Hubbry Logo
Industrial Workers of the WorldIndustrial Workers of the WorldMain
Open search
Industrial Workers of the World
Community hub
Industrial Workers of the World
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Industrial Workers of the World
Industrial Workers of the World
from Wikipedia

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), whose members are nicknamed "Wobblies",[b] is an international labor union founded in Chicago, Illinois, United States, in 1905. Its ideology combines general unionism with industrial unionism, as it is a general union, subdivided between the various industries which employ its members. The philosophy and tactics of the IWW are described as "revolutionary industrial unionism", with ties to socialist,[6] syndicalist, and anarchist labor movements.

Key Information

In the 1910s and early 1920s, the IWW achieved many of its short-term goals, particularly in the American West, and cut across traditional guild and union lines to organize workers in a variety of trades and industries. At their peak in August 1917, IWW membership was estimated at more than 150,000, with active wings in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.[7] However, the extremely high rate of IWW membership turnover during this era (estimated at 133% between 1905 and 1915) makes it difficult for historians to state membership totals with any certainty, as workers tended to join the IWW in large numbers for relatively short periods (e.g., during labor strikes and periods of generalized economic distress).[8][9]

Membership declined dramatically in the late 1910s and 1920s. There were conflicts with other labor groups, particularly the American Federation of Labor (AFL), which regarded the IWW as too radical, while the IWW regarded the AFL as too conservative and opposed their decision to divide workers on the basis of their trades.[10] Membership also declined due to government crackdowns on radical, anarchist, and socialist groups during the First Red Scare after World War I. In Canada, the IWW was outlawed by the federal government by an Order in Council on September 24, 1918.[11]

Likely the most decisive factor in the decline in IWW membership and influence was a 1924 schism in the organization, from which the IWW never fully recovered.[10][12] During the 1950s, the IWW faced near-extinction due to persecution under the Second Red Scare,[13] although the union would later experience a resurgence in the context of the New Left in the 1960s and 1970s.[14]

The IWW promotes the concept of "One Big Union", and contends that all workers should be united as a social class to supplant capitalism and wage labor with industrial democracy.[15] It is known for the Wobbly Shop model of workplace democracy, through which workers elect their own managers[16] and other forms of grassroots democracy (self-management) are implemented. The IWW does not require its members to work in a represented workplace,[17] nor does it exclude membership in another labor union.[18]

United States

[edit]

1905–1950

[edit]

Foundation

[edit]
Big Bill Haywood and office workers in the IWW General Office, Chicago, summer 1917

The first meeting to plan the IWW was held in Chicago in 1904. The seven attendees were Clarence Smith and Thomas J. Hagerty of the American Labor Union, George Estes and W. L. Hall of the United Brotherhood of Railway Employees, Isaac Cowan of the U.S. branch of the Amalgamated Society of Engineers, William E. Trautmann of the United Brewery Workmen and Julian E. Bagley WW1 veteran and author. Eugene Debs, formerly of the American Railway Union, and Charles O. Sherman of the United Metal Workers were involved but did not attend the meeting.[19]

The IWW was officially founded in Chicago, Illinois in June 1905. A convention was held of 200 socialists, anarchists, Marxists (primarily members of the Socialist Party of America and Socialist Labor Party of America), and radical trade unionists from all over the United States (mainly the Western Federation of Miners) who strongly opposed the policies of the American Federation of Labor (AFL). The IWW opposed the AFL's acceptance of capitalism and its refusal to include unskilled workers in craft unions.[20]

The convention took place on June 27, 1905, and was referred to as the "Industrial Congress" or the "Industrial Union Convention". It was later known as the First Annual Convention of the IWW.[9]: 67  In an opening speech, William D. ("Big Bill") Haywood declared:

This is the Continental Congress of the working class. We are here to confederate the workers of this country into a working-class movement that shall have for its purpose the emancipation of the working class from the slave bondage of capitalism.[21]

The IWW's founders included Haywood, James Connolly, Daniel De Leon, Eugene V. Debs, Thomas Hagerty, Lucy Parsons, Mary Harris "Mother" Jones, Frank Bohn, William Trautmann, Vincent Saint John, Ralph Chaplin, and many others.

The IWW aimed to promote worker solidarity in the revolutionary struggle to overthrow the employing class; its motto was "an injury to one is an injury to all". They saw this as an improvement upon the Knights of Labor's creed, "an injury to one is the concern of all" which the Knights had spoken out in the 1880s. In particular, the IWW was organized because of the belief among many unionists, socialists, anarchists, Marxists, and radicals that the AFL not only had failed to effectively organize the U.S. working class, but it was causing separation rather than unity within groups of workers by organizing according to narrow craft principles. The Wobblies believed that all workers should organize as a class, a philosophy that is still reflected in the Preamble to the current IWW Constitution:

The working class and the employing class have nothing in common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of the working people and the few, who make up the employing class, have all the good things of life.

Between these two classes a struggle must go on until the workers of the world organize as a class, take possession of the means of production, abolish the wage system, and live in harmony with the Earth.

We find that the centering of the management of industries into fewer and fewer hands makes the trade unions unable to cope with the ever growing power of the employing class. The trade unions foster a state of affairs which allows one set of workers to be pitted against another set of workers in the same industry, thereby helping defeat one another in wage wars. Moreover, the trade unions aid the employing class to mislead the workers into the belief that the working class have interests in common with their employers.

These conditions can be changed and the interest of the working class upheld only by an organization formed in such a way that all its members in any one industry, or in all industries if necessary, cease work whenever a strike or lockout is on in any department thereof, thus making an injury to one an injury to all.

Instead of the conservative motto, "A fair day's wage for a fair day's work," we must inscribe on our banner the revolutionary watchword, "Abolition of the wage system."

It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for everyday struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on production when capitalism shall have been overthrown. By organizing industrially we are forming the structure of the new society within the shell of the old.[15]

One of the IWW's most important contributions to the labor movement and broader push of social justice was that, when founded, it was the only American union to welcome all workers, including women, immigrants, African Americans and Asians, into the same organization. Many of its early members were immigrants, and some, such as Carlo Tresca, Joe Hill and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, rose to prominence in the leadership. Finns formed a sizable portion of the immigrant IWW membership. "Conceivably, the number of Finns belonging to the I.W.W. was somewhere between five and ten thousand."[22] The Finnish-language newspaper of the IWW, Industrialisti, published in Duluth, Minnesota, a center of the mining industry, was the union's only daily paper. At its peak, it ran 10,000 copies per issue. Another Finnish-language Wobbly publication was the monthly Tie Vapauteen ("Road to Freedom"). Also of note was the Finnish IWW educational institute, the Work People's College in Duluth, and the Finnish Labour Temple in Port Arthur, Ontario, Canada, which served as the IWW Canadian administration for several years. Further, many Swedish immigrants, particularly those blacklisted after the 1909 Swedish General Strike, joined the IWW and set up similar cultural institutions around the Scandinavian Socialist Clubs. This in turn exerted a political influence on the Swedish labor movement's left, that in 1910 formed the Syndicalist union SAC which soon contained a minority seeking to mimick the tactics and strategies of the IWW.[23]

Organization

[edit]
A small red cardstock booklet bearing the text, "Membership Card", and an IWW globe insignia.
A Wobbly membership card, or "red card"

The few own the many because they possess the means of livelihood of all ... The country is governed for the richest, for the corporations, the bankers, the land speculators, and for the exploiters of labor. The majority of mankind are working people. So long as their fair demands – the ownership and control of their livelihoods – are set at naught, we can have neither men's rights nor women's rights. The majority of mankind is ground down by industrial oppression in order that the small remnant may live in ease.

Helen Keller, IWW member, 1911[24]

The IWW first attracted attention in Goldfield, Nevada, in 1906 and during the Pressed Steel Car Strike of 1909.[25]

Black and white photograph of a large crowd of people, a few holding signs above the crowd, displaying IWW acronyms and slogans.
1914 IWW demonstration in New York City

By 1912, the organization had around 25,000 members.[26]

Geography

[edit]

In its first decades, the IWW created more than 900 unions located in more than 350 cities and towns in 38 states and territories of the United States and five Canadian provinces.[27] Throughout the country, there were 90 newspapers and periodicals affiliated with the IWW, published in 19 different languages. Cartoons were a major part of IWW publications. Produced by unpaid rank and file members they satirised the union's opponents and helped spread its messages in various forms, including 'stickerettes'. The most well-known IWW cartoon character, Mr Block, was created by Ernest Riebe and was made the subject of a Joe Hill song.[28] Members of the IWW were active throughout the country and were involved in the Seattle General Strike of 1919,[29] were arrested or killed in the Everett Massacre,[30] organized among Mexican workers in the Southwest,[31] and became a large and powerful longshoremen's union in Philadelphia.[32]

IWW versus AFL Carpenters, Goldfield, Nevada, 1906-1907

[edit]

Resisting IWW domination in the gold mining boom town of Goldfield, Nevada was the AFL-affiliated Carpenters Union. In March 1907, the IWW demanded that the mines deny employment to AFL Carpenters, which led mine owners to challenge the IWW. The mine owners banded together and pledged not to employ any IWW members. The mine and business owners of Goldfield staged a lockout, vowing to remain shut until they had broken the power of the IWW. The lockout prompted a split within the Goldfield workforce, between conservative and radical union members.[33]

Haywood trial and Western Federation of Miners exit

[edit]

Leaders of the Western Federation of Miners such as Bill Haywood and Vincent St. John were instrumental in forming the IWW, and the WFM affiliated with the new union organization shortly after the IWW was formed. The WFM became the IWW's "mining section". Many in the rank and file of the WFM were uncomfortable with the open radicalism of the IWW and wanted the WFM to maintain its independence. Schisms between the WFM and IWW had emerged at the annual IWW convention in 1906, when a majority of WFM delegates walked out.[9]

When WFM executives Bill Haywood, George Pettibone, and Charles Moyer were accused of complicity in the murder of former Idaho governor Frank Steunenberg, the IWW used the case to raise funds and support and paid for the legal defense. Even the not guilty verdicts worked against the IWW, because the IWW was deprived of martyrs, and at the same time, a large portion of the public remained convinced of the guilt of the accused.[34]

Bill Haywood for a time remained a member of both organizations. His murder trial had made Haywood a celebrity, and he was in demand as a speaker for the WFM. His increasingly radical speeches became more at odds with the WFM, and in April 1908, the WFM announced that the union had ended Haywood's role as a union representative. Haywood left the WFM and devoted all his time to organizing for the IWW.[9]: 216–217 

Historian Vernon H. Jensen has asserted that the IWW had a "rule or ruin" policy, under which it attempted to wreck local unions which it could not control. From 1908 to 1921, Jensen and others have written, the IWW attempted to win power in WFM locals which had once formed the federation's backbone. When it could not do so, IWW agitators undermined WFM locals, which caused the national union to shed nearly half its membership.[35][36][37][38]

IWW versus the Western Federation of Miners

[edit]

The Western Federation of Miners left the IWW in 1907, but the IWW wanted the WFM back. The WFM had made up about a third of the IWW membership, and the western miners were tough union men, and good allies in a labor dispute. In 1908, Vincent St. John tried to organize a stealth takeover of the WFM. He wrote to WFM organizer Albert Ryan, encouraging him to find reliable IWW sympathizers at each WFM local, and have them appointed delegates to the annual convention by pretending to share whatever opinions of that local needed to become a delegate. Once at the convention, they could vote in a pro-IWW slate. St. Vincent promised: "once we can control the officers of the WFM for the IWW, the big bulk of the membership will go with them." But the takeover did not succeed.[39]

According to several historians, the 1913 El Paso smelters' strike marked one of the first instances of direct competition between the IWW and the WFM, as the two unions competed to organize workers on strike against the American Smelting and Refining Company's local smelter.[40][41][42] In 1914, Butte, Montana, erupted into a series of riots as miners dissatisfied with the Western Federation of Miners local at Butte formed a new union, and demanded that all miners join the new union, or be subject to beatings or worse. Although the new rival union had no affiliation with the IWW, it was widely seen as IWW-inspired. The leadership of the new union contained many who were members of the IWW or agreed with the IWW's methods and objectives. The new union failed to supplant the WFM, and the ongoing fight between the two resulted in the copper mines of Butte, longtime union strongholds for the WFM, becoming open shops, and the mine owners recognized no union from 1914 until 1934.[43]

Versus United Mine Workers, Scranton, Pennsylvania, 1916

[edit]

The IWW clashed with the United Mine Workers union in April 1916, when the IWW picketed the anthracite mines around Scranton, Pennsylvania, intending, by persuasion or force, to keep UMWA members from going to work. The IWW considered the UMWA too reactionary, because the United Mine Workers negotiated contracts with the mine owners for fixed time periods; the IWW considered that contracts hindered their revolutionary goals. In what a contemporary writer pointed out was a complete reversal of their usual policy, UMWA officials called for police to protect United Mine Workers members who wished to cross the picket lines. The Pennsylvania State Police arrived in force, prevented picket line violence, and allowed the UMWA members to peacefully pass through the IWW picket lines.[9][44]

Bisbee Deportation

[edit]
Workers being forcibly marched away from Bisbee into the desert

In November 1916, the 10th convention of the IWW authorized an organizing drive in the Arizona copper mines. Copper was a vital war commodity, so mines were working day and night. During the first months of 1917, thousands joined the Metal Mine Workers' Union #800. The focus of the organizing drive was Bisbee, Arizona, a small town near the Mexican border. Nearly 5000 miners worked in Bisbee's mines. On June 27, 1917, Bisbee's miners went on strike. The strike was effective and non-violent. Demands included the doubling of pay for surface workers, most of them recent immigrants from Mexico, as well as changes in working conditions to make the mines safer. The six-hour day was raised agitationally but held in abeyance. In the early hours of July 12, hundreds of armed vigilantes rounded up nearly two thousand strikers, of whom 1186 were deported in cattle cars and dumped in the desert of New Mexico. In the following days, hundreds more were ordered to leave. The strike was broken at gunpoint.[45]

Other organizing drives

[edit]
IWW members at a picnic in Seattle, 1919

Between 1915 and 1917, the IWW's Agricultural Workers Organization (AWO) organized more than a hundred thousand migratory farm workers throughout the Midwest and western United States.[46]

Building on the success of the AWO, the IWW's Lumber Workers Industrial Union (LWIU) used similar tactics to organize lumberjacks and other timber workers, both in the deep South and the Pacific Northwest of the United States and Canada, between 1917 and 1924. The IWW lumber strike of 1917 led to the eight-hour day and vastly improved working conditions in the Pacific Northwest. Though mid-century historians credited the US Government and "forward thinking lumber magnates" for agreeing to such reforms, an IWW strike forced these concessions.[47]

Where the IWW did win strikes, such as in Lawrence, they often found it hard to hold onto their gains. The IWW of 1912 disdained collective bargaining agreements and preached instead the need for constant struggle against the boss on the shop floor. It proved difficult to maintain that sort of revolutionary enthusiasm against employers. In Lawrence, the IWW lost nearly all of its membership in the years after the strike, as the employers wore down their employees' resistance and eliminated many of the strongest union supporters. In 1938, the IWW voted to allow contracts with employers.[48]

Government suppression

[edit]
Black and white photograph of a speaker rallying a large crowd. In front of the stage, facing the audience, are several signs, in various languages, displaying demands.
Joseph J. Ettor, who had been arrested in 1912, giving a speech to barbers on strike
A newspaper editorial cartoon from 1917, critical of the IWW's antiwar stance during World War I
Anti-socialist cartoon in a railroad-sponsored magazine, 1919

The IWW's efforts were met with "unparalleled" resistance from Federal, state and local governments in America;[10] from company management and labor spies, and from groups of citizens functioning as vigilantes. In 1914, Wobbly Joe Hill (born Joel Hägglund) was accused of murder in Utah and, on what many regarded as limited and insufficient evidence, was executed in 1915.[49][50] On November 5, 1916, at Everett, Washington, a group of deputized businessmen led by Sheriff Donald McRae attacked Wobblies on the steamer Verona, killing at least five union members[51] (six more were never accounted for and probably were lost in Puget Sound). Two members of the police force—one a regular officer and another a deputized citizen from the National Guard Reserve—were killed, probably by "friendly fire".[52] At least five Everett civilians were wounded.[53]

Many IWW members opposed United States participation in World War I. The organization passed a resolution against the war at its convention in November 1916.[54]: 241  This echoed the view, expressed at the IWW's founding convention, that war represents struggles among capitalists in which the rich become richer, and the working poor all too often die at the hands of other workers.

An IWW newspaper, the Industrial Worker, wrote just before the U.S. declaration of war: "Capitalists of America, we will fight against you, not for you! There is not a power in the world that can make the working class fight if they refuse." Yet when a declaration of war was passed by the U.S. Congress in April 1917, the IWW's general secretary-treasurer Bill Haywood became determined that the organization should adopt a low profile in order to avoid perceived threats to its existence. The printing of anti-war stickers was discontinued, stockpiles of existing anti-war documents were put into storage, and anti-war propagandizing ceased as official union policy. After much debate on the General Executive Board, with Haywood advocating a low profile and GEB member Frank Little championing continued agitation, Ralph Chaplin brokered a compromise agreement. A statement was issued that denounced the war, but IWW members were advised to channel their opposition through the legal mechanisms of conscription. They were advised to register for the draft, marking their claims for exemption "IWW, opposed to war."[54]: 242–244 

Cover of The Evolution of Industrial Democracy by Abner E. Woodruff, initialed by illustrator Ralph Hosea Chaplin, published by the IWW. Notably stamped as evidence used in a trial.

During World War I, the U.S. government moved strongly against the IWW. On September 5, 1917, U.S. Department of Justice agents made simultaneous raids on dozens of IWW meeting halls across the country.[36]: 406  Minutes books, correspondence, mailing lists, and publications were seized, with the U.S. Department of Justice removing five tons of material from the IWW's General Office in Chicago alone.[36]: 406 

Based in large measure on the documents seized September 5, one hundred and sixty-six IWW leaders were indicted by a Federal Grand Jury in Chicago for conspiring to hinder the draft, encourage desertion, and intimidate others in connection with labor disputes, under the new Espionage Act.[36]: 407  One hundred and one went on trial en masse before Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis in 1918. Their lawyer was George Vanderveer of Seattle.[55]

In 1917, during an incident known as the Tulsa Outrage, a group of black-robed Knights of Liberty tarred and feathered seventeen members of the IWW in Oklahoma. The attack was cited as revenge for the Green Corn Rebellion, a preemptive attack caused by fear of an impending attack on the oil fields and as punishment for not supporting the war effort. The IWW members had been turned over to the Knights of Liberty by local authorities after they were beaten, arrested at their headquarters and convicted of the crime of vagrancy. Five other men who testified in defense of the Wobblies were also fined by the court and subjected to the same torture and humiliations at the hands of the Knights of Liberty.[56][57][58][59]

In 1919, an Armistice Day parade by the American Legion in Centralia, Washington, turned into a fight between legionnaires and IWW members in which four legionnaires were shot. Which side initiated the violence of the Centralia massacre is disputed, though there had been previous attacks on the IWW hall and businessmen's association had made threats against union members. A number of IWWs were arrested, one of whom, Wesley Everest, was lynched by a mob that night.[60]

A bronze plaque honoring the IWW members imprisoned and lynched following the Centralia Tragedy was dedicated in the city's George Washington Park on November 11, 2023. A request was delivered to Washington Governor Inslee requesting posthumous pardons for the eight IWW members who were convicted.[61] A rededication was held in June 2024 after the plaque was installed on a 7,500 lb (3,400 kg) granite block base. The color and carved style was an intentional match of the base of the American Legion memorial, The Sentinel. The $20,000 funding for the overall project, and the labor involved, was done mostly by union organizations or workers.[62]

Organizational schism and aftermath

[edit]

IWW quickly recovered from the setbacks of 1919 and 1920, with membership peaking in 1923 (58,300 estimated by dues paid per capita, though membership was likely somewhat higher as the union tolerated delinquent members).[63] But recurring internal debates, especially between those who sought either to centralize or decentralize the organization, ultimately brought about the IWW's 1924 schism.[64]

The twenties witnessed the defection of hundreds of Wobbly leaders (including Harrison George, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, John Reed, George Hardy, Charles Ashleigh, Earl Browder and, in his Soviet exile, Bill Haywood) and, following a path recounted by Fred Beal,[65] thousands of Wobbly rank-and-filers to the Communists and Communist organizations.[66][67]

At the beginning of the 1949 Smith Act trials, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover was disappointed when prosecutors indicted fewer CPUSA members than he had hoped, and—recalling the arrests and convictions of over one hundred IWW leaders in 1917—complained to the Justice Department, stating, "the IWW as a subversive menace was crushed and has never revived. Similar action at this time would have been as effective against the Communist Party and its subsidiary organizations."[68]

1950–2000

[edit]

Taft–Hartley Act

[edit]
IWW globe logo encircled by an IWW slogan.
IWW logo: "An injury to one is an injury to all"

After the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act in 1946 by Congress, which called for the removal of Communist union leadership, the IWW experienced a loss of membership as differences of opinion occurred over how to respond to the challenge. In 1949, US Attorney General Tom C. Clark[69] placed the IWW on the Attorney General's List of Subversive Organizations[70] in the category of "organizations seeking to change the government by unconstitutional means" under Executive Order 9835, which offered no means of appeal, and which excluded all IWW members from Federal employment and federally subsidized housing programs (this order was revoked by Executive Order 10450 in 1953).

At this time, the Cleveland local of the Metal and Machinery Workers Industrial Union (MMWIU) was the strongest IWW branch in the United States. Leading figures such as Frank Cedervall, who had helped build the branch up for over ten years, were concerned about the possibility of raiding from AFL-CIO unions if the IWW had its legal status as a union revoked. In 1950, Cedervall led the 1500-member MMWIU national organization to split from the IWW, as the Lumber Workers Industrial Union had almost 30 years earlier. This act did not save the MMWIU. Despite its brief affiliation with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, it was raided by the AFL and CIO and defunct by the late 1950s, less than ten years after separating from the IWW.[71]

The loss of the MMWIU, at the time the IWW's largest industrial union, was almost a deathblow to the IWW. The union's membership fell to its lowest level in the 1950s during the Second Red Scare, and by 1955, the union's fiftieth anniversary, it was near extinction, though it still appeared on government lists of Communist-led groups.[13]

1960s rejuvenation

[edit]

The 1960s civil rights movement, anti-war protests, and various university student movements brought new life to the IWW, albeit with many fewer new members than the great organizing drives of the early part of the 20th century.

The first signs of new life for the IWW in the 1960s were organizing efforts among students in San Francisco and Berkeley, which were hotbeds of student radicalism at the time. This targeting of students resulted in a Bay Area branch of the union with over a hundred members in 1964, almost as many as the union's total membership in 1961. Wobblies old and new united for one more "free speech fight": Berkeley's Free Speech Movement. Riding on this high, the decision in 1967 to allow college and university students to join the Education Workers Industrial Union (IU 620) as full members spurred campaigns in 1968 at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, and the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.[72]: 13  The IWW sent representatives to Students for a Democratic Society conventions in 1967, 1968, and 1969, and as the SDS collapsed into infighting, the IWW gained members fleeing this discord. These changes had a profound effect on the union, which by 1972 had 67% of members under the age of 30, with a total of nearly 500 members.[72]: 14 

The IWW's links to the 1960s counterculture led to organizing campaigns at counterculture businesses, as well as a wave of over two dozen co-ops affiliating with the IWW under its Wobbly Shop model in the 1960s to 1980s. These businesses were primarily in printing, publishing, and food distribution, from underground newspapers and radical print shops to community co-op grocery stores. Some of the printing and publishing industry co-ops and job shops included Black & Red (Detroit), Glad Day Press (New York), RPM Press (Michigan), New Media Graphics (Ohio), Babylon Print (Wisconsin), Hill Press (Illinois), Lakeside (Madison, Wisconsin), Harbinger (Columbia, South Carolina), Eastown Printing in Grand Rapids, Michigan (where the IWW negotiated a contract in 1978),[72]: 17  and La Presse Populaire (Montreal). This close affiliation with radical publishers and printing houses sometimes led to legal difficulties for the union, such as when La Presse Populaire was shut down in 1970 by provincial police for publishing pro-FLQ materials, which were banned at the time under an official censorship law. Also in 1970, the San Diego, California, "street journal" El Barrio became an official IWW shop. In 1971 its office was attacked by an organization calling itself the Minutemen, and IWW member Ricardo Gonzalves was indicted for criminal syndicalism along with two members of the Brown Berets.[13]

Return to workplace campaigns

[edit]
IWW and anarchists protesting in 1975

Invigorated by the arrival of enthusiastic new members, the IWW began a wave of organizing drives. These largely took a regional form and they, as well as the union's overall membership, concentrated in Portland, Chicago, Ann Arbor, and throughout the state of California, which when combined accounted for over half of union drives from 1970 to 1979. In Portland, Oregon, the IWW led campaigns at Winter Products (a brass plating plant) in 1972, at a local Winchell's Donuts (where a strike was waged and lost), at the Albina Day Care (where key union demands were won, including the firing of the director of the day care), of healthcare workers at West Side School and the Portland Medical Center, and of agricultural workers in 1974. The latter effort led to the opening of an IWW union hall in Portland to compete with extortionate hiring halls and day labor agencies. Organizing efforts led to a growth in membership, but repeated loss of strikes and organizing campaigns anticipated the decline of the Portland branch after the mid-1970s, a stagnancy period lasting until the 1990s.[72]: 15 

In California, union activities were based in Santa Cruz, where in 1977 the IWW engaged in one of its most ambitious campaigns of the 1970s: an attempt in 1977 to organize 3,000 workers hired under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) in Santa Cruz County. The campaign led to pay raises, the implementation of a grievance procedure, and medical and dental coverage, but the union failed to maintain its foothold, and in 1982 the CETA program was replaced by the Job Training Partnership Act.[72]: 15–16  The IWW won some lasting victories in Santa Cruz, such as campaigns at the Janus Alcohol Recovery Center, the Santa Cruz Law Center, Project Hope, and the Santa Cruz Community Switchboard.[72]: 16 

A seated crowd facing a standing woman. Behind her is a table with flowers. Above the table is a large banner with the text, "We never forget!" along with the IWW name and globe logo. A variety of United Auto Workers logos are visible on the wall in the background.
Memorial service

Elsewhere in California, the IWW was active in Long Beach in 1972, where it organized workers at International Wood Products and Park International Corporation (a manufacturer of plastic swimming pool filters) and went on strike after the firing of one worker for union-related activities.[73] Finally, in San Francisco, the IWW ran campaigns for radio station and food service workers.[72]: 15–16 

In Chicago, the IWW was an early opponent of so-called urban renewal programs and supported the creation of the "Chicago People's Park" in 1969. The Chicago branch also ran citywide campaigns for healthcare, food service, entertainment, construction, and metal workers, and its success with the latter led to an attempt to revive the national Metal and Machinery Workers Industrial Union, which twenty years earlier had been a major component of the union. Metalworker organizing mostly ended in 1978 after a failed strike at Mid-American Metal in Virden, Illinois. The IWW also became one of the first unions to try to organize fast food workers, with an organizing campaign at a local McDonald's in 1973.[72]: 16 

The IWW also built on its existing presence in Ann Arbor, which had existed since student organizing began at the University of Michigan, to launch an organizing campaign at the University Cellar, a college bookstore. The union won National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) certification there in 1979 following a strike, and the store became a strong job shop for the union until it was closed in 1986. The union launched a similar campaign at another local bookstore, Charing Cross Books, but was unable to maintain its foothold there despite reaching a settlement with management.[72]: 17 

In the late 1970s, the IWW came to regional prominence in entertainment industry organizing, with an Entertainment Workers Organizing Committee being founded in Chicago in 1976, followed by campaigns organizing musicians in Cleveland in 1977 and Ann Arbor in 1978. The Chicago committee published a model contract which was distributed to musicians in the hopes of raising industry standards, as well as maintaining an active phone line for booking information. IWW musicians such as Utah Phillips, Faith Petric, Bob Bovee, and Jim Ringer also toured and promoted the union,[72]: 17  and in 1987 an anthology album, Rebel Voices, was released.

Other IWW organizing campaigns of the 1970s included a ShopRite supermarket in Milwaukee, at Coronet Foods in Wheeling, West Virginia, chemical and fast food workers (including KFC and Roy Rogers) in State College, Pennsylvania, and hospital workers in Boston, all in 1973; shipyards in Houston, Texas, and restaurant workers in Pittsburgh in 1974; unsuccessful campaigns at the Prospect Nursing Home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and a Pizza Hut in Arkadelphia, Arkansas, in 1975; and a construction workers organizing drive in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in 1978.[72]: 18 

1990s

[edit]

In 1996, the IWW launched an organizing drive against Borders Books in Philadelphia. In March, the union lost an NLRB certification vote by a narrow margin but continued to organize. In June, IWW member Miriam Fried was fired on trumped-up charges and a national boycott of Borders was launched in response. IWW members picketed at Borders stores nationwide, including Ann Arbor, Michigan; Washington, D.C.; San Francisco, California; Miami, Florida; Chicago, Illinois; Palo Alto, California; Portland, Oregon; Portland, Maine; Boston, Massachusetts; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Albany, New York; Richmond, Virginia; St. Louis, Missouri; Los Angeles, California; and other cities. This was followed up with a National Day of Action in 1997, where Borders stores were again picketed nationwide, and a second organizing campaign in London, England.[74]

Also in 1996, the IWW began organizing at Wherehouse Music in El Cerrito, California. The campaign continued until 1997, when management fired two organizers and laid off over half the employees, as well as reducing the hours of known union members. This directly affected the NLRB certification vote which followed, where the IWW lost over 2:1.[74]

A group of seven people stand near the entrance of a building.
Three IWW General Secretary-Treasurers: Mark Kaufmann, Jeff Ditz, and Fred Chase, at a funeral for a friend.

In 1998, the IWW chartered a San Francisco branch of the Marine Transport Workers Industrial Union (MTWIU), which trained hundreds of waterfront workers in health and safety techniques and attempted to institutionalize these safety practices on the San Francisco waterfront.[75]

2000–present

[edit]
Total Members (legal records)

MembersYear0200040006000800010,000200020052010201520202025US MembersUK MembersChart IWW Membership

edit

In 2004, an IWW union was organized in a New York City Starbucks. In 2006, the IWW continued efforts at Starbucks by organizing several Chicago area shops.[78][79]

An IWW protest at Binghamton University in 2009
An IWW protest at Binghamton University in 2009

In New York City, the IWW has organized immigrant foodstuffs workers since 2005. That summer, workers from Handyfat Trading joined the IWW, and were soon followed by workers from four more warehouses.[80]

Three red flags with IWW logos being held above a crowd of people.
IWW flags at a 2007 rally in Seattle

The Wobblies are back. Many young radicals find the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) the most congenial available platform on which to stand in trying to change the world.

In May 2007, the NYC warehouse workers came together with the Starbucks Workers Union to form The Food and Allied Workers Union IU 460/640. In the summer of 2007, the IWW organized workers at two new warehouses: Flaum Appetizing, a Kosher food distributor, and Wild Edibles, a seafood company. Over the course of 2007–08, workers at both shops were illegally terminated for their union activity. In 2008, the workers at Wild Edibles actively fought to get their jobs back and to secure overtime pay owed to them by the boss. In a workplace justice campaign called Focus on the Food Chain, carried out jointly with Brandworkers International, the IWW workers won settlements against employers including Pur Pac, Flaum Appetizing and Wild Edibles.[82][83][84][85]

IWW in Washington D.C.

The Portland, Oregon General Membership Branch is one of the largest and most active branches of the IWW. The branch holds three contracts currently, two with Janus Youth Programs and one with Portland Women's Crisis Line.[86] There has been some debate within the branch about whether or not union contracts such as this are desirable in the long run, with some members favoring solidarity unionism as opposed to contract unionism and some members believing there is room for both strategies for organizing. The branch has successfully supported workers wrongfully fired from several different workplaces in the last two years. Due to picketing by Wobblies, these workers have received significant compensation from their former employers. Branch membership has been increasing, as has shop organizing. As of 2005, the 100th anniversary of its founding, the IWW had around 5,000 members, compared to 13 million members in the AFL-CIO.[87]

2011 Wisconsin general strike

[edit]

In early 2011, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker announced a budget bill which the IWW held would effectively outlaw unions for state or municipal workers. In response, there was an emergency meeting of the Midwestern IWW member organizations. IWW members presented a proposal at a meeting of South-Central Federation of Labor (SCFL) which endorsed a general strike and create an ad hoc Committee to instruct affiliated locals in preparations for the general strike. The IWW proposal passed nearly unanimously. The Madison branch made an international appeal translating various materials concerning the strike into Arabic, French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. An appeal was made to European unions (CNT – Spain, CGT – Spain and CGT – France) to send organizers to Madison who could present their experience of general strikes at union meetings and help organize the strike in other ways. The CNT (France) sent letters of solidarity to the IWW. This was considered the largest and most successful intervention in a working-class struggle that the IWW has undertaken since the 1930s.[88] In the aftermath, the strike was said by some to be "the general strike that didn't happen" because eventually ongoing efforts at industrial action were "completely overwhelmed by the recall effort" against the governor during the crisis.[89]

Late 2010s

[edit]

In the mid-2010s, Wobblies in the United States were focused on campaigns to organize the multinational coffeehouse chain Starbucks, the franchised sandwich fast food restaurant chain Jimmy John's, and the multinational supermarket chain Whole Foods Market. The union had about 3,000 members.[90] The IWW moved its headquarters to 2036 West Montrose, Chicago, in 2012.[91]

The IWW waged an organizing campaign at Chicago-Lake Liquors in Minneapolis, Minnesota in 2013. The store, which advertises itself as the highest-volume liquor store in Minnesota, had a wage cap of $10.50 per hour, but in the face of IWW demands for the wage cap to be lifted, store management fired five organizers. On April 6, the Twin Cities branch of the union responded with a picket around the store informing customers of the situation. This was followed by a second picket on May 4, a day which customarily had heavy business at the store. The union claimed to have made "what should have been an extremely busy Saturday into a quiet afternoon inside the store".[92] After several months, the National Labor Relations Board announced that it found merit in the union's unfair dismissal complaint.[93] As a result, the union and store management agreed to a $32,000 settlement as a form of compensation to the fired workers and the campaign officially ended.

Workers at the Paulo Freire Social Justice Charter School in Holyoke, Massachusetts were organized with the IWW in 2015, hoping to address the "authoritarian leadership" of the school administration and perceived racial bias in hiring.[94]

On September 14, 2015, after a year-long organizing campaign, workers at Sound Stage Production in North Haven Connecticut declared their membership in the IWW.[95]

The IWW announced the Burgerville Workers Union (BVWU) in April 2016, which focuses on workers at the Oregon regional fast food chain, Burgerville. A subsidiary of the IWW, the BVWU went public on April 26 at a rally of workers and supporters outside a Portland, Oregon Burgerville location. Upon going public, the BVWU was endorsed by a number of local Oregon community organizations, including union locals, the Portland Solidarity Network, and food and racial justice organizations.[96] It was also endorsed by then-Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders. The union received pushback with a letter from Burgerville's CEO, Jeff Harvey, being distributed to workers discouraging them from joining the union.[97] In June 2017, Burgerville paid a settlement of $10,000 after an investigation by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, which found that the company had violated state-mandated break periods for workers.[98] In April and May 2018 the IWW won NLRB elections in 2 Burgerville Locations.

In August 2016, workers at Ellen's Stardust Diner in Manhattan formed Stardust Family United (SFU)[99] under the IWW, driven by the firing of thirty employees, as well as an unpopular new scheduling system.[100] After going public, the union accused Stardust management of retaliatory firings and posting anti-union materials in the restaurant.[101]

On September 9, 2016, the 45th anniversary of the Attica Prison Riots, 900 incarcerated workers organized by the IWW and many other prisoners participated in the 9/9 National Prison Strike declared by the IWW's Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee.[102] Supported by a number of anti-incarceration and prisoners' organizations such as the Free Alabama Movement, the strike focused on the poor conditions in many American prisons and the low rates of prisoner pay for maintaining prisons and engaging in commercial production of goods for third-party companies.[103] The strike affected an estimated twenty prisons in eleven states and was strongest at the William C. Holman Correctional Facility in Alabama. Estimates of the number of inmates affected range from 20,000, to 50,000, to as high as 72,000, with David Fathi of the ACLU National Prison Project judging it to be the "largest prisoner strike in recent memory".[104][105][106] Initial media coverage was slow, with strike organizers complaining of a "mainstream-media blackout", which could be attributed to the difficulty in communicating with prisoners, as many prisons went on lockdown either in response to prisoner strike activity or in anticipation of it.[102]

COVID-19 pandemic

[edit]
IWW demonstrating with the Graduate Employees' Organization 3550 at the 2020 Michigan graduate students' strike

The IWW also organized workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. In May 2020 the IWW established the Voodoo Doughnut Workers Union (DWU) in Portland. The newly formed union delivered a letter to management announcing the formation of a union and demanding higher wages, safety improvements and severance packages for employees laid off because of the coronavirus and Oregon's ongoing "shelter-in-place" order.[107] In February 2021, after months of organizing, DWU workers officially filed for a union certification election with the National Labor Relations Board.[108]

The IWW also publicly announced the Second Staff (2S) workers' union in May 2020 at the Faison school, a private school serving students on the autism spectrum in Richmond, Virginia, in response to what the union called a "reckless endangerment of staff and students" in trying to force the school to open too soon.[109] March 2021 saw a rash of organizing with the IWW. On March 9, workers at Moe's Books, an independent used bookstore in Berkeley, California, announced that they received voluntary recognition from Moe's Books management, officially unionizing with the IWW.[110]

Shortly after, on March 13, the IWW announced that it was organizing workers at the Socialist Rifle Association (SRA).[111] The union was voluntarily recognized by the SRA the following day. Two days later, on March 16, staff at the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition (OVEC) announced their intent to unionize with the IWW, and requested voluntary recognition from management. In organizing, the OVEC workers seek to gain "a standardized pay scale, an equitable discipline policy, and the right to union representation at any meeting wherein matters affecting staff pay, hours, benefits, advancement, or layoffs may be discussed or voted on".[112]

The IWW is the first union in the United States to ratify a union contract for fast food workers. Five Oregon locations of Burgerville are unionized,[113] as well as one location of Voodoo Doughnut in downtown Portland.[114]

Australia

[edit]

Australia encountered the IWW tradition early. In part, this was due to the local De Leonist Socialist Labor Party following the industrial turn of the US SLP. The SLP formed an IWW Club in Sydney in October 1907. Members of other socialist groups also joined it, and the relationship with the SLP soon proved to be a problem. The 1908 split between the Chicago and Detroit factions in the United States was echoed by internal unrest in the Australian IWW from late 1908, resulting in the formation of a pro-Chicago local in Adelaide in May 1911 and another in Sydney six months later. By mid-1913 the "Chicago" IWW was flourishing and the SLP-associated pro-Detroit IWW Club in decline.[115] In 1916 the "Detroit" IWW in Australia followed the lead of the US body and renamed itself the Workers' International Industrial Union.[116]

"To arms! Capitalists, parsons, politicians, landlords, newspaper editors and other stay-at-home patriots. Your country needs YOU in the trenches! Workers, follow your masters."
Australian anti-conscription poster, 1916

The IWW opposed the First World War from 1914 onward and in many ways fought against Australian conscription.[117] A narrow majority of Australians voted against conscription in a very bitter hard-fought referendum in October 1916, and then again in December 1917, Australia being the only belligerent in World War One without conscription. In very significant part this was due to the agitation of the IWW, a group which never had as many as 500 members in Australia at its peak. The IWW founded the Anti-Conscription League (ACL) in which members worked with the broader labor and peace movement, and also carried on an aggressive propaganda campaign in its own name; leading to the imprisonment of Tom Barker (1887–1970) the editor of the IWW paper Direct Action, sentenced to twelve months in March 1916. A series of arson attacks on commercial properties in Sydney was widely attributed to the IWW campaign to have Tom Barker released. He was released in August 1916, but twelve mostly prominent IWW activists, the so-called Sydney Twelve were arrested in NSW in September 1916 for arson and other offenses. Their trial and eventual imprisonment became a cause célèbre of the Australian labor movement, which saw no convincing evidence of their involvement. A number of other scandals were associated with the IWW; a five-pound note forgery scandal, the so-called Tottenham tragedy in which the murder of a police officer was blamed on the IWW, and above all it was blamed for the defeat of the October 1916 conscription referendum. In December 1916, the Commonwealth government led by Labour Party renegade Billy Hughes declared the IWW an illegal organization under the Unlawful Associations Act. Eighty six members immediately defied the law and were sentenced to six months imprisonment. Direct Action was suppressed, its circulation was at its peak of something over 12,000.[118] During the war over 100 members Australia-wide were sentenced to imprisonment on political charges,[119] including the veteran activist Monty Miller.

By the early 1930s, most Australian IWW branches had dispersed as the Communist Party grew in influence.[120]

People holding signs near a banner demanding, "Free all class war prisoners!"
IWW members picket in Sydney, June 1981

The Australian IWW has grown since the 1940s, but have been unsuccessful in securing union representation.[121] As an extreme example of the integration of ex-IWW militants into the mainstream labor movement one might instance the career of Donald Grant, one of the Sydney Twelve sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment for conspiracy to commit arson and other crimes. Released from prison in August 1920, he soon broke with the IWW over its antipolitical stand, standing for the NSW Parliament for the Industrial Socialist Labour Party unsuccessfully in 1922 and then in 1925 for the mainstream Australian Labor Party (ALP) also unsuccessfully. This reconciliation with the ALP and the electoral system did not prevent him being imprisoned again in 1927 for street demonstrations supporting Sacco and Vanzetti. He eventually represented the ALP in the NSW Legislative Council in 1931–1940 and the Australian Senate 1943–1956.[122]

"Bump Me Into Parliament"[123] is the most notable Australian IWW song, and is still current. It was written by ship's fireman William "Bill" Casey, later Secretary of the Seaman's Union in Queensland.[118]

New Zealand

[edit]

Australian influence was strong in early 20th century left-wing groups, and several founders of the New Zealand Labour Party (e.g. Bob Semple) were from Australia. The trans-Tasman interchange was two-way, particularly for miners. Several Tasmanian Labour "groupings" in the 1890s cited their earlier New Zealand experience of activism e.g. later premier Robert Cosgrove, and also Chris Watson from New South Wales.[124]

"Wobbly" activists in New Zealand pre-WWI were John Benjamin King and H. M. Fitzgerald (an adherent of the De Leon school) from Canada. Another was Robert Rivers La Monte from America, who was (briefly) an organizer for the New Zealand Socialist Party (as was Fitzgerald). IWW strongholds were Auckland "a city with the demographic characteristics of a frontier town"; Wellington where a branch survived briefly and in mining towns, on the wharves and among laborers.[125]

Canada

[edit]
The Finnish Labour Temple (pictured in 1910) in Port Arthur served as the Canadian headquarters of the IWW between 1919 and the 1960s.

The IWW was active in Canada from a very early point in the organization's history, especially in Western Canada, primarily in British Columbia. The union was active in organizing large swaths of the lumber and mining industry along the coast, in the Interior of British Columbia, and Vancouver Island. Joe Hill wrote the song "Where the Fraser River Flows" during this period when the IWW was organizing in British Columbia. Some members of the IWW had relatively close links with the Socialist Party of Canada.[126] Canadians who went to Australia and New Zealand before WWI included John Benjamin King and H. M. Fitzgerald (an adherent of the De Leon school).[125]

The IWW was banned as a subversive organization in Canada during the First World War (and partially replaced by the One Big Union). After being unbanned after the war, the IWW reached a post-WWI high of 5600 Canadian members in 1923.[127] The union entered a short "golden age" in Canada with an official Canadian Administration located at the Finnish Labour Temple in Port Arthur (now Thunder Bay, Ontario) and a strong base among immigrant laborers in Northern Ontario and Manitoba, especially Finns, which included harvest workers, lumberjacks, and miners. During this period, the IWW competed for members with a number of other radical and socialist organizations such as the Finnish Organization of Canada (FOC), with the IWW's Industrialisti newspaper competing with the FOC's Vapaus for attention and readership. During this period. Membership slowly decreased during the 1920s and 30s despite continued organizing and strike activity as the IWW lost ground to the One Big Union and Communist Party-controlled organizations such as the Workers' Unity League (WUL). Despite this competition, the IWW and WUL cooperated during strikes, such as at the Abitibi Pulp & Paper Company near Sault Ste. Marie in 1933, where the Finnish workers in the IWW and WUL faced discrimination and violence from the Anglo citizens of the town. The IWW also successfully unionized Ritchie's Dairy in Toronto and formed a fishery workers' branch in MacDiarmid (now Greenstone, Ontario).[128]

In 1936, the IWW in Canada supported the Spanish Revolution and recruited for the militia of the anarcho-syndicalist Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT), in direct conflict with Communist Party recruiters for the Mackenzie-Papineau Battalion. The disagreement caused violent clashes at recruitment rallies in Northern Ontario. Several Canadian IWW members were killed in the Spanish Civil War and the CNT's ensuing defeat at the hands of both Fascist and Republican forces.[128]

In 2009, after Starbucks established policies that meant demotions and wage cuts for some workers, IWW branches in Montreal and Sherbrooke helped found the Starbucks Workers' Union (STTS), which made a breakthrough in Quebec City at an establishment in Sainte-Foy.[129] Leaders Simon Gosselin, Dominic Dupont and Andrew Fletcher were harassed in the months following unionization, and union efforts were defeated by law firm Heenan Blaike in a series of hearings before Quebec Labor Relations Board.[130]

Today the IWW is active in Canada, with branches in Vancouver, Vancouver Island, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Ottawa/Outaouais, Toronto, Windsor, Sherbrooke, Québec City and Montréal.[131] In August 2009, Canadian members voted to ratify the constitution of the Canadian Regional Organizing Committee (CanROC) to improve inter-branch coordination and communication. Affiliated branches are Winnipeg, Ottawa-Outaouais, Toronto, Windsor, Sherbrooke, Montréal, and Québec City. Each branch elects a representative to make decisions on the Canadian board. There were originally three officers, the Secretary-Treasurer, Organizing Department Liaison, and Editor of the Canadian Organizing Bulletin.[132] In 2016, CanROC members voted to split the Secretary-Treasurer role into separate Regional Secretary and Regional Treasurer positions.

There are currently five job shops in Canada: Libra Knowledge and Information Services Co-op in Toronto, ParIT Workers Cooperative in Winnipeg, the Windsor Button Collective, the Ottawa Panhandlers' Union, and the Street Labourers of Windsor (SLOW). The Ottawa Panhandlers' Union continues a tradition in the IWW of expanding the definition of worker. The union members include anyone who makes their living in the street, including buskers, street vendors, the homeless, scrappers, and panhandlers. In the summer of 2004, the Union led a strike by the homeless (the Homeless Action Strike) in Ottawa. The strike resulted in the city agreeing to fund a newspaper created and sold by the homeless on the street. On May 1, 2006, the Union took over the Elgin Street Police Station for a day. A similar IWW organization, the Street Labourers of Windsor (SLOW), has garnered local,[133] provincial,[134] and national[135] news coverage for its organizing efforts in 2015.

Europe

[edit]

Germany, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Austria

[edit]

The IWW started to organize in Germany following the First World War. Fritz Wolffheim played a significant role in establishing the IWW in Hamburg. A German Language Membership Regional Organizing Committee (GLAMROC) was founded in December 2006 in Cologne. It encompasses the German-language area of Germany, Luxembourg, Austria, and Switzerland with branches or contacts in 16 cities.[136]

Great Britain and Ireland

[edit]

The regional body of the union in the United Kingdom and Ireland is the Wales, Ireland, Scotland, England Regional Administration (WISERA). Formerly known as the Britain and Ireland Regional Administration (BIRA), its name was changed as a result of a referendum vote by WISERA members.[137]

The IWW was present, to varying extents, in many of the struggles of the early decades of the 20th century, including the UK general strike of 1926 and the dockers' strike of 1947. During the Spanish Civil War, a Wobbly from Neath, who had been active in Mexico, trained volunteers in preparation for the journey to Spain, where they joined the International Brigades to fight against Franco.[23]

Membership numbers for WISE, from the period of 2006-2021

Overall, membership has increased rapidly; in 2014, the union reported a total UK membership of 750,[138] which increased to 1000 by April 2015.[139]

An Industrial Workers of the World graphic

Also in 2007, IWW branches in Glasgow and Dumfries were a key driving force in a successful campaign to prevent the closure of one of Glasgow University's campuses (The Crichton) in Dumfries.[140]

The Edinburgh General Membership Branch of the IWW along with other branches of the IWW's Scottish section voted in 2014 to become a signatory to the "From Yes to Action Statement" produced by the Autonomous Centre of Edinburgh. In 2015, along with similar groups such as the Edinburgh Coalition Against Poverty and Edinburgh Anarchist Federation, they joined the Scottish Action Against Austerity network.[141]

In 2016, WISERA promoted a campaign targeting couriers working for companies such as Deliveroo.[142]

WISERA currently has campaigns organising TEFL teachers, brewery workers and escape room workers.[143][144][145]

Iceland and Greece

[edit]

An Iceland Regional Organizing Committee (IceROC)[146] was chartered in 2015. The union has become a trailblazer in supporting sex workers in Iceland, who lack access to services which do not automatically treat them as victims of abuse.[147]

Also in 2015, a Greek Regional Organizing Committee (GreROC) was chartered. In July of that year, it released a statement condemning the Greek government's response to the results of the 2015 Greek bailout referendum, saying that "despite the Left tone of dignity that the Left governmental administrators use, this is a one-way blackmail. We need a radical change of shift, not in words but in action."[148]

Folk music and protest songs

[edit]
Booklet cover with large title, "IWW Songs", and illustration of a man climbing over a hill, reaching skyward, with factories in the background.
Songs to Fan the Flames of Discontent: The Little Red Songbook

One Wobbly characteristic since their inception has been a penchant for song. To counteract management sending in the Salvation Army band to cover up the Wobbly speakers, Joe Hill wrote parodies of Christian hymns so that union members could sing along with the Salvation Army band, but with their own purposes. For example, "In the Sweet By and By" became "There'll Be Pie in the Sky When You Die (That's a Lie)". From that start in exigency, Wobbly song writing became common because they "articulated the frustrations, hostilities, and humor of the homeless and the dispossessed."[149]

Literature

[edit]

Karl Marlantes's 2019 novel Deep River explores labor issues in the early 1900s in the US and the consequences for an immigrant Finnish family. The book focuses on a female family member who becomes an organizer for the IWW in the dangerous logging industry. Both pro- and anti-labor viewpoints are examined, with special attention given to IWW strikes and the backlash against the labor movement during World War I.[150]

Lingo

[edit]

Wobbly lingo is a collection of technical language, jargon, and historic slang used by the Wobblies, for more than a century. Many Wobbly terms derive from or are coextensive with hobo expressions used through the 1940s.[151][152] The origin of the name "Wobbly" itself is uncertain.[5][153][154] For several decades, many hobos in the United States were members of, or were sympathetic to, the IWW. Because of this, some of the terms describe the life of a hobo such as "riding the rails", living in "jungles", dodging the "bulls". The IWW's efforts to organize all trades allowed the lingo to expand to include terms relating to mining camps, timber work, and farming.[155][156]

Some words and phrases believed to have originated within Wobbly lingo have gained cultural significance outside of the IWW. For example, from Joe Hill's song "The Preacher and the Slave", the expression pie in the sky has passed into common usage, referring to a "preposterously optimistic goal".[157]

Notable members

[edit]

Former lieutenant governor of Colorado David C. Coates was a labor militant, and was present at the founding convention,[54]: 242–278  although it is unknown if he became a member. It has long been rumored, but not proven, that baseball legend Honus Wagner was also a Wobbly. Senator Joseph McCarthy accused Edward R. Murrow of having been an IWW member, which Murrow denied.[158]

See also

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), commonly known as the Wobblies, is a revolutionary labor union founded on June 27, 1905, in , , by socialist, anarchist, and radical unionists who sought to unite all workers—regardless of skill, ethnicity, or trade—into "one big union" to seize control of production and abolish the wage system through and class struggle. Its foundational preamble asserts that the and employing class share no common interests, rejecting compromise in favor of to end exploitation. Opposing the American Federation of Labor's craft-based exclusivity and electoral politics, the IWW emphasized workplace power via strikes, boycotts, and tactics including —defined as deliberate inefficiency or disruption at the point of production—to counter employer control. It rapidly organized among migrant, immigrant, and unskilled laborers in , , , and textiles, conducting free speech campaigns to assert organizing rights and producing cultural artifacts like the to build solidarity. Key achievements included leading the 1912 , textile strike, where over 20,000 workers secured a 25% increase and reduced hours despite violent opposition, and similar victories in Paterson silk mills and wheat harvesting. The union's militant anti-capitalist stance, advocacy of , and refusal to support efforts—viewing the conflict as an imperialist war between bosses—provoked intense backlash, including vigilante attacks, state militias, and federal raids under the , culminating in the 1918 Chicago trial where 101 leaders received harsh sentences for alleged . Events like the Everett Massacre of 1916, where armed confrontation left several IWW members dead, exemplified the violent clashes that marked its history. Though membership peaked around 150,000 before wartime suppression reduced it to obscurity by the , the IWW's emphasis on inclusive, rank-and-file and revolutionary tactics influenced subsequent radical labor efforts and persists in niche organizing today.

Ideology and Principles

Core Philosophical Foundations

The core philosophical foundations of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), established at its founding convention in on June 27, 1905, center on the premise of irreconcilable class antagonism between and employers, as articulated in its . This document posits that "the and the employing class have nothing in common," asserting that economic exploitation under generates perpetual conflict, with no possibility of while labor persists and the means of production remain privately controlled. The explicitly rejects reformist compromises, such as "a fair day's for a fair day's work," in favor of the revolutionary demand to "abolish the wage system" through workers' collective seizure of industries and resources. This framework draws from Marxist analysis of class struggle but adapts it to emphasize as the mechanism for , viewing unions not merely as bargaining entities but as instruments to reorganize production under worker control. Influenced by European syndicalist traditions and American radical labor currents, IWW philosophy prioritizes the self-activity of the over reliance on state intervention or , positing that true liberation arises from seized at the point of production. Founders like , representing the Socialist Labor Party, contributed theoretical rigor by advocating industrial unions as the structural basis for a socialist economy, while William D. "Big Bill" Haywood and Western Federation of Miners delegates infused a praxis-oriented militancy rooted in miners' direct confrontations with capital. Paul Frederick Brissenden's 1920 study characterizes this as "American syndicalism," highlighting its rejection of parliamentary in favor of mass strikes and workplace control to dismantle capitalist relations, though the IWW distanced itself from purely European models by focusing on inclusive, industry-wide organization rather than exclusive trade guilds. The philosophy embodies a deterministic view of , wherein the "army of production" inevitably progresses toward by building "the structure of the new society within the shell of the old." This foundational outlook underscores causal realism in labor dynamics: exploitation stems from structural wage dependency, resolvable only through class-wide industrial solidarity transcending craft divisions, nationalities, and races, as fragmented perpetuates capitalist dominance. from early IWW agitation, such as the 1905 calling for unified worker action against trusts, reinforced this by demonstrating how divided labor forces capitulated to employers, while coordinated efforts could halt production and compel concessions—or ultimately expropriation. Critics from both conservative and orthodox socialist quarters dismissed these tenets as utopian or violent, yet IWW adherents maintained their verifiability through where unified workers gained leverage, predicating long-term success on global proletarian unity.

Rejection of Craft Unionism and Political Action

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), founded in 1905, explicitly rejected the craft unionism dominant in organizations like the American Federation of Labor (AFL), which organized workers by skilled trades and often excluded unskilled laborers, immigrants, women, and African Americans, thereby fragmenting the working class and limiting solidarity. Craft unions were seen as perpetuating divisions that weakened collective power against employers, as they prioritized narrow interests of elite trades over broader class struggle, effectively accommodating capitalism by negotiating wages within the existing system rather than challenging it fundamentally. In contrast, the IWW advocated industrial unionism, structuring organization by workplace industry to unite all workers—regardless of skill, ethnicity, or gender—into "one big union" capable of wielding coordinated economic force to abolish the wage system. This approach stemmed from the IWW's analysis that craft forms fostered "trade monopolies" and jealousy among workers, hindering the revolutionary potential of unified action, as articulated in the founding convention's manifesto denouncing such structures. By 1908, the IWW formalized its commitment to industrial organization in its preamble, emphasizing the formation of the new society "within the shell of the old" through workplace-based solidarity, rejecting the AFL's conservative model that accepted private ownership of production. Parallel to its critique of , the IWW opposed reliance on political action, viewing electoral politics and legislative reforms as distractions that subordinated workers to capitalist-controlled state mechanisms, where politicians inevitably served employer interests over class demands. The 's explicitly refuses "all alliances, direct or indirect, with any or anti-political sects," disclaiming responsibility for members' individual political opinions to maintain focus on economic at the point of production. This stance, evident from the 1905 founding and reinforced by the 1908 deletion of a political from the , held that true power lay in direct worker control of industries, not ballots, as political engagement diluted revolutionary energy and invited co-optation. Historical IWW practice, such as prioritizing strikes over voting campaigns, demonstrated this principle, arguing that systemic change required seizing production means through class combat rather than seeking concessions from ruling elites.

Emphasis on Direct Action, Sabotage, and Class Warfare

The Industrial Workers of the World positioned class warfare as the central dynamic of its revolutionary program, rooted in the irreconcilable antagonism between workers and capitalists as outlined in the organization's . This document declares: "The and the employing class have nothing in common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of the working people and the few who make up the employing class have all the good things of life." It further asserts that "between these two classes a struggle must go on until the workers of the World organize as a class, take possession of the , and the machinery of production and abolish the wage system," framing as a system inherently exploitative and destined for overthrow through organized worker power. This rhetoric permeated IWW propaganda, with leaders like William "Big emphasizing the necessity of militant class to dismantle wage labor, as evidenced in his addresses at the founding convention where he urged workers to recognize their shared subjugation under industrial . Direct action formed the tactical core of IWW strategy, prioritizing worker-initiated disruptions at the workplace over electoral politics, , or craft union negotiations. The advocated tactics such as mass strikes, boycotts, and work stoppages to exert immediate economic pressure on employers, rejecting "indirect" methods like that diluted class power. Early examples included the 1909 Spokane free speech fight, where IWW members systematically violated municipal bans on public organizing to recruit itinerant workers, demonstrating direct defiance to build union density. This approach extended to innovative actions like sit-down strikes, which the IWW pioneered or popularized in industries such as mining and manufacturing, enabling workers to occupy production sites and halt operations without dispersing. The philosophy underscored that only through such unmediated confrontations could workers achieve the "One Big Union" capable of general strikes to seize industries. Sabotage, often termed the "conscious withdrawal of ," complemented by targeting capitalist profits from within the production process, though the IWW as an entity avoided formal endorsement to evade prosecution under emerging anti-syndicalism laws. Elizabeth Gurley Flynn's 1916 pamphlet defined it as "the withdrawal of ," involving slowdowns to reduce output or deliberate impairment of , such as poor or equipment mismanagement, to undermine employer gains during non-strike periods. Walker C. Smith elaborated in 1910 that sabotage encompassed "the destruction of profits to gain a definite, revolutionary, economic end," ranging from passive feigned incompetence to like tool breakage when strikes were infeasible. Haywood reinforced this in public statements, describing sabotage as a means "to push back, pull out or break off the fangs of ," aligning it with broader class war objectives. These tactics, disseminated via pamphlets and the IWW's Industrial Worker newspaper, empowered marginalized workers—such as lumberjacks and harvest hands—to resist exploitation without relying on elite-led unions. Collectively, these elements rejected compromise with , insisting on revolutionary industrial unionism where workers, organized by skill across industries, wielded and to erode employer control incrementally until a final expropriation. This uncompromising stance, while galvanizing radical mobilization, invited severe repression, as governments viewed the rhetoric and methods as threats to industrial order.

Founding and Early Development

Establishment and Initial Leadership

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) was established on June 27, 1905, in , , at a founding convention held in Brand's Hall and attended by 203 delegates from 43 labor organizations, including miners, socialists, and trade unionists dissatisfied with the American Federation of Labor's craft-based exclusivity. The convention, often termed the "Continental Congress of the Working Class," was convened to create a class-struggle union organizing workers industrially across all sectors, emphasizing solidarity to abolish wage slavery through militant tactics rather than political reform or arbitration. William D. "Big Bill" Haywood, a prominent leader of the , called the assembly to order and chaired its sessions, leveraging his experience from western mining strikes to advocate for a revolutionary alternative to conservative unionism. Prominent attendees included of the Socialist Trade and Labor Alliance, who pushed for a structured socialist framework; of the Socialist Party, representing political labor elements; and Mary "Mother" , a veteran organizer known for her agitation among miners and textile workers. These figures, alongside anarchist and syndicalist representatives like Thomas Hagerty—who drafted the initial preamble calling for the to "take possession of the earth and the machinery of production"—reflected the coalition's diverse ideological roots, though tensions between political socialists and direct-action advocates emerged early. The convention rejected affiliations with existing and prioritized to enable general strikes capable of seizing production control. At the convention's conclusion, Charles H. Sherman was elected the first general president, while William E. Trautmann, a German-American socialist and editor, became general secretary-treasurer; Haywood served on the executive board but deferred formal leadership to focus on organizing. This initial structure emphasized a temporary headquarters in and decentralized industrial departments, though internal debates over political action—exemplified by De Leon's insistence on tying the IWW to his Socialist Labor Party—foreshadowed the 1908 schism that expelled his faction, solidifying the union's anti-political stance under Haywood's growing influence.

Organizational Structure and One Big Union Model

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) adopted an organizational model centered on , rejecting craft-based divisions in favor of uniting all workers within an industry into a single union to foster class-wide and enable collective control over production. This "One Big Union" (OBU) approach, articulated in the IWW's 1908 preamble, posited that "the and the employing class have nothing in common" and that workers must organize "not by , but by industry, until all toilers come together in One Big Union." The model aimed to overcome the fragmentation of craft unions, which the IWW viewed as incapable of addressing unskilled labor or coordinating industry-wide action, by structuring membership around productive functions rather than skills or trades. At its core, the IWW's structure divided workers into Industrial Unions (IUs), each encompassing a specific branch of industry, such as , , or , with further subdivision into departments grouping related IUs—for instance, Department 1 for basic production industries and Department 6 for general labor not classified elsewhere. Local organization occurred through General Membership Branches (GMBs) for geographic areas or job-specific branches within workplaces, where workers elected job delegates to handle dues collection, , and agitation without hierarchical over members. These delegates, recallable at any time, served as organizers on the shop floor, emphasizing direct worker control and avoiding a paid ; higher bodies, like district councils or the annual convention, consisted of elected delegates from locals, ensuring policy flowed upward from the rank-and-file. This federated system, formalized in the IWW's from its founding convention, prioritized revolutionary aims over immediate contracts, viewing the union as a means to seize the through unified . The OBU model extended beyond national borders, incorporating international sections and charters for overseas branches, though implementation varied; by 1913, the IWW had chartered over 20 IUs, but full departmental integration proved challenging amid repression and internal debates. Critics within the labor movement, including the , dismissed the structure as utopian for its abolitionist stance against wage slavery, yet proponents argued it enabled effective , as seen in early strikes where industry-wide coordination amplified worker leverage. The absence of full-time officials and reliance on voluntary delegates underscored a commitment to proletarian self-management, though this contributed to administrative strains during peak membership around 1917, when dues-paying members exceeded 150,000.

United States History

Expansion and Strikes, 1905-1916

The Industrial Workers of the World experienced initial growth in membership and influence from to , primarily among unskilled immigrant laborers in extractive and industries, though exact figures remain disputed due to loose and sporadic dues payment. Estimates suggest paid membership hovered around 5,000 to by , with broader influence reaching tens of thousands through strike participation, contrasting with inflated claims of over 100,000. Expansion relied on itinerant organizers targeting migratory workers in , , and , bolstered by free speech fights like the 1909 Missoula campaign, which drew national attention to IWW tactics of mass arrests to overwhelm local authorities. A pivotal success came with the 1909 McKees Rocks strike, where 6,000 steelworkers at Pressed Steel Car Company in Pennsylvania struck against wage cuts and hazardous conditions, employing direct action including bombings attributed to militants; the action ended with concessions on wages and hours after five months and significant violence, enhancing IWW credibility among industrial workers. The 1912 Lawrence textile strike marked the organization's most celebrated victory: on January 12, approximately 23,000 multi-ethnic workers walked out over a 5% wage cut amid rising living costs, organized by IWW leaders Joseph Ettor and Arturo Giovannitti, who were later charged with murder in a striker's death despite evidence pointing to company guards. Tactics included unified demands across mills, solidarity parades, and evacuating children to sympathetic homes; the strike concluded March 14 with a 25% wage increase, improved conditions, and no reprisals, solidifying IWW's reputation for uniting diverse workers against craft union divisions. Subsequent efforts revealed limitations. The 1913 Paterson silk strike involved 24,000 workers protesting a 3.5% effective pay cut from wider looms, starting February 25 under IWW guidance with calls for a general strike and the controversial Paterson Pageant in New York to fund relief, which raised $3,000 but alienated some participants and failed to sustain momentum. Lasting five months, it ended in July without major gains as hunger forced returns to work, exposing internal IWW disputes over leadership and strategy, including criticism of centralized control by figures like William Haywood. That August, the Wheatland hop riot in California saw 2,000-3,000 pickers at Durst Ranch demand fair pay (from 25 cents to 50 cents per bucket) and sanitation amid squalid conditions; an IWW-led meeting escalated when sheriff's deputies intervened, resulting in four deaths, including two officials, and convictions of organizers Richard Ford and Herman Suhr for manslaughter after a biased trial. The incident spurred California's 1915 labor camp regulations, marking an early IWW push into agriculture despite repression. By 1916, IWW activity shifted westward, with the strike commencing June 2 as 8,000 iron ore miners sought an end to the exploitative contract labor system, better pay, and an eight-hour day, coordinated by IWW figures like . Violence ensued, including the sheriff's killing and arrests of union leaders on and charges; the action faltered by September without full demands met, though companies conceded direct hiring and wage adjustments to avert shortages, while IWW influence persisted among Finnish and other immigrant miners. These strikes demonstrated IWW's emphasis on industrial solidarity and but highlighted vulnerabilities to employer intransigence, state intervention, and internal factionalism, setting the stage for wartime crackdowns. Following the ' entry into on April 6, 1917, the Industrial Workers of the World faced intensified suppression due to its anti-war stance and strikes in war-critical sectors such as and . The organization's publications and activities, including calls to resist and maintain , were deemed threats to the by federal authorities. On September 5, 1917, the U.S. Department of Justice executed simultaneous raids on IWW headquarters in and 48 local offices across 12 states, seizing approximately five tons of documents from the national office alone. These operations resulted in the arrest and indictment of 166 IWW leaders on charges of violating the , which prohibited actions intended to interfere with military operations or recruitment, as well as related presidential proclamations. The raids involved coordination with the Bureau of Investigation, military intelligence, and civilian groups like the , accompanied by censorship measures such as the U.S. Post Office's ban on IWW periodicals including Solidarity and Industrial Worker. The most prominent legal challenge was the Chicago conspiracy trial, which commenced on April 1, 1918, before Judge and involved 101 defendants accused of a broad conspiracy to the war. After a lasting nearly five months, the jury deliberated for less than an hour before finding all defendants guilty on August 17, 1918; sentences included 20 years for 15 leaders like William D. Haywood, 10 years for 33 others, 5 years for 31, and total fines exceeding $2 million. Parallel federal trials occurred in districts such as Wichita (December 1919, over 40 convictions with 3- to 9-year terms) and Sacramento, while several states enacted criminal laws targeting IWW advocacy of and . Vigilante actions complemented federal efforts, exemplified by the on July 12, 1917, during an IWW-led strike against copper mines that began June 26. Sheriff Harry C. Wheeler and a posse of about 2,000 citizens rounded up 1,186 strikers and supporters—many affiliated with the IWW—loading them into boxcars and abandoning them in the desert without formal charges or . A subsequent federal investigation by the U.S. Commission on found the action illegal but resulted in no prosecutions of the perpetrators. These suppressions severely curtailed IWW operations; by 1918, membership had declined from peaks near 150,000 amid imprisonments totaling over 900 years. Although President commuted many sentences in 1923 and deportations were later acknowledged as unconstitutional, the wartime legal framework effectively dismantled the organization's capacity for large-scale organizing.

Post-War Schisms and Decline, 1917-1950

Following the ' entry into in April 1917, the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) endured intensified federal repression, including raids under the and subsequent convictions of over 100 leaders in the 1918 Chicago trial for alleged sabotage of war production, which depleted organizational resources and imprisoned key figures for up to 20 years. Released on bail pending appeal in 1921, prominent leader William "Big Bill" fled to the , abandoning his comrades and exacerbating a leadership vacuum that hindered recovery efforts amid ongoing vigilante violence and state surveillance during the First Red Scare. Despite brief membership resurgence to around 30,000 by 1923 through localized organizing in and sectors, internal ideological tensions between anarchist-syndicalist traditionalists and pro-Bolshevik factions—fueled by the latter's push for centralized control and affiliation with the (Red International of Labor Unions)—culminated in a at the IWW's general convention in from September 2-17, 1924. The minority faction, advocating an "Emergency Program" for political action and Comintern alignment, seized control of headquarters and publications, prompting the majority to form the "Four-Trey" group (named for the 1924 convention); this fracture, rooted in irreconcilable views on dual unionism and centralization, caused immediate membership hemorrhage as branches splintered and efforts fragmented. The 1924 split accelerated decline, reducing active membership below 10,000 by 1930, compounded by persistent post-war economic contraction, employer blacklists, and competition from craft unions under the , which absorbed skilled workers while IWW tactics alienated potential allies in stabilizing industries. Organizational weaknesses, including decentralized structure vulnerable to infiltration and failure to adapt to shifts, further eroded influence, with scattered strikes in and maritime sectors yielding limited gains amid deportations and injunctions. By the 1940s, amid World War II-era no-strike pledges by mainstream labor and renewed anti-radical probes, IWW activity dwindled to niche campaigns, sustaining fewer than 5,000 dues-paying members by 1950 and marking a shift from mass movement to symbolic revolutionary outpost.

Marginal Revival Efforts, 1950-Present

Following the severe repression during World War I and subsequent schisms, the IWW experienced further decline in the post-war period, reaching near-extinction by the amid the Second and anti-communist persecutions that targeted radical labor organizations. Membership dwindled to a few hundred active members, primarily sustained by a small core of dedicated Wobblies in isolated branches, with limited organizational capacity for large-scale actions. A modest revival began in the , fueled by the broader social upheavals of the , anti-Vietnam War protests, and university , which attracted younger radicals sympathetic to the IWW's anti-authoritarian ethos and critique of . These movements injected new energy and recruits into the union, though the influx often emphasized cultural and political dissent over traditional industrial organizing, leading to tensions with the IWW's foundational focus on workplace . By the late , branches in urban areas like and reported increased activity, including support for farmworker strikes and environmental causes, but overall membership remained under 1,000, reflecting the union's marginal status relative to mainstream labor federations. In the 1970s and , the IWW attempted to adapt to by targeting service and informal sectors, though many campaigns implicitly adopted elements of (NLRB) processes, diverging from the union's historical rejection of state-mediated bargaining. Efforts included organizing in food service and small , but successes were limited, with persistent internal debates over tactics hindering growth. The marked a notable uptick in visibility through campaigns in precarious employment, exemplified by the formation of the Starbucks Workers Union (SWU) in , an IWW initiative that organized baristas across multiple U.S. cities. The SWU secured wage increases, improved scheduling, and safety enhancements at several stores through and public pressure, despite facing employer retaliation and NLRB challenges; by 2022, it had influenced NLRB rulings against for unfair labor practices. Similar efforts extended to platforms and workers, such as graduate employee organizing, emphasizing "solidarity unionism" without reliance on contracts. As of the 2020s, the IWW maintains an estimated membership of around 8,000 across , with branches active in diverse industries including retail, tech, and healthcare, focusing on rank-and-file control and anti-capitalist . While these efforts demonstrate resilience and localized wins, the union's influence remains peripheral, overshadowed by larger affiliates and constrained by legal barriers to revolutionary tactics, underscoring its role more as an ideological touchstone than a dominant labor force.

International Activities

Australia and New Zealand

The Industrial Workers of the World established branches in Australia during the mid-1900s, with initial IWW Clubs forming between 1905 and 1910, drawing influence from American organizers and emphasizing revolutionary industrial unionism over craft-based or political approaches. By 1907, organized activity emerged in Sydney and Melbourne, attracting migrant workers and advocating direct action tactics such as strikes and sabotage to challenge capitalist control in industries like mining, construction, and waterfront labor. Membership grew amid economic unrest, peaking at approximately 4,000 in mid-1917, with about 1,500 concentrated in Sydney, supported by the newspaper Direct Action reaching a circulation of 15,000 copies. Australian IWW members played a prominent role in opposing World War I conscription efforts, producing propaganda that highlighted class divisions in the war, including posters in 1916 satirizing bourgeois calls for worker enlistment while elites remained insulated from frontline risks. This anti-war stance, coupled with involvement in strikes and alleged sabotage, provoked severe government repression; the Unlawful Associations Act of 1916 outlawed the IWW, exposed membership rolls to employers, and enabled mass arrests, including the 1916-1918 trial of the "IWW Twelve" on charges of treason and arson, which involved fabricated evidence but resulted in convictions later pardoned. Police raids, deportations, and vigilante actions dismantled the organization by 1918, though underground activity persisted briefly before broader decline due to wartime suppression and internal factionalism. In , the IWW founded its first branch in in 1907, promoting anti-racist and anti-sexist principles within a framework of industrial solidarity, and published materials critiquing systems in favor of unionism. The group influenced radical elements during events like the 1912-1913 Waihi miners' strike, where IWW rhetoric attacked moderate trade unions and state mediation as tools of capitalist control, though its overall membership remained smaller and less centralized than in . Repression similar to Australia's followed , curtailing activities, but echoes of IWW tactics appeared in later waterfront disputes and union radicalism, with formal branches reviving sporadically in the under the global IWW umbrella.

Canada and Europe

The Industrial Workers of the World established an early presence in , particularly in , with five branches operating by 1906. Membership expanded rapidly to around 10,000 by 1911, concentrated among itinerant workers in , , and railway construction sectors. Organizing emphasized and across crafts, drawing migrants from U.S. IWW campaigns and appealing to the harsh conditions of frontier industries. Key strikes highlighted this activity. In September 1911, 900 construction workers on the Canadian Northern Railway in halted 100 miles of track-laying. This escalated in March 1912 to an "eight-thousand-mile " involving 8,000 workers spanning over 400 miles of rail lines, followed by another action of 7,000 against the same railway in the . IWW tactics, including flying squadrons of organizers and refusals to handle scab work, disrupted operations but provoked employer blacklists and state intervention. A major logging strike of 15,000 workers erupted in in January 1924 under Lumber Workers Industrial Union No. 120. World War I brought severe repression. Amid fears of sabotage in war industries, the Canadian government outlawed IWW membership via on September 24, 1918, under criminal provisions modeled on U.S. laws; the ban was rescinded on April 2, 1919. Postwar revival yielded modest gains, with 5,600 members in three branches achieving localized job control by 1923, though numbers fell to 2,100 across six branches by 1949 amid competition from craft unions and the One Big Union movement. IWW influence persisted in pockets like and into the mid-20th century, fostering radical labor traditions despite marginalization. In , IWW organizational efforts were sporadic and smaller-scale than in , often limited to ports and immigrant worker networks. The saw branches form as early as , with a chartered British Administration by targeting dockers and seamen; participation in events like the 1947 London dock strike demonstrated continuity, though overall impact remained peripheral amid stronger national unions. Germany hosted a notable Marine Transport Workers branch starting in 1924, operating in ports such as Stettin (now ) and , where it organized 10,000 members before Nazi suppression dismantled it in . Such maritime-focused initiatives reflected IWW's emphasis on global "one big union" but struggled against nationalist labor federations and state controls. Later developments, like a Swedish branch at Malm shipyards in 1971, echoed IWW principles through alliances but postdated the union's peak era. Broader European , including in and , absorbed IWW tactics of and , yet formal branches rarely achieved sustained membership or control comparable to settler economies.

Other Global Efforts

The Industrial Workers of the World exerted influence in through migrant workers, publications, and direct organizing, particularly in and , where syndicalist tactics resonated with local labor struggles from the to the . In , IWW organizers along the U.S. border collaborated with the Partido Liberal Mexicano and influenced the Casa del Obrero Mundial, a federation that adopted one big union principles and participated in strikes during the Mexican Revolution; by 1917, joint IWW-Casa actions involved thousands of workers in border industries. IWW publications like Solidaridad Obrera circulated ideas of class warfare and , fostering autonomous worker groups amid revolutionary upheaval, though formal branches remained limited due to political fragmentation. In , the IWW established a formal branch, the Industrial Workers of the World (Chile), by 1919, with strongestholds among dockworkers and maritime laborers in , where it led strikes demanding better wages and conditions in the nitrate and port sectors; membership peaked in the early before government crackdowns under the "White Terror" era dismantled locals through arrests and office raids in 1921-1927. The group published Acción Directa to promote revolutionary unionism, drawing on IWW tactics like free speech fights adapted to local ports, but internal debates over political alliances weakened cohesion. Further south, sporadic IWW activity occurred in and via traveling organizers and Spanish-language , influencing anarcho-syndicalist circles in ports around 1910-1920, though without sustained branches amid competition from larger federations like the FORA. In , IWW ideas shaped the Industrial Workers of Africa, founded in as the first union open to black workers, which organized across racial lines in tailoring shops and railways, issuing manifestos for industrial solidarity until suppressed by pass laws and arrests by 1921; key figures like T.W. Thibedi adapted the preamble for local conditions, emphasizing anti-capitalist over parliamentary reform. These efforts highlighted the IWW's transnational appeal to marginalized workers but faltered against state repression and competing nationalisms.

Tactics, Culture, and Propaganda

Free Speech Campaigns and Militant Organizing

The Industrial Workers of the World conducted free speech campaigns from 1908 to 1916 as a strategy to defend the right of itinerant workers to hold public meetings for and agitation against employment abuses, deliberately violating local ordinances to provoke mass arrests and overwhelm municipal resources. These efforts, which resulted in approximately 5,000 arrests nationwide, served to publicize labor grievances, attract supporters, and challenge state authority over public spaces. Participants often engaged in hunger strikes while imprisoned to conditions and force releases, turning legal repression into a platform for . In Spokane, Washington, the campaign formally began on November 2, 1909, after authorities banned street speaking to curb IWW criticism of exploitative employment agencies charging fees to unemployed workers. Over 500 individuals were arrested in the ensuing months, including prominent organizer , who at age 19 delivered speeches drawing crowds before her detention on charges of obstructing sidewalks. Jail overcrowding and sustained protests compelled partial concessions by early 1910, allowing limited street meetings, though enforcement remained erratic. The campaign of 1912 exemplified the tactic's potential for escalation, with over 500 arrests in the first weeks following an ordinance restricting speeches within a designated zone. Local elites, fearing IWW influence on transient loggers and sailors, mobilized vigilantes who abducted prisoners from custody, subjected them to beatings, tarring, and forced marches to the county line, resulting in at least one confirmed death from injuries. Police collusion with vigilantes intensified the , yet the campaign garnered national attention and reinforcements from other IWW , highlighting the organization's willingness to endure physical confrontation for organizational gains. Beyond free speech defenses, IWW militant organizing emphasized at the point of production, rejecting arbitration and contracts in favor of strikes, , and boycotts to seize control incrementally. Tactics included tight perimeters around struck facilities to block scabs and supplies, as seen in early textile actions like Lawrence in 1912. , defined by IWW literature as "strike on the job" through deliberate slowdowns or inefficiencies rather than outright destruction, aimed to undermine profitability without halting work entirely, drawing from European syndicalist influences but adapted to American conditions. These methods, while effective in short-term disruptions, often invited severe employer and state retaliation, underscoring the IWW's prioritization of revolutionary confrontation over institutional accommodation.

Role of Songs, Literature, and Lingo

The Industrial Workers of the World utilized songs as a vital instrument for agitation, education, and solidarity, compiling them into the Little Red Songbook, first issued in 1909 to fan discontent among workers. These volumes adapted familiar melodies—often hymns or popular tunes—with lyrics promoting class struggle, authored by figures like Joe Hill, whose contributions such as "Casey Jones—the Union Scab" critiqued strikebreaking before his 1915 execution. Sung collectively at meetings, marches, and strikes from 1906 onward, the songs embedded revolutionary ideas more enduringly than prose, as Hill noted that while pamphlets were read once, songs were internalized and reiterated, cultivating a counterculture resistant to capitalist narratives. IWW literature, including pamphlets and periodicals, served as ideological primers and tactical guides, disseminated via street sales and mail to reach migratory laborers. The Industrial Worker newspaper, debuting in Spokane in 1909, propagated news of labor battles, critiques of , and calls for one big union, sustaining membership amid repression. Works like Walker C. Smith's 1910 pamphlet outlined nonviolent workplace disruptions—such as slowdowns—to pressure employers, framing them as extensions of rather than criminal acts. This output rejected electoral politics in favor of , with leagues formed by 1908 to coordinate distribution and amplify the union's vision of abolishing the wage system through worker control. Wobbly lingo encompassed a lexicon of slang, jargon, and hobo vernacular that forged in-group cohesion among the union's diverse, often unskilled ranks. Terms such as "Wobbly" for members (emerging around 1913 from uncertain origins, possibly phonetic or mocking), "fink" for informers or scabs, and "bulls" for police reflected a worldview of perpetual antagonism, embedded in oral traditions, songs, and pamphlets. This argot, drawn from transient workers' experiences, facilitated discreet communication during organizing drives and reinforced revolutionary identity, distinguishing IWW adherents from reformist laborers and perpetuating tactics like job actions across transient populations.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Violence and Sabotage

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) espoused as a tactical element of , conceptualized in member Elizabeth Gurley Flynn's 1916 pamphlet as "the conscious withdrawal of the workers' industrial efficiency," involving methods like deliberate slowness, feigned incompetence, or minor disruptions to machinery in order to exert economic pressure on employers without physical confrontation or strikes. This approach drew from earlier European labor traditions, such as the French term "saboter" implying inefficient work akin to wooden shoes clogging machines, and was promoted in IWW pamphlets by figures like William E. Trautmann and Walker C. Smith as a non-violent counterpart to lockouts by capitalists. Critics, including U.S. government officials and industrialists, contended that such rhetoric implicitly endorsed destructive violence, associating IWW agitation with equipment sabotage and industrial slowdowns during that allegedly hampered war production in sectors like and . Allegations of outright violence often arose in the context of IWW-led strikes and free speech fights, where clashes with authorities were attributed to union provocation rather than mutual escalation. In the Wheatland hop riot on August 3, 1913, at the Durst Ranch near , approximately 2,000 migrant workers striking for better pay and conditions assembled for a rally; district attorney and deputies arrived to disperse the crowd, firing the first shots that killed two strikers, two deputies, and one bystander, with ensuing melee blamed on IWW organizers for inciting unrest despite evidence that rancher Eugene Durst's poor conditions and broken promises fueled the dispute. IWW leaders and Herman Suhr, who had not fired weapons, were convicted of manslaughter in January 1915 after a marked by testimony and claims of union militancy, though the incident prompted California's first regulations in 1915. A similar pattern emerged in the Everett Massacre on November 5, 1916, when about 300 IWW members sailed from on the steamer to hold a free speech meeting in , amid a shingle weavers' strike; sheriff's deputies numbering around 200, armed under orders from local business interests, blocked the dock and initiated gunfire as the Wobblies approached, killing at least five union members (with bodies dumped at sea) and wounding dozens more, while two deputies died from or initial volleys. Authorities alleged the IWW arrived armed and intent on riot, leading to the of 74 survivors and the conviction of Thomas Tracy for murder based on disputed evidence, though federal inquiries and ballistics suggested deputies fired first into the crowded boat. Federal charges under the 1917 Espionage Act amplified allegations, with over 100 IWW leaders tried in 1918 for conspiring to war industries through strikes and slowdowns in the Midwest, resulting in convictions and sentences totaling over 300 years despite limited forensic evidence of physical destruction—prosecutors relied on IWW and membership lists to infer intent. While isolated acts of occurred during lumber disputes, such as threats in camps around 1917, systematic IWW-orchestrated violence lacked substantiation in court records, with many accusations serving to legitimize vigilante actions and deportations like the July 1917 Bisbee event, where 1,200 strikers were forcibly expelled. Labor historians note that employer-funded propaganda and state repression often conflated rhetorical militancy with criminality, contributing to the IWW's organizational decline without disproving the tactical utility of non-violent in asymmetric power dynamics.

Government Repression and Anti-War Stance

The Industrial Workers of the World maintained an uncompromising opposition to war, framing it as a tool of capitalist exploitation that pitted workers against each other for elite gain. At its November 1916 convention, the IWW passed a resolution condemning all wars and advocating anti-militaristic during peacetime to build class among workers globally. This stance intensified as the approached entry into , with IWW publications like Solidarity depicting the conflict as one where workers would perish for capitalist profits, as illustrated in a June 30, 1917, cartoon. The organization uniquely among major U.S. labor groups rejected American participation, refusing to support war bonds, recruitment, or production boosts in critical sectors like copper mining. Following the U.S. on April 6, 1917, the federal government targeted the IWW under the Espionage Act of June 15, 1917, which criminalized interference with military operations or recruitment. On September 5, 1917, Department of Justice agents raided over 60 IWW halls across the country, confiscating records, publications, and membership lists from locations including headquarters. These actions facilitated mass indictments, with more than 160 members charged for alleged to the through strikes and slowdowns. The government also revoked mailing privileges for IWW newspapers, severely hampering communication. The most prominent case was the Chicago conspiracy trial, commencing April 1, 1918, before federal judge , involving 101 defendants including general secretary-treasurer William D. Haywood. Prosecutors presented IWW records and anti-war literature as evidence of seditious intent, leading to convictions on August 20, 1918, for all defendants; Haywood and 14 others received 20-year sentences, while aggregate prison terms exceeded 300 years. Appeals failed, though President commuted some sentences in 1922, and Haywood jumped bail to the in 1921. Local repression compounded federal efforts, exemplified by the on July 12, 1917, where Cochise County Sheriff Harry C. Wheeler and 2,000 armed vigilantes rounded up approximately 1,300 striking miners—many IWW members—and supporters in , loading them into cattle cars and abandoning them in the desert without food or water. Federal authorities, including President , declined intervention, viewing the action as necessary for war production stability despite its extralegal nature. Similar vigilante expulsions occurred in other mining towns, eroding IWW organizing capacity and membership, which plummeted from peaks of around 150,000 in 1917. Post-armistice, repression persisted via the 1918 Sedition Act and 1919-1920 , targeting residual IWW activity and leading to further arrests and deportations of foreign-born members. These measures, justified by amid wartime hysteria, effectively dismantled the IWW's infrastructure and radical influence by the early .

Internal Divisions and Strategic Failures

The Industrial Workers of the World experienced its first major at the 1908 convention in , where tensions between the Chicago-based faction, emphasizing pure syndicalist and rejecting political involvement, clashed with the Detroit faction led by of the Socialist Labor Party, who advocated integrating with political education and electoral activity to prepare workers for . De Leon's group viewed the IWW as a dual mechanism for economic organization and political propaganda, but the Chicago majority, including figures like William Trautmann and Vincent St. John, expelled De Leon and his supporters, solidifying the union's anti-political stance and labeling the rival Detroit IWW as doctrinaire and ineffective. This fracture weakened the organization early, as De Leon's faction dissolved by 1910, diverting resources and alienating potential socialist allies who saw the IWW's rejection of ballots as utopian. Subsequent internal conflicts revolved around the syndicalist purity versus pragmatic engagement, with recurring debates over "boring from within" established unions like the (AFL) versus maintaining the IWW as a dual union. The saw factional fights, including expulsions of members favoring political action or compromise with craft unions, as the General Executive Board enforced a strict no-contracts policy to avoid "," which critics within and outside argued prevented consolidating strike victories into enduring institutions. This ideological rigidity, rooted in the belief that contracts diluted fervor, led to strategic isolation; for instance, after major wins like the , workers often returned to pre-strike conditions without binding agreements, eroding membership loyalty among semi-skilled and immigrant laborers who prioritized immediate gains. Organizational decentralization exacerbated divisions, as the IWW's federal structure empowered autonomous local branches but fostered inconsistent tactics and leadership rivalries, with "wobblies" often ridiculing formal officials as "tin gods," undermining administrative cohesion. By the 1924 convention, post-World War I repression had thinned ranks to under 10,000, prompting a split where a minority pushed for centralized Communist-influenced reforms to rebuild, but the majority clung to anarcho-syndicalist autonomy, resulting in the loss of key branches and further fragmentation. These failures stemmed causally from overreliance on transient itinerant workers and militant agitation without scalable infrastructure, as evidenced by membership peaking at approximately 150,000 in 1917 before plummeting 90% by 1920 due to unaddressed internal disunity amid external raids. Strategically, the IWW's aversion to political action proved a core weakness, as syndicalist doctrine posited industrial sabotage and general strikes alone could expropriate the , ignoring the need to dismantle state power through broader confrontation—a view empirically falsified by the union's inability to sustain against capitalist resilience and rival reformist unions that accrued legal protections via . While this purity attracted radicals, it repelled moderates and skilled trades, limiting the "one big union" vision to marginal sectors like and , where seasonal amplified turnover; historians note that without adaptive alliances or electoral pressure, the IWW failed to counter divide-and-rule tactics by employers, contributing to its marginalization by .

Legacy and Assessment

Influence on Labor Movements

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) exerted a profound influence on subsequent labor movements through its advocacy of , which prioritized organizing all workers within an industry into a single union, contrasting with the craft-based exclusivity of the . This approach, articulated in the IWW's founding convention on June 27, 1905, demonstrated viability in early strikes, such as the involving 25,000 workers, and prefigured the mass organizing drives of the established in 1935. Historians note that IWW and actions popularized the concept, enabling CIO unions to unionize previously resistant sectors like automobiles and by the late 1930s, when membership surged to over 4 million. IWW tactics, including , mass picketing, and the sit-down strike—first employed systematically by IWW organizers in the 1910s—were adapted by later unions despite the IWW's own suppression under the , which led to over 100 convictions and organizational near-collapse by 1920. The 1936–1937 by , involving 14,000 workers seizing plants, mirrored IWW methods in halting production through occupation, contributing to the union's recognition and broader New Deal-era gains. Such strategies emphasized worker control over workplaces, influencing militant phases of post-World War II labor actions, though diluted by CIO's eventual bureaucratization. Culturally, the IWW's , first published in 1909 with songs like ," embedded class-struggle themes in labor folklore, inspiring union anthems and folk revivals through the . This propaganda tool, disseminated via itinerant organizers ("Wobblies"), fostered a of resistance—phrases like "one big union" and tactics of as "conscious withdrawal of efficiency"—that permeated rank-and-file organizing, even as mainstream unions distanced from the IWW's revolutionary abolition of wage labor. Empirical data from CIO growth, with industrial union density rising from under 10% in 1930 to 30% by 1945, underscores indirect IWW impact, though causal attribution tempers by the IWW's opposition to political reformism, which clashed with CIO alliances under the Democratic Party.

Factors Contributing to Organizational Failure

The Industrial Workers of the World reached its peak membership of approximately 150,000 in August 1917, but by the mid-1920s, numbers had dwindled significantly due to intertwined external pressures and internal frailties. repression during and after severely disrupted operations, beginning with coordinated raids on September 5, 1917, targeting all IWW halls and headquarters across the , resulting in the seizure of records and arrests of key leaders. The 1918 trial prosecuted 101 members under the for alleged seditious activities, leading to convictions and lengthy sentences that decimated leadership and organizational continuity. Vigilante actions compounded state efforts, as seen in the July 1917 , where over 1,200 striking miners and supporters were forcibly loaded onto trains and expelled from by armed company guards and local authorities, exemplifying extralegal violence that intimidated membership. The of organizer Frank Little in August 1917 and the 1919 Centralia incident, involving clashes with members that killed six, further eroded morale and recruiting amid a broader cultural backlash against radical labor. These repressive measures, while not solely causative, exploited the IWW's decentralized structure, preventing rapid reconstitution as imprisoned leaders like William D. Haywood focused on external political maneuvering over internal rebuilding. Internal divisions exacerbated vulnerabilities, culminating in the 1924 schism at the organization's sixteenth convention, where ideological clashes between syndicalist traditionalists and pro-communist factions, fueled by personal rivalries and disputes over centralized control, splintered unity. Earlier tensions, such as debates over accepting partial presidential commutations of sentences in 1922–1923, deepened distrust and led to localized rebellions, like dues boycotts in locals. The IWW's rigid aversion to contracts and political engagement, prioritizing revolutionary agitation over immediate gains, alienated workers seeking stability during the 1920s economic expansion, when industrial output surged and reformist unions like the AFL captured institutional footholds. Organizational weaknesses, including reliance on transient migratory labor and insufficient formal hierarchies for sustaining post-repression, hindered adaptation to shifts like declining and strikes. Financial , with depleted treasuries unable to support defense funds or after 1917 seizures, amplified these issues, as the union struggled against employer blacklists and competing company unions. Collectively, these factors—repression providing the initial blow, compounded by schisms and structural rigidity—ensured the IWW's inability to recover, reducing it to marginal influence by the 1930s.

Comparative Evaluation Against Reformist Unions

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) pursued revolutionary , advocating a single union encompassing all workers to seize control of industries and abolish labor through and general strikes, in stark contrast to reformist unions like the (AFL), which emphasized craft-based , , and incremental improvements within the capitalist system. The IWW rejected political involvement and contracts as concessions to employers, viewing them as perpetuating exploitation, whereas the AFL, under , promoted "pure and simple" unionism focused on immediate economic gains such as higher wages and shorter hours via and . Organizationally, the IWW's inclusive model targeted unskilled laborers, immigrants, and marginalized groups excluded by AFL craft unions, which prioritized skilled tradesmen and often discriminated by race, , or to maintain leverage. This broad appeal enabled the IWW to organize transient workers in logging, mining, and agriculture, achieving temporary victories like the involving 20,000 workers, but its refusal to establish permanent locals or sign agreements undermined long-term stability. In comparison, AFL craft unions secured durable contracts that protected skilled members' privileges, fostering growth from approximately 447,000 members in to over 2 million by 1904 through alliances with employers and government. Tactically, the IWW's emphasis on militant , including and mass strikes, contrasted with the AFL's preference for legalism and avoidance of industrial-wide disruption, which the IWW deemed insufficient for systemic change. While IWW campaigns innovated methods like free speech fights and flying squadrons, leading to short-term concessions in sectors like Western camps by 1917, these efforts provoked severe and state backlash, including the 1917-1918 raids that dismantled locals and deported thousands. Reformist unions, by contrast, navigated repression through political , contributing to reforms like the eight-hour day in federal contracts by and influencing the Wagner Act of 1935, which institutionalized bargaining rights. Empirically, the IWW peaked at around 150,000 members in 1917 before plummeting to near collapse by 1924 due to repression, internal schisms, and failure to retain gains without contracts, rendering it marginal by . The AFL, however, expanded steadily, reaching millions by mid-century, delivering sustained wage increases—real wages for unionized workers rose 20-30% in key trades from 1900-1920—and establishing a framework for postwar labor power, demonstrating that reformist better aligned with workers' immediate needs and capitalist incentives than revolutionary absolutism. This divergence underscores how the IWW's doctrinal rigidity isolated it from broader alliances, while craft unions' adaptability capitalized on economic upswings and legal protections to embed labor within the status quo.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.