Hubbry Logo
PlosivePlosiveMain
Open search
Plosive
Community hub
Plosive
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Plosive
Plosive
Plosive
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

In phonetics, a plosive, also known as an occlusive or simply a stop, is a pulmonic consonant in which the vocal tract is blocked so that all airflow ceases.

The occlusion may be made with the tongue tip or blade ([t], [d]), tongue body ([k], [ɡ]), lips ([p], [b]), or glottis ([ʔ]). Plosives contrast with nasals, where the vocal tract is blocked but airflow continues through the nose, as in /m/ and /n/, and with fricatives, where partial occlusion impedes but does not block airflow in the vocal tract.

Terminology

[edit]

The terms stop, occlusive, and plosive are often used interchangeably. Linguists who distinguish them may not agree on the distinction being made. "Stop" refers to the stopping of the airflow, "occlusive" to the articulation which occludes (blocks) the vocal tract, and "plosive" to the plosion (release burst) of the consonant. Some object to the use of "plosive" for inaudibly released stops, which may then instead be called "applosives". The International Phonetic Association and the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association use the term "plosive".

Either "occlusive" or "stop" may be used as a general term covering the other together with nasals. That is, 'occlusive' may be defined as oral occlusive (plosives and affricates) plus nasal occlusives (nasals such as [m], [n]), or 'stop' may be defined as oral stops (plosives) plus nasal stops (nasals). Ladefoged and Maddieson (1996) prefer to restrict 'stop' to oral non-affricated occlusives. They say,[1]

what we call simply nasals are called nasal stops by some linguists. We avoid this phrase, preferring to reserve the term 'stop' for sounds in which there is a complete interruption of airflow.

In addition, they restrict "plosive" for pulmonic consonants; "stops" in their usage include ejective and implosive consonants.[2]

If a term such as "plosive" is used for oral non-affricated obstruents, and nasals are not called nasal stops, then a stop may mean the glottal stop; "plosive" may even mean non-glottal stop. In other cases, however, it may be the word "plosive" that is restricted to the glottal stop. Generally speaking, plosives do not have plosion (a release burst). In English, for example, there are plosives with no audible release, such as the /p/ in apt. However, English plosives do have plosion in other environments.

In Ancient Greek, the term for plosive was ἄφωνον (áphōnon),[3] which means "unpronounceable", "voiceless", or "silent", because plosives could not be pronounced without a vowel. This term was calqued into Latin as mūta, and from there borrowed into English as mute.[4] Mute was sometimes used instead for voiceless consonants, whether plosives or fricatives, a usage that was later replaced with surd, from Latin surdus "deaf" or "silent",[5] a term still occasionally seen in the literature.[6] For more information on the Ancient Greek terms, see Ancient Greek phonology § Terminology.

Articulation

[edit]

A plosive is typically analysed as having up to three phases:

  • Approach, during which articulators come together
  • Hold (or "occlusion" or "closure"), during which the articulators are held and block the airstream
  • Release (or "burst" or "plosion"), when the articulators are separated, releasing the compressed air[7]

Only the hold phase is requisite. A plosive may lack an approach when it is preceded by a consonant that involves an occlusion at the same place of articulation, as in [d] in end or old. In many languages, such as Malay and Vietnamese, word-final plosives lack a release burst, even when followed by a vowel, or have a nasal release. See no audible release.

Common plosives

[edit]

All spoken natural languages in the world have plosives,[8] and most have at least the voiceless plosives [p], [t], and [k]. However, there are exceptions: Colloquial Samoan lacks the coronal [t], and several North American languages, such as the Iroquoian languages (e.g., Mohawk and Cherokee), and Arabic lack the labial [p]. In fact, the labial is the least stable of the voiceless plosives in the languages of the world, as the unconditioned sound change [p] → [f] (→ [h] → Ø) is quite common in unrelated languages, having occurred in the history of Classical Japanese, Classical Arabic, and Proto-Celtic, for instance. Formal Samoan has only one word with velar [k]; colloquial Samoan conflates /t/ and /k/ to /k/. Niʻihau Hawaiian has [t] for /k/ to a greater extent than Standard Hawaiian, but neither distinguish a /k/ from a /t/. It may be more accurate to say that Hawaiian and colloquial Samoan do not distinguish velar and coronal plosives than to say they lack one or the other.

Ontena Gadsup has only 1 phonemic plosive /ʔ/.[9][10] Yanyuwa distinguishes plosives in 7 places of articulations /b d̪ d ḏ ɖ ɡ̟ ɡ̠/ (it does not have voiceless plosives) which is the most out of all languages.[11]

See Common occlusives for the distribution of both plosives and nasals.

Classification

[edit]

Voice

[edit]

Voiced plosives are pronounced with vibration of the vocal cords, voiceless plosives without. Plosives are commonly voiceless, and many languages, such as Mandarin Chinese and Hawaiian, have only voiceless plosives. Others, such as most Australian languages, are indeterminate: plosives may vary between voiced and voiceless without distinction, some of them like Yanyuwa and Yidiny have only voiced plosives.

Aspiration

[edit]

In aspirated plosives, the vocal cords (vocal folds) are abducted at the time of release. In a prevocalic aspirated plosive (a plosive followed by a vowel or sonorant), the time when the vocal cords begin to vibrate will be delayed until the vocal folds come together enough for voicing to begin, and will usually start with breathy voicing. The duration between the release of the plosive and the voice onset is called the voice onset time (VOT) or the aspiration interval. Highly aspirated plosives have a long period of aspiration, so that there is a long period of voiceless airflow (a phonetic [h]) before the onset of the vowel. In tenuis plosives, the vocal cords come together for voicing immediately following the release, and there is little or no aspiration (a voice onset time close to zero). In English, there may be a brief segment of breathy voice that identifies the plosive as voiceless and not voiced. In voiced plosives, the vocal folds are set for voice before the release, and often vibrate during the entire hold, and in English, the voicing after release is not breathy. A plosive is called "fully voiced" if it is voiced during the entire occlusion. In English, however, initial voiced plosives like /#b/ or /#d/ may have no voicing during the period of occlusion, or the voicing may start shortly before the release and continue after release, and word-final plosives tend to be fully devoiced: In most dialects of English, the final /b/, /d/ and /g/ in words like rib, mad and dog are fully devoiced.[12] Initial voiceless plosives, like the p in pie, are aspirated, with a palpable puff of air upon release, whereas a plosive after an s, as in spy, is tenuis (unaspirated). When spoken near a candle flame, the flame will flicker more after the words par, tar, and car are articulated, compared with spar, star, and scar. In the common pronunciation of papa, the initial p is aspirated whereas the medial p is not.

Length

[edit]

In a geminate or long consonant, the occlusion lasts longer than in simple consonants. In languages where plosives are only distinguished by length (e.g., Arabic, Ilwana, Icelandic), the long plosives may be held up to three times as long as the short plosives. Italian is well known for its geminate plosives, as the double t in the name Vittoria takes just as long to say as the ct does in English Victoria. Japanese also prominently features geminate consonants, such as in the minimal pair 来た kita 'came' and 切った kitta 'cut'. Estonian is unusual for contrasting three lengths, as in the minimal triplet kabi /kɑpi/ 'hoof', kapi /kɑpːi/ 'wardrobe [gen. sg.]', and kappi /kɑpːːi/ 'wardrobe [ill. sg.]'.[13]

There are many languages where the features voice, aspiration, and length reinforce each other, and in such cases it may be hard to determine which of these features predominates. In such cases, the terms fortis is sometimes used for aspiration or gemination, whereas lenis is used for single, tenuous, or voiced plosives. However, the terms fortis and lenis are poorly defined, and their meanings vary from source to source.

Nasalization

[edit]
Further information: Nasal consonant and Nasalization

Simple nasals are differentiated from plosives only by a lowered velum that allows the air to escape through the nose during the occlusion. Nasals are acoustically sonorants, as they have a non-turbulent airflow and are nearly always voiced, but they are articulatorily obstruents, as there is complete blockage of the oral cavity. The term occlusive may be used as a cover term for both nasals and plosives.

A prenasalized stop starts out with a lowered velum that raises during the occlusion. The closest examples in English are consonant clusters such as the [nd] in candy, but many languages have prenasalized stops that function phonologically as single consonants. Swahili is well known for having words beginning with prenasalized stops, as in ndege 'bird', and in many languages of the South Pacific, such as Fijian, these are even spelled with single letters: b [mb], d [nd].

A postnasalized plosive begins with a raised velum that lowers during the occlusion. This causes an audible nasal release, as in English sudden. This could also be compared to the /dn/ cluster found in Russian and other Slavic languages, which can be seen in the name of the Dnieper River.

The terms prenasalization and postnasalization are normally used only in languages where these sounds are phonemic: that is, not analyzed into sequences of plosive plus nasal.

Airstream mechanism

[edit]

Stops may be made with more than one airstream mechanism. The normal mechanism is pulmonic egressive, that is, with air flowing outward from the lungs. All spoken languages have pulmonic stops. Some languages have stops made with other mechanisms as well: ejective stops (glottalic egressive), implosive stops (glottalic ingressive), or click consonants (lingual ingressive).

Tenseness

[edit]
Further information: Tenseness

A fortis plosive is produced with more muscular tension than a lenis plosive. However, this is difficult to measure, and there is usually debate over the actual mechanism of alleged fortis or lenis consonants.

There are a series of plosives in the Korean language, sometimes written with the IPA symbol for ejectives, which are produced using "stiff voice", meaning there is increased contraction of the glottis than for normal production of voiceless plosives. The indirect evidence for stiff voice is in the following vowels, which have a higher fundamental frequency than those following other plosives. The higher frequency is explained as a result of the glottis being tense. Other such phonation types include breathy voice, or murmur; slack voice; and creaky voice.

Transcription

[edit]

The following plosives have been given dedicated symbols in the IPA.

Symbols for plosive consonants
⟨p⟩ voiceless bilabial plosive ⟨b⟩ voiced bilabial plosive
⟨t⟩ voiceless alveolar plosive ⟨d⟩ voiced alveolar plosive
⟨ʈ⟩ voiceless retroflex plosive ⟨ɖ⟩ voiced retroflex plosive
⟨c⟩ voiceless palatal plosive ⟨ɟ⟩ voiced palatal plosive
⟨k⟩ voiceless velar plosive ⟨ɡ⟩ voiced velar plosive
⟨q⟩ voiceless uvular plosive ⟨ɢ⟩ voiced uvular plosive
⟨ʡ⟩ epiglottal plosive
⟨ʔ⟩ glottal stop

English

[edit]
[p t k] voiceless,
aspirated word-initially, tenuis in clusters after s, word-final often with no audible release
[b d ɡ] unaspirated,
partially voiced word-initially, fully voiced intervocalically, fully devoiced when word-final
[ʔ] glottal stop, not as a phoneme in most dialects

Variations

[edit]

Many subclassifications of plosives are transcribed by adding a diacritic or modifier letter to the IPA symbols above.

Phonation and voice-onset time
⟨t⟩ voiceless ⟨d⟩ voiced
⟨t˭⟩ tenuis ⟨tʰ⟩ aspirated
⟨dʱ⟩ breathy-voiced
Airstream mechanism
⟨t⟩ ⟨d⟩ pulmonic egressive
⟨tʼ⟩ ejective ⟨ɗ⟩ implosive
⟨!⟩ click
Nasality
⟨ⁿd⟩ prenasalized ⟨dⁿ⟩ nasally released
⟨d̥⟩ lenis:
⟨d⟩ with voicelessness diacritic 		⟨t͈⟩ tense ⟨tt dd⟩
⟨tː dː⟩ 		geminate

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Plosive

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A plosive, also known as a stop or occlusive , is a type of pulmonic produced by completely blocking the in the vocal tract, building up pressure, and then abruptly releasing it, resulting in a brief followed by a burst of sound. This distinguishes plosives from other like fricatives or , and they are among the most common sounds across human languages, occurring universally due to their straightforward articulatory mechanics. Plosives are classified by their place of articulation—the location where the blockage occurs—and by voicing, which determines whether the vocal folds vibrate during production. The primary places include bilabial (lips together, as in /p/ and /b/), alveolar (tongue against the ridge behind the upper teeth, as in /t/ and /d/), and velar (back of the tongue against the soft palate, as in /k/ and /g/). Voiceless plosives, such as /p/, /t/, and /k/, lack vocal fold vibration during the closure phase and are often aspirated in languages like English, producing a puff of air upon release, while voiced plosives like /b/, /d/, and /g/ involve simultaneous vocal fold oscillation, creating a buzzing quality. Acoustically, plosives feature a period of silence (closure), followed by a transient burst noise and fricative-like release, with formant transitions revealing the place of articulation. In English, the six plosives—/p, b, t, d, k, g/—play a crucial role in and phonological contrasts, such as distinguishing "pat" from "" through voicing differences. Cross-linguistically, plosives vary in aspiration, prevoicing, or implosive forms (where air is drawn inward), but the basic oral plosive pattern remains a phonetic universal, influencing and speech disorders. Their production involves four phases: closure (air buildup), hold (sustained blockage), release (burst), and post-release (optional aspiration or frication), making them perceptually salient yet challenging for non-native speakers due to timing cues like voice onset time.

Fundamentals

Terminology

A plosive, also known as a stop or occlusive, is a produced by completely obstructing the in the vocal tract, allowing pressure to build up behind the closure, and then abruptly releasing it to create an explosive sound; this process distinguishes plosives from , which lack any complete closure and permit free , and from fricatives, which involve a partial narrowing that generates turbulent noise rather than full blockage. The terminology for these sounds evolved significantly in the 20th century, shifting from earlier designations like "stop" or "explosive" to the more precise "plosive," with British phonetician Daniel Jones playing a key role in its standardization through his use of the term in the 1918 edition of An Outline of English Phonetics, where he described plosives as sounds involving complete closure followed by sudden release. Etymologically, "plosive" derives as a shortening of "explosive," first attested in 1897, from Latin explōdere meaning "to drive out" or "burst forth," to emphasize the sudden burst of air upon release. In traditional grammars, particularly those rooted in and Greek phonology, these consonants were termed "mutes" (literae mutae) to focus on the silent closure phase where no sound is produced, contrasting with the modern "plosive," which prioritizes the dynamic release aspect.

Articulation

Plosives, also known as stops, are produced through a pulmonic egressive , where air from the lungs creates a pressure differential essential for sound formation. For oral plosives, the velum is raised, sealing off the to direct solely through the oral tract, allowing intraoral pressure to build sufficiently behind the closure—typically 5-10 cm H₂O (with a range of 3-15 cm H₂O) for audible release in normal speech. The articulation of a plosive occurs in three primary physiological stages. In the closure stage, an active —such as the lips for bilabial plosives or the tongue for alveolar or velar ones—forms a complete obstruction against a passive , fully blocking the in the vocal tract and initiating the stoppage. During the hold (or compression) stage, the closure is maintained, causing subglottal air pressure from the lungs to accumulate behind the blockage in the oral cavity, creating a buildup that can last 50-150 milliseconds depending on the language and context; the tongue, lips, or other articulators remain firmly positioned to sustain this seal. The stage involves the sudden opening of the closure, propelling the compressed air outward in a rapid burst; this explosive decompression generates the characteristic plosive sound, with dynamics shifting abruptly from stasis to high-velocity efflux through the vocal tract. Acoustically, the release phase is marked by a brief burst of noise—a transient, energy spike lasting 5-20 milliseconds—followed by transitions that provide cues to the as the vocal tract configuration adjusts to the ensuing .

Core Classification

Voicing

Plosives are distinguished by voicing based on the of the vocal folds during their articulation. In voiced plosives, such as /b/, /d/, and /g/, the vocal folds throughout the closure and release phases, producing a periodic associated with voicing. In contrast, voiceless plosives, including /p/, /t/, and /k/, involve no of the vocal folds during these stages, resulting in an aperiodic release without the characteristic voicing buzz. A primary acoustic measure differentiating these categories is Voice Onset Time (VOT), defined as the interval between the release of the oral closure and the onset of vocal fold vibration. Voiced plosives typically exhibit negative VOT, where voicing begins before the release (prevoicing), or near-zero VOT with voicing starting at or shortly after release; voiceless unaspirated plosives show short positive VOT (around 0-50 ms), while aspirated voiceless ones have longer positive VOT (over 50 ms). This metric, introduced through cross-linguistic acoustical analysis, highlights how VOT variations perceptually cue voicing contrasts in plosives across languages. Phonologically, voicing serves as a key contrastive feature in many languages, enabling distinctions that alter word meaning through minimal pairs. In English, for instance, the voiceless /p/ in "pin" contrasts with the voiced /b/ in "bin," where the single phonetic difference in initial plosive voicing creates semantically unrelated words. However, misconceptions about this contrast being a pure voicing opposition often arise from traditional textbook simplifications that overlook the role of aspiration and VOT variations in distinguishing English stops. In non-native varieties like Indian English, aspiration may be reduced due to L1 influence from Indic languages, altering the perceived contrast. Comparisons to languages like Chinese, which emphasize a fortis-lenis distinction based on aspiration rather than full voicing (with English /b d g/ often partially voiced), further contribute to these misconceptions; these reflect longstanding facts in phonetic research rather than recent trends. Such patterns underscore voicing's role in phonemic inventory and lexical differentiation, influencing structure and prosody. Historically, voicing shifts in plosives exemplify systematic sound changes, as seen in , which transformed Proto-Indo-European stops in the development of Proto-Germanic. Under this law, PIE voiced stops *b, *d, *g devoiced to voiceless stops *p, *t, *k, as in PIE *genu- "" yielding English "knee" (Latin "genu" retains voicing). This shift, part of a broader chain including fricativization of voiceless stops, illustrates how voicing alternations drove divergence among Indo-European branches.

Place of Articulation

Plosives are categorized by the , which refers to the location in the vocal tract where the is completely blocked to create the stop closure. The primary places of articulation for plosives are bilabial, alveolar, and velar, forming a near-universal series in the world's languages. In bilabial plosives, such as /p/ and /b/, the closure is formed by bringing the two lips together, compressing the air in the oral cavity before release. Alveolar plosives, like /t/ and /d/, involve the or tip pressing against the just behind the upper teeth. Velar plosives, including /k/ and /g/, are produced by raising the back of the to contact the or velum. These three places account for the majority of plosive inventories, with 45% of surveyed languages possessing the full set of voiceless and voiced plosives at all three locations (/p t k b d g/). Secondary places of articulation include palatal, uvular, and glottal, which occur less frequently across languages. Palatal plosives (/c/ and /ɟ/) are produced with the body of the tongue against the hard palate and are rare, appearing primarily in languages like Hungarian and some Eastern Romance varieties, often as allophones or in small inventories. Uvular plosives (/q/ and /ɢ/) involve the back of the tongue contacting the uvula and are found in about 15% of languages, concentrated in regions such as the Caucasus (e.g., Georgian), western North America (e.g., Tlingit, with /qákʷ/ 'tree spine'), and southern Africa. The glottal stop (/ʔ/), a plosive variant formed by closing the vocal folds, is widespread but varies in phonemic status; it functions as a consonant in languages like Arabic and Hawaiian, though it is rarer as a full series member. These secondary places are typically absent from basic plosive systems, with gaps more common in global inventories outside specific areal influences. Cross-linguistically, the bilabial-alveolar-velar series dominates plosive systems, present in nearly all languages, while secondary places like uvulars show areal clustering rather than universality; for instance, only 86 of 567 surveyed languages have uvular stops, often alongside velars. In Khoisan languages of southern Africa, such as !Xóõ, click consonants function as velaric plosives, produced with a velar closure and suction-based release at anterior places like dental (/ǀ/), alveolar (/ǃ/), or palatal (/ǂ/), exemplifying rare ingressive variants in natural language inventories. Acoustically, the place of articulation is cued by the spectral properties of the burst release following the closure: bilabial bursts show low-frequency energy below 1 kHz with a flat spectrum; alveolar bursts exhibit high-frequency peaks above 3,000–3,500 Hz, often diffuse-rising; and velar bursts display mid-frequency concentrations around 1,400–3,000 Hz, varying by vowel context (e.g., lower before back vowels). These cues enable perceptual distinction, with high-frequency regions (3,500–8,000 Hz) being particularly informative for classification.
Place of ArticulationTypical Burst Frequency Range (Hz)Spectral CharacteristicsExample Languages with Series
Bilabial<1,000Flat, low-energyEnglish (/p b/), Spanish
Alveolar>3,000–3,500Diffuse-rising, high peakEnglish (/t d/), Mandarin
Velar1,400–3,000 (vowel-dependent)Compact, mid-frequencyEnglish (/k g/),
UvularVariable, often low-midSimilar to velar but backer (/q/),

Manner Variations

Affricates represent a key variation in plosive manner, functioning as sequences where an initial complete oral closure—characteristic of a stop—is followed by a release at the same , resulting in a prolonged period of frication that distinguishes them from pure plosives. In English, the /tʃ/ as in "church" exemplifies this, beginning with an alveolar stop closure and transitioning into a brief [ʃ]-like frication, whereas a pure plosive like /t/ features a shorter, burst-like release without sustained . This component arises from a gradual lowering of the articulators during release, creating a single phonological unit rather than a cluster of distinct segments. Partial closures contribute to plosive-like sounds through unreleased stops, where the oral closure is maintained without an audible release burst, often occurring in clusters or word-finally to simplify articulation. For instance, in English word-final clusters like "cat" followed by another , the /t/ may remain unreleased [kæt̚], preserving the stop's core obstruction but omitting the transient release energy that defines a fully articulated plosive. This variation maintains the manner's essential blockage of airflow but alters perceptual cues, leading to phonological processes like cluster simplification in casual speech. Plosives differ fundamentally from other manners such as taps, flaps, and trills in the duration and nature of their closure: plosives involve a prolonged complete obstruction allowing intraoral pressure to build before release, whereas taps and flaps feature extremely brief closures (typically under 50 milliseconds) that prevent significant pressure accumulation, producing a single light contact without a burst. Trills, by contrast, consist of multiple rapid vibrations or closures at the articulatory point, creating oscillatory airflow rather than a single pressure-release event, as seen in the Spanish alveolar trill /r/ versus the English alveolar plosive /d/. These distinctions in closure duration underscore plosives' role in creating abrupt acoustic onsets, setting them apart from the smoother transitions in taps, flaps, and trills. In Polish, affricated plosives hold distinct phonological status as single segments, with a rich inventory including alveolar /t͡s/ (as in "cicho"), postalveolar /t͡ʃ/ (as in "czas"), and alveolo-palatal /t͡ɕ/ (as in "ćma"), where they contrast phonemically with stop-fricative sequences like /ts/ in loanwords or careful speech. These affricates participate in palatalization rules and hierarchies, behaving as unitary in structure and prosody. Similarly, features an extensive set of affricates, including bilabial /p/, alveolar /t͡s/, postalveolar /t͡ʃ/, and lateral /tɬ/, with contrasts in aspiration, , and ejection; for example, the voiceless lateral affricate /tɬ/ in "łééchąąʼí" () is treated as a single integral to the language's inventory and morphology. In like , these affricates align with stop series in phonological processes such as tone assignment and prefixation, reinforcing their status as core obstruents rather than clusters.

Advanced Features

Aspiration

Aspiration refers to the burst of breathy that follows the release of a voiceless , resulting from a temporary spreading of the that delays the onset of vocal fold vibration. This feature is phonetically transcribed with a superscript [ʰ], as in the English word "pin" pronounced as [pʰɪn], where the initial voiceless bilabial /p/ is aspirated, in contrast to the unaspirated in "spin" [spɪn]. In voiceless plosives, aspiration manifests as a period of voiceless resembling before the following begins. The acoustic measure of aspiration is primarily captured by voice onset time (VOT), defined as the interval between the release of the plosive closure and the onset of periodic vocal fold vibration for the following vowel. Aspirated voiceless plosives exhibit a positive (lagging) VOT typically exceeding 30 ms for labials like [pʰ], with values around 62 ms in English; alveolar stops like [tʰ] show slightly longer VOTs, and velars like [kʰ] have the longest, often 80 ms or more, due to aerodynamic and articulatory factors that prolong glottal spreading. These VOT durations distinguish aspirated plosives from their unaspirated counterparts, which have shorter lags of about 10-20 ms. In some languages, aspiration serves as a phonological contrast, functioning as a (), while in others it is an allophonic variant conditioned by context. In , aspiration contrasts phonemically with unaspirated stops across voiceless and voiced series, as in minimal pairs like /pəˈtʃas/ "fifty" (unaspirated /p/) versus /ˈpʰəl/ "" (aspirated /pʰ/), where the presence of aspiration changes meaning. By contrast, in English, aspiration is allophonic, occurring predictably on voiceless plosives in word-initial or stressed syllable-onset positions, such as [pʰ] in "pin" but not after /s/ in "spin," without altering word meaning. Hindi's system includes a four-way laryngeal contrast (voiced unaspirated, voiced aspirated, voiceless unaspirated, voiceless aspirated) at multiple places of articulation, making aspiration integral to its phonemic inventory. Physiologically, aspiration arises from the abduction of the arytenoid cartilages, which spreads the vocal folds apart at the during and after the oral closure of the voiceless plosive, preventing immediate voicing and allowing prolonged subglottal . This glottal spreading gesture, often denoted phonologically as [+spread glottis], maintains an open post-release, producing the breathy quality until the arytenoids to enable vocal fold vibration. The timing of this laryngeal adjustment relative to the oral release determines the degree of aspiration, with earlier or more prolonged abduction yielding stronger aspiration.

Length and Nasalization

Plosives exhibit significant variation in duration, particularly through the distinction between singletons and geminates, where the latter involve prolonged closure phases that serve as key perceptual cues. In languages like Italian, geminate plosives such as the bilabial /pp/ in appello ("") feature extended oral closure durations, averaging 193 ms (SE 13.6 ms) for geminates compared to 56 ms (SE 9.1 ms) for singletons, often exceeding 100 ms as a threshold for perceiving contrast. This durational difference arises from articulatory overlap or true doubling of the , influencing the timing of adjacent vowels, with preceding vowels typically before geminates. Nasal modifications of plosives introduce a distinct subtype known as pre-nasalized stops, where the velum lowers during the oral closure (hold phase), generating a nasal murmur alongside the primary occlusion. In such as Ikalanga, pre-nasalized stops like /ᵐb/ exhibit a nasal of approximately 77 ms during this phase, followed by a brief oral occlusion of about 19 ms before release, distinguishing them from plain nasals through the absence of extensive carryover into the following . This configuration creates a hybrid segment that combines nasal and oral properties, often phonemically contrastive in these languages. Phonologically, length and play crucial roles in distinguishing meaning across . In Finnish, a , plosive length forms a binary contrast independent of vowel , as in tuli /tuli/ ("") versus tulli /tulːi/ ("customs"), where the geminate /tː/ extends the closure to alter word identity, typically realized word-internally with durations supporting diphonic analysis. Similarly, in Gujarati, nasal consonants preceding vowels induce on those vowels, rendering them more nasal than those following oral consonants, which enhances perceptual distinctions in breathy contexts and contributes to the 's intricate nasal system. Acoustically, length variations in plosives are evidenced by extended closure durations, alongside secondary cues like voice onset time (VOT) and characteristics. In Finnish geminates, VOT is shorter (19.5 ms) than in singletons (22.4 ms), but the release burst and following exhibit higher (57.0 dB vs. 55.5 dB for burst; 65.84 dB vs. 64.76 dB for ), while preceding vowels shorten, potentially stabilizing steady-states for clearer contrast . For nasalized plosives, the nasal murmur introduces low-frequency energy and anti-formant poles, aiding identification through spectral nasal coupling during the hold.

Airstream Mechanisms

Plosives are primarily classified by their mechanisms, which determine how is initiated and directed during articulation. The most prevalent are pulmonic plosives, produced using air from the lungs as the . These involve a pulmonic egressive airstream, where air is expelled outward from the lungs through the vocal tract, creating the complete blockage and release characteristic of stops like /p/, /t/, and /k/. Pulmonic ingressive airstreams, where air is drawn inward, are rare for plosives and occur in isolated languages, but they do not form a major contrastive category. Non-pulmonic plosives utilize alternative initiation sites, expanding the typology beyond lung-based airflow. Glottalic plosives rely on the for airstream generation, with the vocal folds closed to create a sealed supraglottal cavity. Ejectives employ a glottalic egressive mechanism, where the is raised upward, compressing the air behind the oral closure and producing a release with elevated pressure. This is exemplified by the bilabial ejective [p'] in Quechua, where the upward glottal movement expels air without lung involvement. In contrast, implosives use a glottalic ingressive , with the lowered to rarefy the air, resulting in an inward airflow upon release. The voiced bilabial implosive [ɓ] in Sindhi illustrates this, featuring a downward glottal displacement that draws air into the vocal tract. Velaric plosives, also known as lingual ingressive plosives, initiate airflow using the and velum, forming a sealed oral cavity independent of pulmonic or glottalic sources. These are typically clicks, produced by creating two closures—one forward (e.g., at the lips or teeth) and one rear (velar)—then lowering the body to rarefy the enclosed air, followed by sequential releases. The alveolar click [ǃ] in !Kung (also known as Ju|'hoan) demonstrates this mechanism, where the ingressive lingual generates the stop-like sound. However, debate whether clicks qualify as true plosives due to their dual-closure nature and distinct perceptual qualities compared to single-closure stops. Non-pulmonic plosives are uncommon globally, occurring in fewer than 10% of languages, with ejectives prevalent in Native American languages of the and some Caucasian languages, implosives concentrated in African and Southeast Asian languages, and clicks almost exclusively in of . Acoustically, their bursts differ from pulmonic plosives; for instance, ejectives lack pulmonic , resulting in sharper, more intense release bursts and often an elevated (f₀) in the following due to glottal raising. These properties arise from the localized pressure dynamics in non-pulmonic mechanisms, contrasting with the sustained lung-driven flow in pulmonic stops.

Tenseness

In plosives, tenseness refers to an articulatory involving increased muscular effort, particularly in the and supraglottal regions, which produces a tighter oral closure and enhanced constriction stability compared to lax variants. Tense plosives demand greater subglottal pressure buildup and laryngeal adduction, often resulting in a narrower glottal and reduced airflow during the closure phase. For example, in Korean, the tense alveolar stop /t͈/ (as in ttang 'soil') features heightened laryngeal tension and a longer closure duration—typically 100-150 ms—contrasting with the lax /t/ (as in tal 'moon'), which exhibits looser articulatory control and shorter closure around 80-120 ms. This greater effort in tense plosives also correlates with very short voice onset times (VOTs), typically a short positive lag near zero, minimizing aspiration upon release. Lax plosives, by contrast, are articulated with relaxed muscular tension, leading to shorter relative to aspirated stops but longer than tense ones, and they are more susceptible to voicing or weakening in intervocalic positions. In Korean's three-way stop contrast, lax stops like /t/ have intermediate of approximately 50-80 ms and greater breathiness, marked by a wider glottal opening and higher first harmonic-to-second harmonic (H1-H2) values, which perceptually distinguish them from tense stops. Similar tense-lax distinctions appear in such as Tanacross, where obstruents contrast via laryngeal tension—tense series involving stiff vocal fold adduction versus lax with reduced effort—serving as a phonemic opposition in inventories. These systems highlight how lax plosives facilitate easier modulation, often aligning with pathways in phonological evolution. Tenseness functions as a contrastive phonological feature in languages with such oppositions, influencing downstream effects like vowel tone perturbation or resistance to aspiration. In Korean, tense stops trigger a higher (f0) on following vowels, enhancing lexical contrasts (e.g., ttal 'daughter' with tense /t͈/ versus tal with lax /t/), while lax variants permit more variable aspiration and are prone to spirantization in casual speech. This feature modulates tendencies, with tense plosives resisting weakening due to their inherent stiffness. In articulatory models, is captured through gestural dynamics, where tense plosives employ higher stiffness coefficients (k) in the damped equations governing tract variable movements, yielding quicker formation and maintenance for stops. Historically, tense plosives in evolved from Proto-Indo-European () glottalized stops, reconstructed under the as ejective or implosive series (*p', *t', *k') that conveyed tense-like articulatory effort through glottal closure. These glottalized stops underwent chain shifts in daughter branches: in Armenian, they preserved ejective realizations (e.g., /t'/), maintaining , while in Baltic and Slavic, they devoiced or merged with laryngeals, yielding aspirated or plain stops but retaining traces in vowel lengthening or tone. This evolution underscores as a stable inheritance from PIE's typologically marked stop system, influencing modern contrasts in languages like Greek and .

Representation and Examples

Common Plosives

The most widespread plosives in the world's languages form a universal series consisting of the voiceless and voiced bilabial (/p b/), alveolar (/t d/), and velar (/k g/) stops. Analysis of the UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database (UPSID), which samples 317 languages, reveals high frequencies for these sounds: /t/ occurs in 309 languages (97.5%), /k/ in 283 (89.3%), /p/ in 263 (83.0%), /d/ in 195 (61.5%), /b/ in 199 (62.8%), and /g/ in 175 (55.2%). This series appears across major language families, including Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan, Niger-Congo, and Austronesian, underscoring their role as core consonants in phonological inventories. Illustrative examples highlight these plosives in specific languages. In English, an Indo-European language, the series is realized as /p/ in pin, /b/ in bin, /t/ in tin, /d/ in din, /k/ in kin, and /g/ in gin. In , a Sino-Tibetan language, the inventory features voiceless unaspirated and aspirated pairs without phonemic voicing: /p/ (unaspirated, as in bā 'eight') contrasts with /pʰ/ (aspirated, as in pā 'crawl'), paralleled by /t tʰ/ (e.g., dī 'bottom' vs. tī 'kick') and /k kʰ/ (e.g., gāo 'tall' vs. kāi 'open'). These examples demonstrate how the basic places of articulation support phonemic distinctions, though voicing patterns vary by family. Phonotactically, these plosives show positional preferences and clustering tendencies. They occur most frequently word-initially across languages, facilitating onsets and contributing to prosodic . Common clusters include bilabial-alveolar sequences like /pt/, as in Modern Greek ptōkhós 'poor', where the voiceless stops form a complex onset without deletion or simplification in standard pronunciation. Such patterns reflect cross-linguistic constraints favoring stop sequences at certain places of articulation while avoiding others, like velar-labial combinations. These plosives demonstrate evolutionary stability, retaining their forms in contact languages such as creoles and pidgins. In Portuguese-based creoles, for instance, /p b t d k g/ exhibit high retention rates from the lexifier, with minimal or loss even amid substrate influences, as seen in inventories of and Papiamentu. This persistence highlights their perceptual salience and articulatory simplicity, ensuring continuity in simplified linguistic systems.

Transcription Conventions

The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) employs specific symbols to represent plosive consonants, with the basic pulmonic plosives denoted as /p/ (voiceless bilabial), /b/ (voiced bilabial), /t/ (voiceless alveolar), /d/ (voiced alveolar), /k/ (voiceless velar), and /g/ (voiced velar), alongside /ʔ/ for the glottal plosive. These symbols form the core of IPA notation for stops produced with pulmonic egressive airflow. Diacritics modify these base symbols to capture phonetic variations in plosives, such as [ʰ] for aspiration (e.g., [tʰ] in aspirated releases), [ʼ] for ejectives (e.g., [kʼ] indicating glottalic egressive ), [ᵐ] for prenasalization (e.g., [ᵐb] for a nasalized onset), and [ː] for lengthened duration (e.g., [tː] in geminate plosives). These modifiers allow precise representation of articulatory and aerodynamic details without altering the primary symbol. The IPA originated in 1888, developed by the to standardize across languages. Major revisions in 1989, during the Convention, refined symbol assignments and incorporated greater detail for non-pulmonic consonants like ejectives and implosives, while a 2020 update further clarified notations for such extensions. In practice, IPA transcriptions distinguish between broad and narrow approaches: broad transcription, enclosed in slashes (e.g., /t/), captures phonemic contrasts like voicing without allophonic specifics, whereas narrow transcription, in square brackets (e.g., [tʰ]), incorporates s for detailed phonetic realization. Guidelines emphasize restraint in diacritic use to avoid over-specification, ensuring transcriptions remain interpretable and focused on essential features. Voicing in plosives, represented by voiceless-voiced pairs, aligns with these conventions as outlined in the Voicing section.

English-Specific Usage

In English phonology, the inventory of plosive consonants consists of six phonemes: the voiceless bilabial /p/, voiced bilabial /b/, voiceless alveolar /t/, voiced alveolar /d/, voiceless velar /k/, and voiced velar /g/. While traditionally described in textbooks as a pure voicing contrast between voiceless and voiced plosives, this opposition is more accurately characterized by differences in voice onset time (VOT) and aspiration, with voiceless stops being aspirated and voiced stops often partially devoiced. Misconceptions arise from these traditional simplifications describing English stops as a clear-voiced opposition, non-native varieties like Indian English where aspiration may be reduced due to L1 influence from Indic languages, or discussions in languages like Mandarin Chinese emphasizing a fortis-lenis (strong-weak) distinction since /b d g/ are often not fully voiced; these reflect longstanding facts rather than recent trends. These phonemes exhibit allophonic variations depending on their phonological environment. For instance, the voiceless plosives /p/, /t/, and /k/ are aspirated ([pʰ], [tʰ], [kʰ]) when they occur at the onset of a stressed syllable, as in "pin" [pʰɪn], "tin" [tʰɪn], and "kin" [kʰɪn]. In contrast, the voiced plosives /b/, /d/, and /g/ are typically unaspirated and fully voiced in onset positions but may show partial devoicing in coda contexts. A notable allophonic rule in involves the alveolar plosives /t/ and /d/, which are realized as a voiced alveolar flap [ɾ] in intervocalic positions before an unstressed , as in "" [ˈbʌɾɚ] or "" [ˈlæɾɚ]. This process neutralizes the distinction between /t/ and /d/ in such environments, contributing to the of . Additionally, voiced plosives /b/, /d/, and /g/ undergo partial devoicing in clusters, particularly in word-final positions before voiceless obstruents, where voicing is reduced or absent, as observed in clusters like those in "abs" or "." English orthography shows inconsistencies in representing plosives, often due to historical sound changes that froze spelling conventions while pronunciation evolved, including influences from the (1400–1700), which indirectly affected consonant-vowel interactions and spelling standardization. For example, the letter "t" typically corresponds to /t/, but it can also represent the /tʃ/ in words like "church" /tʃɜːrtʃ/, where the plosive element combines with a release. Similarly, "c" or "k" denotes /k/, as in "cat" /kæt/, while digraphs like "ch" signal /tʃ/ in "chin" /tʃɪn/, reflecting etymological layers from Old and Middle English. Dialectal variations further shape plosive realizations, particularly for /t/. In varieties, such as , /t/ frequently undergoes to [ʔ] in coda or preconsonantal positions, as in "bottle" [ˈbɒʔl], a process increasingly observed in urban dialects like . This contrasts with rhotic dialects, where intervocalic /t/ favors [ɾ] over glottalization, while non-rhotic British dialects like limit glottal stops to informal speech but exhibit more unreleased [t̚] in similar contexts, influenced by the absence of post-vocalic /r/ linking. These differences highlight how rhoticity affects the prosodic environment for /t/, promoting in rhotic systems versus glottal reinforcement in non-rhotic ones.

References

  1. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-410
  2. https://www.ugr.es/~ftsaez/fonetica/consonants.pdf
  3. https://pressbooks.utrgv.edu/engl6360/chapter/manner-of-articulation/
  4. https://archive.org/download/cu31924027389505/cu31924027389505.pdf
  5. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plosive
  6. https://www.etymonline.com/word/plosive
  7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1950.11659368
  8. https://wals.info/chapter/5
  9. https://sheffield.ac.uk/linguistics/home/all-about-linguistics/about-website/branches-linguistics/phonetics/what-do-phoneticians-study/articulatory
  10. https://haskinslabs.org/sites/default/files/files/Reprints/HL1624.pdf
  11. https://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~krussll/phonetics/articulation/describing-consonants.html
  12. https://pressbooks.nvcc.edu/eng200h5p/chapter/3-4-describing-consonants-manner/
  13. https://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~krussll/phonetics/acoustic/spectrogram-sounds.html
  14. https://sites.arizona.edu/sapl/files/2023/10/StoryBuntonJSLHR2010-1.pdf
  15. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/speech.bme.ogi.edu/tutordemos/SpectrogramReading/cse551html/cse551/node37.html
  16. https://corpus.eduhk.hk/english_pronunciation/index.php/3-2-acoustic-aspects-of-consonants/
  17. https://commons.mtholyoke.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/227/2016/06/Phonology-Whelan-Ariza-et-al.-2010-Chp.-6.pdf
  18. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/34654/1/377758.pdf
  19. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/37/paper3529.pdf
  20. https://eajournals.org/ijellr/wp-content/uploads/sites/56/2025/01/A-contrastive-study-of-English.pdf
  21. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~gene/courses/2041/10ie.html
  22. http://www.csun.edu/~sk36711/WWW2/engl400/gmcsoundchanges.pdf
  23. https://uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/media/lectures/8/8_2018_01_16!04_44_53_AM.pdf
  24. https://academic.oup.com/book/36520/chapter/321267555
  25. https://wals.info/chapter/6
  26. https://idiom.ucsd.edu/~mgarellek/files/Garellek_2012_WPP.pdf
  27. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004424357/BP000008.xml
  28. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/334997987.pdf
  29. https://www.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/workshops/crac/papers/jackson.pdf
  30. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/3-4-describing-consonants-manner/
  31. http://nickclements.free.fr/publications/1999c.pdf
  32. https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/BLS/article/view/3860
  33. https://haskinslabs.org/sites/default/files/files/Reprints/HL0386.pdf
  34. https://hal.science/hal-03481440v1/document
  35. https://pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/2-7-classifying-consonants/
  36. https://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/~jcoleman/stricture.htm
  37. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/Fall_2013/ling520/LectureNotes2.html
  38. https://www.diu.edu/documents/Parker_Handouts-Intro-Phonology.pdf
  39. https://www.ub.edu/ocp12/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/OCP12_Main_ZDZIEBKO.pdf
  40. https://www.sas.rochester.edu/lin/joycemarymcdonough/mcdonoughwood-jphon
  41. https://pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/3-5-aspirated-stops-in-english/
  42. https://works.swarthmore.edu/context/fac-linguistics/article/1057/viewcontent/Phonetics.pdf
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5665574/
  44. https://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/course/~daplab/publications/2016/VP_PR_Phonetics_2016.pdf
  45. https://famona.tripod.com/ent/cummings/cumm095.pdf
  46. https://www.isca-archive.org/issp_2024/burroni24_issp.pdf
  47. https://linguistica.sns.it/AISV/abstract/MairanoEtAl.pdf
  48. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2003/papers/p15_0407.pdf
  49. https://oulurepo.oulu.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/36099/isbn978-951-42-8984-2.pdf
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0095447012000514
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221480311_Singleton_and_geminate_stops_in_Finnish_-_acoustic_correlates
  52. https://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/jcoleman/respiration-unicode.html
  53. https://esp.mit.edu/download/06e273f6-df83-496a-b75d-845e668c22e0/H9527_class2.pdf
  54. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/466276
  55. https://sail.usc.edu/publications/files/proctor_book_2016.pdf
  56. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-phonetics/measuring-consonants/D66C93EBB674B50E21AC215090D77054
  57. https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/66068
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262952103_Tense_and_Lax_Stops_in_Korean
  59. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_408284_3/component/file_408283/content
  60. http://users.umiacs.umd.edu/~nhf/courses/ling620/BrowmanGoldstein92.pdf
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28639259_Proto-Indo-European_glottalic_stops_The_comparative_evidence
  62. https://kcr.digitalwords.net/media/txt/maddieson.i:1984:sounds.pdf
  63. https://thesoundofenglish.org/plosives/
  64. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2022.896013/full
  65. https://koine-greek.com/2010/01/09/consonant-clusters/
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388502981_Consonant_stability_in_Portuguese-based_creoles
  67. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/inter_chart_2018/IPA_2018.html
  68. https://archive.phonetics.ucla.edu/Language/ipa-pop-up-2.html
  69. https://teaching.ncl.ac.uk/ipa/diacritics.html
  70. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/IPA_hist/IPA_hist_2018.html
  71. https://pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/3-2-broad-and-narrow-transcription/
  72. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/introducingtheipa/chapter/diacritics/
  73. https://ielp.ehe.osu.edu/files/2025/09/IPA_English.pdf
  74. https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/43954/why-is-a-voiced-voiceless-unaspirated-and-aspirated-distinction-so-rare-cross
  75. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/Canada_College/ENGL_LING_200%253A_Introduction_to_Linguistics/03%253A_Sounds_Part_2-_Phonology/3.03%253A_Other_Phonological_Rules
  76. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/9edeaaa8-b554-4377-bb90-19e4f1803b4d/content
  77. https://www.academia.edu/4950627/More_on_the_Voicing_of_English_Obstruents
  78. https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/great-vowel-shift
  79. https://idiom.ucsd.edu/~mgarellek/files/Chong_Garellek_2023_ICPhS.pdf
  80. https://smng.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/354/2021/02/Parrell_Narayanan2018_ExplainingCoronalReduction.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.