Hubbry Logo
UncyclopediaUncyclopediaMain
Open search
Uncyclopedia
Community hub
Uncyclopedia
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Uncyclopedia
Uncyclopedia
Uncyclopedia
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Uncyclopedia is the name of several forks of satirical online encyclopedias that parody Wikipedia. Its logo, a hollow "puzzle potato", parodies Wikipedia's globe puzzle logo,[2] and it styles itself as "the content-free encyclopedia", parodying Wikipedia's slogan of "the free encyclopedia" and likely as a play on the fact that Wikipedia is described as a "free-content" encyclopedia. Founded in 2005[3] as an English-language wiki, the project spans more than 75 languages as well as several subprojects parodying other wikis. Uncyclopedia's name is a portmanteau of the prefix un- and the word encyclopedia.[4][5]

Key Information

Various styles of humor are used as vehicles for parody, from pointed satire to light sarcasm, along with structured in-jokes and frequent non sequiturs. The site has attracted media attention for its articles on controversial subjects including religion, prominent people, places, politics, and pseudoscience.

Many Uncyclopedia articles contain graphics with a link to the corresponding Wikipedia article; Uncyclopedia often denotes the corresponding Wikipedia article to its content as being listed "for those without comedic tastes", and Wikipedia's article written by "so-called experts".

History

[edit]
A grab from the "About" page of Uncyclopedia highlighting its comical nature and satirical approach to Wikipedia with a link to this page

Uncyclopedia was launched on January 5, 2005, by Jonathan Huang, known online as "Chronarion", and a partner known online as "Stillwaters".[2] It was originally situated at uncyclopedia.org. In July 2006, it was acquired by Fandom, then known as Wikia.[6]

In January 2013, some Uncyclopedia editors and administrators set up a fork of Uncyclopedia at en.uncyclopedia.co, in response to Wikia's censorship, insertion of advertising, and the imposition of content warnings.[7] Fandom ceased hosting its version of Uncyclopedia[8] on May 14, 2019, and the Fandom site (colloquially known as the "spoon", a play on "fork") moved to uncyclopedia.ca, and in September 2021 to uncyclopedia.com. As of 2025, the English-language version of the "spoon" had over 37,000 content pages, while the "fork" had over 40,000 content pages, second only to the Portuguese version. The Fandom version of the site now shows only a "Not a valid community" landing page.

A third site, at mirror.uncyc.org, functions only as a mirror website with backup copies of some Uncyclopedia pages.

Structure

[edit]

Uncyclopedia is built on the same MediaWiki software that Wikipedia uses. However, during Fandom's (Wikia's) hosting of Uncyclopedia, Fandom extensively modified its version of MediaWiki version 1.19, making the Fandom Uncyclopedia site incompatible with later MediaWiki versions. In May 2018, Fandom dropped support for the Monobook skin that its Uncyclopedia site had used to mimic Wikipedia, claiming this was necessary to achieve GDPR compliance,[9] and warned that local work-arounds could not be extended to new visitors and editors by default.[10] Since all Uncyclopedias split off or were removed from Fandom, they mostly switched to using Vector instead (with MinervaNeue on mobile), in order to continue parodying Wikipedia.

Uncyclopedia projects are run independently by their own members, though some users have accounts on multiple Uncyclopedias. They contain interlanguage links to each other, but there is no global governing organization comparable to the Wikimedia Foundation that oversees Wikipedia as well as its sister projects.

Content

[edit]

Uncyclopedia's content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) license, although some content, notably images, is copyrighted.[4] Different Uncyclopedias sometimes have different licenses; for example, dÉsencyclopédie (French Uncyclopedia) is dual-licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 and the GFDL. As of May 2024, the English-language Uncyclopedia contains approximately 37,700 articles.[11]

Many articles on Uncyclopedia link to corresponding Wikipedia article on the subject, and they often designate Wikipedia's content as being written by "so-called experts"; this is most often denoted by Uncyclopedia articles with a corresponding Wikipedia article having a graphic located to the side of an article linking the related Wikipedia article to be used for "those without comedic tastes".[12]

Articles

[edit]
Where available, Uncyclopedia makes use of visual aids as a complement to its text, such as these European hazard symbols that include dogs.

Uncyclopedia encourages satire that is close to or resembles the truth. However, many articles employ absurdist humor and little, if any, factual accuracy remains. For example, Uncyclopedia's article about Wikipedia claims that Wikipedia is a parody of Uncyclopedia, not the reverse.[13] Many articles on the site contradict each other, even articles on the same subject.[citation needed]

Like Wikipedia's "Five pillars", Uncyclopedia has "Five pliers", including "Satirical point of view".[14] Its code of conduct follows from three main rules: "Be funny and not just stupid", "Don't be a dick", and "Dance like you've never danced before!"[3][15]

Parodying Wikipedia's article review service peer review, Uncyclopedia has a "Pee Review" where authors seek review by other Uncyclopedians on humor, grammar, spelling, use of images, and overall presentation.[16][17] Users can post to other wiki pages to solicit coding help and review or request user-edited images. Like Wikipedia, Uncyclopedia features articles and images on its front page. A system of user voting decides which articles and images to feature, usually deciding based on humor and writing quality. The site also welcomes audio contributions such as narration of articles. Uncyclopedia's articles often begin with quotations, usually misquoted, fictitiously attributed or entirely fabricated.[18] Among the most recurrent themes is the invention of quotes attributed to Oscar Wilde,[2] prompted by an article stating that inventing Wilde quotes was the "national sport of England", and themes such as "kitten huffing" (the inhalation of the souls of cats as a form of drug abuse).[3]

Much like Wikipedia, Uncyclopedia has policies concerning vanity articles, which are articles written by an individual associated with the subject of the page. Vanity articles were disallowed after many of them produced flame wars.[3] Uncyclopedia does not police conflict of interest but may delete submissions as non-notable on a case-by-case basis, using an AfD-like system called "Votes for deletion" (VfD) and a CSD-like system called "QuickVFD".

One of Uncyclopedia's most popular articles,[19] "AAAAAAAAA!", is a nonsensical page, with its content completely consisting of the upper case letter A with images and some punctuation marks.

Site-wide pranks

[edit]
Uncyclopedia's logo for Wikipedia

Some jokes involve the entire website, sometimes including a re-skin of the main page, such as with holiday themes. In 2012, as a parody of Wikipedia's black-out protest against the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) et al., Uncyclopedia blocked all content for a day with a notice claiming to support the bills.[20] A tradition of April Fool's Day front page pranks occurs on the wiki, including a "blood donation" plea banner to spoof wiki donation banners on April 1, 2014.[21] For one week in 2013, the Wikia fork interrupted viewing with a claim that the site was unavailable, spoofing a notice on the NASA website during the United States federal government shutdown of 2013.[22]

Traditions

[edit]

Each year, Uncyclopedia writers create a list of 100 worst reflections of that year, marking website milestones or simply news. Most years, the creators of the list reveal that they have once again put off the list until the last second, and simply skip a large chunk to get to a hundred in time. Other Uncyclopedia traditions include creating a "top 10" list of articles for each year, chosen by popular vote.[citation needed]

Subprojects

[edit]
Uncyclomedia project Object of parody
UnBooks Wikibooks
UnNews Wikinews
Undictionary Wiktionary
Un-Bestiary Wikispecies
Uncycloversity Wikiversity
UnQuotable Wikiquote
UnScripts Wikisource
UnMeta-Wiki Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
UnCommons
(Uncyclomedia Commons) 		Wikimedia Commons
UnSignpost Wikipedia Signpost
UnTunes iTunes
UnVoyage Wikivoyage
HowTo wikiHow
Why? Answers.com
Un-Games Choose your own adventure books
UnDebate Debatepedia
UnPoetia Poetry (in general)
Undata Wikidata
UnReviews Reviews (in general)

As well as housing many articles designed to satirize Wikipedia-style content, Uncyclopedia contains several secondary projects (known as "UnProjects").[3][23] As of 2017, there were sixteen such subprojects,[24] each of which specializes in parody of a different information style. Many of these are directly analogous to Wikipedia's sister projects, while others such as UnTunes and HowTo parody projects completely unrelated to Wikipedia.

Press coverage

[edit]

Uncyclopedia has been referenced in several well-known news publications from around the world, in addition to numerous local and regional newspapers and periodicals. In 2005 the Flying Spaghetti Monster entry from Uncyclopedia was mentioned in a New York Times column reporting the spread of "Pastafarianism", the religion that worships the Flying Spaghetti Monster.[25] The column was then reprinted in other newspapers, including the Taipei Times.[26] The magazine .net featured an interview with Huang about Uncyclopedia in May 2007.[3] A number of other articles have been centred on specific entries on Uncyclopedia – most notably the article in the Arizona Daily Star, which focused on the Tucson, Arizona parody,[27] and the article in the Cyprus Mail, which focused on the Cyprus article.[28]

In addition to articles about specific entries on the wiki, several papers speak of the website in general – usually in a section devoted to technology or the Internet. This was the case when Uncyclopedia was referenced in the Boston Herald and The Guardian.[29][30] Although most articles mentioning Uncyclopedia are specific to the site, there are other articles about Wikia or Wikipedia that just mention its name briefly. These include the editorial in The Register discussing the Seigenthaler incident, in which Uncyclopedia was named only once.[31] It has also been listed as one of the "Top 100 Undiscovered Web Sites" in PC Magazine,[32] as well as among the "101 most useful websites" on the internet by The Sunday Telegraph.[33] Seattle Post-Intelligencer considers Uncyclopedia to be the wiki site equivalent of The Onion.[34]

Criticism and controversy

[edit]
The mobile version of an Uncyclopedia article about itself

At various times, articles on Uncyclopedia have been subject to criticism from King's College (School, Auckland)[35] the North-West Evening Mail,[36] Northern Irish politician James McCarry,[37] civic leaders of Telford, Shropshire, UK,[38] the Sioux City Journal,[39] Hawke's Bay Today,[40] and Lochaber News.[41]

In January 2008, the Malaysian Internal Security Ministry issued a directive alerting newspaper editors not to trust Uncyclopedia. It said the article concerning Malaysia contained "untruths, insults and ridicule" and was demeaning to the country.[42][43]

The site uses a layout that looks similar to Wikipedia's,[44] which may confuse inexperienced users who misinterpret the content as factual.[36][45]

In November 2012, the page "HowTo:Commit suicide" on Absurdopedia, the Russian-language Uncyclopedia, was legally prohibited by the Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare (Rospotrebnadzor). Absurdopedia administrator Edward Chernenko unsuccessfully sued them under his right to science and culture guaranteed by the Russian Constitution. During the proceedings, the Russian government and its experts claimed that Absurdopedia is intentionally trying to increase the number of child suicides in Russia by providing children with instructions for killing themselves.[46][47] As of 2013, the case is currently in the ECHR.[needs update][48]

In 2014, the page "HowTo:Make a bomb at home" on Absurdopedia was included in the Russian list of extremist materials.[49]

In August 2014, the logo displayed for Greggs on its Google profile was mistakenly temporarily switched to the logo used on Uncyclopedia's article on the subject at the Wikia site due to a caching issue, causing a PR crisis for the company.[50][51]

In 2017, two pages of Absurdopedia were banned in Russia: "HowTo:Bathe a cat" for "calls to violence against animals" and "HowTo:Make a nuclear bomb" for "information on manufacturing weapons".[52]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Uncyclopedia

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Uncyclopedia is a wiki-based website dedicated to producing satirical articles that the format and style of , presenting absurd, fictional, and humorous content under the guise of an encyclopedia. Launched on January 5, 2005, by contributors Jonathan Huang and the pseudonymous "Stillwaters," the project initially hosted on platforms like Wikia emphasizes collaborative editing to generate "content-free" entries intended to amuse rather than inform. Over time, it has developed multiple language versions and sub-sites mimicking other reference works, amassing a repository of parody pages that highlight the site's defining characteristic: deliberate inaccuracy for comedic effect. While lacking formal awards or institutional recognition, Uncyclopedia's endurance as a user-driven humor outlet underscores its role in , though its content quality varies due to the absence of rigorous akin to its target, .

History

Founding and Initial Development (2005–2006)

Uncyclopedia was launched on January 5, 2005[], inspired by the humorous content in Wikipedia's "Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense" page, by Jonathan Huang, a graduate student using the online pseudonym "Chronarion," and a collaborator known only as "Stillwaters." The initiative sought to parody the encyclopedic format of through intentionally absurd, satirical content written in a mock-serious tone, drawing early contributors who emphasized humor over factual accuracy. Initially hosted independently at uncyclopedia.org, with content licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) license, the site attracted a small but dedicated user base focused on crafting entries that subverted conventional knowledge presentation. Rapid expansion strained the original hosting infrastructure within months, prompting a migration to Wikia, a wiki platform established by Wikipedia co-founder . On May 26, 2005, Angela Beesley, Wikia's vice president, publicly announced the hosting shift, which provided enhanced scalability for the growing archive of parody articles. This move stabilized operations and facilitated broader community participation, with early development centering on establishing core stylistic conventions such as faux neutrality and exaggerated etymologies. By 2006, Uncyclopedia's foundational structure solidified under Wikia's support, though tensions over and platform policies began emerging. On July 10, 2006, Huang transferred ownership of the uncyclopedia.org domain to Wikia, further integrating the project into the service's ecosystem. This period marked the transition from nascent experimentation to a more organized satirical endeavor, with contributors refining mechanisms like in-jokes and template-based parody to sustain engagement.

Expansion and Migration from Wikia (2007–2010)

Following the sale of the uncyclopedia.org domain to Wikia in 2006 by co-founder Jonathan Huang (known online as Chronarion), Uncyclopedia migrated to the Wikia-hosted subdomain uncyclopedia.wikia.com, a decision made secretly and met with community objections due to the lack of consultation. On October 23, 2008, Wikia officially changed the site's URL to uncyclopedia.wikia.com. This transition, motivated by the need to avoid independent hosting costs, positioned the project on Wikia's scalable infrastructure, facilitating expansion without immediate financial strain. From 2007 to 2010, Uncyclopedia saw steady growth in content and engagement, evidenced by the establishment of annual "Best of Uncyclopedia" writing competitions, which encouraged original satirical articles and image creation each year during this interval. The platform's parody format attracted contributors interested in mimicking Wikipedia's style, leading to proliferation of themed articles, recurring in-jokes, and early international language versions as forks emerged. Wikia's hosting supported increased traffic and edits, though specific metrics such as article counts or user registrations remain undocumented in contemporaneous records. Early frictions with Wikia's evolving policies, including advertisements and skin customizations that hindered of Wikipedia's austere layout, began eroding contributor satisfaction by the late 2000s, planting seeds for the community's full departure in 2013. Despite these undercurrents, the period marked a phase of consolidation, with Uncyclopedia solidifying its niche as a humorous to encyclopedic seriousness under Wikia's .

Stabilization and Modern Era (2011–Present)

In January 2013, following growing dissatisfaction with Wikia's policies, the Uncyclopedia community forked the site and migrated to independent hosting at en.uncyclopedia.co under the Uncyclomedia network, utilizing software tailored for content without advertising constraints. Administrators prioritized server reliability and incremental updates, enabling uninterrupted operation amid a volunteer-driven model that emphasized creative freedom over commercial monetization. By mid-2013, the site had fully transitioned, with the community focusing on rather than platform disputes, marking a shift from expansion to maintenance of its satirical corpus. Throughout the 2010s, Uncyclopedia sustained modest growth, accumulating articles through collaborative editing while implementing technical refinements such as enhanced search functionality and responsive design to support mobile access, reflecting adaptations to evolving user habits. The independent fork diverged further from Wikia's remnant version, with Uncyclomedia providing robust, non-profit hosting for the English edition and facilitating multilingual extensions. This era saw no large-scale disruptions, with steady contributor engagement preserving the site's core parody mechanisms despite broader declines in wiki-based humor platforms. Uncyclopedia lacks a unified Chinese version, featuring separate editions in simplified Chinese (Hanzi, hosted at uncyclopedia.miraheze.org/zh) and traditional Chinese (Zhengti, at uncyclopedia.tw). Historical variants in Cantonese and Classical Chinese were created but soon merged into the Hanzi version. As of August 2017, the Hanzi version comprised 8,899 articles, while the Zhengti version had 6,465. The Portuguese-language version is the largest, with approximately 42,813 articles as of January 28, 2013, followed by the English edition with 29,395 articles at that time. In March 2019, (Wikia's successor) terminated its Uncyclopedia mirror, citing policy violations, which prompted the independent community to consolidate resources on Uncyclomedia and archive divergent content, reinforcing autonomy. The platform evolved with periodic upgrades for security and performance, including better integration with modern browsers and spam mitigation tools. By October 2025, the English Uncyclopedia hosted approximately 37,353 articles, underscoring persistent viability through niche appeal and resistance to centralized control. Uncyclomedia's expansion to over a dozen language variants further diversified the ecosystem, promoting cross-lingual satirical exchanges without diluting the original's absurd tone.

Technical Structure and Features

Platform and Software

Uncyclopedia employs the software, an open-source wiki engine written in that supports collaborative editing and through a backend. This platform enables features such as article namespaces, talk pages, user permissions, and revision history, mirroring the technical foundation of while accommodating satirical content creation. The primary English Uncyclopedia site at en.uncyclopedia.co operates as a self-hosted instance, independent of larger wiki farm providers. It originated on Wikia, a founded in 2004 that utilized customized MediaWiki installations for community-driven sites, but migrated to autonomous hosting on January 5, 2013, to address limitations in content policies, advertising integration, and software customization imposed by the host. This transition followed years of growth on Wikia, where Uncyclopedia had become one of the service's prominent properties, but escalating tensions over editorial control prompted the community-led relocation to dedicated servers. Post-migration, Uncyclopedia's administrators have maintained updates selectively to preserve compatibility with custom extensions and themes tailored for humor-oriented navigation, such as parody templates and dynamic infoboxes. The software supports multimedia uploads, category systems, and search functionality optimized for absurd query results, though it lacks advanced AI integrations or real-time collaboration tools found in modern alternatives. Hosting on independent infrastructure allows flexibility in scaling for spikes from viral articles, reportedly handling millions of monthly visits without reliance on third-party content delivery networks specified in . Uncyclopedia utilizes the software platform, version 1.39.7 as of August 2025, which structures its around a standard layout including a prominent search bar at the top of pages for querying satirical articles. The interface features "Jump to " and "Jump to search" links immediately below the site logo, facilitating quick access to core elements. A left sidebar provides primary navigation, containing collapsible sections for namespaces such as "Uncyclopedia," "Uncyclopedia talk," and portals to affiliated projects like Illogicopedia, alongside tools for uploading files, recent changes, and random article selection. This sidebar parodies Wikipedia's by including humorous community links, such as those to "Uncyclomedia Foundation" sister projects, which host additional parody wikis. User-specific tools appear in the top-right, offering , preferences, watchlist management, and contributions tracking for registered editors. The emphasizes satirical navigation through dedicated content blocks: "Today's featured article" links to a community-voted humorous entry; "Did you know?" lists absurd facts with hyperlinks to related pages; "In the news" presents fabricated headlines with ongoing satirical updates; and "On this day" chronicles invented historical events. Article pages include action tabs for viewing, , , and moving content, with inline links enhancing hypertext navigation in line with wiki conventions. Mobile access employs MediaWiki's responsive design, adapting the desktop interface for smaller screens by prioritizing search, main menu, and key sections while maintaining parody elements like the "content-free " slogan. Special pages, accessible via the sidebar's "Tools" section, include revealing site metrics such as 40,505 content articles and 159 active editors as of recent data.

Affiliated Projects and Forks

The Uncyclomedia Foundation, established to host Uncyclopedia, also maintains several affiliated parody projects that mimic initiatives, providing satirical content in specialized formats. These include UnNews, a news-oriented wiki featuring fabricated headlines and articles in the style of ; Undictionary, a of absurd and humorous definitions parodying ; UnBooks, a collection of mock and instructional texts; and Unquotable, an archive of invented quotations attributed to historical or fictional figures. Additional projects such as HowTo offer step-by-step guides for implausible or ridiculous tasks, while UnTunes compiles song lyrics and audio descriptions. Uncyclomedia Commons serves as a central repository for humorous images, diagrams, and media files used across projects, analogous to but with intentionally misleading or comedic assets. These affiliated projects operate on the same software as Uncyclopedia, enabling cross-linking and shared contributor bases, with coordination handled through UnMeta, a meta-wiki for inter-project discussions and policy alignment. The Foundation's structure allows for experimental wikis and supports foreign-language Uncyclopedias, fostering a network of over a dozen language variants as of 2025, though activity levels vary. Forks of Uncyclopedia include both official language adaptations and independent offshoots diverging in editorial focus. Language forks, such as the German Stupidedia (established around 2005) and French Désencyclopédie, replicate the satirical encyclopedia model in their respective tongues but maintain loose affiliation via the Uncyclomedia Foundation for technical support and cross-promotion. Illogicopedia, founded in 2007 by former Uncyclopedia contributors seeking looser standards for surreal and nonsensical content, initially operated as an independent but later integrated as a sister project under Uncyclomedia hosting, attracting users dissatisfied with Uncyclopedia's humor-writing guidelines. Other notable forks arose from hosting disputes, including the 2019 migration from /Wikia to uncyclopedia.co, preserving content while rejecting platform policies; residual versions persist on sites like uncyclopedia.ca, though with diminished activity. These forks highlight tensions between centralized control and community-driven divergence in satirical wiki ecosystems.

Content Characteristics

Core Article Style and Parody Mechanisms

Uncyclopedia articles emulate the formal and neutral tone of entries while deliberately incorporating fictional, exaggerated, or absurd information to generate humor through contrast. This relies on a delivery, where claims are presented with encyclopedic authority, mimicking Wikipedia's purported objectivity but subverting it with . Articles typically feature bolded first mentions of key terms, hierarchical headings for sections such as "" or "See also," and precise capitalization rules that parallel 's manual of style, all to heighten the ironic effect of the . Central parody mechanisms include the inversion of factual accuracy into coherent , such as treating trivial or fictional subjects with grave seriousness or applying pseudo-scholarly analysis to topics. Humor arises from techniques like escalation—building increasingly implausible details—irony, misdirection, and , often structured to maintain consistency within the article rather than devolving into random non-sequiturs. Contributors are advised to real subjects for effective , avoiding stagnant memes or overt bias as substitutes for wit, and to employ reversal by juxtaposing serious topics with silly interpretations or vice versa. Formatting reinforces the parody by prioritizing visual and structural resemblance to , including the use of italics for titles or emphasis, lists for enumerated absurdities, and images selected to underscore satirical points without infringing copyrights excessively. In-jokes specific to Uncyclopedia lore are used sparingly to prevent alienating readers, while proper and spelling—unless deliberately subverted—enhance the authoritative facade. This approach ensures articles achieve "hilarity" over mere stupidity, with revisions encouraged to refine the satirical edge.

Recurring Themes and Satirical Devices

Uncyclopedia employs a primary satirical device of mimicking the formal, neutral tone and structure of traditional encyclopedias while infusing content with deliberate falsehoods, exaggerations, and absurdities to undermine perceived pretensions of authoritative . Articles often begin with plausible-sounding introductions that escalate into nonsensical claims, such as attributing implausible inventions or histories to real figures or events, thereby parodying the encyclopedic commitment to factual accuracy. This contrast highlights the site's critique of encyclopedias' occasional over-seriousness or gaps in verifiability, using structured elements like hierarchical headings, bolded terms for first mentions, and faux-citations to replicate Wikipedia's format while subverting it with humorous irrelevance. Key humor mechanisms include escalation, where narratives start with semi-credible premises and devolve into extremes—for instance, transforming a biographical sketch into claims of outlandish achievements or disasters—and misdirection, luring readers with logical setups before veering into irony or reversal, such as portraying trivial subjects with grave, pseudo-academic analysis. Repetition and overstatement amplify ridicule, as seen in lists or descriptions that redundantly hammer absurd points, while blending real facts with fiction creates a "" effect, where partial truths anchor the . In-jokes, used sparingly, often reference Uncyclopedia's own ecosystem or niche cultural touchstones, fostering community insider humor without alienating broader readers, though recurs in portraying contributors or audiences as comically inept. Recurring themes revolve around deflating pomposity in authority figures, institutions, and cultural icons through inverted realities, such as reimagining historical events with bathetic or scatological twists or satirizing modern phenomena like and media via anthropomorphic absurdities. Mockery of encyclopedic rivals appears frequently, with articles lampooning "content-full" sources as dull or biased in contrast to Uncyclopedia's "content-free" ethos, alongside internal tropes like petty rivalries among parody wikis. Absurdity permeates specialized parodies, including faux news (UnNews) or instructional guides (HowTo), where serious topics invite "silly on serious" reversals, such as equating geopolitical conflicts to mundane failures, reinforcing the site's causal view that humor arises from exposing inflated narratives rather than mere randomness. These elements ensure targets human folly and institutional rigidities, prioritizing layered ridicule over random vulgarity.

Specialized Content Areas

Uncyclopedia maintains specialized content areas through distinct namespaces and category systems that facilitate targeted parody of informational formats. The HowTo namespace, for instance, hosts articles mimicking and instructional guides, offering deliberately flawed or hyperbolic procedures for mundane or impossible tasks, such as "HowTo:Build a Empire," which satirizes bureaucratic excess with steps involving contrived paperwork justification and customer manipulation. These entries diverge from standard articles by emphasizing procedural absurdity over encyclopedic description, often incorporating lists and step-by-step directives laced with escalating ridiculousness to lampoon real-world tutorials. Category hierarchies form another core specialized area, branching into topical subdomains like , sciences, biographies, and , as seen in the site's requested articles framework, which solicits contributions aligned with these fields to expand satirical coverage systematically. The primary category tree trunk organizes thousands of entries, enabling users to navigate parody clusters—such as those under or business and economics—while embedding in-jokes and escalating within each domain to critique source material's perceived pomposity. Graphic or extreme content is segregated into designated categories to contain its disruptive potential, preserving broader site coherence amid varied humor intensities. Templates constitute a technical specialization for content enhancement, with over 8,000 variants supporting mechanics like infoboxes that fabricate biographical or statistical data, citation mocks that ape scholarly footnotes with fabricated references, and formatting aids for media or social networking simulations. These tools, categorized into formatting, infoboxes, and general text elements, allow contributors to replicate Wikipedia's structural rigor while subverting it through ironic or erroneous implementations, such as exaggerated media boxes for fictional entities. Hacks and custom circumventions further specialize content delivery, enabling dynamic elements like screaming case avoidance or profanity filters tailored to satirical needs, ensuring parody fidelity without technical mimicry lapses. Community-driven features like Votes for Highlights (VFH) specialize in curating exemplary content, where articles undergo for elevation to featured status based on humor efficacy and structural polish, often requiring reasoned critiques to refine depth. Similarly, Pee Review provides draft feedback in specialized threads, focusing on elevating "okay" submissions toward VFH viability by addressing weaknesses in satirical execution, such as insufficient reasoning or underdeveloped absurdity. Userspace serves as an experimental enclave for prototyping specialized content, isolating trial-and-error edits from main articles to test namespace-specific innovations without compromising established standards.

Community Dynamics

Contributor Base and Editing Practices

Uncyclopedia operates on a volunteer-driven model, with contributors primarily consisting of pseudonymous or anonymous individuals motivated by an interest in and . The site's base totals 22,080 accounts, though activity levels are modest, with only 135 —defined as those making regular edits—representing 0.61% of the total. Administrative roles are handled by 43 administrators, 11 of whom remain active. This small, dedicated core sustains the project through collaborative efforts, often involving writers, illustrators, and humor enthusiasts who prioritize creative over institutional affiliation or professional credentials. Editing practices mirror those of traditional wikis, employing software that allows any registered user to modify pages directly, fostering rapid iteration and communal refinement. New contributors are advised to register accounts to avoid IP-based anonymity and begin by experimenting in personal userspace subpages, such as drafts tagged with construction templates, before proposing mainspace articles. Major revisions to established content require discussion on forums like the Village Dump to prevent unilateral overhauls, while low-quality submissions can be nominated for deletion via community votes. Image uploads and formatting follow standard syntax, with emphasis on enhancing satirical impact through visuals and links. Core guidelines stress humor as the paramount criterion, encapsulated in the "How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid" (HTBFANJS) policy, which directs editors to infuse wit, originality, and structure into content rather than relying on mere or factual mimicry. The satirical point of view mandates parodying encyclopedic norms, rejecting neutrality in favor of exaggerated, absurd narratives. Behavioral norms enforce and constructive engagement under the "Don't be a dick" principle, prohibiting harassment, plagiarism, or disruptive edits, though enforcement remains informal and community-led, with bans possible for repeated violations. Policies, while documented, are acknowledged as sometimes vague or inconsistently applied, reflecting the site's anti-authoritarian ethos.

Internal Governance and Conflicts

Uncyclopedia's internal governance is managed by a of volunteer editors who operate under a loose set of policies modeled after Wikipedia's structure but adapted for satirical content. Administrators, known as , are granted elevated privileges including page deletion, user blocking, and protection of articles through a community voting process called Votes for Sysop (VFS). Prospective administrators must garner sufficient support in these votes, with no self-nominations allowed and separate tallies for roles like bureaucrats; the process emphasizes humor and contribution quality over strict criteria. Bureaucrats handle user rights assignments, while broader decisions occur via forums and talk pages, though enforcement remains informal and subject to "ignorable policies" that gain acceptance through consensus rather than rigid rules. The site's Ban Policy outlines standards for user blocks, prioritizing disruptions like , spam, or off-topic behavior, with appeals possible but often resolved by admin discretion to prevent escalation into broader disputes. This policy explicitly discourages users from rallying external support or creating drama to challenge bans, such as forums aimed at removing offending administrators, reflecting recurring tensions over perceived power imbalances. Inactive administrators can be de-opped via community discussion, addressing concerns about unmaintained privileges in a low-activity environment. Internal conflicts frequently arise from voting disputes, particularly in VFS, where "fake campaigning" and prolonged debates have prompted forum proposals for streamlined processes, such as limiting nominations or admin intervention to curb "." More severe schisms stem from administrative actions, including permabans perceived as disrespectful, and off-site behaviors influencing on-wiki trust, as debated in forums like "The End of Everything." A pivotal external-internal clash occurred in 2019 when disagreements with host (formerly Wikia) over advertising increases, policy enforcement, and content control led to the community's to an independent server at uncyclopedia.co, rendering the Fandom version largely inactive and splitting resources between forks. This exodus, framed as reclaiming autonomy, highlighted governance vulnerabilities tied to third-party hosting, with the new site redirecting to consolidate the active community.

User Interaction and Traditions

Users engage with Uncyclopedia primarily through articles, participating in discussions, and voting on content nominations, mirroring Wikipedia's collaborative model but adapted for satirical purposes. Anonymous visitors can read and edit pages without registration, though creating user-specific pages requires logging in with a chosen username and optional fake . Registered users gain access to a personal userspace for subpages like sandboxes or talk areas, enabling iterative on humorous drafts. Interaction occurs via talk pages attached to articles and user profiles, where editors solicit feedback, debate revisions, or request on satirical elements, such as punchline structure or accuracy. Forums serve as central hubs for broader discourse, including threads on site policies, technical issues, and content disputes, often infused with the site's ironic tone. User access escalates through levels like autoconfirmed status after minimal edits, unlocking protections against vandalism, while advanced roles such as rollbackers handle rapid reverts of disruptive changes. A key tradition involves user-driven voting systems for , with nominations for Featured Article (VFH) and Featured Picture (VFP) requiring community approval via scored ballots on dedicated forum pages. Monthly votes select top articles from recent features, fostering recurring engagement and highlighting exemplary , as seen in October voting rounds where users rank entries based on humor and originality. Votes for deletion target low-quality or submissions, emphasizing collective judgment to maintain site standards amid prolific, absurd contributions. These processes, debated in forums for refinements like automated scoring, form ritualistic practices that sustain the community's .

Reception and Media Coverage

Early Press Attention

Uncyclopedia garnered its initial significant media notice in August 2005, when referenced the site's entry on the in a column examining the rapid online dissemination of Pastafarianism, a satirical created to protest the teaching of in schools. The article noted that both and Uncyclopedia had developed articles on the topic, positioning the parody site as an emerging counterpart capable of mirroring and mocking Wikipedia's coverage of timely cultural phenomena just months after Uncyclopedia's January 2005 launch. By September 2006, Wired magazine highlighted Uncyclopedia in a sidebar on wiki proliferation, identifying it as one of the largest non-Wikimedia wikis hosted by Wikia and explicitly labeling it a parody of Wikipedia. This coverage emphasized the site's scale and its role in the burgeoning ecosystem of user-generated content platforms, reflecting growing awareness of Uncyclopedia's appeal as a humorous foil to encyclopedic seriousness amid the mid-2000s wiki boom. These early mentions, primarily in U.S.-based outlets, framed Uncyclopedia as a lighthearted, content-free alternative that leveraged Wikipedia's model for , though they did not yet delve into its community dynamics or long-term sustainability. The attention coincided with the site's expansion, including its relocation to dedicated servers in July 2006, but remained sporadic and focused on its novelty rather than in-depth analysis.

Popularity Metrics and Cultural Reach

Uncyclopedia sustains a niche online presence, characterized by a base of approximately 22,204 accounts, with 148 active users contributing monthly as of late 2025. This represents a small fraction of its peak activity in the mid-2000s, when s exceeded 56,000 by 2022, indicating a contraction in over time. The platform has accumulated over 6.4 million edits across its content, averaging 290 edits per user, underscoring cumulative effort despite limited current participation. Article volume stands at 40,832 entries as of April 2025, covering satirical takes on diverse subjects from history to pop culture. External metrics are not prominently tracked by major providers like , suggesting monthly unique visitors remain in the low hundreds of thousands or less, far below mainstream encyclopedic sites. The site's includes 43 administrators, 11 of whom are active, facilitating ongoing amid subdued growth. Culturally, Uncyclopedia's parody model has permeated humor communities, inspiring derivative sites and references in niche media discussions of satirical wikis. Its content on , , and has drawn sporadic press notice for boundary-pushing humor, though without widespread mainstream adoption. The platform's endurance as a "content-free " exemplifies early , influencing user-generated traditions but yielding limited quantifiable reach beyond dedicated online circles.

Academic and Critical Analysis

Scholars in and have occasionally examined Uncyclopedia as an exemplar of collaborative within wiki ecosystems, emphasizing its of encyclopedic authority through deliberate and . In Jason Mittell's analysis of participatory and , Uncyclopedia is characterized as a that mocks "the documentary pretensions of encyclopedic writing" by substituting factual entries with humorous fabrications, thereby critiquing the rigid neutrality and comprehensiveness aspired to by platforms like . This perspective aligns with broader academic interest in how wikis expose the constructed, performative aspects of online knowledge production, where humor reveals the fragility of consensus-based editing. Critical evaluations often highlight Uncyclopedia's structural mimicry of —employing similar templates, categories, and citation styles—to amplify satirical effect, though scholarly coverage remains sparse relative to its subject. Studies of reference it alongside other sites to illustrate tensions between veracity and in user-generated content, noting that its embrace of "content-free" articles serves as a meta-commentary on and in the digital age. However, some critiques within literature point to its inconsistent humor as emblematic of the challenges in sustaining collaborative without devolving into triviality or repetition. Overall, academic discourse treats Uncyclopedia less as a standalone phenomenon and more as a foil for interrogating the cultural dominance of serious encyclopedias, with limited empirical studies on its editorial dynamics or long-term influence.

Controversies and Criticisms

Quality and Ethical Concerns

Uncyclopedia operates as a satirical where factual accuracy is systematically eschewed in favor of fabricated narratives, puns, and , rendering its content unreliable for any informational purpose. Articles routinely invent historical events, biographical details, and scientific claims to mimic and mock encyclopedic style, with the site's self-description emphasizing "content-free" contributions over verifiability. This intentional aligns with its mission but invites scrutiny in contexts where users might overlook the humorous intent, potentially blurring lines with genuine sources in low-discernment environments. Internal guidelines reinforce this by prioritizing comedic value, yet acknowledge through deletion processes that much submitted material fails even satirical standards, often comprising repetitive memes, in-jokes, or underdeveloped stubs. Ethical considerations arise from the site's tolerance for edgy, irreverent content, including vulgar language, stereotypes, and mockery of subjects such as , , and figures. While policies prohibit "hateful articles" and explicit , the threshold for offensiveness remains broad to preserve satirical , leading to entries that revel in or politically unfiltered commentary. This has drawn occasional external notice for pieces lampooning , political scandals, and cultural icons, though without documented legal repercussions or widespread backlash, suggesting the parody label mitigates most liability. Critics within the highlight risks of alienating audiences or devolving into mere provocation absent , but the platform's , volunteer-driven resists stricter to avoid stifling . In May 2006, school officials expressed concerns over Uncyclopedia's potential for facilitating among students. Roy Kelly, principal of in , described the site as a "cyber bullying menace" and characterized its content as "nasty," equating it to and playground violence. A related incident in June 2006 involved the suspension of a at an school for posting content on Uncyclopedia that included abusive slogans targeting teachers, alongside accusations of and personal details; authorities identified the site, alongside , as a platform for such "vicious abuse." In June 2007, the North-West Evening Mail in the UK criticized an Uncyclopedia article on the Lake District for its satirical portrayal, labeling contributors "sad and offensive." Similar backlash occurred in November 2007 when Northern Irish politician James McCarry condemned the site's article on Northern Ireland as inappropriate and inflammatory. Uncyclopedia has encountered no documented successful legal actions or lawsuits related to defamation, copyright infringement, or other claims. However, its operational history includes hosting disputes with Wikia (later Fandom). In 2006, co-founder Jonathan Huang privately sold the uncyclopedia.org domain to Wikia, prompting community discontent over the shift to a commercial host. This led to a community fork and independent migration on January 5, 2013, as contributors sought greater control amid dissatisfaction with Wikia's policies and commercialization. Fandom decommissioned the Wikia-hosted version around 2019, further driving moves to alternative domains without reported litigation.

Internal Decline Narratives

One major internal narrative of decline emerged around Uncyclopedia's migration from Wikia hosting to independent servers, where community administrators cited Wikia's unilateral shifts—including aggressive ad placements, enforced visual skins mimicking commercial sites, and restricted access to traffic analytics—as eroding the site's of Wikipedia's austere aesthetic. These changes prompted an exodus of contributors, with multiple long-term editors resigning in over the commercialization clashing with Uncyclopedia's non-profit . The press release announcing explicitly linked these tensions to a measurable readership drop, warning that without separation, the site risked "dwindl[ing] away to nothing." Earlier forum debates, particularly from –2009, portrayed chronic failures as a core driver of stagnation, with users decrying the absence of formalized decision processes that devolved discussions into repetitive "" and stalled progress. This disorganization was blamed for an observable slowdown in output, such as the featured article queue shifting from daily votes to intervals of 2–3 days by late , signaling reduced editing momentum and contributor burnout. Participants noted an influx of low-effort, "nonsensical" content over polished , exacerbating perceptions of erosion and deterring new users amid the chaos. Sustained inactivity in later years amplified these narratives, with sporadic forum threads lamenting member attrition and failed revival efforts, though quantitative metrics like edit volumes remained internally opaque post-Wikia. Some attributed broader to saturation by Wikipedia's dominance, viewing Uncyclopedia as an increasingly redundant "cheap copy" in a matured online landscape, a sentiment echoed in user reflections on waning novelty. Despite such self-critiques, the resisted outright closure proposals, framing decline as cyclical rather than terminal.

Broader Impact

Influence on Online Satire

Uncyclopedia pioneered the use of wiki technology for collaborative content, establishing a model where users collectively craft articles in an encyclopedic format to lampoon real-world topics through and exaggeration. This approach diverged from traditional satire outlets like , which rely on professional editorial control, by enabling open, community-driven humor that often incorporates in-jokes and escalating ridiculousness. The site's guidelines promote satire that twists proximity to truth into comedic distortion, fostering a style of online that prioritizes clever subversion over outright fabrication. This format influenced subsequent parody wikis, such as Illogicopedia, launched around 2007, which adopted the collaborative editing structure but emphasized surreal illogic over direct satire, crediting Uncyclopedia as the originator of judging wiki content by humorous merit rather than verifiability. Similarly, niche derivatives like UnMicroWiki emulated Uncyclopedia's parody of specialized wikis, applying satirical lenses to micronation documentation. By 2008, mainstream technology coverage recognized Uncyclopedia's role in highlighting Wikipedia-inspired parodies, positioning it as a leading example of user-generated encyclopedic humor amid the Web 2.0 era. Uncyclopedia's meme-infused articles and community traditions contributed to early humor ecosystems, where self-referential became a staple, influencing the tone of online forums and later meme-sharing platforms by normalizing encyclopedic pretense for ironic effect. However, critiques note its humor often devolves into fragmented in-jokes, limiting broader satirical impact compared to polished professional outlets, though its persistence underscores a foundational role in democratizing digital creation.

Relationship to Wikipedia's Model


Uncyclopedia adopts Wikipedia's core operational model of a collaboratively edited wiki, powered by software or compatible platforms, enabling users to create, revise, and discuss entries in a decentralized manner. Launched on January 5, 2005, it was designed to mirror Wikipedia's structure—including article layouts, infoboxes, talk pages, and faux reference lists—to lampoon the encyclopedic format through absurd, fictional content rather than factual reporting. This emulation extends to administrative features, such as policies on article quality and user conduct, which parody 's guidelines but invert their purpose: where enforces verifiability and neutral point of view to compile reliable knowledge, promotes "content-free" humor, encouraging deliberate misinformation and to mock the seriousness of crowd-sourced authority. The site's , "the content-free ," directly spoofs 's "the free ," underscoring the intentional contrast in editorial ethos. By replicating Wikipedia's visual and navigational elements—such as a parodic featuring a hollow puzzle instead of a —Uncyclopedia initially deceives users into mistaking it for a legitimate reference, thereby critiquing the vulnerabilities of open-access models to unverified contributions. This relationship highlights how the same technical and social framework can yield divergent outcomes: Wikipedia's pursuit of empirical accuracy versus Uncyclopedia's embrace of creative absurdity, without the constraints of sourcing requirements.

Enduring Relevance in Digital Culture

Uncyclopedia endures in digital culture as a pioneering platform for wiki-based , parodying the encyclopedic format to produce intentionally absurd content that critiques authoritative knowledge structures. Scholarly analysis of its entries, such as the satirical portrayal of through exaggerated stereotypes and "lulz" humor—deriding deities and invoking colonial tropes like unchecked reproduction—reveals how the site reappropriates for cultural dissent, engaging users in discerning intertextual layers while excluding literal interpretations. This mediality fosters transgressive expression within online netiquette, contrasting real-world sensitivities and illuminating ideological frictions in digital religious discourse. The site's model underscores the absurdity inherent in collaborative digital content creation, serving as a humorous counterpoint to factual repositories and highlighting risks of through blatant fabrication. By mirroring Wikipedia's style while subverting its veracity, Uncyclopedia influences perceptions of online information reliability, remaining relevant in an era where satirical spoofs navigate free speech boundaries and shape user expectations for entertainment amid informational overload. Ongoing activity sustains this relevance, with approximately 37,700 and around 148 active users contributing edits as of late 2024, evidencing a dedicated adapting to evolving humor dynamics. Such persistence positions Uncyclopedia as a that probes the interplay between humor, identity, and digital mediation, informing broader debates on tradition's online evolution.

References

  1. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Main_Page
  2. https://www.theochem.ru.nl/~pwormer/Knowino/knowino.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia.html
  3. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:About
  4. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Best_of
  5. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Copyrights
  6. https://www.englishgratis.com/1/wikibooks/wikipedia/uncyclopedia.htm
  7. https://uncyclopedia.org/history-of-the-sites
  8. https://en.illogicopedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia
  9. https://thewikiswiki.miraheze.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia
  10. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Press_Release_-_move_from_Wikia
  11. https://www.reddit.com/r/trucksim/comments/10qdz8u/the_trucksim_wiki_is_leaving_fandom_we_have_moved/
  12. https://uncyclopedia.info/wiki/List_of_Uncyclopedias_by_date_created
  13. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Wikia
  14. https://awa.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Forked_wikis
  15. https://uncyclomedia.co/wiki/Main_Page
  16. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia/Chinese
  17. https://meta.uncyclomedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
  18. https://pt.uncyclomedia.org/wiki/P%C3%A1gina_principal
  19. https://uncyclopedia.com/wiki/Special:Statistics
  20. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sites_using_MediaWiki/en
  21. https://wikimania2013.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/The_rebirth_of_Uncyclopedia_-_the_story_of_a_community_that_decided_to_take_its_hosting_into_its_own_hands
  22. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Help:HowTo
  23. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Special:Statistics
  24. https://data.uncyclomedia.org/wiki/Undata:Main_Page
  25. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Unquotable:Main_Page
  26. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Illogicopedia
  27. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun:Illogicopedia
  28. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Difference_between_en.uncyclopedia.co_and_uncyclopedia.ca
  29. https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Uncyclopedia
  30. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Style_Guide
  31. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:How_To_Be_Funny_And_Not_Just_Stupid
  32. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/HowTo:Write_a_Funny_Article
  33. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/HowTo:Be_absurdly_funny_on_Uncyclopedia
  34. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia
  35. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/HowTo:Build_a_Paper_Empire
  36. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Requested_articles
  37. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Category:Categories
  38. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Templates
  39. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Category:Templates
  40. https://uncyclopedia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Hacks
  41. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:VFH
  42. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Keanu_Reeves_%28author_request%29
  43. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Userspace
  44. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:At_A_Glance
  45. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:How_To_Get_Started_Editing
  46. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Beginner%27s_Guide
  47. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Satirical_point_of_view
  48. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Don%27t_be_a_dick
  49. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Policies_and_guidelines
  50. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:VFS
  51. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Ban_Policy
  52. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:A_possible_solution_to_the_VFS_drama
  53. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:The_End_of_Everything
  54. https://uncyclopedia.org/home-page
  55. https://www.wikihow.tech/Use-Uncyclopedia
  56. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum
  57. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Help:User_access_levels
  58. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Voting_system_woes
  59. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:VOTE:_Top_3_Articles_of_October
  60. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Vote_for_deletion
  61. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Automatic_voting
  62. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/29/arts/design/but-is-there-intelligent-spaghetti-out-there.html
  63. https://www.wired.com/2006/09/wonderful-wiki-sidebar/
  64. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:SUMMARY
  65. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/UnNews:Uncyclopedia_is_better_than_Wikipedia
  66. https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia
  67. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Deletion_Policy
  68. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:What_Uncyclopedia_is_not
  69. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Hall_of_Shame
  70. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/schools-face-new-cyber-bullying-menace/4RXDIDDMDKRB4ITPAE3NK3CE5M/
  71. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/pupil-suspended-for-slogan-on-website-abusing-teacher/SZB5EKT2KECUIU4P7FDK5VHOV4/
  72. https://awa.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Buy_outs
  73. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:TiazuGotAutism333/Compared_between_the_uncyclopedia.com_and_en.uncyclopedia.co
  74. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Decisions_Time_Folks_-_Let%27s_Be_Organized_for_a_Change
  75. https://www.quora.com/Is-Uncyclopedia-dying-If-so-why
  76. https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Proposal_to_close_the_mirror_Uncyclopedias
  77. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Website/Uncyclopedia
  78. https://micronations.wiki/wiki/UnMicroWiki
  79. https://www.wired.com/2008/05/st-best-14/
  80. https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/34/other-other-topics/why-uncyclopedia-so-unfunny-1097466/
  81. https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wikipedia-admin
  82. https://justtv.wordpress.com/2010/09/18/wikis-and-participatory-fandom/
  83. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/aug/20/internet.guide
  84. https://www.expatica.com/ch/general/hoax-wiki-style-internet-encyclopedia-spoofs-mock-reality-95267/
  85. https://brill.com/view/journals/dias/8/1-2/article-p119_7.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.