Hubbry Logo
WoodlandWoodlandMain
Open search
Woodland
Community hub
Woodland
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Woodland
Woodland
Woodland
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An open woodland in North Lanarkshire, Scotland

A woodland (/ˈwʊdlənd/ ⓘ) is, in the broad sense, land covered with woody plants (trees and shrubs),[1][2] or in a narrow sense, synonymous with wood (or in the U.S., the plurale tantum woods), a low-density forest forming open habitats with plenty of sunlight and limited shade (see differences between British, American and Australian English explained below). Some savannas may also be woodlands, such as savanna woodland, where trees and shrubs form a light canopy.[3]

Woodlands may support an understory of shrubs and herbaceous plants including grasses. Woodland may form a transition to shrubland under drier conditions or during early stages of primary or secondary succession. Higher-density areas of trees with a largely closed canopy that provides extensive and nearly continuous shade are often referred to as forests.

Extensive efforts by conservationist groups have been made to preserve woodlands from urbanization and agriculture. For example, the woodlands of Northwest Indiana have been preserved as part of the Indiana Dunes.[4][5][6]

Definitions

[edit]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Woodland is used in British woodland management to mean tree-covered areas which arose naturally and which are then managed. At the same time, forest is usually used in the British Isles to describe plantations, usually more extensive, or hunting forests, which are a land use with a legal definition and may not be wooded at all.[7] The term ancient woodland is used in British nature conservation to refer to any wooded land that has existed since 1600, and often (though not always) for thousands of years, since the last Ice Age[7] (equivalent to the American term old-growth forest)

North America

[edit]

In ecosystem conservation, the term woodland refers to the plants, animals, and other biota that live in and under scattered trees that are spaced so that they produce more shade than a savanna but less than a forest. In central North America, the most numerous woodland trees are oaks. Woodlands typically require regular fire to maintain their biodiversity. Woodlands were historically among the most widespread ecosystem types but now are restricted to sites that receive regular prescribed burns or persist on very poor or dry soils. Details differ, as seen in definitions and examples given for Illinois,[8] Wisconsin,[9] and elsewhere in the Midwest.[10]

Woodlot is a closely related term in American forest management, which refers to a stand of trees generally used for firewood. While woodlots often technically have closed canopies, they are so small that light penetration from the edge makes them ecologically closer to woodland than forest. North American forests vary widely in their ecology and are greatly dependent on abiotic factors such as climate and elevation. Much of the old-growth deciduous and pine-dominated forests of the eastern United States was harvested for lumber, paper pulp, telephone poles, creosote, pitch, and tar.

Australia

[edit]

In Australia, a woodland is defined as an area with a sparse (10–30%) cover of trees, and an open woodland has a very sparse (<10%) cover. Woodlands are also subdivided into tall woodlands or low woodlands if their trees are over 30 m (98 ft) or under 10 m (33 ft) high, respectively. This contrasts with forests, which have more than 30% of their area covered by trees.[11]

Woodland ecoregions

[edit]
Main article: Ecoregions

Tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrub lands

[edit]
Main article: Tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrublands
Miombo woodland in Malawi

Temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands

[edit]
A dry sclerophyll woodland in western Sydney.
An open woodland in Northern Illinois supporting an herbaceous understory of forbs and grasses
Main article: Temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands

Montane grasslands and shrublands

[edit]
Main article: Montane grasslands and shrublands
Limber Pine woodland in the Toiyabe Range of central Nevada

Mediterranean forests, woodlands, and scrub

[edit]
Main article: Mediterranean forests, woodlands, and scrub
Mallee woodland with eucalyptuses and melaleucas in Esperance, Western Australia
A cedar woodland in Bsharri, Lebanon

Deserts and xeric shrublands

[edit]
Main article: Deserts and xeric shrublands
Sahel woodland in Mali

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Woodland

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Woodland is an characterized by trees with a relatively open canopy, typically allowing significant to penetrate to the and supporting a grassy or shrubby , distinguishing it from denser closed-canopy forests. This structure arises from environmental factors such as conditions, , and historical disturbances like or , which prevent trees from forming a continuous cover. Woodlands often serve as transitional zones between grasslands and forests, hosting species adapted to partial shade and open conditions. Ecologically, woodlands provide essential services including wildlife habitat for species reliant on both tree and ground-layer vegetation, improved water quality through soil stabilization and filtration, and contributions to carbon sequestration via biomass accumulation in trees and soils. Their open structure fosters higher biodiversity in understory plants and herbivores compared to closed forests, though total carbon storage may be lower due to sparser tree density. Globally, woodland types vary by region, encompassing dry mixed forests on rocky substrates, pinyon-juniper stands in arid zones, and upland mesic woodlands on loamy soils, each shaped by local hydrology and topography. Woodlands face pressures from conversion to agriculture, altered fire regimes, and , which can degrade their structure and function, yet restoration efforts emphasize maintaining open canopies to preserve native and services.

Definitions and Terminology

Core Definitions

Woodland refers to an dominated by woody , primarily trees, with a structure that allows significant light penetration to the , fostering a grassy or herbaceous . Unlike denser forests, woodlands feature spaced tree canopies that create open habitats, often transitioning between grasslands and closed-canopy forests. This configuration supports distinct ecological processes, including fire-adapted species and higher in layers due to reduced shading. Core structural criteria for woodlands include a minimum tree canopy cover typically ranging from 5% to 40%, though exact thresholds vary by system; for instance, the U.S. Forest Service includes woodlands within forest land defined by at least 10% canopy cover of s of any size, but emphasizes lower overall crown density compared to traditional s. The (FAO) differentiates "other wooded land," encompassing many woodlands, as areas with 5-20% tree crown cover and trees capable of reaching heights over 5 meters, excluding land primarily under agricultural or urban use. Area thresholds often start at 0.5 hectares, similar to definitions, to exclude small stands or linear features like hedgerows. Distinctions from forests hinge on density and openness: forests generally exhibit canopy cover exceeding 40%, leading to shaded understories with less grass dominance, whereas woodlands' sparser cover (often 10-30%) promotes savanna-like conditions with frequent ground fires maintaining openness. This ecological separation is evident in regions like the American Midwest or African miombo, where woodlands sustain herbivores through accessible forage unavailable in closed forests. Regional adaptations, such as drought-tolerant species in xeric woodlands, further define their resilience to aridity or seasonal flooding, but the unifying trait remains the balance between woody overstory and open ground layer. In the , woodland is legally defined for forestry statistics and regulations as land under stands of trees covering a minimum area of 0.5 hectares, with a canopy cover of at least 20% (or potential to achieve such cover), and a minimum width of 20 meters between the outermost trees. This threshold, established by the , governs activities such as felling licenses under the Forestry Act 1967 and environmental impact assessments, where areas below 0.5 hectares or with sparser cover may be classified as scrub or non-woodland. In , a slightly lower area threshold of 0.1 hectares applies for native woodland recognition under certain conservation frameworks, reflecting adaptations for fragmented highland landscapes. In the United States, the USDA Forest Service distinguishes woodlands from denser primarily by species composition and canopy openness, categorizing them into nine types (three and six ) where tree cover typically ranges from 10% to 40%, with emphasis on open-grown species like oaks or pines adapted to drier sites. land, a broader category encompassing woodlands, requires at least 1 acre (0.4 hectares) with 10% or more tree canopy cover (or potential), excluding areas primarily used for crops or urban development; this definition underpins national inventory reporting and conservation programs like the Farm Bill, influencing eligibility for subsidies and fire management. Australia employs a structural distinction aligned with the National Forest Policy, where woodlands feature widely spaced trees (crowns not interlocked) with 10-30% canopy cover and heights under 10 meters in low variants, contrasting with forests requiring over 20% cover and taller trees exceeding 2 meters. This classification, used by the , affects , offsets, and under the Environment Protection and Conservation Act 1999, with arid woodlands often qualifying for different grazing or clearing permits than closed-canopy eucalypt forests. Internationally, the (FAO) of the provides a harmonized framework distinguishing "" (over 0.5 hectares, trees taller than 5 meters, canopy over 10%) from "other wooded land" (OWL), which approximates woodlands with 5-10% canopy cover and similar size/area criteria; OWL excludes agricultural or urban uses but includes sparser tree stands. European Union countries often adapt FAO metrics for reporting, with variations by nation—such as Germany's emphasis on minimum tree height of 5 meters and 30% cover for "Wald" (forest/woodland)—impacting subsidies and protected sites, where lower-density areas may receive habitat-specific protections rather than general rules. These discrepancies arise from ecological adaptations to local climates and soils, as denser canopies suit humid temperate zones while open structures prevail in semi-arid regions, influencing cross-border data comparability and policy alignment.

Physical and Ecological Characteristics

Vegetative Structure and Composition

Woodlands feature a vertically stratified vegetative structure comprising multiple layers, each adapted to distinct microhabitats defined by light availability, humidity, and soil conditions. This stratification arises from competitive exclusion and niche partitioning among plant species, with taller trees capturing overhead light while lower strata exploit filtered sunlight and litter-derived nutrients. Typical layers include the canopy, sub-canopy or understory, shrub layer, herbaceous or field layer, and ground layer. The canopy layer consists of emergent mature trees forming an open to semi-closed crown cover, generally ranging from 10% to 40% in many definitions, which permits greater light penetration compared to dense forests exceeding 60% cover. Dominant species vary by and but often include drought-tolerant hardwoods like oaks (Quercus spp.) in temperate zones or acacias (Acacia spp.) in savanna woodlands, with tree heights typically 10-25 meters. This openness fosters coexistence with grasses and forbs, enhancing overall plant diversity through reduced shading competition. Beneath the canopy lies the understory or sub-canopy layer of younger trees and saplings, which experiences partial shade and supports shade-tolerant species such as maples (Acer spp.) or beeches (Fagus spp.) in deciduous woodlands. The shrub layer features woody perennials like hazels (Corylus spp.) or viburnums, providing structural complexity and habitat for associated biota, with densities influenced by disturbance regimes like or that prevent overstory dominance. The herbaceous field layer includes grasses, sedges, ferns, and seasonal wildflowers, thriving in the well-lit gaps characteristic of woodlands and contributing significantly to primary in open systems. Ground cover comprises mosses, lichens, and decomposing litter, which recycles nutrients and maintains , with species composition reflecting edaphic factors like and drainage. Overall plant composition emphasizes woody dominants for but herbaceous elements for understory richness, yielding alpha diversities of 20-50 vascular per in undisturbed stands.

Fauna and Biodiversity Patterns

Woodlands support a diverse array of adapted to their open canopy structure, which permits greater sunlight penetration and a grassy compared to dense forests, fostering habitats for both arboreal and ground-dwelling species. In temperate woodlands, common mammals include ( virginianus), eastern gray squirrels ( carolinensis), bobcats ( rufus), and coyotes (Canis latrans), which exploit the mosaic of trees for cover and open areas for foraging. Birds such as pileated woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus), wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina), and various warblers occupy niches in the canopy and , while reptiles and amphibians thrive in xeric woodlands, with elevated by microhabitats like downed logs and leaf litter. In tropical and subtropical woodlands, such as , large herbivores like and smaller mammals coexist with birds and , though data emphasize adaptations to seasonal dryness and fire-prone environments. Biodiversity patterns in woodlands reflect structural complexity and landscape connectivity, with open configurations often sustaining higher overall than closed-canopy forests by accommodating edge-adapted and grassland-associated taxa alongside woodland specialists. Empirical studies show that vertically stratified woodlands enhance alpha and of small mammals, as layered vegetation provides varied foraging and refuge levels, increasing coexistence. Larger, older-growth sites host more specialist —averaging 7.6 specialists per site versus 2.3 non-woodland generalists—due to accumulated deadwood and heterogeneity, while fragmentation reduces connectivity benefits. Grazing management in woodlands boosts plant structural diversity, indirectly elevating mammal functional diversity through enhanced forage availability. Tropical woodlands exhibit peak latitudinal gradients in , harboring disproportionate shares of global terrestrial , though temperate zones show resilience via mixed habitats supporting raptors, , and arthropods in litter ecosystems.

Global Distribution and Classification

Temperate and Boreal Woodlands

Temperate woodlands encompass open-canopy ecosystems dominated by broad-leaved trees or mixtures of and , typically with tree cover between 10% and 60%, allowing for a grassy or shrubby . These formations occur in mid-latitude regions, roughly 25° to 50° north and south of the , under climates with moderate temperatures, seasonal , and distinct seasons including cold winters that induce leaf drop in dominant . Characteristic vegetation includes oaks (Quercus spp.), maples (Acer spp.), and beeches (Fagus spp.) in and , with hickories (Carya spp.) and chestnuts (Castanea spp.) in eastern regions; soils vary from well-drained loams to podzols, supporting moderate adapted to periodic disturbances like fire or . Distribution spans western and eastern North America, western Europe, eastern Asia, and scattered southern Hemisphere locales like parts of and , where oceanic influences moderate extremes. In the , examples include oak-hickory woodlands across the Midwest and Southeast, covering historical extents reduced by and . Globally, temperate woodlands form part of the broader , which historically occupied significant mid-latitude land but has seen fragmentation, with remaining areas providing key habitats for species like and various songbirds. Boreal woodlands feature sparse, open stands of needle-leaved such as spruces (Picea spp.), pines (Pinus spp.), and larches (Larix spp.), with canopy cover often under 40% on well-drained, acidic soils in to cool continental climates. These ecosystems experience long, cold winters with in northern extents and short growing seasons limited by low temperatures and nutrient-poor substrates like spodosols. includes , wolves, and specialized avifauna, with adaptations to fire-prone dynamics that maintain openness. Primarily confined to the between 50° and 65° N, boreal woodlands extend across (covering about 28% of its land), , , and in , which holds the largest continuous expanse. The broader boreal zone spans 1.9 billion hectares, representing 14% of global land and 33% of the world's forested area, though true woodlands occupy drier, upland margins transitioning to or temperate zones. Classification schemes, such as the International Vegetation Classification (IVC), group these under the Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland subclass (1.B), subdividing into boreal (conifer-dominated), cool temperate (mixed or ), and warm temperate formations based on , , and floristics. This framework emphasizes ecological drivers like temperature regimes and disturbance patterns over arbitrary political boundaries, enabling mapping of alliances like North American boreal black spruce woodlands or European temperate woodlands.

Tropical and Subtropical Woodlands

Tropical and subtropical woodlands consist of open-canopied formations dominated by broad-leaved, drought-deciduous trees or microphyll trees, typically with canopy cover between 10% and 40%, distinguishing them from denser tropical dry forests by allowing a prominent grassy adapted to seasonal fires and herbivory. These ecosystems occur in regions with annual of 500-1500 mm, concentrated in a of 3-6 months, followed by prolonged dry periods that induce leaf shedding to conserve water. Edaphic factors, such as nutrient-poor, well-drained soils, further limit tree density, promoting fire-resilient species that regenerate via or root suckers. Globally, tropical dry forests and woodlands, encompassing these formations, cover approximately 42% of all tropical and subtropical forest area, spanning parts of , , , and the between 30°N and 30°S . In , woodlands represent a prime example, extending over 2.7 million km² across seven countries including , , and , characterized by dominant genera Brachystegia, Julbernardia, and Isoberlinia in the subfamily. These woodlands host around 8,500 plant , including high in trees, with alone recording 17 endemic Brachystegia , alongside diverse such as over 50% of 's remaining elephants and various . Wet variants feature taller canopies exceeding 15 m and greater than 60% cover with higher , while dry has sparser, shorter trees under 10 m. Subtropical woodlands, often transitional to xeric or Mediterranean types, include monsoon-influenced eucalypt-dominated systems in and dry acacia-prosopis stands in parts of and , where mild winters and hot summers alternate with erratic rainfall. In , subtropical dry woodlands support multi-stemmed eucalypts adapted to frequent fires, covering extensive savanna-woodland mosaics. These areas sustain unique , including endemic marsupials and birds, but face pressures from extended dry seasons exacerbated by climate variability. Ecologically, both tropical and subtropical woodlands play critical roles in , , and supporting migratory species, though they experience deforestation rates surpassing those of humid rainforests due to and —losing up to 1% of cover annually in some regions as of 2020.

Specialized Woodlands (Montane, Mediterranean, Xeric)


Montane woodlands occupy mid- to high-elevation slopes in mountain ranges worldwide, typically between 1,000 and 3,000 meters, where cooler temperatures and shorter growing seasons limit tree density and favor coniferous species adapted to rocky, well-drained soils. These ecosystems feature open canopies dominated by pines such as Pinus jeffreyi and Pinus ponderosa in California's Sierra Nevada, or Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in the Rocky Mountains east of the Continental Divide up to McDonald Pass. Exposed, convex slopes with thin soils promote fire-resilient structures, with understories of shrubs and grasses supporting biodiversity amid periodic droughts and pathogens. Mediterranean woodlands thrive in climates with mild, wet winters and hot, dry summers, spanning regions like the Mediterranean Basin, , and parts of , where sclerophyllous evergreens like oaks (Quercus spp.) and pines form sparse canopies over shrubby undergrowth on shallow, rocky soils. These systems, often semi-natural due to historical and , host high plant diversity, with up to 2,900 in northern Morocco's varied , including broadleaf trees less than 8 feet tall that resist summer through thick leaves and deep roots. Sylvo-pastoral uses sustain rural economies while preserving endemic , though excessive alteration has reduced native extents. Xeric woodlands, adapted to arid and semi-arid environments with annual precipitation below 500 mm, consist of drought-tolerant trees like acacias (Acacia spp.) and junipers in open formations on dry, sandy, or rocky uplands, as seen in the Somali Montane Xeric Woodlands along escarpments or pinyon-juniper ecosystems in the American Southwest. These dryland systems, including mallee eucalypts in Australia, exhibit low canopy cover and resilience to heat, drought, and wildfire, with species like Boswellia and Commiphora dominating subcoastal areas; recent mortality events from extreme conditions highlight vulnerabilities despite adaptations. In Saharan montane variants, relict Mediterranean shrubs persist on highlands, forming sparse woodlands amid steppe transitions.

Ecosystem Services and Functions

Environmental Roles

Woodlands provide critical regulating ecosystem services, including , where tree biomass and store atmospheric CO₂, mitigating . In mineral soil broadleaved woodlands, carbon stocks can accumulate to up to 600 tonnes of carbon per after 100 years through growth and natural regeneration. New native woodland plantings in temperate regions may sequester 300 to 400 tonnes of CO₂ equivalent per over 50 years, with annual rates varying by species, site quality, and management but often exceeding those of grasslands. These rates underscore woodlands' role in offsetting emissions, though sequestration slows with canopy closure and can be disrupted by disturbances like or harvesting. Through evapotranspiration and canopy interception, woodlands moderate local climates by reducing temperature extremes and humidity fluctuations, while roots stabilize soils against erosion. Tree canopies intercept rainfall, dissipating up to 30% of precipitation before it reaches the ground, thereby lowering runoff velocity and sediment transport in watersheds. Root systems bind soil particles, preventing annual soil losses that can exceed 10 tonnes per hectare on bare slopes but drop below 1 tonne per hectare under woodland cover, particularly in upland or hilly terrains. This stabilization is enhanced by understory vegetation and leaf litter, which further buffer against sheet and rill erosion during intense storms. Woodlands regulate hydrological cycles by enhancing infiltration and reducing peak flood flows, with studies showing on former decreasing annual runoff by 20-50% in temperate catchments. They also improve by filtering pollutants through and uptake, decontaminating post-industrial sites and reducing leaching into aquifers. Infiltration rates under woodland can reach 50-100 mm/hour, compared to 10-20 mm/hour on compacted agricultural fields, sustaining baseflows in during dry periods. As supporting habitats, woodlands foster by providing stratified niches from canopy to , hosting fungi, , birds, and mammals adapted to edge and interior conditions. Small, ancient woodlands often deliver disproportionately high value, supporting through deadwood, glades, and heterogeneous structures that ancient continuous-cover systems maintain. Native compositions yield greater specialist diversity than plantations, with temperate woodlands averaging 100-200 species per site and serving as corridors for pollinators and seed dispersers essential to adjacent ecosystems.

Economic and Human Benefits

Woodlands yield economic value primarily through the sustainable harvest of timber, fuelwood, and non-timber forest products (NTFPs) such as berries, mushrooms, , and foliage, which support rural livelihoods without requiring dense forest conversion. Globally, NTFPs harvested from woodland ecosystems serve nearly 6 billion people and generate market values often comparable to timber products, with systematic reviews indicating potential income increases of 19% to 78% for households in woodland-adjacent communities. In the United States, woodland management contributes to over 103,000 jobs and $17 billion in annual industry output, including value-added products from sustainably sourced materials. Recreational and tourism activities in woodlands further drive economic impacts by attracting visitors for , wildlife viewing, and nature-based pursuits, stimulating local businesses. U.S. national forests and woodlands, which encompass open woodland habitats, generate approximately $11 billion yearly in tourist revenue for surrounding communities through such activities. Conservation of woodland areas has been shown to boost rural by up to 50% per increase in protected land, as conserved sites enhance recreational appeal and support ancillary services like guiding and lodging. Beyond economics, woodlands confer direct human health benefits via physiological and psychological effects from environmental exposure, including reduced , lowered , and improved immune function. Systematic reviews of scientific studies confirm that woodland visits promote mental well-being by decreasing markers like more effectively than urban walks, while fostering that mitigates chronic health risks. These effects stem from sensory stimuli such as and negative air ions prevalent in woodland air, which multiple controlled trials link to enhanced mood and cardiovascular stability.

Historical Development and Human Interactions

Evolutionary and Geological Origins

The evolutionary origins of woodland ecosystems are rooted in the period (approximately 419–358 million years ago), when the first arborescent vascular plants, such as , emerged and formed primitive forests that represented early tree-dominated landscapes. These structures, evidenced by fossils from sites like the Gilboa formation in New York, featured woody trunks supporting fronds and contributed to initial , increased rates, and a drawdown of atmospheric CO2 levels, fundamentally altering terrestrial and . Unlike the denser Carboniferous swamp forests that followed, woodlands likely exhibited more open canopies due to periodic disturbances and limited plant height, setting a precedent for mosaic habitats blending trees with understory vegetation. During the era (252–66 million years ago), gymnosperm-dominated woodlands persisted, but the radiation of angiosperms around 125 million years ago in the introduced broader-leaved trees capable of faster growth and higher productivity, enabling woodlands to occupy diverse edaphic conditions. pollen and leaf records indicate that these ecosystems expanded in subtropical to temperate zones, influenced by continental configurations and fluctuating CO2 levels, though they remained subordinate to closed-canopy forests until later climatic shifts. The transition to modern woodland configurations accelerated in the era (66 million years ago to present), particularly from the Eocene-Oligocene boundary (~34 million years ago), when and —driven by glaciation and tectonic uplifts like the Himalayan —favored open biomes over humid forests. and evidence reveals the replacement of woodlands by grasslands in many interiors, but persistent wooded mosaics in seasonal climates, with tree cover between 10–40%, as seen in paleoenvironments. In the Miocene epoch (23–5 million years ago), open woodlands proliferated globally, exemplified by grassy-wooded habitats in dating to at least 21 million years ago, where isotopic analysis of mammal teeth and soil carbonates confirms C3 tree-grass mixtures under variable monsoonal regimes. This era's biome shifts, corroborated by multiple proxy records including leaf wax biomarkers, reflect adaptations to fire-prone and herbivore-disturbed landscapes, with lineages like Brachystegia in African miombo woodlands evolving scleromorphic traits for around 10–15 million years ago. Post-Miocene, Quaternary glaciations (2.58 million years ago to present) further sculpted regional woodlands through cycles of expansion and contraction, as retreating ice sheets allowed recolonization by fire-adapted species in temperate zones, while tropical woodlands stabilized in refugia amid . These developments underscore woodlands as dynamic responses to causal climatic and edaphic forcings rather than static relics, with empirical timelines derived from integrated , geochemical, and phylogenetic data.

Pre-Modern Human Influences

Early human populations, particularly s during the and early , exerted influence on woodland ecosystems primarily through the strategic use of fire to maintain open landscapes conducive to and . Archaeological and paleoenvironmental from sites in indicates that modern humans as early as 92,000 years ago employed frequent, low-intensity fires that suppressed woody regrowth, transforming biodiverse landscapes into persistent shrublands and open woodlands rather than allowing dense forest recovery. In , communities similarly managed woodlands by selectively harvesting timber for fuel and tools while using fire to create clearings that promoted herbaceous attractive to game animals, as evidenced by analyses and records from inland and coastal sites dating to approximately 10,000–6,000 years . These practices, observed ethnographically among later groups, enhanced resource availability but altered composition, favoring fire-adapted trees and reducing canopy density in temperate and boreal woodlands. The advent of agriculture around 8,000–5,000 years ago marked a intensification of woodland modification, with systematic clearing for cultivation and leading to widespread . In Britain, pollen cores and archaeological data reveal that from circa 3800 BC, early farmers cleared substantial areas of deciduous woodlands—dominated by , , and —for arable fields and settlements, reducing forest cover by an estimated 20–30% in southern regions by the . Similar patterns emerged in the and , where slash-and-burn techniques converted open woodlands into mosaics of farmland and , impacting stability and ; for instance, increased and leaching followed the removal of tree cover, as documented in geomorphic studies of early agrarian sites. In tropical and subtropical zones, including parts of and Asia, pre-agricultural foragers had already promoted woodland openness through fire, but Neolithic expansion further fragmented ecosystems, with evidence from anthracological remains showing selective exploitation of like fruit trees alongside clearance. In regions like the North American Great Plains and Australian woodlands, indigenous pre-modern groups sustained fire regimes that shaped woodland structure, preventing encroachment by denser vegetation and maintaining ecotones suitable for megafauna hunting until the early Holocene. These influences, while adaptive for human subsistence, introduced long-term shifts in woodland dynamics, including altered fire frequencies that favored resilient species over sensitive ones, as reconstructed from sedimentary charcoal and ethnographic analogies. Overall, pre-modern human activities transitioned woodlands from relatively natural states to anthropogenic landscapes, with cumulative effects on carbon storage and habitat heterogeneity persisting into later periods.

Current Status and Changes

Woodlands, defined as terrestrial ecosystems with discontinuous tree cover typically between 5% and 40% canopy density and not primarily managed for production, form a substantial component of global vegetated landscapes, particularly in dry, seasonal, and transitional climates. The (FAO) classifies much of this under "other wooded land" (OWL), which totaled 1.11 billion hectares globally in 2020, equivalent to approximately 8.5% of the Earth's land surface excluding inland water bodies. This category includes shrub-dominated areas with scattered trees exceeding 5 meters in height but falling short of the >10% canopy threshold for forests, aligning closely with ecological definitions of woodlands in regions like savannas and semi-arid zones. When combined with forests (4.06 billion hectares in 2020), total wooded cover approached 5.17 billion hectares, or nearly 40% of land area. The FAO's Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025 reports a slight stabilization in overall forest extent at 4.14 billion hectares, suggesting OWL trends may mirror this amid definitional consistencies across assessments. Over the period 2000–2020, global extent declined by about 9 million hectares, a net loss of roughly 0.8%, driven predominantly by conversion to cropland and in tropical . Parallel trends in broader wooded areas show decelerating net losses: annual global forest reduction averaged 10 million hectares of offset by 5.3 million hectares of gain from 1990–2020, narrowing to a net 4.7 million hectares per year during 2010–2020. Satellite monitoring via Global Forest Watch indicates higher gross tree cover losses, with 26.8 million hectares affected in 2024, including significant woodland areas in fire-prone savannas; however, net changes remain lower due to natural regeneration and plantations. Positive shifts appear in temperate and boreal zones, where land abandonment has enabled woodland expansion, contrasting persistent declines in subtropical and tropical woodlands from commodity-driven clearing. These trends reflect causal factors such as population pressures amplifying agricultural encroachment in biodiverse woodland hotspots like African miombo and Australian mallee systems, while policy interventions—like reduced-impact and designations—have curbed rates in some jurisdictions. Nonetheless, unmonitored degradation, including selective thinning and , likely understates true extent changes in remote woodland expanses, as national self-reporting to FAO varies in . Projections from current trajectories anticipate stabilized or marginally declining woodland cover through 2030 if restoration targets under frameworks like the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration gain traction, though empirical gaps in non-forest woodland mapping persist.

Regional Case Studies

![Nyika miombo][float-right] In , woodlands cover approximately 2.7 million square kilometers across countries including , , and , dominated by tree species such as Brachystegia and Julbernardia. These ecosystems have experienced significant , with smallholder and production as primary drivers, leading to losses estimated at 0.5-1% annually in some areas. In , extensive woody encroachment has altered miombo structure, while policy reports highlight charcoal demand exacerbating fragmentation. Conservation efforts face challenges from illegal and land conversion, threatening hotspots like the Lufira Reserve. Australian eucalypt woodlands, particularly in the Western Wheatbelt, have seen over 50% clearance since European settlement, leaving fragmented remnants classified as critically endangered ecological communities. Pre-1750 extents have declined to about 67% in some regions due to , altered , and grazing intensification. Restoration initiatives emphasize remnant protection and ecological replanting to counter habitat loss, with monitoring showing variable regrowth success influenced by fire regimes and . These woodlands support unique , but ongoing fragmentation risks collapse without sustained management. ![Cumberland Plains Woodlands, Prestons - 2][center] In , temperate oak woodlands, exemplified by those in southern Italy's region, exhibit high fragmentation, with ecological assessments revealing reduced connectivity and diversity in EU-protected types like Quercus formations. Paleoecological evidence indicates that pre-human landscapes featured open oak-hazel-yew systems rather than dense forests, shaped by natural disturbances, though modern pressures from and suppression have led to canopy closure and understory loss. Case studies underscore the need for restoration to maintain , as urban-proximate woodlands show elevated potential when managed for openness. North American oak-hickory woodlands in the midsouth, such as those in the Midwest savannas, have undergone extensive conversion to agriculture, reducing original extents by up to 99% in states like , where open woodlands once dominated transitional zones between prairies and forests. Restoration projects highlight fire's role in maintaining structure, with prescribed burns reversing encroachment by mesophytic trees. These ecosystems, now largely remnants, face ongoing threats from and development, but targeted management has revived habitats supporting species like and grassland birds.

Threats and Challenges

Anthropogenic Pressures

Human activities constitute the primary drivers of woodland degradation worldwide, with land conversion for agriculture and pasture accounting for approximately 80% of deforestation in woodland-dominated regions such as savannas and dry forests between 2000 and 2010. Commercial logging, urbanization, and infrastructure expansion further fragment habitats, reducing woodland connectivity and increasing edge effects that exacerbate vulnerability to invasive species and altered microclimates. These pressures have resulted in 31.2% of global forest areas, including open-canopy woodlands, experiencing observable human modification as of 2020. Global deforestation rates, which encompass woodland loss, averaged 10 million hectares annually from 2015 to , a decline from 16 million hectares per year in the , primarily driven by in tropical and subtropical zones. In woodlands, such as ecosystems in , agricultural encroachment has led to nonlinear declines in tree abundance and , with increasing due to compositional shifts but eroding under intensified cultivation. For instance, agriculture in these areas destroys perennial organs, hindering recolonization and reducing carbon storage in woody proportional to land-use intensity. In temperate woodlands, historical and ongoing land-use changes, including conversion to cropland and urban development, have fragmented remnants, with studies indicating that higher anthropogenic pressure correlates with shifts in plant species composition toward generalists and away from woodland specialists. Urban expansion and road networks in regions like Europe's deciduous woodlands amplify isolation, limiting and . for fuelwood and non-timber products in developing regions compounds these effects, particularly in dry woodlands where demand outpaces regeneration rates. Mining and energy infrastructure pose acute localized threats, as seen in extraction activities that clear woodlands for access roads and facilities, often in biodiversity hotspots with limited regulatory enforcement. Collectively, these pressures have exposed 83.8% of global tree , many endemic to woodland habitats, to moderate to very high influence, underscoring the need for targeted despite uneven progress in reducing net loss rates.

Biotic and Abiotic Disturbances

Biotic disturbances in woodlands, caused by living organisms such as , pathogens, and herbivores, disrupt structure by inducing mortality and creating canopy gaps that alter composition and regeneration patterns. Bark beetles, for instance, are key agents in coniferous woodlands, where outbreaks can kill vast numbers of host trees by boring into and introducing associated fungi that block nutrient transport, leading to widespread mortality observed in North American and European woodlands during periods of climatic stress. Pathogens, including fungi and foliar diseases, further compound these effects by weakening trees, with studies showing that defoliators and root herbivores predispose stands to secondary attacks, reducing and altering dynamics in affected areas. These disturbances often increase short-term in gaps through enhanced regeneration but can shift long-term community structure toward less diverse, early-successional if recurrent. Abiotic disturbances, driven by non-biological factors like , , and , impose rapid or chronic stresses that reshape woodland landscapes, often interacting with biotic agents to amplify damage. , prevalent in open woodlands such as savannas and pine systems, consumes understory fuels and can top-kill mature trees, with historical data indicating that frequent low-intensity burns maintain heterogeneity while severe events reduce canopy cover by up to 50% in affected patches. , including hurricanes and derechos, cause mechanical breakage, with abiotic site factors like saturation and controlling susceptibility; for example, coastal temperate woodlands experience windthrow rates influenced by exposure and tree anchorage, leading to legacies of downed timber that fuel subsequent or invasions. exacerbate vulnerability by impairing tree and growth, as evidenced by NDVI declines of -1.11 in forested areas during prolonged dry spells, which correlate with heightened mortality and compound risks from under warmer conditions. Interactions between biotic and abiotic disturbances frequently intensify impacts, as abiotic stressors like reduce tree defenses, enabling biotic outbreaks; combined events have caused pervasive shifts in dynamics, with warmer-drier climates projected to elevate both and disturbances in woodlands globally by the mid-21st century. In resilient systems, such as certain eucalypt woodlands, post-disturbance legacies like resprouting promote recovery, but chronic compounding—e.g., followed by —can lead to to non-woody states, underscoring the need for disturbance-adapted . Empirical models indicate that while disturbances drive natural variability, anthropogenic alters their frequency and severity, challenging woodland persistence in regions like the western U.S. and Mediterranean.

Management Approaches and Controversies

Sustainable Forestry Practices

Sustainable forestry practices in woodlands emphasize maintaining ecological integrity, timber productivity, and resilience against disturbances through targeted interventions that mimic natural processes. These practices, as defined by the of the (FAO), involve the stewardship of forest lands to sustain biological diversity, regeneration capacity, vitality, and the ability to provide ecological, economic, and social functions at rates that do not exceed replenishment. In woodland contexts—characterized by sparser tree cover and often integrated with grasslands or shrublands—such management prioritizes selective interventions over intensive harvesting to preserve open structures essential for understory species and wildlife corridors. Core techniques include selective logging, where only designated mature, diseased, or competing trees are removed, minimizing soil disturbance and canopy disruption. This approach, contrasted with clear-cutting, has been shown to reduce erosion by up to 50% in managed stands and facilitate natural regeneration, as documented in UNFCCC assessments of ecologically sustainable methods. Thinning operations further enhance growth rates of retained trees by reducing competition for light and nutrients; in Vermont family woodlands, adherence to such silvicultural best management practices (BMPs) across 1,200 acres correlated with improved stand health and minimal water quality impacts from 2007 to 2012 surveys. Reduced-impact logging (RIL), incorporating directional felling and skid trail planning, limits collateral damage to non-target trees, with studies indicating retention rates of 70-80% of original biomass in tropical woodlands adapted to these methods. Reforestation and assisted regeneration complement harvesting by replanting suited to local conditions, often using polycultures to bolster . FAO data from global assessments show that replanted areas under SFM regimes exhibit 20-30% higher survival rates when combined with soil preparation and control, contributing to net gains of 2-5 tons per annually in temperate woodlands. In open woodlands, practices like rotational —cutting stems at ground level to stimulate multi-stem regrowth—sustain fuelwood supply while benefiting pollinators and ground , as evidenced by woodland management trials where selective coppicing increased diversity by 15-25% over unmanaged plots. Monitoring and certification frameworks, such as those from the (FSC), enforce compliance through audits verifying adherence to principles like minimized chemical use and protected habitats. Certified woodlands under FSC standards, covering over 200 million hectares globally as of 2023, demonstrate sustained yields without biodiversity loss, though outcomes depend on rigorous enforcement. Integration with fire management in fire-prone woodlands, including prescribed burns to reduce fuel loads, prevents catastrophic wildfires; peer-reviewed analyses confirm that such regimes in Mediterranean woodlands lower burn severity by 40% compared to suppression-only strategies. Economic viability is supported by diversified outputs, with SFM woodlands yielding stable timber revenues alongside non-timber products like nuts or medicinals, as FAO case studies illustrate in community-managed sites achieving 10-15% higher long-term returns than exploitative . Despite these benefits, efficacy varies by implementation; poorly planned selective cuts can fragment habitats if not spatially optimized, underscoring the need for site-specific adaptive management informed by long-term data. Overall, evidence from FAO-monitored sites indicates that SFM practices stabilize woodland cover, with global managed forests showing no net loss since 1990 when paired with policy enforcement.

Conservation Strategies

Protected woodland reserves and connectivity enhancements form core strategies to safeguard , with empirical studies showing that linking fragments via corridors or targeted restoration maximizes suitability in low-cover landscapes, benefiting most woodland species while aiding select birds. Larger creation sites exceeding 10 hectares, combined with structural interventions like to boost complexity, accelerate successional stages and enhance avian diversity compared to smaller, unmanaged plots. Public policies designating protected status have empirically lowered global cover loss risk by approximately 4 percentage points, though outcomes vary by region and enforcement rigor. Habitat restoration prioritizes rewilding-inspired approaches to reinstate natural disturbances, such as controlled exclusion and reintroduction, countering historical over-suppression that has degraded ecosystems by accumulating fuels and altering compositions—as evidenced in Australian woodlands where 120 years of exclusion intensified vegetation shifts and . and selective harvesting mimic pre-human dynamics, promoting resilience without full plantation reliance, where conifer-focused evidence suggests mixed gains but underscores needs for prioritization. to deter herbivores protects seedlings, enabling regeneration in fragmented areas, while streamside buffers maintain hydrological integrity. International frameworks, including the UN's Global Forest Goals adopted in 2015, target halting woodland degradation through sustainable management, , and by 2030, with monitoring via indicators like the FAO's Forest Resources Assessments tracking progress—though evaluations reveal uneven implementation, with stronger effects in policy-enforced zones. Community-based incentives, such as payments for services, encourage private land stewardship, reducing conversion pressures where empirical reviews confirm trade-offs in agricultural intensification versus sparing intact habitats remain unresolved. Adaptive monitoring, integrating and ground surveys, refines these strategies against climate variability.

Debates on Intervention vs. Natural Processes

In woodland , a central concerns the balance between targeted human interventions—such as mechanical , prescribed burning, and selective harvesting—and permitting natural processes like , herbivory, and succession to dominate dynamics. Proponents of intervention maintain that historical alterations, including over a century of exclusion in many temperate and boreal woodlands, have disrupted indigenous disturbance regimes, leading to excessive fuel loads and denser, less resilient stands vulnerable to catastrophic fires. A 2024 meta-analysis of , prescribed , and their combinations across multiple forest types, including woodland-like systems, found these practices reduce wildfire severity by altering fuel structure and continuity, with effects persisting 10-30 years post-treatment. Similarly, a in California's mixed-conifer woodlands spanning 2003-2023 demonstrated that integrated and burning not only curbed intensity but also bolstered post-disturbance recovery, with treated plots exhibiting 20-40% higher survival rates under conditions than controls. Critics of heavy intervention argue it often deviates from natural variability, potentially eroding old-growth features and biodiversity in minimally altered woodlands. For example, analyses of active management in intact watersheds reveal disruptions to hydrological cycles and soil processes, with logging access roads facilitating invasive species incursions that natural regimes might otherwise limit. In European and North American contexts, clearcutting rotations shorter than natural gap dynamics—typically 100-300 years in boreal woodlands—have been linked to reduced structural heterogeneity and carbon stocks compared to fire-driven succession. Advocates for natural processes, including rewilding frameworks, posit that ceasing conventional forestry allows self-regulating feedbacks to restore resilience; a 2025 review of woodland creation via natural regeneration (versus planting) reported higher long-term structural diversity, with unplanted sites developing 15-25% more microhabitats over 50 years. However, laissez-faire approaches face scrutiny for overlooking anthropogenic legacies and novel threats like climate-driven shifts. Peer-reviewed critiques highlight rewilding's evidence gaps, noting that while theory predicts trophic cascades enhancing woodland stability, field trials in mid-latitude systems show variable outcomes, including stalled succession from overabundant deer herbivory or failure to suppress invasives without initial control. A 2025 assessment in Nepalese hill woodlands found passive rewilding on abandoned lands increased tree cover but risked homogenizing flora, contrasting with hybrid interventions that preserved 30% more diversity. Risks extend to socioeconomic dimensions, where unchecked natural processes may amplify hazards in fire-adapted woodlands or provoke conflicts via megafauna reintroductions, as evidenced by elevated livestock depredation rates in European trials exceeding 5% annually. These positions often hinge on divergent interpretations of paleoecological baselines and predictive models, with interventionists citing fire scar data from (e.g., mean fire return intervals of 5-20 years in pre-colonial ponderosa woodlands) to justify mimicking disturbances, while natural-process advocates emphasize long-term observational data from protected areas showing endogenous recovery post-cessation of use. Empirical synthesis remains contested, as meta-analyses reveal context-dependency: interventions excel in fuel-altered systems but underperform in pristine analogs, underscoring the need for site-specific assessments over universal paradigms.

References

  1. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/woodland/
  2. https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g5054
  3. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/habitats/forests-woodlands
  4. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/chap/chap_2019_dooley.pdf
  5. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-benefits-of-woodland-creation-woods-and-carbon/the-benefits-of-woodland-creation-woods-and-carbon
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112722004911
  7. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70181811
  8. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/habitats/forests-woodlands/upland-forests-woodlands
  9. https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/publications/management-creation-woodland-biodiversity/
  10. https://txmn.org/elcamino/natural-areas-of-interest/forests-and-woodlands/
  11. https://research.fs.usda.gov/programs/fia/forestdefinitions
  12. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/download/58359.pdf
  13. https://www.fao.org/4/x6953e/X6953E04.htm
  14. https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2022/09/Ch1_Woodland_2022.pdf
  15. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/definition-of-trees-and-woodland
  16. https://www.environment.gov.scot/our-environment/habitats-and-species/woodland-and-forests/
  17. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/Forest-Atlas-of-the-United-States.pdf
  18. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/land/woodlands
  19. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/forestsaustralia/australias-forests
  20. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/forestsaustralia/profiles/australias-forests-2016
  21. https://fra-data.fao.org/definitions/fra/2020/en/tad
  22. https://www.fao.org/4/y4171e/Y4171E50.htm
  23. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/nature-environment/natural-history/neighbourhood-nature/content-section-1.1
  24. http://www.countrysideinfo.co.uk/woodland_manage/struct.htm
  25. https://ecology.fnal.gov/woodland/
  26. https://tpwd.texas.gov/landwater/land/habitats/cross_timbers/ecoregions/cross_timbers.phtml
  27. https://hcp.stanford.edu/oak.html
  28. https://www.nps.gov/redw/learn/nature/land-mammals.htm
  29. https://open.lib.umn.edu/woodlandstewardship/chapter/wildlife-and-forest-management/
  30. https://hmf.rutgers.edu/flora-fauna/
  31. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/gtr/gtr_srs073/gtr_srs073-dickson001.pdf
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Smithers/publication/230853609_Woodland_Biodiversity_Expanding_our_horizons/links/09e4150c771b0ec95d000000/Woodland-Biodiversity-Expanding-our-horizons.pdf
  33. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/99/6/1444/5145111
  34. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_hanberry_b001.pdf
  35. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2688-8319.12339
  36. https://forestecosyst.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40663-021-00348-2
  37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12087529/
  39. http://lamarck.unl.edu/zoo/lab/leaflitter.pdf
  40. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1298977/Temperate_Deciduous-Mixed_Forest_Woodland_Ecobiome
  41. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2019/rmrs_2019_adams_m001.pdf
  42. https://www1.usgs.gov/csas/nvcs/unitDetails/860241
  43. https://www.internetgeography.net/topics/what-is-a-temperate-deciduous-woodland/
  44. https://www1.usgs.gov/csas/nvcs/unitDetails/860227
  45. https://www.woodwellclimate.org/primary-forests-boreal-temperate-tropical/
  46. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.860664/North_American_Northern_Boreal_Woodland_Macrogroup
  47. https://mnfi.anr.msu.edu/communities/description/10690/boreal-forest
  48. https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/jrnl/2022/nrs_2022_hayes_001.pdf
  49. https://natural-resources.canada.ca/forest-forestry/sustainable-forest-management/8-facts-about-canada-s-boreal-forest
  50. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1298928/Temperate-Boreal_Forest_Woodland_Biome
  51. https://global-ecosystems.org/explore/biomes/T2
  52. https://www1.usgs.gov/csas/nvcs/unitDetails/860270
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Global-extent-of-tropical-and-subtropical-dry-broadleaf-forests_tbl1_339987894
  54. https://www.awf.org/news/why-miombo-woodlands-matter-southern-africa
  55. https://engagement.virginia.edu/learn/thoughts-from-the-lawn/miombo-woodlands
  56. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/miombo-woodlands
  57. https://ecomatcher.medium.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-types-of-forests-a244bf192453
  58. https://forestsnews.cifor.org/93693/tropical-dry-forests-importance?fnl=
  59. https://ecologicalprocesses.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13717-020-00229-6
  60. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.722763/California_Montane_Jeffrey_Pine-%28Ponderosa_Pine%29_Woodland
  61. https://fieldguide.mt.gov/displayES_Detail.aspx?ES=4266
  62. https://northlab.faculty.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2016/02/Montane-Forests-North-2016.pdf
  63. https://www.oneearth.org/ecoregions/mediterranean-woodlands-and-forests/
  64. https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/brochure_english.pdf
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/mediterranean-forest
  66. https://www.oneearth.org/ecoregions/somali-montane-xeric-woodlands/
  67. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4505
  68. https://www.oneearth.org/ecoregions/west-saharan-montane-xeric-woodlands/
  69. https://www.nature.scot/doc/guidance-evidence-carbon-and-nature
  70. https://defraenvironment.blog.gov.uk/2024/08/29/how-the-woodland-carbon-code-is-supporting-our-net-zero-ambitions/
  71. https://www.epa.gov/soakuptherain/soak-rain-trees-help-reduce-runoff
  72. https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/land-and-sea-management/managing-land/forests-and-woodlands/woodland-benefits
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016788099500583E
  74. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13537
  75. https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/blog/2020/07/biodiversity-and-native-woods/
  76. https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr931/pnw_gtr931_118.pdf
  77. https://www.fao.org/3/cd1211en/online/src/html/non-timber-forest-products.html
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950509725000711
  79. https://ext.vt.edu/natural-resources/woodland-management.html
  80. https://www.nifa.usda.gov/topics/forests
  81. https://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/notes/study-land-conservation-boosts-local-economies/
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2793342/
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8909949/
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169204621000864
  85. https://bfw.ac.at/cms_stamm/GreenCareWald/pdf/GPH_englisch_gesamt.pdf
  86. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/devonian/devonian.php
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825220302464
  88. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/jgs2023-204
  89. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ucp/the-journal-of-geology/article/109/4/407/621395/Cenozoic-Expansion-of-Grasslands-and-Climatic
  90. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32300-5
  91. https://news.asu.edu/20230413-new-research-changes-perception-early-apes-their-environments
  92. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38853465/
  93. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/320791
  94. https://news.yale.edu/2021/05/05/study-offers-earliest-evidence-humans-changing-ecosystems-fire
  95. https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/landscape-shows-earliest-effects-modern-humans-using-fire-shape-ecosystem
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379114004429
  97. https://www.heritagedaily.com/2023/11/hunter-gatherer-communities-used-controlled-fires-11000-years-ago/149095
  98. https://rfs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/7.-A-Brief-History-of-British-Woodlands.pdf
  99. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440312004761
  100. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0500
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6094123/
  102. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/1/3/41
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440314002945
  104. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/global-deforestation-slows--but-forests-remain-under-pressure--fao-report-shows/en
  105. https://www.fao.org/3/cb9360en/online/src/html/deforestation-land-degradation.html
  106. https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2025/09/FS2025_Ch9.pdf
  107. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/global/
  108. https://ourworldindata.org/deforestation
  109. https://gfr.wri.org/latest-analysis-deforestation-trends
  110. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/blog/data-and-tools/global-forest-watch-and-the-forest-resources-assessment-explained-in-5-graphics-2/
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112715006179
  112. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17171
  113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198942030874X
  114. https://soe.dcceew.gov.au/land/environment/native-vegetation
  115. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/publications/guide-eucalypt-woodlands-wa-wheatbelt
  116. https://nrmregionsaustralia.com.au/articles/restoring-the-iconic-eucalypt-woodlands/
  117. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/16/8/1320
  118. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adi9135
  119. https://www.mossyoak.com/our-obsession/blogs/conservation/savanna-and-woodland-habitats
  120. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19493-3
  121. https://www.fao.org/interactive/forest-resources-assessment/2020/en/
  122. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/176730/
  123. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2745.14221
  124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419306924
  125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330664184_Impact_of_different_levels_of_anthropogenic_pressure_on_the_plant_species_composition_in_woodland_sites
  126. https://www.internetgeography.net/topics/deciduous-woodlands-human-uses-and-impacts/
  127. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4978870/
  128. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2026733119
  129. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2022/rmrs_2022_gandhi_k001.pdf
  130. https://academic.oup.com/jof/article/120/6/693/6648424
  131. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1519&context=usgsstaffpub
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112720310495
  133. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_int/int_gtr336.pdf
  134. https://www.fao.org/4/am664e/am664e00.pdf
  135. https://www.montana.edu/hansenlab/documents/downloadables/krameretal2001.pdf
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21000583
  137. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5572641/
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7733969/
  139. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210011760/downloads/pervasive%2520shifts%2520in%2520forest%2520dynamics%2520paper.pdf
  140. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2775
  141. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecog.07680
  142. https://www.fao.org/4/x6896e/x6896e0e.htm
  143. https://www.fao.org/forestry/sfm/en
  144. https://unfccc.int/technology/sustainable-forest-management
  145. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/46332
  146. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725004761
  147. https://www.fao.org/4/XII/0632-C5.htm
  148. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/add54d
  149. https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/blog/2018/07/what-is-a-sustainable-forest/
  150. https://fsc.org/en/blog/sustainable-forestry
  151. https://www.fao.org/policy-support/policy-themes/sustainable-forest-management/en
  152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934123001673
  153. https://conservationcorridor.org/digests/2025/07/connectivity-matters-but-especially-where-woodland-cover-is-scarce/
  154. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802300136X
  155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332225000211
  156. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/5/6/175
  157. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112718306662
  158. https://extension.psu.edu/management-practices-for-enhancing-wildlife-habitat/
  159. https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Global-Forest-Goals-booklet-Apr-2019.pdf
  160. https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/4/9/pgaf251/8245250
  161. https://www.unr.edu/nevada-today/news/2025/woody-enroachment
  162. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272400197X
  163. https://news.berkeley.edu/2023/12/12/twenty-year-study-confirms-california-forests-are-healthier-when-burned-or-thinned/
  164. https://therevelator.org/active-management-harms-forests/
  165. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313434391_Comparing_forest_management_to_natural_processes
  166. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2688-8319.70127
  167. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320723003440
  168. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pan3.10772
  169. https://iucn.org/resources/issues-brief/benefits-and-risks-rewilding
  170. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2116264119
  171. https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/fixing-forests-or-fueling-fires-scientists-split-over-active-management/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.