Hubbry Logo
Trail blazingTrail blazingMain
Open search
Trail blazing
Community hub
Trail blazing
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Trail blazing
Trail blazing
Trail blazing
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Left turn marker on a blue marked trail in the Czech Republic
Marker of the Voyageur Hiking Trail in Canada

Trail blazing or way marking is the practice of marking paths in outdoor recreational areas with signs or markings that follow each other at certain, though not necessarily exactly defined, distances and mark the direction of the trail.

A blaze in the beginning meant "a mark made on a tree by slashing the bark" (The Canadian Oxford Dictionary). Originally a waymark was "any conspicuous object which serves as a guide to travellers; a landmark" (Oxford English Dictionary). Today, paint (most prevalent), carvings, affixed markers, posts, flagging, cairns, and crosses, are commonly used.

Blaze frequency and recognizability varies significantly. In some wilderness areas, such as those governed by the US Wilderness Act requiring that the land seem "untrammeled by man," blazes are kept to a minimum. Alternatively, highly utilized public areas, such as busy municipal, county, or state parks, will use frequent and highly visible blazes to maximize trail recognition.[1]

Types of signage

[edit]

Paint

[edit]
Painted marker in Switzerland

A painted marking of a consistent shape or shapes (often rectangular), dimension and colour or combination of colours is used along the trail route. The system by which blazes are used to signify turns and endpoints in trails (see below) strongly favors the use of paint blazes.

Basic Marker – red, used in Central Europe for difficult or summit trails

European countries usually use systems of painted bars or shapes in more than one colour. The Czech Hiking Markers System uses three bars – usually one color in between two white bars, with different meanings attached to different colours – in a 10 cm x 10 cm square. Red is often used to mark difficult or summit trails. Arrows of similar design signal a change of direction.

This system was first used in today's Czech Republic in May 1889, to mark a trail from the town of Štěchovice to a nearby spring. Today there are 42,000 km (26,000 mi) of marked trails in the Czech Republic.[2] This system is used also in Slovakia, Ukraine, Croatia, Romania, Albania, Brazil, Philippines and Mongolia. Poland, Bulgaria and Georgia used very similar system. French, Italian, Austrian and Swiss trails use a similar system of white and coloured stripes. Slovenia, Croatia and other former members of Yugoslavia use Knafelc trail blaze.

In the United States and Canada, a single colour is used, usually white, red, blue or yellow. Trails in South Africa are often marked by yellow footprints painted on trees and rocks.

In Israel, trails are marked by three stripes. A painted stripe surrounded by two white stripes can indicate length with black, green, blue, or red representing short (<10 km) trails, and purple or orange representing longer trails (60 to 100 km). In addition, some trails are represented by specific colour combinations such as the Golan Trail (white, blue, green), the Jerusalem Trail (blue, gold, blue), and the Israel National Trail (white, blue, orange).[3]

Blazes may also be painted on obvious rock surfaces or on posts set into the ground (or on utility poles, fences, or other handy surfaces) where the trail follows a road or goes through fields and meadows.

Carvings

[edit]
All that is left of hatchet slashes made in 1902 on Three Blaze Trail in Idaho, USA (2015)

Originally a tree would be blazed by axe or hatchet chops (still the dictionary definition) or knife. Most often these are informal routes made by loggers or hunters, or trails descended from those routes, examples of which are found in North America, Australia and New Zealand.[4][5][6]

Today, environmental and aesthetic concerns dictate blazing method on public lands,[7] with other navigational aids, such as cairns, and machine-carved posts, used where blazes are unsuitable.

Affixed markers

[edit]
Affixed marker ▲ (NZ)

Long lasting plastic, metal, or even sometimes wooden markers may be affixed to trees, usually with nails. Historically, affixed metal markers often included the shapes, logos, colors, and identity of prominent trailkeeping organizations, such as the Appalachian Mountain Club (AMC), or just the trail's identity (as in the Voyageur Hiking Trail image above).

Flagging

[edit]
Flagging – a rare use of a tape flag as a blaze on an official trail in the US, here indicating where the trail re-enters the woods after crossing an open ledge where other methods would be unsuitable

Flagging such as surveyor's tape tied around trees or branches is sometimes used to indicate trail routes, but usually only for temporary or unofficial trails, most commonly when a trail route has been selected but the trail itself is under construction.

Trail flagging is the predominant method to mark a mountain hiking trail in Japan. Red ribbons usually indicate an ascent route while yellow ribbon indicate a descent route. On some mountains, a non-standard ribbon colour (white or blue) is used to identify a specific trail.[citation needed]

Poles

[edit]
Trail signs in Switzerland
Pole marker on an Alpine route at Piz Uccello, Switzerland

Poles (also known as "wands"), colored or not, often temporary, are often used to keep the trail visible during winter and under snow cover.[8] Poles are standard trail markers in Austria, Canada, USA, the Czech Republic, Switzerland, and Slovakia.

Cairns

[edit]
Main article: Cairn
Inuksuit - a cairn in northern Canada were markers used for wayfinding and to locate caches of food or other stores

Cairns are carefully arranged piles of stones. Cairns are most commonly used to indicate trails in open areas, such as higher-elevation alpine areas, where no trees are available, or where conditions may make blazes hard to see.[7] An ancient example is the inuksuk (plural inuksuit), used by the Inuit, Inupiat, Kalaallit, Yupik, and other peoples of the Arctic region of North America. These structures are found from Alaska to Greenland. This region, above the Arctic Circle, is dominated by the tundra biome and has areas with few natural landmarks.

Below the tree line, cairns are used less frequently, often like flagging to indicate informal or unofficial paths or just their junctions with official trails. They may become obscured by snow in areas with heavy winters and may be easily knocked over. In some areas the recreational building of numerous cairns has obscured the proper use of cairns to mark junctions and crossings. In some areas of the United States, park rangers and land managers must disassemble excess cairns when they become eyesores or when they mislead navigation.

Where rocks are scarce, poles can be used. Poles are also frequently used to mark ski and snow shoe trails.[9]

Trail ducks

[edit]

Duck is a term used in some parts of the US, generally for a much smaller rock pile than a cairn,[10] typically stacked just high enough to convince the observer it is not natural. For most, two rocks stacked could be a coincidence, but three rocks stacked is a duck. In some regions, ducks also contain a pointer rock (or a couple of stacked rocks) to indicate the direction of the trail.[10]

Crosses

[edit]

A wayside cross is a cross by a footpath, track or road, at an intersection, along the edge of a field or in a forest, which often serve as waymarks for walkers and pilgrims or designate dangerous places.[11] They are particularly common in Europe, for example in Germany, Galicia and the Alps. It can be made of wood, stone or metal. Most wayside crosses are designed as crucifixes.

Systems

[edit]
A National Cycle Network (NCN) milepost in Scotland

On a large piece of land, there is likely to be more than one trail. While it might seem obvious that, at minimum, trails should at least take different colours, this is not always done. In Mount Greylock State Reservation, which contains the highest mountain in Massachusetts, all trails other than the Appalachian Trail use the same blue blaze.

Blaze type might also be mixed when different user groups (i.e., snowmobilers, horse riders, mountain bikers) are allowed on trails. For users of faster vehicles, blazes are often larger in order to be seen better at high speeds, and sometimes affixed markers best communicate who may and may not use a trail besides those on foot.

Another possible distinction is by season. In Norway, it is common to use blue for summer routes and red for winter routes. Red routes may traverse lakes and swamps, which are flat and well suited for cross-country skiing in winter, but impassable on foot in summer.

Colours are often assigned simply with an eye toward making sure that no two trails that intersect use the same one, but it can go further than that. On all state land in New York's Catskill Park, for instance, primary trails, especially longer "trunk trails" that go great distances, use red markers if they go in a generally east–west direction and blue if they go north–south. Shorter spur, loop or connector trails generally use yellow blazes.

On occasions when two trails run concurrently, usually at a slightly staggered junction, only one trail may be signed, often with the longer or more heavily trafficked trail's blaze predominating. In other cases, such as southern Vermont where the Appalachian Trail and the Long Trail follow the same path, both trails may use the same white blaze.

A quite different blazing system, called mute blazes was created in the Czech part of the Giant Mountains.[12] The blazes, cut out of sheet metal and painted red, are suspended on high poles, thus being visible to both hikers and skiers. Unlike in classic systems, they do not refer to paths or trails, but show the way to the nearest mountain huts and adjacent towns and villages with the possibility of overnighting and catering.[13]

Painted triangular blaze - here, the Boardman River Trail parallels a road near Traverse City, Michigan

National Trails in England and Wales generally use an acorn symbol.[14] The National Cycle Network in the United Kingdom is signposted using a white bicycle symbol on a blue background, with a white route number in an inset box, but with no destination names or distances. National Route numbers have a red background, Regional Route numbers have a blue background. The system of symbols is based on that used by the Danish National Cycle Route network.

The colour used may also indicate the status of the route, for example on rights of way in England and Wales yellow marks are used for footpaths, blue for bridleways, and red for byways open to all traffic.[14]

Meaning of trail signs

[edit]
Symbols commonly used in trail blazing in the United States. Turn signals are often non-directional—one blaze is placed directly above the other.

Trail blazes guide the user, reassure them they are on the trail, and alert them to turns and, in instances, potential hazards. They are typically augmented with signage at a trail's beginning, end, and intersections with other trails, though some systems make symbolic provision for these.

Painted marker in the USA – triangular blaze indicating a left turn, in Harriman State Park, New York, USA

Offset blazes is a system whereby a vertically stacked pair of blazes with the upper one offset in the direction that the trail turns. This system was first used in 1970 on the Beech Trail in Harriman State Park.[citation needed] This system was further refined to where a triangular pattern of blazes would indicate a terminus, its point up or down depending on whether that was the beginning or the end. These began to be used elsewhere and are now fairly common throughout North America, though variations of this system exist. Some trails instead use two blazes painted together at an angle to form an "L" shape to indicate a turn, with the angle between the two blazes indicating the angle and direction of the turn. Also, a few trails indicate turns with two stacked blazes, without an offset, but this can cause confusion as the direction is not implied. In addition, other trails may use two non-offset stacked blazes to indicate the trail goes straight at a location where there may be a tempting mis-turn.

A triangular pattern with its point to the side was also devised for eventualities like spurs or junctions, but these have not caught on.

In some areas, a triangular pattern with its point up indicates that a hiker is at the point of a sharp switchback.

In the Netherlands, signage usually consist of two bars above each other: white-red, yellow-red and red-blue are commonly seen blazes. An upcoming turn is indicated by duplicating the blazes: white-red-white-red, yellow-red-yellow-red, etc. Nowadays, stickers are often used, and instead of duplicating the blaze, the rectangle is cut into an arrow, to indicate direction. A diagonal cross is used to indicate a direction should not be taken: the cross will have the same colours as the blazes (each bar will use a different colour).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Trail blazing

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Trail blazing, also known as trail marking or waymarking, is the practice of applying visible markers—such as , carvings, or signs—to trees, rocks, posts, or other natural features along paths in , forested, or recreational areas to guide hikers, explorers, and other users and prevent disorientation. The origins of trail blazing trace back to early in , who created "blazes" by cutting notches or slashes into tree bark to indicate routes through dense forests, building upon paths established by Native American pathfinders using methods like bent ; the earliest recorded English-language use appearing in 1750 in explorer Dr. Thomas Walker's journal, where he described blazing trees to mark his path. By the , this method had become a standard for pioneers establishing trade and migration routes in forested regions, before evolving into more formalized systems with the rise of organized and national parks in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In the United States, the , completed in 1937, played a pivotal role in standardizing modern blazing practices, adopting the iconic 2-by-6-inch rectangular paint blaze in the early 1930s to replace earlier diamond-shaped metal markers for cost efficiency and visibility. Contemporary trail blazing employs a variety of methods to ensure durability and minimal environmental impact, with paint blazes being the most widespread due to their simplicity and low cost; these are typically applied in specific colors to denote trail types, such as orange for , blue for , red for shared-use paths, and yellow for local or side trails. Other techniques include carved notches (traditional but less common today to avoid damage), affixed metal or plastic diamonds, cairns (stacked stones) in open or rocky terrain like alpine zones, and temporary flagging tape for construction or search-and-rescue operations. Blazes are placed at regular intervals—more frequently where visibility is poor—and follow conventions like single markers to confirm the route and offset double blazes to signal turns or junctions, helping maintain user safety while blending into natural landscapes. Organizations like the U.S. Forest Service and agencies emphasize minimal marking on well-defined trails to preserve character, reserving blazes for challenging or primitive paths. Similar practices exist worldwide, adapted to local environments and traditions.

History

Origins and Etymology

The term "blaze" in the context of trail marking derives from a Northern English dialect term for a light-colored mark or spot, from blesi ("white spot"), via Proto-Germanic blas- ("shining, white"). By the 18th century in , "blaze" evolved to describe the practice of cutting or notching tree bark to expose the light-colored underlying wood, creating visible markers for paths; this usage first appeared around as a method to indicate s or select trees for felling. The phrase "blaze a " emerged in the mid-1770s among North American settlers, referring to pioneering routes through by such markings. Early trail-marking practices predate European colonization, with evidence of structured path indicators in various regions. In , prehistoric communities in the Alpine region constructed rock cairns—stacked stone piles—as navigational aids as early as the period around 3000 BCE, such as those discovered underwater at near the , dating to around 3000 BCE whose purpose remains undetermined. Similarly, in the employed natural features for path marking before European contact, including bent saplings shaped into to indicate directions toward water sources or settlements, as well as pictographs on rocks and standing stones to denote routes and boundaries. In colonial , the first documented uses of systematic tree blazing by European appeared in the early during and settlement efforts, with the earliest recorded instance in 1750 in explorer Dr. Thomas Walker's journal, where he described blazing s to mark his path, building on indigenous techniques but adapted for survival in dense forests. A prominent example occurred in the 1770s when frontiersman led a party to blaze the through the , notching trees to create a 200-mile path from into , facilitating migration for thousands of . This survival-oriented practice, essential for in unmarked , marked a shift from ad hoc indigenous methods to more deliberate colonial route-making. By the , trail blazing transitioned toward recreational purposes as organized clubs emerged, promoting marked paths for and . Groups like the , founded in 1876, began systematically marking and maintaining trails in the to encourage outings amid growing . This evolution reflected broader societal changes, turning exploration tools into structured systems for public enjoyment.

Evolution in Exploration and Recreation

Trail blazing evolved significantly during the 19th-century westward expansion in the United States, serving as a vital tool for explorers, settlers, and communication networks to navigate uncharted territories. Following expeditions like Lewis and Clark's, adventurers blazed trails that facilitated migration and economic development across the frontier, marking routes with notches, cairns, or axe cuts to guide travel through rugged landscapes. A notable example was the , which in 1860-1861 operated along pre-existing marked trails spanning approximately 1,800 miles from St. Joseph, Missouri, to , facilitating mail relay stations and rider navigation amid harsh conditions. These practices transitioned trail blazing from survival necessity to structured infrastructure supporting national growth. The late 19th century saw trail blazing formalized through recreational organizations, emphasizing consistency for leisure and preservation. The , established in to promote of the northeastern mountains, began adopting uniform blazing methods on its maintained trails, hiring crews by 1919 to clear paths and apply markers that ensured safe, enjoyable experiences. This institutional approach influenced broader trail systems, shifting blazing from to organized . In the 1920s and 1930s, standardization advanced with the Appalachian Trail Conference—founded in 1925—introducing rectangular white paint blazes, typically two inches by six inches, as a uniform marking system during the trail's construction, which inspired similar practices in U.S. national parks. Post-World War II, the U.S. Forest Service's 1950s programs, including Operation Outdoors launched in 1957, expanded recreational trails with consistent blazing to accommodate surging public use in national forests. Internationally, the UK's Ramblers' Association, formed in 1935, advocated for marked public paths from the 1930s onward, securing access rights and promoting blazed routes that paralleled American developments. By the 2010s, digital tools integrated with traditional blazing, as GPS-assisted apps like Gaia GPS—launched around 2010—enabled users to create, follow, and verify blazed trails offline without supplanting physical markers essential for low-tech reliability.

Purpose and Principles

Trail blazing serves as a fundamental visual cue system designed to guide users along designated paths, ensuring adherence to the route even in challenging outdoor environments. By placing consistent markers at regular intervals, typically every 100 to 300 feet (30 to 90 meters) on moderate terrain with closer spacing in areas of poor visibility, trail blazing helps prevent deviation and maintains directional continuity, particularly in areas where natural landmarks may be obscured. This function is especially critical in low-visibility conditions such as fog, dense foliage, or heavy snowfall, where disorientation can rapidly escalate risks; for instance, in dune fields like those in , hikers are advised to follow markers closely to avoid becoming lost when sand obscures the path. Beyond basic guidance, trail blazing enhances safety by alerting users to potential hazards and facilitating responses. Markers can denote dangerous features, such as cliff edges or unstable , through strategic placement or supplementary indicators that warn of proximity to risks, thereby allowing trail users to adjust their course proactively. In scenarios, well-maintained trails with clear markings often double as evacuation paths, providing routes for egress during wildfires or other crises, as seen in resilience planning where trails are integrated into broader management strategies. This role proved vital in reducing incident severity during various operations, where poor navigation contributed to many (SAR) cases involving day hikers. Data from U.S. SAR records indicate that navigation-related errors, including disorientation, were prevalent in incidents from 2003 to 2006, highlighting the prevalence of such errors in SAR incidents. For novice hikers, the presence of reliable blazes offers psychological reassurance, fostering confidence and encouraging safer that correlates with fewer overall rescue needs in marked areas. This benefit extends to broader user groups, as consistent markers reduce anxiety associated with unfamiliar terrain, promoting a more enjoyable and secure experience. Trail blazing integrates seamlessly with complementary tools like topographic maps and directional to form a robust framework, serving as a dependable low-tech alternative when electronic devices fail due to battery depletion or signal loss. For example, in the Big South Fork National River and Recreational Area, blazes are paired with symbolic signs at trailheads and junctions to provide comprehensive orientation, ensuring users can cross-reference physical markers with mapped routes for enhanced accuracy. This not only bolsters route but also contributes to trail durability by concentrating foot traffic on established paths, minimizing in sensitive ecosystems.

Maintenance and Preservation Roles

Trail blazes play a crucial role in monitoring trail erosion and overuse by providing clear indicators of the intended path, allowing maintainers to detect deviations where high-traffic user-created routes form parallel to official trails, often exacerbating loss and damage. These markers help identify areas of concentrated foot traffic that lead to widened treads or channelized water flow, enabling targeted interventions like installing drainage features or reinforcing surfaces to prevent further degradation. In supporting biodiversity preservation, trail blazes direct hikers away from sensitive habitats, minimizing disturbance to and fragile ecosystems by channeling traffic along durable alignments that avoid wetlands, riparian zones, and rare plant communities. This practice aligns with conservation strategies that emphasize routing recreation to reduce impacts on hotspots, thereby sustaining ecological integrity in protected areas. Volunteer-led maintenance programs rely on trail blazes for ongoing care, with organizations coordinating annual efforts to inspect, repaint, and replace faded or damaged markers to ensure trail integrity. For instance, the Association has facilitated volunteer , including work on trail markers, as part of its comprehensive trail upkeep since its incorporation in 1977, building on earlier council recommendations from 1971 to standardize design and management. These initiatives involve thousands of hours from community members, focusing on restoring visibility after seasonal wear or environmental stress. Long-term durability of blazes is assessed through systematic testing of materials and placement, informing when natural changes necessitate rerouting; for example, faded or absent blazes on landslide-affected sections signal the need to establish new markings on stable alignments while neutralizing old ones to prevent hazardous use. This process ensures trails adapt to events like or geological shifts, promoting sustainable access without compromising safety or environmental health.

Methods of Marking

Paint Blazes

Paint blazes involve the application of rectangular or vertical stripes, typically measuring 2 inches wide by 6 inches high, directly onto bark or occasionally rock surfaces using specialized - or latex-based designed for outdoor durability. These markings are created by trail maintainers who select prominent, healthy trees along the route, clean the surface to ensure , and apply the paint at approximately —around 4 to 5 feet above the ground—for optimal visibility. The process employs simple tools such as 1-inch wide brushes for precise application or dauber-style applicators for quicker coverage in remote areas, allowing crews to mark efficiently during or maintenance phases. This method offers several advantages, including high cost-effectiveness due to the low material and labor requirements compared to more elaborate , with visibility extending 50 to 100 feet under normal conditions to provide reassurance to hikers without the . Paint blazes remain weather-resistant, enduring , , and moderate fluctuations for 3 to 5 years before requiring repainting, depending on exposure and paint quality. Common colors feature white for primary trails to denote the main route and blue for secondary paths or connectors, enhancing navigational clarity in forested environments. The adoption of paint blazes as a standard practice in the United States traces back to the early , with the U.S. Forest Service formalizing guidelines by to promote consistent trail marking across national forests, building on earlier exploratory traditions. This shift from ad-hoc methods to standardized application facilitated safer recreation and on expanding trail networks. However, challenges persist, as exposure accelerates fading through UV degradation, reducing legibility over time, while older oil-based formulations can pose potential toxicity risks to tree health if they contain high levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs); modern low-VOC alternatives mitigate this by minimizing environmental and biological impacts.

Carved Markings

Carved markings represent one of the earliest and most durable methods of trail indication, involving incisions made with axes, hatchets, or chisels to create notches or symbols on trees, rocks, or wooden surfaces. These cuts typically remove sections of outer bark or to expose the lighter inner layers, providing high-contrast visibility against natural surroundings, such as the white layer of trees. Common symbols include simple notches, arrows, or directional indicators, applied at for easy detection by travelers. This technique saw widespread use during the 18th and 19th centuries on frontier trails in , where explorers and settlers relied on manual tools for navigation in dense forests and open plains. For instance, employed axe blazes to mark the through the in 1775, creating a vital route for westward migration. Similarly, pioneers on the in the 1840s carved inscriptions and marks into trees and soft sandstone formations along the route, serving both as personal records and navigational aids in unfamiliar terrain. These practices evolved from Native American traditions of using bent or notched trees as markers, adapted by European settlers for longer expeditions. The primary advantage of carved markings lies in their longevity, often enduring for decades without maintenance due to the permanence of the exposed material and the slow healing process of trees or of stone. Historical axe blazes on trees, for example, have been documented persisting for over 100 years on service trails in regions like . However, this durability comes at a cost: carvings create open wounds that invite fungal infections, infestations, and structural weakening, potentially leading to tree decline or death over time. Studies and expert assessments emphasize that such damage disrupts the tree's vascular systems, including and , impairing nutrient transport and . In response to these environmental concerns, contemporary trail management prioritizes non-invasive alternatives to traditional carving on live trees. Modern approaches include routing tools—such as electric engravers or precision chisels—applied to dead wood, rocks, or prefabricated signs to minimize ecological impact while maintaining visibility. Organizations like the U.S. Forest Service have largely phased out tree blazing since the mid-20th century, favoring these methods to preserve forest health. Specific historical examples, such as notched trail trees in Scandinavian regions from the 1800s, illustrate early adaptations, though documentation remains limited to regional and archaeological surveys.

Affixed Markers

Affixed markers consist of prefabricated signs constructed from materials such as metal, , or , which are to trees, posts, or other fixed structures to provide clear identification and cues. These markers serve as a durable substitute for painted blazes, offering longevity in various environmental conditions. Historically, metal markers have often taken the form of shapes, while plastic variants include bands or tags designed for easy attachment. Installation of affixed markers typically involves nailing or bolting them in place, with techniques emphasizing minimal structural damage to host trees or posts, such as using small-diameter nails or predrilled holes to reduce injury to bark and . Many incorporate reflective materials to enhance during low-light conditions, ensuring safer at dawn, dusk, or night. For instance, colored or metal are commonly selected for their reflectivity and ability to withstand weathering without frequent replacement. These markers have seen widespread adoption on urban-adjacent trails where standardized, high-visibility signage is essential for managing increased foot traffic, exemplified by the United Kingdom's . The distinctive acorn symbol, affixed to posts and trees since the late 20th century, aids in waymarking long-distance paths across , promoting consistent identification amid diverse landscapes. Unlike temporary indicators such as flagging tape, affixed markers provide enduring guidance that supports both recreational and interpretive uses. Affixed markers offer advantages including greater resistance to vandalism compared to surface carvings or paint, as their solid construction deters easy alteration or removal, and the potential for multilingual designs to accommodate international users. However, they carry drawbacks such as higher upfront costs for manufacturing and installation—potentially reaching thousands per mile for comprehensive systems—and vulnerability to , which can necessitate additional security measures or replacements. Overall, their use balances durability with maintenance challenges, making them ideal for high-traffic or protected areas.

Temporary Indicators

Temporary indicators encompass short-term marking techniques employed during , layout, or temporary events to guide crews or participants while minimizing long-term environmental impact. These methods are removable and designed for brief use, allowing for adjustments before installing permanent blazes or structures. Flagging represents the most widespread temporary marking approach, utilizing non-adhesive or surveyor's tape tied to branches or to outline the intended trail corridor. Fluorescent pink flagging is preferred in phases for its high visibility against varied foliage, with ties placed at and spaced approximately every (3 meters) to ensure clear delineation of the path and direction. This technique facilitates precise alignment during initial layout and excavation, using a single row of flags to define the corridor width—typically wider than the final tread—and guide sustainable practices like contour cuts. In open or vegetated-scarce terrain, where tying to branches is impractical, poles such as wooden stakes or metal rods fitted with cloth markers or pin flags provide stable temporary indicators. These are driven into the ground along the centerline or edges to mark alignment and progress, with pin flags—wire wands topped with small plastic flags—offering lightweight, reusable options for exact tread positioning. Such pole-based marking has been integral to trail building since the 1930s, including extensive (CCC) projects that constructed 13,100 miles of foot trails nationwide using similar staking methods for layout and . These indicators are deployed for durations of 1 to 6 months, after which they are systematically removed to avoid accumulation. Biodegradable flagging options, composed of non-woven cellulosic material from wood pulp, have proliferated in the as eco-friendly alternatives that degrade naturally in 6 to 24 months without to or . Event applications highlight their versatility, as seen in the Western States 100 , where pink surveyor's tape tied to branches has marked the 100-mile course since the event's in 1974, alongside arrows and signs for runner before post-race cleanup. Upon completion of or events, temporary indicators are cleared, often paving the way for enduring markers like cairns in suitable terrains.

Rock and Stone Structures

Rock and stone structures serve as durable trail markers in rugged, treeless, or alpine environments where vegetation is sparse, relying on locally sourced materials to guide hikers without permanent alteration to the landscape. These markers, often semi-permanent, are particularly vital in areas prone to , snow, or , providing line-of-sight across open terrain. Cairns, consisting of stacked rocks forming compact towers typically 2-4 feet high, have been employed as trail indicators in alpine regions such as the since , when drovers used them to denote safe paths for across remote moors. These structures originated as simple piles on knolls along ancient routes, evolving into standardized markers for visibility in misty conditions common to the area. Trail ducks represent a specialized form of small cairns, usually three or four stones with a single top stone angled to point the direction of travel, tracing origins to Native American practices in the arid Southwest deserts of the . These low-profile markers, no taller than a foot or two, were essential for navigating vast, featureless expanses like those in and , where they have been documented along prehistoric paths. Their use gained wider popularity among modern hikers in U.S. desert regions during the for subtle, non-intrusive guidance. Construction of these stone structures emphasizes stability to endure wind and weather, beginning with a wide, circular base of larger stones layered in tiers that taper upward for balance, often incorporating a sufficient batter angle to prevent toppling. In open areas, cairns and ducks are spaced approximately 100-200 feet apart on straight sections to maintain visibility, with closer intervals in foggy or winding terrain to ensure the next marker remains in sight. Variations include inukshuks in regions, larger stone figures adapted by communities for navigation across and from pre-colonial eras dating back thousands of years. These humanoid or directional forms, built with balanced boulders, marked travel routes, hunting grounds, and safe passages in the vast, snow-covered North American .

Standardized Systems

Color Coding Conventions

Color coding conventions in trail blazing serve to provide quick visual identification of trail types, difficulties, and uses, enabling hikers to make informed decisions at junctions without relying solely on maps or signs. This system enhances by allowing rapid distinction between primary routes, connectors, and specialized paths, reducing the risk of disorientation in diverse terrains. The adoption of colors evolved from simple monochromatic or black-and-white markings in the early , which were limited to basic visibility, to multifaceted color schemes post-1950s, coinciding with increased recreational use and standardized paint technologies that permitted durable, weather-resistant applications. In the United States, white blazes designate primary long-distance trails, such as the , where 2-by-6-inch rectangular white paint marks have been used since the early 1930s to replace earlier iron or diamond markers, with the full route completed by 1937. Blue blazes typically indicate side trails or connectors to features like shelters or viewpoints along major routes like the . According to U.S. Forest Service standards outlined in EM7100-15, gray or white is recommended for hiker/pedestrian and pack-and-saddle trails, while orange denotes paths, and blue is assigned to cross-country ski and snowshoe routes; these guidelines, formalized in recreation site development policies, prioritize nonreflective or retroreflective paints for visibility across trail classes. In some regional systems, such as those managed by state departments of conservation, yellow marks hiking-only trails, red indicates shared-use paths open to multiple non-motorized activities, and blue or orange specifies equestrian routes. Internationally, color schemes vary but often follow hierarchical conventions to denote trail significance and accessibility. In , the European Ramblers' Association recommends a sequence of leading colors—red for principal long-distance and ridge trails, blue for regional main paths within mountain ranges, green for local access routes, and yellow for shorter connectors—facilitated by painted stripes or symbols on trees and rocks to ensure cross-border consistency. For example, in France's network, established in the 1970s, main long-distance routes use white-over-red markings, while blue may appear on associated regional variants or easier segments in alpine areas. In , the national walking track grading system (grades 1-5) emphasizes descriptive criteria over colors. Exceptions to these conventions arise from regional priorities, such as in Canadian parks where orange markers often designate trails to accommodate users while distinguishing them from other routes; for instance, the Trail in Ontario's Hills uses orange tree tags for its hiking path. These overrides ensure compatibility with local , user groups, and maintenance practices, sometimes integrating symbolic shapes like rectangles or arrows alongside colors for added clarity at intersections.

Symbolic and Regional Variations

Trail blazing employs various non-color-based symbols to convey directional information, turns, and junctions, enhancing navigation beyond basic rectangular blazes. In many standardized systems, particularly in North American trails, a single vertical rectangle serves as the primary marker, while two stacked rectangles indicate caution or an upcoming change, such as a turn or . If the upper blaze is offset to the left or right, it signals a left or right turn, respectively, forming an L- or T-like configuration to guide hikers visually. Arrows, formed by three aligned rectangles pointing upward or downward, denote the trail's start or end, providing clear endpoint cues in systems like those used by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. These shape-based symbols are placed at intervals adjusted for visibility, ensuring hikers can anticipate route changes without relying solely on color. Regional adaptations reflect local geographies, histories, and cultural contexts, incorporating unique symbols to suit specific environments. In Japan's Kumano Kodo pilgrimage routes, established in the as World Heritage paths, markers include stone signposts and kilometer indicators inscribed with Japanese characters, often near symbolic natural features like the turtle-shaped rock at Tainai Keguri, which represents rebirth and integrates spiritual elements into navigation. These routes emphasize minimalistic to preserve the ancient forested , blending practical with cultural reverence for sacred sites. In Alaskan trails, where bear encounters are common, markers adapt to the rugged, wildlife-rich landscapes. Marking frequency and style vary by to optimize and minimize environmental impact. In dense forests, blazes are placed more frequently—often every 50 to 100 meters—to counteract limited sightlines from foliage and undergrowth, ensuring continuous guidance. Conversely, open prairies or savannas require fewer markers, spaced up to 300 meters apart, as natural landmarks and expansive views provide inherent orientation, reducing the need for frequent interventions. Cultural sensitivities further influence these practices, particularly in indigenous lands, where trail blazing avoids carving or painting on sacred trees or sites to respect and heritage protections, as outlined in Aboriginal cultural resource guidelines that designate sensitive areas off-limits for markings. Such adaptations promote sustainable trail use while honoring local customs and ecosystems.

Interpretation of Markers

Directional and Junction Signals

In trail blazing systems, a single rectangular paint blaze, typically 2 inches by 6 inches, signals that the hiker should continue straight ahead along the established path, confirming they are on the correct route. This marking serves as a reassurance indicator, placed at intervals to maintain orientation without overwhelming the landscape. Double blazes, where the upper one is offset slightly to the left or right of the lower, denote an upcoming turn in the direction of the offset, allowing hikers to anticipate changes in the trail's course before they occur. This offset convention, avoiding arrows or slanted marks for a cleaner aesthetic, became standardized on major U.S. trails like the during the 1930s, promoting uniformity across volunteer-maintained routes. At junctions and intersections, more complex configurations guide navigation through path divergences. Three vertically stacked blazes mark the start or terminus of a trail, providing a clear endpoint signal, while a pair of blazes aligned to the crossing—forming a T or plus shape when viewed from the approach—indicates a intersection where the main route continues straight across without turning. These patterns ensure clarity at decision points, reducing confusion in areas with multiple paths. On the , such directional markers have been applied consistently since the trail's designation as a National Scenic Trail and completion in 1993, using white rectangles aligned with the trail axis for bidirectional visibility and integration with aesthetics. Historically, trail marking in the U.S. shifted from ambiguous notches—simple bark slashes that could indicate direction vaguely or merely presence—toward precise symbolic systems by the mid-20th century, as organizations like the Conservancy advocated for standardized paint blazes to enhance safety and efficiency. This evolution reflected growing trail networks and the need for reliable, low-impact amid increasing recreational use. Directional signals occasionally incorporate brief overlays for warnings, but their primary role remains guiding routine path progression.

Warning and Special Indicators

Warning configurations in trail blazing often employ modified blazes to alert hikers to hazards or closures, ensuring safety without relying solely on formal signs. Double blazes, consisting of two standard rectangular marks stacked vertically and offset slightly, are placed 25 to 50 feet before potential dangers such as abrupt turns, junctions, or natural hazards like washouts, signaling hikers to exercise caution. In cases of trail closures, existing blazes may be obliterated by scraping off the and applying a neutralizing color (such as brown, green, or gray) to blend with the natural background, effectively removing the route marker. Red slashes over standard blazes or on associated markers are commonly used to indicate prohibitions or closures due to dangers, such as washouts or restricted access, particularly on motorized or multi-use trails managed by the U.S. Forest Service. These modifications align with broader requirements under the National Trails System Act of 1968, which mandates uniform markers for national trails to facilitate safe navigation and management, including notations for deviations or restrictions. Cross-like configurations, often achieved through diagonal red slashes, signal no-entry zones, such as private land boundaries or hazardous sections, preventing unauthorized access.

Best Practices and Considerations

Placement and Visibility Guidelines

Proper placement of trail markers is essential to provide clear guidance without overwhelming the natural environment or confusing users. According to guidelines from the American Trails organization, markers should be positioned to ensure the next one is visible from the previous, promoting a sense of continuity while minimizing clutter. In forested areas, where visibility is limited by dense , spacing is typically recommended at 50-100 yards between markers to maintain line-of-sight without excessive frequency. This standard, outlined in trail maintenance practices from 2015, ensures hikers can follow the path reliably even in low-visibility conditions. In contrast, open areas such as meadows or prairies allow for wider spacing adjusted based on terrain openness, typically around 300 feet (100 yards) in large openings over 600 feet wide, as per U.S. Forest Service trail construction guidelines that emphasize sight distance in unobstructed landscapes. Height and alignment further enhance marker effectiveness by optimizing visibility for approaching users. Markers on trees are generally placed 4-6 feet above the ground, aligning with average for most hikers to facilitate quick detection. This height range, recommended in recreational trail marking guidelines, accounts for typical user stature and prevents obstruction by undergrowth. Blazes should face the direction of travel, painted on the side of the tree visible to oncoming hikers, and positioned to avoid sharp curves or bends where sightlines may be interrupted. Such alignment prevents misdirection at turns, ensuring the marker serves as a reliable from the intended approach path. Terrain-specific adjustments are critical for maintaining guidance across varied landscapes. On switchbacks, steep inclines, or near obstacles like stream crossings, additional markers such as double blazes should be used 25-50 feet before turns, and overall spacing may need closer monitoring to compensate for obscured views and potential disorientation, as detailed in marking protocols. To verify continuity, maintainers conduct "blaze walks," systematically traversing the trail in both directions to confirm that each marker remains visible from the prior one under normal conditions. This testing method, employed in standard trail upkeep, identifies gaps or excesses before they impact user experience. A common pitfall in trail marking is over-marking, which can create visual clutter and dilute the significance of critical indicators. Excessive blazes, often resulting from inconsistent , lead to as users may overlook important directional cues amid . Modern audits, such as those conducted on the Continental Divide Trail under U.S. Forest Service guidelines, address this by systematically removing surplus markers to restore clarity and adhere to minimalistic standards. These evaluations emphasize sparing use of markers, ensuring only essential placements remain to guide without overwhelming the trail's aesthetic.

Materials, Tools, and Techniques

Trail blazing requires a variety of specialized tools to ensure markers are applied effectively and durably in diverse environments. Traditional hand tools include paint brushes or daubers for applying blazes to trees and rocks, chisels and draw knives for carving markers into wood or stone, wire brushes or scrapers to prepare surfaces by removing loose bark or old paint, and mallets for constructing cairns from stacked rocks. Materials for trail markers prioritize environmental safety, longevity, and visibility while minimizing impact on natural surfaces. Non-toxic, water-based or acrylic paints with UV inhibitors, such as those formulated for forestry boundary marking (e.g., Nelson or exterior grades), are commonly applied to trees or rocks for their adhesion and weather resistance. Biodegradable ribbons, often photodegradable fluorescent varieties like those from HME Products, serve as temporary markers in sensitive areas, breaking down naturally over time without leaving residue. For permanent affixed markers, galvanized metal tags or plates provide rust-resistant durability, especially in wet climates, and can be nailed or bolted to posts or trees. Techniques for creating and maintaining blazes emphasize precision and minimal invasiveness to extend marker lifespan. Surfaces must first be cleaned and smoothed using scrapers or brushes to ensure adhesion, followed by application of for enhanced . Blazes are typically painted as 2-by-6-inch rectangles at , using just enough per stroke for crisp edges, and cairns are built by stacking stable stones in visible tiers without mortar. Reapplication schedules vary by environment and trail conditions, typically every 2-5 years to counter fading from weather and vegetation growth. Proper training ensures these tools, materials, and techniques are used effectively to avoid trail damage. Certification programs, such as those offered through the Professional TrailBuilders Association in partnership with the Trail Skills Project, provide hands-on instruction for volunteers and professionals, focusing on minimal-invasiveness methods like surface preparation without deep bark cuts and eco-friendly material selection. Similar resources from organizations like the emphasize safe tool handling and marker consistency through workshops. Trail blazing practices must balance navigational utility with minimal ecological disruption, as improper marking can lead to tree damage such as , where deep cuts into the bark interrupt nutrient flow and weaken or kill the tree. To mitigate this, guidelines emphasize shallow scrapes that avoid penetrating the layer, preventing bleeding and long-term injury, particularly on thin-barked species like . The Center for Outdoor Ethics, established in the , promotes "no-trace" principles that discourage unnecessary markings altogether, advocating the use of maps, compasses, or GPS to reduce reliance on physical blazes and preserve natural aesthetics. Additionally, employing natural-colored paints or frames around blazes helps them blend into the environment, minimizing visual impact while maintaining visibility. In the United States, legal frameworks strictly regulate trail blazing to protect public lands. Under 36 CFR 261.9(a), administered by the U.S. Forest Service since the , it is prohibited to cut or damage trees in national forests without a permit, special-use authorization, or timber sale contract, requiring official trail maintainers to obtain approvals for any marking activities. The of 1964 further restricts markings in designated wilderness areas, prohibiting permanent structures or installations except for minimal, essential trail maintenance using native materials to preserve the area's untrammeled character. Internationally, similar protections apply, particularly in ecologically sensitive zones. The European Union's (Council Directive 92/43/EEC, adopted in 1992) mandates the conservation of natural habitats and wild species in protected sites like areas, limiting trail markings that could disturb habitats through appropriate assessments for any potentially impacting activities. For indigenous lands, cultural heritage laws, such as those under the U.S. (1966) and its Section 106 provisions, require federal agencies to consider effects on traditional cultural properties before undertaking trail-related actions, extending to international contexts like guidelines that safeguard indigenous sacred sites from alterations. Enforcement underscores these regulations through case studies of violations. In Acadia National Park, unauthorized painted blazes and rock markings in 2020 were deemed vandalism, subjecting offenders to potential fines up to $5,000 and imprisonment under 36 CFR 261 and park-specific rules for damaging natural features. To promote sustainability, alternatives like solar-powered LED pathway markers have been tested and deployed in the 2020s for low-impact trail guidance, offering durable, energy-free illumination without tree alteration or paint.

References

  1. https://www.americantrails.org/resources/faq-when-and-where-to-use-blazes-or-markers
  2. https://grammarist.com/idiom/blaze-a-trail/
  3. https://appalachiantrail.org/news-stories/iconography-of-the-at/
  4. https://www.etymonline.com/word/blaze
  5. https://www.heritagedaily.com/2022/11/archaeologists-explore-mysterious-underwater-cairns-at-lake-constance/145275
  6. https://masshumanities.org/ph-before-google-maps/
  7. https://foresthistory.org/research-explore/us-forest-service-history/policy-and-law/recreation-u-s-forest-service/hiking-in-america/
  8. https://www.coreknowledge.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/CKHG_G5_U10_WestwardExpBefore_TG.pdf
  9. https://www.nps.gov/poex/learn/historyculture/index.htm
  10. https://library.unh.edu/find/archives/collections/amc-trail-crew-association-papers-1914-2009
  11. https://appalachiantrail.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Trail_Years.pdf
  12. https://foresthistory.org/research-explore/us-forest-service-history/u-s-forest-service-publications/general-publications/highlights-in-the-history-of-forest-conservation/table-of-contents/after-world-war-ii-1945-1967/
  13. https://www.ramblers.org.uk/about-us/our-history
  14. https://www.gaiagps.com/
  15. https://www.nps.gov/whsa/planyourvisit/hiking-safety-tips.htm
  16. https://thetrek.co/how-to-read-blazes-and-other-trail-markers/
  17. https://www.railstotrails.org/trail-building-toolbox/signage-and-surface-markings/
  18. https://www.americantrails.org/resources/why-trails-matter-resilience-to-wildfire
  19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19192124/
  20. https://www.nps.gov/biso/planyourvisit/trail-blazing-and-signing.htm
  21. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/trail-maintenance-notebook.pdf
  22. https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr993.pdf
  23. https://www.pcta.org/about-us/history/
  24. https://www.pcta.org/our-work/trail-maintenance-and-reconstruction/
  25. https://northcountrytrail.org/blazing-best-practices-2/
  26. https://mywoodlot.com/images/supporting_information/guidelines_for_marking_recreational_trails.pdf
  27. https://www.kta-hike.org/uploads/8/2/5/0/82502470/trailmarkingguidelines.pdf
  28. https://wyeastblog.org/2011/02/13/blazes/
  29. https://cspforestry.com/blogs/news/tree-marking-paint-in-forestry-and-logging
  30. https://nelsonpaint.com/hydro-spot-tree-marking-paint-gallon/
  31. https://www.thetrek.co/how-to-read-blazes-and-other-trail-markers/
  32. https://orogenesiscollective.org/news/2024/5/15/finding-lost-trails-the-basics
  33. https://theblondecoyote.com/2012/05/24/oregon-trail-ruts-register-cliffs/
  34. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAiKA3a-kAo
  35. https://www.facebook.com/groups/397526214154529/posts/1338801676693640/
  36. https://lnt.org/what-happens-when-we-carve-into-trees/
  37. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/trees_provide_historic_navigation_aid
  38. https://www.fs.usda.gov/t-d/pubs/htmlpubs/htm07232806/page13.htm
  39. https://www.greenbelly.co/pages/how-to-read-hiking-trail-signs-markers-blazes
  40. https://www.countryfile.com/go-outdoors/days-out/guide-to-the-uks-national-trails-history-and-walking-routes
  41. https://britainexplained.com/why-you-want-to-follow-the-acorn-sign/
  42. https://coloradotrail.org/sign-vandalism-on-the-ct/
  43. https://burkehistoricalsociety.org/the-civilian-conservation-corps-ccc-roosevelts-tree-army-1933-1942-by-mary-lipsey/
  44. https://www.fs.usda.gov/eng/pubs/htmlpubs/htm00232839/page11b.htm
  45. https://www.roads.org.uk/articles/three-generations-a82/military-road
  46. https://cairngorms.co.uk/the-national-park/about/history
  47. http://www.stonestructures.org/html/source-cairns.html
  48. https://lionesslearning.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/cairns-along-the-trail/
  49. https://mwvvibe.com/cairns-and-a-century-of-navigation/
  50. https://beringstraits.com/historical-spotlight-inukshuk/
  51. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-ancient-traditions/unravelling-spellbinding-story-inuksuit-mysterious-structures-prehistoric-020830
  52. https://greatdividetrail.com/blazing-the-trail/
  53. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5504d100e4b08eb858c4e8fc/t/5de5919dcceb6a637f1a16a8/1575326125658/Standard%2BColors%2Bfor%2BForest%2BService%2BDeveloped%2BRecreation%2BSites.pdf
  54. https://www.connexionfrance.com/practical/what-do-the-signs-on-french-hiking-paths-mean/668137
  55. https://carphills.com/?page_id=393
  56. https://paparksandforests.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/how-to-read-trail-markers.pdf
  57. https://www.sricd.org/files/837674b26/Signage-Guide.pdf
  58. https://www.insidekyoto.com/kumano-kodo-walking-trail-guide-with-maps
  59. https://www.huguenotsociety.org.uk/blog/in-the-steps-of-the-huguenots-and-the-waldensians-a-european-hiking-trail
  60. https://www.nps.gov/tapr/learn/nature/a-complex-prairie-ecosystem.htm
  61. https://www.merri-bek.vic.gov.au/globalassets/website-merri-bek/areas/living-merri-bek/community-services/diversity/merri-bek-pre-contact-aboriginal-heritage-study.pdf
  62. https://appalachiantrail.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Trail-Design-Construction-and-Maintenance.pdf
  63. https://www.pcta.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/PCT_Trail_Criteria.pdf
  64. http://www.fs.usda.gov/r05/eldorado/recreation/opportunities/highway-vehicles-ohv
  65. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationaltrailssystem/upload/National-Trails-System-Act-Amended-2019.pdf
  66. https://www.michigan.gov/-/media/Project/Websites/dnr/Documents/LED/digests/Motorized_Trail_Signing_Handbook.pdf?rev=da6d04a78ecc484688d9ac659179af15
  67. https://sectionhiker.com/trail-blazing-conventions-and-guidelines/
  68. https://npshistory.com/publications/usfs/forest-trail-handbook/sec7.htm
  69. https://www.trails.actonma.gov/blazing-supplies-and-procedures/
  70. https://appalachiantrail.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Marking-the-Trail-Student-w.pdf
  71. https://ligreenbelt.squarespace.com/s/Trail-Maintenance-Guide.pdf
  72. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/March_2018_CDT_Marking_Guide.pdf
  73. https://www.fs.usda.gov/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf05232810/pdf05232810dpi72.pdf
  74. https://www.hmeproducts.com/trail-marking-ribbon/
  75. https://www.fs.usda.gov/t-d/pubs/pdf/05231202.pdf
  76. https://appalachiantrailhistory.org/items/show/457
  77. https://www.whiteblaze.net/forum/showthread.php/72523-What-are-the-rules-for-painting-white-blazes
  78. https://www.trailskills.org/
  79. https://www.trailbuilders.org/why-join
  80. https://appalachiantrail.org/get-involved/volunteer/safety-training/essential-trail-maintenance/
  81. https://www.nynjtc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Trail-Maintenance-Manual-8th-edition-FINAL-2020.pdf
  82. https://lnt.org/why/7-principles/
  83. https://wilderness.net/learn-about-wilderness/key-laws/wilderness-act/
  84. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A31992L0043
  85. https://www.ntc.blm.gov/krc/system/files?file=legacy/uploads/18293/GuidetoTCPs%26SacredSites.pdf
  86. https://acadiaonmymind.com/2020/09/rash-acadia-national-park-vandalism-illegal-blazes-painted-rocks/
  87. https://www.usaveled.com/product-category/led-solar-powered-road-pathway-markers/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.