Hubbry Logo
Tuqa-TimurTuqa-TimurMain
Open search
Tuqa-Timur
Community hub
Tuqa-Timur
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tuqa-Timur
Tuqa-Timur
Tuqa-Timur
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Tuqa-Temür[a] (also Toqa-Temür and Toghai-Temür, in the Perso-Arabic orthography of the sources rendered Tūqā-Tīmūr or Tūqāy-Tīmūr) was the thirteenth and youngest or penultimate son of Jochi, the eldest son of Genghis Khan. He was a younger brother of Batu Khan and Berke Khan, the rulers of what came to be known as the Golden Horde.

Key Information

Career

[edit]

Tuqa-Timur's mother is identified as Jochi's concubine Kaghri Khatun (Kaghrī Khātūn), a woman from the Merkit tribe.[1] As Jochi's apparently youngest son of standing or significance, Tuqa-Timur was perhaps deemed too young to attend the qurultai for the proclamation and enthronement of the great khan Ögedei in 1229. Instead, Tuqa-Timur remained behind in his father's ulus, apparently governing it during the absence of his older brothers at the assembly. When Batu Khan returned, Tuqa-Timur organized a three-day feast in his honor.[2]

Tuqa-Timur subsequently received an ulus of his own from Batu, somewhere within the Left Wing (i.e., eastern portion) of Batu's possessions, that is to say east of the Ural Mountains and Ural River, and perhaps under the intermediate authority of another brother, Orda.[3] Tuqa-Timur participated in Batu's Western Campaign, but does not seem to have played a very distinguished role in it; he is also credited with a leading role in campaigns against the Bashkirs and Alans.[4] He was among the Jochid princes participating in the qurultai at which the great khan Güyük was formally proclaimed and enthroned, in 1246, Batu having refused to attend.[5] After Batu's quriltai that resulted in the proclamation of Möngke as great khan in 1250, Berke and Tuqa-Timur escorted Möngke to Mongolia with an army, and were generously rewarded by the new great khan for their support.[6] Tuqa-Timur appears to have survived Batu and to have died some time after Berke's accession as khan of the Golden Horde in 1257; it is presumed that he was already dead by 1267, when his son Urung-Timur received lands from the new khan Mengu-Timur.[7] The Mongol prince ("tsarevich") Toktemir, who attacked Tver' in Russia in 1294/1295, is a distinct individual, bearing the same or similar name.[8]

Following the example of his older brother Berke, Tuqa-Timur converted to Islam,[9] sometime after Berke's conversion in 1251–1252.[10] Unlike his brothers Batu, Orda, and Shiban, Tuqa-Timur does not appear to have headed an autonomous and lasting territorial polity, something brought up as a negative comparison in disputes between his descendants and those of Shiban in the late 14th century; the Shibanids argued that this made the Tuqa-Timurids substantially inferior.[11] Some of Tuqa-Timur's descendants appear to have remained in the Left Wing (eastern portion) of the Golden Horde,[12] while others were settled in the Right Wing (western portion) when Khan Mengu-Timur gave the Crimea to Tuqa-Timur's son Urung-Timur.[13]

Family

[edit]

Rashīd ad-Dīn Faḍlallāh[14] and the genealogical compendium Muʿizz al-ansāb [15] attribute four sons to Tuqa-Timur as follows:

  • Bāy-Tīmūr
  • Bāyān
  • Ūrungbāš or Ūrung-Tīmūr (also Ürüng-Temür, sometimes conflated with Ūz-Tīmūr)
  • Kay-Tīmūr (also Ked-Temür, elsewhere Ūz-Tīmūr)

Descendants

[edit]

Apart from his involvement in the affairs of the Golden Horde and his actions as representative of his older brothers, Tuqa-Timur is important as the progenitor of some of the most prolific and historically significant lines of Jochid and Chinggisid descent. From the 1360s, Tuqa-Timur's descendants vied with those of his brother Shiban for possession of the throne of the Golden Horde,[16] starting with the probable Tuqa-Timurid Ordu Malik, who overthrew the Shibanid Timur Khwaja in 1361.[17] A Crimean branch of Tuqa-Timur's descendants furnished the beglerbeg Mamai with a succession of three puppet khans in 1361–1380.[18] Several families descended from Tuqa-Timur ensconced themselves in the former Ulus of Jochi's eldest son Orda in the east, under Qara Noqai in 1360, then Urus Khan in 1369, and finally Tokhtamysh in 1379. The descendants of Urus and Tokhtamysh subsequently disputed possession of the Golden Horde mostly among themselves. Among the successor states of the Golden Horde, the khanates of Kasimov, Kazan, Astrakhan, and the Crimea were all founded by princes descended from Tuqa-Timur.[19] This was also the case with the Kazakh Khanate and, after 1599, the Khanate of Bukhara in Central Asia.[20]


Reigning Descendants of Tuqa-Timur
  • Tūqā-Tīmūr (d. after 1257), son of Jöchi, son of Chinggis Khān
    • Bāy-Timur [b]
      • Tūqānchar
        • Sāsī
          • Qarā Nūqāy of the Ulus of Orda 1360–1363 [c]
          • Būchqāq
            • Tughluq-Tīmūr of the Ulus of Orda 1363–? [d]
          • Qutluq-Khwāja of the Ulus of Orda 1369 [e]
        • Būrqūlāq
    • Bāyān [g]
      • Dānishmand
        • Īl-Tūtār
        • Beg-Tūt
          • Beg-Ṣūfī = ? Beg-Ṣūfī claimant in Crimea 1419–1421 (identification disputed) [i]
            • Sayyid-Aḥmad II claimant in Crimea 1432–1437, Podolia 1433–1452 (d. 1465?) (identification disputed) [j]
    • Ūrung-Tīmūr (Ūrungbāsh, sometimes conflated with Ūz-Tīmūr) [k]
      • Achiq
        • Tāqtaq [l]
          • Tīmūr-Khwāja
            • Bādiq
              • Urūs of the Ulus of Orda 1369–1377, of the Golden Horde 1373, 1374–1375 [m]
                • Qutlū-Būqā of the Ulus of Orda 1374–1375 [n]
                • Tūqtāqiyā of the Ulus of Orda 1377 [o]
                • Tīmūr-Malik of the Ulus of Orda 1377–1379 [r]
                • Qūyūrchuq of the Golden Horde 1395–1397
                  • Barāq of the Ulus of Orda 1419–1421; of Sibir 1421–1426; of the Golden Horde 1423–1428 [s]
                    • Jānī-Beg Abū-Saʿīd of the Kazakhs 1470–after 1490 (the listing of his ruling descendants is selective and incomplete) [t]
                      • Qāsim of the Kazakhs 1513–1521 [u]
                      • Adīk
                        • Ṭāhir of the Kazakhs 1522–1532 [y]
                        • Būydāsh of the Kazakhs 1532–1559 [z]
                        • Khwāja-Muḥammad (Qujāsh) Kazakh claimant 1535 [aa]
                      • Usāq
                        • Pūlād Kazakh claimant 1537
                      • Ūsāk
                        • Būlākāy
                          • Bahādur of the Kazakhs 1652–1680
                          • Aychuwāq
                            • Irīsh
                              • Khwāja-Sulṭān [ab]
                                • Abu'l-Khayr Muḥammad of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1718–1748 [ac]
                                  • Nūr-ʿAlī of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1748–1786, previously 42nd khan of Khwarazm 1742 (d. 1790) [ad]
                                    • Pīr-ʿAlī claimant 1770–1805 [ae]
                                      • Īsh-Muḥammad (Īshīm) of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1794–1797 [af]
                                      • Būkāy of the Kazakh Inner Jüz 1801–1815 [ag]
                                        • Jahāngīr Girāy of the Kazakh Inner Jüz 1823–1845 [ah]
                                          • Ṣāḥib Girāy of the Kazakh Inner Jüz 1845–1847 [ai]
                                      • Shighāy of the Kazakh Inner Jüz 1815–1823 [aj]
                                    • Yār-Muḥammad of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1786–1790
                                    • Īr-ʿAlī of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1791–1794 [ak]
                                      • Būlākāy, 52nd khan of Khwarazm 1770; rival khan of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1797–1809 [al]
                                    • ʿĀdil-Sulṭān [am]
                                      • Aqīm, 53rd and 57th khan of Khwarazm 1770–1772 and 1773–1774 (d. after 1790) [an]
                                      • Tugīn [ao]
                                        • Yādigār, 58th, 60th, and 62nd khan of Khwarazm 1774–1775, 1779–1781, and 1783–1790 (d. before 1803) [ap]
                                          • Abū'l-Ghāzī V, 64th and 66th khan of Khwarazm 1802–1804 and 1806 (d. 1815?)
                                    • Aychuwāq of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1797–1805 (d. 1810) [aq]
                                      • Jān-Tūra of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1805–1809 [ar]
                                        • Shīr-Ghāzī of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1809–1824 (d. 1845) [as]
                                • Tūqtāmish [at]
                                  • Sarī-Aygīr (Mamāy), 38th khan of Khwarazm 1727 [au]
                      • Jādik
                        • Tūgum Kazakh claimant 1552–1556 [av]
                        • Shighāy of the Kazakhs 1580–1582 [aw]
                          • Andān-Sulṭān
                            • Abūlī of Tashkent (d. 1650) [ax]
                            • Uraz-Muḥammad of Kasimov 1600–1611
                            • Kīchīk-Sulṭān
                              • Būkāy
                                • Khudāmanda
                                  • Tursūn I of Tashkent (d.1717) [ay]
                                    • Kīchīk-Sulṭān of the Kazakh Middle Jüz 1748–1750 [az]
                                    • Sulṭān-Barāq of the Kazakh Middle Jüz 1748–1750 [ba]
                                      • Nūr-ʿAlī II, 50th khan of Khwarazm 1768–1769 [bb]
                          • Tawakkul (Tawka) of the Kazakhs 1582–1598 [bc]
                          • Amān-Būlān
                            • Bahādur
                              • Tursūn II of Tashkent (d. 1720) [bd]
                                • Yulbārs of Tashkent and the Kazakh Greater Jüz 1720–1740 [be]
                          • Īsh-Muḥammad (Īshīm) of the Kazakhs 1598–1613, 1627–1628 [bf]
                            • Khudābanda
                              • Sīrdāq
                                • Khusraw
                                  • Qayʾip of the Kazakhs 1715–1718[bg]
                                    • Bahādur Jānī-Beg, 39th khan of Khwarazm 1727–1728, rival khan of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1748–1771 [bh]
                                      • Qayʾip, 44th khan of Khwarazm 1747–1757, rival khan of the Kazakh Lesser Jüz 1786–1791 [bi]
                                        • Jahāngīr, 51st khan of Khwarazm 1769–1770 [bj]
                                        • ʿAbd-al-ʿAzīz, 54th khan of Khwarazm 1771–1772 (d. 1815?)
                                        • Abū'l-Fayḍ, 59th khan of Khwarazm 1775–1779
                                      • Qarā-Biy (ʿAbd-Allāh), 45th and 56th khan of Khwarazm 1757, 1773 (d. after 1810) [bk]
                                        • Abū'l-Ghāzī IV, 63rd khan of Khwarazm 1790–1802 (d. before 1806) [bl]
                                      • (?) Khudāyār
                                        • Tawakkul (Ḫudāydād), 47th khan of Khwarazm 1763–1764 [bm]
                            • Jānī-Beg of the Kazakhs 1628–1644 [bn]
                            • Jahāngīr of the Kazakhs 1644–1652 [bo]
      • Sārīcha
    • Kay-Tīmūr (Ūz-Tīmūr), son of Tūqā-Tīmūr
      • Abāy
        • Nūmqān[fu]
          • Qutluq-Tīmūr = ? Qutluq-Tīmūr named as rival of ʿAbdallāh Khan in 1361 by Ibn Khaldun [fv]
            • Tīmūr-Beg = ? Ūljāy-Tīmūr of the Golden Horde 1368 (d. 1369) [fw]
              • Tīmūr-Qutluq of the Golden Horde 1397–1398, 1398–1399 [fx]
                • Pūlād of the Golden Horde 1406–1409, 1409–1410 [fy]
                • Tīmūr of the Golden Horde 1410–1412 [fz]
                  • Kīchīk Muḥammad of the Golden Horde 1434–1459 [ga]
                    • Maḥmūd of the Golden Horde 1459–1465; of Astrakhan 1465–1471 [gb]
                    • Aḥmad of the Golden Horde 1459–1481 [gh]
                    • Bakhtiyār-Sulṭān [gv]
                      • Shaykh-Awliyār of Kasimov 1512–1516 [gw]
                        • Shāh-ʿAlī of Kasimov 1516–1519, 1537–1567; of Kazan 1519–1521, 1546, 1551–1552 [gx]
                        • Jān-ʿAlī of Kasimov 1519–1532; of Kazan 1531–1533 (d. 1535) [gy]
                    • Yaʿqūb of Khwarazm 1461–1462 [gz]
                    • Jawāq (Chuwāq) of Khwarazm 1462 [ha]
                      • Māngishlāq [hb]
                        • Yār-Muḥammad 1st Ashtarkhanid khan of Bukhara 1599–1600 (d. 1612) [hc]
                          • Jānī-Muḥammad (or Jānī-Beg) of Bukhara 1600–1603 [hd]
                            • Bāqī-Muḥammad of Bukhara 1603–1606 [he]
                            • Walī-Muḥammad of Bukhara 1606–1611, 1611 [hf]
                              • Rustam-Muḥammad rival at Balkh 1613 (d. after 1641) [hg]
                                • Muḥammad-Raḥīm [hh]
                                  • ʿAbd-Allāh of Balkh 1711–1712 [hi]
                                    • Sanjar of Balkh 1712–1717 [hj]
                                • Muḥammad-Ṭāhir, 41st khan of Khwarazm 1739–1740 (d. 1742) [hk]
                                • Walī-Muḥammad
                                  • Muḥammad of Balkh 1717–1720 [hl]
                            • Dīn-Muḥammad [hm]
                              • Imām-Qulī of Bukhara 1611, 1611–1641 (d. 1642) [hn]
                              • Nadhr-Muḥammad of Bukhara 1641–1645 (d. 1651) [ho]
                                • ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz of Bukhara 1645–1681 (d. 1684) [hp]
                                • Subḥān-Qulī of Bukhara 1681–1702 [hq]
                                  • ʿUbaydallāh I of Bukhara 1702–1711 [hr]
                                  • Abu'l-Fayḍ of Bukhara 1711–1747 [hs]
                                    • ʿAbd al-Muʾmin of Bukhara 1747–1750 [ht]
                                    • ʿUbaydallāh II of Bukhara 1750–1753 (adopted; biological son of Shāh-Tīmūr of Khwarazm)
                                    • (Khānim) married Muḥammad-Ḥājjī-Sulṭān
                                      • Abu'l-Ghāzī of Bukhara 1758–1789; Khiva 1767–1768 (d. 1796) [hu]
                                  • Iskandar of Balkh 1681–1683 [hv]
                                    • Muḥammad-Muqīm of Balkh 1697–1707 [hw]
                                  • Abu'l-Manṣūr of Balkh 1683 [hx]
                                  • Ṣaddīq-Muḥammad of Balkh 1683–1686 [hy]
                          • Tursūn-Muḥammad [hz]
                            • Muḥammad-Ibrāhīm possibly the ruler of Balkh in 1601 [ia]
            • Qutlū-Beg
              • Shādī-Beg of the Golden Horde 1399–1407 [ib]
                • Ghiyāth ad-Dīn II of the Golden Horde 1421, 1423–1426 [ic]
                  • Muṣṭafā claimant at Astrakhan 1431–1433; in the Ulus of Orda 1440–1446; of Khwarazm 1447–1464 [id]
        • Mīnkāsar
          • ʿAbdallāh of the Golden Horde 1361–1370 [ie]
          • Tughluq-Khwāja
            • Tawakkul = Tūlāk of the Golden Horde 1379–1380 [ig]
          • Āqmīl
            • Chekre khan of Sibir and Bolghar 1413, of the Golden Horde 1415–1416 [ih]
          • Mamkī
            • Sayyid-Aḥmad I of the Golden Horde 1416 (disputed identification) [ii]
            • Altī-Qurtuqā

An annotated genealogical list of the known reigning descendants of Tuqa-Timur, son of Jochi, son of Genghis Khan. The list includes khans and rival khans, as well as the princes through whom the line of descent passed. The main sources for the Medieval and Early Modern generations are the major genealogical compendium Muʿizz al-ansāb and the Tawārīḫ-i guzīdah-i nuṣrat-nāmah, supplemented by other sources and secondary literature. For consistency, the names are given in the standard scholarly transcription used in English-language scholarship (e.g., Bosworth 1996) for Perso-Arabic sources such as these.

References:

Bibliography

[edit]
Notes:
  1. ^ Turki/Kypchak: توقا تیمور

    There are many variations of this name including:
    توقای تیمور, تغا تیمور, طغای تیمور
  2. ^ Počekaev 2010: 372 conflates him with his brother Bāyān and gives their descendants jointly.
  3. ^ Gaev 2002: 52; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  4. ^ Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 286.
  5. ^ Gaev 2002: 52; Sabitov 2008: 286.
  6. ^ Gaev 2002: 53; Vásáry 2009; correcting the long-held view that this khan was a descendant of Orda Khan, as in, e.g., Howorth 1880: 221 and Stokvis 1888: Chapter 9 Table 7.
  7. ^ Počekaev 2010: 372 conflates him with his brother Bāy-Timur and gives their descendants jointly.
  8. ^ Gaev 2002: 53; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  9. ^ Identification preferred by Sabitov 2008: 288, 295, and Sabitov 2014, but rejected by others (e.g., Parunin 2016, Sidorenko 2016) on chronological grounds.
  10. ^ Sabitov 2014, noting this Sayyid-Aḥmad's patronym Beksubovič in Polish-Lithuanian sources. Počekaev 2010: 205, identifies this Sayyid-Aḥmad as the son of Karīm-Bīrdī.
  11. ^ Welsford 2013: 50, 52-53, identifies Ūz-Tīmūr with his brother Kay-Tīmūr.
  12. ^ Welsford 2013: 53, gives the name as Bādābūk.
  13. ^ Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372; correcting the long-held view that this khan was a descendant of Orda Khan, as in, e.g., Howorth 1880: 221 and Stokvis 1888: Chapter 9 Table 7.
  14. ^ Gaev 2002: 53; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  15. ^ Howorth 1880: 224; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  16. ^ Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 305; Počekaev 2010: 372; Howorth 1880: 685 and Stokvis 1888: Chapter 9 Table 7, erroneously make him a son of Barāq.
  17. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 305.
  18. ^ Howorth 1880: 224; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  19. ^ Howorth 1880: 291; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  20. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 305; Počekaev 2010: 372. For fuller treatment of his descendants, the Kazakh khans and princes, see Sabitov 2008.
  21. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 305.
  22. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 305.
  23. ^ Sabitov 2008: 306.
  24. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305; Howorth 1880: 685 and Stokvis 1888: Chapter 9 Table 7, erroneously make him a son of Adīk.
  25. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 305.
  26. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  27. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  28. ^ Sabitov 2008: 227.
  29. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 310.
  30. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 310.
  31. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 310.
  32. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 310.
  33. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 311.
  34. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 311.
  35. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 311.
  36. ^ Sabitov 2008: 311.
  37. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 310.
  38. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  39. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  40. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  41. ^ Sabitov 2008: 233.
  42. ^ Sabitov 2008: 233.
  43. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 310.
  44. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 310.
  45. ^ Sabitov 2008: 310; Howorth 1880: 685 and Stokvis 1888: Chapter 9 Table 7, erroneously make him a son of Aychuwāq.
  46. ^ Sabitov 2008: 227.
  47. ^ Sabitov 2008: 227.
  48. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  49. ^ Sabitov 2008: 311.
  50. ^ Sabitov 2008: 307.
  51. ^ Sabitov 2008: 307.
  52. ^ Sabitov 2008: 309.
  53. ^ Sabitov 2008: 309.
  54. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  55. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  56. ^ Sabitov 2008: 307.
  57. ^ Sabitov 2008: 307.
  58. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 307, 309.
  59. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 309.
  60. ^ Sabitov 2008: 147, 304.
  61. ^ Sabitov 2008: 147, 304.
  62. ^ Sabitov 2008: 305.
  63. ^ Sabitov 2008: 147, 304.
  64. ^ Sabitov 2008: 187.
  65. ^ Sabitov 2008: 304.
  66. ^ Sabitov 2008: 309; omitted by Howorth 1880: 685 and Stokvis 1888: Chapter 9 Table 7.
  67. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 309.
  68. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 309.
  69. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 309.
  70. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 309.
  71. ^ Sabitov 2008: 309.
  72. ^ Sabitov 2008: 145.
  73. ^ Sabitov 2008: 145.
  74. ^ Sabitov 2008: 145, but at 97-98 identified as a Shibanid, descended from the khans of Sibir.
  75. ^ Sabitov 2008: 307.
  76. ^ Sabitov 2008: 145.
  77. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 309.
  78. ^ Sabitov 2008: 217.
  79. ^ Howorth 1880: 685; Sabitov 2008: 200, 309.
  80. ^ Sabitov 2008: 200.
  81. ^ Sabitov 2008: 218.
  82. ^ Sabitov 2008: 220, 310.
  83. ^ Howorth 1880: 225; Gaev 2002: 53; Počekaev 2010: 372; Welsford 2013: 53, makes him the son of Tūluk-Tīmūr, here given as his brother; correcting the long-held view that this khan was a descendant of Orda Khan, as in, e.g., Stokvis 1888: Chapter 9 Table 7.
  84. ^ Howorth 1880: 226; Gaev 2002: 53; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  85. ^ Howorth 1880: 269; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  86. ^ Proposed by Sidorenko 2016: 66.
  87. ^ Sabitov 2014, noting this Sayyid-Aḥmad's patronym Beksubovič in Polish-Lithuanian sources; Počekaev 2010: 205, identifies this Sayyid-Aḥmad as the son of Karīm-Bīrdī.
  88. ^ Howorth 1880: 270; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  89. ^ Preferred by Sabitov 2008: 56, 295; Počekaev 2010: 205, identifies this Sayyid-Aḥmad with Sayyid-Aḥmad II, who ruled in 1432–1452 (but the latter bears the patronym Beksubovič: Sabitov 2014), while making the Sayyid-Aḥmad of 1416 the son of Mamkī: Počekaev 2010: 194.
  90. ^ Howorth 1880: 270; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  91. ^ Howorth 1880: 270; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  92. ^ Howorth 1880: 274; Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  93. ^ Gaev 2002: 54.
  94. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Počekaev 2010: 372; Welsford 2013: 53, gives the name as Habīnah.
  95. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 286, 295; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  96. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  97. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 296; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  98. ^ Gaev 2002: 53; Sabitov 2008: 296.
  99. ^ Howorth 1880: 452; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 292, 296; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  100. ^ Sabitov 2008: 293.
  101. ^ Sabitov 2008: 293.
  102. ^ Howorth 1880: 452; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 296; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  103. ^ Howorth 1880: 468; Sabitov 2008: 296; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  104. ^ Howorth 1880: 477; Sabitov 2008: 296.
  105. ^ Sabitov 2008: 294.
  106. ^ Howorth 1880: 477; Sabitov 2008: 296; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  107. ^ oworth 1880: 477; Sabitov 2008: 294, 296.
  108. ^ Howorth 1880: 477; Sabitov 2008: 292, 296.
  109. ^ Sabitov 2008: 292, who refers to him as Fatḥ Girāy.
  110. ^ Sabitov 2008: 292.
  111. ^ Sabitov 2008: 292.
  112. ^ Sabitov 2008: 296.
  113. ^ Howorth 1880: 488; Sabitov 2008: 296.
  114. ^ Howorth 1880: 512; Sabitov 2008: 296.
  115. ^ Sabitov 2008: 296.
  116. ^ Sabitov 2008: 297; erroneously, Howorth 1880: 540, conflates him with Muḥammad Girāy II, while Stokvis 1888: chapter 9, table 7, makes him Muḥammad Girāy II's son.
  117. ^ Howorth 1880: 519; Sabitov 2008: 296.
  118. ^ Howorth 1880: 523; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  119. ^ Howorth 1880: 538; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  120. ^ Howorth 1880: 543; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  121. ^ Howorth 1880: 528; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  122. ^ Sabitov 2008: 297.
  123. ^ Sabitov 2008: 297.
  124. ^ Howorth 1880: 538; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  125. ^ Howorth 1880: 545; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  126. ^ Howorth 1880: 559; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  127. ^ Howorth 1880: 568; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  128. ^ Howorth 1880: 579; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  129. ^ Howorth 1880: 585; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  130. ^ Howorth 1880: 582; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  131. ^ Sabitov 2008: 298.
  132. ^ Sabitov 2008: 299.
  133. ^ Sabitov 2008: 307.
  134. ^ Howorth 1880: 584; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  135. ^ Sabitov 2008: 299.
  136. ^ Sabitov 2008: 298.
  137. ^ Howorth 1880: 597; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  138. ^ Howorth 1880: 597; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  139. ^ Sabitov 2008: 298.
  140. ^ Howorth 1880: 571; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  141. ^ Howorth 1880: 571; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  142. ^ Sabitov 2008: 298.
  143. ^ Howorth 1880: 595; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  144. ^ Howorth 1880: 575; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  145. ^ Sabitov 2008: 298.
  146. ^ Howorth 1880: 576; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  147. ^ Sabitov 2008: 298.
  148. ^ Howorth 1880: 585; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  149. ^ Howorth 1880: 546; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  150. ^ Howorth 1880: 547; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  151. ^ Sabitov 2008: 297.
  152. ^ Howorth 1880: 562; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  153. ^ Sabitov 2008: 297.
  154. ^ Howorth 1880: 563; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  155. ^ Howorth 1880: 565; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  156. ^ Sabitov 2008: 297.
  157. ^ Howorth 1880: 565; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  158. ^ Sabitov 2008: 298; Howorth 1880: 558, doubts this descent.
  159. ^ Howorth 1880: 575; Sabitov 2008: 298.
  160. ^ Sabitov 2008: 297.
  161. ^ Howorth 1880: 538; Sabitov 2008: 297.
  162. ^ Proposed by Parunin 2016: 159-168.
  163. ^ Sabitov 2014, noting this Sayyid-Aḥmad's patronym Beksubovič in Polish-Lithuanian sources; Počekaev 2010: 205, identifies this Sayyid-Aḥmad as the son of Karīm-Bīrdī.
  164. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 288, 295; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  165. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 288; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  166. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 291, 295; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  167. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  168. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 291.
  169. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 291; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  170. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 292; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  171. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 292; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  172. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 292; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  173. ^ Sabitov 2008: 292.
  174. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 292; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  175. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Sabitov 2008: 292; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  176. ^ Howorth 1880: 447; Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 292.
  177. ^ Welsford 2013: 53, gives the name as Tumghān.
  178. ^ Sabitov 2008: 284.
  179. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372; Howorth 1880: 259 and Stokvis 1888: chapter 9 table 7 make him erroneously son of Urus' son Tīmūr-Malik.
  180. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372; Howorth 1880: 259 and Stokvis 1888: chapter 9 table 7 make him erroneously son of Urus' son Tīmūr-Malik.
  181. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372; Howorth 1880: 265-266 and Stokvis 1888: chapter 9 table 7 make him erroneously a brother of Shādī-Beg.
  182. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  183. ^ Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 288, 295; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  184. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 288; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  185. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 293; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  186. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 294; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  187. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 294.
  188. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 294; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  189. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 294.
  190. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 288; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  191. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 288; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  192. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 294.
  193. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 292.
  194. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 288; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  195. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 294.
  196. ^ Sabitov 2008: 293.
  197. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 294.
  198. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 288; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  199. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  200. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  201. ^ Gaev 2002: 55.
  202. ^ Gaev 2002: 55.
  203. ^ Sabitov 2008: 293.
  204. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 289, 293.
  205. ^ Howorth 1880: 362; Sabitov 2008: 293.
  206. ^ Sabitov 2008: 292-293.
  207. ^ Sabitov 2008: 292-293.
  208. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  209. ^ Howorth 1880: 743; Gaev 2002: 55; Welsford 2013: 50; Sabitov 2008: 300 makes Jawāq the son of his brother Yaʿqūb.
  210. ^ Howorth 1880: 743-744; Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 300; Welsford 2013: 50.
  211. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Gaev 2002: 55; Welsford 2013: 50.
  212. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 300; Welsford 2013: 50.
  213. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 300.
  214. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 300.
  215. ^ Desmaisons 1871–1874: Table 1b; Howorth 1880: 747.
  216. ^ Desmaisons 1871–1874: Table 1b.
  217. ^ Sabitov 2008: 302.
  218. ^ Sabitov 2008: 302.
  219. ^ Sabitov 2008: 304.
  220. ^ Sabitov 2008: 302.
  221. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 302.
  222. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 300.
  223. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 300.
  224. ^ Howorth 1880: 751; Sabitov 2008: 301.
  225. ^ Howorth 1880: 755; Sabitov 2008: 301.
  226. ^ Howorth 1880: 760; Sabitov 2008: 301.
  227. ^ Howorth 1880: 762; Sabitov 2008: 301.
  228. ^ Howorth 1880: 765; Sabitov 2008: 301.
  229. ^ Sabitov 2008: 301.
  230. ^ Sabitov 2008: 302.
  231. ^ Sabitov 2008: 302.
  232. ^ Sabitov 2008: 302.
  233. ^ Sabitov 2008: 302.
  234. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 301.
  235. ^ Howorth 1880: 744; Sabitov 2008: 301.
  236. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 286; Počekaev 2010: 372; Howorth 1880: 263 and Stokvis 1888: chapter 9 table 7 make him erroneously son of Urus' son Tīmūr-Malik.
  237. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  238. ^ Gaev 2002: 54; Sabitov 2008: 288.
  239. ^ Gaev 2002: 54.
  240. ^ Gaev 2002: 54.
  241. ^ As proposed by Gaev 2002: 54.
  242. ^ Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.
  243. ^ Preferred by Počekaev 2010: 194, 372.
  244. ^ Gaev 2002: 55; Sabitov 2008: 287; Počekaev 2010: 372.


See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tuqa-Timur

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tuqa-Temür (also spelled Tuqa-Timur or Toqa-Temür; fl. 13th century) was a Mongol prince and the thirteenth son of , the eldest son of , making him a grandson of the Mongol Empire's founder. Though he did not himself rule as khan or lead major military campaigns, Tuqa-Temür holds historical importance as the progenitor of the Tuqa-Timurid lineage within the Jochid dynasty, whose descendants dominated the later phases of the and its successor polities. This branch produced several prominent rulers, including Khan (r. 1378–1395), who briefly reunified the fragmented Horde under Jochid authority before clashing with the conqueror . The Tuqa-Timurids' rise reflected the shifting power dynamics in the Ulus of Jochi, where younger sons' lines often outlasted those of elder brothers like Batu and Orda amid internecine struggles and external pressures.

Lineage and Early Context

Parentage and Position within the Jochid Ulus

Tuqa-Timur, also rendered as Toqa Temür or Tuqai-Timur, was the thirteenth son of Jochi, the eldest son of Genghis Khan, positioning him within the Borjigin clan's Jochid branch that inherited and expanded the ulus of Jochi following the latter's death around 1227. Jochi's ulus encompassed vast steppe territories from the Irtysh River to the Caspian Sea and beyond, divided among his sons into appanages, with Tuqa-Timur's share reflecting his junior status amid elder brothers such as Batu, Orda, and Berke who commanded larger contingents and led major campaigns. Historical genealogies, including those by Khondemir, list him as the penultimate or youngest of Jochi's fourteen sons, underscoring his peripheral role in the initial partitioning of the ulus. Within the Jochid ulus, Tuqa-Timur maintained a stationary administrative presence in the core territories while his elder brothers pursued expansive military endeavors under the Mongol Empire's directives, such as the western invasions coordinated by Batu after Ögedei Khan's accession in 1229. He participated in key assemblies, including the that affirmed the Empire's succession arrangements, representing the ulus alongside siblings like Orda, , and , though Batu deferred attendance to consolidate River holdings. This role likely involved overseeing internal governance and resource allocation during prolonged absences of senior kin, preserving ulus cohesion amid the Horde's early fragmentation into western (Batu's domain) and eastern (Orda's ) wings. Berke Khan, Jochi's sixth son and eventual ulus ruler from 1257 to 1266, influenced Tuqa-Timur's religious alignment by persuading him to convert to , as recorded in Abulghazi Bahadur's 17th-century , marking an early adoption of among Jochids that later permeated the Horde. Despite lacking a khanal title himself, Tuqa-Timur's position facilitated the endurance of his lineage, which retained appanages in regions like Greater and , setting for Tuqai-Timurid ascendance over Batuid primacy in the late .

Siblings and Familial Dynamics

Tuqa-Timur was the fourteenth and youngest son of , as enumerated by the 16th-century historian Khondemir drawing on earlier Mongol chronicles. His elder brothers, in approximate birth order, included Orda, who inherited the eastern territories encompassing and as founder of the ; Batu, who led the western ulus and established the core of the after the European campaigns; (Barka), who succeeded Batu as khan in 1257 and adopted , influencing the horde's religious orientation; Berkajar; Burah (possibly identical with ); , whose lineage later produced the Shaybanid rulers of Central Asian khanates; Tangqut; Boqal, progenitor of the influential Nogai; Chilauqun; Shingqor; Chimtai; and Udur. These siblings collectively numbered at least fourteen recorded sons from Jochi's various wives, including senior consorts from the Qonggirad and Imen tribes. Familial dynamics revolved around the partition of Jochi's ulus following his death in early 1227, which had allocated as the westernmost of the . Batu, as the second son but senior leader after Orda's eastern focus, commanded the unified Jochid forces in the 1236–1242 conquests of , , and the , with brothers like , , and younger siblings participating as commanders or contingents. Orda's maintained semi-autonomy in the east, fostering a dual structure that persisted until later mergers. Tuqa-Timur, lacking a major territorial share as the junior member, appears to have fulfilled supportive roles, administering core ulus territories during his brothers' extended absences for qurultais and military expeditions, as inferred from the hierarchical delegation among Jochid princes. While primary sources such as Rashid al-Din and Juvayni emphasize collective Jochid solidarity under Batu against external threats like the and Rus' principalities, underlying tensions emerged post-Batu's death in 1255, including Berke's disputes with the Ilkhan Hulagu over Caucasian territories, which indirectly strained familial alliances. No overt rivalries are documented among Jochi's immediate sons during their lifetimes, but the patrilineal emphasis on and merit in Mongol positioned elder brothers like Batu and Orda as dominant, relegating younger ones like Tuqa-Timur to oversight functions that preserved ulus stability. This structure enabled the Jochids' initial cohesion but sowed seeds for later dynastic shifts, as junior lines vied for supremacy after the Batuid branch's decline.

Role in the Mongol Conquests and Golden Horde

Participation in Western Campaigns

Tuqa-Timur participated in Batu Khan's western campaign, launched in 1236 following Ögedei Khan's directive at the 1235 quriltai to deploy the adult sons of Jochi against western foes, including Volga Bulgaria, the Kipchaks, Rus' principalities, and regions of Eastern Europe. The expedition achieved decisive victories, such as the destruction of Volga Bulgaria in late 1236, the subjugation of Ryazan and Vladimir-Suzdal in 1237–1238, the sack of Kiev on December 6, 1240, and incursions into Poland (Battle of Legnica, April 9, 1241) and Hungary (Battle of Mohi, April 11, 1241), before halting in 1242 upon news of Ögedei's death. Assigned to the left wing under his brother , Tuqa-Timur commanded forces alongside commanders like Shinggum and Udur, supporting operations against the , , and Rus' forces in the and steppe regions during 1238–1239. Chronicles such as Rashid al-Din's Jami' al-tawarikh confirm his involvement as one of the Jochid princes mobilizing ulus troops for the thrust westward, while and C. de Bridia's History of the Mongols Whom We Call Tartars depict him leading the left wing in assaults on Bulghar, the (As), and Rus' territories en route to . The Yuanshi further notes his command of Tatar detachments under Batu, integrating nomadic contingents into the broader of approximately 120,000–150,000 warriors. No primary accounts attribute specific battles or independent commands to Tuqa-Timur, suggesting his contributions were supportive within the coordinated Jochid structure rather than prominently autonomous, in contrast to Batu's central role or Berke's detachments against the . This alignment reflects the campaign's emphasis on familial hierarchy, with Tuqa-Timur's ulus providing auxiliary tumens for flanking maneuvers and pursuit operations across the expansive fronts from the to the Carpathians.

Representation and Influence under Batu and Berke

Tuqa-Timur, as a son of and younger brother to Batu, took part in the Mongol western expedition led by Batu from 1236 to 1241, serving in the left wing of the Jochid forces alongside his brother Orda during the conquests of , Kievan Rus', and incursions into . Historical records, including Rashid al-Din’s accounts, place him among the supporting princes rather than in independent command, indicating his primary function was representational as part of the extended Jochid leadership structure that enforced Mongol authority over newly subjugated territories. His influence under Batu thus derived from familial proximity, aiding in the coordination of ulus resources without documented strategic prominence. After Batu's death in 1255, Tuqa-Timur continued under 's khanate (1257–1266), where his role shifted toward internal consolidation. , the first Jochid khan to convert to circa 1252, persuaded Tuqa-Timur to follow suit, marking an early instance of religious alignment among Jochi's sons that facilitated alliances with Muslim polities in the region. This conversion, occurring sometime after 1252, positioned Tuqa-Timur as a supporter of 's policies amid tensions with the , though he held no recorded military commands during 's conflicts, such as the 1262 clash with Hulagu. Tuqa-Timur's influence under Berke extended to urban development, as both brothers contributed significantly to the expansion of Saraychik (near the Ural River) in the mid-13th century, transforming it into a key administrative and trade hub for the Jochid ulus through investments in infrastructure and settlement. This collaboration reflected a broader Jochid emphasis on sedentarization and economic stabilization post-conquest, with Tuqa-Timur representing fraternal unity in Berke's efforts to legitimize rule via Islamic and urban patronage, though his personal authority remained subordinate to the khan's. He is last attested after 1257, surviving into Berke's reign without succeeding to the throne.

Family and Immediate Descendants

Wives and Children

No specific wives of Tuqa-Timur are named in primary or secondary historical sources, reflecting the limited personal details preserved for Jochid princes beyond their political roles. Accounts of his children are similarly sparse in early chronicles, with Rashid al-Din and Juvayni not enumerating them explicitly; however, his male offspring founded the Tuqai-Timurid lineage, which persisted as a distinct branch of the Jochids and later vied for supremacy in the following the decline of the senior Batuid line around the 1360s. Later genealogical works, such as those drawing on Abul-Ghazi Bahadur, trace multiple generations from Tuqa-Timur, confirming progeny but without precise counts or names tied to verifiable events in his lifetime (post-1257). This scarcity underscores the focus of historiography on khanal successions rather than collateral familial branches until their ascent in the .

Key Offspring and Their Alliances

Tuqa-Timur's sons, as recorded in medieval Persian sources such as Rashid al-Din Hamadani's and the genealogical text Mu'izz al-ansab, included Bay-Timur, Bayan, Urung-Timur, and Quyunchaq; these offspring established lineages that vied for influence in the eastern Jochid territories, particularly the . Bayan, a prominent son, ruled as khan of the in the late , overseeing eastern domains from roughly the 1280s until his deposition around 1299; he navigated alliances amid regional power struggles, including resistance to incursions by claimants and , who supported his cousin Kobelek's coup with military aid, leading to Bayan's temporary loss of authority before partial recovery by 1304. Urung-Timur's descendants rose to prominence in the , most notably through (r. 1378–1395), who forged a strategic alliance with (Tamerlane) in the 1370s; this pact enabled Tokhtamysh to overthrow his great-uncle Urus Khan's successors and unify the fragmented by defeating the Batuid khan Mamai at the Battle of the Kalka River in 1380, temporarily restoring centralized Jochid rule over the Pontic-Caspian s. Quyunchaq's line produced (r. ca. 1368–1377), who expanded control westward into the core territories around 1370, challenging Batuid incumbents like Aziz Saltan by leveraging nomadic coalitions and asserting seniority as a Tuqa-Timurid; Urus's campaigns subdued rival appanages in the , fostering inter-Jochid rivalries that presaged the dynasty's shift from Batu's direct heirs. Bay-Timur's progeny, though less documented in primary accounts, contributed to minor holdings in the eastern ulus, with like Toqanchar appearing in succession disputes by the early , underscoring the Tuqa-Timurids' gradual entanglement in broader Jochid power networks.

Broader Descendants and Dynastic Impact

Tuqa-Timurid Branch in the

The Tuqa-Timurid branch, stemming from Tuqa-Timur (d. after 1257), the fifth son of , initially managed appanages in the eastern Jochid territories, including areas linked to the ulus of Orda, his nephew. Following the Batuid dynasty's extinction with Berdibek's murder circa 1359, which triggered a succession vacuum and internecine strife among Jochid princes, Tuqa-Timurids capitalized on the disorder to challenge and supplant western Batuid and Shibanid claimants. This replacement was not rooted in established but in pragmatic alliances with nomadic clans, military victories, and control over eastern resources, reflecting the ulus's decentralized power structure where assemblies endorsed victors rather than bloodlines alone. Urus Khan (r. circa 1368–1377), a Tuqa-Timurid via the line Tuqa-Timur > Urung-Timur > Sariicha > Kuyunchak > Qutluq-Khwaja > Tuy-Khwaja, consolidated the and invaded the , installing puppets like Temur Khwaja before facing revolts from kin. His nephew (r. 1378–1395), fleeing east after challenging Urus, secured Timur's backing in 1376 to overthrow Urus's sons and unify the fractured Horde by 1382, enforcing tribute from via on August 26 that year. 's campaigns restored central authority temporarily, minting coins in Sarai and expanding to the , but his 1391–1395 defeats by shattered Horde cohesion, scattering Tuqa-Timurids across successor polities. Post-1395 fragmentation saw Tuqa-Timurids dominate ephemeral khanates: Temur Qutlugh (r. 1399–1400) and his son (r. 1400) briefly held Sarai, while Edigu's puppet Jalal al-Din (r. 1411–1412) and others vied for control. By the fifteenth century, Tuqa-Timur descendants supplied most khans from to the , including the in (founded circa 1430s by Haci I Giray, tracing to Tuqa-Timur via Togay), which endured until 1783 under Ottoman . This proliferation owed to the branch's demographic depth in eastern lineages and adaptive intermarriages, sustaining Jochid legitimacy amid Batuid decline, though chronic eroded centralized rule. Genealogical sources like Rashid al-Din's Shu'ab al-Panjgana affirm the branch's claims, yet variant chronicles highlight disputes over exact patrilines, underscoring reliance on seals and oral traditions for verification.

Shift from Batuids to Tuqai-Timurids in Succession

The Batuid dynasty, descended from , dominated the throne of the from its establishment in the mid-13th century until the assassination of Berdibek Khan in August 1359. Berdibek's murder, allegedly by his son or rivals, extinguished the direct male line of Batu's descendants, as subsequent Batuid claimants were either killed or lacked viable succession, triggering a period of instability known as the (approximately 1359–1380). This era saw over a dozen khans enthroned and deposed in rapid succession, often through violence, with power fragmented among competing Jochid princes from various branches, including brief interludes by Shibanid and other lineages. The vacuum created by the Batuid extinction disrupted the Horde's traditional succession norms, which had favored Batu's line due to his seniority and conquests, allowing collateral Jochid branches to vie for legitimacy through kurultai assemblies and clan alliances. Tuqa-Timur's descendants, known as Tuqai-Timurids, capitalized on this chaos; Tuqa-Timur himself, a younger brother of Batu and thus of equal Jochid rank, had maintained a peripheral ulus but his progeny built influence via marriages into powerful tribes like the Kungrats and Shirins. The pivotal figure was Tokhtamysh (r. ca. 1378–1395), a Tuqai-Timurid who first secured the White Horde (eastern territories) around 1378 with backing from Timur (Tamerlane), then invaded the Blue Horde, defeating rivals like Urus Khan (another Tuqai-Timurid) by 1380 and unifying the ulus under Sarai. Tokhtamysh's reign represented the most sustained Tuqai-Timurid interlude, restoring centralized authority, suppressing internal revolts, and reasserting Horde suzerainty over in 1382 through the sack of the city. However, this shift was provisional rather than dynastic; Tokhtamysh's defeat by in 1391–1395 fragmented the Horde anew, and his death in around 1406 ended direct Tuqai-Timurid primacy, with subsequent khans drawing from multiple Jochid lines amid ongoing . The replacement underscored the fragility of Jochid , as support and military prowess overrode strict lineage, contributing to the Horde's eventual disintegration into successor states like the and , where Tuqai-Timurids retained influence.

Notable Later Descendants and Their Achievements

One prominent later descendant was (r. ca. 1368–1377), a great-great-grandson of Tuqa-Timur through the line of Badiq. Urus consolidated power in the by defeating rival claimants and expanding influence into the , capturing Sarai around 1376 and briefly reasserting centralized authority over fragmented Jochid territories amid the decline of Batuid dominance. His campaigns against the and incursions into Moscow's sphere demonstrated military prowess but ended in failure due to internal revolts by his grandsons, including , precipitating further succession crises. The most notable achievement among Tuqa-Timur's later progeny belongs to Tokhtamysh Khan (r. 1378–1395), a fourth-generation descendant via Tuy Khwāja and Qutluq Khwāja. Initially backed by (Tamerlane), Tokhtamysh defeated the bek at the on September 15, 1380, unifying the Blue and White Hordes under Tuqai-Timurid rule for the first time since the mid-14th century fragmentation. He restored Horde suzerainty over the Rus' principalities by besieging and sacking on August 26, 1382, after a three-day assault that killed an estimated 24,000 defenders and civilians, compelling renewed tribute payments and yarlyk grants to princes like Dmitry Donskoy's successors. Tokhtamysh's administrative reforms, including minting coinage in Sarai and New Sarai from 1382 onward, temporarily stabilized the economy, but his subsequent invasion of 's domains in 1385–1391 provoked retaliatory campaigns, culminating in Tokhtamysh's decisive defeat at the on April 15, 1395, which scattered his forces and accelerated the Horde's disintegration into successor khanates. Subsequent Tuqai-Timurid khans, such as Barak Khan (r. 1422–1423), grandson of Urus via Quyurchuq, held brief tenures amid anarchy but contributed little beyond nominal continuity; Barak's rule ended in , underscoring the line's waning influence post-Tokhtamysh. The branch's dynastic impact persisted in peripheral states, with descendants like (d. 1445) founding the Kazan Khanate in 1438 after fleeing Horde infighting, where he leveraged Jochid legitimacy to raid Muscovy until his defeat and death at the Battle of on December 7, 1445. Overall, while Tuqai-Timurids supplanted Batuids by emphasizing lateral over strict descent—evident in Tokhtamysh's enthronement despite non-senior status—their achievements were transient, yielding to Timurid incursions and internal rivalries that eroded the ulus by the early .

Historical Assessment and Legacy

Genealogical Debates and Sources

The genealogy of Tuqa-Timur as a son of , the eldest son of , is attested in early 14th-century Persian chronicles drawing on Mongol court records and oral testimonies. Rashid al-Din's Jamiʿ al-tawārīkh (c. 1307–1316), composed as an official history under Ilkhanid , enumerates Jochi's sons and positions Tuqa-Timur among the younger ones, specifically as the thirteenth in that includes Batu as the eldest legitimate heir and as another prominent brother; this account relies on consultations with Genghisid descendants and imperial archives, lending it empirical weight despite the Ilkhanid authors' potential rivalry with the Jochid ulus. Later corroboration appears in Juvayni's Tārīkh-i Jahāngushā (c. 1260), which references Jochi's broader progeny without exhaustive detail, emphasizing the ulus's division among sons like Batu and Orda while implying additional junior lines such as Tuqa-Timur's. Debates over Tuqa-Timur's exact rank among 's 14–15 sons—whether youngest or penultimate—arise from inconsistencies in source ordering, with Rashid al-Din prioritizing birth sequence based on available traditions, while later Jochid-oriented genealogies like Muʿizz al-ansāb () adjust emphases to elevate Tuqa-Timur's branch for succession legitimacy after the Batuid line's extinction c. 1359. This compendium, compiled amid ulus fragmentation, exhibits sympathy toward Tuqai-Timurids (e.g., legitimizing Urus Khan's claims c. 1360s–1370s), potentially reflecting patronage by that lineage rather than neutral archival fidelity, as it contrasts with rival Shibanid or Ordaid genealogies that downplay Tuqa-Timur's seniority to assert alternative rights under Jochid custom of rotating among senior appanages. Such variances underscore causal tensions in dynastic endurance, where empirical descent from Jochi was undisputed but interpretive biases in post-1360 sources—often tied to outcomes or Timurid interventions—shaped branch precedence without resolving via independent verification like numismatic or inscriptional , which remains sparse for junior lines. For descendants, Tawārīkh-i guzīdah-i nuṣrat-nāma-i sulṭānī and Muʿizz al-ansāb provide branched trees tracing Tuqai-Timurids through figures like Bay-Timur to later khans (e.g., , r. 1378–1395), but these face scrutiny for retrospective fabrication during the "" (1360s–1380s), when competing Jochid factions invoked selective ancestries to counter Batuid primacy's collapse; cross-verification with Arab-Persian annals (e.g., al-ʿAynī's works) confirms core links but highlights omissions of rival claimants, prioritizing causal realism over hagiographic inflation. Overall, while upstream paternity doubts (e.g., Jochi's own legitimacy) indirectly cloud the line, Tuqa-Timur's Jochid status holds via Rashid al-Din's proximity to events, outweighing later partisan sources' credibility deficits.

Causal Role in Jochid Fragmentation and Endurance

Tuqa-Timur's lineage played a pivotal role in the succession crisis following the extinction of the Batuid dynasty around 1359, after the assassination of Khan Berdibek, which initiated the Great Troubles period of civil strife in the 1360s and 1370s. With the primary ruling line of Batu Khan depleted, Tuqa-Timur's descendants, particularly through his son Toqai and grandson Urus Khan (who ruled the White Horde from approximately 1368 to 1377), provided viable Jochid claimants backed by influential clans such as the Kungrats, Shirins, and Kypchaks. This shift enabled Urus Khan's grandson Tokhtamysh to consolidate power by 1378, temporarily reunifying the fragmented Blue and White Hordes under Tuqai-Timurid rule until his defeat by Timur in 1395. The replacement of Batuids by Tuqai-Timurids exacerbated fragmentation by failing to establish a stable succession principle, as the Horde's traditional norms favoring senior Batuid lines dissolved, allowing opportunistic claims from various Jochid branches including Shibanids. Tokhtamysh's reliance on external alliances, such as with Timur against rivals, sowed seeds of vulnerability; his subsequent wars with Timur (1386–1395) devastated the Horde's infrastructure, including the destruction of Sarai, accelerating the ulus's disintegration into autonomous khanates like those of Kazan, Astrakhan, and Crimea by the early 15th century. The proliferation of Tuqai-Timurid sub-branches fueled internecine conflicts, as multiple descendants vied for thrones without a unifying authority, contributing to the Horde's effective collapse as a centralized entity by 1502. Conversely, the endurance of the Jochid ulus owed much to Tuqa-Timur's prolific progeny, which sustained Chinggisid legitimacy across successor states long after the Horde's fragmentation. Tuqai-Timurids ruled entities such as the (until Russian conquest in 1556) and influenced Crimean dynamics, ensuring Jochid descendants maintained nominal sovereignty over polities into the despite territorial losses. This branch's adaptability—leveraging ancestral appanages and tribal loyalties—prevented the total erasure of Jochid rule, preserving a dispersed but resilient dynastic network amid external pressures from Muscovy, , and Timurid incursions.

References

  1. https://qalam.global/en/articles/game-of-thrones-the-beginning-en
  2. https://www.podgorski.com/main/khanate-golden-horde.html
  3. https://www.facebook.com/KingsGenerals/posts/the-golden-horde-emerged-in-the-1240s-as-a-mongol-khanate-founded-by-batu-khan-d/991359976365411/
  4. https://kingsandgenerals.libsyn.com/272-history-of-the-mongols-golden-horde-13
  5. https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/MONGOLS.htm
  6. http://www.karakalpak.com/histgolden.html
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318077950_Succession_to_the_Throne_in_the_Golden_Horde_Rep-lacement_of_the_Batuids_by_the_Tuqai-Timurids
  8. https://qazinform.com/news/the-names-of-about-20-sons-of-jochi-are-known-zhaksylyk-sabitov-0d986e
  9. https://graphsearch.epfl.ch/en/concept/69826409
  10. http://xn--80aimpg.xn--80aagie6cnnb.xn--p1ai/uploads/libraries/original/36e0a73a027d0867d12f69c8b91b2c0ecec638c9.pdf?1499330473
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384251180_Sacred_space_of_the_Jochid_Ulus_Saraychik_and_BarshinkentZosy_lysyny_kieli_mekenderi_Sarajsyk_zne_BarsynkentSakralnoe_prostranstvo_Ulusa_Dzuci_Sarajsyk_i_Barsynkent
  12. https://www.academia.edu/33720758/SUCCESSION_TO_THE_THRONE_IN_THE_GOLDEN_HORDE_REPLACEMENT_OF_THE_BATUIDS_BY_THE_TUQAI_TIMURIDS
  13. https://elbilge.ucoz.ru/books/Qaidu.pdf
  14. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tokhtamysh
  15. https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2017-5-2.344-351
  16. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004315716/BP000006.xml
  17. http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2017-2-5/
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-the-mongol-empire/golden-horde-c-12601502/194D20494453E0AC8373BE9ADFB8B8D6
  19. https://www.academia.edu/44683012/New_Source_on_the_History_of_Juchid_Dynasties
  20. http://goldhorde.ru/en/%25E2%2584%25961-2016/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.