Hubbry Logo
Inrush currentInrush currentMain
Open search
Inrush current
Community hub
Inrush current
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Inrush current
Inrush current
Inrush current
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An example of inrush current transients during capacitor bank energization

Inrush current, input surge current, or switch-on surge is the maximal instantaneous input current drawn by an electrical device when first turned on. Alternating-current electric motors and transformers may draw several times their normal full-load current when first energized, for a few cycles of the input waveform. Power converters also often have inrush currents much higher than their steady-state currents, due to the charging current of the input capacitance. The selection of over-current-protection devices such as fuses and circuit breakers is made more complicated when high inrush currents must be tolerated. The over-current protection must react quickly to overload or short-circuit faults but must not interrupt the circuit when the (usually harmless) inrush current flows.

Capacitors

[edit]

A discharged or partially charged capacitor appears as a short circuit to the source when the source voltage is higher than the potential of the capacitor. A fully discharged capacitor will take approximately 5 RC time periods to fully charge; during the charging period, instantaneous current can exceed steady-state current by a substantial multiple. Instantaneous current declines to steady-state current as the capacitor reaches full charge. In the case of open circuit, the capacitor will be charged to the peak AC voltage (one cannot actually charge a capacitor with AC line power, so this refers to a varying but unidirectional voltage; e.g., the voltage output from a rectifier).

In the case of charging a capacitor from a linear DC voltage, like that from a battery, the capacitor will still appear as a short circuit; it will draw current from the source limited only by the internal resistance of the source and ESR of the capacitor. In this case, charging current will be continuous and decline exponentially to the load current. For open circuit, the capacitor will be charged to the DC voltage.

Safeguarding against the filter capacitor’s charging period’s initial current inrush flow is crucial for the performance of the device. Temporarily introducing a high resistance between the input power and rectifier can increase the resistance of the powerup, leading to reducing the inrush current. Using an inrush current limiter for this purpose helps, as it can provide the initial resistance needed.

Transformers

[edit]

When a transformer is first energized, a transient current up to 10 to 15 times larger than the rated transformer current can flow for several cycles. Toroidal transformers, using less copper for the same power handling, can have up to 60 times inrush to running current. Worst-case inrush happens when the primary winding is connected at an instant around the zero crossing of the primary voltage (which for a pure inductance would be the current maximum in the AC cycle) and if the polarity of the voltage half-cycle has the same polarity as the remanence in the iron core has (the magnetic remanence was left high from a preceding half cycle). Unless the windings and core are sized to normally never exceed 50% of saturation (and in an efficient transformer they never are, such a construction would be overly heavy and inefficient), then during such a start-up the core will be saturated. This can also be expressed as the remnant magnetism in normal operation is nearly as high as the saturation magnetism at the "knee" of the hysteresis loop. Once the core saturates, however, the winding inductance appears greatly reduced, and only the resistance of the primary-side windings and the impedance of the power line are limiting the current. As saturation occurs for part half-cycles only, harmonic-rich waveforms can be generated and can cause problems to other equipment. For large transformers with low winding resistance and high inductance, these inrush currents can last for several seconds until the transient has died away (decay time proportional to XL/R) and the regular AC equilibrium is established. To avoid magnetic inrush, only for transformers with an air gap in the core, the inductive load needs to be synchronously connected near a supply voltage peak, in contrast with the zero-voltage switching, which is desirable to minimize sharp-edged current transients with resistive loads such as high-power heaters. But for toroidal transformers only a premagnetising procedure before switching on allows to start those transformers without any inrush-current peak.

An example of an inrush current transient during a 100 VA toroid transformer energization. Inrush peak around 50 times of nominal current

Inrush current can be divided in three categories:

Energization inrush current result of re-energization of transformer. The residual flux in this case can be zero or depending on energization timing.
Recovery inrush current flow when transformer voltage is restored after having been reduced by system disturbance.
Sympathetic inrush current flow when multiple transformer connected in same line and one of them energized.

Motors

[edit]

When an electric motor, AC or DC, is first energized, the rotor is not moving, and a current equivalent to the stalled current will flow, reducing as the motor picks up speed and develops a back EMF to oppose the supply. AC induction motors behave as transformers with a shorted secondary until the rotor begins to move, while brushed motors present essentially the winding resistance. The duration of the starting transient is less if the mechanical load on the motor is relieved until it has picked up speed.

For high-power motors, the winding configuration may be changed (wye at start and then delta) during start-up to reduce the current drawn.

Heaters and filament lamps

[edit]
The inrush current of an incandescent lamp causes a bench power supply to limit its output current.

Metals have a positive temperature coefficient of resistance; they have lower resistance when cold. Any electrical load that contains a substantial component of metallic resistive heating elements, such as an electric kiln or a bank of tungsten-filament incandescent bulbs, will draw a high current until the metallic element reaches operating temperature. For example, wall switches intended to control incandescent lamps will have a "T" rating, indicating that they can safely control circuits with the large inrush currents of incandescent lamps. The inrush may be as much as 14 times the steady-state current and may persist for a few milliseconds for smaller lamps up to several seconds for lamps of 500 watts or more.[1] (Non-graphitized) carbon-filament lamps, rarely used now, have a negative temperature coefficient and draw more current as they warm up; an "inrush" current is not found with these types.

Protection

[edit]
See also: Inrush current limiter

A resistor in series with the line can be used to limit the current charging input capacitors. However, this approach is not very efficient, especially in high-power devices, since the resistor will have a voltage drop and dissipate some power.

Inrush current can also be reduced by inrush current limiters. Negative-temperature-coefficient (NTC) thermistors are commonly used in switching power supplies, motor drives and audio equipment to prevent damage caused by inrush current. A thermistor is a thermally-sensitive resistor with a resistance that changes significantly and predictably as a result of temperature changes. The resistance of an NTC thermistor decreases as its temperature increases.[2]

As the inrush current limiter self-heats, the current begins to flow through it and warm it. Its resistance begins to drop, and a relatively small current flow charges the input capacitors. After the capacitors in the power supply become charged, the self-heated inrush current limiter offers little resistance in the circuit, with a low voltage drop with respect to the total voltage drop of the circuit. A disadvantage is that immediately after the device is switched off, the NTC resistor is still hot and has a low resistance. It cannot limit the inrush current unless it cools for more than 1 minute to get a higher resistance. Another disadvantage is that the NTC thermistor is not short-circuit-proof.

Another way to avoid the transformer inrush current is a "transformer switching relay". This does not need time for cool down. It can also deal with power-line half-wave voltage dips and is short-circuit-proof. This technique is important for IEC 61000-4-11 tests.

Another option, particularly for high-voltage circuits, is to use a pre-charge circuit. The circuit would support a current-limited precharge mode during the charging of capacitors and then switch to an unlimited mode for normal operation when the voltage on the load is 90% of full charge.

Switch-off spike

[edit]

When a transformer, electric motor, electromagnet, or other inductive load is switched off, the inductor increases the voltage across the switch or breaker and can cause extended arcing. When a transformer is switched off on its primary side, inductive kick produces a voltage spike on the secondary that can damage insulation and connected loads.[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Inrush current

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Inrush current, also known as input surge current, is the maximum instantaneous current drawn by an upon initial energization, often several times greater than the steady-state operating current due to the sudden demand for or charging. This phenomenon occurs across various , including transformers, electric motors, and power supplies, and typically lasts only a few cycles before decaying to normal levels. Understanding and managing inrush current is essential in to prevent equipment damage, system instability, and protective device malfunctions. In power transformers, inrush current primarily arises from magnetizing the iron core when the device is switched on without load, leading to temporary core saturation influenced by residual and the point on the voltage at energization. Peak values can reach 5 to 25 times the transformer's full-load amperage (FLA), with high second-order harmonics that may persist for several cycles and cause sympathetic inrush in nearby s. These surges can induce mechanical stresses on windings, trigger false differential trips, and contribute to power quality issues like voltage dips or overvoltages. For electric motors, inrush current—often termed starting or locked-rotor current—manifests as the high demand to accelerate the from standstill, typically 4 to 8 times the full-load current at full voltage application. Premium efficiency motors may exhibit slightly higher inrush due to design optimizations for reduced losses, potentially leading to nuisance tripping of circuit breakers or fuses during startup. The magnitude is indicated by NEMA on motor nameplates, guiding protective device selection to accommodate this transient without interrupting operation. In switching power supplies, inrush current results from the rapid charging of input capacitors upon power-on, creating a brief surge that can exceed steady-state levels by factors depending on and input voltage . This can strain upstream power sources, cause voltage sags on the supply line, or activate protection if not limited. Mitigation strategies across these applications include NTC thermistors for resistive limiting, soft-start circuits to gradually apply voltage, and point-on-wave switching to avoid peak saturation conditions, thereby enhancing reliability and longevity.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

Inrush current, also known as input surge current or switch-on surge, is defined as the maximal instantaneous input current drawn by an upon its initial energization from a power source. This transient phenomenon occurs specifically at the moment of power application and is distinct from steady-state operating currents, representing a temporary overload that the device imposes on the supply system. Unlike peak current, which refers to the maximum amplitude of current during normal, ongoing operation (such as the crest of an AC waveform), inrush current is a short-lived surge confined to the startup phase and does not recur under steady conditions. The magnitude of inrush current typically ranges from 5 to 100 times the device's steady-state value, depending on the load type, with inductive devices like typically 4 to 8 times and transformers up to 25 times the rated current, while capacitive loads in power supplies can reach higher multiples due to rapid charging. Its duration generally spans a few milliseconds to several seconds (e.g., 10-100 ms at 50/60 Hz for many cases), after which the current decays toward nominal levels. In AC systems, a key parameter is the asymmetry of the inrush waveform, arising from the interaction between the switching instant and the supply voltage phase, which introduces a transient DC offset that offsets the current from its symmetric sinusoidal form. This peak value, duration, and asymmetry collectively characterize the inrush event, influencing system design considerations for protection and stability.

General Causes

Inrush current primarily stems from the abrupt application of voltage to electrical circuits, prompting a rapid accumulation of in storage elements or the of . In capacitive elements, this manifests as the need to charge the from zero voltage to the supply level, drawing significant current until equilibrium is reached. Similarly, in inductive elements, the sudden voltage induces a quick buildup of through the coil, requiring substantial transient current to overcome the initial absence of opposing electromagnetic forces. These mechanisms result in a surge that can exceed steady-state operating currents by several times, depending on the circuit configuration. The high magnitude of inrush current is fundamentally due to the low initial impedance presented by the load at the moment of energization. Uncharged capacitors exhibit effectively zero reactance initially, as there is no voltage across them to impede flow, while unsaturated inductors lack the back (EMF) generated by established current, reducing their effective opposition to near the resistive component alone. This minimal impedance Zmin⁡Z_{\min} allows the full supply voltage to drive current through a path with limited resistance, amplifying the surge before reactive effects build up and increase the total impedance. Differences between AC and DC systems influence the nature and severity of inrush. In DC circuits, the phenomenon is mainly driven by direct charging of capacitors or the transient ramp-up of current in inductors until steady-state back EMF stabilizes the flow, with the surge decaying exponentially based on time constants. In AC systems, the sinusoidal voltage waveform introduces additional variability; the point-on-wave at which switching occurs, combined with any residual flux in inductive elements, can misalign the applied voltage with the existing magnetic state, leading to transient DC offsets that drive the core toward saturation and exacerbate the current peak. The approximate magnitude of inrush current follows from Ohm's law applied at the instant of switching:
Iinrush≈VZmin⁡I_{\text{inrush}} \approx \frac{V}{Z_{\min}}
where VV is the applied voltage amplitude and Zmin⁡Z_{\min} is the circuit's minimum impedance at t=0t = 0. To derive this, consider a general linear circuit under a step voltage input v(t)=Vu(t)v(t) = V u(t), where u(t)u(t) is the unit step function. The steady-state current is Iss=V/ZI_{ss} = V / Z, with Z=R+jωL+1/(jωC)Z = R + j \omega L + 1/(j \omega C) in the frequency domain for AC, or Z=RZ = R for DC resistive paths. However, transients arise from initial conditions: capacitors start at vC(0)=0v_C(0) = 0, so initial capacitive current iC(0+)=Cdv/dti_C(0^+) = C dv/dt effectively sees Zmin⁡≈RZ_{\min} \approx R (series resistance); inductors start at iL(0)=0i_L(0) = 0, so initial diL/dt=V/Ldi_L/dt = V / L, with the circuit impedance momentarily dominated by resistance before inductive reactance builds. In both cases, the peak inrush occurs when reactive contributions are negligible, yielding Iinrush≈V/Zmin⁡I_{\text{inrush}} \approx V / Z_{\min}, where Zmin⁡Z_{\min} typically equals the non-reactive (resistive or source) impedance. For AC, VV is the peak voltage, and Zmin⁡Z_{\min} may include brief harmonic effects, but the approximation holds for the initial surge. This relation establishes the scale, often 5–10 times IssI_{ss}, highlighting the need for careful circuit design.

Key Characteristics

In DC circuits, inrush current manifests as an initial high-amplitude surge that undergoes toward steady-state levels. This decay follows the circuit's , defined as τ = RC for capacitive-dominated loads or τ = L/R for inductive loads, where R is resistance, C is , and L is . The waveform starts at a peak determined by the applied voltage divided by the instantaneous impedance, then diminishes rapidly as elements charge or magnetize. In AC systems, the inrush current is fundamentally oscillatory at the supply but distorted by a superimposed DC offset component, resulting in an asymmetric first half-cycle. This offset arises from the switching instant relative to the voltage zero-crossing, causing the current to peak unidirectionally and decay exponentially over subsequent cycles as the offset diminishes. The overall shape features a prominent initial spike, often 10 to 100 times the steady-state current, followed by damped oscillations that symmetrize over time. The duration of inrush current events typically spans a few milliseconds to several seconds, aligning with the time constants of the circuit elements and influenced by damping factors. Magnitude is modulated by several key parameters: higher supply voltages amplify the peak proportionally, while system frequency affects the oscillation rate and decay speed through its impact on inductive reactance. The point-on-wave energization—such as closing at voltage zero versus peak—can vary the peak by factors of 3 to 14, with zero-crossing often yielding the highest asymmetry due to flux buildup. These characteristics stem from the transiently low impedance during energization. To quantify inrush current, specialized measurement techniques capture its transient nature, including peak-hold function on clamp meters for non-intrusive monitoring or oscilloscopes for detailed analysis. Standards like IEC 63129 for products outline procedures combining direct measurements with calculations to determine peak values and pulse durations. Such methods highlight the asymmetric initial cycle in AC cases, where the DC offset shifts the , emphasizing the need for high-bandwidth to avoid underestimating peaks.

Effects and Impacts

System-Level Consequences

Inrush current imposes significant challenges on power systems by inducing voltage sags and dips, where the sudden high current draw across system impedance results in temporary reductions in voltage magnitude, often 10-90% below nominal levels for durations of half a cycle to one minute. These events can lead to brownouts in shared circuits, disrupting sensitive equipment such as computers and industrial controls, and causing visible light flicker that affects in residential and commercial settings. In severe cases, repeated sags contribute to reduced grid reliability, potentially violating power quality standards like IEC 61000-3-3 for voltage fluctuations. A primary reliability issue arises from circuit breakers and fuses tripping due to inrush currents exceeding their instantaneous or short-time ratings, resulting in shutdowns that interrupt power without an actual fault. For instance, energizing inductive loads like transformers or motors can produce peak currents 5-10 times the rated value, triggering protective devices and requiring manual resets, which compromises system availability in critical applications such as hospitals or data centers. This phenomenon is particularly problematic in distribution feeders, where cold load pickup after outages amplifies the effect through simultaneous re-energization of multiple loads. Inrush currents also degrade overall power quality by generating transients and harmonics that propagate through the grid, potentially destabilizing and causing in weak networks. The nonsinusoidal nature of inrush, rich in odd and a DC offset, can lead to temporary overvoltages and irregular operation of relays, with compliance challenges under standards like IEEE 519 for limiting at the point of common coupling. In interconnected systems, these disturbances increase the risk of cascading failures, particularly in areas with or renewable integration, underscoring the need for monitoring to maintain grid stability. Economically, unmanaged inrush accelerates wear on utility infrastructure, including transformers and transmission lines, through repeated and mechanical stresses that shorten lifespan and elevate expenses. Additionally, designing systems to accommodate peak inrush demands often requires oversized components, such as higher-rated breakers or reinforced cabling, inflating by 20-50% in large installations. Billing inaccuracies from metering errors during inrush events further compound financial burdens for utilities and consumers, with cumulative over-registration leading to disputed charges. A representative example in residential settings involves simultaneous startup of multiple appliances with inductive loads, such as air conditioners and refrigerators, on a shared 20-amp circuit. Such combined inrush can cause voltage dips and breaker trips, resulting in frequent outages and the need for circuit upgrades to prevent fire hazards and ensure compliance with guidelines. This highlights how everyday household operations can overload local distribution, emphasizing the broader safety implications for aging electrical infrastructures.

Component-Level Stress

Inrush current imposes severe on electrical components primarily through , governed by the relation P=I2RP = I^2 R, where the transient peak currents—often several times the rated value—generate excessive power dissipation in resistive elements like windings and conductors. This rapid release creates localized hotspots, with temperature rises that can exceed 100°C in milliseconds, promoting insulation degradation via accelerated oxidation, cracking, or initiation in materials such as paper-oil composites or polymeric dielectrics. Electromechanical forces during inrush events further exacerbate component stress, particularly in inductive elements where high currents interact with self-generated to produce Lorentz forces (F=IL×B\mathbf{F} = I \mathbf{L} \times \mathbf{B}), causing axial and radial stresses on windings or coils. These forces, which can be comparable to those experienced under short-circuit conditions but last longer and occur more frequently, induce vibrations at frequencies up to several hundred hertz, leading to mechanical fatigue through cyclic deformation, loosening of turns, and eventual structural failure over repeated exposures. The cumulative impact of these stresses from inrush events is often quantified using damage accumulation models, notably the for thermal life reduction: L=Aexp⁡(EakT)L = A \exp\left(\frac{E_a}{k T}\right) where LL represents the remaining life, AA is a , EaE_a is the , kk is Boltzmann's constant, and TT is the absolute temperature; brief but intense heating from inrush effectively shortens LL by shifting the system to higher effective temperatures during each event. Long-term reliability suffers as repeated startups accumulate these insults, reducing the (MTBF) by factors of 2 to 10 depending on frequency and magnitude, as thermal cycling and mechanical wear compound failure probabilities in components like transformers and power semiconductors.

Inrush in Devices

Capacitive Loads

In capacitive loads, inrush current occurs due to the instantaneous charging of the capacitor's dielectric material when a voltage source is suddenly applied, leading to a rapid buildup of charge. The fundamental relationship governing this transient is the capacitor current equation, where the current II is proportional to the rate of change of voltage across the capacitor: I=CdVdtI = C \frac{dV}{dt} Here, CC represents the capacitance, and dVdt\frac{dV}{dt} is the voltage slew rate, which can be extremely high at the moment of connection, resulting in a significant current spike. In practical series RC circuits, this peak current is limited and reaches its maximum value immediately upon energization, given by Ipeak=VRI_{peak} = \frac{V}{R}, where VV is the applied voltage and RR is the total series resistance, including wiring and component resistances. For a pure capacitive load with negligible resistance, the theoretical inrush current would be infinite at the instant of switching, as there is no inherent limitation to dVdt\frac{dV}{dt}; however, real-world capacitors always include an equivalent series resistance (ESR), which caps the peak current and introduces a finite charging time constant. This ESR, combined with external circuit resistances, prevents unbounded surges but still allows high transients that stress switches and upstream components. Capacitive inrush is prevalent in applications such as input stages, where bulk filter capacitors charge rapidly during startup. A prominent example in consumer electronics is modern televisions, which utilize switched-mode power supplies (SMPS) with large input filter capacitors. When a modern TV is turned on, these capacitors charge from a discharged state, producing a brief inrush current (power surge). This surge can reach peaks of several to tens of times the normal operating current—for example, 50–60 A in some cases—but lasts only milliseconds. The resulting energy consumption is negligible (far less than a watt-second), which is insignificant compared to the TV's steady-state power draw of 50–200 W and has no meaningful impact on electricity bills or loading of home circuits. Other examples include EMI/RFI filters in electronic equipment; and start capacitors in single-phase induction motors, which energize briefly to provide phase shift for torque during initiation. A notable example occurs in utility-scale capacitor bank switching, where energizing uncharged banks for correction can produce inrush surges up to several tens of kA, potentially causing voltage magnification and equipment damage if not managed. The severity of capacitive inrush is influenced by several key factors: the capacitance value, as larger CC amplifies the current for a given dVdt\frac{dV}{dt}; the pre-charge state, where a fully discharged yields the highest surge compared to a partially charged one; and the ESR, which directly determines the effective limiting resistance and thus the peak magnitude.

Inductive Loads: Transformers

In transformers, inrush current primarily results from core saturation upon energization, driven by the nonlinear characteristics of the B-H curve in the ferromagnetic core material. The B-H curve describes the relationship between magnetic flux density BB and magnetic field strength HH, where permeability μ=B/H\mu = B / H remains high in the linear region but drops sharply near the saturation knee as magnetic domains fully align, forcing a significant increase in magnetizing current to sustain the required flux. This nonlinearity causes the core to behave like an air-core inductor in deep saturation, with μ\mu approaching μ0\mu_0, the permeability of free space, leading to currents that can exceed normal operating levels by several times. The remanence effect intensifies this phenomenon, as residual flux—remanent magnetism trapped in the core from prior de-energization—adds to the transient flux waveform upon re-energization, potentially shifting the peak flux and driving the core into deeper saturation. This residual flux can amplify the inrush current by up to 10 times the rated full-load current, depending on its polarity and magnitude relative to the steady-state flux. The severity of inrush also hinges on the energization , the phase of the supply voltage at the switching instant, with the worst-case scenario occurring at the voltage zero-crossing ( of 0°). Here, the of the voltage over the first half-cycle produces a transient that doubles the steady-state peak, exacerbating saturation. One approach to mitigate inrush involves point-on-wave switching, which synchronizes energization to the voltage peak (90° angle) or a calculated optimal point compensating for residual , thereby minimizing transient overflux and current peaks.

Inductive Loads:

In electric , particularly inductive types, inrush current manifests prominently during startup as the locked-rotor current, which occurs when the rotor is at standstill and back (back-EMF) is minimal or absent. This results in the motor drawing a significantly higher current from the supply, as the impedance is dominated by the resistance and leakage reactance rather than counteracting voltage from rotation. For AC induction , this locked-rotor current is typically 5 to 8 times the full-load current, providing the necessary surge to initiate motion against . The high inrush is essential for overcoming the motor's and accelerating the to operating speed, where production is governed by the relation T=kI2T = k I^2, with kk as a constant incorporating motor design factors like and geometry. At startup, the elevated current II generates substantial proportional to its square, enabling rapid spin-up despite the mechanical load; as speed increases, back-EMF rises, reducing current and to steady-state levels. This dynamic is most pronounced in AC induction motors, which exhibit the highest inrush due to their reliance on induced currents without initial opposition, whereas DC motors experience more limited surges constrained by armature resistance, often 5 to 7 times full-load but without the same inductive dominance. The starting current can be approximated by the equation Istart=VRstator+jXleakageI_{\text{start}} = \frac{V}{R_{\text{stator}} + j X_{\text{leakage}}}, where VV is the applied voltage, RstatorR_{\text{stator}} is the resistance, and XleakageX_{\text{leakage}} is the leakage reactance, which is near zero initially before the fully establishes. In practical applications such as industrial pumps and HVAC systems, these surges can reach up to 10 times the full-load current, stressing power supplies and necessitating robust design considerations to prevent voltage dips or equipment damage. Similar to transformers, motor cores may experience transient saturation during this phase, amplifying the current peak briefly.

Resistive Loads

In resistive loads, such as heating elements and incandescent lamps, inrush current arises primarily from thermal transients rather than reactive effects. When power is applied, the resistance of the material is lower at ambient temperature compared to its operating temperature, leading to a temporary surge in current as the element heats up. This phenomenon is characteristic of materials exhibiting a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) of resistance, where conductivity decreases as temperature rises. For incandescent filament lamps, the filament exemplifies this behavior. At , the filament's cold resistance is significantly lower—often 10 to 15 times less than its hot resistance—resulting in an initial inrush current up to 15 times the steady-state value during warmup. As the filament rapidly heats to over 2,500°C, its resistance increases dramatically due to the PTC properties of tungsten, causing the current to decay exponentially toward the nominal operating level. Similar dynamics occur in resistive heaters, including those using PTC thermistors or metallic coils. PTC thermistor-based heaters start with low cold resistance, drawing an inrush current that can reach up to 8 times the steady-state current, which then diminishes as self-heating raises the resistance. Metallic coil heaters, like those in electric space heaters, also exhibit PTC effects from the base metal's temperature-dependent resistivity, leading to initial surges followed by stabilization. The thermal response is governed by the τ = (m c) / (h A), where m is the of the , c is its , h is the convective , and A is the surface area; this quantifies the time for the element to approach . The duration of inrush in resistive loads typically spans seconds until is reached, contrasting with the millisecond-scale transients in reactive components. For instance, in a 250 incandescent heat lamp, the inrush peaks at around 31 A but decays within 0.1 seconds as resistance rises from its cold value to approximately 58 Ω. This prolonged surge contributes to general on components, potentially accelerating wear in switching devices.

Mitigation Strategies

Passive Techniques

Passive techniques for mitigating inrush current rely on non-electronic components that provide inherent resistance or clamping without active control, offering simple and cost-effective solutions for applications such as power supplies and inductive loads. These methods are particularly effective for limiting the initial high current surge during startup, such as in switched-mode power supplies or energization. NTC thermistors, constructed from sintered metal oxides, exhibit high resistance at ambient temperatures to restrict inrush current, which then decreases rapidly as the device self-heats from the passing current, allowing near-normal steady-state operation with minimal ongoing losses. This behavior follows a nonlinear resistance-temperature curve, where selection involves choosing a device based on its R(T) characteristic to match the application's peak inrush demands and operating current, ensuring the cold resistance limits the surge to safe levels while the hot resistance remains low. For instance, in scenarios involving inrush, NTC thermistors can reduce peak currents by factors of up to 5 compared to unprotected circuits. Fixed resistors provide a straightforward series limiting approach by presenting a constant impedance to the load, effectively damping the initial current spike based on Ohm's law. However, they must be rated for continuous power dissipation according to P = I²R, where I is the steady-state current and R is the resistor value, to prevent overheating during normal operation. This results in persistent efficiency losses, making fixed resistors suitable only for low-power or intermittent-use applications where simplicity outweighs energy concerns. Surge suppressors like metal oxide varistors (MOVs) address associated voltage spikes during inrush events by clamping transient overvoltages above a threshold, protecting downstream components from secondary damage. MOVs operate as bidirectional voltage-dependent resistors, shunting excess energy to ground when the voltage exceeds their clamping level, typically in the range of 130-275 V for AC line protection. In implementation, these passive elements are typically placed in series with the load for current limiters like NTC thermistors and fixed resistors, or in parallel for MOVs to divert surges. Key trade-offs include power dissipation in fixed resistors and NTCs during warmup, which can increase system heat and reduce efficiency, alongside size and cost considerations for high-current ratings. MOVs add protection against transients but degrade over time with repeated surges, requiring periodic replacement. Standards such as UL 1449 govern MOV ratings, ensuring safety through tests for nominal discharge current, energy absorption, and in surge protective devices. Compliance verifies that MOVs withstand specified surge levels without fire or explosion risks, facilitating reliable integration in commercial equipment.

Active Techniques

Active techniques for managing inrush current involve dynamic electronic controls that actively regulate power delivery, contrasting with passive methods by incorporating sensing, timing, and switching logic to adapt to load conditions in real time. These approaches typically employ devices, relays, or microcontrollers to limit peak currents during startup, preventing voltage sags, component stress, and instability. By gradually applying voltage or precisely timing connections, active techniques can reduce inrush by factors of 5 to 10 times compared to direct switching, depending on the implementation and load type. Soft-start circuits provide gradual voltage ramp-up to loads, significantly curbing inrush by controlling the rate of energy transfer. These circuits often use TRIACs in anti-parallel configuration for AC applications, where phase-angle control delays the firing until the voltage reaches a safe point, limiting initial current peaks to below 2-3 times steady-state values. Alternatively, PWM-based soft-starts employ MOSFETs or IGBTs to modulate the , starting at low values (e.g., 10-20%) and ramping up over 100-500 ms, which is particularly effective for capacitive or inductive loads in power supplies. This method ensures smooth acceleration without abrupt surges, as demonstrated in designs for switch-mode power converters where inrush is otherwise 10-20 times the operating current. Relay bypassing enhances efficiency by initially inserting a current-limiting element and then shorting it out once the load stabilizes. In this setup, a is triggered after a timed delay (typically 200-500 ms) or voltage sensing confirms capacitor charging or thermal warmup, bypassing an NTC or fixed to eliminate ongoing power loss. For instance, the relay coil is driven by a or simple RC timer, closing contacts to parallel the limiter, reducing steady-state to near zero while limiting startup inrush to 1.5-2 times nominal. This technique is widely used in high-power audio amplifiers and UPS systems, where NTC self-heating would otherwise cause efficiency penalties of 1-5%. Inrush current limiters (ICLs) are integrated modules that use for precise, programmable control of startup currents. These devices feature built-in and foldback mechanisms, where the MOSFET operates in linear mode initially to enforce a limit (e.g., 1-10 A), then transitions to full conduction once the output voltage stabilizes. Programmable via resistors or digital interfaces, ICLs like hot-swap controllers adjust inrush based on load , achieving limits as low as 50% of direct-start peaks while protecting against faults. In power supplies, such modules prevent bus voltage droops exceeding 10%, ensuring reliable operation across multiple rails. Microcontroller-based systems enable advanced sensing and point-on-wave (PoW) closing for transformers, minimizing magnetizing inrush by synchronizing switch closure to the AC waveform zero-crossing or optimal phase angle. A monitors voltage via ADC, calculates the residual to avoid saturation, and triggers a or solid-state switch within 1-5 ms of the target point, reducing peak currents from 10-20 times rated to under 2 times. This closed-loop control adapts to varying supply conditions, as implemented in protection schemes where inrush otherwise causes differential trips. Algorithms often incorporate estimation models for predictive switching, achieving over 90% reduction in transient magnitude. In automotive applications, electronic control units (ECUs) can manage starter motor inrush through oversight of engagement and voltage application sequencing. The typically engages the gear with the before applying full power to the motor, helping to prevent excessive initial current draw and battery stress during cranking. This engagement logic, often integrated with vehicle security systems like immobilizers, supports reliable starts and extends component life, particularly in vehicles with start-stop functionality.

Design and Calculation Approaches

Engineers employ analytical , tools, and adherence to standards to predict and mitigate inrush currents during the of power systems and devices. These approaches enable the estimation of peak currents, selection of protective components, and verification of system reliability under transient conditions. For capacitive loads, the peak inrush current is determined by the applied voltage and the (ESR) of the , approximated as Ipeak=VESRI_{\text{peak}} = \frac{V}{ESR} when series resistance is negligible. This arises from the initial charging phase where the behaves as a limited primarily by ESR, allowing designers to size limiting resistors or fuses accordingly. For inductive loads such as transformers, inrush calculations incorporate concepts to account for core saturation effects. The ψ\psi relates to current II through the LL in the linear regime as ψ=LI\psi = L I, but during energization, residual flux and switching angle cause transient overfluxing, leading to peaks up to 10-20 times the rated current. Analytical models, such as those enhancing Specht's method, solve differential equations for and current waveforms to predict maximum inrush, considering parameters like core saturation curve and remnant . These computations help in timing switch closures to minimize peaks. Simulation tools like variants facilitate transient analysis by modeling nonlinear magnetics and circuit dynamics. PSpice models for transformers capture inrush by representing the core with saturable inductors and hysteresis loops, enabling prediction of current waveforms and validation of protection schemes. Similarly, simulations for capacitive or inductive loads incorporate time-dependent elements to replicate real-world energization, aiding in the design of inrush limiters. Sizing guidelines recommend limiting managed inrush to 2-3 times the steady-state current to avoid nuisance tripping of or overheating of conductors. Derating factors for frequency are applied in inductive designs, where higher frequencies reduce effective and thus inrush magnitude, often by a factor of f1f2\frac{f_1}{f_2} for core flux density, ensuring components handle harmonic-rich environments without excessive losses. Standards such as IEC 60947-4-1 specify ratings for low-voltage and contactors, including short-time withstand current IcwI_{cw} that encompasses inrush tolerance for motor starters and transformers. This ensures devices can handle peak currents without failure, with defining inrush capabilities for specific loads. MATLAB and Simulink provide scripts and block-based models for waveform prediction, such as the Three-Phase Saturable Transformer example, which simulates inrush currents and flux during breaker closure. File Exchange contributions include Simulink models for single-phase transformer inrush, allowing parameter sweeps to optimize switching angles and residual flux mitigation. These tools integrate analytical solutions with numerical solvers for accurate transient forecasting.

Switch-Off Spikes

Switch-off spikes, also known as inductive kickback or flyback transients, arise during the de-energization of inductive loads, where the collapsing generates high-voltage impulses that contrast with the high-current surges of power-on inrush. These transients occur when the current through an is suddenly interrupted, releasing stored magnetic energy as a superimposed on the supply line. The underlying mechanism stems from , where the voltage induced opposes the change in current according to E=−LdidtE = -L \frac{di}{dt}, with LL representing the and didt\frac{di}{dt} the rate of current decay during field collapse. This back-electromotive force (back-EMF) can produce spikes of several kilovolts, potentially causing arcing across switch contacts in inductive circuits. Devices such as relays, contactors, and are particularly susceptible, as their coils exhibit inductive rebound that sustains current flow momentarily after switch-off, exacerbating the voltage excursion. In distinction from inrush phenomena, switch-off spikes exhibit negative polarity in DC systems, persist for microseconds rather than milliseconds, and emphasize voltage over current magnitude. Protection against these transients commonly employs circuits, which are RC networks connected across the switching elements to dampen the high-frequency components and limit voltage rise.

Saturation and Overload Surges

Saturation and overload surges refer to abnormal current increases in electrical devices, particularly and , that exceed normal operating levels due to excessive loading or faults, leading to core saturation similar to but distinct from energization inrush. In , core saturation overload occurs when excessive load currents, often combined with conditions, drive the density beyond the saturation point (B_sat), resulting in nonlinear behavior where the core's permeability drops sharply, mimicking high-magnetizing inrush currents. This phenomenon causes the to draw disproportionate currents, generating excessive heat and harmonics, as the saturated core acts as a for odd-order harmonics that flow through the windings. Fault currents, typically arising from short circuits, represent another form of sustained high-current surges that can overload transformers and push them toward saturation. During a short-circuit event, the fault current can reach 10 to 25 times the rated current, limited primarily by the transformer's impedance, leading to intense electromagnetic forces on the windings and potential core flux excursion into saturation if the duration exceeds the device's withstand capability. These surges are not transient like startup inrush but persist until cleared by , causing mechanical stress and thermal if not interrupted promptly. Nonlinear loads, such as variable frequency drives or rectifiers, can induce saturation-like surges in transformers by injecting harmonic currents that distort the waveform, amplifying peak values and driving partial core saturation even under nominal voltage. These harmonics, particularly third and fifth orders, increase the effective magnetizing current, leading to overheating and reduced , with the saturated core further generating additional harmonics in a feedback loop. In distribution transformers serving nonlinear loads, this can result in by up to 50% to avoid overload. Detection of these saturation and overload surges often relies on current transformers (CTs) to monitor for current asymmetry and distortion indicative of nonlinear behavior. CTs measure phase currents and detect imbalances or sudden increases exceeding 150-300% of rated values, triggering protective relays through elements for sustained overloads or for overexcitation conditions. In practice, digital relays using CT inputs can identify partial saturation by the presence of elevated odd harmonics in the current . Representative examples include overloaded uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems, where excessive load from connected devices causes sustained current draws that overload the internal , leading to core heating and potential saturation if the UPS operates beyond its 125% overload rating for extended periods. Similarly, in stalled motors, such as induction motors under mechanical lockup, the rotor speed drops to zero, eliminating back-EMF and causing locked-rotor current to surge to 5-7 times the full-load value, resulting in rapid overheating and stall-induced overload that mimics inrush but persists until is relieved or actuates.

References

  1. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/glossary/inrush_current.html
  2. https://www.egr.msu.edu/~mitraj/research/pubs/jour/mitra-xu-benidris_inrush.pdf
  3. https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/products/low-voltage-power-distribution-controls-systems/transformer/files/dtdt-inrush-white-paper-wp009002en.pdf
  4. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/understanding-motor-and-gear-drive-nameplate-information-for-irrigation-pump-evaluations.html
  5. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/04/f15/avoid_nuisance_motorsys_ts6.pdf
  6. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva670a/slva670a.pdf
  7. https://product.tdk.com/en/techlibrary/applicationnote/howto_ntc-limiter.html
  8. https://pacificpower.com/inrush-current-and-peak-current/
  9. https://www.eeworldonline.com/how-to-analyze-and-manage-inrush-current/
  10. https://www.eaton.com/us/en-us/products/low-voltage-power-distribution-control-systems/switchboards/protecting-step-up-transformers/understanding-transformer-inrush-current.html
  11. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/2715/753/00019468.pdf
  12. https://www.bearpwr.com/pdfs/InrushCurrent.pdf
  13. https://www.dranetz.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/article-gold-in-waveforms.pdf
  14. https://emsg.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Inrush_Current_Measurement_for_Transient_Space_Characterization_and_Fault_Detection.pdf
  15. https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/direct-current/chpt-16/voltage-current-calculations/
  16. https://sound-au.com/articles/inrush.htm
  17. https://www.powerelectronictips.com/how-to-analyze-and-manage-inrush-current/
  18. https://voltage-disturbance.com/power-engineering/parameters-that-determine-transformer-inrush-current/
  19. https://www.fluke.com/en-us/learn/blog/clamps/how-and-why-to-measure-inrush-current
  20. https://clouglobal.com/the-silent-surge-understanding-and-managing-inrush-current-in-power-systems/
  21. https://powerside.com/mitigating-voltage-sags-during-large-motor-starts/
  22. https://www.allumiax.com/blog/what-is-nuisance-tripping-and-how-to-prevent-it-in-electrical-power-systems
  23. https://www.sensata.com/sites/default/files/a/sensata-circuit-breaker-inrush-currents-whitepaper.pdf
  24. https://www.mayfield.energy/technical-articles/motor-and-transformer-inrush-considerations/
  25. https://www.pes-psrc.org/kb/report/075.pdf
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289478598_Power_quality_problems_due_to_transformer_inrush_current
  27. https://www.eaton.com/us/en-us/products/controls-drives-automation-sensors/harmonics/harmonics-faq-video-library/ieee-519-standard-what-do-i-need-to-know.html
  28. https://www.jadelearning.com/blog/understanding-motor-starting-inrush-currents-nec-article-430-52/
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352115477_Magneto-Thermo-Structural_Analysis_of_Power_Transformers_under_Inrush_and_Short_Circuit_Conditions
  30. https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/hve.2018.5019
  31. https://pserc.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/755/2018/08/T-25_Final-Report_Feb-2011.pdf
  32. https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sluy001
  33. https://web.stanford.edu/class/archive/engr/engr40m.1178/reader/chapter6.pdf
  34. https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/677031/pre-charge-for-230-v-household-appliances
  35. https://www.ametherm.com/blog/inrush-current/capacitor-inrush-current/
  36. http://www.hvacrschool.com/start-capacitor-and-inrush-facts-myths-part-2/
  37. http://alexandria.tue.nl/openaccess/Metis243699.pdf
  38. https://circuitdigest.com/tutorial/inrush-current-causes-effects-protection-circuits-and-design-techniques
  39. https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/products/medium-voltage-power-distribution-control-systems/power-capacitors/calculation-of-inrush-currents-in-single-and-multi-step-capacitor-bank-installations-td230004en.pdf
  40. https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/electromagnetism/magnetic-hysteresis.html
  41. https://www.iotpe.com/IJTPE/IJTPE-2009/IJTPE-Issue1-Vol1-No1-Dec2009/9-IJTPE-Issue1-Vol1-No1-Dec2009-pp48-53.pdf
  42. https://tameson.com/pages/transformer-inrush-current
  43. https://electricalengineeringprofessional.wordpress.com/2019/03/18/transformer-inrush-current/
  44. https://www.ije.ir/article_156142_560315e3f5c47110c771c29e34d7f648.pdf
  45. https://control.com/technical-articles/inrush-current-why-is-motor-startup-current-so-high/
  46. https://www.electrical4u.com/torque-equation-of-three-phase-induction-motor/
  47. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/electrotechnology/chapter/part-8-dc-motor-starters/
  48. https://www.rose-hulman.edu/class/ee/HTML/NSF/CCLI_EMD_DUE_0088904/PDFS/lecture_notes_12.pdf
  49. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/tech_assistance/pdfs/motor.pdf
  50. https://www.edn.com/hot-resistance-versus-cold-resistance/
  51. https://www.ametherm.com/blog/inrush-current/limiting-heat-lamp-inrush-current/
  52. https://www.eltwin.com/news/news/2024-06-04-ptc-heaters-with-eltwin-starting-torque-limiters
  53. http://www.mhtl.uwaterloo.ca/courses/ece309_mechatronics/lectures/pdffiles/ach5_web.pdf
  54. https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/products/electronic-components/resources/technical/eaton-ntc-thermistors-app-note-elx1247-en.pdf
  55. https://www.ametherm.com/blog/inrush-current/what-is-an-inrush-current-limiter-the-single-part-solution/
  56. https://www.ametherm.com/blog/inrush-current/transformer-inrush-current-40va-transformer/
  57. https://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/bourns-tips-on-selecting-the-right-mov-surge-suppressor-white-paper.pdf
  58. https://circuitdigest.com/electronic-circuits/inrush-current-limiter-using-ntc
  59. https://www.littelfuse.com/products/overvoltage-protection/varistors/radial-leaded-varistors/itmov/tmov20rp275m
  60. https://www.intertek.com/standards-updates/ul-1449-surge-protective-devices/
  61. https://www.st.com/resource/en/application_note/an4606-inrushcurrent-limiter-circuits-icl-with-triacs-and-thyristors-scr-and-controlled-bridge-design-tips-stmicroelectronics.pdf
  62. https://recom-power.com/en/rec-n-inrush-current--a-guide-to-the-essentials-119.html
  63. https://bourns.com/docs/technical-documents/technical-library/ntc-thermistors/publications/techniques_to_mitigate_inrush_current_using_ntc_thermistor_rc_circuits_appnote.pdf?sfvrsn=2c7a2df6_11
  64. https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ltc4283.pdf
  65. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tps1hc30-q1.pdf
  66. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8244993
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264147955_Help_of_Microcontroller_on_Voltage_Control_to_Reduce_Transformer_Inrush_Current
  68. https://www.tlxtech.com/articles/sophisticated-starter-contactors
  69. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5570102
  70. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7127041
  71. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8441033
  72. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1473
  73. https://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/2403202_a_w.pdf
  74. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S05/is.iec.60947.4.1.2000.pdf
  75. https://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/rm/lvsam-rm003_-en-p.pdf
  76. https://www.mathworks.com/help/sps/ug/three-phase-saturable-transformer.html
  77. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/181689-transformer-inrush-current
  78. https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/power/transient-suppression.html
  79. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/switching-inductive-loads-with-safe-demagnetization.html
  80. https://www.durakool.com/media/uzxj3x1k/a-laymans-guide-to-coil-suppression.pdf
  81. https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-9/practical-considerations-transformers/
  82. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5559192
  83. https://americas.hammondpowersolutions.com/en/resources/faq/general/transformer-short-circuit-considerations
  84. https://www.vatransformer.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/transformer-short-circuit-design-6-12-20.pdf
  85. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5759145
  86. https://www.maddox.com/resources/articles/guide-to-transformer-harmonics-and-k-factor
  87. https://site.ieee.org/fw-pes/files/2013/01/transfguide.pdf
  88. https://energy-oil-gas.com/news/current-transformers-and-their-role-in-high-voltage-power-protection/
  89. https://www.kuo-yuh.com/msg/msg60.html
  90. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel3/1503/5002/00193666.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.