Hubbry Logo
PregamingPregamingMain
Open search
Pregaming
Community hub
Pregaming
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Pregaming
Pregaming
Pregaming
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Pregaming (also known as pre-booze, pre-drinking[1] or pre-loading[2]) is the process of getting drunk prior to going out socializing, typically done by college students and young adults in a manner as cost-efficient as possible, with hard liquor and cheap beer consumed while in group.[1][3][4][5][6][7][8]

Although pregaming is typically done before a night out, it can also precede other activities, like attending a college football game, large party, social function, or another activity where possession of alcohol may be limited or prohibited.[1][9][10][11] The name "pregaming" spread from the drinking that took place during tailgating before football games to encompass similar drinking periods.[8]

Other terms for the practice are pre-partying,[12] prinking,[4] prefunking and pres.[12]

Background

[edit]

Origins

[edit]

Pregaming first became popular in the United States in the 1990s, becoming a common practice after Mothers Against Drunk Driving pressured the federal government to coerce states into increasing the legal drinking age in the United States to 21.[13] It is also an unintended consequence of alcohol laws that prohibit happy hours and other discounts on alcohol,[14] as well as rising tuition and other costs for students.[15] Pregaming minimizes the cost of purchasing alcohol at local bars and clubs and can reduce the problems associated with obtaining and using fake identification listing an age permitting legal consumption of alcohol.[5][7][8] The high cost of bar tabs in nightlife and the difficult financial situations often faced by students and young adults has been a major factor increasing the rate of pregaming.[3][8]

Pregaming appeals to persons under 21 years of age who may not otherwise legally enter bars or purchase alcohol in the United States.[5][8] Pregaming also ensures that the drinker is drunk before going out in public, lessens inhibitions, and can stall the going-on process so that the group enters the local nightlife scene at a more exciting hour.[3][8] Pregaming is also often motivated by the higher cost of alcohol in licensed venues, and many people also choose to pre-drink to achieve rapid intoxication, or to facilitate socializing with friends.[16] Pregaming may also increase in probability after the age of 30 among people in Brazil, Canada, England, Ireland, New Zealand and the United States.[16]

Activities

[edit]
Friends pregame at an apartment before going to a bar (2024)

Drinking games associated with pregaming include Power Hour, Quarters, Kings, and Asshole.[1][8] One function of the pregaming games is to increase camaraderie, while offering competition and social interplay.[1]

Pregaming sessions are often single sex, and can feature playing heavy drinking games or video games.[1][5][8] Other activities that can accompany pregaming, especially for women, are primping and trying on different outfits.[1][3][5] Another element of pregaming is texting friends to find out about social opportunities for the night, flirting, and trying to locate a sexual partner for later that night.[5][6][17] Having a "shower beer" while getting ready to go out is also a form of pregaming.[18]

Pregaming and the games that go with it can also build solidarity among the drinking group, mentally preparing them with the confidence needed to handle the experience of nightlife.[1][8] Pregaming is also often more conducive to socializing with friends than the loud nightclubs and bars where the group will eventually arrive.[15]

Pervasiveness

[edit]

Experts believe that 65 to 75 percent of college-age youths predrink,[12] while in the UK, a study reported that 55 percent of men and 60 percent of women acknowledged pre-drinking.[citation needed] Researchers believe that the practice is becoming more widespread due to changing cultural mores, alcohol laws, and economics.[15]

Effects

[edit]

Local business

[edit]

Local bars and clubs lose business from pregaming both because students purchase alcohol elsewhere and because pregaming can delay students' arrival, pushing these businesses toward failure.[5] Young adults often don't arrive until 11:30 pm or midnight, relatively near the time bars are required to close in many U.S. states.[3]

Local bars might sell only one or two drinks to students who have consumed alcohol heavily earlier in the night.[15] In addition, nightlife establishments may become liable for fines and civil and criminal penalties under local laws prohibiting the serving of alcohol to an intoxicated person or permitting a person to be intoxicated in the bar, even when that person pregamed elsewhere and entered the bar before the alcohol caused intoxication.[15]

Health

[edit]

Pregaming has been associated with binge drinking and other dangerous activities, leading some universities to attempt to crack down on the practice.[19][8][13] Government agencies at both the state and federal level have studied the problems created by pregaming.[7]

The furtive nature of pregaming and bingeing can lead to massive quick consumption, acute alcohol poisoning, hospitalization, and death.[13]

A 2012 study of more 250 Swiss students indicated that those who "pre-loaded" ended up consuming more total alcohol over the night (seven drinks rather than four) and engaged in riskier behavior.[12] They had a 24% chance of reporting negative consequences for drinking (such as injury, unprotected sex, and unplanned drug use), compared to 18% chance for those who did not pre-drink.[12]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pregaming

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pregaming, also known as pre-drinking or pre-loading, is the practice of consuming alcohol in private settings, such as one's home, prior to attending social events like parties or bars where alcohol is served but often more expensive. This behavior allows participants to achieve higher levels of intoxication at lower cost, bypassing venue pricing, but frequently results in heavier episodic drinking without the moderating influences present in licensed establishments. Among young adults, particularly college students, pregaming is highly prevalent, with over 40% reporting it in the past month and approximately two-thirds of drinkers engaging in it at least once during that period. Motives include cost-saving, enhancing social confidence, and amplifying enjoyment at the subsequent event, though empirical studies link it to elevated risks such as alcohol poisoning, polysubstance use, physical injuries, and sexual misconduct due to unchecked consumption volumes. Despite its economic rationale rooted in market disincentives for on-site drinking, pregaming empirically correlates with more severe negative consequences than equivalent alcohol intake in supervised venues, highlighting causal pathways from reduced oversight to heightened harm.

Definition and Motivations

Core Definition

Pregaming, also known as pre-drinking, pre-loading, or pre-partying, refers to the intentional consumption of alcohol prior to attending a social event or gathering, often at a private location such as a residence, with the aim of achieving partial intoxication before arriving at the primary venue. This practice typically involves heavier episodic drinking compared to on-site consumption, as participants seek to minimize expenditures at commercial establishments where alcohol prices are elevated or access is regulated. The term "pregaming" derives from the preposition "pre-" combined with "gaming," originally linked to preparatory drinking during tailgating at sports events, but has broadened to encompass pre-event alcohol intake across various social contexts. In scholarly contexts, pregaming is distinguished from casual home drinking by its anticipatory nature, targeting an "anticipated event" such as a party, bar outing, or concert, where additional alcohol may be available but is often cost-prohibitive or limited. This definition emphasizes the strategic aspect, where individuals or groups consume larger quantities—frequently exceeding standard drink limits—in a controlled environment to enhance sociability, reduce financial outlay, or circumvent venue-specific restrictions like age checks or cover charges. The Oxford English Dictionary records the noun form "pregaming" emerging in the early 2000s, with initial documented use in 2004 among U.S. college populations, reflecting its roots in youth-oriented social rituals.

Primary Motivations and Rationales

The primary motivations for pregaming, particularly among students and young adults, revolve around , intoxication upon arrival at social , and . Individuals often cite the substantial savings of consuming alcohol at or settings compared to commercial , where markups can exceed 300-500% on drinks; for instance, a study of U.S. students found to be a leading rationale, endorsed by a significant portion of participants pregaming before bar outings. This financial incentive is amplified by limited disposable income among younger demographics, making pregaming a pragmatic strategy to extend budgets for extended evenings out. A second key rationale is the desire to arrive at events already intoxicated or "buzzed," allowing for quicker escalation of effects in controlled environments and avoidance of initial sobriety in high-stimulation settings. Empirical data from Canadian undergraduates indicate that showing up to parties or social events partially intoxicated ranks as the most prevalent motive, often tied to "fun/intoxication" orientations that prioritize rapid mood elevation. This approach leverages the lower marginal cost and higher alcohol concentration of home-mixed drinks, enabling participants to bypass slower, more diluted consumption at bars. Social and interpersonal factors also drive pregaming, including group bonding in relaxed pre-event gatherings and using alcohol as a lubricant for subsequent interactions. Research highlights motives such as catching up with friends in low-pressure settings or preparing mentally for larger crowds, with pregaming serving as a ritual to build camaraderie before transitioning to public venues. For underage individuals, pregaming circumvents legal access barriers, though this is secondary to broader enhancement goals in most samples. These rationales reflect causal dynamics where pregaming optimizes resource allocation and experiential outcomes, though they correlate with elevated overall consumption risks.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Analogues

In ancient civilizations, alcohol frequently played a in preparatory rituals leading into festivals or communal gatherings, facilitating social cohesion and psychological preparation rather than economic savings. Archaeological indicates that fermented beverages were consumed in domestic or semi-private settings prior to larger , as seen in Mesopotamian and Egyptian practices where served both daily sustenance and prelude to celebrations honoring deities or harvests, with production back to approximately 7000 BCE in the . Similarly, (circa 5th-4th centuries BCE), wine—a ubiquitous household staple diluted for everyday use—was routinely imbibed by commoners homes, often as a precursor to symposia or festivals like the , where it helped establish a state of mild euphoria conducive to participatory revelry. This pattern reflects causal links between alcohol's disinhibiting effects and enhanced group dynamics, though documentation emphasizes integration with the event rather than isolation as "pre-" consumption. Medieval European households (roughly 5th-15th centuries CE) paralleled these habits through widespread production and of weak ale or small beer, averaging about 1-2 pints daily per for hydration in water-scarce environments, before to markets, fairs, or alehouses for structured socializing. Such home-brewed drinks, safer than untreated water to in , provided a foundational mild intoxication that could amplify subsequent imbibing, as taverns focused more on camaraderie than primary supply. Unlike modern pregaming, these practices stemmed from necessity and cultural rather than venue disparities, with textual of deliberate "pre-loading" to circumvent costs, given ale's affordability via home or production.

Emergence in Contemporary Culture

The practice of pregaming emerged in the United States during the 1990s, evolving from tailgating traditions—where fans consumed alcohol in parking lots before sporting events, a custom traceable to early 20th-century college football gatherings—into a broader ritual of home-based drinking prior to nightlife or social events. This expansion coincided with economic incentives, as rising bar prices and cover charges made on-site consumption costlier, prompting groups, particularly college students, to pre-consume cheaper alcohol at private residences to achieve desired intoxication levels more affordably. The term "pregaming" derives etymologically from these pre-sporting event rituals, with the verb form "to pregame" first documented in , reflecting its assimilation into vernacular descriptions of strategic alcohol intake before parties or bars. This development was amplified by the of , which uniformly set the legal drinking age at 21 nationwide, inadvertently fostering pregaming among young adults aged 19–20 who sought to circumvent age restrictions or high venue costs by initiating consumption off-premises. By the mid-2000s, pregaming had solidified as a normative element of contemporary youth culture, especially on college campuses, where empirical studies began documenting its role in escalating overall alcohol intake and associated risks like binge drinking. Initial research, such as surveys of undergraduates, revealed pregaming's ties to social enhancement motives, with participants often engaging in rapid consumption via games or shots to build group cohesion and confidence for subsequent outings.

Prevalence and Patterns

Pregaming is most prevalent among young adults aged 18 to 25, particularly students, where past-month rates exceed 40% overall and reach 50% to 85% among drinkers. In a sample of 18- to 25-year-olds, 66.2% reported pregaming at least once, accounting for 36.7% of drinking days, with 87.8% of participants enrolled in . attendees show higher than same-age non-students, correlating with elevated binge drinking. Prevalence increases from high school to college, with high school pregaming linked to older students (mean age 16.1) and frequent participation in drinking games or parties. Among adolescents, males pregame more often than females, with stronger ties to hazardous use (AUDIT scores of 8.77 versus 4.92 for non-pregamers). Gender patterns persist into young adulthood, where males consume more pre-drinks on average (e.g., 9.8 standard units in UK youth samples versus 7.4 for females) and favor beer, while females average fewer drinks and prefer wine or vodka. No significant sex-based moderation appears in associations between pregaming and alcohol consequences among young adults. Older demographics engage less intensely, with Baby Boomers and Gen X averaging about one pre-drink compared to higher volumes in younger groups, though pre-drinking occurs across ages for social meetups. Fraternity members and those without college degrees report higher negative experiences from pregaming, suggesting subgroup variations within education levels. Cross-sectional data dominate, with limited evidence of shifting demographic patterns over time.

Statistical Data and Variations

Among U.S. college students, pregaming prevalence exceeds 40% in the past month, with rates reaching up to 66.7% among current alcohol users in specific cohorts such as male undergraduates. Among drinkers overall, 41% report pregaming involving heavy episodic drinking (defined as 4+ drinks for women or 5+ for men in a short period), occurring on approximately 15% of drinking days and 38% of pregaming occasions. Frequency among regular pregamers typically ranges from 3 to 4 instances per month. Demographic variations show elevated rates among certain subgroups; for instance, Latina/o emerging adults exhibit higher pregaming compared to other ethnic minorities, potentially linked to factors. Sexual and minority (SGM) students greater pregaming and intensity than non-SGM peers, often tied to distinct motives like social enhancement. status also influences patterns, with in-season athletes displaying lower pregaming volumes but similar consequences to non-athletes, while overall alcohol use hovers around 61.7%. remain predominantly U.S.-centric and self-reported from undergraduate samples, limiting generalizability to broader populations or international contexts where analogous practices may vary by cultural norms around alcohol access and .

Practices and Social Context

Typical Activities

Pregaming sessions typically involve small groups of friends gathering residences, such as apartments or dormitories, to consume alcohol before heading to bars, parties, or . The core activity centers on , with participants aiming for rapid intoxication through multiple servings of , , or mixed drinks, often selected for affordability compared to venue prices. Men tend to favor , while women more commonly opt for hard alcohol, reflecting gendered consumption patterns observed in surveys of young adults. Beyond alcohol intake, participants frequently engage in social rituals to build camaraderie and accelerate drinking, such as playing organized games like , kings, or , which structure consumption around rules that penalize slower drinkers with additional shots or sips. , casual conversations, and light preparations—like selecting outfits or applying makeup—occur concurrently, though these serve secondary roles to the primary focus on preemptive inebriation. Some groups incorporate preparatory eating, such as carbohydrate-heavy snacks to mitigate later nausea, aligning with informal guidelines for sustaining intoxication without immediate impairment. These activities unfold over 1-2 hours, calibrated to achieve a moderate alcohol level upon arrival at the main event, thereby reducing perceived social inhibitions or venue costs. Empirical studies confirm pregaming's emphasis on group-based heavy episodic , with intakes exceeding four standard drinks per session among participants.

Group Dynamics and Norms

Pregaming frequently takes place in small, same-gender groups among college students, facilitating shared alcohol consumption in private settings before transitioning to public venues. This composition aligns with patterns observed in U.S. surveys, where males and females report similar pregaming prevalence rates of 64%–98% in the past month, alongside comparable total alcohol intake per session, though males tend to consume drinks more rapidly, accelerating intoxication. Coed groups, when they occur, are associated with elevated consumption among females compared to same-sex settings, potentially due to social facilitation effects. Social norms within these groups emphasize to perceived peer behaviors, with descriptive norms—beliefs about how frequently others pregame—strongly predicting participation. In a study of 198 college drinkers (92% of whom pregamed), higher perceived descriptive norms correlated with increased personal pregaming (β = .34, p < .001), independent of factors like or injunctive norms approving the . Stronger identification with peers' habits further amplifies this effect (β = .25, p < .001), suggesting that group cohesion reinforces pregaming as a normative for , alleviating , or enhancing event anticipation. These dynamics often involve implicit pressures to consumption levels, contributing to patterns where participants aim for synchronized intoxication upon arrival at destinations. High-status subgroups, such as , , or affluent students, may leverage pregaming to signal dominance or social power, while lower-status individuals use it to elevate their standing, underscoring how norms intersect with status hierarchies to sustain . Underreporting of in self-reports indicates potential norm-driven concealment within groups to normalize heavier .

Economic Dimensions

Cost-Saving Benefits for Individuals

Pregaming enables individuals to minimize alcohol expenditures by consuming beverages purchased at retail prices prior to patronizing commercial venues, where markups significantly inflate costs per unit of alcohol. For example, a standard 1.5-ounce pour of in a mixed drink typically retails for $1–2 when bought in bottles for use, compared to $5–15 charged at bars after for overhead, labor, and profit margins. This disparity arises from bars' standard pour costs of around 20%, meaning the itself represents a small fraction of the final price, with the balance covering venue operations. Empirical studies consistently identify as a principal motive for pregaming among young adults, particularly students. In a 2010 analysis of U.S. undergraduates, saving ranked among the top reasons for pre-drinking, alongside access for those under legal purchase age. Similarly, a review of pre-loading behaviors highlighted alcohol pricing as a primary driver, with participants opting for home consumption to achieve intoxication affordably before outings. Surveys of high school and college pregamers further corroborate this, noting that underage individuals pregame more frequently to circumvent bar costs. These savings extend out by conserving budgets for non-alcohol expenses such as entry fees, transportation, or , without curtailing overall consumption. While some suggests pregaming may correlate with higher total —and thus potential offsets through increased —the per-unit still yield net for the pre-consumed portion, as avoids venue surcharges.

Impacts on Hospitality Industries

Pregaming shifts a portion of alcohol consumption from high-margin on-premise venues, such as bars and nightclubs, to lower-cost off-premise retail sources, thereby reducing expenditures on alcohol within hospitality establishments. Research consistently identifies cost-saving as a primary motive for pregaming, with participants reporting that drinks in licensed premises can cost several times more than equivalent retail purchases; for instance, one Australian study found 67% of pre-drinkers citing expense avoidance as a key driver. This substitution effect diminishes on-premise alcohol sales, which often account for 70-80% of bar revenues due to markups of 300-400% on liquor costs. Event-level analyses further reveal that while total alcohol intake may rise on pregaming nights—averaging 7.1 drinks compared to 4.2 on on-premise-only evenings—the pre-consumed volume (typically 2-4 standard drinks at home) displaces equivalent on-site purchases, leading to net revenue losses for venues. Pre-drinkers arrive with elevated blood alcohol concentrations (mean BAC of 0.071% in one Brisbane district study of over 2,700 patrons), prompting reduced further drinking, selection of cheaper non-alcoholic options, or refusal of service to avoid overserving liabilities, all of which compound the sales shortfall. Hospitality operators report this pattern erodes profitability, particularly in nightlife districts where fixed costs like staffing and licensing remain high despite lower per-patron spend. Although pregaming sustains venue foot traffic for ambiance, , or cover charges, the alcohol gap prompts adaptive strategies like promotional or bundled experiences, yet these often fail to fully offset the trend amid rising off-premise availability via supermarkets and delivery services. In regions with strict on-premise regulations, such as and , pre-drinking exceeds 70-80% among nightlife entrants, correlating with broader economic pressures on the sector, including venue closures and reduced in alcohol service roles. counters claims of simple additionality, showing pre-drinking primarily supplements rather than replaces on-site intake only when total consumption escalates unchecked, but motives persistent diversion.

Health and Behavioral Effects

Potential Upsides

Pregaming, the consumption of alcohol prior to attending a social event such as a bar or party, has been linked to self-reported increases in positive alcohol-related consequences among young adults, including enhanced enjoyment, relaxation, and sociability. In a daily diary study of 187 participants aged 18-30, those who pregamed reported 44% more positive consequences—such as feeling exhilarated or more social—on pregaming days compared to non-pregaming drinking days, an association that persisted even after controlling for total alcohol intake in multivariable models. Similarly, a 2013 analysis of college students found greater endorsement of positive consequences during weeks involving pregaming, independent of the number of drinks consumed. Participants in pregaming often describe it as a to reduce initial inhibitions in a controlled, setting, facilitating easier entry into larger social gatherings. Among U.S. students, surveys indicate that pregaming promotes loosening up before , making conversations and interactions more once at the venue. This aligns with motives for social enhancement, where moderate pre-event is perceived to boost confidence and group cohesion without immediate exposure to unfamiliar environments. For some demographics, such as students, pregaming serves to synchronize intoxication levels among peers, potentially mitigating risks associated with drinking paces in public nightlife settings. Qualitative accounts highlight its in fostering a of preparedness and shared , contributing to perceived behavioral benefits like reduced during transitions to high-stimulation . However, these are subjective and context-dependent, with empirical emphasizing experiential gains rather than objective in .

Empirical Risks and Consequences

Pregaming is empirically associated with accelerated alcohol consumption, often involving 3–5 standard drinks within 1–2 hours prior to social events, which elevates blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) before participants engage in further drinking at the venue. This front-loading pattern contributes to high-intensity drinking, defined as 10 or more drinks per night, and distinguishes pregaming as one of the riskiest alcohol behaviors among young adults, particularly college students where over 40% report past-month participation. On average, pregaming days involve nearly double the alcohol intake of non-pregaming drinking days, with participants consuming 8.94 drinks versus 4.53 drinks. Negative consequences are more frequent on pregaming days, with studies reporting 25% higher incidence of adverse outcomes such as rude or aggressive prior to adjustments for total alcohol volume. Specific harms include blackouts, passing out, regretted sexual activity, after , and alcohol-related hospitalizations, often exacerbated by the combination of rapid initial intoxication and continued consumption. Longitudinal analyses indicate that pregaming prospectively predicts heavier overall patterns and persistent alcohol problems for up to one year. Behavioral risks extend to impulsivity-amplified outcomes, where pregaming potentiates associations between traits like negative urgency and daily-level problems such as hangovers or interpersonal conflicts. Among high school students, pregaming correlates with hazardous drinking levels and elevated intoxication, foreshadowing similar trajectories into young adulthood. Frequent pregaming also heightens vulnerability to concurrent substance use, including illegal drugs, and long-term sequelae like academic impairment and mental health deterioration.

Debates and Perspectives

Public Health Critiques

Public health researchers have identified pregaming as a high-risk form of alcohol consumption that often precedes heavy episodic drinking, leading to elevated blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) and increased incidence of acute harms such as blackouts, injuries, and alcohol poisoning. A 2013 event-level analysis found that pregaming significantly predicted higher subsequent BAC levels among college students, independent of total alcohol intake, due to the rapid consumption in unregulated home settings without immediate oversight. This pattern contributes to a cycle where individuals arrive at public venues already intoxicated, amplifying risks of impaired decision-making and vulnerability to violence or sexual assault. Longitudinal studies link pregaming to broader negative consequences, including greater overall alcohol dependence trajectories and co-occurring substance use, particularly among young adults in college environments. For instance, research from 2022 highlights pregaming as one of the riskiest behaviors for mandated students, correlating with elevated BAC and events like falls, fights, or driving under the influence, often because it normalizes rapid intake without protective strategies like pacing or hydration. Critics argue this practice undermines harm reduction efforts, as pregamers report more blackouts and regrets compared to non-pregamers, with daily-level data showing unique associations with physical and social harms even after controlling for drink volume. From a causal perspective, pregaming's —often involving shots or in peer groups—facilitates patterns that exceed thresholds, with from national surveys indicating heightened of adverse outcomes like hangovers, , and visits. interventions, such as mobile-based prevention programs in , target pregaming specifically due to its in escalating from moderate to hazardous use, yet of the underscores challenges in countering social norms that prioritize intoxication over . While some defend pregaming for controlled environments, data consistently show it correlates with poorer outcomes than venue-only drinking, prompting calls for policy measures like stricter home alcohol regulations to mitigate population-level risks.

Pro-Liberty and Economic Defenses

Advocates for individual liberty argue that pregaming embodies rational self-determination in the consumption of a legal substance, allowing adults to privately optimize their alcohol intake without state-imposed constraints on timing, location, or quantity, as long as no harm is inflicted on third parties. This aligns with broader libertarian critiques of alcohol regulations, which are seen as paternalistic overreaches that prioritize perceived societal protection over personal agency and responsibility. The Cato Institute, for instance, has documented how historical and ongoing alcohol controls, from Prohibition to modern distribution limits, fail to curb abuse while eroding economic freedoms and consumer choice, implicitly endorsing private strategies like pregaming as market-responsive behaviors. From an economic standpoint, pregaming enables substantial cost efficiencies for participants by shifting consumption to off-premise purchases, where alcohol prices are typically 50-100% lower than at licensed venues due to reduced markups, taxes, and operational overheads. Peer-reviewed research confirms cost-saving as a dominant motive, with 85% of college pregamers in one study explicitly citing it as a key reason, often tied to the disparity between retail bottle prices and per-drink bar charges. This practice promotes fiscal prudence among younger or budget-constrained adults, potentially redirecting savings toward other expenditures and countering narratives that frame it solely as risky without acknowledging its utility in a high-cost hospitality environment. Surveys of U.S. undergraduates further identify financial accessibility—bypassing age-restricted or expensive bar service—as a strategic driver, underscoring pregaming's role in democratizing alcohol enjoyment amid regulatory barriers. Pro-liberty economists contend that such consumer adaptations enhance overall welfare by fostering competition and efficiency in alcohol markets, where individuals arbitrage price differences rather than subsidizing venue profits through inflated on-site sales. While critics highlight potential overconsumption, defenders emphasize that voluntary pregaming reflects informed trade-offs, with empirical data showing it as a calculated response to economic incentives rather than mere impulsivity. This perspective challenges interventionist policies, arguing they distort incentives and overlook how personal cost management mitigates broader fiscal burdens like public health subsidies for venue-driven bingeing.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8511230/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9756404/
  3. https://ascpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13722-022-00314-5
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376871623010773
  5. https://vitalrecord.tamu.edu/pregaming-linked-to-risky-substance-use-among-college-students/
  6. https://hecaod.osu.edu/the-alcohol-and-polysubstance-behaviors-of-mandated-college-students-prior-to-collegiate-sporting-events-an-assessment-of-pregaming/
  7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27232646/
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303593018_What_Is_Pregaming_and_How_Prevalent_Is_It_Among_US_College_Students_An_Introduction_to_the_Special_Issue_on_Pregaming
  9. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/pregame_v
  10. https://alcohol.org/guides/prevalence-of-pregaming/
  11. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/pregaming_n
  12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07448480903540523
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3746183/
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460316301265
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460320308789
  16. https://theconversation.com/want-to-pre-drink-before-going-out-it-probably-wont-save-you-money-and-can-be-risky-to-boot-195098
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371735928_A_National_Study_on_Pregaming_Motives_Frequency_Consumption_and_Negative_Alcohol_Consequences_among_University_Students_in_the_United_States
  18. https://recovery.org/alcohol-addiction/history/
  19. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/sep/01/social-drinking-moderation-health-risks
  20. https://history.howstuffworks.com/medieval-people-drink-beer-water.htm
  21. https://zythophile.co.uk/2022/07/12/so-how-much-ale-did-a-medieval-peasant-actually-drink-much-much-less-than-you-think/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2094391/
  23. https://wordspy.com/words/pre-gaming/
  24. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pregame
  25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07448480903380300
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3115388/
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262577492_Who_pre-drinks_before_a_night_out_and_why_Socioeconomic_status_and_motives_behind_young_people%27s_pre-drinking_in_the_United_Kingdom
  28. https://news.uq.edu.au/2019-05-13-pre-drinking-not-just-young
  29. https://journals.lww.com/ijcm/fulltext/2021/46030/pregaming_on_alcohol_products_among_male_college.8.aspx
  30. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/20476
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6057833/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11125522/
  33. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047237920976658
  34. https://www.colorado.edu/aod/sites/default/files/attached-files/Pregaming%2520AOD%2520Handout.pdf
  35. https://www.hercampus.com/school/ithaca/9-drinking-games-your-next-pregame-21/
  36. https://www.boozah.co.uk/blog/a-students-guide-to-pre-drinks-everything-you-need-to-know
  37. https://www.thrillist.com/culture/how-to-pregame-drinking
  38. https://hecaod.osu.edu/pregame-heavy-episodic-drinking-and-its-association-with-negative-consequences-and-other-risky-substance-use-behaviors/
  39. https://www.colorado.edu/aod/sites/default/files/attached-files/Pregaming%20AOD%20Handout.pdf
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3356446/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4967554/
  42. https://home.binwise.com/blog/alcohol-pricing
  43. https://academic.oup.com/alcalc/article/49/2/213/205233
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4884131/
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0955395917300610
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023008294
  47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23136847/
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924001506
  49. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01872.x
  50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15221
  51. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2785
  52. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2024-29846-001
  53. https://awspntest.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0022252
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3819100/
  55. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15095
  56. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pre-gaming-may-lead-heavier-drinking-blackouts/
  57. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/alcohol-prohibition-was-failure
  58. https://www.cato.org/blog/nearly-century-later-we-are-still-fighting-alcohol-prohibition
  59. https://www.cato.org/blog/supreme-court-toasts-economic-liberty-tennessee-wine-case-cheers
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.