Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Gasoline
View on Wikipedia

Gasoline (North American English) or petrol (Commonwealth English) is a petrochemical product characterized as a transparent, yellowish and flammable liquid normally used as a fuel for spark-ignited internal combustion engines. When formulated as a fuel for engines, gasoline is chemically composed of organic compounds derived from the fractional distillation of petroleum and later chemically enhanced with gasoline additives. It is a high-volume profitable product produced in crude oil refineries.[1]
The ability of a particular gasoline blend to resist premature ignition (which causes knocking and reduces efficiency in reciprocating engines) is measured by its octane rating. Tetraethyl lead was once widely used to increase the octane rating but is not used in modern automotive gasoline due to the health hazard. Aviation, off-road motor vehicles, and racing car engines still use leaded gasolines.[2][3] Other substances are frequently added to gasoline to improve chemical stability and performance characteristics, control corrosion, and provide fuel system cleaning. Gasoline may contain oxygen-containing chemicals such as ethanol, MTBE, or ETBE to improve combustion.
History and etymology
[edit]English dictionaries show that the term gasoline originates from gas plus the chemical suffixes -ole and -ine.[4][5][6] Petrol derives from the Medieval Latin word petroleum (L. petra, rock + oleum, oil).[7]
Interest in gasoline-like fuels started with the invention of internal combustion engines suitable for use in transportation applications. The so-called Otto engines were developed in Germany during the last quarter of the 19th century. The fuel for these early engines was a relatively volatile hydrocarbon obtained from coal gas. With a boiling point near 85 °C (185 °F) (n-octane boils at 125.62 °C (258.12 °F)[8]), it was well suited for early carburetors (evaporators). The development of a "spray nozzle" carburetor enabled the use of less volatile fuels. Further improvements in engine efficiency were attempted at higher compression ratios, but early attempts were blocked by the premature explosion of fuel, known as knocking. In 1891, the Shukhov cracking process became the world's first commercial method to break down heavier hydrocarbons in crude oil to increase the percentage of lighter products compared to simple distillation.
Chemical analysis and production
[edit]


Commercial gasoline, as well as other liquid transportation fuels, are complex mixtures of hydrocarbons.[9] The performance specification also varies with season, requiring less volatile blends during summer, in order to minimize evaporative losses.
Gasoline is produced in oil refineries. Roughly 72 liters (19 U.S. gal) of gasoline is derived from a 160-liter (42 U.S. gal) barrel of crude oil.[10] Material separated from crude oil via distillation, called virgin or straight-run gasoline, does not meet specifications for modern engines (particularly the octane rating; see below), but can be pooled to the gasoline blend.
The bulk of a typical gasoline consists of a homogeneous mixture of hydrocarbons with between four and twelve carbon atoms per molecule (commonly referred to as C4–C12).[11] It is a mixture of paraffins (alkanes), olefins (alkenes), naphthenes (cycloalkanes), and aromatics. The use of the term paraffin in place of the standard chemical nomenclature alkane is particular to the oil industry (which relies extensively on jargon). The composition of a gasoline depends upon:
- the oil refinery that makes the gasoline, as not all refineries have the same set of processing units;
- the crude oil feed used by the refinery;
- the grade of gasoline sought (in particular, the octane rating).
The various refinery streams blended to make gasoline have different characteristics. Some important streams include the following:
- Straight-run gasoline, sometimes referred to as naphtha (and also light straight run naphtha "LSR" and light virgin naphtha "LVN"), is distilled directly from crude oil. Once the leading source of fuel, naphtha's low octane rating required organometallic fuel additives (primarily tetraethyllead) prior to their phaseout from the gasoline pool which started in 1975 in the United States.[12] Straight run naphtha is typically low in aromatics (depending on the grade of the crude oil stream) and contains some cycloalkanes (naphthenes) and no olefins (alkenes). Between 0 and 20 percent of this stream is pooled into the finished gasoline because the quantity of this fraction in the crude is less than fuel demand and the fraction's Research Octane Number (RON) is too low. The chemical properties (namely RON and Reid vapor pressure (RVP)) of the straight-run gasoline can be improved through reforming and isomerization. However, before feeding those units, the naphtha needs to be split into light and heavy naphtha. Straight-run gasoline can also be used as a feedstock for steam crackers to produce olefins.
- Reformate, produced from straight run gasoline in a catalytic reformer, has a high octane rating with high aromatic content and relatively low olefin content. Most of the benzene, toluene, and xylene (the so-called BTX hydrocarbons) are more valuable as chemical feedstocks and are thus removed to some extent. Also the BTX content is regulated.
- Catalytic cracked gasoline, or catalytic cracked naphtha, produced with a catalytic cracker, has a moderate octane rating, high olefin content, and moderate aromatic content.
- Hydrocrackate (heavy, mid, and light), produced with a hydrocracker, has a medium to low octane rating and moderate aromatic levels.
- Alkylate is produced in an alkylation unit, using isobutane and C3-/C4-olefins as feedstocks. Finished alkylate contains no aromatics or olefins and has a high MON (Motor Octane Number). Alkylate was used during World War II in aviation fuel.[13] Since the late 1980s, it is sold as a specialty fuel for (handheld) gardening and forestry tools with a combustion engine.[14][15]
- Isomerate is obtained by isomerizing low-octane straight-run gasoline into iso-paraffins (non-chain alkanes, such as isooctane). Isomerate has a medium RON and MON, but no aromatics or olefins.
- Butane is usually blended in the gasoline pool, although the quantity of this stream is limited by the RVP specification.
- Oxygenates (more specifically alcohols and esters) are mostly blended into the pool in the US as ethanol. In Europe and other countries, the blends can contain ethanol in addition to Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) and Ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE). MTBE in the United States was banned by most states in the early-to-mid-2000s.[16] A few countries still allow methanol as well to be blended directly into gasoline, especially in China.[17] More about oxygenates and blending is covered further in this article.
The terms above are the jargon used in the oil industry, and the terminology varies.
Currently, many countries set limits on gasoline aromatics in general, benzene in particular, and olefin (alkene) content. Such regulations have led to an increasing preference for alkane isomers, such as isomerate or alkylate, as their octane rating is higher than n-alkanes. In the European Union, the benzene limit is set at one percent by volume for all grades of automotive gasoline. This is usually achieved by avoiding feeding C6, in particular cyclohexane, to the reformer unit, where it would be converted to benzene. Therefore, only (desulfurized) heavy virgin naphtha (HVN) is fed to the reformer unit.[18]
Gasoline can also contain other organic compounds, such as organic ethers (deliberately added), plus small levels of contaminants, in particular organosulfur compounds (which are usually removed at the refinery).
On average, U.S. petroleum refineries produce about 19 to 20 gallons of gasoline, 11 to 13 gallons of distillate fuel diesel fuel and 3 to 4 gallons of jet fuel from each 42 U.S. gallons (160 liters) barrel of crude oil. The product ratio depends upon the processing in an oil refinery and the crude oil assay.[19]
Physical properties
[edit]
Density
[edit]The specific gravity of gasoline ranges from 0.71 to 0.77,[20] with higher densities having a greater volume fraction of aromatics.[21] Finished marketable gasoline is traded (in Europe) with a standard reference of 0.755 kilograms per liter (6.30 lb/U.S. gal), (7,5668 lb/ imp gal). Its price is escalated or de-escalated according to its actual density.[clarification needed] Because of its low density, gasoline floats on water, and therefore water cannot generally be used to extinguish a gasoline fire unless applied in a fine mist.
Stability
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2022) |
Quality gasoline should be stable for six months if stored properly, but can degrade over time.[22] Gasoline stored for a year will most likely be able to be burned in an internal combustion engine without too much trouble.[22] Gasoline should ideally be stored in an airtight container (to prevent oxidation or water vapor mixing in with the gas) that can withstand the vapor pressure of the gasoline without venting (to prevent the loss of the more volatile fractions) at a stable cool temperature (to reduce the excess pressure from liquid expansion and to reduce the rate of any decomposition reactions). When gasoline is not stored correctly, gums and solids may result, which can corrode system components and accumulate on wet surfaces, resulting in a condition called "stale fuel". Gasoline containing ethanol is especially subject to absorbing atmospheric moisture, then forming gums, solids, or two phases (a hydrocarbon phase floating on top of a water-alcohol phase).[22]
The presence of these degradation products in the fuel tank or fuel lines plus a carburetor or fuel injection components makes it harder to start the engine or causes reduced engine performance.[23] On resumption of regular engine use, the buildup may or may not be eventually cleaned out by the flow of fresh gasoline. The addition of a fuel stabilizer to gasoline can extend the life of fuel that is not or cannot be stored properly, though removal of all fuel from a fuel system is the only real solution to the problem of long-term storage of an engine or a machine or vehicle. Typical fuel stabilizers are proprietary mixtures containing mineral spirits, isopropyl alcohol, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene or other additives. Fuel stabilizers are commonly used for small engines, such as lawnmower and tractor engines, especially when their use is sporadic or seasonal (little to no use for one or more seasons of the year). Users have been advised to keep gasoline containers more than half full and properly capped to reduce air exposure, to avoid storage at high temperatures, to run an engine for ten minutes to circulate the stabilizer through all components prior to storage, and to run the engine at intervals to purge stale fuel from the carburetor.[11]
Gasoline stability requirements are set by the standard ASTM D4814. This standard describes the various characteristics and requirements of automotive fuels for use over a wide range of operating conditions in ground vehicles equipped with spark-ignition engines.
Combustion energy content
[edit]A gasoline-fueled internal combustion engine obtains energy from the combustion of gasoline's various hydrocarbons with oxygen from the ambient air, yielding carbon dioxide and water as exhaust. The combustion of octane, a representative species, performs the chemical reaction:
- 2 C8H18 + 25 O2 → 16 CO2 + 18 H2O
By weight, combustion of gasoline releases about 46.7 megajoules per kilogram (13.0 kWh/kg; 21.2 MJ/lb) or by volume 33.6 megajoules per liter (9.3 kWh/L; 127 MJ/U.S. gal; 121,000 BTU/U.S. gal), quoting the lower heating value.[24] Gasoline blends differ, and therefore actual energy content varies according to the season and producer by up to 1.75 percent more or less than the average.[25] On average, about 74 liters (20 U.S. gal) of gasoline are available from a barrel of crude oil (about 46 percent by volume), varying with the quality of the crude and the grade of the gasoline. The remainder is products ranging from tar to naphtha.[26]
A high-octane-rated fuel, such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), has an overall lower power output at the typical 10:1 compression ratio of an engine design optimized for gasoline fuel. An engine tuned for LPG fuel via higher compression ratios (typically 12:1) improves the power output. This is because higher-octane fuels allow for a higher compression ratio without knocking, resulting in a higher cylinder temperature, which improves efficiency. Also, increased mechanical efficiency is created by a higher compression ratio through the concomitant higher expansion ratio on the power stroke, which is by far the greater effect. The higher expansion ratio extracts more work from the high-pressure gas created by the combustion process. An Atkinson cycle engine uses the timing of the valve events to produce the benefits of a high expansion ratio without the disadvantages, chiefly detonation, of a high compression ratio. A high expansion ratio is also one of the two key reasons for the efficiency of diesel engines, along with the elimination of pumping losses due to throttling of the intake airflow.
The lower energy content of LPG by liquid volume in comparison to gasoline is due mainly to its lower density. This lower density is a property of the lower molecular weight of propane (LPG's chief component) compared to gasoline's blend of various hydrocarbon compounds with heavier molecular weights than propane. Conversely, LPG's energy content by weight is higher than gasoline's due to a higher hydrogen-to-carbon ratio.
Molecular weights of the species in the representative octane combustion are 114, 32, 44, and 18 for C8H18, O2, CO2, and H2O, respectively; therefore one kilogram (2.2 lb) of fuel reacts with 3.51 kilograms (7.7 lb) of oxygen to produce 3.09 kilograms (6.8 lb) of carbon dioxide and 1.42 kilograms (3.1 lb) of water.
Octane rating
[edit]Spark-ignition engines are designed to burn gasoline in a controlled process called deflagration. However, the unburned mixture may autoignite by pressure and heat alone, rather than igniting from the spark plug at exactly the right time, causing a rapid pressure rise that can damage the engine. This is often referred to as engine knocking or end-gas knock. Knocking can be reduced by increasing the gasoline's resistance to autoignition, which is expressed by its octane rating. A detailed analysis further explores the conditions where premium fuel provides actual performance benefits versus when it is unnecessary.[27]
Octane rating is measured relative to a mixture of 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (an isomer of octane) and n-heptane. There are different conventions for expressing octane ratings, so the same physical fuel may have several different octane ratings based on the measure used. One of the best known is the research octane number (RON).
The octane rating of typical commercially available gasoline varies by country. In Finland, Sweden, and Norway, 95 RON is the standard for regular unleaded gasoline and 98 RON is also available as a more expensive option.
In the United Kingdom, over 95 percent of gasoline sold has 95 RON and is marketed as Unleaded or Premium Unleaded. Super Unleaded, with 97/98 RON and branded high-performance fuels (e.g., Shell V-Power, BP Ultimate) with 99 RON make up the balance. Gasoline with 102 RON may rarely be available for racing purposes.[28][29][30]
In the U.S., octane ratings in unleaded fuels vary between 85[31] and 87 AKI (91–92 RON) for regular, 89–90 AKI (94–95 RON) for mid-grade (equivalent to European regular), up to 90–94 AKI (95–99 RON) for premium (European premium).
| 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | |
| Scandinavian | Regular | Premium | ||||||||||
| UK | Regular | Premium | Super | High-performance | ||||||||
| USA | Regular | Mid-grade | Premium | |||||||||
As South Africa's largest city, Johannesburg, is located on the Highveld at 1,753 meters (5,751 ft) above sea level, the Automobile Association of South Africa recommends 95-octane gasoline at low altitude and 93-octane for use in Johannesburg because "The higher the altitude the lower the air pressure, and the lower the need for a high octane fuel as there is no real performance gain".[32]
Octane rating became important as the military sought higher output for aircraft engines in the late 1920s and the 1940s. A higher octane rating allows a higher compression ratio or supercharger boost, and thus higher temperatures and pressures, which translate to higher power output. Some scientists[who?] even predicted that a nation with a good supply of high-octane gasoline would have the advantage in air power. In 1943, the Rolls-Royce Merlin aero engine produced 980 kilowatts (1,320 hp) using 100 RON fuel from a modest 27 liters (1,600 cu in) displacement. By the time of Operation Overlord, both the RAF and USAAF were conducting some operations in Europe using 150 RON fuel (100/150 avgas), obtained by adding 2.5 percent aniline to 100-octane avgas.[33] By this time, the Rolls-Royce Merlin 66 was developing 1,500 kilowatts (2,000 hp) using this fuel.
Additives
[edit]Antiknock additives
[edit]Tetraethyl lead
[edit]Gasoline, when used in high-compression internal combustion engines, tends to auto-ignite or "detonate" causing damaging engine knocking (also called "pinging" or "pinking"). To address this problem, tetraethyl lead (TEL) was widely adopted as an additive for gasoline in the 1920s. With a growing awareness of the seriousness of the extent of environmental and health damage caused by lead compounds, however, and the incompatibility of lead with catalytic converters, governments began to mandate reductions in gasoline lead.
In the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency issued regulations to reduce the lead content of leaded gasoline over a series of annual phases, scheduled to begin in 1973 but delayed by court appeals until 1976. By 1995, leaded fuel accounted for only 0.6 percent of total gasoline sales and under 1,800 metric tons (2,000 short tons; 1,800 long tons) of lead per year. From 1 January 1996, the U.S. Clean Air Act banned the sale of leaded fuel for use in on-road vehicles in the U.S. The use of TEL also necessitated other additives, such as dibromoethane.
European countries began replacing lead-containing additives by the end of the 1980s and, by the end of the 1990s, leaded gasoline was banned within the entire European Union with an exception for Avgas 100LL for general aviation.[34] The UAE started to switch to unleaded in the early 2000s.[35]
Reduction in the average lead content of human blood may be a major cause for falling violent crime rates around the world[36] including South Africa.[37] A study found a correlation between leaded gasoline usage and violent crime (see Lead–crime hypothesis).[38][39] Other studies found no correlation.
In August 2021, the UN Environment Programme announced that leaded gasoline had been eradicated worldwide, with Algeria being the last country to deplete its reserves. UN Secretary-General António Guterres called the eradication of leaded petrol an "international success story". He also added: "Ending the use of leaded petrol will prevent more than one million premature deaths each year from heart disease, strokes and cancer, and it will protect children whose IQs are damaged by exposure to lead". Greenpeace called the announcement "the end of one toxic era".[40] However, leaded gasoline continues to be used in aeronautic, auto racing, and off-road applications.[41] The use of leaded additives is still permitted worldwide for the formulation of some grades of aviation gasoline such as 100LL, because the required octane rating is difficult to reach without the use of leaded additives.
Different additives have replaced lead compounds. The most popular additives include aromatic hydrocarbons, ethers (MTBE and ETBE), and alcohols, most commonly ethanol.
Lead replacement petrol
[edit]Lead replacement petrol (LRP) was developed for vehicles designed to run on leaded fuels and incompatible with unleaded fuels. Rather than tetraethyllead, it contains other metals such as potassium compounds or methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT); these are purported to buffer soft exhaust valves and seats so that they do not suffer recession due to the use of unleaded fuel.
LRP was marketed during and after the phaseout of leaded motor fuels in the United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa, and some other countries.[vague] Consumer confusion led to a widespread mistaken preference for LRP rather than unleaded,[42] and LRP was phased out 8 to 10 years after the introduction of unleaded.[43]
Leaded gasoline was withdrawn from sale in Britain after 31 December 1999, seven years after EEC regulations signaled the end of production for cars using leaded gasoline in member states. At this stage, a large percentage of cars from the 1980s and early 1990s which ran on leaded gasoline were still in use, along with cars that could run on unleaded fuel. However, the declining number of such cars on British roads saw many gasoline stations withdrawing LRP from sale by 2003.[44]
MMT
[edit]Methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) is used in Canada and the U.S. to boost octane rating.[45] Its use in the U.S. has been restricted by regulations, although it is currently allowed.[46] Its use in the European Union is restricted by Article 8a of the Fuel Quality Directive[47] following its testing under the Protocol for the evaluation of effects of metallic fuel-additives on the emissions performance of vehicles.[48]
Fuel stabilizers (antioxidants and metal deactivators)
[edit]
Gummy, sticky resin deposits result from oxidative degradation of gasoline during long-term storage. These harmful deposits arise from the oxidation of alkenes and other minor components in gasoline[citation needed] (see drying oils). Improvements in refinery techniques have generally reduced the susceptibility of gasolines to these problems. Previously, catalytically or thermally cracked gasolines were most susceptible to oxidation. The formation of gums is accelerated by copper salts, which can be neutralized by additives called metal deactivators.
This degradation can be prevented through the addition of 5–100 ppm of antioxidants, such as phenylenediamines and other amines.[11] Hydrocarbons with a bromine number of 10 or above can be protected with the combination of unhindered or partially hindered phenols and oil-soluble strong amine bases, such as hindered phenols. "Stale" gasoline can be detected by a colorimetric enzymatic test for organic peroxides produced by oxidation of the gasoline.[49]
Gasolines are also treated with metal deactivators, which are compounds that sequester (deactivate) metal salts that otherwise accelerate the formation of gummy residues. The metal impurities might arise from the engine itself or as contaminants in the fuel.
Detergents
[edit]Gasoline, as delivered at the pump, also contains additives to reduce internal engine carbon buildups, improve combustion and allow easier starting in cold climates. High levels of detergent can be found in Top Tier Detergent Gasolines. The specification for Top Tier Detergent Gasolines was developed by four automakers: GM, Honda, Toyota, and BMW. According to the bulletin, the minimal U.S. EPA requirement is not sufficient to keep engines clean.[50] Typical detergents include alkylamines and alkyl phosphates at a level of 50–100 ppm.[11]
Ethanol
[edit]
European Union
[edit]In the EU, 5 percent ethanol can be added within the common gasoline spec (EN 228). Discussions are ongoing to allow 10 percent blending of ethanol (available in Finnish, French and German gasoline stations). In Finland, most gasoline stations sell 95E10, which is 10 percent ethanol, and 98E5, which is 5 percent ethanol. Most gasoline sold in Sweden has 5–15 percent ethanol added. Three different ethanol blends are sold in the Netherlands—E5, E10 and hE15. The last of these differs from standard ethanol–gasoline blends in that it consists of 15 percent hydrous ethanol (i.e., the ethanol–water azeotrope) instead of the anhydrous ethanol traditionally used for blending with gasoline.
From 2009 to 2022, renewable percentage in gasoline slowly increased from 5% to 10%, even though EU-produced ethanol can achieve a climate-neutral production capability and most EU cars can use E10. E10 availability is low even in larger countries like Germany (26%) and France (58%). 8 countries in the EU have not adopted E10 as of 2024.[51]
Brazil
[edit]The Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP) requires gasoline for automobile use to have 27.5 percent of ethanol added to its composition.[52] Pure hydrated ethanol is also available as a fuel.
Australia
[edit]Australia uses both E10 (up to 10% ethanol) and E85 (up to 85% ethanol) in its gasoline. New South Wales mandated biofuel in its Biofuels Act 2007, and Queensland had a biofuel mandate since 2017. Fuel pumps must be clearly labeled with its ethanol/biodiesel content.[53]
U.S.
[edit]The federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) effectively requires refiners and blenders to blend renewable biofuels (mostly ethanol) with gasoline, sufficient to meet a growing annual target of total gallons blended. Although the mandate does not require a specific percentage of ethanol, annual increases in the target combined with declining gasoline consumption have caused the typical ethanol content in gasoline to approach 10 percent. Most fuel pumps display a sticker that states that the fuel may contain up to 10 percent ethanol, an intentional disparity that reflects the varying actual percentage. In parts of the U.S., ethanol is sometimes added to gasoline without an indication that it is a component.
India
[edit]In October 2007, the Government of India decided to make five percent ethanol blending (with gasoline) mandatory. Currently, 10 percent ethanol blended product (E10) is being sold in various parts of the country.[54][55] Ethanol has been found in at least one study to damage catalytic converters.[56]
Dyes
[edit]Though gasoline is a naturally colorless liquid, many gasolines are dyed in various colors to indicate their composition and acceptable uses. In Australia, the lowest grade of gasoline (RON 91) was dyed a light shade of red/orange, but is now the same color as the medium grade (RON 95) and high octane (RON 98), which are dyed yellow.[57] In the U.S., aviation gasoline (avgas) is dyed to identify its octane rating and to distinguish it from kerosene-based jet fuel, which is left colorless.[58] In Canada, the gasoline for marine and farm use is dyed red and is not subject to fuel excise tax in most provinces.[59]
Oxygenate blending
[edit]Oxygenate blending adds oxygen-bearing compounds such as methanol, MTBE, ETBE, TAME, TAEE, ethanol, and biobutanol. The presence of these oxygenates reduces the amount of carbon monoxide and unburned fuel in the exhaust. In many areas throughout the U.S., oxygenate blending is mandated by EPA regulations to reduce smog and other airborne pollutants. For example, in Southern California fuel must contain two percent oxygen by weight, resulting in a mixture of 5.6 percent ethanol in gasoline. The resulting fuel is often known as reformulated gasoline (RFG) or oxygenated gasoline, or, in the case of California, California reformulated gasoline (CARBOB). The federal requirement that RFG contain oxygen was dropped on 6 May 2006 because the industry had developed VOC-controlled RFG that did not need additional oxygen.[60]
MTBE was phased out in the U.S. due to groundwater contamination and the resulting regulations and lawsuits. Ethanol and, to a lesser extent, ethanol-derived ETBE are common substitutes. A common ethanol-gasoline mix of 10 percent ethanol mixed with gasoline is called gasohol or E10, and an ethanol-gasoline mix of 85 percent ethanol mixed with gasoline is called E85. The most extensive use of ethanol takes place in Brazil, where the ethanol is derived from sugarcane. In 2004, over 13 billion liters (3.4×109 U.S. gal) of ethanol was produced in the U.S. for fuel use, mostly from corn and sold as E10. E85 is slowly becoming available in much of the U.S., though many of the relatively few stations vending E85 are not open to the general public.[61]
The use of bioethanol and bio-methanol, either directly or indirectly by conversion of ethanol to bio-ETBE, or methanol to bio-MTBE is encouraged by the European Union Directive on the Promotion of the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels for transport. Since producing bioethanol from fermented sugars and starches involves distillation, though, ordinary people in much of Europe cannot legally ferment and distill their own bioethanol at present (unlike in the U.S., where getting a BATF distillation permit has been easy since the 1973 oil crisis).
Safety
[edit]
Toxicity
[edit]The safety data sheet for a 2003 Texan unleaded gasoline shows at least 15 hazardous chemicals occurring in various amounts, including benzene (up to five percent by volume), toluene (up to 35 percent by volume), naphthalene (up to one percent by volume), trimethylbenzene (up to seven percent by volume), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) (up to 18 percent by volume, in some states), and about 10 others.[62] Hydrocarbons in gasoline generally exhibit low acute toxicities, with LD50 of 700–2700 mg/kg for simple aromatic compounds.[63] Benzene and many antiknocking additives are carcinogenic.
People can be exposed to gasoline in the workplace by swallowing it, breathing in vapors, skin contact, and eye contact. Gasoline is toxic. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has also designated gasoline as a carcinogen.[64] Physical contact, ingestion, or inhalation can cause health problems. Since ingesting large amounts of gasoline can cause permanent damage to major organs, a call to a local poison control center or emergency room visit is indicated.[65]
Contrary to common misconception, swallowing gasoline does not generally require special emergency treatment, and inducing vomiting does not help, and can make it worse. According to poison specialist Brad Dahl, "even two mouthfuls wouldn't be that dangerous as long as it goes down to your stomach and stays there or keeps going". The U.S. CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry says not to induce vomiting, lavage, or administer activated charcoal.[66][67]
Inhalation for intoxication
[edit]Inhaled (huffed) gasoline vapor is a common intoxicant. Users concentrate and inhale gasoline vapor in a manner not intended by the manufacturer to produce euphoria and intoxication. Gasoline inhalation has become epidemic in some poorer communities and indigenous groups in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and some Pacific Islands.[68] The practice is thought to cause severe organ damage, along with other effects such as intellectual disability and various cancers.[69][70][71][72]
In Canada, Native children in the isolated Northern Labrador community of Davis Inlet were the focus of national concern in 1993, when many were found to be sniffing gasoline. The Canadian and provincial Newfoundland and Labrador governments intervened on several occasions, sending many children away for treatment. Despite being moved to the new community of Natuashish in 2002, serious inhalant abuse problems have continued. Similar problems were reported in Sheshatshiu in 2000 and also in Pikangikum First Nation.[73] In 2012, the issue once again made the news media in Canada.[74]
Australia has long faced a petrol (gasoline) sniffing problem in isolated and impoverished aboriginal communities. Although some sources argue that sniffing was introduced by U.S. servicemen stationed in the nation's Top End during World War II[75] or through experimentation by 1940s-era Cobourg Peninsula sawmill workers,[76] other sources claim that inhalant abuse (such as glue inhalation) emerged in Australia in the late 1960s.[77] Chronic, heavy petrol sniffing appears to occur among remote, impoverished indigenous communities, where the ready accessibility of petrol has helped to make it a common substance for abuse.
In Australia, petrol sniffing now occurs widely throughout remote Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory, Western Australia, northern parts of South Australia, and Queensland.[78] The number of people sniffing petrol goes up and down over time as young people experiment or sniff occasionally. "Boss", or chronic, sniffers may move in and out of communities; they are often responsible for encouraging young people to take it up.[79] In 2005, the Government of Australia and BP Australia began the usage of Opal fuel in remote areas prone to petrol sniffing.[80] Opal is a non-sniffable fuel (which is much less likely to cause a high) and has made a difference in some indigenous communities.
Flammability
[edit]
Gasoline is flammable with low flash point of −23 °C (−9 °F). Gasoline has a lower explosive limit of 1.4 percent by volume and an upper explosive limit of 7.6 percent. If the concentration is below 1.4 percent, the air-gasoline mixture is too lean and does not ignite. If the concentration is above 7.6 percent, the mixture is too rich and also does not ignite. However, gasoline vapor rapidly mixes and spreads with air, making unconstrained gasoline quickly flammable.
Gasoline exhaust
[edit]The exhaust gas generated by burning gasoline is harmful to both the environment and to human health. After CO is inhaled into the human body, it readily combines with hemoglobin in the blood, and its affinity is 300 times that of oxygen. Therefore, the hemoglobin in the lungs combines with CO instead of oxygen, causing the human body to be hypoxic, causing headaches, dizziness, vomiting, and other poisoning symptoms. In severe cases, it may lead to death.[81][82] Hydrocarbons only affect the human body when their concentration is quite high, and their toxicity level depends on the chemical composition. The hydrocarbons produced by incomplete combustion include alkanes, aromatics, and aldehydes. Among them, a concentration of methane and ethane over 35 g/m3 (0.035 oz/cu ft) will cause loss of consciousness or suffocation, a concentration of pentane and hexane over 45 g/m3 (0.045 oz/cu ft) will have an anesthetic effect, and aromatic hydrocarbons will have more serious effects on health, blood toxicity, neurotoxicity, and cancer. If the concentration of benzene exceeds 40 ppm, it can cause leukemia, and xylene can cause headache, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. Human exposure to large amounts of aldehydes can cause eye irritation, nausea, and dizziness. In addition to carcinogenic effects, long-term exposure can cause damage to the skin, liver, kidneys, and cataracts.[83] After NOx enters the alveoli, it has a severe stimulating effect on the lung tissue. It can irritate the conjunctiva of the eyes, cause tearing, and cause pink eyes. It also has a stimulating effect on the nose, pharynx, throat, and other organs. It can cause acute wheezing, breathing difficulties, red eyes, sore throat, and dizziness causing poisoning.[83][84] Fine particulates are also dangerous to health.[85]
Environmental effect
[edit]The air pollution in many large cities has changed from coal-burning pollution to "motor vehicle pollution". In the U.S., transportation is the largest source of carbon emissions, accounting for 30 percent of the total carbon footprint of the U.S.[86] Combustion of gasoline produces 2.35 kilograms per liter (19.6 lb/U.S. gal) of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.[87][88]
Unburnt gasoline and evaporation from the tank, when in the atmosphere, react in sunlight to produce photochemical smog. Vapor pressure initially rises with some addition of ethanol to gasoline, but the increase is greatest at 10 percent by volume.[89] At higher concentrations of ethanol above 10 percent, the vapor pressure of the blend starts to decrease. At a 10 percent ethanol by volume, the rise in vapor pressure may potentially increase the problem of photochemical smog. This rise in vapor pressure could be mitigated by increasing or decreasing the percentage of ethanol in the gasoline mixture. The chief risks of such leaks come not from vehicles, but gasoline delivery truck accidents and leaks from storage tanks. Because of this risk, most (underground) storage tanks now have extensive measures in place to detect and prevent any such leaks, such as monitoring systems (Veeder-Root, Franklin Fueling).
Production of gasoline consumes 1.5 liters per kilometer (0.63 U.S. gal/mi) of water by driven distance.[90]
Gasoline use causes a variety of deleterious effects to the human population and to the climate generally. The harms imposed include a higher rate of premature death and ailments, such as asthma, caused by air pollution, higher healthcare costs for the public generally, decreased crop yields, missed work and school days due to illness, increased flooding and other extreme weather events linked to global climate change, and other social costs. The costs imposed on society and the planet are estimated to be $3.80 per gallon of gasoline, in addition to the price paid at the pump by the user. The damage to the health and climate caused by a gasoline-powered vehicle greatly exceeds that caused by electric vehicles.[91][92]
Gasoline can be released into the environment as an uncombusted liquid fuel, as a flammable liquid, or as a vapor by way of leakages occurring during its production, handling, transport and delivery.[93] Gasoline contains known carcinogens,[94][95][96] and gasoline exhaust is a health risk.[85] Gasoline is often used as a recreational inhalant and can be harmful or fatal when used in such a manner.[97] When burned, one liter (0.26 U.S. gal) of gasoline emits about 2.3 kilograms (5.1 lb) of CO2, a greenhouse gas, contributing to human-caused climate change.[98][99] Oil products, including gasoline, were responsible for about 32% of CO2 emissions worldwide in 2021.[100]
Carbon dioxide
[edit]About 2.353 kilograms per liter (19.64 lb/U.S. gal) of carbon dioxide (CO2) are produced from burning gasoline that does not contain ethanol.[88] Most of the retail gasoline now sold in the U.S. contains about 10 percent fuel ethanol (or E10) by volume.[88] Burning E10 produces about 2.119 kilograms per liter (17.68 lb/U.S. gal) of CO2 that is emitted from the fossil fuel content. If the CO2 emissions from ethanol combustion are considered, then about 2.271 kilograms per liter (18.95 lb/U.S. gal) of CO2 are produced when E10 is combusted.[88]
Worldwide 7 liters of gasoline are burnt for every 100 km driven by cars and vans.[101]
In 2021, the International Energy Agency stated, "To ensure fuel economy and CO2 emissions standards are effective, governments must continue regulatory efforts to monitor and reduce the gap between real-world fuel economy and rated performance."[101]
Contamination of soil and water
[edit]Gasoline enters the environment through the soil, groundwater, surface water, and air. Therefore, humans may be exposed to gasoline through methods such as breathing, eating, and skin contact. For example, using gasoline-filled equipment, such as lawnmowers, drinking gasoline-contaminated water close to gasoline spills or leaks to the soil, working at a gasoline station, inhaling gasoline volatile gas when refueling at a gasoline station is the easiest way to be exposed to gasoline.[102]
Use and pricing
[edit]The International Energy Agency said in 2021 that "road fuels should be taxed at a rate that reflects their impact on people's health and the climate".[101]
Europe
[edit]Countries in Europe impose substantially higher taxes on fuels such as gasoline when compared to the U.S. The price of gasoline in Europe is typically higher than that in the U.S. due to this difference.[103]
U.S.
[edit]This section needs to be updated. (April 2016) |


From 1998 to 2004, the price of gasoline fluctuated between $0.26 and $0.53 per liter ($1 and $2/U.S. gal).[104] After 2004, the price increased until the average gasoline price reached a high of $1.09 per liter ($4.11/U.S. gal) in mid-2008 but receded to approximately $0.69 per liter ($2.60/U.S. gal) by September 2009.[104] The U.S. experienced an upswing in gasoline prices through 2011,[105] and, by 1 March 2012, the national average was $0.99 per liter ($3.74/U.S. gal). California prices are higher because the California government mandates unique California gasoline formulas and taxes.[106]
In the U.S., most consumer goods bear pre-tax prices, but gasoline prices are posted with taxes included. Taxes are added by federal, state, and local governments. As of 2009[update], the federal tax was $0.049 per liter ($0.184/U.S. gal) for gasoline and $0.064 per liter ($0.244/U.S. gal) for diesel (excluding red diesel).[107]
About nine percent of all gasoline sold in the U.S. in May 2009 was premium grade, according to the Energy Information Administration. Consumer Reports magazine says, "If [your owner's manual] says to use regular fuel, do so—there's no advantage to a higher grade."[108] The Associated Press said premium gas—which has a higher octane rating and costs more per gallon than regular unleaded—should be used only if the manufacturer says it is "required".[109] Cars with turbocharged engines and high compression ratios often specify premium gasoline because higher octane fuels reduce the incidence of "knock", or fuel pre-detonation.[110] The price of gasoline varies considerably between the summer and winter months.[111]
There is a considerable difference between summer oil and winter oil in gasoline vapor pressure (Reid Vapor Pressure, RVP), which is a measure of how easily the fuel evaporates at a given temperature. The higher the gasoline volatility (the higher the RVP), the easier it is to evaporate. The conversion between the two fuels occurs twice a year, once in autumn (winter mix) and the other in spring (summer mix). The winter blended fuel has a higher RVP because the fuel must be able to evaporate at a low temperature for the engine to run normally. If the RVP is too low on a cold day, the vehicle will be difficult to start; however, the summer blended gasoline has a lower RVP. It prevents excessive evaporation when the outdoor temperature rises, reduces ozone emissions, and reduces smog levels. At the same time, vapor lock is less likely to occur in hot weather.[112]
Gasoline production by country
[edit]| Country | Gasoline production | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barrels (thousands) |
m3 (thousands) |
ft3 (thousands) |
kL | |
| U.S. | 8,921 | 1,418.3 | 50,090 | 1,418.3 |
| China | 2,578 | 409.9 | 14,470 | 409.9 |
| Japan | 920 | 146 | 5,200 | 146 |
| Russia | 910 | 145 | 5,100 | 145 |
| India | 755 | 120.0 | 4,240 | 120.0 |
| Canada | 671 | 106.7 | 3,770 | 106.7 |
| Brazil | 533 | 84.7 | 2,990 | 84.7 |
| Germany | 465 | 73.9 | 2,610 | 73.9 |
| Saudi Arabia | 441 | 70.1 | 2,480 | 70.1 |
| Mexico | 407 | 64.7 | 2,290 | 64.7 |
| South Korea | 397 | 63.1 | 2,230 | 63.1 |
| Iran | 382 | 60.7 | 2,140 | 60.7 |
| UK | 364 | 57.9 | 2,040 | 57.9 |
| Italy | 343 | 54.5 | 1,930 | 54.5 |
| Venezuela | 277 | 44.0 | 1,560 | 44.0 |
| France | 265 | 42.1 | 1,490 | 42.1 |
| Singapore | 249 | 39.6 | 1,400 | 39.6 |
| Australia | 241 | 38.3 | 1,350 | 38.3 |
| Indonesia | 230 | 37 | 1,300 | 37 |
| Taiwan | 174 | 27.7 | 980 | 27.7 |
| Thailand | 170 | 27 | 950 | 27 |
| Spain | 169 | 26.9 | 950 | 26.9 |
| Netherlands | 148 | 23.5 | 830 | 23.5 |
| South Africa | 135 | 21.5 | 760 | 21.5 |
| Argentina | 122 | 19.4 | 680 | 19.4 |
| Sweden | 112 | 17.8 | 630 | 17.8 |
| Greece | 108 | 17.2 | 610 | 17.2 |
| Belgium | 105 | 16.7 | 590 | 16.7 |
| Malaysia | 103 | 16.4 | 580 | 16.4 |
| Finland | 100 | 16 | 560 | 16 |
| Belarus | 92 | 14.6 | 520 | 14.6 |
| Turkey | 92 | 14.6 | 520 | 14.6 |
| Colombia | 85 | 13.5 | 480 | 13.5 |
| Poland | 83 | 13.2 | 470 | 13.2 |
| Norway | 77 | 12.2 | 430 | 12.2 |
| Kazakhstan | 71 | 11.3 | 400 | 11.3 |
| Algeria | 70 | 11 | 390 | 11 |
| Romania | 70 | 11 | 390 | 11 |
| Oman | 69 | 11.0 | 390 | 11.0 |
| Egypt | 66 | 10.5 | 370 | 10.5 |
| UAE | 66 | 10.5 | 370 | 10.5 |
| Chile | 65 | 10.3 | 360 | 10.3 |
| Turkmenistan | 61 | 9.7 | 340 | 9.7 |
| Kuwait | 57 | 9.1 | 320 | 9.1 |
| Iraq | 56 | 8.9 | 310 | 8.9 |
| Vietnam | 52 | 8.3 | 290 | 8.3 |
| Lithuania | 49 | 7.8 | 280 | 7.8 |
| Denmark | 48 | 7.6 | 270 | 7.6 |
| Qatar | 46 | 7.3 | 260 | 7.3 |
Comparison with other fuels
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (December 2020) |
Below is a table of the energy density (per volume) and specific energy (per mass) of various transportation fuels as compared with gasoline. In the rows with gross and net, they are from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Transportation Energy Data Book.[114]
| Fuel type | Energy density | Specific energy | RON | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||
| MJ/L | BTU / U.S. gal | MJ/L | BTU / U.S. gal | MJ/kg | BTU/lb | MJ/kg | BTU/lb | ||
| Gasoline | 34.8 | 125,000 | 32.2 | 115,400 | 44.4 | 19,100[115] | 41.1 | 17,700 | 91–98 |
| Autogas (LPG)[a] | 26.8 | 96,000 | 46 | 20,000 | 108 | ||||
| Ethanol | 21.2 | 76,000[115] | 21.1 | 75,700 | 26.8 | 11,500[115] | 26.7 | 11,500 | 108.7[116] |
| Methanol | 17.9 | 64,000 | 15.8 | 56,600 | 22.6 | 9,700 | 19.9 | 8,600 | 123 |
| Butanol | 29.2 | 105,000 | 36.6 | 15,700 | 91–99[clarification needed] | ||||
| Gasohol | 31.2 | 112,000 | 31.3 | 112,400 | 93–94[clarification needed] | ||||
| Diesel[b] | 38.6 | 138,000 | 35.9 | 128,700 | 45.4 | 19,500 | 42.2 | 18,100 | 25 |
| Biodiesel | 33.3–35.7 | 119,000–128,000[117][clarification needed] | 32.6 | 117,100 | |||||
| Avgas | 33.5 | 120,000 | 31 | 112,000 | 46.8 | 20,100 | 43.3 | 18,600 | |
| Jet A | 35.1 | 126,000 | 43.8 | 18,800 | |||||
| Jet B | 35.5 | 127,500 | 33.1 | 118,700 | |||||
| LNG | 25.3 | 91,000 | 55 | 24,000 | |||||
| LPG | 25.4 | 91,300 | 23.3 | 83,500 | 46.1 | 19,800 | 42.3 | 18,200 | |
| CGH2[c] | 10.1 | 36,000 | 0.036 | 130[118] | 142 | 61,000 | 0.506 | 218 | |
See also
[edit]Chevron published a free technical guide Motor Gasolines Technical Review[inappropriate external link?] using common language that explains gasoline production, blending, and combustion in an engine.[promotion?] The report covers the US and other locations globally.
- Aviation fuel – Fuel used to power aircraft
- Butanol fuel – Fuel for internal combustion engines – replacement fuel for use in unmodified gasoline engines
- Biogasoline – Gasoline produced from biomass - petrol derived from biomass such as algae
- Diesel fuel – Liquid fuel used in diesel engines
- Filling station – Facility that sells gasoline and diesel
- Fuel dispenser – Machine at a filling station that is used to pump fuels
- Fuel saving device – Product sold in the automotive aftermarket
- Gas to liquids – Conversion of natural gas to liquid petroleum products
- Gasoline and diesel usage and pricing
- Gasoline gallon equivalent – Amount of alternative fuel it takes to equal the energy content of one liquid gallon of gasoline
- Hydrogen fuel – Using hydrogen to decarbonize more sectors
- Internal combustion engine (ICE) – Engine in which fuel combusts with an oxidizer
- Jerrycan – Robust pressed steel liquid container
- List of automotive fuel retailers
- List of gasoline additives
- Natural-gas condensate § Drip gas – Low-density mixture of hydrocarbon liquids
- Synthetic gasoline – Fuel from carbon monoxide and hydrogen
- Octane rating – Standard measure of the performance of an engine or aviation fuel
- World oil market chronology from 2003 – Chronology of events affecting the oil market
Explanatory notes
[edit]- ^ Consisting mostly of C3 and C4 hydrocarbons
- ^ Diesel fuel is not used in a gasoline engine, so its low octane rating is not an issue; the relevant metric for diesel engines is the cetane number.
- ^ at −253.2 °C (−423.8 °F)
References
[edit]- ^ Gary, James H.; Handwerk, Glenn E. (2001). Petroleum refining: technology and economics (4. ed.). New York Basel: Dekker. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-8247-0482-7.
- ^ "Why small planes still use leaded fuel decades after phase-out in cars". NBC News. 22 April 2021. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
- ^ "Race Fuel 101: Lead and Leaded Racing Fuels". Archived from the original on 25 October 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- ^ "gasoline". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster.
- ^ "gasoline". Dictionary.com Unabridged (Online). n.d.
- ^ gasoline". Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, 2024.
- ^ "petroleum". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Archived from the original on 16 May 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
- ^ "N-OCTANE / CAMEO Chemicals / NOAA". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived from the original on 24 August 2023. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ "Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids Explained - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". www.eia.gov. Archived from the original on 5 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
- ^ "Gasoline—a petroleum product". U.S. Energy Information Administration website. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 12 August 2016. Archived from the original on 24 May 2017. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
- ^ a b c d Werner Dabelstein, Arno Reglitzky, Andrea Schütze and Klaus Reders "Automotive Fuels" in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2007, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/14356007.a16_719.pub2
- ^ Hofverberg, Elin (14 April 2022). "The History of the Elimination of Leaded Gasoline | In Custodia Legis". The Library of Congress. Retrieved 16 January 2025.
- ^ "Alkylate: Understanding a Key Component of Cleaner Gasoline". American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers. 6 August 2021. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
- ^ "Specially designed fuel for cleaner oceans". AlkylateFuel.com. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
- ^ "The story behind Aspen Alkylate Fuel". AspenFuel.co.uk. 5 June 2024. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
- ^ US EPA (June 2004). "State Actions Banning MTBE (Statewide)" (PDF). EPA Archives.
- ^ "China's use of methanol in liquid fuels has grown rapidly since 2000 - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
- ^ Huess Hedlund, Frank; Boier Pedersena, Jan; Sinc, Gürkan; Garde, Frits G.; Kragha, Eva K.; Frutiger, Jérôme (February 2019). "Puncture of an import gasoline pipeline—Spray effects may evaporate more fuel than a Buncefield-type tank overfill event" (PDF). Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 122: 33–47. Bibcode:2019PSEP..122...33H. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 November 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
- ^ "Refining crude oil—U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". Archived from the original on 27 August 2022. Retrieved 27 August 2022.
- ^ Bell Fuels. "Lead-Free gasoline Material Safety Data Sheet". NOAA. Archived from the original on 20 August 2002.
- ^ Demirel, Yaşar (26 January 2012). Energy: Production, Conversion, Storage, Conservation, and Coupling. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 33. ISBN 978-1-4471-2371-2. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ^ a b c Crisara, Matt (6 March 2023). "It's True: Gasoline Has an Expiration Date". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 15 January 2025. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Pradelle, Florian; Braga, Sergio L.; Martins, Ana Rosa F. A.; Turkovics, Franck; Pradelle, Renata N. C. (3 November 2015). "Gum Formation in Gasoline and Its Blends: A Review". Energy & Fuels. 29 (12): 7753–7770. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01894.
- ^ "Energy Information Administration". www.eia.gov. Archived from the original on 15 December 2015.
- ^ "Fuel Properties Comparison" (PDF). Alternative Fuels Data Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 October 2016. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
- ^ "Oil Industry Statistics from Gibson Consulting". Archived from the original on 12 September 2008. Retrieved 31 July 2008.
- ^ Gomez, Aly (6 February 2025). "Premium vs. Regular Gas: Are You Getting What You Pay For?". Substack. Retrieved 8 February 2025.
- ^ "Quality of petrol and diesel fuel used for road transport in the European Union (Reporting year 2013)". European Commission. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- ^ "Types Of Car Fuel". Archived from the original on 25 September 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- ^ "Sunoco CFR Racing Fuel". Archived from the original on 21 October 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- ^ Ryan Lengerich Journal staff (17 July 2012). "85-octane warning labels not posted at many gasoline stations". Rapid City Journal. Archived from the original on 15 June 2015.
- ^ "95/93 – What is the Difference, Really?". Automobile Association of South Africa (AA). Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 26 January 2017.
- ^ Hearst Magazines (April 1936). "Popular Mechanics". Popular Mechanics. Hearst Magazines: 524–. ISSN 0032-4558. Archived from the original on 19 June 2013.
- ^ Calderwood, Dave (8 March 2022). "Europe moves to ban lead in avgas". FLYER. Retrieved 28 July 2024.
- ^ "UAE switches to unleaded fuel". January 2003. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
- ^ Matthews, Dylan (22 April 2013). "Lead abatement, alcohol taxes and 10 other ways to reduce the crime rate without annoying the NRA". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 23 May 2013.
- ^ Marrs, Dave (22 January 2013). "Ban on lead may yet give us respite from crime". Business Day. Archived from the original on 6 April 2013. Retrieved 23 May 2013.
- ^ Reyes, J. W. (2007). "The Impact of Childhood Lead Exposure on Crime" (PDF). National Bureau of Economic Research. "a" ref citing Pirkle, Brody, et al. (1994). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 January 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
- ^ "Ban on leaded petrol 'has cut crime rates around the world'". 28 October 2007. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017.
- ^ "Highly polluting leaded petrol now eradicated from the world, says UN". BBC News. 31 August 2021. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- ^ Miranda, Leticia; Farivar, Cyrus (12 April 2021). "Leaded gas was phased out 25 years ago. Why are these planes still using toxic fuel?". NBC News. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- ^ Seggie, Eleanor (5 August 2011). "More than 20% of SA cars still using lead-replacement petrol but only 1% need it". Engineering News. South Africa. Archived from the original on 13 October 2016. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
- ^ Clark, Andrew (14 August 2002). "Petrol for older cars about to disappear". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
- ^ "AA warns over lead replacement fuel". The Daily Telegraph. London. 15 August 2002. Archived from the original on 21 April 2017. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
- ^ Hollrah, Don P.; Burns, Allen M. (11 March 1991). "MMT Increases Octane While Reducing Emissions". www.ogj.com. Archived from the original on 17 November 2016.
- ^ "EPA Comments on the Gasoline Additive MMT". United States Environmental Protection Agency. 5 October 2015. Archived from the original on 17 November 2016.
- ^ "Directive 2009/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009". Archived from the original on 22 September 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- ^ "Protocol for the Evaluation of Effects of Metallic Fuel-Additives on the Emissions Performance of Vehicles" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- ^ A1 AU 2000/72399 A1 Gasoline test kit
- ^ "Top Tier Detergent Gasoline (Deposits, Fuel Economy, No Start, Power, Performance, Stall Concerns)", GM Bulletin, 04-06-04-047, 06-Engine/Propulsion System, June 2004
- ^ "Ethanol in gasoline: an immediate solution for renewables in road transport, the potential of E10 deployment in the EU – Summary of webinar by ETIP Bioenergy Working Group 3 – ETIP Bioenergy". Retrieved 9 April 2025.
- ^ "MEDIDA PROVISÓRIA nº 532, de 2011". senado.gov.br. Archived from the original on 19 September 2011.
- ^ "Ethanol and other biofuels". Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. 20 February 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2025.
- ^ "Government to take a call on ethanol price soon". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 21 November 2011. Archived from the original on 5 May 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- ^ "India to raise ethanol blending in gasoline to 10%". 22 November 2011. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- ^ "European Biogas Association" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
- ^ "The Color of Australian Unleaded Petrol Is Changing To Red/Orange" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 April 2013. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
- ^ "EAA – Avgas Grades". 17 May 2008. Archived from the original on 17 May 2008. Retrieved 6 October 2012.
- ^ "Fuel Taxes & Road Expenditures: Making the Link" (PDF). p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 April 2014. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
- ^ "Removal of Reformulated Gasoline Oxygen Content Requirement (national) and Revision of Commingling Prohibition to Address Non-0xygenated Reformulated Gasoline (national)". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 22 February 2006. Archived from the original on 20 September 2005.
- ^ "Alternative Fueling Station Locator". U.S. Department of Energy. Archived from the original on 14 July 2008. Retrieved 14 July 2008.
- ^ "Material safety data sheet" (PDF). Tesoro petroleum Companies, Inc., U.S. 8 February 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2007.
- ^ Karl Griesbaum et al. "Hydrocarbons" in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2005, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/14356007.a13_227
- ^ "CDC – NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards – Gasoline". www.cdc.gov. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
- ^ E Reese and R D Kimbrough (December 1993). "Acute toxicity of gasoline and some additives". Environmental Health Perspectives. 101 (Suppl 6): 115–131. Bibcode:1993EnvHP.101S.115R. doi:10.1289/ehp.93101s6115. PMC 1520023. PMID 8020435.
- ^ University of Utah Poison Control Center (24 June 2014), Dos and Don'ts in Case of Gasoline Poisoning, University of Utah, archived from the original on 8 November 2020, retrieved 15 October 2018
- ^ Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (21 October 2014), Medical Management Guidelines for Gasoline (Mixture) CAS# 86290-81-5 and 8006-61-9, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, archived from the original on 14 November 2020, retrieved 13 December 2018
- ^ "Petrol Sniffing Fact File". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on 26 May 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
- ^ Yip, Leona; Mashhood, Ahmed; Naudé, Suné (2005). "Low IQ and Gasoline Huffing: The Perpetuation Cycle". American Journal of Psychiatry. 162 (5): 1020–1021. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.1020-a. PMID 15863813. Archived from the original on 14 August 2017.
- ^ "Rising Trend: Sniffing Gasoline – Huffing & Inhalants". 16 May 2013. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
- ^ "Petrol Sniffing / Gasoline Sniffing". Archived from the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
- ^ "Benzene and Cancer Risk". American Cancer Society. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- ^ Lauwers, Bert (1 June 2011). "The Office of the Chief Coroner's Death Review of the Youth Suicides at the Pikangikum First Nation, 2006–2008". Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario. Archived from the original on 30 September 2012. Retrieved 2 October 2011.
- ^ "Labrador Innu kids sniffing gas again to fight boredom". CBC.ca. Archived from the original on 18 June 2012. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
- ^ Wortley, R.P. (29 August 2006). "Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights (Regulated Substances) Amendment Bill". Legislative Council (South Australia). Hansard. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
- ^ Brady, Maggie (27 April 2006). "Community Affairs Reference Committee Reference: Petrol sniffing in remote Aboriginal communities" (PDF). Official Committee Hansard (Senate). Hansard: 11. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 September 2006. Retrieved 20 March 2006.
- ^ Kozel, Nicholas; Sloboda, Zili; Mario De La Rosa, eds. (1995). Epidemiology of Inhalant Abuse: An International Perspective (PDF) (Report). National Institute on Drug Abuse. NIDA Research Monograph 148. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
- ^ "Petrol-sniffing reports in Central Australia increase as kids abuse low aromatic Opal fuel". ABC News. 10 May 2022. Archived from the original on 16 May 2022. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
- ^ Williams, Jonas (March 2004). "Responding to petrol sniffing on the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands: A case study". Social Justice Report 2003. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Archived from the original on 31 August 2007. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
- ^ "Submission to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee by BP Australia Pty Ltd" (PDF). Parliament of Australia Web Site. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 June 2007. Retrieved 8 June 2007.
- ^ "Carbon Monoxide Poisoning" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
- ^ "Carbon monoxide poisoning - Symptoms and causes". Mayo Clinic. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
- ^ a b x-engineer.org. "Effects of vehicle pollution on human health – x-engineer.org". Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
- ^ "NOx gases in diesel car fumes: Why are they so dangerous?". phys.org. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
- ^ a b "Human Health Risk Assessment for Gasoline Exhaust". www.canada.ca. 13 October 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2024.
- ^ "Facts About Gasoline". Coltura - moving beyond gasoline. Archived from the original on 9 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
- ^ "How Gasoline Becomes CO2". Slate Magazine. 1 November 2006. Archived from the original on 20 August 2011.
- ^ a b c d
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain: "How much carbon dioxide is produced by burning gasoline and diesel fuel?". U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Archived from the original on 27 October 2013.
- ^ V. F. Andersen; J. E. Anderson; T. J. Wallington; S. A. Mueller; O. J. Nielsen (21 May 2010). "Vapor Pressures of Alcohol−Gasoline Blends". Energy Fuels. 24 (6): 3647–3654. doi:10.1021/ef100254w.
- ^ "Water Intensity of Transportation" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 September 2013. Retrieved 6 October 2016.
- ^ University, Duke. "New models yield clearer picture of emissions' true costs". phys.org. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
- ^ Shindell, Drew T. (2015). "The social cost of atmospheric release". Climatic Change. 130 (2): 313–326. Bibcode:2015ClCh..130..313S. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0. hdl:10419/85245. S2CID 41970160.
- ^ "Preventing and Detecting Underground Storage Tank (UST) Releases". United States Environmental Protection Agency. 13 October 2014. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
- ^ "Evaluation of the Carcinogenicity of Unleaded Gasoline". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on 27 June 2010.
- ^ Mehlman, MA (1990). "Dangerous properties of petroleum-refining products: carcinogenicity of motor fuels (gasoline)". Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis, and Mutagenesis. 10 (5): 399–408. doi:10.1002/tcm.1770100505. ISSN 2472-1727. PMID 1981951.
- ^ Baumbach, JI; Sielemann, S; Xie, Z; Schmidt, H (15 March 2003). "Detection of the gasoline components methyl tert-butyl ether, benzene, toluene, and m-xylene using ion mobility spectrometers with a radioactive and UV ionization source". Analytical Chemistry. 75 (6): 1483–90. doi:10.1021/ac020342i. PMID 12659213.
- ^ "Gasoline Sniffing". HealthyChildren.org. 28 December 2012. Archived from the original on 11 March 2024. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
- ^ "Releases or emission of CO2 per Liter of fuel (Gasoline, Diesel, LPG)". économie, écologie, énergies, innovations et société. 7 March 2008. Archived from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- ^ Cook, John; Nuccitelli, Dana; Green, Sarah A.; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Painting, Rob; Way, Robert; Jacobs, Peter; Skuce, Andrew (2013). "Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet". Environmental Research Letters. 8 (2) 024024. NASA. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024. S2CID 250675802. Archived from the original on 11 April 2019. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- ^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (11 May 2020). "CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions". Our World in Data. Global Change Data Lab. Archived from the original on 19 April 2023. Retrieved 19 April 2023.
- ^ a b c "Fuel Consumption of Cars and Vans – Analysis". IEA. November 2021. Archived from the original on 3 May 2022.
- ^ "Gasoline, Automotive | ToxFAQs™ | ATSDR". wwwn.cdc.gov. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
- ^ "Fuel Prices and New Vehicle Fuel Economy in Europe" (PDF). MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. August 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 November 2020. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
- ^ a b "Gas Prices: Frequently Asked Questions". fueleconomy.gov. Archived from the original on 21 January 2011. Retrieved 16 August 2009.
- ^ "Fiscal Facts". Archived from the original on 6 July 2009. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
- ^ "Regional gasoline price differences - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". Archived from the original on 15 November 2021. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
- ^ "When did the Federal Government begin collecting the gas tax?—Ask the Rambler — Highway History". FHWA. Archived from the original on 29 May 2010. Retrieved 17 October 2010.
- ^ "New & Used Car Reviews & Ratings". Consumer Reports. Archived from the original on 23 February 2013.
- ^ "Gassing up with premium probably a waste". philly.com. 19 August 2009. Archived from the original on 21 August 2009.
- ^ Biello, David. "Fact or Fiction?: Premium Gasoline Delivers Premium Benefits to Your Car". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012.
- ^ "Why is summer fuel more expensive than winter fuel?". HowStuffWorks. 6 June 2008. Archived from the original on 30 May 2015. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
- ^ "Why Is Gas More Expensive in the Summer Than in the Winter?". HowStuffWorks. 6 June 2008. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
- ^ "Gasoline production - Country rankings". Archived from the original on 22 September 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- ^ "Appendix B – Transportation Energy Data Book". ornl.gov. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 8 July 2011.
- ^ a b c George Thomas. "Overview of Storage Development DOE Hydrogen Program" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 February 2007. (99.6 KB). Livermore, California. Sandia National Laboratories. 2000.
- ^ Eyidogan, Muharrem; Ozsezen, Ahmet Necati; Canakci, Mustafa; Turkcan, Ali (2010). "Impact of alcohol–gasoline fuel blends on the performance and combustion characteristics of an SI engine". Fuel. 89 (10): 2713. Bibcode:2010Fuel...89.2713E. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.01.032.
- ^ "Extension Forestry" (PDF). North Carolina Cooperative Extension. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 November 2012.
- ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". The National Hydrogen Association. 25 November 2005. Archived from the original on 25 November 2005. Retrieved 23 May 2008.
Bibliography
[edit]- Gold, Russell. The Boom: How Fracking Ignited the American Energy Revolution and Changed the World (Simon & Schuster, 2014).
- Yergin, Daniel. The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World (Penguin, 2011).
- Yergin, Daniel. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power (Buccaneer Books, 1994; latest edition: Reissue Press, 2008).
- Graph of inflation-corrected historic prices, 1970–2005. Highest in 2005 Archived 23 September 2005 at the Wayback Machine
- The Low-Down on High Octane Gasoline
- MMT-US EPA Archived 20 September 2005 at the Wayback Machine
- An introduction to the modern petroleum science Archived 4 April 2005 at the Wayback Machine, and to the Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins.
- What's the difference between premium and regular gas? Archived 19 October 2004 at the Wayback Machine (from The Straight Dope)
- International Fuel Prices 2005 with diesel and gasoline prices of 172 countries
- EIA – Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update
- World Internet News: "Big Oil Looking for Another Government Handout", April 2006.
- Durability of various plastics: Alcohols vs. Gasoline Archived 28 October 2004 at the Wayback Machine
- Dismissal of the Claims of a Biological Connection for Natural petroleum.
- Fuel Economy Impact Analysis of RFG Archived 22 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine i.e. reformulated gasoline. Has lower heating value data, actual energy content is higher see higher heating value
- A Refiner's Viewpoint on MOTOR FUEL QUALITY Archived 4 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 'A Refiner's Viewpoint on Motor Fuel Quality' About the fuel specs refiners can control. Holaday W, and Happel J. (SAE paper 430113, 1943).
External links
[edit]- CNN/Money: Global gas prices
- EEP: European gas prices
- Transportation Energy Data Book
- Energy Supply Logistics Searchable Directory of US Terminals
- High octane fuel, leaded and LRP gasoline—article from robotpig.net
- CDC – NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards
- Comparison of Regular, Midgrade, and Premium Fuel
- Images
- Down the Gasoline Trail Handy Jam Organization, 1935 (Cartoon)
Gasoline
View on GrokipediaHistory
Etymology and early nomenclature
The term "gasoline" originated in the mid-19th century as a trade name for a volatile petroleum distillate, deriving from "gas," which alluded to its ability to produce illuminating gas through evaporation or its similarity to gaseous fuels in volatility, combined with the suffix "-oline" from Latin oleum (oil) to denote an oily substance.[10] The earliest recorded variant, "gasolene," appeared in 1863 in Britain as a trademark for refined petroleum products, likely influenced by earlier brands such as "Cazeline," registered in 1862 by British merchant John Cassell for a patent illuminating oil, and its Irish imitation "Gazeline."[11] By 1864, "gasoline" had entered American usage, reflecting marketing efforts to promote the liquid as a solvent or lighter fluid distinct from gaseous "illuminating gas" (typically coal-derived town gas piped for lighting), though early nomenclature often blurred the line due to gasoline's role in generating vapors for illumination.[10] [12] In British English, the term "petrol" emerged later as a shortening of "petroleum," specifically for refined motor fuel, with roots in Medieval Latin petroleum (rock oil).[13] It was trademarked in 1892–1893 by the British firm Carless, Fitzpatrick & Co. (later Haltermann Carless) as a branded solvent and fuel, gaining prevalence in the UK and Commonwealth to differentiate automotive use from American "gasoline" amid regional patent and marketing divergences.[14] Early 19th-century nomenclature for such distillates varied widely, including "naphtha" or "benzine" for lighter fractions, but "gasoline" and "petrol" standardized as the liquid gained recognition separate from gaseous illuminants, emphasizing its petroleum origin over coal gas production.[10]Pre-industrial uses and distillation
Petroleum from natural seeps was utilized in ancient Persia and China for rudimentary applications such as lamp fuels, medicines, and incendiary mixtures, with early distillation separating lighter volatile fractions akin to naphtha for solvents and preservatives.[15] In China, petroleum extraction via drilled wells reached depths of up to 800 feet by 347 CE, primarily for fuel in salt evaporation processes, though distillation remained trial-based and focused on heavier oils.[16] By the 9th century, Persian scholar Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi documented the fractional distillation of crude oil in Kitab al-Asrar, yielding kerosene for illumination alongside lighter, more volatile distillates used medicinally or as cleaners, marking an empirical advancement in isolating hydrocarbons without theoretical purity standards.[15][17] These pre-industrial efforts emphasized kerosene-like middle distillates for practical lamps, relegating lighter gasoline-range fractions to marginal roles due to their instability and low demand. In medieval Islamic regions, alembic distillation refined seep oils for disinfectants and fuels, but light ends were often evaporated or repurposed sparingly, reflecting causal limitations in storage and combustion control.[18] The 19th-century shift to commercial refining amplified this dynamic: after Edwin Drake's 1859 well in Pennsylvania initiated systematic production, distillers prioritized kerosene for lighting, discarding or flaring the volatile light fraction—later standardized as gasoline—as a hazardous waste, though some employed it as an industrial solvent or cleaner.[19][20] Refineries like those operated by early producers treated gasoline as an "essence" byproduct, evaporating it or using it minimally due to explosion risks, with yields varying by crude source but typically comprising 10-20% of output.[9] Emerging internal combustion experiments in the 1860s-1880s began highlighting gasoline's volatility as a potential asset for liquid fuels, contrasting its prior nuisance status. Étienne Lenoir's 1860 gas engine and Nikolaus Otto's 1876 four-stroke cycle initially relied on manufactured gases, yet testers noted the evaporative properties of light petroleum distillates for carburetion prototypes, foreshadowing engine adaptations despite persistent safety concerns and preference for heavier fuels.[9][21] This recognition stemmed from empirical trials, such as vaporizing light fractions for ignition, though widespread adoption awaited automotive viability.[19]19th and early 20th century development
In the late 19th century, the invention of practical internal combustion engines transformed light petroleum distillates from mere byproducts of kerosene production into viable fuels. Karl Benz's 1885 Patent-Motorwagen, widely recognized as the first automobile, operated on ligroin—a volatile, low-boiling petroleum fraction akin to naphtha or early gasoline analogs—demonstrating the feasibility of such fuels for mobile engines despite their prior discard as waste during lamp oil refining.[22] [23] By 1896, Henry Ford's Quadricycle further advanced this application, employing straight-run gasoline derived from simple distillation, which underscored the causal link between engine design and fuel necessity amid nascent industrialization.[24] [25] Refining techniques evolved to meet burgeoning automotive needs, with continuous fractional distillation processes supplanting batch methods between 1880 and 1910, utilizing multiple interconnected stills to boost throughput and isolate gasoline fractions more efficiently from crude oil.[26] This enabled scalable production without advanced cracking, aligning supply with demand surges. The 1908 introduction of Ford's Model T accelerated this shift, as mass production of affordable vehicles—reaching over 15 million units by 1927—propelled gasoline from a niche solvent to an industrial staple, overtaking kerosene in U.S. refinery output by around 1910.[27] [28] World War I intensified gasoline's strategic role, with Allied forces consuming millions of gallons daily for trucks, aircraft, and tanks, exposing supply vulnerabilities and cementing petroleum's military primacy—Entente powers controlled over 70% of global production, averting shortages that plagued the Central Powers.[29] [30] Prewar consumption patterns, averaging 1 million gallons daily for French operations alone, escalated dramatically, driving postwar investments in refining capacity and underscoring gasoline's emergence as a cornerstone of mechanized economies devoid of contemporary octane enhancers or detergents.[31]Mass production and post-WWII advancements
The introduction of thermal cracking processes in the early 1910s marked a pivotal advancement in gasoline production, enabling higher yields from crude oil to meet surging automotive demand. William Merriam Burton's process, implemented commercially in 1913 by Standard Oil of Indiana, applied high temperatures (around 700–750°F) and pressures (up to 90 psi) to break down heavier hydrocarbons into lighter fractions, roughly doubling gasoline output from straight-run distillation levels of approximately 20% to over 40% of crude input.[8][32] Similar innovations by firms including Gulf Refining Company, through Almer McAfee's early batch cracking methods in 1915, further refined these techniques, prioritizing efficiency in converting residuum into usable motor fuel. By the 1920s, thermal cracking had become widespread, with global gasoline production from such methods accounting for about half the total supply and average octane ratings reaching 70.[33] World War II accelerated production scaling through wartime imperatives and synthetic alternatives, underscoring gasoline's strategic role. In Germany, the Fischer-Tropsch process, commercialized in the 1930s from coal gasification, supplied over 92% of aviation gasoline and roughly half of total liquid fuels by war's peak, compensating for petroleum shortages via syngas conversion to hydrocarbons.[34][35] The United States, conversely, emphasized refinery expansions, boosting capacity growth to over 3% annually by 1945—up from 1.3% in the prior decade—primarily along the Gulf Coast to sustain Allied logistics, including pipelines like Big Inch for efficient inland transport.[36] These efforts yielded vast gasoline volumes for military vehicles and aircraft, with U.S. output rising to support over 4.7 million barrels per day of crude processing by 1945.[37] Postwar decades saw catalytic and hydrocracking innovations drive further efficiency, aligning with economic expansion and suburban mobility. Fluid catalytic cracking, commercialized in 1942, enhanced yields and octane via zeolite catalysts, while hydrocracking—leveraging byproduct hydrogen from 1950s catalytic reforming—converted heavy feeds into premium gasoline fractions, often exceeding 50% yields in integrated units.[38][8] These processes proliferated through the 1950s–1970s, enabling refineries to meet ballooning civilian demand amid U.S. highway construction and household car ownership surges, without relying on wartime synthetics.[39]Recent trends (post-2000)
Global gasoline demand expanded significantly in the early 21st century, rising from approximately 32 million barrels per day in 2000 to over 45 million barrels per day by 2019, propelled by economic growth, urbanization, and increased personal vehicle ownership in developing regions such as Asia.[40] This growth persisted despite efficiency improvements and initial biofuel integrations, with China's gasoline consumption contributing substantially through the 2010s before plateauing amid rapid electric vehicle penetration.[41] In contrast to projections of imminent decline driven by electrification, empirical recovery post-2020 disruptions underscores demand resilience, as global transportation fuel use rebounded to near pre-pandemic levels by 2023.[42] In the United States, gasoline demand has stabilized around 9 million barrels per day since the late 2010s, with 2024 consumption at 8.97 million barrels per day, reflecting a modest 0.25% increase from the prior year despite per-capita reductions from efficiency gains and remote work trends.[43] Biofuel blending, particularly ethanol, saw widespread adoption post-2000 via mandates like the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard, elevating blended volumes to over 10% of gasoline supply by the 2010s, though global biofuel production growth decelerated after 2010 due to feedstock constraints and market saturation.[44] Emerging synthetic alternatives, such as e-gasoline produced via carbon capture and electrolysis, remain in pilot stages with niche markets valued at under $1 billion in 2024 but forecasted to expand at a 32% compound annual growth rate to $26 billion by 2035; however, these constitute a fractional share compared to conventional petroleum-derived gasoline, which dominates supply chains.[45] Supply chains demonstrated robustness following 2020 pandemic-induced contractions, where U.S. gasoline demand plummeted to 5.9 million barrels per day in April 2020 before recovering to 8.9 million barrels per day by April 2025, aided by diversified refining capacity and inventory buffers.[42] Long-term forecasts diverge, with organizations assuming aggressive net-zero policies projecting oil demand peaks near 100 million barrels per day by 2030, while baseline scenarios anticipate sustained growth to 123 million barrels per day by 2050, implying continued gasoline relevance in non-electrified transport sectors like aviation and heavy-duty applications.[46] This resilience counters narratives of rapid obsolescence, as empirical data highlights persistent demand in emerging economies offsetting advanced-market moderation.[47]Chemical Composition
Primary hydrocarbons and molecular structure
Gasoline consists mainly of hydrocarbons containing 4 to 12 carbon atoms (C4–C12), including paraffins (alkanes), olefins (alkenes), naphthenes (cycloalkanes), and aromatics.[48] These compounds are predominantly saturated or unsaturated chains and rings derived from petroleum fractions.[1] The typical composition by volume features 4–8% straight-chain alkanes, 25–40% branched isoalkanes, 3–7% cycloalkanes, and 2–5% alkenes, with aromatic hydrocarbons often accounting for 20–40% in conventional blends.[1] This mixture yields a boiling range of 32–210 °C, allowing the fuel to exist as a liquid under ambient conditions while enabling efficient vaporization during combustion.[48] Alkanes dominate as straight-chain molecules like n-butane (C4H10) to n-dodecane (C12H26) or branched variants such as isooctane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane, C8H18). Straight chains promote linear molecular alignment, whereas branching introduces steric hindrance, altering packing density and influencing ignition characteristics through differential radical stability in oxidation pathways.[49] Cycloalkanes form saturated rings, like cyclohexane (C6H12), contributing to density, while alkenes introduce carbon-carbon double bonds for reactivity, and aromatics feature stable benzene-derived rings such as toluene (C7H8). Energy release during combustion stems from the oxidation of C–H and C–C bonds across these structures, yielding approximately 44–47 MJ/kg, with isomerism minimally affecting total enthalpy but modulating reaction kinetics.[1][50]Variability and fractions from crude oil
The yield and composition of the gasoline fraction obtained from crude oil distillation depend primarily on the feedstock's API gravity, which measures its density relative to water; crudes with higher API gravity (>31.1°) are lighter and richer in lower-molecular-weight hydrocarbons, yielding higher volumes of gasoline—typically 40-50% by volume—through straightforward atmospheric distillation, whereas heavier crudes (<22.3° API) produce lower gasoline yields, often below 30%, necessitating secondary cracking to convert residuum into lighter fractions.[51][52][53] Sulfur content in the crude also influences processing efficiency for gasoline production; low-sulfur "sweet" crudes (<0.5 wt% sulfur) require minimal hydrodesulfurization, allowing higher retention of naphtha-range fractions suitable for gasoline blending, while high-sulfur "sour" crudes (>0.5 wt% sulfur) demand intensive treating that can reduce light-end yields due to hydrogen consumption and side reactions.[54][55] Batch-to-batch variability arises from blending different crudes, affecting the gasoline fraction's boiling range as standardized by ASTM D86 atmospheric distillation, which specifies key points such as a 10% recovered temperature of 50-70°C and 90% of 140-190°C to ensure engine compatibility and volatility control.[56][57] Seasonal adjustments to volatility, measured by Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP), further standardize fractions; U.S. EPA regulations limit summer gasoline RVP to 9.0 psi (or 7.8 psi in high-ozone areas) to curb evaporative emissions, contrasting with winter blends permitting up to 12-15 psi for improved cold-weather vaporization.[58][59] Regional standards impose compositional limits on fractions post-distillation; EU Euro 6 unleaded gasoline restricts aromatics to ≤35% vol to reduce emissions, while U.S. California Air Resources Board (CARB) Phase 3 reformulated gasoline caps aromatics at 30% (or averages ~25%) via predictive models, prioritizing lower benzene and olefin content over Euro equivalents.[60][61][62]Synthetic and alternative compositions
Synthetic gasoline can be produced through the Fischer–Tropsch (FT) process, which catalytically converts synthesis gas—a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen—into hydrocarbons spanning the gasoline range of C5 to C12 alkanes and alkenes.[63] Originating from research in Germany during the 1920s by Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch, the process gained prominence in the 1940s when Nazi Germany scaled it up at facilities like Leuna to synthesize approximately 600,000 tons of liquid fuels annually from coal-derived syngas, compensating for wartime petroleum blockades.[64][65] The resulting FT syncrude is predominantly linear paraffins with minimal aromatics or sulfur, necessitating downstream hydroisomerization and cracking to yield branched isomers suitable for spark-ignition engines.[63] Commercial applications of FT for gasoline persist in gas-to-liquids (GTL) plants utilizing stranded natural gas, where syngas is generated via steam reforming before FT polymerization.[63] Coal-to-liquids (CTL) variants, exemplified by Sasol's Secunda complex in South Africa—operational since 1980 and processing over 40 million tons of coal yearly—employ Lurgi gasification to produce syngas, followed by FT synthesis yielding synthetic gasoline fractions refined to ASTM D4814 specifications.[66][67] Sasol's facilities have cumulatively output 1.5 billion barrels of synthetic liquids by 2005, with gasoline comprising a portion of the naphtha and condensate streams upgraded via hydrocracking.[67] Emerging alternatives include power-to-liquids (PtL) routes for "e-gasoline," where renewable electrolysis produces hydrogen from water, combined with direct air capture of CO2 to form syngas via reverse water-gas shift, then processed through FT or methanol-to-gasoline pathways.[68] Pilot-scale demonstrations in the 2020s, such as those targeting marine and aviation compatibility, generate drop-in hydrocarbons with near-zero net CO2 emissions when powered by excess renewables, though high electricity demands limit scalability to niche volumes below 1% of global gasoline supply by 2030.[69] Biomass-derived gasoline components, obtained via pyrolysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks to bio-oil followed by catalytic upgrading or via syngas fermentation, enable blending up to 20-30% by volume in conventional gasoline to meet renewable mandates.[70] These pathways yield 40-60% gasoline-range liquids by mass from dry biomass input, but require 1.5-2 times the feedstock's energy content in processing heat and hydrogen, resulting in net energy returns inferior to petroleum refining.[71][70]Production Processes
Refining from petroleum
Crude oil, after desalting to remove impurities such as salts and sediments, undergoes atmospheric distillation in a fractionation column where it is heated to approximately 350–400°C, allowing vapors to rise and condense at different heights based on boiling points, yielding fractions including gases, light naphtha (C5–C6 hydrocarbons boiling below 100°C), heavier naphtha or straight-run gasoline (boiling 100–200°C), kerosene, and heavier residues.[3] Vacuum distillation follows for the atmospheric residue to further separate heavier components without thermal cracking, though gasoline primarily derives from the lighter atmospheric cuts. Straight-run gasoline from these distillation processes typically yields 20–30% of the crude barrel volume, varying with crude type—heavier crudes produce less light ends—providing a base stock low in octane (around 60–70 RON) insufficient for modern engines without further processing.[72] To maximize gasoline yield from the limited straight-run light ends (initially 10–15% of crude), refineries employ alkylation, which reacts isobutane with olefins (C3–C4) under acidic catalysts like hydrofluoric or sulfuric acid to produce branched alkylate hydrocarbons (C7–C9) with high octane (90–95 RON), and isomerization, which rearranges straight-chain paraffins (n-pentane, n-hexane) over platinum-based catalysts into branched isomers, boosting octane by 10–20 units and increasing the gasoline pool yield to over 50% of the barrel.[73] These unit operations integrate light gases and naphtha streams, enhancing volumetric efficiency through molecular restructuring rather than mere separation, with alkylation alone contributing up to 15–20% of the final gasoline volume in complex refineries.[74] Hydrotreating desulfurization treats naphtha and gasoline fractions with hydrogen over cobalt-molybdenum or nickel-molybdenum catalysts at 300–400°C and 30–130 bar, converting sulfur compounds like thiophenes into hydrogen sulfide for removal, essential to meet regulatory limits such as the U.S. Tier 3 standard of 10 ppm sulfur average (effective January 2017, down from Tier 2's 30 ppm average implemented by 2006).[75] This process not only reduces emissions precursors but also protects downstream catalysts in isomerization and reforming from poisoning, with modern units achieving over 99% sulfur removal efficiency on feeds up to 1,000–5,000 ppm.[76] Refineries balance hydrotreating severity with hydrogen consumption, typically 200–500 scf per barrel, to comply without excessive yield loss to lighter gases.[77]Cracking and reforming techniques
Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) breaks carbon-carbon bonds in heavy hydrocarbon fractions, such as vacuum gas oil, to yield lighter gasoline-range molecules, olefins, and other products suitable for alkylation.[78] Developed in the 1930s as an advancement over fixed-bed catalytic cracking, the fluid-bed FCC process was commercialized in 1942, enabling continuous operation with powdered catalysts circulated between reactor and regenerator.[79] Catalysts like zeolites lower activation energy compared to thermal cracking, operating at 500–550°C and atmospheric pressure, which improves selectivity for gasoline (typically 40–50% yield) over coke formation. The process generates olefins that feed alkylation units, enhancing overall gasoline production efficiency in refineries.[79] Hydrocracking employs hydrogen under high pressure (up to 200 bar) and catalysts to cleave heavy feeds into gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, saturating olefins for reduced sulfur and higher stability.[80] Introduced post-World War II as refineries shifted toward cleaner products, it achieves gasoline yields of 20–40% from gas oils, with advantages in producing higher-octane naphtha (research octane number >90) due to isomerization alongside cracking.[81] Thermodynamically, hydrogen addition suppresses coke and boosts conversion efficiency, operating at 350–450°C versus higher temperatures in non-hydrogen processes, minimizing energy loss to side reactions.[82] This results in lower emissions and flexibility for varying crude slates, though higher capital costs limit its use to complex refineries.[83] Catalytic reforming, exemplified by the Platforming process developed by UOP in the 1940s, rearranges naphtha molecules without net bond breaking, dehydrogenating cycloalkanes to aromatics and isomerizing paraffins for elevated octane (up to 100+ RON) and BTU content.[84] Platinum or bifunctional catalysts facilitate reactions at 450–525°C and moderate pressure, with continuous variants like Platforming IV enabling hydrogen recycle for equilibrium shifts toward higher-value products.[73] Yield losses are minimal (5–10% to byproducts), and the process's exergy efficiency stems from coupling endothermic reforming with exothermic hydrogen production, optimizing refinery heat integration.[85] Reformate constitutes 30–50% of gasoline blending stock in modern facilities, prioritizing quality over volume.[86]Non-petroleum sources and emerging methods
Gas-to-liquids (GTL) processes convert natural gas into liquid hydrocarbons, including gasoline, via syngas intermediate steps followed by methanol synthesis and methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) conversion using zeolite catalysts.[87] The commercial MTG process, licensed by ExxonMobil (formerly Mobil), was first demonstrated at scale in New Zealand's Motunui plant, operational from 1985 to 1997, producing 14,500 barrels per day of unleaded gasoline (primarily isoparaffins and aromatics with 92-94 octane) from methanol derived from local natural gas.[88] This facility, built amid 1970s oil crises, supplied about 30% of New Zealand's gasoline needs but ceased MTG operations in 1997 due to falling global oil prices rendering it uneconomic, shifting to methanol export only.[89] Scalability remains limited by high capital costs (e.g., $1-2 billion for mid-scale plants) and energy intensity, with GTL EROI typically below conventional petroleum refining's historical 20:1 ratio, as multi-step conversions (gas reforming, Fischer-Tropsch or MTG synthesis) yield net energy returns closer to 5-10:1 depending on gas feedstock quality and prices.[90][91] Biomass pyrolysis offers a non-fossil route by rapidly heating lignocellulosic feedstocks (e.g., wood residues, agricultural waste) at 400-600°C in oxygen-free conditions to yield bio-oil (up to 75% liquid by weight), which can be hydrotreated or catalytically upgraded to gasoline-range hydrocarbons.[70] Yields average 40-60% energy recovery as bio-oil, but upgrading to drop-in gasoline requires additional hydrogen and processing, achieving overall 16-40% mass yield of hydrocarbons from dry biomass.[92] Scalability is constrained by biomass's low energy density (10-20 MJ/kg dry vs. 42 MJ/kg for gasoline), high moisture content (often >50%), and dilute logistics, necessitating vast land areas—e.g., converting U.S. forest residues might yield energy equivalent to 1 billion barrels of diesel but at EROI of 2-8:1, far below petroleum's 10-30:1, due to harvesting, transport, and conversion inefficiencies.[93][94] Emerging e-fuels (electrofuels) synthesize gasoline from renewable electricity via electrolysis to hydrogen, combined with captured CO2 in Fischer-Tropsch or alcohol-to-jet processes, aiming for carbon-neutral drop-in fuels.[68] Pilot-scale production began in the 2020s, but costs exceed $10 per gallon equivalent (e.g., initial €50/liter orPhysical Properties
Density and temperature effects
The density of gasoline typically ranges from 0.71 to 0.77 kg/L when measured at 15°C, reflecting variations due to its hydrocarbon composition and refining processes.[99][100] This standard reference temperature ensures consistency in trade and specification, as densities outside this range may indicate adulteration or non-standard blends.[99] Gasoline exhibits significant thermal expansion, with a volumetric coefficient of approximately 0.00095 per °C, meaning its volume increases by about 0.095% for every 1°C rise in temperature.[101][102] Consequently, density decreases inversely with temperature; for instance, at 30°C, the density of a 0.74 kg/L sample at 15°C would drop to roughly 0.72 kg/L due to expansion.[101] This effect influences pump metering, particularly in regions without automatic temperature compensation at retail dispensers, where warmer fuel delivers less mass per liter dispensed—potentially reducing the effective energy content by 1-2% during summer conditions compared to winter.[103][104] These density variations directly impact vehicle range, as the energy yield of gasoline is tied to its mass rather than volume, with higher-density fuel providing more mass—and thus more potential energy—per tank capacity.[105][106] A 0.03 kg/L density difference, common across seasonal or temperature shifts, can alter the mass in a 50 L tank by about 1.5 kg, translating to a proportional change in drivable distance assuming constant combustion efficiency.[105] Seasonal blending, while primarily addressing volatility for cold-start reliability, indirectly affects density through lighter winter hydrocarbons, further modulating mass-energy delivery in colder climates.[107] As a mixture of hydrocarbons, gasoline lacks a precise freezing point. It begins to thicken and lose fluidity around −60 °C, becoming gel-like around −72 °C for typical grades such as AI-92, AI-95, and AI-98, though additives can lower this temperature further.[108]Volatility and evaporation
Gasoline volatility refers to the tendency of the fuel to vaporize, which is quantified primarily by the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP), a measure of the vapor pressure at 100°F (37.8°C) under specific test conditions.[58] This property is essential for carbureted engines, where controlled evaporation in the carburetor float bowl and venturi enables the formation of a combustible air-fuel mixture; insufficient volatility can lead to incomplete vaporization and poor combustion efficiency in cold conditions, while excessive volatility risks premature vapor formation.[109] In the United States, federal regulations under the Clean Air Act limit summer-season gasoline RVP to a maximum of 9.0 psi (from June 1 to September 15) to curb evaporative losses and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions that contribute to ground-level ozone formation through photochemical reactions in the atmosphere.[58] [110] Winter blends, by contrast, permit higher RVP values—often up to 12-13.5 psi in non-attainment areas without volatility controls—to promote easier vaporization for cold-start carburetion and mitigate risks of inadequate fuel atomization, though vapor lock (premature boiling in fuel lines due to engine heat) remains a concern primarily in warmer months and is addressed via the lower summer RVP.[111] [112] Evaporative emissions arise from fuel permeation through storage tanks, vehicle components, and during refueling or diurnal temperature cycles, releasing VOCs such as light hydrocarbons that serve as ozone precursors; these emissions can account for a significant portion of urban VOC inventories, exacerbating smog in high-temperature environments.[113] [114] To maintain long-term evaporative stability, gasoline formulations incorporate antioxidants and metal deactivators to inhibit oxidation of reactive components like olefins, which otherwise form insoluble gums—polymeric residues that deposit in carburetors and fuel systems upon prolonged exposure to air and heat.[115] Oxidation stability is assessed via ASTM D525, targeting an induction period exceeding 240 minutes to limit existent gum to under 5 mg/100 mL after accelerated aging.[116] [117]Energy content and combustion efficiency
Gasoline possesses a lower heating value (LHV) of approximately 32 MJ/L, reflecting the heat released from combustion excluding the latent heat of water vapor formation.[118] This value corresponds to roughly 115,000 to 125,000 BTU per U.S. gallon, with variations arising from hydrocarbon composition and measurement standards.[119] The higher heating value (HHV), which includes this latent heat, reaches about 35 MJ/L or 125,000 to 138,000 BTU/gallon under standard conditions.[120] The stoichiometric air-fuel ratio for gasoline combustion is 14.7:1 by mass, denoting the precise proportion of air to fuel that theoretically enables complete oxidation of hydrocarbons to carbon dioxide and water.[121] At this ratio, the reaction C₈H₁₈ + 12.5 O₂ → 8 CO₂ + 9 H₂O exemplifies ideal efficiency for octane, the primary component.[122] However, real-world combustion incurs efficiency losses from incomplete burning, including unburned hydrocarbons due to flame quenching near cylinder walls, dissociation of products at high temperatures, and mixture non-uniformity, typically reducing chemical efficiency to 95-98% even in optimized conditions.[123] Compared to electrochemical alternatives, gasoline exhibits superior volumetric energy density, exceeding that of lithium-ion battery packs by over 100 times on an energy-per-volume basis.[124] Battery packs achieve around 0.3 MJ/L in practical automotive applications, constrained by cell chemistry, packaging, and safety margins, whereas gasoline's 32 MJ/L enables compact storage for high-energy-density propulsion.[125] This disparity underscores gasoline's advantages in applications prioritizing volume-limited energy delivery, though it requires catalytic conversion for controlled release.Performance Enhancements
Octane rating and engine knock
Engine knock, also known as detonation, in spark-ignition internal combustion engines arises from the auto-ignition of the unburned end-gas mixture ahead of the propagating flame front, triggered by excessive compression-induced heating and pressure.[126] This premature combustion generates shock waves and rapid pressure spikes, producing audible pinging, vibrations, and potential damage to pistons and cylinder walls.[127] The phenomenon stems from the fuel-air mixture reaching its auto-ignition temperature, typically around 400°C under high-pressure engine conditions, where chemical kinetics accelerate chain-branching reactions leading to runaway ignition.[128] Octane rating quantifies a gasoline's resistance to knocking by comparing its performance to a standardized blend of iso-octane (high resistance, rated 100) and n-heptane (low resistance, rated 0).[129] Two primary laboratory methods determine this: the Research Octane Number (RON), conducted at 600 rpm with moderate intake heating to simulate steady-speed cruising, and the Motor Octane Number (MON), at 900 rpm with hotter intake and variable loads to mimic harsher acceleration conditions.[130] In the United States, pump labels display the Antiknock Index (AKI), calculated as AKI = (RON + MON)/2, providing a practical average for consumer fuels.[131] Fuel composition influences octane through molecular structure; straight-chain paraffins like n-heptane promote rapid auto-ignition due to simpler decomposition pathways, while branched paraffins such as iso-octane exhibit higher resistance owing to steric hindrance that slows radical formation and chain propagation.[132] Increasing branching degree elevates octane, as multi-branched isomers require higher temperatures for ignition onset.[133] Prior to the 1920s, knocking constrained spark-ignition engine compression ratios to approximately 4:1, limiting power output and efficiency as higher ratios intensified end-gas compression and auto-ignition risk.[134] Advances in fuel antiknock properties have since enabled ratios exceeding 10:1 in modern engines, enhancing thermal efficiency while mitigating knock under optimized spark timing and combustion chamber designs.[135]Antiknock additives
Antiknock additives are chemical compounds incorporated into gasoline to mitigate engine knocking, a phenomenon caused by premature autoignition of the air-fuel mixture, by elevating the fuel's octane rating and promoting more uniform combustion. These additives enable higher engine compression ratios, enhancing power output and efficiency without mechanical modifications. Historically, tetraethyllead (TEL), synthesized in 1921 by Thomas Midgley Jr. and commercially deployed in gasoline starting in 1923, dominated as the primary antiknock agent due to its exceptional efficacy and economy.[136][137] At typical concentrations of about 1-3 ml per gallon, TEL could boost octane ratings by 7-15 points depending on base fuel quality and dosage, far outperforming alternatives on a molar basis and allowing widespread adoption in automotive and aviation fuels.[138][139] As lead-based additives were gradually restricted beginning in the 1970s under environmental regulations, organometallic substitutes like methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) emerged as octane enhancers, particularly in unleaded gasoline. Introduced in the 1950s and later approved for broader use, MMT decomposes during combustion to release manganese species that inhibit knock, providing octane improvements comparable to TEL at low treat rates of 8-16 mg Mn per liter. However, empirical testing has revealed manganese oxide deposits accumulating in combustion chambers, exhaust systems, and catalytic converters, which can impair catalyst performance, elevate hydrocarbon and particulate emissions, and necessitate more frequent maintenance.[140][141] Automakers and regulators, citing vehicle fleet data from Canada where MMT was permitted, have documented these effects, though additive manufacturers maintain that deposits are manageable and do not compromise overall engine durability when used within specified limits.[142][143] Oxygenated compounds such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), derived from isobutylene and methanol, have also functioned as antiknock agents by increasing octane through molecular branching that delays autoignition, while simultaneously supplying oxygen to reduce carbon monoxide emissions in reformulated fuels mandated under the U.S. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. MTBE typically raised octane by 2-3 points at 11-15% blending levels and was cost-effective for refiners. Its persistence in the environment, however, stemming from high water solubility (over 40,000 mg/L) and slow biodegradation, resulted in detectable groundwater plumes from leaking underground storage tanks, with concentrations exceeding drinking water advisories in multiple U.S. states by the late 1990s. This led to phase-outs, including a statewide ban in California effective January 1, 2004, shifting reliance to alternatives like ethanol despite MTBE's superior blending economics and energy density.[144][145][146]Detergents and stabilizers
Detergents in gasoline function as surface-active agents that inhibit deposit accumulation on critical engine components such as fuel injectors, intake valves, and combustion chambers, thereby preserving fuel delivery efficiency and engine durability. Polyether amines (PEAs), a class of high-molecular-weight detergents, excel at solubilizing and removing carbonaceous residues through polar head groups that adhere to metal surfaces while non-polar tails disperse deposits into the fuel stream. The Top Tier Detergent Gasoline standard, initiated in 2004 by automakers including General Motors, Toyota, and Honda, mandates detergent concentrations exceeding the U.S. EPA's minimum requirements to achieve these cleaning effects across various engine designs.[147] Testing data underscore the impact on engine longevity: a AAA investigation revealed that after 4,000 miles of simulated operation, engines fueled with non-Top Tier gasoline exhibited 19 times more carbon deposits on injectors, valves, and combustion chambers than those using Top Tier equivalents, leading to measurable declines in power output and fuel economy. These findings align with broader empirical evidence linking detergent efficacy to sustained injector flow rates—up to 20% higher in treated fuels—and reduced octane demand increase over time, directly correlating with prolonged component life in port-fuel and direct-injection systems.[148][149] Stabilizers in gasoline, distinct from detergents, target chemical degradation during storage or distribution by curtailing autoxidation and phase instability. Phenolic antioxidants, such as alkylated phenols, interrupt free-radical chain reactions by donating hydrogen atoms to peroxyl radicals, thereby suppressing hydroperoxide formation and subsequent gum precursors. Complementary metal deactivators, often chelating agents like N,N'-disalicylidene-1,2-diaminopropane derivatives, bind trace copper or iron ions that catalyze peroxidation, enhancing overall antioxidant longevity without altering combustion properties.[150][151] Untreated gasoline typically degrades within 30-60 days, forming insoluble gums and varnishes via olefin polymerization and oxidation that clog carburetors or injectors upon use. Stabilized formulations extend usability to 1-2 years under sealed, cool conditions by limiting existent gum to below 5 mg/100 mL and potential gum formation through accelerated aging tests, as validated in ASTM D381 protocols, thus averting fuel system failures in intermittent-use engines like those in seasonal vehicles or generators.[152][153]Oxygenates including ethanol
Oxygenates are organic compounds containing oxygen atoms added to gasoline to enhance combustion completeness, elevate octane ratings, and curb emissions of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. These additives, typically ethers or alcohols, contribute 1-2% oxygen by weight in blends, facilitating leaner air-fuel mixtures without misfires. Ethanol, derived primarily from corn fermentation in the United States, dominates as the principal oxygenate, with E10 (10% ethanol by volume) serving as the standard blend since widespread adoption in the early 2000s to meet reformulated gasoline requirements.[154] Ethanol elevates the blend's octane rating by 2-3 points compared to pure gasoline, mitigating engine knock in high-compression engines. However, its lower volumetric energy content—approximately 76,000 BTU per gallon versus 114,000 BTU for gasoline—dilutes the overall energy density of E10 by 3-4%, necessitating 3-4% more fuel volume for equivalent power output and reducing vehicle range. This dilution stems from ethanol's higher oxygen fraction (34.7% by weight), which prioritizes combustion efficiency over raw caloric yield, a trade-off critiqued for inflating fuel consumption without proportional emissions benefits in real-world driving.[155] Ethanol's hygroscopic properties exacerbate storage vulnerabilities, as it readily absorbs atmospheric moisture up to 3-5% by volume before saturating, triggering phase separation. In this process, a denser water-ethanol layer settles at the tank bottom, depleting the upper gasoline phase of oxygenate and dropping its octane by up to 10 points, which risks severe engine knock upon use. Phase separation accelerates in humid environments or with prolonged storage, undermining fuel stability and contributing to injector fouling.[156][157] Compounding these issues, ethanol promotes corrosion in fuel systems, attacking zinc, brass, and aluminum components while degrading rubber hoses and gaskets through swelling and cracking; studies indicate up to 10-fold increased corrosion rates in ethanol blends versus pure gasoline. In the United States, this manifests in higher failure rates for small engines, marine outboards, and legacy vehicles not engineered for compatibility, with NIST research documenting pitting in steel tanks exposed to E15 blends.[158][159] In contrast, Brazil's mandatory E27 blend, implemented since 2015, has operated successfully in a fleet of flex-fuel vehicles optimized for high-ethanol tolerance, with corrosion mitigated by corrosion-resistant materials and annual mandates exceeding 27% anhydrous ethanol without widespread phase separation incidents. This resilience attributes to proactive infrastructure adaptations and sugarcane-derived ethanol's purity, differing from U.S. corn-based production prone to higher water content.[160][161] Alternatives like methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) offer oxygenate benefits with reduced hygroscopicity; MTBE, once prevalent, provided clean burning and octane boosts but was phased out post-2000 due to groundwater persistence. ETBE, synthesized from ethanol and isobutylene, retains ethanol's renewable aspect while exhibiting lower water affinity and corrosion potential, though its adoption remains limited in the U.S. owing to production costs.[162][163] As of October 2025, U.S. fuel ethanol exports averaged 138,000 barrels per day through July, marking a record pace with 13% of domestic production shipped abroad, driven by global demand; however, the nation sustains net imports of approximately 130,000 barrels per day to fulfill regional blending needs, underscoring partial reliance on foreign supply amid surging exports.[164][165]Primary Uses
Automotive and transportation
Gasoline powers the majority of spark-ignition internal combustion engines in light-duty vehicles worldwide, including passenger cars, light trucks, and motorcycles, which form the bulk of road transportation fleets. These engines convert chemical energy from gasoline combustion into mechanical work, though with thermodynamic limitations inherent to the Otto cycle, resulting in typical thermal efficiencies of 20-30% under real-world driving conditions, where much energy is lost as heat and friction.[166][167] Globally, gasoline accounts for the predominant share of fuel in light-duty applications, with estimates indicating over 80% reliance excluding diesel-prevalent regions like Europe; this dominance stems from gasoline's suitable volatility for cold starts, high energy density for range, and compatibility with high-volume production of affordable engines.[168] To accommodate variability in fuel composition, particularly ethanol blending mandated in regions like the United States and Brazil, flex-fuel vehicles incorporate sensors to detect ethanol content in the fuel mix, dynamically adjusting engine parameters such as fuel injection volume, ignition timing, and air-fuel ratios via the electronic control unit. These adaptations enable seamless operation across blends from 0% to 83% ethanol (E85), mitigating risks of lean misfires or power loss from ethanol's lower energy content (about 30% less than pure gasoline) while leveraging its higher octane for knock resistance.[169] Flex-fuel designs originated in Brazil in the late 1970s amid oil crises and have since proliferated, with over 30 million such vehicles registered there by 2023, demonstrating practical resilience to fuel supply fluctuations without compromising drivability. In the U.S., federal incentives under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 promoted flex-fuel production, though adoption remains below 10% of new light-duty sales due to limited E85 infrastructure.[169] Gasoline's role diminishes in heavy-duty transportation, such as trucks and buses, where diesel engines prevail due to their higher compression ratios yielding greater low-end torque—essential for hauling heavy loads—and superior brake thermal efficiency up to 45%, compared to gasoline's constraints under sustained high torque demands. Diesel's higher volumetric energy density (about 15% more than gasoline) further extends range for long-haul operations, reducing refueling frequency, while gasoline engines suffer from higher knock propensity and lower power density in large-displacement configurations needed for heavy payloads.[170][171] Consequently, gasoline applications in this segment are niche, often limited to smaller urban delivery vans or auxiliary power units, with global heavy-duty fleets exceeding 90% diesel reliance as of 2023.[172]Aviation and specialty fuels
Aviation gasoline, commonly known as avgas, is formulated for reciprocating piston engines in general aviation aircraft, requiring high resistance to detonation under elevated compression ratios. The standard grade, 100LL (low lead), achieves a minimum aviation octane rating of 100 through a blend of alkylate base stock and tetraethyllead (TEL) as the primary antiknock additive, with a maximum lead content of 0.56 grams per liter.[173] [174] TEL provides superior knock suppression compared to many unleaded alternatives, enabling safe operation in engines certified for leaded fuel since the mid-20th century.[175] This grade, dyed blue for identification, dominates the market, powering approximately 70% of U.S. piston-engine aircraft operations as of 2019.[176] Efforts to phase out TEL in avgas, initiated amid broader environmental regulations, face delays due to certification challenges for drop-in unleaded replacements that must prevent pre-ignition or detonation in high-compression legacy engines without extensive retrofits.[176] The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration targets elimination of leaded avgas by the end of 2030 to reduce emissions, but as of 2025, no universal unleaded substitute has achieved full supplemental type certification across the diverse piston fleet, prioritizing aviation safety over accelerated timelines.[177] [176] California's state-level prohibition on leaded avgas sales begins January 1, 2031, contingent on viable alternatives, underscoring the tension between regulatory mandates and operational reliability.[178] In contrast, fuels for turbine engines, such as Jet A (ASTM D1655 specification), are kerosene-based distillates rather than gasoline, featuring narrower hydrocarbon chains (primarily C9-C16) with a minimum flash point of 38°C for safer handling in large aircraft.[179] [180] This composition yields lower volatility and higher energy density by mass compared to avgas, but it is unsuitable for spark-ignition piston engines due to inadequate vaporization and octane characteristics.[181] Specialty racing fuels, used in motorsports like drag racing and endurance events, often surpass 100 octane via elevated aromatic hydrocarbon content—such as toluene or xylene blends up to 10% or more—to withstand extreme compression ratios exceeding 14:1 without detonation.[182] Leaded variants may incorporate up to 4.23 grams of lead per gallon alongside these aromatics for motors exceeding standard unleaded limits, while unleaded options rely on refined oxygenates and high-purity base stocks to achieve equivalent performance, tailored to specific racing sanctions.[182] [183] These fuels prioritize power output and consistency over everyday drivability, with formulations varying by sanctioning body requirements like those from the National Hot Rod Association.[184]Industrial and non-transport applications
Gasoline and closely related petroleum distillates function as solvents in various industrial processes, including the dilution of paints, varnishes, and the removal of oils, greases, and resins. Petroleum naphtha, a fraction similar to gasoline components, dissolves these substances effectively through its hydrocarbon composition, enabling applications in surface preparation and cleaning operations.[185] Historically, raw white gasoline served as a primary solvent in dry cleaning from the early 20th century, leveraging its solvency to extract soils from fabrics without water, though it was largely supplanted by safer alternatives due to volatility.[186] Modern dry cleaning employs synthetic petroleum solvents—derived as byproducts during gasoline production—in approximately 20% of U.S. operations, such as ExxonMobil's DF-2000, which maintain compatibility with gasoline's solvent properties while reducing flammability risks.[187] In power generation, gasoline fuels small stationary and portable engines for non-transport purposes, including lawnmowers, chainsaws, leaf blowers, and backup generators. These two-stroke or four-stroke engines, common in residential and light industrial settings, require unleaded gasoline with a minimum 87-octane rating and ethanol blends limited to 10% (E10) to prevent corrosion and fuel degradation in carbureted systems.[188] Gasoline generators deliver reliable on-demand power, with capacities typically ranging from 1,000 to 10,000 watts, serving as critical backups during grid failures caused by weather events or supply intermittency from variable renewable sources.[189] In regions with unstable electricity infrastructure, such as parts of developing countries, gasoline-powered units support essential operations like irrigation pumps and small-scale manufacturing, where diesel alternatives may be less accessible.[190] Non-transport gasoline consumption, representing under 5% of total U.S. petroleum product use in industrial sectors, has declined in developed economies since the 2000s due to stricter volatile organic compound regulations and shifts to electric or propane alternatives for small engines.[191] This trend reflects broader efficiency gains and electrification, yet usage endures in off-grid or remote applications where gasoline's portability and energy density (approximately 32 MJ/L) provide unmatched convenience over battery systems for intermittent high-load needs.[192]Safety Hazards
Flammability and fire risks
Gasoline exhibits high flammability due to its low flash point of approximately -40°C, at which point its vapors can form ignitable mixtures with air when exposed to an ignition source such as an open flame or spark.[7] The autoignition temperature, the lowest temperature at which vapors ignite spontaneously without an external spark, ranges from 246°C to 280°C depending on composition.[193] Flammable vapor-air mixtures exist between the lower explosive limit of 1.4% and upper explosive limit of 7.4% by volume, enabling rapid combustion or explosion upon ignition within this concentration range.[7] Gasoline vapors have a relative density of 3 to 4 times that of air, causing them to hug the ground, travel along surfaces to distant ignition sources, and accumulate in low-lying areas or confined spaces, thereby increasing the risk of flashback fires or vapor cloud explosions.[194] This behavior heightens fire hazards during spills, leaks, or improper storage, where even small releases can produce sufficient vapor concentrations for ignition under ambient conditions.[195] To mitigate ignition risks from static electricity generated during transfer or handling, equipment must be bonded and grounded to safely dissipate accumulated charges, preventing sparks capable of igniting flammable vapors.[196] In environments with potential flammable atmospheres, non-sparking tools constructed from non-ferrous alloys such as copper-beryllium or aluminum-bronze are required to avoid frictional or impact sparks that could initiate fires.[197] Proper ventilation to disperse vapors below explosive limits and elimination of ignition sources further reduce these hazards.[198]Acute toxicity from exposure
Acute exposure to gasoline primarily occurs through ingestion, dermal contact, ocular exposure, or inhalation of vapors, with varying degrees of toxicity depending on the route. Oral ingestion demonstrates low systemic toxicity, evidenced by an LD50 of approximately 18.8 mL/kg (equivalent to roughly 14-18 g/kg, given gasoline's density) in rats, indicating that substantial quantities are required for lethality via direct gastrointestinal absorption alone.[199][200] However, the primary acute hazard from swallowing gasoline is aspiration into the lungs, which can trigger chemical pneumonitis—a severe inflammatory response leading to pulmonary edema, hypoxia, respiratory distress, and potentially fatal pneumonia if untreated.[199][201] This risk arises from gasoline's low viscosity and surface tension, facilitating entry into the respiratory tract during vomiting or coughing post-ingestion.[202] Dermal exposure results in minimal systemic absorption due to gasoline's volatility and the skin's barrier function, though hydrocarbons can penetrate if the skin is occluded or damaged; acute effects are limited to local irritation, erythema, and defatting leading to dermatitis upon prolonged contact.[199][203] Ocular exposure causes immediate irritation, including redness, tearing, and burning sensation, classified as a mild to moderate irritant without permanent damage if promptly irrigated, though corneal abrasion may occur in severe cases.[203][204] For vapor inhalation, acute high-level exposure (e.g., above 5,000 ppm) can induce central nervous system effects such as dizziness, headache, nausea, and coordination impairment, with lethality possible at concentrations exceeding 20,000 ppm for short durations in animal studies.[199] Occupational guidelines recommend limiting vapor exposure to 300 ppm as an 8-hour time-weighted average and 500 ppm as a short-term exposure limit to avert these acute responses, reflecting variability in gasoline composition but prioritizing benzene and aromatic content.[205][206]Storage and handling precautions
Gasoline must be stored in approved safety cans or Department of Transportation-specified containers to minimize vapor release and rupture risks, with quantities limited to 25 gallons outside dedicated flammable storage cabinets in non-industrial settings.[207][208] Storage areas require adequate ventilation to disperse flammable vapors, separation from ignition sources such as open flames or electrical equipment, and protection from direct sunlight or heat exceeding room temperature to prevent pressure buildup and autoignition.[209] Gasoline is incompatible with strong oxidizers, which can trigger violent reactions, necessitating isolated storage to avoid contact.[210] During handling, equipment must be grounded to eliminate static electricity sparks, and non-sparking tools should be used to reduce ignition potential from friction or impact.[211] Prohibitions on smoking, hot work, or unapproved electrical devices in vicinity apply to prevent vapor ignition, with fueling conducted in open, well-ventilated spaces away from enclosed areas where fumes accumulate.[211] For spills, immediate containment using absorbent materials like sand, kitty litter, or hydrophobic booms prevents spread, as water is ineffective and can exacerbate dispersion since gasoline floats on it.[212][213] Dry cleanup methods, including pumping recovery where feasible, followed by proper disposal of saturated absorbents, reduce environmental release and re-ignition hazards.[214] In firefighting scenarios involving gasoline, Class B foams, dry chemicals, or carbon dioxide extinguishers are recommended to smother flames and suppress vapors, whereas water streams should be avoided as they fail to extinguish the fire and promote pooling and runoff of the burning liquid.[215] Bulk transportation favors pipelines over rail for enhanced integrity and lower spill frequency per volume transported, as evidenced by comparative safety data showing pipelines' superior performance despite incidents; the 2013 Lac-Mégantic derailment of an unattended crude oil train, resulting in 47 deaths and massive fire from tank car breaches, underscores rail vulnerabilities like inadequate securing and routing through populated areas, with analogous risks for gasoline shipments.[216][217][218]Health Effects
Inhalation for intoxication
Inhalation of gasoline vapors, commonly referred to as huffing or sniffing, produces acute intoxicating effects primarily through volatile aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene and toluene, which depress the central nervous system and induce euphoria, dizziness, slurred speech, and lethargy.[219][220] These effects mimic alcohol intoxication but arise from rapid absorption via the lungs, leading to altered consciousness and, in some cases, visual hallucinations.[220] The practice typically involves breathing fumes from soaked rags or directly from containers for short durations, with onset within seconds.[221] Acute risks include sudden cardiac arrhythmia, known as sudden sniffing death syndrome, which accounts for a significant portion of inhalant-related fatalities and can occur even in first-time users due to myocardial sensitization to catecholamines.[222][223] Gasoline vapors at concentrations around 2,000 ppm have been linked to lethal dysrhythmias, with historical case reports documenting deaths from ventricular fibrillation during or shortly after inhalation.[223][224] Epidemiological data indicate low but persistent prevalence among adolescents, with inhalant use (including gasoline) affecting approximately 0.4% of U.S. youth aged 12-17 for abuse or dependence, though gasoline-specific sniffing is rarer outside high-risk groups such as indigenous communities where rates have reached 50-60% historically.[225][226] In general populations, lifetime experimentation hovers around 1% for solvent huffing, often as a gateway to other substances, with higher incidence among antisocial or socioeconomically disadvantaged youth.[227][228] Chronic inhalation leads to progressive sensorimotor polyneuropathy, characterized by symmetric nerve damage, muscle weakness, and sensory loss, alongside cognitive deficits like memory impairment and behavioral changes from monoamine neurotransmitter disruptions.[229][230] Reports of lead-induced encephalopathy from sniffing leaded gasoline have declined sharply following the phaseout of tetraethyl lead additives in the 1970s-1980s, reducing associated blood lead elevations and acute toxicities, though hydrocarbon solvent effects on the nervous system persist in unleaded formulations.[221][231]Chronic exposure and lead legacy
Chronic exposure to tetraethyllead (TEL), the primary lead additive in gasoline from its commercial introduction in 1923 until widespread phase-out beginning in the 1970s, primarily occurred through vehicular exhaust, with population-level blood lead levels peaking during the mid-20th century. In the United States, geometric mean blood lead concentrations averaged 12.8 μg/dL in 1976–1980, reflecting cumulative environmental deposition from gasoline combustion that accounted for up to 90% of airborne lead.[232] Attributed cognitive effects, such as modest IQ reductions estimated at 2–5 points on average across exposed cohorts, remain contested, with dose-response analyses indicating nonlinear impacts concentrated at higher exposure levels (>10 μg/dL) while lower chronic doses show weaker or insignificant associations after controlling for confounders including socioeconomic status, nutrition, and co-exposures like iron deficiency prevalent in impoverished communities.[233] [234] Aggregate claims of vast societal IQ losses, such as 824 million points from childhood exposures, derive from ecological correlations but overlook these multivariate factors and fail to isolate lead's causal contribution amid concurrent improvements in public health.[235] Post-1970 regulatory reductions in automotive lead content precipitated a precipitous decline in blood lead levels, dropping over 90% nationally by the 1990s to below 1 μg/dL on average, underscoring the reversibility of environmental lead burdens from gasoline sources.[236] [237] Residual lead from aviation gasoline (avgas), which continues in piston-engine aircraft comprising less than 1% of U.S. fuel consumption, poses localized risks near airports but minimal population-wide exposure, with annual avgas lead emissions equivalent to a fraction of historical automotive totals and blood lead elevations detectable only in proximal high-risk subgroups.[238] [239] TEL's antiknock properties enabled higher engine compression ratios, advancing from 4:1 in early low-octane designs to 8–12:1 in optimized configurations, which boosted thermal efficiency and reduced fuel consumption per mile traveled by up to 30% compared to alternatives like ethanol blends available contemporaneously.[240] This efficiency gain correspondingly lowered total combustion emissions per unit of transport output, offsetting some lead-related externalities through diminished hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide outputs prior to catalytic converter mandates.[241]Exhaust emissions and respiratory impacts
Gasoline combustion in internal combustion engines produces tailpipe emissions including carbon monoxide (CO) from incomplete oxidation of fuel, nitrogen oxides (NOx) from high-temperature reactions between nitrogen and oxygen in the air, hydrocarbons (HC) or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from unburned or partially burned fuel, and particulate matter (PM) consisting of soot and condensed organics.[242][243] These pollutants contribute to respiratory effects: CO reduces oxygen-carrying capacity in blood by binding to hemoglobin, leading to hypoxia that can exacerbate respiratory distress; NOx, particularly NO2, irritates airways and increases susceptibility to infections; VOCs and PM penetrate lung tissues, triggering inflammation, reduced lung function, and higher rates of asthma exacerbations and bronchitis.[244][245] Among VOCs, benzene—a naturally occurring component of gasoline—is emitted via incomplete combustion and evaporation, classified as a human carcinogen primarily linked to leukemia at high occupational exposures, though ambient levels from modern vehicles pose lower risks with ongoing debate over a no-threshold model versus evidence suggesting a practical threshold below which leukemia incidence does not rise significantly based on dose-response epidemiology.[246][247] Respiratory irritation from benzene occurs at acute high concentrations, but chronic low-dose effects remain uncertain without clear linear extrapolation from industrial data.[248] Catalytic converters, mandated on U.S. vehicles since 1975, achieve three-way conversion: oxidizing CO and HC to CO2 and H2O while reducing NOx to N2, yielding over 90% reductions in these pollutants per vehicle mile compared to pre-regulation models.[249][250] New gasoline vehicles today emit roughly 99% less CO, HC, and NOx than 1970 models, enabling national criteria pollutant concentrations to decline 70-90% since 1970 despite vehicle miles traveled rising 194% and population growth.[250][251] Urban areas have seen corresponding air quality gains, with smog formation and PM levels dropping even amid increased driving, attributable to fleet turnover and fuel quality improvements like reduced sulfur.[252][253]Environmental Considerations
Local air pollution from combustion
Combustion of gasoline in spark-ignition engines releases nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and particulate matter (PM) as primary non-greenhouse gas pollutants, alongside carbon monoxide (CO). NOx and VOCs, emitted in vehicle exhaust, undergo photochemical reactions in sunlight to produce ground-level ozone, the principal constituent of urban smog, which impairs visibility and respiratory health locally.[254][255] These emissions concentrate in urban environments, creating steep pollution gradients where city centers experience 2-5 times higher ozone and PM levels than rural surroundings due to traffic density and stagnant air in street canyons.[256] Historically, tetraethyllead additives in gasoline generated fine lead-laden PM, depositing toxic particulates in ambient air and contributing to elevated blood lead levels in urban populations until the U.S. phase-out began in 1975 and completed by 1996.[257] Though modern unleaded gasoline has eliminated routine lead emissions from passenger vehicles, legacy atmospheric deposition from prior decades persists in soils and resuspended dust, with trace lead still detectable in some exhaust PM from incomplete combustion or impurities.[258] Vehicle technologies have offset emissions through catalytic converters, which convert over 90% of NOx, VOCs, and CO in post-1975 models under stoichiometric conditions, and electronic fuel injection (EFI) systems, which enhance vapor recovery and reduce evaporative losses by up to 50% compared to carbureted predecessors via precise metering and returnless designs.[259] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency monitoring data indicate that from 1990 to 2017, nationwide air toxics emissions fell 74%, with urban vehicle-sourced contributions to criteria pollutants like NOx and VOCs declining 70-90% by 2020 due to these controls and fleet turnover.[251][260]Greenhouse gas emissions and climate context
Combustion of gasoline releases carbon dioxide (CO₂) as the primary greenhouse gas, with approximately 8.89 kilograms of CO₂ emitted per US gallon fully combusted, based on the carbon content of typical reformulated gasoline.[261] This figure assumes complete oxidation of the fuel's hydrocarbons, as verified through stoichiometric calculations and empirical measurements by agencies like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Globally, transportation emissions from fuels including gasoline constituted about 21% of total energy-related CO₂ emissions in 2023, totaling around 8 gigatons out of 37.4 gigatons, with road vehicles responsible for the largest share due to their reliance on liquid hydrocarbons.[262] These emissions arise directly from tailpipe exhaust during internal combustion, distinct from upstream production phases. Empirical satellite data reveal that rising atmospheric CO₂ concentrations, partly from gasoline and other fossil fuel use, have driven a "fertilization effect" enhancing plant photosynthesis and growth. A NASA analysis of vegetation indices from 1982 to 2015 documented a 14% increase in global leaf area index, with CO₂ fertilization accounting for 70% of this greening trend, as higher CO₂ levels improve water-use efficiency and expand the viable range for C3 plants like wheat and rice.[263] This effect has boosted biomass accumulation, with drylands showing particular gains from reduced transpiration stress under elevated CO₂.[264] Parallel observations indicate that associated mild warming has lengthened frost-free growing seasons, extending the US average by nearly two weeks over the past century, enabling additional crop cycles in northern latitudes.[265] Critiques of predominant climate narratives highlight that gasoline-derived CO₂ emissions facilitate economic mobility and productivity gains that outweigh projected harms in observed data, rather than the catastrophic scenarios emphasized by model-dependent forecasts from bodies like the IPCC, which have historically overestimated warming rates relative to measurements.[266] Institutional biases in academia and media, favoring alarmist interpretations, often downplay these verifiable benefits, such as CO₂-driven agricultural yield increases of 50-80% in the US since 1940.[267] Proposed alternatives like battery electric vehicles carry substantial upstream CO₂ burdens from lithium and cobalt mining, refining, and battery production—equivalent to years of gasoline vehicle tailpipe emissions in some grid-dependent scenarios—complicating direct equivalence claims without full causal accounting.[268] Gasoline's role thus supports a net positive in human flourishing when evaluating empirical outcomes over speculative projections.Soil and water contamination
Gasoline releases from spills, leaks, and underground storage tanks (USTs) primarily contaminate soil and groundwater through the leaching of volatile aromatic hydrocarbons, notably BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes), which are soluble in water and migrate readily in subsurface environments.[269] These compounds exhibit variable persistence, with half-lives in groundwater ranging from 1 week to 2 years depending on site-specific factors like oxygen availability and microbial activity.[270] In contrast to heavier petroleum fractions that sorb to soil particles, BTEX's mobility facilitates plume formation downgradient from release points, often detected hundreds of meters from USTs at gasoline stations.[271] The oxygenate methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), added to gasoline in the 1990s to enhance combustion and reduce emissions, exacerbated contamination risks due to its high aqueous solubility (over 40,000 mg/L) and low soil retardation, allowing rapid groundwater transport.[269] MTBE's resistance to biodegradation resulted in half-lives exceeding 5 years in some aquifers, leading to widespread detections in U.S. drinking water supplies by the late 1990s.[272] This prompted regulatory action, including California's ban on MTBE in gasoline effective January 1, 2004, followed by at least 25 states enacting prohibitions or restrictions by 2009, shifting reliance to ethanol blends.[269][273] UST leaks represent the dominant source of gasoline releases in the U.S., with over 505,000 confirmed leaking UST (LUST) sites addressed historically, many involving petroleum hydrocarbons impacting soil and aquifers.[274] Pipeline incidents, while less frequent for refined gasoline than for crude oil, have caused notable spills; for instance, localized releases from tank farms and distribution infrastructure in the 2010s contributed to episodic contamination events tracked by the EPA.[275] Remediation strategies emphasize monitored natural attenuation and bioremediation, where indigenous microbes degrade BTEX under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, achieving half-lives from days to years based on nutrient enhancement and bioaugmentation.[276] Pump-and-treat systems extract contaminated groundwater for ex situ treatment, though intrinsic bioremediation has proven effective at many sites with sufficient electron acceptors.[277]Lifecycle assessments versus alternatives
Lifecycle assessments of gasoline encompass well-to-tank emissions from crude oil extraction, refining, and distribution, which typically account for 20-25% of total well-to-wheel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with the remaining 75-80% arising from tailpipe combustion.[268][278] This distribution highlights that while upstream processes contribute, the dominant emissions occur during end-use, contrasting with narratives emphasizing only tailpipe outputs for alternatives. For battery electric vehicles (BEVs), manufacturing emissions—driven by battery production, rare earth mining, and materials processing—comprise 30-50% or more of total lifecycle GHG, particularly when vehicle lifetimes are short or electricity grids rely on fossil fuels.[279][280] Global analyses indicate BEVs yield lower overall lifecycle emissions than gasoline vehicles in low-carbon grids, but advantages erode in coal-intensive regions, where total emissions can approach or exceed those of internal combustion engines.[281][282] These upfront burdens, often underemphasized in promotional assessments, underscore the need for full cradle-to-grave accounting to avoid misleading comparisons. Corn ethanol's lifecycle GHG emissions frequently exceed gasoline's by 20-50% when incorporating agricultural inputs such as synthetic fertilizers, machinery fuel, and indirect land-use changes, which release stored soil carbon and nitrous oxide.[283][284] Industry-backed models claim reductions of 40-50%, but critiques highlight methodological exclusions of full farming externalities, rendering such figures optimistic.[285][286] Energy return on investment (EROI) for gasoline derived from conventional oil ranges from 10:1 to 20:1, delivering substantial net energy after extraction and refining costs.[91] Biofuels like corn ethanol yield far lower EROI values, typically 1:1 to 5:1, due to energy-intensive crop cultivation and processing, limiting their scalability without subsidies.[287][288] Gasoline's high EROI and energy-dense infrastructure enable efficient distribution networks, outperforming alternatives in throughput per unit land and capital invested.Economic Factors
Global production by country
The United States leads global gasoline production, with refinery output averaging approximately 9 million barrels per day in late 2024, supported by a refining capacity of around 18 million barrels per day of crude oil and record domestic crude production exceeding 13 million barrels per day.[289][290] This positions the U.S. as the top producer, enabling significant net exports amid non-OPEC supply growth driven by shale innovations.[291] China ranks second, with gasoline output tied to its expansive refining sector processing over 14 million barrels per day of crude throughput in 2024, though consumption trends indicate production around 3 million barrels per day amid a shift toward electric vehicles reducing gasoline demand growth.[41][292] India follows as a rising producer, expanding refinery capacity to over 5 million barrels per day to meet surging domestic vehicle fuel needs, contributing to non-OPEC refining gains.[293] OPEC+ countries collectively hold about 40% of global crude oil production in 2024, supplying feedstock for downstream gasoline refining primarily in Asia and the Americas rather than domestic output dominance.[294] Russia, an OPEC+ member, maintains notable gasoline production from its roughly 5 million barrels per day refining capacity, while Saudi Arabia focuses more on crude exports.[295] For 2025, U.S. crude output is forecast to reach a record 13.41 million barrels per day, sustaining high gasoline yields and exports, as China and India continue driving demand pressures on global refining balances.[291][296]Pricing determinants and volatility
The price of gasoline is predominantly determined by the cost of crude oil, which typically accounts for 50 to 70 percent of the retail price, depending on market conditions.[297] [298] Refining costs, including processing into gasoline and blending additives, contribute another 10 to 15 percent, while distribution, marketing, and taxes make up the remainder.[299] These proportions fluctuate with crude oil benchmarks like Brent or West Texas Intermediate, where a $10 per barrel change in crude can shift U.S. gasoline prices by about 25 cents per gallon due to the yield of roughly 19 gallons of gasoline per 42-gallon barrel.[300] Government taxes and subsidies further modulate final prices but vary widely by jurisdiction, with subsidies in some oil-producing nations offsetting costs and taxes in consumer markets adding 10 to 30 percent or more.[297] Volatility arises primarily from supply-demand imbalances, exacerbated by geopolitical events that disrupt crude production or exports. For instance, Russia's invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, triggered a 30 percent surge in Brent crude prices within two weeks, pushing U.S. gasoline prices above $4 per gallon nationally by mid-March due to sanctions on Russian oil supplies, which accounted for about 10 percent of global seaborne crude.[301] [302] Seasonal demand spikes from summer driving or economic growth similarly amplify fluctuations, while OPEC+ production cuts or non-OPEC supply outages tighten markets. Refining margins, measured by crack spreads, have ranged from $10 to $25 per barrel post-COVID recovery, reflecting capacity constraints and product yields but remaining a minor volatility driver compared to crude swings.[303] Claims of widespread price gouging by refiners or retailers lack empirical support, as federal data and studies attribute high prices to elevated crude costs and supply chain frictions rather than profiteering.[304] [305] Oil and gasoline futures markets, such as NYMEX RBOB contracts, efficiently incorporate expectations of future supply risks, enabling hedgers to stabilize prices and preventing persistent deviations from fundamentals.[306] This forward-looking mechanism explains rapid price responses to anticipated events, countering narratives of manipulation with evidence of arbitrage-driven convergence to spot realities.[307]Regional market differences
In the United States, average retail prices for regular gasoline in 2025 have ranged from approximately $3.15 to $3.28 per gallon through mid-year, reflecting a combination of crude oil costs, refining margins, and relatively low federal and state taxes that constitute about 15-20% of the pump price.[308][309] In contrast, European markets exhibit significantly higher prices, typically equivalent to $6-8 per gallon, driven by excise duties averaging €0.548 per liter (about $2.24 per gallon) plus value-added taxes (VAT) that push total taxation to over 50% of the retail price in many countries, such as 64.5% in the Netherlands and 62% in Italy.[310][311][312] These pricing disparities influence regional consumption patterns, with subsidized ethanol blending programs in Brazil and India altering effective gasoline costs and market dynamics. Brazil mandates up to 27% anhydrous ethanol blending in gasoline, supported by historical government incentives that have integrated sugarcane-derived ethanol into the fuel mix since the 1970s, reducing reliance on imported petroleum.[313] India similarly promotes 20% blending targets through price incentives and subsidies favoring domestic sugar-based ethanol, which lowers blended gasoline costs for consumers while bolstering local agriculture.[314] Aviation gasoline markets highlight further divergences, as Europe permits continued production and use of leaded 100LL avgas until at least 2032 under extended authorizations, despite road gasoline being unleaded since the 1990s, to accommodate legacy piston-engine aircraft.[315] In the U.S., while road gasoline is fully unleaded, leaded avgas persists in general aviation but faces parallel phase-out pressures without the same regulatory extensions. Across regions, gasoline demand exhibits strong inelasticity to price changes, with short-term price elasticity estimates ranging from -0.02 to -0.04, meaning a 1% price reduction typically yields less than a 0.04% increase in volume consumed due to limited short-run substitutes for vehicle travel.[316][317]Regulations and Debates
Phase-out of lead additives
The phase-out of tetraethyllead (TEL) as an antiknock additive in gasoline began in the United States following the 1970 Clean Air Act, which empowered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate air pollutants including lead emissions from vehicles.[318] In 1973, the EPA mandated a gradual reduction in lead content across all gasoline grades, targeting a drop from average levels of 2-3 grams per gallon to 0.1 grams per gallon by 1986, with unleaded gasoline required for new vehicles equipped with catalytic converters starting in 1975 to prevent catalyst poisoning.[318] This process culminated in a full ban on leaded gasoline for on-road motor vehicles effective January 1, 1996, under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, reducing U.S. gasoline lead emissions by over 99% from peak levels.[319] Globally, the transition was uneven, with developed nations like those in Europe following similar timelines in the 1970s and 1980s, while many developing countries delayed due to economic constraints and reliance on cheaper leaded formulations.[320] A United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) partnership accelerated efforts, setting a 2008 target that was not fully met, with leaded gasoline persisting in some regions until Algeria's ban in July 2021 marked the worldwide end for road use.[258] Aviation gasoline, particularly 100LL (low-lead avgas), remains an exception, continuing in use for piston-engine aircraft due to the lack of a drop-in unleaded alternative meeting performance needs; U.S. federal goals aim for transition by 2030, though state-level bans like California's 2031 prohibition highlight ongoing tensions.[321][322] TEL provided critical engineering advantages, including elevated octane ratings to suppress engine knock, enabling higher compression ratios for improved power and fuel efficiency, alongside valve lubrication that reduced wear in pre-1970s engines.[323][324] Phase-out necessitated costlier replacements such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) or ethanol, which demanded increased refining complexity, raised production expenses by an estimated 5-10 cents per gallon for low-octane grades, and occasionally led to minor efficiency losses or accelerated valve recession in unmodified older engines without additives.[325][326] While blood lead levels declined post-phase-out, causal attribution to gasoline alone overlooks confounders like concurrent reductions in leaded paint and plumbing, and overlooks how TEL's performance benefits supported advanced engine designs without equivalent unleaded substitutes at the time.[327] Empirical data indicate the policy's health gains, though real, were weighed against unaddressed trade-offs in vehicle performance and fuel economics.Ethanol blending mandates and subsidies
The United States established the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) via the Energy Policy Act of 2005, mandating 4 billion gallons of renewable fuel blending in 2006 and expanding under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to require up to 15 billion gallons annually of conventional biofuels, predominantly corn-derived ethanol, by 2015.[328] These policies compel refiners to incorporate ethanol into gasoline, with E10 (10% ethanol) as the predominant blend, despite ethanol's lower volumetric energy content reducing overall fuel efficiency.[329] In Brazil, mandatory ethanol blending in gasoline originated in the 1930s and currently stands at 27%, with recent legislation enabling increases to 30% or higher; flex-fuel vehicles permit voluntary higher ethanol use, but the base blend remains government-enforced rather than optional.[330][331] Proponents cite ethanol's role in energy independence, yet efficiency critiques highlight persistent drawbacks across such mandates. Ethanol blends like E10 yield 3-5% lower miles per gallon than pure gasoline due to ethanol's approximately 30% lower energy density, necessitating greater volumes for equivalent range and elevating effective fuel costs for consumers.[332][333] Corrosion in fuel systems, exacerbated by ethanol's affinity for water and acidity, accelerates degradation of rubber, plastic, and metal components, particularly in older engines, increasing maintenance expenses and reducing vehicle longevity.[334][335] Mandates divert substantial corn acreage to ethanol—over 40% of U.S. corn production—driving corn prices higher by 2-3% per billion gallons of additional ethanol and contributing to broader food price inflation, as evidenced by an 83% global food price surge linked partly to biofuel crop shifts in 2007-2008.[336][337][338] Any octane enhancement from ethanol, which raises blend ratings to meet 87 AKI standards, fails to deliver net efficiency gains in conventional engines, as the lower energy content dilutes performance benefits without engine redesigns to exploit higher compression.[339] In 2025, U.S. ethanol exports reached record paces—averaging 138,000 barrels per day through July—sustained by mandate-driven overproduction, which obscures domestic blending inefficiencies by offloading surplus abroad while U.S. gasoline remains limited to low-ethanol mixes incompatible with higher volumes.[164][340]Environmental regulations' economic costs
The implementation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Tier 3 vehicle emission and fuel standards, which mandated an average sulfur content of 10 parts per million (ppm) in gasoline starting in 2017, imposed substantial compliance burdens on refineries. Refineries faced options including process upgrades, such as enhanced hydrotreating units, or purchasing sulfur credits, with credit prices surging to $3,600 per million U.S. gallons by October 2023—a tenfold increase from 2021 levels—equating to approximately $3 per barrel in added refining costs for non-compliant facilities.[341][342] Industry-wide capital expenditures for sulfur control and related upgrades exceeded initial EPA projections of minimal impact (less than 1 cent per gallon), contributing to cumulative costs in the billions as refiners adapted to the 10 ppm refinery-gate average, with allowances up to 80 ppm post-refinery.[343][344] In the European Union, analogous low-sulfur mandates under the Fuel Quality Directive have similarly elevated refining costs, with forward estimates indicating potential significant increases in operating expenses across the sector due to desulfurization investments and process reconfigurations for 10 ppm gasoline sulfur limits.[345] Capital investments for achieving ultra-low sulfur levels, combined with annual operating costs, have been projected in the range of billions of euros for compliant configurations, straining margins in regions with complex regulatory stacks including benzene and aromatics controls.[346] These regulations have accelerated refinery rationalization, with U.S. closures totaling dozens between 2010 and 2020—such as the Sunoco Eagle Point (New Jersey) and Western Refining Yorktown (Virginia) facilities in 2010-2012—often citing high environmental compliance expenditures alongside market pressures as key factors.[347][348] Resulting job losses in refining have numbered in the thousands per major closure, with affected workers facing challenges transitioning due to specialized skills, exacerbating regional economic dislocations in states like Pennsylvania and Delaware.[349] Broader analyses attribute part of the sector's contraction to cumulative regulatory costs, including Clean Air Act amendments, which have reduced domestic refining capacity by over 1 million barrels per day since the 2010s.[350] Regulatory frameworks also induce market distortions by subsidizing intermittent renewable energy sources—such as solar and wind—over reliable fuels like gasoline, leading to higher system-wide costs through uncompensated grid integration expenses and backup requirements.[351] In the U.S., federal subsidies disproportionately favor renewables, skewing investment away from dispatchable refining infrastructure and inflating gasoline's relative economic burden amid mandates that prioritize low-carbon alternatives without fully accounting for reliability premiums.[352] This has manifested in elevated electricity costs passed to consumers and stranded refining assets, with estimates suggesting distortions equivalent to hundreds of billions in implicit support for intermittents versus fossil-based fuels.Ongoing policy controversies
California's Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) program, which mandates increasing sales quotas for electric and hydrogen vehicles, has sparked debate over its economic impacts, including the role of transferable credits that manufacturers trade to meet requirements, effectively subsidizing compliance at elevated costs estimated in billions annually. Critics argue these credits distort markets by inflating vehicle prices and shifting burdens to gasoline vehicle buyers through higher regulatory compliance expenses, with California's average gasoline prices remaining 50-70 cents per gallon above national averages partly due to such mandates.[305][353] Proponents, including state regulators, contend the program accelerates emissions reductions, though sales data shows ZEVs still command premiums of $5,000 to $10,000 over comparable gasoline models despite federal tax credits.[354][355] Global tightening of fuel efficiency and emissions standards, such as the European Union's Euro 7 proposals and U.S. EPA light-duty vehicle rules targeting 50+ mpg fleets by 2030, continues amid projections of sustained gasoline demand growth, particularly in developing economies and the U.S., where liquid fuels consumption is forecast to reach 20.49 million barrels per day in 2025.[356][357] These policies impose refinery upgrades and blend restrictions that elevate production costs, yet empirical demand trends—rising U.S. petroleum product use contradicting rapid phase-out assumptions—highlight tensions between regulatory stringency and real-world energy needs driven by economic expansion and limited electric vehicle infrastructure.[358][359] Attributions of gasoline price volatility often pit claims of corporate profiteering against evidence of policy-induced factors like taxes and environmental mandates, with studies debunking "greed" narratives by quantifying how California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard and cap-and-trade programs add 20-65 cents per gallon in compliance costs.[360][305] Mainstream outlets frequently amplify accusations of oil industry excess, yet analyses from independent researchers attribute chronic differentials to state-specific regulations rather than market manipulation, as refiners' margins align with historical norms when adjusted for policy burdens.[361] In 2025, national averages dipping below $3 per gallon amid deregulatory shifts underscore how easing mandates can counter upward pressures from taxes, which comprise 15-30% of pump prices in high-tax jurisdictions.[362][363]Comparisons to Alternatives
Versus diesel and other petroleum fuels
Gasoline possesses a lower energy density by mass than diesel fuel, approximately 44 MJ/kg compared to 45-46 MJ/kg for diesel, resulting in about 5% less energy per unit mass.[364] By volume, the difference widens to roughly 10-15% due to diesel's higher density (around 0.83 kg/L versus 0.74 kg/L for gasoline), making diesel more suitable for applications prioritizing fuel volume efficiency, such as long-haul trucking.[365] However, gasoline engines generally facilitate easier cold starts than diesel engines, as diesel fuel can gel in sub-zero temperatures (below -10°C for standard grades without additives), increasing cranking demands and risking incomplete combustion, whereas gasoline remains volatile and ignites more readily under low temperatures.[366] Diesel engines deliver superior low-end torque—often 20-50% higher than comparably sized gasoline engines—owing to their higher compression ratios (typically 14:1 to 25:1 versus 8:1 to 12:1 for gasoline) and compression-ignition process, which enhances force multiplication for heavy loads like towing or commercial vehicles.[367] Gasoline engines, by contrast, excel in high-revving power output for passenger cars, but require turbocharging or larger displacements to match diesel torque. In petroleum refining, crude oil distillation naturally yields more diesel from heavier fractions (kerosene and gas oil boiling ranges, 150-350°C), while gasoline derives from lighter naphtha (below 200°C); heavy crudes favor diesel output (up to 30-40% yield versus 20-25% gasoline), but refineries employ processes like fluid catalytic cracking to convert heavy residues into additional gasoline, trading off diesel volumes and increasing complexity costs.[51] Diesel engines exhibit higher thermal efficiency, converting 35-45% of fuel energy to work compared to 25-35% for gasoline engines, stemming from leaner air-fuel mixtures and avoiding throttling losses in spark-ignition cycles.[367] On emissions, pre-2007 diesel engines emitted significantly higher nitrogen oxides (NOx, up to 10 times more in some tests) and particulate matter (PM) than gasoline counterparts due to high-temperature combustion and richer soot formation, though post-diesel particulate filter (DPF) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) implementations since the mid-2000s have reduced these by 90% or more in compliant vehicles.[368] Gasoline engines historically produced lower NOx but higher carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons (HC) without three-way catalysts, which became standard by the 1980s; overall, diesel's efficiency edge offsets some well-to-wheel CO2 emissions despite higher raw NOx.[369]Versus biofuels and ethanol blends
The energy return on energy invested (EROEI) for conventional gasoline derived from petroleum sources typically ranges from 10:1 to 20:1, reflecting the net energy surplus after accounting for extraction, refining, and distribution processes.[91] In contrast, corn-based ethanol exhibits a much lower EROEI of approximately 1.2:1 to 1.3:1, indicating minimal net energy gain due to intensive agricultural inputs including fertilizers, pesticides, and distillation energy requirements.[370] This disparity underscores biofuels' inferior energetic efficiency compared to gasoline, limiting their role in sustainable energy systems that prioritize high net energy yields for societal functions. Biofuel production, particularly corn ethanol, demands substantial cropland, often displacing food crop cultivation and contributing to indirect land use changes such as deforestation or conversion of grasslands elsewhere to maintain global food supply.[371] In the United States, ethanol mandates have driven corn acreage expansion, with studies estimating that biofuels utilize 2-3% of global agricultural land and water resources, resources that could alternatively support food production for up to 30% of the world's malnourished population.[371] Such displacement has been linked to elevated food prices, as biofuel policies incentivize feedstock diversion from edible crops, exacerbating food insecurity in vulnerable regions without commensurate energy security benefits. Lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions analyses reveal that while corn ethanol combustion emits less CO2 per unit of energy than gasoline, full assessments incorporating farming emissions from tillage, synthetic fertilizers, and nitrous oxide releases—along with indirect land use changes—often yield totals comparable to or exceeding those of petroleum fuels.[372] For instance, evaluations of U.S. ethanol under the Renewable Fuel Standard indicate no net GHG reduction relative to gasoline baselines when these factors are included, challenging claims of environmental superiority.[372] Ethanol blends, such as E10 (10% ethanol), reduce volumetric energy density by about 3% compared to pure gasoline, effectively increasing fuel costs for equivalent mileage despite ethanol's lower wholesale price.[373] This energy penalty, combined with potential engine compatibility issues and infrastructure corrosion, imposes economic burdens without delivering proportional reductions in fossil fuel dependence or emissions, as blends still derive most energy from petroleum components.[373] Empirical data suggest ethanol's integration into gasoline markets has not substantially lowered pump prices beyond short-term blending economics, highlighting limited consumer benefits against the systemic inefficiencies of biofuel pathways.Versus electrification and batteries
Gasoline-powered internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles leverage a vast global refueling infrastructure, with over 100,000 stations in the United States alone as of 2025, enabling refueling in under five minutes and supporting long-distance travel without range limitations imposed by battery capacity.[374] In contrast, electric vehicle (EV) charging stations remain sparse relative to demand, with global public charging points totaling around 6-7 million in 2025, many of which are slow Level 2 units requiring 30-60 minutes for modest range gains, and fast chargers concentrated in urban areas.[375] This disparity underscores gasoline's practical dispatchability for mobile energy needs, as fuel can be stored portably in cans or delivered via trucks during grid outages, whereas EVs depend on electrical infrastructure vulnerable to blackouts or overloads.[376] The energy density of gasoline, at approximately 46 MJ/kg, exceeds that of lithium-ion batteries by a factor of 60-100 times on a gravimetric basis, allowing ICE vehicles to carry sufficient fuel for 500+ km ranges in lightweight tanks without the mass penalties of multi-ton batteries.[377] [378] Battery systems, typically achieving 0.5-0.9 MJ/kg at the pack level, necessitate heavier vehicles that consume more energy for propulsion and degrade infrastructure faster due to increased axle loads.[379] This fundamental physical advantage preserves gasoline's role in applications requiring high power density, such as aviation or heavy trucking, where battery equivalents remain impractical. Lifecycle analyses reveal that EV production emits 50-70% more greenhouse gases than comparable ICE vehicles, primarily from energy-intensive mining and refining of lithium, cobalt, and nickel, with battery manufacturing alone accounting for up to 46% of an EV's total cradle-to-grave emissions.[279] [380] These upfront burdens, often overlooked in tailpipe-focused comparisons, delay break-even points for emissions savings, particularly in regions with coal-heavy grids, where EVs may require 100,000+ km to offset manufacturing impacts.[280] As of 2025, global gasoline demand shows no signs of a rapid electrification-driven decline, projected to peak at around 28 million barrels per day amid steady road transport growth in developing economies, outpacing EV adoption constrained by infrastructure and cost barriers.[381] Gasoline's grid-independent reliability ensures continued viability for essential mobility, avoiding the cascading failures from EV charging surges that strain aging power networks during peak demand or emergencies.[382]References
- https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Gasoline