Community hub
Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Rod (unit)
View on Wikipedia
| rod | |
|---|---|
| Unit system | imperial/US units |
| Unit of | length |
| Conversions | |
| 1 rod in ... | ... is equal to ... |
| Imperial/US units | 16+1⁄2 ft |
| metric (SI) units | 5.0292 m |
The rod, perch, or pole (sometimes also lug) is a surveyor's tool[1] and unit of length of various historical definitions. In British imperial and US customary units, it is defined as 16+1⁄2 feet, equal to exactly 1⁄320 of a mile, or 5+1⁄2 yards (a quarter of a surveyor's chain), and is exactly 5.0292 meters. The rod is useful as a unit of length because integer multiples of it can form one acre of square measure (area). The 'perfect acre'[2] is a rectangular area of 43,560 square feet, bounded by sides 660 feet (a furlong) long and 66 feet (a chain) wide (220 yards by 22 yards) or, equivalently, 40 rods by 4 rods. An acre is therefore 160 square rods or 10 square chains.
The name perch derives from the Ancient Roman unit, the pertica. The measure also has a relationship with the military pike of about the same size. Both measures[1] date from the sixteenth century,[3] when the pike was still utilized in national armies. The tool has been supplanted, first by steel tapes and later by electronic tools such as surveyor lasers and optical target devices for surveying lands. In dialectal English, the term lug has also been used, although the Oxford English Dictionary states that this unit, while usually of 16+1⁄2 feet, may also be of 15, 18, 20, or 21 feet.[4][5][6]
In the United States until 1 January 2023, the rod was often defined as 16.5 US survey feet, or approximately 5.029 210 058 m.[7]
History
[edit]
In England, the perch was officially discouraged in favour of the rod as early as the 15th century;[8][better source needed] however, local customs maintained its use. In the 13th century, perches were variously recorded in lengths of 18 feet (5.49 m), 20 feet (6.1 m), 22 feet (6.71 m) and 24 feet (7.32 m); and even as late as 1820, a House of Commons report notes lengths of 16+1⁄2 feet (5.03 m), 18 feet (5.49 m), 21 feet (6.4 m), 24 feet (7.32 m), and even 25 feet (7.62 m).[9] In Ireland, a perch was standardized at 21 feet (6.4 m), making an Irish chain, furlong and mile proportionately longer by 27.27% than the "standard" English measure.[10]
Until English King Henry VIII seized the lands of the Roman Catholic Church in 1536,[1] land measures as we now know them were essentially unknown.[1] Instead a narrative system of landmarks and lists was used. Henry wanted to raise even more funds for his wars than he'd seized directly from church property (he'd also assumed the debts of the monasteries[1]), and as James Burke writes and quotes in the book Connections that the English monk Richard Benese "produced a book on how to survey land using the simple tools of the time, a rod with cord carrying knots at certain intervals, waxed and resined against wet weather." Benese poetically described the measure of an acre in terms of a perch:[3]
an acre bothe of woodlande, also of fyldlande [heath] is always forty perches in length, and four perches in breadth, though an acre of woodlande be more in quantitie [value, i.e. was more valued commercially] than an acre of fyldelande
The practice of using surveyor's chains, and perch-length rods made into a detachable stiff chain, came about a century later when iron was a more plentiful and common material. A chain is a larger unit of length measuring 66 feet (20.1168 m), or 22 yards, or 100 links,[11] or 4 rods (20.1168 meters). There are 10 chains or 40 rods in a furlong (eighth-mile), and so 80 chains or 320 rods in one statute mile (1760 yards, 1609.344 m, 1.609344 km); the definition of which was legally set in 1593 and popularized by Royal surveyor (called the 'sworn viewer'[12]) John Ogilby only after the Great Fire of London (1666).
An acre is defined as the area of 10 square chains (that is, an area of one chain by one furlong), and derives from the shapes of new-tech plows[2] and the desire to quickly survey seized church lands into a quantity of squares for quick sales[3] by Henry VIII's agents; buyers simply wanted to know what they were buying whereas Henry was raising cash for wars against Scotland and France.[3] Consequently, the surveyor's chain and surveyor rods or poles (the perch) have been used for several centuries in Britain and in many other countries influenced by British practices such as North America and Australia. By the time of the industrial revolution and the quickening of land sales, canal and railway surveys, et al. Surveyor rods such as used by George Washington were generally made of dimensionally stable metal—semi-flexible drawn wrought iron linkable bar stock (not steel), such that the four folded elements of a chain were easily transportable through brush and branches when carried by a single man of a surveyor's crew. With a direct ratio to the length of a surveyor's chain and the sides of both an acre and a square (mile), they were common tools used by surveyors, if only to lay out a known plottable baseline in rough terrain thereafter serving as the reference line for instrumental (theodolite) triangulations.
The rod as a survey measure was standardized by Edmund Gunter in England in 1607 as a quarter of a chain (of 66 feet (20.12 m)), or 16+1⁄2 feet (5.03 m) long.
In ancient cultures
[edit]The perch (pertica) as a lineal measure in Rome (also decempeda) was 10 Roman feet (2.96 metres), and in France varied from 10 feet (perche romanie) to 22 feet (perche d'arpent—apparently 1⁄10 of "the range of an arrow"—about 220 ft (67 m)). To confuse matters further, by ancient Roman definition, an arpent equalled 120 Roman feet. The related unit of square measure was the scrupulum or decempeda quadrata, equivalent to about 8.76 m2 (94.3 sq ft).[13]
In continental Europe
[edit].jpg)
Units comparable to the perch, pole or rod were used in many European countries, with names that include French: perche and canne, German: Ruthe, Italian: canna and pertica, Polish: pręt and Spanish: canna. They were subdivided in many different ways, and were of many different lengths.
| Place | Local name | Local equivalent | Metric equivalent (meters) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aachen | Feldmeßruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.512[14] |
| Amsterdam | Roede | 13 Voet | 3.681[15] |
| Aubenas, Ardèche | canne | 8 pans | 1.985[14] |
| Baden, Grand Duchy of | Ruthe | 10 Fuß | 3.0[14] |
| Basel, Canton of | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.864[14] |
| Bern, Canton of | Ruthe | 10 Fuß | 2.932[14] |
| Barcelona | canna | 8 palmos | 1.581[14] |
| Braunschweig | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.565[14] |
| Bremen | Ruthe | 8 Ellen or 16 Fuß | 4.626[14] |
| Brussels | Ruthe | 20 Fuß | 4.654[14] |
| Cagliari, Sardinia | canna | 10 palmi | 2.322[14] |
| Calenberg Land | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.677[14] |
| Cassel, Hessen | Ruthe | 14 Fuß | 4.026[14] |
| Denmark | Ruthe | 10 Fuß | 3.138[14] |
| Canton of Geneva | Ruthe | 8 Fuß | 2.598[14] |
| Hamburg | Geestruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.583[14] |
| Hamburg | Marschruthe | 14 Fuß | 4.010[14] |
| Hannover | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.671[14] |
| France | Perche | 3 toises | 5.847[14] |
| France | Perche (for woodland) | 3+2⁄3 toises | 7.145[14] |
| Genoa | canna | 10 palmi | 2.5[14] |
| Jever, Oldenburg | Ruthe | 20 Fuß | 4.377[14] |
| Mallorca | canna | 8 palmos | 1.714[14] |
| Malta | canna | 8 palmi | 2.08[14] |
| Mecklenburg | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.655[14] |
| Menorca, but not Mahón | canna | 1.599[14] | |
| Menorca, city of Mahon | canna | 8 palmos | 1.714[14] |
| Messina, Sicily | canna | 8 palmi | 2.113[14] |
| Montauban, Tarn-et-Garonne | canne | 8 pans | 1.783[14] |
| Morocco | canna | 8 palmos | 1.714[14] |
| Naples | canna (for cloth) | 8 palmi | |
| Naples, Kingdom of: Apulia, Calabria, Eboli, Foggia, Lucera | percha | 7 palmi | 1.838[14] |
| Naples, Kingdom of: Capua | percha | 7+1⁄5 palmi | 1.892[14] |
| Naples, Kingdom of: Fiano, Naples | percha | 7+1⁄2 palmi | 2.014[14] |
| Naples, Kingdom of: Caggiano, Cava, Nocera, Rocce, Salerno | percha | 7+2⁄3 palmi | 1.971[14] |
| Nuremberg, Bavaria | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.861[14] |
| Oldenburg | Ruthe | 20 Fuß | 5.927[14] |
| Palermo, Sicily | canna | 8 palmi | 1.942[14] |
| Parma | Pertica | 6 bracci | 3.25[14] |
| Poland | Pręt | 7+1⁄2 łokci or 10 pręcików | 4.320[14] |
| Prussia, Rheinland | Ruthe | 12 Fuß | 3.766[14] |
| Rijnland | Roede | 12 Voet | 3.767[15] |
| Rome | canna (for cloth) | 2[14] | |
| Rome | canna (for building) | 2.234[14] | |
| Saragoza | canna | 2.043[14] | |
| Saxony | Ruthe | 16 Leipziger Fuß | 4.512[14] |
| Sweden | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.748[14] |
| Tortosa | canna | 1.7[14] | |
| Tuscany, Grand-Duchy of (Florence, Pisa) | canna | 5 bracci | 2.918[14] |
| Uzès, Gard | canne | 8 pans | 1.98[14] |
| Waadt, Canton of | Ruthe or toise courante | 10 Fuß | 3[14] |
| Württemberg | Reichsruthe | 10 Fuß | 2.865[14] |
| Württemberg | old Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.583[14] |
| Venice, Republic of | Pertica | 6 piedi | 2.084[14] |
| Zürich, Canton of | Ruthe | 10 Fuß | 3.009[14] |
In Britain and Ireland
[edit]
In England, the rod or perch was first defined in law by the Composition of Yards and Perches, one of the statutes of uncertain date from the late 13th to early 14th centuries: tres pedes faciunt ulnam, quinque ulne & dimidia faciunt perticam (three feet make a yard, five and a half yards make a perch).[16]
The length of the chain was standardized in 1620 by Edmund Gunter at exactly four rods.[17][18] Fields were measured in acres, which were one chain (four rods) by one furlong (in the United Kingdom, ten chains).[19]
Bars of metal one rod long were used as standards of length when surveying land. The rod was still in use as a common unit of measurement in the mid-19th century, when Henry David Thoreau used it frequently when describing distances in his work, Walden.[20]
In traditional Scottish units, a Scottish rood (ruid in Lowland Scots, ròd in Scottish Gaelic), also fall measures 222 inches (6 ells).[21]
Modern use
[edit]The rod was phased out as a legal unit of measurement in the United Kingdom as part of a ten-year metrication process that began on 24 May 1965.[22]
_2750.jpg)
In the United States, the rod, along with the chain, furlong, and statute mile (as well as the survey inch and survey foot) were based on the pre-1959 values for United States customary units of linear measurement until 1 January 2023. The Mendenhall Order of 1893 defined the yard as exactly 3600⁄3937 meters, with all other units of linear measurement, including the rod, based on the yard. In 1959, an international agreement (the international yard and pound agreement), defined the yard as the fundamental unit of length in the Imperial/USCU system, defined as exactly 0.9144 metres. However, the above-noted units, when used in surveying, may retain their pre-1959 values, depending on the legislation in each state. The U.S. National Geodetic Survey and National Institute of Standards and Technology have replaced the definition for the above-mentioned units by the international 1959 definition of the foot, being exactly 0.3048 meters.[23][24]
Despite no longer being in widespread use, the rod is still employed in certain specialized fields. In recreational canoeing, maps measure portages (overland paths where canoes must be carried) in rods; typical canoes are approximately one rod long.[25] The term is also in widespread use in the acquisition of pipeline easements, as the offers for an easement are often expressed on a "price per rod".[26]
In the United Kingdom, the sizes of allotment gardens continue to be measured in square poles in some areas, sometimes being referred to simply as poles rather than square poles.[27]
In Vermont, the default right-of-way width of state and town highways and trails is three rods 49 ft 6 in (15.09 m).[28] Rods can also be found on the older legal descriptions of tracts of land in the United States, following the "metes and bounds" method of land survey;[29] as shown in this actual legal description of rural real estate:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Commencing 45 rods East and 44 rods North of Southwest corner of Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4; thence North 36 rods; thence East 35 rods; thence South 36 rods; thence West 35 rods to the place of beginning, Manistique Township, Schoolcraft County, Michigan.[30]
Area and volume
[edit]The terms pole, perch, rod and rood have been used as units of area, and perch is also used as a unit of volume. As a unit of area, a square perch (the perch being standardized to equal 16+1⁄2 feet, or 5+1⁄2 yards) is equal to a square rod, 30+1⁄4 square yards (25.29 square metres) or 1⁄160 acre. There are 40 square perches to a rood (for example a rectangular area of 40 rods times one rod), and 160 square perches to an acre (for example a rectangular area of 40 rods times 4 rods). This unit is usually referred to as a perch or pole even though square perch and square pole were the more precise terms. Rod was also sometimes used as a unit of area to refer to a rood.
However, in the traditional French-based system in some countries, 1 square perche is 42.21 square metres.
As of August 2013, perches and roods are used as government survey units in Jamaica.[citation needed] They appear on most property title documents. The perch is also in extensive use in Sri Lanka, being favored even over the rood and acre in real estate listings there.[31] Perches were informally used as a measure in Queensland real estate until the early 21st century, mostly for historical gazetted properties in older suburbs.[32]
Volume
[edit]A traditional unit of volume for stone and other masonry. A perch of masonry is the volume of a stone wall one perch (16+1⁄2 feet or 5.03 metres) long, 18 inches (45.7 cm) high, and 12 inches (30.5 cm) thick. This is equivalent to exactly 24+3⁄4 cubic feet (0.92 cubic yards; 0.70 cubic metres; 700 litres).
There are two different measurements for a perch depending on the type of masonry that is being built:
- A dressed stone work is measured by the 24+3⁄4-cubic foot perch (16+1⁄2 feet or 5.03 metres) long, 18 inches (45.7 cm) high, and 12 inches (30.5 cm) thick. This is equivalent to exactly 24+3⁄4 cubic feet (0.916667 cubic yards; 0.700842 cubic metres).
- a brick work or rubble wall made of broken stone of irregular size, shape and texture, made of undressed stone, is measured by the (16+1⁄2 feet or 5.03 metres) long, 12 inches (30.5 cm) high, and 12 inches (30.5 cm) thick. This is equivalent to exactly 16+1⁄2 cubic feet (0.611111 cubic yards; 0.467228 cubic metres).[33]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Burke, James (1978). "Chapter 9". Connections: Alternative History of Technology. Macmillan. p. 304. ISBN 978-0-333-29066-8.
- ^ a b Connections, pbk. p.63
- ^ a b c d Connections, pbk. p.263
- ^ Bonten, JHM (19 January 2007). "Anglo-Saxon and Biblical to Metrics Conversions". Surveyor + Chain + British-Nautical. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
- ^ Rowlett, Russ (15 December 2008). "lug [1]". How Many? A Dictionary of Units of Measurement. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
- ^ "lug, n.1". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ "U.S. Survey Foot: Revised Unit Conversion Factors". National Institute of Standards and Technology. 23 September 2019. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
- ^ Encyclopædia Britannica, English measure
- ^ House of Commons Report (Second) of Commissioners to Consider the Subject of Weights and Measures. Parliamentary Papers. Vol. HC314. 13 July 1820. pp. 473–512.
- ^ "Units: P". unc.edu.
- ^ Kirkpatrick, Elizabeth Mclaren (1990). The Cassell English Dictionary. London. p. 214. ISBN 0-304-34003-0.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ "Connections", pbk. p.265
- ^ Smith, Sir William & Anthon, Charles (1851). A new classical dictionary of Greek and Roman biography, mythology, and geography partly based upon the Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. New York: Harper & Bros. pp. 1024–1030.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az Niemann, Friedrich (1830). Vollständiges Handbuch der Münzen, Masse, und Gewichte aller Länder der Erde fur Kaufleute, Banquiers ... in alphabetischer Ordnung [Complete handbook of coins, measures and weights of all countries in the world for merchants, bankers ... in alphabetical order] (in German). Quedlinburg und Leipzig: Gottfr. Basse. pp. 231–232, 286.
- ^ a b de Gelder, Jacob (1824). Allereerste Gronden der Cijferkunst [Introduction to Arithmetic] (in Dutch). ’s-Gravenhage (The Hague) and Amsterdam: de Gebroeders van Cleef. pp. 163–176. Retrieved 13 June 2017.
- ^ The statutes at large (in Latin). London: Charles Eyre & Andrew Strahan. 1794. p. 200.
- ^ Taylor, Thomas Ulvan (1908). "Chapter 1". Surveyor's hand book. McGraw-Hill. p. 1. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
- ^ Russell, Jeffrey S.; American Society of Civil Engineers (1 August 2003). Perspectives in civil engineering: commemorating the 150th anniversary of the American Society of Civil Engineers. ASCE Publications. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-7844-0686-1. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
- ^ Rowlett, Russ (3 December 2008). "acre (ac or A)". How Many? A Dictionary of Units of Measurement. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
- ^ Thoreau, Henry David (1899). Walden: or, Life in the woods. H. Altemus. pp. 67, 113, 203, 204, 208, 290, 300, 309, 319, 339, 341, 356. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
- ^ ""fall, faw"". Dictionary of the Scottish Language – Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue.
- ^ Consumer and Competition Policy Directorate (1968). Report (1968) by the Standing Joint Committee on Metrication (PDF) (Report). Department of Trade and Industry. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
{{cite report}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ "NGS and NIST to Retire U.S. Survey Foot after 2022". National Geodetic Survey. 31 October 2019. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
- ^ "U.S. Survey Foot: Revised Unit Conversion Factors". NIST. 16 October 2019. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
- ^ "Canoe Glossary and Clickable Canoe". OutdoorPlaces.com. Michael Thiessen. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
- ^ "Pipeline Terms and Addendum". The Clark Law Firm. Archived from the original on 8 March 2015. Retrieved 24 October 2012.
- ^ "Allotments". Watford Borough Council. Archived from the original on 14 August 2009. Retrieved 5 October 2009.
- ^ "19 V.S.A. § 702: Width of highways and trails". The Vermont Statutes Online. Vermont General Assembly.
- ^ Shelton, Neil. "How to Read Land Descriptions". homestead.org. p. 5. Retrieved 7 May 2008.
- ^ "Lake View Parcel $198 Down $198 Month Incredible 8 Acre Parcel!". EagleStar. American Eagle Star. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
- ^ "Land For Sale". Sri Lanka Property Market. Archived from the original on 24 January 2018.
- ^ "Dutton Park real estate agent Archives". Bees Nees.
- ^ See McClurg, William M. & Shoemaker, Morrell M. (1970). The Building Estimator's Reference Handbook (17th ed.). Chicago: Frank R. Walker Company. p. 1644.
Rod (unit)
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Standards
Basic Definition
The rod is a traditional unit of length in the imperial and United States customary systems of measurement, defined as exactly 5.5 yards or 16.5 feet, and it originated as a practical tool for land surveying.[6] This unit, also referred to by the synonyms perch, pole, and lug—with rod serving as the primary designation—facilitated precise delineation of property boundaries in agricultural and legal contexts.[7] In surveying practice, the rod traditionally corresponds to one-quarter of a Gunter's chain, a 66-foot chain composed of 100 links that became a cornerstone of linear measurement in the 17th century.[8] The rod's integration into larger imperial measures underscores its role in standardizing land assessment, where 40 rods constitute one furlong (660 feet), a distance rooted in the length of a plowed furrow.[9] This relationship extends to area computation, as the acre—historically defined as a rectangular plot one furlong long by one chain (4 rods) wide—equates to 160 square rods, providing a foundational metric for farmland evaluation.[10] The rod's dimensions were standardized in Britain through 19th-century legislation to ensure consistency across the realm.[9]Length Variations
The rod unit has shown considerable variation in its defined length across regions and time periods, often shaped by local customs and practical needs such as land surveying or farming. In Scotland, it was commonly 18.5 feet, while in Ireland, the equivalent perch extended to 21 feet.[11][12] In the United States, the survey rod is precisely 5.029210058 meters long, based on 16.5 U.S. survey feet, which differs slightly from the international rod of exactly 5.0292 meters due to the distinct definitions of the survey foot (1200/3937 meter) versus the international foot (0.3048 meter).[13] These differences arose from factors like varying agricultural requirements and customary practices, though British standardization efforts in the 19th century aimed to align the rod at 16.5 feet across imperial territories.Historical Development
Ancient Origins
The earliest known uses of rod-like measuring units trace back to ancient Egypt, where the cubit rod served as a foundational tool for land surveying following the annual Nile floods. These floods, occurring between July and August, erased field boundaries, necessitating precise re-measurement to redistribute agricultural land and assess taxes. The royal cubit rod, approximately 52.4 cm in length and divided into 7 palms or 28 fingers, was standardized and often inscribed on wooden or stone artifacts preserved in temples and tombs from the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1069 BCE), such as the hinged cubit rod from the tomb of Kha in the 18th Dynasty. Ceremonial versions, sometimes gilded, underscored the rod's role in both practical redistribution and ritual standardization of measures.[14][15] In Mesopotamia, similar rod-based units emerged for surveying and land allocation, with the nindan serving as a primary measure derived from a surveyor's rod approximately 6 meters long. Originating in the Early Dynastic period (c. 2900–2350 BCE), the nindan facilitated the division of fields into grids for agriculture and urban planning, reflecting the region's sexagesimal system where 60 nindan equaled one USH (about 360 meters). This unit's practical application is evident in cuneiform tablets detailing field measurements, emphasizing its role in economic administration under palace control. Biblical texts further illustrate such rods in the Near Eastern context; for instance, in Ezekiel 40:5 (c. 6th century BCE), a measuring rod of six long cubits—each cubit plus a handbreadth, totaling around 3.1 meters—is used to describe visionary temple dimensions, drawing on established Mesopotamian and Levantine traditions of rod-based architecture.[16][17][18] Greek and Roman civilizations adapted these proto-rod measures for more formalized surveying. In Rome, the pertica, a wooden rod exactly 10 Roman feet (about 2.96 meters) long with metal caps, was the standard tool of agrimensores for land division in centuriation schemes, enabling the layout of orthogonal grids for colonies and estates from the Republic onward. This instrument, referenced in the Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum, supported imperial expansion by standardizing territorial claims. Earlier Greek influences included the kalamos, a reed or wooden rod used for linear measurements in agriculture and construction, though less rigidly defined than its Roman counterpart.[19] These ancient rods held dual practical and symbolic significance in agriculture and architecture. In Egypt, the "stretching of the cord" ritual—using knotted ropes extended from cubit rods—aligned temple foundations with celestial orientations, as depicted in tomb scenes like that of Menna (TT69, 18th Dynasty), blending surveying precision with religious cosmology to ensure fertile lands and divine harmony. Mesopotamian nindan rods similarly underpinned ziggurat constructions and field allocations, symbolizing authority in scribal and divine records. Roman perticae extended this legacy in engineering feats, such as aqueduct alignments, where accuracy ensured agricultural productivity across the empire. These early applications laid conceptual groundwork for later European evolutions without direct continuity.[14][15][16]Continental European Development
In continental Europe, the rod unit, known variably as the Rute or Ruthe in Germanic regions and the perche in France, evolved from Roman precedents during the Middle Ages, adapting to local needs for land surveying and administration within the fragmented political landscape of the Holy Roman Empire and feudal France. The ancient Roman pertica, a surveying rod of approximately 10 Roman feet (about 2.96 meters), served as a foundational influence, providing a model for linear measures in land division that persisted into medieval practices.[20] Under the Carolingian reforms of Charlemagne in the late 8th and early 9th centuries, efforts to standardize weights and measures across the Frankish realms laid groundwork for consistent rod-like units, bridging Roman traditions with emerging medieval systems and emphasizing uniformity in land allocation for agricultural and fiscal purposes. These reforms influenced the development of the Rute or Ruthe, typically ranging from 12 to 16 local feet (approximately 3.55 to 4.74 meters), which became a Carolingian-era staple for regional surveying. By the High Middle Ages, within the Holy Roman Empire, the Rute varied significantly by principality, often measuring 12 or 16 Rhineland feet (about 3.76 to 5.01 meters), and was employed primarily for dividing arable land into plots known as acker (160 square Ruten), facilitating equitable distribution among tenants and lords in decentralized territories like Nuremberg and Oldenburg.[20] In France, the perche emerged as a direct evolution from these Carolingian influences, serving as a key tool in the feudal system for measuring estates and assessing taxation based on land holdings. Regional variations proliferated during the medieval period, with the perche de Paris standardized at 18 royal feet (approximately 5.85 meters), the perche ordinaire at 20 feet (about 6.50 meters), and the perche des eaux et forêts at 22 feet (roughly 7.15 meters), reflecting adaptations for urban, agricultural, and forestry domains. These measures underpinned the arpent system, where 100 square perches defined taxable parcels, enabling lords and the crown to quantify feudal obligations and revenues through notarial records and surveys.[21][20] As the early modern period approached, standardization attempts intensified in response to growing administrative demands, particularly in Prussia. The Prussian Rute, set at 12 Prussian feet (approximately 3.77 meters), represented a precursor to metric reforms, with key efforts in 1816 under King Frederick William III aiming to unify measures across Prussian territories for precise land division and economic planning, though regional discrepancies persisted until broader metric adoption.[20]British and Irish Standardization
The rod, known interchangeably as the perch or pole in medieval England, entered a period of gradual unification following the Norman Conquest of 1066, building upon pre-existing Anglo-Saxon traditions while incorporating minor continental influences from Norman practices. Early post-Conquest English rods varied in length between 15 and 16.5 feet, reflecting Saxon origins where the gyld (rod) approximated 15 feet based on agricultural and surveying needs, though regional discrepancies persisted due to local customs.[22][23] During the 14th to 16th centuries, parliamentary statutes sought to resolve these inconsistencies through legislative definition. The Composition of Yards and Perches, enacted sometime between 1266 and 1303 under Edward I, established the perch at precisely 5.5 yards (16.5 feet), derived from three dry barley grains equaling one inch, 12 inches one foot, three feet one yard, and five yards and a half one perch; this measure was tied to land division, with an acre defined as 40 perches by 4 perches.[24] Further refinement came in 1620 with Edmund Gunter's invention of the surveyor's chain, standardized at 66 feet and comprising exactly four rods, thereby reinforcing the 16.5-foot rod for precise land measurement in agriculture and engineering.[25] In Ireland, prior to unification with British standards, the rod—termed the perch—differed significantly, measuring 7 yards (21 feet) under the Irish or plantation measure system introduced during 16th-century English plantations; this longer unit resulted in an Irish acre of 7,840 square yards, larger than the English equivalent, and was used extensively in land surveys until the early 19th century.[26] The Irish Weights and Measures Act of 1824 aligned these variations with imperial standards by abolishing the distinct Irish system, mandating adoption of the English rod length for uniformity across the United Kingdom. The British Weights and Measures Act 1824 culminated this standardization process by legally defining the imperial yard via a brass standard prototype (later standardized as exactly 0.9144 meters in 1959), thereby definitively setting the rod at 5.5 yards (equivalent to 5.0292 meters based on the 1959 definition) and eliminating lingering ambiguities in surveying and commerce; this reform was particularly vital for resolving disputes in land delineation, where prior variations had led to inconsistencies in property assessments and enclosures.[27]Measurement Applications
Linear Measurement
In historical surveying, the rod served as a fundamental unit for direct linear measurements, often implemented through physical tools such as wooden poles or metal bars calibrated to the standard length of 16.5 feet. These rods allowed surveyors to measure distances by laying the tool end-to-end along the ground, providing a portable and straightforward method for fieldwork in varied terrains.[7][28] For greater efficiency over longer distances, surveyors employed chains divided into rods, notably Gunter's chain, which measured 66 feet and consisted of four rods, with each rod comprising 25 links of 7.92 inches. This subdivision enabled precise incremental measurements while relating the rod to larger units like the chain, and it was commonly used alongside pacing techniques to verify distances in open fields.[29][30] The rod found practical application in boundary marking, where surveyors used rod-length poles to delineate property lines and establish fixed points with stakes or stones, ensuring accurate demarcation of land parcels during colonial and early American surveys. In road construction, the unit determined alignments and widths, as exemplified by "four rod roads" standardized at 66 feet to accommodate wagons and livestock, a practice rooted in 19th-century infrastructure development in regions like the Midwest.[31][32] Similarly, in early engineering projects such as canal building, rods and rod-divided chains guided the layout of routes and excavations, with teams measuring linear extents to align waterways and assess gradients for efficient water flow, as seen in 19th-century American canal systems.[33] Historical texts illustrate the rod's role in linear applications, such as the Domesday Book of 1086, which referenced rod-based perches (synonymous with rods) for measuring linear dimensions in land assessments across England, often tying them to broader surveying chains of four rods. These examples highlight the rod's integration with practical tools and methods, emphasizing its utility in establishing reliable one-dimensional references without reliance on derived area computations.[34][35]Area Measurement
The square rod, also known as a square perch or square pole, is a unit of area derived from the linear rod, equal to the area of a square with sides measuring one rod in length.[36] It measures 30.25 square yards or 272.25 square feet.[36] This unit has been employed historically in land surveying to quantify planar extents, particularly in agrarian contexts where precise delineation of fields was essential. In area calculations, the square rod forms the basis for larger units like the acre, which traditionally comprises 160 square rods, corresponding to a rectangular grid of 4 rods by 40 rods (one chain by one furlong).[37] This configuration reflects the practical dimensions of medieval plowable fields, where the width accommodated a team's turning radius and the length aligned with a day's plowing output. The relation extends to the rood, an intermediate unit equivalent to 40 square rods or one-quarter of an acre, often used for smaller parcels such as crofts or meadows.[37] The square rod played a pivotal role in medieval English land management, particularly from the 12th to 14th centuries, when it underpinned the standardization of the acre for taxation and agricultural assessment. Manorial surveys, such as those from the early 13th century, utilized perch (rod) measurements to quantify holdings in fiscal acres, enabling lords to levy dues based on arable capacity— for instance, discrepancies in measured versus conventional acres could adjust tax liabilities, as seen in records where 30 acres by the plow were reckoned as 36 for assessment.[37] In farming, it facilitated yield monitoring and sowing allocations, with selions (strips) grouped into acres of 4 by 40 perches to optimize open-field systems. During enclosures, as in 14th-century Bedfordshire meadows like Biddenham, square rod equivalents defined parcel boundaries, supporting the transition from communal to privatized land use and ensuring equitable division for cultivation.[37]Volume Measurement
The cubic rod is a unit of volume derived from the cube of the linear rod, primarily used in historical surveying and engineering contexts. It equals 4,492⅛ cubic feet, calculated as (16.5 feet)³ based on the standard English rod length of 16.5 feet. [38] In metric terms, this corresponds to approximately 127.3 cubic meters, using the rod length of 5.0292 meters (based on the international foot). To compute the volume of a three-dimensional space using rods, multiply the length, width, and height, each expressed in rods:where is the volume in cubic rods, and , , and are the dimensions in rods. This straightforward product provided a basis for estimating bulk quantities in early applications, though practical measurements often required adjustments for irregular shapes. [38] Historically, the cubic rod saw limited application in volume assessments for construction, masonry, and earthwork, such as calculating material displacement in building projects or irrigation systems. [39] For instance, in 19th-century German regional practices, variants like the Frankfurt mason's cubic rod (312 cubic feet) were employed for stone and earth volumes in structural work. [39] Its use extended occasionally to scientific decimal systems in England, where it was standardized at 1,000 cubic feet based on a 10-foot rod for simplified calculations in technical volumes. [39] Despite these niche roles, the cubic rod remained rare for volumetric measurement, overshadowed by more practical units like the cubic yard for solids or the chaldron for coal in 18th-century British trade. [40] In agriculture, approximations for grain storage favored bushels (approximately 1.244 cubic feet each), while mining volumes typically relied on tons or cubic yards for ore and coal assessments, rendering the cubic rod impractical for widespread adoption. [40] Its limitations included cumbersome conversions to everyday units and lack of standardization across regions, contributing to its obsolescence in favor of metric or imperial volumetric standards by the 20th century. [39]
Modern Context
Current and Legacy Uses
In the United States, the rod retains practical utility in land surveying, particularly within the Public Land Survey System (PLSS), where it is used to describe distances in sections, townships, and aliquot parts of land parcels. Official PLSS guidelines continue to incorporate rods in conversion tables and boundary specifications to align with original surveys, ensuring legal continuity in property delineations. For instance, state assessor manuals and federal cadastral standards reference rods as 16.5 feet, equivalent to one-quarter of a surveyor's chain, for interpreting and maintaining historical land divisions.[41][42][43] Legacy applications of the rod appear in real estate descriptions, where older property deeds and titles employ the unit to define lot boundaries without conversion to modern metrics, especially in rural or historically surveyed areas. In cricket, the standard pitch measures 22 yards from wicket to wicket, traditionally equivalent to 4 rods, a measurement rooted in imperial surveying practices that persists in the sport's codified dimensions. Some agricultural contexts, such as plotting field layouts in traditional farming regions, reference rods for subdividing plots, though this is increasingly rare amid metric adoption.[44][9] As of 2025, the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) has ceased support for the U.S. survey foot in the modernized State Plane Coordinate System (SPCS2022), fully transitioning to the international foot, though legacy PLSS descriptions continue to reference the survey rod. Metrication has significantly diminished the rod's everyday use, notably in the United Kingdom, where the Weights and Measures Act 1985 authorized the elimination of non-metric imperial units from trade and retail transactions, redirecting emphasis to meters and related standards. Despite this, the rod endures in legal deeds, where it interprets pre-metric conveyances and boundary descriptions without alteration, safeguarding the integrity of historical property rights.[45] Contemporary niche uses include genealogy, where researchers decode 18th- and 19th-century land records that routinely specify holdings in rods, perches, or poles to reconstruct family estates and migrations. In historical reenactments, the rod facilitates authentic replication of colonial surveying and land allocation practices, employing physical rods or chains to demonstrate period techniques.[46]Equivalents and Conversions
The international rod, standardized since 1959 in the United States and 1963 in the United Kingdom (effective 1964), measures exactly 5.0292 meters.[47] This equates precisely to 16.5 international feet or 5.5 yards, reflecting its definition as one-quarter of a Gunter's chain (which is 66 international feet). Historically, in the U.S. survey system (deprecated in federal use since January 1, 2023), the rod was defined using the survey foot, resulting in a slightly longer value of approximately 5.0292100584 meters, or exactly 16.5 survey feet.[48] This distinction arises because the survey foot equals exactly 1200/3937 meters (≈0.3048006096 meters), compared to the international foot's exact 0.3048 meters; thus, the survey rod = 16.5 × (1200/3937) meters.[48] The following table summarizes key linear equivalents for the international rod; survey values are nearly identical but use the survey foot where noted for precision.| Unit | International Rod Equivalent | Notes/Source |
|---|---|---|
| Meter (m) | 5.0292 m exactly | Exact definition since 1959[47] |
| Foot (international) | 16.5 ft exactly | Base definition |
| Foot (U.S. survey) | ≈16.499967 survey ft | Number of U.S. survey feet in one international rod; derived from survey foot[48] |
| Yard | 5.5 yd exactly | 3 ft = 1 yd[47] |
| Chain (Gunter's) | 0.25 chains exactly | Rod = 1/4 chain |
| Furlong | 0.025 furlongs exactly | Furlong = 40 rods[47] |
| Mile (statute) | 1/320 mile exactly | Mile = 5280 ft |
| Kilometer | ≈0.0050292 km | Derived from meter equivalent[47] |