Hubbry Logo
Ranger SchoolRanger SchoolMain
Open search
Ranger School
Community hub
Ranger School
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ranger School
Ranger School
from Wikipedia

Ranger School
An instructor explains abseiling to his students as part of Ranger School training, April 2009.
Active1950–present
Country United States
Branch United States Army
TypeMilitary training
RoleSpecial skills training
Part of Airborne and Ranger Training Brigade, United States Army Infantry School
Garrison/HQFort Benning, Georgia
Motto"Rangers lead the way"
Insignia
Ranger Tab awarded upon graduation
Shoulder sleeve insignia of the Airborne and Ranger Training Brigade
Unit flash of the Airborne and Ranger Training Brigade and its 4th, 5th, and 6th Ranger Training Battalions

The Ranger School is a 62-day United States Army small unit tactics and leadership course that develops functional skills directly related to units whose mission is to engage the enemy in close combat and direct fire battles.[1][2] Ranger training was established in September 1950 at Fort Benning, Georgia. The Ranger course has changed little since its inception. Since 1995,[3] it was an eight-week course divided into three phases. The 62 day course of instruction is divided into three phases: Darby Phase, Mountain Phase, and Swamp Phase.[1][4]

Overview

[edit]

The Ranger School is open to U.S. military personnel from the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and Space Force, as well as selected students from other nations allied with the United States. The course is conducted in various locations. Benning Phase occurs in and around Camp Rogers and Camp Darby at Fort Benning, Georgia. Mountain Phase is conducted at Camp Merrill, in the remote mountains near Dahlonega, Georgia. Swamp Phase is conducted in the coastal swamps at various locations near Camp Rudder, Eglin Air Force Base in Florida.[citation needed]

The school is not organizationally affiliated with the 75th Ranger Regiment. Ranger School falls under control of the United States Army Training and Doctrine Command as a school open to most members of the United States Army, but the 75th Ranger Regiment is a Special Operations warfighting unit organized under the United States Army Special Operations Command. The two share a common heritage and subordinate battalions common lineage, and Ranger School is a requirement for all officers and non-commissioned officers (NCO) of the 75th Ranger Regiment.[5]

Those graduating from Ranger School are presented with the Ranger Tab, which is worn on the upper shoulder of the left sleeve of a military uniform, according to U.S. Army regulations.[6] Wearing the tab is permitted for the remainder of a soldier's military career. The cloth version of the tab is worn on the Army Combat Uniform and Army Green Service Uniform; a smaller, metal version is worn on the Army Service Uniform.[7]

"Without a doubt, Ranger School is the most physically and mentally demanding course in the U.S. Army."

Major General Scott Miller, Commander of the U.S. Maneuver Center of Excellence, July 2015.[8]

History

[edit]
First graduates of Ranger School (1950).

Ranger Training had begun in September 1950 at Fort Benning Georgia "with the formation and training of 17 Airborne Companies by the Ranger Training Command".[9] The first class graduated from Ranger training in November 1950, becoming the 1st Ranger Infantry Company.[10] The United States Army's Infantry School officially established the Ranger Department in December 1951. Under the Ranger Department, the first Ranger School Class was conducted in January–March 1952, with a graduation date of 1 March 1952. Its duration was 59 days.[11] At the time, Ranger training was voluntary.

In 1966, a panel headed by General Ralph E. Haines Jr. recommended making Ranger training mandatory for all Regular Army officers upon commissioning. On 16 August 1966, the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Harold K. Johnson, directed it so. This policy was implemented in July 1967. It was rescinded on 21 June 1972 by General William Westmoreland. Once again, Ranger training was voluntary.[11]

In August 1987, the Ranger Department was split from the Infantry School and the Ranger Training Brigade was established. The Ranger Companies that made up the Ranger Department became the current training units—the 4th, 5th and 6th Ranger Training Battalions.[3]

Desert Phase was added in 1983 and the length of the Ranger course was extended to 65 days. The duration was again expanded in October 1991 to 68 days, concurrently with the reshuffling of the Desert phase from the last phase to the second. The 7th Ranger Training Battalion was added to administer this phase. The most recent duration change to Ranger School occurred in May 1995, when the Desert Phase was removed from the Ranger course, and Ranger School was reduced to its current 61-day length of training, at 19.6 hours of training per day.[3]

The Ranger Assessment Phase, the first five days of Ranger School, was added in 1992.[12]

In 2015 Ranger School was permanently opened to women.[13][14]

Students

[edit]
An Airman 1st Class from the 823rd Base Defense Squadron receives his Ranger Tab after completing Ranger School (April 2011).

Ranger School is open to all Military Occupational Specialties (MOSs) in the U.S. Army, although—as of April 2011—an Army combat exclusion zone still limits some from attending.[15] Ranger students come from units in the United States Army, Marine Corps, Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard, and from foreign military services. However, the two largest groups of attendees for Ranger School are from the U.S. Army's Infantry Basic Officer Leadership Course (IBOLC), and the 75th Ranger Regiment.[15] Competitions and pre-Ranger courses are typically used to determine attendance. The Marine Corps is only allotted twenty slots for Ranger school each year, while the Air Force is only allotted six.[16]

Ranger students typically range in rank from Private First Class to Captain, with lieutenants and specialists making up the largest group. The average age of a student is 23, and the average class consists of 366 students, with 11 classes conducted per year.[15] The vast majority of Ranger students have already graduated from Airborne School, and will make multiple jumps during the course. However, a small number of students have entered and completed Ranger School without being Airborne qualified. These individuals completed tasks assigned by cadre instead of taking part in the jumps alongside their classmates.

Following the graduation of Captain Kristen Marie Griest and First Lieutenant Shaye Lynne Haver in August 2015, the Army announced that Ranger School would henceforth be open to female students.[14] While acknowledging that in the past he "would have doubted a woman could pass the rigorous course",[17] Brigade Command Sergeant Major Curtis Arnold described Griest and Haver as "tough soldiers"[17] who "proved their mettle beyond a doubt"[17] and "absolutely earned the respect of every ranger instructor".[17] In October 2015, Major Lisa Jaster also graduated from Ranger School, becoming the first female Army Reserve officer to receive a Ranger tab.[18] In 2019, First Lieutenant Chelsey Hibsch became the first female Air Force officer to graduate from Ranger School.[19] In 2024, Captain Molly Murphy became the first female Army nurse to graduate from Ranger School.[20]

Training

[edit]

Not for the weak or fainthearted.

Ranger Handbook.[21]

Ranger School training has a basic scenario: the flourishing drug and terrorist operations of the enemy forces, the "Aragon Liberation Front," must be stopped. To do so, the Rangers will take the fight to their territory, the rough terrain surrounding Fort Benning, the mountains of northern Georgia, and the swamps and coast of Florida. Ranger students are given a clear mission, but they determine how to best execute it.

The purpose of the course is learning to soldier as a combat leader while enduring the great mental and psychological stresses and physical fatigue of combat; the Ranger Instructors (RIs) – also known as Lane Graders – create and cultivate such a physical and mental environment. The course primarily comprises field craft instruction; students plan and execute daily patrolling, perform reconnaissance, ambushes, and raids against dispersed targets, followed by stealthy movement to a new patrol base to plan the next mission. Ranger students conduct about 20 hours of training per day, while consuming two or fewer meals daily totaling about 2,200 calories (9,200 kJ), with an average of 3.5 hours of sleep a day. Students sleep more before a parachute jump for safety considerations. Ranger students typically wear and carry some 65–90 pounds (29–41 kg) of weapons, equipment, and training ammunition while patrolling more than 200 miles (320 km) throughout the course.[15]

Darby phase

[edit]
MAJ Jaster performs a fireman's carry on a simulated casualty during the first phase of Ranger School. MAJ Jaster was the first female US Army Reserve officer to graduate from the course (October 2015).

The first phase of Ranger School is conducted at Camp Rogers and Camp Darby at Fort Benning, Georgia and is conducted by the 4th Ranger Training Battalion. The "Darby Phase" is the "crawl" phase of Ranger School, where students learn the fundamentals of squad-level mission planning. It is "designed to assess a Soldier’s physical stamina, mental toughness, leadership abilities, and establishes the tactical fundamentals required for follow-on phases of Ranger School".[22] In this phase, training is separated into two parts, the Ranger Assessment Phase (RAP) and Squad Combat Operations.

The Ranger Assessment Phase is conducted at Camp Rogers. As of April 2011, it encompasses Days 1–3 of training. Historically, it accounts for 60% of students who fail to graduate Ranger School.[15] Events include:

  • Ranger Physical Fitness Test (RPFT) requiring the following minimums:
  • Push-ups: 49 (in 2 minutes, graded strictly for perfect form)
  • Sit-ups: 59 (in 2 minutes)
  • Pull-ups: 6 (performed from a dead hang with no lower body movement)
  • 5 mile individual run in 40 minutes or less over a course with gently rolling terrain
  • Combat Water Survival Test (no longer conducted as of 2010)
  • Combat Water Survival Assessment, conducted at Victory Pond (previously called the Water Confidence Test). This test consists of three events that test the Ranger student's ability to calmly overcome any fear of heights or water. Students must calmly walk across a log suspended thirty-five feet above the pond, then transition to a rope crawl before plunging into the water. Each student must then jump into the pond and ditch their rifle and load-bearing equipment while submerged. Finally, each student climbs a ladder to the top of a seventy-foot tower and traverses down to the water on a pulley attached to a suspended cable, subsequently plunging into the pond. All of these tasks must be performed calmly without any type of safety harness. If a student fails to negotiate an obstacle (through fear, hesitation or by not completing it correctly) they are dropped from the course.
  • Combination Night/Day land navigation test – This has proven to be one of the more difficult events for students, as sending units fail to teach land navigation using a map and compass. Students are given a predetermined number of MGRS locations and begin testing approximately two hours prior to dawn. Flashlights, with red lens filters, may only be used for map referencing; the use of flashlight to navigate across terrain will result in an immediate dismissal from the school. Later in the course, Ranger students will be expected to conduct, and navigate, patrols at night without violating light discipline. The land navigation test instills this skill early in each student's mind, thus making the task second nature when graded patrolling begins.
  • A 2.1 mile buddy run, followed by the Malvesti Field Obstacle Course, featuring the notorious "worm pit": a shallow, muddy, 25-meter obstacle covered by knee-high barbed wire. The obstacle must be negotiated—usually several times—on one's back and belly.
  • Demolitions training and airborne refresher training.
  • Modern Army Combatives Program (MACP) training was removed as a part of a new POI at the start of 2009; it was reinstated with Class 06–10. The Combatives Program was spread over all phases and culminated with practical application in Swamp Phase. However, MACP has been removed from Ranger again, starting with the Combatives Program in Mountains and Florida and followed by the removal of RAP week combatives in class 06–12.
  • A 12-mile forced, individual ruck march with full gear on roads and trails surrounding Camp Rogers. This is the last test during RAP and is a pass/fail event. If the Ranger student fails to finish the march in under 3 hours, they are dropped from the course. (12 miles is approximately 20,000 metres.)
Students conduct 360° security while another element moves ahead to secure their path (December 2009).

The emphasis at Camp Darby is on the instruction in and execution of Squad Combat Operations. The phase includes "fast paced instruction on troop leading procedures, principles of patrolling, demolitions, field craft, and basic battle drills focused towards squad ambush and reconnaissance missions".[22] The Ranger student receives instruction on airborne/air assault operations, demolitions, environmental and "field craft" training, executes the infamous "Darby Queen" obstacle course, and learns the fundamentals of patrolling, warning and operations orders, and communications. The fundamentals of combat operations include battle drills (React to Contact, Break Contact, React to Ambush, React to Indirect Fire, and Crossing a Danger Area), which are focused on providing the principles and techniques that enable the squad-level element to successfully conduct reconnaissance and ambush missions. As a result, the Ranger student gains tactical and technical proficiency and confidence in themselves, and prepares to move to the next phase of the course, the Mountain Phase.

Mountain phase

[edit]
A student receives instructions on rappelling from Cadre during the Mountain Phase of Ranger School (February 2011).

The second phase of Ranger School is conducted at the remote Camp Merrill near Dahlonega, Georgia by the 5th Ranger Training Battalion. Here, "students receive instruction on military mountaineering tasks, mobility training, as well as techniques for employing a platoon for continuous combat patrol operations in a mountainous environment".[22] Adding to the physical hardships endured in the Darby phase, in this phase "the stamina and commitment of the Ranger student is stressed to the maximum. At any time, they may be selected to lead tired, hungry, physically expended students to accomplish yet another combat patrol mission".[22] The Ranger student continues learning how to sustain themselves and their subordinates in the mountains. The rugged terrain, severe weather, hunger, mental and physical fatigue, and the psychological stress the student encounters allow them to measure their capabilities and limitations and those of their fellow soldiers.

In addition to combat operations, the student receives four days of military mountaineering training. The sequence of training has changed in past decades. As of 2010, the training sequence is as follows. In the first two days students learn knots, belays, anchor points, rope management, mobility evacuation, and the fundamentals of climbing and abseiling. The training ends in a two-day Upper mountaineering exercise at Yonah Mountain, to apply the skills learned during Lower mountaineering. Each student must make all prescribed climbs at Mt. Yonah to continue in the course. During the field training exercise (FTX), students execute a mission requiring mountaineering skills.

Combat missions are against a conventionally equipped threat force in a Mid-Intensity Conflict. These missions are both day and night in a two part, four and five-day FTX, and include moving cross country over mountains, vehicle ambushes, raiding communications and mortar sites, river crossing, and scaling steeply sloped mountainous terrain.

The Ranger student reaches his objective in several ways: cross-country movement, parachuting into small drop zones, air assaults into small, mountain-side landing zones, or a 10-mile march across the Tennessee Valley Divide. The student's commitment and physical-mental stamina are tested to the maximum. At the end of the Mountain Phase, the students travel by bus to a nearby airfield and conduct an airborne operation, parachuting into Swamp Phase. Non-airborne are bused to Eglin Air Force Base for the Swamp Phase.

Swamp phase

[edit]
Students paddle their Combat Rubber Raiding Craft down a river to start their waterborne training mission at Camp Rudder, Eglin Air Force Base (July 2016).

The third phase of Ranger School is conducted at Camp James E. Rudder (Auxiliary Field #6), Eglin Air Force Base, Florida by the 6th Ranger Training Battalion. According to the Ranger Training Brigade,

This phase focuses on the continued development of the Ranger student's combat arms functional skills. Students receive instruction on waterborne operations, small boat movements, and stream crossings upon arrival. Practical exercises in extended platoon level operations executed in a coastal swamp environment test the Students’ ability to operate effectively under conditions of extreme mental and physical stress. This training further develops the Students' ability to plan and lead small units during independent and coordinated airborne, air assault, small boat, and dismounted combat patrol operations in a low intensity combat environment against a well trained, sophisticated enemy.[22]

The Swamp Phase continues the progressive, realistic OPFOR (opposing forces) scenario. As the scenario develops, the students receive "in-country" technique training that assists them in accomplishing the tactical missions later in the phase. Technique training includes: small boat operations, expedient stream crossing techniques, and skills needed to survive and operate in a rainforest/swamp environment by learning how to deal with reptiles and how to determine the difference between venomous and non-venomous snakes. Camp Rudder has specially trained reptile experts who teach the students to not fear the wildlife they encounter.

The Ranger students are updated on the scenario that eventually commits the unit to combat during techniques training. The 10-day FTX comprises "fast paced, highly stressful, challenging exercises in which the Students are evaluated on their ability to apply small unit tactics and techniques during the execution of raids, ambushes, movements to contact, and urban assaults to accomplish their assigned missions".[22] The capstone of the course is the extensively planned raid of the Atropian Liberation Front's (ALF) island stronghold. This small boat operation involves each platoon in the class, all working together on separate missions to take down the simulated cartel's final point of strength.

Afterwards, students who have met graduation requirements spend several days cleaning their weapons and equipment before returning to Fort Benning. By then they have earned PX (Post Exchange) privileges, and access to a community center where they can use a telephone, eat civilian food, and watch television. In years past, the "Gator Lounge" served this purpose, but it was destroyed by a fire in late 2005. In the years since, a new "Gator Lounge" has been built, maintaining many of the features of the original. Graduation is at Fort Benning. In an elaborate ceremony at Victory Pond, the black-and-gold Ranger Tab is pinned to the graduating soldier's left shoulder (usually by a relative, a respected RI, or soldier from the student's original unit). The Ranger Tab is permanently worn above the soldier's unit patch.

Desert phase

[edit]

The Desert Phase was designed to instruct its students in Desert Warfare operations and basic survival in the deserts of the Middle East. John Lock describes the Desert Phase as follows.

The phase commenced with an in-flight rigging and airborne assault—or an air assault landing by non-airborne personnel, onto an objective. Following the mission, the students moved into a cantonment area. Remaining in garrison for five days, they then received classes on desert-survival techniques to include water procurement and water preservation. Leadership responsibilities, standing operating procedures (SOPs), reconnaissance, and ambush techniques were also reviewed. Additional emphasis was placed on battle drills to include react to enemy contact, react to indirect fire, and react to near and far ambushes. Drills on how to breach barbed and concertina wire with wire cutters and assault ladders were taught as were techniques on how to clear a trench line and how to assault a fortified bunker.[23]

The remainder of the phase comprised patrolling during field training exercises—"reconnaissance, raid, or ambush missions". "The phase culminated with an airborne assault—with non-Airborne trucked—by the entire class on a joint objective."[24]

Ranger School's initial evaluation of a Desert Phase was a cadre-lead patrol at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico in early 1971 called Arid Fox I. In June 1971, the Ranger Training Brigade conducted Arid Fox II, the first student-led patrol. This was part of the brigade's continuing evaluation of the possibility of integrating a Desert Phase into the Ranger course. The first students to undergo the Desert Phase were selected from Ranger Class 13–71 (class 13 in 1971). When the bulk of the class went on to begin the Swamp phase, the airborne qualified members of Ranger Class 13–71 (Desert) donned MC1-1 parachutes, boarded a C-130 aircraft and parachuted into the White Sands Missile Range.

Upon formal integration into the Ranger Course, the Desert Phase was initially run by the Ranger School's 4th (Desert Ranger) Training Company stationed at Fort Bliss, Texas from 1983 to 1987. When the Desert Phase was officially introduced, the length of Ranger School was lengthened to 65 days. At the outset, the Desert Phase was the last phase of the Ranger Course—following the Benning, Mountain and Swamp Phases, respectively.[3]

In 1987, the unit was expanded into the 7th Ranger Training Battalion and moved to Dugway Proving Grounds, Utah.

In October 1991, the course was increased to sixty-eight days and the sequence was changed to Fort Benning, Desert (Fort Bliss, Texas), Mountain, and Florida. In May 1995, the school underwent its most recent course change when the Desert phase was discontinued.[3] The last Ranger School class to go through the Desert Phase was class 7–95.[citation needed]

The U.S. Army has not given up on small unit desert training. In 2015, the 1st Armored Division created the Desert Warrior Course that focuses on honing combat tracking, night land navigation, live-fire drills, and a myriad of other tasks.[25]

Leadership positions

[edit]

Students' graduation is highly dependent on their performance in graded positions of leadership. The ability to lead is evaluated at various levels in various situations, and is observed while students are in one of typically two graded leadership-roles per phase. The student can either meet the high standards and be given a "GO" by the RI, or can fail to meet this standard and receive a "NO GO". The student must demonstrate the ability to meet the standard in order to move forward, and can thus only afford one unsuccessful patrol. Students' success depends on the ability to essentially manipulate those they directly lead. At times, this will be as few as two to three people—and at other times a student may be required to lead up to an entire 45-person platoon. The student's success can be dependent on the performance and teamwork of these individuals, whom they must motivate and lead. Missions are typically broken up into four stages: planning, movement, actions on the objective, and establishment of a patrol base. The Platoon Leader position (in Mountains and Florida) is rotated throughout the mission, and the same is true for the Platoon Sergeant position. The Squad Leader position is on a 24-hour rotation, which is the same for all of the ungraded key leadership positions: Medic, Forward Observer (FO) and Radio Telephone Operator (RTO).

Peer evaluations

[edit]

Another part of the evaluation of the student is a peer evaluation; failing a peer evaluation (scoring less than a 60% approval rating from your squad) can result in disqualification, though usually only if it happens twice. Due to unit loyalties, certain individuals within a squad who may be "the odd one out" will sometimes be singled out by the squad arbitrarily. Because of this, someone who has been "peered out" or "peered," will be moved to another squad, sometimes within another platoon, in order to ensure that this was not the reason the student was peered. If it happens within this new squad, however, this is taken as an indication that student is being singled out because they are either lazy, incompetent, or cannot keep up. At this time the student will usually be removed from the course.

Recycling

[edit]

If a student performs successfully, but suffers an injury that keeps them from finishing, they may be medically recycled (med recycle) at the discretion of either the battalion or the Ranger Training Brigade commander; the student will be given an opportunity to heal and finish the course with the next class. Students recycled in the first phase are temporarily assigned to Vaughn's Platoon (informally known as the "Gulag" to Ranger students). Recycled students typically receive classes on Ranger School tasks and perform a variety of general tasks for their respective Ranger Training Battalion. While marking time at Ranger School is not always pleasant, those who have been recycled typically perform well when reinserted back into the course, with pass rates well over 80%.

Students can also be recycled for a variety of other reasons, including failing their patrol evaluations, peer evaluation, collecting 3 or more bad spot reports in a phase, or receiving a Serious Observation Report (SOR). Students may receive SORs for actions including, but not limited to, negligent discharges, safety violations involving demolitions or mountaineering, not looking through their sights while firing, or throwing away ammunition to lighten their load while on patrol. If a student fails a phase twice for the same reason (patrols, peers, etc.) they will usually be dropped from the course, but may possibly be offered a "day one restart," and will restart on Day 1 of the next Ranger School class. In rare cases, those assessed of honor violations (lying, cheating, stealing) and SORs may be offered a day one restart as opposed to being dropped from the course.

Graduation rates

[edit]
Ranger School graduate congratulated by his superior officer (June 2015).

Historically, the graduation rate has been around 50%, but this has fluctuated. In the period prior to 1980, the Ranger School attrition rate was over 65%. 64% of Ranger School class 10–80 graduated.[26] The graduation rate has dropped below 50% in recent years: 52% in 2005, 54% in 2006, 56% in 2007, 49% in 2008, 46% in 2009, 43% in 2010, and 42% in 2011. Recycles are included in the graduation rates. Recycles are tracked by the class they start with, and affect only that class's graduation rate.[15]

Physical effects

[edit]

Following the completion of Ranger School, a student will usually find himself "in the worst shape of his life".[27] Military folk wisdom has it that Ranger School's physical toll is like years of natural aging; high levels of fight-or-flight stress hormones (epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol), along with standard sleep deprivation and continual physical strain, inhibit full physical and mental recovery throughout the course.

Common maladies during the course include weight loss, dehydration, trench foot, heatstroke, frostbite, chilblains, fractures, tissue tears (ligaments, tendons, muscles), swollen hands, feet, knees, nerve damage, loss of limb sensitivity, cellulitis, contact dermatitis, cuts, and insect, spider, bee, and other wildlife bites.

Because of the physical and psychological effect of low calorie intake over an extended period of time, it is not uncommon for many Ranger School graduates to encounter weight problems as they return to their units and their bodies and minds slowly adjust to routine again. A drastically lowered metabolic rate, combined with a nearly insatiable appetite (the result of food deprivation and the ensuing survivalist mentality) can cause quick weight gain, as the body is already in energy (fat) storing mode.

Food and sleep deprivation

[edit]

A Ranger student's diet and sleep are strictly controlled by the Ranger Instructors. During time in garrison, students are given one to three meals a day, but forced to eat extremely quickly and without any talking. During field exercises, Ranger students are given two MREs (Meal, Ready-to-eat) per day, but not allowed to eat them until given permission. This is enforced most harshly in Darby and Mountain phases. Since food and sleep are at the bottom of the priorities of those in the infantry behind security, weapons maintenance, and personal hygiene, it is generally the last thing Ranger students are allowed to do. As such, the two MREs are generally eaten within three hours of each other, one post mission, and the other prior to the planning portion of the mission. Though the Ranger student's daily caloric intake of 2200 calories would be more than enough for the average person, Ranger students are under such physical stress that this amount is insufficient. The Ranger Training Brigade does not maintain weight information in the 21st century, but in the 1980s, Ranger students lost an average of 25–30 pounds during the Ranger course.[27]

Ranger School Class Awards

[edit]

The awards listed below are designed to recognize outstanding achievement during the Ranger Course. Dependent on class performance, all or some of these awards may be presented upon graduation.[28]

William O. Darby Award (Distinguished Honor Graduate)

The Darby Award is awarded to the Ranger that shows the best tactical and administrative leadership performance, has the most positive spot reports and has demonstrated being a cut above the rest. They must also pass all graded leadership positions, peer reports, and may not recycle. This award is named in the honor of BG William O. Darby, who organized the 1st Ranger Battalion in 1942 with handpicked volunteers leading the way onto the beaches of North Africa. Ranger Battalions also spearheaded the campaigns in Sicily and Italy, and the D-Day landing on Omaha Beach. In the Pacific the 6th Ranger Battalion served with distinction in the Philippines.

Ralph Puckett Award (Officer Honor Graduate)

The Puckett Award is awarded to the Ranger that passes all graded leadership positions; peer reports, and may not recycle. The Ranger may not have any lost equipment due to negligence and may not have any retests on any critical tasks. This award is named in honor of Colonel Ralph Puckett. Colonel Puckett earned the Distinguished Service Cross (upgraded to the Medal of Honor in 2021) during the Korean War as company commander of the 8th Army Ranger Company, the first Ranger Company seeing active service during the war. Then-First Lieutenant Puckett, in an attack against numerically superior Chinese forces, established defensive fighting positions on the captured objective. His Rangers held off five successive Chinese counterattacks before he was severely wounded during a sixth counterattack and evacuated despite his protests.

Glenn M. Hall Award (Enlisted Honor Graduate)

The Hall is awarded to the Ranger that passes all graded leadership positions; peer reports, and may not recycle. The Ranger may not have any lost equipment due to negligence and may not have any retests on any critical tasks. This award is named in honor of Corporal Glenn M. Hall. Corporal Hall was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross while serving with the 1st Airborne Ranger Company for his gallant actions at Chipyon-Ni during the Korean War. He exposed himself to direct enemy fire to cover his platoon's movement. Once his weapon jammed he joined his platoon and volunteered to contact friendly forces on an adjacent hill. When he reached the hill, it was covered with enemy troops. Corporal Hall killed a Chinese soldier in a foxhole and used that position to drive the enemy from the hill. He was wounded during that action by a grenade.

LTC Keith Antonia Officer Leadership Award

Awarded to the highest ranked commissioned officer as selected by their peers for demonstrating outstanding leadership, initiative, and motivation.

CSM Michael Kelso Enlisted Leadership Award

Awarded to the highest ranked enlisted Ranger as selected by their peers for demonstrating outstanding leadership, initiative, and motivation.

Ranger training deaths

[edit]

While Ranger School is designed to physically stress students to a point short of death, some fatalities have occurred during training.

In the winter of 1977, two students in class 2-77 died of hypothermia while on patrol in the Florida swamp.

In 1985, in the Swamp phase, a student drowned crossing a stream against a strong current.

In March 1992, a student with sickle cell trait died after exposure to high altitude and stress in the mountain phase. The Ranger Training Brigade did not know about his medical issue until after his death.[citation needed]

In March 1992, a student died from a fall on the Slide for Life.[29]

On 15 February 1995, the "worst incident in the 44-year history of the school" occurred during the Swamp Phase of class 3–95. Captain Milton Palmer, 2LT Spencer Dodge, 2LT Curt Sansoucie, and SGT Norman Tillman died from hypothermia. Investigations were conducted by the U.S. Air Force, the Ranger Training Brigade, and the U.S. Army's Safety Board. The incident was determined to be a result of a combination of human errors exacerbated by "unexpected weather conditions". Nine Ranger Instructors were disciplined and the 6th Ranger Training Battalion commander was relieved. As there was no basis for criminal charges, none were court-martialed.[30] The four students were posthumously awarded the Ranger Tab.[31] As a result, 38 new safety measures were implemented in the Swamp Phase. According to John Lock,

New equipment is now on hand to assist troubled students; equipment which includes one-man inflatable rafts designed to get Rangers out of the water and to arrest hypothermia, water measuring devices, and global positioning systems. Monitoring stations have also been installed in swamp locations to provide better information on weather and water conditions. Command and control procedures now include the Ranger Battalion Commander who will make the final call as to whether waterborne operations are a Go, No Go, or modified—on-site RIs [Ranger Instructors] also have the authority to call off an operation should the situation warrant it. Additionally, training lanes will be walked by RIs prior to the exercise and there will be no deviation in the landing sites for the patrols.[32]

On 25 March 2021, Cpl. James A. Requenez died due to drowning during an unspecified training incident at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida. The incident was under investigation.[33][34]

On 9 August 2022, Staff Sgt. George Taber and 2nd Lt. Evan Fitzgibbon were killed while conducting mountaineering training in the north Georgia mountains. Both were struck by a falling tree while sheltering during a weather-induced training hold. Three additional students were injured during the event and treated at a hospital.[35][36][37]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Ranger School is the United States Army's premier small-unit tactics and combat leadership course, a 61-day program that challenges volunteer officers and enlisted soldiers with intense physical and mental demands to build proficiency in infantry operations under stress.
Conceived during the Korean War and formally established on October 10, 1951, as the Ranger Training Command, the course has evolved into three distinct phases: the Darby Phase at Fort Moore focusing on basic skills and assessment, the Mountain Phase at Camp Merrill emphasizing patrolling in rugged terrain, and the Swamp Phase at Camp Rudder stressing waterborne operations and endurance.
Participants lead squads and platoons through realistic combat scenarios, including raids, ambushes, and reconnaissance, while operating on minimal sleep, rations, and equipment to simulate wartime privations.
The program's high attrition rate, typically around 50%, underscores its role as a selective forge for leaders who demonstrate resilience, decision-making, and team cohesion essential for effective small-unit performance in combat.
Graduates earn the Ranger Tab, signifying mastery of these skills, though qualification does not mandate service in the 75th Ranger Regiment and is attainable by personnel from other branches and services.

Purpose and Establishment

Founding and Objectives

Ranger training was initiated in September 1950 at Fort Benning, Georgia, amid the , to rapidly develop small-unit leaders capable of executing combat operations in challenging environments. This effort preceded the formal establishment of the Ranger Training Command on October 10, 1951, under the U.S. Army Infantry School, which structured the program to emphasize leadership under duress. The inaugural Ranger class, comprising selected officers and enlisted soldiers, completed the course and graduated on March 1, 1952, marking the operational launch of what would become the Army's premier leadership school. The core objectives of Ranger School center on forging proficient small-unit leaders through rigorous, scenario-based training that simulates combat stressors, including extended physical exertion, limited sleep averaging three to four hours per night, and controlled caloric intake of approximately 1,000 calories daily. This methodology aims to instill habits of initiative, adaptability, and cohesive teamwork, enabling graduates to plan, lead, and execute missions such as raids, ambushes, and patrols in austere conditions. Unlike selection for specialized units like the , the school's mission focuses on universal applicable across branches and joint forces, producing officers and non-commissioned officers equipped for high-stakes operational environments. By prioritizing empirical assessment of performance over mere physical , Ranger School evaluates candidates' ability to maintain command effectiveness amid and , with success rates historically below 50 percent to ensure only those demonstrating exceptional resilience advance. This approach, rooted in first-hand combat lessons from and Korea, underscores causal links between sustained small-unit cohesion and mission outcomes, distinguishing it from conventional military education.

Entry Requirements and Selection Process

Candidates must volunteer for the Ranger Course through their unit chain of command, with approval from their company commander, who validates proficiency in prerequisites such as basic combat skills, , weapons qualification, and physical readiness as detailed in the Ranger Training Handbook. Airborne qualification is encouraged but not mandatory for attendance. Medical screening is required, disqualifying those with chronic orthopedic issues in the back, shoulders, knees, or ankles that impair performance under stress. The formal selection occurs during the initial Ranger Assessment Phase (RAP), spanning the first four to five days of the course at Fort Moore, Georgia, which filters candidates based on physical and mental resilience. RAP includes a assessment requiring at least 49 push-ups, 59 sit-ups, and a five-mile run completed in 40 minutes or less; a 12-mile ruck march with a 35-pound load; day and night courses; partial buddy-supported loads; and tests. Candidates must also demonstrate basic potential and peer evaluations during initial patrols. Failure to meet RAP standards results in peer or instructor recommendation for elimination, recycling to a later class, or return to unit, with attrition rates often exceeding 50% at this stage. Many units conduct optional Pre-Ranger Courses, such as those at , to pre-assess and train soldiers on similar tasks, ensuring only qualified individuals are slotted for the full course. This process emphasizes self-selection through voluntary hardship, prioritizing those with demonstrated unit-level performance over arbitrary quotas.

Historical Development

Early Years and World War II Origins

The concept of specialized Ranger units in the U.S. Army originated during , drawing inspiration from British Commando forces to create elite raiders capable of amphibious assaults and deep reconnaissance. On May 26, 1942, Brigadier General Lucian K. Truscott Jr. proposed the formation of such units to General , emphasizing shock troops for daring missions behind enemy lines. This led to the activation of the on June 19, 1942, at , , under the command of Major William O. Darby, who was selected for his organizational skills and promoted to lead the effort. Over 2,000 soldiers volunteered from units including V Corps, the 1st Armored Division, and the 34th Infantry Division, with 575 selected and 473 ultimately completing initial training. Training for the 1st Rangers began in before shifting to the Commando Training Center at , , in July 1942, where they underwent a rigorous three-month program modeled on British methods, including cliff assaults, long marches, and live-fire exercises. Additional amphibious training occurred in Argyle and , , in August 1942. The battalion's first combat test came during the on August 19, 1942, where 51 Rangers participated, suffering three fatalities but gaining valuable experience in large-scale raids. This was followed by on November 8, 1942, when captured the port of Arzew, , in a nighttime assault, securing key facilities with minimal losses and demonstrating their effectiveness in operations. By the end of , six Ranger infantry battalions had been activated between 1941 and 1945, employing British standards for selection and tactics. These units saw action across multiple theaters: the 1st Battalion fought in and , including the ; the 2nd and 5th Battalions assaulted and on D-Day, June 6, 1944, originating the motto "Rangers lead the way"; and the 6th Battalion executed the Cabanatuan Raid in the on January 30, 1945, liberating over 500 prisoners of war. The battalions were deactivated after the war, but their combat record—emphasizing leadership under extreme stress, small-unit initiative, and physical endurance—established a doctrinal foundation for future elite training. The Ranger tradition persisted into the postwar period amid emerging threats, but the immediate catalyst for formalizing training was the . In response to the need for specialized infantry companies capable of raids and reconnaissance, the U.S. Army established the Ranger Training Command in September 1950 at Fort Benning, Georgia (now Fort Moore), initially as a unit-specific school to prepare airborne Ranger companies. This evolved into the Ranger Department under the Infantry School by December 1951, with the first formalized Ranger Course commencing around October 10, 1951, focusing on small-unit tactics derived from experiences. Fifteen Ranger companies were ultimately formed and deployed in Korea, conducting scouting, ambushes, and assaults, which validated the program's emphasis on adaptive leadership in austere conditions. The early curriculum retained core elements from Darby-era training, such as patrol techniques and survival, setting the stage for Ranger School's enduring structure despite high attrition rates from the outset.

Post-War Evolution and Phase Standardization

Following the disbandment of the six U.S. Army Ranger battalions in August 1945 amid post-World War II demobilization, the need for specialized small-unit leadership training reemerged during the Korean War. In response to demands for elite infantry leaders capable of operating in austere conditions, the Ranger Training Command was established, with the inaugural class commencing on September 21, 1950, at Fort Benning, Georgia. This early iteration emphasized combat skills, physical endurance, and tactical proficiency under stress, drawing from World War II Ranger experiences but adapted for conventional infantry augmentation rather than independent raiding forces. The program underwent structural reorganization on October 10, 1951, when the Ranger Training Command was inactivated and integrated as the Ranger Department within the Infantry School at Fort Benning. By 1952, the creation of the Ranger Training Company expanded capacity and formalized instruction, focusing on airborne-qualified leaders for attachment to infantry divisions. In 1954, the department was redesignated the Ranger School, and qualification became mandatory for all officers, reflecting a doctrinal shift toward embedding Ranger-trained leaders across to enhance and initiative in fluid battlefields. The course length stabilized at approximately eight weeks, prioritizing realistic field exercises over classroom theory to simulate combat deprivations like sleep and caloric deficits. Phase standardization emerged as the curriculum adapted to diverse operational environments, progressing from a centralized Benning-based model to distributed training across specialized sites. The Darby Phase, named for Ranger commander William O. Darby and conducted at Fort Benning, focused on individual and squad-level patrolling in forested terrain, incorporating the Ranger Assessment Phase (RAP) added in 1992 to cull unfit candidates via intense physical and leadership evaluations. The Mountain Phase, relocated to Camp Frank D. Merrill in northern Georgia's Appalachian terrain, emphasized operations, , and small-unit tactics in elevation-challenged environments, building on lessons in rugged mobility. The Florida Phase (Swamp Phase), at Camp James Rudder near , targeted waterborne infiltration and swamp navigation, addressing amphibious and lowland challenges observed in Pacific and Korean theaters. These phases were codified into a sequential "crawl-walk-run" progression by the late , with full institutionalization under the Ranger Training Brigade designation on November 1, 1987, ensuring standardized evaluation of leadership rotations, peer reviews, and terrain-specific stressors across 61 days. This phased structure prioritized causal links between environmental demands and leadership demands, fostering adaptability without diluting attrition—historically over 50%—through mechanisms like for phase failures. Post-Vietnam refinements, informed by empirical after-action reviews, integrated intelligence-driven missions and squad-level focus, but the core three-phase framework persisted as the benchmark for producing resilient leaders. By the , the model had evolved to counter perceived institutional complacency, emphasizing undiluted field immersion over sanitized simulations.

Key Reforms and Recent Updates

In 2015, the U.S. opened Ranger School to soldiers who met the standard entry prerequisites, marking a significant policy shift to integrate women into the course previously limited to male personnel. The first candidates reported for (RASP) in January 2015, following mandatory completion of a Ranger Training and Assessment Course (RTAC) designed to prepare them equivalently to male peers. On August 20, 2015, Capt. Kristen Griest and 1st Lt. Shaye Haver became the first women to graduate, earning the after completing all phases under the same leadership evaluation criteria applied to male students. The reported that attrition and metrics in initial integrated classes aligned closely with male averages, with approximately 55% of women passing the Ranger Course Assessment compared to 50% of men, though critics alleged that repeated recycling of candidates in early cycles constituted an effective easing of progression standards not equally extended to males. Subsequent reforms emphasized maintaining rigorous, gender-neutral standards amid integration, with the Army rejecting claims of diluted requirements and instead attributing female success to enhanced pre-course preparation via RTAC, which included physical conditioning tailored to bridge any physiological gaps without altering core course demands. By 2016, additional women, including , had graduated, bringing the total to over a dozen and demonstrating sustained viability of the policy, though overall graduation rates for women remained lower than for men in subsequent years due to higher initial dropout rates in the physically demanding phases. In March 2025, the U.S. Army Infantry School announced a comprehensive overhaul of the Ranger Physical Fitness Assessment (RPFA), effective for Class 06-25 starting April 21, 2025, to better align entry and in-course testing with functional combat demands rather than traditional metrics like sit-ups. The revised RPFA, deemed more rigorous overall, incorporates events such as an 800-meter run in full combat uniform, 30 dead-stop push-ups, kettlebell swings, farmer's carries, and deadlifts, eliminating less operationally relevant exercises while emphasizing endurance, strength, and load-bearing capacity under stress. This update, developed over years of iterative testing, aims to reduce injury risks from mismatched training emphases and enhance predictive validity for course success, with all candidates—regardless of gender—required to pass it upon arrival and periodically thereafter. No structural changes to the core 62-day curriculum phases were reported alongside this fitness reform, preserving the emphasis on small-unit tactics, sleep deprivation, and peer-evaluated leadership.

Training Curriculum

Ranger Assessment Phase (RAP Week)

The Ranger Assessment Phase (RAP Week) constitutes the initial five-day evaluation segment of Ranger School's Darby Phase, held at Camp Rogers, Fort Moore, Georgia, designed to screen candidates for the physical, mental, and technical proficiencies essential for enduring the course's subsequent demands. Established in to standardize early attrition and identify resilient leaders, it imposes progressive stressors including minimal sleep (typically 2-4 hours per night), caloric restriction, and unrelenting physical tasks to replicate combat fatigue and reveal inherent capabilities or deficiencies. Commencing on day one with in-processing and issuance of gear, RAP Week's core events begin with the Ranger Physical Fitness Test (RPFT), mandating at least 49 push-ups in two minutes, 59 sit-ups in two minutes, six pull-ups, and a five-mile run in under 40 minutes; non-compliance leads to immediate elimination. Subsequent requirements include a two-mile run in under 13 minutes (for males under 37), a 12-mile with a 35-pound load completed in under three hours, day and night land navigation courses, combat water survival (involving swims in uniform and equipment), and the emphasizing upper-body strength and agility. These assessments prioritize raw endurance over tactical proficiency, with failures often stemming from inadequate preparation in rucking, running, or navigation under duress; peer and instructor evaluations during tasks further gauge initial leadership traits. RAP Week generates the highest attrition rate in Ranger School, eliminating roughly 60% of starters through performance shortfalls, injuries, or voluntary withdrawals (VWs), thereby ensuring only viable candidates advance to patrolling exercises.

Darby Phase

The Darby Phase, also known as the patrolling phase, occurs at Camp Rogers and the forested terrain of northern Georgia following the Ranger Assessment Phase. It spans approximately 19 days and emphasizes the application of small unit tactics through squad-level operations. Students lead and participate in patrols under realistic conditions, including rucksack loads of 65 to 90 pounds and cumulative foot marches exceeding 200 miles. Training begins with non-graded patrols to reinforce fundamentals such as troop-leading procedures, principles, and battle drills. These evolve into graded missions where students plan, execute, and debrief squad ambushes, raids, and patrols, often establishing patrol bases at night. Sleep is restricted to 3 to 4 hours per night, with rations limited to three Meals, Ready-to-Eat (MREs) per week to simulate operational deprivation. Leadership evaluation occurs continuously through peer reviews and instructor assessments during each patrol cycle, which typically includes , execution, and recovery phases. to demonstrate proficiency in planning or leading missions can result in to repeat the phase. The phase culminates in a series of demanding patrols that test tactical in adverse and , preparing students for subsequent phases.

Mountain Phase

The Mountain Phase of Ranger School, conducted at Camp Frank D. Merrill near , by the 5th Ranger Training Battalion, emphasizes platoon-level leadership and military mountaineering in rugged terrain. Lasting approximately three weeks, this phase builds on skills from the Darby Phase by focusing on operations in elevated, challenging environments to prepare students for global combat scenarios where terrain impacts maneuverability. Training is divided into four sub-phases: lower , upper , mountain techniques, and tactical operations. Students master essential skills, including knot tying, , lead and , rappelling (day and night, up to 200 feet using night vision goggles), rope bridge construction, and fixed-rope mobility systems. Practical applications involve navigating mountains with 85-90 pound rucksacks, such as the 45-minute ascent of , crossing water obstacles like the 80-foot-wide Toccoa River, and casualty evacuations using hauling systems. The phase culminates in a 10-day field training exercise featuring day and night combat patrols against hybrid threats, including ambushes, raids, and missions at the level. Students must plan, resource, and execute these operations while sustaining themselves and subordinates amid fatigue, adverse weather, and terrain difficulties. To progress to the Swamp Phase, candidates require successful , positive peer evaluations, and no more than three negative spot reports.

Florida Swamp Phase

The Florida Swamp Phase, also known as the Swamp Phase, represents the culminating segment of the 62-day Ranger Course, conducted at Camp Rudder on in 's coastal swamp environment. This phase spans approximately 18 days, including an initial 15-day structured into three mini-phases emphasizing small-unit tactics, waterborne operations, and under compounded physical and mental stress from prior phases. Its objectives center on applying principles to develop , adaptability, and resiliency, preparing students for small-unit in deployable units. The phase begins with the Techniques mini-phase (days 1-5), featuring classroom instruction and practical exercises in raids, ambushes, waterborne techniques such as small boat movements and stream crossings, and patrol base establishment. The Adaptability mini-phase (days 6-10) shifts to dismounted patrols covering 5-12 kilometers with 1-3 hours of sleep per night, incorporating mission changes to test flexibility and communication under caloric and sleep deprivation. Concluding with the Resiliency mini-phase (days 11-15), students execute complex movements involving swamps, rope bridges, air assaults, and coordinated boat operations against hybrid threats, integrating airborne, helicopter, and amphibious elements. Environmental challenges dominate, with high heat, humidity, insects, and swamp exacerbating , while wildlife education from the 6th Ranger Training Battalion's reptile team addresses risks from local like alligators and snakes. Students face extended platoon-level operations, including urban assaults and movements to contact, all while maintaining standards amid emotional stress and limited resources. Safety protocols include field ambulances, evacuation helicopters, rescue boats, and continuous weather and water monitoring implemented since 1995. Leadership evaluation persists through graded performance in field training exercises, practical applications, and peer reviews, with assessments determining progression based on mission execution and adherence to Ranger standards. Successful completion reinforces combat skills in amphibious and dismounted contexts, contributing to the overall attrition rate of the course, where environmental and operational demands often lead to or elimination.

Evaluation and Standards

Leadership Rotations and Peer Reviews

Students in Ranger School are assigned to small-unit patrols where they rotate through critical roles to simulate real-world command under conditions of , hunger, and operational stress. positions typically rotate on a 24-hour basis, mirroring the cycle for supporting roles such as , forward observer, and radio telephone operator. and duties shift multiple times per mission, often twice daily, ensuring broad exposure to responsibilities across phases. These rotations, assigned randomly by instructors, compel participants to lead diverse teams while adapting to subordinates' strengths and weaknesses, fostering skills in , , and mission accomplishment independent of cadre oversight. Complementing rotations, peer evaluations occur at the end of each major phase—Darby, Mountain, and Florida—requiring squad members to rank-order every participant from highest to lowest performer based on demonstrated during patrols. Criteria emphasize attributes like initiative in planning, ability to motivate exhausted teams, technical and tactical proficiency, and prioritization of subordinates' welfare over personal comfort, as poor rankings often stem from self-focused behavior or failure to sustain . Instructors review submissions to mitigate biases, but the process relies on collective judgment to identify those who fail to earn respect, with bottom-ranked individuals ("peered out") facing phase recycle or course elimination if they cannot demonstrate improved peer standing. Research affirms the reliability of these evaluations, showing peer ratings from Ranger training correlate with later unit performance and success, validating their role in selecting resilient leaders over purely instructor-assessed metrics. This dual mechanism—rotations for and peers for —prioritizes causal factors of effective small-unit command, such as trust-building amid adversity, over isolated skill drills.

Recycling Mechanisms and Attrition Factors

Recycling in Ranger School involves restarting a failed phase or returning to an earlier point in the course when students do not meet performance standards, allowing opportunities for remediation while maintaining rigorous evaluation. Common triggers include substandard leadership in graded , negative peer evaluations, accumulation of three or more major minuses on spot reports, or failure of assessments within a phase. For instance, failing to demonstrate effective small-unit tactics during operations often leads to recycling at the end of the Darby or subsequent phases. Orthopedic injuries, such as or ankle issues from ruck marches and terrain navigation, frequently necessitate recycling if deemed recoverable, though persistent conditions result in medical drops. Policies generally permit multiple recycles provided deficiencies differ across attempts, with severe infractions like safety violations or repeated identical failures potentially leading to a Day One Recycle, which restarts the entire including the Ranger Assessment Phase. Attrition rates in Ranger School typically range from 40% to 60%, with graduation hovering around 40-50% depending on class conditions; a 2021 overview reported just over 50% success, while a cohort study of 670 students yielded 40.3%. The Ranger Assessment Phase accounts for the largest initial attrition at approximately 62%, primarily from failing physical benchmarks like the 12-mile ruck march or combat water survival tests under stress. Beyond RAP, failures concentrate in leadership evaluations and peer reviews during field phases, where students must lead squads amid sleep deprivation and caloric restriction simulating combat privations; voluntary withdrawals rise here due to cumulative fatigue. Medical attrition from injuries and administrative separations contribute smaller shares, though lower self-efficacy scores strongly predict overall dropout risk, with graduates exhibiting higher confidence in enduring hardships. Conversely, predictors of persistence include superior aerobic fitness (e.g., sub-13-minute 2-mile runs), younger age (average graduate 24.3 years versus 26.0 for non-graduates), and affiliation with units having higher proportions of Ranger-qualified personnel.

Graduation Requirements and Rates

To graduate from Ranger School, students must successfully complete all three phases—Darby, Mountain, and —while demonstrating leadership in field training exercises (FTXs). This includes leading and passing at least one graded as a or (or higher) in each phase, meeting tactical execution standards evaluated by instructors, such as proper setup, enemy engagement, and exfiltration without major errors. Failure to pass such a patrol typically results in recycling the phase or course elimination. Students must also secure positive peer evaluations after each phase, where squadmates anonymously rank individuals on , initiative, and ; consistently low rankings (being "peered out") lead to or dropout, accounting for about 4% of overall attrition. Cadre-issued spot reports document deficiencies in performance or conduct, with accumulation of more than three negative reports generally barring graduation. Additional requirements include passing physical benchmarks like 12-mile ruck marches under time, courses, and weapons qualifications, alongside maintaining good standing without major infractions such as safety violations. Graduation rates remain low due to these multifaceted standards, with 2022 recording 44.8% across classes 01-11, including attrition from Ranger Assessment Phase (17.4%), Ranger Training Team evaluations (7.7%), and foot marches (5.3%). Broader historical data indicate rates typically between 40% and 50%, with a 2021 figure slightly above 50%; most failures stem from leadership shortfalls rather than pure physical inability, as over 85% of entrants at least one phase.

Physiological and Psychological Demands

Sleep and Nutrition Deprivation Protocols

Ranger School employs deliberate protocols to simulate the of prolonged operations, where leaders must make decisions under duress. Across the 61-day course, students average approximately 3.6 hours of per night, with variations by phase: higher during initial assessments but severely restricted during field exercises (FTXs), often limited to 0-1.5 hours nightly in the swamp phase patrols. opportunities are controlled by instructors, occurring in short increments such as 45 minutes when feasible, prioritizing mission demands over rest to enforce continuous operations. These restrictions align with empirical studies showing cumulative sleep loss impairs cognitive and physical , yet the protocol tests resilience without exceeding safety thresholds monitored by medical personnel. Nutrition protocols induce a controlled energy deficit through rationed Meals Ready-to-Eat (MREs), typically two per 24-hour period, yielding 2,200-2,600 calories daily despite expenditures of 4,000-5,000 calories from rucking, patrols, and maneuvers. This underfeeding, standardized since at least the 1980s per biomedical evaluations, promotes averaging 20-30 pounds per student, enhancing stress inoculation while avoiding acute via periodic health checks. Rations emphasize high-energy components like carbohydrates and proteins, but palatability issues and operational tempo often result in , amplifying the deficit; supplements are not provided to maintain realism. Protocols draw from physiological indicating such deficits elevate and reduce testosterone, yet correlate with improved sustained performance under duress post-training.

Physical Fitness Standards and Health Impacts

Candidates for Ranger School must meet specific physical fitness prerequisites prior to arrival, including passing the (ACFT) at a minimum score aligned with their Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), though scores exceeding 500 are recommended for success given the course's demands. The Ranger Assessment Phase (RAP Week), the initial evaluation period, culminates in the Ranger Physical Assessment (RPA), updated as RPA 2.0 effective April 21, 2025, which requires completion within 14 minutes while wearing and boots: an 800-meter run, 30 dead-stop push-ups, a 100-meter sprint, lifting 16 forty-pound sandbags onto a 68-inch platform, and additional tactical movements such as a 6-foot wall climb and casualty drag. Failure to pass these events results in elimination, with historical data indicating that physical performance shortfalls account for approximately 40-50% of RAP Week attrition. Throughout the 61-day course, students undergo sustained physical stressors including 12-mile ruck marches with 35-50 pound loads in under three hours, daily physical training sessions, and mission-specific endurance events, enforcing standards derived from combat-relevant tasks rather than isolated gym metrics. The health impacts of Ranger School's regimen, characterized by caloric deficits averaging 800-1,000 calories daily below expenditure, limited to three to four hours per night, and continuous load-bearing activity, manifest in elevated rates of musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and infections. A of Ranger students documented a progressive increase in injury incidence, with lower extremity and upper respiratory infections rising in the latter phases due to immune suppression from sustained stress, affecting up to 25% of participants with medical issues by the Swamp Phase. MSK injuries, comprising nearly 50% lower extremity (e.g., stress fractures, sprains) and 31% spinal, represent the primary cause of non-completion, with predictors including suboptimal pre-training aerobic capacity and , as lower initial fitness correlates with higher nonserious risk. Poor quality further exacerbates injury likelihood, with self-reported suboptimal rest linked to doubled odds of MSK incidents among participants. Post-training recovery analyses reveal differential restitution of physical capabilities, with body composition losses (up to 10-15% body weight) and tactical performance metrics like and repeated sprint ability showing incomplete rebound even six weeks after graduation, while maximal strength recovers more rapidly. These impacts underscore the course's design to simulate combat privations, yielding short-term physiological adaptations such as enhanced fat metabolism but at the cost of acute morbidity, including rare but documented cases of and outbreaks traced to cumulative fatigue. Despite mitigations like medical monitoring and recycling for minor injuries, the attrition rate exceeds 60%, predominantly from physical failure rather than leadership deficiencies, affirming the standards' rigor in selecting resilient personnel.

Mental Resilience Training Outcomes

Ranger School's mental resilience training, imposed through sustained sleep restriction (often under 3 hours nightly), caloric deficits, and peer-evaluated under duress, demonstrably enhances among successful graduates. A prospective study of 670 participants identified pre-training —measured as in executing course tasks on a 1–5 scale—as a significant predictor of completion, with graduates scoring higher (mean 4.53 vs. 4.36; 1.72, 95% CI 1.04–2.9). This factor, alongside unit environments boasting higher proportions of Ranger-qualified personnel (mean 21.5% vs. 14.4%), fosters collective resilience, yielding an of 5.3 for success (95% CI 1.4–19.7). Overall graduation rates approximate 40–50%, with mental attrition manifesting in voluntary quits and failures amid ; 86% of students recycle at least one phase due to such lapses, highlighting the course's capacity to expose and cultivate psychological limits. Negative mood states, including elevated tension, depression, , and confusion—assessed via Profile of Mood States questionnaires—correlate positively with slower performance in high-stress road marches (e.g., tension-march time r=0.60, p=0.004 in summer heat), indicating training amplifies emotional strain to filter resilient performers. Notwithstanding these gains, empirical evidence reveals trade-offs: prolonged deprivation degrades hippocampal function and activity, reducing by up to 30–60% in analogous tasks and elevating long-term risks like hippocampal and PTSD , though fit soldiers exhibit rapid post-course recovery. Graduates, however, leverage acquired grit for enduring benefits, with reports of applying compartmentalization and perseverance techniques to navigate subsequent crises, including episodes precipitated by service-related trauma.

Impact and Effectiveness

Career Advancement for Graduates

Graduation from Ranger School confers the , a qualification that significantly bolsters professional trajectories for both enlisted personnel and officers in the . For enlisted soldiers, completion awards promotion points in the military education category, calculated at four points per week of training, with Ranger School's 61-day duration yielding substantial credits toward eligibility for (E-5) and (E-6) ranks under Army Regulation 600-8-19. Privates (E-1) who graduate receive automatic promotion to (E-3), reflecting the 's recognition of the course's rigor as a fast-track mechanism. The tab also enhances competitiveness in promotion boards by demonstrating proven leadership under extreme conditions, leading to higher selection rates for non-commissioned officer positions and specialized assignments. Soldiers earn a Special Qualification Identifier (SQI "V" for Ranger-qualified), which further prioritizes them for roles in elite units and contributes to overall promotion potential. For officers, particularly in infantry and other combat arms branches, the Ranger Tab serves as a critical benchmark for career advancement, often expected as part of standard progression to captain and major ranks. It improves selection for key developmental assignments, such as platoon leadership in airborne or Ranger units, and increases access to advanced schooling like the Captains Career Course. The qualification broadens opportunities for billets in high-demand organizations, including the 75th Ranger Regiment—where tab holders gain preferential consideration for Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) entry—facilitating faster promotion timelines and greater operational responsibilities. Empirical patterns show Ranger-qualified officers achieving higher board scores due to the tab's association with resilience and small-unit tactics proficiency, though exact quantitative promotion differentials remain internal to Army personnel evaluations.

Combat Performance Correlations

Graduates of Ranger School are trained to lead small units in simulated conditions characterized by extreme , resources, and high stress, with the U.S. positing that such correlates with improved resilience and in actual scenarios. However, peer-reviewed and military research predominantly examines physiological and psychological predictors of course completion—such as younger age, higher , superior 2-mile run times, and prior unit exposure to graduates—rather than longitudinal outcomes. No large-scale, publicly available studies directly quantify correlations between Ranger tab possession and metrics like individual survival rates, mission success probabilities, or unit casualty reductions in operations post-2001. Indirect evidence from elite units like the , where Ranger School graduation is a standard qualification for many roles, points to exceptional combat performance, including a cumulative of approximately 7.6% across 813 battle injuries (62 fatalities) sustained over 20 years of continuous deployments in and from October 2001 to August 2021. This low rate, compared to broader U.S. military averages in similar theaters, is attributed to rigorous selection, tactical proficiency, and protocols, though disentangling Ranger School's specific contribution from these factors remains challenging due to —candidates are already high-performers prior to enrollment. Doctrinal materials emphasize Ranger School's role in fostering "stress inoculation," enabling leaders to maintain effectiveness amid sleep deprivation akin to sustained combat, as evidenced by controlled studies on fragmented rest during National Training Center rotations mirroring Ranger phases. Yet, critiques note that while the course builds endurance, its peer-evaluation system and recycling mechanisms may prioritize attrition over transferable combat skills, with limited validation against real-world data. Overall, the absence of robust, causal empirical links underscores reliance on anecdotal operational success and institutional prestige rather than falsifiable metrics for assessing combat correlations.

Quantitative Measures of Success

The graduation rate serves as the principal quantitative metric for Ranger School's selectivity and efficacy in identifying proficient small-unit leaders, with recent data indicating rates between 40% and 45%. In 2022, across classes 01 through 11, the overall graduation rate stood at 44.8%, encompassing failures in peer evaluations, Ranger physical assessments, ruck tolerance tests, and foot marches as key attrition points. A longitudinal analysis of 670 candidates yielded a 40.3% graduation rate, with 86% of participants at least one phase, underscoring the iterative demands of the . Peer evaluations conducted during the course provide another validated quantitative indicator of long-term potential, correlating with progression. A study of 1,236 peer ratings from Ranger predicted promotion outcomes for 886 U.S. senior officers, demonstrating the assessments' criterion-related validity in forecasting subsequent performance in assigned duties. These metrics collectively affirm Ranger School's role in producing a cadre of verified leaders, though success is tempered by high attrition, which ensures only those meeting exacting standards—encompassing physical, tactical, and interpersonal proficiencies—advance to earn the .

Controversies and Criticisms

Gender Integration and Performance Data

In April 2015, the U.S. Army integrated women into Ranger School for the first time, following the 2013 policy opening all roles to women, with the inaugural class comprising 19 female and 381 male students starting on April 20. The first women to graduate were Capt. Kristen Griest and 1st Lt. Shaye Haver on August 21, 2015, after completing all phases under identical standards to male peers, including multiple phase recycles and patrol evaluations. Initial Army assessments indicated comparable performance among early female graduates, who recycled phases at rates matching male counterparts, passed four patrols while failing three (similar to select male students), and scored higher on peer evaluations (83/100 and 77/100 versus male averages of 71-75/100), with no female dropouts for medical reasons in those classes. However, broader empirical data reveal persistent gender disparities in graduation rates, reflecting physiological demands that disadvantage female candidates on average, as Ranger School emphasizes sustained load-bearing , upper-body strength, and minimal / under stress—attributes where sex-based differences in muscle mass, aerobic capacity, and recovery are well-documented in military physiology research. A 2018-2021 of 670 students (614 male, 19 female) found male graduation at 41.5% (255/614) versus 15.8% for females (3/19), with overall attrition driven by failures (86% recycled at least once); the small female sample limited statistical power for gender-specific predictors, but faster 2-mile run times and higher correlated with success across genders. data from 2022 showed women comprising 15% of class enrollments but only 4% of graduates, yielding an implied female success rate far below the program's historical 40-50% overall average. As of January , 154 women had graduated since integration, representing a fraction of total tabs awarded annually, underscoring that while select women excel and earn the tab without standards alteration, aggregate outcomes align with sex-dimorphic performance gaps rather than institutional bias in evaluation.

Training Fatalities and Risk Management

Ranger School training, while designed to simulate stresses without intending lethality, has resulted in fatalities since its establishment in 1952, with a total of 56 student deaths recorded as of 1997, primarily from environmental exposure, , and accidents. Causes often involve from prolonged cold-water immersion, rapid weather changes, and physical overexertion in austere conditions, though the program's attrition rate exceeds 60% due to voluntary quits, peer evaluations, and issues rather than direct fatalities. A significant incident occurred on February 15, 1995, during the swamp phase at , , where four students died of after over six hours in chest-high water amid rising flood levels from heavy rain; their core body temperatures dropped 2°F below normal, exacerbating risks despite prior policy adjustments delegating safety authority to local commanders. More recently, on March 18, 2021, Specialist James A. Requenez, 28, drowned during a swamp-phase river crossing at Eglin, despite attempting to self-identify as a weak swimmer earlier in the course. In August 2022, during the mountain phase in north Georgia, George Taber and Evan Fitzgibbon were killed when a tree fell on them while sheltering from a severe windstorm on . To mitigate risks, the integrates composite risk management into Ranger training, including pre-phase medical screenings, deliberate assessments of environmental hazards using data, and real-time monitoring with weather sensors and water depth markers. Instructors, certified through a four-month program emphasizing procedures, enforce protocols such as limiting swamp-phase water immersion to 2-3.5 hours at temperatures of 55-64°F and maintaining evacuation readiness with dedicated medevac assets and fuel support. Medical attrition from injuries and infections remains high, with studies of 190 students identifying overuse injuries and environmental factors as primary causes, informing ongoing support adjustments. Following the 1995 fatalities, the implemented 38 safety measures for the phase, including overhauled regulations, standardized command controls, and enhanced equipment for hypothermia prevention and rapid extraction, as recommended by internal investigations and Government Accountability Office reviews to institutionalize controls and expand oversight inspections. These reforms aimed to balance rigor with hazard reduction, though subsequent incidents highlight persistent challenges from unpredictable weather and individual vulnerabilities, prompting continued emphasis on instructor accountability and student self-reporting.

Debates on Leadership Development Validity

Critics contend that Ranger School's structure prioritizes tactical execution and endurance over deliberate instruction, rendering its developmental impact on leadership secondary to selection for resilient performers. A 2016 analysis from the Modern War Institute at West Point describes the course as fundamentally a "tactical school," where leadership emerges tangentially from repeated patrol leadership roles assessed via peer evaluations, but without systematic teaching of broader leadership doctrines or feedback mechanisms beyond pass/fail outcomes in simulated missions. Instructors emphasize compliance with under duress—such as , ambushes, and raids—rather than cultivating strategic or interpersonal skills applicable outside small-unit, combat-like settings, potentially limiting transferability to higher-level command or non-infantry roles. Proponents counter that the program's immersive design—requiring students to lead squads through 61 days of progressive phases with minimal sleep (averaging three hours per night) and caloric intake (one meal daily)—fosters authentic emergence through peer-driven , where subordinates vote to retain or eliminate leaders based on observed performance in real-time crises. This method, rooted in the Army's emphasis on decentralized execution, is credited with building adaptive and resilience, traits empirically linked to success via predictors like grit and in cohort studies of over 600 candidates, where only 40% complete the course. However, such correlations highlight selection effects rather than causal development, as pre-existing factors explain variance in outcomes more than in-course training. Debates intensify over the peer evaluation system's reliability, which determines up to 50% of recycling or elimination decisions but occurs amid collective exhaustion and that may incentivize risk-averse behaviors or favoritism over bold initiative. Research on peer assessments in military contexts, including Ranger-inspired models, notes challenges in dynamic, high-stress environments where subjective biases can undermine objectivity, though revisions aim to enhance validity through structured criteria. Absent longitudinal studies tracking Ranger graduates' command efficacy—beyond anecdotal correlations with career progression—the program's claims rely heavily on doctrinal assertion rather than rigorous, peer-reviewed validation, raising questions about opportunity costs like high attrition (over 50% ) and resource intensity for marginal gains in transferable skills.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.