Hubbry Logo
The boy JonesThe boy JonesMain
Open search
The boy Jones
Community hub
The boy Jones
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
The boy Jones
The boy Jones
from Wikipedia

Small boy kneeling by a door taking notes
Depiction of Jones, 1840s

Edward Jones (7 April 1824 – c. 1893 or 1896), also known as "the boy Jones", was an English stalker who became notorious for breaking into Buckingham Palace several times between 1838 and 1841.

Jones was fourteen years old when he first broke into the palace in December 1838. He was found in possession of some items he had stolen, but was acquitted at his trial. He broke in again in 1840, ten days after Queen Victoria had given birth to Princess Victoria. Staff found him hiding under a sofa and he was arrested and subsequently questioned by the Privy Council—the monarch's formal body of advisers. He was sentenced to three months' hard labour at Tothill Fields Bridewell prison. He was released in March 1841 and broke back into the palace two weeks later, where he was caught stealing food from the larders. He was again arrested and sentenced to three months' hard labour at Tothill Fields.

To remove Jones from Britain, the Thames Police tried to surreptitiously coerce him into employment as a sailor. After a voyage on a merchant ship to Brazil, Jones returned to London, where he worked for a month before disappearing and signing up to the Royal Navy—again at the instigation of the Thames Police. He was a ship's boy on HMS Warspite and had further duty on Inconstant and Harlequin. He deserted twice before being allowed to leave the service in 1847. After his return to Britain, Jones was arrested in 1849 for burgling houses in Lewisham, Kent (now South London), and sentenced to transportation to Australia for ten years. He returned to Britain in late 1855 or early 1856 and was again arrested for burglary, before he returned—of his own accord—to Australia. The details of his death are not known, although it was possibly in Bairnsdale in the east of Australia on Boxing Day 1893 or in Perth, in the west of Australia in 1896.

Jones's exploits were extensively covered in the press, and several songs, ballads, poems and cartoons were created. He has been used as the basis for fictional characters and, because of the connection to Queen Victoria, is mentioned in several history books.

Biography

[edit]

Early life, 1824–1838

[edit]

Edward Jones was born on 7 April 1824 in Charlotte Street, Westminster, London, the eldest of seven children of Henry Jones, an impecunious tailor, and Mary (née Shores).[1][a] Mary was a 16-year-old seamstress in Henry's employ when the couple married in 1822. Edward had some basic education: he was literate and excelled at arithmetic, but left school before he was twelve.[3] He professed an interest in becoming an architect.[2] The Weekly Chronicle reported that as a child, Jones "manifested a very restless spirit, ... always inquisitive, active and thirsting for information".[4] According to his father, however, Jones was lazy, pessimistic, melancholic and reserved; Henry also said his son did not mix with his siblings and treated them with open contempt.[3]

Jones was apprenticed to two pharmacists between 1836 and 1838.[2] He was dismissed from one of the positions for demonstrating a "mischievous and restless disposition".[5] He was also apprenticed to a Thomas Griffiths, a builder with premises on Coventry Street, where he lasted for a year before being dismissed. In August 1838 he became an apprentice to a carver and gilder, but left on 11 December.[6]

Break-ins, 1838–1841

[edit]
Buckingham Palace, showing Marble Arch on its left, as a ceremonial entrance.
Buckingham Palace in 1837, with Marble Arch as the front gate

December 1838

[edit]

At 5:00 am on 14 December 1838 Jones was found in Buckingham Palace—the main residence of the monarch—by William Cox, one of the night porters. Among the items in Jones's possession were a regimental sword, some underwear, three pairs of trousers, some foreign coins and a likeness of Queen Victoria. She was not in residence at the time, but was staying at her country palace, Windsor Castle.[7] He was covered in bear's grease and soot, which led palace staff to think he had climbed down the chimney and tried to make his way out the same way. When he was taken to the police station, he claimed his name was Edward Cotton, the son of a tradesman. When asked where he came from, he said "I came from Hertfordshire twelve months ago, and I met a man ... who asked me to go with him to Buckingham-house. I went, and have been there ever since."[8][9][b]

Jones appeared in front of the magistrates at the police station in Queen Street on 19 December. News of a boy living secretly in Buckingham Palace had become known among the public, and the court was full of viewers and journalists. His real name and background were told to the court, and he admitted that he had lied about having lived in the house for the previous year, and had only spent "a day or two" in the palace. He was asked about the various items he had on him and said he found them on the lawn; the magistrate disbelieved his story and sent him for trial.[10][11] On 28 December 1838 Jones appeared for trial at the Westminster court of sessions. William Prendergast, Jones's solicitor, described how his client had a "warmth of spirit which ... had manifested itself in an inordinate curiosity to obtain a view of Buckingham Palace; and a very natural inclination it was".[12][13] Griffiths gave a character reference for Jones and said that he would have him back as an apprentice; after Prendergast told the court that Jones had promised he would not break into the palace again, he was acquitted.[14]

Jones was re-apprenticed to Griffiths after the trial. Several members of the public travelled to meet Jones, paying his father for the experience. The American novelist James Fenimore Cooper was one who visited, but found Jones to be a "dull, undersized runt, remarkable only for his taciturnity and obstinacy". An offer to take the boy to the US was turned down by Jones's father.[15][16] Another offer Jones received was from a theatre manager, who was planning to stage Intrusion; or a Guest Uninvited, a comedy based on Jones's exploits. Jones was to receive a salary of £4 a week for coming on stage at the end of the night to take a bow. Jones's father, concerned his son would be a laughing stock, declined the offer.[17][18][c] Jones was sacked for a second time by Griffiths and, in 1840, began working for another chemist, but his unpunctuality led to his again losing his position.[20]

November and December 1840

[edit]
Albert and Victoria sitting on a sofa; Jones is present in the background, peering through a doorway.
Jones spying on Prince Albert and Queen Victoria; from the Sunday Chronicle, April 1841

On 30 November 1840 Jones scaled a wall on Constitution Hill to access the grounds of Buckingham Palace. He entered the building through a window, but there were too many people moving around and he left the way he had come.[21][22] He entered again on the following night. Victoria was in residence with her daughter, Princess Victoria, who had been born ten days previously. Just after midnight the domestic staff at the palace found Jones hiding under a sofa in an anteroom near the Queen's bedroom.[21][23] Neither the Queen nor her baby was woken by the event.[24] In her diary the following morning, Victoria recorded the following:

Albert told me ... that a man had been found, under the sofa in my sitting room. ... The audience room, and [Baroness Louise] Lehzen's were searched first and then mine, Kinnaird, looking under one corner of the sofa, on which I had been rolled into the bedroom but said nothing. Lehzen however pushed it away, and there on the ground, lay a lad who was seized and would not speak, but he was quite unarmed. After he had been taken downstairs, he said he had meant no harm, and had only come to see the Queen! We have since heard that he was in the palace once before, was half-witted, and had merely come, out of curiosity. But supposing he had come into the bedroom – how frightened I should have been.[25]

Police based at the palace arrested Jones and took him into custody at the Gardner's Lane police station; he told officers that he "sat upon the throne, saw the Queen, and heard the Princess Royal cry".[26][23] When he was arrested he did not struggle, nor had he stolen anything; he was unarmed and polite to his captors.[27] At midday on 3 December he was taken from the police station to offices of the Home Department in Whitehall where he was interrogated by the Privy Council—the monarch's formal body of advisers.[28][d]

During his questioning Jones said he would show the members where and how he entered, and he was taken to the palace, explained his route and method, and returned to the council to continue being questioned.[21] He told the council that his reason for entering the palace was because he wanted to write a book about the Queen and "wanted to know how they lived at the Palace" and that he thought "an account of the Palace, and of the disposition and arrangement of the chambers, and particularly of the dressing room of Her Majesty, would be very interesting".[29]

Jones's father was summoned to the council; he suggested his son was insane.[29] Two police doctors examined Jones and concluded that although "his head was of a most peculiar formation", they could not decide on his sanity.[21] As he had been unarmed and not stolen anything, the council decided that a summary punishment was the best course of action; Thomas Hall, the Chief Metropolitan Police Magistrate wrote a warrant to send Jones to Tothill Fields Bridewell prison for three months' hard labour.[30]

March 1841

[edit]

Jones was released from Tothill on 2 March 1841. Hall suggested that he should become a sailor, but Jones and his parents refused. He tried to find a job, but his notoriety preceded him and he was unable to find employment. Less than two weeks later, on the evening of 15 March, he entered Buckingham Palace again. At 1:30 am on 16 March he was found by a police patrol near the palace's Picture Gallery, eating food stolen from the kitchens.[31][e] He was again arrested and, later that day, questioned by the Privy Council, with Hall attending in his magistrate's capacity.[33][32] No-one else was allowed into the hearing—including Jones's parents—and the only witness called was the police sergeant who had made the arrest. Unlike the previous hearing, there were no leaks of the events to the journalists waiting outside, and the only statement given was that Jones had been sent back to Tothill for a further three months' detention with hard labour.[34] Jones's father, unhappy at the treatment of his son, complained to journalists about an "un-English secret court".[29]

Later life, 1841–1893

[edit]
Cartoon showing Boy Jones in prison, talking to his jailor. The text reads: OLD HARRY'S VISIT TO JONES, IN SEARCH OF USEFUL KNOWLEDGE. "Now, my lad, just inform me how you managed to get in, for that's the very thing I want to do!" "Vy, yer see, my Lord, I can't wery well do that, 'cos I means to go back again ven I gets out o' quod."
Cartoon of the boy Jones in The Odd Fellow, April 1841

Jones was released from Tothill on 14 June 1841. His movements were monitored by police,[35] and he was reported as being in the vicinity of Constitution Hill and Buckingham Palace on several occasions.[36] Jones and his family were soon visited by William James, their landlord, who brought with him James Evans, who said he was an agent able to get Jones a job on a ship. Evans was, however, an Inspector of the Thames Police, who had orders to get Jones employed on a ship to remove him from Britain.[2][36]

Jones was persuaded to go to Gravesend, Kent, an entry port for the Thames. Evans told him the ship Diamond was waiting for him and he would be able to secure a job; Evans promised him five guineas to help get the necessary clothing and as an incentive.[37][f] When they got to Gravesend, the captain of Diamond recognised Jones as the palace intruder and refused to have him on board. The ship left for Cork, Ireland, where it was due to take on passengers before its planned journey to Australia.[38]

Evans, James and Jones returned to London, where Evans was instructed by his superiors to get to Cork and ensure Jones was put on Diamond. The three men travelled to Cork, but the captain again refused to allow Jones on board his ship. Evans, concerned that he would be in trouble with his superiors, persuaded Tom Clancy—one of the Irish emigrants wanting to travel to Australia—to take the berth and pretend he was Jones to the other passengers. This he did, and when Clancy arrived in Melbourne, it was mentioned in the local press. His subterfuge only lasted three weeks after arrival, and newspapers in Australia reported the mistaken identity of the new immigrant to the country.[39]

Looking for another ship to take Jones, the three men travelled to Liverpool, where they met Captain Ramsay, whose ship Tiber was due to sail for Bahia, Brazil. Ramsay took Jones onto his crew and they sailed to Brazil and back, returning to Liverpool on 30 November 1841. Jones left Liverpool with 2 shillings 6 pence,[g] and walked back to London, a distance of 210 miles (340 km). He slept in barns and outhouses and after he ran out of money, he ate raw turnips. He arrived back in London on 18 December.[40][41]

In early January 1842 Jones began work for Mr Elgar, a tobacconist, in a role organised for him by his father. After a few weeks he told his employer that there were suspicious men watching him. One of them, who was dressed like a Royal Navy midshipman, had been into the shop and, Jones said, sat grinning at him. On the way into work on 4 February he saw the man he thought of as the midshipman, and asked Elgar if he could go home. He went home, put on a clean shirt and went out again between 10:00 and 11:00 am and did not return home.[42][43] His father reported the disappearance to the police, who searched Buckingham Palace, but found no evidence that Jones had been there.[44]

Royal Navy, 1842–1848

[edit]
Depictions of the boy Jones in the humorous magazine Punch
Cartoon of Jones, dressed as a sailor, wearing a bonnet
Jones, depicted as a sailor; July 1844 issue
Cartoon of Jones atop of a ship's mast, looking scared
Jones while mast manning; August 1844 issue

Within two days of his disappearance, Jones's father had received a letter from "a Captain, and Well-wisher to your son" that said "I am requested by your son Edward to inform you he has sailed on board the ____, for America, on Friday last".[45][h] Soon after, Elgar received a letter from Jones informing him that James—the family's landlord—had taken him to Portsmouth dockyard, where he had been introduced to Captain Lord John Hay of HMS Warspite, a 74-gun third-rate ship of the line. Jones informed Elgar that he was now in the Royal Navy for the next four years and would shortly be sailing to America.[43][46] The Times considered that "suspicion strongly points to the same parties who rendered themselves so notoriously conspicuous in his former abduction; and though the father of the boy is in such reduced circumstances as to be unable to take legal measures, it is probable means may be found to fathom this mysterious matter",[43] an assessment with which Jan Bondeson, Jones's biographer, agrees.[47]

Jones served on Warspite as a second-class ship's boy, possibly Hay's servant, and then, from May 1842, as first-class ship's boy. He was then also made a mast man on the mizzen-topmast.[2] Warspite returned to Portsmouth that October and Jones was allowed shore leave, although he was accompanied by a midshipman to ensure he did not try to abscond. He evaded his watcher, swapped his uniform jacket for a black coat, and walked back to London. Hay alerted the Admiralty, who informed the police; they increased security at the palace and put some of Jones's known haunts under surveillance. He was soon arrested at his parents' house and returned to Portsmouth.[48] When police asked him why he had deserted, Jones informed them that he was tired of being mocked by his shipmates about breaking into the palace.[49]

Bondeson notes that little is known about Jones's life in the Royal Navy. It is recorded that in early 1844 he fell overboard while Warspite was off the North African coast, but was soon rescued. In December that year, he jumped overboard at Athens and swam to shore. He was pursued and captured by a search party and his rum ration was stopped for the remainder of his time on Warspite.[50]

In December 1845 Jones was promoted to ordinary seaman and transferred to HMS Inconstant, a 36-gun fifth-rate ship of the line. He served on board for a year and when the ship returned to Britain, Jones was transferred to HMS Harlequin, a Racer-class brig-sloop that was to continue on patrol duty in the Mediterranean. In October 1847 Jones's father petitioned the Admiralty to allow his son to return home. This was granted and Jones was discharged from the navy in Smyrna (modern İzmir, Turkey), and given free passage home. He arrived back in London in January 1848.[51]

Britain, 1848–1853

[edit]

In August 1849 several burglaries and petty thefts occurred in Lewisham, Kent (now South London); a man wearing sailor's dress had been seen at the times the crimes were committed. On 24 August a man was arrested after a wealthy solicitor had been burgled in Lewisham Road; he was found to have the stolen goods in his possession. He gave his name as John Frost, and was tried at the Old Bailey under that name and sentenced to transportation to one of the Australian penal colonies for ten years. While waiting for departure at Newgate Prison, he was recognised as Jones. He was moved to the prison hulks, where he remained for over three years.[52][53]

Australia, 1853–1893 or 1896

[edit]
Plaque that reads "THOMAS JONES. Labourer, Late of Sarsfield. Died after a fall from the Mitchell River Bridge 26.12.1893 – Aged 73 Years. Transported to Australia in 1840 for breaching security at Windsor Castle. Plaque erected by East Gipps Historical Society 2005"
Memorial plaque of Edward Jones at the Bairnsdale Cemetery. The date that he was transported and the description that he breached Windsor Castle are both erroneous.

In January 1853 Jones was transported on the Pyrenees, a four-masted barque, to the penal colony in Fremantle, Western Australia, arriving on 30 April. Instead of being incarcerated, the day after he arrived he was given a ticket of leave—a document of parole which allowed him some freedoms.[54] He was remembered in the memoirs of Edmund Du Cane, the soldier and prison administrator who organised convict labour in the region, who recalled:

The only case that ever occurred of trespass in my grounds ... was when once the celebrated "boy Jones" (whose lofty aspirations towards high life had not met with success) broke out of the depot about ten o'clock to complain that the lights had been put out too early![55]

Jones returned to England in late 1855 or early 1856. He broke into the Plymouth home of Major-General George Morton Eden on 10 May 1856, but was soon arrested by the Devonport police. He was tried, found guilty and sentenced to six months of hard labour.[56][57]

According to Bondeson, there is limited information about Jones after his release from hard labour, but it is probable that he returned to Australia, possibly at the suggestion of his brother, who was a civil servant in the colony.[58] The contemporary journalist Henry Lucy reports that he received a letter from a reader who told him that Jones became the town crier in Perth, Western Australia. According to this possible version, Jones died in 1896.[2][59] Lucy related that:

When he went forth, bell in hand, to perform his important functions, the naughty boys of Perth were accustomed to gather round him and make pointed inquiries as to the approaches to Buckingham Palace, the health of the Queen, and the appearance of the baby who is to-day Dowager Empress of Germany. The man Jones, angered beyond self-restraint, occasionally made dashes at the enemy, committing assaults which made his appearance in the police court familiar.[59][i]

Bondeson considers it more likely that Jones—known locally as Thomas Jones—was living near Bairnsdale, Victoria. On Boxing Day 1893, while drunk, he fell asleep on the parapet of a bridge over the Mitchell River. He rolled off, hit his head and died. He was buried in an unmarked grave in the town's cemetery.[60][61] A memorial plaque was erected by the East Gippsland Historical Society in 2005 in his memory.[62]

Coverage in the media

[edit]
Undated news sheet describing the incident. The headline reads "A Stranger in her majesty's bedroom. The Boy Jones again!"
A cheap news sheet published in 1871 about Boy Jones's exploits

After Jones broke into the palace in December 1840, there was a high level of interest in him shown by the newspapers and satirical magazines, as well as gossip among the public;[29] Bondeson considers that Jones became "the media celebrity of the day".[63] The report of the events in The Times observed that "The subject engrosses public attention at the west end of town. Nothing else is talked of".[23]

The poet Samuel Rogers had alluded to the Renaissance architect Inigo Jones when he nicknamed Jones "In-i-go Jones"; the novelist Charles Dickens recorded in his literary magazine All the Year Round that Jones gained the name because of his "extraordinary powers of finding an entrance into the palace".[64][65] Charles Hindley, the biographer of the printer James Catnach, observed that Jones was the subject of satirical pieces in the press, as well as several cartoons printed for street sale. These included works such as "Her Majesty's Chimney Sweep", "The Royal Sooter", "The Buckingham Palace Hero" and "The Royal Flue Faker".[66] Jones was included in fictional stories by the humorous magazine Punch, which also included cartoons of him.[67] In 1842 George Cruikshank's The Comic Almanack published a poem about Jones after he put to sea with the Royal Navy:[68]

For though his name is Jones, and though he did
Enter the Palace, and not touch the knocker,
There is no reason why Jones's kid
Should be consigned to Davy Jones's locker.

— "The boy Jones sent to sea"[68]

Legacy

[edit]
The words at the top are "The Boy What Visits the Palace". This is above a drawing of Jones listening at a door; Albert and Victoria are in the next room. Below the image are the words "A comic song, written & sung by James Bruton. Sung also by Mr Fitzwilliam, arranged by Henry Clifton."
Sheet music for "The Boy Wot Visits the Palace"

Jones's notoriety and nickname became part of London slang in the mid-1800s. Initially it was used as "it's that boy Jones again!" when something unexpected happened; it changed over time to be "Boy Jones", as a nickname for an informant.[69]

Factual coverage of Jones's life has appeared in several histories of Queen Victoria,[2] a BBC Radio history documentary in October 1992 titled That Boy Jones,[70] and Paul Murphy's entry for the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography in 2010.[2] Later that year Bondeson's full history of Jones's life, Queen Victoria's Stalker, was published.[71][72]

Jones's story has been covered in works of fiction. In the mid-1840s the writer George W. M. Reynolds published the series The Mysteries of London, which includes Henry Holford, a pot-boy; this character was a combination of Jones and Edward Oxford—the man who attempted to assassinate Victoria in 1840.[73][74] Jones's story inspired the children's book The Boy Jones by Joan Howard, which was published in 1943,[75] and a 1949 novel, The Mudlark, by Theodore Bonnet.[76] The novel was adapted as a 1950 film of the same name in which the title character is portrayed by Andrew Ray.[77][78] In 2002 a two-act play, written and directed by Sky Gilbert, was staged.[79] Robert Forrest-Webb turned the story into a musical, Jones, in 2006; Peter Gritton wrote the music.[80] Jones's break-ins were dramatised in the second season of the period drama Victoria (2017), where Jones is portrayed by Tommy Rodger,[81] and in a 2021 animated short film.[82]

Jones was the subject of two ballads from the 1840s: "The Boy Wot Visits the Palace" by James Bruton and "The Boy That was Found in the Palace" by Catnach. The second of these describes the moment he was discovered under the sofa:

You have heard of the chap that they found t'other day
In Buckingham Palace, I can tell you the truth –
'Twas in the next chamber to where the Queen lay,
They found me, this very identical youth.
At first, they all thought I had come there to plunder,
But I had no notion of stealing, not I –
Pages, nurses and officers, pulled me from under
The very identical couch where she lay.

— James Catnach, "The Boy That was Found in the Palace"[83]

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Edward Jones (c. 1823/1824 – 26 December 1893), known as the "Boy Jones," was a British teenager who achieved infamy for his multiple unauthorized intrusions into and other royal residences between 1838 and 1841 during the early years of Queen Victoria's reign. Disguised initially as a , Jones first entered in December 1838 at around age 14 or 15, where he roamed freely for hours, pilfered items including the Queen's underwear, and evaded detection until discovered hiding under a sofa. His subsequent break-ins in 1840 and 1841, including one at where he was found breakfasting in the quadrangle, exposed significant lapses in palace security and sparked widespread media , with Jones becoming a folk anti-hero in some radical press accounts. Despite repeated arrests and brief incarcerations, authorities struggled to deter him; after enlisting in the and deserting, Jones was transported as a to in 1843 aboard the ship Hydery, where he labored, adopted the alias Thomas Jones, and eventually died after falling from the Mitchell River Bridge near , Victoria. His exploits, blending audacious trespass with an obsessive fascination for the royal family—evidenced by his eavesdropping on Victoria and Prince Albert—highlighted vulnerabilities in monarchical protection amid growing public scrutiny of .

Early Life

Family Background and Childhood (1824–1838)

Edward Jones was born in 1824 in Westminster, , the son of a whose family resided in straitened circumstances, sharing a one-room . Contemporary accounts describe his father as industrious yet unable to escape , with the household marked by limited resources typical of working-class Londoners in the post-Napoleonic era. Little documented evidence survives regarding Jones's precise early upbringing or before age 14, reflecting the obscurity of many lower-class youths in early Victorian records. By 1838, however, he had entered the workforce, employed in some capacity with a builder, suggesting an or labor role common for boys from similar backgrounds lacking access to schooling beyond basic . This period aligned with Westminster's dense urban environment, where proximity to royal sites like —undergoing renovations—may have fostered his later fixation, though no causal links to specific childhood events are verified in primary sources.

Intrusions into Buckingham Palace

First Intrusion (December 1838)

On 14 December 1838, 14-year-old Edward Jones, a tailor's apprentice, unlawfully entered for the first time. He gained access by coating his body with bear's grease to squeeze through a narrow crack in the railings adjacent to the entrance. Once inside, Jones roamed freely through , engaging in various unauthorized activities over an unspecified period prior to detection. These included sitting on 's throne, examining books and paintings in the library, sleeping in closets and empty rooms, pilfering food from the kitchens, and hiding behind furniture to eavesdrop on state discussions involving the Queen and her ministers. Early in the morning, night porter William Cox discovered Jones's soot-blackened face peering through the glass door into the . Jones fled the scene but was apprehended shortly thereafter near by James Stone. Upon capture, authorities found in his possession a regimental , assorted items—including reports of several pairs of the Queen's undergarments stuffed in his —and a letter addressed to . Jones was arraigned at Queen Square Police Court under the alias "Edward Cotton" before being identified as Edward Jones of Bell Alley, Newgate Street. During interrogation, he claimed to have resided intermittently within the palace for up to a year while disguised as a , allegedly induced to do so by an unnamed man encountered in ; these assertions remain unverified beyond his own statements. A acquitted him of , citing insufficient of intent to steal, and he was released without bail or further immediate penalty. The incident exposed significant lapses in palace security, prompting internal reviews but no public scandal at the time due to limited press coverage.

Intrusions of 1840

On 30 November 1840, nine days after the birth of Princess Victoria, Edward Jones scaled a wall adjacent to Constitution Hill to access the grounds of . He entered the building undetected, likely exploiting vulnerabilities in the palace's perimeter and internal access points similar to his prior method of chimney sweeps or low windows. Once inside, Jones roamed private areas, including the Queen's apartments, where he appropriated several items of her , which he later concealed on his person. Jones evaded detection for approximately two days, hiding in various locations such as beneath furniture and within alcoves while palace staff conducted their routines. On the night of 2 December 1840, a nurse attending the infant princess, Mrs. Lilly, discovered him concealed under a settee in Queen Victoria's dressing room around 1:00 a.m. Palace guards apprehended him after a brief pursuit, during which he attempted to flee through the entrance. The incident heightened security concerns at , leading to immediate reinforcements in patrols and access controls. , recently postpartum, recorded her distress in her journal, noting the intruder's proximity to her private quarters and the inadequacy of existing safeguards. Jones faced at Westminster Police Court, where he was convicted of and , receiving a sentence of three months' hard labor. Contemporary newspaper accounts, such as those in the Wilts and Standard, detailed the breach, emphasizing the repeated nature of Jones's exploits despite prior warnings from the bench. Some reports suggested Jones may have made additional brief entries or reconnaissance attempts around this period, contributing to perceptions of multiple intrusions in 1840, though primary records confirm the principal event spanned late November to early December. The palace's failure to prevent his prolonged presence underscored systemic lapses in , prompting internal reviews but no fundamental architectural changes at the time.

Final Intrusion (March 1841)

Edward Jones, having been released from Tothill Fields Prison on 2 March 1841 after serving a sentence for prior palace intrusions, re-entered undetected shortly after 1:00 a.m. on 15 March 1841. Security had been bolstered following his earlier breaches, with additional plainclothes police patrols, yet Jones evaded initial detection, likely scaling exterior walls or exploiting known vulnerabilities as in previous incidents. Once inside, Jones proceeded to the palace kitchen, where he procured cold meat and potatoes, stuffing them into a handkerchief for sustenance. He then moved to the throne room, positioning himself to peer through a glass door into adjacent areas, echoing his pattern of voyeuristic exploration from earlier visits. A patrolling police officer in the grand hall recognized him and confronted the intruder, prompting Jones to charge aggressively before being subdued and arrested on the spot; the stolen food remnants were found draped over the throne's arm. This third documented intrusion, occurring mere weeks after his release, underscored persistent security lapses at the palace despite heightened measures, as Jones had roamed freely for an undetermined period before detection. No theft of royal undergarments or direct proximity to the Queen and Prince Albert was reported in this instance, unlike prior entries, though his presence in state rooms heightened alarms over potential threats to the royal family.

Trials and Sentencing

Following his first apprehension on 14 December 1838, Edward Jones, using the alias Edward Cotton, was charged with trespass at the Queen's Square Police Court. He claimed to have resided undetected within for a year, but was found not guilty and released without sureties. After his second intrusion, Jones was captured on 2 1840 while hiding inside . His , conducted in secret by the to avoid public sensationalism, resulted in a for being a rogue and vagabond. He was sentenced to three months' at Tothill Fields Bridewell Prison. The third and final capture occurred on 15 March 1841, when Jones was found in the with stolen food items. Another closed-door proceeding before the led to his conviction, this time with a sentence of three months' hard labour at Tothill Fields Prison. These lenient sentences reflected the era's legal constraints on prosecuting simple without proven or damage, despite the repeated breaches of royal security. No further immediate legal actions followed his release in June 1841, though conditions were imposed to monitor his behavior.

Imprisonment and Release Conditions

Following his on 1 April 1841 after the final intrusion into , Edward Jones was charged as a rogue and vagabond. He was tried before the Middlesex Sessions and sentenced to three months' imprisonment with hard labour at Tothill Fields Bridewell. Jones served the full term of his sentence under conditions of hard labour, which typically involved rigorous physical tasks such as operation or stone-breaking as punitive measures in Victorian prisons. Tothill Fields, located in Westminster, was known for housing and minor offenders, enforcing strict discipline to deter . Upon completion of his sentence, Jones was released on 2 March 1842 without formal probationary conditions documented in , though authorities maintained due to his prior offenses. Mere days after his release, he was discovered lurking near grounds again, prompting officials to forgo further prosecution in favor of enlisting him in the Royal Navy to remove him from and ensure ongoing oversight through military discipline.

Enlistment and Service (1842–1848)

Following his conditional release from imprisonment in late 1841, Edward Jones was enlisted in the Royal Navy in early 1842 without formal trial, a measure instigated by police authorities to relocate him far from London and Buckingham Palace. He initially served as a ship's boy aboard HMS Warspite, a 76-gun two-decker stationed primarily in home waters and the Mediterranean. During his time on Warspite, Jones fell overboard in an incident that crew members suspected was deliberate, possibly to test the lifebuoy's light or attract attention. On 31 1842, he deserted the vessel while it was in port but was soon recaptured in after attempting to return to the capital. Despite this breach, he continued naval service, transferring to HMS Inconstant, a 36-gun , and later to HMS Harlequin, another engaged in anti-slavery patrols off . Jones deserted a second time during his service on these vessels but was ultimately discharged from the around 1847–1848 after approximately five to six years, having fulfilled much of his enforced term without further major incidents documented in available records. Details of his conduct and performance remain sparse, as naval logs from the period offer limited personal accounts beyond disciplinary notes.

Life in Britain After the Navy

Criminal Activities and Alcoholism (1848–1853)

Following his discharge from the Royal in 1848, Edward Jones developed , which exacerbated his inability to maintain steady employment or lawful conduct. This period marked a decline into petty and , as Jones, now in his mid-20s, failed to integrate into civilian society after years at sea. Historical accounts attribute his drinking to a combination of post-service adjustment difficulties and lingering resentment from prior legal troubles, though no formal exists from the era. In August 1849, Jones was arrested for housebreaking in , charged with burglary after breaking into residences and stealing small items. Tried at the , he was convicted and sentenced to ten years' transportation to a penal colony in , reflecting the era's harsh penalties for repeat offenders unable to reform. The conviction stemmed from evidence of forced entry and theft, with Jones offering little defense beyond claims of desperation driven by destitution and intoxication. While awaiting shipment, he was held in British prisons or hulks, where his reportedly worsened under confinement, leading to further disciplinary issues. Throughout 1850–1853, Jones's pre-transportation detention involved sporadic access to alcohol, sustaining his dependency amid the squalid conditions of penal holding facilities. Contemporary reports note no additional major convictions in this interval, but his persistent inebriation hindered any prospect of commutation or early release, delaying his departure until mid-decade. This phase underscored the causal link between his untreated alcoholism and recidivism, as unchecked substance abuse fueled opportunistic crimes without evident planning or profit motive.

Emigration to Australia and Final Years

Settlement and Occupations (1853–1893)

In January 1853, Edward Jones was transported as a convict to Western Australia aboard the barque Pyrenees, departing England and arriving at Fremantle on 30 April after an 87-day voyage. Sentenced for burglary following repeated criminal offenses in Britain, he entered the penal system of the Swan River Colony, where convicts contributed to infrastructure and labor projects under strict oversight. Upon earning a or conditional , Jones secured employment as the town crier in Perth, a public role involving announcements and errands that afforded him a degree of community standing despite his background. This position, noted in contemporary accounts relayed through journalists, marked a period of relative stability in the colony, though his past notoriety persisted among expatriates. By the 1880s, seeking to evade recognition tied to his earlier exploits, Jones adopted the alias Thomas Jones and relocated eastward to Victoria, settling in rural districts including Sarsfield near Bairnsdale. There, he worked as a labourer, engaging in manual tasks typical of frontier agricultural and settlement work, such as clearing land and general odd jobs, until his later years. His occupation as a labourer is corroborated by local memorials, though these contain factual discrepancies regarding his transportation date and the site of his original offenses, reflecting folkloric embellishments over time.

Death

Edward Jones, known in Australia as Thomas Jones, died on 26 December 1893 near , Victoria, at approximately 73 years of age. He suffered fatal injuries after falling from the Mitchell River Bridge while intoxicated, reportedly having fallen asleep on the before tumbling over. Jones was interred in an unmarked grave at Bairnsdale Cemetery. In 2005, the East Gippsland Historical Society installed a memorial plaque acknowledging his transportation to in connection with breaching royal security, though it references rather than .

Motivations and Psychological Aspects

Obsession with Queen Victoria

Edward Jones exhibited a pronounced fixation on , repeatedly breaching security between 1838 and 1841 to access her private residences and observe her personal routines. His intrusions targeted the royal apartments, where he explored furniture and items associated with the Queen, such as stealing undergarments from the laundry and a card from Prince Albert's desk during the December 1840 entry. Jones himself stated to authorities that his purpose was to "see the Queen" and understand palace life, denying any intent for or harm, though his actions centered on proximity to Victoria rather than general curiosity about the building. In one notable instance in late , Jones concealed himself under a sofa in the Queen's dressing room shortly after she had occupied it, positioning himself adjacent to her bedroom while she retired for the night. Earlier, during his initial 1838 penetration disguised as a , he spent hours mapping layout, including areas frequented by the royal family, and returned multiple times despite prior detections. These repeated, targeted violations indicate an obsessive interest in Victoria's domestic environment, extending to eavesdropping on private conversations with Prince Albert and pilfering personal effects, behaviors that contemporaries interpreted as rather than mere mischief. Jones's behavior lacked evidence of broader criminal enterprise or ideological drive, focusing instead on unauthorized intimacy with the ; he accumulated detailed knowledge of servants' schedules and entry points to facilitate access to Victoria's vicinity. Despite warnings and brief detentions, his persistence—evident in at least five documented attempts—underscored a compulsive attachment, leading authorities to view him as a singular fixated on the Queen personally.

Evidence of Mental Instability or Criminal Intent

In the December 1840 following his second intrusion into , Edward Jones's father attempted to enter a plea of on his behalf, arguing that the boy's actions stemmed from a disordered mind rather than deliberate wrongdoing. The court rejected this defense, finding insufficient evidence to support it, and convicted Jones of , sentencing him to ' imprisonment in the at Tothill Fields. This ruling indicated judicial assessment of Jones as mentally competent and criminally liable, with no documented medical examination revealing delusions, hallucinations, or other hallmarks of severe psychological disorder prevalent in Victorian-era standards, such as those later formalized in the . Jones's recidivism provided circumstantial behavioral evidence suggestive of fixation or impulsivity bordering on instability. Despite the 1840 conviction and explicit warnings, he re-entered the palace in June 1841, where he was discovered in the quadrangle with stolen items including cigars and a tablecloth, leading to another trespass conviction and a three-month hard labor sentence, later commuted to naval enlistment. His stated motives—curiosity about royal life, a desire to "see the Queen," and claims of living undetected within the palace for extended periods—reflected an obsessive preoccupation with Victoria, whom he fixated upon from afar, but lacked violent or destructive elements. Contemporary accounts described him as solitary and eccentric rather than clinically insane, with no records of institutionalization for mental illness post-trials. Evidence of criminal outweighed claims of mere , as Jones's actions involved premeditated entry via chimneys and disguises, evasion of guards, and minor thefts, demonstrating awareness of illegality. He admitted to prior knowledge of layouts from maps and repeated visits, actions incompatible with innocent exploration, though prosecutors noted no to harm the royals. The courts consistently treated these as willful crimes, not symptoms of uncontrollably deranged behavior, aligning with 19th-century legal norms that required proof of cognitive incapacity for acquittals. Later historical analyses attribute his persistence to adolescent audacity and rather than diagnosable pathology, absent any verified psychiatric evaluation.

Contemporary Media and Public Reaction

Press Sensationalism

The intrusions by Edward Jones into garnered extensive coverage in the British press during the late 1830s and early 1840s, characterized by sensational headlines and embellished narratives that captivated the public. Following his detection on December 14, 1838, after spending approximately two weeks within the palace undetected, newspapers amplified the story by highlighting his evasion of security and alleged consumption of royal foodstuffs, portraying him as a precocious youth with audacious nerve. Subsequent arrests in July 1840, when he was found in the having dined on the Prince of Wales's food, and December 1841, concealed behind a screen near the Queen's state couch, intensified the media frenzy with reports of his persistent returns and intimate proximity to the royal family. Penny dreadfuls and broadsheets exploited the episodes for dramatic effect, with headlines such as "A Stranger in Her Majesty's Bedroom" emphasizing voyeuristic elements and security lapses to boost sales among working-class readers. Comic periodicals and cartoons further sensationalized Jones, depicting him as a mischievous intruder or folk anti-hero, which extended public fascination even after his naval enlistment in 1843; for instance, Punch published satirical illustrations in July and August 1844 showing Jones in naval guise amid exaggerated perils. Popular songs like "The Boy Wot Visits the Palace," written and sung by James Bruton and arranged by Henry Clifton, romanticized his exploits, turning the incidents into music-hall entertainment that reinforced his notoriety. This coverage not only exposed palace vulnerabilities but also reflected broader Victorian anxieties about and urban underclass intrusion, though some accounts verged on fabrication, such as of Jones living undetected for extended periods or pilfering royal undergarments, which were later debunked in more rigorous historical analyses. The resultant "Boy Jones" moniker permeated , denoting recurrent mischief, underscoring how press amplification transformed a nuisance into cultural .

Royal and Governmental Responses

Queen Victoria expressed personal alarm following the discovery of Jones's intrusions, particularly after the July 1840 incident when he was found in possession of items from her private apartments, including undergarments; she noted in her diary the intruder's close proximity to her bedrooms, describing the event as frightening. Prince Albert displayed greater agitation, viewing the breaches as a grave threat to the family's safety and fearing potential violence during sleep, which contrasted with Victoria's relatively composed public demeanor. The royal household responded by offering a £50 reward for information aiding in Jones's apprehension after subsequent entries, underscoring heightened vigilance amid public sensationalism. Governmental authorities treated Jones's acts primarily as rather than , given the absence of in initial incidents, leading to lenient initial dispositions; after his first detection in December 1838, he was released on his father's surety to keep the peace without formal incarceration. Following the 1840 breaches, magistrates at Marlborough Street Police Court sentenced him to three months' at Tothill Fields Prison, a critics deemed insufficient given the repeated nature of the offenses and proximity to the . Efforts to deter included compulsory enlistment in the Royal Navy in 1841, but after and recapture, authorities escalated to convict transportation; Jones was shipped to () in 1843 under a seven-year sentence for persistent security breaches, effectively exiling him from Britain. These measures reflected a pragmatic approach prioritizing removal over severe domestic penalty, amid debates on pleas that were rejected due to lack of medical evidence.

Security Failures and Reforms at Buckingham Palace

Vulnerabilities Exposed

Edward Jones's first documented intrusion on December 14, 1838, highlighted deficiencies in Buckingham Palace's perimeter security, as the 14-year-old scaled a wall aided by nearby tree branches around 5 a.m., entering undetected despite the presence of spikes and railings. Once inside, he exploited unshuttered ground-floor windows and unlocked doors to access state rooms and corridors, demonstrating a lack of basic locking protocols for entry points. The palace's internal layout further exposed vulnerabilities, allowing Jones to hide behind furniture, in chimneys, or under sofas for extended periods without detection, as there were no routine sweeps or patrols to uncover concealed intruders. His ability to roam freely at night and eavesdrop near private apartments, including the Queen's bedroom, underscored the absence of vigilant night watchmen beyond a single porter who discovered him by chance. Security was hampered by fragmented oversight, with multiple departments handling tasks like window maintenance inefficiently, contributing to overall lax organization. Subsequent breaches, such as on November 30, 1840, when Jones again scaled the wall and reached areas near the Queen's before hiding under a sofa, revealed persistent failures despite prior incidents, including the garden's frequent use by vagrants and drunks who slept undisturbed. These repeated successes by an untrained teenager pointed to inadequate guard presence, particularly at night, and a lack of coordinated response mechanisms, as royal bodyguards were not deployed effectively during off-hours. The disorganized state of palace security in the 1830s and 1840s, with no unified protocol, enabled such exploits until Jones's captures prompted scrutiny.

Resulting Changes in Protocols

The repeated successful intrusions by Edward Jones into Buckingham Palace's private quarters revealed profound deficiencies in the Victorian-era security apparatus, which relied predominantly on external sentries and unlocked internal access points without systematic interior patrols or . Following his December 1840 capture inside , where he had been hiding for up to 16 days and accessing restricted areas, contemporary press accounts explicitly demanded intensified security measures to avert breaches by more malicious actors. In the immediate aftermath, palace officials implemented ad hoc enhancements, including more frequent night-time searches of chimneys, basements, and unoccupied rooms—entry points Jones had exploited via sweeps and vents—though these were reactive rather than formalized protocols. recorded her alarm in private correspondence, noting the intruder's proximity to her family's living spaces and the inadequacy of current arrangements, which spurred Prince Albert to advocate for greater vigilance among household staff. However, no comprehensive overhaul of protocols, such as the introduction of dedicated internal guards or locked barriers in royal apartments, occurred contemporaneously; the era's security paradigm prioritized ceremonial deterrence over proactive internal defense. The government's principal response focused on neutralizing the threat posed by Jones himself, establishing a for handling obsessive repeat intruders through escalated punitive measures: after short imprisonments in 1838 and 1840 failed to deter him, he received an indefinite sentence in 1841, leading to his transportation to aboard the Layton on April 1, 1841, effectively removing him from proximity to the . This approach underscored a reliance on individual deterrence over systemic reform, with palace security remaining vulnerable to similar exploits for decades, as evidenced by subsequent breaches. The Boy Jones episodes thus contributed to long-term in royal protection, influencing later Victorian-era developments like the augmentation of plainclothes police details for residences, but without attributable specific protocol shifts in the .

Legacy

Historical Significance as a Stalker

Edward Jones, known as the Boy Jones, holds historical significance as one of the earliest documented cases of celebrity stalking, predating modern legal and psychological frameworks for such behavior. Between 1838 and 1841, the teenage Jones repeatedly infiltrated , driven by an obsessive fascination with , whom he spied upon during private moments, including while she dined with Prince Albert and handled state documents. His intrusions, which involved hiding in chimneys, stealing undergarments, and lingering undetected for up to 16 months cumulatively, exemplified a pattern of persistent, unwanted pursuit that instilled fear in the royal household, with Victoria reportedly checking beneath her bed for years afterward. Jones's case is recognized by as that of the world's first celebrity stalker, highlighting his role in establishing the archetype of an individual fixated on a high-profile accessible through physical breaches of security. Unlike mere , his actions lacked clear financial motive, focusing instead on proximity to and knowledge of the Queen's , behaviors retrospectively aligned with stalking's core elements of and boundary violation. This obsession persisted post-arrest, as evidenced by his reenactments of palace layouts for and continued notoriety even after transportation to in 1841, where he expressed resentment at being perpetually labeled the Queen's stalker. Historically, Jones's exploits contributed to early public and media discourse on intrusive and personal security for elites, influencing perceptions of vulnerability among the famous long before amplified such risks. While not prosecuted under statutes—which emerged in the —his repeated offenses underscored causal patterns of fixation and escalation, providing a foundational for later analyses of non-violent yet psychologically invasive pursuits.

Modern Interpretations and Cultural Depictions

In historical scholarship, Edward Jones has been characterized as one of the earliest documented cases of a stalker, driven by an obsessive fixation on rather than political motives or theft for gain. Jan Bondeson's 2010 Queen Victoria's Stalker draws on contemporary newspapers to depict Jones's intrusions as symptomatic of a solitary, introverted averse to employment and social norms, though without evidence of clinical insanity such as . Bondeson emphasizes Jones's media notoriety as amplifying his celebrity status, marking a precursor to modern stalker archetypes where public fascination sustains the behavior. Psychological interpretations frame Jones's actions as stemming from social isolation and fixation rather than delusional grandeur, with contemporaries and later analysts noting his odd habits—like infrequent washing and obsessive reading—but rejecting labels of madness in favor of eccentricity or mild deviance. This view aligns with causal analyses attributing his persistence to lax 19th-century palace security enabling repeated access, rather than innate criminal genius or profound psychopathology. Culturally, Jones's story influenced mid-20th-century and , including Joan Howard's 1943 children's book The Boy Jones, which romanticized his palace exploits for young readers, and Theodore Bonnet's 1949 novel , adapted into a starring as Victoria and as Prince Albert, portraying a fictional urchin inspired by Jones sneaking into for a glimpse of the queen. These depictions softened the elements into tales of youthful curiosity and social aspiration, diverging from the empirical record of Jones's underwear thefts and . More recent media, such as podcasts labeling him the "first celebrity ," reinforce his role in highlighting vulnerabilities in royal privacy and foreshadowing tabloid-driven obsessions.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.