Hubbry Logo
Welsh devolutionWelsh devolutionMain
Open search
Welsh devolution
Community hub
Welsh devolution
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welsh devolution
Welsh devolution
from Wikipedia
Senedd building

Welsh devolution is the transfer of legislative powers for self-governance to Wales by the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The current system of devolution began following the enactment of the Government of Wales Act 1998, with the responsibility of various devolved powers granted to the Welsh Government rather than being the responsibility of the Government of the United Kingdom.

Wales was conquered by England during the 13th century, with the Laws in Wales Acts 1535 and 1542 applying English law to Wales and incorporating it into England (survives as the England and Wales legal jurisdiction), and later into Great Britain and the United Kingdom. A rise in Welsh nationalism and political movements advocating for Welsh autonomy became more prominent in the late nineteenth century. The devolution of some administrative responsibilities began in the early twentieth century, as well as the passing of laws specific to Wales. Since World War II, various movements and proposals have advocated different models of Welsh devolution.

A 1979 referendum on devolution failed by 79%, while a 1997 referendum narrowly won. Laws were subsequently passed to establish the National Assembly for Wales and grant it secondary legislative powers over areas such as agriculture, education and housing. The third referendum, in 2011, saw voters support full primary law-making powers for the national assembly over specified areas of governance. In 2020, the assembly was renamed to Senedd Cymru/Welsh Parliament (commonly known as the Senedd), to better reflect its expanded legislative powers.

The Welsh Labour Party advocates for further devolution and sometimes federalism, whilst the Welsh nationalist party, Plaid Cymru, has described devolution as a stepping stone towards full Welsh independence.

Incorporation of Wales into England

[edit]

Wales was conquered by England during the 13th century and the last native prince of Wales, Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, was killed in an ambush by an English soldier in 1282.[1] The 1284 Statute of Rhuddlan caused Wales to lose its de facto independence and formed the constitutional basis for it as a principality in the Realm of England.[2]

Owain Glyndŵr briefly restored Welsh independence in a national uprising that began in 1400. He convened Wales's first Senedd in Machynlleth in 1404, but the Welsh were defeated by the English by 1412.[3] The penal laws against the Welsh of 1401-02 passed by the English parliament made the Welsh second-class citizens. With hopes of independence ended, there were no further wars or rebellions against English rule and the laws remained on the statute books until 1624.[4]

The English parliament's Laws in Wales Acts 1535 and 1542 applied English law to Wales and united the Principality and the Marches of Wales, effectively abolishing both regions and incorporating Wales into England.[5][6] The Wales and Berwick Act 1746 defined "England" to include Wales.[7]

History

[edit]

Home rule movement

[edit]

Disestablishment of the Anglican church

[edit]

The Sunday Closing (Wales) Act 1881 was the first legislation to acknowledge that Wales had a separate politico-legal character from the rest of the English state.[8] At the time, a majority of people in Wales belonged to noncomformists chapels despite members of the Church of England having legal and social privileges. The Sunday Closing Act was therefore celebrated in Wales as a significant step towards establishing equal status for the noncomformist chapels and disestablishing the Anglican church in Wales. Historian and former BBC Wales producer John Trefor suggests that the act "was a victory, not only for the chapels and the temperance leagues, but for Welsh identity. He goes on to say, "There was a sense that things could be done differently here. Wales-only Education and cemetery acts came soon after, and in many respects it established the principle on which devolution and the National Assembly are based."[9]

David Lloyd George

David Lloyd George, MP for Caernarfon at the time, was devoted to Welsh devolution early in his career, starting with the Church in Wales. He said in 1890; "I am deeply impressed with the fact that Wales has wants and inspirations of her own which have too long been ignored, but which must no longer be neglected. First and foremost amongst these stands the cause of religious liberty and equality in Wales. If returned to Parliament by you, it shall be my earnest endeavour to labour for the triumph of this great cause. I believe in a liberal extension of the principle of decentralisation."[10] In 1895, in a Church in Wales Bill which was ultimately unsuccessful, Lloyd George added an amendment in a discreet attempt at forming a sort of Welsh home rule, a national council for appointment of the Welsh Church commissioners.[11][12][13] The Welsh Church Act 1914 was passed giving the Church in Wales the freedom to govern its own affairs. After being suspended for the duration of the First World War, the Act came into effect from 1920.[14]

Home rule

[edit]

In response to the Irish demand for "home rule", Liberal prime minister of the UK, William Gladstone proposed two bills on home rule for Ireland in 1886 and 1893, which both failed.[15] Although the idea of "home rule all round" had been around since the 1830s the idea became more popular in 1910 during the constitutional conference and on the brink of an Irish war during 1913–14.[16]

Llywelyn Williams set up the first Cymru Fydd branch on Welsh soil in Barry in 1891.[17]

Political movements supporting Welsh self-rule began in the late nineteenth century alongside a rise in Welsh nationalism.[18][19] In the same year as the first bill for Ireland was proposed, the Cymru Fydd (Wales To Be/Wales Will Be) movement was founded to further the home rule cause for Wales.[8] Lloyd George was one of the main leaders of Cymru Fydd which was an organisation created with the aim of establishing a Welsh Government[20] and a "stronger Welsh identity".[21] As such Lloyd George was seen as a radical figure in British politics and was associated with the reawakening of Welsh nationalism and identity.[22][23] Historian Emyr Price has referred to him as "the first architect of Welsh devolution and its most famous advocate’" as well as "the pioneering advocate of a powerful parliament for the Welsh people".[24] The first Cymru Fydd societies were set up in Liverpool and London in 1887 and in the winter of 1886–7, the North and South Wales liberal federations were founded.[25] Lloyd George was also particularly active in attempting to set up a separate Welsh National Party which was based on Charles Stewart Parnell's Irish Parliamentary Party and also worked to unite the North and South Wales Liberal Federations with Cymru Fydd to form a Welsh National Liberal Federation.[26] The Cymru Fydd movement collapsed in 1896 amid personal rivalries and rifts between Liberal representatives such as David Alfred Thomas.[8][27] In 1898 however, David Lloyd George managed to form the Welsh National Liberal Council, a loose umbrella organisation covering the two federations.[28]

Support for home rule for Wales and Scotland amongst most political parties was strongest in 1918 following the independence of other European countries after the First World War, and the Easter Rising in Ireland, wrote Dr Davies.[29] Although Cymru Fydd had collapsed, home rule was still on the agenda, with liberal Joseph Chamberlain proposing "Home Rule All Round" for all nations of the United Kingdom, in part to meet Irish demands but maintain the superiority of the imperial parliament of Westminster. This idea which eventually fell out of favour after "southern Ireland" left the UK and became a dominion in 1921 and the Irish free state was established in 1922.[25] Home rule all round became official labour party policy, by the 1920s, but the Liberals lost interest because if a Welsh Parliament was formed they would not control it.[30]

Welsh institutions form

[edit]

The late 19th century saw the formation of a number of national institutions; a national and annual cultural event, the National Eisteddfod of Wales in 1861,[31] the Football Association of Wales in 1876,[32] the Welsh Rugby Union in 1881[33] and the University of Wales in 1893.[34]

In 1896, Education in Wales began to become distinct with the formation of the Central Welsh Board which inspected grammar schools in Wales and The Welsh Intermediate Education Act 1889 was brought about to "make further provision for the intermediate and technical education of the inhabitants of Wales and the county of Monmouth.", making the board responsible for inspection of secondary schools.[35][36] In 1907, the Welsh department of the Board of Education was formed and in the same year, a Welsh Inspectorate was established for inspection of primary and secondary schools in Wales.[37]

The early 20th century also saw the continued formation of a number of Welsh national institutions; the National Library of Wales in 1911,[38] the Welsh Guards in 1915[39] and the Welsh Board of Health in 1919.[40] The Church in Wales came into existence in 1920 following the disestablishment of the Church of England via the Welsh Church Act 1914.[41]

Lewis Valentine, first president of Plaid Cymru.[42]

There had been discussions about the need for a "Welsh party" since the 19th century.[43] With the generation or so before 1922 there "had been a marked growth in the constitutional recognition of the Welsh nation", wrote historian Dr John Davies.[44] By 1924 there were people in Wales "eager to make their nationality the focus of Welsh politics".[45] In 1925 Plaid Genedlaethol Cymru ("the National Party of Wales") was founded; it was renamed Plaid Cymru – The Party of Wales in 1945. The party's principles defined in 1970 were (1) self government for Wales, (2) to safeguard the culture, traditions, language and economic position of Wales and (3) to secure membership for a self-governing Welsh state in the United Nations.[46]

Early members of the Independent Labour Party attempted to establish a South Wales Federation towards the end of the 19th century but the South Wales Regional Council of Labour was not established until 1937.[47] The UK Labour government elected in 1945 was strongly centrist, but in the same year, there were 15 UK Government departments established in Wales.[30][48] By 1947, a unified Welsh Regional Council of Labour became responsible for all Wales.[47] In 1959 the Labour council title was changed from "Welsh Regional council" to "Welsh council", and the Labour body was renamed Labour Party Wales in 1975.[47]

Council for Wales

[edit]

Welsh Labour backbenchers such as D. R. Grenfell, W. H. Mainwaring and James Griffiths supported the establishment of a Secretary of State post whereas Aneurin Bevan thought devolution would distract from "British mainstream politics". The UK Government compromised and agreed to the establishment of a Council for Wales and Monmouthshire. However, it was given no more than a responsibility to advise the UK government on matters of Welsh interest.[49]

The proposal to set up a Council for Wales and Monmouthshire was announced in the House of Commons on 24 November 1948. Its inaugural meeting was in May 1949, and its first business meeting the following month. Its terms of reference were:

  • to meet from time to time and at least quarterly for the interchange of views and information on development and trends in the economic and cultural fields in Wales and Monmouthshire; and
  • to ensure the government is adequately informed of the impact of government activities on the general life of the people of Wales and Monmouthshire.[50]

The Council for Wales and Monmouthshire had 27 appointed members. Of these, 12 were nominated by Welsh local authorities; there were also nominees from the Joint Education Committee, the University of Wales, the National Eisteddfod Council, the Welsh Tourist and Holidays Board, and from both management and union sides of Welsh industry and agriculture.[51] The chairman was Huw T. Edwards, a trade union leader.[52] The Council met in private, a further source of controversy.[53] It set up various panels and committees to investigate issues affecting Wales, including a Welsh Language Panel to study and report upon the present situation of the language; a Government Administration Panel; an Industrial Panel; a Rural Development Panel; a Transport Panel; and a Tourist Industry Panel.[50]

A Plaid Cymru rally in Machynlleth in 1949 where the "Parliament for Wales in 5 years" campaign was started
Megan Lloyd George, leader of the Parliament for Wales campaign 1950–1956.

Parliament for Wales campaign

[edit]

In the 1950s, the deterioration of the British Empire removed a sense of Britishness and there was a realisation that Wales was not as prosperous as south-east England and smaller European countries. Successive Conservative Party victories in Westminster led to suggestions that only through self-government could Wales achieve a government reflecting the votes of a Welsh electorate. The Tryweryn flooding was opposed by 125 local authorities and 27 of 36 Welsh MPs voted against the second reading of the bill with none voting for it. At the time, Wales had no Welsh office (introduced in 1964) or any devolution.[54] John Davies adds that the representatives of Wales were powerless under the political structure of the time, a core message of Plaid Cymru.[55] The Epynt clearance in 1940 has also been described as a "significant - but often overlooked - chapter in the history of Wales".[56]

Those in favour of a Welsh parliament paraded in Machynlleth (the place of Owain Glyndŵr's last Senedd) on 1 October 1949. Speakers and entertainment were also at the event.[57] From 1950 to 1956, Parliament for Wales campaign brought devolution back onto the political agenda. A cross-party campaign was led by Lady Megan Lloyd George, daughter of former prime minister and campaigner for Welsh devolution, David Lloyd George, who had died in 1945.[37][58] The Campaign for a Welsh parliament (Ymgyrch Senedd i Gymru) was formally launched on 1 July 1950, at a rally in Llandrindod. This event lead to the creation of a petition of 240,652 names calling for the establishment of a Welsh parliament, which was presented to the House of Commons by Megan Lloyd George in 1956.[57] This was rejected by the UK government. Petitions were also presented to the House of Commons for a Secretary of State for Wales which were also rejected.[58]

Welsh Office & Secretary of State for Wales

[edit]

In the first half of the 20th century, a number of politicians had supported the creation of the post of Secretary of State for Wales as a step towards home rule for Wales. A post of Minister of Welsh Affairs was created in 1951 under the home secretary and was promoted to Minister of State level in 1954.[19] In 1964, the UK Labour government formed a new office of the Secretary of State for Wales and in 1965 the Welsh Office was created which was run by the Secretary of State for Wales and which was responsible for implementing UK government policies in Wales.[19] In 1999 the Welsh Office made way for the National Assembly for Wales and staff from the Welsh office moved into the National Assembly.[59]

Official flag and capital city

[edit]

The first official flag of Wales was created in 1953 for the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. This "augmented" flag including the Royal badge of Wales was criticised in 1958 by "Gorsedd y Beirdd", a national Welsh group comprising Welsh literary figures and Welsh people of note. In 1959, likely in response to criticism, the Welsh flag was changed to a red Welsh dragon on a green and white background that remains the current flag of Wales today.[60]

1908 banner used by Cardiff & District Women's Suffrage Society
Flag of Wales today featuring the Welsh Dragon

On 21 December 1955, the Lord Mayor of Cardiff announced to a crowd that Cardiff was now the official capital of Wales following a vote the previous day by Welsh local authority members. Cardiff won the vote with 136 votes and Caernarfon came in second place with 11 votes. A campaign for Cardiff to become the capital city had been ongoing for 30 years prior to the vote. Historian James Cowan outlined some reasons why Cardiff was chosen which included; being the largest city in Wales with a population of 243,632, buildings in Cathays park such as City Hall and the National Museum of Wales among other reasons. Dr Martin Johnes, lecturer at Swansea University suggested that following the formation of the National Assembly for Wales in 1999, Cardiff became "a capital in a meaningful way, as the home of the Welsh government, whereas before, its capital status was irrelevant, it was just symbolic".[61]

First Plaid Cymru MP

[edit]
Gwynfor Evans in 1951.

The leader of Plaid Cymru, Gwynfor Evans won the party's first-ever seat in Westminster in Carmarthen in 1966, which "helped change the course of a nation" according to Dr Martin Johnes of Swansea University. This, paired with the SNP's Winnie Ewing's winning a seat in Hamilton, Scotland in 1967 may have contributed to pressure on Labour prime minister Harold Wilson to form the Kilbrandon Commission.[62][63] This event may have also contributed to the passing of the Welsh Language Act 1967.[63] This act repealed a provision in the Wales and Berwick Act 1746 that the term "England" should include Wales, thus defining Wales to be a separate entity from England within the UK.[64][65] The legislation permitted the use of Welsh including in courts of law. The act was in part based upon the Hughes Parry Report from 1965. While the Welsh Courts Act in 1942 had previously allowed limited use of Welsh if defendants or plaintiffs had limited knowledge of English, the 1967 act was far more robust. While the act itself was quite limited, it had large symbolic importance.[65] In 1966, Emlyn Hooson convinced a majority of delegates to merge both the Welsh liberal federations into a single entity, forming the Welsh Liberal Party. The new party had far more authority, and gradually centralised the finances and policy of the party in Wales.[28]

National Assembly referendums

[edit]

The UK Labour government introduced separate devolution bills for Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in 1977 following the support for a Scottish parliament by the Kilbrandon Commission.[66] On St David's Day (March 1), 1979 Welsh devolution referendum was held on a Welsh Assembly but came at the end of the Winter of Discontent in addition to "tribalism" divisions within Wales. According to John Morris, people in southern Wales were persuaded that the Assembly would be dominated by "bigoted Welsh-speakers from the north and the west" whilst in the northern Wales, people were persuaded that the Assembly would be dominated by Glamorgan County Council “Taffia”.[67] Richard Wyn Jones also suggests that suspicions of a secret elite of a "Taffia" or "crachach" may have affected the referendum results,“There was a perception amongst anti-devolutionists that devolution was some sort of plot by the establishment, by the crachach. Their [the anti-devolutionists’] idea that they were standing up for ‘the people’ was reinforced by 1979.” [68] Welsh voters voted against forming an Assembly, with 79.7% voting against and 20.3% who voting Yes. Meanwhile, Scotland had narrowly voted in favour of a Scottish parliament with 51.6% in favour.[66]

The Welsh Language Act 1993 provided a new law for public organisations in Wales to have bilingual schemes, which would be supervised by the Welsh Language Board. Some private sector companies including British Telecoms (BT) and British Gas had already included Welsh language schemes in company policies before this Act.[69]

In the 1980s, economic restructuring and market reforms by Margaret Thatcher are described as having brought social dislocation to parts of Wales, which was formerly described as having "the largest public sector west of the Iron Curtain".[70] A succession of non-Welsh Conservative Secretaries of State after 1987 was portrayed by opponents as 'colonial' and indicative of a 'democratic deficit'.[70]

In the early 1990s, Labour became committed to devolution to both Scotland and Wales, and in 1997 it was elected with a mandate to hold referendums on a Scottish Parliament and a Welsh Assembly.[70] The political climate was very different from that of 1979 Welsh devolution referendum which resulted in a no vote, with a new generation of Welsh MPs in Westminster and a broad consensus on the previously divisive issue of the Welsh language.[70] In the 1997 Welsh devolution referendum, a majority of the Welsh electorate vote in favour of establishing a National Assembly for Wales by 50.3 per cent, on a 50.2 per cent turnout.[71]

Devolved legislature (1998–present)

[edit]
Senedd building, Cardiff Bay (formerly National Assembly for Wales).

The Government of Wales Act 1998 granted the formation of the National Assembly and granted it a significant number of new powers which included most of the powers previously held by the Secretary of State for Wales and at least 20 national institutions including the Education and Learning Wales, Environment Agency Wales and the Welsh Language Board.[72][73] The National Assembly for Wales was formed in 1999 and the UK Parliament reserved the right to set limits on its powers.[71]

Law making

[edit]

The Commission on the Powers and Electoral Arrangements of the National Assembly for Wales (the Richard Commission) was formed in 2002. This commission made a series of recommendations in 2004. These included an increased number of members, legally separating executive and legislative acts and the devolution of primary law-making powers. A large majority of these findings were used by the UK government to introduce the Government of Wales Act 2006, describing the powers and responsibilities of the devolved authorities for legislating, decision-making and policy-making.[37] In March 2011, a referendum was held on whether full primary law-making powers should be given to the National Assembly in the twenty subject areas where it held jurisdiction. The referendum concluded with 63.5% of voters supporting the transfer of full primary law-making powers to the Assembly.[74]

Official country and language status

[edit]

In 2011, the International Standards Organisation officially changed the status of Wales to country after the term "principality" was used in error. This came about following lobbying from Plaid Cymru AM (Assembly Member) Leanne Wood. Legally Wales had ceased to be a principality since the period that the Statue of Rhuddlan was implemented from 1284 to 1542.[75] The governments of the United Kingdom and of Wales almost invariably define Wales as a country.[76][77] VisitWales.com states that "Wales is not a Principality. Although we are joined with England by land, and we are part of Great Britain, Wales is a country in its own right."[78][79]

The Welsh Language (Wales) Measure 2011 modernised the 1993 Welsh Language Act and gave Welsh an official status in Wales for the first time, a major landmark for the language. Welsh is the only official de jure language of any country in the UK. The Measure was also responsible for creating the post of Welsh Language Commissioner, replacing the Welsh Language Board.[80] Following the referendum in 2011, the Official Languages Act became the first Welsh law to be created in 600 years, according to the First Minister at the time, Carwyn Jones. This law was passed by Welsh AMs (assembly members) only and made Welsh an official language of the National Assembly.[81]

Further powers

[edit]

The UK Government also formed the Commission on Devolution in Wales (the Silk Commission). The commission published part 1 of its report in 2012, recommending new financial powers for Wales including borrowing and taxation, which came into force in the Wales Act 2014.[37] The Tax Collection and Management (Wales) Act 2016 was passed by the National Assembly to facilitate the financial powers of the Wales Act 2014.[37] The Land Transaction Tax (replacing Stamp Duty) and the Landfill Disposal Tax were the very first two devolved taxes. In 2019, over £2 billion of income tax was devolved to the Senedd.[37]

Hall and oriel of the Senedd building.

The Wales Act 2017 defined the National Assembly and devolved institutions to be a permanent component of the UK constitution, and any abolition of such institutions would require a referendum. The act also changed the model of operation of the devolved institutions from a "conferred powers model" to a "reserved powers model".[37] This allowed the Assembly to legislate on any matter that is not expressly reserved from its competence.[82] The Assembly was also given the power to decide its own name and voting system of members.[37] In May 2020, the Senedd and Elections (Wales) Act 2020, the National Assembly for Wales was renamed "Senedd Cymru" or "the Welsh Parliament", commonly known as the "Senedd" in both English and Welsh, to reflect increased legislative powers.[83] The Act for the first time in Wales allowed 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote, beginning with the 2021 Senedd election.[84]

Plaid Cymru proposed two bills to the UK parliament in the 2021-22 parliamentary session which ultimately did not gain royal assent. A Crown Estate (Devolution to Wales) Bill - A bill to devolve the Crown Estate's management and assets in Wales to the Welsh Government was sponsored by Liz Saville Roberts.[85] Shared Prosperity Fund (Wales) Bill - A bill which would require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament on the merits of devolving management and administration of the money allocated to Wales via the Shared Prosperity Fund to the Welsh Government, was sponsored by Ben Lake.[86]

Currently devolved powers

[edit]

The powers currently employed by the Senedd are, in summary:

  • Agriculture, forestry and fishing
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health and social care
  • Housing
  • Local government
  • Highways and transport
  • Some control over income tax, stamp duty and landfill tax
  • Welsh language[87]

Government of Wales Act 1998

[edit]

The Government of Wales Act 1998 allowed the creation of the National Assembly for Wales (now Senedd Cymru / Welsh Parliament) and also describes devolved powers given to the Senedd. These powers include most of the powers previously held by the Secretary of State for Wales and powers over multiple national institutions such as:

Government of Wales Act 2006

[edit]

The Government of Wales Act 2006 separated the Welsh Assembly Government and the National Assembly for Wales and gives the assembly the power to create legislation on devolved matters in the following "fields":

  1. Agriculture, fisheries, forestry & rural development
  2. Ancient monuments & historic buildings
  3. Culture
  4. Economic development
  5. Education & training
  6. Environment
  7. Fire and rescue services & promotion of fire safety
  8. Food
  9. Health & health services
  10. Highways and transport
  11. Housing
  12. Local government
  13. National Assembly for Wales
  14. Public administration
  15. Social welfare
  16. Sport and recreation
  17. Tourism
  18. Town and country planning
  19. Water and flood defence
  20. Welsh language[89]

Wales Act 2014: Tax

[edit]

The Wales Act 2014 allows the Senedd the following:

  1. Legislate devolved taxes. These revisions to devolution are added to Part 4A of the Government of Wales Act 2006.
  2. This Act also allows the Senedd to set income tax rates for Wales.
  3. Welsh Ministers' borrowing powers. This includes powers to borrow funds and meet current expenditure (Welsh income tax vs forecast receipts).
  4. The power for borrowing in order to fund capital spending (with the consent of UK Treasury). This sum was increased from £500 million to £1 billion.

Other provisions include:

  • Increasing the Senedd term from 4 to 5 years
  • no restriction on standing as a Senedd constituency member and Senedd regional member
  • Prevents someone from being both an MP and MS
  • Welsh Assembly Government renamed Welsh Government
  • Local Government and Housing Act 1989: limits on housing debts incurred by local housing authorities in Wales with a Housing Revenue Account
  • Law Commission to provide advice and assistance to Welsh Ministers & Welsh ministers to report how Law Commission recommendations are implemented in Wales[90]

Wales Act 2017: Reserved Powers Model

[edit]

The reserved powers model sets out the UK reserved powers that the Senedd are not permitted to apply an Act of Senedd to change. These are set out in the Wales Act 2017.

Powers not devolved

Schedule 7A - Reserved Matters

The following subject headings are listed in the new Schedule 7A which contains all of the matters that are reserved to the UK Parliament.

Part 1 – General Reservations

  • The Constitution
  • Public service
  • Political parties
  • Single legal jurisdiction of England and Wales
  • Tribunals
  • Foreign affairs etc.
  • Defence

Part 2 – Specific Reservations

Head A – Financial and Economic Matters

Section A1 – Fiscal, economic and monetary policy

Section A2 – The currency

Section A3 – Financial services

Section A4 – Financial markets

Section A5 – Dormant accounts

Head B – Home Affairs

Section B1 – Elections

Section B2 – Nationality and immigration

Section B3 – National security and official secrets

Section B4 – Interception of communications, communications data and surveillance

Section B5 – Crime, public order and policing

Section B6 – Anti-social behaviour

Section B7 – Modern slavery

Section B8 – Prostitution

Section B9 – Emergency powers

Section B10 – Extradition

Section B11 – Rehabilitation of offenders

Section B12 – Criminal records

Section B13 – Dangerous items

Section B14 – Misuse of and dealing in drugs or psychoactive substances

Section B15 – Private security

Section B16 – Entertainment and late night refreshment

Section B17 – Alcohol

Section B18 – Betting, gaming and lotteries

Section B19 – Hunting

Section B20 – Scientific and educational procedures on live animals

Section B21 – Lieutenancies

Section B22 – Charities and fund-raising

Head C – Trade and Industry

Section C1 – Business associations and business names

Section C2 – Insolvency and winding up

Section C3 – Competition

Section C4 – Intellectual property

Section C5 – Import and export control

Section C6 – Consumer protection

Section C7 – Product standards, safety and liability

Section C8 – Weights and measures

Section C9 – Telecommunications and wireless telegraphy

Section C10 – Post

Section C11 – Research Councils

Section C12 – Industrial development

Section C13 – Protection of trading and economic interests

Section C14 – Assistance in connection with exports of goods and services

Section C15 – Water and sewerage

Section C16 – Pubs Code Adjudicator and the Pubs Code

Section C17 – Sunday trading

Head D – Energy

Section D1 – Electricity

Section D2 – Oil and gas

Section D3 – Coal

Section D4 – Nuclear energy

Section D5 – Heat and cooling

Section D6 – Energy conservation

Head E – Transport

Section E1 – Road transport

Section E2 – Rail transport

Section E3 – Marine and waterway transport etc.

Section E4 – Air transport

Section E5 – Transport security

Section E6 – Other matters

Head F – Social Security, Child Support, pensions and Compensation

Section F1 – Social security schemes

Section F2 – Child Support

Section F3 – Occupational and Personal Pensions

Section F4 – Public sector compensation

Section F5 – Armed forces compensation etc.

Head G – Professions

Section G1 – Architects, auditors, health professionals and veterinary surgeons

Head H – Employment

Section H1 – Employment and industrial relations

Section H2 – Industrial training boards

Section H3 – Job search and support

Head J – Health, Safety and Medicines

Section J1 – Abortion

Section J2 – Xenotransplantation

Section J3 – Embryology, surrogacy and genetics

Section J4 – Medicines, medical supplies, biological substances etc.

Section J5 – Welfare foods

Section J6 – Health and safety

Head K – Media, Culture and Sport

Section K1 – Media

Section K2 – Public lending right

Section K3 – Government Indemnity Scheme

Section K4 – Property accepted in satisfaction of tax

Section K5 – Sports grounds

Head L – Justice

Section L1 – The legal profession, legal services and claims management services

Section L2 – Legal aid

Section L3 – Coroners

Section L4 – Arbitration

Section L5 – Mental capacity

Section L6 – Personal data

Section L7 – Information rights

Section L8 – Public sector information

Section L9 – Public records

Section L10 – Compensation for persons affected by crime and miscarriages of justice

Section L11 – Prisons and offender management

Section L12 – Family relationships and children

Section L13 – Gender recognition

Section L14 – Registration of births, deaths and places of worship

Head M – Land and Agricultural Assets

Section M1 – Registration of land

Section M2 – Registration of agricultural charges and debentures

Section M3 – Development and buildings

Head N – Miscellaneous

Section N1 – Equal opportunities

Section N2 – Control of weapons

Section N3 – Ordnance Survey

Section N4 – Time

Section N5 – Outer space

Section N6 – Antarctica

Section N7 – Deep sea bed mining

Schedule 7B: Restrictions

Schedule 7B sets out certain restrictions on the Senedd's powers. For example, Acts of the Senedd:

  • must not generally modify the law on reserved matters;
  • must not modify private law (such as contract, tort, property) unless it is for a devolved purpose,
  • must not modify certain criminal offences (such as serious offences against the person and any sexual offences) and must not modify certain rules around criminal law (such as the age a person can commit a criminal offence and the meaning of dishonesty);
  • must not modify certain enactments such as the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Civil Contingencies Act 2004;
  • must not modify any of the 2006 Act unless an exception applies;
  • must not confer or impose functions on reserved authorities (such as Ministers of the Crown, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Health & Safety Executive) without the consent of the UK Government.
Senedd, "Powers"[91]

Proposed further devolution

[edit]

The following options have been proposed as a systematic and constitutional change to autonomy in Wales by The Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales.

  1. Entrenched devolution
  2. Federal structures
  3. Independence[92]

Among calls for specific matters to be devolved to Wales are powers over; Broadcasting,[93] the Crown Estate in Wales[94] and natural resources,[95] Shared Prosperity Fund,[96] bank holidays,[97] energy firm taxation & regulation,[98] gender self-identification,[99] the justice system,[100] rail infrastructure,[101] setting rates and bands of all income tax,[102] welfare system and full taxation powers.[103]

Limitations relating to reserved matters

[edit]

Welsh devolution operates on a reserved powers model with specific areas being "reserved" to be the responsibility of the UK Parliament, including the Crown, the union, the UK Parliament, defence, national security, foreign affairs, immigration, fiscal policy, monetary policy, energy (with some exceptions), broadcasting, and telecommunications.[104] Furthermore, justice and policing is also reserved, therefore other matters such as measures addressing anti-social behaviour and alcohol licensing are too.[105]

Acts of Senedd Cymru are restricted constitutionally. They must not modify the law on reserved matters, cannot generally modify private law (such as contract, tort and property) unless for a devolved purpose, and they cannot modify certain criminal offences or criminal law procedures.[104] Welsh legislation cannot modify protected enactments such as the Human Rights Act 1998 or the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, and cannot confer functions on reserved authorities without UK Government consent.[104]

The UK Parliament has since passed the UK Internal Market Act in 2020, which establishes the presumption that, in general, goods, services and professional qualifications that are sold or recognised in other parts of the UK, should be able to be sold or recognised in any other part of the UK, regardless of local laws. The act however does not affect the ability of the Senedd to pass laws in its devolved areas (the Senedd's legislative competence), but it does impact the practicalness of enforcing its laws.[106]

The Scottish Government states that the act "directly constrains devolution", it may cause the regulation of service in one part of the UK to be recognised across the whole UK, and would allow UK ministers to intervene on devolved policies without the approval of the devolved parliament.[107] The Senedd refused to provide consent for the act itself.[106] The Welsh Government has also voiced concerns over the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020, passed by the UK Parliament, describing its passing as an "attack on its competence".[108]

The Welsh Government launched a request for judicial review of the act, which was rejected on the ground of being premature by the divisional court. As of February 2022, the Welsh government awaited an appeal of the divisional court's decision.[108]

Intervention powers

[edit]

The Secretary of State for Wales possesses intervention powers under section 114 of the Government of Wales Act 2006. They may make an order prohibiting the submission of a Senedd bill for Royal Assent if they have reasonable grounds to believe the bill would have an adverse effect on reserved matters, would be incompatible with international obligations, or would affect the interests of defence or national security.[109][110] This power has never been used in relation to Welsh legislation, although the equivalent section 35 power in Scotland was used for the first time in 2023.[109]

Assessment of devolution

[edit]

Ron Davies, former secretary of state for Wales and described as the architect of devolution said in 2022, "One thing which I know is lacking is an overarching sense of wanting to create a better way, of wanting to shape our own destiny. I don't see that." His deputy, Peter Hain said "We need to do what we all say we want to do, which is create a more vibrant, competitive, successful Wales economically. But it does mean some pretty tough decisions." Former leader of Plaid Cymru, Dafydd Wigley stated "We have yet to see the election in Wales, changing the colour of a government. And democracy in Wales will not have been properly tested until that happens." Originally the leader of the No campaign in the 90s, Conservative Nick Bourne now supports more members for the Senedd "We need more members. It's got expanded powers, it's the settled will of the people that we have a Welsh parliament, and that's got to be effective, so by all means, be concerned about value for money, we should be, as any political party should be, but in terms of is it a good idea then the personal view is we need more members."[111]

Economic impact

[edit]

In a report for the Institute of Welsh Affairs in 2003, Phil Cooke of Cardiff University argued that the Welsh Government had responded to the loss of productivity in manufacturing by substituting new jobs in the public sector, making Wales increasingly dependent on fiscal transfers from Whitehall. Cooke suggested that a relatively weak devolution settlement had prevented the Welsh Government from developing innovative economic policies, especially when compared to Scotland.[112] However, critics including former Welsh Secretary Ron Davies and John Lovering, another Cardiff academic, claimed that Cooke's argument that a more powerful Assembly was a necessary precondition to more effective economic policies was a non-sequitur.[113]

In 2005, Plaid Cymru leader Ieuan Wyn Jones suggested that the lack of tax varying powers in Wales was a major reason why Wales did not have its own Celtic Tiger and that growth strategy should not be focused only on cities.[114] Plaid Cymru have also argued that economic dividend can only be achieved with Welsh independence.[115]

Jonathan Bradbury and Andrew Davies published an article in the National Institute Economic Review in January 2023 criticising both the Welsh government and UK government economic policies for Wales. They note that Wales had one of the weakest economies of the UK prior to devolution. They also noted views that the UK government remained in control of macro-economic powers; lacked regional economic policy; and a lack of devolution to the Welsh government to make a real difference. They also note the view of some that the historic exploitation of Wales and its treatment as an economic periphery plays have implications today. They added that Wales's economic performance has not progressed under devolution with weakness in Welsh government strategy and policy and that the dissolution of the Wales Development Agency remains a topic of debate.[115]

Political party position on devolution

[edit]

Welsh Labour and the Welsh Liberal Democrats support further devolution for Wales, as well as reform/federalism of the United Kingdom.[116][117] Plaid Cymru supports further devolution for Wales as well as independence.[118][119] Wales Green Party and Gwlad also both support Welsh independence whilst Propel supports national sovereignty for Wales.[120][121][122] The Welsh Conservatives support the devolution system as it currently stands.[123] The UK Independence Party and Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party both support reduced or the abolishment of devolution.[123]

Referendum results and opinion polling

[edit]
Referendums on devolution
Date Conducted Question/Statement Support
Devolution (%)
Against
Devolution (%)
Turnout (%)
3 March 2011[124] Do you want the Assembly now to be able to make laws on all matters in the 20 subject areas it has powers for? 63.5 36.5 35.2
18 September 1997[125] (i) I agree that there should be a Welsh Assembly; or

(ii) I do not agree that there should be a Welsh Assembly

50.3 49.7 51.3
1 March 1979[126] Do you want the provisions of the Wales Act 1978 to be put into effect? 20.3 79.7 58.8

Polls on devolution status

[edit]

Polls on powers

[edit]

Note: On 4 March 2011, 63.5% voted to devolve primary lawmaking powers for the areas already devolved to the Senedd.[127]

Constitutional status polls
Date(s) conducted Polling organisation Support
independence (%)
Support more
powers for
the Senedd (%)
Support
status quo (%)
Support fewer
powers for
the Senedd (%)
Support abolition
of the Senedd (%)
Indifferent/
don't know (%)
Combined total:
more powers (%)
Combined total:
no more powers (%)
5-25 June 2023[128] Beaufort Research / WalesOnline 16 23 25 6 17 13 39 48
12-17 May 2023[129] YouGov / Barn Cymru 13 21 20 7 20 16 34 47
3-7 February 2023[130] YouGov / Barn Cymru 15 20 21 7 20 16 35 50
25 November - 1 December 2022[131] YouGov / Barn Cymru 14 21 23 7 20 14 35 50
20-22 September 2022[131] YouGov 17 19 21 7 19 15 36 47
28 January – 21 February 2021[132] BBC / ICM Unlimited 14 35 27 3 15 6 49 45
4–22 February 2020[133] BBC / ICM 11 43 25 2 14 3 54 41
7–23 February 2019[134] BBC / ICM 7 46 27 3 13 4 53 43
December 2018[135] SkyData 8 40 23 4 18 7 48 45
February 2017[136] BBC / ICM 6 44 29 3 13 4 50 45
31 January 2017 Wales Act 2017 is passed
February 2016[137] BBC / ICM 6 43 30 3 13 4 49 46
February 2015[138] BBC / ICM 6 40 33 4 13 4 46 50
17 December 2014 Wales Act 2014 passed
19-22 September 2014[139] BBC / ICM 3 49 26 2 12 6 52 40
18 September 2014 2014 Scottish independence referendum
February 2014[140] BBC / ICM 5 37 28 3 23 5 42 54
2013[141] BBC / ICM 9 36 28 2 20 4 45 50
2012[141] BBC / ICM 7 36 29 2 22 4 43 55
2011[141] BBC / ICM 11 35 18 17 15 4 46 50
3 March 2011 2011 Welsh devolution referendum
January 2011[142] ITV Wales / YouGov n/a 49 26 n/a n/a 26 n/a n/a
2010[141] BBC / ICM 11 40 13 18 13 4 51 44
June 2007[142] BBC / ICM n/a 47 44 n/a n/a 9 n/a n/a

Polls on parliament

[edit]
Polls on devolved parliament
Question: Should Wales Have Its Own Parliament?
Date published Publisher Yes Parliament (%) No Parliament (%) Do not know (%) Lead Notes
2–8 September 2024 YouGov 46 31 24 15 Non-standard question: Abolition question
18–19 May 2024 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 60 31 9 29
22–23 April 2024 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 60 30 10 30
23–24 March 2024 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 55 32 13 23
18 February 2024 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 55 34 11 21
24–26 January 2024 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 59 32 9 27
10–11 December 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 60 30 10 30
12–13 November 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 55 33 11 22
14–15 October 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 58 32 10 26
16–17 September 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 65 22 13 43
13–14 August 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 60 28 12 32
14–16 July 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 66 27 8 39
17–18 June 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 61 30 9 31
14–15 May 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 63 28 10 35
15–17 April 2023 Redfield & Wilton Strategies 63 25 12 38

Other

[edit]
Polls on devolved powers
Date Published Publisher Question/Statement Disagree with removing powers (%) Agree with removing powers (%)
2021[143] UK in a Changing Europe

Using Welsh Election Study (WES) data in a report "British Politics after Brexit".

Brexit should not be used as an excuse to undermine the Senedd VS The UK Government is right to remove powers from the Senedd if it is necessary to maximise Brexit benefits 71 29
Date Published Publisher "Do you support or oppose the following potential constitutional settlements for Wales?" Total Support (%) Total Oppose (%) Don't Know (%)
2–8 September 2024 YouGov A fully independent Wales outside of the United Kingdom 24 61 15
An autonomous Welsh parliament and government within the United Kingdom with powers over everything except defence and foreign affairs 32 42 27
A devolved Welsh parliament and government with more powers than it currently has 40 37 22
A devolved Welsh parliament and government with the level of powers that it currently has 39 35 27
A devolved Welsh parliament and government with fewer powers than it currently has 23 52 25
Abolition of the devolved Welsh parliament and government 31 46 24
Polls on the status of the Senedd
Date(s) conducted Polling organisation Question/Statement Support devolution
(excluding don't know) (%)
Abolish the Senedd
(excluding don't know) (%)
Do not know (%) Abstain / Would not vote (%)
19 – 22 February 2021[144] YouGov If there was a referendum tomorrow on abolishing the Senedd (Welsh Parliament) and this was the question, how would you vote? Should Wales abolish the Senedd (Welsh Parliament)? 45 (62) 28 (38) 17 10
1997[145] The Guardian / ICM On establishing a National Assembly for Wales 37 (51) 36 (49) 27 n/a
Polls on increased devolved powers
Date(s) conducted Polling organisation Question/Statement Age 18-24 Yes:No (%) Age 25-49 Yes:No (%) Age 50-64 Yes:No (%) Age 65+

Yes:No (%)

Yes (%, excluding don't know) No (%, excluding don't know) Do not know (%) Abstain / Would not vote (%) Refused
11–16 November 2020[146] YouGov If there was a referendum tomorrow on the transferring of more powers to the Senedd (Welsh Parliament), including control of tax and welfare, but excluding defence and foreign affairs, how would you vote? Should more powers be transferred to the Senedd (Welsh Parliament)? 55:12 41:15 40:39 32:43 40 (59) 28 (41) 20 10 3
Polls in the absence of devolution, by political party
Date(s) conducted Polling organisation & client Sample size Independence (inc. sub-samples) No devolved government (inc. sub-samples) Indifferent

/ no reply (%)

Total (%) Conservative (%) Labour (%) Lib Dem (%) Plaid Cymru (%) Total (%) Conservative (%) Labour (%) Lib Dem (%) Plaid Cymru (%)
29 May – 1 June 2020 ITV Wales / YouGov / Cardiff Uni Archived 2020-09-04 at the Wayback Machine 1,021 33% 12% 45% 39% 87% 45% 79% 35% 53% 4% 21%

References

[edit]

General sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Welsh devolution refers to the incremental transfer of legislative, executive, and limited fiscal powers from the to Welsh institutions, initiated by the after a 1997 narrowly approved a with 50.3% voting yes on a 50.1% turnout. The Act created a corporate body combining legislative scrutiny and executive functions, devolving administrative control over policy areas including health, education, and economic development, but initially lacking primary law-making authority. Subsequent reforms marked a gradual evolution: the Government of Wales Act 2006 separated the executive (Welsh Assembly Government, now ) from the legislature and introduced conditional primary powers via framework Orders in Council; a 2011 referendum granted permanent full law-making competence in devolved fields; and the Wales Act 2017 adopted a model, making the permanent and adding tax-varying abilities such as on land transactions and waste disposal. Today, the Cymru legislates on non-reserved matters like transport, housing, and justice (since 2022), while executive decisions shape public services, though macroeconomic levers, defense, and remain with Westminster. Devolution's defining features include its conferred powers model evolving toward parity with Scotland's, yet Wales lags in fiscal and economic divergence persists, with GDP per capita below the average and heavy dependence fueling critiques of underachievement despite increased public support from initial . Notable achievements encompass tailored policies in areas like free prescriptions and NHS reorganization, but controversies surround funding via the —yielding consequential adjustments but disputes over adequacy—and governance challenges, including Labour's dominance through without outright majorities since 1999, alongside calls for amid stagnant regional growth.

Historical Context

Incorporation of Wales into England

The conquest of Wales by Edward I in 1282–1283 established English overlordship, but the territory retained distinct administrative divisions, including the semi-autonomous Marcher lordships along the border and the Principality of Wales under direct crown control. The Statute of Rhuddlan in 1284 extended English common law to the Principality while preserving native Welsh customs in the lordships, creating a fragmented governance structure that persisted for over two centuries. Under , the Laws in Acts—receiving in 1536 and 1543—achieved full legal and political incorporation of into . The 1536 Act abolished the Marcher lordships as independent political entities, eliminated separate Welsh courts applying native laws such as galanas (blood money) and sarhaed (insult fines), and reorganized into shires mirroring English counties, including the creation of five new ones: , , , , and . This unified administration under English justices of the peace and sheriffs centralized authority, granting Welsh counties the right to send representatives—initially one per shire—to the English . The 1543 Act completed the process by fully annexing remaining lordships, mandating English as the sole language for legal proceedings and official records—a aimed at standardizing administration but effectively marginalizing Welsh in governance. Welsh subjects gained formal legal equality with the English, opening crown offices to them without prior restrictions based on birth or tenure, which benefited the Welsh who had petitioned for amid unrest in the Marcher regions during the 1520s and 1530s. These measures entrenched a single under the English and , dissolving prior Welsh institutional autonomy without provision for separate legislative bodies or fiscal powers. Over subsequent centuries, this framework fostered administrative integration and anglicization among elites, though native customs endured informally outside formal law, shaping a centralized governance baseline that persisted until modern pressures emerged.

Emergence of Home Rule Ideas

In the mid-19th century, a cultural revival in emphasized the , eisteddfodau, and Nonconformist chapels, fostering a distinct amid industrialization and anglicization pressures. This revival laid groundwork for political demands, though initially focused on cultural preservation rather than political autonomy. By the , Welsh Liberals began advocating for measures, influenced by broader federalist ideas and Irish campaigns. The Cymru Fydd society, founded in 1886 by Welsh expatriates in and , emerged as a key vehicle for these aspirations, aiming to organize Welsh Liberalism and push for , , and disestablishment of the Anglican Church in Wales. Leaders such as Thomas Edward Ellis and promoted a "Young Wales" agenda, seeking a to address Welsh-specific grievances while remaining within the framework. The movement drew inspiration from Irish debates, with Lloyd George actively supporting "Home Rule All Round" in parliamentary motions by 1886, viewing it as a means to devolve powers without threatening imperial unity. Disestablishment of the , achieved through the (effective 1920), served as a major catalyst, resolving a long-standing Nonconformist grievance against an institution perceived as English-imposed and alien to the Welsh majority. This victory bolstered identity-based claims for greater autonomy, uniting Welsh politicians across divides and highlighting disparities in UK governance structures. However, these efforts yielded limited tangible progress toward ; Cymru Fydd fragmented by 1896 due to internal conflicts and opposition from trade unionists prioritizing class over national issues. Proponents faced constraints from Wales's economic integration with , particularly through and industries reliant on markets and , which dampened appetite for radical separation. Moreover, absent strong separatist fervor—unlike in Ireland—Welsh remained a peripheral Liberal cause, subordinated to imperial loyalty and broader social reforms, with public support confined largely to cultural elites rather than .

20th-Century Institutional Developments

In the post-World War II era, the government took initial administrative steps to address Welsh-specific concerns through centralized oversight rather than granting substantive autonomy. The Council for Wales and Monmouthshire was established in 1949 as an advisory body comprising 27 members, including Welsh MPs, peers, local authority representatives, and appointees, tasked with consulting on economic, social, and cultural matters affecting but lacking executive powers or budget authority. This followed recommendations from parliamentary committees highlighting the need for coordinated policy amid industrial decline in Welsh coalfields and agriculture, though the Council's influence remained marginal, often sidelined by departments. In 1951, the post of Minister of Welsh Affairs was created within the to channel its advice, marking a pragmatic recognition of ' distinct administrative needs without altering the unitary state structure. These arrangements evolved amid growing calls for focused governance, culminating in the establishment of the Welsh Office on 17 October 1964 under the Labour government of . Headed by the newly created —initially Jim Griffiths, a former miners' leader from —the department assumed control over health, education, agriculture, and , with its own civil service staff initially numbering around 300 and an annual budget separate from English counterparts. This "administrative devolution" was driven by economic imperatives, including responses to depopulation and in rural and industrial areas, rather than separatist ideology, allowing Westminster to retain ultimate legislative sovereignty while delegating implementation. Symbolic recognitions accompanied these changes, reinforcing Welsh identity within the Union. On 20 December 1955, declared the in a parliamentary written answer, affirming its role as the administrative and civic center despite lacking prior formal status, amid debates over alternatives like or . Four years later, on 23 February 1959, the red dragon flag (Y Ddraig Goch) on a green-and-white field was officially recognized as the of by parliamentary resolution, codifying a longstanding emblem derived from medieval badges but previously unofficial for state use. Political developments underscored emerging nationalist pressures, though contained within parliamentary channels. On 14 July 1966, won the by-election for —the Welsh nationalist party founded in 1925—with 39.6% of the vote, becoming the first Plaid MP in the UK Parliament and overturning a Labour majority of over 8,000. This upset, fueled by rural discontent and cultural revivalism, amplified demands for Welsh-language rights and policy differentiation but operated within the unionist framework, as Evans participated in Westminster proceedings to advocate incremental reforms rather than immediate independence.

Path to Modern Devolution

Referendums on Devolution

The first on devolution in was held on 1 1979, following the passage of the Wales Act 1978 under the Labour government of . Voters were asked whether they supported the creation of an elected assembly with limited legislative powers over devolved matters such as and , but without tax-varying authority. Of the votes cast, 243,359 (20.3%) favored the proposal, while 946,339 (79.7%) opposed it, with a turnout of 58.7%. The measure also required approval from at least 40% of the eligible electorate to pass, a threshold not met due to the low yes share relative to the total voter roll. Rejection in stemmed primarily from widespread economic concerns, including fears that the assembly would impose additional tax burdens without corresponding fiscal benefits and create an unnecessary bureaucratic layer amid . Many voters, particularly in industrial and border regions with stronger English cultural ties, viewed as a step toward that could exacerbate regional divisions and deter investment. Labour Party divisions and opposition from trade unions, who prioritized UK-wide economic solidarity over regional governance, further eroded support, reflecting a pragmatic assessment that centralized control better addressed 's post-industrial challenges. The second referendum occurred on 18 September 1997, after the Labour victory under , who pledged as part of a broader constitutional reform to modernize governance without threatening national unity. It featured two questions: one on establishing a 60-member assembly with executive and secondary legislative powers, and a second on granting tax-varying powers, which was rejected by 68.3%. The assembly question passed narrowly with 559,419 yes votes (50.3%) against 552,698 no votes (49.7%), on a turnout of 50.1%. Approval in 1997 reflected Blair's strategic framing of devolution as enhancing democratic accountability and aligning with trends, appealing to voters disillusioned with Westminster's remoteness, though support remained tepid compared to Scotland's 74.3% yes. Regional variations were pronounced, with higher yes percentages in Welsh heartlands like (58.1%) driven by cultural nationalism, contrasted by unionist majorities in eastern border counties such as (43.8% yes), where economic interdependence with fostered skepticism toward diluted cohesion. Low turnout and the razor-thin margin underscored persistent doubts about 's net benefits, including risks of policy divergence harming Wales's subsidized economic position within the .

Initial Legislative Framework

The received on 31 July 1998 and established the for as a single corporate body comprising 60 members elected every four years through a system of combined with first-past-the-post constituencies. This unified structure fused executive and legislative functions within the Assembly, lacking the formal separation seen in the concurrent , which created a distinct Scottish Executive and Parliament. The Act transferred all executive functions previously held by the Secretary of State for Wales to the Assembly, effective upon its first meeting following elections on 6 May 1999. The Assembly's powers were confined to subordinate (secondary) legislation in devolved areas including , , , , , and , requiring reliance on existing UK primary legislation for substantive changes. Unlike the Scottish Parliament, which possessed primary legislative competence from inception, the Welsh Assembly could not enact standalone laws, a constraint designed to limit and reflect the UK government's incremental approach amid the narrow 50.3% "yes" vote in Wales' 1997 devolution referendum—contrasting with Scotland's 74.3% approval. This framework emphasized administrative devolution over , with the Assembly functioning akin to an enhanced local authority rather than a full . In early operations commencing with its first sitting on 26 May 1999 under First Secretary , the Assembly prioritized policy implementation within its secondary powers, such as adjusting regulations on NHS services and education standards. Internal pressures soon prompted informal differentiation of roles, with increasingly handled separately by 2002 under , who coined the term "clear red water" to denote policy divergence from Westminster; this practical separation of the executive (later termed the Welsh Assembly Government) from the legislative arm persisted until formal codification in subsequent legislation. The corporate body model facilitated unified decision-making but drew criticism for blurring accountability, as executive decisions were not distinctly scrutinized by a separate .

Expansion of Legislative Powers

The Government of Wales Act 2006 separated the executive functions of the Welsh Assembly Government from the legislative functions of the for Wales, enabling the latter to enact primary known as Assembly Measures within 20 defined fields listed in Schedule 7, such as health, education, and agriculture. These powers required endorsement through a to remove the need for UK Parliamentary approval on a case-by-case basis via Legislative Consent Motions. A referendum on 3 March 2011 asked voters whether the Assembly should gain full law-making powers in devolved areas without further UK oversight. With a turnout of 35.2%, 63.5% voted in favor, representing the first time a devolved legislature in the UK secured such authority directly from public approval. The result took effect on 5 May 2011, allowing the Assembly to pass Acts of the Assembly on matters within its competence, thereby shifting from subordinate to primary legislative capacity. The Wales Act 2017 further refined and expanded this framework by adopting a model, under which the Cymru—renamed from the in 2020—can legislate on any subject not explicitly reserved to the UK Parliament, such as , defense, and certain areas. This replaced the prior conferred powers system, reducing ambiguity in jurisdictional boundaries and aligning Wales more closely with Scotland's devolution structure, with key provisions commencing on 1 April 2018. Among early exercises of expanded powers, the Welsh Language (Wales) Measure 2011 formalized Welsh as an official language alongside English, creating the Welsh Language Commissioner to promote its use and requiring public bodies to provide services bilingually where appropriate, building on the pre-devolution . This measure exemplified the Assembly's nascent primary legislative role in cultural and administrative matters.

Current Framework and Powers

Devolved Competencies

The Welsh Parliament (Senedd Cymru) operates under a model established by the Wales Act 2017, whereby it possesses legislative competence over all matters except those explicitly reserved to the Parliament. This framework devolves authority primarily to areas affecting domestic policy within , while maintaining UK-wide uniformity in critical national functions. Devolved competencies encompass health and social care, where the manages the , including funding allocation, service organization, and policy priorities such as the abolition of in 2001, diverging from England's retention of them. Education and skills training fall under devolved control, enabling the Senedd to legislate on curriculum standards, school funding, and higher education policies, including tuition fee regulations set at £9,250 annually since 2012, lower than potential English variations. Environment, , and rural affairs are devolved, covering issues like flood management, , and sustainable farming subsidies, with the implementing distinct targets such as the 2030 net-zero emissions goal for . , , and also reside with the Senedd, allowing for localized laws and projects like the rail enhancements. Key limitations persist, as reserved matters—including defense, , , macroeconomic policy, and most social security—remain under UK Parliament jurisdiction, preventing Wales from pursuing independent fiscal or security strategies. The scope evolves through intergovernmental forums like the Welsh Government-UK Government disputes resolution process, which has addressed overlaps in areas such as and , though tensions arise over perceived encroachments, as in the UK Supreme Court's 2022 ruling clarifying reserved boundaries in environmental permitting. Despite these powers, devolved functions rely on UK block grant funding via the , constraining autonomous resource decisions.

Fiscal and Tax Powers

The possesses limited tax-varying powers, primarily confined to land and waste-related levies devolved under the Wales Act 2014 and implemented from April 2018. Land Transaction Tax replaced the UK's Stamp Duty Land Tax for property purchases in , while Landfill Disposals Tax supplanted the national landfill tax for disposals at authorized sites, both administered by the Welsh Revenue Authority. These taxes generated approximately £5.5 billion in devolved revenues for the 2026-27 budget period, representing a modest fraction of overall public spending. Income tax powers, devolved via the Wales Act 2017, allow the to set Welsh rates applied to non-savings and non-dividend income from April 2019, but the authority has not deviated from rates, maintaining alignment across bands despite legislative capacity for variation. Unlike Scotland's fuller utilization of rate and threshold adjustments, lacks devolved control over corporation tax, which remains reserved to Westminster, limiting revenue diversification. Allocations continue to rely on the , which adjusts the based on comparable English spending changes, ensuring fiscal dependency on UK-wide decisions. Borrowing capacity, established in the 2017 Fiscal Framework agreement, permits capital borrowing up to a £1 billion overall limit with an annual cap of £150 million for infrastructure, alongside resource borrowing of up to £200 million annually (within a £500 million total) to offset shortfalls. These limits aim to manage volatility but constrain independent , with adjustments requiring UK consent and tied to block grant adjustments for devolved tax yields. The 2025 UK Spending Review provided an average annual of £22.4 billion for over 2026-27 to 2028-29, incorporating Barnett consequentials and additional capital allocations, though real-terms borrowing limits have eroded due to since . This framework underscores ' constrained fiscal autonomy, with devolved revenues covering under 20% of expenditures and no mechanism for broad-based taxation beyond property transactions.

Recent Institutional Changes

In May 2020, the for Wales was officially renamed Cymru or the to better reflect its status as a primary legislature with law-making and tax-varying powers. This change, enacted via the Senedd and Elections (Wales) Act 2020, took effect on 6 May 2020 following in January of that year. To address growing legislative demands and scrutiny needs, the Senedd Cymru (Members and Elections) Act expanded the number of Members of the from 60 to 96, with the increase applying to the May 2026 election alongside a revised voting system of 16 larger constituencies each electing six members via closed lists. This reform, passed in , is projected to raise annual operating costs by approximately £19 million, including staff and facilities expansions, though core devolved competencies remain unchanged. The Welsh Government advanced accessibility of Welsh law through its ongoing programme, with the 2023–2024 annual report documenting progress in consolidating over 200 instruments, improving drafting consistency, and enhancing online publication tools from October 2023 to September 2024. A related Welsh Courts Bill, introduced in October 2024, seeks to streamline legislative publication, scrutiny, and bilingual drafting standards to reduce complexity for users. Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the 1999 Government of Wales Act in May 2024, described devolution as a "fragile" achievement deepened by institutional adaptations yet vulnerable to UK-level interventions, while public and political assessments varied on its delivery of policy outcomes like free prescriptions amid persistent economic challenges. These reflections underscored a stable but evolving framework, with reforms prioritizing capacity over power expansions ahead of the elections.

Economic and Fiscal Consequences

Empirical Assessments of Growth and Performance

Since the establishment of devolved powers in 1999, Wales' gross domestic product (GDP) per capita has remained largely stagnant relative to the UK and England averages. Data from the Office for National Statistics indicate that Wales' GDP per head as a proportion of the UK figure hovered around 75-80% throughout the period from 1998 to 2022, with minimal convergence; for instance, it stood at approximately 78% in 1999 and 77% in 2022, reflecting no significant closing of the gap despite devolution. Similarly, assessments by the Wales Centre for Public Policy (WCPP) confirm that Welsh GDP relative to England has "hardly changed" over the same timeframe, attributing this stasis to underlying structural factors such as industrial legacy and geography rather than devolved policy interventions. Longer-term trends reveal a relative decline in disposable income per head, with ' position worsening since the . Relative disposable household incomes in fell from near parity with the average in the early 1970s to about 90% by , driven by slower wage growth and persistent regional disparities; this erosion predates but has not reversed under it, as evidenced by gross disposable household income per head remaining the lowest among nations at £17,263 in 2019. Employment rates have shown some improvement, particularly among women, rising from around 65% in 1999 to over 70% by 2018, though this mirrors -wide gains from 64.9% to 70.5% over the same period and does not exceed national trends. However, lags persist, with (GVA) per hour worked in at 82.7% of the average in 2022—17.3% below the national figure—and the lowest among all regions, a gap unchanged or widening since devolution amid low innovation activity (31% of businesses innovation-active, the worst regionally). In health performance, hospital waiting times have not improved relative to England, with Welsh patients facing median waits of 5.7 weeks for diagnostics in September 2025—longer than pre-devolution benchmarks—and over 8,700 individuals waiting over two years for treatment by late 2025, compared to just 168 in England, rendering Welsh residents nearly 500 times more likely to endure such delays. WCPP analyses question direct causal attribution to devolution, noting that outcomes align more closely with pre-existing socioeconomic challenges like deprivation and rurality than with policy divergence, as health inequalities remain comparable or worse than UK averages despite targeted spending.

Funding Mechanisms and Deficits

The Welsh Government derives the bulk of its funding from an unconditional block grant allocated by the UK Treasury, which accounted for approximately 80% of its budget in 2025-26. This grant is primarily adjusted through the Barnett formula, which calculates annual changes by multiplying comparable UK departmental spending increases (or decreases) by a comparability factor—reflecting the proportion of devolved services—and Wales' population share relative to England, further modified by a needs-based uplift to address higher relative spending requirements. The formula does not set absolute funding levels but incremental adjustments, aiming toward per-person spending convergence with England over time, though full convergence remains distant due to entrenched needs differences. Critics argue that this block grant dependency, insulated from local economic performance, undermines incentives for growth-oriented policies, as fiscal transfers effectively subsidize consumption without compelling investments in productivity or efficiency to expand the base. Unlike arrangements tying to revenue , the Barnett perpetuates a cycle where underperformance does not trigger proportionate reductions, potentially dampening reforms needed to close structural weaknesses. Wales exhibits no fiscal self-sufficiency, recording persistent net deficits financed by UK-wide borrowing and transfers. For the financial year ending 2023, the net fiscal deficit stood at £21.5 billion, equivalent to £6,888 per person—the second-highest among UK nations and regions—driven by per-person expenditure of £18,400 against revenue of £11,500. Earlier data for 2018-19 showed a £13.5 billion deficit, or 18% of estimated GDP (£4,300 per head), highlighting ongoing reliance absent equivalent UK-wide averaging at £620 per head. Devolved economic initiatives since 1999, including tax devolution yielding modest net gains (e.g., +£300 million annually by 2025-26 from Welsh rates), have failed to materially erode the , with deficits lingering at 15-18% of GDP and requiring annualized growth of at least 1.8%—above historical norms—to narrow even modestly by 2030. This stasis underscores the block grant's role in sustaining higher public spending relative to onshore revenues, without devolved strategies bridging the underlying gap between output and needs.

Comparative Analysis with UK Regions

Wales' economic performance, measured by (GVA) , has remained comparable to that of non-devolved English regions such as the and , which recorded figures around £23,900 in recent data, while stood at £23,804 in 2022. This similarity in output metrics persists despite possessing devolved legislative powers since 1999, whereas English regions operate under centralized Westminster policy, indicating that has not produced a discernible uplift attributable to greater . In contrast to , which enjoys fuller fiscal including variation powers granted in 2016, Wales' more limited borrowing and tax-raising capacities have resulted in less policy divergence from UK norms and correspondingly muted economic experimentation. 's GVA per capita exceeds Wales' by approximately 20-25% in recent years, yet both nations have experienced relative stagnation against England's national average since began, with Wales' GDP share of the UK barely shifting from pre-1999 levels. This pattern suggests that enhanced powers in have not yielded superior growth trajectories, while Wales' restrained framework may have curtailed risks associated with bold fiscal maneuvers, such as 's post-2017 tax hikes correlating with slower private sector expansion. Health outcomes further underscore limited devolution-driven gains, with ' life expectancy at birth aligning closely with poorer English regions like the North East (around 79.8-80.4 years recently) and marginally exceeding 's (79.3 years), without evidence of devolved policies accelerating improvements beyond national trends. Healthy life expectancy in (approximately 62-63 years for males and females in 2021-2023) mirrors England's regional variances, failing to justify the administrative overhead of separate governance structures estimated at several hundred million pounds annually. Educational attainment, as gauged by scores in 2022, reveals underperforming (e.g., scores of 466 vs. 492) and trailing in reading (466 vs. 493), with steeper declines in across maths, reading, and since 2009 compared to non-devolved English benchmarks. These gaps persist despite devolved control over curricula and funding, implying that administrative has not enhanced outcomes sufficiently to offset implementation costs, and mirroring challenges in under-resourced English regions without such layers of .
Metric (Recent Data)WalesNorth East EnglandScotland
GVA per Capita (2022, £)23,804~23,900 (Tees Valley proxy)~28,000+
Life Expectancy at Birth (years)80.479.879.3
PISA Science Score (2022)466492 (England avg.)~500 (est. from reading proxy)
Overall, the absence of superior metrics in devolved relative to comparable non-devolved regions challenges attributions of underperformance to centralization alone, pointing instead to structural factors like industrial legacy and as primary drivers, with adding bureaucratic costs without commensurate causal benefits.

Political Dynamics and Public Support

Party Positions and Ideological Debates

, the dominant force in the since devolution's inception, endorses the existing framework while pursuing incremental expansions, such as devolving employment support funding from Westminster to enable tailored Welsh policies. This approach reflects internal party tensions between alignment with UK Labour and a distinct pro-devolution path, as articulated by Eluned Morgan in September 2025. Labour has historically driven devolution's evolution, including through cross-party commissions advocating further powers like justice and policing under a federal model. Plaid Cymru positions itself as the primary advocate for enhanced autonomy, seeking devolution of sectors like —proposing an independent Welsh authority—and the Crown Estate to bolster without immediate pursuits. Party leader emphasized in October 2025 that while a on remains a long-term goal, immediate focus lies on expanding devolved competencies to address Welsh-specific needs. Welsh Conservatives prioritize UK unity, critiquing devolution's implementation for inefficiencies while accepting its permanence; however, internal ideological rifts persist, with a devo-skeptic faction clashing against leadership in 2025 debates over whether to challenge the 's existence outright. leader Darren Millar faced accusations from anonymous critics of suppressing anti-devolution voices, exacerbating party divisions amid fears of electoral irrelevance if skepticism alienates voters. Reform UK embodies unionist skepticism, with Senedd member Laura Anne Jones stating in September 2025 that the party does not rule out Senedd abolition but prioritizes reforming to deliver tangible improvements rather than expansion. Leader echoed this in the same month, pledging to "make work" through efficiency drives while opposing further power transfers that could strain fiscal accountability. Welsh Liberal Democrats advocate as a structured alternative to asymmetric , arguing it would grant equitable powers—including over and —without nationalist overreach or Westminster dominance. This stance aligns with UK-wide party policy for a federal , emphasizing upward from regions while maintaining shared standards. Across parties, a consensus has emerged on devolution's enduring status, as evidenced by unanimous cross-party endorsements in the 2023 Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of , though debates center on fiscal prudence and avoiding unchecked that risks economic divergence from the . Unionist parties stress safeguards against overreach, while pro-devolution advocates counter that targeted expansions enhance democratic legitimacy without threatening unity. The 1979 referendum on Welsh devolution, held on 1 March 1979, rejected the proposed directly elected assembly by a margin of 20.8% in favor to 79.2% opposed, with a turnout of 58.7%. The vote required a 40% threshold of the electorate for approval, which the Yes side failed to meet despite the narrow Scottish counterpart's conditional passage. The 1997 referendum, conducted on 18 September 1997, narrowly approved the creation of the for with 50.3% Yes to 49.7% No votes, on a turnout of 50.1%. Unlike , no electorate threshold applied, enabling implementation despite the slim margin and regional variations, with stronger Yes support in the south and valleys.
ReferendumDateYes VotesYes %No VotesNo %Turnout %
1979 Devolution1 March 1979272,04020.81,063,12779.258.7
1997 Assembly18 September 1997559,41950.3552,69849.750.1
Post-1997 polling has shown stable majority preference for retaining the devolved assembly over abolition or full reversal, with support for the consistently above 50% in surveys tracking constitutional preferences. Approval for has risen steadily since the narrow 1997 vote, reaching sustained levels around 60-70% by the , reflecting acclimatization to devolved amid economic continuity with the . However, volatility persists in attitudes toward further changes, with economic concerns—such as fears of fiscal autonomy without protections—anchoring opposition to expansion. In 2024-2025 trends, retention enjoys broad backing, but support for remains below thresholds, ranging from 24% in absolute terms to 41% when excluding don't knows in selective polls. A September 2024 survey recorded 24% favoring against 61% opposed, while an April 2025 Redfield & Wilton poll adjusted to 41% Yes among deciders, highlighting demographic splits (higher among ) but no overall tipping point. Hypothetical scenarios, like paired with rejoining, have occasionally boosted Yes responses by 10-15 points in prior surveys, though baseline economic apprehensions limit sustained gains. No poll since 1997 has shown a consistent for or rollback, underscoring entrenched status quo preference despite partisan pushes. Plaid Cymru, established in 1925 to promote Welsh cultural and linguistic preservation amid perceived assimilation pressures, gradually shifted toward advocating political , positioning as a transitional mechanism toward full by the late . The party's platform has consistently framed enhanced autonomy within the as insufficient, with leaders committing to pursue referendums on sovereignty, as evidenced by pledges for a vote by 2026 contingent on electoral success. This evolution reflects a strategic adaptation, where initial marginal electoral performance—rarely exceeding 10-15% in UK-wide votes prior to —leveraged powers to amplify separatist rhetoric without broad public mandate. Campaign organizations like have intensified links between devolved governance and aspirations, conducting advocacy-driven polling that highlights peaks in sentiment. A March 2025 survey commissioned by the group, involving 1,000 Welsh adults, recorded 41% support for when excluding undecided respondents, marking a claimed record amid youth demographics showing up to 72% favorability among 25-34-year-olds. Such figures, while elevated compared to pre-devolution eras, derive from pro-independence sources and contrast with independent aggregates indicating sustained minority backing, underscoring historic marginality where separatist views hovered below 20% for decades. Devolution since 1999 has coincided with incremental rises in independence sentiment, potentially normalizing separatist discourse through localized policy control and amplifying grievances over UK-level decisions like , yet empirical trends reveal no causal surge to majority viability. Support trajectories, tracked from under 10% in the to mid-20s percentages post-2016, align with broader regional discontents rather than devolution-specific efficacy, maintaining sub-50% thresholds in non-partisan polls. This correlation suggests fosters incremental nationalist momentum without resolving underlying economic dependencies. Fiscal data further illustrates realism's constraints on independence transitions, with Wales' net fiscal deficit averaging £13-15 billion annually—equivalent to 17-20% of GDP—necessitating abrupt revenue generation or external borrowing absent UK equalization, risking acute shocks to public services and growth. Analyses project initial post-independence gaps narrowing modestly through efficiencies but persisting at 3-5% of GDP without unproven reforms, highlighting devolution's role in exposing rather than bridging structural imbalances that deter widespread separatist endorsement.

Controversies and Restrictions

UK Government Interventions and Limits

The Wales Act 2017 shifted Welsh devolution from a conferred powers model—where specific competencies were explicitly granted—to a model, devolving all legislative authority except for matters expressly reserved to the Parliament, such as , , and macroeconomic policy. This framework explicitly preserves the of the Parliament, enabling it to legislate on any matter and override devolved measures if necessary, thereby maintaining constitutional safeguards against devolved overreach into reserved domains. Disputes have arisen over the boundaries of these powers, notably with the Internal Market Act 2020, which establishes mutual recognition principles for goods and services across the UK to prevent regulatory fragmentation post-Brexit. Welsh ministers challenged aspects of the Act, arguing it unduly restricted devolved competencies in areas like environmental standards and public procurement, but a permission for was refused in April 2021, affirming the UK's authority to intervene for internal market integrity. Under section 114 of the Government of Wales Act 2006, the UK Secretary of State holds the power to make an order prohibiting a Welsh bill from progressing if it exceeds legislative competence, discriminates against or matters, or is incompatible with EU obligations (prior to adjustments), providing a mechanism to check potential excesses while requiring notification to . Although rarely invoked for —unlike Scotland's 2023 gender recognition reform veto—the provision underscores Westminster's role in upholding the devolution settlement's limits. In July 2023, Welsh Counsel General Mick Antoniw publicly described the Government's handling of devolution issues, including retained law reforms and internal market governance, as adopting a "centralised, unilateral and destructive approach," claiming it undermined collaborative principles and the Sewel convention on legislative consent. Despite such attributions of , these interventions reflect the 's retained capacity to ensure policy coherence across the union, with devolution statutes remaining amendable or revocable by simple parliamentary majority, preserving the framework's conditional and non-federal character.

Criticisms of Policy Outcomes and Governance

Critics have highlighted the lack of measurable improvements in key devolved policy areas, such as health services, where NHS waiting lists in reached over 800,000 patients for the first time in 2025, with two-year waits increasing despite additional funding allocations. Patients in remain twice as likely to face extended treatment compared to those in , attributing this to policy decisions under devolved control that have not reversed longstanding trends in service delivery. Social policy initiatives, including the 2022 ban on parental smacking enacted through the Children (Abolition of Defence of Reasonable Punishment) (Wales) Act, have diverged from UK norms without demonstrated reductions in child harm or behavioral issues. Official monitoring for the first year post-implementation (March 2022 to March 2023) recorded no significant shifts in child protection referrals attributable to the law, while concerns persist regarding its potential misuse in family disputes, potentially straining social services without addressing underlying causal factors in child welfare. Governance structures have expanded amid , with the increasing from 60 to 96 members for the 2026 elections, incurring costs estimated at £17 million annually and drawing accusations of bureaucratic bloat during fiscal pressures. This growth has coincided with heightened staff stress levels, affecting nearly half of Senedd personnel, and limited public support confined largely to pro-devolution advocates. Wales' GDP growth averaged 0.8% annually from 2007 to 2023, lagging England's 1.4%, with gross value added per head at 72.7% of the UK average in 2020, reflecting persistent underperformance not mitigated by devolved levers. Prolonged single-party governance by Welsh Labour since 1999 has fostered policy inertia, exacerbating vulnerabilities to unscrutinized decisions without resolving core economic dependencies on Westminster funding.

Internal Welsh Debates on Devolution's Value

Within Welsh political discourse, has elicited mixed assessments, with proponents highlighting cultural and institutional gains while critics emphasize persistent economic shortfalls and fiscal dependencies. Supporters, including elements of the Party, point to advancements in policy as a key achievement, such as the Welsh Language Measure 2011, which established official status for Welsh and supported a target to reach one million speakers by 2050, up from 538,300 in the 2011 . These efforts have fostered institutional maturity over 25 years, enabling tailored legislation on and heritage that pre-devolution Westminster structures arguably could not prioritize as effectively. Critics, however, argue that such gains are outweighed by , with ' gross value added per head remaining below the UK average and declining relatively since 1999, from 84% of the level in 1998-99 to around 75% by 2023, amid slower growth compared to other regions. This has fueled calls for pragmatic reassessment, questioning whether devolved powers have delivered commensurate value given the £15-20 billion annual fiscal deficit, where public spending exceeds tax revenues by roughly 20% of GDP, reliant on -wide redistribution without local revenue-raising incentives matching Scotland's. Internal Conservative Party debates in Wales have intensified scrutiny, with factional tensions in 2025 exposing devo-sceptic sentiments against further empowerment, as voiced by MS Mark Isherwood in opposing Plaid Cymru motions for expanded authority in June 2024, advocating instead for Westminster-led focus on core economic foundations like and skills. An anonymous Welsh blogger in May 2025 accused Senedd leader Darren Millar of sidelining anti-devolution voices, highlighting rifts where some members view the referendum's narrow 50.3% approval—on 50% turnout—as evidence of fragile mandate, prompting arguments to prioritize integration over autonomy to address underperformance in devolved areas like and . Even senior Labour figures, such as former minister Leighton Andrews in August 2024, conceded that promised economic uplift remains undelivered after 25 years, urging refocus on delivery within existing powers rather than expansion. Public opinion reflects this ambivalence, with polling in September 2024 showing 52% favoring the of with law-making powers, yet 18% preferring abolition and 15% full , indicating substantive doubt amid perceptions of mismatched outcomes like higher rates (23% in vs. 17% average in 2023). These debates underscore a broader Welsh : while has embedded democratic institutions, its value hinges on empirical delivery, with reformers advocating scrutiny of costs against benefits to rebuild trust without assuming perpetual expansion.

Future Prospects

Proposals for Further Devolution

The Welsh Government has prioritized the devolution of policing powers, with a March 2024 statement outlining preparatory steps while emphasizing focus on implementation rather than structural changes to funding or oversight. In August 2025, First Minister Eluned Morgan provided an update on ongoing discussions with the UK Government regarding justice devolution, signaling intent to expand legislative competence in criminal justice matters to align with existing devolved areas like youth justice. These efforts build on post-Brexit adjustments, where repatriated powers have prompted calls for a federal-style model granting Wales fuller control over areas such as rail franchising and energy consents, as advocated by constitutional experts in 2024 reports. Proposals for enhanced tax powers include greater flexibility over income tax bands and rates, beyond the limited variations introduced via the Wales Act 2017, to incentivize economic alignment; the Welsh Government's 2021 tax policy framework update stressed strategic development of these powers alongside borrowing capacities. The Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales, in its January 2024 final report, recommended structural reforms to bolster democratic resilience, including enhanced as one of three viable long-term governance options, while urging protections against fiscal volatility. Pre-2026 priorities, as articulated by Counsel General Mick Antoniw in June 2025, emphasize constitutional reform for further to address democratic deficits, with the Crown Estate (Wales) Bill passing its report stage unopposed on 22 July 2025 to transfer offshore to Welsh control. Fiscal analyses temper these expansions, noting Wales' persistent budget deficit—estimated at 18.4% of GDP in recent Wales Governance Centre assessments—requires growth incentives to avoid exacerbating reliance on block grants post-devolution. The Welsh Commission for Public Audit's examination of the base post-fiscal devolution highlights risks of revenue volatility without corresponding economic expansion, as devolved es like land transaction have shown sensitivity to housing cycles without built-in growth mechanisms. forecasts for March 2025 project modest devolved growth but warn that unchecked deficit amplification could strain public services absent productivity reforms.

Arguments for Reversal or Reform

Proponents of reversing Welsh devolution, including the , contend that the has failed to deliver tangible benefits, advocating for its abolition to restore unified governance and eliminate an unnecessary administrative layer. The party argues that devolution has not improved public services or economic outcomes, positioning reintegration as a means to enhance efficiency by centralizing decision-making at the level, where policies on defense, foreign affairs, and macroeconomics could be coordinated without regional fragmentation. This view emphasizes causal inefficiencies in devolved structures, such as duplicated bureaucracies and policy silos that dilute fiscal accountability and hinder national-scale responses to economic shocks. Empirical data supports claims of underdelivery, with Wales' gross value added (GVA) per head at £21,010 in 2020—72.7% of the average—showing little relative improvement since devolution began in 1999, when productivity was already lagging at 76.9% of levels, declining to 75.2% by 2011. Overall GDP relative to has remained largely static over the period, while productivity in has diverged further from the average compared to and , attributing this to devolution's limited powers over key growth drivers like trade and welfare. Unionists, including elements within the , assert that this stasis indicates devolution's failure to address structural weaknesses, with some leaders stating has "gone into reverse" under the Senedd's oversight. Reform advocates, such as , propose alternatives short of full reversal, including potential support for scrapping the while enhancing local government autonomy to bypass the national devolved tier, arguing it introduces inefficiency without commensurate gains in responsiveness. Polling reflects muted enthusiasm for the , with only 40% of respondents in a 2023 survey crediting devolution with a "stronger voice" for and 29% citing better services, alongside 5% viewing it negatively, suggesting stability rather than robust endorsement amid broader union preferences evidenced by low support at 24% in September 2024. These positions prioritize UK-wide policy coherence for economic resilience, positing that devolution fragments incentives and resources, perpetuating ' subordinate performance without reversing underlying dependencies on Westminster funding.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.