Hubbry Logo
Gough WhitlamGough WhitlamMain
Open search
Gough Whitlam
Community hub
Gough Whitlam
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gough Whitlam
Gough Whitlam
from Wikipedia

Edward Gough Whitlam[a] (11 July 1916 – 21 October 2014) was the 21st prime minister of Australia, serving from December 1972 to November 1975. To date the longest-serving federal leader of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), he was notable for being the head of a reformist and socially progressive government that ended with his controversial dismissal by the then-governor-general of Australia, Sir John Kerr, at the climax of the 1975 constitutional crisis. Whitlam remains the only Australian prime minister to have been removed from office by a governor-general.

Key Information

Whitlam was an air navigator in the Royal Australian Air Force for four years during World War II, and worked as a barrister following the war. He was first elected to the Australian House of Representatives in 1952, becoming a member of parliament (MP) for the division of Werriwa. Whitlam became deputy leader of the Labor Party in 1960, and in 1967, after the retirement of Arthur Calwell, was elected leader of the party and became the Leader of the Opposition. After narrowly losing the 1969 federal election to John Gorton, Whitlam led Labor to victory at the 1972 election, after 23 years of Coalition government.

In its first term, the Whitlam government introduced numerous socially progressive and reformist policies and initiatives, including the termination of military conscription and the end of Australian involvement in the Vietnam War, institution of universal health care and free university education, and the implementation of legal aid programmes. With the opposition-controlled Australian Senate delaying passage of bills, Whitlam called a snap double dissolution election in May 1974 in which he won a slightly reduced majority in the House of Representatives, and picked up three Senate seats to hold equal Senate numbers to the opposition. The Whitlam government then instituted the first and only joint sitting enabled under section 57 of the Australian constitution as part of the double dissolution process. His government's second term was dominated by a declining economy suffering from the 1973 oil crisis and the 1970s global recession, as well as a political scandal known as the Loans affair, which led to the removal of two government ministers. The opposition continued to obstruct Whitlam's agenda in the Senate.

In late 1975, the opposition senators refused to allow a vote on the government's appropriation bills, returning them to the House of Representatives with a demand that the government go to an election. Whitlam argued that his government, which held a clear majority in the House of Representatives, was being held to ransom by the Senate. The crisis ended in mid-November, when governor-general Sir John Kerr dismissed him from office and commissioned the opposition leader, Malcolm Fraser, as caretaker prime minister. Labor lost the subsequent election by a landslide. Whitlam stepped down as leader of the party after losing again at the 1977 election, and retired from parliament the following year. Upon the election of the Hawke government in 1983, he was appointed as Ambassador to UNESCO; he was later elected a member of the UNESCO Executive Board. He remained active into his nineties. The propriety and circumstances of his dismissal and the legacy of his government have been frequently debated in the decades since he left office. Whitlam is often ranked in the upper-tier of Australian prime ministers by political experts and academics,[2][3][4][5] with political journalist Paul Kelly writing in 1994 that "there is no doubt that in three years his government was responsible for more reforms and innovations than any other government in Australian history".[6]

Early life

[edit]
"Ngara", Whitlam's birthplace (now demolished)

Edward Gough Whitlam was born on 11 July 1916 at the family home 'Ngara', 46 Rowland Street,[7] Kew, a suburb of Melbourne, the elder of two children (his sister, Freda, was born four years after him),[8][9] to Martha (née Maddocks) and Fred Whitlam.[10] His father was a federal public servant who later was Commonwealth Crown Solicitor, and Whitlam senior's involvement in human rights issues was a powerful influence on his son.[11] Since his maternal grandfather was also named Edward, from early childhood he was called by his middle name, Gough, which had come from his paternal grandfather who had been named after the British soldier Field-Marshal Hugh Gough, 1st Viscount Gough.[12]

In 1918, Fred Whitlam was promoted to deputy Crown solicitor and transferred to Sydney. The family lived first in the North Shore suburb of Mosman and then in Turramurra. At age six, Gough began his education at Chatswood Church of England Girls' School (early primary schooling at a girls' school was not unusual for small boys at the time). After a year there, he attended Mowbray House School and Knox Grammar School in the suburbs of Sydney.[13]

Fred Whitlam was promoted again in 1927, this time to Assistant Crown Solicitor. The position was located in the new national capital of Canberra, and the Whitlam family moved there.[13] As of 2008, Whitlam was the only prime minister to have spent his formative years in Canberra.[14] At the time, conditions remained primitive in what was dubbed "the bush capital" and "the land of the blowflies".[15] Gough attended the government Telopea Park School.[16] In 1932, Whitlam's father transferred him to Canberra Grammar School where, at the Speech Day ceremony that year, he was awarded a prize by the Governor-General, Sir Isaac Isaacs.[17]

A folder showing a head-and-shoulders photo of Whitlam as a young man, with an identification paper
Photograph of Whitlam and attestation paper from his RAAF officer personnel file dated 1942

Whitlam enrolled at St Paul's College at the University of Sydney at the age of 18.[16] He earned his first wages by appearing, with several other "Paulines", in a cabaret scene in the film The Broken Melody – the students were chosen because St Paul's required formal wear at dinner, and they could therefore supply their own costumes.[18][19] After receiving a Bachelor of Arts degree with second-class honours in classics, Whitlam remained at St Paul's to study law. He had originally contemplated an academic career, but his lacklustre marks made that unlikely.[20] Dropping out of Greek classes, he professed himself unable to care for the "dry as dust" lectures of Enoch Powell.[21]

Military service

[edit]
Whitlam in military uniform stands under a tree in front of a large tent. He holds a mug in his hand.
Gough Whitlam in Cooktown, Queensland, in 1944

Soon after the outbreak of World War II in 1939, Whitlam enlisted in the Sydney University Regiment, part of the Militia.[22] In late 1941, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, and with a year remaining in his legal studies, he volunteered for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF).[23] In 1942, while awaiting entry into the service, Whitlam met and married Margaret Elaine Dovey, who had swum for Australia in the 1938 British Empire Games and was the daughter of barrister and future New South Wales Supreme Court judge Bill Dovey.[24][25] He entered the RAAF on 20 June 1942.[26]

Whitlam trained as a navigator and bomb aimer, before serving with No. 13 Squadron RAAF, based mainly on the Gove Peninsula, Northern Territory, flying Lockheed Ventura bombers. He reached the rank of Flight Lieutenant.[27] While in the service, he began his political activities, distributing literature for the Australian Labor Party during the 1943 federal election and urging the passage of the 1944 "Fourteen Powers" referendum, which would have expanded the powers of the federal government.[28] Although the party was victorious, the referendum it advocated was defeated.[27] In 1961, Whitlam said of the referendum defeat, "My hopes were dashed by the outcome and from that moment I determined to do all I could do to modernise the Australian Constitution."[29] While still in uniform, Whitlam joined the ALP in Sydney in 1945.[27] He was discharged from the RAAF on 17 October 1945, and continued to use Air Force log books to record all the flights he took until 2007.[26][30] After the war, he obtained his Bachelor of Laws; he was admitted to the federal and New South Wales bars in 1947.[27]

Early political career, 1952–1967

[edit]

Member of Parliament, 1952–1960

[edit]
Whitlam as a newly elected MP, circa 1952
Whitlam with his wife Margaret and their four children in 1954

With his war service loan, Whitlam built a house in seaside Cronulla.[31] He also bought the block of land next door, using the prize money (£1,000 in security bonds) he received in the Australian National Quiz Championship. Whitlam was joint winner in 1948,[32] was runner-up in 1949,[33] and was one of four prize-winning finalists in 1950.[32][10][34]

He sought to make a career in the ALP in Cronulla, but local Labor supporters were sceptical of Whitlam's loyalties, given his privileged background.[31] In the postwar years, he practised law, concentrating on landlord/tenant matters, and sought to build his bona fides in the party. He ran twice – unsuccessfully – for the local council, once (also unsuccessfully) for the New South Wales Legislative Assembly, and campaigned for other candidates.[35] In 1951, Bert Lazzarini, the Labor member for the Federal electorate of Werriwa, announced that he would stand down at the next election. Whitlam won the preselection as ALP candidate. Lazzarini died in 1952 before completing his term and Whitlam was elected to the House of Representatives in the ensuing by-election on 29 November 1952. Whitlam trebled Lazzarini's majority in a 12 per cent swing to Labor.[31]

Whitlam joined the ALP minority in the House of Representatives. His maiden speech provoked an interruption by a future prime minister, John McEwen, who was then told by the Speaker that maiden speeches are traditionally heard in silence. Whitlam responded to McEwen by saying Benjamin Disraeli had been heckled in his maiden speech and had responded, "The time will come when you shall hear me." He told McEwen, "The time will come when you may interrupt me." According to early Whitlam biographers Laurie Oakes and David Solomon, this cool response put the Coalition government on notice that he would be a force to be reckoned with.[36]

In the rough and tumble debate in the House of Representatives, Whitlam called fellow MHR Bill Bourke "this grizzling Quisling", Garfield Barwick (who, as High Court Chief Justice, played a role in Whitlam's downfall) a "bumptious bastard", and he said Bill Wentworth exhibited a "hereditary streak of insanity".[37] After calling future prime minister William McMahon a "quean", he apologised.[37]

Whitlam in 1959

The ALP had been out of office since the Chifley Government's defeat in 1949 and, since 1951, had been under the leadership of Bert Evatt, whom Whitlam greatly admired. In 1954, the ALP seemed likely to return to power. The Prime Minister, Robert Menzies, adroitly used the defection of a Soviet official to his advantage, and his coalition of the Liberal and Country parties was returned in the 1954 election with a seven-seat majority. After the election, Evatt attempted to purge the party of industrial groupers, who had long dissented from party policy, and who were predominantly Catholic and anti-communist. The ensuing division in the ALP, which came to be known as "The Split", sparked the birth of the Democratic Labor Party (DLP). The conflict helped to keep Labor out of power for a generation, since DLP supporters chose the Liberal Party in preferential voting. Whitlam supported Evatt throughout this period.[38]

In 1955, a redistribution divided Whitlam's electorate of Werriwa in two, with his Cronulla home located in the new electorate of Hughes. Although Whitlam would have received ALP support in either division, he chose to continue standing for Werriwa and moved from Cronulla to Cabramatta. This meant even longer journeys for his older children to attend school, since neither electorate had a high school at the time; they attended school in Sydney.[39]

Whitlam was appointed to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Constitutional Review in 1956. Biographer Jenny Hocking calls his service on the committee, which included members from all parties in both chambers of Parliament, one of the "great influences in his political development".[40] According to Hocking, service on the committee caused Whitlam to focus not on internal conflicts consuming the ALP, but on Labor goals which were possible and worthwhile in the constitutional framework. Many Labor goals, such as nationalisation, ran contrary to the Constitution. Whitlam came to believe the Constitution – and especially Section 96 (which allowed the federal government to make grants to the states) – could be used to advance a worthwhile Labor programme.[41]

Deputy Leader, 1960–1967

[edit]

By the late 1950s Whitlam was seen as a leadership contender once the existing Labor leaders exited the scene. Most of the party's major figures, including Evatt, Deputy Leader Arthur Calwell, Eddie Ward, and Reg Pollard, were in their sixties, twenty years older than Whitlam.[42] In 1960, after losing three elections, Evatt resigned and was replaced by Calwell, with Whitlam defeating Ward for deputy leader.[43] Calwell came within a handful of votes of winning the cliffhanger 1961 election. He had not wanted Whitlam as deputy leader, and believed Labor would have won if Ward had been in the position.[44]

Soon after the 1961 election, events began to turn against Labor. When President Sukarno of Indonesia announced that he intended to take over West New Guinea as the colonial Dutch departed, Calwell responded by declaring that Indonesia must be stopped by force. Calwell's statement was called "crazy and irresponsible" by Prime Minister Menzies, and the incident reduced public support for the ALP.[45] At that time, the Federal Conference of the Labor Party, which dictated policy to parliamentary members, consisted of six members from each state, but not Calwell or Whitlam. In early 1963 a special conference met in a Canberra hotel to determine Labor policy regarding a proposed US base in northern Australia; Calwell and Whitlam were photographed by The Daily Telegraph peering in through the doors, waiting for the verdict. In an accompanying story, Alan Reid of the Telegraph wrote that Labor was ruled by "36 faceless men". The Liberals seized on it, issuing a leaflet called "Mr Calwell and the Faceless Men" which accused Calwell and Whitlam of taking direction from "36 unknown men, not elected to Parliament nor responsible to the people".[46]

Menzies manipulated the Opposition on issues that bitterly divided it, such as direct aid to the states for private schools, and the proposed base. He called an early election for November 1963, standing in support of those two issues. The Prime Minister performed better than Calwell on television and received an unexpected boost after the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy. As a result, the Coalition easily defeated Labor on a 10-seat swing. Whitlam had hoped Calwell would step down after 1963, but he remained, reasoning that Evatt had been given three opportunities to win, and that he should be allowed a third try.[47] Calwell dismissed proposals that the ALP leader and deputy leader should be entitled to membership of the party's conference (or on its governing 12-person Federal Executive, which had two representatives from each state), and instead ran successfully for one of the conference's Victoria seats.[48] Labor did badly in a 1964 by-election in the Tasmanian electorate of Denison, and lost seats in the 1964 half-Senate election. The party was also defeated in the state elections in the most populous state, New South Wales, surrendering control of the state government for the first time since 1941.[49]

Whitlam's relationship with Calwell, never good, deteriorated further after publication of a 1965 article in The Australian reporting off-the-record comments Whitlam had made that his leader was "too old and weak" to win office, and that the party might be gravely damaged by an "old-fashioned" 70-year-old Calwell seeking his first term as prime minister.[50] Later that year, at Whitlam's and Don Dunstan's urging, and over Calwell's objection, the biennial party conference made major changes to the party's platform: deleting support for the White Australia policy and making the ALP's leader and deputy leader ex officio members of the conference and executive, along with the party's leader and deputy leader in the Senate. As Whitlam considered the Senate unrepresentative, he opposed the admission of its ALP leaders to the party's governing bodies.[51]

Menzies retired in January 1966, and was succeeded as prime minister by the new Liberal Party leader, Harold Holt.[52] After years of politics being dominated by the elderly Menzies and Calwell, the younger Holt was seen as a breath of fresh air, and attracted public interest and support in the run-up to the November election.[52]

In early 1966, the 36-member conference, with Calwell's assent, banned any ALP parliamentarian from supporting federal assistance to the states for spending on both government and private schools, commonly called "state aid". Whitlam broke with the party on the issue, and was charged with gross disloyalty by the executive, an offence which carried the penalty of expulsion from the party. Before the matter could be heard, Whitlam left for Queensland, where he campaigned intensively for the ALP candidate Rex Patterson in the Dawson by-election. The ALP won, dealing the government its first by-election defeat since 1952. Whitlam survived the expulsion vote by a margin of only two, gaining both Queensland votes.[53] At the end of April, Whitlam challenged Calwell for the leadership; though Calwell received two-thirds of the vote, he announced that if the party lost the upcoming election, he would not stand again for the leadership.[54]

Holt called an election for November 1966, in which Australia's involvement in the Vietnam War was a major issue. Calwell called for an "immediate and unconditional withdrawal" of Australian troops from Vietnam. Whitlam, however, said this would deprive Australia of any voice in a settlement, and that regular troops, rather than conscripts, should remain under some circumstances.[55] Calwell considered Whitlam's remark disastrous, disputing the party line just five days before the election. The ALP suffered a crushing defeat; the party was reduced to 41 seats in the House of Representatives. Shortly after the election, Whitlam faced another expulsion vote for his stance on Vietnam, and survived.[56] True to his word, Calwell resigned two months after the election. At the caucus meeting on 8 February 1967, Whitlam was elected party leader, defeating leading left-wing candidate Jim Cairns.[57]

Leader of the Opposition, 1967–1972

[edit]

Reforming the ALP

[edit]
Whitlam and his wife Margaret entering the memorial service for Harold Holt in December 1967

Whitlam believed the Labor Party had little chance of being elected unless it could expand its appeal from the traditional working-class base to include the suburban middle class.[58] He sought to shift control of the ALP from union officials to the parliamentary party, and hoped even rank-and-file party members could be given a voice in the conference.[59] In 1968, controversy erupted within the party when the executive refused to seat new Tasmanian delegate Brian Harradine, a Whitlam supporter who was considered a right-wing extremist.[60] Whitlam resigned the leadership, demanding a vote of confidence from caucus. He defeated Cairns for the leadership in an unexpectedly close 38–32 vote. Despite the vote, the executive refused to seat Harradine.[61]

With the ALP's governing bodies unwilling to reform themselves, Whitlam worked to build support for change among ordinary party members. He successfully reduced union influence in the party, though he was never able to give the rank and file a direct vote in selecting the executive.[62] The Victoria branch of the party had long been a problem; its executive was far to the left of the rest of the ALP, and had little electoral success. Whitlam was able to reconstruct the Victoria party organisation against the will of its leaders, and the reconstituted state party proved essential to victory in the 1972 election.[61]

By the time of the 1969 party conference, Whitlam had gained considerable control over the ALP. That conference passed 61 resolutions, including broad changes to party policy and procedures. It called for the establishment of an Australian Schools Commission to consider the proper level of state aid for schools and universities, recognition of Aboriginal land claims, and expanded party policy on universal health care.[63] The conference also called for increased federal involvement in urban planning, and formed the basis of "The Program" of modern socialism which Whitlam and the ALP presented to voters in 1972.[64]

Since 1918, Labor had called for the abolition of the existing Australian Constitution, and the vesting of all political power in Parliament, a plan which would turn the states into powerless geographic regions. Beginning in 1965, Whitlam sought to change this goal. He finally succeeded at the 1971 ALP Conference in Launceston, Tasmania, which called for Parliament to receive "such plenary powers as are necessary and desirable" to achieve the ALP's goals in domestic and international affairs.[65] Labor also pledged to abolish the Senate; this goal was not erased from the party platform until 1979, after Whitlam had stepped down as leader.[66]

Leader of the Opposition

[edit]
Whitlam in August 1971

Soon after taking the leadership, Whitlam reorganised the ALP caucus, assigning portfolios and turning the Labor frontbench into a shadow cabinet.[67] While the Liberal-Country Coalition had a huge majority in the House of Representatives, Whitlam energised the party by campaigning intensively to win two by-elections in 1967: first in Corio in Victoria, and later that year in Capricornia in Queensland. The November half-Senate election saw a moderate swing to Labor and against the Coalition, compared with the general election the previous year.[68] These federal victories, in which both Whitlam and Holt campaigned, helped give Whitlam the leverage he needed to carry out party reforms.[69]

At the end of 1967, Holt vanished while swimming in rough seas near Melbourne; his body was never recovered.[70] John McEwen, as leader of the junior Coalition partner, the Country Party, took over as prime minister for three weeks until the Liberals could elect a new leader. Senator John Gorton won the vote and became prime minister.[71] The leadership campaign was conducted mostly by television, and Gorton appeared to have the visual appeal needed to keep Whitlam out of office.[72] Gorton resigned his seat in the Senate, and in February 1968 won the by-election for Holt's seat of Higgins in Victoria.[73] For the remainder of the year, Gorton appeared to have the better of Whitlam in the House of Representatives. In his chronicle of the Whitlam years, however, speechwriter Graham Freudenberg asserts that Gorton's erratic behaviour, Whitlam's strengthening of his party, and events outside Australia (such as the Vietnam War) ate away at Liberal dominance.[74]

Gorton called an election for October 1969. Whitlam and the ALP, with little internal dissension, stood on a platform calling for domestic reform, an end to conscription, and the withdrawal of Australian troops from Vietnam by 1 July 1970.[75] Whitlam knew that, given the ALP's poor position after the 1966 election, victory was unlikely.[76] Nevertheless, Whitlam scored an 18-seat swing, Labor's best performance since losing government in 1949. It also scored a 7.1 per cent two-party swing, the largest to not result in a change of government. Although the Coalition was returned for an eighth term in government, it was with a slim majority of three seats, down from 19 prior to the election.[75] Labor actually won a bare majority of the two-party vote and only DLP preferences, especially in Melbourne-area seats, kept Whitlam from becoming prime minister.[77] The 1970 half-Senate election brought little change to Coalition control, but the Coalition vote fell below 40 per cent for the first time, representing a severe threat to Gorton's leadership.[78]

Man standing on stage addressing a crowd with a view of a mountain in the background
Whitlam speaking at the Aboriginal Tent Embassy, February 1972

In March 1971, the resentment against Gorton came to a head when a confidence vote in the Liberal caucus resulted in a tie. Declaring that this was a sign he no longer had the confidence of the party, Gorton resigned, and William McMahon was elected his successor.[75] With the Liberals in turmoil, Whitlam and the ALP sought to gain public trust as a credible government-in-waiting. The party's actions, such as its abandonment of the White Australia policy, gained favourable media attention.[79] The Labor leader flew to Papua New Guinea and pledged himself to the independence of what was then under Australian trusteeship.[80] In 1971, Whitlam flew to Beijing and met with Chinese officials, including Zhou Enlai.[81] McMahon attacked Whitlam for the visit and claimed that the Chinese had manipulated him. This attack backfired when US President Richard Nixon announced that he would visit China the following year. His National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger, visited Beijing between 9–11 July (less than a week after Whitlam's visit), and, unknown to Whitlam, some of Kissinger's staff had been in Beijing at the same time as the Labor delegation. According to Whitlam biographer Jenny Hocking, the incident transformed Whitlam into an international statesman,[82] while McMahon was seen as reacting defensively to Whitlam's foreign policy ventures.[83] Other errors by McMahon, such as a confused ad-lib speech while visiting Washington, and a statement to Indonesia's President Suharto that Australia was a "west European nation", also damaged the government.[84]

Whitlam giving a speech during the 1972 election campaign

By early 1972, Labor had established a clear lead in the polls; indeed, for the first time since 1955 its support was greater than the combined vote for the Coalition and DLP.[85][86] Unemployment was at a ten-year peak, rising to 2.14 per cent in August (though the unemployment rate was calculated differently compared to the present, and did not include thousands of rural workers on Commonwealth-financed relief work).[87] Inflation was also at its highest rate since the early 1950s. The government recovered slightly in the August Budget session of Parliament, proposing income tax cuts and increased spending.[85] The Labor strategy for the run-up to the election was to sit back and allow the Coalition to make mistakes. Whitlam controversially stated in March "draft-dodging is not a crime" and that he would be open to a revaluation of the Australian dollar.[88] With the Coalition sinking in the polls and his own personal approval ratings down as low as 28 per cent, McMahon waited as long as he could, finally calling an election for the House of Representatives for 2 December. Whitlam noted that the polling day was the anniversary of the Battle of Austerlitz at which another "ramshackle, reactionary coalition" had been given a "crushing defeat".

Labor campaigned under the slogan "It's Time", an echo of Menzies' successful 1949 slogan, "It's Time for a Change". Surveys showed that even Liberal voters approved of the Labor slogan.[89] Whitlam pledged an end to conscription and the release of individuals who had refused the draft; an income tax surcharge to pay for universal health insurance; free dental care for students; and renovation of ageing urban infrastructure. The party pledged to eliminate university tuition fees and establish a schools commission to evaluate educational needs.[90] The party benefited from the support of the proprietor of News Limited, Rupert Murdoch, who preferred Whitlam over McMahon.[91] Labor was so dominant in the campaign that some of Whitlam's advisers urged him to stop joking about McMahon; people were feeling sorry for him.[92] The election saw the ALP increase its tally by 12 seats, mostly in suburban Sydney and Melbourne, for a majority of nine in the House of Representatives. The ALP gained little beyond the suburban belts, however, losing a seat in South Australia and two in Western Australia.[93]

Prime Minister, 1972–1975

[edit]

First term

[edit]

Duumvirate

[edit]
Whitlam and his deputy, Lance Barnard

Whitlam took office with a majority in the House of Representatives, but without control of the Senate (elected in the 1967 and 1970 half-elections). The Senate at that time consisted of ten members from each of the six states, elected by single transferable vote.[94] Historically, when Labor won government, the parliamentary caucus chose the ministers, with the party leader having the power only to assign portfolios.[95] However, the new Labor caucus would not meet until after the final results came in on 15 December.[96]

With Labor's win beyond doubt even though counting was still underway, McMahon advised the Governor-General, Sir Paul Hasluck, that he was no longer in a position to govern. Soon afterward, Whitlam advised Hasluck that he could form a government with his new majority. This was in accordance with longstanding Australian constitutional practice. Convention also held that McMahon would stay on as caretaker prime minister until the full results were in. However, Whitlam was unwilling to wait that long. On 5 December, per Whitlam's request, Hasluck swore Whitlam and Labor's deputy leader, Lance Barnard, as an interim two-man government, with Whitlam as prime minister and Barnard as deputy prime minister. The two men held 27 portfolios during the two weeks before a full cabinet could be determined.[97]

During the two weeks the so-called "duumvirate" held office, Whitlam sought to fulfill those campaign promises that did not require legislation. Whitlam ordered negotiations to establish full relations with the People's Republic of China, and broke those with Taiwan.[98] The diplomatic relations were established in 1972 and an embassy opened in Beijing in 1973. Legislation allowed the defence minister to grant exemptions from conscription. Barnard held this office, and exempted everyone.[99] Seven men were at that time incarcerated for refusing conscription; Whitlam arranged for their liberation.[100] The Whitlam government in its first days reopened the equal pay case pending before the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission, and appointed a woman, Elizabeth Evatt, to the commission. Whitlam and Barnard eliminated sales tax on contraceptive pills, announced major grants for the arts, and appointed an interim schools commission.[101] The duumvirate barred racially discriminatory sports teams from Australia, and instructed the Australian delegation at the United Nations to vote in favour of sanctions on apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia.[102] It also ordered the Australian Army Training Team home from Vietnam, ending Australia's involvement in the war; most troops, including all conscripts, had been withdrawn by McMahon.[103][104] According to Whitlam's speechwriter Graham Freudenberg, the duumvirate was a success, as it showed that the Labor government could manipulate the machinery of government, despite almost a quarter-century in opposition. However, Freudenberg noted that the rapid pace and public excitement caused by the duumvirate's actions caused the Opposition to be wary of giving Labor too easy a time, and gave rise to one post-mortem assessment of the Whitlam government: "We did too much too soon."[105]

Enacting a program

[edit]
Members of the Third Whitlam Ministry in 1974

The McMahon government had consisted of 27 ministers, twelve of whom comprised the Cabinet. In the run-up to the election, the Labor caucus had decided that if the party took power all 27 ministers were to be Cabinet members.[106] Intense canvassing took place amongst ALP parliamentarians as the duumvirate did its work, and on 18 December the caucus elected the Cabinet. The results were generally acceptable to Whitlam, and within three hours, he had announced the portfolios of the Cabinet members.[107] To give himself greater control over the Cabinet, in January 1973 Whitlam established five Cabinet committees (with the members appointed by himself, not the caucus) and took full control of the Cabinet agenda.[108]

Whitlam, prime minister for fewer than three years between 1972 and 1975, pushed through a raft of reforms that radically changed Australia's economic, legal and cultural landscape.[109]

The Whitlam government abolished the death penalty for federal crimes.[110] Legal aid was established, with offices in each state capital.[111] It abolished university fees, and established the Schools Commission to allocate funds to schools.[110] Whitlam founded the Department of Urban Development and, having lived in developing Cabramatta, most of which lacked sewage facilities, established the National Sewerage Program, which set a goal to leave no urban home unsewered.[112] The Whitlam government gave grants directly to local government units for urban renewal, flood prevention, and the promotion of tourism. Other federal grants financed highways linking the state capitals, and paid for standard-gauge rail lines between the states. The government attempted to set up a new city at Albury–Wodonga on the Victoria–New South Wales border. The process was started for "Advance Australia Fair" to become the country's national anthem in place of "God Save the Queen". The Order of Australia replaced the British honours system in early 1975.[111]

The Women's Electoral Lobby, founded in 1972, had helped Whitlam win government.[113] In 1973, Elizabeth Reid was appointed the world's first adviser on women's affairs to a head of government.[114] Through Reid's work in this role, the government took a greater role in the protection of women and increasing their rights; and, through the 1974 establishment and later recommendations of a Royal Commission on Human Relationships, a feminist reform agenda was put on the agenda for future action by the government.[113][115] Among other reforms, the Whitlam government introduced three months' paid maternity leave, along with a week's paid paternity leave, for public servants, as well as the Supporting Mother's Benefit, in 1973.[116]

In 1973, the National Gallery of Australia, then called the Australian National Gallery, bought the painting "Blue Poles" by contemporary artist Jackson Pollock for US$2 million (A$1.3 million at the time of payment),[117] which was about a third of its annual budget. This required Whitlam's personal permission, which he gave on the condition the price was publicised.[118] The purchase created a political and media scandal, and was said to symbolise, alternatively, Whitlam's foresight and vision or his profligate spending.[117]

Whitlam travelled extensively as prime minister, and was the first Australian prime minister to visit China while in office.[111] He was criticised for making this visit, especially after Cyclone Tracy struck Darwin; he interrupted an extensive tour of Europe for 48 hours (deemed too brief a period by many) to view the devastation.[119]

Gough Whitlam during his visit to China in 1973
Whitlam visits China, 1973

In keeping with Labor's social commitments, Whitlam's time in office witnessed significant increases in government spending. In one year, for instance, real government spending increased by 20% followed by 16% the following year.[120] During Whitlam's three years in office, social spending (including education) as a percentage of total Commonwealth budget outlays rose from 36.9% to 50.4.% From 1972–73 to 1975–76, spending on education as a percentage of total Commonwealth budget outlays went up from 4.3% to 8.5%, urban development from 0.5% to 1.9,% housing from 2.3% to 2.6%, social security from 20.6% to 23.2%, and health from 7.7% to 13.5%.[121] In 1975, Whitlam justified the big increases in government spending by arguing that when Labor returned to office 1972 they had "the task of redressing many years of neglect by previous Governments in almost every field of national life".[122]

Early troubles

[edit]

From the start of the Whitlam government, the Opposition, led by Billy Snedden, who replaced McMahon as Liberal leader in December 1972, sought to use control of the Senate to baulk Whitlam.[123] It did not seek to block all government legislation; the Coalition senators, led by Senate Liberal leader Reg Withers, sought to block government legislation only when the obstruction would advance the Opposition's agenda.[124] The Whitlam government also had troubles in relations with the states. New South Wales refused the government's request to close the Rhodesian Information Centre in Sydney. The Queensland premier, Joh Bjelke-Petersen refused to consider any adjustment in Queensland's border with Papua New Guinea, which, due to the state's ownership of islands in the Torres Strait, came within half a kilometre of the Papuan mainland.[125] Liberal state governments in New South Wales and Victoria were re-elected by large margins in 1973.[126] Whitlam and his majority in the House of Representatives proposed a constitutional referendum in December 1973, transferring control of wages and prices from the states to the federal government. The two propositions failed to attract a majority of voters in any state, and were rejected by over 800,000 votes nationwide.[127]

In 1974, the Senate refused to pass six bills after they were passed twice by the House of Representatives. With the Opposition threatening to disrupt money supply to government, Whitlam used the Senate's recalcitrance to trigger a double dissolution election, holding it instead of the half-Senate election.[128] After a campaign featuring the Labor slogan "Give Gough a fair go", the Whitlam government was returned, with its majority in the House of Representatives cut from seven to five and its Senate seats increased by three. It was only the second time since Federation that a Labor government had been elected to a second full term.[129] The government and the opposition each had 29 Senators with two seats held by independents.[130][131] The deadlock over the twice-rejected bills was broken, uniquely in Australian history, with a special joint sitting of the two houses of Parliament under Section 57 of the Constitution. This session, authorised by the new governor-general, John Kerr, passed bills providing for universal health insurance (known then as Medibank, today as Medicare) and providing the Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory with representation in the Senate, effective at the next election.[132]

Murphy raids

[edit]
Whitlam with Richard Nixon
Whitlam visits US President Richard Nixon, July 1973

In February 1973, the Attorney General, Senator Lionel Murphy, led a police raid on the Melbourne office of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, which was under his ministerial responsibility. Murphy believed that ASIO might have files relating to threats against Yugoslav Prime Minister Džemal Bijedić, who was about to visit Australia, and feared ASIO might conceal or destroy them.[133] The Opposition attacked the Government over the raid, terming Murphy a "loose cannon". A Senate investigation of the incident was cut short when Parliament was dissolved in 1974.[134] According to journalist and author Wallace Brown, the controversy continued to dog the Whitlam government throughout its term, because the incident was "so silly".[133]

Gair Affair

[edit]

By early 1974, the Senate had rejected nineteen government bills, ten of them twice. With a half-Senate election due by mid-year, Whitlam looked for ways to shore up support in that body. Queensland senator and former DLP leader Vince Gair signalled his willingness to leave the Senate for a diplomatic post. Gair's term would not expire until the following half-Senate election or upon a double dissolution election. With five Queensland seats at stake in the half-Senate election, the ALP was expected to win only two, but if six (including Gair's) were at stake, the party would be likely to win a third. Possible control of the Senate was therefore at stake; Whitlam agreed to Gair's request and had Governor-General Sir Paul Hasluck appoint him ambassador to Ireland. Word leaked of Gair's pending resignation, and Whitlam's opponents attempted to counteract his manoeuvre. On what became known as the "Night of the Long Prawns", Country Party members secreted Gair at a small party in a legislative office as the ALP searched for him to secure his written resignation. As Gair enjoyed beer and prawns, Bjelke-Petersen advised the Queensland governor, Colin Hannah, to issue writs for only the usual five vacancies, since Gair's seat was not yet vacant, effectively countering Whitlam's plan.[135]

Second term

[edit]

By mid-1974, Australia was in an economic slump, suffering from the 1973 oil crisis and 1973–1975 recession. The 1973 oil crisis had caused prices to spike and, according to government figures, inflation topped 13 per cent for over a year between 1973 and 1974.[136] Part of the inflation was due to Whitlam's desire to increase wages and conditions of the Commonwealth Public Service as a pacesetter for the private sector.[137] The Whitlam government had cut tariffs by 25 per cent in 1973; 1974 saw an increase in imports of 30 per cent and a $1.5 billion increase in the trade deficit. Primary producers of commodities such as beef were caught in a credit squeeze as short-term rates rose to extremely high levels.[136] Unemployment also rose significantly.[137] Unease within the ALP led to Barnard's defeat when Jim Cairns challenged him for his deputy leadership. Whitlam gave little help to his embattled deputy.[138]

Despite these economic indicators, the Budget presented in August 1974 saw large increases in spending, especially in education.[139] Treasury officials had advised a series of tax and fee increases, ranging from excise taxes to the cost of posting a letter; their advice was mostly rejected by Cabinet.[140] The Budget was unsuccessful in dealing with the inflation and unemployment, and Whitlam introduced large tax cuts in November. He also announced additional spending to help the private sector.[139]

Beginning in October 1974, the Whitlam government sought overseas loans to finance its development plans, with the newly enriched oil nations a likely target. Whitlam attempted to secure financing before informing the Loan Council which included state officials hostile to Whitlam. His government empowered Pakistani financier Tirath Khemlani as an intermediary in the hope of securing US$4 billion in loans. While the Loans Affair did not result in a loan,[141] according to author and Whitlam speechwriter Graham Freudenberg, "The only cost involved was the cost to the reputation of the Government. That cost was to be immense – it was government itself."[142]

Whitlam appointed Senator Murphy to the High Court, even though Murphy's Senate seat would not be up for election if a half-Senate election were held. Labor then held three of the five short-term New South Wales Senate seats. Under proportional representation, Labor could hold its three short-term seats in the next half-Senate election but, if Murphy's seat were also contested, Labor was unlikely to win four out of six. Thus, a Murphy appointment meant the almost certain loss of a seat in the closely divided Senate at the next election.[143] Whitlam appointed Murphy anyway. By convention, senators appointed by the state legislature to fill casual vacancies were from the same political party as the former senator. The New South Wales premier, Tom Lewis, felt that this convention applied only to vacancies caused by deaths or ill-health, and arranged for the legislature to elect Cleaver Bunton, former mayor of Albury and an independent.[144] By March 1975, many Liberal parliamentarians felt Snedden was doing an inadequate job as leader of the Opposition, and that Whitlam was dominating him in the House of Representatives.[145] Malcolm Fraser challenged Snedden for the leadership, and defeated him on 21 March.[146]

Soon after Fraser's accession, controversy arose over the Whitlam government's actions in trying to restart peace talks in Vietnam. As the North prepared to end the civil war, Whitlam sent cables to both Vietnamese governments, telling Parliament both cables were substantially the same.[147] The Opposition contended he had misled Parliament, and a motion to censure Whitlam was defeated along party lines.[148] The Opposition also attacked Whitlam for not allowing enough South Vietnamese refugees into Australia, with Fraser calling for the entry of 50,000. Freudenberg alleges that 1,026 Vietnamese refugees entered Australia in the final eight months of the Whitlam government, and only 399 in 1976 under Fraser.[149] However, by 1977, Australia had accepted more than five thousand refugees.[150]

As the political situation deteriorated, Whitlam and his government continued to enact legislation: The Family Law Act 1975 provided for no-fault divorce while the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 caused Australia to ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination that Australia had signed under Holt, but which had never been ratified. In August 1975, Whitlam gave the Gurindji people of the Northern Territory title deeds to part of their traditional lands, beginning the process of Aboriginal land reform. The next month, Australia granted independence to Papua New Guinea.[111]

The Suharto-Whitlam House in Dieng Plateau, Indonesia, where Whitlam discussed the future of East Timor with Indonesia's President Suharto in 1974

Following the 1974 Carnation Revolution, Portugal began a process of decolonisation and began a withdrawal from Portuguese Timor (later East Timor). Australians had long taken an interest in the colony; the nation had sent troops to the region during World War II.[151] In September 1974, Whitlam met with President Suharto in Indonesia and indicated that he would support Indonesia if it annexed East Timor.[152] At the height of the Cold War, and in the context of the American retreat from Indo-China, he felt that incorporation of East Timor into Indonesia would enhance the stability of the region, and reduce the risk of the East Timorese FRETILIN movement, which many feared was communist, coming to power.[151]

Whitlam had offered Barnard a diplomatic post and in early 1975 Barnard accepted, triggering a by-election in his Tasmanian electorate of Bass. The election on 28 June proved a disaster for Labor, which lost the seat with a swing against it of 17 per cent.[153] The next week, Whitlam removed deputy prime minister Cairns, who had misled Parliament about the Loans Affair amid controversy about his relationship with his office manager, Junie Morosi.[154] At the time of Cairns's dismissal, one Senate seat was vacant, following the death on 30 June of Queensland ALP Senator Bertie Milliner. The state Labor party nominated Mal Colston, resulting in a deadlock. The unicameral Queensland legislature twice voted against Colston, and the party refused to submit any alternatives. Bjelke-Petersen finally convinced the legislature to elect a low-level union official, Albert Field. In interviews, Field made it clear he would not support Whitlam. Field was expelled from the ALP for standing against Colston, and Labor senators boycotted his swearing-in.[155] Whitlam argued that, because of the manner of filling vacancies, the Senate was "corrupted" and "tainted", with the Opposition enjoying a majority they did not win at the ballot box.[156]

Dismissal

[edit]

In October 1975, the Opposition, led by Malcolm Fraser, determined to withhold supply by deferring consideration of appropriation bills. With Field on leave (his Senate appointment having been challenged), the Coalition had an effective majority of 30–29 in the Senate. The Coalition believed that if Whitlam could not deliver supply, and would not advise new elections, Kerr would have to dismiss him.[157] Supply would run out on 30 November.[158]

The stakes were raised on 10 October, when the High Court declared valid the Act granting the territories two senators each. In a half-Senate election, most successful candidates would not take their places until 1 July 1976, but the territories' senators, and those filling Field's and Bunton's seats, would assume their seats immediately. This gave Labor an outside chance of controlling the Senate, at least until 1 July 1976.[159]

On 14 October, Labor minister Rex Connor, mastermind of the loans scheme, was forced to resign when Khemlani released documents showing that Connor had made misleading statements. The continuing scandal bolstered the Coalition in their stance that they would not concede supply.[160] Whitlam, convinced that he would win the battle, was glad of the distraction from the Loans Affair, and believed he would "smash" not only the Senate, but Fraser's leadership.[161]

Whitlam told the House of Representatives on 21 October,

Let me place my government's position clearly on the record. I shall not advise the Governor-General to hold an election for the House of Representatives on behalf of the Senate. I shall tender no advice for an election of either House or both Houses until this constitutional issue is settled. This government, so long as it retains a majority in the House of Representatives, will continue the course endorsed by the Australian people last year.[162]

Whitlam and his ministers repeatedly claimed that the Opposition was damaging not only the constitution, but the economy as well. The Coalition senators remained united, though several became increasingly concerned about the tactic of blocking supply.[163] As the crisis dragged into November, Whitlam attempted to make arrangements for public servants and suppliers to be able to cash cheques at banks. These transactions would be temporary loans which the government would repay once supply was restored.[164] This plan to prolong government without supply was presented to Kerr unsigned on 6 November, under the title "Draft Joint Opinion" (ostensibly of solicitor-general Maurice Byers and attorney-general Kep Enderby). It proposed that public employees, including members of the armed forces and police, "could assign arrears of pay by way of mortgage". The government's refusal to formalise this and other "advice" was a factor justifying Kerr's resort to advice from elsewhere.[165]

Kerr was following the crisis closely. At a luncheon with Whitlam and several of his ministers on 30 October, Kerr suggested a compromise: if Fraser conceded supply, Whitlam would agree not to call the half-Senate election until May or June 1976, or alternatively would agree not to call the Senate into session until after 1 July. Whitlam rejected the idea, seeking to end the Senate's right to deny supply.[166] On 3 November, after a meeting with Kerr, Fraser proposed that if the government agreed to hold a House of Representatives election at the same time as the half-Senate election, the Coalition would concede supply. Whitlam rejected this offer, stating that he had no intention of advising a House election for at least a year.[167]

With the crisis unresolved, Kerr decided to dismiss Whitlam as prime minister.[168] Fearing that Whitlam would go to the Queen and potentially have him removed, the Governor-General gave Whitlam no prior hint.[169] Against Whitlam's advice, he conferred with High Court Chief Justice Sir Garfield Barwick, who agreed that he had the power to dismiss Whitlam.[170]

A meeting among the party leaders, including Whitlam and Fraser, to resolve the crisis on the morning of 11 November came to nothing.[171] Kerr and Whitlam met at the Governor-General's office that afternoon at 1:00 pm. Unknown to Whitlam, Fraser was waiting in an ante-room; Whitlam later said he would not have set foot in the building if he had known Fraser was there.[172] Whitlam, as he had told Kerr by phone earlier that day, came prepared to advise a half-Senate election, to be held on 13 December.[173] Kerr instead told Whitlam he had terminated his commission as prime minister, and handed him a letter to that effect.[174] After the conversation, Whitlam returned to the Prime Minister's residence, The Lodge, had lunch and conferred with his advisers. Immediately after his meeting with Whitlam, Kerr commissioned Fraser as caretaker Prime Minister, on the assurance he could obtain supply and would then advise Kerr to dissolve both houses for election.[175]

In the confusion, Whitlam and his advisers did not immediately tell any Senate members of the dismissal, with the result that when the Senate convened at 2:00 pm, the appropriation bills were rapidly passed, with the ALP senators assuming the Opposition had given in.[176] The bills were soon sent to Kerr to receive Royal Assent. At 2:34 pm, ten minutes after supply had been secured, Fraser rose in the House and announced he was prime minister. Whitlam immediately moved a successful no confidence motion against Fraser. The Speaker, Gordon Scholes, was instructed to advise Kerr to reinstate Whitlam.[177]

Kerr refused to receive Scholes, keeping him waiting for more than an hour. In that time Kerr rang Justice Anthony Mason to ask for advice. Mason told him the no confidence motion in the House was "irrelevant".[178] Kerr then dissolved Parliament by proclamation: his Official Secretary, David Smith, came to Parliament House to proclaim the dissolution from the front steps. A large, angry crowd had gathered, and Smith was nearly drowned out by their noise. He concluded by taking the unilateral step of re-instating the traditional ending for a royal proclamation "God save the Queen", a practice the Whitlam government had abolished.[179] Whitlam, who had been standing behind Smith, then addressed the crowd:[180]

Well may we say "God save the Queen", because nothing will save the Governor-General! The Proclamation which you have just heard read by the Governor-General's Official Secretary was countersigned Malcolm Fraser, who will undoubtedly go down in Australian history from Remembrance Day 1975 as Kerr's cur. They won't silence the outskirts of Parliament House, even if the inside has been silenced for a few weeks. ... Maintain your rage and enthusiasm for the campaign for the election now to be held and until polling day.[181]

Alleged CIA involvement

[edit]

Kerr had been involved with a number of CIA fronts. In the 1950s, Kerr had joined the Association for Cultural Freedom, a conservative group which had been established by, and received funding from, the CIA through the Congress for Cultural Freedom. Kerr was on its executive board and wrote for its magazine Quadrant. In 1966, Kerr helped to found Lawasia (or Law Asia), an organization of lawyers with offices in all the major capitals of Asia. It was funded by The Asia Foundation, a prominent CIA front.[182]

Christopher Boyce, who was convicted of spying for the Soviet Union while an employee of a CIA contractor, said the CIA wanted Whitlam removed from office because he threatened to close US military bases in Australia, including Pine Gap. Boyce said Kerr was described by the CIA as "our man Kerr".[183] Former ASIO chief Sir Edward Woodward has dismissed the notion of CIA involvement,[184] as has journalist Paul Kelly.[185][186]

Whitlam later wrote that Kerr did not need any encouragement from the CIA.[187] However, he also said that in 1977 United States Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher made a special trip to Sydney to meet with him and told him, on behalf of US President Jimmy Carter, of his willingness to work with whatever government Australians elected, and that the US would never again interfere with Australia's democratic processes.[188]

Return to Opposition, 1975–1978

[edit]
A large crowd. Far away is a platform, and a banner reading SHAME FRASER SHAME.
A huge ALP rally overspills The Domain in Sydney, 24 November 1975.

As the ALP began the 1975 campaign, it seemed that its supporters would maintain their rage. Early rallies drew huge crowds, with attendees handing Whitlam money to pay election expenses. The crowds greatly exceeded those in any of Whitlam's earlier campaigns; in The Domain, Sydney, 30,000 people gathered for an ALP rally below a banner: "Shame Fraser Shame".[189] Fraser's appearances drew protests, and a letter bomb sent to Kerr was defused by authorities. Instead of making a policy speech to keynote his campaign, Whitlam made a speech attacking his opponents and calling 11 November "a day which will live in infamy".[190]

Polls from the first week of campaigning showed a nine-point swing against Labor. Whitlam's campaign team disbelieved the results at first, but additional polling returns clearly showed that the electorate had turned against Labor. The Coalition attacked Labor for economic conditions, and released television commercials with the title "The Three Dark Years" showing images from Whitlam government scandals. The ALP campaign concentrated on the issue of Whitlam's dismissal and did not address the economy until its final days. By that time Fraser was confident of victory and content to sit back, avoid specifics and make no mistakes.[191] In the election, the Coalition won the largest majority government in Australian history, winning 91 seats to Labor's 36. Labor suffered a 6.5 per cent swing against it and its caucus was cut almost in half, suffering a 30-seat swing. Labor was left with five fewer seats than it had when Whitlam took the leadership. The Coalition also won a 37–25 majority in the Senate.[192]

A cartoon showing a man and a woman in bed together with balloon caption "Did the earth move for you too dear?"
Controversial cartoon of the Whitlams by Peter Nicholson

Whitlam stayed on as Opposition leader, surviving a leadership challenge.[193] In early 1976, an additional controversy broke when it was reported that Whitlam had been involved in ALP attempts to raise $500,000 during the election from the Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr government of Iraq.[194] No money had actually been paid, and no charges were filed.[195] The Whitlams were visiting China at the time of the Tangshan earthquake in July 1976, though they were staying in Tianjin, 140 kilometres (90 mi) away from the epicentre. The Age printed a cartoon by Peter Nicholson showing the Whitlams huddled together in bed with Margaret Whitlam saying, "Did the earth move for you too, dear?" This cartoon prompted a page full of outraged letters from Labor partisans and a telegram from Gough Whitlam, safe in Tokyo, requesting the original of the cartoon.[196]

In early 1977 Whitlam faced a leadership challenge from Bill Hayden, the last treasurer in the Whitlam government, with Whitlam remaining leader of the ALP by a two-vote margin.[197] Fraser called an election for 10 December. Although Labor managed to pick up five seats, the Coalition still enjoyed a majority of 48.[198] According to Freudenberg, "The meaning and the message were unmistakable. It was the Australian people's rejection of Edward Gough Whitlam."[199] Whitlam's son Tony, who had joined his father in the House of Representatives at the 1975 election, was defeated.[199] Shortly after the election, Whitlam resigned as party leader and was succeeded by Hayden.[198]

Later years and death, 1978–2014

[edit]

Whitlam was made a Companion of the Order of Australia in June 1978,[200] and resigned from Parliament on 31 July of the same year. He then held various academic positions. When Labor returned to power under Bob Hawke in 1983, Whitlam was appointed as Australia's ambassador to UNESCO, based in Paris. He served for three years in this post, defending UNESCO against allegations of corruption. At the end of his term as ambassador Whitlam was elected to the executive board of UNESCO for a three-year term, until 1989.[201] In 1985, he was appointed to Australia's Constitutional Commission.[202]

Whitlam was appointed chairman of the National Gallery of Australia in 1987 after his son Nick, who was then managing director of the State Bank of New South Wales, turned down the position.[203] He and Margaret Whitlam were part of the bid team that in 1993 persuaded the International Olympic Committee to award Sydney the 2000 Summer Olympics.[202]

Sir John Kerr died in 1991. He and Whitlam never reconciled; indeed, Whitlam always saw his dismissal from office as a "constitutional coup d'état".[204][205][206] Whitlam and Fraser became friends during the 1980s, though they never discussed the events of 1975.[207] The two subsequently campaigned together in support of the 1999 Australian republic referendum.[208] In March 2010, Fraser visited Whitlam at his Sydney office while on a book tour to promote his memoirs. Whitlam accepted an autographed copy of the book and presented Fraser with a copy of his 1979 book about the dismissal, The Truth of the Matter.[209]

During the 1990s Labor government, Whitlam used the Australian Greens as a "decoy questioner" in parliament.[210] According to Dee Margetts, Whitlam "didn't like what Keating and Hawke had done" and regularly sent the Greens questions to ask the government about policies he disagreed with.[210]

Whitlam, in extreme old age, sits with an elderly lady as a woman bends to speak with him. He holds a metal cane. Other people, mostly men, stand behind him.
Gough Whitlam with wife Margaret at Parliament House for the national apology to the Stolen Generations in February 2008
Gough Whitlam (right) at 88, with the then-leader of the Australian Labor Party, Mark Latham, at an election fundraising event in Melbourne, September 2004

Whitlam initially had a close relationship with Labor leader Mark Latham, who held his old seat of Werriwa. However, by 2005 he had called for Latham's resignation from parliament.[211] Whitlam called his support of Latham to enter federal politics as one of his "lingering regrets".[212]

Whitlam supported fixed four-year terms for both houses of Parliament. In 2006, he accused the ALP of failing to press for this change.[213] In April 2007, he and Margaret Whitlam were both made life members of the Australian Labor Party. This was the first time anyone had been made a life member of the party organisation at the national level.[214]

In 2007, Whitlam testified at an inquest into the death of Brian Peters, one of five Australia-based TV personnel killed in East Timor in October 1975. Whitlam indicated he had warned Peters' colleague, Greg Shackleton, who was also killed, that the Australian government could not protect them in East Timor and that they should not go there. He also said Shackleton was "culpable" if he had not passed on Whitlam's warning.[215]

Whitlam joined three other former prime ministers in February 2008 in returning to Parliament to witness the Federal Government apology to the Aboriginal Stolen Generations by the then prime minister Kevin Rudd.[216] On 21 January 2009, Whitlam achieved a greater age (92 years, 195 days) than any other Australian prime minister, surpassing the previous record holder Frank Forde.[217] On the 60th anniversary of his marriage to Margaret Whitlam, he called it "very satisfactory" and claimed a record for "matrimonial endurance".[218] In 2010, it was reported that Whitlam had moved into an aged care facility in Sydney's inner east in 2007. Despite this, he continued to go to his office three days a week. Margaret Whitlam remained in the couple's nearby apartment.[8] In early 2012, she suffered a fall there, leading to her death in hospital at the age of 92 on 17 March of that year, a month short of the Whitlams' 70th wedding anniversary.[219]

Whitlam died on the morning of 21 October 2014. His family announced that there would be a private cremation and a public memorial service.[220][221] He was the longest-lived Australian Prime Minister, dying at the age of 98 years and 102 days. He predeceased his successor Malcolm Fraser by just under five months.[222]

Memorials

[edit]
Memorial service, Sydney Town Hall, at welcome to country

A state memorial service was held on 5 November 2014 in the Sydney Town Hall and was led by Kerry O'Brien.[223] The Welcome to Country was given by Auntie Millie Ingram and eulogies were delivered by Graham Freudenberg,[224] Cate Blanchett,[225] Noel Pearson,[226] John Faulkner[227] and Antony Whitlam.[228] Pearson's contribution was hailed as "one of the best political speeches of our time".[229][230] Musical performances were delivered by William Barton (a didgeridoo improvisation), Paul Kelly and Kev Carmody (their land rights protest song From Little Things Big Things Grow), as well as the Sydney Philharmonia Choir and the Sydney Symphony Orchestra, conducted by Benjamin Northey. In accordance with Whitlam's wishes, the orchestra performed "In Tears of Grief" from Bach's St Matthew Passion, "Va, pensiero" from Verdi's Nabucco, "Un Bal" from Symphonie fantastique by Berlioz and, as the final piece, Jerusalem by Parry.[231] Jerusalem was followed by a flypast of four RAAF F/A-18 Hornets in missing man formation.[232] Those attending the memorial included the current and some former governors-general, the current and all living former prime ministers, and members of the family of Vincent Lingiari.[233] The two-hour service, attended by 1,000 invited guests and 900 others, was screened to thousands outside the Hall, as well as in Cabramatta and Melbourne, and broadcast live by ABC television.

In honour of Whitlam, the Australian Electoral Commission created the Division of Whitlam in the House of Representatives in place of the Division of Throsby, with effect from the 2016 election.[234] ACT Chief Minister Katy Gallagher announced that a future Canberra suburb will be named for Whitlam, and that his family would be consulted about other potential memorials.[235] Gough Whitlam Park in Earlwood, New South Wales, is named after him.[236]

In January 2021, the Whitlams' purpose-built home from 1956 to 1978 at 32 Albert Street, Cabramatta, designed by architect Roy Higson Dell Appleton, came up for sale.[237] It was eventually sold at for $1.15 million to a group of Labor supporters, including former NSW Premier Barrie Unsworth, with the intention of restoring the house as a museum.[238][239] The work is supported by a Commonwealth government national heritage grant of $1.3 million, and is to be managed by the Whitlam Institute of Western Sydney University.[240] The house was as of November 2021 proposed to be listed as a local heritage item.[241][242][243] Following renovations and restoration works, the "Whitlam Prime Ministerial Home" was officially opened by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on 2 December 2022.[244][245]

Legacy and historical evaluation

[edit]
Bust of Gough Whitlam by sculptor Victor Greenhalgh, in the Prime Ministers Avenue in the Ballarat Botanical Gardens

Whitlam is remembered for the circumstances of his dismissal. It is a legacy he did little to efface; he wrote a 1979 book, The Truth of the Matter (the title is a play on Kerr's 1978 memoir Matters for Judgment), and devoted part of his subsequent book, Abiding Interests, to his removal.[246] According to journalist and author Paul Kelly, who penned two books on the crisis, Whitlam "achieved a paradoxical triumph: the shadow of the dismissal has obscured the sins of his government".[204]

More books have been written about Whitlam, including his own writings, than about any other Australian prime minister.[247] According to Whitlam biographer Jenny Hocking, for a period of at least a decade, the Whitlam era was viewed almost entirely negatively, but that has changed. Still, she feels Australians take for granted programmes and policies initiated by the Whitlam government, such as recognition of China, legal aid, and Medicare. Ross McMullin, who wrote an official history of the ALP, notes that Whitlam remains greatly admired by many Labor supporters because of his reform efforts and inspiring leadership.[217] Some rankings have put Whitlam high on the list of Australia's better prime ministers.[248][249] Economist and writer Ross Gittins evaluates opinions on the Whitlam government's responses to the economic challenges of the time:

What Labor's True Believers don't want to accept is that the inexperience, impatience and indiscipline with which the Whitlam government changed Australia forever, and for the better, cost a lot of ordinary workers their jobs. Many would have spent months, even a year or more without employment.

But what the Whitlam haters forget is that Labor had the misfortune to inherit government just as all the developed economies were about to cross a fault-line dividing the post-war Golden Age of automatic growth and full employment from today's world of always high unemployment and obsession with economic stabilisation.[250]

Wallace Brown describes Whitlam in his book about his experiences covering Australian prime ministers as a journalist:

Whitlam was the most paradoxical of all Prime Ministers in the last half of the 20th century. A man of superb intellect, knowledge, and literacy, he yet had little ability when it came to economics. ... Whitlam rivalled Menzies in his passion for the House of Representatives and ability to use it as his stage, and yet his parliamentary skills were rhetorical and not tactical. He could devise a strategy and then often botch the tactics in trying to implement that strategy. ... Above all he was a man of grand vision with serious blind spots.[251]

Despite being in office for only three years, Whitlam's government succeeded in carrying out a radical programme of social reform during that period. As noted by Tom Bramble and Rick Kuhn (2011):

If many Labor supporters regard the Curtin and Chifley governments as a period of great achievements and greater ambitions frustrated by conservative forces, their illusions in the Whitlam government are even more heroic. After nearly a quarter of a century of stagnant conservative rule during which Australia seemed to be a backward looking outpost of the British empire run by monarchists and reactionaries, Gough Whitlam, the Mighty Gough, broke through and during his first 12 months in office remade Australia forever.[252]

Whitlam's last words in the documentary film Gough Whitlam – In His Own Words (2002) were in response to a question about his status as an icon and elder statesman. He said:

I hope this is not just because I was a martyr; the fact was, I was an achiever.[253]

Published works

[edit]
  • On Australia's Constitution (Melbourne: Widescope, 1977).
  • The Truth of the Matter (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1979).
  • The Whitlam Government (Ringwood: Viking, 1985).
  • Abiding Interests (Brisbane: University of Queensland Press, 1997).
  • My Italian Notebook: The Story of an Enduring Love Affair (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2002)

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Edward Gough Whitlam AC QC (11 July 1916 – 21 October 2014) was an Australian , , and statesman who served as the 21st from December 1972 to November 1975 and as Leader of the Australian Labor Party from 1967 to 1977. Whitlam led the Labor Party to electoral victory in 1972, ending 23 years of under the Liberal and parties, and pursued an ambitious program of social, foreign, and constitutional reforms. His administration withdrew Australian forces from the , abolished military conscription, established as a universal health insurance system, lowered barriers to non-European immigration, recognized the diplomatically, and advanced Aboriginal land rights legislation, including the return of land to the Gurindji people. These initiatives aimed to modernize Australia's institutions and international stance but were implemented rapidly without full parliamentary consensus in some cases, contributing to fiscal expansion amid rising and . Whitlam's tenure ended abruptly in a when, facing Senate opposition blocking supply bills, he refused to advise an , prompting Sir John Kerr to dismiss him and his government on 11 November 1975—the only such dismissal in Australian history—and commission Malcolm Fraser's Liberal-National coalition to form a caretaker administration. The move, rooted in reserve powers under the constitution to resolve parliamentary deadlock, sparked widespread protests but was ratified by voters in the ensuing . Post-dismissal, Whitlam continued as an influential Labor elder statesman and ambassador to until 1983.

Early Life

Family Background and Childhood

Edward Gough Whitlam was born on 11 July 1916 in the Melbourne suburb of Kew, Victoria. He was the elder of two children and only son of Harry Frederick Ernest Whitlam, a federal public servant in the Attorney-General's Department, and his wife Martha Christina, née Maddocks. His younger sister, Freda, was born four years later. Due to his father's career advancing in the Commonwealth public service, the family relocated frequently during Whitlam's early years. They moved from to soon after his birth, where Whitlam spent much of his childhood in suburbs including Mosman and . In , as the federal government transferred operations to the new capital, the Whitlams followed, settling initially in Red Hill and later in the Deakin suburb at the home named Ngara. Whitlam's father, who rose to become Deputy Crown Solicitor, instilled in his son an appreciation for and legal principles through his work on federal matters, including early involvement in international diplomacy. The family's peripatetic lifestyle across major Australian cities provided Whitlam with broad exposure to diverse environments, shaping his early worldview amid the stability of a middle-class household.

Education and Early Influences

Whitlam was born on 11 July 1916 in Kew, a suburb of Melbourne, to Frederick Whitlam, a federal public servant in the Attorney-General's Department, and Martha Maddocks Whitlam. The family relocated to Sydney in the early 1920s due to his father's career, where Whitlam attended Mowbray House School in Chatswood and Knox Grammar School. In 1927, following another promotion for his father, the family moved to Canberra, and Whitlam enrolled at Telopea Park High School before transferring to Canberra Grammar School in 1930 at age 14; deemed too young for university admission, he focused there on classics, including Ancient Greek, to strengthen his academic foundation. At age 18, Whitlam enrolled in 1935 at the , residing at St Paul's College, an Anglican institution, where he studied arts with an emphasis on classics. He edited the college journal The Pauline and the university's Hermes magazine, engaging actively in student intellectual life. His studies were interrupted by service in 1941, after which he resumed and completed a , being admitted to the Bar in 1947. Whitlam's early influences stemmed from a stable, intellectually oriented family environment emphasizing , , and public affairs discussions. His father's role in advocating for —such as assisting German-Jewish refugees denied entry to in the 1930s—instilled a commitment to internationalism and legal equity, shaping Whitlam's later political priorities. This upbringing, amid frequent relocations tied to , fostered resilience and a broad exposure to Australian governance from youth.

Pre-Political Career

World War II Military Service

Prior to full-scale Australian involvement in World War II, Whitlam joined the Sydney University Regiment in December 1939. Following Japan's entry into the war in December 1941, he enrolled in the Royal Australian Air Force Reserve and applied for active service in the General Duties Branch. He was called up and enlisted on 20 June 1942 in Sydney, New South Wales, with service number 423371, shortly after his marriage. Whitlam underwent training as a and bomb-aimer, commencing in May 1942, and was commissioned following completion. In 1943, he was posted to No. 13 Squadron, RAAF, operating from bases in eastern and , including Cooktown in and the Gove Peninsula in the . The squadron conducted patrols over , escorted convoys, and conducted attacks on Japanese positions and shipping, with operations extending to . In April 1944, Whitlam flew missions from targeting Japanese forces on the Tanimbar and Aroe Islands. By 1945, operations shifted to Truscott airfield in , with flights to Soembawa via Morotai and extending toward the . On 15 January 1945, during a mission over Bima Harbour in , Netherlands East Indies, he navigated a Ventura bomber damaged by anti-aircraft fire back to base on one engine, sustaining permanent hearing damage. Whitlam was discharged on 17 October 1945 with the rank of Flight Lieutenant. Following his discharge from the Royal Australian Air Force in 1945, Whitlam completed his Bachelor of Laws at the University of Sydney and was admitted to the bar of the Supreme Court of New South Wales on 14 February 1947, as well as to the federal courts. He established a practice as a barrister in Sydney, sharing chambers with future Governor-General Sir John Kerr among others. As a junior , Whitlam received many briefs from the Legal Service Bureau, a initiative established to provide affordable legal representation to returned servicemen who lacked the means for private counsel. This work encompassed advocacy in civil and administrative matters for veterans, emphasizing access to justice for those disadvantaged by post-war economic conditions. His involvement in such cases honed his courtroom skills and aligned with his growing affiliation with the Australian Labor Party and the Returned and Services League of Australia. Whitlam maintained his practice until his successful candidacy in the 1952 federal by-election for Werriwa, after which he shifted focus to parliamentary duties. In 1962, while serving as a Labor frontbencher, he was appointed Queen's Counsel, a distinction acknowledging his professional reputation despite limited post-1952 practice.

Entry into Federal Politics

1952 Election and Initial Parliamentary Role

The Division of Werriwa, a safe Labor seat in southwestern , became vacant following the death of longtime Labor MP Lazzarini on 31 October 1952. Edward Gough Whitlam, a 36-year-old and local resident who had joined the Australian Labor Party in 1945, was preselected as the Labor candidate for the ensuing held on 29 November 1952. Whitlam secured a decisive victory, defeating Liberal candidate Ian Griffith with a two-candidate preferred of 17,306 votes, representing more than a two-to-one margin in Labor's favor and marking a record win for the seat at the time. This outcome occurred amid the Liberal-Country Party coalition's national government under , with Labor in opposition since 1949. As a new opposition backbencher, Whitlam quickly engaged in parliamentary proceedings, delivering his on 19 March 1953. In it, he addressed concerns, including Australian relations with and the , as well as domestic matters such as housing shortages in growing electorates like Werriwa, which included post-war migrant communities in areas like Cabramatta and . His contributions emphasized practical constituency needs, including development and public services, reflecting the electorate's rapid suburban expansion. Whitlam retained the seat in the 1954 federal election, solidifying his position.

Shadow Ministry Positions (1950s-1960s)

Whitlam entered federal parliament as the Labor member for Werriwa on 29 November 1952, initially serving as a during the opposition led by . In 1956, he was elected to the informal role of shadow , a position that reflected Labor's opposition scrutiny of under Robert ' Liberal-Country Party government; this role, lacking formal structure until Labor formalized its shadow ministry in 1969, involved critiquing federal budgets and fiscal measures, and Whitlam retained it for 16 years. By 1959, Whitlam's rising influence within the party led to his election to the Labor caucus executive, automatically placing him in Evatt's as the opposition prepared for the election. Following Evatt's resignation after three successive electoral defeats, Whitlam contested and won the deputy leadership on 7 March 1960 under new leader , defeating Eddie Ward; in this capacity, he continued as shadow Treasurer while assuming broader frontbench duties, including advocacy for constitutional reform and party modernization amid internal factional tensions. Throughout the 1960s, as deputy leader until February 1967, Whitlam's shadow roles emphasized economic critique and external affairs, often standing in for Calwell during parliamentary debates on treasury matters and , such as Australia's involvement in the escalation under and successors. His positions highlighted a pragmatic approach to opposition tactics, focusing on differentiation rather than ideological rigidity, though Labor remained out of , securing only 47.9% of the in the 1963 election. These years solidified Whitlam's reputation as a reformist voice, contrasting with Calwell's more traditional stance, and laid groundwork for his later bid.

Rise in the Labor Party

Deputy Leadership and Internal Challenges (1960-1967)

On 7 March 1960, Edward Gough Whitlam was elected deputy leader of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), defeating the left-wing parliamentarian Eddie Ward in a conducted by the parliamentary following the election of as leader. This victory positioned Whitlam, then aged 43, as a representative of the party's emerging moderate and modernizing faction, contrasting with Calwell's traditionalist outlook rooted in older labor movement ideologies, including support for the . Calwell had favored Ward, a long-serving hardliner aligned with his class-based and socially conservative views, over Whitlam, creating immediate tensions in the leadership pairing. As deputy opposition leader, Whitlam advocated policy reforms aimed at broadening the ALP's appeal beyond its industrial base, including campaigns for equal pay for women, enfranchisement of in federal elections, and independence for . These initiatives reflected his emphasis on national modernization rather than sectarian union priorities, which drew resistance from the party's federal executive and entrenched factions, particularly the left-wing elements influenced by anti-communist industrial groups and state machines in and . Policy divergences with Calwell sharpened over foreign affairs; while Calwell staunchly opposed Australian involvement in the and , Whitlam supported UN-mediated negotiations and operations there, and in 1966 he visited to assess the conflict firsthand. Internal challenges intensified amid the ALP's electoral struggles, exacerbated by the 1955 party split that birthed the Democratic Labor Party and siphoned conservative Catholic votes. In February 1966, Whitlam publicly lambasted the federal executive as "twelve witless men" for obstructing policy innovation, prompting moves toward his potential expulsion that were only narrowly averted when the executive deferred the matter to the federal conference in March, where he secured a last-minute endorsement. These factional clashes highlighted Whitlam's outsider status within the party's machine politics, as he pressed for control over platform decisions to dilute external veto powers. The November 1966 federal election delivered a severe setback, with Labor losing nine seats under Calwell's leadership, in part due to public backlash against the party's rigid anti-Vietnam stance, which Whitlam had critiqued as electorally damaging. In a post-election address, Whitlam delivered a forceful indictment of the ALP's internal dysfunction, calling for comprehensive structural reforms to render the party governable and electable, a stance that alienated traditionalists but solidified his reformist credentials. Calwell resigned in January 1967, and on 8 February Whitlam was elected leader unopposed, with Lance Barnard as deputy, marking the culmination of his deputy tenure amid persistent factional headwinds.

Leadership Ascension and Party Modernization (1967-1972)

Following the Australian Labor Party's (ALP) heavy defeat in the 1966 federal election, incumbent leader resigned, paving the way for a . On 8 February 1967, the ALP caucus elected Edward Gough Whitlam as federal parliamentary leader, marking the end of the party's socially conservative old guard and the rise of a more progressive figure intent on renewal. Whitlam, deputy leader since 1960, secured the position with strong support from moderates seeking to reposition the party for electoral viability. Whitlam's leadership faced immediate tests from intraparty factions, particularly the left wing resistant to his centralizing tendencies. In December 1968, he resigned amid a dispute over the federal executive's refusal to seat Tasmanian delegate Brian Harradine, an anti-communist aligned with Whitlam's reformist agenda, prompting a ; Whitlam was swiftly re-elected, consolidating his authority. Similar challenges arose in 1969, but Whitlam retained the leadership, enabling policy focus ahead of that year's , where Labor achieved a 7.1% swing and gained 18 seats, though falling short of government. To modernize the ALP into a credible social democratic force, Whitlam pursued structural and platform reforms, emphasizing federal oversight to curb state-level factionalism and communist influences that he viewed as electorally toxic. He overhauled the party platform to prioritize equality of opportunity, universal education, and health access over rigid pledges, aligning with middle-class aspirations while retaining commitments to public ownership in key sectors. In 1970, Whitlam orchestrated a federal intervention in the Victorian branch, dissolving its executive due to persistent disunity on state aid for non-government schools, installing administrators to enforce discipline despite backlash from the state left. The most contentious reform targeted , the ALP's largest state branch, long dominated by industrial unions and machine politics. In , after years of criticism from Whitlam post-1966, the federal executive intervened, appointing a provisional council to restructure processes, marginalize entrenched figures, and promote winnable candidates, thereby diluting left-wing control and enhancing electability. These interventions, while alienating traditionalists, streamlined party operations and contributed to Labor's disciplined 1972 campaign, ending 23 years in opposition. Whitlam's approach reflected a pragmatic realism: causal links between factional chaos and electoral failure necessitated top-down discipline to achieve broader reforms.

Opposition Years

Policy Platform Reforms

Upon assuming leadership of the Australian Labor Party (ALP) in February 1967, Gough Whitlam initiated comprehensive reforms to the party's policy platform, aiming to transform it from outdated socialist doctrines into a modern social democratic agenda capable of broader electoral appeal. He centralized policy-making authority within the parliamentary leadership, reducing the influence of union affiliates and state branches that had perpetuated rigid ideological commitments, such as extensive industry and . This shift emphasized practical reforms in , , urban development, and Aboriginal rights over doctrinal . A pivotal change involved abandoning the , a longstanding ALP principle dating to the party's founding, which had restricted non-European immigration. Whitlam, building on earlier unsuccessful attempts in 1959 and 1961, successfully advocated for its removal from the platform, aligning the party with evolving international norms on and non-discrimination. Similarly, he diluted commitments to wholesale of key sectors like banking and insurance, acknowledging the impracticality of such measures in a while retaining on public ownership where feasible, such as in natural resources. These alterations were ratified progressively through federal conferences, culminating in significant revisions at the 1971 Launceston meeting, where the platform pivoted toward diplomatic recognition of and opposition to conscription and Australian involvement in the . Whitlam's platform evolution also incorporated forward-looking domestic priorities, including free , , and expansion, framed as responses to contemporary social needs rather than class warfare. Facing internal resistance from traditionalists, particularly in , he defended these reforms as essential for electability after the election's modest gains, criticizing the party's prior "irrelevant" methods. By 1972, the revamped platform underpinned the "It's Time" campaign, promising an end to 23 years of rule through targeted, evidence-based policies rather than sweeping ideological overhauls. These changes, while contentious, positioned the ALP as a viable government alternative, though critics from the left argued they compromised core socialist objectives.

1969 Election Setback and 1972 Victory

In the 1969 federal election held on 25 October, the Liberal–Country Party coalition government under was returned to office, albeit with a sharply reduced after losing 17 seats. The Australian Labor Party (ALP), led by Whitlam, achieved its largest-ever swing of 7.1% and secured a narrow of around 51.7%, gaining an estimated 18 seats to reach 59 in the 125-seat chamber. However, this translated into a setback for Labor, as Democratic Labor Party preferences flowed predominantly to the coalition—reflecting anti-Labor sentiment stemming from Cold War-era splits—and rural malapportionment favored the Country Party, preserving the coalition's hold on 61 seats despite the popular vote shift. Whitlam's campaign emphasized modernization of Labor's platform, including urban-focused policies on education and housing, which broadened appeal beyond traditional working-class bases but fell short of overcoming entrenched electoral dynamics. ![Gough Whitlam delivering his 1972 election policy speech at Blacktown Civic Centre]float-right Building on this momentum, Whitlam positioned Labor as a viable alternative amid growing disillusionment with the coalition's leadership instability, including Gorton's replacement by William McMahon in 1971, whose tenure was marred by perceptions of incompetence and policy drift. The 1972 election, contested on 2 December, featured Whitlam's 13 November policy launch at Blacktown Civic Centre, which promised comprehensive reforms such as free tertiary education, national health insurance, and withdrawal from Vietnam—framed under the slogan "It's Time" to evoke generational change after 23 years of conservative rule. Labor secured a narrow House majority with 71 seats to the coalition's 54, capturing 49.6% of the first-preference vote and a two-party-preferred edge of 50.5%, with gains concentrated in suburban electorates responsive to Whitlam's progressive agenda. On 5 December, Governor-General Sir Paul Hasluck swore in Whitlam and Deputy Leader Lance Barnard as an interim two-man ministry, marking Labor's return to power and the onset of rapid policy implementation. This victory validated Whitlam's strategy of party reform and targeted outreach, though the slim margin underscored vulnerabilities to preferential voting and regional disparities.

Domestic Policies as Prime Minister

Rapid Social Reforms (1972-1973)

The , upon taking office on 5 December 1972, utilized executive regulations and prioritized to enact social reforms targeting welfare gaps, gender equity, and . These measures addressed longstanding exclusions in support for vulnerable families and shifted federal involvement toward direct provision of aid, bypassing state-level dependencies. An immediate reform involved terminating through regulations gazetted on 5 December 1972, ending compulsory military training for males aged 18-20 that had been in place since 1964. This action released approximately 67,000 men from service obligations and granted amnesty to draft resisters, reducing social disruptions from the era without awaiting parliamentary approval. In gender equity, the government intervened in the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission case, leading to a decision on 16 December 1972 granting , with implementation phased: 25% from 1 January 1973, rising to full parity by September 1974 for awards covering about 80% of female workers. Complementing this, the Maternity Leave ( Employees) Act 1973, passed on 18 June 1973, provided 12 weeks of paid leave and job protection for female federal employees, marking the first national maternity entitlement and influencing practices. Welfare expansions included the Supporting Mother's Benefit, introduced on 1 July 1973, which extended payments of up to A$13.50 weekly (plus allowances) to single mothers ineligible for the , covering deserted, divorced, or unmarried mothers with dependent children and aiding over 18,000 recipients initially. A special benefit for homeless individuals was also established in 1973, providing temporary assistance outside existing categories like age or invalid pensions. These reforms increased social security outlays by 40% in the first year, funded through budget reallocations. Further, the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1973 Amendment, enacted in May 1973, lowered the from 21 to 18 for federal elections, enfranchising about 750,000 young adults and applying first in the 1974 polls, aligning with international trends toward broader democratic participation.

Education, Health, and Welfare Initiatives

The prioritized expanding access to through structural reforms aimed at reducing disparities in funding and removing financial barriers. On 12 December 1972, shortly after assuming office, Whitlam appointed an Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission, chaired by Peter Karmel, to assess school funding needs and recommend a needs-based allocation model that considered socioeconomic factors rather than institutional type. This led to the establishment of the Australian Schools Commission in 1973, which oversaw federal funding to states for both government and non-government schools, marking a shift from previous state aid toward systematic, equity-focused resource distribution. In higher education, tuition fees at universities and colleges of advanced education were abolished effective 1 January 1974, enabling fee-free enrollment for Australian citizens and permanent residents, which Whitlam later described as a cornerstone of his policy legacy to broaden participation beyond affluent cohorts. In health policy, the government pursued universal coverage to mitigate reliance on private insurance and address uneven access. , Australia's inaugural scheme, was legislated in 1974 following a election and commenced operations on 1 July 1975, providing subsidized medical and hospital services funded by a 1.35% income levy (with provisions for private coverage) and aiming to cover all citizens regardless of means. This initiative built on earlier inquiries into health inequities but faced implementation delays due to legal challenges from medical associations and state governments opposing federal incursion into traditionally state-dominated domains. Welfare expansions under Whitlam emphasized income support for vulnerable groups, including significant rate adjustments and new targeted benefits. In July 1973, the Supporting Mother's Benefit was introduced, extending income support to unmarried mothers previously ineligible under widow's pensions, with payments aligned to standard rates around $21.50 weekly plus child additions, thereby recognizing sole parenting as a basis for federal assistance. Pensions for aged, invalid, and widow categories were raised multiple times, including a $1.50 weekly increase to $21.50 in February 1973, with commitments to reach 25% of average weekly earnings by progressive budgeting; the means test was also eased for those over 75. Additionally, the Australian Assistance Plan, launched in 1973, devolved federal funding to regional councils for community-based services, fostering localized welfare delivery in areas like family support and disability aid. These measures collectively indexed benefits to inflation where possible and abolished the property means test for certain pensions, though critics noted the rapid expenditure growth strained budgets amid rising unemployment.

Aboriginal Affairs and Land Rights

The Whitlam government centralized Aboriginal policy by establishing the Department of Aboriginal Affairs on 19 December 1972, appointing Gordon Bryant as the first dedicated Minister and absorbing the previous Office of Aboriginal Affairs. This reform transferred responsibility from states and welfare-oriented bodies to a federal framework emphasizing self-determination over assimilation, with increased funding for housing, health, and education programs. In 1973, the government created the National Aboriginal Consultative Committee, Australia's first elected national Indigenous representative body, to advise on policy. Whitlam's approach to land rights responded to longstanding Indigenous claims, particularly in the , where traditional ownership lacked legal recognition. On 8 February 1973, he commissioned Justice to lead a investigating appropriate mechanisms for granting land rights, following the 1966 by Gurindji stockmen demanding wages and land return. Woodward's first report in July 1973 advocated inalienable freehold title for groups demonstrating traditional attachment, while the second in April 1974 outlined administrative structures like land councils; these informed draft legislation introduced by Whitlam in mid-1975, though passage occurred under the subsequent as the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976. A landmark action came on 16 August 1975 at Daguragu, when Whitlam granted the Gurindji a over 3,300 square kilometers of former land, fulfilling their core demand from the nine-year strike led by . In a symbolic ceremony, Whitlam poured local soil into Lingiari's hands, declaring, "Vincent Lingiari, I solemnly hand back to you this land that was taken from your ancestors," and committing federal funds to purchase additional properties from Vesteys, the original leaseholders. This gesture advanced principles but relied on leases rather than full freehold initially, with freehold title secured later in 1986. These initiatives marked a shift from , prioritizing Indigenous control over lands and resources, though implementation faced delays due to Whitlam's dismissal in November 1975 and ongoing debates over mining access and compensation. The policies drew support from activists, including at the established in 1972, where Whitlam had pledged land rights legislation as opposition leader.

Economic Policies and Management

Expansionary Fiscal Measures

The Whitlam government, upon taking office on 5 December 1972, pursued an expansionary fiscal stance to accelerate economic growth from the perceived stagnation under the prior Coalition administration, targeting annual GDP expansion of up to 6 percent amid rising unemployment. This involved substantial increases in public outlays, particularly on social infrastructure, education, and urban renewal programs, financed through deficit budgeting rather than tax hikes or spending restraint. Australian government expenditure rose from 18.9 percent of GDP in 1971–72—the final full year before Whitlam's election—to 24.8 percent by the end of his term, reflecting a deliberate shift toward Keynesian-style demand stimulation. Real government spending surged by 20 percent in 1973–74, followed by an additional 16 percent increase in 1974–75, driven by initiatives such as expanded federal grants to states for hospitals, schools, and sewerage systems under the Australian Assistance Plan. The 1973–74 , delivered by Treasurer on 22 August 1973, allocated an extra A$2.9 billion in outlays over two years for priority areas including services and , contributing to a domestic deficit that year despite initial promises of balance. These measures were justified by Whitlam as necessary to modernize neglected during prior conservative rule, with outlays on alone projected to become the fastest-growing sector. By 1974–75, the expansionary approach yielded a Commonwealth budget deficit of 3.8 percent of GDP, escalating to 4.7 percent in 1975–76 as global oil price shocks compounded domestic pressures, though some analyses peg the peak domestic deficit lower at around 2 percent of GDP when excluding state transfers. Accompanying revenue measures included a 25 percent across-the-board reduction announced in the 1973 budget to boost and , which reduced duties but widened the fiscal gap by forgoing estimated at hundreds of millions annually. This mix prioritized short-term stimulus over immediate fiscal consolidation, aligning with Whitlam's campaign critique of the McMahon government's 3 percent growth rate as inadequate.

Inflation, Unemployment, and Budget Deficits

The pursued expansionary fiscal policies, including substantial increases in public spending on social programs, , and , which shifted the federal from surplus to deficit. In the 1972–73, the recorded a small surplus of approximately 0.5% of GDP under the incoming administration, but by 1973–74, it turned to a deficit of around 1.2% of GDP amid rising outlays. The deficit widened sharply to 3.8% of GDP in 1974–75, driven by outlays growing 32% while receipts lagged, totaling a shortfall of $571 million. These deficits reflected deliberate stimulus to achieve higher growth targets—Whitlam aimed for 6% annual GDP expansion, contrasting with the prior 3% under the —but contributed to demand pressures in an economy already facing external shocks like the . Inflation accelerated markedly during the period, with (CPI) annual rates rising from 6.9% in 1972 to 8.3% in 1973, then surging to 14.0% in 1974 and peaking near 18% by mid-1975. This uptick stemmed partly from fiscal expansion fueling , compounded by cuts (25% across-the-board in 1973) that boosted imports and wage pressures under centralized systems. While global factors, including oil price quadrupling, played a role—evident in comparable inflation spikes elsewhere—the mix, including rapid spending growth without offsetting monetary tightening, amplified the effect, as noted in Reserve Bank analyses of the era's monetary expansion ( grew at 25% annualized rates by early 1975). Unemployment, historically low at around 2% through 1973, began rising in 1974 amid the inflationary slowdown and reached an average of about 4% by 1975, marking the start of a structural shift to higher equilibrium levels. This increase reflected recessionary pressures from eroding competitiveness and the government's initial reluctance to prioritize over growth, leading to a policy trilemma where fiscal stimulus inadvertently prolonged adjustment lags.
YearInflation (CPI, annual %)Unemployment (annual avg %)Budget Balance (% GDP)
19726.9~1.7Surplus ~0.5
19738.3~2.0Near balance
197414.0~2.5Deficit ~1.2
1975~17.5~4.0Deficit 3.8
Data compiled from official historical series; unemployment pre-1978 based on registered measures, later harmonized to labor force surveys. Overall, these indicators highlighted the trade-offs of the Whitlam approach: short-term demand boosting at the cost of macroeconomic instability, with deficits and legacies influencing subsequent austerity.

Criticisms of Fiscal Irresponsibility

The Whitlam government's fiscal policies drew sharp criticism for prioritizing expansive social spending over budgetary discipline, resulting in rapid increases in public outlays that strained Australia's amid global pressures like the 1973 oil shock. Real government spending rose by 20 percent in the first full year of office, followed by an additional 16 percent the next, pushing total outlays up by approximately 30 percent in a single year and elevating the share of government expenditure in GDP to its highest level since . Critics, including economists and the Liberal opposition, attributed this to ideological overreach rather than necessity, arguing that Whitlam's disinterest in economic detail led to unchecked program proliferation without corresponding revenue measures or cost controls. Budget deficits ballooned under these policies, shifting from a surplus of 2.0 percent of GDP in 1971-72 to a deficit of 1.8 percent by 1975-76, with the 1974-75 outcome reaching 3.8 percent of GDP and worsening to 4.7 percent the following year. Opponents contended that this fiscal expansion, which added about 6 percentage points to government size as a share of GDP, ignored warnings and fueled , as evidenced by consumer price inflation accelerating from 9.09 percent in 1973 to 15.42 percent in 1974 and remaining above 15 percent through 1975. Concurrently, doubled from around 2 percent at the start of Whitlam's term to approximately 4-5 percent by mid-decade, with critics linking the rise to wage pressures (up 25 percent in ) and overheating from deficit-financed initiatives rather than solely external factors. These outcomes cemented a perception of fiscal profligacy, with figures like future Prime Minister decrying the government's approach as reckless mismanagement that halved rates and tripled from pre-term levels. Economic analyses have since highlighted how the spending surge, unaccompanied by structural reforms to boost productivity, amplified risks, contrasting with more restrained responses elsewhere and contributing to Whitlam's 1975 dismissal amid Senate blockage of supply bills tied to deficit concerns. While defenders point to inherited low deficits and global commodity booms enabling initial largesse, the empirical record of escalating imbalances underscores longstanding critiques that the administration's causal chain—from unchecked outlays to macroeconomic instability—prioritized reformist ambitions over prudent stewardship.

Foreign Policy Shifts

Vietnam War Withdrawal and Conscription End

Upon assuming office on 5 December 1972, Gough Whitlam immediately announced the termination of national service , fulfilling a key Labor Party pledge after the scheme had drafted over 63,000 men since 1964, with nearly 16,000 serving in . The government granted an to draft resisters, dropping pending prosecutions against approximately 350 individuals, and began discharging conscripts from the using provisions for exceptional hardship. was formally abolished through the of the National Service Act later in December 1972, ending a policy that had fueled domestic protests and divided since its reintroduction in 1964. Concurrently, Whitlam moved to extricate from the , where troop commitments had peaked at over 7,000 personnel in 1968–1969 but had dwindled to fewer than 200 military advisers by late 1972 under prior Liberal governments. On 11 December 1972, the government ordered the withdrawal of these remaining advisers, with most departing by 18 December and the last elements leaving by January 1973, marking the complete end of 's combat and advisory presence after a total deployment of nearly 60,000 personnel. This rapid action aligned with Whitlam's longstanding opposition to the war, expressed in opposition platforms since 1969, though it followed substantial prior reductions and occurred amid broader U.S. drawdowns under the framework. The moves symbolized a shift in Australian foreign policy away from uncritical alignment with U.S. interventionism, without altering the conflict's trajectory, which concluded with the fall of Saigon in 1975.

Recognition of China and Regional Realignment

As Leader of the Opposition, Gough Whitlam visited the People's Republic of China (PRC) in July 1971, meeting senior officials including Zhou Enlai, which foreshadowed his government's policy shift. Upon assuming office on December 5, 1972, the Whitlam government prioritized normalizing relations with the PRC. On December 21, 1972, Australian and Chinese envoys initialled a joint communique in Paris establishing full diplomatic relations, with Australia recognizing the PRC as the sole legal government of China and terminating relations with the Republic of China (Taiwan). The communique committed both nations to developing diplomatic ties, friendship, and cooperation, reflecting Whitlam's view that engagement with the PRC was essential given its geopolitical weight, despite ongoing Cold War tensions. In October 1973, Whitlam became the first Australian prime minister to visit the PRC, where he held discussions with and on bilateral relations, regional stability, and global issues. This visit solidified the new ties and underscored Whitlam's strategy to prioritize pragmatic realism over ideological alignment with the , which had only begun its own earlier that year. The recognition facilitated early trade opportunities, including wheat sales, and positioned to engage with independently of superpower blocs. Whitlam's approach extended to broader regional realignment, emphasizing deeper integration with beyond security frameworks. His government initiated Australia's first formal dialogue partnership with the in 1974, pledging financial assistance and fostering economic and political ties as ASEAN's inaugural dialogue partner outside the region. Relations with improved through high-level visits and assurances of non-interference, including tacit support for Indonesia's 1975 annexation of East Timor, aligning with Whitlam's decolonization principles while prioritizing stability with the regional power. This shift aimed to reposition Australia as an engaged in , supporting initiatives like a Southeast Asian zone of peace and neutrality, though it drew criticism for diverging from traditional alliances.

Multilateral Engagement and Anti-Colonial Stances

The pursued active multilateral engagement, ratifying over 130 international treaties between 1972 and 1975, including 16 multilateral agreements such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which entered into force for on 23 January 1973. This reflected a commitment to international institutions, with Whitlam addressing the on 30 September 1974, emphasizing the UN as the primary forum for global settlements and urging collective action on issues like , , and . In the speech, he advocated strengthening the Non-Proliferation Treaty, banning nuclear testing, and supporting UN efforts, while positioning as a contributor to peace zones in the and adherence to the Antarctic Treaty. Within the Commonwealth, Whitlam's administration aligned with efforts to isolate apartheid South Africa, condemning its policies and banning racially selected South African sporting teams from competing in during the apartheid era. This stance extended to supporting Commonwealth initiatives against , including contributions to UN funds for education in in 1973 and advocacy for the elimination of apartheid at international conferences. The government also signed the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights on 22 December 1972, signaling intent to align domestic policies with multilateral frameworks, though full ratification occurred under the subsequent administration. On anti-colonial matters, Whitlam accelerated in , pledging during the 1972 election campaign and granting self-government on 1 December 1973, culminating in full on 16 September 1975. This process ended Australia's trusteeship responsibilities and was framed as essential for Australia's own sovereignty, with Whitlam stating in 1974 that 's demonstrated Australia's rejection of colonial legacies. In his UN address, he highlighted this as part of a broader global shift away from , welcoming Portugal's withdrawal from its empire and condemning illegal regimes in and South Africa's administration of . However, the government's approach to prioritized integration with over separate , viewing the territory as unviable as a , which drew criticism for undermining principles. Whitlam consistently opposed resource exploitation by former colonial powers, advocating fair access for developing nations and rejecting "resource blackmail" in multilateral forums.

Key Controversies During Premiership

Murphy Raid and Interference with Institutions

On 16 March 1973, Attorney-General , accompanied by around 20 Commonwealth Police officers, forcibly entered the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation's (ASIO) Melbourne headquarters at 2 without a warrant or prior notification to ASIO Director-General Peter Barbour. The raid lasted several hours, during which police seized 371 files and documents, primarily related to alleged infiltration by Yugoslav intelligence and potential Croatian separatist terrorism. Murphy acted on intelligence from the Australian Federal Police suggesting ASIO held undisclosed records on threats to Labor Party figures and broader risks from Balkan-linked groups, which he claimed the agency was withholding to undermine the newly elected . Murphy publicly defended the operation the following day, asserting it was necessary to access "highly relevant" material on that had failed to share despite repeated requests since the government's December 1972 election victory. Gough Whitlam initially endorsed the raid as a means to assert civilian oversight over intelligence operations, aligning with Labor's campaign promises to reform and democratize secretive agencies inherited from the previous Liberal-Country Party administration. However, officials, including Barbour, protested that the files contained routine data rather than the explosive evidence Murphy anticipated, and much of the seized material proved irrelevant or already known to federal authorities. The raid provoked immediate outrage, with opposition Leader Billy Snedden labeling it a "constitutional outrage" and an assault on ASIO's operational independence, enshrined under the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1956. Within ASIO, it triggered internal dissent, including leaks to media and politicians alleging Murphy's motives included suppressing files on Labor's own vulnerabilities to foreign influence; some officers speculated the real target was documents on Soviet or Croatian contacts within left-wing unions supportive of Whitlam. Subsequent inquiries, including a 1977 royal commission, confirmed procedural irregularities, such as the absence of judicial authorization, and highlighted that Murphy's actions bypassed standard protocols for accessing classified material, fueling accusations of executive overreach. Critics, including former ASIO officers and conservative commentators, framed the raid as emblematic of the Whitlam government's broader pattern of institutional interference, exemplified by rapid sackings of heads perceived as disloyal—such as the attempted removal of Reserve Bank officials—and pressure on the judiciary through controversial appointments like Murphy's own elevation to the in February 1975 to create a vacancy. While Labor supporters argued it exposed 's biases toward anti-communist over genuine threats, the event eroded trust in the government's respect for institutional , contributing to heightened of Whitlam's "crash through or crash" administrative style. No prosecutions arose from the seized documents, but the raid's legacy persisted in debates over balancing security agency accountability with safeguards against politicization.

Gair Affair and Senate Manipulation Attempts

In early 1974, the Whitlam government faced ongoing obstruction in the Senate, where the opposition coalition and minor parties held a majority and had rejected multiple bills twice, meeting the threshold under section 57 of the Australian Constitution for a potential double dissolution. To bolster its position ahead of the scheduled half-Senate election due by mid-year, the government devised a strategy targeting Democratic Labour Party (DLP) Senator Vince Gair, whose term in the Queensland delegation was set to expire in June. On 1 April 1974, Whitlam recommended Gair's appointment as Ambassador to Ireland and the Holy See, anticipating that Gair would resign his Senate seat promptly, creating an additional casual vacancy in Queensland. This would expand the seats contested in Queensland from the standard five (half of the state's 10 senators) to six at the half-Senate election, potentially allowing Labor to secure three seats instead of two, thereby improving its overall Senate numbers. The plan relied on Gair accepting the diplomatic post without immediate resignation, but it was compromised when details leaked to the opposition. Gair delayed his formal resignation, while Premier , alerted to the maneuver, advised the to issue writs for the half- election on 3 April 1974—before the vacancy materialized—limiting contests to five seats and preserving the existing balance. Gair eventually resigned on 11 April, but the early writs rendered the extra vacancy ineffective for altering election numbers. Critics, including opposition leaders, condemned the tactic as an underhanded attempt to manipulate composition outside normal electoral processes, though Whitlam defended it as a legitimate use of executive prerogative to address legislative deadlock. Undeterred, Whitlam requested and obtained a from Sir John Kerr on 11 April 1974, citing the Senate's repeated rejections of key bills such as those on electoral redistribution and . The ensuing federal election on 18 May 1974 returned Labor with an increased majority (66 seats to the coalition's 40) but failed to deliver a majority, leaving the government with 29 seats against the opposition's 30 and three independents/minors. The Gair Affair exemplified broader Whitlam administration efforts to circumvent resistance, including earlier maneuvers like the 1973 appointment of Senator to the , which prompted the New South Wales Labor government to nominate a replacement Labor senator, temporarily boosting party numbers. These actions highlighted the government's aggressive pursuit of legislative control amid constitutional checks, contributing to heightened political tensions that persisted into 1975.

Loans Affair, Khemlani, and Unorthodox Borrowing

In late 1974, the Whitlam government sought to fund major energy and resource development projects, including potential nationalization efforts, by securing large-scale loans from Middle Eastern petrodollar sources outside conventional Australian borrowing channels. On 6 November 1974, Cabinet authorized Minerals and Energy Minister Rex Connor to negotiate up to US$4 billion in loans for "urgent" aspects of a national energy policy, with authority formalized by the Federal Executive Council on 13 December 1974. This approach bypassed the standard oversight of the Treasury and the Australian Loan Council, relying instead on private brokers to tap into surplus oil revenues, reflecting the government's frustration with established financial institutions perceived as obstructive to its developmental ambitions. Connor engaged Tirath Khemlani, a London-based Pakistani commodities broker with no prior established ties to major financial institutions, as an starting in early 1975; Khemlani promised access to sheikh funds but delivered no actual despite extensive correspondence and meetings. Connor's authority was revoked on 10 April 1975 after initial efforts failed, yet he continued secret communications with Khemlani, including phone calls and letters, without informing Cabinet or reinstating formal powers. Separately, Jim Cairns pursued a smaller US$2 billion in 1975 through another broker, effectively extending the unorthodox strategy despite public denials of such dealings. The scandal erupted in mid-1975 when leaked documents, including Khemlani's letters detailing unauthorized negotiations and promises of commissions, were provided to the Liberal Opposition by sources linked to the broker himself. On 9 1975, Whitlam convened a special parliamentary sitting where hundreds of documents were tabled, but revelations of ministerial misleading of —Connor had denied ongoing contacts post-revocation, and Cairns had issued inconsistent statements—prompted a motion of against the government, passed 61-34. Cairns resigned from Cabinet on 12 June 1975 amid related pressures, while Connor, despite retaining Whitlam's support initially, resigned on 14 October 1975 after admitting to false assurances about ceasing Khemlani dealings. No loans were secured, and the affair highlighted procedural irregularities, including the use of executive authority without parliamentary or bureaucratic scrutiny, fueling opposition claims of financial recklessness and impropriety that eroded in the government's competence. The episode, while not involving personal , underscored the Whitlam administration's willingness to employ unconventional tactics to circumvent perceived constraints, contributing to its political vulnerability in the lead-up to the 1975 constitutional crisis.

The 1975 Dismissal Crisis

Senate Opposition to Supply Bills

In late 1975, following the April 1974 double dissolution election, Gough Whitlam's Labor government retained a narrow in the but faced a hostile controlled by the Liberal– Party opposition, which held 30 seats to Labor's 27 and two independents. The opposition, led by after his ascension to Liberal leadership on 21 March 1975, viewed the Whitlam administration as having forfeited public confidence amid scandals including the and ministerial resignations. Fraser had pledged upon taking leadership that the would block supply only under extreme circumstances, such as evidence of grave misconduct by the government. On 15 October 1975, Fraser publicly announced that the opposition parties would defer passage of the government's appropriation bills—known as Supply Bills I and II, which funded ordinary government operations including public service salaries and departmental expenditures—unless Whitlam agreed to call a general election. This decision followed a shadow cabinet meeting where members unanimously resolved to delay the bills as a means to compel Whitlam to seek a fresh electoral mandate, arguing that the government's persistence in office without Senate cooperation undermined democratic accountability. The bills, introduced in the House on 9 October and passed there by 10 October, totaled approximately A$2.8 billion for the period from December 1975 to May 1976. The following day, 16 October 1975, Senator Reg Withers (Liberal) moved in the Senate to defer consideration of the bills until the government announced an election date, a motion carried by the opposition's numbers on party lines. This deferral, rather than outright rejection, preserved the Senate's constitutional option to revisit the legislation while halting immediate funding flows, effectively pressuring the executive by threatening a partial government shutdown after 30 November 1975, when prior appropriations expired. Whitlam denounced the tactic as an unconstitutional abuse of Senate powers under section 53 of the Constitution, which grants the upper house authority over money bills but had not previously been invoked to deny supply in peacetime federal politics. He rejected negotiation overtures, including Fraser's 3 November proposal to pass supply in exchange for an election by May 1976, insisting no minority Senate could dictate terms to the elected lower house. The opposition maintained that deferring supply was a legitimate exercise of prerogatives to check executive overreach, citing precedents like state blocks and the absence of explicit constitutional prohibition against it. By early November, with funds dwindling, the government explored interim borrowing from public service superannuation funds and banks to avert immediate crisis, but the standoff escalated constitutional tensions, culminating in Sir John Kerr's intervention. The episode highlighted the 's co-equal legislative role in fiscal matters, though it remains debated whether the tactic violated unwritten conventions of .

Breakdown of Negotiations and Constitutional Tensions

On 16 October 1975, the Opposition-controlled , led by Liberal Party leader , deferred consideration of the 's appropriation bills (commonly referred to as supply bills), marking an escalation in the standoff over funding for operations. This action was explicitly tied to demands for a House of Representatives election, citing loss of confidence in the Whitlam amid ongoing scandals such as the . Whitlam rejected these demands, asserting that the House of Representatives held primacy in financial matters and refusing to yield to what he viewed as unconstitutional interference in . The bills were reintroduced multiple times but repeatedly deferred, heightening tensions as funds neared exhaustion, prompting plans for interim borrowing from domestic banks to cover servant salaries and obligations. Efforts at negotiation proved futile, culminating in a brief meeting between Whitlam and Fraser on the morning of 11 November 1975. Whitlam proposed calling a half-Senate to resolve the deadlock without dissolving the , but Fraser insisted on a full for the , viewing it as essential to restore supply and . No compromise emerged from the talks, with Whitlam proceeding to seek an audience with Governor-General Sir John Kerr to request the half-Senate , unaware that Kerr had already decided to intervene decisively. This breakdown underscored the absence of established protocols for resolving inter-cameral impasses, as prior conventions had generally discouraged the Senate from withholding supply to coerce policy or electoral outcomes, though historical precedents allowed deferral rather than outright rejection. The impasse exposed deep constitutional ambiguities regarding the 's legislative powers under sections 53 and 57 of the Australian Constitution, particularly its authority over money bills and the implications of prolonged deferral equivalent to blockage. Proponents of the Opposition's stance argued that denial of supply justified invoking reserve powers to ensure , while Whitlam's position emphasized the elected House's mandate and the impropriety of unelected Senators dictating executive tenure. Kerr's subsequent consultations with figures including Chief Justice —conducted without Whitlam's knowledge—intensified debates over the Governor-General's impartiality and the activation of dormant reserve powers, traditionally reserved for dire threats to governance stability. These tensions revealed the Constitution's reliance on unwritten conventions, which failed to prevent the crisis from escalating to dismissal later that day. On 11 November 1975, Governor-General Sir John Kerr dismissed Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, prorogued Parliament until 30 July 1976, and commissioned Malcolm Fraser as caretaker Prime Minister with instructions to pass the blocked supply bills and then advise an election. Kerr's decision stemmed from the ongoing deadlock where the Senate, controlled by the opposition, had deferred the appropriation bills since 16 October, denying the government funds to operate beyond mid-December 1975. Whitlam had refused to recommend a double dissolution or resignation, insisting instead on the Senate's obligation to pass supply, which Kerr viewed as untenable given the constitutional requirement for the executive to maintain fiscal responsibility. Kerr justified his actions by invoking the reserve powers of the , derived from the Australian Constitution's silence on explicit procedures for such crises and informed by British and Australian conventions. These powers, unwritten but recognized in legal , allow the to act independently when the Prime Minister's advice would perpetuate a governmental , particularly over supply, which Kerr deemed essential for democratic . In his statement, Kerr emphasized that without supply, the government could not pay public servants or meet obligations, risking , and that Whitlam's rejection of electoral options left no alternative but intervention to resolve the impasse. Prior to the dismissal, on 10 November 1975, Kerr sought private advice from Sir , who provided a written opinion affirming that the could withdraw a Prime Minister's commission if the government lost the Senate's confidence on supply and failed to either resign or advise dissolution. Barwick's memorandum, drawing on constitutional analogies to the 1926 crisis and Australian precedents, argued that the 's duty to ensure overrode blind adherence to ministerial advice in extremis. Kerr also consulted other judicial figures informally but relied heavily on Barwick's view, maintaining that his role required safeguarding the Constitution's integrity against potential abuse by a government clinging to power without fiscal means. The legal basis rested on sections 5, 50, 57, and 64 of the , interpreted to grant the discretionary authority to appoint and dismiss ministers, prorogue , and dissolve the if necessary to restore functionality. Critics later contested the absence of codified reserve powers and Kerr's failure to warn Whitlam, but supporters, including Barwick, upheld the action as consonant with the framers' intent for a balanced where the Crown's representative prevents deadlocks from undermining . No challenge succeeded in overturning the dismissal, affirming its procedural validity despite ongoing scholarly over its conventional propriety.

Public Reactions and Alleged External Influences

The dismissal of Gough Whitlam on November 11, 1975, elicited immediate and polarized public responses across . Labor Party supporters and left-leaning groups decried the Governor-General's action as an unconstitutional usurpation of democratic will, sparking protests in major cities that evoked comparisons to civil unrest not seen since the . In , thousands gathered in outrage as news spread rapidly, with similar demonstrations in and drawing crowds chanting against and Sir John Kerr. A notable rally occurred at Sydney's Domain on November 24, 1975, where an estimated 20,000 participants protested the events, reflecting deep divisions within the Australian labor movement and broader society. Counter-demonstrations also emerged, including attacks on Labor Party headquarters by anti-Whitlam groups, underscoring the era's political volatility. Despite the fervor, public sentiment ultimately favored resolution through electoral means, as evidenced by the Liberal-National Coalition's in the December 13, 1975, federal election, where they secured 91 of 127 seats amid widespread approval for ending the supply deadlock. Allegations of external influences, particularly U.S. involvement, surfaced amid speculation that Whitlam's foreign policy— including scrutiny of the intelligence facility and reduced cooperation with American agencies—threatened bilateral security ties. Central to these claims were assertions by Christopher Boyce, a former TRW defense contractor and convicted Soviet spy, who alleged in the late that CIA cables he intercepted directed efforts to destabilize the , including pressure on Kerr to act. Boyce, imprisoned for 25 years on charges after selling U.S. secrets, maintained these revelations stemmed from his role handling NSA communications, though his credibility has been widely contested due to his motives and lack of corroborating documents. Kerr, who had prior ties to Australian intelligence bodies like but no verified direct CIA operational links, explicitly denied foreign prompting in his decision-making, emphasizing constitutional imperatives. Whitlam himself later stated that Kerr required no external encouragement to dismiss him, attributing the act to domestic political deadlock rather than overseas intrigue. Independent analyses, including those reviewing declassified materials and Kerr's private correspondence, have found no substantive evidence of CIA orchestration or direct intervention, portraying the dismissal as a unilateral exercise of reserve powers amid escalating parliamentary crisis. Persistent questions about U.S. archival records notwithstanding, these claims remain speculative and unsubstantiated by primary documentation.

Post-Dismissal Career

1975 Election Defeat and Opposition Return

Following the dismissal of his government on 11 November 1975, Whitlam remained leader of the Australian Labor Party and campaigned vigorously against Malcolm Fraser's caretaker administration in the ensuing federal election. Labor's platform emphasized restoring the dismissed government and portrayed Fraser as illegitimate, with Whitlam addressing rallies featuring chants of "Shame Fraser, Shame" to protest the . However, voter discontent was driven primarily by the Whitlam government's economic mismanagement—including reaching 17.5% in 1974–75, rising to 4.9%, and a current account deficit of A$1.6 billion—and scandals such as the , which involved unauthorized overseas borrowing attempts and eroded public trust in fiscal responsibility. The election, held on 13 December , resulted in a landslide defeat for Labor. In the House of Representatives, Labor won 36 seats out of 127, a loss of 30 from its 1974 total, while the Liberal-National Country secured 91 seats (Liberals 68, National Country Party 23). Labor's primary vote fell to 35.6%, reflecting a uniform swing against it, though exact two-party-preferred figures underscored a decisive shift, with the gaining a majority of 35 seats to Labor's 27. Whitlam retained his seat of Wills with a reduced margin. Despite the rout, Whitlam was reaffirmed as party leader and by the Labor shortly after the , defeating internal challengers amid factional tensions. He held the position for nearly two years, using it to critique Fraser's policies while facing ongoing party divisions over strategy and his personal authority. This period marked Labor's return to opposition benches, with Whitlam's leadership sustaining ideological continuity but failing to rebuild electoral support, as evidenced by further losses in the 1976 and 1977 half-Senate elections. The 1975 defeat thus entrenched a conservative dominance that lasted until 1983, highlighting the electorate's rejection of Whitlam-era governance amid causal factors like unchecked public spending and institutional instability rather than isolated procedural disputes.

Leadership Resignation and Party Infighting (1976-1977)

Following the heavy defeat in the December 1975 federal election, where the (ALP) secured only 36.7% of the primary vote and lost 30 seats, Whitlam faced mounting internal pressure to relinquish the leadership, with critics arguing that his continued tenure hindered the party's recovery from the dismissal crisis and economic fallout associated with his government's policies. Party infighting intensified in 1976, driven by factional divisions between Whitlam loyalists on the left and moderates on the right who sought a fresh image to distance the ALP from perceptions of fiscal irresponsibility and administrative chaos under Whitlam's prior term. A occurred that year, in which Whitlam was re-elected over challengers Lionel Bowen and , though the contest highlighted deepening rifts within the caucus over strategy and accountability for the 1975 loss. Tensions peaked in May 1977 with a formal leadership challenge from former Treasurer , who positioned himself as a more pragmatic alternative amid ongoing debates over and electability. Whitlam narrowly retained the position in the caucus ballot by 32 votes to Hayden's 30, the closest margin in his leadership tenure, underscoring the fragility of his support base. Whitlam led the ALP into the December 10, 1977, federal , where the party again suffered defeat, gaining only one net seat while the Fraser Liberal-National Coalition expanded its majority to 48 seats. On election night, as vote counting confirmed the loss—with Labor's primary vote at 39.65%—Whitlam announced his immediate as leader, conceding that the result reflected unresolved internal divisions and public rejection of his continued leadership. He formally stood down on , 1977, paving the way for Hayden's unopposed as leader with 36 votes to Lionel Bowen's 28. This episode of infighting, rooted in post-dismissal recriminations and strategic disagreements, marked the end of Whitlam's 23-year parliamentary career, as he resigned his seat in July 1978.

Later Life and Death

Retirement Engagements and Writings

Following his resignation from Parliament on 8 July 1978, Whitlam engaged in various public and intellectual pursuits, including diplomatic roles and scholarly contributions. In 1983, the Hawke Labor government appointed him Australian Ambassador to in , a position he held until 1986, where he advocated for international education, science, and cultural programs aligned with Australia's interests. Upon completing his ambassadorship, Whitlam was elected to the Executive Board, serving from 1985 to 1989 and contributing to policy on heritage preservation, including support for the . In 1985, he was also appointed as a member of Australia's , tasked with reviewing federal structures and recommending reforms, though the commission's proposals faced limited implementation amid political opposition. Whitlam maintained an active intellectual presence through writings that defended and analyzed his political legacy. His first major post-retirement book, The Truth of the Matter (1979), provided a detailed firsthand account of the 1975 dismissal crisis, attributing it to institutional overreach by Sir John Kerr and alleging undue influence from foreign and domestic opponents, though critics contested its selective emphasis on events. This was followed by The Whitlam Government, 1972–1975 (1985), a comprehensive of his administration's policies on , social reforms, and economic initiatives, presented as a factual record but interpreted by some as an effort to counter narratives of fiscal mismanagement. He also authored articles and essays on constitutional matters, , and Australian republicanism, often delivered as lectures at universities and public forums, where he critiqued monarchical reserve powers and advocated for treaty-based Indigenous recognition. Throughout the and , Whitlam served as a visiting fellow at the Australian National University's Department of Political and Social Change, delivering seminars on diplomacy and governance drawn from his experiences in and . His engagements emphasized first-hand policy insights over partisan advocacy, though they occasionally reignited debates on the Whitlam era's constitutional precedents.

Final Years, Health Decline, and Death (2014)

In his final years, Whitlam experienced a steady physical decline, though he remained mentally sharp and maintained a routine of attending his office several days per week. This persistence reflected his enduring , even as advancing age limited his public engagements. Following the of his on 17 March 2012—just weeks shy of their 70th anniversary—Whitlam's personal life became more solitary, yet he continued selective involvement in intellectual and archival pursuits. Whitlam's health issues culminated in heart disease, which proved fatal. He died on 21 October 2014 at his home in Elizabeth Bay, , at the age of 98. His family announced the passing in a statement, noting his loving and beloved fatherly role. A state memorial service was held at , attended by approximately 2,000 people, including seven former prime ministers, underscoring his lasting influence despite the physical frailties of his later years.

Legacy and Evaluations

Claimed Achievements and Progressive Narratives

Supporters of the (1972–1975) often credit it with initiating a transformative era of social, economic, and reforms that expanded the and modernized Australia's institutions, portraying Whitlam as a visionary leader who prioritized equality and national sovereignty. These narratives emphasize rapid implementation of over 180 legislative measures in its first term, including the overhaul of federal-state relations through initiatives like the Australian Assistance Plan, which aimed to equalize services across regions. In education, the government is hailed for abolishing university tuition fees in 1974, enabling free tertiary access for Australian citizens and permanent residents, and introducing needs-based funding for schools via the Karmel Report, which allocated $1.9 billion over three years to address disparities. Proponents argue this democratized higher education, increasing enrollment from 106,000 in 1972 to over 125,000 by 1975, though critics later noted fiscal unsustainability. Health reforms are frequently cited as foundational, with the introduction of on July 1, 1975, providing universal coverage funded by a 1.35% income levy (later adjusted), covering 85% of medical costs and all hospital expenses for low-income families. Advocates describe it as a step toward equity, reducing out-of-pocket expenses and influencing the eventual Medicare system, despite implementation challenges like state opposition. Foreign policy achievements in progressive accounts include ending on December 5, 1972, within hours of taking office, withdrawing remaining Australian forces from by mid-1973, and recognizing the on December 22, 1972, which facilitated diplomatic relations and trade growth to $500 million by 1975. These moves are framed as assertions of independent Australian interests, distancing from U.S. alignment. Indigenous policies receive prominent mention, such as upgrading the Office of Aboriginal Affairs to a dedicated ministry in 1972, enacting the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage (Interim) Act in 1973 to protect sacred sites, and returning 1,200 square kilometers of land to the Gurindji people in 1975 following their 1966 . Narratives highlight Whitlam's August 16, 1975, ceremony pouring soil into Vincent Lingiari's hands as symbolic of , though full land rights legislation stalled. Women's and family initiatives are touted, including equal pay decisions for female workers in 1972–1974, establishing the Office for Women's Affairs, introducing child endowment as family allowances from 1973 ($15 weekly per child), and removing on contraceptives to improve access. Single mothers' benefits were expanded, reducing reliance on institutional care. Democratic expansions, such as lowering the to 18 via the 1973 referendum (passed with 71.4% approval) and granting territories representation, are presented as broadening participation. Environmental milestones include creating the Department of Urban and Regional Development in 1972 and enacting the Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act in 1974, requiring assessments for major projects. Overall, these elements form a narrative of progressive , though implementation often relied on executive action amid blocks, with Whitlam estimating over half his agenda realized.

Economic and Governance Failures

The Whitlam government's expansionary fiscal policies, including substantial increases in public spending on social welfare, , and , contributed to rising budget deficits and exacerbated inflationary pressures amid global oil shocks. Government outlays grew by nearly 40 percent in a single year during the period, outpacing revenue growth and leading to deficits that reached 3.8 percent of GDP in 1974–75. Inflation accelerated sharply, peaking at 16.7 percent in 1974–75, compared to lower rates prior to 1972, as wage indexation policies and loose monetary conditions fueled cost-push and demand-pull effects. Unemployment also deteriorated, rising from around 2 percent in 1972 to approximately 5 percent by 1975, reflecting a shift from under previous administrations to stagflationary conditions that the government's stimulus measures failed to mitigate effectively. The 25 percent tariff reduction in 1973, intended to promote efficiency, instead triggered a 30 percent surge in imports and a $1.5 billion widening of the deficit in 1974, straining the current account without corresponding gains. Governance lapses compounded these economic challenges, most notably in the of 1974–75, where ministers, including Rex Connor, authorized intermediaries like Tirath Khemlani to secure $4 billion in offshore loans bypassing and parliamentary oversight, in violation of established protocols. This scandal, involving unauthorized negotiations with non-traditional lenders and lacking formal guarantees, eroded public and institutional confidence, highlighting administrative improvisation and a disregard for fiscal . The affair's exposure through leaked cables amplified perceptions of impropriety, contributing to political instability and underscoring failures in cabinet coordination and adherence to constitutional norms. Further governance shortcomings included rapid policy implementation without adequate bureaucratic preparation, leading to inefficiencies such as project delays and cost overruns in initiatives like programs. The government's wage explosion in 1974, driven by aggressive union negotiations and , amplified without offsetting measures, reflecting a causal disconnect between interventionist reforms and macroeconomic stability. These elements collectively strained the economy, fostering a legacy of fiscal indiscipline that subsequent administrations addressed through .

Constitutional Precedents and Ongoing Debates

The dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam by Governor-General Sir John Kerr on 11 November 1975 established a rare invocation of the Governor-General's reserve powers under section 64 of the Australian Constitution, which allows the appointment and dismissal of ministers. Kerr justified the action on the grounds that Whitlam's government had lost the confidence of the Senate, which had deferred supply bills since October 1975, rendering the government unable to fund ordinary services. This marked the first instance in Australian history where an elected prime minister was removed by the Governor-General without prior advice from the monarch or parliamentary defeat in the House of Representatives. Kerr's decision drew on constitutional conventions implying reserve powers to ensure , particularly when a cannot obtain supply or maintain supply and confidence. He sought private advice from Sir , who opined that the could dismiss the ministry under these circumstances, emphasizing the executive's inability to govern without funds. While legally grounded in the 's text and historical precedents like British reserve powers, the dismissal bypassed Whitlam's expectation of prior consultation, sparking debates over whether it adhered to unwritten conventions of vice-regal neutrality. The event set a precedent for the Senate's power under section 53 to block or amend money bills, affirming that neither house can be compelled to pass appropriations, though it intensified scrutiny of supply as a tool for resolving deadlocks. It also highlighted the Governor-General's discretionary authority independent of the prime minister's advice in crises, as Kerr prorogued and called a double dissolution election under section 57, which Malcolm Fraser's won on 13 December 1975. Ongoing debates center on the ambiguity of reserve powers, which remain uncodified and untested since 1975, with no subsequent dismissals despite political crises like the 2018 . Critics argue the crisis exposed flaws in relying on conventions for executive stability, prompting calls for constitutional amendments to clarify dismissal triggers, limit supply vetoes, or establish fixed terms, though no referendums have succeeded. Proponents of the maintain that the powers deter governmental paralysis, as evidenced by bipartisan restraint post-1975, but the episode fueled republican sentiments questioning monarchical influences via the . The Constitution's relevant provisions—on supply, , and ministerial tenure—have undergone no formal changes, leaving the 1975 framework intact for potential future invocations.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.