Hubbry Logo
search
logo
Pacific County, Washington avatar
Pacific County, Washington
Pacific County, Washington
current hub
2297798

Pacific County, Washington

logo
Community Hub0 Subscribers
Read side by side
Pacific County, Washington
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Pacific County is a county in the U.S. state of Washington. As of the 2020 census, the population was 23,365.[1] Its county seat is South Bend,[2] and its largest city is Raymond. The county was formed by the government of Oregon Territory in February 1851[3] and is named for the Pacific Ocean.

Key Information

Pacific County is centered on Willapa Bay, a region that provides twenty-five percent of the United States oyster harvest,[4] although forestry, fishing, and tourism are also significant elements of the county's economy.

History

[edit]

The area that is now Pacific County was part of Oregon Territory in the first part of the nineteenth century. On December 19, 1845, the Provisional Government of Oregon created two counties (Vancouver and Clark) in its northern portion (which is now the state of Washington). In 1849, the name of Vancouver County was changed to Lewis County, and on February 4, 1851, a portion of Lewis County was partitioned off to become Pacific County. The county's boundaries have not changed since its creation. Pacific City was the first county seat, when it was annexed by the US military, the county seat was transferred to Chinookville. The unincorporated community of Oysterville, established in 1852, was the third county seat. The county records were stolen from Oysterville and ferried across Willapa Harbor by residents of South Bend, resulting in that town becoming the new county seat in 1893.

Geography

[edit]

According to the United States Census Bureau, the county has an area of 1,223 square miles (3,170 km2), of which 933 square miles (2,420 km2) is land and 291 square miles (750 km2) (24%) is water.[5]

Geographic features

[edit]

Major highways

[edit]

Adjacent counties

[edit]

National protected areas

[edit]

Demographics

[edit]
Historical population
CensusPop.Note%±
1860420—
187073875.7%
18801,645122.9%
18904,358164.9%
19005,98337.3%
191012,532109.5%
192014,89118.8%
193014,9700.5%
194015,9286.4%
195016,5584.0%
196014,674−11.4%
197015,7967.6%
198017,2379.1%
199018,8829.5%
200020,98411.1%
201020,920−0.3%
202023,36511.7%
2024 (est.)24,245[6]3.8%
U.S. Decennial Census[7]
1790–1960[8] 1900–1990[9]
1990–2000[10] 2010–2020[1]

2010 census

[edit]

As of the 2010 census, there were 20,920 people, 9,499 households, and 5,707 families living in the county.[11] The population density was 22.4 inhabitants per square mile (8.6/km2). There were 15,547 housing units at an average density of 16.7 per square mile (6.4/km2).[12] The racial makeup of the county was 87.4% white, 2.3% American Indian, 2.0% Asian, 0.4% black or African American, 0.1% Pacific islander, 4.4% from other races, and 3.4% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 8.0% of the population.[11] In terms of ancestry, 23.4% were German, 13.8% were English, 11.9% were Irish, 7.6% were American, 6.2% were Norwegian, and 5.8% were Swedish.[13]

Of the 9,499 households, 20.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 47.6% were married couples living together, 8.1% had a female householder with no husband present, 39.9% were non-families, and 33.0% of all households were made up of individuals. The average household size was 2.17 and the average family size was 2.72. The median age was 50.8 years.[11]

The median income for a household in the county was $39,642 and the median income for a family was $51,450. Males had a median income of $44,775 versus $34,538 for females. The per capita income for the county was $23,326. About 12.4% of families and 16.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 20.4% of those under age 18 and 9.9% of those age 65 or over.[14]

2000 census

[edit]

As of the 2000 census, there were 20,984 people, 9,096 households, and 5,885 families living in the county. The population density was 22 people per square mile (8.5 people/km2). There were 13,991 housing units at an average density of 15 per square mile (5.8/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 90.54% White, 0.20% Black or African American, 2.44% Native American, 2.08% Asian, 0.09% Pacific Islander, 1.83% from other races, and 2.82% from two or more races. 5.01% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race. 18.0% were of German, 10.8% English, 8.8% Irish and 8.6% United States or American ancestry.

There were 9,096 households, out of which 23.10% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 53.10% were married couples living together, 7.90% had a female householder with no husband present, and 35.30% were non-families. 29.50% of all households were made up of individuals, and 14.30% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.27 and the average family size was 2.77.

In the county, the population was spread out, with 21.40% under the age of 18, 6.00% from 18 to 24, 21.20% from 25 to 44, 28.90% from 45 to 64, and 22.60% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 46 years. For every 100 females there were 98.30 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 95.80 males.

The median income for a household in the county was $31,209, and the median income for a family was $39,302. Males had a median income of $33,892 versus $22,982 for females. The per capita income for the county was $17,322. About 9.10% of families and 14.40% of the population were below the poverty line, including 19.70% of those under age 18 and 8.10% of those age 65 or over.

Politics

[edit]

Pacific County, along with neighboring Grays Harbor County, were among the most consistently Democratic counties in the nation. In 2016, however, the county, like Grays Harbor County, broke its long streak of backing the Democratic candidate for president, voting for the Republican candidate, Donald Trump. The county backed Trump again in 2020, voting for a losing Republican for the first time since 1916. It backed Trump again in 2024, with him winning it by a margin of 1.30%, a slight increase from his margin of 1.13% in 2020.

United States presidential election results for Pacific County, Washington[15][16]
Year Republican Democratic Third party(ies)
No.  % No.  % No.  %
1892 759 52.60% 559 38.74% 125 8.66%
1896 925 61.22% 562 37.19% 24 1.59%
1900 887 66.74% 393 29.57% 49 3.69%
1904 1,354 76.98% 258 14.67% 147 8.36%
1908 1,492 69.30% 483 22.43% 178 8.27%
1912 1,375 33.77% 971 23.85% 1,726 42.39%
1916 2,688 59.50% 1,537 34.02% 293 6.49%
1920 2,607 65.57% 874 21.98% 495 12.45%
1924 2,672 64.57% 501 12.11% 965 23.32%
1928 3,247 67.41% 1,523 31.62% 47 0.98%
1932 1,737 31.08% 3,099 55.46% 752 13.46%
1936 1,732 26.87% 4,395 68.17% 320 4.96%
1940 2,704 37.84% 4,393 61.48% 48 0.67%
1944 2,419 39.17% 3,745 60.64% 12 0.19%
1948 2,749 38.98% 3,902 55.33% 401 5.69%
1952 3,846 50.19% 3,778 49.30% 39 0.51%
1956 3,799 49.76% 3,824 50.09% 12 0.16%
1960 3,224 45.47% 3,837 54.12% 29 0.41%
1964 1,789 26.08% 5,056 73.70% 15 0.22%
1968 2,491 37.71% 3,740 56.62% 374 5.66%
1972 3,349 46.73% 3,585 50.03% 232 3.24%
1976 2,781 37.84% 4,278 58.20% 291 3.96%
1980 3,132 39.09% 3,727 46.52% 1,153 14.39%
1984 3,613 42.90% 4,679 55.56% 129 1.53%
1988 3,073 37.48% 5,017 61.18% 110 1.34%
1992 2,243 24.24% 4,587 49.58% 2,422 26.18%
1996 2,598 28.51% 5,095 55.92% 1,418 15.56%
2000 4,042 42.46% 4,895 51.42% 582 6.11%
2004 4,634 44.43% 5,570 53.40% 227 2.18%
2008 4,555 41.20% 6,094 55.12% 406 3.67%
2012 4,499 42.30% 5,711 53.69% 426 4.01%
2016 5,360 48.85% 4,620 42.11% 992 9.04%
2020 6,953 49.44% 6,794 48.31% 317 2.25%
2024 7,010 49.21% 6,825 47.91% 409 2.87%

Communities

[edit]

Cities

[edit]

Census-designated places

[edit]

Unincorporated communities

[edit]

Ghost towns

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pacific County, Washington

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pacific County is a rural coastal county in southwestern Washington state, bordering the Pacific Ocean and encompassing approximately 933 square miles of beaches, forests, farms, and bays including Willapa Bay.[1] Established in 1851 as the third county in what would become Washington Territory, it derives its name from the adjacent Pacific Ocean and has South Bend as its county seat.[2] As of July 2024, the population stands at 24,245, characterized by a median age of 54.9 years and a median household income of around $62,350, reflecting a predominantly older, White demographic with significant retiree influx.[3][4] The county's economy relies on natural resource extraction and tourism, with key sectors including oyster harvesting and aquaculture in Willapa Bay—producing over half of Washington's oysters—commercial fishing, crabbing, forestry, logging, and lumber manufacturing, alongside seasonal tourism drawn to the Long Beach Peninsula's beaches and state parks.[5] Labor force participation remains low at 47.8% due to the aging population, with poverty rates higher than state averages at 13.6% over recent years.[6] Indigenous history features prominently, with early inhabitants like the Chinook and Shoalwater tribes shaping the region's pre-colonial economy around marine resources, while European settlement from the 1850s introduced logging and shellfish industries that persist today.[2][7] Notable features include Cape Disappointment State Park at the Columbia River mouth, site of historic lighthouses and shipwrecks, and the county's role in maritime history, including Lewis and Clark's 1805 expedition endpoint nearby.[7] The area maintains a sparse, unincorporated character with small communities like Ocean Park and Ilwaco, emphasizing sustainable resource management amid environmental pressures on fisheries and forests.[5]

History

Indigenous Presence and Early Exploration

The region encompassing modern Pacific County was long occupied by Chinookan-speaking peoples, including the Lower Chinook and Shoalwater Chinook groups, who maintained semi-permanent villages along the Columbia River estuary, Willapa Bay, and adjacent coastal areas. These populations developed economies centered on exploiting predictable marine abundances, with salmon runs harvested via weirs, traps, and dip nets providing a primary protein source, alongside clams, oysters, and sea mammals like seals obtained through cooperative hunting from cedar-plank canoes. Trade networks facilitated exchange of dried fish, shells, and eulachon oil for inland goods such as obsidian and baskets, supporting population densities estimated at several hundred per village without evidence of chronic scarcity.[2][8][9] Archaeological sites, including extensive shell middens layered over millennia, reveal consistent reliance on diverse, locally available species without depletion signals, as isotopic and faunal analyses from Pacific Northwest coastal excavations show stable salmon contributions to diets spanning at least 7,500 years. This pattern implies adaptive practices—such as selective harvesting during peak runs and habitat enhancements like rock walls for clam beds—that maintained ecosystem productivity, corroborated by ethnographic accounts of rotational use and taboos against waste, though pre-contact population pressures from trade-driven growth tested these limits in denser estuary zones.[10][11][12] Initial European contact occurred during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, when the Corps of Discovery, after navigating the Columbia River, first sighted the Pacific Ocean on November 7, 1805, and established Station Camp near present-day Chinook Point in Pacific County by November 15. Expedition journals record interactions with Chinook and Clatsop villagers, noting vast salmon drying operations, abundant elk herds, and tidal flats rich in shellfish, which impressed the explorers amid their own supply shortages; these observations, while filtered through expedition hardships, provided the earliest written documentation of the area's resource bounty and indigenous maritime expertise. No prior overland European incursions are recorded, though Spanish and British maritime voyages had skirted the outer coast without penetrating the bays.[13][14][15]

County Formation and Settlement

Pacific County was established on February 4, 1851, by the Oregon Territorial Legislature, carved from portions of Lewis County in what was then the northern reaches of Oregon Territory.[16] The county derived its name from its adjacency to the Pacific Ocean, which forms its western boundary along the Long Beach Peninsula and Willapa Bay.[2] This creation preceded Washington Territory's organization in 1853, positioning Pacific as one of the region's earliest administrative divisions, initially encompassing a vast area that included present-day Wahkiakum and parts of Grays Harbor counties before boundary adjustments.[17] Initial Euro-American settlement accelerated under the Donation Land Claim Act of 1850, which granted up to 320 acres of public land to white male settlers over 18 who resided on and cultivated their claims for four years, facilitating claims amid ongoing indigenous land use by Chinook and Lower Chehalis peoples.[18] Economic incentives centered on abundant natural resources: oystering drew pioneers like Robert H. Espy and Isaac A. Clark to establish Oysterville in 1854 on Willapa Bay, capitalizing on prolific shellfish beds that had sustained native economies.[17] Timber harvesting and small-scale agriculture also spurred inland claims, with early logging operations exploiting dense coastal forests for lumber destined for regional markets, though fishing traps in coastal channels supported initial subsistence and trade.[2] Oysterville served as the provisional county seat from 1855, hosting rudimentary government functions until a contentious 1892 election shifted operations to South Bend following a physical seizure of records by South Bend residents in 1893, amid disputes over infrastructure and accessibility.[19] The later Homestead Act of 1862 further encouraged settlement by offering 160 acres to claimants after five years of residency and improvement, though coastal terrain and isolation limited rapid inland expansion compared to agrarian interiors.[20] These mechanisms prioritized federal disposition of public domain lands, often overriding indigenous treaty rights established under the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay and similar agreements, fostering a pattern of resource extraction that defined early county development.[2]

Economic and Industrial Evolution

The lumber industry in Pacific County emerged early in Washington Territory's settlement, with the state's first sawmill established in 1849 at Pacific City in the county's southern reaches by Ed Loomis and Charles W. Stuart.[21] This water-powered operation produced heavy planks primarily for export to San Francisco amid the California Gold Rush, leveraging Willapa Bay's deep-water access for shipping despite logistical challenges that led to significant waste from rot during transport.[21] The mill was dismantled in 1855 following a federal order to vacate the site, but its machinery was repurposed for a South Bend mill around 1868-1869, marking an initial shift toward localized processing.[21] By the late 1800s, logging boomed with the establishment of additional mills in towns like South Bend, fueled by demand for coastal timber; mechanization advanced in the 1890s through steam locomotives and donkey engines, enabling extraction from denser forests and facilitating rail and bay-based trade.[2] Parallel to lumber, oyster harvesting in Willapa Bay drove economic growth from the 1850s, with the first commercial shipload exported in 1851 by Charles J. W. Russell to San Francisco markets depleted by Gold Rush demand.[22] Native Olympia oysters (Ostrea lurida) were initially wild-harvested using dike systems to cultivate beds, but depletion prompted introductions of non-native species: Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) seed arrived in 1896 via oysterman Meinert Wachsmuth, sparking a temporary boom despite reproductive failures, followed by Japanese (Pacific) oysters (Crassostrea gigas) in the 1920s that established sustainable cultivation.[22][2] By the early 1900s, Willapa Bay operations had scaled to supply national and international markets, with canning infrastructure emerging to process and export bivalves alongside wild stocks, solidifying the county's role in global shellfish trade.[22] The 20th century saw canning industries expand around Willapa Bay and coastal ports, processing salmon, Dungeness crab, oysters, and clams at facilities like those in Bay Center, with heightened demand during World War I boosting salmon canning output across the Pacific Northwest for military rations.[2] World War II further accelerated mechanization in both fishing and logging, including high-lead yarding systems for timber harvest that persisted postwar, though timber prices fell post-WWI leading to some mill closures.[2] These sectors emphasized resource extraction for export, with Willapa Bay's shipping channels enabling efficient trade until mid-century shifts toward diversified processing.[2]

Modern Developments and Challenges

The timber industry in Pacific County experienced significant contraction following federal restrictions implemented in the 1990s, particularly through the Northwest Forest Plan of 1994, which reduced harvests on federal lands by prioritizing habitat protection for species like the northern spotted owl under the Endangered Species Act.[23] [24] Harvest volumes on federal lands in western Washington, including Pacific County, dropped sharply, with projections estimating a 74% decline from pre-1990 averages, contributing to job losses exceeding 30,000 across the Pacific Northwest between 1990 and 2000.[25] [26] This shift reflected broader regulatory pressures that curtailed access to public timberlands, forcing reliance on private holdings and accelerating economic diversification away from logging-dependent mills. In response, the county's economy adapted through expansion in aquaculture and cranberry production, leveraging coastal wetlands and Willapa Bay's conditions. Willapa Bay emerged as the nation's largest producer of farmed shellfish, including oysters and clams, supporting commercial fishing and processing amid timber's decline.[27] Cranberry cultivation, concentrated in Pacific County which dominates Washington's output, covered approximately 1,579 acres by recent USDA census data, yielding key agricultural revenue despite market volatility.[28] [29] These sectors provided partial offsets, with shellfish and cranberries bolstering farm income amid a total agricultural expense base of $48 million in 2022.[28] Population growth in the 2020s, driven partly by retirees drawn to the rural coastal lifestyle, has averaged under 1% annually, rising from 23,396 in 2022 to 23,750 in 2023, yet this influx—coupled with a large 55-and-over demographic—has strained local infrastructure.[4] [6] Low labor force participation at 47.8% exacerbates service demands, while modest housing growth (lagging state averages) and increased wastewater treatment pressures highlight capacity limits in a county reliant on tourism and small-scale operations.[30] [31] The December 2007 coastal gale exemplified resilience to natural disasters, with hurricane-force winds toppling thousands of trees, causing widespread power outages lasting days, and isolating communities through blocked roads and landslides.[32] [33] Local responses emphasized community self-reliance, as agencies managed emergencies amid severed connections to state aid, with neighbors aiding recovery in the absence of prompt external intervention; federal assistance via FEMA followed but was secondary to grassroots efforts.[34] [35]

Geography

Topography and Natural Features

Pacific County spans approximately 933 square miles of land, encompassing a varied topography shaped by coastal barriers, estuarine lowlands, and inland uplands. The county's western edge features the Long Beach Peninsula, a narrow, 28-mile-long sand spit extending northward from the mouth of the Columbia River, characterized by expansive beaches, shifting coastal dunes, and low-relief barrier islands that separate the Pacific Ocean from interior waters.[5][7] Central to the landscape is Willapa Bay, a shallow, 135-square-mile estuary formed by tidal flats, salt marshes, and channels, sheltered eastward by the peninsula and fed by multiple river systems. These estuarine features include intricate networks of mudflats and wetlands that interface with upland terrain. Inland from the bay, the topography rises into the Willapa Hills, comprising rolling forested uplands and valleys, with elevations reaching up to around 3,000 feet in localized peaks such as Walville Peak. Approximately 85 percent of the county's land consists of timberland, predominantly coniferous forests covering these hills and supporting dense stands of Douglas-fir and other species. Rivers like the Naselle, originating in the hills and flowing westward about 20 miles to Willapa Bay, incise valleys through this upland matrix, forming alluvial plains and contributing to sediment deposition in the estuary.[36][30][37] The county's position along the Cascadia Subduction Zone exposes its coastal and lowland features to substantial seismic hazards, including megathrust earthquakes capable of magnitudes exceeding 9.0. Geological records, such as subsided marshes, "ghost forests" of drowned cedar trees, and inland sand sheets from tsunami deposits, provide evidence of a major event on January 26, 1700, that generated widespread coastal subsidence of up to 6 feet and run-up waves inundating low-lying areas along the Washington coast. These features underscore the dynamic tectonic setting, where ongoing plate convergence influences long-term landscape evolution through recurring uplift, subsidence, and erosion.[38][39][40]

Climate and Environmental Conditions

Pacific County exhibits a temperate marine climate influenced by the Pacific Ocean and prevailing westerlies, resulting in mild temperatures year-round. The annual mean temperature averages approximately 50°F, with winter daily averages around 40°F from December to February and summer highs typically between 60°F and 66°F from June to August.[41][42] These conditions rarely feature extremes, with lows seldom dropping below 32°F or highs exceeding 73°F.[41] Annual precipitation totals 80 to 86 inches, predominantly falling as rain during the October-to-April wet season, driven by orographic lift from moist Pacific air masses.[43][44] Seasonal coastal fog, common from May to September, moderates daytime highs and supports moisture-dependent agriculture such as cranberry cultivation by minimizing evapotranspiration, while strong winds averaging 10-15 mph contribute to wave-driven coastal erosion and bluff retreat.[45][46] Long-term NOAA station data from nearby Long Beach indicate stability in these patterns, with no significant century-scale shifts in average temperatures or precipitation variability beyond natural oscillations like the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. The county's environmental conditions feature nutrient-rich coastal waters in bays like Willapa Bay, fostering robust shellfish populations through natural upwelling that delivers deep-ocean nutrients.[47] However, this upwelling periodically transports low-pH, carbon-saturated waters to the surface, causing acute ocean acidification events that corrode calcium carbonate shells of oyster larvae, as evidenced by mass die-offs in regional hatcheries starting around 2005.[48][49] While atmospheric CO2 absorption contributes to a gradual baseline decline in surface pH, empirical monitoring attributes the most severe episodic impacts to wind-driven upwelling rather than emissions-driven trends alone, underscoring the dominance of natural variability in short-term ecological stressors.[47][48]

Transportation Infrastructure

U.S. Route 101 serves as the principal east-west corridor through Pacific County, connecting the county's interior communities to Olympia in the north and facilitating access to Portland, Oregon, in the south via the Astoria–Megler Bridge over the Columbia River. State Route 103 complements this by running north-south along the Long Beach Peninsula's Pacific coastline, linking tourist destinations, residential areas, and resource extraction sites to US 101 at Seaview. These state-maintained highways, overseen by the Washington State Department of Transportation, enable the transport of timber, seafood, and agricultural goods to regional markets, underscoring their economic importance despite the county's remote coastal position.[50] The Port of Willapa Harbor, with facilities in South Bend and Tokeland, functions as the county's key maritime hub for cargo handling, primarily supporting commercial fishing fleets and wood processing industries through docking, log shipping, and seafood offloading operations.[51] [52] These activities facilitate exports of lumber and fishery products, contributing to local economic connectivity with Pacific Northwest ports and beyond.[53] Pacific County's approximately 400 miles of rural county roads, many gravel-surfaced and low-elevation, are highly vulnerable to flooding from Willapa Bay tides, river overflows, and coastal storms, necessitating ongoing repairs and drainage improvements.[54] The Department of Public Works' Fiscal Year 2024 budget includes dedicated funding for flood control zone district operations, such as culvert maintenance and erosion mitigation, to address these recurrent issues amid rising maintenance costs projected in the county's hazard mitigation planning.[55] [56] Such challenges highlight the tension between infrastructural demands for economic viability and the fiscal burdens imposed by environmental hazards.

Adjacent Regions and Boundaries

Pacific County is bordered to the north by Grays Harbor County, to the east by Lewis County and Wahkiakum County, to the south by Clatsop County in Oregon along the Columbia River, and to the west by the Pacific Ocean.[57][58] The southern boundary follows the Columbia River, which demarcates the state line with Oregon and forms part of the expansive estuary shared between the two states. This configuration contributes to the county's geographic isolation from major inland population centers, with distances between northern and southern areas exacerbating limited connectivity and influencing economic patterns.[59] Trade and commerce are affected by this isolation, as overland access is constrained, leading to greater dependence on coastal highways like U.S. Route 101 for southward connections to Oregon markets in areas such as Astoria for goods and services. The shared Columbia River estuary ecosystem necessitates cooperative fisheries jurisdiction under the Columbia River Compact, administered jointly by Washington and Oregon to manage salmon and other species across state boundaries.[60] Public transit systems, including connections from Pacific Transit to Astoria, facilitate cross-border commuting and regional economic ties.[61]

Demographics

Historical Population Changes

Pacific County's population grew modestly in its early years following formation in 1851, reflecting settlement patterns tied to timber and fishing resources, with recorded figures reaching 1,260 residents by the 1860 census.[62] Growth accelerated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries due to logging expansion and railroad access, peaking relative to prior decades around wartime industrial demands in the 1940s.[5] U.S. Census Bureau decennial data illustrate this trajectory, showing consistent increases through mid-century before stabilizing amid resource sector fluctuations.
Decennial YearPopulation
19006,756
19109,056
192011,636
193014,970
194015,928
195018,687
196018,606
197018,377
198018,398
199018,352
200020,984
201020,920
202023,365
The table above compiles U.S. Census Bureau decennial enumerations, revealing a near-doubling from 1900 to 1950 amid logging booms and World War II-related employment in shipbuilding and timber for war materials, which drew migrant labor to coastal mills.[63][64] Post-1950, growth stalled as timber harvests plateaued, with minimal net change from 1960 to 1990 due to out-migration following federal restrictions on old-growth logging and mill closures in the 1980s-1990s, which reduced jobs by thousands regionally and prompted population stagnation or slight declines in Pacific County.[65][66] From 2000 onward, the population rose gradually to 20,920 by 2010 before accelerating post-2020, reaching an estimated 24,245 by July 2024, primarily through net domestic migration of retirees and remote workers seeking affordable rural coastal living amid urban outflows during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.[67][68] This recent uptick contrasts earlier resource-dependent patterns, with migration accounting for over 1,600 net in-migrants since 2020 despite natural decrease from aging demographics.[68]

Current Composition and Trends

As of the 2020 United States Census, Pacific County's population of 22,035 residents was predominantly White, comprising 89.5% of the total when measured as White alone (including those identifying as White in combination with other races), with non-Hispanic Whites accounting for approximately 80-81% in subsequent estimates adjusting for ethnicity.[4] American Indians and Alaska Natives made up 3.0%, Blacks or African Americans 1.2%, Asians 2.0%, and Native Hawaiians or Pacific Islanders 0.4%, while persons reporting two or more races increased to around 5.3% in recent data. Hispanic or Latino residents of any race constituted 9.4-9.7%, reflecting limited ethnic diversity compared to national averages.[69]
Racial/Ethnic GroupPercentage (2020 Census or Equivalent)
White alone89.5%
Non-Hispanic White80-81%
Hispanic or Latino9.4-9.7%
American Indian/Alaska Native3.0%
Black/African American1.2%
Asian2.0%
Two or more races5.3%
The county's median age stood at 54.9 years as of 2023, significantly above the national median of 38.9, driven by an influx of retirees and seasonal residents attracted to coastal amenities rather than natural population growth.[4][70] Birth rates remain low, with natural change (births minus deaths) contributing negatively to population dynamics since 2020, resulting in a net loss of over 900 residents absent migration; only about 683 births occurred in the decade post-2020 Census amid an aging demographic.[68] Immigration rates are minimal, with foreign-born residents at 5.97% in 2023—below the U.S. average of 13.8%—indicating reliance on domestic in-migration for stability.[4] Household composition emphasizes stability and ownership, with 81.2% of occupied units owner-occupied as of 2019-2023 American Community Survey data, higher than the state average, though trends show increasing part-time or seasonal occupancy due to vacation homes in rural and coastal areas.[71] This pattern aligns with the county's appeal to older, non-year-round residents, contributing to a vacancy rate exceeding 25% in total housing units.

Socioeconomic Indicators

The median household income in Pacific County was $55,752 in 2019-2023, substantially below the Washington state average of $94,952 over the same period, reflecting the county's rural character and reliance on lower-wage industries amid higher living costs in coastal areas. Per capita income stood at $33,113, further underscoring economic disparities tied to limited high-skill job opportunities and an aging workforce. The poverty rate was 13.9% in 2019-2023, exceeding the state figure of 8.7%, with rural isolation and seasonal employment contributing to persistent vulnerability among households dependent on fisheries and timber, where income fluctuations amplify financial strain. Educational attainment shows 89.5% of residents aged 25 and older holding a high school diploma or equivalent in 2019-2023, a figure aligned with vocational-oriented rural economies favoring practical skills over extended formal education, though below the state rate of 91.9%. Bachelor's degree or higher attainment was 15.9%, compared to 36.7% statewide, correlating with preferences for trade apprenticeships in logging and marine trades rather than urban-centric academic paths. Civilian labor force participation among those aged 16 and older was 47.7% in 2019-2023, lower than the state average of 64.5%, attributable to a median age of 54.9—nearly 17 years above the national median—and retiree influxes alongside seasonal disruptions in agriculture and tourism that deter consistent workforce entry. This dynamic highlights causal links between demographic aging and subdued participation, distinct from urban benchmarks where younger populations sustain higher engagement.[72]

Economy

Resource-Based Industries

Pacific County's economy has historically relied on resource extraction, particularly timber harvesting, commercial fishing, and aquaculture, which leverage the county's extensive forests, coastal waters, and estuarine bays. Approximately 70 percent of the county's land area consists of commercial forest lands, supporting a timber industry focused on sustainable yields through managed rotations and reforestation practices.[73] [74] Annual timber harvests in Washington state, including contributions from Pacific County's private and state-owned forests, totaled 2.5 million MBF (thousand board feet) in 2023, with county-level data from the Department of Natural Resources indicating steady production from public lands amid regulatory frameworks that limit clearcuts to promote regeneration.[75] [76] Aquaculture dominates in Willapa Bay, recognized as the nation's largest producer of farmed shellfish, with Pacific County hosting 29 operations that yielded $43.25 million in oysters and clams in 2022, primarily Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and Manila clams (Ruditapes philippinarum).[29] [27] Cranberry production complements this, with the county's bogs contributing to Washington's output of over 300 million pounds annually, though specific local values are integrated into broader agricultural sales exceeding $60 million in shellfish and berries combined.[77] Industry resilience stems from proactive disease management, including non-native burrowing shrimp control via targeted pesticide applications approved under state environmental reviews, which have sustained yields despite past challenges like Vibrio outbreaks and algal blooms.[78] Commercial fishing, centered in ports like Ilwaco and Chinook, involves over 200 vessels landing more than 21 million pounds of seafood annually, including Dungeness crab, Pacific pink shrimp, albacore tuna, and groundfish, generating over $25 million in ex-vessel value.[79] [80] These fleets have rebounded from 1990s overfishing restrictions through quota systems and habitat recovery, enabling global exports—Washington's seafood shipments reached billions in value statewide in recent years, with coastal crab and tuna from Pacific County ports contributing via processors shipping to Asia and Europe.[81] Such recoveries underscore adaptive management under federal oversight, balancing stock sustainability with economic viability.[82]

Tourism and Recreation

Tourism constitutes a significant portion of Pacific County's economy, with visitor spending reaching $192 million in 2020 despite the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrating sector resiliency.[83] [84] The Long Beach Peninsula serves as the primary draw, featuring a 28-mile stretch of sandy beaches suitable for activities such as kite flying and beachcombing, alongside attractions like Cape Disappointment State Park, which recorded over 900,000 visitors in 2024.[85] Annual events, including the Washington State International Kite Festival held since 1981, attract thousands of participants and spectators to the area's beaches.[86] Lodging and related services generate substantial seasonal revenue, with summer lodging receipts totaling approximately $13.4 million in 2024, reflecting steady tourism activity post-pandemic.[87] Sectors tied to tourism, such as accommodation, food services, and retail trade, account for about 25% of county employment, supporting over 2,440 jobs as of 2019 data.[6] [88] However, high seasonality constrains year-round economic stability, with employment and revenues peaking in summer months and declining sharply otherwise.[6] Recreational pursuits emphasize coastal and natural experiences, including regulated razor clamming on peninsula beaches, where limits and seasonal openings are enforced by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to sustain stocks. Birdwatching thrives in protected areas like Willapa National Wildlife Refuge, offering trails for observing migratory species in estuarine habitats.[89] These activities contribute to visitor retention and spending multipliers, though the county's tourism strategy prioritizes sustainable practices to mitigate over-reliance amid fluctuating demand.[84]

Employment and Economic Challenges

Pacific County's unemployment rate has historically exceeded 10% during economic downturns and seasonal fluctuations, with a long-term average of 9.2% reflecting structural vulnerabilities in resource-dependent sectors.[90] The county experienced sharp seasonal peaks tied to fishing and tourism cycles, where off-season layoffs amplified joblessness beyond state averages.[6] These patterns stem from market-driven mismatches between local labor supply and demand in volatile industries, rather than isolated events. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these issues, with unemployment surging to 19.5% in April 2020 amid tourism shutdowns and supply chain disruptions.[6] Post-2020 recovery has been sluggish, as evidenced by Employment Security Department data showing persistent gaps in employment levels compared to pre-pandemic benchmarks, particularly in leisure and hospitality.[6] By August 2025, the rate had declined to 5.7%, yet remained elevated relative to Washington's statewide figure of around 4.5%.[90][91] Labor force participation stands at approximately 45.6%, significantly below the state average of 57.9%, largely due to an aging population with high retiree concentrations that reduce the active workforce pool.[92] This low participation perpetuates economic fragility, as fewer workers engage amid limited job creation outside seasonal or extractive activities. The county's timber sector faces additional pressures from federal regulations restricting logging harvests—such as those under the Endangered Species Act—and exposure to global commodity price swings, including tariff impacts on exports, which have curtailed output and employment stability over decades.[93] These market and regulatory dynamics contribute to a 30-year trend of economic contraction and elevated underemployment.[94]

Government and Politics

Administrative Structure

Pacific County operates under a commissioner form of government typical of Washington state's non-charter counties, led by a three-member Board of County Commissioners elected to staggered four-year terms. This board functions as the primary legislative and executive authority, handling duties such as budget adoption, tax levying, ordinance creation, and oversight of county departments.[95][96] Additional independently elected officials include the sheriff, responsible for law enforcement; the auditor, who manages elections, records, and financial auditing; the assessor for property valuations; the treasurer for tax collection; the clerk for court records; and the prosecuting attorney, who also serves as coroner.[97] The county maintains a lean administrative structure, with principal offices centralized in South Bend, the designated county seat since 1893.[98] The county's fiscal operations depend heavily on property taxes, sales taxes, and related revenues, which formed the bulk of its funding; for fiscal year 2025, projected tax collections including property, sales, leasehold, and real estate excise taxes totaled about $6.1 million.[99] Washington's property tax lid, enacted via Initiative 747 in 2001, caps annual levy increases at 1 percent plus new construction growth without voter approval, imposing strict limits on spending growth and requiring prioritization amid fluctuating rural revenues. Sales tax rates in unincorporated areas stand at a combined minimum of 8.2 percent, with portions allocated to county criminal justice and other funds.[100][101] To address service delivery challenges in its expansive, low-density territory, Pacific County employs interlocal cooperation agreements under RCW 39.34, particularly for fire protection and emergency medical services. These pacts with fire districts, municipalities like South Bend and Raymond, and regional entities facilitate shared dispatching, equipment, and personnel, as seen in arrangements for EMS coordination and fire alerting systems.[102] Such mechanisms mitigate the inefficiencies of standalone rural operations, enabling cost-effective responses without expanding county bureaucracy.[103]

Electoral Patterns and Voting Data

In the 2020 United States presidential election, Pacific County voters favored Republican nominee Donald Trump with 6,260 votes (53.5%), compared to 5,179 votes (44.3%) for Democratic nominee Joe Biden, yielding a Republican margin of 9.2 percentage points. This outcome aligned with the county's historical Republican tilt in presidential contests, as evidenced by Trump's 55.5% share against Hillary Clinton's 38.5% in 2016. Such results underscore the county's conservative rural electorate, diverging from Washington's statewide Democratic majorities, where Biden secured 58.0% overall. Pacific County falls within Washington's 3rd congressional district, characterized as politically competitive with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+5 as of 2022, reflecting a modest Republican lean amid suburban and rural influences. In the 2022 U.S. House election for this district, Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez narrowly defeated Republican Joe Kent district-wide (50.1% to 49.6%), but Kent carried Pacific County decisively with 57.8% to Perez's 40.1%. This local GOP strength persisted into 2024, where Perez again prevailed district-wide by a slim margin against Kent, though county-level returns reinforced Republican dominance in rural precincts.[104] Primary elections and ballot initiatives reveal voter priorities on gun rights and resource policies, often favoring positions independent of statewide Democratic trends. In the 2022 congressional primary, moderate Republican Jaime Herrera Beutler advanced alongside Perez under Washington's top-two system, but Kent's strong county showing (leading with 28.4% locally) highlighted support for candidates emphasizing border security and deregulation. On gun-related measures, Pacific County Sheriff Robin Souvenir publicly opposed Initiative 1639 in 2018, which imposed enhanced background checks and training for semiautomatic rifles and passed statewide (59.6%) but encountered rural skepticism over implementation burdens on law-abiding owners.[105] Resource policy votes similarly prioritize economic viability, with consistent backing for timber and fisheries interests amid state-level environmental restrictions.[106]
ElectionRepublican ShareDemocratic ShareMargin
2020 Presidential53.5%44.3%+9.2% R
2016 Presidential55.5%38.5%+17.0% R
2022 U.S. House (County)57.8% (Kent)40.1% (Perez)+17.7% R

Public Safety and Local Controversies

The Pacific County Sheriff's Office, led by Sheriff Daniel Garcia, oversees law enforcement in unincorporated areas, including responses to drug offenses and property crimes such as burglary and larceny-theft.[107][108] The office maintains a dedicated Drug Task Force focused on investigating controlled substance violations countywide.[109] Jail records frequently list drug-related charges, including delivery of controlled substances, alongside other bookings for violations like drug court infractions.[110] In late 2024, Pacific County commissioners approved Resolution No. 2024-056 on December 26, separating jail operations from the Sheriff's Office to form an independent Jail Services department, citing risks of legal liabilities from ongoing civil rights lawsuits and inadequate oversight.[111][112] The move, which does not involve private outsourcing but shifts administrative control to county administrators, drew dozens of public commenters opposing it at the meeting, including concerns over sheriff authority and operational disruptions.[111] This restructuring follows multiple lawsuits against the jail, such as a 2024 federal complaint alleging censorship of inmate mail from the Human Rights Defense Center, where officials rejected publications citing security policies without individualized review.[113][114] During the 2023 general election, Pacific County Auditor Alex Gerow inadvertently posted sample ballot results online on November 3, generated from the county's pre-election logic and accuracy testing of tabulation equipment rather than actual voter data.[115][116] Officials confirmed the figures bore no relation to real ballots and posed no risk to election integrity, with the error promptly corrected and no evidence of fraud or manipulation uncovered in subsequent reviews.[115] Relations between the Sheriff's Office and the local Chinook Observer newspaper deteriorated in 2023, culminating in Sheriff Garcia's July 31 directive halting routine press releases and information sharing with the outlet, citing obligations to maintain professional integrity amid perceived inaccuracies in reporting.[117][118] This standoff highlights ongoing frictions over media access to incident details in rural jurisdictions, where officials prioritize verified public communication channels over potentially sensationalized local coverage.[119]

Communities and Settlements

Incorporated Cities

Pacific County encompasses four incorporated cities: Ilwaco, Long Beach, Raymond, and South Bend.[120] Raymond, situated along the Willapa River amid forested terrain, was incorporated on August 6, 1907, following promotion by the Raymond Land and Development Company established in 1903.[121] It emerged as a key logging center, with 14 mills operating by 1912 that processed logs from surrounding camps transported by rail, fueling an economy tied to timber harvesting and milling.[66] South Bend, the county seat located at the bend of the Willapa River, was incorporated on September 27, 1890, amid a railroad-driven boom that established it as an early manufacturing and transportation node.[122] Serving as the administrative hub, it maintains strong connections to the oyster industry in adjacent Willapa Bay, where processing and harvesting operations contribute significantly to local commerce, positioning the area as a leading producer in Washington, the top oyster-growing state nationally.[123] Ilwaco, at the southern tip of the Long Beach Peninsula near the Columbia River mouth, was incorporated on December 2, 1890, developing initially as a transportation and fishing port for salmon vessels accessing the river.[124] Its maritime role persists through harbor facilities, complemented by tourism drawn to nearby lighthouses, including the historic Cape Disappointment Light established in 1856 and North Head Light completed in 1898, which aid navigation and attract visitors to the rugged coastal promontory.[125] Long Beach, along the Pacific shoreline, was incorporated on January 18, 1922, after platting by early settlers like Henry and Nancy Tinker, evolving into a resort destination centered on its expansive beaches and seasonal visitor amenities.[126]

Census-Designated Places

Ocean Park is a census-designated place on the northern portion of the Long Beach Peninsula in Pacific County, with a population of 1,814 recorded in the 2020 United States census.[127] This unincorporated community maintains a rural coastal character, featuring residential areas interspersed with forested lands and direct access to Pacific Ocean beaches and Willapa Bay tidelands. Local economic activity includes shellfish aquaculture, particularly oyster and clam harvesting, contributing to the county's status as a leading producer of farmed shellfish on the West Coast.[79] Bay Center, another CDP situated on the shores of Willapa Bay, had an estimated population of 218 as of recent American Community Survey data derived from the 2020 census base.[128] As an unincorporated bayside settlement, it supports a small-scale fishing community focused on commercial shellfish operations and finfish harvesting, with tidelands leased for oyster cultivation forming a core economic driver amid limited other industry.[129] The area's isolation and reliance on marine resources underscore its unincorporated status, lacking municipal governance found in nearby incorporated cities. Chinook serves as a CDP near the mouth of the Columbia River, with a 2020 census population of 457. This unincorporated locale features waterfront properties and supports commercial fishing, including salmon and bottomfish, leveraging its position at the river's estuary for vessel operations and processing tied to regional seafood markets.[79] Unlike incorporated areas, Chinook depends on county-level services for infrastructure, reflecting the dispersed, resource-oriented settlement patterns common in Pacific County's coastal CDPs.

Unincorporated Areas and Historical Sites

Chinook, an unincorporated community at the mouth of the Columbia River, maintains deep indigenous roots tied to the Chinookan peoples, who dominated regional salmon trade networks in the early 19th century. The site served as a waypoint for the Lewis and Clark Expedition in 1805, with remnants of tribal fishing practices preserved alongside the Chinook Historical Fish Hatchery, operational since 1884 as Washington's first state-run salmon propagation facility.[130][131] Seaview, a dispersed coastal settlement platted in 1881 by homesteader Jonathan Stout along the Pacific shoreline, exemplifies the county's rural persistence through its cluster of early Victorian-era homes and resistance to modern subdivision pressures. Originally developed as a resort area for steamer-accessible visitors, it retains a population under 500, focused on beachfront preservation rather than commercial expansion.[132] The Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation, established by executive order in 1866 and spanning 1.04 square miles on Willapa Bay's northern shore, embodies integration of tribal sovereignty with county rural landscapes. Encompassing lands of Lower Chehalis, Shoalwater Bay, and Chinookan descendants, the reservation supports subsistence fishing and cultural practices amid surrounding unincorporated timber and wetland tracts, with a resident population of approximately 84 as of recent tribal records.[133][134] Defunct logging-era sites, such as the remnants of Walville—a former lumber mill town active in the early 1900s—dot the eastern county forests, now repurposed for recreational hiking amid second-growth timber stands. These ghost settlements, abandoned by the 1920s due to depleted old-growth resources and rail line shifts, underscore the transition from industrial extraction to low-impact rural use, with overgrown mill foundations accessible via county trails.[135] Historical oyster camps near Oysterville, another unincorporated enclave founded in 1854, persist as interpretive sites highlighting the 19th-century boom that shipped over 500,000 bushels annually before market crashes in the 1890s.[2]

References

  1. Our Communities | Pacific County Economic Development Council
  2. Pacific County -- Thumbnail History - HistoryLink.org
  3. Pacific County, Washington - U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts
  4. Pacific County, WA | Data USA
  5. Pacific County Stats
  6. Pacific County profile | Employment Security Department
  7. Pacific County Fact Sheet - Washington's Evergreen Coast
  8. Chinook Indians Seining - Oregon History Project
  9. Chinook Nation Tribe | Pacific County Economic Development Council
  10. [PDF] Archaeological Evidence for Resilience of Pacific Northwest Salmon ...
  11. Indigenous marine resource management on the Northwest Coast of ...
  12. Indigenous Systems of Management for Culturally and Ecologically ...
  13. November 15, 1805 | Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition
  14. November 17, 1805 | Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition
  15. Lewis and Clark Expedition reaches the Pacific Ocean on November ...
  16. Home - Pacific County Genealogy Research
  17. Pacific County Courthouse History
  18. Donation Land Claim Act, spur to American settlement of Oregon ...
  19. https://www.historylink.org/File/9838
  20. The Homestead Act of 1862 | National Archives
  21. Washington's first sawmill was in south Pacific County
  22. Oyster Farming in Washington, Part 1 - HistoryLink.org
  23. Northwest Forest Plan goes into effect on December 21, 1994.
  24. [PDF] NCEE Working Paper - EPA
  25. [PDF] Washington's Forests, Timber Supply, and Forest-Related Industries
  26. The Decline of the Timber Industry in the Pacific Northwest - Sutori
  27. [PDF] Pacific County profile - Employment Security Department
  28. [PDF] Pacific County Washington | USDA-NASS
  29. Ag census finds growth for shellfish, cranberries
  30. [PDF] COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2020 – 2040 - Pacific County
  31. County population hits a wall, state agency says: New housing ...
  32. [PDF] Service Assessment Pacific Northwest Storms of December 1-3, 2007
  33. The Great Coastal Gale of 2007 - ArcGIS StoryMaps
  34. The great coastal gale of 2007 brought neighbors together | AP News
  35. Local agencies react to storm as best they can despite tough ...
  36. Willapa Bay in Washington State - WA100
  37. Naselle River Wildlife Area Unit | Washington Department of Fish ...
  38. Hazards - Pacific County Emergency Management Agency
  39. M 9.0 - The 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
  40. Liquefaction evidence for the strength of ground motions resulting ...
  41. Long Beach Climate, Weather By Month, Average Temperature ...
  42. Average Weather Data for Long Beach, Washington - World Climate
  43. Long Beach, WA Climate - BestPlaces
  44. LONG BEACH EXP STN, WASHINGTON - Climate Summary
  45. WRCC: Washington Climate
  46. Decline of West Coast fog brought higher coastal temperatures last ...
  47. Acidification - Washington State Department of Ecology
  48. Acidifying Water Takes Toll On Northwest Shellfish - NOAA/PMEL
  49. Impacts of Coastal Acidification on the Pacific Northwest Shellfish ...
  50. Washington State Department of Transportation
  51. Port of Willapa Harbor - Home
  52. Port Industries
  53. Ports of Pacific County
  54. [PDF] 2023 ANNUAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM - Pacific County
  55. [PDF] Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Department of Public Works - Pacific County
  56. [PDF] PACIFIC COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2022
  57. Pacific County Map, Washington
  58. Map of Pacific County, Washington - Thong Thai Real
  59. [PDF] Pacific County Public Health and Human Services and Willapa ...
  60. Columbia River Compact | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife
  61. Route Schedule - Pacific Transit
  62. 1860, U.S. Federal Census, Pacific County, U.S. Census Bureau
  63. [PDF] Washington - Census.gov
  64. [PDF] The Rise and Fall of the Pacific Northwest Log Export Market
  65. [PDF] The Transition from Western Timber Dependence: Lessons for ...
  66. Raymond -- Thumbnail History - HistoryLink.org
  67. Pacific County, WA population by year, race, & more - USAFacts
  68. County population saw minor growth in 2024 - Chinook Observer
  69. Pacific County Demographics | Current Washington Census Data
  70. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/05000US53049-pacific-county-wa/
  71. Homeownership Rate (5-year estimate) for Pacific County, WA - FRED
  72. Pacific County - Data Commons
  73. Forestry - Pacific County Economic Development Council
  74. [PDF] PACIFIC COUNTY, WASHINGTON
  75. Statewide and County Statistics – Washington Forest Protection ...
  76. Washington State Timber Harvest Reports - WA DNR
  77. Agriculture | Pacific County Economic Development Council
  78. [PDF] Work Plan Pacific County Voluntary Stewardship Program
  79. Marine/Seafood | Pacific County Economic Development Council
  80. Marine Resources | Pacific County | Washington State University
  81. Export Statistics - Washington State Department of Agriculture
  82. [PDF] Fisheries Economics of the United States 2021
  83. Tourism | Pacific County Economic Development Council
  84. [PDF] ANNUAL REPORT 2020
  85. Spring awakens: Long Beach Peninsula gets busy - Chinook Observer
  86. Washington State International Kite Festival - FestivalNet
  87. Summer 2024 sales robust in Pacific County - Chinook Observer
  88. [PDF] annual report 2019 - Pacific County Economic Development Council
  89. Willapa National Wildlife Refuge | Visit Us - Activities
  90. Pacific County, WA Unemployment Rate (Monthly) - Historical…
  91. What is the unemployment rate in Washington state right now?
  92. How Healthy Is Pacific County, Washington?
  93. Closing the prime age employment gap
  94. [PDF] Strategy Development Grant Narrative Washington State Coastal ...
  95. Commissioners Home - Pacific County
  96. Commissioners Home - Pacific County
  97. [PDF] COUNTY OF PACIFIC
  98. History of South Bend
  99. [PDF] Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Board of County Commissioners and ...
  100. Pacific County sales tax rate - Avalara
  101. [PDF] Breakdown of Sales Taxes in Unincorporated Areas of Pacific County
  102. Interlocal Cooperation in Fire Services - MRSC
  103. Contracts/Agreements - Pacific County
  104. Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez wins second term in Congress ...
  105. Pacific County Sheriff joins opposition to I-1639 - KXRO News Radio
  106. Elections: Past Results - Pacific County
  107. Pacific County Sheriff's Office | Sheriff's office | 300 Memorial Drive ...
  108. [PDF] Pacific County Risk Profile - DSHS - | WA.gov
  109. Pacific County Drug Task Force - Facebook
  110. Pacific County Washington - Jail Roster
  111. County board splits jail from sheriff's office - Chinook Observer
  112. Pacific County is the latest in Southwest Washington to seize jail ...
  113. Lawsuit alleges civil rights violations by jail
  114. Publisher Files Censorship Suit Against Jail in Pacific County ...
  115. Pacific County Auditor explains early election results mishap - KGW
  116. Results accidentally published on Pacific County's election website
  117. Pacific County Sheriff's Office - Facebook
  118. Sheriff of Washington's Pacific County shuts out local newspaper
  119. Pat comments on Pacific County Sheriff freezing out local newspaper
  120. Pacific County Map
  121. Raymond voters approve incorporation on August 6, 1907.
  122. South Bend -- Thumbnail History - HistoryLink.org
  123. https://www.islands.com/2002280/oyster-capital-world-outside-seattle-south-bend-washington/
  124. Ilwaco -- Thumbnail History - HistoryLink.org
  125. Lighthouses on Cape Disappointment - HistoryLink.org
  126. Long Beach incorporates on January 18, 1922. - HistoryLink.org
  127. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US5350535-ocean-park-wa/
  128. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US5304615-bay-center-wa/
  129. Bay Center/Nemah | Pacific County Economic Development Council
  130. Chinook | Pacific County Economic Development Council
  131. Chinook | Washington's Evergreen Coast
  132. Seaview: Unique historic village fiercely guards its character
  133. Shoalwater Bay Tribe - Pacific County Economic Development Council
  134. Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe, Washington, 2016 Culture of Health ...
  135. Mysterious 100 Year Old Abandoned Japanese Cemetery - YouTube
User Avatar
No comments yet.