Hubbry Logo
SigmodontinaeSigmodontinaeMain
Open search
Sigmodontinae
Community hub
Sigmodontinae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sigmodontinae
Sigmodontinae
Sigmodontinae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sigmodontinae
Temporal range: Early Pliocene - recent
↓
Hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Family: Cricetidae
Subfamily: Sigmodontinae
Wagner, 1843
Tribes

See text

The rodent subfamily Sigmodontinae includes New World rats and mice, with at least 376 species. Many authorities include the Neotominae and Tylomyinae as part of a larger definition of Sigmodontinae. When those genera are included, the species count numbers at least 508. Their distribution includes much of the New World, but the genera are predominantly South American, such as brucies. They invaded South America from Central America as part of the Great American Interchange near the end of the Miocene, about 5 million years ago.[1] Sigmodontines proceeded to diversify explosively in the formerly isolated continent. They inhabit many of the same ecological niches that the Murinae occupy in the Old World.

The "Thomasomyini" from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil are generally thought to be not especially related to the "real" Thomasomyini from the northern Andes and the Amazon rainforest. The genera Wiedomys and Sigmodon are generally placed in their own tribe, and the "phyllotines" Irenomys, Punomys, Euneomys, and Reithrodon are considered incertae sedis.

The name "Sigmodontinae" is based on the name of the type genus, Sigmodon. This name in turn derives from the Greek roots for "S-tooth" (sigm- for "S" and odont- for "tooth", as in orthodontist) for the characteristic of the molars having an S-shape when viewed from above.

Species

[edit]

The Sigmodontinae are divided into a number of tribes and genera:

Incertae sedis

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sigmodontinae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Sigmodontinae is a diverse of within the family , encompassing with approximately 88 genera and over 430 (as of 2025) characterized by a wide range of morphological adaptations, ecological niches, and locomotory behaviors. These exhibit high , making Sigmodontinae one of the most speciose mammalian clades in the , with members ranging from small, arboreal forms to larger, semi-aquatic or adapted to varied environments. Their and cranial features, including rooted molars and a sigmodont pattern, distinguish them from Old World murids, while overall body sizes vary from 7 grams to 455 grams. Distributed across the from the to , Sigmodontinae predominantly inhabit , where the majority of genera and occur, occupying habitats from tropical lowlands and Amazonian forests to Andean highlands and open grasslands. Ecologically versatile, they include herbivores, omnivores, and insectivores that play key roles in , predation, and as reservoirs for zoonotic diseases, with diversification driven by geological events like Andean uplift during the around 10 million years ago.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Etymology and Definition

Sigmodontinae is a within the family of the order Rodentia, encompassing a diverse group of primarily distributed across the . This represents one of the most speciose clades among muroid , characterized by their adaptation to a wide range of habitats from arid deserts to tropical forests. The name Sigmodontinae derives from its type genus, , which originates from the Greek words σίγμα (, denoting an S-shape) and ὀδούς (, meaning tooth), alluding to the characteristic S-shaped pattern observed in the molars of these rodents. This etymological reference highlights a key morphological feature first noted in the genus description by in 1825, emphasizing the distinctive dental structure that aids in their identification. A core diagnostic trait of Sigmodontinae is the S-shaped ectoloph on the upper molars, formed by the transverse crests connecting the buccal cusps, which sets this subfamily apart from other cricetids like or that exhibit more rectilinear or simplified loph patterns. This dental configuration, often manifesting as sigmoid enamel loops on the occlusal surface, supports efficient grinding of vegetation and is evident across genera such as Sigmodon and Oryzomys.

Classification History

The subfamily Sigmodontinae was established by Johann Andreas Wagner in 1843 as "Sigmodontes," a group based on the genus Sigmodon Say and Ord, 1825, with the name later formalized as Sigmodontinae by in 1897; this classification held priority over the earlier proposed Hesperomyinae Murray, 1866. The defining morphological feature at the time was the characteristic S-shaped pattern of the molars, which distinguished these from other cricetids. In the early , taxonomic debates focused on the boundaries of Sigmodontinae, particularly whether to include North American genera now assigned to (such as ) and Central/South American forms in Tylomyinae (such as Nyctomys); some classifications broadly encompassed these groups under a expansive Sigmodontinae based on shared morphological traits like complex morphology in South American species, while others advocated restriction to Neotropical taxa. These discussions were influenced by morphological studies (e.g., Hooper 1959) and karyotypic analyses (e.g., Gardner and Patton 1976), but lacked resolution due to limited and comparative data. By the late , Reig (1980) proposed a narrower , limiting Sigmodontinae to South American cricetids with complex , explicitly separating it from and establishing Tylomyinae as distinct based on reproductive and cranial features. A pivotal milestone came with Marshall's 1979 analysis of cricetid phylogeny, which modeled the paleobiogeographic invasion of South American cricetine rodents (including sigmodontines) from during the , emphasizing dispersal routes and diversification patterns supported by fossil evidence. This work shifted focus from purely morphological groupings toward integrating biogeographic and temporal contexts, distancing Sigmodontinae from earlier associations with Old World (voles) by highlighting its independent radiation. Subsequent molecular studies in the 21st century, such as those by Smith and Patton (1999) and Steppan et al. (2004), confirmed Sigmodontinae's monophyly and separation from and Tylomyinae using DNA sequences, though debates persist on lumping them into a broader "New World cricetid" assemblage that could encompass up to approximately 500 . Recent revisions, including Salazar-Bravo et al. (2023) on the tribe Ichthyomyini and a 2025 phylogenomic study, have incorporated molecular and morphological data to refine subtribal boundaries within Sigmodontinae, reinforcing its distinct status while acknowledging ongoing taxonomic fluidity with related subfamilies; these updates estimate more than 500 extant species across 88 genera, primarily in .

Phylogenetic Relationships

Sigmodontinae is a monophyletic within the family , comprising the most diverse group of Neotropical with more than 500 species across 88 genera. Recent phylogenomic analyses place Sigmodontinae as the to Tylomyinae, with their divergence estimated at approximately 17.24 million years ago (95% CI: 13.17–21.64 mya), reflecting a single invasion of around 10.46 mya (95% CI: 8.25–13.27 mya). Earlier molecular studies based on the IRBP gene suggested a closer relationship between Sigmodontinae and the northern hemisphere subfamilies (voles and lemmings) and Cricetinae, forming a well-supported within . This updated position underscores the deep divergence of southern cricetid lineages, supported by comprehensive sampling of nuclear and sequences. Internally, Sigmodontinae exhibits a complex structure divided into 13 major s, including Sigmodontini (e.g., cotton rats), Oryzomyini (rice rats and allies), and Akodontini (grass mice), as resolved by anchored hybrid enrichment (AHE) phylogenomics using 415 nuclear loci and overlapping mitochondrial data from 74 genera (84% coverage) and 190 (38% coverage). The tribe Thomasomyini, comprising Andean thomasomys mice, has undergone recent taxonomic refinement, with phylogenetic evidence distinguishing an (e.g., involving genera like Abrawayaomys) from the core Andes-Amazonian radiation, highlighting biogeographic vicariance in eastern . This internal diversification is characterized by rapid , particularly within the Oryzomyalia , which radiated around 6.61 mya (95% CI: 5.49–7.96 mya); the 2025 study also proposes two new tribes, Chinchillulini and Delomyini. DNA sequencing evidence, including mitochondrial cytochrome b and nuclear genes like IRBP, has revealed an explosive diversification of Sigmodontinae following the Great American Biotic Interchange (approximately 3 mya), with diversification bursts in the Late Miocene (6.61–5.78 mya) and Mid-Pliocene (4.66–3.07 mya), driven by Andean uplift and climatic shifts. These patterns are corroborated by concatenated maximum likelihood and multispecies coalescent analyses, providing high support for tribal monophyly. Genera such as Irenomys and Punomys, previously considered incertae sedis, are now firmly placed within Euneomyini and Andinomyini, respectively, resolving longstanding uncertainties through integrated genomic and morphological data.

Physical Characteristics

General Morphology

Sigmodontines exhibit a typical body plan, characterized by a compact, elongated form adapted for quadrupedal locomotion. Body sizes vary widely across the subfamily, ranging from small mice with head-body lengths of approximately 5–10 cm (e.g., in genera like Reithrodontomys) to larger rats reaching up to 20 cm or more (e.g., in Akodon or Oryzomys), with weights spanning 7–455 grams. The tail is often as long as or longer than the body, measuring 3–33 cm, and serves functions such as balance and sensory perception. The pelage is generally soft and dense, providing insulation and in diverse habitats, though textures can range from fine and short to coarse or even spiny in specialized forms. Coloration typically includes dorsal hues of gray-brown, reddish, or yellowish tones, with ventral surfaces paler, often white or buff; some species display grizzled, spotted, or polymorphic patterns for . Limbs are proportionate for movement, with fore- and hindlimbs featuring five digits and claws suited to grasping or scratching; certain genera show adaptations for (e.g., elongated digits in arboreal Oecomys), burrowing (e.g., robust foreclaws in fossorial Punomys), or jumping (e.g., elongated hindlimbs in some open-habitat forms). Ears and eyes are moderately to prominently large, facilitating nocturnal activity common in the , with ears varying from short and rounded (nearly hidden in the fur) to elongate (up to one-third of head-body in some ). is generally minimal, with males and females similar in size and proportions, though males in some (e.g., Abrothrix) may be slightly larger and possess prominent ventral sebaceous glands.

Dental and Cranial Features

The skulls of Sigmodontinae exhibit distinctive cranial features that support their classification within the family, including an elongated and often tapering rostrum, a large that accommodates the infraorbital branch of the and associated vasculature, and robust zygomatic arches providing extensive attachment sites for the masseter and temporalis muscles essential for mastication. The dental formula is characteristic of cricetids and conserved across most of the : I 1/1, C 0/0, P 0/0, M 3/3 = 16, though rare exceptions occur in certain genera such as Neusticomys with reduced molars. Upper molars are bunodont to lophodont, featuring an S-shaped ectoloph formed by the alignment of cusps and lophs, with increasing complexity in the posterior molars where additional lophules and fossettes enhance occlusal surfaces for processing diverse foods. Lower molars mirror this pattern with an S-curved hypolophid and arranged cusps that enable efficient grinding and shearing, reflecting adaptations to varied diets within the subfamily. Molar morphology varies significantly among genera; for instance, folivorous species in tribes like Phyllotini often show simplified, less lophate structures with reduced cusp complexity, whereas omnivorous forms in Oryzomyini display more intricate, multi-lophate patterns for broader dietary flexibility. The subfamily name derives from this signature S-shaped dental configuration.

Evolutionary History

Origins and Ancestral Lineage

The subfamily Sigmodontinae belongs to the family , whose ancestral forms originated in during the late Eocene to early , approximately 30 million years ago, before dispersing across the Holarctic region through multiple migration routes. Early cricetids exhibited primitive dental features, such as low-crowned molars with simple cusp patterns, which laid the foundation for later diversification within the family. By the Miocene epoch, sigmodontine-like forms had emerged in , representing proto-sigmodontines with primitive S-shaped molar enamel patterns derived from cricetid ancestors. The Copemys, first appearing in the early (Hemingfordian stage, around 20-16 million years ago), is considered a key ancestral , featuring molars with incipient sigmodontine characteristics, including weakly developed S-shapes and moderate hypsodonty. The fossil record documents the oldest potential sigmodontines from the (approximately 10-5 million years ago) in , with genera such as Copemys and Abelmoschomys providing evidence of this early radiation; for instance, Abelmoschomys simpsoni from Florida's Clarendonian deposits (around 9 million years ago) shows transitional dental morphology linking it to later sigmodontines. Genetic analyses, including phylogenomic studies of nuclear and from over 190 sigmodontine , support a single origin from a North American cricetid ancestor prior to southward dispersal, with the crown group diverging around 10.46 million years ago (95% CI: 8.25–13.27 mya). This monophyletic origin aligns with the subfamily's position as part of the cricetid radiation, sister to Tylomyinae.

Migration and Diversification

The subfamily Sigmodontinae, originating from North American cricetid ancestors, underwent a pivotal migration to during the , approximately 10.46 million years ago (95% CI: 8.25–13.27 mya), marking a single invasion event as part of the early phases of the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI). This dispersal likely occurred prior to the final closure of the around 3 million years ago, possibly facilitated by proto-Panamanian land connections or island-hopping via the , allowing sigmodontines to establish in northern . The earliest unambiguous South American fossils, such as those from the Cerro Azul Formation in dated to about 6.192 mya, confirm this entry and initial colonization along the Central and regions. Following this migration, sigmodontines experienced rapid diversification, evolving from a limited number of ancestral lineages into over 300 extant species across more than 80 genera, rapidly diversifying into a wide array of ecological niches alongside the diverse native caviomorph rodents (Hystricomorpha), which already occupied many similar roles in the South American ecosystem. This adaptive radiation was punctuated by two major pulses of lineage accumulation: an initial burst around 6.61–5.78 mya associated with the radiation of the Oryzomyalia clade, and a second during the Mid-Pliocene Faunal Turnover (4.5–3.0 mya), which enabled continent-wide expansion by approximately 3.07 mya. Key drivers included Late Miocene climatic cooling, which promoted the spread of Andean montane cloud forests and the collapse of wetland systems like the Pebas Mega-Wetland around 6.8 mya, alongside habitat fragmentation, Plio-Pleistocene extinctions of incumbent taxa, and interspecific competition that spurred tribe-level divergences, such as the specialization of Oryzomyini in wetland and riparian environments. Fossil records from the Pliocene-Pleistocene further illustrate this explosive , with early South American assemblages in Venezuela's San Gregorio Formation (3.6–2.6 mya) yielding taxa like Oligoryzomys sp. and Zygodontomys sp., representing the oldest evidence for these genera and highlighting accelerated rates of morphological and ecological divergence. These findings underscore how sigmodontines rapidly exploited open savannas east of the , achieving high speciation rates that outpaced background levels for cricetids, ultimately establishing them as a dominant component of South America's diversity.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The subfamily Sigmodontinae, comprising over 500 species of , is predominantly distributed across the , with its primary range extending from southern through to . This distribution spans from and the southward to the tip of the continent in , encompassing diverse biomes that support the subfamily's extensive radiation. The northernmost extent of Sigmodontinae reaches the southern edge of the Canadian Arctic, where species of the genus , such as the deer mouse (P. maniculatus), occur across much of , including and the as far north as and the . In contrast, the southernmost populations are found and , represented by genera like Akodon and Oligoryzomys, which inhabit open and forested environments in southern and . This latitudinal span highlights the subfamily's adaptability to varied climatic zones, though the majority of its diversity is concentrated south of the . Endemism is a defining feature of Sigmodontinae, with over 90% of its species restricted to , where the vast majority (approximately 85) of the 88 recognized genera are endemic, as of 2025. Biodiversity hotspots include the , particularly the Central Andes with the highest ; the , hosting at least 40 species across multiple tribes; the Atlantic Forest; and seasonally dry biomes like the and Chaco, which exhibit significant patterns. No significant introduced populations of native sigmodontines are reported outside the , maintaining their status as a New World radiation that diversified following the Great American Biotic Interchange approximately 3-5 million years ago.

Habitat Preferences

Sigmodontine occupy a broad spectrum of environments across the Neotropics, ranging from tropical rainforests and temperate woodlands to open grasslands, arid deserts, and high-elevation montane zones. This ecological versatility underpins their diversification, with mixed vegetation habitats—combining forest edges and open areas—exhibiting the highest rates compared to pure forest or open settings. For instance, in the tribe Oryzomyini exploit forested environments, while Reithrodontini favor southern South American grasslands and scrublands. Microhabitat utilization further highlights their adaptability, with many species tailoring behaviors to specific conditions within these broader ecosystems. In arid and semi-arid zones, genera like Sigmodon (cotton rats) construct extensive systems for shelter and , enabling persistence in dry grasslands and fringes. Conversely, rice rats in the genus Oryzomys often adopt semi-aquatic lifestyles in wetlands and swamps, while some Oryzomyini species are arboreal, navigating forest canopies for resources. Altitudinal gradients reveal pronounced climatic adaptations, with lowland species thriving in the humid below 800 m and high-Andean forms, such as those in Thomasomys and Andinomyini, enduring cold, hypoxic conditions above 3,000 m and up to 5,000 m in and montane shrublands. These high-elevation rodents, concentrated in the Central where peaks, exhibit physiological adjustments like enhanced to cope with low oxygen levels. Transitions between lowland, middle (up to 3,000 m), and highland habitats have been frequent, correlating with elevated diversification in Andean regions. Numerous sigmodontines have successfully colonized human-modified landscapes, including agricultural fields and urban peripheries, where they exploit crop residues and disturbed soils, often attaining pest status due to crop damage and transmission risks. Species like Calomys and Akodon frequently inhabit field borders in pampean agroecosystems, using grassy margins for cover.

Ecology and Behavior

Diet and Foraging Strategies

Sigmodontine exhibit primarily omnivorous diets, incorporating a diverse array of sources such as , fruits, , and green vegetation, which supports their adaptability across varied ecosystems. This generalist feeding strategy allows them to exploit available resources opportunistically, with material often comprising the bulk of their intake in forested or habitats. Studies of sympatric assemblages in montane forests reveal high consumption of fruits and , underscoring their role as both seed predators and potential dispersers. Dietary preferences vary within the subfamily, with some genera leaning toward herbivory, such as grass-dominated consumption in Akodon species, while others show greater insectivory, as observed in Calomys. Foraging behaviors are predominantly nocturnal and ground-based, involving active searching in leaf litter or for scattered resources, though arboreal species may climb vegetation to access fruits or . Seed caching, akin to that seen in deer mice (), is a key strategy in arid regions, where individuals store in shallow burrows or surface caches to buffer against food scarcity. These behaviors enhance survival in unpredictable environments but also position sigmodontines as significant agricultural pests through on crops like grains. Seasonal fluctuations influence patterns, with a notable shift toward insectivory during dry periods when resources dwindle, as evidenced in assemblages where arthropods supplement dwindling . This flexibility mitigates nutritional stress and maintains population stability.

Reproduction and Life History

Sigmodontines display flexible breeding patterns adapted to environmental conditions, with continuous reproduction in tropical habitats and seasonal breeding in temperate regions, often peaking during periods of abundant resources. Females are polyestrous, typically producing 2-5 litters annually, though some achieve up to 6-7 litters per year or breeding season. occurs spontaneously, and postpartum estrus enables rapid successive pregnancies. Gestation lasts 20-30 days, varying slightly by and influenced by delayed implantation in some cases until the current is weaned. Litter sizes range from 2-10 young, with extremes up to 13 in certain northern populations; are altricial, born blind, hairless, and entirely dependent on maternal care. This reproductive strategy, supported by an omnivorous diet that facilitates rapid growth, underscores the subfamily's high . Sexual maturity is attained early, generally within 1-3 months, with females reaching it several weeks before males; in some species, females can reproduce as young as 4 weeks old. In the wild, most individuals survive less than a year, though some may live up to 3 years. Parental care is predominantly maternal, with females constructing nests from plant material and altricial young for 5-30 days until ; in select species, communal nursing occurs, where multiple females share duties to enhance pup . This elevated reproductive output bolsters resilience amid high mortality rates characteristic of sigmodontine .

Diversity and Conservation

Genera and Species Overview

The subfamily Sigmodontinae represents one of the most diverse groups of , with current estimates recognizing approximately 88 genera and more than 500 . This diversity underscores Sigmodontinae's status as a major component of cricetid , surpassing many other mammalian subfamilies in . Diversity within Sigmodontinae is heavily concentrated in , where the majority of occur, reflecting extensive following the group's colonization of the continent. This pattern has been driven by rapid speciation events, particularly over the last 5–7 million years, coinciding with environmental changes like Andean uplift and climatic shifts that facilitated niche diversification. More than 60 genera are endemic to , highlighting the region's role as a primary center of , while others extend into North and . Representative examples include (deer mice, primarily in North and ), Sigmodon (cotton rats, widespread in arid and grassland habitats), and Oryzomys (rice rats, common in and environments across the Neotropics). Taxonomic trends show continued expansion through ongoing discoveries, with molecular phylogenetic studies frequently uncovering cryptic species and refining genus boundaries, contributing to the dynamic nature of Sigmodontinae classification.

Major Tribes and Notable Species

The subfamily Sigmodontinae is classified into 15 tribes based on recent phylogenomic analyses, reflecting its extensive diversification across the . Among the major tribes, Sigmodontini comprises genera such as Sigmodon, with the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) serving as a representative ; this is widespread in southern and northern , where it acts as an agricultural pest by damaging crops like , grains, and through foraging and burrowing activities. Similarly, the tribe Oryzomyini, one of the most species-rich groups, includes rice rats like the marsh rice rat (Oryzomys palustris), a semi-aquatic adapted to habitats in the and parts of , where it swims efficiently and feeds on aquatic vegetation and invertebrates. The tribe Akodontini encompasses diverse South American mice, such as Akodon azarae, known as Azara's grass mouse, which specializes in grassland ecosystems of the region spanning , , , and southern ; this species thrives in open, herbaceous areas, contributing to turnover through its burrowing habits. Other prominent tribes include Phyllotini, featuring leaf-eared mice like Phyllotis species that are adapted to arid and high-altitude environments in the , and Reithrodontini, which includes vesper mice such as Calomys and Reithrodon, noted for their nocturnal foraging in shrublands. Additionally, the tribe Abrotrichini contains southern specialists like the long-haired akodont (Abrothrix longipilis), an endemic to Patagonian forests and shrublands in southern and , where it exhibits adaptations for cooler, temperate climates. Several genera, such as Wiedomys in the tribe Wiedomyini, remain in some but are recognized for their distinct arboreal or semi-arboreal lifestyles in eastern South American dry forests. The 2025 phylogenomic study also proposed two new tribes, Chinchillulini and Delomyini, further refining the classification. Notable across tribes highlight unique ecological roles; for instance, many sigmodontines function as primary dispersers in montane and forest ecosystems, transporting seeds via scatter-hoarding and promoting plant regeneration, as observed in assemblages from Peruvian cloud forests. Others serve as reservoirs for zoonotic pathogens, including transmitted by ticks, underscoring their influence on disease dynamics in Neotropical habitats. These traits exemplify the subfamily's adaptability and integral position in food webs, from facilitation to trophic interactions.

Conservation Status

The subfamily Sigmodontinae encompasses more than 500 species, the majority of which are classified as Least Concern by the IUCN Red List due to their broad adaptability to diverse environments, including human-modified landscapes. However, around 10-15% of assessed species face elevated risks, with categories including Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered, particularly among endemics with restricted ranges such as those in the Atlantic Forest. For instance, in Argentina, a reassessment of 108 sigmodontine species identified 73 as Least Concern, but 7 as Endangered, 7 as Vulnerable, 6 as Near Threatened, 13 as Data Deficient, and 2 as Extinct, highlighting regional vulnerabilities that likely reflect broader Neotropical patterns. Primary threats to sigmodontine rodents include habitat loss and fragmentation driven by , , and , which disproportionately impact forest-dependent species; in the Atlantic Forest, endemics like Rhagomys rufescens are critically endangered due to these pressures. poses additional risks, especially to montane and Andean populations, by altering habitat suitability and elevation ranges, as projected for species in cloud forests of the western Andean cordillera. Disease transmission, such as hantavirus infections in genera like Peromyscus, can contribute to population declines in affected areas, though rodents primarily serve as reservoirs with limited direct mortality impacts. Conservation efforts focus on establishing and expanding protected areas within biodiversity hotspots, such as national parks covering portions of the and Andean regions, which safeguard key habitats and support ongoing monitoring; in , these areas encompass about 13% of the territory but require better distribution to protect threatened sigmodontines. Research gaps persist, particularly for Amazonian and Andean species, where many remain due to insufficient ecological data and assessment. While some adaptable species, such as crop-raiding Sigmodon members, benefit from anthropogenic landscapes by exploiting agricultural fields, habitat fragmentation continues to isolate populations of less tolerant taxa, underscoring the need for integrated landscape management.

References

  1. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=552329
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12585052/
  3. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Sigmodontinae/
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-28497-0
  5. https://www.utep.edu/leb/pleistnm/taxamamm/Sigmodon.htm
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2918645/
  7. https://www.wtamu.edu/~rmatlack/Mammalogy/sigmodon_skull.htm
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/sigmodon
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299228478_Subfamily_Sigmodontinae_Wagner_1843
  10. https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1980.tb04233.x
  11. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/model-for-paleobiogeography-of-south-american-cricetine-rodents/A2746ACDF719A7AB83023D2F3CF9A485
  12. https://peerj.com/articles/14319/
  13. https://zoologicalstudies.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/1810-522X-52-55
  14. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Reithrodontomys_montanus/
  15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23766808.2022.2132023
  16. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/96/4/839/853050
  17. https://www.bioone.org/journals/american-museum-novitates/volume-2006/issue-3537/Ten-New-Genera-of-Oryzomyine-Rodents-Cricetidae-Sigmodontinae/10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3537[1:TNGOOR]2.0.CO;2.full
  18. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12164
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9841913/
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/cricetidae
  21. https://tarpits.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/la_brea_and_beyond_2015._nhm_science_science_no._42.pdf
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349092503_Morphological_similarity_and_dental_homologies_in_two_sigmodontine_rodents_Mammalia_Cricetidae_from_different_tribes_A_topological_analysis_to_explore_convergence
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342698005_A_new_nomenclatural_system_for_the_study_of_sigmodontine_rodent_molars_first_step_towards_an_integrative_phylogeny_of_fossil_and_living_cricetids
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0944200622000678
  25. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app70/app012342024.pdf
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016699577800405
  27. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/uwyo/books/book/961/chapter/106840727/The-late-Miocene-radiation-of-Neotropical
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289185840_The_late_Miocene_radiation_of_Neotropical_sigmodontine_rodents_in_North_America
  29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317165
  30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221417
  31. https://elifesciences.org/articles/06813
  32. https://revchilhistnat.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40693-020-00094-9
  33. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.25.630327v1.full-text
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790312004794
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259553906_Sigmodontine_rodents_diversified_in_South_America_prior_to_the_complete_rise_of_the_Panamanian_Isthmus
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790306002764
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4549906/
  38. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-015-0440-z
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098221201264X
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333699236_MICROHABITAT_USE_BY_SIGMODONTINAE_RODENTS_IN_CROP-FIELD_BORDERS_OF_PAMPEAN_AGROECOSYSTEMS
  41. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/96/5/1071/920406
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227624317_Seed_hoarding_by_rodents_of_the_Monte_Desert_Argentina
  43. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/71/3/610/6725900
  44. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/428/42825278004.pdf
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343239792_A_new_fossil_cricetid_Rodentia_Sigmodontinae_from_northeastern_Brazil_with_remarks_on_small_mammal_extinctions_in_the_tropical_Quaternary
  46. https://rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-7827-9-55
  47. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-33642014000200008
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274942349_Annual_age_structure_and_reproduction_in_the_Caatinga_red-nosed_mouse_Wiedomys_pyrrhorhinos_Rodentia_Sigmodontinae
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262856239_To_nest_communally_or_not_to_nest_communally_a_review_of_rodent_communal_nesting_and_nursing
  50. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.50012
  51. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1142879/Oryzomys_palustris
  52. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/98/6/1760/4201799
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7369023/
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298428450_Primary_seed_dispersal_by_a_sigmodontine_rodent_assemblage_in_a_Peruvian_montane_forest
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39369449/
  56. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2684/8fa9bf150154038c813751360009d9f23563.pdf
  57. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/457/45762554007/html/
  58. https://mapress.com/zt/article/view/883
  59. https://peerj.com/articles/10247/
  60. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5109a1.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.