Hubbry Logo
KhamrKhamrMain
Open search
Khamr
Community hub
Khamr
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Khamr
Khamr
Khamr
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Timurid painting of courtly men enjoying khamr

Khamr (Arabic: خمر) is an Arabic word for wine or intoxicant.[a] In Islamic context, is variously defined as alcoholic beverages, wine or liquor.[1] The "dominant belief" among Muslims is that consumption of alcohol in any form is forbidden, and in addition selling, transporting, serving, etc. alcohol is also a sin.[2] However, according to Murtaza Haider of Dawn, "A consensus (ijma) on how to deal with alcohol has eluded Muslim jurists for more than a millennium".[3]

How Khamr in Islam is defined varies by the school of jurisprudence (madhhab). Most Islamic jurists have traditionally viewed it as general term for any fermented intoxicating beverage,[4] though one school (Hanafi) has limited it to alcohol derived from dates and grapes (whose consumption they also forbid). Over time, other intoxicants, such as opium and khat, have been classed by jurists as khamr.[4][5] The punishment for consumption of alcohol is disagreed upon; some believe that any punishment for consuming alcohol is un-Islamic, while others believe it is flogging, though legal scholars disagree over whether the number of lashes should be 40 or 80.[3][6]

Historically, many Muslim elites consumed alcohol, encompassing the reign of the Umayyads, the Abbasids, Islamic Spain (al-Andalus), and dynasties that ruled Egypt and the eastern, Persianate half of the Muslim world.[7] Modern Islamic countries have low rates of alcohol consumption, and it is completely banned in several of them while strictly controlled in others (such as consumption being allowed only in private places or by non-Muslims). A minority of Muslims do drink and believe consuming alcohol is not Qur'anically forbidden.[8][9] Muslim-majority countries produce a variety of regional distilled beverages such as arak (drink) and rakı. There is a long tradition of viniculture in the Middle East, particularly in Egypt (where it is legal) and in Iran (where it is banned).

Definition

[edit]

In fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), it refers to certain forbidden substances, and its technical definition depends on the madhhab (school of jurisprudence). Most jurists, including those from the Maliki, Shafiʽi, Hanbali and Ahl-i Hadith legal schools, have traditionally viewed it as general term for any intoxicating beverage made from grapes, dates, and similar substances.[4] Hanafi jurists restricted the term to a narrower range of beverages.[4] Over time, some jurists classified other intoxicants, such as opium and khat, as khamr, based on a hadith attributed to Muhammad stating,

  • "The Holy Prophet said: 'every intoxicant is khamr, and every intoxicant is forbidden.'"[4][5]

Other traditions state: (Narrated Abu Kathir As-Suhaimi that he heard Abu Hurairah saying that Muhammad the Messenger of Allah said)

  • "Khamr comes from these two trees (plants): The date palm and the grape (vine)."[10][11]

A minority of faqīh (experts in Islamic jurisprudence), particularly of the Hanafi school, take the concept of khamr literally and forbid only grape-based (or date-based) alcoholic beverages, allowing those made with other fruits, grains, or honey.[12][13] Other sources (Shaykh Nabil Khan) speaking for the Hanafi Madhhab, state that while not all alcohol is khamr (alcohol not derived from dates and grapes is ‘non-khamr’), all alcohol consumption is forbidden if consumed 1) in sufficient quantity to intoxicate or if 2) consumed for recreational purposes,[14] (i.e. medicinal use may be permitted).[15]

Scriptural basis

[edit]

Quran

[edit]

Quranic verses that at least discourage alcohol include:

They ask you about wine (khamr) and gambling. Say, "In them is great sin and [yet, some] benefit for people. But their sin is greater than their benefit."

— Qur'an 2:219, [16][17][18]

"O you who acknowledge, Do not go near prayer, (Salat) while you are stupified (under influence), until you know what you are saying"

— Qur'an 4:43, [19] [18]

O you who have believed, indeed, intoxicants (khamr), gambling, [sacrificing on] stone altars [to other than God], and divining arrows are but defilement from the work of Satan, so avoid it that you may be successful.

— Qur'an 5:90, [20][18]

Hadith

[edit]

Various sahih version of the hadith below are found in Abu Dawood (3674), Ibn Maajah (3380), Al-Tirmidhi (1295) and other collections:[21][2] The Prophet Muhammad said:

Allah has cursed wine, its drinker, its server, its seller, its buyer, its presser, the one for whom it is pressed, the one who conveys it, and the one to whom it is conveyed.[22][21]

According to a hadith where Imam Ahmad recorded what Abu Maysarah said, the verses came after requests by Umar to Allah, to "Give us a clear ruling regarding Al-Khamr!"[23] Many Muslims believe the verses were revealed over time in this order to gradually nudge Muslim converts away from drunkenness and towards total sobriety, as to ban alcohol abruptly would have been too harsh and impractical,[24] since Islam brought "a society steeped in immorality" to one observing "the highest standards of morality",[25]

Interpretation

[edit]

All alcohol or only wine debate

[edit]
Sign on a refrigerator in a convenience store in Malaysia notifying that sales of beer are for non-Muslim customers only

Early caliphs distributed cooked wine (tilā’) to Muslim troops, as the cooking process caused the wine to be nonalcoholic. However, fermentation could resume in the amphorae, and Caliph ‘Umar II had to prohibit drinking this beverage.[26]

Like the rationalist school of Islamic theology, the Muʿtazila,[27] early Hanafi scholars upheld the unlawfulness of intoxication, but restricted its definition to fermented juice of grapes[28] or grapes and dates.[29] As a result, alcohol derived by means of honey, barley, wheat and millet such as beer, whisky or vodka was permitted according to some minor faction of followers of Abu Hanifa and Abu Yusuf, although all forms of grape alcohol were banned absolutely.[30] (Hanafis traced their view on intoxicants back to Umar (d.644) and Abdullah ibn Masud (c.653).)[31][need quotation to verify] This was in stark contrast to other schools of fiqh, which prohibit consumption of alcohol in all its forms.

Averroes, the Muslim Andalusi[32] polymath and jurist, explained in his encyclopedia of comparative Islamic jurisprudence the idea of alcohol derived from honey, wheat, barley or corn being haram when used as an intoxicant, in an amount that intoxicates, but permissible if used in a manner intended for medical purpose, hygiene, perfume, etc.:

In their argument by way of reasoning they said that the Koran has explicitly laid down that the Illa (underlying cause) of prohibition of khamr is that it prevents the remembrance of God and breeds enmity and hatred…[this is] found only in a certain quantity of the intoxicating liquor not in what is less than that; it follows therefore that only this quantity be prohibited.[33]

The distinction between the legal status of wine and non-grape alcoholic beverages was reflected in early Hanafi jurists delineated drinking-related offences into two categories:

  1. Drinking grape-derived wine (punishment applicable on drinking "even a drop").[34]
  2. Intoxication from non-grape intoxicants (certainly prohibited from a religious-moral perspective, but may or may not qualify for criminal punishment).[35][need quotation to verify]

Since the second category of punishment was specific to the Hanafis (other schools punish drinking regardless of intoxication), they had to come with a legal definition of drunkenness. These definitions ranged from Ibn Qutaybah's, "[a drunk is he] whose intellect has left him so he does not understand a little or much (anything at all)" to Ibn Nujaym’s, "[a drunk is he who] does not know (the difference) between a man and a woman or the earth from the sky". Hanafi understanding of Shariah not only permitted adherents to indulge in alcoholic beverages but they could do so up to a near point of total "annihilation".[36]

However, from the 12th century, the Hanafi school embraced the general prohibition of all alcoholic beverages, in line with the other schools.[37]

Alcohol consumption as traditionally allowed

[edit]

Contemporary Islamic scholar Shahab Ahmed (1966-2015) argued that fiqh prohibition and punishment of consumption of alcoholic beverages notwithstanding,

an equally distinctive mark of the history of Muslims has been a widely held and constantly reiterated alternative evaluation of wine in non-legal discourses where wine and the consumption thereof are invested with a positive meaning expressive of higher, indeed rarified value – and this positive meaning has been enacted in society both in literary reiteration and in the physical consumption of wine in social settings.[38]

Rudi Matthee also writes that many Muslim elites during the reign of the Umayyads, the Abbasids, Islamic Spain (al-Andalus), and dynasties that ruled Egypt and the eastern, Persianate half of the Muslim world consumed alcohol.[7]

Rather than being relegated to "‘bad’ or ‘non-observant’ Muslims, or talked about only as a metaphor for the mystic’s ‘spiritual intoxication’ in the midst of the divine, wine consumption in the Islamic Golden Age was a mainstream literal practice, sometimes even intertwined with religious rituals.[38] "The Ottoman traveller Evliya Çelebi, for example, describes a party at a palace of Sultan Murad IV where wine was consumed, followed by mid-afternoon prayer and Quranic recitation."[38] 10th century polymath Abu Zayd al-Balkhi, in a "foundational work" of medicine, The Welfare of Bodies and Souls, waxed rhapsodic on the virtues of wine, "unique among all foods and drinks, for none of these have in them anything of which the pleasure is transported from the body to the soul, producing therein".[38] Physician and philosopher Ibn Sina (c.980-1037), (aka Avicenna), 'routinely drank wine in good company’ when ‘not engaged in the problem of defining God'.[38] According to Gina Hames some scholars argue that the Quran only prohibited wine drinking when used in pagan rituals or when misused to create social divisions or further Godlessness.[39]

Punishment

[edit]

The Quran does not prescribe a penalty for consuming alcohol. Among hadith, the only reference for punishment comes from one by Anas ibn Malik (according to Murtaza Haider of the newspaper/website Dawn in Pakistan), who is reported to have stated that Muhammad prescribed 40 lashes "administered with two palm branches ... for someone accused of consuming alcohol".[3] Saudi Arabian scholar Muhammad Al-Munajjid also states that a hadith report narrated by Sahih Muslim (3281) from Anas reports that Muhammad flogged someone who had drunk wine with palm branches stripped of their leaves and with shoes.[40]

According to Muhammad Al-Munajjid, the consensus of classical fuqaha’ for the punishment for consumption of alcohol is flogging, but scholars do not agree on the number of lashes to be administered; "the majority of scholars are of the view that it is eighty lashes for a free man" and forty for slaves and women.[6] Similarly Murtaza Haider writes, "a consensus (ijmāʿ) on how to deal with alcohol has eluded Muslim jurists for more than a millennium". The "Maliki, Hanbali, and Hanafi schools" of Islamic jurisprudence consider 80 lashes to be lawful punishment, the Shafi’i school calls for 40 lashes. "The Hadith does not cover the matter in sufficient detail. ... Is it 40 or 80 lashes? Can one substitute palm branches with a cane or leather whips? What constitutes as proof for consumption?"[3]

Contemporary punishments in Muslim majority countries

[edit]
  • A man convicted of consuming alcohol was given 80 lashes in a public square in the Iranian city of Kashmar on 10 July 2018.[41]
  • In Pakistan the penal code, under "the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order of 1979, awards 80 lashes to those convicted of consuming alcohol".[3] Non-Muslims may consume alcohol in licensed areas in Pakistan, but violating alcohol regulations there may result in "severe penalties, including fines, imprisonment, and public flogging in some regions".[42]
  • In Saudi Arabia lashes "can also be part of the sentence" for consuming alcohol, according to the British Embassy.[43]

Contemporary state laws

[edit]

Laws on alcohol consumption as of 2025 in some Muslim majority countries include:

  • in the UAE, Muslims and non-Muslims are forbidden to drink except at home or in licensed venues.[44]
  • in Dubai, non-Muslims may consume alcohol, within licensed hotels, restaurants, and bars.[45]
  • in Saudi Arabia, public consumption, sale, and importation of alcohol are prohibited under Islamic law (Sharia).[46]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Khamr

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Khamr (: خَمْر), derived from the root kh-m-r meaning "to cover" or "to conceal," denotes in primarily fermented or wine that veils or obscures the through intoxication. In the Qur'an, khamr is explicitly prohibited as "an abomination, of Satan's handiwork" in Surah (5:90), equating it with and other vices that lead to enmity and distraction from remembrance of God. Islamic extends the term to encompass any substance—whether from grapes, dates, , or otherwise—that produces intoxication, based on prophetic traditions defining khamr as whatever "takes hold of the mind." The prohibition unfolded gradually across three revelatory stages during the Prophet Muhammad's era: initial caution against its harms in Surah al-Baqarah (2:219), further restriction barring prayer while intoxicated in Surah an-Nisa (4:43), and final outright ban in , reflecting a pragmatic approach to reforming pre-Islamic Arabian society's entrenched wine culture. This ruling underpins the total abstinence from intoxicants in orthodox , influencing legal, social, and cultural norms across Muslim-majority regions despite historical elite consumption in some eras.

Etymology and Definition

Linguistic Origins

The Arabic term khamr (خَمْر) derives from the triliteral kh-m-r (خ-م-ر), with the khamara (خَمَرَ) meaning "to cover," "to ," or "to conceal" something, thereby implying an obscuring or shrouding effect. This root connotation specifically applies to substances that veil or cover the (ʿaql), producing a state of mental rather than strictly identifying a beverage by its composition or production method. In , such as Ibn Manẓūr's Lisān al-ʿArab (compiled in the 13th century CE), khamr is defined as "that which covers the mind" (mā satara ʿalā l-ʿaql), prioritizing the cognitive impairment over the fermenting material, whether grapes or otherwise. This definition aligns with the root's semantic field, where ing denotes not just physical concealment but a metaphorical overlay that hinders rational faculties. Pre-Islamic and cultural references employed khamr predominantly for fermented grape-based wines, evoking their potent intoxicating over perception and judgment, as seen in Jāhiliyyah-era verses describing such drinks' mind-clouding potency. This usage predates Islamic contexts, rooting the term in and settled Arabian traditions where khamr signified stronger, cognition-altering ferments distinct from milder date-based beverages like nabīdh.

Scope in Islamic Jurisprudence

In Islamic jurisprudence, the scope of khamr extends to any substance that acts as an intoxicant (muskir), impairing rational judgment and veiling the mind, rather than being confined to beverages with specific alcohol content derived from . This broad definition reflects a consensus (ijma') among the four major Sunni schools—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali—that the targets the effect of intoxication itself, encompassing narcotics, psychotropics, and other mind-altering agents beyond traditional wine. Scholars distinguish khamr—typically fermented drinks from grapes, dates, or similar sources intended for consumption—from non-khamr forms of alcohol, such as industrial used in trace amounts for non-beverage purposes like pharmaceuticals or , provided these do not intoxicate upon . In such cases, the absence of intoxicating potential or beverage intent permits limited application, though Hanbali and Shafi'i scholars emphasize stricter scrutiny to avoid any risk of habitual consumption leading to impairment. Non-intoxicating stimulants, such as , fall outside this scope due to their lack of a mind-veiling (sukr) effect, even in substantial quantities. Historical fatwas from the onward, after initial prohibitions in regions like based on concerns over stimulation rather than true intoxication, affirmed coffee's permissibility by consensus among later jurists, including Ottoman and Egyptian scholars, who tested its effects against the criterion of rational impairment. This exclusion underscores the jurisprudence's focus on causal harm to , permitting substances that enhance alertness without compromising mental faculties.

Quranic Foundations

Key Revelatory Verses

The Quran addresses khamr, typically understood as fermented beverages causing intoxication, in several verses revealed progressively in Medina. The earliest such reference appears in Surah Al-Baqarah (2:219), responding to inquiries from companions about its permissibility: "They ask you about wine and gambling. Say, 'In them is great sin and [yet, some] benefit for people. But their sin is greater than their benefit.' And they ask you what they should spend. Say, 'The excess [beyond needs].' Thus Allah makes clear to you the signs [of guidance] that you might give thought." This verse acknowledges potential utility, such as trade or relaxation, but prioritizes the predominant moral and social harms, without yet imposing a ban. Subsequently, Surah An-Nisa (4:43) restricts its use in relation to worship, revealed after an incident where companions performed while intoxicated, reciting verses incoherently without comprehension: "O you who have believed, do not approach while you are intoxicated until you know what you are saying or in a state of janabah, except those passing through [a place of prayer], until you have washed [your whole body]." This directive, conveyed during the Prophet Muhammad's lifetime around 3-4 AH, underscores impaired judgment as disqualifying ritual purity, linking khamr directly to spiritual negligence without broader prohibition at this stage. The culminating verses in Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:90-91), revealed circa 10 AH near the end of the prophetic mission, issue an unequivocal command to abstain, framing khamr alongside other vices as satanic works: "O you who have believed, indeed, intoxicants, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone altars [to other than Allah], and divining arrows are but defilement from the work of Satan, so avoid it that you may be successful. Satan only wants to cause between you animosity and hatred through intoxicants and gambling and to avert you from the remembrance of Allah and from prayer. So will you not desist?" These ayat emphasize khamr's role in fostering enmity, distraction from divine remembrance, and disruption of communal harmony, categorizing it as rijs (impurity) integral to idolatrous and divisive practices. The phrasing integrates it with maysir (gambling), ansab (idols), and azlam (divination arrows), portraying a cluster of moral abominations to be wholly eschewed for felicity.

Process of Gradual Prohibition

The prohibition of khamr unfolded progressively across the Quranic revelation, reflecting a phased divine approach amid the sociocultural context of , where intoxicant consumption was widespread and economically tied to tribal life. Prior to the in 622 CE, during the Meccan period, khamr remained permissible without explicit ban, accompanied by indirect ethical cautions against excess, as the nascent Muslim community focused on foundational monotheistic tenets rather than social reforms that might provoke resistance. Following the migration to , the initial Medinan around 622–623 CE introduced advisory guidance, acknowledging both utility and predominant harm in khamr while urging discernment, thereby initiating reflection without outright interdiction. This evolved to a partial restriction circa 624 CE, barring intoxication during to prioritize spiritual clarity and communal . The culmination occurred with the comprehensive near 632 CE, shortly before the Muhammad's death, framing khamr as an satanic abomination severing ties to divine favor. This incremental methodology stemmed from pragmatic consideration of Arabian society's entrenched reliance on intoxicants, which sudden fiat might have incited backlash or undermined nascent Islamic authority, as evidenced by historical accounts of companions like Umar ibn al-Khattab seeking incremental rulings to facilitate adherence. Scholarly exegeses attribute the staging to divine wisdom in fostering voluntary compliance and societal reconfiguration, averting the chaos of abrupt enforcement in a polity transitioning from polytheistic norms. Post-conquest of in 630 CE, the terminal decree's irrevocability—unabrogated thereafter—solidified its permanence, aligning with the consolidation of Islamic governance.

Prophetic Traditions

Hadith on Intoxicants

In Sahih Muslim, Ibn 'Umar narrated that the Prophet Muhammad stated: "Every intoxicant is khamr, and every khamr is forbidden." This declaration broadens the Quranic term khamr beyond grape-based wine to encompass all substances causing intoxication, reinforcing the absolute prohibition without qualification. The Prophet further clarified the criterion of intoxication in rulings on beverages like nabidh, a date-infused drink. He permitted nabidh prepared in non-intoxicating forms but forbade it if fermentation rendered it capable of inebriation, as in a narration where he declared: "Every drink that causes intoxication is forbidden." This principle extends to any quantity producing impairment, equating such drinks' harm to khamr regardless of base ingredients or fermentation process. The exemplified post-prohibition, instructing companions to avoid even residual exposure to intoxicants and emphasizing their inherent impurity akin to other divinely forbidden items. His commands included discarding vessels potentially used for khamr preparation, underscoring practical detachment from intoxicating substances to prevent or accidental consumption. These traditions collectively affirm intoxicants' categorical unlawfulness, prioritizing as a foundational ethical imperative.

Punishments in Sunnah

In the Sunnah, punishments for consuming khamr center on flogging as a hadd penalty for , derived from the Muhammad's direct actions and subsequent caliphal precedents. Narrations indicate that the flogged drunkards using palm-leaf stalks, shoes, or similar implements, approximating 40 lashes, as reported by Anas bin Malik in . al-Siddiq maintained this measure at 40 lashes for offenders brought before him. Umar ibn al-Khattab later prescribed 80 lashes as the minimum for drinking, particularly when intoxication involved disruption, according to a narration in where he explicitly set this as the baseline to strengthen deterrence. These floggings targeted voluntary intoxication manifesting publicly, with enforcement triggered by the offender's evident state, often confirmed through or by companions. Application required the individual to be a sane Muslim capable of , with proof via self-admission or from reliable witnesses attesting to consumption or unmistakable intoxication signs, as exemplified in prophetic cases where suspects were tested by reciting verses to verify sobriety. Sincere repentance could absolve the spiritual sin before , potentially restoring acceptance of prayers after a period, but did not negate the communal hadd obligation, underscoring its role in upholding beyond personal remorse.

Interpretive Debates

Khamr as Wine Versus All Intoxicants

The term khamr in classical Islamic primarily refers linguistically to wine derived from the fermented juice of grapes, from the Arabic root khamara connoting the veiling or intoxication of the mind. A minority position, advanced by certain Hanafi scholars such as , confines khamr strictly to grape or date-based fermented beverages, reserving the specific Quranic designation and associated hudud-level prohibitions for these while extending lesser prohibitions to other intoxicating drinks via ta'zir or . This literalist approach prioritizes the term's pre-Islamic lexical specificity, where khamr denoted grape wine amid Arabian poetic and cultural usage, arguing against expansive reinterpretation without explicit textual warrant. The majority scholarly consensus, spanning Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali schools—and prevailing among most Hanafis—broadens khamr to include all substances causing intoxication (muskir), employing qiyas (juridical analogy) on the shared 'illah (effective cause) of mental impairment and resultant moral detriment. This extension draws direct support from prophetic hadith, including the narration from Abdullah ibn Abbas: "Every intoxicant is khamr, and every intoxicant is forbidden," authenticated in collections like Sahih Muslim and Sunan Abu Dawud. Quranic verses reinforce this universality, as in 5:90-91, which frames khamr within a triad of Satanic works—alongside gambling and idolatry—emphasizing comprehensive avoidance to avert enmity, distraction from prayer, and disbelief, without limiting to grape derivatives. Jurists substantiating the majority view reason that restricting khamr to wine alone would undermine the prohibition's intent, permitting loopholes for equivalently harmful intoxicants like (date infusions) or herbal brews prevalent in early Islamic society, despite identical effects on cognition and behavior. Early debates, as documented in juristic texts, highlight how literal confinement risks eroding the rule's efficacy, given intoxication's consistent causation of impaired judgment and social discord across substances. Thus, the expansive interpretation aligns with the Sharia's of preserving intellect ('aql), ensuring prohibition addresses the uniform peril of any agent that "covers" rational faculties, irrespective of botanical source.

Extension to Modern Substances

In Islamic jurisprudence, there exists a broad consensus among major schools of thought that the prohibition of khamr extends to modern intoxicating substances such as marijuana, cocaine, and other narcotics that impair mental faculties, based on prophetic traditions equating all intoxicants with khamr. This analogy (qiyas) derives from hadiths stating, "Every intoxicant is khamr, and every khamr is forbidden," applying to any substance causing clouded judgment or euphoria, regardless of form. Scholars from Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali traditions, as well as contemporary bodies like the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA), affirm this, viewing recreational use as unequivocally haram due to the core objective of preserving rationality (hifz al-'aql). Debates arise regarding medical applications of such substances, where necessity (darura) may permit non-recreational use if no alternative exists and intoxication is minimized, as opined by some jurists permitting opioids or derivatives under strict supervision. However, stricter views, including those of Ibn Taymiyyah and modern Salafi scholars, reject intoxicants even medicinally, prioritizing avoidance unless life-threatening, and deeming them a "disease" rather than cure. For non-intoxicating alcohol derivatives, such as those below 0.5% in foods or beverages (e.g., fermented vinegars or trace in ripe fruits), rulings diverge: permissive opinions hold them if they neither intoxicate nor derive directly from prohibited khamr production, emphasizing actual impairment over nominal content. Stricter positions, prevalent in Hanbali and some Shafi'i circles, prohibit any quantity of alcohol-derived substances to avoid (shubha), applying the principle that what intoxicates in large amounts is in small. In the 2020s, fatwas from institutions like IslamQA have reaffirmed the status of edibles and similar products, even in low doses, as they veil the intellect akin to traditional khamr, rejecting secular legalization trends in favor of unchanging imperatives. This stance underscores a prioritization of doctrinal consistency over , with scholars warning against incremental permissibility that erodes prohibition's rationale.

Prescribed Penalties

The hadd punishment for consuming khamr, applicable to adult Muslims who intentionally drink intoxicants, consists of flogging with 40 to 80 lashes, reflecting consensus among Sunni jurists derived from early Islamic legal precedents. The variation in lash count—40 in some rulings and 80 in others—stems from interpretive differences on the precise prophetic benchmark, but the corporal nature serves as a fixed deterrent rather than a lethal measure for initial violations. For recidivists, while the hadd flogging may repeat, ta'zir (discretionary punishment) can escalate severity, with certain views permitting execution after three or four offenses to address persistent public endangerment. Proof for imposing the hadd demands rigorous evidentiary standards: either the offender's uncoerced confession, repeatable if retracted, or testimony from two upright adult Muslim male witnesses who directly observed the ingestion of the intoxicant. These requirements, stricter than for many ta'zir offenses, prevent arbitrary enforcement by mandating judicial verification and excluding circumstantial evidence alone, thereby safeguarding against false accusations and emphasizing state-administered justice over private vigilantism. Unlike penalties for () or ( or lashing), which address property rights or familial with potentially irreversible consequences, the khamr penalty prioritizes non-lethal correction to curb intoxication's immediate threats to individual rationality and communal stability, facilitating repentance and societal restoration without barring future reform.

Historical Applications

During the , enforcement of penalties for consuming khamr was rigorous under Caliph (r. 634–644 CE), who personally oversaw floggings of companions and others found intoxicated, increasing the prescribed lashes from 40 to 80 after observing among offenders. This escalation aimed to deter public and private violations, with Umar reportedly smashing bottles of alcohol in to symbolize the faith's stance against intoxicants. Following military conquests in the seventh and eighth centuries CE, Islamic rulers systematically destroyed vineyards across regions like the , Persia, and to eliminate sources of wine production, leading to a sharp decline in in these areas. In and , for instance, Byzantine-era wine presses were dismantled or abandoned, shifting agricultural focus away from grapes and reducing availability for Muslim consumers, though non-Muslim communities retained limited cultivation under status. Public enforcement prioritized prohibiting sales in markets, with authorities patrolling urban centers to confiscate and spill contraband, contrasting with occasional leniency toward discreet private use among elites. In the (750–1258 CE), policing extended to marketplace oversight in and other cities, where muhtasibs (market inspectors) enforced bans on open alcohol trade to , destroying seized stocks and fining vendors, even as caliphal courts exhibited tolerance for elite indulgence. This dual approach—strict public regulation versus selective private exemption—persisted into later periods, evidenced by sporadic crackdowns amid persistent underground networks. Under the (1299–1922 CE), enforcement fluctuated but included severe measures, such as Sultan Murad IV's (r. 1623–1640 CE) campaigns in , where he executed drinkers and owners publicly to eradicate urban consumption, temporarily curbing visible through patrols and informant networks. While taxes on alcohol (müskirat resmi) were levied from non-Muslims, Muslim violators faced flogging or execution, with vineyards in occasionally uprooted during puritanical reigns to prevent proliferation. These applications demonstrably lowered rates of and alcohol-related disorders in core territories compared to pre-conquest norms, as viticultural collapse and punitive deterrence shifted societal patterns away from dependence on fermented beverages.

Variations Among Juridical Schools

The Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali schools of Sunni jurisprudence prescribe flogging as the primary punishment for consuming intoxicants, though the number of lashes varies. The Shafi'i school mandates 40 lashes, drawing from the practice attributed to Abu Bakr, while the Hanafi, Maliki, and Hanbali schools stipulate 80 lashes, based on the precedent set by Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab. In the Maliki school, the punishment may extend to 80 lashes combined with discretionary measures such as imprisonment or additional ta'zir (discretionary penalties) at the judge's discretion, particularly for repeat offenses or public intoxication. In Twelver Shia (Ja'fari school), the prescribed penalty is 80 lashes for the first offense, escalating to 160 for the second and 240 for the third, with potential only on the fourth conviction; however, execution is not applied to and requires stringent evidentiary standards. All major schools agree that hudud penalties for intoxication do not apply to non-Muslims, who are exempt under Islamic law, nor to minors lacking legal capacity. For female offenders, the flogging penalty remains equivalent across genders, but execution is typically administered without exposing the body, often over clothing to preserve . Enforcement differs structurally between Sunni and Shia traditions: Sunni schools vest discretion in the caliph or (judge) for applying , allowing flexibility in verification and execution based on . In contrast, Ja'fari emphasizes the authority of the infallible for hudud implementation; during the Imam's , penalties for intoxication are often treated as ta'zir under the jurist's , with stricter proof requirements to avoid error.

Empirical Rationales

Health and Social Harms of Intoxicants

Alcohol consumption is causally linked to approximately 2.6 million deaths annually worldwide, representing 4.7% of all deaths in 2019, with the majority attributable to noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular conditions, cancers, and liver diseases. Among these, , including , accounts for a significant portion, with chronic heavy drinking leading to progressive liver damage through mechanisms like fatty liver accumulation, , and fibrosis. Alcohol is classified as a carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, causally associated with at least seven types of cancer, including those of the , , , liver, colon, , and , via DNA damage and acetaldehyde toxicity. , or alcohol use disorder, affects over 200 million people globally, characterized by tolerance, withdrawal, and compulsive use despite adverse consequences, with neuroadaptations in reward pathways exacerbating relapse risk. Social harms extend beyond individual , encompassing and accidents. In 2019, alcohol contributed to 298,000 road crash deaths, including 156,000 from others' drinking, and was involved in a substantial fraction of global road fatalities, estimated at around 25% in high-income countries where data is robust. Interpersonal , including homicides and assaults, is similarly elevated, with impairing impulse control and judgment in both perpetrators and victims. These effects manifest through acute intoxication, where even moderate doses disrupt function, reducing and . At the cellular level, alcohol induces via and , disproportionately affecting the , which governs like and foresight; chronic exposure leads to neuronal loss and structural in this region, perpetuating cycles of poor choices and dependency. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) represent intergenerational harm, with prenatal exposure causing lifelong neurodevelopmental deficits in offspring, including cognitive impairments and behavioral issues; epigenetic modifications from alcohol can transmit vulnerability across generations via germline changes, as evidenced in models and human cohorts. Empirical data highlight the benefits of low-consumption environments: countries with predominantly Muslim populations and minimal alcohol use, such as those in the , exhibit the lowest rates of alcohol-attributable and related mortality, contrasting sharply with higher-incidence regions like and the , where per capita consumption correlates directly with . For instance, age-standardized prevalence of alcoholic is markedly lower in Muslim-dominant nations like and compared to Western countries, underscoring abstinence's protective role against these harms.

Scientific Corroboration of Prohibition

Neuroscientific research substantiates the Islamic conceptualization of khamr—etymologically derived from a root implying "covering" or veiling—as alcohol intoxication demonstrably impairs cognitive faculties, particularly in the prefrontal cortex responsible for executive function and rational decision-making. Acute alcohol exposure disrupts prefrontal cortex activity, leading to diminished inhibitory control and heightened risk-taking behaviors, as evidenced by functional neuroimaging studies showing attenuated responses in fronto-temporal networks during intoxication. Chronic consumption further exacerbates this by altering dopamine receptor activity in the prefrontal cortex, correlating with persistent deficits in decision-making and impulse regulation observed in alcohol-dependent individuals. These findings align with scriptural prohibitions against substances that obscure mental clarity, confirming a causal mechanism where intoxication mechanistically "covers" higher reasoning akin to the described effects. Longitudinal epidemiological data reinforces the absence of a safe consumption threshold, mirroring the categorical prohibition of khamr by indicating that even minimal intake elevates health risks without offsetting benefits. A 2018 global burden of disease analysis in The Lancet, synthesizing data from over 190 countries, determined that zero ethanol consumption per week minimizes overall risk, with harms—including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and injuries—escalating linearly from any positive level.31571-X/fulltext) This conclusion has been upheld in subsequent reviews, such as a 2023 meta-analysis of cohort studies finding no significant mortality reduction from low or moderate daily intake, and instead associating it with increased all-cause mortality risks. Peer-reviewed syntheses from the 2020s, drawing on randomized and observational data, consistently refute moderation as protective, attributing prior J-shaped curve observations (suggesting cardiovascular benefits at low doses) to methodological flaws like abstainer bias and confounding lifestyle factors.00317-6/fulltext) Claims of net advantages from moderate alcohol use, such as purported cardioprotection, have been empirically dismantled in recent federal and academic assessments, underscoring total prohibition's alignment with risk minimization. A 2025 U.S. Dietary Guidelines advisory report, reviewing over 1,000 studies, concluded that even one daily drink raises risks of liver , , and injuries, with benefits overstated and outweighed by aggregate harms across organ systems. Similarly, updated meta-analyses in the early 2020s, correcting for biases in legacy research, found low-level consumption linked to , disorders, and diminished cognitive , without verifiable thresholds below which harms cease. These data preclude safe episodic or diluted exposure, validating as the empirically optimal strategy against intoxicants' insidious, dose-independent detriments.

Historical Context

Pre-Islamic Prevalence

In , known as the period, khamr—primarily referring to fermented beverages made from dates, raisins, or due to the arid unsuitable for widespread cultivation—was a staple of daily life and cultural expression. Local production centered on date wine, or , steeped from abundant dates in water, reflecting the region's agricultural realities and trade influences from Aramaic-speaking areas where the term khamr originated as a . Ports like Ghazza facilitated imports of other varieties, such as sakkar and nabbad, integrating khamr into commerce along caravan routes. Khamr featured prominently in tribal rituals and social gatherings, often symbolizing , status, and communal bonding, with drinking parties evoking poetic ideals of revelry. Pre-Islamic , a cornerstone of , extolled khamr as an emblem of pleasure, wealth, and honor, embedding it deeply in the cultural lexicon and masking its disruptive potential through romanticized depictions of intoxication. Archaeological and textual evidence from settled areas indicates taverns existed, underscoring its normalization across nomadic and urban contexts. This ubiquity contributed to observable social pathologies, including widespread intertwined with , which exacerbated tribal feuds and moral laxity by impairing judgment and fueling impulsive conflicts. Drinking bouts frequently devolved into , diverting communal resources toward indulgence rather than sustenance or alliance-building, while economic patterns showed khamr production and trade siphoning labor from arid-zone . Such normalization obscured causal links to societal fragmentation, where intoxicated decisions perpetuated cycles of vendetta and instability.

Post-Prohibition Societal Shifts

Following the final prohibiting khamr in around 624 CE, contemporary historical accounts describe a rapid societal transformation, with pouring out stores of wine such that "the streets of flowed with wine." This act symbolized a break from pre-Islamic norms of heavy intoxication, which had contributed to and social disorder, enabling clearer and rational among the populace. Religious sources attribute this shift to heightened , as fostered disciplined communal life and reduced instances of intoxication-induced conflicts, aiding the consolidation of the early Muslim community amid external threats. During the subsequent Arab conquests from 632 to 750 CE, the enforced from intoxicants provided Muslim armies with organizational and strategic advantages over adversaries like the wine-tolerant Byzantine and Sassanid empires. Unlike and Byzantines, whose elites and troops integrated alcohol into cultural and practices, the sober of Islamic forces—unencumbered by the cognitive impairments of inebriation—facilitated rapid mobilizations and tactical cohesion, contributing to victories such as the conquest of the Sassanid Empire by 651 CE. This contrast in lifestyles underscored a causal link between and the edge that propelled Islam's territorial expansion across the and beyond. Over centuries, strict adherence to the ban correlated with empirically lower rates of alcohol in core Muslim communities compared to non-prohibitive societies, with consumption in Muslim-majority regions remaining below the global average despite underground persistence among elites. However, uneven —evident in historical and court indulgences—resulted in regional variances, where lax application diluted these benefits and allowed intoxicant-related harms to recur in less observant strata. Such patterns affirm prohibition's role in curbing long-term societal vulnerabilities to , though causal depended on cultural fidelity rather than mere legal fiat.

Contemporary Perspectives

Modern Fatwas and Interpretations

In the , prominent Islamic scholarly bodies have issued fatwas reaffirming the classical prohibition of khamr, extending it to novel intoxicants amid globalization and technological advancements. For instance, the organization in declared vaping in a fatwa, citing its addictive nicotine content and potential harms as akin to traditional intoxicants, regardless of whether alcohol mixtures are involved. Similarly, post-2020 rulings from sites like IslamQA have maintained that electronic cigarettes and vaping devices are impermissible due to their intoxicating and dependency-inducing effects, rejecting claims of medicinal necessity unless no alternatives exist, as the Prophet's equates all intoxicants with khamr. Debates on trace alcohol in consumer products persist, with the majority scholarly view deeming such substances impure and if derived from processes akin to khamr production, even in non-intoxicating quantities. The Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas in has ruled that foods or medicines retaining alcohol essence—detectable by taste or effect—are prohibited, emphasizing avoidance to preserve ritual purity. In contrast, some Hanafi-influenced opinions, such as from , permit synthetic or industrial in perfumes if it lacks the intoxicating properties of grape-derived wine, but this remains a minority position amid broader consensus against any khamr-linked impurities in daily use items like or flavorings. Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiatives have sparked interpretations critiqued by conservative as potential dilutions of the khamr ban. Reports in 2025 indicated plans for limited alcohol sales in up to 600 tourist zones starting 2026, targeting non-Muslims in luxury venues to boost revenues, yet official denials followed amid backlash. Religious authorities, including Alifta, have countered by reiterating that any policy easing must exclude Muslims, underscoring the absolute prohibition's basis in Quranic verses (5:90-91) and unchanging societal risks like and moral decay. Minority revisionist interpretations, advocating contextual rereadings that limit khamr to ancient grape wine or permit moderate use absent modern harms, have been rebutted by mainstream fatwas citing of intoxicants' persistent dangers. Scholars like those in recent jurisprudential critiques argue that reinterpreting Surah al-Ma'idah (5:90-91) ignores expansions ("every intoxicant is khamr") and data on alcohol's role in , deterioration, and economic burdens, which validate the timeless rationale for total abstinence rather than situational leniency. These views, often from reformist academics, fail to account for global studies linking even low-level consumption to elevated risks of dependency and social disruption, reinforcing orthodox prohibitions.

Enforcement Challenges in Muslim Societies


In Gulf states like the United Arab Emirates, tourism-driven economies have prompted allowances for alcohol sales to non-Muslims in licensed hotels and venues, easing prior requirements such as personal consumption licenses for expatriates. Dubai eliminated its 30% alcohol tax in January 2023 to enhance competitiveness in attracting visitors, reflecting pragmatic adaptations to global travel demands while nominally restricting access for Muslims. These policies strain enforcement by necessitating vigilant segregation and raise concerns over inadvertent exposure or smuggling within diverse populations. Stricter prohibitions in countries like and foster extensive black markets, exacerbating risks from unregulated supply chains. In , where alcohol is banned under Islamic , illicit homemade and smuggled beverages have led to spikes in fatal methanol poisonings, with over 700 deaths reported in a single 2020 outbreak tied to adulterated products. Qualitative analyses identify facilitators including porous borders, , and unmet demand, complicating efforts beyond outright suppression. 's hudud enforcement, prescribing up to 80 lashes for consumption since 1979, faces similar hurdles from cross-border smuggling, particularly via , sustaining an illicit economy amid weak regulatory oversight. Globalization and secular media portrayals of "moderate" drinking challenge entrenched prohibitions by normalizing limited intake, yet data reveal correlations between diminished religious adherence and elevated misuse risks, positioning even occasional use as a potential precursor to dependency in vulnerable demographics. Enforcement thus contends with cultural permeation from Western influences, where empirical patterns show stronger faith commitments inversely linked to alcohol involvement across Muslim communities. Saudi Arabia exemplifies relative success through uncompromising measures, including border seizures and judicial penalties, maintaining negligible public consumption despite regional pressures; official statements in 2025 reaffirmed the ban's permanence, countering speculation amid events like the anticipated 2034 . This approach has curtailed visible incidents compared to lenient jurisdictions, prioritizing societal cohesion over economic concessions. Complementing strictures, some Muslim educators and commentators urge integrating religious instruction to cultivate intrinsic restraint, cautioning that coercive tactics alone may alienate and undermine voluntary , as aggressive enforcement without explanatory risks fostering resentment toward prohibitions. Proponents argue this balanced strategy—enforcement paired with doctrinal emphasis on intoxicants' causal harms—better sustains long-term adherence in modern contexts.

References

  1. https://sunnahonline.com/library/fiqh-and-sunnah/747-the-prohibition-of-alcohol-in-islam
  2. http://heritage.ismaili.net/node/10539
  3. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/concept-of-halal-and-stand-of-alcohol-in-islam/
  4. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EQO/EQSIM-00460.xml?language=en
  5. https://www.reviewofreligions.org/37094/the-origins-of-wine-drinking-culture-in-pre-islamic-arabia/
  6. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/410981-alcohol-and-khamr-in-fiqh-based-on-scien-fa6fac3e.pdf
  7. https://www.bakkah.net/en/differences-between-khamr-and-alcohol.htm
  8. https://islamquest.net/en/archive/fa1309
  9. https://askimam.org/public/question_detail/10761.html
  10. https://islamiclaw.blog/2025/01/07/coffee-as-an-intoxicant-in-islamic-law/
  11. https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/92232/there-is-no-proof-that-caffeine-is-intoxicating
  12. https://www.dar-alifta.org/en/fatwa/details/7561/people-get-addicted-to-coffee-just-as-they-do-to-alcohol-why-alcohol-is-forbidde
  13. https://quran.com/en/al-baqarah/219
  14. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/43
  15. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/43/tafsirs
  16. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=43&to=43
  17. https://quran.com/en/al-maidah/90-91
  18. https://quran.com/en/5:90/tafsirs/en-tafisr-ibn-kathir
  19. https://www.islamicstudies.info/towards.php?sura=5&verse=90&to=91
  20. https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/bitstream/2433/210344/1/I.A.S_009_097.pdf
  21. https://explore-islam.com/the-stages-of-forbidding-alcohol-in-islam/
  22. https://islamictreasure.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/the-gradual-prohibition-of-khamr-alchoholic-drink-in-3-stages/
  23. https://sunnah.com/muslim:2003a
  24. https://sunnah.com/muslim/36
  25. https://sunnah.com/bukhari/86/2-8
  26. https://sunnah.com/abudawud/40/132-135
  27. https://hadeethenc.com/en/browse/hadith/58254
  28. https://www.iium.edu.my/deed/hadith/abudawood/020_sat.html
  29. https://seekersguidance.org/answers/general-counsel/did-imam-abu-hanifa-distinguish-between-the-legal-rulings-for-wine-and-beer/
  30. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/7327/why-is-it-forbidden-to-drink-alcohol
  31. http://ijtihadnet.com/wp-content/uploads/Contesting_Intoxication_Early_Juristic_D.pdf
  32. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/176545
  33. https://aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-the-scholar/much-alcohol-islam-allow/
  34. https://www.amjaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/The-Fiqh-of-Mind-Altering-Medication-AMJA-2023-Shaykh-Dr-Rafaqat-Rashid.pdf
  35. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/juristic-approach-to-the-concept-of-intoxicant-khamr-and-its-punishment/
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370878532_The_Legality_of_Medical_Cannabis_from_the_Islamic_Perspective
  37. https://www.bakkah.net/en/ibn-taymiyyah-on-using-haraam-substances-as-medical-treatments.htm
  38. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/201520
  39. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/198536
  40. https://www.albalaghacademy.org/blog/are-all-intoxicants-haram/
  41. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/20037
  42. https://theislamissue.wordpress.com/2019/02/10/the-death-penalty-for-drinking-alcohol-in-islam/
  43. https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/323479/punishment-of-consumer-of-alcohol
  44. https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijcrs/article/view/5974
  45. https://onlinequrankidsschool.com/punishment-for-drinking-alcohol-in-islam/
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365256527_Islamic_Sociological_Perspective_on_Social_Deviance_of_Khamr_Drinking
  47. https://aboutislam.net/reading-islam/about-muhammad/breaking-bottles-story-of-umar-with-alcohol/
  48. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/237679
  49. http://www.vinetowinecircle.com/en/history/islamic-legacy-and-viticulture/
  50. https://www.vinetowinecircle.com/en/history/islamic-legacy-and-viticulture/
  51. https://www.dhi.ac.uk/blogs/intoxicantsproject/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2018/06/6-Matthee-Alcohol-and-Politics-in-Muslim-Culture.pdf
  52. https://www.ekrembugraekinci.com/article/?ID=1486&did-the-ottoman-sultans-drink-alcohol-
  53. https://telegrafi.com/en/where-did-the-risk-of-destroying-the-wine-culture-come-from%252C-a-short-story-on-the-prohibition-of-alcohol-in-Islam/
  54. https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/thirteenth-greater-sin-drinking-liquor
  55. https://shiastudies.com/en/4667/the-punishment-for-drinking-liquor/
  56. https://www.islamiqate.com/5829/what-is-the-punishment-in-islam-for-drinking-alcohol
  57. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/alcohol
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3593065/
  59. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0106945
  60. https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-020-00859-9
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7250160/
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7650014/
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1089326112000840
  64. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/34/10/3706
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4115290/
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066463/
  67. https://www.statnews.com/2025/01/14/alcohol-health-effects-new-federal-report-says-single-drink-daily-raises-risk/
  68. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/08/moderate-alcohol-consumption-drinking-health-benefits-impacts-research
  69. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/14/health/alcohol-cancer-heart-stroke.html
  70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41223398
  71. https://bible-quran.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Khamr-Wine-Encyclopaedia-of-Islam.pdf
  72. https://www.academia.edu/77554781/_Passed_around_by_a_crescent_Wine_Poetry_in_the_Literary_Traditions_of_the_Islamic_World
  73. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7658/1/2561-5265-1-SM.pdf
  74. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2ahaek/what_is_the_history_of_alcohol_in_preislamic/
  75. https://kashmirreader.com/2024/10/13/a-glimpse-into-jahiliyyah-the-dark-social-landscape-of-arab-before-islam/
  76. https://medium.com/interfaith-now/did-you-know-that-drinking-alcohol-was-a-norm-among-muslims-2ceef8850475
  77. https://www.alhakam.org/from-manhattan-to-medina-prophet-muhammads-prohibition-movement/
  78. https://www.reviewofreligions.org/12519/why-alcohol-is-prohibited-in-islam/
  79. https://beer-studies.com/en/world-history/Beer-and-religions/Islam-alcohol-prohibition/Alcohol-prohibition-expansion
  80. https://harmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12954-024-01087-7
  81. https://www.umy.ac.id/en/muhammadiyah-keluarkan-fatwa-haram-vape/
  82. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/201512
  83. https://www.dar-alifta.org/en/fatwa/details/5922/can-i-use-perfumes-which-contain-alcohol
  84. https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/saudi-arabia-to-permit-alcohol-in-six-hundred-tourist-locations-by-2026-as-part-of-vision-2030-tourism-reforms/
  85. https://www.newarab.com/analysis/saudi-arabia-wont-lift-its-alcohol-ban-anytime-soon-heres-why
  86. https://aliftaa.jo/research-fatwa-english/3928/Khamr-is-forbidden-in-Islam-and-its-Prohibition-is-a-Well-Established-and-Indisputable-Matter-of-the-Religion
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383595378_Revisiting_The_Prohibition_of_Khamr_and_Maysir_in_The_Qur%27an_An_Examination_of_Surah_Al-Ma%27idah_5_90-91
  88. https://ejournal.stiq-almultazam.id/index.php/muhafidz/article/download/228/114/1277
  89. https://www.worldnomads.com/travel-safety/middle-east/united-arab-emirates/drinking-and-the-united-arab-emirates-dont-mix
  90. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-64142652
  91. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/03/dubai-nixes-its-30percent-alcohol-tax-in-a-bid-to-attract-more-tourism-.html
  92. https://www.rferl.org/a/farda-briefing-fatal-alcohol-poisoning-iran/32469173.html
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11681710/
  94. http://www.dawn.com/news/1141153
  95. https://newlinesinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/20240111-Intel-Briefing-Pakistan-Illicit-Economy-2.pdf
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3919702/
  97. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-official-denies-reports-lifting-ban-alcohol-2025-05-26/
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002135
  99. https://healthymuslimfamilies.ca/2022/01/17/lets-talk-islam-alcohol-and-substance-abuse-among-muslim-children-and-youth/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.