Hubbry Logo
Peace ActionPeace ActionMain
Open search
Peace Action
Community hub
Peace Action
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Peace Action
Peace Action
Peace Action
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Peace Action is a peace organization whose focus is on preventing the deployment of nuclear weapons in space, thwarting weapons sales to countries with human rights violations, and promoting a new United States foreign policy based on common security and peaceful resolution to international conflicts.

Key Information

Peace Action believes that every person has the right to live without the threat of nuclear weapons, that war is not a suitable response to conflict, and that the United States has the resources to both protect and provide for its citizens.[2] Peace Action has over 100,000 members who belong to over 70 autonomous affiliate and chapter organizations.[3]

The name "Peace Action" was adopted in 1993 by SANE / FREEZE, which had been formed in 1987 by the merger of the Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy and the Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign (also known as "The Freeze").

Campaigns

[edit]

In 2003, Peace Action launched the Campaign for a New Foreign Policy, an initiative to build grassroots support and congressional pressure for a U.S. foreign policy based on human rights and democracy, nuclear disarmament and international cooperation.

Peace Action opposes the U.S. occupation of Iraq as well as any potential future action within that state to impose permanent military bases, any attempt to control Iraqi oil through U.S. government or corporate institutions, or any action on the part of the U.S. government to further influence the domestic policy of elected Iraqi officials. They lobby their activist network to demand a complete withdrawal from Iraq as soon as possible.[4]

To prevent future wars, Peace Action lobbies its grassroots network to demand peaceful diplomacy with Iran. In December 2006 Peace Action began a petition to prevent war with Iran; to date there are over 44,000 names.[5]

On the nuclear front, Peace Action took part in a coalition lobby effort with organizations like the Arms Control Association and the Council for a Livable World to zero out funding for the Reliable Replacement Warhead and Complex 2030. Efforts of the coalition helped stir the Senate Arms Services Committee to zero out the Administration’s $15 million RRW request for Navy research and development.

Peace Action participated in organizing People’s Climate March in September 2014. Peace Action believes war and militarism are interconnected with the climate crisis. The organization states that wars and militarism are the biggest obstacles to funding initiatives to address global warming. Both wars and climate crisis require a political solution which can become a reality only if the climate justice movement links to ending wars and militarism and the peace movement connects to justice: climate, economic and racial justice. Peace Action, as a national endorser, jumped into the organizing from the beginning, launching the Peoples Climate March Peace and Justice Hub. The Hub brought together peace and faith groups to organize a No War, No Warming contingent and rally. George Martin, Peace Action Education Fund board member; Cole Harrison, executive director of Massachusetts Peace Action (MAPA); Jim Anderson, Peace Action of New York State (PANYS) Chair; and Natia Bueno, PANYS Student Outreach Coordinator, led the way.[6]

Grassroots work

[edit]

Peace Action has 100 chapters nationwide with a network of over 100,000 paying members. They send bi-weekly Action Alerts to almost 100,000 people worldwide, keeping them up to date on legislation regarding the Iraq war, nuclear disarmament, and preventing future wars with countries the former Bush administration deemed[clarification needed] "rogue nations," like Iran. They also run a forum blog concerning issues of peace, nuclear abolition, and justice.

Their motto is "Peace Demands Action" and work on issues like Iraq, missile bases in Europe, or cutting the funding of new nuclear warheads . Peace Action’s goal is to organize the nation around issues of peace and justice through protests, congressional action, and lobby days. They recently [when?] organized a petition to let our leaders know that any war with Iran, particularly one that involves nuclear weapons, should not be an option.

Peace Action initiated the Student Peace Action Network (SPAN) in 1995 to bring the voices of young activists into the forefront of the peace movement. Youth actively engaged in peace issues lacked a systematic tool to unite and organize with other young people. SPAN addresses this problem by providing advocacy tools, a nationwide network of like-minded youth, information about the issues, and support for affiliate chapters. Through coordinated direct actions, demonstrations, teach-ins, letter-writing campaigns, dissemination of materials, and other tactics, SPAN activists all over the country challenge unjust policies and work for non-violent, constructive alternatives.[undue weight? – discuss]

History

[edit]

Peace Action was founded as 'SANE' in 1957 by Lenore Marshall and Norman Cousins and others in response to the nuclear arms race and the Eisenhower administration's policies on the production and testing of nuclear weapons. William Sloane Coffin, former chaplain of Yale University and political activist, retired from Riverside Church to become President of SANE/FREEZE in 1987.[7] The name "SANE" came from the concepts put forth by Erich Fromm in his book The Sane Society.[8] The group's aim was to alert Americans of the threat of nuclear weapons. A full-page advertisement placed in The New York Times in November 1957 provoked a nationwide response, and by 1958 the membership of the organization had grown to 25,000. SANE was formally incorporated in July of that year.

Various influential people and celebrities began to get involved with the organization and show support for their cause. In 1959, Steve Allen hosted a meeting that founded the Hollywood SANE. Members included Marlon Brando, Henry Fonda, Marilyn Monroe, Arthur Miller, Harry Belafonte, and Ossie Davis. In 1960, a SANE rally held at Madison Square Garden attracted 20,000 to hear Eleanor Roosevelt, Norman Cousins, Norman Thomas, A. Philip Randolph, Walter Reuther, and Harry Belafonte call for an end to the arms race. International sponsors of SANE (including Martin Buber, Pablo Casals, Bertrand Russell and Albert Schweitzer) petitioned President John F. Kennedy to maintain a moratorium on testing in the atmosphere. Graphic Artists for SANE was also organized, with members that included Jules Feiffer, Ben Shahn, and Edward Sorel.

The group launched campaigns and rallies to drum up support for its cause and to put pressure on political figures. In 1961, SANE hosted an eight-day, 109-mile march from McGuire Air Force Base to the United Nations Plaza that was attended by more than 25,000 people. They organized a rally of over 10,000 people on "Cuba Sunday" to express concern and outrage over the Cuban Missile Crisis. Dr. Spock became a national sponsor and appeared in an ad stating "Dr. Spock is worried." The ad was printed in 700 papers worldwide.

Early political influence

[edit]

As a way of seeing their goals achieved, SANE began working through its political lobbying programs. The organization began by pushing for the election of congressional candidates whose positions reflected those of the organization. In 1966, SANE formed the "Voter's Peace Pledge Campaign" to urge Congressional candidates to work for peace in Vietnam. They became one of the first national organizations to advocate removal of President Lyndon B. Johnson from office. They went on to endorse Eugene McCarthy as the Democratic presidential candidate in 1968.

SANE's Norman Cousins acted as an unofficial liaison between President Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev on the Partial Test Ban Treaty negotiations. The organization helped secure the passage of the War Powers Resolution. As the Vietnam War began to escalate, SANE organized a rally at Madison Square Garden that attracted 18,000 people opposing the war, as well as a march on Washington in November 1965 drawing 35,000. Three days after the march, Vice-president Hubert Humphrey met with SANE leaders Dr. Spock, Sanford Gottlieb, and Homer Jack "to openly, responsibly, and frankly discuss their proposals" to end the war. Many more SANE marches on Washington would occur throughout the war.

SANE would go on to criticize the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and SALT agreements for ignoring offensive strategic weapons. Following Richard Nixon's re-election, SANE advocated Congressional cut-off of funds for the Vietnam war. After the end of the Vietnam War, SANE lobbied to have Congress end the bombing of Cambodia, and helped lead a successful effort to pass the War Powers Act. SANE would also take on the military budget, and produced the "America Has a Tapeworm" ad. Despite the end of the war, SANE continued actions throughout the 1970s that promoted its purpose.

Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign

[edit]
Main article: Nuclear Freeze campaign

During the 1980s, SANE continued to monitor the political and military actions of the U.S. government and beyond. In 1981, The Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign began with the purpose of pressuring the government to stop the nuclear arms build-up. The campaign was initiated by Randall Forsberg's call to "freeze and reverse the nuclear arms race".[9] Many SANE leaders participated in the creation of 'the Freeze', as it was sometimes called, which was a grassroots-based confederation of groups spanning the country. Freeze leaders included Randall Forsberg, Helen Caldicott, Pam Solo, and Randy Kehler. Elected officials such as Rep. Patricia Schroeder and Sen. Ted Kennedy helped to lead the movement in Congress. The Freeze's grassroots network pushed for nuclear reductions through ballot initiatives in towns and cities across the nation.

Specifically, the Freeze's goal was to get the U.S. and the Soviet Union to simultaneously adopt a mutual freeze on the testing, production, and deployment of nuclear weapons and of missiles, as well as new aircraft designed primarily to deliver nuclear weapons. Much emphasis was put on the MX and Pershing II missiles. Randall Forsberg was the organizer who initiated this idea of the "mutual, verifiable" Freeze.

During 1982, the SANE political action committee was formed for the political election year. Aside from working to get selected candidates elected, it became a driving force behind many proposed nuclear freeze referendums. In a victory for both the Freeze campaign and SANE, Ronald Reagan proposed START I, part of a two-phase treaty between the U.S. and the USSR that would reduce overall warhead counts on any missile type.

In roughly the 1983–84 period, when the Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign was planning expansively around mass-movement fund raising, lobbying, and Political Action Committees (PACs), SANE was merged into that entity, though local SANE chapters would continue to hold meetings for some time to come. Specific congressional races were targeted, and some of the pro-Freeze candidates credited the movement, and the grass-roots funds it raised, with their success in getting elected, or re-elected, to Congress. From 1984 on, the movement had three actual legal entities, the 'Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign', with both public education and lobbying arms (501.C-3 and 501.C-4 corporations), and the Freeze Voter PAC (501.C-5).

During the 1980s, SANE/FREEZE expanded its work to oppose U.S. military intervention in El Salvador and to end U.S. military aid to the Contras in Nicaragua. The organization promoted its agenda in different ways. An ad was placed in Variety magazine signed by over 250 celebrities including Jack Lemmon, Burt Lancaster, James Earl Jones, Sally Field, Shirley MacLaine, and Ed Asner supporting its causes. A weekly radio program by SANE/FREEZE, "Consider the Alternatives", reaches 140 radio stations. Their door canvassing campaign reached 250,000 households.

The Gulf War and the War on Terror

[edit]

Following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, SANE/FREEZE opposed the U.S. military buildup in the Persian Gulf. Throughout the Gulf War, the organization coordinated anti-war marches in Washington, DC, helping to mobilize 500,000 protesters. Soon after, in 1993, SANE/FREEZE renamed itself Peace Action.

Of great concern to Peace Action in 1995 was the conference for review of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The signatories to the treaty decided by consensus to extend the treaty indefinitely and without conditions. The year also marked the 50th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The next year Peace Action launched Peace Voter '96, the organization's largest nationally coordinated campaign since the mid-1980s. Over one million Peace Voter Guides were distributed for the November elections. Also that year, Peace Action joined human-rights groups to stop major weapons sales to Indonesia and Turkey. In 1997, Indonesia withdrew its request for U.S. fighter jets due to "unwarranted criticism" of their human-rights record.

In 1999, Peace Action opposed the NATO bombing of Kosovo, which it described as "cruise missile humanitarianism", and founded the National Coalition for Peace and Justice, a body uniting most of the major peace groups in the country. Also that year, Peace Action commemorated the bombing of Nagasaki by staging a demonstration at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. The demonstration was led by actor Martin Sheen.

Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Peace Action responded to the war on terrorism and the bombing of Afghanistan with a call for justice, not war. The group went on to participate in two national coalitions: Win Without War and United for Peace and Justice.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Peace Action

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Peace Action is a United States-based nonprofit organization focused on promoting , reducing spending, and advancing diplomatic alternatives to armed conflict, formed in 1991 through the merger of the Committee for a SANE Nuclear (founded in 1957) and the Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign (launched in the early ). As the nation's largest peace and network, with chapters and affiliates across multiple states, it mobilizes public pressure to curb , oppose U.S. arms sales to governments with poor records, and redirect federal budgets from weaponry toward domestic needs like alleviation and . Key historical efforts include early opposition to the , for the 1996 , and campaigns to block weapons transfers to nations such as and in the , which contributed to policy shifts like Indonesia's 1997 withdrawal of a request for U.S. fighter jets amid scrutiny. While praised by supporters for amplifying anti-militarism voices during the and post-9/11 eras, the group has drawn criticism from conservative observers for its left-leaning orientation and perceived selective focus on U.S. over threats from authoritarian regimes.

Origins and Formation

Predecessor Organizations

The Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy (SANE), founded on November 11, 1957, by journalist and a coalition of intellectuals, clergy, and atomic scientists including Albert Einstein's associate , emerged in response to the escalating between the and the following the Soviet launch of Sputnik. SANE advocated for diplomatic negotiations to curb and end atmospheric nuclear testing, mobilizing through advertisements in major newspapers that warned of the "hydrogen bomb peril" and called for sanity in foreign policy. By the , SANE had grown into a significant anti-war voice, opposing the and influencing congressional debates on , though it faced internal divisions over broader military engagements. The , initiated by analyst Randall Forsberg in a distributed as a one-page proposal, gained traction amid renewed tensions under President Reagan, formalizing as a movement by 1981. Forsberg's "Call to Halt the " demanded a mutual, verifiable freeze on the testing, production, and deployment of nuclear weapons by the U.S. and USSR to break the cycle of escalation, attracting endorsements from over 1,000 organizations and leading to initiatives in nine states by 1982, where Freeze measures passed overwhelmingly. Unlike SANE's focus on policy advocacy, the Freeze emphasized citizen-driven pressure, coordinating with labor unions, religious groups, and local governments to lobby for congressional resolutions, culminating in a 1983 House vote of 278-149 in favor of a freeze resolution, though it stalled in the . These organizations represented complementary approaches to : SANE through elite-driven education and , and the Freeze via and electoral politics, setting the stage for their merger into SANE/FREEZE to consolidate resources amid shifting post- priorities.

Merger into SANE/FREEZE and Renaming

In , the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE), founded in 1957 to advocate against nuclear armament, merged with the Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign, a movement launched in the early 1980s to halt the U.S.-Soviet . The merger, formalized in November , created SANE/FREEZE, combining SANE's established infrastructure with the Freeze's mobilization of through resolutions passed in hundreds of cities and states. This consolidation aimed to amplify anti-nuclear advocacy during the final years of the , leveraging synergies to pressure policymakers on amid Reagan-era escalations. The newly formed SANE/FREEZE operated as the largest U.S. peace organization at the time, coordinating campaigns like opposition to the and participation in mass protests, including the 1991 anti-Gulf War mobilizations that drew 500,000 participants in However, with the Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991 and the perceived diminished immediacy of superpower nuclear confrontation, the organization sought to expand its focus beyond exclusive . In 1993, SANE/FREEZE rebranded as Peace Action to encompass broader issues such as halting , curbing military spending, and opposing U.S. interventions abroad. Under leadership including Rev. Jr., the renaming reflected a strategic pivot to address post-Cold War security challenges, including ethnic conflicts and arms sales, while maintaining core commitments to verifiable treaties. This evolution positioned Peace Action as a more versatile advocate for non-interventionist foreign policy, though critics from defense-oriented think tanks argued it diluted focus on immediate threats like rogue state nuclear programs.

Organizational Structure and Operations

National Leadership and Affiliates

Peace Action's national operations are directed by Jon Rainwater, who assumed the position in October 2003 and brings over 30 years of involvement in peace, , and advocacy. The organization, based in , employs a professional staff handling functions such as development, finance, administration, communications, and campaign coordination, including roles like Senior Director of Finance & Administration Rosalie Brooks and Deputy Director of Major Gifts Joe Cicero. The Peace Action Education Fund, its affiliated 501(c)(3) entity focused on and , is governed by a that includes Co-Chair Susie Allison-Litton of , Michael Keller of , and Todd Kolze, among others, providing strategic oversight on policy and programmatic priorities. This dual structure—Peace Action as a 501(c)(4) and the Education Fund—enables , mobilization, and nonpartisan educational initiatives under shared leadership. Affiliates form the core of Peace Action's decentralized model, comprising over 20 state-level organizations and more than 100 local chapters that operate autonomously while aligning with national goals on and . These include groups in states such as , , , , , , , , , and , enabling localized actions like protests and that amplify national campaigns. The , totaling around 100,000 members nationwide, facilitates coordination through resources, , and joint endorsements, positioning Peace Action as the largest U.S. peace organization.

Grassroots and Local Chapters

Peace Action's operations are anchored in a nationwide network of over 100 local chapters and more than 28 state affiliates, enabling decentralized activism that complements national campaigns. These components emphasize community-driven initiatives, where chapters prioritize local issues such as opposition to regional military spending or public forums on , while synchronizing efforts with the organization's broader anti-war objectives. Local chapters operate with significant autonomy, often leading agenda-setting for actions including vigils, educational workshops, and petitions targeting municipal or state policies. For instance, affiliates like for Peace and Peace Action Staten Island in New York focus on neighborhood-level against , such as challenging local defense contractor influences or promoting nonviolent programs. This structure fosters direct member involvement, drawing from ordinary citizens who participate in door-to-door canvassing, town hall testimonies, and coalition-building with other civic groups. State affiliates bridge local chapters and the national leadership, coordinating multi-chapter mobilizations for state legislative advocacy and amplifying voices in congressional districts. Peace Action New York State, as one such affiliate, exemplifies this by integrating dozens of local entities into unified campaigns, such as statewide pushes for reduced military budgets or divestment from nuclear weapons programs. The network's design supports rapid response to emerging crises, with chapters providing on-the-ground data and volunteer networks that inform national strategies, thereby enhancing the organization's lobbying efficacy in Washington, D.C.

Ideology and Policy Positions

Nuclear Disarmament and Arms Control

Peace Action advocates for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons worldwide, emphasizing multilateral diplomacy, verifiable arms reductions, and binding international treaties as essential mechanisms to prevent nuclear catastrophe. The organization prioritizes de-escalation through negotiations that curb proliferation, modernization, and deployment of nuclear arsenals, arguing that reliance on nuclear deterrence perpetuates existential risks without enhancing security. A cornerstone of their arms control agenda is support for treaties like the agreement, which they actively campaigned to ratify in 2010, achieving a 30% reduction in deployed strategic nuclear warheads between the and . Peace Action has also endorsed United Nations Security Council Resolution 1887, adopted on September 24, 2009, which calls for global , strengthened non-proliferation measures, and reductions in production. They promote adherence to such frameworks to build momentum toward zero nuclear weapons, critiquing unilateral U.S. policies that undermine bilateral trust with adversaries like . The group strongly backs the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which entered into force on January 22, 2021, and declares nuclear weapons illegal under by prohibiting their development, testing, possession, and use. Peace Action views the TPNW as a vital normative shift, congratulating the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) for its 2017 and urging the U.S. to pursue despite not participating in the treaty. They oppose domestic nuclear modernization efforts, such as low-yield weapons and excessive funding for arsenal upgrades, advocating legislation to cap spending and redirect resources toward diplomacy. In regional contexts, Peace Action supports establishing nuclear-weapon-free zones, including in the , as a step to resolve tensions over programs like Iran's and prevent arms races. Their positions consistently prioritize verifiable reductions over deterrence doctrines, warning that escalating nuclear postures—such as U.S. reliance on extended deterrence—hinder global progress.

Views on Military Interventions and Foreign Policy

Peace Action consistently opposes U.S. interventions abroad, viewing them as counterproductive to long-term security and often exacerbating , instability, and humanitarian crises. The organization advocates for a centered on , multilateral cooperation, and , arguing that force should be a last resort and subject to strict congressional oversight. They criticize "endless wars" enabled by broad authorizations like the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which they seek to repeal, claiming it has justified operations in at least 14 countries without adequate debate. In specific conflicts, Peace Action has called for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from since the early 2000s, asserting that escalations—such as the 2017 deployment of the "Mother of All Bombs"—prolong suffering without achieving stability, and that only negotiated political settlements can resolve the conflict. They opposed the 2003 Iraq invasion and subsequent occupations, linking U.S. militarism to the rise of groups like and pushing for diplomatic engagement over airstrikes or ground operations. Similarly, regarding , the group condemned unauthorized U.S. attacks under both Obama and Trump administrations, such as the 2017 Shayrat missile strikes, as illegal escalations that increase civilian casualties and undermine peace efforts, while favoring and multilateral talks. On , Peace Action demands an end to U.S. logistical support and arms sales to the Saudi-led coalition, which they accuse of war crimes and contributing to affecting millions since 2015; they supported 2016-2017 congressional resolutions to block such sales, involving 27 and then 47 senators, and prioritize ceasefires and UN-mediated . In , while condemning Russia's 2022 invasion and troop deployments in , the organization urges immediate ceasefires and rejects further U.S. , favoring through negotiations over arms shipments. Broader stances include restoring the nuclear deal (JCPOA) abandoned in 2018, opposing preventive strikes, and promoting to reduce global tensions. Peace Action ties these views to domestic priorities, seeking to cut budgets—peaking at $886 billion in 2022—and redirect funds to , human needs, and climate initiatives, contending that overreliance on military solutions distorts U.S. and erodes public support for genuine . They evaluate political candidates on commitments to end interventions, support diplomatic funding, and challenge hawkish policies, as outlined in their presidential primary tracking since at least 2020.

Domestic Priorities and Broader Agenda

Peace Action advocates redirecting funds from military expenditures to domestic social programs, arguing that excessive spending undermines investments in education, healthcare, and . The organization has joined coalitions calling for cuts to the U.S. defense budget, estimated at over $800 billion annually in recent fiscal years, to prioritize human needs over what it describes as bloated military allocations. For instance, in 2012, Peace Action celebrated the passage of ' Budget for All initiative, which passed by a 3-to-1 margin and sought to reallocate military savings toward local economic and social priorities. This redirection stance forms a core element of Peace Action's broader agenda, which frames peace advocacy as interconnected with addressing domestic challenges like poverty and environmental degradation. The group posits that reducing nuclear and conventional arms spending—such as opposing provisions—frees resources for community funding, including job creation and , rather than perpetuating fiscal imbalances that exacerbate inequality. Affiliates like Peace Action have echoed this by protesting federal budgets that shield military outlays while threatening programs like Medicare and . Beyond budget reallocation, Peace Action's domestic focus remains subordinate to its foreign policy goals, with limited standalone positions on issues like or domestic ; instead, it emphasizes how diverts from holistic solutions to and economic justice. The organization critiques unchecked military growth as a causal driver of opportunity costs, citing examples where resolutions from local bodies, influenced by its network, urge shifting funds to unmet community needs. This approach aligns with coalition efforts involving over 20 progressive groups to enforce spending restraint, though Peace Action attributes opposition to such reforms to entrenched defense industry interests rather than fiscal prudence.

Major Activities and Campaigns

Cold War-Era Nuclear Freeze Initiatives

The Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign, a core predecessor effort that shaped Peace Action's advocacy, emerged in December 1979 when researcher Randall Forsberg presented a proposal at a Mobilization for Survival meeting for the and to mutually halt the testing, production, and deployment of nuclear weapons. In April 1980, Forsberg formalized this in the "Call to Halt the ," emphasizing a verifiable bilateral freeze as a step toward deeper reductions, which quickly gained traction among peace organizations seeking to counter escalating tensions. The campaign's focus distinguished it from earlier efforts, prioritizing simple, achievable demands to build broad public consensus. By March 1981, the Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign held its founding national conference at , coordinating local actions that led to early successes such as resolutions in town meetings and state legislatures. In November 1980, voters in approved freeze measures in 59 of 62 towns, setting a model for subsequent referenda. Momentum accelerated in 1982, culminating on June 12 with an estimated one million participants rallying in New York City's —the largest anti-nuclear demonstration in U.S. history—demanding an immediate freeze and reversal of the . That fall, ballot initiatives succeeded in nine of ten states and the District of Columbia, encompassing roughly one-third of the U.S. electorate and marking a record for citizen-driven foreign policy referenda. Legislative efforts paralleled grassroots gains, with Senators Edward Kennedy and introducing a nonbinding freeze resolution in in March 1982, which passed the in May 1983 by a vote of 278-149 but stalled in the . By 1983, the proposal secured endorsements from over 370 city councils, 71 county councils, and 23 state legislatures, alongside 2.3 million petition signatures and consistent public support exceeding 70% in national polls. These initiatives pressured the Reagan administration, prompting President Reagan's April 1982 speech asserting that "a nuclear cannot be won and must never be fought," a rhetorical shift from earlier hardline stances. The campaign also influenced related fights, such as reducing planned deployments from 200 to 50 through targeted advocacy. The Freeze Campaign's activities extended to broader coalitions, including endorsements from 25 major trade unions, hundreds of professional groups, and religious bodies like the U.S. Catholic Bishops, whose 1983 pastoral letter reinforced opposition to nuclear escalation. By 1984, the Democratic Party platform incorporated the freeze, reflecting its penetration into electoral politics. These efforts contributed to a policy environment that facilitated U.S.-Soviet negotiations, including the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty eliminating an entire class of missiles in Europe, though direct causation remains debated among analysts. In 1987, the campaign merged with the National Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE) to form SANE/FREEZE, consolidating resources for continued Cold War-era disarmament work until the organization's evolution into Peace Action in 1996.

Post-Cold War Advocacy Against Interventions

Following the in 1991, Peace Action—formed that year through the merger of the Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy (SANE) and the —redirected efforts toward opposing U.S.-led military interventions, emphasizing diplomacy, reduced defense spending, and prevention of "new cold wars" through arms buildups. The organization coordinated nationwide protests against the Persian Gulf War, including marches in Washington, D.C., that mobilized around 500,000 demonstrators in January 1991 to protest Operation Desert Storm and demand sanctions over military action against . In the decade following, Peace Action criticized U.S. interventions in the , advocating against NATO's 1999 bombing campaign in by calling for UN-led peacekeeping and negotiations rather than airstrikes, which it argued risked civilian casualties and regional escalation without addressing root ethnic conflicts. By the early , amid the post-9/11 "War on Terror," the group opposed the U.S. invasion of in October 2001, supporting targeted operations against but rejecting broader nation-building and troop surges as counterproductive to stability, insisting on political settlements involving regional powers. Peace Action's most prominent post-Cold War campaign targeted the 2003 , joining coalitions like Win Without War to organize pre-invasion protests, lobby against authorization for use of military force (passed October 2002), and push for withdrawal after the March 2003 invasion began. The organization highlighted intelligence failures on weapons of mass destruction, estimated civilian deaths exceeding 100,000 by 2006 based on contemporaneous studies, and collaborated with groups like MoveOn.org for legislative efforts to cap troop levels and fund redeployments, contributing to the 2006-2008 shift in public opinion that pressured partial drawdowns under Presidents Bush and Obama. In 2008, it coordinated with allies to amplify Iraqi protests against the U.S.- Status of Forces Agreement, framing prolonged presence as fueling . Extending into the 2010s, Peace Action opposed escalations in against , including the 2014 reintroduction of U.S. combat advisors and airstrikes, arguing in June 2015 that such actions risked entrenching American involvement without diplomatic progress on and sectarian divides. It also critiqued interventions in (2011) and , promoting multilateral talks over unilateral strikes, and by 2016 called for ending the broader "War on Terror" framework, which it linked to over 6,000 U.S. military deaths and trillions in costs across , , , , , and since 2001. These efforts included for defense budget cuts and arms sale restrictions, though measurable policy impacts remained limited amid bipartisan support for operations.

Contemporary Global and Human Rights Campaigns

Peace Action's contemporary campaigns emphasize U.S. policy reforms to mitigate abuses in conflict zones, particularly where American or operations are perceived to prolong suffering. These efforts prioritize Middle Eastern theaters, including Gaza and , through mobilization, congressional , and public for arms embargoes and ceasefires. A central initiative is the "Block the Bombs" campaign, launched to terminate U.S. weapons shipments to amid its military operations in Gaza, which Peace Action describes as enabling gross violations. The organization issued a summer/fall 2025 organizing guide detailing events, resources, and strategies for activists to pressure policymakers, including protests and direct congressional outreach. In , Peace Action has campaigned against U.S. support for strikes and the Saudi-led coalition's intervention, arguing it contributes to famine and civilian deaths affecting over 20 million people as of 2019 estimates updated in ongoing advocacy. On April 23, 2025, following intensified U.S. operations, the group called for a congressional to halt unauthorized military actions, building on prior successes like the 2019 resolution passage. During its Spring 2025 Grassroots Advocacy Days on February 25, Peace Action mobilized affiliates to lobby for an enduring in Gaza, cessation of U.S. arms to , and restoration of funding to the Relief and Works Agency (), which it views as essential for Palestinian . On , Peace Action condemned Russia's 2022 as aggressive while advocating an immediate comprehensive to prioritize civilian protection and over prolonged armament, aligning with its broader anti-intervention stance. These campaigns fall under the umbrella of "Ending U.S. Complicity in Gross Violations," targeting U.S.-linked crises in , Israel/, and similar areas through policy advocacy and public pressure.

Political Influence and Engagement

Electoral Endorsements and Fundraising

Peace Action influences elections primarily through its PeaceVoter program, which endorses candidates demonstrating strong records on reducing military interventions, advancing , and prioritizing over . Endorsements are determined by alignment with these priorities, including support for specific legislative amendments on issues like policy and , as seen in the 2024 endorsement of Representative for his consistent voting record. The organization distributes millions of voter guides highlighting endorsed candidates' stances on , aiming to elevate these issues in congressional races where they often receive limited attention. In the 2022 midterm elections, Peace Action endorsed 56 candidates for , achieving a success rate of over 75% with 48 victories, reflecting targeted selection of incumbents and challengers likely to prevail while advancing pro-peace positions. Endorsements extend to special elections and cycles like 2024 and 2026, focusing on federal races, and are extended to candidates via a resource center offering support such as volunteer mobilization and voter outreach. While the group claims non-partisanship, its endorsements overwhelmingly favor Democratic candidates whose platforms align with progressive foreign policy views, with no notable Republican endorsements in recent cycles tracked by independent databases. Complementing endorsements, Peace Action operates a political action committee (PAC) that channels member contributions to federal candidates, though at modest scales. In the 2023-2024 election cycle, the PAC raised $344,333 from individual donors and disbursed $6,000 directly to endorsed federal candidates. Fundraising for the PAC occurs through grassroots appeals and platforms like ActBlue, often tied to specific races, such as solicitations for candidates like Karishma Manzur or , emphasizing their commitment to ending "endless wars." These efforts amplify electoral influence beyond endorsements by providing direct financial aid, albeit limited compared to larger PACs, and mobilizing small-dollar donations from peace advocates.

Lobbying and Legislative Efforts

Peace Action primarily engages in through mobilization, coordinating its network of over 100,000 supporters to pressure members of via phone campaigns, email petitions, in-district visits, and direct meetings with legislators and staff. The provides activists with toolkits, including guides on scheduling congressional meetings, crafting policy briefs, and leveraging polling data to influence decision-makers on issues like military spending and arms transfers. This decentralized approach supplements occasional direct advocacy by staff, focusing on building constituent pressure rather than large-scale registered expenditures, as reflected in minimal federal lobbying disclosures. In and , Peace Action has lobbied for legislation restricting weapons proliferation, including early efforts post-Cold War to support treaties like the and reductions in U.S. nuclear stockpiles. During the era, the group mobilized for amendments prohibiting permanent U.S. military bases, contributing to congressional language in 2007 appropriations bills that barred funding for such bases and influenced the eventual policy shift under the Obama administration to avoid long-term occupation. More recently, it advocated against arms sales, issuing statements criticizing Senate votes, such as the January 2024 decision (72-11) to table Sen. ' resolution on U.S. complicity in Gaza operations. On foreign interventions, Peace Action's legislative push emphasized diplomacy over military action, notably lobbying starting in 2013 for negotiations with that culminated in the 2015 (JCPOA), with staff testifying and coordinating coalitions to counter sanctions escalation. In 2025, it supported bills conditioning U.S. aid to , including Rep. Pramila Jayapal's March legislation to block offensive weapons sales amid Gaza conflict concerns, and a June bipartisan measure by Reps. Raúl Ruiz, , and others to tie arms transfers to compliance. These efforts often align with progressive coalitions but have faced limited success in passage, with most resolutions failing amid bipartisan support for aid packages exceeding $14 billion in 2024. To track and amplify influence, Peace Action publishes an annual Congressional Scorecard rating lawmakers on votes related to budgets, interventions, and , such as opposition to supplemental funding or support for UNRWA restoration. In 2023, its "Honor Roll" highlighted 28 House members and 10 senators achieving 90% or higher alignment on key votes, using these metrics to guide endorsements and public accountability campaigns. While the organization attributes policy shifts—like base restrictions—to sustained pressure, critics note that broader legislative outcomes often reflect partisan dynamics rather than isolated advocacy impacts.

Funding Sources and Financial Overview

Peace Action primarily relies on contributions from individual donors for its , with the claiming that 99% of its support comes from sources rather than large institutional grants or corporate contributions. In a recent , amounted to $818,899, of which $794,176—or 97%—originated from contributions, while expenses reached $857,026, yielding a net operating loss of $38,127 and net assets of $172,412. This modest financial footprint aligns with its structure as a 501(c)(4) focused on member-driven campaigns. The affiliated Peace Action Education Fund, a 501(c)(3) entity supporting educational initiatives, reported similarly constrained finances, with $123,536 in revenue and $118,838 in expenses for 2023, again dominated by contributions totaling $111,991. Historical records indicate occasional grants from progressive foundations such as the to the Education Fund, though these do not constitute a primary revenue stream in recent filings. Absent evidence of significant or defense industry funding, Peace Action's budget reflects dependence on small-scale, ideologically aligned donations, potentially vulnerable to fluctuations in activist mobilization. Separately, the Peace Action PAC, used for electoral activities, raised $344,333 in the 2023-2024 cycle from 191 large individual contributions exceeding $200 each, underscoring a pattern of donor reliance on sympathetic private supporters rather than broad-based or institutional backing. This funding model sustains operations but limits scale, with total organizational revenue across entities hovering under $1.2 million annually in recent years.

Achievements and Measurable Impacts

Peace Action's predecessor organizations, SANE and the , mobilized significant grassroots support in the , securing endorsements from 370 city councils, 71 county councils, and 23 state legislatures by 1983, alongside a non-binding resolution that passed overwhelmingly. This effort shifted , with polls showing 72% support in 1983, and pressured the Reagan administration to engage in talks with the , contributing to the 1987 , which eliminated an entire class of nuclear weapons, and the 1991 Treaty, which reduced strategic nuclear arsenals. Following the 1993 merger into Peace Action, the organization advocated for further arms reductions, including lobbying efforts that supported ratification of the Treaty on December 22, 2010, by a 71-26 vote, limiting each side to 1,550 deployed strategic warheads—a roughly 30% reduction from prior levels—and enabling on-site inspections. In , Peace Action drafted and promoted anti-militarization measures, including H.Con.Res. 197 in 2005, which expressed Congress's sense against establishing permanent bases, influencing broader policy debates and contributing to the U.S.- signed on November 17, 2008, that explicitly barred permanent basing and facilitated the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops by December 2011.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Strategic Shortcomings

Policy Influence and Unintended Consequences

Peace Action's advocacy played a key role in the passage of legislation in 1992 that prohibited funding for , effectively instituting a U.S. moratorium on such activities that has persisted since. This effort, building on the organization's Cold War-era nuclear freeze campaigns, pressured the administration and subsequent policymakers toward measures, culminating in President Clinton's signing of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1996. While intended to curb proliferation and reduce global nuclear risks, the moratorium has produced unintended challenges for U.S. nuclear deterrence, including difficulties in verifying the long-term safety, reliability, and performance of an aging without empirical explosive data from tests. Critics, including defense analysts, contend that reliance on computer simulations and subcritical experiments via the Stockpile Stewardship Program—established in 1995 with an annual budget exceeding $1.5 billion by the —fails to replicate the confidence provided by full-yield tests, potentially eroding stockpile efficacy over time as warheads age and materials degrade. The organization's persistent lobbying for military spending reductions, framed as redirecting funds to domestic priorities, contributed to the post-Cold War "" under the administration, where defense budgets fell from 4.8% of GDP in 1993 to 3% by 2000, shrinking active-duty forces by over 30% to about 1.4 million personnel. Proponents viewed this as fiscal prudence amid reduced threats, but emerged in diminished readiness and modernization, exemplified by procurement shortfalls that left the U.S. military under-equipped for asymmetric conflicts post-9/11, with reports citing delayed responses and higher operational costs in and due to pre-2001 underinvestment. analyses, drawing on data, argue such cuts signaled vulnerability to adversaries, correlating with accelerated military buildups by and during the and , as U.S. qualitative edges eroded without sustained funding. Peace Action's opposition to U.S. interventions, including the 1991 and 2003 Iraq invasion, influenced progressive congressional resistance and public discourse, amplifying calls for restraint that resonated in debates over force deployments. However, this stance has been linked by foreign policy realists to unintended escalations, such as the partial restraint in the during the mid-1990s, where delayed action amid anti-intervention pressure allowed to intensify before the 1995 Dayton Accords, resulting in over 100,000 deaths. Similarly, advocacy against robust post-9/11 countermeasures arguably contributed to policy hesitations that empowered non-state actors, with empirical studies on anti-war movements showing correlations between eroded political will and prolonged insurgencies, as domestic opposition extended conflict durations by undermining sustained commitment. These outcomes highlight causal disconnects between ideals and geopolitical realities, where reduced U.S. posture empirically invited adventurism from revisionist powers without reciprocal .

Ideological Biases and Selective Advocacy

Peace Action has been characterized as a left-of-center organization, with its political action committee directing 100% of contributions to Democratic candidates in the 2019-2020 election cycle. This partisan alignment reflects broader ideological leanings toward progressive foreign policy priorities, including opposition to military spending increases and advocacy for diplomatic alternatives, often in concert with left-leaning coalitions. Historical ties trace to predecessors like the Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy, which during the Cold War emphasized unilateral U.S. restraint on nuclear arms while downplaying Soviet advancements, contributing to perceptions of asymmetry in threat assessment. The organization's advocacy exhibits selectivity, prioritizing critiques of U.S. and allied military engagements over equivalent scrutiny of non-Western aggressions. For instance, Peace Action has launched targeted campaigns like "Block the Bombs to ," urging to halt U.S. arms transfers amid the - conflict, framing such aid as exacerbating violence without parallel initiatives demanding accountability from for , 2023, attacks or Iranian proxy support. In contrast, its response to 's 2022 invasion of focused on U.S. , including proposals to reduce sanctions on in exchange for troop withdrawals and an immediate , rather than sustained campaigns condemning Russian actions or supporting Ukrainian unequivocally. This pattern aligns with a recurring emphasis on U.S. policy reformulations—such as cutting aid to over —as the primary lever for peace, sidelining direct advocacy against authoritarian expansions like China's claims or North Korean provocations absent U.S. involvement. Such selectivity has drawn implicit critique from analysts noting that left-of-center peace groups, including Peace Action, often frame conflicts through lenses of Western , potentially undermining causal realism by attributing violence disproportionately to U.S. actions while treating adversaries' intents as reactive. This approach, while mobilizing domestic opposition to interventions like in 2003, risks inconsistent application of non-interventionist principles, as evidenced by muted responses to Syria's Assad regime atrocities or Venezuelan humanitarian crises without U.S. military footprints. on global conflicts, such as the Uppsala Conflict Data Program's tracking of battle deaths, reveal diverse aggressors, yet Peace Action's legislative pushes remain anchored in Washington-centric reforms.

Internal and External Disputes

Peace Action has faced internal tensions primarily through debates within its affiliated network over responses to major conflicts. The in February 2022 highlighted factionalism in the broader , including among groups like Peace Action, an affiliate of the national organization. Positions diverged into three main camps: those attributing the war primarily to expansionism and advocating withdrawal from the alliance; those viewing Russian President as the chief aggressor and supporting limited arming of for defense; and those prioritizing immediate, unconditional ceasefire negotiations to halt hostilities. These divisions strained coalitions, with Peace Action emphasizing diplomatic de-escalation and criticism of both Russian aggression and policies, reflecting ongoing strategic disagreements on balancing anti-war principles with geopolitical analysis. Externally, Peace Action has pursued legal challenges against executive military actions perceived as bypassing . In 2011, Peace Action, a state affiliate, filed suit against President , contending that the intervention in without explicit congressional approval violated the of 1973. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case in May 2011, ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing due to insufficient demonstration of concrete injury, though the decision underscored broader disputes over war powers separation. The organization's advocacy on Israel-Palestine has generated significant external friction with pro-Israel constituencies and policymakers. Peace Action's calls to condition or reduce military aid to —totaling approximately $3.8 billion annually as of 2023—and its support for have drawn rebukes from groups like the , which argue such stances embolden adversaries and undermine Israel's qualitative military edge against threats like and . In September 2022, Peace Action issued a statement defending Rep. (D-MI) amid backlash for her criticism of Israeli policies, framing attacks on her as attempts to stifle progressive voices on Palestinian rights rather than substantive policy debate. Conservative outlets have further criticized Peace Action for selective opposition to interventions, alleging it weakens deterrence against authoritarian regimes while downplaying aggressions not involving American forces.

References

  1. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/peace-action/
  2. https://peaceaction.org/who-we-are/
  3. https://peaceaction.org/who-we-are/our-mission/
  4. https://peaceaction.org/who-we-are/our-mission/timeline/
  5. https://peaceaction.org/who-we-are/our-mission/history/
  6. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2010-12/nuclear-freeze-and-its-impact
  7. https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/national-committee-sane-nuclear-policy-sane
  8. https://findingaids.library.upenn.edu/records/Peace_SCPC.DG.151
  9. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/sane-national-committee-sane-nuclear-policy
  10. https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/teachinger/glossary/nat-com-sane-nuc-pol.cfm
  11. https://masspeaceaction.org/about/history/
  12. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/national-committee-sane-nuclear-policy
  13. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jon-rainwater-2100a44
  14. https://peaceaction.org/team/jon-rainwater/
  15. https://www.peaceaction.org/who-we-are/our-team/staff/
  16. https://www.idealist.org/en/nonprofit/e1a22369d83b426bb7adeb9b9c4e1f7b-peace-actionpeace-action-education-fund-silver-spring
  17. https://www.peaceactioneducationfund.org/who-we-are/board-of-directors/
  18. https://www.peaceaction.org/who-we-are/
  19. https://www.peaceaction.org/who-we-are/find-a-local-affiliate/
  20. https://www.peaceaction.org/get-involved/
  21. https://www.peaceaction.org/about/
  22. https://www.peacesi.org/about1
  23. https://www.panys.org/chapters
  24. https://actionnetwork.org/groups/peace-action-new-york-state
  25. https://www.facebook.com/PeaceActionNY/
  26. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/world-without-nuclear-weapons/
  27. https://peaceaction.org/2009/09/24/un-resolution-1887-a-step-forward/
  28. https://www.peaceaction.org/2021/01/21/treaty-on-the-prohibition-of-nuclear-weapons/
  29. https://www.peaceaction.org/news-posts/peace-action-congratulates-ican-nobel-peace-prize-us-must-work-towards-nuclear-disarmament/
  30. https://www.peaceaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/6_23-nuclear-disarmament-policy-briefing.pdf
  31. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/world-without-nuclear-weapons/stop-a-new-nuclear-arms-racemiddle-east-nuclear-free-zone/
  32. https://www.peaceaction.org/2016/11/04/us-to-the-world-we-cant-eliminate-our-nukes-because-we-rely-on-our-nukes/
  33. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/ending-wars-in-the-middle-east/
  34. https://peaceaction.org/positions/
  35. https://www.peaceaction.org/2015/11/10/new-push-in-congress-to-vote-on-iraqsyria-war/
  36. https://peaceactionme.org/issues/diplomacy-and-de-escalation-not-further-militarization-for-ukraine.html
  37. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/global-flash-points-for-diplomacy/
  38. https://www.peaceaction.org/platform-2/
  39. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/
  40. https://www.peaceaction.org/2012/11/07/a-huge-election-victory-you-probably-didnt-hear-about-budget-for-all-initiative-wins-by-3-to-1-in-massachusetts/
  41. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/521554826/202003039349302560/full/
  42. https://www.peaceaction.org/2013/06/13/peace-action-positions-on-national-defense-authorization-act-ndaa-amendments/
  43. https://baystatebanner.com/2019/04/25/peace-activists-protest-trumps-budget/
  44. https://www.peaceaction.org/
  45. https://peacecoalition.org/about/recent-accomplishments.html
  46. https://www.peaceaction.org/who-we-are/our-mission/history/
  47. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-09/features/freeze-grassroots-movement-halt-arms-race-and-end-cold-war
  48. https://peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/ending-wars-in-the-middle-east/
  49. https://peaceaction.org/2008/03/04/collaborating-to-end-the-war-in-iraq/
  50. https://peaceaction.org/2017/03/19/14-years-after-invasion-iraq-wars-lessons-still-unlearned/
  51. https://peaceaction.org/2008/11/24/iraqis-protest-sofa/
  52. https://peaceaction.org/2015/06/25/oppose-the-u-s-escalation-of-the-war-in-iraq/
  53. https://peaceaction.org/2016/03/28/why-and-how-to-end-the-war-on-terror/
  54. https://www.peaceaction.org/block-the-bombs/
  55. https://www.peaceaction.org/2025/04/23/congress-should-exercise-its-authority-to-stop-strikes-on-yemen/
  56. https://www.peaceaction.org/2025/02/25/grassroots-advocacy-days-spring-2025/
  57. https://www.peaceaction.org/media-center/
  58. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/ending-u-s-complicity-in-gross-human-rights-violations/
  59. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/elections/peace-voter/
  60. https://www.peaceaction.org/2024endorsements/
  61. https://www.peaceaction.org/2022victories/
  62. https://www.peaceaction.org/candidate-resources/
  63. https://www.peaceaction.org/endorsements/
  64. https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Peace_Action
  65. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/peace-action/C00157941/summary/2024
  66. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00157941/candidate-recipients/2024
  67. https://secure.actblue.com/donate/peace_action_kmanzur
  68. https://secure.actblue.com/donate/peace_action_mlevin
  69. https://peaceaction.org/who-we-are/our-mission/how-we-work/
  70. https://www.peaceaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/a-brief-guide-to-lobbying.pdf
  71. https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/peace-action/summary?id=D000047313
  72. https://www.peaceaction.org/media-center/press-releases-3/
  73. https://www.peaceaction.org/what-we-do/campaigns/iran/
  74. https://jayapal.house.gov/2025/03/31/jayapal-introduces-legislation-to-block-offensive-weapons-sales-to-israel/
  75. http://carson.house.gov/media/press-releases/ramirez-jacobs-jayapal-pocan-18-members-congress-introduce-legislation
  76. https://www.peaceaction.org/know-the-score/
  77. https://www.peaceaction.org/peace-honor-roll/
  78. https://www.peaceaction.org/get-involved/donate/
  79. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/363294748
  80. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/222402577
  81. http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990_pdf_archive/510/510198509/510198509_200912_990.pdf
  82. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/peace-action/C00157941/donors/2020
  83. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011-01/senate-approves-new-start
  84. https://peaceaction.org/2010/12/22/senate-ratifies-new-start-pact-71-26/
  85. https://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/NMHB2020rev/chapters/chapter14.html
  86. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/1998-03/arms-control-today/challenges-nuclear-stockpile-stewardship-under-comprehensive-test
  87. https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/why-the-administrations-stockpile-stewardship-will-harm-the-us-nuclear-deterrent
  88. https://www.cato.org/commentary/frank-deserves-credit-push-cut-defense-spending
  89. https://www.macvsog.cc/anti-war%27s_unintended_consequences.htm
  90. https://origins.osu.edu/history-news/war-and-law-unintended-consequences
  91. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/peace-action/C00157941/summary/2020
  92. https://peaceaction.org/2022/03/28/peace-action-statement-fact-sheet-on-war-in-ukraine/
  93. https://masspeaceaction.org/the-ukraine-crisis-is-splitting-the-peace-movement-when-its-needed-most/
  94. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2372&context=thirdcircuit_2010
  95. https://peaceaction.org/news-posts/peace-action-statement-about-progressive-values-and-palestinian-rights/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.