Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Old Toronto
View on Wikipedia
Old Toronto is the part of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, that corresponds to the boundaries of the City of Toronto prior to 1998. It was incorporated as a city in 1834, after being known as the town of York, and being part of York County. Toronto periodically grew in size by annexing adjacent land and municipalities.
Key Information
In 1954, the City of Toronto and the surrounding suburban towns and townships of York County were joined in a federation known as the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (Metro). Later, the lower-tier city annexed two towns until it reached its final boundaries in 1967. In 1998, the municipalities of Metro Toronto were amalgamated into the present-day single-tier City of Toronto, which continues legally from the predecessor City of Toronto, although the by-laws of each municipality remained in force.
Historically, "Old Toronto" referred to Toronto's boundaries before the Great Toronto Fire of 1904, when most urban development was to the east of Yonge Street. Since the 1998 amalgamation, the 1967–1998 city proper is referred to as "Old Toronto" or the "former city of Toronto". It is sometimes less accurately referred to as "downtown" (Downtown Toronto is located within Old Toronto) or as "the core". Old Toronto has a population density of approximately 8,659 residents per square kilometre, which would rank as Canada's densest (North America's second-densest) city with a population over 100,000 if it were still a distinct city.
History
[edit]
| History of Toronto | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| History | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Events | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
The former town of York was incorporated on March 6, 1834, reverting to the name Toronto to distinguish it from New York City, as well as about a dozen other localities named "York" in the province (including the county in which Toronto was situated), and to dissociate itself from the negative connotation of "dirty Little York",[1] a common nickname for the town by its residents. The population was recorded in June 1834 at 9,252.[2]
In 1834, Toronto was incorporated with the boundaries of Bathurst Street to the west, 400 yards north of Lot (today's Queen) Street to the north, and Parliament Street to the east. Outside this formal boundary were the "liberties", land pre-destined to be used for new wards. These boundaries were today's Dufferin Street to the west, Bloor Street to the north, and the Don River to the east, with a section along the lakeshore east of the Don and south of today's Queen Street to the approximate location of today's Maclean Street. The liberties formally became part of the city in 1859 and the wards were remapped.[3]
William Lyon Mackenzie, a Reformer, was Toronto's first mayor, a position he only held for one year, losing to Tory Robert Baldwin Sullivan in 1835.[4] Sullivan was replaced by Dr. Thomas David Morrison in 1836. Another Tory, George Gurnett, was elected in 1837. That year, Toronto was the site of the key events of the Upper Canada Rebellion. Mackenzie would eventually lead an assault on Montgomery's Tavern, beginning the Upper Canada Rebellion. The attacks were ineffectual, as British regulars and the Canadian militia in Toronto went out to the camp at Montgomery's Tavern and dispersed the rebels. Mackenzie and some other Reformers escaped to the United States, while other rebel leaders, such as Samuel Lount and Peter Matthews, were hanged. Toronto would thenceforth elect a succession of Tory or Conservative mayors—it was not until the 1850s that a Reform member would be mayor again.[5] Shortly after the rebellion, Toronto was ravaged by its first great fire in 1849. The fire was one of two great fires to occur in the city, with the other occurring in 1904.
It is a matter of deep regret that political differences should have run high in this place, and led to most discreditable and disgraceful results. It is not long since guns were discharged from a window in this town at the successful candidates in an election, and the coachman of one of them was actually shot in the body, though not dangerously wounded. But one man was killed on the same occasion; and from the very window whence he received his death, the very flag which shielded his murderer (not only in the commission of his crime, but from its consequences), was displayed again on the occasion of the public ceremony performed by the Governor General, to which I have just adverted. Of all the colours in the rainbow, there is but one which could be so employed: I need not say that flag was orange.
— Charles Dickens, commenting on 1841 Toronto Orange violence in American Notes for General Circulation, 1842
In their efforts to control the city and its citizens, the Tories were willing to turn to extra-governmental tools of social control, such as the Orange Order in Canada. As historian Gregory Kealey concluded, "Following the delegitimation of Reform after the Rebellions were suppressed, the Corporation (of Toronto) developed into an impenetrable bastion of Orange-Tory strength."[6] By 1844, six of Toronto's ten aldermen were Orangemen, and, over the rest of the 19th century, twenty of twenty-three mayors would be as well. A parliamentary committee reporting on the 1841 Orange Riot in Toronto concluded that the powers granted the corporation made it ripe for Orange abuse. Orange influence dominated the emerging police force, giving it a "monopoly of legal violence, and the power to choose when to enforce the law."[7] Orange Order violence at elections and other political meetings was a staple of the period. Between 1839 and 1866, the Orange Order was involved in 29 riots in Toronto, of which 16 had direct political inspiration.[8]
At its height in 1942, 16 of the 23 members of city council were members of the Orange Order.[9] Every mayor of Toronto in the first half of the 20th century was an Orangeman. This continued until the 1954 election when the Jewish Nathan Phillips defeated radical Orange leader Leslie Howard Saunders.
Annexations and amalgamations
[edit]The boundaries of Toronto remained unchanged into the 1880s. Then followed a series of expansions lasting to the 1910s: Toronto expanded to the west by annexing the Town of Brockton in 1884, the Town of Parkdale in 1889, and properties west to Swansea (such as High Park) by 1893; to the north by annexing Yorkville in 1883, The Annex in 1887, Seaton Village in 1888, Rosedale in 1905, Deer Park in 1908, the City of West Toronto, Bracondale, and Wychwood Park in 1909, Dovercourt Park and Earlscourt in 1910, and Moore Park and North Toronto in 1912; and to the east by annexing Riverdale in 1884, a strip east of Greenwood in 1890, Town of East Toronto (including East Danforth and Upper Beaches) in 1908, an extension east to Victoria Park Avenue in 1909, and the Midway (bounded by Danforth Avenue in north, Greenwood Avenue to west, Queen Street to south and East Toronto western boundaries to the east) in 1909.[10] By 1908, the named wards were abolished, replaced by a simple numbering scheme of Ward 1 to Ward 6.[3]
By the 1920s, Toronto stopped annexing suburbs. In 1954, the municipalities in York County south of Steeles Avenue were severed from the county to form the aforementioned Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (a precursor to later regional municipalities), which included Toronto and numerous suburbs. Metropolitan Toronto operated as an upper-tier municipal government whereas Toronto continued to operate as a lower-tier government within Metropolitan Toronto. In 1967, provincial reform of lower-tier municipalities in Metropolitan Toronto saw Toronto annex the municipalities of Forest Hill and Swansea. The City of Toronto remained this size until 1998, when it was formally dissolved and its area amalgamated into the new single-tier City of Toronto. The new City of Toronto was formed from Old Toronto, the five other dissolved municipalities that made up Metropolitan Toronto, and that upper tier itself in 1997.[citation needed]
Culture
[edit]
The first Crystal Palace in Toronto, officially named the Palace of Industry, was modelled after the Crystal Palace in Hyde Park, London, England, and was Toronto's first permanent exhibition hall. Completed in 1858, it was located south of the Provincial Lunatic Asylum, northwest of King and Shaw streets. It was dismantled in 1878, and the ironwork was used to construct a new Crystal Palace on what would later become Exhibition Place. The second Crystal Palace hosted Toronto's first Industrial Exhibition (the predecessor to the Canadian National Exhibition or CNE) in 1879. By the time it was destroyed in 1906 by fire, it was officially known as the CNE Transportation Building. It was replaced by the Horticulture Building in 1907.[11]
Institutions
[edit]Health care
[edit]
Old Toronto was home to a number of hospitals, including Bridgepoint Active Healthcare (originally named House of Refuge, see below), Casey House, Mount Sinai Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (originally named Princess Margaret Hospital), St. Joseph's Health Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Grace Health Centre, Toronto Western Hospital and Women's College Hospital. Two health care institutions were also established in 1998 by amalgamating previously separate hospitals: the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.
The Toronto General Hospital is the oldest operating hospital established in Toronto. It started as a small shed in the old town and was used as a military hospital during the War of 1812, after which it was founded as a permanent institution, York General Hospital, in 1829, at John and King streets. In 1853–1856, a new home for the hospital was built on the north side of Gerrard Street, east of Parliament, using a design by architect William Hay, and relocated to University Avenue at College Street in 1913.[12]
The House of Providence on Power Street (between King and Queen streets) was opened by the Sisters of St. Joseph in 1857 to aid the plight of the desperately poor. It was demolished in 1962 to make way for the Richmond Street exit from the Don Valley Parkway. By that time it was a nursing home, and its residents moved to a new facility at St. Clair and Warden Avenues, known today as Providence Healthcare.
The House of Refuge was built in 1860 as a home for "vagrants, the dissolute, and for idiots". The building became a smallpox hospital during an epidemic during the 1870s. It was demolished in 1894, and a new structure called the Riverdale Isolation Hospital was built on the site in 1904, which evolved into the Rivderdale Hospital and later Bridgepoint Health.
Public library
[edit]
Toronto has operated the Toronto Public Library system since 1884. Its collection originated from The Mechanics Institute, which was founded in 1830 by reform Alderman James Lesslie to provide technical and adult education. In 1853 the Institute erected a new permanent home at the corner of Church and Adelaide streets, but it struggled to attract new paying members. In 1883 the institute was thus transformed into a municipally supported public reference library. The idea was promoted by alderman John Hallam, but it met considerable resistance in city council. No other city in Canada at this time had a completely free public library. Hallam brought the initiative to a public referendum, and the citizens of Toronto voted in its favour on January 1, 1883. The 5,000-book collection of the Mechanics' Institute became the first books of the newly formed Toronto Public Library.[13]
As a result of the 1998 amalgamation of Toronto, the other municipal libraries of Metropolitan Toronto were merged with Toronto Public Library. It also merged with the Metro Toronto Public Library, which operated one branch, the Toronto Reference Library in Old Toronto.
Education
[edit]Four public school boards provide primary and secondary education for residents of Old Toronto, Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir (CSCM), Conseil scolaire Viamonde (CSV), the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB), and the Toronto District School Board (TDSB). CSV and TDSB are secular public school boards, operating respectively a French first language institution and English first language institutions. The other two school boards, CSCM and TCDSB, are public separate school boards, operating French first language separate schools and English first language separate schools. Before 1998, the Toronto Board of Education and Conseil des écoles françaises de la communauté urbaine de Toronto had operated public secular schools while the Metropolitan Separate School Board (French: Les Conseil des écoles catholiques du Grand Toronto) had operated public separate schools. These were reorganized upon the amalgamation into the City of Toronto.
Old Toronto hosts Toronto Metropolitan University, University of Toronto's St. George Campus, OCAD University, George Brown College and several other post-secondary institutions.
Politics
[edit]Capital
[edit]
The first Upper Canada parliament buildings were built in 1796 at Front and Parliament streets when the capital of the Province was moved from Niagara-on-the-Lake. These were destroyed in 1813 during an attack on the then-City of York during the War of 1812. A second building was constructed on the same site in 1820, only to be lost to fire in 1824. They were replaced by a new structure built between 1829 and 1832 near Front, John, Simcoe, and Wellington streets, which saw alterations take place in 1849.
With the unification of Upper and Lower Canada in 1840, the building continued to see sporadic periods of usage as the legislature of the Province of Canada until the capital was permanently moved to what is now Ottawa shortly before Confederation in 1867, which saw the formation of the modern-day province of Ontario (the same area as Upper Canada). Upon Confederation, Toronto was selected to be the provincial capital and thus the Front Street building returned to usage as the location of the provincial legislature until the current Legislative Buildings at Queen's Park were completed in 1893. The Front Street building remained vacant until it was demolished in 1903; the Canadian Broadcasting Centre now sits on the site.
Chorley Park, located in the Rosedale neighbourhood, served as the official residence of the Lieutenant-Governor of Ontario from 1915 to 1937. The building was demolished in 1961 after it and the lands around it were purchased by the municipal government.
Municipal politics
[edit]City council
[edit]
In 1833, several prominent reformers had petitioned the House of Assembly to have the town incorporated, which would also have made the position of magistrate elective. The Tory-controlled House struggled to find a means of creating a legitimate electoral system that might nonetheless minimize the chances of reformers being elected. The bill passed on March 6, 1834, proposed two different property qualifications for voting. There was a higher qualification for the election of aldermen (who would also serve as magistrates) and a lower one for common councillors. Two aldermen and two councilmen would be elected from each city ward. This relatively broad electorate was offset by a much higher qualification for election to office, which essentially limited election to the wealthy, much like the old Courts of Quarter Sessions it replaced. The mayor was elected by the aldermen from among their number, and a clear barrier was erected between those of property who served as full magistrates and the rest. Only 230 of the city's 2,929 adult men met this stringent property qualification.[14]
City halls
[edit]
The second market building replaced the original wooden market building in 1831 and ran from King Street to Front Street (the site of the current St. Lawrence Hall, and the St. Lawrence Market North building). It was selected by the first mayor, William Lyon Mackenzie, as city hall. His newspaper, the Colonial Advocate, rented space in the rear. This building, along with much of the surrounding Market Block, was destroyed by fire in the 1849 Cathedral Fire. The site was rebuilt as St. Lawrence Hall in 1850.
The second city hall, built in 1845 and renovated in 1850, was known as the New Market House. It served as city hall until 1899. In 1904, the current St. Lawrence Market South building was built, incorporating part of the city hall structure. Toronto third city hall began construction in 1889, and was completed a decade later, in 1899. Old City Hall was also used as a court house (assuming the role of the closed Adelaide Street Court House, closed in 1900), and continues to be used as a dedicated court house. The third city hall was used by the Toronto City Council from 1899 to 1965, when they moved to the completed fourth Toronto City Hall.
Ward system
[edit]The earliest Toronto neighbourhoods were the five municipal wards that the city was split into in 1834. The wards were named for the patron saints of the four nations of the British Isles (St. George, St. Andrew, St. Patrick, and St. David) and St. Lawrence, a patron saint of Canada (St. Joseph is the principal patron saint of Canada). Today, only St. Lawrence remains a well-known neighbourhood name. The others have attached their names to a variety of still-existing landmarks, including three subway stations. As Toronto grew, more wards were created, still named after prominent saints. St. James Ward is preserved in the modern St. James Town neighbourhood, while the northern ward of St. Paul's has continued to the present as a federal and provincial electoral district.
Demographics
[edit]| Year | Pop. | ±% |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | 30,775 | — |
| 1861 | 44,821 | +45.6% |
| 1871 | 56,092 | +25.1% |
| 1881 | 86,415 | +54.1% |
| 1891 | 181,215 | +109.7% |
| 1901 | 208,040 | +14.8% |
| 1911 | 376,471 | +81.0% |
| 1921 | 521,893 | +38.6% |
| 1931 | 631,207 | +20.9% |
| 1941 | 667,457 | +5.7% |
| 1951 | 675,754 | +1.2% |
| 1956 | 667,706 | −1.2% |
| 1961 | 672,407 | +0.7% |
| 1966 | 664,584 | −1.2% |
| 1971 | 712,786 | +7.3% |
| 1976 | 633,318 | −11.1% |
| 1981 | 599,217 | −5.4% |
| 1986 | 612,289 | +2.2% |
| 1991 | 635,395 | +3.8% |
| 1996 | 653,734 | +2.9% |
| 2001 | 676,352 | +3.5% |
| Source: Statistics Canada [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] | ||
According to the 2001 census, the population was:[25]
- 70% Caucasian
- 10% Chinese
- 5% African-Canadian
- 5% South Asian
- 3% Filipino
- 2% Latin American
- 2% Southeast Asian
- 1% Korean
- 2% other
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- Bibliography
- Careless, J. M. S. (1984). Toronto to 1918. James Lorimer & Company. ISBN 0-88862-665-7.
- Notes
- ^ Firth, Edith G., ed. (1966). The Town of York: 1815—1834; A Further Collection of Documents of Early Toronto. University of Toronto Press. pp. 297–298.
- ^ Careless, p. 54
- ^ a b Careless, p. 126
- ^ Careless, p. 59
- ^ Careless, p. 60
- ^ Gregory S. Kealey (1984). Victor L. Russell (ed.). Forging the consensus: historical essays on Toronto. Toronto. p. 45.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Gregory S. Kealey (1984). Victor L. Russell (ed.). Forging the consensus: historical essays on Toronto. Toronto. p. 50.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Gregory S. Kealey (1984). Victor L. Russell (ed.). Forging the consensus: historical essays on Toronto. Toronto. p. 42.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Leslie Howard Saunders. An Orangeman in public life: the memoirs of Leslie Howard Saunders. Britannia Printers, 1980. pg. 85
- ^ Careless, p. 125
- ^ Walden, Keith (1997). Becoming Modern in Toronto: The Industrial Exhibition and the Shaping of Late Victorian Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- ^ Arthur, Eric (2003). Toronto, No Mean City. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 114.
- ^ Robertson, John Ross (1894). Landmarks of Toronto Vol. 1. Toronto: J. Ross Robertson. pp. 398–99.
- ^ Firth, Edith (1966). The town of York, 1815–1834: a further collection of documents of early Toronto. Toronto: Champlain Society. pp. lxviii–lxix.
- ^ Census of the Canadas, 1951-2, Personal Census. Quebec: Board of Registration and Statistics. 1853.
- ^ Census of the Canadas, 1961-2, Personal Census. Quebec: Bureau of Agriculture and Statistics. 1863.
- ^ "Table 12: Population of Canada by provinces, counties or census divisions and subdivisions, 1871-1931". Census of Canada, 1931. Ottawa: Government of Canada. 1932.
- ^ "Table 2: Population of Census Subdivisions, 1921–1971". 1971 Census of Canada. Vol. I: Population, Census Subdivisions (Historical). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 1973.
- ^ "Table 3: Population for census divisions and subdivisions, 1971 and 1976". 1976 Census of Canada. Census Divisions and Subdivisions, Ontario. Vol. I: Population, Geographic Distributions. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 1977.
- ^ "Table 4: Population and Total Occupied Dwellings, for Census Divisions and Subdivisions, 1976 and 1981". 1981 Census of Canada. Vol. II: Provincial series, Population, Geographic distributions (Ontario). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 1982. ISBN 0-660-51092-8.
- ^ "Table 2: Census Divisions and Subdivisions – Population and Occupied Private Dwellings, 1981 and 1986". Census Canada 1986. Vol. Population and Dwelling Counts – Provinces and Territories (Ontario). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 1987. ISBN 0-660-53460-6.
- ^ "Table 2: Population and Dwelling Counts, for Census Divisions and Census Subdivisions, 1986 and 1991 – 100% Data". 91 Census. Vol. Population and Dwelling Counts – Census Divisions and Census Subdivisions. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 1992. ISBN 0-660-57115-3.
- ^ "Table 10: Population and Dwelling Counts, for Census Divisions, Census Subdivisions (Municipalities) and Designated Places, 1991 and 1996 Censuses – 100% Data". 96 Census. Vol. A National Overview – Population and Dwelling Counts. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 1997. ISBN 0-660-59283-5.
- ^ "2001 Community Profiles: Toronto, Ontario (City / Dissolved)". Statistics Canada. Retrieved September 13, 2025.
- ^ "2001 Community profiles". Statistics Canada. Archived from the original on January 19, 2016. Retrieved April 15, 2010.
External links
[edit]Old Toronto
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Boundaries
Historical Boundaries and Annexations
The Town of York, established in 1793, initially comprised a compact grid of ten blocks laid out near Toronto Harbour, bounded southward by the waterfront, westward by George Street, eastward by Parliament Street (then extending to Frederick and Caroline Streets), and northward approximately to Duchess Street.[7] [8] This original townsite, selected by Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe for its defensible harbor access, covered a modest area suitable for early administrative and military functions, including a garrison.[7] Upon incorporation as the City of Toronto in 1834, these boundaries persisted, limiting the urban core to the immediate harbor vicinity amid surrounding unincorporated lands in York Township.[9] Rapid industrialization and population influx from European immigration in the late 19th century prompted a wave of annexations to extend municipal control over expanding settlements, ensuring provision of water, sewers, and roads while curbing haphazard development in adjacent villages.[9] Key early expansions included the annexation of Yorkville in 1883, Brockton and the Riverside area (precursor to Riverdale) in 1884, the Annex in 1887, and Parkdale in 1889, each incorporating burgeoning residential suburbs driven by streetcar lines and factory proximity.[9][10] Further growth in the early 20th century saw the addition of North Toronto in 1912, integrating streetcar-dependent communities north of the original limits to accommodate housing demands from wartime economic booms.[11] By mid-century, suburban enclaves proliferated beyond the core, leading to 1967 provincial reforms in Metropolitan Toronto that rationalized lower-tier municipalities; Toronto thereby annexed the Village of Forest Hill and Town of Swansea, absorbing upscale, low-density areas to consolidate urban services and fiscal resources amid postwar automobile-driven expansion.[12][1] These boundary adjustments, documented in municipal records, reflected pragmatic responses to demographic pressures, transforming the pre-amalgamation City of Toronto into a contiguous entity of approximately 97 square kilometers by integrating peripheral townships and villages under centralized administration.[13]Post-1998 Administrative Status
Following the enactment of the City of Toronto Act, 1997 (S.O. 1997, c. 2), which received royal assent on December 17, 1997, the pre-amalgamation City of Toronto—commonly referred to post-1998 as "Old Toronto"—lost its independent administrative status on January 1, 1998, when it was merged with the municipalities of Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, York, and East York to form a single-tier City of Toronto.[14] This legislation dissolved Old Toronto's separate municipal council, mayor, and bylaws, integrating its governance into the unified city structure under a single elected council of 57 members (later adjusted).[5] The former core's administrative autonomy ended without provisions for retained sub-municipal entities, though certain legacy bylaws were grandfathered temporarily for transitional purposes.[15] "Old Toronto" persists as an informal designation for the pre-amalgamation central area, encompassing roughly 97 km² historically bounded westward by the Humber River, southward by Lake Ontario, eastward toward Victoria Park Avenue, and northward variably to Steeles Avenue in select annexed portions, though exact limits were irregular due to prior expansions.[13] This term highlights enduring distinctions in urban character, with the core exhibiting higher population densities—often exceeding 4,000 residents per km² in central neighborhoods—compared to the lower-density former suburbs averaging under 2,000 per km².[16] Zoning frameworks reflect these legacies: Old Toronto's districts permit greater intensification, such as multiplexes up to six units per lot in Toronto and East York planning areas as of July 2025, while suburban zones lag in adoption due to retained single-family dominance and slower rezoning.[17] Heritage preservation efforts underscore core-periphery disparities, with Old Toronto hosting a disproportionate share of designated properties and conservation districts—such as South Rosedale, spanning over 1,100 sites—owing to denser historical built fabric from 19th- and early 20th-century development.[18] Post-amalgamation, former suburban areas have reported imbalances in resource allocation for heritage evaluation, fostering perceptions of central prioritization in citywide surveys and policies.[19] As of 2025, these patterns contribute to ongoing tensions in municipal budgeting and service delivery, where core infrastructure like TTC expansions receives $4.9 billion in proposed investments amid a $29.5 billion unfunded capital backlog, prompting suburban critiques of uneven service levels and calls for decentralized fiscal tools.[20][21] Such dynamics trace causal roots to amalgamation's centralization, which empirically concentrated decision-making without proportional periphery representation, exacerbating service equity debates in annual budget consultations.[5]History
Indigenous Presence and Early Settlement
The Toronto area, known to Indigenous peoples as Tkaronto, was inhabited by Iroquoian-speaking groups, including ancestors of the Huron-Wendat, with archaeological evidence of semi-permanent villages emerging around A.D. 500 in southern Ontario through the Princess Point complex, characterized by early maize cultivation and longhouse structures.[22] By circa 1500, large Iroquoian villages existed near the Humber River, supporting populations through agriculture, hunting, and trade networks extending to the St. Lawrence Valley.[23] These communities were disrupted by mid-17th-century conflicts, including Iroquois Wars and epidemics, leading to depopulation; by the late 17th century, Anishinaabe groups, specifically the Mississaugas, migrated southward from Georgian Bay and established control over the region, including the Toronto waterfront, through conquest and alliance.[24][25] The Mississaugas of the Credit, a band of the Ojibwa (Anishinaabe) nation, occupied and stewarded approximately 3.9 million acres of southern Ontario lands by the 18th century, utilizing the Toronto area's abundant fisheries, waterways, and fertile plains for seasonal camps and resource gathering.[26] British colonial expansion, driven by Loyalist resettlement after the American Revolution, prompted the 1787 Toronto Purchase, in which Mississauga leaders, under pressure from wartime alliances and gifts, ceded a tract of land—intended for a narrow strip along the waterfront but later interpreted as 250,880 acres—to the Crown for £1,700 in goods and cash, facilitating European settlement while reserving Mississauga hunting and fishing rights.[27] This treaty reflected causal dynamics of displacement, as British strategic needs outweighed Indigenous land tenure, with ambiguities fueling later disputes resolved partially in the 1805 clarification (Treaty 13).[28] In 1793, Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe surveyed and selected the site for the new capital of Upper Canada, renaming it York (later Toronto), prioritizing its deep natural harbor for naval defense against potential American incursions following the Revolutionary War and amid fears of U.S. expansionism.[29] Simcoe's choice emphasized military utility over civilian habitability, as the marshy peninsula offered defensible access to Lake Ontario but required clearing dense forests and addressing flooding risks. Initial European settlement commenced that year with the construction of a garrison—precursor to Fort York—housing Queen's Rangers troops, followed by rudimentary government buildings like a parliament house and lieutenant governor's residence, establishing a fortified outpost with fewer than 100 settlers by year's end.[30][31] This military-first approach underscored British imperial priorities, subordinating Indigenous displacement to geopolitical security.Colonial Era and Incorporation (1793–1834)
In 1793, Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe founded the town of York on the northern shore of Lake Ontario, designating it the capital of Upper Canada to relocate government functions from Niagara-on-the-Lake, which was vulnerable to American incursions along the border. This strategic choice prioritized defensibility and facilitated settlement by Loyalists fleeing the United States after the American Revolution, with Simcoe implementing land grant programs to incentivize their relocation and agricultural development.[32][33] York's establishment reflected colonial priorities of securing British North America through population growth and resource extraction, though its marshy terrain posed challenges for infrastructure and health, including recurrent fevers from stagnant waters.[34] The War of 1812 exposed York's vulnerabilities when American forces, numbering approximately 2,700, landed on April 27, 1813, and overwhelmed a defending British force of about 750 regulars, militia, and Indigenous allies at Fort York. The invaders captured the town, looted supplies, and burned key public structures, including the legislative buildings and a naval vessel under construction, as reprisal for British actions elsewhere; British commanders had preemptively spiked cannons and destroyed gunpowder stores to deny them to the enemy. This sacking, which caused limited casualties but significant material loss, underscored administrative shortcomings in preparedness and prompted post-war investments in fortifications like blockhouses to deter future invasions.[35][36] York's early economy centered on milling to process grain and timber from surrounding townships, with the first government-operated grist mill erected in 1793 along the Don River to support settler self-sufficiency, complemented by sawmills for lumber export via the lake harbor. Fur trade activities contributed indirectly through overland and lake routes connecting to interior posts, providing pelts for export, though local priorities emphasized agricultural processing over large-scale trapping. By 1834, these foundations had sustained population growth to 9,254 residents, driven by immigration and land clearance.[34][37] On March 6, 1834, the Legislative Council of Upper Canada incorporated York as the City of Toronto, restoring the Huron-Wendat-derived name "Toronto" (meaning "meeting place") to evoke pre-colonial geography, differentiate from other British Yorks, and symbolically align with Reformist demands for expanded local representation amid frustrations with oligarchic control by the Family Compact. This change occurred against rising political tensions, as Reform leaders like William Lyon Mackenzie advocated for elective municipal councils to counter appointed governance, setting the stage for the 1837 Upper Canada Rebellion over unresponsive institutions.[38][39]19th-Century Urban Growth
Following incorporation in 1834, Toronto experienced rapid population expansion driven primarily by immigration from Ireland and Britain. The Great Irish Famine of the 1840s prompted a massive influx, with approximately 18,000 Irish arrivals in Toronto alone during 1847, many arriving via "coffin ships" amid high mortality from disease aboard vessels.[40] British migration continued steadily through the mid-century, reinforcing demographic growth as settlers sought opportunities in [Upper Canada](/page/Upper Canada).[41] This influx contributed to the city's population rising from around 15,000 in 1841 to over 30,000 by 1851 and nearly 45,000 by 1861, transforming Toronto from a modest colonial outpost into a denser urban center with increased housing pressures and informal settlements.[42] Infrastructure developments accelerated this urbanization, particularly through railway integration that enhanced trade connectivity. The opening of the first Union Station on June 21, 1858, by the Grand Trunk Railway at York and Front Streets, consolidated passenger and freight operations, linking Toronto to broader North American networks and facilitating exports of timber, grain, and manufactured goods.[43] By the 1850s, Toronto had emerged as the provincial railway hub, with lines like the Grand Trunk spurring economic activity by reducing transport costs and enabling bulk commodity flows that outpaced lake-based shipping limitations.[44] This shift supported a transition from agrarian dependencies to manufacturing, as workshops expanded into factories producing items like bricks, beer, and machinery, though large-scale industry remained limited until the 1860s.[45] Urban growth was not without severe challenges, exemplified by recurrent cholera epidemics that exposed sanitation deficiencies. The 1832 outbreak, arriving via immigrants, recorded 565 cases and 329 deaths in Toronto by September, concentrated in crowded, unsanitary wards.[46] A similar epidemic struck in 1854, prompting municipal responses including the establishment of a cholera hospital and initial by-laws for waste management and quarantine in 1834.[47] These crises, recurring in 1849 and 1854, catalyzed rudimentary public health reforms, such as improved water supply considerations and board of health activations, though enforcement remained inconsistent amid rapid densification.[48] Overall, these factors—immigration-fueled density, rail-enabled commerce, and health-driven adaptations—laid the groundwork for Toronto's emergence as an industrial entrepôt by century's end.20th-Century Expansion and Metro Formation
The City of Toronto pursued territorial expansion in the early 20th century through targeted annexations from adjacent townships, including the absorption of North Toronto in 1912, which added residential and commercial areas north of the city's pre-existing boundaries. These moves reflected practical needs for contiguous land to support urban services amid steady population increases, though growth increasingly spilled into independent suburbs like the newly incorporated Town of Leaside in 1913 and Township of East York in 1924, which developed separately to avoid Toronto's tax burdens.[49][50] Following World War II, Toronto experienced explosive suburban sprawl driven by the baby boom, economic prosperity from manufacturing sectors like automobiles, and influxes of immigrants and internal migrants seeking affordable housing tracts beyond the core city.[51] This decentralized development strained isolated municipal infrastructures, prompting provincial intervention to enable coordinated regional planning without immediate full mergers; by 1953, the Ontario government established the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto as a federation of the City of Toronto and 12 surrounding municipalities—covering about 240 square miles—to jointly manage essential services such as water supply, sewage, arterial roads, and planning.[52] The Metro structure prioritized fiscal efficiency and infrastructure equity, funding projects like regional highways to accommodate car-dependent commuters while preserving local autonomy.[53] Under Metro Toronto's framework, major infrastructure addressed the boom's demands: the elevated Gardiner Expressway, a six-lane corridor along the waterfront, was constructed in phases from 1955 to 1964 using provincial funds to link the city core with western suburbs and reduce congestion. Complementing this, the Toronto Transit Commission extended rapid transit eastward with the Bloor-Danforth line, which opened on February 25, 1966, between Keele and Woodbine stations, doubling the subway network and serving the densifying midtown and east-end populations.[54] By 1966, the City of Toronto's population had grown to approximately 665,000, underscoring the Metro's role in sustaining orderly expansion amid pressures that individual municipalities could no longer handle alone.[55]1998 Amalgamation and Its Immediate Effects
The Ontario Progressive Conservative government, led by Premier Mike Harris, enacted legislation in December 1997 to amalgamate Metropolitan Toronto's six lower-tier municipalities—the City of Toronto (Old Toronto), Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, York, and East York—into a single City of Toronto, effective January 1, 1998.[56] [57] This process dissolved the prior two-tier Metropolitan Toronto structure, which had managed regional services like highways and transit since 1954, and centralized governance under one mayor and council.[57] The amalgamation expanded the municipal boundaries sixfold to 641 square kilometers while increasing the population to approximately 2.4 million, with Old Toronto's pre-existing high density of over 4,000 residents per square kilometer largely preserved amid the integration of lower-density suburbs.[58] [59] Immediate administrative changes involved unifying budgets and operations across the former entities, which had previously operated semi-independently under Metro oversight. This led to redundancies in overlapping roles, resulting in the elimination of about 1,935 positions—roughly 8.8% of the initial workforce—by the end of 2000 as duplicate departments in areas like planning and finance were consolidated.[60] Short-term disruptions affected public services, including challenges in harmonizing transit schedules under the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), which absorbed suburban bus operations, and waste collection systems, where varying collection frequencies and routes from the legacy municipalities caused temporary delays in pickup and processing during the transition period.[61] Fiscal impacts included efforts to equalize service levels, prompting property tax increases in former suburban areas—where rates had been 20-30% lower pre-amalgamation—to fund core-city standards like enhanced policing and infrastructure maintenance.[62] [57] Overall city-wide taxes remained stable in 1998-2000 due to provincial downloading of costs and initial efficiencies, though suburban residents faced hikes averaging 5-10% in the first years to address disparities.[63] These changes prioritized administrative streamlining but highlighted integration frictions in a rapidly expanded entity.[57]Government and Politics
Pre-Amalgamation Municipal Governance
Prior to the 1998 amalgamation, Old Toronto's municipal government operated under a weak mayor-council system, wherein the mayor, elected city-wide, functioned primarily as a presiding officer and policy influencer with one vote on council, while legislative authority rested with the elected city council comprising the mayor and ward-based councillors.[64] This structure emphasized collective decision-making, with council committees handling key functions such as budget approval and bylaw enactment.[65] Art Eggleton held the position of mayor from 1980 to 1991, marking the longest continuous tenure in the city's history and overseeing periods of economic development alongside social initiatives like increased housing projects.[66] His administration navigated urban growth challenges, including infrastructure demands, within the constraints of limited mayoral powers that required building coalitions for policy advancement. The city's budget process centered on annual operating and capital budgets approved by council, with heavy reliance on property taxes as the dominant revenue stream due to provincial restrictions limiting municipalities to property assessments and user fees for supplementary funds.[61] Debates over debt issuance for infrastructure, such as roads and public transit expansions, often pitted advocates for borrowing against those wary of escalating long-term liabilities, reflecting tensions between immediate needs and fiscal sustainability. Efforts at reform in the 1980s included discussions on streamlining council operations for greater efficiency, such as proposals to reduce the number of members or adjust ward structures to minimize administrative costs and curb tendencies toward expansive social expenditures.[67] These initiatives aimed to foster fiscal conservatism amid economic pressures, prioritizing restrained per-capita spending relative to less dense suburban counterparts in Metropolitan Toronto, where service delivery costs sometimes escalated due to sprawling development patterns.[68]Political Institutions and Reforms
Old City Hall, constructed between 1889 and 1899, served as the seat of Toronto's municipal government from its opening until 1966, embodying the centralized administrative authority of the pre-amalgamation era.[69] The building's Romanesque Revival design and prominent clock tower symbolized the city's growing civic infrastructure, housing city council meetings and administrative functions that coordinated urban services for a population exceeding 600,000 by the mid-20th century. Its replacement by New City Hall in 1965 reflected a shift toward modernist governance spaces, yet retained the core executive structure where the mayor and council wielded collective decision-making power, often prioritizing infrastructure over expansive social programs.[70] The ward system in Old Toronto evolved to enhance local accountability, transitioning from multi-member wards in the 19th century to configurations that better aligned representation with population growth. Initially established with five wards upon incorporation in 1834, boundaries were redrawn multiple times through 1908 to accommodate annexation and demographic shifts, aiming to ensure councillors focused on neighborhood-specific issues like sanitation and transit rather than city-wide abstractions.[71] By the 20th century, the system emphasized single-member districts in practice for many periods, fostering direct constituent ties but exposing vulnerabilities to gerrymandering that diluted urban core influence amid suburban pressures pre-1998. Reforms in the 1990s highlighted tensions over fiscal policy, with Toronto officials contesting provincial property tax changes that risked unmoored increases decoupled from service delivery efficiencies. Amid Ontario's Fair Tax Commission deliberations in 1993, municipal leaders advocated for indexing tax hikes to verifiable cost drivers like inflation, resisting mandates for redistributive equity that strained budgets without empirical justification for improved outcomes.[72] These efforts underscored a preference for causal fiscal restraint, preserving resident accountability over ideologically driven expansions. The legacy of Old Toronto's institutions persisted post-amalgamation, with its compact wards informing the 2022 strong-mayor powers under Ontario's City of Toronto Act amendments, which empowered the executive to bypass council on priority matters like housing amid representational fragmentation.[73] This reform addressed accountability deficits inherited from pre-1998 structures, where dense urban wards had sustained mayoral leverage against dispersed suburban votes, enabling decisive action on empirically pressing issues without diluting local input entirely.[74]Role as Provincial Capital and Federal Influence
York, the precursor to Old Toronto, served as the capital of Upper Canada from 1796 until 1841, when the seat of government relocated to Kingston amid concerns over vulnerability to American incursions following the War of 1812.[32] This selection stemmed from its defensible harbor on Lake Ontario, facilitating trade and military logistics rather than symbolic preferences.[75] The legislature briefly returned to Toronto in 1849 after unrest in Montreal disrupted proceedings in the Province of Canada, but rotations continued until Queen Victoria designated Ottawa as the permanent federal capital in 1857 to mitigate rivalries among major cities like Toronto, Montreal, and Quebec City, prioritizing geographic centrality and defensibility between English and French provinces.[75][76] Upon Confederation in 1867, Toronto was established as the continuous capital of the new Province of Ontario, hosting the legislature from Front Street initially before the Ontario Legislative Building opened in 1893.[77] This enduring status reflected Toronto's demographic and economic primacy within the province, enabling direct provincial oversight of urban development and infrastructure tied to its port and rail hubs.[32] Federally, Old Toronto's compact area encompassed multiple electoral ridings that exerted outsized influence due to high population density, often aligning with Liberal majorities pre-1990s as urban centers favored centrist policies on trade and immigration.[78] These districts' representatives advocated for protections like the 1879 National Policy tariffs, which bolstered local manufacturing by shielding it from U.S. competition, underscoring Toronto's leverage through parliamentary seats rather than formal capital prerogatives.[75] Economic sectors, particularly finance and shipping, shaped federal agendas via lobbying for infrastructure funding, with the port's role in Great Lakes commerce driving allocations for harbor improvements in the early 20th century.[32] This influence arose from locational advantages—proximity to U.S. markets and internal waterways—prioritizing practical connectivity over partisan symbolism.[77]Economy
Historical Economic Foundations
The economic foundations of Old Toronto were rooted in staple exports through its harbour, initially centered on timber during the early 19th century when wood products fueled much of Upper Canada's trade with Britain amid high European demand.[79] As agricultural expansion inland increased wheat and grain production, Toronto Harbour emerged as a vital conduit for these commodities, facilitating shipments via the Great Lakes to export markets and supporting milling and shipbuilding industries locally.[80] By the late 1800s, grain elevators and port infrastructure had developed to handle growing volumes from prairie regions funneled by railways, establishing the port as a primary economic driver for the city.[81] The industrial era accelerated after the arrival of the Grand Trunk Railway in 1856, which spurred the creation of extensive rail yards and manufacturing clusters, transforming Old Toronto into a processing hub for agricultural goods.[82] Meatpacking became particularly prominent with the opening of the Union Stock Yards around 1904, drawing livestock by rail and road; by the 1910s, the facilities processed thousands of railcars annually and employed up to 3,000 workers in packing operations, underpinning a sector that included major firms like the William Davies Company.[83] These industries, alongside rail maintenance and assembly, absorbed a substantial share of the urban workforce into the early 20th century, leveraging the city's central location for distribution across Ontario and beyond.[84] Post-1950s, Old Toronto's economy pivoted toward services as manufacturing waned, with the financial sector gaining prominence through the 1955 merger of the Bank of Toronto (chartered 1855) and Dominion Bank (founded 1871) into the Toronto-Dominion Bank, which headquartered in the city and expanded operations amid postwar prosperity.[85] This development reinforced Toronto's role as Canada's banking center, where the core urban area historically concentrated a disproportionate portion of provincial economic output through finance and related activities, outpacing rural contributions in value-added sectors.[80]Key Industries and Trade Hubs
The financial district centered on Bay Street constitutes Old Toronto's dominant economic pillar, functioning as Canada's equivalent to Wall Street and concentrating major banking, investment, and securities activities. It houses the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), the country's largest stock market, with a total market capitalization surpassing CAD 3.9 trillion as of October 2025.[86] This sector employs tens of thousands in high-value roles, underpinned by headquarters of the "Big Five" Canadian banks and global asset managers, driving over 20% of national financial services output.[87] The Port of Toronto, situated on the eastern waterfront within Old Toronto's pre-1998 boundaries, operates as a vital Great Lakes logistics node, managing dry bulk and breakbulk cargo despite navigational constraints from the St. Lawrence Seaway that preclude large container ships. In 2024, it handled 2,056,924 metric tonnes of goods across 173 vessel calls, including 591,265 tonnes of sugar and substantial volumes of road salt and cement, equivalent to diverting 51,000 truck trips from regional highways.[88] This throughput supports industrial supply chains, though volumes remain modest compared to ocean ports due to lockage limitations and seasonal ice risks.[89] Technology innovation clusters, notably the MaRS Discovery District in the core, foster startups in fintech, health tech, and cleantech, leveraging proximity to universities and venture capital. MaRS supports over 1,400 ventures, facilitating access to networks and scaling resources.[90] Yet, sector expansion has depended on public incentives like the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) tax credits—offering up to 35% refunds on qualifying R&D—and provincial grants, which critics argue distort market signals, favor politically connected firms, and yield uneven returns amid recent funding scandals.[91][92] These anchors have sustained Old Toronto's trade orientation, with financial services exports bolstering resilience against post-amalgamation suburban dilution, though empirical data underscore finance's outsized role over manufacturing in export value.[93]Culture and Society
Cultural Landmarks and Heritage
Old Toronto's cultural landmarks encompass a range of preserved industrial, residential, and institutional sites that reflect the area's evolution from colonial outpost to urban center, with preservation often sustained by economic viability rather than solely regulatory enforcement. The Distillery District, originally the Gooderham and Worts Distillery established in the 1830s and featuring Canada's oldest distillery structure from 1859-1861, was designated a National Historic Site in 1988 for its cohesive Victorian industrial architecture. Adaptive reuse transformed it into a pedestrian-oriented arts, dining, and entertainment hub by 2003, preserving 47 heritage buildings through private investment that capitalized on their market appeal for cultural tourism, yielding sustained economic returns without relying on top-down subsidies.[94] [95] Casa Loma, a Gothic Revival mansion constructed from 1911 to 1914 by financier Sir Henry Pellatt at a cost exceeding $3.5 million (equivalent to over $100 million today), exemplifies early 20th-century extravagance with 98 rooms across five acres, including medieval-inspired towers and a 640-foot tunnel. Opened to the public in 1937 after Pellatt's financial decline, its maintenance as a heritage attraction has depended on visitor revenue and event hosting, underscoring how intrinsic market demand for experiential history preserves such sites more effectively than isolated state interventions.[96] [97] St. Lawrence Market, Toronto's oldest continuous market since its informal establishment in 1803 and formal structures from 1820 onward, integrates 19th-century architecture including the 1845 former City Hall facade into its 1902 South Building. Ranked among the world's top food markets, its vitality stems from daily vendor operations and events that generate over 1.2 million annual visitors, illustrating heritage endurance through commercial adaptation rather than preservation mandates alone.[98] [99] Cabbagetown, a residential enclave of late 19th-century Victorian row houses and semi-detached homes in styles like Queen Anne and Gothic Revival, achieved Heritage Conservation District status incrementally, with Cabbagetown North designated under the Ontario Heritage Act and Southwest finalized by Toronto City Council in December 2024, encompassing high-integrity buildings from the 1880s-1890s boom. These districts have seen property assessment growth outpacing non-designated areas, as heritage designation enhances market values by 10-20% through buyer preference for authentic architecture, evidencing bottom-up economic incentives outperforming prescriptive planning that can stifle adaptive uses.[100] [101] [102] Intangible heritage includes the origins of the Toronto International Film Festival, launched in 1976 as the Festival of Festivals at the Windsor Arms Hotel in Yorkville, a core Old Toronto venue, screening international films to build cultural prestige. Its growth to over 500,000 attendees by drawing market-supported premieres and industry deals highlights how organic, demand-driven events embed lasting cultural value, contrasting with government-led initiatives prone to bureaucratic inertia.[103][104]Social Dynamics and Multicultural Evolution
Old Toronto's social fabric originated from a predominantly Anglo-Protestant settler base established in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, with British immigrants forming the core population amid a culture emphasizing Protestant values and English common law traditions.[105] This homogeneity persisted until post-World War II labor demands spurred immigration waves, particularly from southern Europe in the 1950s and 1960s, when annual Italian arrivals exceeded 20,000 nationally, many settling in Toronto's working-class neighborhoods like Little Italy and Kensington Market.[106] Portuguese immigrants followed suit, concentrating in areas such as Little Portugal, drawn by construction and manufacturing jobs, gradually diversifying the city's ethnic composition while initial integration involved ethnic enclaves and cultural preservation rather than rapid assimilation.[107] These shifts challenged the Anglo-centric social order, fostering parallel communities that maintained distinct languages and customs amid occasional frictions, such as labor competition and neighborhood turf disputes documented in local histories.[108] By the 21st century, Old Toronto's core reflected intensified multiculturalism, with the 2021 census recording approximately 51.2% of the City of Toronto's population as foreign-born, a figure elevated in the pre-amalgamation downtown wards due to ongoing global inflows from Asia, the Caribbean, and Africa post-1970s policy changes.[109] However, integration metrics reveal uneven outcomes: recent immigrants often face median employment incomes around $36,800 nationally, with Toronto-specific household medians at $84,000 overall but lower for non-European origins due to credential recognition barriers and skill mismatches, perpetuating socioeconomic divides by birthplace.[110][111] Gentrification exacerbated these dynamics, as rising property values—driven by condo developments and professional influxes—displaced working-class residents, including earlier European immigrant descendants, with studies linking high-rise booms to informal evictions and rent hikes in neighborhoods like the Studio District, where industrial lands converted to upscale uses reduced affordable housing stock by over 20% in affected zones since the 1990s.[112][113] Empirical assessments of multiculturalism's evolution highlight causal strains from unchecked population growth via immigration, which boosted aggregate GDP but depressed per-capita metrics and intensified pressures on municipal services like housing and transit in Old Toronto's dense core. Rapid demographic expansion contributed to a housing shortage, with vacancy rates below 1% correlating to immigrant-driven demand, straining infrastructure budgets and prompting debates over fiscal sustainability, as lower-skilled inflows yielded net public costs in early years per lifecycle analyses.[114] Social tensions, though mitigated by policy frameworks since Canada's 1971 multiculturalism adoption, persisted in forms like ethnic segregation in schooling and employment, with historical precedents such as 1930s riots underscoring resistance to rapid diversification, underscoring that harmonious evolution required deliberate integration efforts rather than passive inflows.[115][116]Demographics
Population Trends Over Time
The population of Old Toronto experienced rapid growth in the 19th and early 20th centuries, reaching 681,517 by the 1951 census, reflecting industrialization and immigration.[117] Following annexations such as those of Parkdale in 1889 and Riverdale in 1884, growth stabilized post-World War II, with the 1991 census recording 635,395 residents within the pre-1998 boundaries spanning approximately 97 km².[118]| Year | Population | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1951 | 681,517 | Statistics Canada via Demographia[117] |
| 1991 | 635,395 | Statistics Canada census data |
| 1996 | 635,395 | Statistics Canada via Demographia[117] |
.jpg)