Hubbry Logo
Surayud ChulanontSurayud ChulanontMain
Open search
Surayud Chulanont
Community hub
Surayud Chulanont
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Surayud Chulanont
Surayud Chulanont
from Wikipedia

Surayud Chulanont (Thai: สุรยุทธ์ จุลานนท์, RTGSSurayut Chulanon, IPA: [sù.rá.jút t͡ɕù.laː.non]; born 28 August 1943) is a Thai former politician and military officer who was the 24th prime minister of Thailand and head of Thailand's interim government between 2006 and 2008. He is a former supreme commander of the Royal Thai Army and is currently Privy Councilor to King Vajiralongkorn.

Key Information

Surayud came from a military family, but his father defected from the Royal Thai Army to the Communist Party of Thailand when Surayud was a boy. Surayud joined the Thai Army and rose to power as an aide to General Prem Tinsulanonda. He commanded troops during Bloody May, the violent 1992 crackdown on anti-government protesters, but he denied giving his men the order to shoot protesters. He was promoted to army commander during the government of Chuan Leekpai and was promoted to supreme commander in 2003, under the government of Thaksin Shinawatra. Upon his retirement from the army, he was appointed by King Bhumibol Adulyadej to the Privy Council of Thailand. Surayud and Privy Council President Prem Tinsulanonda played a key role in the promotion of General Sonthi Boonratklin to the position of army commander.

Sonthi overthrew the government of Thaksin in a coup on 19 September 2006 and implored Surayud to be the head of interim government. Surayud's government was controversial. There was a significant worsening in perceived levels of corruption during his government.[1] Surayud's Deputy Finance Minister, Sommai Pasee, was sentenced to jail for abuse of power.[2] Surayud raised the military budget by 35% and was accused of economic mismanagement, rampant human rights abuses, and flip-flopping on numerous policies. Article 19 ranked Thailand as falling behind Cambodia and Indonesia in terms of freedom of expression.[3] Thailand's economic growth rate slowed to the lowest level in five years and was ranked the lowest in the region.[4][5] However, Surayud was praised for apologising for atrocities committed by the Thai military fighting the South Thailand insurgency, although the apology was accompanied by a sharp escalation in violence. He has been accused of forest reserve encroachment (a charge that was not investigated since the statute of limitations had run out by two years) and of illegally acquiring train carriages for display in his forest home.

Family and education

[edit]

Surayud came from a long line of military leaders. His maternal grandfather was Phraya Sri Sitthi Songkhram (Din Tharab), a royalist leader during the failed Boworadej Rebellion. Surayud's father was Lt. Colonel Phayom Chulanont, a Royal Thai Army military officer who, as "Comrade Too Khamtan" (Thai: สหายตู้คำตัน, RTGS: sahai tu khamtan), became a member of the Central Committee Communist Party of Thailand and Chief of Staff of the People's Liberation Army of Thailand.[6]

Surayud completed his early education at Saint Gabriel's College and Suankularb Wittayalai School in Bangkok. He graduated from the inaugural class of Armed Forces Preparatory Academy.

As a boy, Surayud's father left his family to go underground to join the Communists. Phayom explained his defection by citing corruption in the army and its inability to defend the powerless.[7] His father's defection to the Communists had a large impact on Surayud. Surayud's son, Non, noted that, "My father always told me that we must help each other redeem the tarnished family name of Chulanont so that Thais can look up to it."[8]

Surayud entered Chulachomklao Royal Military Academy (CRMA) and graduated from Class 12.

Surayud was conferred honorary doctor of philosophy degrees in: 1. Communication Arts in 1995 by Wongchavalidkul University, Thailand. 2. Liberal Arts (Rural Planning and Development) in 2000 by Maejo University, Thailand. 3. Liberal Arts (Political Science) in 2004 by Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. 4. Engineering in April 2007 by Tokai University, Japan. 5. Social Development in December 2008 by Huachiew University, Thailand.[citation needed]

Surayud currently serves as a chancellor of the council of King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL) and Phetchaburi Rajabhat University.

Military career

[edit]

Early in his army career, Surayud served in several army divisions including a light artillery unit and a paratrooper unit. He conducted operations against the Communist Party of Thailand (CPT) while his father was a leader of the CPT. From 1972 to 1978, he was an instructor at the Special Warfare School. He was an aide to General Prem Tinsulanonda when Prem was appointed army commander and later Prime Minister of Thailand. Surayud was appointed Commander of the Special Warfare Command in 1992, where he was the commanding officer of Sonthi Boonratklin.[9]

During Bloody May, the violent crackdown 1992 on anti-government protesters, Surayud's men were seen at areas near the Royal Hotel, where protesters were seen being searched for weapons and later dragged into the hotel. He later claimed that he never gave orders for his soldiers to shoot.[10] According to a later interview, "It convinced me that the army should never be involved in politics."[7] Days later he told a national television audience that he deplored the loss of life and that he had not given any orders to shoot.[7] In 1994, he was appointed commander of the 2nd Army Region.

Surayud was promoted to army commander in late-1998. At the time, his promotion was controversial, as Surayud had been politically "shelved" at a staff position. To secure his vision of a politics-free army, Surayud appointed several of his classmates from Class 12 of the CRMA to key positions. Among these were Lt Gen Sompong Maivichit, who he made head of army-controlled Channel 5 television station, replacing Gen Pang Malakul na Ayudhya, and Lt Gen Boonrod Somtap, who he promoted to a key subordinate position to replace Gen Charn Boonprasert.[11] He also ended a policy of deporting Burmese refugees, especially ethnic Karens, back to Burma. "He's been a friend to us," said Pastor Robert Htway of the Karen Refugee Committee.[7] During his term, Thai soldiers took part in the United Nations Peace Keeping Force, assisting UN-PKF efforts in East Timor.

To stop drug and drug cartels into Thailand, Surayud, in March 2002, ordered one of Thailand's largest military operations in recent times, when Thai troops moved deep into Myanmar territory to destroy drug labs and military bases controlled by the United Wa State Army.[12]

In 2003, after over four years as Army Commander, Surayud was promoted to the position of supreme commander, a loftier, but less influential, post, during the government of Thaksin Shinawatra. He was replaced as army commander by Somthad Attanan. His promotion was rumoured to be the result of a conflict with the prime minister,[7] possibly over foreign policy towards Myanmar and the crackdown on drugs.

Privy councilor

[edit]

On 14 November 2003, King Bhumibol Adulyadej appointed Surayud to his Privy Council of personal advisors. Several months later he asked the king for permission to ordain as a monk for a brief period at a forest temple in northeastern Thailand. Surayud and Privy Council President Prem Tinsulanonda had been perceived to have a key role in the promotion of General Sonthi Boonratklin to the position of army commander.[13][14]

Facing an escalating insurgency in the south of Thailand, Surayud urged the media to paint a more positive picture of the violence. "Truthful words that may not be beneficial nor do any good to the public should be avoided", noted Surayud to the Press Council of Thailand. He was contradicted by Deputy Prime Minister Chaturon Chaisang, who noted that he couldn't think of any news about the conflict in the South that could or should not be reported by the media.[15]

In response to numerous claims made by anti-Thaksin activist Sondhi Limthongkul that his People's Alliance for Democracy was "fighting for the King", Surayud responded by saying that, "Recent references to the monarchy were inappropriate. The institution should not be involved in politics. Political disputes should be solved in a political way."[16]

In January 2008, not long after Surayud ended his term as prime minister, he was again reappointed to King Bhumibol Adulyadej's Privy Council.

In 2020 Surayud stood in for Vajiralongkorn in the Royal Ploughing Ceremony of rice, directing the planting of Dok Mali 105, Pathum Than 1, Kor Khor 43, Kor Khor 6, and Kor Khor 79.[17]

Environmental protection

[edit]

Surayud was chairman of the Khao Yai National Park Protection Foundation.[18]

However, after becoming premier in 2006, he was accused of breaching the Forestry Act and the National Forest Reserves Act by illegally owning forest land in Yaithiang Mountain of Nakhon Ratchasima Province. He vowed to resign and return the land (which he did not deny owning) if found guilty.[19]

In February 2010 after demonstrations by "Red Shirts" at Khao Yaithiang Mountain, Surayud, who by then had already left politics, returned the land to the Royal Forestry Department when it was found that the land was within forest reserve land under the ministry's decades old code. The plot of land is now under Royal Forestry Department's care. However, up until now no legal action has been taken by Thai authorities against him or other landowners of similar case around the country. Some opposition pressed him to resign from his post as privy councillor only as to understand later that Surayud "had no ill intention" and that it was highly inappropriate to ask for resignation of the post on such unreasonable ground.[citation needed]

Premiership (2006–2008)

[edit]
Surayud (right) with U.S. President George W. Bush at the National Conference Center in Hanoi

Surayud was already considered a strong candidate for appointment as civilian prime minister premiership immediately after General Sonthi overthrew the government of Thaksin Shinawatra. Indeed, Surayud's appointment to the Premiership was confirmed by junta leader Sonthi Boonyaratglin on the morning of Sunday 1 October 2006. After a couple imploring asks for Surayud to take the temporary premiership, Sonthi had a formal audience with King Bhumibol Adulyadej at 4 pm that day to nominate Surayud's name to the monarch.[20][21] "Security and social unity" were cited by Sonthi as the key reasons for appointing Surayud.[22]

Surayud announced that as premier, he would "Focus on self-sufficiency, more than focusing on the GDP numbers. I will focus on the happiness of the people, more than the GDP."[23] He also claimed that he would be "Friendly to every party, trying to receive information from every side and meeting people as much as possible. I will lead a government based on justice."[10]

Due to influences from junta and those behind the scene, the policies and positions of several ministers in Surayud's cabinet changed very frequently, sometimes on a daily basis. Notable flip-flops included Thailand's refusal to share avian flu samples with the WHO, capital controls against foreign investment, shareholding limits for foreign investors in telecommunications firms, the identity of bombers in the 2006 New Year's Eve bombings, and the role of the Malaysian government in mediating the South Thailand insurgency.[citation needed]

While he was prime minister, Surayud's wife, Colonel Khunying Chitrawadee, was awarded the Dame Grand Commander (Second Class) of the Most Illustrious Order of Chulachomklao, allowing her to use the prefix Than Phu Ying.[24]

Popularity

[edit]
Surayud (4th from left) at APEC Summit in Australia

The Surayud government's initial nationwide approval rating in October 2006 stood at 60%, with 8% disapproving. By early-November, this fell to 55% approving and 15% disapproving.[25] For comparison, a nationwide poll in July 2006 found that 49% of respondents would have voted for Thaksin Shinawatra in the cancelled October elections.[26]

The 2006 Bangkok New Year's Eve bombings caused Surayud's popularity to drop to 48.5% according to Assumption University's polling arm—and just 11% said they had "full confidence" the government can handle the crisis.[27]

The 2007 Chinese New Year Bombings, which saw 38 bombing attacks, 26 cases of arson, and seven ambushes within a single day, caused Surayud's popularity to drop even further: 53.7% of respondents living in Bangkok and other major cities in felt the government and the CNS could not put an end to problems in the country. Only 24.6% thought that the situation would improve in six months.[28]

By 24 February 2007, his popularity among Bangkokians had further dropped to 34.8%, although he was still more popular than Thaksin Shinawatra, whom 28.8% of Bangkokians favoured.[29]

By 4 March 2007, only 31.3% of people in Bangkok supported the government's political stance. This fell dramatically to 12.5% by 26 March 2007.[30] Notably the main reason behind the drop was that people wanted to see quick changes in state policies and that actions and judgments for the ousted former prime minister were not forthcoming soon enough.

The US government decided to continue holding "Cobra Gold" joint military exercises with the Thai government. Immediately after the coup, Washington had halted all military co-operation with, and aid to, the junta. US law forbade assistance to governments of a country where an elected leader has been deposed in a coup.[31]

In early-May 2007, activists from the Assembly of Isaan People met with junta chief Sonthi Boonyaratglin in order to appeal for him to remove Surayud Chulanont. Sonthi personally met the anti-Surayud activists at army headquarters and promised he would consider their request. This was the first time that Sonthi met people calling for the removal of Surayud.[32] Sonthi later claimed that he was "tricked" into meeting the activists.[33]

Surayud launched a weekly talk show called "Poed Baan Phitsanulok" ("Opening Up Baan Pitsanulok"; Baan Pitsanulok is the informal name for Government House) so as to share views and progress of interim government's aim (towards peaceful, internationally recognised general election). The show aired on state-run Channel 11 every Saturday between 08:30 and 09:15. Calling the weekly radio show that was hosted by Thaksin Shinawatra when he was premier "propaganda", he denied any similarity between the two shows.[34]

The military junta's popularity continued to decline. By late-June 2007, an ABAC Poll found that only 13.6% supported the government, with 69.8 of respondents disappointed with the political situation.[35]

The government's popularity continued to decline into July, when survey respondents in Bangkok and outlying areas gave the government an average score of 4.32 out of 10. The average score had been 4.53 in March 2007 and 5.27 in January 2007. Fewer than 15% of respondents in the survey felt that the nation's overall situation had improved during the government's nine-month tenure, while 31.6% said the situation remained unchanged and the majority, 34.9% said it had worsened.[36]

Drafting of a permanent constitution and elections

[edit]

The junta's 2006 Interim Constitution authorised the junta to appoint a 2,000 person National Assembly which would select members to become candidates for a Constitution Drafting Assembly. From the onset of his appointment as premier, Surayud Chulanont was urged by academics to override the junta's control of the constitution drafting process. Somchai Siripreechakul, Dean of Law at Chiang Mai University, urged Surayud to call a general election as soon as possible and hand the task of drafting a charter to an elected parliament.[37] Banjerd Singkhaneti of Thammasat University noted of the constitution drafting process, "I think it will be a mess and the next constitution will be just that."[38]

After the coup, the military junta had originally promised to draft a permanent charter within eight months and to hold elections in October 2007. However, Prime Minister's Office Minister Thirapat Serirangsan later announced that elections might not occur until one year and five months.[39]

After a constitutional referendum on 19 August, Surayud promised that elections would “definitely” be held in late December.[40]

Cabinet appointments

[edit]

Some believed that Prem Tinsulanonda, President of the King's Privy Council, played a significant role in picking the members of Surayud's cabinet. It was, however, Surayud who made the final decision. General Boonrawd Somtas, a former CDRMA classmate and longtime friend of Surayud, was appointed defense minister.[41] former Interior Permanent Secretary Aree Wong-araya was appointed interior minister, former Energy Policy and Planning Office director Piyasvasti Amranand became energy minister, central bank governor Pridiyathorn Devakula became finance minister, and Bangkok Bank Chairman Kosit Panpiemras became industry minister. Michael Nelson of Chulalongkorn University noted that the cabinet was dominated by bureaucrats and that "It's very strongly guided by military ideas combined with some technocrats, some people in economic areas and some former bureaucrats."[42]

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Pridiyathorn resigned on 28 February 2007. His resignation shocked the political world as well as the business community.[43] His cited reasons for resignation included,

  • Surayud's decision to appoint Pridiyathorn's rival, former Thaksin-government Finance Minister Somkid Jatusripitak, as a self-sufficiency economy special envoy. Somkid resigned from his position after less than a week.
  • Prime Minister's Office Minister Thirapat Serirangsan's alleged preference to certain private media interests.[44] Several analysts speculated that he was referring to the preferential treatment the junta gave to leading anti-Thaksin critic Sondhi Limthongkul, who was also a long-time critic of Pridiyathorn.[45][46]

Pridiyathorn was replaced by Chalongphob Sussangkarn, an academic who led the Thailand Development Research Institute. Chalongphob had previously criticised the junta's capital controls policy.[47]

Policies

[edit]

Telecommunications

[edit]
  • The planned merger of state-telecom companies TOT and CAT.[48]
  • The cancellation of plans to list TOT, CAT, and Thai Post on the Stock Exchange of Thailand.[49]
  • The cancellation of the Thaksin government's telecom excise tax policy. The Thaksin government imposed an excise tax on privately offered fixed and cellular services, and then allowed telecom companies to deduct the amount they paid in excise tax from concession fees they had to pay to state concession owners TOT or CAT Telecom. The total amount paid by the private telecom firms did not change. The Surayud government's excise tax cancellation meant that TOT and CAT would receive their full concession payments. However, TOT and CAT were then forced to increase their dividends to the Ministry of Finance to account for their increased income.[50]
  • Changing the publicly listed state-enterprise media company MCOT's policy from focusing on monetary benefits to social benefits. MCOT's stock prices dropped 5.13% to an 11-month low as a result.[51]
  • Surayud reversed policies many times regarding the fate of the iTV TV station. Surayud first announced that it intended to take over the station and promised that the station would not be taken off the air no matter what happened regarding its concession controversy. However, in early-March 2007, PM's Office Minister Dhipawadee Meksawan announced that the station would be taken off the air on midnight on 6 March 2007, following the cabinet's revocation of iTV's concession. Surayud apologised for not keeping his word.[52][53][54][55] Then on 7 March 2007, Surayud reversed his decision yet again and ordered that iTV continue broadcasting after the deadline had passed.[56]

Culture

[edit]
  • The planned ban against all forms of advertising for alcoholic beverages.[57]
  • The banning of all "sexually arousing dances" (locally called "coyote dances") during the Loy Kratong festival.[58]
  • From March 2007 onwards, encouraging that all Thai citizens dress in yellow every day until 31 December 2007, in order to display loyalty to King Bhumibol and celebrate his 80th birthday.[59][60]
  • Urging Chulalongkorn University to take action against its fourth-year psychology student Pemmika Veerachatraksit, for having broken university discipline by having an affair with another person's husband. ' The Culture Ministry claimed that as a student, being accused of having an adulterous affair should be taken as guilt. The student was sued for 27 million baht by Alisa Thomthitchong for allegedly having an affair with her husband, Dr Prakitpao Thomthitchong.[61]

Public health

[edit]
  • Making the 30-baht universal healthcare program completely free.[57] The Budget Bureau criticised the move.[62] The government later cut the universal healthcare program budget by over 3.8 billion baht, providing a subsidy of just 1,899 baht per head, compared to the previously proposed figure of 2,089 baht. The number of eligible people was cut from 48 million to 46 million people.[63] Funding for the program was diverted from the government's road-accident victims' protection fund.[64]
  • Licensed the production and sale of patented HIV and heart disease drugs without the permission of the foreign patent owners. Lack of public health budget was cited as the reasons for breaking the patents. "It has stunned our industry," said the president of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association (PReMA). The Minister of Public Health claimed that pharmaceutical industry was reaping "colossal" profits. Under World Trade Organization rules, a government is allowed to break patents under after declaring a "national emergency."[65] Breaking the patents of Abbott's HIV treatment Kaletra and Sanofi-Aventis' blood clot drug Plavix was estimated to save Thailand US$24 million a year.[66] Abbott Laboratories said it would stop launching new medicines in Thailand in protest at the junta's move to override international drug patents. "Thailand has chosen to break patents on numerous medicines, ignoring the patent system. As such, we've elected not to introduce new medicines there," an Abbott spokesperson told reporters. The seven withdrawn drugs include the new version of Kaletra, an antibiotic, a painkiller and medicines to fight blood clots, arthritis, kidney disease and high blood pressure.[67]
  • The junta joined Indonesia in a boycott on sharing its H5N1 avian influenza virus samples with vaccine developers and the international health community. Surayud's Public Health Minister told reporters that "Drugmakers rarely help us. They only gave us a small amount of vaccine, just like a donation." Thailand had 25 H5N1 cases and 17 deaths since 2003, ranking it the fourth hardest hit country by the avian flu. Indonesia stopped sharing its H5N1 samples with the WHO at the end of 2006 since the strains were being used to develop vaccines that the country couldn't afford.[68][69]
  • Thailand's representative to the World Health Organization (also special advisor to the public health minister), Dr Suwit Wibulpolprasert said that during an executive board meeting of the WHO in January, Dr Suwit, declared that if an influenza pandemic were to hit Thailand, he would advise the government to hold Western tourists hostage until those countries gave Thailand the necessary vaccines. The US government has lodged a formal protest letter and requested an apology. US Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt wrote that Dr Suwit's comments "appear to contravene the spirit and provisions of the revised International Health Regulations."[70]
  • Human Rights Watch and the Thai AIDS Treatment Action Group claimed that the Surayud junta failed to provide safe treatment for drug users infected with HIV, and did not effectively promote harm reduction techniques to stop the spread of the virus.[71]

Energy

[edit]
  • The indefinite delay of the previous government's policy of converting all octane 95 gasoline sales to gasohol.[72]
  • The cancellation of state electricity company EGAT's guaranteed 50% share in all new power plant construction.[73]
  • The prevention of EGAT from participating in bidding for new electricity plants under the Independent Power Producer (IPP) program.[74]
  • The cancellation of plans to import hydroelectric power and natural gas from Myanmar.[12]
  • The development of a US$6 billion nuclear power plant. The 4,000 megawatt plant would be Thailand's first.[75] The government announced that it would start a large public relations program, starting with kindergarten children, of "educating" the public about how nuclear power was unavoidable.[76]

Security and the southern insurrection

[edit]
  • An increase in military spending by 35% in 2007, compared to 2006.[77] The budget for 2008 totalled 140 billion baht, 24% higher than 2007 and representing 8.6% of the total 2008 budget.[78][79] Since 1999, military spending had remained stagnant at approximately $2 billion in 2000 dollars.[80][81] In addition, Surayud received an extra request for an additional 17.6 billion baht to fund counter-insurgency efforts in the far South over the next four years on top of an additional 456-million-baht secret military budget.[82]
  • Issuing a formal apology regarding the Tak Bai incident.[83] The day after he issued his apology, 46 violent incidents were recorded, compared with a daily average of 9 in the previous month. Violence continued to escalate throughout 2006 and 2007.[84]
  • Revealing for the first time to the public that the insurgency was being finance by a network of restaurants and stalls selling Tom Yam Kung in Malaysia. Surayud claimed that the Tom Yam Kung network collected money from local businessmen through blackmail and demands for protection fees and channelled the sum to the separatists.[85] Malaysian Deputy Security Minister Fu Ah Kiow described the revelation as "absolutely baseless," and "very imaginative."[86]
  • Surayud's Cabinet gave the staff of the Internal Security Operations Command an 84.3 million baht "reward". The ISOC had originally requested the reward in 2003, but was turned down by the Thaksin government.[87]
  • Appointing Seripisut Temiyavet as Police Commissioner General, replacing Kowit Watana. Kowit was transferred to a civilian post soon after arresting several military personnel for alleged involvement in the 2006 Bangkok New Year's Eve bombings. Kowit protested his transfer, and the Central Administrative Court later an injunction to protect him from the transfer until it reached a final ruling on the matter.[88]
  • Allowing the Malaysian government to help mediate in the South Thailand insurgency, contradicting a statement by Foreign Minister Nitya Pibulsonggram made just 2 days before.[89]

Education

[edit]
  • The cancellation of Thailand's participation in the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) program.[90] The project has been criticised as unrealistic for an impoverished country like Thailand.[91]
  • The cancellation of plans to install personal computers and broadband internet connections in every public and secondary school in Thailand.[90]
  • Forcing 430 prestigious schools across the country to accept half of their students from the local neighbourhood. All other schools would be required to accept all applicants; if applicants exceeded seats, a random draw would choose which applicants would be accepted.[92]
  • The continuation of the Thaksin Shinawatra government's "One District, One Scholarship" program under the name "Scholarships for Community Development". The maximum annual income for eligible recipients' families was raised from 100,000 baht to 150,000 baht.[93]
  • The proposed cancellation of the guarantee of 12 years of free education in the next constitution of Thailand.[94]

Economy and agriculture

[edit]
  • A budget deficit of 147 billion Baht for fiscal year 2007. This was the first budget deficit since 2003.[95] Fiscal deficits were also expected for 2008.[96] The Deficit expanded to 168 billion baht in 2008. The junta-appointed National Legislative Assembly passed the budget unanimously. The deficit would be funded by domestic borrowing.[78][97]
  • Capital controls in an attempt to reverse a massive appreciation of the Thai Baht. The moves caused a crash in the Thai stock market, with a one-day loss of 820 billion baht (approx. US$22 billion) in market value. The move resulted in harsh criticism both within Thailand and abroad. "My definition of what's going on is 'Welcome to amateur hour,'" said Donald Gimbel, fund manager for Carret & Co. Korn Chatikavanij of the Democrat party noted a policy reversal, "That can't repair the damage that was caused in one historic day."[98] The Export-Import Bank of Thailand also criticised the capital controls.[99]
  • Elimination of subsidies for rice farmers. The price of rice, set at 30% above market prices during the deposed Thaksin Shinawatra government, was dramatically lowered. It was claimed that the high price of rice seriously affected farmers and caused social burdens.[100]
  • The cancellation of the Million Cows project. Under the project, the government lent five million cows to one million farming families. The families were allowed to sell milk and calves for profit. The program was highly popular among politicians.[101]
  • The rebranding of Thaksin Shinawatra's "SML" village development scheme as the "sufficiency village development scheme." Villagers wishing to draw down funds under the scheme were now required to draft projects based on the King's self-sufficient economy principles. The self-sufficiency scheme was given a budget of 10 billion baht.[102]
  • The cancellation of the Assets Capitalisation Bureau, the administrator of the Thaksin-government's asset capitalisation program. The program allowed people owning assets not accepted by banks as collateral (e.g., machinery, intellectual property rights, or land rental rights) to capitalise those assets and get loans. According to the government, the abolition of the Assets Capitalisation Bureau was based on its policy not to encourage people to go into debt. Critics claimed the program was cancelled due to its association with the deposed premier.[103]
  • To punish Thaksin Shinawatra for his sale of Shin Corp to a Singaporean company, Surayud altered regulations concerning foreign ownership of companies.[104] This impacted the legality of thousands of local subsidiaries of foreign companies operating in Thailand.[105] However, Finance Minister Pridiyathorn noted that, "If they (foreign investors) had seen the details (of the foreign investment law), I am sure that they would be happy."[106][107] Brokers and analysts criticised the move as a political intervention that hurt the economy.[108] The governments of the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Japan, and European Union protested the move.[109]
  • Reversing the Thaksin government's "dual track" economic policy and relying too heavily on exports. Deputy Prime Minister Kosit Panpiemras admitted that the Surayud government was not doing enough to stimulate domestic consumption to drive economic growth.[110]
  • The approval of debt-relief measures for farmers. This prompted Northeastern farmer leaders from cancelling a planned protests in Bangkok.[111]
  • Surayud appointed Thaksin-government Finance Minister Somkid Jatusripitak to head of a government committee charged with promoting King Bhumibol's self-sufficient economy policy to a foreign audience. The appointment provoked great controversy, as critics claimed that the populist economics czar had no role promoting a key principle of the Surayud-government's economic policy.[112][113] Somkid appointment was supported by General Saprang Kalyanamitr, a powerful member of the junta, and Sondhi Limthongkul of the People's Alliance for Democracy, a long-time colleague of Somkid's. Somkid later decided to resign from the committee, which was then dissolved. Somkid's long-time rival, Finance Minister Pridiyathorn Devakula, denied any role in Somkid's resignation.[114]
  • The junta, blaming the Thaksin government's lending to the grassroots sector for creating off-balance sheet government debts, cut off rural lending. However, it soon faced an economic slowdown, and decided to increase rural lending in order to revive the economy.[115]
  • Surayud's Cabinet approved a draft bill that would ban the privatisation of several state enterprises, including the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), the Metropolitan Water Works Authority (MWWA), the Thailand Tobacco Monopoly, and the Government Lottery Office.[116]
  • After the coup, Surayud announced that all free trade agreement negotiation and drafting be immediately stopped. However, in February 2007, it gave the go-ahead for the Japan-Thailand Economic Partnership Agreement (JTEPA). The policy U-turn was criticised by many, including Saneh Chamarik of the National Human Rights Commission, Kraisak Choonhavan, Greenpeace Southeast Asia, FTA Watch.[117] The Surayud government was charged with policy corruption.[118] The JTEPA was finally signed on 3 April 2007, in Tokyo, Japan.[119][120] Protests against the FTA were held at the Japanese embassy in Bangkok.[121]
  • Surayud declared that all mobile phone contracts with the government were illegal. The concessions would be renegotiated within a few months, before the military junta was scheduled to hold elections.[122]
  • Surayud approved a draft retail business law which gave the Interior Ministry power to curb the expansion of large retailers through its city planning and building codes. The move is part of a set of measures proposed by the Commerce Ministry to halt the rapid expansion of giant retailers, which interest groups blamed for causing the demise of thousands of "mom and pop" stores. However, the president of Thai Retailers Association said that the new retail law would "damage the sentiment and confidence" in the Thai economy, which could cause a domino effect on employment, manufacturing and public spending. "The Cabinet has stepped back to allow 'old traders' in many areas to continue to monopolise the market instead of creating more choices for the consumer," he said.[123]
  • Surayud's economic policies failed to stem a slowdown of the economy. In the last quarter of 2006, the economy expanded 3.9%, a drop from the 4.7% recorded before the coup. Applications to build new factories and other facilities dropped 24% in 2006.[124] In February 2007, Thai consumer confidence fell to the lowest point in 5 years.[125] Consumer confidence continued its decline in March.[126] Private sector non-bank foreign debt rose for the first time in 6 years.[127] Thailand's competitiveness dropped to among the worst in the Asia-Pacific region, according to the Switzerland-based Institute for Management Development.[128]

Suvarnabhumi Airport

[edit]

Surayud ordered the reopening Don Muang Airport for domestic and international flights. This decision came after allegations that the newly opened Suvarnabhumi Airport alone was incapable of handling future traffic volume and that the airport was unsafe. The decision met with strong opposition from Airports of Thailand, the Civil Aviation Department, the Board of Airline Representatives in Thailand (BAR), the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the Thai Airways International labour union, and many domestic and international airlines, including Thai Airways and the Star Alliance.[129][130][131] 60 airlines threatened to halt flights to Thailand if they were forced to move back to Don Muang airport.[132][133]

A two-week investigation led by Tortrakul Yomnak, a chief engineer for Airports of Thailand and prominent supporter of the anti-Thaksin movement, found that the runway was safe, and that cracks could be repaired in as little as a few hours.[134] At the beginning of the investigation, Tortrakul had warned that the airport might need to be closed for three years.[135] However, Admiral Bannawit Keng-rien, chairman of the National Legislative Assembly's airport committee, urged Surayud to close down Suvarnabhumi. Surayud's decision to reopen Don Muang was based on his personal advisors, without waiting for the Ministry of Transport or Airports of Thailand to finish their studies.[136]

A completed study by the AoT showed that the cost of fixing 60 identified problems at the airport would be less than 1% of the total airline cost and the problems could be fixed in up to four to five years. Dr. Narupol Chaiyut, a member of a committee overseeing service problems at the new airport, estimated that 70% of the problems would be fixed within 2007.[137]

Surayud and AoT Chairman General Saprang Kalayanamitr refused to authorise urgent repairs on the airport tarmac, despite warnings from engineers. Karun Chandrarangsu, president of the Engineering Institute of Thailand (and a close relative to Srisuk Chandrarangsu, who was a former AOT board member, which was implicated in several corruption allegations, such as CTX and King Power scandals, and now being investigated[citation needed]) noted, "Suvarnabhumi is like a patient in a coma who continues to suffer from severe bleeding. Stopping the blood flow now is more urgent and important than debating what caused the injury."[138] The Engineering Institute of Thailand sent a formal warning to AoT in November 2006 about the urgent need to drain water from beneath the tarmac, and that immediate action should be taken. "The AOT did nothing about the problem," Suebsak Promboon of the EIT noted. "The situation might not have become this bad if the water had been drained then." Suebsak Promboon, a senior foundation engineer and a member of the Tortrakul Yomnak-led airport tarmac inspection panel, accused the AOT of refusing to take any actions to solve the problems at the airport.[139]

Human rights

[edit]
  • Censorship of broadcast television. Troops were dispatched to all television stations on the night of the coup and remain there as of late December 2006. An interview with the late Nuamthong Phaiwan broadcast by television channel ITV came to an abrupt end after the Director of Army-owned Royal Thai Army Radio and Television called the station to warn them against the broadcast. Additional troops were dispatched to "keep order" at the station.[140] Broadcast media were to stop airing news about former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra and his associates.[141] Military control over broadcast television was tighter than at any time in the past 15 years.[142]
  • Censorship of community radio. Thousands of community radio stations were shut down after the coup. Community radio operators were only allowed to rebroadcast if they reported in the "spirit of national unity." The junta retained the authority to shut down any station at any time.[143]
  • Massive censorship of the internet. Pre-coup, the government blocked 2,475 websites, while as of January 2007, the government blocked 13,435 websites—an increase of a shade under 443%.[144] In addition, the popular Midnight University web board was shut down for what the government claimed were posts offensive to the monarchy.[145] Numerous anti-coup, anti-junta, and pro-Thaksin websites were blocked.[146]
  • Strict execution of the CNS's ban against all political activities.[147]
  • The establishment of a 14,000-strong special operations force with a mandate to control anti-junta protests. The 556 million baht fund allocation came from a request by the Council for National Security. The rapid deployment force began operations on 1 December 2006. Surayud refused to explain why his Cabinet approved funding of the force after it had already started, which was contrary to PM's Office directives. Government spokesman Yongyuth Mayalarp promised that the force would be dissolved on 30 September 2007, along with the CNS. The funds would be diverted from the Defense Ministry and Police Office, but if those two agencies lacked funding, they would be diverted from the government's reserve fund for emergency situations. Yongyuth revealed that no Cabinet members questioned the use of the fund. General Saprang Kallayanamit, assistant Secretary-General of the CNS, was appointed Commander of the force.[148][149]
  • Arresting and impeding anti-coup/anti-junta protesters. Several arrests occurred in the immediate aftermath of the coup. On 15 March 2007, five political activists were arrested in Sanam Luang and their stage demolished.[150] The government also violently cracked down on protesters at the house of Prem Tinsulanonda, and arrested several protesters, including an interim National Human Rights Commissioner and former chief justice of the Criminal Court.[151][152] Afterwards, Surayud, along with his entire Cabinet, went to Prem's house to apologise to him for "apologise for failing to take good care of him." Surayud accused the protesters of trying to "bring down the highest institution of the country."[153]
  • Surayud defended the detention of Chiang Mai protester Sombat Boonngarm-anong (head of the Midnight University) after he criticised the junta and the Surayud government in public. Sombat was not allowed to make any phone calls during his detention and was only allowed to receive a phone call from former Chiang Rai Senator Tuanjai Deethet. He also said the military did not allow him to drink anything during his detention. Sombat claimed that the director of Phitsanulok Military Intelligence told him he had committed a crime against the state by disseminating one-sided information to the public and was liable for the death penalty under Article 116 of the Criminal Code.[154]
  • Censorship and manipulation of the media. The government cancelled the most popular program on state-owned broadcaster's MCOT's Modernine TV, Khui Khui Khao. The anti-Thaksin movement claimed the program's host, prominent political commentator Sorrayuth Suthassanachinda, was a supporter of the overthrown premier.[155][156] A daily slot was given for anti-Thaksin crusader Sondhi Limthongkul's "Yam Fao Paen Din", a show that media reformers called a junta "propaganda tool." Lese majeste charges against Sondhi filed prior to the coup were dropped, admittedly for no legal reason.[157][158] Seri Wongmontha and Boonyod Sukthintai, both prominent members of the anti-Thaksin People's Alliance for Democracy, were given program slots.[159]
  • Censoring nationalised television station TITV. TITV was ordered not to produce any news reports that ran counter to government policies. Government officials attended all news briefing to make sure no news content conflicted with the junta's interests.[160]
  • Forbidding motorcycle taxi drivers in Bangkok and adjacent provinces from participating in anti-coup/anti-junta rallies.[161] Thousands of members of the Assembly of the Poor (AOP) were also prevented by military and government officials from boarding buses from their home provinces to stage demonstrations in Bangkok. Authorities cited the lack of paper permit required under martial law (still in effect in more than 30 provinces at the time of the planned protests).[162]
  • Surayud's ICT Minister Sitthichai Pookaiyaudom claimed that criticising the president of the Privy Council was a threat to national security, justifying the shutdown of any websites containing critical material.[163]
  • The Surayud government pushed through a cyber crime law that criminalised any attempt to get around government internet censors to access any of the tens of thousands of sites censored for supposedly moral or political purposes. The law also made it a serious crime for service providers to withhold IP addresses from government requests.[164]
  • The approval of a law that would imprison anyone found guilty of forwarding a pornographic e-mail for up to three years.[165]
  • The shutdown of a radio station that broadcast a call-in from deposed Premier Thaksin. Thaksin made what was his first post-coup statement on Thai broadcast media on 16 May 2007 when he called into Bangkok's 87.75FM and 92.75FM community radio stations. The next day, officials from the junta, the government's Public Relations Department (PRD), and the Internal Security Operations Command inspected the community radio station. The station then went off the air.[166]
  • The arrest of anti-junta White Dove 2000 protesters in Chiang Mai in May 2007. The protesters claimed that they had sought permission from the Deputy Governor and the Third Army Region Commander to use the demonstration site. Military officials claimed that the protesters had documents and CDs with content that was deemed likely to instigate political conflict.[167]
  • The establishment of a 700,000 strong network of junta supporters to prevent anti-junta demonstrators from allegedly inciting violence. "The idea is to take out as many as possible prospective demonstrators. In a public rally with less than 50,000 participants, there will be no problem," said the head of the ISOC.[168]
  • The repeal of junta restrictions against organising protests on 9 November 2006. However, martial law has been lifted in most of the country.[169]
  • Censorship of Somtow Sucharitkul's opera Ayodhya. It was thought that the on-stage death of the demon-king, Thotsakan, would constitute a bad omen. Somtow, a harsh critic of the deposed Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, criticised the move but agreed to modify the scene.[170][171]
  • 15 January 2007: The military government has censored the interview of Thaksin Shinawatra on CNN in Thailand.[172]

Other

[edit]
  • The granting of unprecedented salaries for the leaders of the military junta.[173][174]
  • Expanding Bangkok's mass transit rail network by 5 new routes, using the same amount as budgeted by the deposed Thaksin government.[175]
  • On Friday 18 May 2007, Surayud claimed that if the country were politically peaceful, generations elections under a new constitution could be held earlier than 16 or 23 December. On Saturday 19 May 2007, he claimed he had misspoken, and said it would be impossible to hold general elections before mid-December. He noted that he had just realised that earlier elections would conflict with preparations for King Bhumibol's 80th birthday celebrations on 5 December.[176]
  • Submitting draft legislation that would force children from age one to apply for and carry identification cards to the legislature. Failure to apply for the card would carry a 500 baht fine while not producing the card to officials would be punishable by a 200 baht fine.[177]

Thaksin Shinawatra

[edit]

Surayud warned deposed Premier Thaksin Shinawatra several times against returning to Thailand, calling his return "a threat".[178] During a November 2006 trip to China for the ASEAN-China Summit, Surayud refused to meet Thaksin, who was also in China at the time.[179] Surayud later denied Thaksin the opportunity to return to Thailand to contest in eventual elections, and said that the appropriate time for him to return would be "after a year," when a newly elected government was already in place.[180]

Thaksin's diplomatic passport was revoked by the Foreign Ministry on 31 December 2006 after the government claimed he had engaged in political activities while in exile. Thai embassies were ordered not to facilitate his travels. Traditionally, all former prime ministers and foreign ministers of Thailand were permitted to hold on to their diplomatic passports for life.[181]

Thaksin later publicly announced that he was quitting politics. Surayud's Defense Minister later announced that the junta would refuse Thaksin's reconciliation offer, claiming that Thailand was being threatened by "ill-intentioned people" and capitalism.[182]

Surayud's government completely purged all senior military officers perceived as loyal to the Thaksin government, replacing them with officers trusted by the new regime.[183]

In April 2007, during an interview where reporters asked Surayud what he would say to Thaksin if he could meet him in person, Surayud responded, "I would say please don't ever come back."[184]

Council for National Security

[edit]

The Surayud government allowed the Council for National Security to interfere with many government responsibilities, including the transfer of civil servants. The CNS was allowed to control a nationwide reshuffle of the civil service in April 2007 in order to weed out officials "clinging" to the deposed "Thaksin-regime".[185]

Surayud also authorised the removal of police chief Kowit Wattana from his position in early February 2007. Kowit had also been police chief under the ousted government of Thaksin Shinawatra.

In March, junta leader Sonthi asked Surayud to declare emergency rule in Bangkok in response to the protests by the founders of PTV. In an interview, Sonthi noted that the protests, attended by approximately 1,500-3,000 people, had so far been peaceful but that he was afraid the movement could lead to "mutiny and chaos in the country."[186] CNS Spokesman Sansern Kaewkamnerd asked, "What will we do if the numbers of protesters go beyond 100,000? It will greatly damage the country's image." Emergency powers allowed the government to ban public gatherings, impose curfews and censor local news reports.[187]

On 3 April 2007, Surayud approved a 15% pay rise (on top of an earlier 15% pay rise) for members of the CNS, as a "special reward" for their "honesty, tolerance and dedication on weekdays and weekends."[188]

Despite this, relations between Surayud and the CNS deteriorated. Rumours swirled in mid-April 2007 that the CNS would overthrow the government. However, in a meeting with the CNS President, Surayud declared, "Don't ever think of launching another coup. If you utter only one word, then I am ready to resign."[189]

Criticism

[edit]

Besides being heavily criticised for gaining power through the 2006 coup and his subsequent actions as premier, Surayud has been accused of forest encroachment and corruption.

Forest encroachment

[edit]

Surayud was accused of breaching the Forestry Act and the National Forest Reserves Act by illegally owning forest reserve land in Yaithiang Mountain of Nakhon Ratchasima province. When Surayud was Commander of the 2nd Army Region, he was sold the plot of land for 50,000 baht. He later transferred ownership of the plot to his wife. Surayud vowed to resign and return the land (which he did not deny owning) if found guilty.[19] He was defended by Interior Minister Aree Wongarya, who claimed, "Gen Surayud purchased the land from someone else so the question has to be posed to the first owner whether the land is reserved."

National Human Rights Commissioner and Thaksin sympathiser Jaran Ditthapichai noted, "I cannot agree to have someone call himself a man of morality and sufficiency if he built a fancy house in a forest reserve."[190]

However, the National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC) refused to investigate the land encroachment charges, claiming that the statute of limitations on the case had run out. NCCC member Klanarong Chantik noted that Surayud retired from military service in 2003 whereas the charges were made 4 years after his retirement, and that the NCCC could not legally investigate an officer for alleged wrongdoing beyond two years after retirement.[191]

In February 2010 after demonstrations by the "Red Shirts" at Khao Yaithiang Mountain, Surayud returned the land to the Royal Forestry Department, without any removals of structures or plants, weeks before a formal notice from the department was issued. The plot of land is now under the care of the Royal Forestry Department after Surayud moved out. However, up until now no legal action has been taken by Thai authorities against Surayud or other landowners of similar type all over Thailand.

Corruption

[edit]

Surayud, an avid collector of model trains, was accused of illegally acquiring four train compartments for his resort home in Kho Yaithiang mountain, Nakhon Ratchasima. Surayud claimed that he had more than 4 compartments, but they were all in his residence in Bangkok and were all models driven by household class electricity of 220V.[192]

However, Thai-language newspaper Khaosod published a photo on the front page of its edition of 26 December 2006 which showed a building resembling a railway carriage near Surayud's resort home. The National Counter Corruption Committee was petitioned to scrutinise the land at Surayud's retreat residence, but refused to take action (see above). Before the end of his tenure as prime minister, Surayud invited dozens of reporters from various fields to visit and have a lunch at his disputed Kho Yaithiang home, where they realised that what seemed to be train carriages were only a resort building of his friend nearby viewed from a particular angle. [citation needed]

While Surayud was frequently accused of corruption, many in the business community believed otherwise. A poll conducted in January 2007 found that 66% of business people thought that local corruption would increase, with only 10.5% thinking that it would decrease. However, only about 14% believed that leading figures in Surayud's administration were corrupt.[193]

Royal decorations

[edit]

Surayud has received the following royal decorations in the Honours System of Thailand:

Foreign honours

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Surayud Chulanont (born 28 August 1943) is a retired Thai army general and statesman who served as the 24th Prime Minister of Thailand from 1 October 2006 to 19 January 2008, leading the interim government formed in the aftermath of the 19 September 2006 coup d'état that ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. A career military officer, he rose through the ranks to become Commander-in-Chief of the Royal Thai Army and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, earning respect for his handling of border security with Cambodia and counter-insurgency operations against communist rebels. After retiring from active duty in 2003, Surayud briefly ordained as a monk before his appointment to the Privy Council by King Bhumibol Adulyadej, a role he continues to hold as president under King Vajiralongkorn since 2020. His premiership focused on political reconciliation and constitutional reform but was marked by economic challenges and opposition protests demanding elections. As a close advisor to the Thai monarchy, Surayud has been noted for bridging military and civilian interests in Thailand's turbulent politics.

Early Life

Family Background

Surayud Chulanont was born on 28 August 1943 in , , into a military family. His father, Colonel Payom Chulanont, served as a senior officer in the Royal Thai Army before defecting to the (CPT) during Surayud's childhood, an action that marked a significant ideological rift within the family. Payom later rose to a leadership role in the CPT's and died in exile in , prompting Surayud to travel to to retrieve his ashes for repatriation. His mother, Amphot Tharap, separated from Payom amid these events. The family experienced a in 1947, when Surayud was four years old, leading to a fragmented upbringing that contrasted with the traditions of his paternal lineage. Despite his father's communist affiliations and —which placed him in opposition to the Thai establishment—Surayud pursued a career in the Royal Thai Army, highlighting a deliberate divergence from his father's path. This background of familial division and ideological conflict shaped Surayud's early life, though he maintained no public alignment with communist causes.

Education

Surayud Chulanont received his primary education at St. Francis Xavier Convent School in . He continued secondary schooling at St. Gabriel's College through Mathayom 3 before transferring to , where he completed Mathayom 6 in 1957. In 1958, Surayud enrolled in the inaugural class of the Armed Forces Academies Preparatory School, completing the program as a precursor to military training. He then entered Chulachomklao Royal Military Academy (CRMA), graduating from Class 12 in with a degree. Following his academy graduation, Surayud pursued advanced military education, including training at the Center School, the Joint Staff College in , and the Joint Staff College in the United States. He later attended the Command and General Staff College in the United States.

Military Career

Early Service

Surayud Chulanont entered the Chulachomklao Royal Academy and graduated as part of Class 12, commissioning into the Royal Thai as an infantry officer in the mid-1960s. His initial service focused on counter-insurgency operations in , where the maintained strongholds amid rural unrest fueled by influences and local grievances. Despite his father Phayom Chulanont's to the communists in Surayud's —Phayom having previously served as a —Surayud actively participated in campaigns against insurgent cells, including those linked to his father's group, contributing to efforts that suppressed guerrilla activities through combined and development strategies. These operations involved small-unit tactics in rugged terrain, emphasizing mobility and intelligence to disrupt supply lines and recruitment, though they faced challenges from insurgents' ideological appeal and external support from and . By the late , such engagements had helped weaken communist momentum in the region, paving the way for Surayud's subsequent promotions within the army's branches.

Key Commands

Surayud Chulanont advanced through the ranks of the Royal Thai Army, assuming command of specialized units early in his career, including operations against communist insurgents in during the era. As a commander in May 1992, he directed troops during the Black May crisis in , where soldiers under his authority clashed with pro-democracy demonstrators protesting the military-backed government of , resulting in dozens of deaths and injuries. In October 1998, Prime Minister Chuan Leekpai elevated Surayud from an advisory role to Commander-in-Chief of the Royal Thai Army, succeeding General Pramon Ruchirawong, amid efforts to reform military leadership and reduce political interference. He retained this position until September 2002, during which he implemented internal reforms to professionalize the army, including enhanced training and efforts to insulate the military from partisan politics. Following this, Surayud served as Supreme Commander of the Royal Thai Armed Forces, the highest uniformed military post overseeing all branches, until his mandatory retirement on September 30, 2003, at age 60. In these roles, he earned a reputation for integrity and tactical competence, though his 1992 command drew criticism for the use of force against civilians.

Supreme Command and Retirement

Surayud Chulanont was appointed Supreme Commander of the Royal Thai Armed Forces on October 1, 2002, succeeding General Sampao Chusoi, following his tenure as Commander-in-Chief of the Royal Thai Army from 1998 to 2002. In this position, which serves as the highest-ranking military office overseeing the army, navy, and air force, Surayud focused on inter-service coordination amid ongoing internal security challenges, including southern insurgency operations, though the role was often described as largely ceremonial with limited operational authority compared to branch-specific commands. During his brief tenure as Supreme Commander, Surayud emphasized military discipline and loyalty to the , aligning with his reputation for professionalism cultivated over decades of service; he had previously commanded key units in efforts and border security. No major structural reforms or public controversies marked this period, which lasted approximately one year, reflecting the rotational nature of top Thai military appointments typically tied to age and seniority limits. Surayud retired from active military duty in at age 60, adhering to standard Thai armed forces retirement norms for four-star generals, after which he briefly ordained as a Buddhist —a traditional practice among retiring Thai officers symbolizing reflection and detachment from worldly duties. His departure from the supreme command post was uneventful, paving the way for General Somtat Attanand as successor, and marked the end of his 40-year military career without formal ceremonies highlighting disputes or accolades specific to that final role. Post-retirement, Surayud transitioned to advisory capacities outside active service, maintaining influence through established networks in military and royal circles.

Pre-Premiership Roles

Privy Council Appointment

On November 14, 2003, King appointed General Surayud Chulanont as a privy councillor to the , the body of up to 18 personal advisors to the monarch on national and ceremonial matters. This appointment occurred shortly after Surayud's retirement from the armed forces, where he had served as [Supreme Commander](/page/Supreme Commander) of the Royal Thai Armed Forces until January 2003, marking a transition from military leadership to royal advisory duties. The , established under the 1949 and subsequent amendments, operates independently of the government to offer counsel grounded in the King's perspective, often influencing stability during political crises. Surayud's selection reflected his reputation for integrity and alignment with monarchical principles, honed through decades of service in operations and internal security roles, which positioned him as a reliable figure amid Thailand's volatile politics in the early . Surayud maintained this non-partisan advisory position until late 2006, when constitutional requirements compelled his resignation upon acceptance of the interim prime ministership, underscoring the 's apolitical mandate that prohibits members from holding executive office.

Monarchical Advisory Duties

Surayud Chulanont served as a or to King from his appointment in November 2003 until his resignation in September 2006. In this capacity, he provided counsel on matters of state, including , constitutional interpretation, and the exercise of royal prerogatives, leveraging his prior experience as Supreme Commander of the . The , limited to no more than 18 members under the Thai , functions primarily to assist the in deliberating royal acts, issuing royal commands, and addressing judicial appeals via its Judicial Committee. Proceedings of the Privy Council remain confidential, limiting public records of specific contributions by individual members like Surayud during this period. However, as a senior military figure and close advisor to the , his input focused on defense and stability issues amid rising political tensions under Thaksin Shinawatra's administration. This advisory role underscored the Council's influence in guiding monarchical responses to governance challenges, though formal decisions rested with the King. Surayud's tenure ended when he stepped down to accept the nomination for interim prime minister following the 19 2006 coup d'état.

2006 Coup d'État

Background and Rationale

The political crisis preceding the stemmed from Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra's governance since 2001, marked by rapid economic recovery post- through populist policies favoring rural constituencies, but increasingly criticized for fostering and authoritarian tendencies. Thaksin's secured landslide victories in 2001 and 2005 elections, implementing village funds and universal healthcare that boosted his rural support base to over 60% in polls, yet alienated urban elites, intellectuals, and monarchy loyalists who viewed his administration as eroding checks and balances. A pivotal trigger was the January 2006 sale of Thaksin's family-owned Shin Corporation to Singapore's for 73 billion baht ($1.9 billion), executed via a tax-exempt mechanism under Thai , which opponents decried as and given Thaksin's prior benefiting telecom firms. This event ignited mass protests by the (PAD), comprising middle-class residents and royalists, who accused Thaksin of —such as his wife's 2003 purchase of state auctioned land at a suspiciously low price—and , including using state agencies to target critics. PAD demonstrations swelled to hundreds of thousands by mid-2006, highlighting societal polarization between Thaksin's populist base and traditional power structures. Thaksin's February 2006 dissolution of parliament and snap elections, boycotted by opposition parties for alleged electoral manipulation, resulted in a contested victory later annulled by the on May 30 for irregularities, installing him as caretaker amid ongoing unrest. Underlying rationales cited by coup plotters included Thaksin's policies exacerbating southern Muslim through heavy-handed tactics—yielding over 3,000 deaths since 2004—and perceived threats to monarchical influence, as Thaksin's centralization diminished privy councilors' roles and fueled lèse-majesté rumors. leaders framed the intervention as essential to avert civil strife, dissolve parliament, and abrogate the 1997 constitution, prioritizing institutional stability over elected continuity amid documented graft cases like the 2004 scandal involving rigged contracts.

Surayud's Role

Surayud Chulanont, a retired general and former Supreme Commander of the Royal Thai Armed Forces from 1998 to 2003, played a pivotal post-coup role as the designated leader of Thailand's interim government following the military overthrow of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra on September 19, 2006. The coup, executed by Army Commander-in-Chief General Sonthi Boonyaratglin and the Council for Democratic Reform (later renamed the Council for National Security, or CNS), established martial law and dissolved key institutions, but required a figurehead to administer civilian governance and legitimize the transition. Surayud, then a Privy Councilor with longstanding ties to King Bhumibol Adulyadej, was selected by the CNS for this position due to his perceived integrity and distance from active political factions. On October 1, 2006, Surayud was formally appointed interim via royal decree, endorsed by the King, and sworn into office during a televised ceremony in attended by CNS members. This appointment, announced by Sonthi, tasked Surayud with forming a cabinet, drafting an interim , and preparing for national elections within approximately one year, while the CNS retained oversight of security matters and key appointments. Surayud's leadership provided a bridge between the and civilian administration, emphasizing reconciliation and institutional reform amid criticisms of Thaksin's alleged and , though the faced accusations of consolidating power under monarchical and military influence. In assuming this role, Surayud committed to upholding the monarchy's centrality and addressing national divisions, stating upon inauguration that priorities included resolving political conflicts and southern insurgency issues exacerbated under Thaksin. His non-partisan background—having avoided direct involvement in the coup's planning or execution—helped garner initial domestic and international acceptance, though the arrangement preserved dominance, with CNS figures holding posts and veto powers.

Transition to Premiership

The (CNS), established by the September 19, 2006, coup leaders under General Sonthi Boonyaratkalin, promptly moved to formalize an interim administration following the ouster of Prime Minister . On September 28, 2006, the CNS selected retired General Surayud Chulanont, a former army commander-in-chief and privy councilor with close ties to King , as the interim prime minister to lead the transitional government. An interim constitution was promulgated shortly after the coup, vesting executive authority in the CNS while providing a framework for oversight under Surayud's , with the stated aim of restoring democratic processes within one year. On October 1, 2006, Surayud was formally sworn in as 's 24th via royal decree during a in , marking the shift from direct military rule to an interim premiership backed by the . This appointment emphasized continuity with monarchical influence, as Surayud's military background and advisory to the king positioned him as a stabilizing figure amid public divisions over Thaksin's policies. The CNS retained significant oversight powers, including control over security matters, ensuring the premiership operated within coup-imposed constraints until elections could be arranged.

Premiership (2006–2008)

Government Structure

The government of Surayud Chulanont functioned as an interim civilian administration under the oversight of the (CNS), which had orchestrated the September 19, 2006, and promulgated the on October 1, 2006. This established a framework without elected legislative or executive bodies, vesting significant authority in the CNS to appoint key officials, screen cabinet nominees, and issue that superseded ordinary laws. Surayud, appointed on October 1, 2006, led the executive branch as head of a cabinet formed on October 9, 2006, following royal endorsement, with the CNS retaining veto power over appointments and policies to ensure alignment with its reform agenda. Legislatively, the CNS appointed a 250-member National Legislative Assembly on October 3, 2006, comprising military personnel, former officials, and civilians selected for loyalty to the coup's objectives, tasked with drafting a permanent and approving cabinet actions. This body lacked public elections, differing from prior democratic structures, and operated until the August 2007 referendum on a new , which it helped formulate under CNS guidelines. The judiciary remained intact but subject to CNS interventions in sensitive cases, such as those involving ousted Prime Minister . The structure emphasized military influence, with CNS leader General Sonthi Boonyaratglin serving as and the council holding undefined but expansive powers to safeguard , including extensions of emergency decrees in southern provinces. This hybrid model prioritized stability over democratic accountability, as evidenced by the absence of mechanisms for parliamentary dissolution or public referenda on interim until 2007. The cabinet, numbering around 36 members including figures in key security roles, focused on administrative continuity while deferring to CNS directives on core issues like asset seizures from Thaksin-linked entities.

Economic Policies

The Surayud government prioritized the philosophy of , a framework originating from King Bhumibol Adulyadej's guidance emphasizing moderation, rationality in decision-making, and self-resilience to mitigate risks from and volatility. This approach guided macroeconomic strategy, allocating resources toward projects rather than expansive stimulus, with an initial pledge of 10 billion baht for initiatives aligned with these principles. It represented a deliberate shift from the prior administration's dual-track policy of domestic demand stimulation alongside export promotion, favoring export-led growth and fiscal prudence to address perceived excesses in populist spending. Fiscal measures included approving a for 2007 with expenditures of 1,566.2 billion baht against projected revenues of 1,420 billion baht, resulting in a deficit of roughly 146 billion baht—the first since 2003—to support growth amid post-coup uncertainty. The administration reversed select prior subsidies, such as those for farmers, and curtailed programs like the Million Cows initiative, aiming to reduce fiscal burdens and enhance . To bolster investor confidence, the government pursued regulatory adjustments, including reductions and plans for a revised privatization bill to improve transparency in state asset sales. Capital controls imposed by the just before the coup were eventually lifted in February 2008, alleviating market distortions that had exacerbated the initial economic slowdown. These policies coincided with annual GDP growth of 4.97% in and 5.44% in , though quarterly figures reflected early deceleration to 3.9% in the final quarter of due to political instability dampening domestic and consumption. Exports remained a key driver, compensating for subdued internal demand, but the emphasis on sufficiency was critiqued for constraining bolder recovery measures, contributing to Thailand's comparatively lower regional growth amid lingering coup-related hesitancy. By late , defense spending rose 24.3% within the budget, reflecting priorities beyond pure economic expansion.

Security Policies

Surayud Chulanont's administration prioritized addressing the Islamist in Thailand's southern provinces of Pattani, Yala, and , shifting from the prior government's suppressive measures toward reconciliation and dialogue. This approach included mending relations with , a key regional player in countering cross-border militant networks, through diplomatic overtures and reduced rhetoric against alleged safe havens. The policy emphasized investigating past abuses rather than escalation, though it faced criticism for insufficient concrete incentives amid rising attacks. A cornerstone initiative was the public apology for security force excesses, beginning with acknowledgment of the 2004 where 85 detainees died in transit, followed by commitments to probe ongoing enforced disappearances of over 1,000 Muslims since the insurgency's resurgence in 2004. On August 9, 2007, Surayud addressed 1,000 Muslim leaders, expressing regret for governmental errors and pledging thorough inquiries into abuses to build trust. This conciliatory stance replaced invective with outreach, including revival of the Southern Border Provinces Administrative Center (SBPAC) in October 2006 to coordinate non-kinetic responses like development and cultural sensitivity training for troops. The government also allocated resources for enhanced internal security, including a 556 million baht fund requested by the to bolster provincial operations, while maintaining the 2005 Emergency Decree in affected areas to enable detentions without standard warrants. Broader efforts extended to refugee management, with directives in May 2007 to halt UNHCR status determinations for thousands of asylum seekers, prioritizing border stability over expanded processing amid concerns over infiltration. These measures aimed at causal stabilization through and coordination but yielded mixed results, as insurgent spiked post-apology, underscoring challenges in translating to operational success.

Social and Infrastructure Policies

During his premiership, Surayud Chulanont prioritized social reconciliation, particularly addressing grievances in Thailand's southern provinces amid the ongoing Muslim insurgency. On November 2, 2006, he issued a public apology to residents of Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat for human rights violations committed by state forces under previous administrations, marking a shift from Thaksin Shinawatra's hard-line suppression tactics toward dialogue and restorative justice. This conciliatory stance included overhauling repressive policies, such as reviewing the 2005 Emergency Decree's application, and endorsing recommendations from the National Reconciliation Commission (NRC) to promote cultural sensitivity, economic equity, and community involvement in security matters. However, violence persisted, with over 1,000 deaths reported in 2007, underscoring the limits of these initiatives amid entrenched separatist militancy. Surayud's administration also sought to strengthen institutional frameworks for and social welfare. It pledged support for the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) by prioritizing implementation of its recommendations, aiming to rebuild public trust eroded by prior extrajudicial actions. In social security, the government advanced discussions on expanding coverage, with the Tripartite Labor Standing Committee (TLSC) pushing reforms during 2006–2007, though fiscal constraints and political instability delayed comprehensive enactment. Broader welfare efforts aligned with the philosophy of , emphasizing self-reliance and ethical governance over populist handouts, but critics noted minimal tangible expansions in alleviation programs compared to Thaksin-era initiatives. On infrastructure, Surayud's interim government adopted a cautious approach, embedding development within the Tenth National Economic and Social Development Plan (NESDP) proclaimed in for 2007–2011. This plan shifted focus from rapid growth to sustainable, equitable progress, promoting biodiversity conservation, resource security, and a "Green and Happiness Society" through moderated economic strategies rather than large-scale capital-intensive projects. Specific measures included the Plan (2006–2008), which supported agricultural like and supply chains in border areas to boost rural incomes, with exemptions for key commodities. However, the post-coup economic contraction—marked by capital outflows and slowed investment—limited new initiatives, with priorities deferred in favor of political stabilization and constitutional drafting; no major transport or urban projects were launched, reflecting the administration's 18-month tenure amid widespread protests.

Constitutional Reforms

Following the 2006 military , which annulled Thailand's 1997 , Surayud Chulanont's interim government operated under the Interim of 2006, which outlined a process for drafting a permanent . This interim framework established a Constitution Drafting Assembly (CDA) comprising 100 members selected by the (CNS), the military-led body behind the coup, along with a 35-member Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC) appointed partly by the CDA and partly by the CNS president. The drafting began with a royal command convening the assembly on January 1, 2007, and the CDC finalized an initial draft in April 2007, which the CDA amended on July 6 before submission for public approval. The proposed constitution faced domestic criticism for potentially weakening elected institutions, including provisions enshrining an for coup participants and enhancing oversight roles, though Surayud pledged to advance toward full if approved. A national held on August 19, 2007, resulted in approval by 57.81% of valid votes, with a turnout of 57.61%; Surayud declared it a for democratic shortly after polls closed. The was promulgated on August 24, 2007, enabling legislative elections on December 23, 2007, which Surayud's government scheduled to restore civilian rule. Relative to the 1997 constitution, which emphasized broad in its own drafting, the version introduced executive constraints such as an eight-year cumulative for the and mandatory asset disclosures for the prime minister's family to curb corruption. It also enhanced public involvement in by allowing legislative petitions initiated by 10,000 citizens and strengthening independent oversight bodies, though the process retained significant military influence via CNS selections, reflecting post-coup priorities to prevent perceived abuses of power under prior elected governments.

Relations with Thaksin and Military Council

Surayud Chulanont's relations with were marked by prior conflicts that predated the coup. Following Thaksin's election victory, the two clashed over attempts at political interference in military appointments and promotions, with Surayud, as army commander-in-chief from 1998 to 2002, resisting encroachments on institutional autonomy. Additional friction arose in the late from Surayud's opposition to Thaksin's advocacy for expanded business ties with Burma's military regime, which Surayud viewed as compromising Thailand's security stance toward border incursions and refugee flows. These disagreements contributed to Thaksin's decision in 2002 to sideline Surayud by appointing a political ally as chief. Post-coup, Surayud's pursued accountability measures against Thaksin, including warnings in late 2006 against his return from , which Surayud publicly labeled a potential destabilizing . Escalating protests by Thaksin's "red shirt" supporters prompted Surayud to offer negotiations in June 2007, aiming to de-escalate unrest amid asset freezes totaling about $1.5 billion imposed by a on Thaksin's holdings for alleged . These actions reflected the administration's commitment to dismantling Thaksin's influence, though they fueled reciprocal accusations of vendettas from Thaksin's camp. Surayud maintained a cooperative yet occasionally independent relationship with the Council for National Security (CNS), the coup leaders who rebranded from the Council for Democratic Reform after installing him. Appointed interim prime minister by royal decree on 1 October 2006 at the CNS's behest, Surayud, a retired general with privy council ties, provided a nominally civilian veneer to the regime while the CNS wielded de facto veto power over policy, including constitutional drafting and security matters. The CNS, under General Sonthi Boonyaratkalin, retained control over key military and intelligence portfolios, ensuring alignment on core objectives like restoring monarchical influence and curbing Thaksin-era excesses. However, strains emerged, as in March 2007 when Surayud rebuffed CNS pressure to deploy broader emergency powers against southern insurgency violence, prioritizing legal constraints over immediate military escalation. This dynamic underscored Surayud's role as a bridge between military hardliners and reformist governance, though ultimate authority rested with the CNS until elections in 2007.

Popularity Dynamics

Surayud Chulanont assumed the premiership on October 1, 2006, amid initial public support for the military coup that ousted , with approval ratings reflecting optimism for stability and reform. Polls conducted shortly after his appointment showed high , with one survey indicating up to 90% approval in the immediate post-coup period, attributed to Surayud's for and the perceived necessity of the intervention against Thaksin's alleged . By November 2006, however, ratings had moderated to around 71-75%, as measured by Assumption University (ABAC) polls, signaling early erosion amid expectations for rapid economic recovery and security improvements. Popularity declined sharply through early 2007, dropping to 48% by according to ABAC polling, and falling below 50% for the first time in , as reported by multiple outlets citing local surveys. Key factors included persistent violence in , where insurgent attacks escalated, undermining promises of reconciliation; a series of bombings, including New Year's Eve incidents in that killed three and wounded dozens, exposed security lapses, with critics faulting inadequate investigations and arbitrary arrests. Economic stagnation, with GDP growth slowing to 4.8% in 2007 from 5% the prior year, fueled discontent among rural voters who felt neglected in favor of anti-corruption probes targeting Thaksin's assets, perceived as politically motivated retribution rather than broad reform. This downward trend contrasted with rising sentiment for Thaksin, whose approval climbed from 16% in November 2006 to 22% by January 2007 in the same polls, reflecting nostalgia for his populist policies amid the interim government's technocratic focus. By mid-2007, Surayud's ratings hovered in the low 40s, contributing to pressure for elections and the dissolution of his cabinet in May 2008, as public frustration mounted over unfulfilled pledges of self-sufficiency and ethical governance without tangible short-term gains.

Environmental Initiatives

Key Efforts

Surayud Chulanont chaired the Protection Foundation, directing funds toward habitat preservation and anti-encroachment measures in Thailand's first national park. In this capacity, he facilitated donations exceeding several million baht annually for patrol enhancements and biodiversity monitoring, including support for in buffer zones threatened by and urban expansion. A prominent initiative under his foundation leadership involved the "2nd Home for Tigers" project within the Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex, a spanning over 6,000 square kilometers. On behalf of the foundation, Chulanont signed a with the Department of National Parks to expand tiger habitats, deploy camera traps for population tracking, and curb poaching through joint ranger operations, aiming to recover numbers estimated at fewer than 200 individuals in the complex at the time. During his premiership, Chulanont endorsed regional environmental commitments, including Thailand's participation in the Singapore Declaration on Climate Change, Energy and the Environment signed on November 21, 2007. This agreement promoted -wide adoption of clean energy technologies, peatland management strategies like the Peatland Management Initiative, and transboundary forest conservation efforts, such as the Heart of Borneo project, to mitigate deforestation and carbon emissions across . His administration also approved initial assessments for pollution controls at industrial sites like Map Ta Phut, responding to community protests over emissions by directing feasibility studies for emission reduction technologies, though implementation faced delays amid economic priorities.

Outcomes and Challenges

The Surayud administration's environmental efforts, primarily channeled through the promotion of the philosophy and updates to frameworks, yielded limited tangible outcomes during its brief tenure from September 2006 to February 2008. The Promotion Act (No. 2) B.E. 2550, enacted in , strengthened regulatory mechanisms for efficiency in sectors like transportation and industry, including incentives for alternative fuels such as biodiesel aligned with self-sufficiency principles. However, quantifiable impacts on energy consumption or emissions reductions remained modest, as short-term measures focused on planning rather than widespread enforcement amid post-coup economic stabilization priorities. The Sufficiency Economy approach, emphasizing moderation, resilience, and local resource management, informed initiatives to mitigate environmental risks through sustainable agriculture and reduced overconsumption, as outlined in national human development strategies. Rural projects under this banner promoted biomass energy and risk-averse practices, contributing to conceptual shifts toward sustainability, but lacked large-scale adoption, with environmental indicators like deforestation rates showing no significant reversal during the period. Key challenges included the government's interim status following the 2006 coup, which diverted resources to political reconciliation, southern insurgency containment, and constitutional drafting, sidelining deeper environmental reforms. Policy lethargy and inward focus under principles were criticized for fostering economic conservatism over dynamic growth needed to fund conservation, exacerbating vulnerabilities to ongoing issues like and without robust institutional changes. The subsequent 2007 elections and shift to a Thaksin-aligned further stalled momentum, as incoming policies prioritized rapid industrialization.

Post-Premiership Career

Privy Council Return

Following the end of his premiership on February 6, 2008, Surayud Chulanont was reappointed to the by King in early April 2008, restoring his prior advisory role to the monarch after a hiatus necessitated by his interim leadership. The reappointment occurred alongside two other figures, expanding the council to 19 members and underscoring Surayud's continued alignment with institutions amid Thailand's post-coup political transitions. As a privy councilor, Surayud resumed duties providing counsel on constitutional, military, and matters, leveraging his background as former from 1998 to 2002. This return positioned him within the council's framework of advising the King under Article 11 of the 2007 Constitution, which emphasizes members' independence from active political office. His service remained low-profile, consistent with the council's tradition of operating behind public view while influencing key royal decisions.

Presidency and Recent Duties

General Surayud Chulanont was appointed acting president of the on May 28, 2019, following the death of his predecessor, General . He assumed the full role of president on January 5, 2020, by royal command of King Maha Vajiralongkorn, tasked with leading the council in advising the monarch on matters of state, including appointments, pardons, and ceremonial duties as the King's representative. The , comprising up to 18 members appointed by the King, operates under Article 11 of the Thai , providing non-partisan counsel independent of elected government structures. In this capacity, Surayud has presided over key advisory sessions and public ceremonies, emphasizing continuity in royal traditions amid Thailand's political transitions. His duties include representing the King at official events, such as merit-making rituals and award presentations, which underscore the council's role in maintaining institutional stability. For instance, on July 27, 2025, he was appointed as the King's representative to perform royal merit-making ceremonies. Recent activities highlight his ongoing ceremonial and diplomatic engagements. On July 7, 2025, Surayud presided over the 31st Toray Thai Foundation (TTSF) Awards and Grants Presentation Ceremony, marking his 16th consecutive year in this role, where he honored contributions to science and technology research. In 2025, he attended the opening of the Thailand-China Cooperation Expo, reinforcing bilateral ties through high-level presence. These duties reflect his function as a bridge between the monarchy and public institutions, with no reported shifts in his advisory responsibilities as of October 2025.

Criticisms and Controversies

Economic Criticisms

The Surayud government's economic stewardship from October to January 2008 drew criticism for contributing to investor uncertainty amid post-coup political instability, with Thailand's GDP growth decelerating to 4.8% in 2007 from 5.0% in , exacerbated by baht appreciation that squeezed exporters and accelerated . Critics attributed the slowdown partly to the administration's conservative fiscal approach, which prioritized stability over stimulus, leading to subdued private investment and a fourth-quarter expansion of just 1.5% seasonally adjusted. A focal point of contention was the Bank of Thailand's December 11, 2006, imposition of abrupt capital controls—requiring a 30% reserve on inflows—to curb speculative short-term capital (estimated at $950 million weekly) driving baht gains of over 15% that year, which critics argued unfairly penalized foreign investors and exporters. The policy triggered a 14.8% plunge in the index on December 19, wiping out approximately ฿700 billion ($20 billion) in market value, prompting a partial reversal within days amid domestic and international backlash for poor communication and execution under Surayud's oversight. Surayud defended the measures as essential for export competitiveness but later acknowledged broader economic handling critiques, including impacts on foreign business confidence. The administration's embrace of the "sufficiency economy" philosophy—advocated by Surayud as a framework for moderate, self-reliant growth with resilience to shocks—faced accusations of vagueness and incompatibility with Thailand's export-driven model, with substantial budget outlays (e.g., for community projects) dismissed by some as inefficient promotion rather than pragmatic policy. Detractors, including economists, contended it discouraged risk-taking and foreign needed for sustained expansion, contrasting with Thaksin-era , though growth metrics remained positive but below potential amid ongoing political tensions. Additionally, a 35% hike in the 2007 was lambasted for reallocating funds from civilian economic priorities during a period of subdued domestic demand.

Security and Human Rights Claims

During his tenure as interim from October 2006 to January 2008, Surayud Chulanont's administration maintained the Emergency Decree in 's southern border provinces, a measure originally imposed in that allowed to detain suspects without charge for up to seven days, restricted freedoms of movement and assembly, and shielded officials from prosecution for abuses. This decree was extended multiple times, including in April 2007, amid ongoing violence that resulted in over 2,000 civilian deaths from January 2004 to November 2007, primarily attributed to insurgent attacks but also including operations. Critics, including , argued that the decree facilitated ongoing abuses such as extrajudicial killings and by security personnel, with no significant accountability achieved despite promises to reform. In a notable conciliatory gesture, Surayud publicly apologized on November 2, 2006, for the 2004 , in which 85 Muslim protesters suffocated to death while crammed into army trucks following a demonstration in , accepting state responsibility for past and present government actions and pledging to address root causes of injustice. He subsequently dropped charges against 92 protesters involved in Tak Bai and related cases, and revived the Southern Border Provinces Administrative Centre (SBPAC) to investigate complaints against officials and foster trust through non-coercive approaches. However, these steps yielded limited results; the SBPAC, under military influence, lacked independent resources and credibility, failing to curb a culture of impunity linked to earlier incidents like Tak Bai and the 2004 siege. Security operations under Surayud included a October 2006 strategy emphasizing reconciliation alongside military action, but implementation faltered, as evidenced by the June 2007 "Battle Plan" sweeps that arrested nearly 2,000 suspects, with 384 men subjected to forced vocational training until halted by a court ruling on October 18, 2007. organizations reported persistent insurgent financing networks and sectarian targeting, yet responses prioritized suppression over addressing ethnic Malay Muslim grievances, contributing to escalated without prosecutions for state abuses. In October 2007, Surayud's proposed Internal Act drew criticism for granting the unchecked powers to declare emergencies, censor media, and limit rights without parliamentary oversight, potentially institutionalizing decree-like restrictions nationwide. Despite these measures, impunity for violations persisted, with activists like Ma-usoh Malong assassinated on October 10, 2007, highlighting inadequate protection for defenders.

Corruption Allegations

In late 2006, shortly after assuming the premiership, Surayud Chulanont faced allegations of illegally encroaching on protected forest land in the Khao Yai Thiang reserve, located in . The property in question was a rural home or resort built by Surayud and his wife, Khunying Chitravadee Chulanont, on land classified as a state forest reserve, raising concerns over given Surayud's prior role as chairman of the Protection Foundation. The land had been acquired through a chain of transactions: originally purchased in 1995 by Noppadon Pitakwanich for 700,000 baht, resold in 1997 to an army officer for 50,000 baht, and subsequently transferred to Khunying Chitravadee. The controversy intensified in 2007 when Prasong Soonsiri, during a National Legislative Assembly debate, presented an aerial map claiming the property lay within the reserve boundaries and urged Surayud to face penalties for trespass, such as imprisonment, to uphold standards. Surayud had previously stated in December 2006 that he would accept responsibility if the occupation proved illegal. A subsequent investigation panel reported that Surayud had transferred the land to his daughter. In response, the Forestry Department issued an order for Surayud to vacate the Khao Yai Thiang land within 30 days. Public backlash persisted into 2009 and 2010, with anti-government protesters, including Red Shirt demonstrators, marching to the site to demand its return to the state, citing perceived double standards in enforcement against elite figures. Ultimately, Surayud returned the property to state control, and the Office of the Attorney General declined to prosecute, determining no legal action was warranted for the forest preserve ownership. No other substantiated charges were leveled against him during or after his tenure.

Environmental Policy Disputes

During Surayud Chulanont's premiership from 2006 to 2008, allegations emerged that his vacation home at Khao Yai Thiang in encroached on protected forest reserve land, sparking accusations of hypocrisy in environmental enforcement. In October 2007, activist Prasong Soonsawat presented aerial maps during a public forum claiming the property occupied approximately 100 rai (16 hectares) of conserved area, highlighting perceived double standards as the government cracked down on similar encroachments by villagers and farmers elsewhere. Critics, including environmental NGOs and local conservationists, argued that the incident undermined public trust in the administration's commitment to , especially amid broader concerns over rates exceeding 2,000 square kilometers annually in during the mid-2000s. Surayud's government did not immediately address the claims, fueling perceptions of elite privilege overriding policy consistency, though official investigations were initiated but yielded no formal charges at the time. The controversy persisted beyond his tenure, culminating in protests by anti-government groups demanding the property's demolition and Surayud's prosecution for in a state forest preserve, but it originated as a dispute over equitable application of land-use regulations during his . In , Surayud agreed to return the land to the state following sustained pressure, acknowledging the encroachment without admitting wrongdoing. Additionally, Surayud's administration ordered a comprehensive review of Thailand's policies in 2007, imposing moratoriums on new licenses that halted projects like the Chatree gold mine and led to complaints of regulatory overreach stifling economic activity without sufficient environmental safeguards in place. This move, intended to reassess ecological impacts, resulted in an eight-year policy deadlock, exacerbating tensions between mining interests and conservation advocates who viewed it as insufficiently proactive against pollution from leaching and .

Honors

Royal Thai Decorations

General Surayud Chulanont received the Knight Grand Cross (First Class, Pathom Chula Chom Klao) of the Most Illustrious Order of Chula Chom Klao in both the civil (front) and military (rear) divisions, effective 3 January 2018. This prestigious award, one of Thailand's highest royal honors for distinguished service, particularly in military and advisory capacities to the throne, was proclaimed in the Royal Gazette by King Vajiralongkorn. The Order of Chula Chom Klao, established in 1873, recognizes exceptional loyalty and contributions to the Chakri dynasty and national defense.

Foreign Awards

Surayud Chulanont was awarded the (Tentera), Singapore's preeminent military honor for distinguished service in defense, on July 25, 2003. President presented the decoration to him in his capacity as Supreme Commander of the Royal Thai Armed Forces, acknowledging contributions to bilateral military collaboration.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.