Community hub
0 subscribers7 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to 180 nm process.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
180 nm process
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
| Semiconductor device fabrication |
|---|
 |
|
MOSFET scaling (process nodes) |
The 180 nm process is a MOSFET (CMOS) semiconductor process technology that was commercialized around the 1998–2000 timeframe by leading semiconductor companies, starting with TSMC[1] and Fujitsu,[2] then followed by Sony, Toshiba,[3] Intel, AMD, Texas Instruments and IBM.
History
[edit]The origin of the 180 nm value is historical, as it reflects a trend of 70% scaling every 2–3 years.[citation needed] The naming is formally determined by the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS).
Some of the first CPUs manufactured with this process include Intel Coppermine family of Pentium III processors. This was the first technology using a gate length shorter than that of light used for contemporary lithography, which had a wavelength of 193 nm.[citation needed]
Some more recent[when?] microprocessors and microcontrollers (e.g. PIC) are using this technology because it is typically low cost and does not require upgrading of existing equipment.[citation needed] In 2022, Google sponsored open-source hardware projects using GlobalFoundries 180nm MCU (microcontroller) process on multi-project wafers.[4]
In 1988, an IBM research team led by Iranian engineer Bijan Davari fabricated a 180 nm dual-gate MOSFET using a CMOS process.[5] The 180 nm CMOS process was later commercialized by TSMC in 1998,[1] and then Fujitsu in 1999.[2]
Processors using 180 nm manufacturing technology
[edit]- Intel Coppermine E—October 1999
- ATI Radeon R100 and RV100 Radeon 7000—2000
- Nintendo GameCube's Gekko CPU—2000
- Sony PlayStation 2's Emotion Engine and Graphics Synthesizer—March 2000[3]
- AMD Athlon Thunderbird—June 2000
- AMD Duron Spitfire–June 2000
- AMD Duron Morgan–August 2001
- Intel Celeron (Willamette)—May 2002
- Motorola PowerPC 7445 and 7455 (Apollo 6)—January 2002
References
[edit]- ^ a b "0.18-micron Technology". TSMC. Retrieved 30 June 2019.
- ^ a b 65nm CMOS Process Technology
- ^ a b "EMOTION ENGINE AND GRAPHICS SYNTHESIZER USED IN THE CORE OF PLAYSTATION BECOME ONE CHIP" (PDF). Sony. April 21, 2003. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
- ^ "Google funds open source silicon manufacturing shuttles for GlobalFoundries PDK". Google Open Source Blog. Retrieved 2022-11-16.
- ^ Davari, Bijan; et al. (1988). "A high performance 0.25 mu m CMOS technology". Technical Digest., International Electron Devices Meeting. pp. 56–59. doi:10.1109/IEDM.1988.32749. S2CID 114078857.
| Preceded by 250 nm |
CMOS manufacturing processes | Succeeded by 130 nm |
180 nm process
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Fundamentals
Definition of Process Node
In semiconductor manufacturing, a process node refers to a specific generation of technology defined by the minimum feature size achievable in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) fabrication, typically measured as the half-pitch of metal interconnect lines or the gate length of transistors. This metric serves as a proxy for the overall scale of circuit elements, enabling the production of increasingly dense and efficient integrated circuits. The naming convention for process nodes evolved historically from the micrometer (μm) scale in the 1970s, where early CMOS processes operated at around 10 μm, to the nanometer (nm) scale by the 1990s and 2000s, reaching sub-100 nm nodes as lithography and etching techniques advanced. This progression reflected improvements in resolution, driven by innovations in photolithography and materials, allowing for smaller features and higher integration levels over decades. A key distinction exists between the marketed process node name, such as 180 nm, and the actual physical dimensions realized in production; for instance, the physical gate length is often smaller than the named node to optimize performance while adhering to industry scaling trends. This divergence arose as nodes transitioned below 100 nm, where direct correspondence to a single feature size became impractical due to multi-dimensional scaling and marketing strategies. Process node advancements underpin transistor scaling in accordance with Moore's Law, which posits that the number of transistors on a chip doubles approximately every two years, leading to exponential increases in density, computational performance, and energy efficiency. Across nodes, transistor density has scaled from approximately 20,000 per cm² at 10 μm to over 100 million per cm² at sub-100 nm levels, illustrating the law's impact on enabling smaller, faster devices.Characteristics of the 180 nm Node
The 180 nm process node, also known as 0.18 μm CMOS technology, features a typical physical gate length ranging from 140 nm to 180 nm, with the transistor channel length drawn at approximately 0.18 μm to enable reliable scaling while maintaining compatibility with prior generations. This configuration allowed for enhanced electron mobility and reduced short-channel effects compared to larger nodes, supporting the integration of high-performance logic circuits. Transistor density in 180 nm logic circuits typically reached 150,000 to 250,000 transistors per mm², facilitating compact designs for complex chips; for instance, Intel's Pentium III Coppermine processor incorporated 28 million transistors across a 106 mm² die, achieving a density of about 264,000 transistors per mm². The process supported dual-voltage operation, with a 1.8 V core supply for low-power logic and 3.3 V for input/output interfaces, which enabled mixed-signal applications by accommodating both high-speed digital and analog components without excessive power dissipation. Interconnects in the 180 nm node commonly utilized up to six layers of aluminum metallization, paired with low-k dielectrics such as fluorine-doped silicon dioxide (SiOF) with a dielectric constant of around 3.55, to minimize parasitic capacitance and improve signal propagation speeds. Performance characteristics included clock speeds up to 1.13 GHz in microprocessor implementations like the Pentium III Coppermine, alongside NMOS drive currents of approximately 500–900 μA/μm at operating voltages of 1.5–1.8 V, depending on the specific foundry optimization for on-current versus leakage trade-offs. These metrics underscored the node's balance between density, speed, and power efficiency for late-1990s computing demands.Manufacturing Technology
Key Process Steps
The fabrication of integrated circuits using the 180 nm CMOS process begins with wafer preparation, where high-purity silicon wafers, typically 200 mm in diameter and 700 μm thick, are inspected for dopant concentration (around 10^{16} cm^{-3}), crystallographic orientation, and minimal bow or warp to ensure uniformity.[6] These wafers undergo thorough cleaning to remove native oxides, organic contaminants, and metallic impurities, followed by thermal oxidation in a vertical furnace at 900-1000°C to grow a high-quality silicon dioxide (SiO_2) gate dielectric layer approximately 3-5 nm thick, which provides the necessary insulation between the gate and channel while minimizing leakage.[6][7] Next, gate formation involves depositing a layer of polysilicon via chemical vapor deposition (CVD), followed by patterning and etching to define the gate width at 180 nm using deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography at 248 nm wavelength, enabling precise feature resolution for transistor scaling.[6] Source and drain regions are then created through ion implantation, where boron serves as the p-type dopant for PMOS transistors and phosphorus or arsenic as n-type dopants for NMOS transistors, achieving concentrations around 10^{18} cm^{-3} to form lightly doped drain (LDD) extensions that reduce hot carrier effects.[6][8] This is followed by rapid thermal annealing at 900-1000°C to activate the dopants and repair implantation-induced lattice damage, ensuring low junction depths of about 100 nm.[6] Silicidation follows to form low-resistance contacts, typically using cobalt silicide (CoSi_2) deposited via physical vapor deposition (PVD) on source/drain and polysilicon gate regions, with rapid thermal processing at around 500°C for initial reaction and 800°C for phase transformation, yielding sheet resistances of 3-10 Ω/square.[9][10] Interconnect layering in the back-end-of-line (BEOL) process employs CVD to deposit up to six layers of aluminum or copper metallization, separated by inter-level dielectrics and planarized using chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) to maintain topography control and enable dense wiring.[1][11] The complete 180 nm CMOS process flow encompasses approximately 300-400 individual steps, including numerous cleaning, deposition, etching, and metrology operations, spanning several weeks in a fabrication facility to produce functional wafers with yields optimized for commercial production.[6]Materials and Lithography
The 180 nm process employed deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography at a wavelength of 248 nm, leveraging KrF excimer lasers as the primary light source for exposing patterns onto wafers using high numerical aperture (NA) steppers and scanners. This configuration allowed for the delineation of critical features approaching the 180 nm half-pitch while maintaining throughput suitable for high-volume manufacturing.[12] To extend resolution beyond the Rayleigh criterion limits imposed by the wavelength and NA, resolution enhancement techniques were essential, including optical proximity correction (OPC) and phase-shift masks (PSMs). OPC adjusted mask geometries to counteract diffraction-induced distortions such as line-end shortening and corner rounding, ensuring faithful pattern transfer to the wafer. PSMs, particularly alternating or attenuating types, introduced controlled phase shifts (typically 180°) in the transmitted light to improve image contrast and depth of focus, particularly for dense periodic structures like gates and contacts.[13][14] Chemically amplified photoresists (CARs), designed for sensitivity at 248 nm, were the standard for this node, relying on photoacid generators to catalyze deprotection reactions during post-exposure bake for amplified sensitivity and high contrast. These resists were spin-coated to thicknesses of 300-500 nm, providing sufficient aspect ratios for vertical sidewalls while minimizing standing wave effects and enabling robust pattern definition during subsequent etching steps.[12] The CAR formulation typically included a polymer matrix with acid-labile groups, such as poly(hydroxystyrene) derivatives, tuned for etch resistance and minimal linewidth roughness. For insulating layers, silicon dioxide (SiO2) remained the dominant material for gate oxides, thermally grown or deposited to dual thicknesses of approximately 2.9 nm for 1.8 V core operations and 6.5 nm for 3.3 V input/output (I/O) interfaces to support transistor performance with acceptable leakage currents.[1][15] In parallel, inter-metal dielectrics transitioned from traditional SiO2 (k ≈ 3.9) to low-k alternatives like fluorinated silicate glass (FSG), which incorporated fluorine doping to achieve a dielectric constant of approximately 3.0-3.5, thereby mitigating signal delay from interconnect capacitance. FSG was deposited via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and integrated into multilevel metallization schemes to preserve signal integrity without compromising mechanical stability.[15] Interconnect metallization predominantly used aluminum alloys (e.g., Al-Cu or Al-Si-Cu) sputtered and patterned for their compatibility with reactive ion etching and reliable contacts, forming the wiring layers in a subtractive process. However, pioneering implementations began incorporating copper (Cu) in dual-damascene flows for select high-performance variants, capitalizing on copper's lower resistivity (about 40% better than aluminum) and enhanced resistance to electromigration under high current densities. Copper adoption required barrier layers like TaN to prevent diffusion into adjacent dielectrics and was initially limited to global interconnects.[10][16] Precise pattern transfer from the lithographically defined photoresist to underlying layers was achieved via reactive ion etching (RIE), a plasma-based anisotropic process that combined chemical reactivity with physical ion bombardment for high selectivity and vertical profiles. For dielectrics like SiO2 or FSG, CF4/O2 gas mixtures were commonly employed, where fluorine radicals from CF4 dissociated to form volatile SiF4 byproducts, while O2 controlled polymer deposition on sidewalls to enhance anisotropy and suppress lateral etching. This chemistry yielded etch rates of several hundred nm/min with selectivities exceeding 10:1 over photoresist, ensuring minimal critical dimension loss during fabrication of gates, contacts, and vias.[17]Historical Development
Timeline and Commercialization
Research and development efforts on scaling semiconductor processes from 250 nm to 180 nm commenced in the mid-1990s, driven by the need to increase transistor density and performance in CMOS technology.[18] The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) in its 1999 edition projected the 180 nm node for high-volume manufacturing by 1999, aligning with a two-year technology cycle from prior nodes and emphasizing advancements in lithography and interconnect scaling.[18] In 1999, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) achieved a significant milestone by commercializing the first 0.18 μm CMOS process optimized for logic applications, marking the initial entry of this node into foundry production.[19] This was followed in 1999 by production launches from major integrated device manufacturers, including Intel, Texas Instruments, IBM, and Fujitsu, which integrated the 180 nm process into their fabrication facilities for advanced digital circuits.[20] Samsung joined this wave in 2000, initiating mass production of its 180 nm processes with a focus on high-reliability features suitable for mixed-signal designs.[4] The period from 2000 to 2002 represented the peak adoption of the 180 nm process, with widespread mass production supporting the burgeoning demand in consumer electronics, embedded systems, and early mobile devices.[21] During this time, the node enabled cost-effective scaling for a range of applications before the transition to the 130 nm process began in late 2001, led by Intel and others advancing to sub-150 nm technologies.[22] By 2003 to 2005, mainstream use of the 180 nm process had largely declined as most fabrication facilities shifted to smaller nodes like 130 nm and 90 nm to meet performance and density requirements for next-generation products.[23] However, legacy production lines persisted beyond this period, particularly for analog and power management integrated circuits where the node's maturity offered advantages in yield and cost stability.[4]Major Contributors and Innovations
TSMC was the first foundry to commercialize the 0.18 μm logic process in 1999, pioneering a flexible platform that supported mixed-signal designs and multiple operating voltages ranging from 1.8 V to 5 V, which enabled broad adoption through its pure-play foundry model.[24][25] This approach allowed customers to integrate analog and digital components efficiently without proprietary constraints, marking a significant shift toward accessible advanced manufacturing. Intel first implemented the 180 nm process in its Pentium III Coppermine processors released in late 1999, featuring transistors with an effective gate length of approximately 140 nm to enhance performance in high-frequency applications, followed by the Pentium 4 Willamette-core processors starting in 2000.[26] Although strained silicon was explored in research pilots during this era, its production integration occurred later at the 90 nm node.[27] IBM had introduced copper interconnects earlier in 1997 for the 220 nm process node, ahead of many competitors, and this technology saw broader adoption at the 180 nm node. Texas Instruments deployed copper-based flows for 180 nm production, incorporating low-k dielectrics to mitigate resistance-capacitance delays in high-performance logic.[28][29] Samsung commenced mass production of its 180 nm CMOS process in 2000, emphasizing analog-focused variants with high-voltage modules supporting up to 5 V operations, particularly suited for sensor interfaces and mixed-signal circuits.[4][30] Fujitsu adopted the 180 nm process in early 1999, offering options for embedded memory integration in system-on-chip designs to support compact, multifunctional devices.[31] This included experimental work on silicon-on-insulator substrates to improve power efficiency, though full commercialization of SOI variants followed in subsequent nodes.[32]Applications
Microprocessors and CPUs
The 180 nm process enabled the production of several influential microprocessors in the late 1990s and early 2000s, particularly in the x86 and enterprise architectures, balancing performance gains with manufacturing maturity.[33] Intel's Pentium III Coppermine, released in 1999, was fabricated on a 0.18 μm process with 28 million transistors and clock speeds ranging from 500 MHz to 1.133 GHz.[33] It featured an on-die 256 KB L2 cache and served as a key component in desktop and server systems, supporting SSE instructions for enhanced multimedia processing.[33] The Intel Pentium 4 Willamette, launched in 2000, utilized the same 180 nm process and contained 42 million transistors, operating at frequencies from 1.3 GHz to 2 GHz.[34] Its NetBurst architecture emphasized high clock speeds through a long pipeline, targeting performance in consumer desktops and entry-level workstations.[35] AMD's Athlon processors, including the Thunderbird core introduced in 2000, were built on 180 nm technology with approximately 37 million transistors and clock speeds up to 1.4 GHz. These CPUs employed a Socket A platform, offering competitive integer and floating-point performance for gaming and productivity applications. As a budget-oriented variant, the AMD Duron (Spitfire core), also released in 2000 on 180 nm with 25 million transistors, ran at speeds from 600 MHz to 950 MHz.[36] It targeted value-oriented markets with reduced L2 cache but retained core Athlon architecture features for affordable computing.[36] Intel's Itanium Merced, debuted in 2001, leveraged 180 nm fabrication and 25 million transistors in its core, achieving clock rates of 733 MHz to 800 MHz.[37] Designed with the EPIC architecture for enterprise and high-performance computing, it focused on explicit parallelism to handle complex server workloads.[37] IBM's RS64-IV, a PowerPC-based microprocessor from around 2000, incorporated 44 million transistors on a 180 nm process and operated at 600 MHz to 750 MHz.[38] It powered AS/400 (later iSeries) servers, emphasizing reliability and multi-processor scalability for business transaction processing.[38]Other Integrated Circuits
The 180 nm process enabled the production of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips with densities ranging from 64 Mb to 256 Mb, supporting the growing demands of personal computing and early multimedia applications in the late 1990s and early 2000s.[39] A notable example is Samsung's 256 Mb DDR SDRAM, fabricated using a 0.18 μm process with trench capacitors to achieve high cell density and reliable data retention. These DRAM variants operated at supply voltages around 2.5 V to 3.3 V, balancing power efficiency with performance for desktop and notebook systems.[40] Embedded non-volatile memory solutions, such as flash and static random-access memory (SRAM), were integral to microcontrollers produced on the 180 nm node, providing on-chip storage for code and data in embedded systems. TSMC offered embedded flash (eFlash) modules compatible with its 0.18 μm logic process for applications requiring program storage without external components.[41] These modules integrated seamlessly with core logic, enabling compact designs for consumer devices like remote controls and basic IoT precursors, while SRAM blocks provided fast, volatile caching up to several hundred kilobits.[25] In analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits, the 180 nm process excelled in high-voltage applications, particularly for automotive electronics where robustness under harsh conditions was essential. X-FAB's XP018 platform, a 180 nm high-voltage CMOS technology, incorporated devices supporting up to 40 V operation, suitable for motor drivers and sensor interfaces in vehicles.[42] This platform also facilitated power management chips, such as DC-DC converters and low-dropout regulators, which managed voltage scaling from 5 V inputs to 1.8 V cores while meeting AEC-Q100 automotive qualification standards.[43] Sensor integrated circuits benefited from the 180 nm node's compatibility with optoelectronic structures, enabling advancements in imaging and wireless peripherals. Pinned photodiode technology was introduced in CMOS image sensors in the late 1990s and early 2000s, offering improved quantum efficiency and reduced noise for low-light capture.[44] Implementations in 180 nm CMOS processes have demonstrated 4T pixel architectures achieving fill factors above 50% and supporting VGA resolutions. Complementing this, radio-frequency (RF) ICs for wireless standards like Bluetooth were realized on 180 nm CMOS, with single-chip transceivers handling 2.4 GHz operations at power consumptions under 50 mW for short-range connectivity in headsets and peripherals.[45] Application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) on the 180 nm process provided customized logic solutions for consumer electronics, optimizing cost and performance through advanced interconnects. These ASICs leveraged up to six metal layers for intricate routing, allowing complex digital-analog integration in devices such as DVD players and set-top boxes, where gate densities reached 25 kGates/mm². The multi-layer metallization reduced signal delays and supported mixed-signal features like ADCs, making 180 nm ASICs a staple for volume production in entertainment and communication gadgets until the mid-2000s.[46] In June 2025, X-FAB Silicon Foundries released a new isolation class within its 180 nm XH018 semiconductor process, enhancing integration and efficiency of single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) technology for higher-density photon-detection applications.[47]Legacy and Impact
Advantages and Limitations
The 180 nm process offered a balanced power-performance profile through its standard 1.8 V operation, which supported clock speeds reaching 1 GHz in high-performance logic applications, enabling efficient operation for microprocessors without excessive thermal challenges.[48] This voltage level, combined with gate lengths around 140-180 nm, provided reliable switching speeds suitable for GHz-range computing while maintaining lower dynamic power compared to higher-voltage predecessors.[49] Additionally, the process was cost-effective for high-volume logic production due to the maturity of deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography at 248 nm wavelengths, which allowed for scalable manufacturing without the complexities of extreme ultraviolet tools.[23] For analog circuits, the 180 nm node supported dual-voltage options (e.g., 1.8 V core with 3.3 V I/O), enhancing reliability in mixed-signal designs by reducing stress on thin gate oxides and improving noise margins.[50] Despite these strengths, the 180 nm process suffered from higher leakage currents relative to subsequent nodes, primarily due to gate oxide scaling to approximately 3.5-4 nm, which increased subthreshold and gate tunneling effects under aggressive biasing.[15] Aluminum-based interconnects, common in this generation with up to six metal layers, were susceptible to electromigration at high current densities, limiting reliability in dense routing and requiring wider lines or barriers to mitigate void formation.[49] Larger die sizes, often exceeding 200 mm² for complex chips, amplified yield risks, with typical defect densities around 0.4-0.5 defects/cm² contributing to lower overall wafer utilization.[23] Economically, establishing a 180 nm fabrication facility in the late 1990s required investments of approximately $800 million to $1 billion, reflecting the scale of cleanroom infrastructure and lithography equipment for 200 mm wafers. Wafer yields for complex logic chips typically ranged from 70-80%, influenced by process maturity and defect control, which supported viable production but constrained profitability for low-margin designs.[51] In terms of performance trade-offs, the 180 nm node delivered density improvements of about 1.5-2x over the 250 nm process, allowing more transistors per die, but at the cost of higher static and dynamic power consumption—CPUs often dissipated 25-40 W under load due to increased leakage and less efficient scaling of supply voltage.[23] This resulted in greater environmental impact from cooling requirements and energy use, though it marked a transitional step in achieving higher integration for computing applications.[49]Transition to Smaller Nodes
The introduction of the 130 nm process by major foundries marked a pivotal shift away from the 180 nm node, beginning around 2001. Intel began high-volume production of its 130 nm logic technology in 2001, featuring 60 nm gate lengths to achieve higher performance compared to the 180 nm generation's approximately 140 nm gates.[26] TSMC similarly ramped up 130 nm production in 2001, focusing on copper interconnects and low-k dielectrics to support faster microprocessors and memory devices, relegating 180 nm primarily to cost-sensitive and legacy applications.[52] This transition was driven by the need for advanced lithography, such as 193 nm immersion tools, to enable denser integration beyond the limitations of 248 nm deep ultraviolet systems used in 180 nm.[26] Despite the rapid adoption of smaller nodes, the 180 nm process persisted in specialized niches through the 2010s, particularly for applications prioritizing reliability over density. In automotive sectors, it remained viable for sensors and power integrated circuits due to its proven robustness in high-voltage and harsh environments. For instance, X-FAB continued to offer its XP018 and XH018 platforms, modular 180 nm high-voltage CMOS processes qualified for automotive-grade operation up to 175°C, supporting embedded non-volatile memory and analog-mixed signal designs.[42][43] Economically, the industry prioritized smaller nodes by retrofitting existing fabs and constructing new facilities optimized for 130 nm and beyond, which progressively reduced 180 nm capacity. According to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), the 130 nm node was accelerated into production by 2001 to maintain scaling momentum, leading to a contraction in older node infrastructure as capital investments shifted. By 2005, advanced logic production at nodes larger than 130 nm, including 180 nm, accounted for less than 20% of overall wafer starts in leading-edge fabs, reflecting the diminished role of 180 nm in high-performance segments.[23][53] As of 2025, select specialized production lines for 180 nm CMOS continue to operate for strategic applications where scaling is secondary to other requirements, such as radiation tolerance in space electronics. India's Semi-Conductor Laboratory (SCL) maintains 180 nm bulk and silicon-on-insulator processes, demonstrating total ionizing dose tolerance up to 300 krad through targeted layout techniques for analog circuits. These lines support radiation-hardened designs, including 15 Mb SRAM with fault-tolerance features and the indigenous Vikram-32 microprocessor, unveiled in September 2025 at Semicon India 2025 and presented to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, fabricated using the 180 nm process at SCL Mohali for ISRO/DRDO space and defense applications emphasizing its radiation hardness, for space missions.[54][55][56] The 180 nm process served as a critical bridge in semiconductor scaling history, facilitating the continuation of Moore's Law by enabling incremental density improvements from the 250 nm era (circa 1998) to sub-100 nm nodes in the mid-2000s. It incorporated key advances like copper interconnects and shallower junctions that smoothed the path for subsequent generations, sustaining transistor density doubling every 18-24 months during a period of accelerating innovation.[57]References
- https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/180_nm_lithography_process
- https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/duron/d650aut1b