Hubbry Logo
PreadolescencePreadolescenceMain
Open search
Preadolescence
Community hub
Preadolescence
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Preadolescence
Preadolescence
Preadolescence
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Human growth
and development
Stages
Biological milestones
Development and psychology

Preadolescence is a stage of human development following middle childhood and preceding adolescence.[1] It commonly ends with the beginning of puberty.[2] Preadolescence is commonly defined as ages 9–12[3] ending with the major onset of puberty. It may also be defined as simply the 2-year period before the major onset of puberty.[4] Preadolescence can bring its own challenges and anxieties.

Terminology

[edit]

A term used to refer to the preadolescent stage in everyday speech is tween and its perhaps older variants tweenie, tweeny, tweenager, preteen and tweener. It's a blend (portmanteau) of the words "teen" and "between" in the sense of "between childhood and adolescence" and refers to 9- to 12-year-olds.[5][3][6] Sometimes the terms tweenie and tweenager are used to differentiate between older (10 to 15) and younger (7 to 11) age groups, respectively.[7][8]

While known as preadolescent in psychology, the terms preteen or tween are common in everyday use. A preteen or preteenager[1] is a person below 13 years of age.[9] Generally, the term is restricted to those close to reaching age 13,[1] especially ages 9 to 12.[3] Tween is an American neologism and marketing term[10] for preteen, which is a blend of between and teen.[9][11] People within this age range are variously described as tweens, preadolescents, tweenies, preteens, pubescents, middle schoolers,[12] or tweenagers.[13][14]

A junior high school can sometimes be confused with a middle school.[citation needed] Though serving a similar purpose in bridging a gap between elementary school and high school, a junior high school typically serves 7th to 9th grade students, whereas a middle school serves 6th to 8th grade students. Therefore, middle schools serve a slightly younger demographic, more befitting of preadolescents, while junior high schools typically serve young adolescents.

Prepubescence, puberty, and age range

[edit]
Approximate outline of development periods in child development. Preadolescence and preteen marked at center right
Illustration of the Tanner scale for males

Being prepubescent is not the same thing as being preadolescent. Instead, prepubescent (and sometimes child) is a term for boys and girls who have not developed secondary sex characteristics,[15] while preadolescent is generally defined as those ranging from age 9 to 12 years.[16] Preadolescence may also be defined as the period from 10 to 13 years.[17][18]

The point at which a child becomes an adolescent is defined by the major onset of puberty.[2][15] However, in some individuals (particularly females), puberty begins in the preadolescence years.[19][20] Studies indicate that the onset of puberty has been one year earlier with each generation since the 1950s.[21]

One can also distinguish middle childhood and preadolescence[22] – middle childhood from approximately 5–8 years, as opposed to the time children are generally considered to reach preadolescence.[23] There is no exact agreement as to when preadolescence starts and ends.

Hormonal development and the development of secondary sex characteristics

[edit]

Early puberty begins as the result of the initiation of the pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion by the hypothalamus; the exact mechanism of this initiation is currently unknown and remains under investigation.[24] Pulsatile GnRH secretion results in the pulsatile secretions of gonadotropins Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), which act on the gonads (ovaries in females or testicles in males) to cause increase secretion of sex steroids. In females, the predominant sex steroid released is estrogen and in males, the predominant sex steroid released is testosterone. These sex hormones then lead to the development of secondary sex characteristics.[25]

Illustration of the Tanner scale for females

The stages of puberty can be described with the Tanner scale, also known as the Sexual Maturity Rating, which incorporates measurements and characteristics of primary and secondary sex characteristics. For example, genital and breast development, as well as pubic hair growth. Pubertal development is regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis.[26] Tanner staging ranges from 1 through 5 (with 5 being the most developed).[27]

With regards to pubic hair development, the scale goes as follows: Stage 1-no hair; 2-downy hair; 3-scant terminal hair; 4-terminal hair overlying the pubic triangle; 5-terminal hair extending to the thigh. With regards to male genitalia development, the scale goes as follows: 1-testes at the same size and proportion of early childhood; 2-enlargement of the scrotum/change in texture of scrotal skin; 3-growth of the penis length-wise; 4-growth of the penis in terms of length and circumference; 5-adult-sized genitalia.

With regards to female breast development, the scale is as follows: 1-no palpable gland tissue; 2-palpable breast bud under areola; 3-breast tissue palpable outside of areola; 4-areola elevated above breast contour; 5-areolar mound recedes into single breast contour. The average age in which both males and females reach Tanner stage 5 of pubertal development is around 15–16.[28]

Neurological development

[edit]

There are significant neurological changes that are expressed during preadolescence. White matter refers to the region of the nervous system corresponding to neuronal axons, which form fibers that convey information across different regions of the brain. In contrast, grey matter refers to the region of the nervous system corresponding to neuronal cell bodies, which process and relay neuronal signals. White matter volume increases at a relatively linear rate of about 12% from ages 4 through 22, specifically focused in the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes.[29] Increases in white matter volume may be correlated to improvements of fine motor performance, auditory processing, as well as sensory information transfer between language areas of the brain. In contrast, cortical gray matter increases in early life, peaks in preadolescence, and declines through adulthood, with the exception of occipital lobe gray matter. For example, parietal lobe gray matter peaks at age 10 in girls and 12 in boys, while frontal lobe gray matter peaks at age 11 in girls and 12 in boys. Such changes might reflect overproduction of synapses in the preadolescent years; in subsequent years, there seems to be pruning dependent on environmental context, corresponding to increased synchronicity of neuron firing. A key caveat from these imaging studies, however, is that there exists significant variability in the timing and characteristics of neurological change in preadolescents. Neurological changes, particularly in the prefrontal cortex, appear to be highly dependent on environmental input.[30] Toxins, hormones, and lifestyle factors including stress and nutrition impact neurological maturation, demonstrating the importance of early lifestyle health interventions in preadolescence with regards to neurological and psychological development.[31]

Psychological and social development

[edit]
Main article: Developmental psychology
See also: Socialization

Of the 'two major socializing agents in children's lives: the family environment...and formal educational institutions,'[32] it is 'the family in its function a primary socializer of the child'[33] that predominates in the first five years of life: middle childhood by contrast is characterized by 'a child's readiness for school...being self-assured and interested; knowing what kind of behavior is expected...being able to wait, to follow directions, and getting along with other children.'[34]

Preadolescent children have a different view of the world from younger children in many significant ways. Typically, theirs is a more realistic view of life than the intense, fantasy-oriented world of earliest childhood. Preadolescents have more mature, sensible, realistic thoughts and actions: 'the most "sensible" stage of development...the child is a much less emotional being now.'[35] They will often have developed a sense of ' intentionality. The wish and capacity to have an impact, and to act upon that with persistence';[36] and will have a more developed sense of looking into the future and seeing effects of their actions (as opposed to early childhood where children often do not worry about their future). This can include more realistic job expectations ("I want to be an engineer when I grow up", as opposed to "I want to be a wizard"). Middle children generally show more investment 'in control over external reality through the acquisition of knowledge and competence':[37] where they do have worries, these may be more a fear of kidnappings, rapes, and scary media events, as opposed to fantasy things (e.g., witches, monsters, ghosts).

Preadolescents may well view human relationships differently (e.g. they may notice the flawed, human side of authority figures). Alongside that, they may begin to develop a sense of self-identity, and to have increased feelings of independence: 'may feel an individual, no longer "just one of the family."'[38] A different view on morality can emerge; and the middle child will also show more cooperativeness. The ability to balance one's own needs with those of others in group activities'.[39] Many preadolescents will often start to question their home life and surroundings around this time and they may also start to form opinions that may differ from their upbringing in regards to issues such as politics, religion, sexuality, and gender roles.

They may choose their own activities, though they are still susceptible to pressure from others around them.[40][41] Many preadolescents play organized sports, but necessary free play (self-directed, freely chosen, independent play) may get overlooked.[42][43] Early sports specialization (choosing a single sport to play intensively or year-round) before puberty has a high risk of injuries.[43] Youth sports organizations recommend a minimum of five hours of free play per week for preadolescent athletes.[43]

Greater responsibility within the family can also appear, as middle children become responsible for younger siblings and relatives, as with babysitting; while preadolescents may start caring about what they look like and what they are wearing.

Prior to adolescence, children may have a dependence on their family as their main agent of socialization. This helps the child establish their attitudes, viewpoints, social norms, and societal roles.[citation needed]

Among these changes is the shift from elementary to middle (or junior high) school. In this unfamiliar environment, the child may find the pressure to rapidly adapt and fit in.[44] Children start to spend less time with family and more time with friends. At this time, socialization by the school and peer environment can become more predominant, as the preadolescent starts to learn more about how they would wish to hold themselves during interpersonal relationships.[citation needed]

While children find this need to fit in, preadolescents have a conflicting desire to establish their own individualism.[45] As the child grows into the transitionary period of preadolescence, the child often starts to develop a sense of autonomy as the child is exposed to a larger world around them full of sudden and unfamiliar changes. Compounded with a sense of self-consciousness, the preadolescent starts to explore their own self-identity and their role in society further.[45]

Development of sexual orientation

[edit]

During preadolescence (early adolescence), individuals may become more preoccupied with body image and privacy, corresponding to physical changes seen during adrenarche and puberty. Early adolescents may become aware of their sexuality for the first time, and experience attraction towards others.[46] Homosexual and heterosexual experimentation is not uncommon, although it is important to note that many teens who eventually identify as LGBT do not always do so during adolescence. On average, gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals report experiencing same-sex attraction in early adolescence, at age 12. About 4 in 10 gay men, and 2 in 10 lesbian women report experiencing same-sex attraction before age 10.[47] For individuals who begin to experience same-sex attraction, familial support and acceptance consistently predicts positive outcomes.[48] Parents and guardians can support preadolescents, regardless of sexual orientation, by having honest conversations about sex. Specifically, parents can talk and listen in a way that invites preadolescents to have an open discussion about sexual orientation.[49]

Home from home

[edit]

Where development has been optimal, preadolescents 'come to school for something to be added to their lives; they want to learn lessons...which can lead to their eventually working in a job like their parents.'[50] When earlier developmental stages have gone astray, however, then, on the popular assumption that 'if you miss a stage, you can always go through it later,'[51] some middle children 'come to school for another purpose...[not] to learn but to find a home from home...a stable emotional situation in which they can exercise their own emotional lability, a group of which they can gradually become a part.'[52]

Divorce

[edit]

Children at the threshold of adolescence in the nine-to-twelve-year-old group[53] would seem to have particular vulnerabilities to parental separation. Among such problems were the very "eagerness of these youngsters to be co-opted into the parental battling; their willingness to take sides...and the intense, compassionate, caretaking relations which led these youngsters to attempt to rescue a distressed parent often to their own detriment".[54]

Media

[edit]

Preadolescents may well be more exposed to popular culture than younger children and have interests based on internet trends, television shows and movies (no longer just cartoons), fashion, technology, music and social media. Preadolescents generally prefer certain brands, and are a heavily targeted market of many advertisers. Their tendency to buy brand-name items may be due to a desire to fit in, although the desire is not as strong as it is with teenagers.

Some scholars suggest that 'pre-adolescents ... reported frequent encounters with sexual material in the media, valued the information received from it, and used it as a learning resource ... and evaluated such content through what they perceived to be sexual morality.'[55] However, other research has suggested that sexual media influences on preadolescent and adolescent sexual behavior is minimal.[56]

Freud

[edit]

Freud called this stage the latency period to indicate that sexual feelings and interest went underground.[57] Erik H. Erikson noted that latency period children in middle childhood can then direct more of their energy into asexual pursuits such as school, athletics, and same-sex friendships.[58] Nevertheless, recent research contradicts these notions—suggesting that sexual development, interest, and behavior among latent period children does not cease. Instead, the apparent lack of sexual interest is due to children not sharing their sexual interests/emotions with adults.[59]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Preadolescence

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Preadolescence denotes the transitional developmental phase in human children, typically spanning ages 9 to 12, that follows middle childhood and anticipates the physiological upheavals of . Physically, preadolescents undergo consistent but unaccelerated growth, gaining approximately 2.5 inches in height and 5 pounds in weight annually, accompanied by enhanced , strength, and the emergence of permanent , while the initial stirrings of —such as in some girls—may appear toward the stage's conclusion without yet dominating. Cognitively, this period aligns largely with the concrete operational stage described by Piaget, wherein children master logical operations on tangible objects, extend attention spans, and initiate rudimentary abstract thought, planning, and strategic problem-solving, laying groundwork for formal operational capabilities. Socially, preadolescents increasingly prioritize peer interactions over parental guidance, cultivating same-sex friendships, adhering to group conformity, and honing empathy alongside interpersonal negotiation skills, which foster emerging independence and relational competence.

Definitions and Terminology

Historical and Etymological Context

The term preadolescence combines the prefix pre-, denoting "before" or "prior to," with adolescence, which originates from the Latin adolescens, the present participle of adolescere, meaning "to grow up," "to mature," or "to come to adulthood." This etymological structure reflects its designation as the developmental phase immediately preceding the onset of adolescence, typically aligned with the years just before puberty. The earliest documented use of the word preadolescence appears in English in 1907, coinciding with the burgeoning field of child psychology that sought to delineate precise stages of human growth. Prior to the , human life stages were broadly categorized in Western thought through frameworks like the "ages of man," traceable to ancient sources such as Hesiod's (c. 700 BCE), which outlined mythological eras, or more individually focused schemes in Aristotle's Historia Animalium (c. 350 BCE), dividing life into infancy, boyhood, , and maturity without isolating a distinct pre-pubertal interlude. Medieval and depictions, including Shakespeare's (c. 1600), enumerated seven ages from infancy to decrepitude, treating childhood and as fluid transitions into adult responsibilities, often by age 12–14 in agrarian or feudal societies where economic necessities accelerated maturity. These classifications emphasized biological and social milestones like or apprenticeships over psychological subtleties, with serving as a de facto boundary rather than a preceded "preadolescent" buffer. The modern conceptualization of preadolescence as a discrete stage emerged alongside scientific in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, influenced by evolutionary theories and empirical observations of child behavior. G. Stanley Hall's foundational two-volume Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relations to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion and Education (1904) demarcated as commencing with (around ages 14–25), implicitly framing the prior 2–3 years as a preparatory phase of latency or "senescence of childhood," though Hall did not yet standardize preadolescence. This gained traction as compulsory schooling and delayed labor extended childhood in industrialized nations, allowing recognition of unique cognitive and social shifts, such as increased peer orientation and abstract reasoning precursors, distinct from both earlier middle childhood and turbulent . By the 1920s–1930s, psychologists like incorporated overlapping elements in his concrete operational stage (ages 7–11), solidifying preadolescence's role in developmental taxonomies amid growing data from longitudinal studies.

Contemporary Definitions and Distinctions

Contemporary definitions in characterize preadolescence as the stage of human development immediately preceding , typically comprising the approximately two years before the onset of , during which children exhibit prepubertal physical and psychological traits. This period is marked by subtle preparatory changes in growth and , without the pronounced hormonal surges associated with pubertal , such as increased gonadal production. Scholarly sources emphasize its transitional nature, distinguishing it from earlier childhood phases by heightened anticipation of bodily changes and social shifts, yet lacking the full physiological disruptions of . Age ranges for preadolescence are conventionally set at 9 to 12 years, though these are approximations influenced by individual variation in pubertal timing, with girls often entering earlier than boys due to earlier average adrenarche around ages 6-8 followed by gonadarche. In contrast to middle childhood (roughly 6-12 years), which encompasses stable latency-like stability in Freudian terms or concrete operational thinking in Piagetian frameworks, preadolescence highlights emerging abstract reasoning and peer orientation as precursors to adolescent identity exploration. Distinctions from adolescence are rooted in biological markers: preadolescence precedes the major onset of puberty (Tanner stages 2+), characterized by minimal secondary sexual characteristics, whereas adolescence begins with these changes, extending into the mid-20s with ongoing brain maturation. The term is sometimes conflated with "tween" or "preteen" in popular usage, referring to 10- to 12-year-olds navigating consumer culture and early independence, but psychological definitions prioritize developmental readiness over chronological age or cultural labels. Variations in definition arise from empirical observations of secular trends, such as earlier onset in modern cohorts (e.g., in girls as young as 7-8 in some populations), prompting calls for flexible, biology-based delineations over rigid age cutoffs. These contemporary framings underscore causal links between prepubertal neural pruning and , setting the stage for adolescent risks without yet manifesting full pubertal .

Developmental Timeline and Variations

Typical Age Range and Stages

Preadolescence typically spans ages 9 to 12 years, serving as a transitional phase between middle childhood and , immediately preceding the primary physiological surges of . This range aligns with the period when children exhibit heightened anticipation of adult roles while retaining many childlike dependencies, though exact boundaries vary due to individual differences in maturation timing. onset, marking the transition out of preadolescence, averages 10 to 11 years in girls and 11 to 12 years in boys, influenced by genetic and nutritional factors. Formal substages within preadolescence are not universally standardized in , unlike Piaget's or Erikson's broader frameworks, but the period is often characterized by progressive intensification of pre-pubertal changes. Early preadolescence (ages 9–10) features continued linear growth at rates of 5–7 cm per year, consolidation of concrete operational thinking, and emerging peer-oriented social competencies, such as group play and basic based on rules. Mid-preadolescence (age 11) involves accelerating physical cues like initial breast budding in girls or testicular enlargement in boys, alongside cognitive shifts toward hypothetical reasoning and increased challenges. Late preadolescence (age 12) anticipates full pubertal activation, with growth velocities rising to 8 cm annually, heightened concerns, and prioritization of peer status over familial approval, fostering competencies for intimacy and . These phases reflect empirical observations from longitudinal studies tracking somatic, neurological, and metrics, emphasizing gradual rather than abrupt demarcations. Individual variations in stage progression stem from sex differences—girls typically advance earlier—and environmental modulators like , which have lowered average ages by 1–2 years over the past century without proportionally extending preadolescence. Cross-cultural data indicate similar ranges in industrialized populations, though delayed onset occurs in undernourished cohorts, underscoring over strict chronological fixes. This framework prioritizes observable milestones over arbitrary age cutoffs to account for asynchrony in development.

Factors Influencing Onset and Individual Differences

The onset of preadolescence, typically marking the transition from middle childhood around ages 9-11, exhibits individual variations influenced primarily by genetic factors, with estimates for pubertal timing—a key boundary for preadolescence—ranging from 50% to 80%. Twin and studies indicate that genes such as MKRN3 and DLK1 play roles in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, which governs the shift toward pubertal readiness, leading to differences in when preadolescent cognitive and social accelerations emerge. Parental pubertal timing, particularly maternal age at , correlates strongly with offspring onset, accounting for up to 50% of variance in girls. Nutritional status and body composition significantly modulate these genetic predispositions, with higher childhood adiposity and obesity linked to earlier pubertal onset, thereby shortening the preadolescent phase, especially in girls. Longitudinal studies show that improved nutrition over the past century has contributed to secular trends of earlier maturation, with girls in higher BMI categories experiencing thelarche up to 1-2 years sooner than undernourished peers. Conversely, diets rich in whole foods and lower in processed items may delay onset, reducing risks of early puberty by up to 53% in adherent children compared to those with poor lifestyles. Ethnic and racial differences further contribute to variability, with African American girls showing pubertal entry 6-12 months earlier than Caucasian counterparts, as evidenced by breast development data from national cohorts. Among Asian subgroups, timing varies by up to 14 months, with certain Pacific Islander ancestries maturing faster than East Asian groups. These disparities persist after controlling for socioeconomic factors, suggesting interplay with genetic ancestry and early-life exposures. Environmental endocrine disruptors, such as and , have been associated with advanced pubertal timing in epidemiological studies, potentially accelerating the end of preadolescence through mimicry of estrogenic signals. Exposure levels in urine correlate with earlier in girls, though causal mechanisms require further longitudinal validation beyond observational data. Stress and socioeconomic adversity may exacerbate these effects indirectly via altered and pathways.

Biological Development

Hormonal and Physical Changes

Preadolescence features the initial hormonal shifts preceding full pubertal development, including and early . , typically occurring around ages 7 to 8 in both sexes, involves maturation of the adrenal cortex's zona reticularis, leading to increased production of weak androgens such as dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA sulfate (DHEAS). These changes occur independently of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis and contribute to early signs like growth and activation, without triggering gonadal maturation. Gonadarche begins with reactivation of the HPG axis, characterized by pulsatile (GnRH) secretion from the , which stimulates pituitary release of (FSH) and (LH). In females, rising FSH promotes ovarian production, while in males, LH drives testicular testosterone synthesis; FSH supports . These events typically initiate between ages 8 to 13 in girls and 9 to 14 in boys, marking the transition from Tanner stage 1 (prepubertal) to stage 2. Physically, these hormonal changes manifest as the earliest . In girls, —breast budding (Tanner breast stage 2)—represents the first gonadal sign, with average onset around 10 to 11 years, accompanied by potential nipple tenderness and areolar pigmentation. (Tanner pubic hair stage 2), often driven initially by adrenal androgens, appears as sparse, downy hair along the , averaging 10 to 11 years. A prepubertal growth spurt accelerates height velocity to about 6-7 cm/year, primarily affecting the legs. In boys, starts with testicular enlargement (Tanner genital stage 2), defined as volume exceeding 4 mL or length over 2.5 cm, averaging 11 to 12 years, with scrotal skin reddening and thinning. follows slightly later, around 12 years, with initial fine hair at the base. Growth acceleration begins later than in girls, reaching 7-8 cm/year, with early increases in muscle and shoulder broadening. Both sexes may experience , , and axillary hair due to effects, alongside advancing and potential transient acceleration in linear growth.

Neurological Maturation and Sex Differences

During preadolescence, typically spanning ages 9 to 12, the undergoes continued refinement of neural circuits, including accelerated myelination of tracts that facilitates faster signal transmission between regions and selective that streamlines connectivity by eliminating redundant synapses. Gray matter volume in the , associated with higher-order , peaks around 11.0 years in females and 12.1 years in males, after which predominates to enhance . The matures progressively, supporting advancements in such as , , and , though full integration with subcortical areas remains incomplete. Sex differences in structure and maturation trajectories emerge prominently during this period, influenced by genetic and hormonal factors rather than solely environmental ones. Males consistently display total volumes 9-12% larger than females, a disparity evident from childhood and persisting into preadolescence after adjusting for body size. Females exhibit earlier peaking of gray matter volumes, often around 10.5 years, compared to males who peak later at approximately 14.5 years, reflecting a faster trajectory toward cortical thinning and reorganization in girls. volume, indicative of inter-regional connectivity, increases more rapidly in males during these years, potentially underpinning differences in spatial processing. Regionally, males show greater volume growth, linked to heightened emotional reactivity, while females demonstrate earlier maturation of amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity via tracts like the uncinate fasciculus, which may confer advantages in socioemotional by age 10-12. Cortical thickness in females tends to be greater in areas such as the right inferior during preadolescence, correlating with verbal and attentional skills, whereas males display thicker parietal cortices earlier but equalize by mid-adolescence. These patterns, observed in longitudinal MRI studies of hundreds of participants, suggest females optimize neural efficiency sooner, though within-sex variability exceeds between-sex differences in many metrics, challenging overgeneralizations of dimorphism.

Psychological Development

Cognitive and Intellectual Growth

Children in preadolescence, generally ages 9 to 12, exhibit advancements in aligned with the concrete operational stage of , enabling them to perform mental operations on tangible objects and events while grasping principles like conservation—recognizing that properties such as volume or number remain invariant under perceptual changes—and seriation, the ability to order items by size or quantity. This stage, empirically observed through tasks demonstrating inductive logic and skills, marks a shift from egocentric preoperational thinking, with children solving problems involving reversible actions and reversible thought processes by age 7 to 11. Intellectual growth during this period includes refined memory processes, such as improved associative memory and working memory capacity, which support learning complex rules in games or academic subjects. Attention mechanisms mature, with longer spans for selective focus amid distractions, facilitating engagement in structured activities like reading or mathematics, where children increasingly apply cause-and-effect reasoning to concrete scenarios. Language skills advance, incorporating more sophisticated vocabulary and comprehension of abstract relational terms within familiar contexts, though full abstract hypothetical thinking remains limited until later stages. Early seeds of appear by late preadolescence, allowing rudimentary of cognitive strategies, such as recognizing knowledge gaps during problem-solving, though these abilities strengthen more prominently in early . Variations in these developments correlate with environmental factors like influencing cognitive control trajectories, underscoring the interplay of maturation and experience. Peer-reviewed longitudinal studies confirm that by ages 10 to 12, intellectual performance on standardized tasks stabilizes, reflecting consolidated operational competencies without yet achieving formal operational .

Emotional Regulation and Identity Formation

In preadolescence, spanning approximately ages 9 to 12, emotional advances through the integration of cognitive strategies, such as cognitive reappraisal and problem-solving, alongside lingering reliance on behavioral suppression. This progression correlates with maturation, enabling improved and reduced in emotional contexts. Longitudinal data from studies reveal a developmental shift in connectivity during regulation tasks, from positive to negative functional coupling between limbic and cortical regions, facilitating more adaptive responses to stressors. This period also features the development of key emotional strengths, including growing empathy with the ability to understand others' perspectives and feelings, increasing self-awareness, and better handling of complex emotions. Poor regulation at this stage, characterized by heightened rumination or avoidance, predicts elevated depressive symptoms; for example, a study of preadolescents linked deficits in flexibility to increased internalizing behaviors. Secure early parent-child attachments, particularly maternal, mediate emotional efficacy by preadolescence, with attached children demonstrating greater modulation and fewer externalizing outbursts. factors, including socioeconomic stability and parental modeling, account for up to 20-30% of variance in regulatory skills, per meta-analytic reviews, underscoring causal pathways from environmental support to neurobehavioral competence. School-based challenges, such as peer conflicts or academic demands, often expose regulation gaps, manifesting as behavioral dysregulation; systematic reviews of preadolescent interventions highlight that targeted training in or cognitive-behavioral techniques yields moderate effect sizes (d ≈ 0.4-0.6) in enhancing self-reported control. Identity formation in preadolescence lays foundational self-concept structures, emphasizing concrete competencies in academic, athletic, and social realms rather than abstract ideological commitments typical of adolescence. Children aged 9-12 develop multidimensional self-views, incorporating evaluations of abilities and traits, with empirical assessments showing increased differentiation between domains like scholastic versus physical self-efficacy. This period coincides with Erikson's stage of industry versus inferiority, where task mastery fosters competence; failure risks inferiority feelings, evidenced by longitudinal tracking of self-esteem trajectories. A transient self-esteem decline around ages 9-10, observed in cohort studies, stems from emerging self-critical cognition, prompting realistic recalibrations that stabilize by age 12. These developments are supported by increasing self-awareness and growing empathy, which aid in forming a more coherent personal identity and integrating relational understandings into self-concept. Emotional regulation scaffolds identity processes, as regulated individuals form more coherent self-narratives; deficits exacerbate confusion, with data from early adolescent samples indicating bidirectional links where unstable self-concepts hinder regulatory efforts. Peer and familial validations shape these foundations, with high-competence perceptions predicting resilience; for instance, 10-year-olds rating positively on social exhibit lower identity diffusion in follow-ups. Sex differences emerge modestly, with girls showing earlier verbal regulation but higher relational self-focus, per developmental surveys, though biological and factors interplay without deterministic effects. Overall, preadolescent identity remains fluid yet anchored in observable achievements, priming the explorations of .

Social and Familial Dynamics

Role of Family Structure and

Children in stable two-parent families during preadolescence exhibit lower rates of behavioral problems, such as externalizing behaviors and hyperactivity, compared to those in single-parent households, with longitudinal indicating persistent advantages in emotional and cognitive outcomes. Family structure transitions, including shifts to single-parent arrangements, disrupt routines and roles, correlating with elevated socioemotional difficulties in children aged 9-12, independent of socioeconomic controls in some analyses. Single-parent families, often characterized by reduced parental resources and higher , are associated with increased risks of academic underperformance and psychological issues in preadolescents, though these effects can be partially attenuated by high-quality ; however, population-level data consistently show two-biological-parent households yielding superior averages in and behavioral adjustment. Economic and time constraints in single-parent setups exacerbate these disparities, limiting supervision and emotional availability critical for preadolescent and peer navigation. Authoritative parenting, marked by warmth combined with firm limits, promotes optimal preadolescent development by fostering emotional , self-discipline, and academic competence, outperforming permissive or authoritarian styles in reducing depression and enhancing school . In contrast, permissive approaches correlate with diminished self- and higher vulnerability to external influences during this transitional phase, while authoritarian styles may suppress without proportionally improving outcomes. Empirical reviews affirm that responsive, structured within intact families amplifies these benefits, underpinning resilience against familial stressors.

Peer Relationships and Socialization Processes

During preadolescence, typically spanning ages 9 to 12, children exhibit a marked shift toward peer-oriented , with friendships serving as primary contexts for emotional support, , and . demonstrates that supportive peer relationships foster feelings of safety through empathic actions and effective conflict management, while also predicting continuity in into young adulthood. Peer groups often form as same-sex cliques, where children negotiate status hierarchies and reinforce group norms, contributing to the development of interpersonal skills essential for later . Children at this stage, particularly around age 12, demonstrate several behavioral strengths in peer interactions. These include greater independence in social decision-making and relationship formation, the ability to establish strong and enduring peer friendships, emerging leadership skills within groups, enhanced abilities in conflict resolution and effective communication with peers, increased personal responsibility in social settings, and the capacity to set and pursue personal or shared goals. Positive peer groups support cooperation, self-esteem, and these prosocial behaviors, contributing to overall social and emotional adjustment. Socialization processes within these peer networks emphasize to emerging social expectations, including gender-typed behaviors and prosocial or antisocial conduct. Boys tend to engage in larger, more physically active groups involving competitive play, whereas girls prefer smaller, dyadic interactions focused on relational intimacy and compliance, patterns that intensify peer enforcement of sex differences. pressures manifest in both adaptive outcomes, such as enhanced prosocial behaviors through mutual , and maladaptive ones, like to align with group dominance or exclusion norms, with victims often facing heightened victimization due to perceived deviance. These dynamics are influenced by peer selection and influence effects, where children affiliate with similar others, perpetuating cycles of acceptance or rejection based on behavioral alignment. Peer interactions also impact broader adjustment, including academic performance and emotional regulation, as positive relationships buffer stress while negative ones, such as chronic exclusion, elevate risks for internalizing problems. Longitudinal data underscore that early peer experiences shape by modeling self-presentation and risk evaluation, with deviations from group norms prompting corrective socialization via ridicule or . Interventions targeting peer climates, such as promoting inclusive norms, have shown efficacy in mitigating persistence driven by demands.

Impacts of Divorce and Family Instability

Preadolescents exposed to parental demonstrate heightened vulnerability to , including increased incidence of anxiety, depression, and conduct issues compared to peers from intact families. Longitudinal analyses reveal that these psychological difficulties often escalate in the period immediately following the divorce, rather than stemming primarily from pre-existing family conflicts, with effects persisting into later . For instance, Dutch cohort studies tracking children from age 11 onward found a significant uptick in emotional and behavioral problems post-separation, independent of prior adjustment levels. Family instability, characterized by repeated changes in household structure such as serial cohabitations or remarriages, amplifies these risks, particularly for socioemotional development over . Meta-analytic syntheses of developmental research indicate that children aged 9-12 undergoing multiple transitions face compounded stress from disrupted routines, diminished parental , and ongoing interparental tension, leading to poorer self-regulation and interpersonal relations. Economic strain and reduced coparental further mediate these outcomes, with single-parent households post-divorce correlating to elevated delinquency and academic disengagement in this age group. Gender-specific patterns emerge, wherein boys in unstable families exhibit more externalizing behaviors like , while girls show greater internalizing symptoms such as withdrawal, though both experience lasting impacts on attachment and trust in relationships. Recent mixed-methods explorations confirm that early adolescents (approximately 10-13 years) from divorced homes report intensified , often tied to loyalty conflicts and perceived parental rejection, underscoring the causal role of relational rupture over mere demographic shifts. Interventions targeting post-divorce can mitigate some effects, yet population-level data affirm that instability during preadolescence hinders the consolidation of identity and resilience typically fostered in stable environments.

External Influences and Risks

Media, Technology, and Cultural Exposures

Preadolescents, typically aged 9 to 12, encounter heightened exposure to and technology, often exceeding guidelines from health organizations such as the , which recommend no more than 2 hours of recreational daily for this age group. Longitudinal studies have linked excessive —defined as over 2-3 hours per day—to attentional deficits, diminished executive function, and lower academic performance in children, with evidence suggesting alterations in regions responsible for and impulse control. These effects arise from displacement of interactive, hands-on activities essential for neural pruning and synaptic strengthening during this developmental window, where causal pathways involve reduced opportunities for sustained focus and problem-solving outside digital interfaces. Technology use, including smartphones and tablets, correlates with impaired emotional regulation in preadolescents, as frequent reliance on devices for self-soothing—such as video games or streaming to manage —interferes with the maturation of prefrontal cortex-mediated mechanisms. Prospective analyses reveal a bidirectional relationship: initial predicts greater problematic technology engagement, which in turn exacerbates symptoms like and poor frustration tolerance, with effect sizes indicating small but consistent risks across cohorts. Peer-reviewed meta-analyses further substantiate that high screen exposure prospectively heightens depressive and anxiety symptoms, potentially through disrupted cycles and diminished face-to-face social reciprocity, which are critical for emotional calibration in this stage. Media content, particularly depictions of violence, consumerism, and sexual themes, shapes preadolescent perceptions of social norms and identity precursors, with empirical data showing accelerated internalization of adult-oriented behaviors. Exposure to sexual content in mainstream media and online platforms—often inadvertent via unfiltered streaming or peer-shared links—has been associated with earlier onset of sexual curiosity and riskier attitudes toward interpersonal boundaries, as evidenced by cohort studies tracking media consumption from ages 10-12 into later behaviors. For instance, preadolescents viewing higher levels of sexualized media report distorted expectations of relationships, contributing to anxiety or maladaptive coping, independent of familial supervision levels. Cultural narratives propagated through popular entertainment, emphasizing materialism and peer validation over intrinsic values, further compound identity formation challenges by prioritizing external metrics of self-worth, though direct causal links remain moderated by individual temperament and parental mediation. These exposures underscore the need for discernment in source selection, as institutional research often underemphasizes countervailing evidence of minimal impacts from moderated, educational media use.

Educational Environments and Societal Pressures

In educational settings, preadolescents aged 9–12 encounter significant challenges during transitions from elementary to , which often lead to declines in , , and . A positive , characterized by supportive teacher-student relationships and inclusive policies, correlates with reduced and depression symptoms, explaining up to 2.4% of variance in outcomes among early adolescents. Conversely, urban school environments and higher socioeconomic deprivation, as indicated by free eligibility, are associated with elevated depression and poorer . Peer victimization, or , emerges as a prevalent in preadolescent contexts, affecting approximately 15.3% of 9–10-year-olds and disproportionately impacting boys. Bullied preadolescents exhibit heightened risks for non-suicidal self-injury (odds ratio 2.4) and active suicidality (odds ratio 3.4), alongside increased behavioral problems and diminished cognitive and academic performance. These effects persist even after controlling for baseline , underscoring 's causal role in exacerbating during this developmental stage. , such as strong peer friendships and teacher interventions, mitigate these risks by fostering engagement and reducing isolation. Societal pressures, particularly academic expectations, impose additional stress on preadolescents, with systematic reviews indicating consistent positive associations between such pressures and symptoms of depression, anxiety, , and suicidality across 48 of 52 studies on adolescents. In preadolescent cohorts, these pressures compound school-related stressors, contributing to through mechanisms like reduced and heightened responses, though longitudinal data remain limited primarily to cross-sectional designs. from large-scale surveys highlights that 68% of teens perceive substantial pressure to achieve high grades, a trend observable in preadolescent academic tracking and parental expectations that prioritize performance over holistic development. Interventions targeting these pressures, including skill-building programs during school transitions, have demonstrated efficacy in preserving and countering disengagement.

Theoretical Perspectives and Controversies

Evolutionary and Causal Foundations

In human life history , preadolescence corresponds to the latter phase of the juvenile period, a distinctly elongated stage compared to other that permits intensive social learning, peer interaction, and accumulation of adaptive skills prior to reproductive maturity. This extension, spanning roughly ages 7 to 11 or 12, evolved to support the development of behaviors, cultural transmission, and complex problem-solving in ancestral environments reliant on group and tool use, thereby optimizing lifetime fitness through enhanced probabilities. The juvenile period's adaptive value lies in its role as a developmental buffer, allowing in response to environmental cues like resource availability and social competition, which fine-tune maturation timing and behavioral repertoires for later . Empirical models from indicate that this stage maximizes embodied capital—encompassing neural, somatic, and skill-based investments—by deferring energy allocation from reproduction to learning, a particularly in variable, high-cognition-demanding habitats. Causally, preadolescent changes stem from genetically programmed neurobiological maturation, including ongoing and myelination in prefrontal and association cortices, which underpin advances in executive function, impulse control, and abstract reasoning while the brain reaches approximately 90-95% of adult volume by age 6, followed by refinement. Hormonally, —typically initiating between ages 6 and 9—involves activation producing androgens like dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), driving early somatic changes such as apocrine gland development, , and subtle mood shifts without triggering gonadal , modulated by nutritional status and stress via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. These mechanisms reflect conserved developmental cascades, where genetic thresholds interact with ecological inputs to synchronize growth trajectories.

Critiques of Psychoanalytic and Social Constructivist Views

Psychoanalytic interpretations of preadolescence, exemplified by Freud's (roughly ages 6 to ), describe a phase of repressed libidinal drives, with psychic energy sublimated into non-sexual pursuits like learning and same-sex peer bonds. This model has been widely critiqued for its absence of empirical foundation, relying instead on retrospective clinical anecdotes rather than prospective, controlled observations or experimental data. Longitudinal developmental studies reveal no evidence of such drive dormancy; preadolescents display persistent curiosity about sexuality and relationships, often accelerated by adrenarche-related hormonal surges beginning around ages 6-8, which correlate with increased emotional volatility and social experimentation inconsistent with Freudian quiescence. Further challenges arise from and behavioral genetics, which demonstrate ongoing maturation of the and limbic regions during preadolescence, fostering incremental rather than stage-bound consolidation without reliance on unconscious repression. Psychoanalytic claims of fixed psychosexual fixations predicting later lack and predictive power when tested against large-scale cohort , such as those from the Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, where early environmental and genetic factors better account for outcomes than inferred Oedipal residues. Critics, including philosophers like , have long argued that such theories evade scientific scrutiny by retrofitting interpretations to post hoc. Social constructivist perspectives, drawing from theorists like Vygotsky, posit preadolescent development as largely emergent from cultural tools, peer dialogues, and scaffolded social practices, downplaying innate constraints in favor of malleable, context-dependent identities. This view underestimates genetic influences, as twin studies of middle childhood cohorts estimate for core dimensions (e.g., extraversion, neuroticism) at 40-60%, with monozygotic concordance exceeding dizygotic pairs even in shared rearing environments, indicating biological endowments guide behavioral phenotypes beyond . Biological sex differences further undermine ; preadolescent boys exhibit higher rates of and spatial task proficiency, while girls show advantages in verbal fluency and , patterns traceable to prenatal exposure and evident cross-culturally from infancy, persisting despite variations. confirms dimorphic brain trajectories by ages 9-11, with males displaying larger volumes linked to risk-taking, independent of cultural narratives. Such findings privilege causal mechanisms rooted in evolutionary adaptations and over purely discursive constructions, as radical social models fail to predict observed universals in cognitive and behavioral maturation.

References

  1. http://bkc-od-media.vmhost.psu.edu/documents/HO_NSOS_TypicalDev.pdf
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6135107/
  3. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/factsheets/puberty
  4. https://openbooks.library.baylor.edu/lifespanhumandevelopment/chapter/middle-childhood-cognition/
  5. https://www.etymonline.com/word/adolescence
  6. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/preadolescence
  7. https://academic.oup.com/book/50930/chapter/421860553
  8. https://paulmottram.com/seven-ages-seven-ages-of-man-in-art-and-literature/
  9. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-12691-005
  10. https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
  11. https://dictionary.apa.org/preadolescence
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/preadolescent-child
  13. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/2/130
  14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545476/
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347512878_Preadolescent_age_the_formation_of_the_interconnections_in_the_personality_structure
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/pre-adolescent
  17. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/8/989
  18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222829/
  19. https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=psych_fac
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235674879_The_Development_of_Children_Ages_6_to_14
  21. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=ci_fac
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6082372/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1521690X22000057
  24. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/101/7/2667/2810131
  25. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122606
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4266869/
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/association-between-healthy-lifestyle-pattern-and-early-onset-of-puberty-based-on-a-longitudinal-followup-study/BC0641662CE6A4AD3A2C80748151DF3C
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23934693/
  29. https://divisionofresearch.kaiserpermanente.org/puberty-varies-among-asian-youth/
  30. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2818645
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3065309/
  32. https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2024/girls-may-start-puberty-early-due-to-chemical-exposure
  33. https://e-apem.org/journal/view.php?number=779
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7030995/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8494404/
  36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279024/
  37. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534827/
  38. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470280/
  39. https://www.amboss.com/us/knowledge/puberty/
  40. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/137/1/e20153732/52918/Evaluation-and-Referral-of-Children-With-Signs-of
  41. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2017/1101/p590.html
  42. https://www.nature.com/articles/nn1099_861
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2818549/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6235840/
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929325000635
  46. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537095/
  47. https://www.verywellmind.com/concrete-operational-stage-of-cognitive-development-2795458
  48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448206/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5074888/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3299351/
  51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216774/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3719211/
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929322000822
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12540916/
  55. https://raisingchildren.net.au/pre-teens/development/social-emotional-development/social-emotional-changes-9-15-years
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51870134_Emotion_Regulation_and_Depressive_Symptoms_in_Preadolescence
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7041853/
  58. https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.13894
  59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216782/
  60. https://karger.com/hde/article/68/5-6/255/909400/Development-of-Self-Concept-in-Childhood-and
  61. https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdev.14227
  62. https://emergingminds.com.au/resources/understanding-child-development-ages-9-12-years/
  63. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-80015-001
  64. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2013/26.pdf
  65. https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/media/_media/pdf/Reference%2520Media/Carlson%2520and%2520Corcoran_2001_Children.pdf
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5948107/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4201193/
  68. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/661922
  69. https://paa2008.princeton.edu/papers/80469
  70. https://www.jsr.org/hs/index.php/path/article/view/3679
  71. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/3/506
  72. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1218&context=nursuht
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10378631/
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523000201
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4060826/
  76. https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/underwood2.pdf
  77. https://www.parents.com/12-year-old-child-development-milestones-8650722
  78. https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/adolescent-development-explained/social-development
  79. https://www.apa.org/topics/teens/developing-adolescents-professionals-reference
  80. https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/gender-early-socialization/according-experts/peer-socialization-gender-young-boys-and-girls
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8630732/
  82. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732308325865
  83. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589403/full
  84. https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-024-01780-z
  85. https://mitch.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4922/2020/04/4_30_2020_Future-Dir.pdf
  86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18955466/
  87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34860682/
  88. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00787-020-01715-0
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9209384/
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4902167/
  91. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/32706/412899-The-Negative-Effects-of-Instability-on-Child-Development-A-Research-Synthesis.PDF
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3171291/
  93. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.2047851
  94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387340655_Understanding_the_Impact_of_Parental_Divorce_on_Emotional_Development_in_Early_Adolescents_A_Mixed-Methods_Exploration
  95. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192513X211030027
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11592547/
  97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000242
  98. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/developmental-psychology/articles/10.3389/fdpys.2024.1439040/full
  99. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2025/06/screen-time-problems-children
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295251/
  101. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-024-20102-x
  102. https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2025/24_0537.htm
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7147756/
  104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0145213423002363
  105. https://acpeds.org/the-impact-of-pornography-on-children/
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1070813/
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8669152/
  108. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925727/full
  109. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032723008510
  110. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2025/03/13/pressures-teens-are-facing/
  111. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18337281/
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027322970800035X
  113. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2104
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3639027/
  115. https://gurven.anth.ucsb.edu/sites/secure.lsit.ucsb.edu.anth.d7_gurven/files/sitefiles/papers/kaplanetal_ch3.pdf
  116. https://raisingchildren.net.au/pre-teens/development/understanding-your-pre-teen/brain-development-teens
  117. https://www.parents.com/kids/development/adrenarche-and-puberty-everything-you-need-to-know/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3678794/
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5459228/
  120. https://www.simplypsychology.org/psychosexual.html
  121. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557526/
  122. https://psychology.town/psychotherapeutic-methods/limitations-of-freudian-psychoanalytical-theory/
  123. https://www.bialikbreakdown.com/articles/freuds-follies-what-did-freud-get-wrong
  124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092656680900306
  125. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%252Fbul0000017
  126. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-29881-x
  127. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3030621/
  128. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854992.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.