Hubbry Logo
Jumping spiderJumping spiderMain
Open search
Jumping spider
Community hub
Jumping spider
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jumping spider
Jumping spider
from Wikipedia

Jumping spiders
Temporal range: Eocene to Present, 54–0 Ma Possible Paleocene record
Adult female Platycryptus undatus
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Araneae
Infraorder: Araneomorphae
Family: Salticidae
Blackwall, 1841
Genera

See List of Salticidae genera.

Diversity
c. 700 genera, 6,000+ species

Jumping spiders are a group of spiders that constitute the family Salticidae. As of 2025, this family contained almost 700 described genera and over 6,000 described species,[1] making it the largest family of spiders – comprising 13% of spider species.[2] Jumping spiders have some of the best vision among arthropods — being capable of stereoptic color vision — and use sight in courtship, hunting, and navigation. Although they normally move unobtrusively and fairly slowly, most species are capable of very agile jumps, notably when hunting, but sometimes in response to sudden threats or crossing long gaps. Both their book lungs and tracheal system are well-developed, and they use both systems (bimodal breathing). Jumping spiders are generally recognized by their eye pattern. All jumping spiders have four pairs of eyes, with the anterior median pair (the two front middle eyes) being particularly large.

Description

[edit]
Salticidae male anterior and dorsal aspects, showing positions of eyes
A regal jumper staying near its shelter on a thistle. It attempts to capture a small winged insect.

Jumping spiders are among the easiest to distinguish from similar spider families because of the shape of the cephalothorax and their eye patterns. The families closest to Salticidae in general appearance are the Corinnidae (distinguished also by prominent spines on the back four legs), the Oxyopidae (the lynx spiders, distinguished by very prominent spines on all legs), and the Thomisidae (the crab spiders, distinguished by their front four legs, which are very long and powerful). None of these families, however, have eyes that resemble those of the Salticidae. Conversely, the legs of jumping spiders are not covered with any very prominent spines. Their front four legs generally are larger than the hind four, but not as dramatically so as those of the crab spiders, nor are they held in the outstretched-arms attitude characteristic of the Thomisidae.[3] In spite of the length of their front legs, Salticidae depend on their rear legs for jumping. The generally larger front legs are used partly to assist in grasping prey,[4] and in some species, the front legs and pedipalps are used in species-recognition signaling.

The jumping spiders, unlike the other families, have faces that are roughly rectangular surfaces perpendicular to their direction of motion. In effect this means that their forward-looking, anterior eyes are on "flat faces". Their eye pattern is the clearest single identifying characteristic. They have eight eyes.[3][4] Most diagnostic are the front row of four eyes, in which the anterior median pair are more dramatically prominent than any other spider eyes apart from the posterior median eyes of the Deinopidae. There is, however, a radical functional difference between the major (anterior median) eyes of Salticidae and the major (posterior median) eyes of the Deinopidae; the large posterior eyes of Deinopidae are adapted mainly to vision in dim light, whereas the large anterior eyes of Salticidae are adapted to detailed, three-dimensional vision for purposes of estimating the range, direction, and nature of potential prey, permitting the spider to direct its attacking leaps with great precision. The anterior lateral eyes, though large, are smaller than the anterior median eyes and provide a wider forward field of vision.

The rear row of four eyes may be described as strongly bent, or as being rearranged into two rows, with two large posterior lateral eyes being the furthest back. They serve for lateral vision. The posterior median eyes also have been shifted out laterally, almost as far as the posterior lateral eyes. They are usually much smaller than the posterior lateral eyes and there is doubt about whether they are at all functional in many species.[citation needed]

The body length of jumping spiders generally ranges from 1 to 25 mm (0.04–0.98 in).[3][5] The largest is Hyllus giganteus,[5] while other genera with relatively large species include Phidippus, Philaeus and Plexippus.[6]

In addition to using their silk for safety lines while jumping, they also build silken "pup tents", where they take shelter from bad weather and sleep at night.[7] They molt in these shelters, build and store egg cases in them, and also spend the winter in them.[8]

Their body's sensory hairs are able to detect airborne acoustic stimuli up to 3 m away.[9]

Vision

[edit]
The visual fields of a jumping spider
The eight eyes of a Telamonia dimidiata located near the front
Adult male Phidippus audax

Jumping spiders have four pairs of eyes; three secondary pairs that are fixed and a principal pair that is movable.

The posterior median eyes are vestigial in many species, but in some primitive subfamilies, they are comparable in size with the other secondary eyes and help to detect motion.[10] While unable to form images, the reduced pair of eyes is thought to have a role similar to that of insect ocelli by receiving light from the sky. The photoreceptors in the other secondary pairs are almost exclusively green-sensitive, but the posterior median eyes have two visual opsins different from those in all the other eyes, sensitive to blue and UV light.[11]

The posterior lateral eyes (PLEs) are wide-angle motion detectors that sense motions from the side and behind. Combined with the other eyes, PLEs give the spider a near 360° view of the world.[citation needed]

The anterior lateral eyes (ALEs) have the best visual acuity of the secondary eyes.[12] They are able to distinguish some details, as well, and without them, no "looming response" can be triggered by motion.[13] Even with all the other pairs covered, jumping spiders in a study could still detect, stalk, and attack flies, using their ALEs only, which are also sufficiently widely spaced to provide stereoscopic vision.[14]

The anterior median eyes have very good vision. This pair of eyes is built like a telescopic tube with a corneal lens in the front and a second lens in the back that focus images onto a four-layered retina, a narrow, boomerang-shaped strip oriented vertically.[15][16] Physiological experiments have shown they may have up to four different kinds of receptor cells, with different absorption spectra, giving them the possibility of tetrachromatic color vision, with sensitivity extending into the ultraviolet (UV) range.[17] As the eyes are too close together to allow depth perception, and the animals do not make use of motion parallax, they have instead evolved a method called image defocus. Of the four photoreceptor layers in the retina, the two closest to the surface contain a UV-sensitive opsin (visual pigment), while the two deepest contain a green-sensitive opsin. The incoming green light is only focused on the deepest layer, while the other one receives defocused or fuzzy images. By measuring the amount of defocus from the fuzzy layer, calculating the distance to the objects in front of them is possible.[18][19] In addition to receptor cells, red filters also have been detected, located in front of the cells that normally register green light.[20] All salticids, regardless of whether they have two, three, or four kinds of color receptors, seemingly are highly sensitive to UV light.[17] Some species (such as Cosmophasis umbratica) are highly dimorphic in the UV spectrum, suggesting a role in sexual signaling.[21] Color discrimination has been demonstrated in behavioral experiments.

The anterior median eyes have high resolution (11 min visual angle),[22] but the field of vision is narrow, from 2 to 5°. The central region of the retina, where acuity is highest, is no more than six or seven receptor rows wide. However, the eye can scan objects off the direct axis of vision. As the lens is attached to the carapace, the eye's scanning movements are restricted to its retina through a complicated pattern of translations and rotations.[23] This dynamic adjustment is a means of compensation for the narrowness of the static field of vision. Movement of the retina in jumping spiders is analogous to the way many vertebrates, such as primates, move their entire eyes to focus images of interest onto their fovea centralis. In jumping spiders with a translucent carapace, such movements within the jumping spider's eyes are visible from outside when the attention of the spider is directed to various targets.[24]

Behavior

[edit]

Jumping

[edit]
Unidentified salticid jumping with trailing dragline

Many other arthropods are known to jump, including grasshoppers, fleas, leafhoppers, and sand fleas. Jumping spiders are different from these animals because they are able to make accurate, targeted jumps. Jumps are used for navigation, to escape danger, and to catch prey. When jumping, they use mainly their third or fourth pair of legs, or both pairs, depending on species.[25] Jumping spiders' well-developed internal hydraulic system extends their limbs by altering the pressure of their body fluid (hemolymph) within them.[26] This enables the spiders to jump without having large muscular legs like a grasshopper. The maximum horizontal jump distance varies greatly between species, with some capable of jumping two or three body lengths, while the jump of an individual Colonus puerperus was measured at 38 times the body length.[27] The accuracy of their jumps is mediated by their well-developed visual system and the ability to quickly process visual information to tailor each jump.[28][29] When a jumping spider moves from place to place, and especially just before it jumps, it tethers a filament of silk (or 'dragline') to whatever it is standing on.[3][5] This dragline provides a mechanical aid to jumping, including braking and stabilization[28][30] and if the jump should fail, the spider climbs back up the dragline.[8]

Hunting

[edit]
Heavy-bodied jumper eating a Pantropical jumper, another jumping spider

The hunting behaviour of the Salticidae is confusingly varied compared to that of most spiders in other families.[31] Salticids hunt diurnally as a rule, which is consistent with their highly developed visual system. When it detects potential prey, a jumping spider typically begins orienting itself by swiveling its cephalothorax to bring the anterior median eyes to bear. It then moves its abdomen into line with its cephalothorax. After that, it might spend some time inspecting the object of its attention and determining whether a camouflaged or doubtful item of prey is promising, before it starts to stalk slowly forward. When close enough, the spider pauses to attach a dragline, then springs onto the prey.

Many variations on the theme and many surprising aspects exist. For one, salticids do not necessarily follow a straight path in approaching prey. They may follow a circuitous course, sometimes even a course that takes the hunter through regions from which the prey is not visible. Such complex adaptive behaviour is hard to reconcile with an organism that has such a tiny brain, but some jumping spiders, in particular some species of Portia, can negotiate long detours from one bush down to the ground, then up the stem of another bush to capture a prey item on a particular leaf.[32] Such behaviour still is the subject of research.[31]

Some salticid species are continually on the move, stopping periodically to look around for prey, which they then stalk immediately. Others spend more time scanning their surroundings from one position, actively stalking any prey they detect. Members of the genus Phaeacius take that strategy to extremes; they sit on a tree trunk, facing downwards and rarely do any stalking, but simply lunge down on any prey items that pass close before them.[31]

Some Salticidae specialise in particular classes of prey, such as ants. Most spiders, including most salticids, avoid worker ants, but several species not only eat them as a primary item in their diets, but also employ specialised attack techniques; Anasaitis canosa, for example, circles around to the front of the ant and grabs it over the back of its head. Such myrmecophagous species, however, do not necessarily refuse other prey items, and routinely catch flies and similar prey in the usual salticid fashion, without the special precautions they apply in hunting dangerous prey such as ants. Ants offer the advantages of being plentiful prey items for which little competition from other predators occurs, but catching less hazardous prey when it presents itself remains profitable.[31]

Some of the most surprising hunting behaviours occur among the araneophagous Salticidae, and vary greatly in method. Many of the spider-hunting species quite commonly attack other spiders, whether fellow salticids or not, in the same way as any other prey, but some kinds resort to web invasion; nonspecialists such as Phidippus audax sometimes attack prey ensnared in webs, basically in acts of kleptoparasitism; sometimes they leap onto and eat the web occupant itself, or simply walk over the web for that purpose.

Salticidae in the genera Brettus, Cyrba, Gelotia, and Portia display more advanced web-invasion behavior. They slowly advance onto the web and vibrate the silk with their pedipalps and legs. In this respect, their behaviour resembles that of the Mimetidae, probably the most specialised of the araneophagous spider families. If the web occupant approaches in the manner appropriate to dealing with ensnared prey, the predator attacks.[31]

The foregoing examples present the Salticidae as textbook examples of active hunters; they would hardly seem likely to build webs other than those used in reproductive activities, and in fact, most species really do not build webs to catch prey. However, exceptions occur, though even those that do build capture webs generally also go hunting like other salticids. Some Portia species, for example, spin capture webs that are functional, though not as impressive as some orb webs of the Araneidae; Portia webs are of an unusual funnel shape and apparently adapted to the capture of other spiders. Spartaeus species, though, largely capture moths in their webs. In their review of the ethology of the Salticidae, Richman and Jackson speculate on whether such web building is a relic of the evolution of this family from web-building ancestors.[31] Their tendency towards being active hunters poses a risk in relation to spider-pathogenic fungi, especially in the Tropics, Subtropics, and North America. This is because spider-pathogenic fungi tend to infect spiders that move around a lot.[33]

In hunting, the Salticidae also use their silk as a tether to enable them to reach prey that otherwise would be inaccessible. For example, by advancing towards the prey to less than the jumping distance, then retreating and leaping in an arc at the end of the tether line, many species can leap onto prey on vertical or even on inverted surfaces, which of course would not be possible without such a tether.

Having made contact with the prey, hunting Salticidae administer a bite to inject rapid-acting venom that gives the victim little time to react.[34] In this respect, they resemble the Mimetidae and Thomisidae, families that ambush prey that often are larger than the predator, and they do so without securing the victim with silk; they accordingly must immobilise it immediately and their venom is adapted accordingly.

This small female jumping spider (Hyllus semicupreus) successfully captured a grasshopper that is much larger and stronger than she is. The grasshopper tried to escape, but the spider immobilized it using the venom she injected, and the "dragline" helped her hold her position with respect to the prey object.

Diet

[edit]
A camouflaged Menemerus bivittatus jumping spider with a captured male ant

Although jumping spiders are generally carnivorous, many species have been known to include nectar in their diets,[35]. One species, Bagheera kiplingi, feeds primarily on Beltian bodies, specialized structures rich in fat and protein, found on some acacia (Vachellia) species.[36] None are known to feed on seeds or fruit. Extrafloral nectaries on plants, such as Chamaecrista fasciculata (partridge pea), provide jumping spiders with nectar; the plant benefits accordingly when the spiders prey on whatever pests they find.

The female of the Southeast Asian species Toxeus magnus feeds its offspring with a milky, nutritious fluid for the first 40 days of their lives.[37]

Reproduction

[edit]
Courtship display of Saitis barbipes jumping spider

Courtship and mating behavior

[edit]

Jumping spiders conduct complex, visual courtship displays using movements and physical bodily attributes. A form of sexual dimorphism, the males possess plumose hairs, colored or iridescent hairs (particularly pronounced in the peacock spiders), front leg fringes, structures on other legs, and other, often bizarre, modifications. These characteristics are used in a courtship "dance" in which the colored or iridescent parts of the body are displayed. In addition to displaying colors, jumping spiders perform complex sliding, vibrational, or zigzag movements to attract females. Many males have auditory signals, as well. These amplified sounds presented to the females resemble buzzes or drum rolls.[38] Species vary significantly in visual and vibratory components of courtship.[39] The ability to sense UV light (see Vision section) is used by at least one species, Cosmophasis umbratica, in courtship behavior,[40][41] though it is reasonable to assume that many other species exhibit this characteristic. Cosmophasis umbratica males have markings that are only visible in UV and the females use the markings for mate choice.[42]

If receptive to the male, the female assumes a passive, crouching position. In some species, the female may vibrate her palps or abdomen. The male then extends his front legs towards the female to touch her. If the female remains receptive, the male climbs on her back and inseminates her with his palps.[43]

Consequences of sexual dimorphism

[edit]

Maintaining colorful ornamentation may seem strictly beneficial to sexual selection, yet costs to maintain such distinguishing characteristics occur.[42] While colorful or UV-reflecting individuals may attract more female spiders, it can also increase the risk of predation.[16]

Taxonomy

[edit]
Classification within the spiders (Araneae)[44]

The monophyly of the family Salticidae is well established through both phylogenetic and morphological analyses. The sister group to Salticidae is the family Philodromidae.[45][46] Synapomorphies of the two families include loss of cylindrical gland spigots and loss of tapeta in the indirect eyes.[46]

A 2015 revision of the Salticidae family divided it into seven subfamilies:[47]

  • Onomastinae Maddison, 2015 – 1 extant genus
  • Asemoneinae Maddison, 2015 – 4 extant genera (Hindumanes, originally placed here, was moved to Lyssomaninae[48])
  • Lyssomaninae Blackwall, 1877 – 4 extant genera (including Hindumanes)
  • Spartaeinae Wanless, 1984 – 29 extant genera in 3 tribes
  • Eupoinae Maddison, 2015 – 3 extant genera
  • Hisponinae Simon, 1901 – 6 extant genera
  • Salticinae Blackwall, 1841 – about 540 extant genera in 27 tribes

The relationships between these subfamilies is still up for debate. Below are the results of a 2017 phylogenomic study that attempted to resolve this question. The subfamily Eupoinae was unevaluated and its exact position is unclear.[49]

Habitat

[edit]
Diamorphic jumping spider in family Salticidae on tree trunk.

Jumping spiders live in a variety of habitats. Tropical forests harbor the most species, but they are also found in temperate forests, scrubland, deserts, intertidal zones, and mountainous regions. Euophrys omnisuperstes is the species reported to have been collected at the highest elevation, on the slopes of Mount Everest.[50]

Models for mimicry

[edit]

Some small insects are thought to have evolved an appearance or behavioural traits that resemble those of jumping spiders and this is suspected to prevent their predation, specifically from jumping spiders. Some examples appear to be provided by patterns on the wings of some tephritid flies,[51][52] the nymph of a fulgorid[53] and possibly some moths.[54]

Fossils

[edit]

Very few jumping spider fossils have been found. Of those known, all are from Cenozoic era amber. The oldest fossils are from Baltic amber dating to the Eocene epoch, specifically, 54 to 42 million years ago. Other fossil jumping spiders have been preserved within Chiapas amber and Dominican amber.[55]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Jumping spiders are small to medium-sized arachnids belonging to the family Salticidae, the largest family of spiders with over 6,900 described worldwide. These diurnal hunters are renowned for their exceptional vision, enabled by eight eyes including a pair of large anterior median eyes that provide acute, color-sensitive sight and a near-360-degree , allowing them to stalk and pounce on prey with precision. Unlike web-building spiders, jumping spiders actively pursue small such as and other spiders, leaping distances up to 50 times their body length using a hydraulic leg extension mechanism, while anchoring themselves with a safety line. Ranging in size from 1 to 22 mm, they exhibit stocky bodies, often adorned with iridescent scales or colorful patterns, particularly in males who display elaborate dances to attract females. Found in diverse habitats globally except the polar regions, jumping spiders thrive in , rocky areas, wood piles, and even structures like buildings and gardens, where they contribute as beneficial predators by controlling pest such as flies and . Their reproductive cycle typically spans one year, with females producing sacs containing 25 to 60 eggs in silken retreats, guarding them until the spiderlings emerge and disperse after several weeks. Although generally harmless to s, larger species may deliver a mildly painful bite if provoked, but they pose no significant medical threat. Notable for their intelligence and curiosity, jumping spiders demonstrate complex behaviors like recognizing biological motion in prey and even consuming or nectar as supplementary food sources.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Classification and diversity

Jumping spiders belong to the Salticidae within the order Araneae, representing the largest and most diverse family with over 6,700 described distributed across approximately 700 genera as of 2025. This family encompasses a wide array of forms, with recent surveys indicating ongoing discoveries that continue to expand the known diversity. The classification of Salticidae includes several key subfamilies, with comprising the majority of species (over 90%) and characterized by typical jumping spider traits, while others like Spartaeinae exhibit specialized behaviors such as . Notable genera include Salticus, known for its striped patterns and widespread occurrence; Phidippus, prominent in with bold coloration; and Maratus, famous for elaborate male courtship displays in . Salticidae exhibit a , occurring on all continents except , with the highest species diversity concentrated in tropical regions such as and , where environmental complexity supports extensive radiations. Recent taxonomic updates in have highlighted adaptations to extreme environments, including the description of the new alpine genus from the South Island mountains of , comprising species like O. alpinus and O. marmoratus specialized for high-altitude habitats. Additional contributions include new species in the Spartaeini tribe from understudied tropical areas, underscoring the family's undescribed potential.

Evolutionary history and fossils

Jumping spiders (Salticidae) belong to the clade within the araneomorph spiders, a diverse group characterized by advanced genitalic structures and silk-producing capabilities. Phylogenetic analyses place Salticidae as a relatively derived family among entelegynes, with molecular data supporting their divergence from other araneomorph lineages during the early . Relaxed estimates, calibrated using constraints, indicate that the Salticidae family originated approximately 41–50 million years ago, coinciding with the Eocene . The fossil record of jumping spiders is sparse but provides key insights into their radiation. The earliest known salticid fossils date to the Eocene, preserved in deposits from , approximately 44–54 million years old. These inclusions often reveal well-preserved specimens with identifiable and leg structures typical of modern salticids, suggesting the family had already achieved much of its distinctive morphology by this time. No definitive precursors to Salticidae have been identified, though early araneomorph spiders from the and periods represent broader ancestral stock within Araneae. A pivotal evolutionary in salticids was the development of their principal eyes, which feature a tiered enabling high-resolution vision crucial for active hunting. This adaptation likely emerged early in the family's history, as evidenced by the advanced ocular structures in Eocene fossils, allowing salticids to exploit visual cues in diverse habitats. Recent paleontological discoveries have expanded the known geographic range of fossil salticids. In 2022, the first jumping spider from Chinese was described from mid-Miocene Zhangpu deposits in Province, representing an Asian record and tentatively assigned to the subfamily . These finds, alongside Eocene Baltic specimens, underscore the family's post-Eocene diversification, with over 6,600 extant today.

Physical characteristics

Morphology

Jumping spiders (family Salticidae) possess a classic body plan, divided into two tagmata: a compact (prosoma) and a bulbous (opisthosoma), connected by a slender pedicel. The is relatively short and robust, bearing the mouthparts anteriorly and four pairs of sturdy legs laterally, which are often covered in dense setae for sensory perception. Body lengths typically range from 1 to 22 mm, though most fall in the smaller to medium category. The , located at the front of the , are paired, hinged appendages each tipped with a hollow fang used to inject for subduing prey. Adjacent to the are the pedipalps, short leg-like structures that function in sensory exploration and prey manipulation; in males, the terminal segments are enlarged and modified into emboli for sperm transfer during . At the posterior end of the lie the spinnerets, six small, finger-like projections arranged in three pairs from silk glands that extrude various types of for draglines, lines, and other uses. The abdomen of jumping spiders often displays striking patterns, ranging from cryptic to iridescent hues that enhance survival or signaling. Many feature scales or hairs that produce through light interference, while others rely on pigments for matte tones blending with foliage. A notable example is the peacock spider genus , where males bear vividly colored abdominal scales—iridescent blues and greens from multilayer reflectors, alongside red and yellow pigments in brush-like hairs—arranged in expandable lateral flaps. Sexual dimorphism is prevalent in Salticidae, with males generally smaller and more ornate than females to facilitate mate attraction. For instance, in Salticus scenicus, females measure 4–6.5 mm in body length compared to 4–5.5 mm for males, and exhibit less vivid coloration. In species like Cosmophasis umbratica, males display unique ultraviolet-reflective ornamentation across the body, absent in females, highlighting the role of such traits in sexual signaling.

Vision and sensory adaptations

Jumping spiders possess eight eyes arranged in two rows on the , consisting of two large anterior median principal eyes and six smaller secondary eyes. The principal eyes provide high-acuity, telescopic vision through a - or V-shaped located at the end of long, tube-like structures, with a foveal region enabling sharp focus on small details. These eyes feature a single lens system that focuses light onto four tiers of photoreceptors, allowing for detailed imaging despite the spiders' small size (typically 2–20 mm in body length). In contrast, the secondary eyes—comprising anterior lateral, posterior median, and posterior lateral pairs—offer a wide approaching 360 degrees, primarily for detecting motion and providing low-resolution in black and white. The principal eyes support trichromatic color vision, with photoreceptors sensitive to ultraviolet (UV), green, and, in some species, red wavelengths achieved via spectral filtering in the retina. This UV sensitivity, peaking around 350 nm, combined with green sensitivity near 520 nm, enables discrimination of prey patterns and colors from distances up to approximately 20 cm. Additionally, jumping spiders detect linearly polarized light, likely through the secondary eyes, which aids in navigating glare or enhancing contrast in bright environments, though this capability is more pronounced in certain species than others. These visual adaptations allow for precise prey recognition and object discrimination, far surpassing most other spiders. Beyond vision, jumping spiders rely on supplementary senses, though to a lesser extent. Tactile hairs (setae) on the legs and body detect vibrations and air currents, providing cues for and prey proximity. Chemoreceptors, concentrated on the tarsi of the legs, sense chemical cues from silk trails or substrates, enabling trail-following in low-visibility conditions, but vision dominates sensory integration for and . In specific habitats, such as deserts, certain jumping spider species exhibit enlarged principal eyes or structural modifications like parallel ridges on the corneal surface to reduce from intense , enhancing visual clarity in arid conditions. For instance, species in the genus Phidippus show such corneal features, potentially aiding adaptation to high-light environments.

Ecology

Habitat and distribution

Jumping spiders (family Salticidae) exhibit a , present on every continent except , where extreme cold precludes their survival. They thrive in diverse terrestrial ecosystems worldwide, from arid deserts to humid rainforests, reflecting their broad ecological tolerance. Approximately 90% of the over 6,000 described species occur in tropical and subtropical regions, underscoring their preference for warmer climates that support high . Within these biomes, jumping spiders favor specific microhabitats that provide vantage points for and , such as foliage on trees and shrubs, rough bark surfaces, and accumulations of ground litter in forests and grasslands. They also occupy open scrublands and dunes, where they navigate sandy or rocky substrates. Remarkably, certain species extend into marginal environments like intertidal zones along coastlines; for instance, Terralonus californicus inhabits pebble and sandy beaches, enduring wave splash and tidal exposure while preying on flies amid debris. The family's altitudinal distribution ranges from to alpine elevations exceeding 2,000 meters, demonstrating vertical adaptability across elevational gradients. In montane forests and tundra-like highlands, they exploit crevices in rocks and low vegetation. A striking example comes from recent discoveries in , where the new Ourea—comprising 12 species—was described in 2025 from the South Island's rocky alpine zones, with Ourea saffroclypeus recorded at altitudes up to 2,200 meters amid fields and outcrops. Jumping spiders show considerable resilience to climatic variability, including in flood-vulnerable settings. Species in and coastal habitats employ behavioral strategies to mitigate inundation risks, such as rapid relocation to elevated perches during rising . A 2025 study on the intertidal species marinus revealed physiological adaptations, including enhanced tolerance to saltwater immersion and behavioral shifts like nest or evasion, enabling in periodically flooded pebble beach environments.

Diet and foraging

Jumping spiders (family Salticidae) are predominantly carnivorous, with diets centered on small arthropods such as flies, moths, , and other s. Field studies of species like Salticus tricinctus reveal that flies (Diptera) constitute 70.3% of observed prey, primarily chironomids, with (2.7%) and moths (2.7%) making up smaller portions, while analyses of show similar preferences including larvae, aphids, and conspecific s. occurs occasionally, often in contexts of food scarcity or during mating interactions, where females may consume males to gain nutritional benefits. An exceptional case is , a Neotropical that obtains about 90% of its sustenance from plant-based sources, primarily nutrient-rich Beltian bodies on trees, marking it as the most herbivorous known. Unlike web-building spiders, jumping spiders forage as diurnal active hunters, patrolling or surfaces during daylight to visually locate and stalk prey over short distances before . Their superior eyesight enables precise detection of movement and form, allowing them to pursue targets without reliance on traps. Prey selection favors items up to approximately 50-80% of the spider's body length, optimizing energy gain relative to handling effort. Once subdued, victims are immobilized with , after which the spider regurgitates onto the body to externally liquefy tissues, facilitating fluid ingestion through its sucking mouthparts—a process common to araneomorph spiders but adapted for their mobile lifestyle. Although jumping spiders primarily hunt live, moving prey using their acute vision, they are capable of consuming dead or motionless prey, particularly when hungry or food-deprived. Studies have demonstrated that starved females of Salticus scenicus will feed on dead houseflies, showing that ingestion can occur without predatory capture. Similarly, Phidippus audax can survive and complete its life cycle solely on dead prey, though with significantly reduced survival rates and longer instar durations compared to those fed live prey. In captive settings, jumping spiders often accept dead or immobilized prey, such as crushed mealworms (with heads crushed to prevent movement). In addition to animal prey, nectarivory supplements the diet in numerous species, providing carbohydrates for energy and hydration, particularly in arid environments or during prey shortages. Observations across over 90 salticid species confirm nectar consumption from floral and extrafloral sources as a routine behavior. Recent 2020s research on Phidippus audax demonstrates that access to nectar-like sucrose solutions alongside high-protein diets boosts juvenile growth by over 40% and improves survival rates by 20-60%, highlighting its role in optimizing foraging efficiency. Recent 2025 studies indicate that warming temperatures may enhance nectar consumption in species like Phidippus audax to cope with prey scarcity in changing habitats.

Mimicry and defenses

Jumping spiders exhibit various forms of that enhance their survival, either by deceiving prey or deterring predators. In , species like melanotarsa leverage their ant-like appearance to approach potential prey undetected, blurring the line between defensive and offensive tactics; this allows the spider to stalk that would otherwise flee from an approaching spider, increasing predation success in field observations. Batesian mimicry is prevalent among jumping spiders, particularly in ant-mimicking genera such as and Peckhamia, where the harmless spiders resemble aggressive or unpalatable s to avoid predation by birds, , and other arthropods. For instance, Peckhamia picata experiences significantly lower predation rates—less than one-third compared to non-mimetic congeners—when presented to predators like mantises and jumping spiders, demonstrating the protective efficacy of morphological and behavioral ant resemblance in North American habitats. Similarly, species replicate locomotion, such as alternating leg movements and jerky gaits, which further reduces detection by visual predators and has been quantified through high-speed video analysis showing mimicry accuracy exceeding 80% in stride patterns. Some jumping spiders also engage in Batesian mimicry of toxic beyond ants, including velvet ants (Mutillidae), which possess potent stings. Species like display bright red-and-black coloration mirroring female velvet ants such as , deterring predators that associate the warning pattern with danger; field observations from the 1980s confirmed this resemblance reduces attacks, and recent 2020s surveys in southeastern U.S. habitats continue to document these mimics evading avian and arthropod predators through aposematic-like signaling. While Peckhamia primarily mimics ants, ongoing field studies in the 2020s highlight convergent mimicry rings where velvet ant patterns overlap with spider defenses, emphasizing evolutionary pressures from shared predators. Beyond mimicry, jumping spiders employ behavioral defenses to evade threats. Thanatosis, or death feigning, involves the spider becoming rigidly immobile upon disturbance, a tactic observed in species such as Phidippus spp. during predator encounters; this response can last minutes to hours, allowing predators to lose interest and depart. Autotomy, the voluntary detachment of legs when grasped, serves as an escape mechanism, enabling Phidippus spp. to break free from predators like birds or larger arthropods; post-autotomy, spiders experience initial reduction in speed but recover quickly, and legs regenerate after molting, minimizing long-term costs. Additionally, rapid escape jumps provide immediate flight, with spiders like Phidippus regius achieving leaps up to 5 times their body length in under 0.03 seconds, often tethered by a silk safety line to prevent fatal falls; this propulsion, powered by hydraulic leg extension, effectively eludes pursuing threats in diverse habitats.

Behavior

Locomotion and jumping

Jumping spiders exhibit versatile locomotion adapted to their active lifestyle, including walking, , and . During walking, they employ an alternating tetrapod , where two pairs of legs move simultaneously while the other two provide support, enabling stable forward, backward, or sideways progression. This , common among salticids, allows for precise maneuvering on varied substrates. For , they rely on specialized setae on the tarsi of their legs, particularly in the claw tufts, which provide and on smooth vertical or inverted surfaces. These densely packed, hairy structures, numbering around 50–73 per tuft in species like Pseudeuophrys lanigera and Sitticus pubescens, enable secure attachment and rapid detachment during ascent. The hallmark of jumping spider locomotion is their ability to perform rapid, propelled leaps using a hydraulic mechanism powered by (blood) pressure. Lacking extensor muscles in major leg joints such as the femur-patella and tibia-metatarsus, they increase internal pressure in the prosoma to force into the legs, extending them explosively for takeoff. This system, supplemented by flexor muscle relaxation and , primarily involves the third and fourth pairs of legs, with the third legs often providing the main propulsive force. Jumps can cover distances up to 50 body lengths. In exploratory jumps of , maximum distances reach 5 body lengths, equivalent to 75 mm for a 15 mm spider, achieving takeoff velocities of 0.5–1 m/s and accelerations up to 5 g. To ensure safety and control, jumping spiders attach a dragline from their spinnerets before leaping, which unreels at speeds of 500–700 mm/s during flight and serves as a tether for descent or mid-air adjustments. This major ampullate is exceptionally tough (mean toughness 282 MJ/m³), maintaining uniformity even at high spinning rates. These jumps are energetically efficient compared to sustained running, as they harness stored in the and structures during the crouch phase, releasing it rapidly to minimize metabolic demands for short-distance travel. In Phidippus regius, for instance, exploratory jumps optimize trajectories for minimal energy cost, with steeper takeoff angles for longer distances. Vision briefly aids in targeting jumps, but the core rely on hydraulic and elastic components for precision and power.

Hunting strategies

Jumping spiders ( Salticidae) employ active hunting strategies that rely on their exceptional vision to detect, stalk, and capture prey without the use of webs. They typically approach potential prey through a slow, deliberate creeping motion, orienting themselves using their forward-facing principal eyes for detailed targeting while secondary eyes provide a wide panoramic view to monitor surroundings and detect movement. This stalking culminates in a sudden pounce, where the spider leaps onto the prey from a short , often securing itself with a dragline of silk to prevent falls. Although jumping spiders primarily hunt live, moving prey using visual cues such as motion and form, they are capable of consuming dead or motionless prey under conditions of hunger or in experimental and captive settings. Laboratory studies have shown that starved females of Salticus scenicus feed on dead houseflies, and Phidippus audax can survive and develop solely on dead prey, albeit with significantly lower survival rates and longer instar durations compared to those fed live prey. Once contact is made, jumping spiders immobilize prey through a rapid bite that injects , leading to quick in most cases. They often ambush from elevated perches, such as foliage or bark, allowing them to scan for or other small arthropods below. After capture, prey may be wrapped in for later consumption or eaten immediately on the spot, depending on the hunter's hunger and environmental risks. These tactics are versatile across species, though some like Portia exhibit specialized behaviors, such as luring web-builders by vibrating to mimic struggling before pouncing. Jumping spiders demonstrate notable in hunting, including learning from trial-and-error experiences to refine strategies. In studies, like Portia have shown the ability to plan detours around obstacles to reach prey, adapting paths based on visual cues and prior attempts. More recent research highlights navigation skills, where jumping spiders adjust routes after visual exploration, indicating and problem-solving akin to trial-and-error learning in contexts. For instance, experiments in the early revealed that spiders can employ different navigational tactics depending on overhead visual surveys, improving success rates over repeated trials. These abilities underscore their predatory , particularly in overcoming complex prey defenses.

Reproduction

Courtship and mating

Male jumping spiders initiate with elaborate, species-specific displays that combine visual, vibratory, and sometimes chemical signals to attract females and reduce the risk of . These displays typically involve rhythmic leg waving, particularly of the forelegs, flicking, and bobbing or vibrations produced by rapid movements against the substrate. In like Phidippus clarus, vibratory signals during correlate positively with male leg size and predict higher mating success, as faster signaling rates increase copulation likelihood. Such multimodal behaviors allow males to communicate from a distance, often starting 10–50 cm away, before approaching closer. A striking example of species-specific visual displays occurs in peacock spiders of the genus , such as M. volans, where males unfurl colorful abdominal flaps in a "fan dance" synchronized with third-leg waves and side-stepping to showcase iridescent patterns. This fan display, combined with opisthosomal bobbing and flickering, lasts from 6 to 51 minutes on average, escalating to pre-mount sequences with leg rotations and extended forelegs. Vibrational components, including short "rumble-rumps" at long range and longer "grind-revs" near mounting, further enhance the display's effectiveness in eliciting female receptivity. These rituals exploit the spiders' acute vision, with males orienting toward females and performing dances to signal species identity and quality. Pheromones play a complementary role by modulating visual recognition, hastening males' identification of conspecific females and increasing the appeal of matching morphological cues like light coloration on the face and legs. In Lyssomanes viridis, exposure to female pheromones activates conspecific templates, prompting quicker courtship responses to animated images resembling receptive females while reducing interest in heterospecifics. Airborne and contact pheromones from silk draglines thus integrate with visual signals, guiding mate choice and preventing misdirected courtship. Upon female acceptance, typically signaled by reduced aggression or orientation toward the male, copulation ensues with the male mounting and inserting his pedipalps sequentially into the female's to transfer . durations vary by context, lasting 15–45 minutes in open arenas and up to 80 minutes in retreats, during which the male remains vulnerable. Post-copulation, males face a high risk of , with females in species like Phidippus and Habronattus consuming courting males in up to 7–30% of interactions, often as a gain despite no direct reproductive benefit. Polyandry occurs in some jumping spider species, though mating frequency is generally low, with females like those of Servaea incana remating once or twice lifetime after an initial inhibition period. Multiple inseminations lead to , influenced by morphology, as the paired emboli deliver sperm to separate spermathecae, allowing and displacement of prior ejaculates based on male order and volume. In Servaea, stored sperm from successive males compete, with first-male precedence reduced by behavioral inhibition post-mating.

Life cycle and sexual dimorphism

The life cycle of jumping spiders begins with females laying eggs within protective silk sacs, typically containing 10 to 100 eggs per clutch depending on the species and environmental conditions. For instance, in Phidippus johnsoni, the first egg sac averages approximately 93 eggs, with females producing up to five such sacs over their reproductive period, though subsequent clutches are smaller. These sacs are often concealed in retreats like leaf curls or bark crevices, where the female remains to guard them against predators and environmental threats. Eggs hatch after about 2 to 4 weeks, releasing spiderlings that undergo 4 to 8 instars through molting, with males generally requiring fewer molts (5–7) to reach maturity compared to females (6–8). Post-hatching, many exhibit maternal care, with females guarding the brood for 2 to 3 weeks until the spiderlings disperse, providing protection but not direct feeding in most cases. Development from to spans 6 to 18 months, influenced by factors such as , availability, and ; for example, in Portia , maturation takes around 1.5 years under laboratory conditions. typically live 1 to 2 years, though recent research on Toxeus magnus shows that extended maternal care, including non-nutritional nursing, prolongs female longevity by about 25% compared to non-caring females, potentially enhancing overall . Environmental factors like diet quality also affect development, with food restriction leading to longer maturation times and smaller sizes in such as Phintelloides versicolor. Sexual dimorphism in jumping spiders often manifests in size and coloration differences between sexes, with females generally larger than males by 20–30% in body mass or length in many species, such as Phidippus and Habronattus, to support greater reproductive investment like egg production. Males, in contrast, are smaller and frequently exhibit more vibrant colors and patterns—such as iridescent scales or bold markings—to facilitate mate attraction during displays. This dimorphism arises from pressures, where male traits signal genetic quality but come at a cost. The smaller size and conspicuous coloration of males increase their predation risk, as they are more active in searching for females and less camouflaged than the typically drab, larger females. Studies on species like Phidippus clarus indicate that males' higher mobility exposes them to more encounters with predators, contributing to elevated male mortality rates and often female-biased adult sex ratios. This dimorphism influences female choosiness, as larger, longer-lived females can afford to select high-quality mates, while male-biased juvenile mortality affects by reducing male availability and potentially intensifying competition among surviving males.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.