern revival of oil pulling in the late is credited to Ukrainian physician Dr. F. Karach, who introduced the practice to a broader audience during a 1992 presentation at the conference of the All-Ukrainian Union of Oncologists and Bacteriologists. Karach described oil pulling as a simple method using edible oils like sunflower or , claiming it could address over 30 systemic illnesses by drawing toxins from the bloodstream through the . His advocacy, based on personal observations and patient outcomes, sparked initial interest among alternative health practitioners in , though it remained niche outside traditional Ayurvedic circles until the . The practice gained significant momentum in the West during the early , propelled by publications that framed it as an accessible wellness ritual. A key milestone was the 2008 release of Oil Pulling Therapy: Detoxifying and Healing the Body Through Oral Cleansing by naturopath and Bruce Fife, which detailed the technique's purported benefits and encouraged its daily use for oral and overall improvement. By the , oil pulling surged as a trend in wellness blogs and early , with sites like Goop and natural forums promoting it as a natural alternative to conventional oral care, leading to widespread adoption among health-conscious consumers. Integration into and accelerated in the 2010s, as practitioners began incorporating oil pulling into preventive regimens for its supposed antibacterial properties and support for gingival health. Endorsements from celebrities amplified this shift; for instance, actresses and discussed its benefits in interviews in 2014, crediting it for brighter teeth and fresher breath. By the 2020s, influencers on platforms like and , including wellness advocates with millions of followers, further popularized it through viral challenges and testimonials, sustaining its status as a go-to ritual in contemporary up to 2025.

Practice

Procedure and technique

Oil pulling, akin to the Ayurvedic practice of kavala graha (swishing a smaller amount of oil to draw out toxins), though related to gandusha (holding a full mouth of oil without swishing to strengthen tissues), involves swishing a measured amount of edible oil in the mouth to cleanse the oral cavity. The modern technique, following kavala, is performed by gently pulling and pushing the oil through the teeth and around the gums without gargling or swallowing. The standard procedure follows these steps:
  • Begin on an empty stomach, ideally in the morning, by taking approximately 1 (10-15 ml) of oil into the .
  • Swish the oil vigorously but gently between the teeth and throughout the oral cavity for 10-20 minutes, or until the oil becomes thin and milky in consistency.
  • Spit the oil into a trash receptacle to avoid clogging drains, taking care not to it as it may contain and toxins.
  • Rinse the mouth thoroughly with warm , followed by brushing the teeth and flossing as part of regular .
For beginners or those finding the full duration challenging, variations include starting with shorter sessions of 5-10 minutes and gradually increasing the time as tolerance builds. In cases of acute conditions, the practice may be repeated up to three times daily, though once daily is typical for maintenance. Timing is recommended first thing in the morning before or to maximize absorption and cleansing effects, and it integrates seamlessly into daily routines by preceding or following standard brushing. Suitable oils for the practice include , sunflower, or , with being traditionally preferred for its nutritional properties.

Types of oils used

In traditional Ayurvedic practice, , known as til taila, is the primary oil recommended for oil pulling due to its warming, nourishing properties and deep penetration into tissues. It contains lignans such as sesamin, sesamolin, and sesaminol, along with and polyunsaturated fatty acids, which contribute to its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory qualities. These attributes make sesame oil suitable for balancing vata dosha and supporting oral detoxification in ancient texts. Modern adaptations of oil pulling frequently incorporate as a popular alternative, valued for its high content—approximately 50% of its fatty acids—which exhibits effects against oral pathogens. and are also commonly used, with providing neutral taste and for mild antioxidant support, while offers anti-inflammatory . These oils are selected for their compatibility with the swishing technique, though 's solid-to-liquid transition at body temperature enhances ease of use. When choosing oils for oil pulling, organic and unrefined (cold-pressed) varieties are preferred to preserve compounds like medium-chain fatty acids and antioxidants, which may be diminished in refined versions. Essential oils should be avoided, as they are concentrated and not intended for prolonged oral swishing, potentially causing .

Purported Benefits

Oral health claims

Oil pulling, known as kavala or gandusha in Ayurvedic , is claimed to promote oral health by reducing plaque buildup through the binding of oral and toxins to the oil, which are then expelled upon . This mechanism is said to decrease the adherence of harmful microbes to teeth and gums, thereby limiting the formation of . Traditional sources assert that regular oil pulling alleviates and inflammation by soothing irritated tissues and preventing , attributed to the oil's lubricating and detoxifying effects on the . It is also purported to improve halitosis by eliminating odor-causing and volatile compounds accumulated in the . Additionally, oil pulling is believed to contribute to teeth whitening by removing surface stains and toxins that dull the enamel, resulting in a brighter appearance over time. Anecdotal reports and traditional Ayurvedic texts, such as the , describe it as a preventive measure against cavities by strengthening enamel and reducing susceptibility to decay through enhanced . These practices emphasize the overall fortification of teeth, , and jaws for long-term dental resilience.

Systemic health claims

Proponents of oil pulling, rooted in Ayurvedic traditions, assert that the practice facilitates of the body by drawing toxins through the into the oil, which is then expelled, thereby purifying the bloodstream and . This mechanism is believed to support overall holistic balance as described in ancient texts like the , where oil pulling (known as or Gandusha) is prescribed to eliminate impurities that accumulate from daily metabolic processes. Advocates claim that this process leads to improvements in various systemic conditions, such as headaches and migraines, by alleviating underlying toxic buildup affecting the . Similarly, skin issues like are said to benefit from enhanced purification, resulting in clearer complexion through reduced and hormonal imbalances linked to overload. For digestive problems, oil pulling is purported to aid in resolving issues like or metabolic disturbances by promoting better assimilation and elimination of waste, aligning with Ayurveda's emphasis on interconnected bodily systems. From an Ayurvedic holistic perspective, oil pulling is credited with bolstering the by fostering a toxin-free environment that strengthens natural defenses against pathogens. Traditional claims extend to the reduction or prevention of chronic diseases, with the suggesting it can address up to 30 systemic illnesses, including and , through sustained practice that harmonizes the body's doshas (vital energies).

Scientific Research

Evidence on oral health effects

Research on oil pulling's effects on oral health has primarily focused on its potential to reduce bacterial loads, plaque accumulation, and gingival inflammation through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses conducted between 2008 and 2025. Early studies, such as Asokan et al. (2008), demonstrated that oil pulling with sesame oil significantly reduced Streptococcus mutans counts in plaque among adolescents after 2 weeks, with notable decreases observed after 1 week (p=0.01) and 2 weeks (p=0.008), though less effective than chlorhexidine mouthwash. A 2018 RCT using coconut oil reported a 39% reduction in salivary S. mutans counts and a 45% reduction in total bacterial counts after 2 weeks, showing no significant difference compared to 0.12% chlorhexidine (60% and 53% reductions, respectively). Regarding , short-term trials have shown positive outcomes comparable to . A 2023 meta-analysis of 25 RCTs involving 1,184 participants found oil pulling significantly improved the Modified Gingival Index (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.14; 95% CI: -1.31 to -0.97) compared to non- controls over 7–45 days, though was superior for plaque index reduction (SMD = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.49). A 2024 RCT with further supported plaque reduction, achieving an 18.98% decrease in the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index after 8 weeks (p=0.023) versus 10.49% with control, alongside modest gingival bleeding index improvements (5.13%). A 2025 RCT on reported significant decreases in both plaque and gingival indices after eight weeks of intervention. In the broader context of natural remedies for gingivitis, other agents such as saltwater rinses, aloe vera mouthwash, tea tree oil, turmeric/curcumin, and green tea have also been investigated and show supportive evidence from RCTs and systematic reviews for reducing plaque, gingival inflammation, and bacterial counts, with efficacy often comparable to chlorhexidine in some aspects (e.g., gingival health improvements) but varying across studies. For example, aloe vera has demonstrated beneficial effects on plaque and gingival indices comparable to or as a potential alternative to chlorhexidine, curcumin mouthwashes have shown comparable anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis properties with no significant differences from chlorhexidine, green tea has exhibited medium positive effects on gingival and plaque indices as well as other periodontal parameters, and tea tree oil has shown some adjunctive benefits with fewer adverse events compared to chlorhexidine. However, no high-quality head-to-head comparative studies directly compare coconut oil pulling or other forms of oil pulling to these alternatives to establish superiority. All such natural approaches are considered adjuncts to standard oral hygiene practices, with evidence quality generally low to moderate due to similar limitations (small sample sizes, short durations, risk of bias). Despite these results, limitations persist across the evidence base. A 2022 of nine RCTs (344 participants) highlighted small sample sizes (typically 20–40 per group), short durations (2–8 weeks), and high heterogeneity, noting significant overall salivary bacterial reductions (mean difference = 17.55; 95% CI: 2.56–32.55; p=0.02) but no consistent effects on S. mutans specifically or gingival indices. Reviews up to 2023 and 2025 emphasize the need for larger, longer-term RCTs to address biases, publication issues, and inconsistent methodologies.

Evidence on systemic effects and limitations

Research on the systemic effects of oil pulling, such as detoxification, immune system enhancement, or relief from chronic conditions like diabetes and arthritis, remains limited and inconclusive. Traditional claims suggest that oil pulling can draw toxins from the bloodstream and address over 30 systemic illnesses by activating salivary enzymes and reducing inflammation, but no high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have substantiated these benefits as of 2025. A review in the Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine highlights these purported mechanisms but notes the absence of robust clinical evidence beyond oral health improvements. Similarly, authoritative sources like the American Dental Association state that there is insufficient research to support non-oral health claims, including toxin elimination or broader physiological benefits. Methodological limitations plague the existing body of oil pulling studies, undermining confidence in any potential systemic impacts. Key issues include heterogeneity in protocols—such as varying oil types (e.g., vs. ), swishing durations (10–20 minutes), and frequencies (daily vs. multiple times)—which complicates comparisons across trials. Many studies suffer from small sample sizes, short intervention periods (often 7–30 days), and inadequate controls for effects, where participants' expectations may influence subjective outcomes. is evident in meta-analyses, with Egger's tests indicating a tendency to report positive oral results while negative or null systemic findings go unpublished. Overall, oil pulling has not demonstrated superiority to standard practices like brushing and flossing, even for confirmed oral benefits, further questioning its value for systemic applications. Future research should prioritize large-scale, long-term RCTs to assess systemic markers, such as levels of (CRP) for or indicators like profiles. Such studies could clarify whether reductions in oral pathogens translate to measurable physiological changes, addressing current gaps in evidence quality and protocol standardization.

Safety and Criticism

Potential risks and side effects

Oil pulling, while generally considered safe for most individuals when performed correctly, can lead to several common side effects primarily related to the physical demands of the practice. Prolonged swishing of oil in the mouth for 10–20 minutes may cause fatigue or soreness, headaches, sensitivity, dry mouth, or initial , particularly among beginners; these effects often subside with consistent use over one to two weeks. In rare cases, accidental swallowing of the oil can result in stomach upset, , or aspiration into the lungs, potentially leading to lipoid pneumonia, a serious condition involving from accumulation. Certain individuals should avoid oil pulling due to specific contraindications that could exacerbate existing conditions. It is not recommended for children under 5 years old because of the high risk of aspiration or during swishing. Additionally, individuals with allergies to common oils like or should refrain from using them to prevent allergic reactions ranging from mild irritation to severe responses. Hygiene practices are crucial to minimize risks during oil pulling. The used oil becomes laden with oral after swishing, so it must be spat out properly—ideally into a trash bin rather than a or toilet to avoid —and never swallowed to prevent of contaminants. Always use edible-grade or food-safe oils, such as cold-pressed organic varieties of , , or , to ensure they are free from harmful additives or contaminants that could pose additional health risks if trace amounts are ingested. Consulting a before starting is advisable, especially for those with pre-existing oral conditions, to tailor the practice safely.

Expert critiques and regulatory views

The American Dental Association (ADA) has consistently stated that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support oil pulling as an effective oral hygiene practice, emphasizing that it should not replace proven methods like brushing with fluoride toothpaste twice daily and flossing. The ADA advises against using oil pulling as a substitute for evidence-based dental care, noting that no reliable studies demonstrate its ability to reduce cavities, whiten teeth, or improve overall oral health. Similarly, the British Dental Journal has critiqued oil pulling as "bad science," highlighting the absence of evidence for its purported benefits such as preventing cavities, detoxifying the body, or treating conditions like cancer, despite widespread online claims. Experts in , including those from , have labeled oil pulling as , particularly when promoted as a universal remedy for oral and systemic ailments, arguing that it distracts from established treatments and may lead individuals to delay seeking professional dental care for issues like plaque buildup or gum disease. Dental professionals warn that reliance on such unproven practices could exacerbate oral health problems by forgoing use and regular check-ups, potentially resulting in worsened conditions over time. From a regulatory perspective, the U.S. (FDA) does not approve oil pulling as a medical treatment, classifying products marketed with therapeutic claims—such as reducing bacteria or improving health—as unapproved new drugs in violation of . In 2025, the National Advertising Review Board recommended that companies like GuruNanda discontinue unsubstantiated claims about oil pulling products whitening teeth or providing dental benefits, underscoring concerns over misleading wellness that positions it as a cure-all without supporting data. Health authorities, including the ADA, echo these regulatory cautions by urging consumers to avoid products or practices hyped for unverified systemic effects, prioritizing instead scientifically validated oral care routines.

References

  1. https://www.[healthline](/page/Healthline).com/nutrition/oil-pulling-coconut-oil
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.