Hubbry Logo
PrairiePrairieMain
Open search
Prairie
Community hub
Prairie
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Prairie
Prairie
Prairie
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Collage of prairies in different environments

Prairies are ecosystems considered part of the temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands biome by ecologists, based on similar temperate climates, moderate rainfall, and a composition of grasses, herbs, and shrubs, rather than trees, as the dominant vegetation type. Temperate grassland regions include the Pampas of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, and the steppe of Romania, Ukraine, Russia, and Kazakhstan. Lands typically referred to as "prairie" (a French loan word) tend to be in North America. The term encompasses the lower and mid-latitude of the area referred to as the Interior Plains of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. It includes all of the Great Plains as well as the wetter, hillier land to the east. From west to east, generally the drier expanse of shortgrass prairie gives way to mixed grass prairie and ultimately the richer and wetter soils of the tallgrass prairie.

In the U.S., the area is constituted by most or all of the states, from north to south, of North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma, and sizable parts of the states of Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas in the west, and to the east, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana. The Palouse of Washington and the Central Valley of California are also prairies. The Canadian Prairies occupy vast areas of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. Prairies may contain various lush flora and fauna, often contain rich soil maintained by biodiversity, with a temperate climate and a varied view.[1][2][3]

Etymology

[edit]
Approximate regional types of prairie in the United States
  Shortgrass prairie
  Mixed grass prairie
  Tallgrass prairie

According to Theodore Roosevelt:

We have taken into our language the word prairie, because when our backwoodsmen first reached the land [in the Midwest] and saw the great natural meadows of long grass—sights unknown to the gloomy forests wherein they had always dwelt—they knew not what to call them, and borrowed the term already in use among the French inhabitants.[4]

Prairie (pronounced [pʁɛʁi]) is the French word for "meadow", formed ultimately from the Latin root word pratum (which has the same meaning).[5]

Formation

[edit]
Tallgrass prairie flora (Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie)

The formation of the Canadian Prairies started with the uplift of the Rocky Mountains near Alberta. The mountains created a rain shadow which resulted in lower precipitation rates downwind.[6]

The parent material of most prairie soil was distributed during the last glacial advance that began about 110,000 years ago. The glaciers expanding southward scraped the landscape, picking up geologic material and leveling the terrain. As the glaciers retreated about 10,000 years ago, they deposited this material in the form of till. Wind-based loess deposits also form an important parent material for prairie soils.[7]

Tallgrass prairie evolved over tens of thousands of years with the disturbances of grazing and fire. Native ungulates such as bison, elk, and white-tailed deer roamed the expansive, diverse grasslands before European colonization of the Americas.[8] For 10,000-20,000 years, native people used fire annually as a tool to assist in hunting, transportation, and safety.[9] Evidence of ignition sources of fire in the tall grass prairie are overwhelmingly human as opposed to lightning.[10] Humans, and grazing animals, were active participants in the process of prairie formation and the establishment of the diversity of graminoid and forbs species. Fire has the effect on prairies of removing trees, clearing dead plant matter, and changing the availability of certain nutrients in the soil from the ash produced. Fire kills the vascular tissue of trees, but not prairie species, as up to 75% (depending on the species) of the total plant biomass is below the soil surface and will re-grow from its deep (upwards of 20 feet[11]) roots. Without disturbance, trees will encroach on a grassland and cast shade, which suppresses the understory. Prairie and widely spaced oak trees evolved to coexist in the oak savanna ecosystem.[12]

Ecology

[edit]
Prairie grasses
Wheatfield intersection in the Southern Saskatchewan prairies, Canada

Prairie ecosystems in the United States and Canada are divided into the easternmost tallgrass prairie, the westernmost shortgrass prairie, and the central mixed-grass prairie. Tallgrass prairies receive over 30 inches of rainfall per year, whereas shortgrass prairies are much more arid, receiving only 12 inches or so, and mixed-grass prairies receive intermediate rainfall.[13][14] Wet, mesic, and dry prairie ecosystems can also form more locally due to soil and terrain characteristics. Wet prairies may form in low-lying areas with poor drainage; dry prairie can be found on uplands or slopes. Dry prairie is the dominant habitat type in the Southern Canadian agricultural and climatic region which is known as Palliser's Triangle. It was once thought to be completely unarable, but is now one of the most important agricultural regions in Canada thanks to advances in irrigation technology.[15]

Biodiversity

[edit]

The dominant plant life in prairies consists of grasses, which may include 40 to 60 different grass species. In addition to grasses, prairies can include over 300 species of flowering plants.[16] The Konza Tallgrass Prairie in Kansas hosts 250 species of native plants and provides habitat for 208 birds, 27 mammals, 25 reptiles, and over 3,000 insects.[17]

Some of the dominant grasses of prairies are Indian grass, big bluestem, side-oats grama, Canada wildrye, and switchgrass.[18]

Prairies are considered to be fire-dependent ecosystems. Regular controlled burning by Native Americans, practices developed through observation of non-anthropogenic fire and its effects, maintained the biodiversity of the prairie, clearing away dead vegetation and preventing trees from shading out the diverse grasses and herbaceous plants. Prairies also depend on the presence of large grazing animals, particularly bison.[19]

Bison are important to the prairie ecosystem because they shape and alter the environment by grazing, trampling areas with their hooves, wallowing, and depositing manure.[20] Bison eat more grass than flowering plants, increasing the diversity of plants in the prairie.[21] Cattle are thought to prefer to eat flowering plants over grasses, but it is not known if that is because of inherent differences in the species or because farmed cattle tend to be confined in smaller areas.[22] Bison dung is a vital source of nutrients for prairie soil, spreads seeds, and supports over 1,000 insect species, including specialist dung beetles which cannot subsist on the feces of any other animal.[23]

Degradation

[edit]

In spite of long recurrent droughts and occasional torrential rains, the grasslands of the Great Plains were not subject to great soil erosion. The root systems of native prairie grasses firmly held the soil in place to prevent run-off of soil. When the plant died, the fungi and bacteria returned its nutrients to the soil. These deep roots also helped native prairie plants reach water in even the driest conditions. Native grasses suffer much less damage from dry conditions than many farm crops currently grown.[24][25] When the eastern tallgrass prairies were plowed and turned into agricultural lands, the prairie grasses with their strong root systems were destroyed. In combination with severe droughts that resulted in the Dust Bowl, a major ecological disaster in which winds picked up the dry, unprotected prairie soil and formed it into "black blizzards" of airborne dirt that blackened the skies for days at a time across 19 states and forced 400,000 people to abandon the Great Plains ecoregion. The Dust Bowl was a major reason for the Great Depression.[26][27]

Human use

[edit]

Bison hunting

[edit]
Main articles: plains tribes and bison hunting

Nomadic hunting has been the main human activity on the prairies for the majority of the archaeological record. This once included many now-extinct species of megafauna.

After the other extinctions, the main hunted animal on the prairies was the plains bison. Using loud noises and waving large signals, Native peoples would drive bison into fenced pens called buffalo pounds to be killed with bows and arrows or spears, or drive them off a cliff (called a buffalo jump), to kill or injure the bison en masse. The introduction of the horse and the gun greatly expanded the killing power of the plains Natives. That was followed by the policy of indiscriminate killing by European Americans and Canadians for both commercial reasons and to weaken the independence of plains Natives, and caused a dramatic drop in bison numbers from millions to a few hundred in a century's time, and almost caused their extinction.

Farming and ranching

[edit]
The Prairie Homestead, Milepost 213 on I-29, South Dakota (May 2010)

The very dense soil plagued the first European settlers who were using wooden plows, which were more suitable for loose forest soil. On the prairie, the plows bounced around, and the soil stuck to them. This problem was solved in 1837 by an Illinois blacksmith named John Deere who developed a steel moldboard plow that was stronger and cut the roots, making the fertile soils ready for farming. Former grasslands are now among the most productive agricultural lands on Earth.[28]

The tallgrass prairie has been converted into one of the most intensive crop producing areas in North America.[29] Less than one tenth of one percent (<0.09%) of the original landcover of the tallgrass prairie biome remains.[30] Much of what persists is in cemetery prairies, railroad rights-of-way, or rocky/sandy/hilly places unsuitable for agriculture.[31] States formerly with landcover in native tallgrass prairie including Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Nebraska, and Missouri have become valued for their highly productive soils and are included in the Corn Belt. As an example of this land use intensity, Illinois and Iowa rank 49th and 50th, out of 50 US states, in total uncultivated land remaining.[29]

Drier shortgrass prairies were once used mostly for open-range ranching. With the development of barbed wire in the 1870s and improved irrigation techniques, this region has mostly been converted to cropland and small fenced pastures. In southern Canada, Palliser's Triangle has been changed into one of the most important sources of wheat in the world as a result of improved methods of watering wheat fields (along with the rest of the Southern prairie provinces which also grow wheat, canola and many other grains). Despite those advances in farming technology, the area is still very prone to extended periods of drought, which can be disastrous for the industry if it is significantly prolonged.[15]

Biofuels

[edit]
Main article: Biofuel
Sawgrass prairie in Everglades

Research by David Tilman, ecologist at the University of Minnesota, suggests "Biofuels made from high-diversity mixtures of prairie plants can reduce global warming by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Even when grown on infertile soils, they can provide a substantial portion of global energy needs, and leave fertile land for food production."[32] Unlike corn and soybeans, which are both directly and indirectly major food crops, including livestock feed, prairie grasses are not used for human consumption. Prairie grasses can be grown in infertile soil, eliminating the cost of adding nutrients to the soil. Tilman and his colleagues estimate that prairie grass biofuels would yield 51 percent more energy per acre than ethanol from corn grown on fertile land.[32] Some plants commonly used are lupine, big bluestem (turkey foot), blazing star, switchgrass, and prairie clover.

Preservation

[edit]

Because rich and thick topsoil made the land well suited for agricultural use, only 1% of tallgrass prairie remains in the U.S. today.[33] Shortgrass prairie is more abundant.

See also: List of protected grasslands of North America

Significant preserved areas of prairie include:

Virgin prairies

[edit]

Virgin prairie refers to prairie land which has never been plowed. Small virgin prairies exist in the American Midwestern states and in Canada. Restored prairie refers to a prairie that has been reseeded after plowing or other disturbance.

Prairie garden

[edit]

A prairie garden is a garden consisting primarily of plants from a prairie.

Physiography

[edit]
A large area with fertile soil is a good habitat for prairie dogs.

The originally treeless prairies of the upper Mississippi basin began in Indiana and extended westward and north-westward until they merged with the drier region known as the Great Plains. An eastward extension of the same area, originally tree-covered, extended to central Ohio. Thus, the prairies generally lie between the Ohio and Missouri rivers on the south and the Great Lakes on the north. The prairies are a contribution of the glacial period. They consist of glacial drift deposited unconformably on an underlying rock surface of moderate or small relief. Here, the rocks are an extension of the same stratified Palaeozoic formations already described as occurring in the Appalachian region and around the Great Lakes. They are usually fine-textured limestones and shales lying horizontal. The moderate or small relief they were given by mature preglacial erosion is now buried under the drift.

View of sand dunes and vegetation at Fossil Lake, with the Christmas Valley Sand Dunes, Feb. 21, 2017

The most significant area of the prairies, from Indiana to North Dakota, consists of till plains, that is, sheets of unstratified drift. The plains are 30, 50 or even 100 ft (up to 30 m) thick covering the underlying rock surface for thousands of square miles except where postglacial stream erosion has locally laid it bare. The plains have an extraordinarily even surface. The till is presumably made in part of preglacial soils, but it is largely composed of rock waste mechanically transported by the creeping ice sheets. Although the crystalline rocks from Canada and some of the more resistant stratified rocks south of the Great Lakes occur as boulders and stones, a great part of the till has been crushed and ground to a clayey texture. The till plains, although sweeping in broad swells of slowly changing altitude, often appear level to the eye with a view stretching to the horizon. Here and there, faint depressions occur, occupied by marshy sloughs or floored with a rich black soil of postglacial origin. Thus, by sub-glacial aggradation, the prairies have been leveled up to a smooth surface, in contrast to the higher and non-glaciated hilly country just to the south.

The great ice sheets formed terminal moraines around their border at various stages. However, the morainic belts are of slight relief in comparison to the great area of the ice. They rise gently from the till plains to 50, 100 or more feet. They may be one, two or three miles (5 km) wide and their hilly surface, dotted over with boulders, contains many small lakes in basins or hollows, instead of streams in valleys. The morainic belts are arranged in groups of concentric loops, convex southward, because the ice sheets advanced in lobes along the lowlands of the Great Lakes. Neighboring morainic loops join each other in re-entrants (north-pointing cusps), where two adjacent glacial lobes came together and formed their moraines in largest volume. The moraines are of too small relief to be shown on any maps except of the largest scale. Small as they are, they are the chief relief of the prairie states, and, in association with the nearly imperceptible slopes of the till plains, they determine the course of many streams and rivers, which as a whole are consequent upon the surface form of the glacial deposits.

The complexity of the glacial period and its subdivision into several glacial epochs, separated by interglacial epochs of considerable length (certainly longer than the postglacial epoch) has a structural consequence in the superposition of successive till sheets, alternating with non-glacial deposits. It also has a physiographic consequence in the very different amount of normal postglacial erosion suffered by the different parts of the glacial deposits. The southernmost drift sheets, as in southern Iowa and northern Missouri, have lost their initially plain surface and are now maturely dissected into gracefully rolling forms. Here, the valleys of even the small streams are well opened and graded, and marshes and lakes are rare. These sheets are of early Pleistocene origin. Nearer the Great Lakes, the till sheets are trenched only by the narrow valleys of the large streams. Marshy sloughs still occupy the faint depressions in the till plains and the associated moraines have abundant small lakes in their undrained hollows. These drift sheets are of late Pleistocene origin.

When the ice sheets extended to the land sloping southward to the Ohio River, Mississippi River and Missouri River, the drift-laden streams flowed freely away from the ice border. As the streams escaped from their subglacial channels, they spread into broader channels and deposited some of their load, and thus aggraded their courses. Local sheets or aprons of gravel and sand are spread more or less abundantly along the outer side of the morainic belts. Long trains of gravel and sands clog the valleys that lead southward from the glaciated to the non-glaciated area. Later, when the ice retreated further and the unloaded streams returned to their earlier degrading habit, they more or less completely scoured out the valley deposits, the remains of which are now seen in terraces on either side of the present flood plains.

When the ice of the last glacial epoch had retreated so far that its front border lay on a northward slope, belonging to the drainage area of the Great Lakes, bodies of water accumulated in front of the ice margin, forming glacio-marginal lakes. The lakes were small at first, and each had its own outlet at the lowest depression of land to the south. As the ice melted further back, neighboring lakes became confluent at the level of the lowest outlet of the group. The outflowing streams grew in the same proportion and eroded a broad channel across the height of land and far down stream, while the lake waters built sand reefs or carved shore cliffs along their margin, and laid down sheets of clay on their floors. All of these features are easily recognized in the prairie region. The present site of Chicago was determined by an Indian portage or carry across the low divide between Lake Michigan and the headwaters of the Illinois River. This divide lies on the floor of the former outlet channel of the glacial Lake Michigan. Corresponding outlets are known for Lake Erie, Lake Huron, and Lake Superior. A very large sheet of water, named Lake Agassiz, once overspread a broad till plain in northern Minnesota and North Dakota. The outlet of this glacial lake, called river Warren, eroded a large channel in which the Minnesota River evident today. The Red River of the North flows northward through a plain formerly covered by Lake Agassiz.

Certain extraordinary features were produced when the retreat of the ice sheet had progressed so far as to open an eastward outlet for the marginal lakes. This outlet occurred along the depression between the northward slope of the Appalachian plateau in west-central New York and the southward slope of the melting ice sheet. When this eastward outlet came to be lower than the south-westward outlet across the height of land to the Ohio or Mississippi river, the discharge of the marginal lakes was changed from the Mississippi system to the Hudson system. Many well-defined channels, cutting across the north-sloping spurs of the plateau in the neighborhood of Syracuse, New York mark the temporary paths of the ice-bordered outlet river. Successive channels are found at lower and lower levels on the plateau slope, indicating the successive courses taken by the lake outlet as the ice melted further and further back. On some of the channels, deep gorges were eroded heading in temporary cataracts which exceeded Niagara in height but not in breadth. The pools excavated by the plunging waters at the head of the gorges are now occupied by little lakes. The most significant stage in this series of changes occurred when the glacio-marginal lake waters were lowered so that the long escarpment of Niagara limestone was laid bare in western New York. The previously confluent waters were then divided into two lakes. The higher one, Lake Erie, supplied the outflowing Niagara River, which poured its waters down the escarpment to the lower, Lake Ontario. That gave rise to Niagara Falls. Lake Ontario's outlet for a time ran down the Mohawk Valley to the Hudson River. At the higher elevation, it was known as Lake Iroquois. When ice melted from the northeastern end of the lake, it dropped to a lower level, and drained through the St. Lawrence area creating a lower base level for the Niagara River and increasing its erosive capacity.

In certain districts, the subglacial till was not spread out in a smooth plain, but accumulated in elliptical mounds, 100–200 feet. high and 0.5 to 1 mile (0.80 to 1.61 kilometres) long with axes parallel to the direction of the ice motion as indicated by striae on the underlying rock floor. These hills are known by the Irish name, drumlins, used for similar hills in north-western Ireland. The most remarkable groups of drumlins occur in western New York, where their number is estimated at over 6,000, and in southern Wisconsin, where it is placed at 5,000. They completely dominate the topography of their districts.

A curious deposit of an impalpably fine and unstratified silt, known by the German name bess (or loess), lies on the older drift sheets near the larger river courses of the upper Mississippi basin. It attains a thickness of 20 ft (6.1 m) or more near the rivers and gradually fades away at a distance of ten or more miles (16 or more km) on either side. It contains land shells, and hence cannot be attributed to marine or lacustrine submergence. The best explanation is that, during certain phases of the glacial period, it was carried as dust by the winds from the flood plains of aggrading rivers, and slowly deposited on the neighboring grass-covered plains. The glacial and eolian origin of this sediment is evidenced by the angularity of its grains (a bank of it will stand without slumping for years), whereas, if it had been transported significantly by water, the grains would have been rounded and polished. Loess is parent material for an extremely fertile, but droughty soil.

Southwestern Wisconsin and parts of the adjacent states of Illinois, Iowa, and Minnesota are known as the driftless zone, because, although bordered by drift sheets and moraines, it is free from glacial deposits. It must therefore have been a sort of oasis, when the ice sheets from the north advanced past it on the east and west, and joined around its southern border. The reason for this exemption from glaciation is the converse of that for the southward convexity of the morainic loops. While they mark the paths of greatest glacial advance along lowland troughs (lake basins), the driftless zone is a district protected from ice invasion by reason of the obstruction which the highlands of northern Wisconsin and Michigan (part of the Superior upland) offered to glacial advance.

The course of the upper Mississippi River is largely consequent upon glacial deposits. Its sources are in the morainic lakes in northern Minnesota. The drift deposits thereabouts are so heavy that the present divides between the drainage basins of Hudson Bay, Lake Superior, and the Gulf of Mexico evidently stand in no very definite relation to the preglacial divides. The course of the Mississippi through Minnesota is largely guided by the form of the drift cover. Several rapids and the Saint Anthony Falls (determining the site of Minneapolis) are signs of immaturity, resulting from superposition through the drift on the under rock. Further south, as far as the entrance of the Ohio River, the Mississippi follows a rock-walled valley 300 to 400 ft (91 to 122 m) deep, with a flood-plain 2 to 4 mi (3.2 to 6.4 km) wide. This valley seems to represent the path of an enlarged early-glacial Mississippi, when much precipitation that is today discharged to Hudson Bay and the Gulf of St. Lawrence was delivered to the Gulf of Mexico, for the curves of the present river are of distinctly smaller radii than the curves of the valley. Lake Pepin (30 mi [48 km] below St. Paul), a picturesque expansion of the river across its flood-plain, is due to the aggradation of the valley floor where the Chippewa River, coming from the northeast, brought an overload of fluvio-glacial drift. Hence, even the father of waters, like so many other rivers in the Northern states, owes many of its features more or less directly to glacial action.

The fertility of the prairies is a natural consequence of their origin. During the mechanical transportation of the till, no vegetation was present to remove the minerals essential to plant growth, as is the case in the soils of normally weathered and dissected peneplains. The soil is similar to the Appalachian piedmont which though not exhausted by the primeval forest cover, are by no means so rich as the till sheets of the prairies. Moreover, whatever the rocky understructure, the till soil has been averaged by a thorough mechanical mixture of rock grindings. Hence, the prairies are continuously fertile for scores of miles together. The true prairies were once covered with a rich growth of natural grass and annual flowering plants, but today, they are covered with farms.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Prairie

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A prairie is an extensive area of flat or rolling grassland dominated by herbaceous plants, particularly perennial grasses, with few trees due to moderate rainfall, periodic fires, and soil conditions that favor grass over woody vegetation. These ecosystems, prevalent across central North America, once formed the continent's largest continuous habitat supporting diverse flora and fauna adapted to seasonal droughts, grazing, and combustion-driven renewal. North American prairies are classified into three primary types based on grass height, precipitation gradients, and geographic distribution: tallgrass prairie in the east with grasses up to several feet tall and higher moisture; mixed-grass prairie in central regions blending taller and shorter species; and shortgrass prairie in the arid west dominated by drought-tolerant bunchgrasses. Ecologically, prairies feature deep-rooted grasses that stabilize fertile soils, foster high biodiversity including pollinators, herbivores like bison, and predators, while serving as carbon sinks through extensive root systems exceeding surface foliage in mass. However, over 90% of original tallgrass prairies have been converted to agriculture, rendering them among the most endangered ecosystems globally, with remnants preserved in national parks and restorations emphasizing fire management and native seed propagation.

Definition and Classification

Types of Prairies

Prairies in North America are classified into three principal types—tallgrass, mixed-grass, and shortgrass—differentiated primarily by dominant grass heights, annual precipitation levels, and adaptations to moisture gradients across the Great Plains. These distinctions arise from east-to-west decreases in rainfall, with taller vegetation in wetter eastern zones transitioning to shorter forms in drier western areas. Classification emphasizes empirical measures of vegetation structure and climatic data rather than arbitrary boundaries. Tallgrass prairies, prevalent in the eastern Great Plains, support grasses exceeding 1.8 meters in height, exemplified by big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), which thrives under annual precipitation of at least 760 millimeters, often concentrated in spring and summer. These areas historically featured fertile loess soils conducive to dense forb and grass cover. Less than 4% of the original tallgrass prairie extent persists today, largely confined to fragmented remnants like the Flint Hills in Kansas. Mixed-grass prairies form transitional belts, such as in the central Dakotas, with intermediate vegetation heights blending tall- and shortgrass species under 500 to 760 millimeters of annual rainfall. Shortgrass prairies occupy the western, semiarid flanks near the Rocky Mountains, dominated by low-stature species like buffalo grass (Buchloe dactyloides) that rarely surpass 0.3 meters, adapted to under 300 millimeters of precipitation and pronounced drought cycles. These types are further shaped by fire frequency, which suppresses woody invasion in mesic tallgrass zones more than in arid shortgrass regions, and by soil fertility gradients favoring nutrient-demanding tallgrasses eastward. Precipitation thresholds—exceeding 760 millimeters for tallgrass dominance versus below 500 millimeters for shortgrass—provide quantifiable delineators supported by long-term meteorological records.

Geographic Extent

The North American prairies, encompassing grassland ecosystems within the Great Plains, extend from the Prairie Provinces of Canada—southern portions of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta—southward through the central United States to northern Mexico. This range aligns with the Prairie Ecozone in Canada, covering approximately 520,000 square kilometers of the interior plains. The Great Plains physiographic region, which largely coincides with historical prairie distribution, measures about 3,000 miles (4,800 km) from north to south and 300 to 700 miles (480 to 1,120 km) from east to west, bounded by the Rocky Mountains to the west and transitioning to deciduous forests or humid regions eastward. Key topographic and climatic features delineate prairie boundaries, including the 100th meridian, which approximates the 20-inch (51 cm) annual rainfall isohyet dividing more arid shortgrass prairies to the west from relatively humid tallgrass prairies to the east. Latitude-driven climate gradients further modulate extent, with cooler, shorter growing seasons limiting prairie dominance northward into Canada and warmer conditions enabling persistence southward, though constrained by increasing aridity near the U.S.-Mexico border. These factors, rooted in precipitation patterns and elevation rises east of the Rockies, confined prairies to rain-shadow zones unsuitable for extensive tree cover. Historically, tallgrass prairies alone spanned roughly 150 million acres from southern Canada to Texas, forming part of a broader grassland continuum fragmented by conversion to agriculture. Current distribution features scattered remnants, with the Flint Hills of Kansas preserving the largest intact tallgrass expanse at approximately 4 million acres, comprising nearly 80% of remaining global tallgrass prairie. U.S. Geological Survey analyses of satellite-derived land cover data indicate that only 28% of the original North American grassland biome persists as of recent mappings, with ongoing fragmentation evident in annual National Land Cover Database updates tracking conversions from 2020 onward. Managed ranchlands in shortgrass regions occasionally sustain prairie-like extents through grazing practices, though overall native cover continues to decline.

Etymology

Linguistic Origins

The term "prairie" entered the English language from French prairie, denoting a meadow or field, which originated in Old French praerie or praierie. This form evolved from Vulgar Latin prataria, a derivative of the classical Latin pratum, meaning "meadow" or "pasture." French explorers introduced the word to describe the expansive, treeless grasslands of North America during the late 17th century, with the earliest recorded English usage dating to circa 1682. René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, employed it in writing as early as 1680 to characterize these level, grass-dominated landscapes encountered during expeditions. Prior to European contact, across the region used distinct terms in their languages to denote these open grasslands, reflecting longstanding ecological knowledge independent of nomenclature.

Historical Terminology

In the early , American explorers characterized the expansive grasslands of the as the "," reflecting perceptions of and limited agricultural potential. , leading an expedition from 1806 to 1807, traversed the region and in his 1810 published account described it as a barren, desert-like expanse east of the , unfit for dense settlement due to insufficient rainfall and poor soil visibility. This persisted through subsequent explorations, such as Major H. Long's 1819–1820 journey, where his cartographer Edwin James labeled the central Plains on maps as the , emphasizing treeless, drought-prone conditions that deterred farming. Perceptions evolved by the and as railroads and surveys revealed deeper soils and periodic wetter climates, transforming the "" label into "prairie," connoting vast, open grasslands amenable to cultivation with sod-breaking technologies. Wetter years in the post-Civil era, particularly the 1860s–1870s, further dispelled fears, aligning with promotional narratives that highlighted prairie for and cattle. The Homestead Act of 1862 codified this shift by granting 160-acre claims to settlers for minimal fees after five years' improvement, embedding rhetoric that portrayed prairies as providential arable lands awaiting transformation from "wild" vacancy to productive farms. Congressional debates and act provisions explicitly targeted these grasslands, overriding earlier designations to justify federal land distribution. While "prairie" solidified for North American contexts, early analogies drew from South American "pampas" for similar flat, grassy extents, though North American usage avoided Eurasian "steppe" after mid-20th-century ecological delineations emphasized regional distinctions in grass height, fire regimes, and fauna over broad steppe applications.

Formation and Physical Characteristics

Climatic and Geological Factors

Prairies originate in regions dominated by continental climates with hot summers averaging 10–30°C and cold winters often dipping below -10°C, where annual precipitation ranges from 250 to 1000 mm, primarily as summer rainfall that supports grass growth but induces seasonal droughts insufficient for widespread tree establishment. These conditions favor herbaceous perennials with deep root systems capable of accessing subsoil moisture, while limiting woody vegetation through water stress and temperature extremes that hinder seedling survival and canopy closure. Geologically, North American prairies overlie Pleistocene-era glacial deposits, including till plains and wind-deposited up to several meters thick, which weather into deep, fertile mollisols such as chernozems characterized by high base saturation, 2–3% organic matter in surface horizons, and neutral to slightly alkaline . These edaphic features—dark, humus-rich A horizons over calcareous C horizons—enhance water retention and cycling tailored to grass decomposition, contrasting with the podzolic or alfisols of adjacent forested uplands. Causal feedbacks reinforce prairie persistence: low and fine-textured s promote rapid fuel accumulation in grasses, enabling frequent lightning-ignited fires with historical return intervals of 3–10 years that selectively kill tree saplings while sparing resprouting graminoids. Herbivory further suppresses juvenile trees by consuming browse and disturbing , amplifying edaphic and climatic barriers to encroachment in a self-sustaining grassland equilibrium.

Soil Profiles and Hydrology

Prairie soils, primarily Mollisols, are distinguished by a thick A-horizon (mollic epipedon) rich in from decomposed grass roots and surface litter, often exceeding 20 cm in thickness and reaching up to 60 cm or more in tallgrass variants. This organic enrichment, with content supporting high base saturation and nutrient availability, underlies the inherent fertility observed in undisturbed profiles. The root architecture of dominant graminoids and forbs further defines these profiles, with fibrous systems extending depths greater than 2 m in many species, enabling penetration into subsoils for moisture and nutrient uptake that bolsters in semi-arid conditions. While primary water absorption occurs in upper horizons, these deeper extensions enhance overall hydraulic redistribution and aggregation, reducing compaction and maintaining for infiltration. Hydrologically, prairie landscapes feature gently rolling to flat that fosters high infiltration rates under perennial cover, with ephemeral and seasonal dominating drainage patterns rather than rivers. The interlocking roots of native vegetation minimize sheet and rill , confining to rare high-flow events, though disrupts this stability and elevates wind and water potentials, as seen in the 1930s when and plowing contributed to massive displacement estimated in hundreds of millions of tons annually across millions of acres. Undisturbed prairie soils exhibit substantial organic carbon storage, with totals of 150-160 metric tons per hectare in the A-horizon and upper 30 cm, accumulated via belowground inputs from deep-rooted perennials under regimes of periodic and . This sequestration reflects efficient cycles and minimal leaching in base-rich profiles, conferring resilience to climatic variability through enhanced water retention and microbial activity.

Ecological Dynamics

Plant Communities and Biodiversity

Prairie plant communities consist primarily of s and s adapted to periodic droughts and nutrient-poor soils, with composition varying along a gradient from eastern tallgrass to western shortgrass types. In tallgrass prairies, which receive 25-40 inches of annual , Andropogon gerardii (big bluestem) dominates, often comprising 50-80% of biomass alongside (indiangrass) and (little bluestem). Shortgrass prairies, in arid zones with 10-20 inches of , are dominated by (blue grama), forming dense sods that cover up to 70% of the ground, co-occurring with (buffalograss). Forbs such as Echinacea angustifolia and E. pallida contribute to diversity, providing nectar for pollinators and comprising 20-30% of species in mesic sites. Plant species richness exhibits a west-east , peaking in mesic tallgrass prairies where up to 200 species occur per acre in undisturbed plots, compared to approximately 50 species per acre in shortgrass systems, reflecting availability and differences. Long-term monitoring at Konza Prairie Biological Station, established in 1977, documents over 500 species across its 13,000 acres, with highest local diversity in annually burned tallgrass stands featuring a mix of C4 grasses and forbs. Mixed-grass prairies occupy transitional zones, blending tall- and shortgrass dominants with intermediate richness of 80-120 species per acre. Dominant prairie graminoids exhibit C4 photosynthesis, a biochemical that boosts carbon fixation efficiency by 50% over C3 pathways under high light and temperature, enabling rapid growth in summer conditions with minimal water loss. Many , including big bluestem and blue grama, employ clonal through rhizomes or tillers, facilitating resource sharing and regrowth after physical stress, which enhances persistence in variable environments. These traits, shaped by , underpin the structural stability of prairie vegetation across subtypes.

Animal Interactions and Keystone Species

American bison (Bison bison) historically numbered 30-60 million across North American prairies, functioning as through ecosystem engineering activities such as selective , trampling, and wallowing that enhanced heterogeneity and forb diversity while limiting woody plant encroachment. These behaviors created microhabitats, increased nutrient cycling via dung deposition, and supported a cascade of trophic interactions by maintaining open grasslands essential for dependent herbivores and predators. Black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) serve as colonial engineers, excavating extensive networks that benefit over 170 associated , including reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals, by providing , improved soil , and enhanced availability through clipping around colonies. These structures facilitate predator-prey dynamics, such as offering refuge for burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) and black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes), while prairie dog colonies attract higher densities of grazing ungulates that further modify structure. In prairie food webs, apex and mesopredators like coyotes (Canis latrans) regulate rodent populations, including prairie dogs, through preferential predation on colonies, which helps maintain prey-predator balances and prevents eruptive herbivore outbreaks that could destabilize vegetation. Ground-nesting birds such as the greater prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus cupido) integrate into these dynamics, relying on prey like grasshoppers and beetles—key components of arthropod —for chick survival, while their leks demand open, grazed habitats shaped by large herbivores. Recent studies on managed grazing systems, including rotational practices mimicking herd movements, indicate that adaptive stocking avoids chronic overutilization myths by allowing sufficient plant recovery, sustaining without the degradation seen in continuous heavy use.

Role of Disturbances like Fire and Grazing

Fire and grazing represent essential disturbances in prairie ecosystems, sustaining grassland persistence by countering natural tendencies toward woody succession and facilitating nutrient turnover. In North American tallgrass prairies, historical fire return intervals averaged 2 to 10 years, with evidence from tree-ring and historical records indicating mean intervals as short as 2.59 years at certain sites between 1759 and 2003. These frequent fires recycled nutrients via ash deposition, enhancing soil inorganic nitrogen availability, microbial activity, and both above- and belowground plant productivity in the short term. Suppression of fire disrupts this cycle, leading to thatch accumulation, reduced resource heterogeneity, and declines in plant species richness over decades. Grazing by native herbivores further reinforces prairie maintenance through selective that removes senescent , limits buildup, and suppresses and establishment, thereby preventing transition to . In the absence of , grasslands exhibit increased woody encroachment, altering structure and reducing openness characteristic of prairies. Moderate intensities mimic historical patterns, promoting and grass regeneration while curbing dominance by unpalatable species. The interaction of and , termed pyric herbivory, amplifies these effects by directing herbivores to nutrient-rich, regrowing burned patches, which fosters in vegetation structure and elevates overall . Long-term studies at sites like Konza Prairie LTER demonstrate that combining periodic burning with offsets diversity losses from frequent alone, maintaining higher species compared to undisturbed plots. This underscores disturbances as integral to prairie resilience, with modern patch-burn in rangelands replicating historical dynamics to sustain productivity and ecological function.

Historical Human Interactions

Pre-Columbian Indigenous Practices

of the employed controlled burns to manage prairie grasslands, igniting patches to promote tender regrowth that attracted herds and facilitated . These fires, combined with climatic variability, increased fire frequency and altered vegetation patterns, creating mosaics of early-successional grasses preferred by herbivores. Archaeological and paleoecological evidence, including charcoal records from sediment cores, indicates such practices occurred for millennia prior to European contact, shaping prairie composition without leading to widespread degradation. Bison hunting relied on communal drives, utilizing natural topography for jumps or impounds to channel herds, a method documented archaeologically across sites spanning over 13,000 years. Pre-horse societies operated on foot, with human populations maintaining low densities—estimated at fewer than 1 million across the Plains—employing selective culling that targeted prime animals while sparing calves and cows to preserve herd reproduction. Dogs served as draft animals, pulling travois laden with meat, hides, and camp gear after kills, enabling semi-nomadic or village-based lifestyles centered on riverine horticulture supplemented by seasonal hunts. Pre-contact bison populations numbered 30 to 60 million across , sustained by these practices amid vast herd migrations and minimal human pressure, as evidenced by stable faunal assemblages in archaeological records showing no signs of depletion or conversion at scale. Tribes integrated prairie and into diets and —using grasses for cordage and for multifaceted sustenance—while avoiding into arid grasslands, preserving the dominant herbaceous cover. This equilibrium reflected demographic constraints rather than deliberate restraint, with empirical data from kill sites indicating harvest rates insufficient to disrupt ecological .

European Colonization and Bison Exploitation

European settlers' arrival in the intensified bison exploitation building on indigenous practices, where tribes had long hunted bison for subsistence using methods like drives and surrounds. Pre-contact indigenous hunting was sustainable at lower scales, but the introduction of , firearms, and European networks from the onward enabled larger communal hunts, particularly by Plains tribes and groups, increasing annual kills into the thousands per expedition. By the early , these augmented harvests predated widespread white commercial activity but set the stage for escalation as demand for bison products grew. Commercial hunting surged in the , driven by market demand for hides used in industrial belting and goods, with railroads providing efficient access and transport. Hunters, often professional "skinners," killed millions annually from moving or camps, exporting an estimated six million hides internationally between 1871 and 1881 alone, reflecting the profitability of industrialized processing. This period's efficiency—enabled by repeating rifles and rail logistics—contrasts with romanticized views of wasteful slaughter, as kills aligned with high-value markets rather than mere subsistence or policy-driven extermination, though U.S. encouragement amplified the . Indigenous participation continued but was overshadowed by white market hunters, who accounted for the bulk of the 10-15 million harvested in the decade. Bison numbers plummeted from an estimated 30-60 million in the early 1800s to fewer than 1,000 by 1889, primarily due to this targeted overhunting exceeding reproductive rates despite herds' prior resilience. While habitat encroachment from settlement and fencing contributed marginally, and diseases like affected localized groups, from cattle likely played minimal role in the 19th-century collapse as it spread more prominently later. Empirical records indicate annual kills often stayed below potential population growth until cumulative effects and herd fragmentation tipped the balance, underscoring causal primacy of incentivized exploitation over singular tragedy. The near-eradication cleared vast prairie lands for ranching and , facilitating European agricultural dominance without competition. Subsequent private breeding efforts from remnant herds rebuilt populations to approximately 500,000 by the , predominantly on commercial ranches rather than wild ranges.

19th-Century Agricultural Expansion

The 19th-century agricultural expansion across North American prairies stemmed from economic incentives favoring high-value crop production over extensive grazing, enabled by innovations that overcame the challenges of converting resilient sod into . In 1837, developed the self-scouring steel plow, which effectively sliced through the thick, root-bound prairie soils that clung to traditional cast-iron plows, drastically reducing labor and time required for initial tillage. This technology, combined with advancing rail networks for , shifted settlement patterns toward grain farming, as and other cereals promised returns exceeding those from native under operations. Federal policy amplified these drivers through the Homestead Act of 1862, which allocated 160-acre parcels of land to qualifying settlers upon proof of residency and cultivation, ultimately distributing about 270 million acres primarily in prairie regions. This spurred rapid land claims, particularly in the , where fertile soils supported wheat booms; in , for instance, soft acreage expanded dramatically in the , transforming former cattle domains into export-oriented breadbaskets with yields that economically outperformed uncultivated grasslands. By the early , such conversions had placed millions of acres under the plow, boosting national food output and enabling demographic growth in frontier areas. The pace of expansion, however, revealed limits when intensive tillage met climatic variability, as seen in the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, where drought exacerbated wind erosion on recently broken sod lacking deep-rooted vegetative cover. This episode underscored causal risks of monocultural overreliance without restorative practices, yet post-1930s adaptations—including reduced tillage and crop rotations—mitigated soil degradation, facilitating yield triplings via enhanced moisture retention and mechanized inputs by the mid-20th century. Overall, these developments prioritized scalable productivity, converting marginal grazing lands into engines of agricultural surplus despite periodic setbacks.

Modern Economic Uses

Crop Farming and Productivity

Converted prairie lands form the core of the U.S. Corn Belt and soybean production regions, enabling the country to supply approximately 31% of global corn and 28% of global soybeans in the 2024/2025 marketing year. These outputs underpin by providing staple feed grains and oils, with U.S. corn production reaching about 377 million metric tons and soybeans 119 million metric tons in that period. Adoption of across these farmlands has curtailed by 70-95% relative to conventional systems, preserving essential for sustained yields. Hybrid corn seeds, developed for and higher output, combined with , have extended cultivation into marginal prairie zones, yielding average corn harvests of 179.3 bushels per acre in 2024—equivalent to over 10 tons of when adjusted for . This productivity surpasses native prairie forage, which sustainably yields 1-3 dry tons per acre annually under natural conditions. Crop farming in these areas generates economic value exceeding $100 billion yearly in agricultural GDP contributions from grain sectors, bolstering national output where total agribusiness added $1.5 trillion to U.S. GDP in 2023. Initial declines from prairie conversion are offset by rotations incorporating or perennials, which boost and aggregate stability over time. Such practices maintain long-term , with integrated systems showing no net SOC loss compared to continuous .

Livestock Ranching and

Livestock ranching on prairie landscapes employs systems that replicate the migratory patterns of historical herds, fostering periodic disturbances which prevent woody encroachment and promote native grass regeneration. These practices enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation, with studies in prairie-adjacent Sandhills meadows showing low-density increasing long-term SOC compared to continuous systems. Managed intensities maintain indicators like and , outperforming ungrazed or heavily continuous grazing scenarios. Prairie ranchlands store substantially more than converted row-crop fields, as root systems and reduced preserve deep SOC pools lost during plowing and annual cultivation. Empirical data from ecosystems indicate higher SOC resilience under versus cropland expansion, which emits carbon for decades post-conversion. Integrating prairie strips—narrow bands of native perennials—into ranching operations further bolsters ; the STRIPS demonstrates that 10% land conversion to such strips reduces by 95%, water runoff by 44%, and nutrient losses by up to 90%, enhancing overall farm resilience without yield penalties. Economically, prairie-based cattle ranching underpins rural communities, with U.S. and calf production valued at over $83 billion in 2024, a sector concentrated in states where sustains land amid fluctuating markets. For biodiversity, evidence counters narratives favoring static ungrazed preserves: cessation of in historically grazed prairies leads to biotic homogenization and loss, as disturbances from herbivores maintain diverse plant communities evolved under megafaunal influence. Managed thus serves as a dynamic conservation analog, aligning productivity with ecological function over exclusionary models that overlook keystone roles.

Alternative Uses Including Biofuels

Prairie grasses, particularly switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), have been evaluated in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs for cellulosic ethanol production, with field trials demonstrating dry biomass yields of 5 to 10 tons per acre annually in suitable regions after establishment. Conversion efficiencies yield approximately 70 to 100 gallons of ethanol per dry ton of biomass, translating to 350 to 1,000 gallons per acre depending on yield and processing technology. Net energy return for switchgrass ethanol exceeds that of corn-based ethanol, with peer-reviewed analyses reporting an energy return on investment (EROI) of approximately 5.4:1—delivering 540% more energy output than inputs—compared to corn ethanol's 1.25:1 to 1.3:1. Despite this advantage, commercial scaling remains limited, as prairie land dedicated to biofuels competes directly with higher-value uses like food crop production and livestock grazing, where opportunity costs include forgone yields of 150 to 200 bushels of corn per acre or sustained forage for cattle. Government subsidies, such as those under the Renewable Fuel Standard, have driven marginal expansions but distort markets by underpricing the land's food and feed productivity, leading to elevated commodity prices and inefficient resource allocation. As of 2025, biofuel adoption on prairie acres constitutes less than 1% of potential biomass, prioritizing empirical land economics over subsidized fuel mandates. Beyond biofuels, prairie supports credits, with intact storing up to 1 ton of carbon per acre annually through root systems and , enabling markets for verified offsets in conservation programs. Processed prairie residues also serve as low-cost adsorbents, such as activated carbons derived from for removal in or mitigation, though adoption remains niche due to competition from synthetic alternatives. These uses highlight biofuels' relative underperformance against food-priority baselines, with 2025 data affirming sustained marginality amid unsubsidized market signals.

Environmental Changes and Controversies

Habitat Loss and Fragmentation

Less than 4% of the original remains intact, with the vast majority converted to cropland since the 19th century, while shortgrass and mixed-grass prairies retain higher proportions—around 50% of their extent in some regions—but in increasingly subdivided forms. This conversion reflects direct economic causation, as agricultural delivers yields and revenues far exceeding those from native , driven by crop profitability and land market dynamics rather than inherent "degradation." Fragmentation exacerbates these losses by subdividing remnants into patches often under 100 acres, where roads and fences impose barriers to animal movement and , reducing connectivity. Roads contribute through direct removal and , while fences—proliferating with ranching and property divisions—physically block migrations and increase mortality risks for herbivores and other . Biodiversity metrics in fragmented prairies show pronounced declines at edges and in small isolates, with dropping substantially due to altered microclimates, invasive proliferation, and disrupted ecological processes, yet generalist and adaptive taxa endure without precipitating outright failure. Converted landscapes function as modified agro-matrices supporting some native biota, underscoring that prairie transformation prioritizes human utility over preserved wild states but avoids claims unsupported by data.

Debates Over Conservation vs. Development

The debates surrounding prairie conservation versus development revolve around the tension between preserving ecological functions in remnant habitats and sustaining economic activities like and ranching, which cover vast expanses of former prairie lands. Proponents of development emphasize that active land uses, such as , can maintain or enhance by mimicking natural disturbances like herds, thereby supporting without the need for exclusionary protections. Studies from 2023-2024 indicate that managed in grasslands often results in higher plant functional group diversity and resources compared to ungrazed preserves, as it prevents woody encroachment and promotes native species regeneration. Critics of stringent conservation measures argue that regulatory interventions, such as Endangered Species Act (ESA) listings, impose undue economic burdens on private landowners while yielding limited recoveries. For instance, the lesser prairie-chicken, subject to proposed listings in the , a 2014 listing vacated in 2015, and a 2022 relisting split into distinct population segments, has prompted ongoing legal battles culminating in a 2025 federal court ruling vacating protective rules for failing to adequately consider compliance costs to ranchers and energy developers. These restrictions, including mitigation requirements for impacts, have stressed rural economies in drought-prone areas without clear evidence of population stabilization, fostering preferences for voluntary initiatives over mandatory federal oversight. Advocates for conservation counter that remnant prairies provide critical services, including storage and for endemic species, warranting public investments to offset development pressures. In , federal programs enrolled over 2.2 million acres of grasslands in conservation reserves, while projects received $83 million for prairie protection, aiming to bolster ecosystem resilience amid agricultural expansion. However, such approaches face scrutiny for potentially restricting landowner access and economic viability, as easements—while voluntary—permanently limit subdivision or intensive uses to prioritize collective environmental goals over individual property rights. Empirical assessments suggest that hybrid models, integrating ranching with targeted conservation, may outperform pure preservation in maintaining prairie , as fragmented reserves often suffer from and without the disturbance regimes provided by . These findings underscore landowner rights as a counterbalance to group-driven claims, advocating for incentives over prohibitions to align private with broader ecological outcomes.

Critiques of Regulatory Interventions

Regulatory interventions under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), such as the 2022 listing of the lesser prairie-chicken as threatened in its southern population and endangered in the northern, have drawn criticism for imposing substantial operational constraints on energy and agricultural sectors in the southern without commensurate ecological benefits. These listings necessitated avoidance measures, mitigation, and permitting delays for oil, gas, and ranching activities across approximately 4.7 million acres in and , exacerbating economic pressures in drought-vulnerable rural areas already facing declining farm incomes. Critics, including industry groups, argue that pre-listing voluntary conservation efforts—such as the Lesser Prairie-Chicken Initiative, which enrolled over 3.5 million acres in —demonstrated effective private-sector , rendering federal mandates redundant and counterproductive by deterring participation in such programs. data indicate a historical 90% decline since European settlement, but post-2014 listing analyses showed limited recovery, with short-term increases offset by ongoing fragmentation, suggesting regulatory burdens yielded negligible net gains relative to costs. Congressional resolutions in 2023 to delist the species underscored these flaws, prioritizing market-oriented incentives over top-down restrictions that hinder land productivity without addressing root causes like conversion. Federal fire suppression policies in prairie ecosystems have inadvertently promoted woody encroachment, altering hydrology, reducing grassland productivity, and diminishing biodiversity through fuel accumulation and inhibited natural disturbance cycles. In tallgrass prairies, fire exclusion has increased woody plant cover by 18% to 63% across seasons, facilitating invasion by species like eastern redcedar and leading to a 20-50% drop in native grass diversity and forage quality for grazers. Regulatory frameworks, including air quality restrictions and liability concerns under agencies like the EPA and state forestry services, often delay or prohibit prescribed burns—despite evidence that controlled fires reduce invasive woody regrowth by up to 90% in canopy damage and maintain prairie resilience against catastrophic blazes. This top-down caution contrasts with private landowners' adaptive use of burns, which empirical studies show better emulate historical regimes (fires every 2-5 years) to prevent ecological phase shifts, highlighting how bureaucratic hurdles exacerbate rather than mitigate degradation. Private market incentives have outperformed federal conservation reserves in bison recovery, scaling populations through commercial ranching while public lands struggle with limited herd sizes and disease management. As of recent estimates, approximately 420,000 exist in commercial herds on private lands, comprising over 95% of the total North American of around 500,000, driven by for sustainable production and that mimics natural patterns. In contrast, federal and tribal conservation herds total fewer than 20,500 animals across less than 1% of historical range, constrained by regulatory mandates for isolation and to prevent spillover, as seen in Yellowstone where herds exceed 5,000 but require costly interventions without broader restoration. Economic analyses attribute this disparity to private incentives enabling and land-scale expansion—over 1,900 U.S. ranches—versus federal models that prioritize containment over proliferation, resulting in slower gains despite public funding. This empirical contrast illustrates how foster , outpacing interventionist approaches prone to scale limitations and unintended ecological bottlenecks.

Preservation and Restoration Efforts

Protected Prairies and Reserves

Less than 1 percent of the original North American extent is currently protected in reserves, with the vast majority of remnants consisting of small, fragmented patches managed for conservation rather than economic production. These protected areas prioritize the preservation of native and , establishing baselines amid widespread conversion to , though they , farming, and other revenue-generating activities that characterize working landscapes. The Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie in Illinois spans approximately 19,165 acres and originated from the 1996 transfer of former Joliet Army Ammunition Plant lands to the U.S. Forest Service for restoration purposes. Restoration efforts have focused on reconstructing native grasslands, wetlands, and savannas, yielding stable populations of prairie-dependent species such as butterflies and birds, though public access is regulated to minimize disturbance. Similarly, the Nachusa Grasslands, a 3,800-acre preserve managed by The Nature Conservancy in northern Illinois, features reintroduced bison herds since 2014, supporting long-term plant monitoring that documents consistent native species diversity without the rotational disturbances of ranching. In , the American Prairie Reserve encompasses over 527,000 acres of combined deeded and leased lands as of 2024, with recent expansions including 12,534 acres acquired in to enhance migration corridors. rewilding initiatives have increased herd sizes, fostering trophic cascades that maintain health, yet the reserve's emphasis on minimal human intervention limits compatible economic uses like sustainable . Monitoring in such sites reveals persistent but relatively static metrics compared to adjacent working lands, where managed can promote heterogeneity and resilience in composition. These reserves thus provide critical refugia, albeit at the cost of forgone productive land values.

Active Management and Rewilding

Active management of prairie ecosystems involves deliberate interventions such as prescribed burns and to replicate historical disturbance regimes that sustained native plant and animal communities. Prescribed fires, conducted under controlled conditions, remove accumulated litter and thatch, suppress woody encroachment, and promote the germination of fire-adapted native grasses and forbs. In 2025, organizations including the Eden Prairie Parks Department scheduled burns through early December to rejuvenate native vegetation and control invasives, while the Sheyenne National Grassland initiated operations in October pending approvals. These practices often integrate with grazing, as patch-burn grazing—where fire creates heterogeneous patches—encourages herbivores to preferentially graze burned areas, mimicking pre-European settlement dynamics driven by and indigenous burning. Rewilding efforts emphasize reintroducing keystone species like bison to restore trophic cascades, with the American Prairie Reserve having expanded its conservation herd to over 900 animals since initial reintroductions in 2005, aiming toward ecosystem-scale populations that influence soil turnover and vegetation structure. Outcomes from managed sites demonstrate enhanced biodiversity; for instance, long-term studies indicate that burning and grazing regimes yield higher plant species richness compared to idled areas, with frequent dormant-season burns increasing native diversity by reducing dominance of non-natives. Research from prairie management experiments, including those informed by Long-Term Ecological Research networks, shows that active treatments can boost overall species diversity and productivity relative to unmanaged controls, though timing and frequency must align with local ecology to avoid short-term declines. These methods confer benefits by enhancing resilience to drought and invasion—such as through improved nutrient cycling—but incur substantial costs, typically ranging from $200 to $1,700 per acre depending on site preparation, seeding, and ongoing maintenance. Critics of pure rewilding paradigms argue they undervalue the co-evolutionary role of human activity in shaping prairies, as ecosystems like tallgrass prairie depended on frequent anthropogenic fires for persistence, rendering hands-off approaches ecologically naive and prone to woody succession or feral ungulate overgrazing without containment. Such unmanaged rewilding risks amplifying conflicts with adjacent agriculture, as unbound bison herds historically prompted overhunting and habitat conversion, underscoring the need for hybrid management that acknowledges human influence without excessive intervention.

Restoration Challenges and Outcomes

Restoration of prairies faces significant economic barriers, with costs typically ranging from $600 to $2,500 per acre depending on site preparation, quality, and labor, often exceeding budgets for large-scale projects due to the need for repeated interventions. sourcing presents additional hurdles, as mismatches between provenance and local conditions—such as or adaptations—frequently result in poor establishment rates, with studies showing that common locality metrics fail to reliably predict in early restoration phases. exacerbate these issues; for instance, reed canary grass () persists in seed banks for over a decade, rapidly overwhelming native plantings in wetlands and low-lying areas unless aggressively managed with herbicides or mechanical removal. Long-term remains elusive for most sites, with prairie reconstructions characterized by inherent unpredictability and , leading to frequent failures where exotic or non-target dominate rather than desired native assemblages. Empirical indicate that inadequate control of invasives and weeds contributes to these outcomes, with only intensive, ongoing interventions—such as those varying by site-specific intensity—correlating with higher quality and duration of restored prairies, though even these rarely achieve full without perpetual . Small-scale applications, like prairie strips integrated into row-crop fields, have shown more consistent benefits, including enhanced , , and reduced nutrient runoff, as evidenced by 2024 assessments demonstrating improved pollinator habitat and microbial communities with minimal crop yield impacts when comprising 10% of farmland. However, large-scale efforts often yield mixed results, particularly where or is absent, allowing woody species encroachment that shifts sites toward rather than dominance, underscoring the causal role of historical disturbances in maintaining prairie structure. Critiques of restoration paradigms highlight an overreliance on strictly , which may overlook more resilient hybrids or adapted non-natives that could enhance productivity and establishment in altered landscapes, potentially improving outcomes amid seed availability constraints. Private landowner initiatives, leveraging economic incentives like easements, have outpaced public programs in scale and adaptability, given that over 80-98% of prairie lands are privately held in regions like and , where flexible management better addresses site-specific barriers compared to rigid governmental frameworks.

Regional Variations and Physiography

North American Prairie Subregions

The North American prairies span a precipitation gradient from east to west, resulting in distinct subregions defined by grass height, soil depth, , and climatic influences that drive vegetation structure and . Annual rainfall decreases westward, from over 30 inches (760 mm) in the east to about 12 inches (300 mm) in the west, correlating with grass dominants shifting from tall species exceeding 50 cm to short ones under 50 cm. These zones align with physiographic provinces: the more humid, fertile eastern interiors versus the arid, erosion-prone western High Plains. , influenced by loess deposition in the east and eolian processes in the west, further delineates fertility and drainage patterns. The eastern occupies rolling terrains in the , particularly the of and , where wind-blown silt deposits from the created deep, well-drained mollisols with high and fertility, supporting dense stands of grasses like big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) reaching 2-3 meters. These soils, enriched by historic glacial till and up to 10-15 meters thick, exhibit pH levels around 6.5-7.5 and retain moisture effectively under 25-35 inches (640-890 mm) of annual , fostering higher production compared to western zones. Topographic relief in areas like the of , with steep slopes and rocky outcrops, limited plowing and preserved remnants, while the ' undulating hillslopes enhance infiltration and reduce . Transitioning westward, the mixed-grass prairie serves as an across the central , blending tallgrass dominants in mesic lowlands with shortgrass species on drier uplands, under 20-30 inches (510-760 mm) of . Physiographically, it spans flatter interfluves and subtle escarpments between the and High Plains, with soils of intermediate depth and texture—often chernozems—that reflect blended eolian and fluvial deposition. This zone's variability in microtopography and gradients drives patchier vegetation, with influenced by shallow aquifers feeding seasonal streams, contrasting the deeper eastern profiles. The western dominates the High Plains physiographic province, characterized by vast, flat to gently rolling expanses with coarse-textured and prone to wind erosion due to low organic content and sparse cover under 12-15 inches (300-380 mm) annual rainfall. Soils here feature higher in surface horizons (pH 7.5-8.5) and layers restricting rooting depth, exacerbating stress and favoring bunchgrasses like buffalo grass (). Episodic wind events, amplified by the region's elevation (900-1,800 meters) and fetch across open plains, historically stripped , as seen in paleorecords of eolian deflation; modern ties to the Ogallala aquifer's recharge dynamics, where semi-arid conditions limit infiltration to 10-20% of , sustaining sparse vegetation but vulnerable to depletion under extraction pressures.

Global Analogues and Comparisons

The Argentine pampas, a temperate grassland biome spanning parts of Argentina, Uruguay, and southern Brazil, serve as a primary analogue to North American prairies due to shared ecological traits including dominance by C3 grasses and deep, fertile soils suited to agriculture. Like prairies, the pampas have experienced extensive conversion to cropland and pasture since the 19th century, driven by export-oriented farming, with over 80% of the original extent transformed by mechanized agriculture by the mid-20th century. This parallel reflects convergent responses to similar climatic conditions—moderate rainfall and seasonal temperatures—favoring grassland persistence over forest encroachment absent disturbance. Eurasian steppes, extending from to , represent another analogue, characterized by shorter grasses adapted to continental climates with cold winters and hot summers, emphasizing by large herbivores over intensive . These steppes, often classified as shortgrass variants, have historically supported , with sustainable stocking rates maintaining productivity through that mimics natural herd movements. Empirical studies indicate that moderate intensities enhance and in steppe ecosystems, preventing woody invasion while boosting forage quality, offering models for elsewhere. Comparatively, prairies, pampas, and steppes all depend on recurrent fire and herbivore grazing to suppress shrubs and trees, fostering grass dominance via evolutionary adaptations like resprouting rhizomes and nutrient cycling. While prairies feature particularly extensive mollisols—dark, humus-rich soils formed under tallgrass sod—analogous chernozems prevail in steppes and alfisols in pampas, all indicative of high organic matter from periodic disturbances rather than inherent biogeographic uniqueness. Global grassland conversion patterns underscore shared pressures: FAO data show agricultural expansion, including permanent pastures and meadows, occupying over one-third of Earth's land surface as of 2022, with temperate zones experiencing the highest proportional losses to cultivation due to soil fertility. Economic imperatives, such as demand for grains and livestock, universally propel these shifts, though steppe grazing regimes demonstrate that adaptive herding can sustain yields without total conversion, informing restoration strategies across analogues.

References

  1. https://www.mndnr.gov/biomes/prairie.html
  2. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/prairie/
  3. https://www.nps.gov/tapr/learn/nature/a-complex-prairie-ecosystem.htm
  4. http://www.fs.usda.gov/r09/midewin/natural-resources
  5. https://www.nps.gov/wica/learn/nature/prairies.htm
  6. https://outdoornebraska.gov/learn/nebraska-habitat/prairies/
  7. https://www.grasslandgroupies.org/grasslands/american-prairie/
  8. https://projectupland.com/hunting-conservation/types-of-grasslands-in-north-america/
  9. https://www.prairiemoon.com/andropogon-gerardii-big-bluestem
  10. https://keep.konza.k-state.edu/prairieecology/TallgrassPrairieEcology.pdf
  11. https://gf.nd.gov/magazine/2016/jul/grasslands
  12. https://dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu/rangelandrecommended/2018/05/05/the-great-plains/
  13. http://www.ecozones.ca/english/zone/Prairies/index.html
  14. https://www.britannica.com/place/Great-Plains
  15. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/b1493
  16. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/eint/22/5/ei-d-17-0012.1.xml
  17. https://jimwfonseca.medium.com/the-one-minute-geographer-the-magical-meridian-the-20-inch-rainfall-line-f929aa4de734
  18. https://www.manhattanks.gov/3599/What-are-the-Flint-Hills
  19. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/kansas/stories-in-kansas/flint--hills-ranching-to-save-the-tallgrass-prairie/
  20. https://www.maps.com/north-american-grasslands-map-shows-substantial-loss/
  21. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/annual-national-land-cover-database
  22. https://www.etymonline.com/word/prairie
  23. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prairie
  24. https://assets.noviams.com/novi-file-uploads/aatf/pdfs_and_documents/Conference_Proceedings/DISPATCHES-FROM-THE-PRAIRIE-68ec31c7.pdf
  25. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-origins-of-the-word-prairie
  26. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/great-american-desert/
  27. https://www.hhhistory.com/2015/03/the-great-american-desert-move-along.html
  28. https://longreads.com/2018/07/02/taming-the-great-american-desert/
  29. https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/homestead-act
  30. http://www.americanyawp.com/text/12-manifest-destiny/
  31. https://news.prairiepublic.org/podcast/plains-folk/2022-09-10/the-true-character-of-the-plains
  32. https://www.fs.usda.gov/land/ecosysmgmt/colorimagemap/images/250.html
  33. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/biome/biograssland.php
  34. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/biomes/prairie.html
  35. https://www.soils4teachers.org/prairies
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/prairie-soils
  37. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/fire_regimes/PlainsGrass_Prairie/all.html
  38. https://fireecology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42408-019-0043-y
  39. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.202100437
  40. https://nawm.org/pdf_lib/soils_webinar/five_factors_of_soil_formation_and_horizonation_vs_simple_processes_daniels_071316.pdf
  41. https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/assistance/nrplanning/community/roadsidesforwildlife/putdownroots_poster.pdf
  42. https://tobuildavillage.org/blog/posts/prairie-grass-root-systems/
  43. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/prairie/why-important/prairie-soils.html
  44. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.9867
  45. https://online.ucpress.edu/cse/article/7/1/2006981/197534/Intermittent-Prairie-Streams-in-the-Northern-Great
  46. https://kinsleylibrary.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Handi-facts.pdf
  47. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=44723
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004896972206137X
  49. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/andger/all.html
  50. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide/big-bluestem
  51. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/bougra/all.html
  52. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.860672/Bouteloua_gracilis_-_Bouteloua_dactyloides_Shortgrass_Prairie_Macrogroup
  53. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/forb/echang/all.html
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7022177/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742411500703
  56. https://lter.konza.ksu.edu/
  57. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nph.70057
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0098847207000111
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7988519/
  60. https://movementoflife.si.edu/species/plains-bison
  61. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.2436
  62. https://blog.nature.org/2023/10/10/quick-and-dirty-guide-bison-keystone-species/
  63. https://environment-review.yale.edu/where-bison-roam-prairies-thrive
  64. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/csp2.70004
  65. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/30123025/Publications/2025/Duchardt%2520et%2520al.%25202025_The%2520interactive%2520role%2520of%2520prairie%2520dogs%2520with%2520fire%2520and%2520ungulate%2520grazing%2520in%2520the%2520Great%2520Plains.pdf
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11586099/
  67. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Greater_Prairie-Chicken/lifehistory
  68. https://www.nps.gov/articles/bison-bellows-8-18-16.htm
  69. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/rangelands/article/viewFile/11258/10531
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227672876_Fire_history_of_a_prairieforest_boundary_More_than_250_years_of_frequent_fire_in_a_North_American_tallgrass_prairie
  71. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02390180
  72. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/eap.70080
  73. https://nativegrasses.tennessee.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/184/2020/10/Grazing-and-Fire.pdf
  74. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.3213
  75. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2664.12641
  76. https://lter.konza.ksu.edu/outreach/FireEcologyMgmt.pdf
  77. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.1431
  78. https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/07/native-americans-managed-the-prairie-for-better-bison-hunts/
  79. https://news.arizona.edu/news/native-bison-hunters-amplified-climate-impacts-prairie-fires
  80. https://wildlife.org/native-americans-used-fire-to-hunt-bison/
  81. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34661/chapter/295341716
  82. https://www.nps.gov/articles/bison-bellows-3-31-16.htm
  83. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Indigenous-peoples-of-the-Great-Plains/Plains-life-before-the-horse
  84. https://giscenter.isu.edu/Research/Projects/BisonPaper.pdf
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052818300087
  86. https://biodiversity.ku.edu/archaeology/research/ancient-farming
  87. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/8ktdqi/were_native_american_bison_hunts_truly_sustainable/
  88. https://indigenouspeoplesatlasofcanada.ca/article/bison-hunting/
  89. https://www.thecollector.com/role-metis-play-depletion-bison-herds/
  90. https://lewis-clark.org/sciences/mammals/buffalo/bison-in-decline/
  91. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/where-the-buffalo-no-longer-roamed-3067904/
  92. https://kearnycountymuseum.org/railroads-spelled-doom-for-the-buffalo/
  93. https://users.nber.org/~confer/2006/si2006/ee/taylor.pdf
  94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258521274_Buffalo_Hunt_International_Trade_and_the_Virtual_Extinction_of_the_North_American_Bison
  95. https://www.environmentandsociety.org/tools/keywords/near-extinction-great-plains-bison-1820-1900
  96. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/what-happened-to-the-bison.htm
  97. https://nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/american-bison
  98. https://story.illinoisstatemuseum.org/content/moldboard-plow
  99. https://www.kancoll.org/khq/1943/43_1_malin.htm
  100. https://drought.unl.edu/dustbowl/
  101. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/30640500/INTEGRATOR/Jul2007.pdf
  102. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/0440000
  103. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/2222000
  104. https://aces.illinois.edu/news/no-till-practices-vulnerable-areas-significantly-reduce-soil-erosion
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0341816220305221
  106. https://www.agriculture.com/2024-corn-and-soybean-yields-11724747
  107. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/how-center-pivot-irrigation-brought-dust-bowl-back-to-life-180970243/
  108. https://tallgrassprairiecenter.org/sites/default/files/inline-uploads/2018_biomass_report_1.pdf
  109. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/chart-detail?chartId=58270
  110. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01500-w
  111. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2025EF006117
  112. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.534187/full
  113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124000053
  114. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/jeq2017.08.0313
  115. https://bwsr.state.mn.us/carbon-sequestration-grasslands
  116. https://westernconfluence.org/free-range-carbon-2/
  117. https://climatechange.ucdavis.edu/news/grasslands-more-reliable-carbon-sink-than-trees/
  118. https://www.nrem.iastate.edu/research/STRIPS/how-prairie-strips-address-midwestern-farmer-challenges
  119. https://research.fs.usda.gov/nrs/projects/strips
  120. https://agrilifetoday.tamu.edu/2025/08/05/low-herd-inventory-ripples-through-u-s-beef-market/
  121. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2023.1345
  122. https://prairieecologist.com/2017/02/06/compatibility-of-cows-conservation-and-climate-change/
  123. https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/articles/switchgrass-high-potential-energy-crop
  124. https://farm-energy.extension.org/switchgrass-panicum-virgatum-for-biofuel-production/
  125. https://attra.ncat.org/publication/switchgrass-as-a-bioenergy-crop/
  126. https://www.agmrc.org/commodities-products/renewable-energy/switchgrass
  127. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0704767105
  128. https://news.mongabay.com/2008/01/switchgrass-a-better-biofuel-source-than-corn/
  129. https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/food-agriculture-environment/biofuel-policy-is-failing-consumers-and-the-climate
  130. https://www.wri.org/insights/increased-biofuel-production-impacts-climate-change-farmers
  131. https://news.mongabay.com/2015/04/turning-prairies-into-gas-study-finds-u-s-biofuel-production-has-big-impacts-on-grasslands/
  132. https://carboncredits.com/grasslands-an-emerging-frontier-for-nature-based-carbon-credits/
  133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498425000663
  134. https://news.mongabay.com/2016/12/grasslands-in-us-great-plains-are-being-destroyed-at-alarming-rate/
  135. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/minnesota/stories-in-minnesota/northern-tallgrass-prairie-nwr/
  136. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/73fae29840a0410c8e0618805bce43f8
  137. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/clas/ctip/wildlife_crossing_structures/ch_2.aspx
  138. https://movementecologyjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40462-022-00336-3
  139. https://e360.yale.edu/features/unnatural-barriers-how-the-rapid-rise-of-fences-is-harming-wildlife
  140. https://www.biodiversityinfrastructure.org/handbook/1-infrastructure-effects/1-4-secondary-and-cumulative-effects/1-4-1-landscape-fragmentation/
  141. https://prairieecologist.com/tag/habitat-fragmentation/
  142. https://www.audubon.org/our-work/prairies-and-forests/ranching
  143. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725003386
  144. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26395916.2024.2311176
  145. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47632
  146. https://www.endangeredspecieslawandpolicy.com/district-court-vacates-lesser-prairie-chicken-4-d-rule
  147. https://www.bdlaw.com/publications/texas-district-court-rules-fws-must-consider-the-cost-of-protecting-threatened-species/
  148. https://www.fb.org/market-intel/lesser-prairie-chicken-rule-pressures-fragile-rural-economies
  149. https://wafwa.org/forbes-regulators-delisting-of-lesser-prairie-chicken-a-win-and-a-test-for-voluntary-conservation/
  150. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/news-events/news/08-20-2024/usda-accepts-22-million-acres-2024-grassland-general-continuous
  151. https://southdakotasearchlight.com/2024/11/04/grassland-and-other-conservation-projects-in-sd-receive-83-million-federal-boost/
  152. https://www.prairiepartner.org/conservation-easements
  153. https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wsb.1415
  154. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/40259/83.%2520Augustine%2520et%2520al.%25202021%2520REM%2520Thinking%2520like%2520a%2520Grassland.pdf
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10873014/
  156. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/who-we-are/how-we-work/private-lands-conservation/
  157. https://www.fws.gov/press-release/2022-11/lesser-prairie-chicken-listed-under-endangered-species-act
  158. https://wildlife.org/resolution-would-end-lesser-prairie-chicken-esa-protection/
  159. https://www.cattlerange.com/articles/2023/07/house-votes-to-remove-endangered-species-act-protections-for-the-prairie-chicken/
  160. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0313
  161. https://fireecology.springeropen.com/articles/10.4996/fireecology.130290241
  162. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742421000609
  163. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/illinois/stories-in-illinois/prescribed-fire/
  164. https://www.fws.gov/species/plains-bison-bison-bison-bison
  165. https://nationalbison.org/bison-by-the-numbers/
  166. https://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/images/get-involved/students-resource-about-bison/bison-research-papers/Conservation-of-North-American-Bison-Status-and-Recommendations-April-2003.pdf
  167. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13527
  168. https://www.thewilds.org/conservation/endangered-prairie-habitat-creation-north-america
  169. https://americanprairie.org/why-it-matters/
  170. https://publish.illinois.edu/tallgrass-prairie/prairie-restoration/
  171. https://www.fs.usda.gov/r09/midewin/recreation/discover-history/silver-anniversary-25-years-restoration-timeline
  172. https://dnr.illinois.gov/inpc/lwr-display.nachusa-grasslands-1.html
  173. https://www.nachusagrasslands.org/
  174. https://americanprairie.org/the-latest/2024-two-acquisitions/
  175. https://americanprairie.org/bison-restoration/
  176. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/greatPlainsFramework.pdf
  177. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aau6020
  178. https://www.eplocalnews.org/2025/10/23/eden-prairie-plans-prescribed-prairie-burns-through-early-december/
  179. https://www.fs.usda.gov/r01/dpg/newsroom/releases/sheyenne-national-grassland-begin-prescribed-fires
  180. https://prairieecologist.com/2021/08/04/prairie-management-tradeoffs-prescribed-fire/
  181. https://americanprairie.org/wildaboutbison/
  182. https://americanprairie.org/project/bison-reintroduction/
  183. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742418301519
  184. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.70195
  185. https://www.lsohc.mn.gov/FY2026/Accomp_Plans/2f.pdf
  186. https://prairieecologist.com/2025/03/21/are-prairies-less-natural-because-they-need-us/
  187. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6231070/
  188. https://ictnews.org/archive/restoring-native-prairie-provides-economic-cultural-benefits/
  189. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/Restoration-Guide-Crop-to-Conservation-Prairie.pdf
  190. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2688-8319.12223
  191. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/Restoration-Guide-Invasive-Perennial-to-Utility-Meadow.pdf
  192. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Reed%2520Canary%2520Grass%2520Management%2520Guide_0.pdf
  193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989423002470
  194. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rec.13993
  195. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1620229114
  196. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224561.2024.2435683
  197. https://prairieprophets.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Prairie-Strips-White-Paper_03.08.2024_Final-1.pdf
  198. https://www.nrem.iastate.edu/research/STRIPS/files/publication/2011-02-incorporating-prairies-multifunctional-landscapes.pdf
  199. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rec.13650
  200. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052821000249
  201. https://www.wisconservation.org/private-land-restoration/
  202. https://orionmagazine.org/article/prairie-grassland-restoration-north-america/
  203. https://mdc.mo.gov/blogs/discover-nature-notes/tallgrass-prairie-american-original-landscape
  204. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/habitats/grasslands-prairies-savannas/prairies
  205. https://range.altervista.org/Grasslands/shortgrassprairie.html
  206. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=greatplainsresearch
  207. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1400b/report.pdf
  208. https://academic.oup.com/book/40888/chapter/348969420
  209. https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/97568/is-a-pampa-an-example-of-ecological-succession
  210. https://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c01/E4-06-02-09.pdf
  211. https://animals.sandiegozoo.org/habitats/prairie-steppes
  212. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.984725/full
  213. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001581
  214. https://prairieecologist.com/2011/06/05/the-myth-of-self-sustaining-prairies/
  215. https://www.nps.gov/tapr/learn/nature/fire-and-grazing-in-the-prairie.htm
  216. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9804691/
  217. https://www.fao.org/statistics/highlights-archive/highlights-detail/land-statistics-2001-2022.-global--regional-and-country-trends/en
  218. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12527
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.