Hubbry Logo
Barbed wireBarbed wireMain
Open search
Barbed wire
Community hub
Barbed wire
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Barbed wire
Barbed wire
Barbed wire
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Close-up of a barbed wire
Roll of modern agricultural barbed wire

Barbed wire, also known as barb wire or bob wire (in the Southern and Southwestern United States), is a type of steel fencing wire constructed with sharp edges or points arranged at intervals along the strands. Its primary use is the construction of inexpensive fences, and it is also used as a security measure atop walls surrounding property. As a wire obstacle, it is a major feature of the fortifications in trench warfare.

A person or animal trying to pass through or over barbed wire will suffer discomfort and possibly injury. Barbed wire fencing requires only fence posts, wire, and fixing devices such as staples. It is simple to construct and quick to erect, even by an unskilled person.

The first patent in the United States for barbed wire[1] was issued in 1867 to Lucien B. Smith of Kent, Ohio, who is regarded as the inventor.[2][3] Joseph F. Glidden of DeKalb, Illinois, received a patent for the modern invention[4] in 1874 after he made his own modifications to previous versions.

Wire fences are cheaper and easier to erect than their alternatives (one such alternative is Osage orange, a thorny bush that is time-consuming to transplant and grow).[5] When wire fences became widely available in the United States in the late 19th century, it became more affordable to fence much larger areas than before, and intensive animal husbandry was made practical on a much larger scale.

An example of the costs of fencing with lumber immediately prior to the invention of barbed wire can be found with the first farmers in the Fresno, California, area, who spent nearly $4,000 (equivalent to $105,000 in 2024) to have wood for fencing delivered and erected to protect 2,500 acres (1,000 ha) of wheat crop from free-ranging livestock in 1872.[6]

Design

[edit]
Materials
  • Zinc-coated steel wire. Galvanized steel wire is the most widely used steel wire during barbed wire production. It has three types: commercial type, Class 1 type and Class 3 type. It is also well known as electric galvanized steel wire and hot dipped galvanized steel wire.
  • Zinc-aluminum alloy coated steel wire. Barbed wire is available with zinc, 5% or 10% aluminum alloy and mischmetal steel wire, which is also known as Galfan wire.[7]
  • Polymer-coated steel wire. Zinc steel wire or zinc-aluminum steel wire with PVC, PE or other organic polymer coating.
  • Stainless steel wire. It is available with SAE 304, 316 and other materials.
Strand structure
  • Single strand. Simple and light duty structure with single line wire (also known as strand wire) and barbs.
  • Double strand. Conventional structure with double strand wire (line wire) and barbs.
Barb structure
  • Single barb. Also known as 2-point barbed wire. It uses single barb wire twisted on the line wire (strand wire).
  • Double barb. Also known as 4-point barbed wire. Two barb wires twisted on the line wire (strand wire).
Twist type
  • Conventional twist. The strand wire (line wire) are twisted in single direction, which is also known as traditional twist. Besides, the barb wires are twisted between the two strand wire (line wire).
  • Reverse twist. The strand wire (line wire) are twisted in opposite direction. Besides, the barb wires are twisted outside of the two line wire.

Nominal diameter

[edit]
Gauge Imperial Metric
12+1⁄2 gauge 0.099 in. 2.51 mm
13 gauge 0.093 in. 2.34 mm
13+3⁄4 gauge 0.083 in. 2.11 mm
14 gauge 0.080 in. 2.03 mm
16+1⁄2 gauge 0.058 in. 1.47 mm

History

[edit]

Before 1865

[edit]

Fencing consisting of flat and thin wire was first proposed in France, by Leonce Eugene Grassin-Baledans in 1860. His design consisted of bristling points, creating a fence that was painful to cross. In April 1865 Louis François Janin proposed a double wire with diamond-shaped metal barbs; Francois was granted a patent. Michael Kelly from New York had a similar idea, and proposed that the fencing should be used specifically for deterring animals.[8]

More patents followed, and in 1867 alone there were six patents issued for barbed wire. Only two of them addressed livestock deterrence, one of which was from American Lucien B. Smith of Ohio.[9] Before 1870, westward movement in the United States was largely across the plains with little or no settlement occurring. After the American Civil War the plains were extensively settled, consolidating America's dominance over them.[10]

Ranchers moved out on the plains, and needed to fence their land in against encroaching farmers and other ranchers. The railroads throughout the growing West needed to keep livestock off their tracks, and farmers needed to keep stray cattle from trampling their crops.[11] Traditional fence materials used in the Eastern U.S., like wood and stone, were expensive to use in the large open spaces of the plains, and hedging was not reliable in the rocky, clay-based and rain-starved dusty soils. A cost-effective alternative was needed to make cattle operations profitable.[12]

1873 meeting and initial development

[edit]
An early handmade specimen of Glidden's "The Winner" on display at the Barbed Wire History Museum in DeKalb, Illinois
Patent drawing for Joseph F. Glidden's Improvement to barbed wire (24 November 1874)

The "Big Four" in barbed wire were Joseph Glidden, Jacob Haish, Charles Francis Washburn, and Isaac L. Ellwood.[13] Glidden, a farmer in 1873 and the first of the "Big Four", is often credited for designing a successful sturdy barbed wire product, but he let others popularize it for him. Glidden's idea came from a display at a fair in DeKalb, Illinois in 1873, by Henry B. Rose. Rose had patented "The Wooden Strip with Metallic Points" in May 1873.[14]

This was simply a wooden block with wire protrusions designed to keep cows from breaching the fence. That day, Glidden was accompanied by two other men, Isaac L. Ellwood, a hardware dealer and Jacob Haish, a lumber merchant. Like Glidden, they both wanted to create a more durable wire fence with fixed barbs. Glidden experimented with a grindstone to twist two wires together to hold the barbs on the wire in place. The barbs were created from experiments with a coffee mill from his home.[14]

Later Glidden was joined by Ellwood who knew his design could not compete with Glidden's for which he applied for a patent in October 1873.[15] Meanwhile, Haish, who had already secured several patents for barbed wire design, applied for a patent on his third type of wire, the S barb, and accused Glidden of interference, deferring Glidden's approval for his patented wire, nicknamed "The Winner", until November 24, 1874.[16]

Barbed wire production greatly increased with Glidden and Ellwood's establishment of the Barb Fence Company in DeKalb following the success of "The Winner". The company's success attracted the attention of Charles Francis Washburn, Vice President of Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Company, an important producer of plain wire in the Eastern U.S. Washburn visited DeKalb and convinced Glidden to sell his stake in the Barb Wire Fence Company, while Ellwood stayed in DeKalb and renamed the company I.L Ellwood & Company of DeKalb.[17]

Promotion and consolidation

[edit]

In the late 1870s, John Warne Gates of Illinois began to promote barbed wire, now a proven product, in the lucrative markets of Texas. At first, Texans were hesitant, as they feared that cattle might be harmed, or that the North was somehow trying to make profits from the South. There was also conflict between the farmers who wanted fencing and the ranchers who were losing the open range.[11]

Demonstrations by Gates in San Antonio in 1876 showed that the wire could keep cattle contained, and sales then increased dramatically. Gates eventually parted company with Ellwood and became a barbed wire baron in his own right. Throughout the height of barbed wire sales in the late 19th century, Washburn, Ellwood, Gates, and Haish competed with one another. Ellwood and Gates eventually joined forces again to create the American Steel and Wire Company, later acquired by The U.S. Steel Corporation.[18]

Between 1873 and 1899 there were as many as 150 companies manufacturing barbed wire. Investors knew that the business required minimal capital, and almost anyone with determination could profit by manufacturing a new wire design.[19] There was then a sharp decline in the number of manufacturers, and many were consolidated into larger companies, notably the American Steel and Wire Company, formed by the merging of Gates's and Washburn's and Ellwood's industries.

Smaller companies were decimated because of economies of scale and the smaller pool of consumers available to them, compared to the larger corporations. The American Steel and Wire Company established in 1899 employed vertical integration: it controlled all aspects of production, from producing the steel rods to making many different wire and nail products from that steel. It later became part of U.S. Steel, and barbed wire remained a major source of revenue.[20][21]

In the American West

[edit]
A rangeland fence which has caught a tumbleweed

Barbed wire was important in protecting range rights in the Western U.S. Although some ranchers put notices in newspapers claiming land areas, and joined stockgrowers associations to help enforce their claims, livestock continued to cross range boundaries. Fences of smooth wire did not hold stock well, and hedges were difficult to grow and maintain. Barbed wire's introduction in the West in the 1870s dramatically reduced the cost of enclosing land.[22]

Rusted barbed wire in a roll

One fan wrote the inventor Joseph Glidden:

it takes no room, exhausts no soil, shades no vegetation, is proof against high winds, makes no snowdrifts, and is both durable and cheap.[23]

Barbed wire emerged as a major source of conflict with the so-called "Big Die Up" incident in the 1880s. This occurred because of the instinctual migrations of cattle away from the blizzard conditions of the Northern Plains to the warmer and plentiful Southern Plains, but by the early 1880s this area was already divided and claimed by ranchers. The ranchers in place, especially in the Texas Panhandle, knew that their holdings could not support the grazing of additional cattle, so the only alternative was to block the migrations with barb wire fencing.[24]

Many of the herds were decimated in the winter of 1885, with some losing as many as three-quarters of all animals when they could not find a way around the fence. Later other smaller scale cattlemen, especially in central Texas, opposed the closing of the open range, and began cutting fences to allow cattle to pass through to find grazing land. In this transition zone between the agricultural regions to the south and the rangeland to the north, conflict erupted, with vigilantes joining the scene causing chaos and even death. The Fence Cutting Wars ended with the passage of a Texas law in 1884 that made fence cutting a felony. Other states followed, although conflicts occurred through the early years of the 20th century.[25] An 1885 federal law forbade placing such fences across the public domain.[22]

Barbed wire is cited by historians as the invention that tamed the West. Herding large numbers of cattle on open range required significant manpower to catch strays. Barbed wire provided an inexpensive method to control the movement of cattle. By the beginning of the 20th century, large numbers of cowboys were unnecessary.[26]

In the Southwest United States

[edit]
Examples of barbed wire used in the late 1800s in Arizona Territory

John Warne Gates demonstrated barbed wire for Washburn and Moen in Military Plaza, San Antonio, Texas in 1876. The demonstration showing cattle restrained by the new kind of fencing was followed immediately by invitations to the Menger Hotel to place orders. Gates subsequently had a falling out with Washburn and Moen and Isaac Ellwood. He moved to St. Louis and founded the Southern Wire Company, which became the largest manufacturer of unlicensed or "bootleg" barbed wire.

An 1880 US District Court decision upheld the validity of the Glidden patent, effectively establishing a monopoly. This decision was affirmed by the US Supreme Court in 1892. In 1898 Gates took control of Washburn and Moen, and created the American Steel and Wire monopoly, which became a part of the United States Steel Corporation.

This led to disputes known as the range wars between open range ranchers and farmers in the late 19th century. These were similar to the disputes which resulted from enclosure laws in England in the early 18th century. These disputes were decisively settled in favor of the farmers, and heavy penalties were instituted for cutting a barbed wire fence. Within 2 years, nearly all of the open range had been fenced in under private ownership. For this reason, some historians have dated the end of the Old West era of American history to the invention and subsequent proliferation of barbed wire.

Installation

[edit]
Barbed wire fence in line brace

The most important and most time-consuming part of a barbed wire fence is constructing the corner post and the bracing assembly. A barbed wire fence is under tremendous tension, often up to half a ton, and so the corner post's sole function is to resist the tension of the fence spans connected to it. The bracing keeps the corner post vertical and prevents slack from developing in the fence.

Brace posts are placed in-line about 2.5 metres (8 ft) from the corner post. A horizontal compression brace connects the top of the two posts, and a diagonal wire connects the top of the brace post to the bottom of the corner post. This diagonal wire prevents the brace post from leaning, which in turn allows the horizontal brace to prevent the corner post from leaning into the brace post. A second set of brace posts (forming a double brace) is used whenever the barbed wire span exceeds 60 metres (200 ft).

When the barbed wire span exceeds 200 m (650 ft), a braced line assembly is added in-line. This has the function of a corner post and brace assembly but handles tension from opposite sides. It uses diagonal brace wire that connects the tops to the bottoms of all adjacent posts.

Line posts are installed along the span of the fence at intervals of 2.5 to 15 m (8 to 50 ft). An interval of 5 m (16 ft) is most common. Heavy livestock and crowded pasture demands the smaller spacing. The sole function of a line post is not to take up slack but to keep the barbed wire strands spaced equally and off the ground.

Once these posts and bracing have been erected, the wire is wrapped around one corner post, held with a hitch (a timber hitch works well for this) often using a staple to hold the height and then reeled out along the span of the fence replacing the roll every 400 m. It is then wrapped around the opposite corner post, pulled tightly with wire stretchers, and sometimes nailed with more fence staples, although this may make readjustment of tension or replacement of the wire more difficult. Then it is attached to all of the line posts with fencing staples driven in partially to allow stretching of the wire.

There are several ways to anchor the wire to a corner post:

  • Hand-knotting. The wire is wrapped around the corner post and knotted by hand. This is the most common method of attaching wire to a corner post. A timber hitch works well as it stays better with wire than with rope.
  • Crimp sleeves. The wire is wrapped around the corner post and bound to the incoming wire using metal sleeves which are crimped using lock cutters. This method should be avoided because while sleeves can work well on repairs in the middle of the fence where there is not enough wire for hand knotting, they tend to slip when under tension.
  • Wire vise. The wire is passed through a hole drilled into the corner post and is anchored on the far side.
  • Wire wrap. The wire is wrapped around the corner post and wrapped onto a special, gritted helical wire which also wraps around the incoming wire, with friction holding it in place.

Barbed wire for agriculture use is typically double-strand 12+1⁄2-gauge, zinc-coated (galvanized) steel and comes in rolls of 400 m (1,320 ft) length. Barbed wire is usually placed on the inner (pasture) side of the posts. Where a fence runs between two pastures livestock could be with the wire on the outside or on both sides of the fence.

Galvanized wire is classified into three categories; Classes I, II, and III. Class I has the thinnest coating and the shortest life expectancy. A wire with Class I coating will start showing general rusting in 8 to 10 years, while the same wire with Class III coating will show rust in 15 to 20 years. Aluminum-coated wire is occasionally used, and yields a longer life.

Corner posts are 15 to 20 centimetres (6 to 8 in) in diameter or larger, and a minimum 2.5 metres (8 ft) in length may consist of treated wood or from durable on-site trees such as osage orange, black locust, red cedar, or red mulberry, also railroad ties, telephone, and power poles are salvaged to be used as corner posts (poles and railroad ties were often treated with chemicals determined to be an environmental hazard and cannot be reused in some jurisdictions). In Canada spruce posts are sold for this purpose. Posts are 10 centimetres (4 in) in diameter driven at least 1.2 metres (4 ft) and may be anchored in a concrete base 51 centimetres (20 in) square and 110 centimetres (42 in) deep. Iron posts, if used, are a minimum 64 millimetres (2.5 in) in diameter. Bracing wire is typically smooth 9-gauge. Line posts are set to a depth of about 76 centimetres (30 in). Conversely, steel posts are not as stiff as wood, and wires are fastened with slips along fixed teeth, which means variations in driving height affect wire spacing.

During the First World War, screw pickets were used for the installation of wire obstacles; these were metal rods with eyelets for holding strands of wire, and a corkscrew-like end that could literally be screwed into the ground rather than hammered, so that wiring parties could work at night near enemy soldiers and not reveal their position by the sound of hammers.

Gates

[edit]
Wire or "Hampshire" gate

As with any fence, barbed wire fences require gates to allow the passage of persons, vehicles and farm implements. Gates vary in width from 3.5 metres (12 ft) to allow the passage of vehicles and tractors, to 12 metres (40 ft) on farm land to pass combines and swathers.

One style of gate is called the Hampshire gate in the UK, a New Zealand gate in some areas, and often simply a "gate" elsewhere. Made of wire with posts attached at both ends and in the middle, it is permanently wired on one side and attaches to a gate post with wire loops on the other. Most designs can be opened by hand, though some gates that are frequently opened and closed may have a lever attached to assist in bringing the upper wire loop over the gate post.

Gates for cattle tend to have four wires when along a three wire fence, as cattle tend to put more stress on gates, particularly on corner gates. The fence on each side of the gate ends with two corner posts braced or unbraced depending on the size of the post. An unpounded post (often an old broken post) is held to one corner post with wire rings which act as hinges. On the other end a full-length post, the tractor post, is placed with the pointed end upwards with a ring on the bottom stapled to the other corner post, the latch post, and on top a ring is stapled to the tractor post, tied with a Stockgrower's Lash or one of numerous other opening bindings. Wires are then tied around the post at one end then run to the other end where they are stretched by hand or with a stretcher, before posts are stapled on every 1.2 metres (4 ft). Often this type of gate is called a portagee fence or a portagee gate in various ranching communities of coastal Central California.

Most gates can be opened by push post. The chain is then wrapped around the tractor post and pulled onto the nail, stronger people can pull the gate tighter but anyone can jar off the chain to open the gate.

Uses

[edit]

Agriculture

[edit]
Modern barbed wire

Barbed wire fences remain the standard fencing technology for enclosing cattle in most regions of the United States, but not all countries. The wire is aligned under tension between heavy, braced, fence posts (strainer posts) and then held at the correct height by being attached to wooden or steel fence posts, and/or with battens in between.

The gaps between posts vary depending on type and terrain. On short fences in hilly country, steel posts may be placed every 3 metres (3 yd), while in flat terrain with long spans and relatively few stock they may be spaced up to 30 to 50 metres (33 to 55 yd) apart. Wooden posts are normally spaced at 10 metres (11 yd) on all terrain, with 4 or 5 battens in between. However, many farmers place posts 2 metres (2 yd) apart as battens can bend, causing wires to close in on one another.

Barbed wire for agricultural fencing is typically available in two varieties: soft or mild-steel wire and high-tensile. Both types are galvanized for longevity. High-tensile wire is made with thinner but higher-strength steel. Its greater strength makes fences longer lasting because it resists stretching and loosening better, coping with expansion and contraction caused by heat and animal pressure by stretching and relaxing within wider elastic limits. It also supports longer spans, but because of its elastic (springy) nature, it is harder to handle and somewhat dangerous for inexperienced fencers. Soft wire is much easier to work but is less durable and only suitable for short spans such as repairs and gates, where it is less likely to tangle.

In high soil-fertility areas where dairy cattle are used in great numbers, 5- or 7-wire fences are common as the main boundary and internal dividing fences. On sheep farms 7-wire fences are common with the second (from bottom) to fifth wire being plain wire. In New Zealand wire fences must provide passage for dogs since they are the main means of controlling and driving animals on farms.

Around the turn of the 20th century, in some rural areas, barbed wire fences were used for local telephone networks.[27]

Warfare and law enforcement

[edit]
A wiring party deploying entanglements during World War I
American soldiers during World War I laying barbed wire. June, 1918

Barbed wire was used for the first time by Portuguese troops defending from African tribes during the Combat of Magul in 1895.[28] Less well known is its extensive usage in the Russo-Japanese War.

In 1899 barbed wire was also extensively used in the Boer War, where it played a strategic role bringing spaces under control, at military outposts as well as to hold the captured Boer population in concentration camps.

The government of the United States built its first international border fence from 1909 to 1911 along the California-Mexico border. It included barbed wire and was intended to keep cattle from moving between the two countries.[29] In 1924, the United States created its border patrol, which built more barbed wire fences on the Mexican border; this time to prevent people from crossing.[30]

More significantly, barbed wire was used extensively by all participating combatants in World War I to prevent movement, with deadly consequences. Barbed wire entanglements were placed in front of trenches to prevent direct charges on men below, increasingly leading to greater use of more advanced weapons such as high-powered machine guns and grenades. A feature of these entanglements was that the barbs were much closer together, often forming a continuous sequence.[31] Barbed wire could be exposed to heavy bombardments because it could be easily replaced, and its structure included so much open space that machine guns rarely destroyed enough of it to defeat its purpose. However, barbed wire was defeated by the tank in 1916, as shown by the Allied breakthrough at Amiens through German lines on August 8, 1918.[32]

One British writer described how the Germans used barbed wire as follows: The enemy wire was always deep, thick, and securely staked with iron supports, which were either crossed like the letter X, or upright, with loops to take the wire and shaped at one end like corkscrews so as to screw into the ground. The wire stood on these supports on a thick web, about four feet high and from thirty to forty feet across. The wire used was generally as thick as sailor's marline stuff, or two twisted rope yarns. It contained, as a rule, some sixteen barbs to the foot. The wire used in front of our lines was generally galvanized, and remained grey after months of exposure. The (German) wire, not being galvanized, rusted to a black color, and shows up black at a great distance.[33]

Barbed wire and containment: Japanese prisoner of war 1945

During the Great Depression, migratory work camps in the United States used barbed wire.[34]

In the 1930s and 1940s Europe the Nazis used barbed wire in concentration camp and extermination camp architecture, where it usually surrounded the camp and was electrified to prevent escape. Barbed wire served the purpose of keeping prisoners contained.

Auschwitz (Nazi Germany concentration camp) fence in Poland

Infirmaries in extermination camps like Auschwitz where prisoners were gassed or experimented on were often separated from other areas by electrified wire and were often braided with branches to prevent outsiders from knowing what was concealed behind their walls.[35]

During the United States' World War II Internment of Japanese Americans, barbed wire was used to enclose the concentration camps, such as Manzanar.[36][37]

During the 1968 Chicago riots, barbed wire was attached to the fronts of police and National Guard vehicles. The vehicles were used to drive into protesters and rioters and were nicknamed "Daly dozers" after then-Chicago mayor Richard J. Daley.[38][39][40]

Safety and injuries

[edit]
Chain link fence with barbed wire on top
Razor wire is a curved variation of barbed wire.

Most barbed wire fences, while sufficient to discourage cattle, are passable by humans who can simply climb over or through the fence by stretching the gaps between the wires using non-barbed sections of the wire as handholds. To prevent humans crossing, many prisons, and other high-security installations construct fences with razor wire, a variant which replaces the barbs with near-continuous cutting surfaces sufficient to injure unprotected persons who climb on it. Both razor wire and barbed wire can be bypassed with protection, such as a thick carpet, or with the use of wire cutters.

A commonly seen alternative is the placement of a few strands of barbed wire at the top of a chain link fence. The limited mobility of someone climbing a fence makes passing conventional barbed wire more difficult. On some chain link fences, these strands are attached to a bracket tilted 45 degrees towards the intruder, further increasing the difficulty.

Barbed wire began to be widely used as an implement of war during World War I. Wire was placed either to impede or halt the passage of soldiers, or to channel them into narrow defiles in which small arms, particularly machine guns, and indirect fire could be used with greater effect as they attempted to pass. Artillery bombardments on the Western Front became increasingly aimed at cutting the barbed wire that was a major component of trench warfare, particularly once new "wire-cutting" fuzes were introduced midway through the war.

As the war progressed, the wire was used in shorter lengths that were easier to transport and more difficult to cut with artillery. Other inventions were also a result of the war, such as the screw picket, which enabled construction of wire obstacles to be done at night in No Man's Land without the necessity of hammering stakes into the ground and drawing attention from the enemy.

During the Soviet–Afghan War, the accommodation of Afghan refugees into Pakistan was controlled in Pakistan's largest province, Balochistan, under General Rahimuddin Khan, by making the refugees stay for controlled durations in barbed wire camps (see Controlling Soviet–Afghan war refugees).

The frequent use of barbed wire on prison walls, around concentration camps, and the like, has made it symbolic of oppression and denial of freedom in general. For example, in Germany, the totality of East Germany's border regime is commonly referred to with the short phrase "Mauer und Stacheldraht" (that is, "wall and barbed wire"), and Amnesty International has a barbed wire in their symbol.

Movement against barbed wire can result in moderate to severe injuries to the skin and, depending on body area and barbed wire configuration, possibly to the underlying tissue. Humans can manage not to injure themselves excessively when dealing with barbed wire as long as they are cautious. Restriction of movement, appropriate clothing, and slow movement when close to barbed wire aid in reducing injury.

Infantrymen are often trained and inured to the injuries caused by barbed wire. Several soldiers can lie across the wire to form a bridge for the rest of the formation to pass over; often any injury thus incurred is due to the tread of those passing over and not to the wire itself.[41][42]

Injuries caused by barbed wire are typically seen in horses, bats, or birds. Horses panic easily, and once caught in barbed wire, large patches of skin may be torn off. At best, such injuries may heal, but they may cause disability or death (particularly due to infection). Birds or bats may not be able to perceive thin strands of barbed wire and suffer injuries.

For this reason, horse fences may have rubber bands nailed parallel to the wires. More than 60 different species of wildlife have been reported in Australia as victims of entanglement on barbed wire fences,[43] and the wildlife friendly fencing project is beginning to address this problem.[44] Grazing animals with slow movements that will back off at the first notion of pain (e.g., sheep and cows) will not generally suffer the severe injuries often seen in other animals.

Barbed wire has been reported as a tool for human torture.[45] It is also frequently used as a weapon in hardcore professional wrestling matches, often as a covering for another type of weapon—Mick Foley was infamous for using a baseball bat wrapped in barbed wire—and infrequently as a covering of or substitute for the ring ropes.

Because of the risk of injuries, in 2010 Norway prohibited making new fences with barbed wire for limiting migration of animals.[46] Electric fences are used instead. Consequently, automotive brands such as Bentley and Rolls-Royce Motor Cars use Norwegian (and other Northern European region) hides for producing leather interior in their cars, since the hides from Norwegian cattle have fewer scratches than hides from countries where barbed wire is used.[47]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References and further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Barbed wire

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Barbed wire is a fencing material consisting of one or more strands of galvanized steel wire with sharp barbs or points spaced at regular intervals along its length, intended to impede the passage of cattle, wildlife, and humans. Developed in the mid-19th century amid numerous experimental designs, the practical and commercially dominant version was patented by Illinois farmer Joseph F. Glidden on November 24, 1874, as U.S. Patent No. 157,124 for an "improvement in wire-fences" featuring machine-produced barbs crimped onto twisted wire strands. This innovation drastically reduced fencing costs in treeless prairies, enabling ranchers and farmers to enclose large areas with minimal materials and labor, which enforced property boundaries, curtailed open-range cattle drives, and accelerated the privatization of land in the American West following the Homestead Act. Dubbed the "devil's rope" by cattlemen whose nomadic herding lifestyle it disrupted, barbed wire's proliferation led to the decline of the cowboy era and the rise of settled agriculture, while sparking "fence wars" over disputed grazing rights. In the 20th century, it became a staple of modern warfare, with millions of tons deployed during World War I to form tangled entanglements that slowed infantry assaults, funneled troops into machine-gun fire, and defined the static trench lines of the Western Front. Its enduring utility in deterring intrusion persists in contemporary applications, from livestock containment and crop protection to perimeter security at prisons, military bases, and international borders.

Design and Materials

Components and Construction

Barbed wire consists of two longitudinal steel wires twisted together to form the core strands, with short barbed segments attached at regular intervals for deterrence. The wires are typically galvanized, applying a zinc coating to enhance corrosion resistance in outdoor environments. Standard line wire gauges range from 12.5 for conventional construction to 15.5 for high-tensile variants, providing diameters of approximately 2.5 mm and 1.8 mm, respectively, to balance durability and flexibility. Barbs, usually formed from similar gauge wire, are attached via machine twisting of the line wires around the barb segments or by clipping pre-formed barbs into the twists during fabrication. Configurations include two-point barbs, which form simple hooks, or four-point designs with outward-projecting spikes for greater snag potential. Intervals between barbs are typically 3 to 6 inches, with 5 inches common to optimize material use while ensuring continuous hazard along the length. Under tension, the twisted strands straighten slightly, orienting barbs to the plane for maximal contact, with prestressing to 250-300 kg recommended to eliminate slack and sustain barrier integrity. tensile strengths exceed 400-500 kg per strand in standard gauges, preventing easy severance, while the primary efficacy derives from barb geometry inducing lacerations upon penetration attempts rather than absolute .

Types and Variations

Traditional barbed wire, exemplified by designs similar to Joseph Glidden's patented configuration, consists of one or two strands of steel wire twisted together, with sharp-pointed barbs affixed at regular intervals along the length. Single-strand variants use a solitary wire with attached barbs, while double-strand types interlock two wires for added strength and barb retention. Barbs are typically 2- or 4-pointed, spaced 4 to 5 inches apart in standard configurations, providing effective deterrence for containment by entangling and puncturing hide without excessive lethality. Razor wire represents a structural from traditional barbed wire, employing a high-tensile core wire tightly crimped with stamped tape featuring razor-sharp barbs positioned at close, uniform intervals of approximately 1 to 2 inches. Unlike linear traditional wire, is often formed into concertina coils—expandable spirals up to 10 meters in circumference—enhancing coverage and entanglement for perimeter security, with the blade-like edges designed for greater cutting potential against intrusion attempts. Variations in barbed wire include coatings for environmental adaptation: hot-dip galvanized steel with zinc layers of 50 to 60 g/ offers resistance suitable for rural, soil-contact applications, extending service life to 20-50 years. PVC-coated versions apply an additional 0.4 to 0.6 mm layer over galvanized wire, improving resistance to urban pollutants or saline conditions while allowing color customization, such as green for aesthetic blending. Barb spacing further differentiates types by application: wider intervals of 5 to 6 inches suffice for fencing, balancing cost and by reducing injury risk while maintaining boundary integrity, whereas closer 3-inch spacing in security-oriented variants heightens deterrence through increased contact points and penetration resistance. Empirical standards indicate that denser barb placement correlates with higher efficacy in impeding deliberate breaches, as measured by reduced crossing success in controlled tests.

Modern Innovations

Polymer coatings, such as (PVC), have been applied to barbed wire since the late to improve resistance and longevity in harsh environments. These overlays shield the underlying galvanized from , UV , and chemical exposure, potentially extending service life by 5-10 years over uncoated variants. High-tensile polymer-embedded designs, like those using coatings on 12.5-gauge wire, further enhance flexibility and tensile strength while maintaining barb integrity. Integration with electronic systems has advanced perimeter security, with electrified barbed wire delivering pulsed high-voltage (typically 5,000-10,000 volts), low-amperage shocks for non-lethal deterrence without requiring full replacement of traditional . Since the , sensor-equipped variants incorporate or tension-detection devices directly onto barbed wire strands, enabling real-time intrusion alerts via integration with control systems and reducing false alarms through advanced signal processing. Automated manufacturing has scaled production through high-speed machines operating at up to 180 RPM, capable of yielding 1,600-1,760 kg of per shift with multi-strand output and minimal operator intervention. These efficiencies support rising demand from protection needs, contributing to market expansion at a projected 6% CAGR from 2024 onward amid heightened security requirements for critical assets.

History

Early Precursors

In ancient civilizations, including those in , , and early Britain, livestock enclosures frequently relied on wattle fences constructed by weaving flexible branches or saplings between upright stakes, a technique that provided temporary barriers but demanded significant manual labor and flexible materials sourced locally. These structures, while suitable for small-scale rotation, decayed rapidly due to exposure and lacked the durability or height to reliably contain larger animals over extended periods, limiting their application in expansive or arid regions. During the medieval period in , hedgerows planted with thorny species such as hawthorn or blackthorn emerged as a common method for field boundaries and containment, leveraging natural deterrence from spines to discourage breaching once the plants matured. However, establishing effective hedgerows required several years for growth, periodic laying or trimming to maintain density, and fertile conditions, making them costly in time and resources while vulnerable to neglect-induced gaps or animal damage during immaturity. Stone walls supplemented these in rocky terrains but entailed even greater labor and material demands, rendering both approaches unscalable for the vast, timber-poor prairies encountered by later settlers. In the early to mid-19th-century , prairie homesteaders faced acute fencing challenges due to timber scarcity, turning to innovations like ha-ha ditches—sunken barriers with vertical drops concealed from view—and imported smooth iron wire strung between posts. Ha-ha designs, adapted from European estate landscaping, proved feasible only for limited perimeters as excavation across broad expanses was prohibitively laborious and prone to or filling by windblown soil on open plains. Smooth wire experiments, initiated in the East around the and extended westward by the , offered a low-material alternative but frequently sagged under weather or tension and permitted to rub against or push through without painful restraint, as the absence of protrusions failed to condition animals to boundaries. Thorn hedge trials similarly faltered due to slow growth and incompatibility with soils and climates. These inadequacies perpetuated open-range practices, where unrestricted herd movements caused widespread crop trampling and , intensifying conflicts between sedentary farmers seeking exclusion and nomadic ranchers reliant on communal access.

Invention and Patent Disputes

Lucien B. Smith of , received the first U.S. for barbed wire on June 25, 1867 (U.S. No. 66,182), describing a with projecting spurs on spools to deter livestock. This basic design laid groundwork but lacked efficient production methods for widespread use. Michael Kelly advanced the concept with a on February 11, 1868, introducing twisted-wire cables with attached flat iron barbs, marking a step toward more durable . In , during the 1873 county fair, local inventor Jacob Haish displayed a wooden barb design, inspiring farmer Joseph F. Glidden to experiment with metal barbs. Glidden, collaborating with hardware merchant Isaac L. Ellwood, developed a machine-twisted barb locked onto standard wire strands, applying for a on October 27, 1873, and receiving U.S. Patent No. 157,124 on November 24, 1874, for this "improvement in wire fences." His design, known as "The Winner," prioritized reproducibility and cost-effective manufacturing over novel materials, enabling that prior hand-attached barbs could not achieve. The surge in barbed wire innovation led to over 500 patent variations by the late 1870s, sparking disputes resolved through litigation emphasizing enforceable, practical designs. Glidden's faced challenges from competitors like the Beat 'Em All Barbed Wire Company, but the U.S. upheld its validity in 1892 (Washburn & Moen Mfg. Co. v. Beat 'Em All Barbed Wire Co.), affirming the inventive merit in its barb-securing mechanism distinct from earlier loose or wooden attachments. Courts favored Glidden's approach for fostering scalable property enclosure, reflecting competitive evolution rather than isolated genius, as multiple inventors iteratively refined wire amid rising demand for affordable barriers.

Commercialization and "The Devil's Rope"

Following the issuance of Joseph Glidden's patent in November 1874, he partnered with Isaac L. Ellwood to establish the Barb Fence Company in , initiating factory production of his "Winner" barbed wire design on a commercial scale. This marked the shift from experimental fencing to mass manufacturing, with output rapidly expanding from approximately 10,000 pounds in 1874. Barbed wire quickly earned the derogatory nickname "Devil's Rope" among open-range cattlemen, who viewed it as a infernal barrier that fragmented vast prairies and curtailed traditional free grazing practices essential to their herds. This cultural resistance reflected fears of economic disruption, as homesteaders and farmers adopted the wire to enclose private plots, provoking early conflicts that foreshadowed widespread "fence-cutting" disputes in the late 1870s and 1880s. Sales volumes surged amid aggressive promotion through illustrated catalogs and demonstrations, which highlighted the wire's affordability and efficacy for containing ; by 1880, over 80 million pounds of Glidden-style barbed wire had been sold nationwide. Intense competition among producers drove prices down dramatically, from $20 per hundred pounds in 1874 to $10 by , enabling broader diffusion despite initial rancher opposition. Industry consolidation accelerated in the , with major firms like Washburn & Moen—already a dominant wire that had acquired stakes in Glidden's operations—merging into larger entities such as the American Steel & Wire Company in 1898, which standardized processes and dominated output. These developments solidified barbed wire's role as a staple , with annual production exceeding prior peaks and prices falling below $2 per hundred pounds by the late 1890s due to scaled efficiencies.

Role in the American West

The Homestead Act of 1862 granted 160 acres of public land to settlers willing to improve it, but the lack of affordable fencing initially hindered effective homesteading on the treeless . Barbed wire, commercialized after Joseph Glidden's 1874 patent, provided a low-cost solution at about $0.02 per rod, enabling homesteaders to enclose claims and protect crops from free-roaming cattle. This demarcation of property reduced conflicts over grazing rights and facilitated the settlement of millions of acres, contributing to the U.S. Census Bureau's 1890 declaration that the frontier had closed. By the , barbed wire production surged to 80 million pounds annually, allowing the of vast open ranges previously used for communal herding. Structures like the 175-mile drift fence built by cattlemen in during 1880–1881 blocked traditional migration routes, effectively ending long-distance drives from to northern markets. This shift curtailed the nomadic ranching economy, as fences prevented on shared lands and minimized rustling by establishing clear, enforceable boundaries. The transition provoked violent range wars, exemplified by the of 1892 in , where large cattle associations clashed with small settlers over fenced public ranges and water access. While initial fence-cutting by aggrieved ranchers highlighted resistance to , barbed wire ultimately favored smallholders and farmers by securing individual plots against encroachment, promoting sedentary over expansive operations. Empirical evidence from increased farm outputs in fenced regions underscores how crop protection from damage boosted yields and diversified the regional toward staple production like and corn.

Manufacturing and Production

Traditional Methods

Early barbed wire production relied on mechanically simple processes using basic steel wire derived from the , which enabled of affordable steel starting in the 1850s. Steel billets were heated, rolled into rods, cleaned via in acid, and drawn through dies in multiple stages to achieve the desired gauge, typically around 0.097 inches (2.5 mm) in diameter, followed by annealing in furnaces to restore pliability. Short segments of wire were cut at angles to form pointed barbs, which were then twisted or clinched onto one or two main strands using early machinery. Joseph Glidden's initial method involved hand-forming barbs by coiling short wire pieces around a smooth wire and securing them with a clinch or by twisting with an additional strand, progressing to horse-powered winders that propelled twisting equipment with a single . Two primary strands were then twisted together to lock the barbs in place at regular intervals, often 4 to 5 inches apart, enhancing tensile strength and resistance to sagging. This twisting was achieved via rudimentary devices, such as modified coffee mills for barb formation or basic winders, before or power supplemented horse operation in larger facilities by the late . After assembly, the wire underwent by immersion in molten baths to coat it against , a step increasingly standard post-1880s as proved a key durability issue in outdoor use. U.S. output scaled dramatically with these methods, reaching 1,500 tons in and approximately 200,000 tons annually by , reflecting the efficiency of low-tech machinery and inexpensive inputs that reduced costs to around $0.75 per rod (16.5 feet) by 1880.

Contemporary Techniques

Modern barbed wire manufacturing employs automated high-speed machines that twist line wires and attach barbs with precision, operating at speeds up to 360 rpm for reverse-twisted configurations using galvanized or mild steel wires of 1.6-2.5 mm diameter. These systems, evolved from post-1950s mechanization, integrate continuous twist mechanisms capable of producing up to 85 feet per minute while maintaining consistent barb pitch sizes. Programmable controls and advanced sensors enable exact barb placement and tension management, minimizing defects and supporting customizable outputs for security applications. Post-forming treatments, such as PVC , are applied inline to enhance resistance, with the layer extruded directly onto the assembled wire for uniform thickness and color options like green or black. This process, standard in contemporary lines, extends durability in harsh environments without altering the wire's structural integrity. Major production occurs in hubs like , which dominates export volumes, and the , where firms deploy automated facilities to meet rising perimeter needs. The global market reached $1.6 billion in 2024, reflecting and demand that incentivizes for cost-efficient scaling. Such techniques reduce labor dependency, preserving deterrence efficacy through reliable, high-volume output.

Installation and Applications

Agricultural Uses

Barbed wire fencing serves primarily to contain in agricultural settings, particularly for , sheep, and goats, by creating barriers that deter from pushing through or rubbing against the enclosure. Standard configurations for pastures typically involve three to five strands of wire, spaced to match height and behavior, with posts set 10 to 12 feet apart to maintain tension and visibility. These setups facilitate systems, dividing land into paddocks that prevent , reduce parasite accumulation, and promote even forage utilization, thereby enhancing pasture productivity. In the late 19th century, the widespread adoption of in the American Midwest and revolutionized ranching by enabling effective herd confinement, which curtailed the open-range system and minimized losses from wandering invading fields. This shift lowered the economic costs of land enclosure and protection, allowing farmers to intensify without constant , as the wire's barbs physically discouraged from breaching fences. Prior to its commercialization around , unfenced ranges led to frequent disputes and destruction, but post-adoption fencing supported sustainable by confining animals to designated areas. For crop protection, barbed wire delineates field boundaries to deter such as deer and from accessing planted areas, with the sharp barbs providing a passive physical barrier that reduces damage. In some applications, hybrid systems combine barbed wire with electrified strands to enhance deterrence while minimizing risk, delivering a corrective shock that trains animals to avoid the without relying solely on laceration. These configurations preserve yields by limiting wildlife incursions, though proper tensioning is essential to avoid sagging that could lead to entanglements. Overall, such has empirically supported higher agricultural efficiency by securing productive zones against unauthorized entry.

Perimeter and Border Security

Barbed wire and variants serve as cost-effective toppings on chain-link or other for residential and commercial perimeters, deterring unauthorized human intrusions through physical entanglement and psychological barriers. , with its sharp-edged blades arranged in coils or clips, offers superior resistance to cutting and compared to traditional barbed wire, making it suitable for high-security applications around warehouses, industrial sites, and private estates. These installations enhance overall integrity by delaying breaches, allowing time for detection via integrated systems. In national border contexts, concertina wire—expanded coils of barbed or razor wire—has been integral to U.S.-Mexico boundary fortifications since the 1990s escalation of enforcement measures, often layered atop vehicle barriers to impede pedestrian crossings. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data correlates such physical deterrents, when combined with patrols and technology, with reduced apprehensions in targeted sectors, as evidenced by post-installation declines in high-traffic areas. In the 2020s, Texas authorities deployed over 100 miles of razor wire along the Rio Grande amid record migrant encounters, aiming to channel flows toward legal ports and disrupt smuggling operations. Federal appeals courts have upheld these state-led efforts against removal by Border Patrol, affirming their role in state sovereignty over border security. Empirical assessments indicate that and barbed wire augment deterrence by increasing breach times and risks, though effectiveness varies with , , and complementary assets like sensors; studies show barriers reduce illegal entries in fortified zones but face circumvention via ladders or tunnels. Proponents highlight quantifiable drops in crossings—such as CBP-reported shifts from unsecured riverbanks—while critics argue the wire creates hazardous obstacles to asylum seekers without addressing root migration drivers.

Military and Law Enforcement

Barbed wire was extensively deployed during to construct defensive entanglements in , impeding infantry charges and machine-gun fire across the Western Front. All major combatants utilized it to create layered obstacles, often in conjunction with barrages to cut and rearrange wires, forcing attackers into kill zones. , consisting of coiled barbed wire for expanded barriers, entered widespread military application during this conflict, enabling quicker installation than straight strands. In contemporary military operations, —a sharpened variant of barbed wire—fortifies perimeters around bases and checkpoints, as evidenced in where troops erected coils atop HESCO bastions at Airfield to deter insurgent incursions. Similar deployments occurred in , integrating into defensive barriers for forward operating bases to channel threats and delay advances, providing defenders time to engage with or . These systems exploit the wire's capacity to inflict lacerations and entanglement, empirically slowing unauthorized movement while minimizing static defensive vulnerabilities. Law enforcement agencies employ and barbed wire in high-security prisons to prevent escapes and in scenarios to establish temporary containment lines. Mobile barriers, often vehicle-mounted, allow rapid uncoiling of coils to block streets or isolate agitators during civil unrest, facilitating controlled responses over chaotic pursuits. Tactical innovations include trailer-based deployment systems that unspool 75-80 meters of triple-strand in seconds, supporting swift perimeter establishment in fluid combat environments or policing operations. Such mechanisms enhance operational by reducing manual labor and exposure risks during setup.

Other Uses

Barbed wire is employed in industrial applications to protect remote infrastructure, such as oil and gas facilities, where it augments perimeter security at drill sites and processing plants against unauthorized access. These uses leverage its low cost and deterrent effect in high-value, low-population areas, though modern alternatives like razor wire often supplement or replace it for enhanced efficacy. In artistic contexts, barbed wire serves as a medium for sculptures, exploiting its rigid, barbed structure to evoke themes of confinement and resilience. Sculptor Melvin Edwards produced a series of abstract works titled "b.wire" between 1969 and 1970, barbed wire into aggressive, Lynchpin-like forms displayed in exhibitions. Contemporary practitioners, such as Colorado-based father-son teams, fabricate life-sized animal figures like bears and elk from repurposed barbed wire, preserving Western heritage motifs since at least 2019. These creations, often sold through galleries or studios like Devil's Rope, highlight the material's transformation from utilitarian barrier to symbolic art, though they constitute a negligible fraction of global production.

Economic and Social Impacts

Transformation of Agriculture and Land Use

The widespread adoption of barbed wire following Joseph F. Glidden's 1874 patent enabled the economic enclosure of vast open ranges in the American , transitioning from communal grazing systems dominated by large cattle operations to individualized fenced homesteads. By the 1880s, this shift had subdivided much of the previously unfenced prairie—estimated at over 80% open range in key states like and —into protected farm plots, as affordable wire (costing less than 2 cents per rod) replaced scarce wood and labor-intensive alternatives. This causal mechanism addressed the "tragedy of the commons" inherent in , where depleted grasslands, by incentivizing private investment in land improvements such as plowing and seeding. Fencing directly boosted agricultural output through crop protection and practices, which minimized damage to fields and allowed for sustainable . In Plains counties adopting barbed wire, farmland values rose by approximately 50% from to 1890, reflecting enhanced productivity from shifted toward diversified farming over ranching alone. U.S. production in the region expanded from 68 million bushels in to 267 million by 1899, while corn output grew amid fenced irrigation and , as enclosures prevented unregulated herd trampling that had previously limited cultivation. These gains stemmed from barbed wire's role in enforcing exclusive rights, which empirical links to higher yields via reduced free-rider problems in herd control and input application, outperforming open-range inefficiencies. Parallel transformations occurred in settler frontiers like the Canadian prairies and Australian outback, where barbed wire facilitated dryland farming expansion from the 1880s onward. In Canada's western provinces, wire fencing supported homestead settlement under the Dominion Lands Act, enclosing over 10 million acres by 1900 for wheat-dominated agriculture, mirroring U.S. patterns of productivity uplift through bounded grazing. Australian sheep stations adopted similar wire boundaries to combat overstocking on arid plains, correlating with wool output increases and erosion control via managed stocking densities. Across these regions, private enclosure empirically preceded GDP per capita rises in agricultural zones—e.g., 2-3% annual growth in U.S. Plains farm output values post-1880—contrasting with stagnant communal systems elsewhere, as secure boundaries encouraged capital inflows for mechanization and soil husbandry.

Property Rights and Conflicts

The introduction of barbed wire in the 1870s facilitated the practical enforcement of rights on the American Great Plains, where vast open ranges had previously operated under informal commons grazing norms. Under the Homestead Act of 1862, settlers could claim up to 160 acres of public land, but without affordable fencing, cattle drives and roaming herds frequently trampled crops, undermining incentives for improvement and investment. Barbed wire's low cost—approximately $0.10 per rod by the late 1870s—allowed homesteaders to delineate and defend boundaries effectively, aligning physical barriers with legal titles and mitigating the by preventing and free-riding. This shift provoked intense conflicts between sedentary farmers and nomadic ranchers, who viewed enclosures as an infringement on traditional access to unfenced lands. In , the "Fence-Cutting Wars" of 1883–1885 saw organized groups, often backed by large ranchers, systematically destroy barbed wire fences to restore open , resulting in dozens of incidents, exceeding thousands of dollars, and at least four deaths. In response, the in criminalized fence-cutting as a punishable by one to five years' and fines up to $2,000, while also regulating illegal enclosures on ; similar statutes emerged in and , reflecting states' prioritization of settled agriculture over ranching interests. Over time, widespread adoption of barbed wire resolved these disputes by entrenching property norms, with large-scale fence-cutting ceasing in by the mid-1880s and broader range wars declining sharply after 1900 as fenced farms proliferated. Empirical analysis of county data from 1850–1900 shows that barbed wire increased farmland values by approximately 140% in low-woodland areas suitable for fencing, capitalizing the economic returns to secure tenure and encouraging capital-intensive improvements like plowing and drainage. While ranchers faced herd reductions and trail relocations—evident in the closure of major drives by the —this transition favored gains, reducing violent clashes over rights through clearer causal chains of and deterrence.

Controversies and Debates

Effectiveness vs. Humane Concerns in Border Security

In contemporary border security, barbed wire and analogous or installations serve as physical deterrents along segments of international frontiers, notably the US-Mexico border and European enclaves in . Deployed to impede unauthorized entries, these barriers complement patrols and by exploiting natural human aversion to injury, thereby channeling migration flows toward legal ports or discouraging attempts altogether. Empirical assessments from US Department of Homeland Security evaluations indicate that sectors with expanded barriers, including wire toppings, experienced measurable declines in illegal crossings and activities as of 2020, with crossings dropping in fortified areas compared to pre-installation baselines. Texas's Operation Lone Star, initiated in 2021, exemplifies efficacy claims: state-installed along the correlated with shifted migration patterns, reducing encounters in Texas sectors relative to other border states by mid-2024, as crossings migrated to less fortified regions like Arizona and California. Texas officials reported apprehensions in the Del Rio sector—site of extensive wire deployments—falling sharply from peaks in 2023, attributing deterrence to the barriers' role in repelling mass surges without relying solely on personnel-intensive patrols, which prior open-border policies proved inefficient at scale. This aligns with causal mechanisms where visible hazards elevate perceived risks, empirically lowering attempt rates over time, as evidenced by overall southwest border encounters plummeting 91.8% year-over-year in some months by 2025, partly amid sustained barrier use. Critics, often from humanitarian organizations and left-leaning outlets, highlight injuries during breach attempts, such as lacerations and bleeding reported among migrants clashing with over wire in El Paso in March 2024, framing the wire as inherently cruel and prompting federal efforts to remove it. Similarly, initiated razor wire removal from Ceuta and Melilla fences in December 2019, citing ethical imperatives to mitigate cuts to asylum seekers scaling the barriers, with full extraction by 2020 despite subsequent reinforcements via alternative designs. These concerns, while documenting non-lethal wounds in rare forcible crossings, overlook comparative data: unbarriered routes yield higher fatalities via drownings or exposure, and wire's preventive effect averts such outcomes for the vast majority deterred, rendering it a net reducer of harm when weighed against alternatives like expanded but resource-strapped policing. Proponents, including sovereignty-focused analysts, contend that prioritizing border integrity via low-cost, passive defenses upholds national control without lethal , countering narratives amplified by biased media that equate deterrence with inhumanity absent proportional risk analysis.

Historical Fence Wars and Violence

In the late 19th-century American West, the proliferation of barbed wire fencing to enclose homesteads and ranchlands ignited conflicts between small-scale settlers asserting claims and large open-range operations dependent on unfettered access to communal resources. These disputes, driven by scarcity of sources and prime amid expanding settlement, manifested as organized fence-cutting campaigns by cattlemen seeking to restore access for their herds, often met with armed retaliation from fence owners. Such "fence wars" peaked in intensity during the , particularly in regions like and , where wire-cutting gangs systematically destroyed barriers, leaving threats against owners and escalating to direct confrontations. In , the fence-cutting wars began around 1883, with masked groups like the Blue Devils and Javelinas severing wires on large enclosed tracts, sometimes burning structures and prompting shootouts that resulted in multiple fatalities. State lawmakers responded by criminalizing fence-cutting as a in 1884, with penalties including fines up to $1,000 and , though sporadic persisted until about 1888, after which enforcement and judicial rulings clarified property boundaries under existing land laws. In , analogous tensions arose as homesteaders deployed inexpensive barbed wire—priced at roughly two cents per rod (about 16.5 feet) by the mid-1880s—to demarcate claims, enabling even modest operators to enforce exclusions against itinerant cattle drives. This democratization of intensified resource , as large ranchers, organized through associations like the , viewed it as a threat to their control over open ranges. Wyoming's conflicts culminated in the Johnson County War of April 1892, when approximately 50 armed cattlemen, imported from and funded by major stock growers, invaded northern to eliminate perceived rustlers and small ranchers who had fenced key watercourses and pastures. The invaders killed at least three settlers, including during a siege at the KC Ranch, before being besieged themselves at the TA Ranch by local forces, leading to federal intervention by U.S. troops and eventual dispersal without full prosecution of the perpetrators. Broader vigilante actions by both sides, including wire-cutting raids and retaliatory killings, contributed to dozens of deaths across Wyoming's range disputes in the preceding decade, though exact tallies remain disputed due to unreported incidents. Violence subsided after 1890 as clarified property rights under federal homestead laws and territorial statutes reduced ambiguities over land enclosure, shifting reliance from open-range practices to defined allotments amid declining cattle numbers from and harsh winters like the 1886-1887 "Big Die-Up." Barbed wire's affordability lowered barriers to private enforcement, but sustained peace required institutional resolution of scarcity-driven claims rather than unilateral .

Safety and Health Considerations

Injury Risks and Mitigation

Barbed wire primarily inflicts and lacerations due to its sharp barbs, which can penetrate and cause deep tissue damage during contact, such as during maintenance or accidental encounters. These injuries often occur in agricultural settings where workers handle wire without adequate protection, leading to , scarring, and potential secondary infections. In cases involving rusted wire, wounds are tetanus-prone if contaminated with or harboring Clostridium tetani spores, as the bacteria thrive in anaerobic environments created by punctures; however, rust itself does not cause , but the associated dirt does. For and , entanglements pose significant risks, particularly with sagging or poorly spaced wire, resulting in lacerations, nerve damage, restricted movement, and fatal outcomes from exhaustion or predation. Studies on indicate barbed wire injuries contribute to abrasions and lacerations, with frequency potentially increasing under stress like , though exact parallels in are limited by sparse data. Low-quality or untensioned wire exacerbates these hazards by allowing loops that snag horns, legs, or wings. Mitigation strategies emphasize , such as heavy gloves during handling and installation, to prevent cuts, alongside tools like wire rollers for safe unspooling. Proper installation techniques, including maintaining wire tension to avoid sagging and spacing barbs at standard intervals (typically 4-6 inches), reduce entanglement risks for both humans and animals by minimizing loose strands. Enhancing visibility with flagging tape at 4-foot intervals or offset smooth wires between barbs further prevents collisions and snags, while hybrid designs incorporating high-tensile smooth strands lower injury incidence compared to traditional all-barbed setups. For wound care post-injury, prompt cleaning and prophylaxis are essential, particularly for contaminated punctures. In the United States, property owners installing barbed wire face potential liability under for injuries to trespassers, particularly where local ordinances restrict its use in residential or urban settings to mitigate risks from artificial hazards. Courts generally hold that landowners owe minimal duty to trespassers—avoiding willful or wanton harm—but may impose liability if the wire constitutes a concealed trap or violates codes prohibiting such near public areas. The further heightens responsibility when children are involved, requiring owners to secure dangers that foreseeably attract minors onto the property, though barbed wire's deterrent nature often limits its classification as an "attractive" condition absent other lures like pools. Compliance with state-specific laws, such as those mandating removal of exposed wire after notice to prevent or pedestrian harm, can avert claims. Recent border security applications have sparked federal-state conflicts over wire interference with enforcement, exemplified by litigation in where state-installed razor wire—functionally akin to barbed wire—prompted suits against federal agents for cutting it. On January 22, 2024, the U.S. ruled 5-4 that Border Patrol could remove such obstructions for operational access under federal immigration authority, reversing a Fifth Circuit . However, on November 27, 2024, the Fifth Circuit again blocked federal destruction of Texas's Eagle Pass fencing, affirming state sovereignty in barrier placement absent explicit federal . These precedents underscore that while states retain property control, can override local installations impeding national duties, potentially exposing installers to removal orders or inverse condemnation suits. Internationally, some European jurisdictions impose restrictions on barbed wire citing welfare considerations, with local councils in , , and banning it outright due to injury potential, and Norway's Act prohibiting its use in certain contexts to avoid undue harm. These measures, often extending humane standards from animal regulations, influence urban deployments by requiring alternatives like smooth wire or . Homeowners' insurance typically covers trespasser injuries via general liability provisions, but urban installations correlate with elevated claim frequencies owing to denser populations and higher trespass rates, prompting some carriers to exclude barbed wire-related incidents or demand waivers. Visible warning signage demonstrably curtails liability by fulfilling notice duties under occupiers' laws, deterring entrants and bolstering defenses against negligence allegations in both U.S. and analogous systems. Empirical patterns indicate that fortified, signed barriers reduce aggregate enforcement liabilities by minimizing unauthorized entries, though improper setup invites tort exposure.

References

  1. https://www.madehow.com/Volume-2/Barbed-Wire.html
  2. https://fencing.bekaert.com/en/fence-products-category/barbed-wire-fence
  3. https://patents.google.com/patent/US157124A/en
  4. https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/barbed-wire
  5. https://www.invent.org/inductees/joseph-f-glidden
  6. https://www.perc.org/2011/02/24/barbed-wire-entrepreneurship/
  7. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-40448594
  8. https://www.warmuseum.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/CWM_SupplyLine_BarbedWire_EN_FINAL_20140922.pdf
  9. https://www.farmanddairy.com/columns/barbed-wires-history-entangled-in-war/480937.html
  10. https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_4_022_03_2013.pdf
  11. https://www.homedepot.com/p/FARMGARD-1-320-ft-12-1-2-Gauge-4-Point-Class-I-Galvanized-Steel-Barbed-Wire-317831A/202025610
  12. https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/bekaert-155-gauge-4-point-high-tensile-barbed-wire-1-320-ft
  13. https://www.barbedwiresupplier.com/barbed-wire/barbed-wire-twist-types.html
  14. https://www.beefresearch.ca/content/uploads/2022/05/Wire-Fences-for-Livestock-Management.pdf
  15. https://50yearfence.com/gauges-and-breaking-strengths-explained/
  16. https://skweldedmesh.weebly.com/home/understanding-barbed-wire-its-history-types-and-modern-applications
  17. https://www.barbedwiresupplier.com/products/index.html
  18. https://bcfenceaustin.com/barbed-wire-complete-guide/
  19. https://fencing.bekaert.com/en/fence-products/12-5-ga-4-point-5-spacing-standard-barbed-wire-c3-dot
  20. https://razorfencewire.com/razor-wire-vs-barbed-wire/
  21. https://www.barbedwiresupplier.com/technology/concertina-wire-vs-barbed-wire.html
  22. https://skyhallfence.com/difference-between-barbed-wire-and-razor-wire/
  23. https://www.razorbarbedwirefence.com/technology/galvanized-barbed-wire-specifications.html
  24. https://www.razorbarbedwirefence.com/technology/barbed-wire-hot-specifications.html
  25. https://www.barbedwiresupplier.com/barbed-wire/pvc-barbed-wire.html
  26. https://www.barbedwire.net/barbed-wire/pvc-coated-barbed-wire.html
  27. https://sunviksteels.com/best-barbed-wire-for-farms-and-agricultural-use-a-complete-guide/
  28. https://www.a-1fenceproducts.com/blog/different-types-of-barbed-wire/
  29. https://www.fencedepots.com/blog/4-different-materials-of-barbed-wire.html
  30. https://www.galvanizedmeshproducts.com/news/durable-barbed-wire-with-pvc-coating-for-enhanced-security-and-longevity.html
  31. https://www.hooverfence.com/centaur-polyplus-roll
  32. https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/electrified-barbed-wire.html
  33. https://www.vikingfence.com/2024/01/05/how-to-electrify-a-fence-for-security/
  34. https://www.nariasecurity.it/en/applications/perimeter-protection-for-fences/perimeter-alarm-sensor-for-barbed-wire-wire-rope/
  35. https://www.beisecurity.com/products/smartfence.html
  36. https://www.securefencingmachines.com/barb-wire-machine.html
  37. https://www.omlathemachine.com/wire-making-machine.html
  38. https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/barbed-wire-market-report
  39. https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/articles/growth-in-infrastructure-development-propels-the-barbed-wire-market
  40. https://insteading.com/blog/wattle-fence/
  41. https://www.metmuseum.org/perspectives/whence-willow-wattle
  42. https://blacklinehhp.com/history-of-fences/
  43. https://hedgelink.org.uk/guidance/importance-of-hedgerows/
  44. https://sites.create-cdn.net/sitefiles/77/3/5/773556/History_of_Hedgerows_-_ARTICLE.pdf
  45. https://heald.nga.gov/mediawiki/index.php/Ha-Ha/Sunk_fence
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2115927
  47. https://www.farmcollector.com/equipment/history-barbed-wire-fencing/
  48. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/barbed-wire
  49. https://www.dcba.org/mpage/v33-Carl-A-Miller
  50. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Hornbeck2010.pdf
  51. https://daily.jstor.org/how-barbed-wire-changed-farming-forever/
  52. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/143/275/
  53. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/october-27/joseph-glidden-applies-for-a-patent-on-his-barbed-wire-design
  54. https://www.gliddenhomestead.org/barbed-wire/
  55. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Joseph-Farwell-Glidden
  56. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/joseph-glidden
  57. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/7312037c-5607-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b/download
  58. https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=BA016
  59. https://westerntrips.blogspot.com/2012/06/history-of-fencing.html
  60. https://ridewayoutwest.com/2025/08/06/barbed-wire-end-open-range/
  61. https://history.nebraska.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/doc_publications_NH1953Inventions.pdf
  62. https://www.foodreference.com/html/facts-barbed-wire.html
  63. https://www.junenmetal.com/wire-machinery/barbed-wire-machine-reverse-twisted-type
  64. https://bergandi.com/barbed-wire-equipment/
  65. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/barbed-wire-making-machine-market-142300183.html
  66. https://www.kingcats-fence.com/pvc-coated-barbed-wire-a-colorful-and-effective-security-solution/
  67. https://sunviksteels.com/advantages-of-pvc-coated-barbed-wire-over-traditional-barbed-wire/
  68. https://www.shcorewires.com/products/high-speed-barbed-wire-machine/
  69. https://www.indexbox.io/store/world-barbed-wire-and-entanglements-market-analysis-forecast-size-trends-and-insights/
  70. https://www.xzmetal.com/sq/news/barbedwirefactory-16907.html/
  71. https://bigjerrysfencing.com/barbed-wire-fencing-pros-and-cons-for-farm-owners/
  72. https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/C774/fences-for-the-farm/
  73. https://extension.msstate.edu/publications/livestock-fencing-systems-for-pasture-management
  74. https://profence.org/how-cattle-fencing-design-affects-animal-stress-and-health/
  75. https://prairietimes.com/how-barbed-wire-changed-the-american-west-forever/
  76. https://www.ironwirefactory.com/sw/case/barbed-wire-for-wildlife-control-protecting-farmland-orchard
  77. https://www.zarebasystems.com/articles/benefits-electrified-high-tensile-fencing
  78. https://extension.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2024-08/az1855-2021.pdf
  79. https://almiqathardware.com/blog/how-barbed-wire-revolutionized-agriculture/
  80. https://www.cochraneglobal.com/razor-wire-versus-barbed-wire/
  81. https://barkersfencing.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-barbed-wire-security-fencing/
  82. https://www.cbp.gov/frontline/walls-work
  83. https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/texas-deploys-more-than-100-miles-of-razor-wire-to-secure-border
  84. https://www.npr.org/2024/11/27/g-s1-36115/texas-razor-wire-mexico-border
  85. https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/27/texas-border-lawsuit-razor-wire-fence/
  86. https://journalistsresource.org/politics-and-government/border-walls-barriers-migrant-research/
  87. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/political-science/united-states-mexico-border-fence
  88. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-us-patrols-its-borders
  89. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/barbed-wire/
  90. https://www.rushcounty.org/BarbedWireMuseum/BWabout.html
  91. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/on-guard-the-contemporary-salience-of-military-fortification/
  92. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1112032.pdf
  93. https://razorfencewire.com/razor-wire/military-razor-wire/
  94. https://www.hurricanefenceinc.com/blog/what-are-the-uses-of-barbed-tape-or-razor-wire-fence/
  95. https://www.razorwireconcertina.com/razorwire/mobilesecuritybarrierrazorwire.htm
  96. https://www.heslyfence.com/html/product/detail/38.html
  97. https://perimetersecurityproducts.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2013-Wire-Deployment-System-White-Paper.pdf
  98. https://www.duraguardfence.ca/post/when-to-add-barbed-wire-to-your-commercial-fencing
  99. https://www.a-1fenceproducts.com/blog/perimeter-security-for-oil-and-gas-facilities/
  100. https://diaart.org/exhibition/exhibitions-projects/melvin-edwards-exhibition
  101. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ7yr7vzhJ8
  102. https://devilsropestudio.com/
  103. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27867495
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342376696_The_Agricultural_Settlement_of_the_Canadian_Prairies_1870-1930_Using_GIS_to_Interpret_a_Dynamic_Process
  105. https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/9b07cbce-08ac-4abc-9871-0a60cea381f0/download
  106. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/125/2/767/1882212
  107. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/fence-cutting
  108. https://lrl.texas.gov/whatsNew/client/index.cfm/2018/9/11/Legislating-on-the-Range-Ending-the-Fence-Cutting-War-of-the-1880s
  109. https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2020/10/29/border-wall-system-deployed-effective-and-disrupting-criminals-and-smugglers
  110. https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/texas-holds-the-line-against-border-crisis-throughout-2024
  111. https://www.texastribune.org/2024/04/22/texas-border-migrant-apprehensions-abbott-operation-lone-star/
  112. https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/texas-stiff-resistance-shifts-illegal-crossings-to-other-border-states
  113. https://usafacts.org/answers/how-many-migrant-encounters-are-there-along-the-us-mexico-border/country/united-states/
  114. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/22/texas-troops-clash-migrants-border-el-paso
  115. https://www.reuters.com/pictures/tension-soars-migrants-challenge-barbed-wire-texas-border-2024-03-24/M7XTW3JMKFPF7OM2K2XFF6YZTM
  116. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/may/13/a-bloody-method-of-control-the-struggle-to-take-down-europes-razor-wire-walls
  117. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44485995
  118. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/23/supreme-court-allows-federal-agents-to-cut-razor-wire-at-us-mexico-border
  119. https://repository.tcu.edu/entities/publication/73610d97-714c-4ef5-90eb-10ca465f0664
  120. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=business_pub
  121. https://www.wyohistory.org/encyclopedia/johnson-county-war-1892-invasion-northern-wyoming
  122. https://skillsetmag.com/article/range-wars/
  123. https://www.rongtaifence.com/news/razor-wire-vs-barbed-wire
  124. https://www.agridirect.ie/article/5-common-fencing-injuries-and-how-to-avoid-them
  125. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tetanus
  126. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/did-you-know/rust-doesnt-cause-tetanus
  127. https://wildlifefriendlyfencing.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/action_plan.pdf
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Various-types-of-injury-and-their-frequency-distribution-in-cattle-before-and-after_tbl2_325991970
  129. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/WildlifeFriendlyFences.pdf
  130. https://fwp.mt.gov/binaries/content/assets/fwp/conservation/land-owner-wildlife-resources/a_landowners_guide_to_wildlife_friendly_fences.pdf
  131. https://www.americanwhitewater.org/content/Wiki/stewardship:obstructions
  132. https://buckleyfence.com/horse-fencing-information/barbed-wire-fencing/
  133. https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/recommendations/identify-whether-the-wound-is-tetanus-prone
  134. https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/am-i-liable-for-injury-if-i-install-barbed-wire-on-4400368.html
  135. https://www.quora.com/Is-it-legal-to-use-barbed-wire-fencing-as-a-deterrent-for-trespassers-on-private-property-in-the-US
  136. https://www.findlaw.com/realestate/owning-a-home/dangers-to-children-attractive-nuisances.html
  137. https://www.beardstclair.com/careless-exposure-of-barbed-wire/
  138. https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/department-of-homeland-security-v-texas/
  139. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/nature-and-biodiversity/humane-trapping-standards_en
  140. https://www.quora.com/If-I-line-my-backyard-fence-with-barbed-wire-and-someone-injured-themselves-while-attempting-to-climb-it-what-are-the-repercussions-Will-I-need-special-insurance
  141. https://morrisdewett.com/does-a-posted-sign-on-your-property-prevent-liability/
  142. https://www.yoursecuritysign.co.uk/Perimeter-Roof-Security-Signs/Razor-Barbed-Wire-Signs
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.