Hubbry Logo
Animals in Christian artAnimals in Christian artMain
Open search
Animals in Christian art
Community hub
Animals in Christian art
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Animals in Christian art
Animals in Christian art
Animals in Christian art
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cat in Domenico Ghirlandaio's Last Supper fresco, San Marco, Florence, 1486

In Christian art, animal forms have at times occupied a place of importance. With the Renaissance, animals were nearly banished, except as an accessory to the human figure.

Late Antique period

[edit]
Funerary stele inscribed ΙΧΘΥϹ ΖΩΝΤΩΝ ("fish of the living"), early 3rd century

In the early days of Latin and Byzantine Christianity, many representations of animals are found in monumental sculpture, in illuminated manuscripts, in stained glass windows, and in tapestry. Reasons for this include:[a]

  1. It affords an easy medium of expressing or symbolizing a virtue or a vice, by means of the virtue or vice usually attributed to the animal represented.[a]
  2. Animal forms were traditional elements of decoration. [a]
  3. Medieval designers returned to the direct study of nature, including man, the lower animals, and the humblest plants.[a]

The paintings of the first period, as seen in the Catacombs of Rome, show us, usually, the lamb accompanying the Good Shepherd, a representation of the Christian soul during its earthly life.[a] The lamb was strongly associated with religious sacrifices in the ancient Near East, and was adopted as a symbol of Christ and his sacrifice on behalf of humanity.[1]

Birds, too, appear either as simple decorative elements transmitted from antique paintings, or used symbolically as in Noah's dove, symbolical of the Christian soul released by death; the peacock, with its ancient meaning of immortality, and the phoenix, the symbol of apotheosis.[a]

The symbol of perhaps the widest distribution is the Ichthys (Greek: ΙΧΘΥΣ, fish), used since the second century as an acronym for "Ίησοῦς Χριστός, Θεοῦ Υἱός, Σωτήρ" (Iesous Christos, Theou Huios, Soter), meaning "Jesus Christ, Son of God, Saviour".[2] Artistically, these various representations are somewhat crude, and show the decadence of the pagan art of the time.[a]

After the recognition of the Church by Constantine I in 313, the Book of Revelation is the source from which are derived most of the decorative themes of Christian Art. The lamb is now the most important of these, and its meaning is either the same as before or, more frequently perhaps, it is symbolic of Christ the expiatory victim. The dove is the Holy Spirit, and the four animals that St. John saw in Heaven[3] are used as personifications of the Four Evangelists.[a] [4][5] Under the influence of Byzantine art, a great variety of fantastic animals, such as dragons, birds with human heads, winged lions, etc., entwined themselves around the decorative forms until foreign wars and the iconoclast movement brought this period of vigorous art to an end.[a]

Middle Ages

[edit]

Fantastic and composite animals

[edit]

During the succeeding three centuries, new types of animals appear only in Romanesque architecture. These are usually either purely fantastic or composite, that is, made up of elements of different species combined in one. Often, the subject grows out of foliage forms; and monsters are shown fighting and even devouring one another.[a]

Specific symbols

[edit]
The symbols of the Four Evangelists around the glorified Christ, St Trophime, Arles, 12th century. Clockwise, Mark (lion, lower left), Matthew (human), John (eagle), and Luke (ox bull).
Further information: Four Evangelists

In the spandrels of the entrance doorways, around the glorified Christ, the symbols of the four evangelists, namely the lion, the ox, the man, and the eagle are shown, holding the holy books. This is a favourite motif in the sculpture of the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Sometimes the jaws of a monster figure the entrance of Hell, into which sinners are plunged.[a]

Some of the most important symbolic animals are:[6]

Animal Attributes Symbolism
Lamb Innocence, purity, vulnerability Christ[6]
Dog Loyalty, watchfulness, trustworthiness A person with those attributes[6]
Dove Purity, peace (If with halo) Holy Spirit[6]
Dragon Powers of darkness The devil[6]
Snake cunning, deceit The devil[6]

Symbolic animals from bestiaries

[edit]
Further information: Bestiary
Monstrous medieval beasts decorating the West facade of Notre Dame de Paris

With the beginning of the thirteenth century Gothic art affords the greatest number and the best representations of animal forms. The great cathedrals, especially those of the Isle of France, where sculpture reached its highest point of excellence, are a sort of encyclopedia of the knowledge of the time. They show, therefore, examples of all the then known animals, that is, whether by legend or experience. The bestiaries, developed in the twelfth century, are fully illustrated in the cathedrals in the stone carving of the capitals, the parapets, and the tops of the buttresses, and in the woodwork of the stalls.[a][1]

There are birds of prey, wild boars, and feline forms on the towers of Notre Dame de Paris; birds covered with draperies, and elephants at Reims; enormous oxen on the towers of Laon placed there in memory of the service of those animals during the construction of the Cathedral. With the animals of the country, domestic or wild, those of remote parts of the earth, known by a few specimens, are also represented: the lion, the elephant, apes, etc.; legendary creatures also, like the unicorn, the basilisk (described by Pliny), the dragon, and the griffin.[a][1] In classical times, the griffin was a keeper of light, attending Apollo, and Christians retained the griffin's association as a guardian of the dead.[1] Imaginary creatures are also frequent, and the gargoyles alone display a great variety. Viollet-le-Duc remarked that he did not know, in France, two gargoyles alike.[a][7]

The symbolism which usually attaches to the various animals is derived for the most part from the bestiaries. Thus, for the lion, strength, vigilance, and courage; for the siren, voluptuousness; for the pelican, charity. The four animals which symbolize the leading characteristics of each of the Four Evangelists become more and more an accessory used to characterize the figure of the Evangelists themselves from the fifth century onwards.[a][1]

Animals used to identify saints

[edit]

In the same way many saints, when not characterized by the instruments of their martyrdom, are accompanied by animals which identify them; as, St. Roche, with a dog; St. Hubert, with a stag; St. Jerome, with a lion; St. Peter, with a cock; St. Paul the Hermit, with a raven; St. Gertrude of Nivelles, with a cat, etc. The Bible, also, gives some motives, as the ram of Isaac, the golden calf, the brazen serpent.[a]

Renaissance

[edit]

With the fourteenth century, animals become less frequent in iconography. The fifteenth and sixteenth centuries use them again, but copied more closely from life, usually of small size, and often without any intention of symbolism. One finds now animals such as rats, snakes, rabbits, snails, and lizards.[a]

Detail of goldfinch in Raphael's Madonna del cardellino, 1506

Raphael's Madonna del cardellino (Madonna of the Goldfinch) however portrays John the Baptist holding a goldfinch while Christ reaches out his arms to touch it. This is certainly symbolic; the bird is associated by legend with the crucifixion, the red spot on its head supposedly arising from a drop of Christ's blood.[8]

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Animals in Christian art

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Animals in Christian art represent a profound symbolic tradition that spans from the of to medieval cathedrals and beyond, where creatures both real and mythical illustrate biblical narratives, embody divine attributes, and impart moral and theological lessons derived from scripture and interpretive texts like bestiaries. In early Christian art, dating from the 2nd to 4th centuries, animals served as discreet emblems of faith amid persecution, drawing directly from imagery to convey salvation and spiritual identity without overt human figures. The , or , emerged as a primary symbol for Christ—standing for the Greek "Iēsous Christos, Theou Yios, Sōtēr" ( Christ, , Savior)—and for the Christian soul, often depicted alongside fishermen representing Christ calling his disciples as in Matthew 4:18–22. These motifs persisted even after iconoclastic attacks in the , as seen in repaired mosaics at sites like the Horvat Beit Loya in , where and scenes symbolized the apostles' mission to gather believers. During the medieval period (roughly 4th to 15th centuries), animals proliferated in Christian art across manuscripts, ivories, tapestries, and architecture, influenced by biblical accounts and the allegorical interpretations in bestiaries such as the 2nd-century , which attributed Christian virtues or vices to over a hundred species. The lamb symbolized Christ's sacrificial role, frequently appearing in scenes of the or as the from John 1:29. The dove represented the , evoking its descent at Jesus' baptism in Matthew 3:16, and was commonly paired with other sacred figures in Byzantine and Romanesque works. Fantastic creatures also held prominence: the embodied Christ's incarnation and purity, as in the late-15th-century Hunt of the Unicorn tapestries, while the griffin guarded divine treasures or the dead, blending and eagle forms to signify vigilance. A cornerstone of this iconography is the tetramorph—the four living creatures from :4–14 and 4:5–8—assigned to the Evangelists to reflect their emphases: a winged man or for Matthew, denoting Christ's humanity; a for Mark, evoking royal resurrection; an ox for Luke, symbolizing priestly sacrifice; and an eagle for John, representing soaring divine insight. These emblems adorned altarpieces, book illuminations, and church facades from the Carolingian era onward, as in the 15th-century at the . Biblical episodes further integrated animals, such as with its pairs of creatures illustrating divine covenant (Genesis 6–9), swallowed by the great fish signifying resurrection ( 1–2), and Daniel protected by lions in the den, emphasizing God's deliverance (Daniel 6). Domestic and wild animals extended this symbolism into and moral instruction; for instance, the lion accompanied Saint Jerome as a companion healed of a thorn, symbolizing evangelization, while dogs often denoted fidelity or, in some contexts, lasciviousness in cautionary tales. By the , animal depictions shifted toward naturalistic accessories in human-centered compositions, though symbolic roles lingered in works like Dürer's engravings, reflecting a transition from to realism while retaining Christian interpretive layers.

Foundations of Animal Symbolism

Biblical and Scriptural Animals

In the Old Testament, animals frequently serve as allegorical symbols conveying theological truths about human sin, divine judgment, redemption, and kingship. The serpent in Genesis 3 embodies temptation and deception, described as "more crafty than any other wild animal" (Gen 3:1, NRSV), enticing Eve to disobey God by questioning divine command and promising godlike knowledge, thereby introducing sin and death into creation. This figure later becomes equated with Satan in Christian interpretation, as seen in Revelation 12:9, where the "ancient serpent" is identified as the devil, symbolizing enmity between humanity and evil, with Genesis 3:15 interpreted as the protoevangelium foretelling Christ's ultimate victory over Satan. Similarly, the lamb in Isaiah 53:7 represents the suffering servant led "like a lamb to the slaughter," silent and meek amid oppression, signifying innocent sacrifice and atonement for sins, a motif rooted in Passover and substitutionary offerings. In Genesis 49:9, the lion symbolizes regal strength and authority in Jacob's blessing to Judah—"Judah is a lion's whelp"—foreshadowing messianic kingship and divine rule. The four living creatures in Ezekiel 1:10—likened to a lion, ox, human, and eagle—encircle God's throne, their multifaceted forms representing divine omniscience, power, and mobility, evoking virtues of majesty, service, intelligence, and transcendence. The builds on these symbols, applying them directly to Christ and eschatological realities. declares the " who takes away the sin of the world" (:29), linking the sacrificial imagery from to Christ's atoning , portraying him as the ultimate offering whose blood redeems humanity. At ' baptism, the descends "like a dove" (Matthew 3:16), symbolizing purity, peace, and gentle divine presence, confirming ' messianic identity and anointing. In the , the "great fish" that swallows the prophet for three days and nights ( 1:17) typologically prefigures Christ's resurrection, as himself states: "For just as was three days and three nights in the belly of the , so for three days and three nights will be in the heart of the " (Matthew 12:40), illustrating themes of , , and rebirth. amplifies apocalyptic animal symbolism, with the dragon as , the deceiver cast from heaven (:9), embodying chaos and opposition to , while beasts like the leopard-bear-lion hybrid (:1-2) represent imperial powers and vices such as and . The slain yet standing Lamb (:6) signifies Christ's sacrificial triumph, blending meekness with sovereign power, and the four living creatures—reprising Ezekiel's vision—continuously proclaim 's holiness ( 4:6-8), modeling ceaseless worship and divine attributes. These biblical texts employ animals allegorically to illustrate virtues like (lamb, dove) and strength (), vices such as deceit (serpent, ), and divine attributes including holiness and judgment (, beasts). Typological links bridge Old and New Testaments, such as the lamb fulfilled in John's or Jonah's fish mirroring ' tomb, underscoring continuity in God's redemptive plan. Patristic writers later expanded these symbols into broader theological frameworks.

Patristic and Medieval Interpretations

In the patristic period, early developed allegorical interpretations of animals drawn from biblical texts, transforming natural observations into moral and theological lessons that laid the groundwork for later . The , an anonymous Greek text from the 2nd to 4th century, exemplifies this approach by attributing Christian virtues and narratives to various creatures; for instance, the phoenix symbolizes through its cyclical rebirth from ashes, while the represents Christ's by piercing its breast to feed its young with blood. These interpretations blended classical with scriptural , emphasizing animals as divine metaphors for salvation history. St. Ambrose of , in his Hexameron (c. 389 CE), a series of sermons on the Genesis creation account, further elaborated animals as moral exemplars for human conduct, urging believers to emulate virtues observed in nature. He praised the for its diligence in gathering provisions, contrasting it with the laziness of the ass to illustrate the need for industriousness in spiritual life. Similarly, St. employed animal imagery in his sermons and expositions to teach ethical lessons, drawing on biblical examples to promote virtues like foresight and communal harmony. These patristic writings established animals not merely as literal creatures but as pedagogical tools for ethical formation, influencing subsequent theological discourse. During the medieval era, these ideas evolved into more systematic frameworks through texts like Honorius of Autun's Speculum Ecclesiae (c. 1100–1130 CE), which expanded animal allegories to encompass ecclesial mysteries and sacramental themes. Honorius interpreted the unicorn as a symbol of Christ's purity and the Incarnation, depicting it as a fierce yet tamable beast that lays its head in a virgin's lap, evoking the Virgin Mary's role in redemption. This work bridged patristic exegesis with emerging bestiary traditions, where animals served as mirrors for divine truths, transitioning from isolated moral lessons to interconnected symbolic systems. Bestiaries, proliferating from the 12th century, formalized this evolution by compiling Physiologus-derived entries with added theological depth, often attributing dual symbolism to creatures to reflect moral ambiguity in human experience. A hallmark of medieval interpretations was the recognition of animals' ambivalent roles, embodying both and to caution against spiritual peril. The , for example, signified the cunning who feigns death to lure the unwary, symbolizing and , as elaborated in accounts drawing on patristic warnings. In contrast, the represented faithful companionship and vigilance, often allegorized as the believer's to Christ or the watchful guardian against , underscoring themes of devotion amid . This dual framework enriched theological reflection, portraying creation as a moral landscape where animals illuminated the soul's journey toward or away from .

Early Christian and Late Antique Art

Catacomb and Sarcophagus Depictions

In the Roman catacombs of the 2nd to 5th centuries, animals served as subtle symbols in underground funerary art, reflecting the early Christian community's need for discretion amid periodic persecutions by Roman authorities. The fish, known as the ichthys, emerged as a primary emblem for Christ, derived briefly from biblical narratives like the miraculous catch in the Gospels, and appeared in simple frescoes and engravings on tomb slabs to signify faith without overt identification. In the Catacomb of Callixtus, a major 3rd-century burial site along the Appian Way overseen by Pope Callixtus I (r. 217–222 CE), fish motifs often accompanied Eucharistic scenes, such as alongside loaves of bread, underscoring themes of spiritual nourishment and communal secrecy. Doves, symbolizing the Holy Spirit or the soul's peaceful ascent to heaven, were depicted with olive branches in locations like the Catacombs of Priscilla and St. Sebastian, evoking eternal rest amid the era's threats. Anchors intertwined with fish further represented steadfast hope in resurrection, a motif etched on inscriptions to affirm endurance through trials, as seen across multiple catacomb networks during the Decian (249–251 CE) and Diocletianic (303–311 CE) persecutions. Sheep and lambs appeared prominently in catacomb depictions of the , a figure carrying a sheep over his shoulders to symbolize Christ's protective guidance of the faithful soul toward salvation. This imagery, borrowed and repurposed from pagan Roman funerary scenes of Hermes Kriophoros (the ram-bearer) who led souls to the , adapted classical motifs for Christian eschatological hope while maintaining visual ambiguity to evade detection. In the 3rd-century , such frescoes emphasized forgiveness and divine care, aligning with scriptural parables of the lost sheep. These animal representations were rendered in a stylized, non-naturalistic manner—flat figures with minimal shading and exaggerated proportions—contrasting sharply with the anatomical realism of contemporaneous pagan sculptures and murals, prioritizing symbolic essence over lifelike depiction to convey spiritual abstraction in confined, dimly lit spaces. Sarcophagus reliefs from the marked a transitional phase in animal symbolism, bridging clandestine catacomb and emerging public expressions following the in 313 CE, which granted Christians legal tolerance and ended widespread persecution under Emperors Constantine I and . On the Junius Bassus (c. 359 CE), carved for a Roman prefect and now in , lions flank the prophet Daniel in a scene of deliverance, symbolizing divine protection and foreshadowing through , integrated into a narrative frieze of Old and events. Peacocks, drawn from late antique beliefs in the bird's incorruptible flesh, appeared in Paradise-inspired motifs on similar , denoting immortality and the soul's renewal, often paired with vines or garlands to evoke eternal gardens. Sheep recurred as attributes of the in these marble works, reinforcing pastoral care amid the shift to more elaborate, basilica-influenced designs post-313 CE, yet retaining stylized contours that echoed catacomb simplicity while incorporating classical Roman drapery and framing for elite patrons. This evolution highlighted animals' role in affirming hope during the fragile transition from hidden worship to imperial favor.

Mosaics and Early Church Symbols

In the 4th to 6th centuries, following the legalization of under Constantine, mosaics emerged as a prominent medium for public church decorations, transforming animal motifs from discreet symbols into overt elements of imperial Christian architecture that conveyed theological depth and celebratory themes. These artworks, often executed in vibrant tesserae against gold backgrounds, adorned basilicas and baptisteries in regions like , integrating animals into paradisiacal and narrative contexts to evoke eternal life and divine order. Unlike earlier subterranean , these public displays reflected the Church's newfound prominence, with animals serving as visual allegories accessible to congregations during . In , a key center of late antique , the 5th-century features numerous motifs across its mosaics, symbolizing Christ as the "" () and the in scenes like the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes and the . These aquatic symbols, appearing in at least 26 panels commissioned under (r. 493–526), evoke paradisiacal abundance and baptismal renewal, drawing on early Christian interpretations of as emblems of the faithful . Complementing these, birds such as doves and peacocks appear in Ravenna's mosaic ensembles, including nearby structures like the (c. 425), where they perch amid vines and represent the and immortality in eternal, garden-like settings. The Jonah and the whale cycle in the 4th-century Basilica of Aquileia exemplifies early narrative use of marine animals as prefigurations of , with floor mosaics depicting swallowed by a ketos (), cast ashore, and resting under a gourd vine amid surrounding and . Dating to around 314–350, this allegorizes Christ's and rising, with the naked symbolizing the baptized soul's rebirth, a theme echoed in patristic writings like those of on the as a type of the grave. The paradisiacal framing with and underscores baptismal themes of deliverance and eternal life. Imperial patronage under Justinian (r. 527–565) infused animal motifs with triumphal connotations, as seen in 6th-century mosaics where s denote strength and royal authority, often as evangelist symbols or subdued foes. In the (c. 549), a represents Mark atop the , embodying Christ's kingship amid paradisiacal scenes of transfigured creation. Earlier examples of Christ treading upon a and serpent, signifying victory over evil forces, appear in the Archiepiscopal (late 5th century). Dolphins and entwined in San Vitale's arches (c. 547) further symbolize salvation and ecclesiastical unity, aligning with Justinian's reconquest and Orthodox consolidation. By the mid-6th century, animal motifs shifted toward deeper narrative integration, supporting Christological themes in church mosaics by embedding them within biblical cycles rather than isolated symbols. In Aquileia's Jonah panels and Ravenna's Eucharistic fish scenes, animals actively propel stories of redemption, prefiguring and reinforcing doctrines of and for diverse audiences in imperial basilicas. This evolution marked a maturation of public Christian , where creatures from scripture illustrated the harmony of creation under divine rule.

Byzantine and Eastern Traditions

Iconographic Roles in Icons and Frescoes

In Eastern Orthodox art from the 6th to 15th centuries, animals served stylized iconographic roles that prioritized spiritual hierarchy and theological symbolism over naturalistic representation, functioning as mediators between the earthly and divine realms. This approach emerged prominently after the end of in 843 CE, when icons and frescoes were restored as essential tools for devotion and contemplation, allowing believers to engage with through visual forms. Animals, drawn from biblical visions and patristic , embodied celestial orders and eschatological hopes, reinforcing the doctrine that such images were not idols but conduits for . In icons, animals often depicted angelic hierarchies and evangelistic attributes, as seen in 14th-century Novgorod panels where seraphim appear as wheels covered in eyes, inspired by Ezekiel's vision of the divine chariot and Revelation's throne room imagery. These , or "wheels with eyes," symbolize God's and the watchful gaze of the , positioned to underscore the seraphim's proximity to the divine throne. Similarly, eagles represent St. John the Evangelist, signifying his gospel's soaring theological depths and apocalyptic revelations; this motif, rooted in early Christian symbolism, appears in Byzantine-derived icons to evoke the evangelist's elevation above earthly concerns. Frescoes in monastic settings further illustrated animals in biblical narratives, such as the depiction of at the 11th-century monastery of in , symbolizing divine protection and deliverance. Lions, traditionally fierce yet tamed under God's will, depict the restoration of creation, drawing on prophetic imagery of reconciled beasts. These motifs built on early precedents of abundance, formalizing them in post-Iconoclastic devotional programs to guide monastic meditation. Theologically, animals in these works aligned with iconodule doctrine, portraying them as "windows to the divine" that pierced the veil between material and spiritual worlds, as affirmed in the 843 Triumph of Orthodoxy. By embodying scriptural archetypes, they facilitated the viewer's theosis, or union with God, without confusing the image for the prototype. A distinctive Eastern symbol, the two-headed eagle, merged imperial and faith elements in , representing the empire's dual sovereignty over East and West under Orthodox rule, often flanking imperial icons to signify Christ-centered authority.

Influence on Non-Western Christian Art

Byzantine animal symbolism, rooted in scriptural and patristic traditions, profoundly shaped non-Western Christian art through adaptations in Eastern and African contexts, where local fauna and pre-Christian motifs were integrated to convey theological themes from the 4th to 19th centuries. In Coptic Egyptian art from the 4th to 12th centuries, animals such as appeared in frescoes and carvings as symbols of evil and chaos associated with the Nile's destructive forces, often defeated by saints to represent divine triumph over creation's perils. For instance, depictions of St. Tadros El-Shatby (Prince Theodore of Shotep) spearing a on horseback in medieval Coptic icons echo this motif, portraying the saint as a victorious hero over Satanic forces. These images blended Pharaonic elements, such as the god piercing a to symbolize order over chaos, adapting ancient Egyptian to Christian narratives of redemption and . Ethiopian Christian art, spanning the 6th to 15th centuries, incorporated lions as potent symbols of the , linking the to biblical heritage and imperial legitimacy, as elaborated in the . In 15th-century illuminations, lions flanked royal figures or appeared in narrative scenes to evoke Judah's strength and Ethiopia's divine election, such as in depictions of Emperor Menelik I's lineage. Dragons, representing apocalyptic evil and , featured in early Ethiopian manuscripts, where equestrian saints akin to St. George slayed serpentine beasts, symbolizing victory over chaos in illuminated scenes and . These motifs drew from Byzantine prototypes but emphasized local triumph over historical adversaries, reinforcing eschatological themes. In 13th-century Armenian manuscripts from Cilician workshops, peacocks and griffins were adapted as decorative and symbolic elements in canon tables and headpieces, signifying eternal life and royal Christian authority amid the kingdom's multicultural milieu. Peacocks evoked and paradise, their iridescent feathers symbolizing divine . Griffins, guarding sacred spaces in marginal vignettes, represented Christ's dual nature and protective power, adorned with collars or rosettes to denote heavenly nobility, as seen in Cilician books blending Byzantine and Sasanian influences. Syncretic elements in non-Western Christian art often reflected local fauna and pre-Christian beliefs, particularly serpents in Syriac traditions, which merged Mesopotamian chthonic reverence with biblical motifs of temptation and redemption. In 3rd-century Dura-Europos church frescoes, the serpent coiled at Adam and Eve's feet symbolized the Fall while echoing ancient Near Eastern fertility deities, adapted to underscore Christian salvation. Later Syriac icons retained this duality, depicting serpents under saints' feet as conquered evil, blending Hellenistic and local Semitic iconographies to affirm orthodoxy amid cultural exchanges.

Medieval Western Art

Fantastic and Composite Creatures

In 11th- to 15th-century Western medieval , fantastic and composite creatures—hybrids blending human, animal, and mythical elements—served as vivid allegories for moral and cosmic chaos, embodying the disruptive forces of and that threatened divine . These beings, drawn from ancient lore but reinterpreted through a Christian lens, populated church portals, capitals, and architectural details, warning worshippers of the perils of straying from God's ordered creation. Unlike natural animals symbolizing virtues, these monstrosities underscored theological disorder, where unnatural forms mirrored the inversion of as described in patristic writings and bestiaries. Basilisks, manticores, and hydras frequently appeared in church carvings as emblems of sins or , their forms illustrating the seductive and destructive power of the . The , a serpent-rooster hybrid with a deadly , symbolized Satanic and , often carved on column capitals to depict humanity's vulnerability to corruption; for instance, at the 12th-century Abbey of , a with a rooster's head, wings, and serpent's body faces figures, one of which holds a vase-like object, possibly a for against its petrifying glance. Similarly, the —a lion-bodied creature with a human face and scorpion tail—embodied tyrannical deceit and voracious , appearing in 12th-century capitals as a devourer of souls, its insatiable appetite evoking the devil's temptations. Hydras appeared among fabulous beasts symbolizing evil in . Apocalyptic beasts from the Book of Revelation further amplified this theme, manifesting as multi-headed monsters in Last Judgment scenes to evoke end-times disorder. In 13th-century Gothic tympana, such as those at Chartres Cathedral, these composite horrors depicted beasts from Revelation as agents of cosmic rebellion, tormenting the damned and underscoring the ultimate victory of divine order over satanic anarchy. In Gothic architecture, gargoyles and misericords extended this symbolism, functioning as apotropaic wards against evil while grotesquely parodying sin. At 14th-century Lincoln Cathedral, gargoyles like the iconic Lincoln Imp—a mischievous, winged imp—protruded from parapets to channel rainwater and repel malevolent spirits, their hybrid forms embodying chaotic vices that believers were urged to reject. Misericords in choir stalls featured similar fantastical hybrids—snarling beasts and contorted figures—carved beneath seats to mock disorder during lulls in liturgy, reinforcing the theological notion that such creatures represented the inversion of God's creation, where unnatural unions signified rebellion against celestial hierarchy. Bestiary moralizations briefly interpreted these as emblems of unchecked passions, aligning with broader medieval exegesis.

Bestiary-Derived Symbols

Medieval bestiaries of the 12th to 14th centuries transformed descriptions of real animals into intricate allegories, drawing on earlier patristic traditions to interpret natural behaviors as Christian virtues or warnings against , thereby influencing the of illuminated manuscripts and church sculptures. These texts, often produced in monastic scriptoria, emphasized spiritual lessons over empirical observation, with animals serving as metaphors for divine truths in an era when visual and textual aids reinforced theological education. The , a 12th-century English from the Library (MS 24), exemplifies this approach through its entry on the , which symbolizes the law and prophets that could not save humanity, contrasted with Jesus Christ as the "elephant capable of understanding" who provides salvation. Similarly, the in the represents the 's deception, opening its mouth to emit a sweet odor that lures smaller inside to devour them, mirroring how the entices the faithful with pleasing words only to consume them in the fires of . In the 13th-century Rochester Bestiary (British Library, Royal MS 12 F XIII), produced in southeastern , such allegories extend to and birds, with bees embodying communal harmony and the production of honey as , while signify and , dwelling in dark ruins and polluting their nests, akin to those who feign while harboring . These moralizations, rendered in vibrant miniatures, directly informed sculptural motifs on church portals and capitals, where animals like bees and owls appeared as didactic elements to instruct the illiterate faithful. Bestiary symbols permeated broader artistic applications, notably in moralized Bibles of the 13th century, such as the (Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS lat. 10525), created around 1270–1274 for King . This features 78 full-page illustrations of scenes, including animals like the lion slain by or the doves in , interpreted morally to parallel psalm texts and underscore themes of divine protection and redemption, adapting bestiary-style allegories to narrative cycles for royal devotion and ethical guidance. Such integrations elevated animals from mere decoration to vehicles for scriptural in Gothic illumination. Beyond manuscripts, bestiaries served as vital preaching aids and educational tools in monastic schools, where monks excerpted animal allegories for sermons to illustrate vices like or virtues like communal harmony, fostering moral formation among and during the 12th–14th centuries. Classified alongside rhetorical handbooks like the , these texts equipped preachers with vivid exempla, ensuring their symbolic content shaped both oral instruction and the visual culture of cathedrals and .

Animals in Hagiography and Saints' Attributes

In medieval Christian art from the 13th to 15th centuries, animals frequently served as distinctive attributes for saints, drawn directly from legends to identify them visually and narrate key episodes from their lives. These depictions, rooted in texts like Jacobus de Voragine's (ca. 1260), emphasized the saints' miraculous interactions with creation, portraying animals not merely as companions but as obedient elements under divine authority. Such appeared prominently in panel paintings, altarpieces, and church decorations, allowing viewers to recognize saints amid crowded compositions. A prime example is Saint Jerome, often shown with a lion symbolizing his compassion and healing. According to the Golden Legend, Jerome encountered a limping lion at his monastery in , removed a thorn from its paw, and gained its lifelong companionship as a guardian; this motif appears in numerous 14th- and 15th-century works, such as Rogier van der Weyden's (ca. 1450–1465), where the lion rests tamely beside the saint. Similarly, Saint is depicted taming wild animals, reflecting his 13th-century legends of harmony with nature. In Giotto di Bondone's fresco cycle in the Upper Basilica of San Francesco at (ca. 1297–1299), Francis preaches to birds, blessing them as they listen attentively, while other scenes illustrate his pacification of the ferocious of , a beast terrorizing the town until Francis negotiated peace on behalf of its people. Hagiographic narratives also featured dramatic confrontations, such as Saint Margaret of Antioch slaying a dragon, representing her triumph over . In 14th-century altarpieces, like those from Agnolo Gaddi's workshop, Margaret emerges victorious from the dragon's belly after making the , her attribute underscoring her role as patron of childbirth and protector against evil. For Saint Benedict of Nursia, a serpent emerges from a poisoned cup at his command in the , symbolizing his discernment of treachery; this scene, where the snake writhes at his feet after he blesses the vessel, highlights his spiritual authority over deception. These animal episodes extended to identifying saints in multi-figure works, such as polyptychs and windows, where attributes like Jerome's lion or Francis's birds enabled quick recognition. Theologically, these portrayals illustrated the saints' restored over creation, evoking a postlapsarian harmony where human sin's rupture with nature is healed through holiness. Drawing briefly on traditions that moralized animal behaviors as divine lessons, such images affirmed that saints, as Christ-like figures, exercised compassionate rule over beasts, mirroring humanity's pre-Fall and pointing to eschatological . This motif reinforced medieval devotion, encouraging believers to emulate the saints' in daily life.

Renaissance and Mannerist Developments

Classical Revival and Naturalism

During the , particularly in the 15th and 16th centuries, artists revived classical naturalism by incorporating detailed, observed depictions of animals into Christian , drawing from ancient sources while preserving symbolic meanings. This revival blended empirical observation with theological narrative, as seen in Leonardo da Vinci's meticulous animal studies, which informed his sacred compositions. Leonardo's notebooks contain hundreds of sketches of horses, birds, and other creatures, dissected and rendered with anatomical precision to achieve lifelike quality in paintings like the unfinished (1481), where rearing horses in the background depict the chaos among the magi's entourage, symbolizing the disruptive arrival of the divine event amid human disorder. In (c. 1483–1486), while no animals appear directly, Leonardo's naturalistic approach to the rocky landscape and flora reflects his broader commitment to observed nature, elevating the sacred encounter between the Virgin, Christ, , and the angel through immersive environmental realism. Sandro Botticelli's Mystical Nativity (c. 1500) exemplifies animals as passive witnesses in settings, echoing classical motifs of idyllic rural life while advancing naturalism. The and ass, positioned at the , gaze upon the with quiet reverence, their forms rendered with soft contours and integrated lighting that suggest observed domestic creatures rather than stylized symbols. This depiction draws from ancient traditions, such as those in Virgil's , repurposed to underscore the of the , where humble beasts affirm Christ's amid apocalyptic elements above. Botticelli's animals thus bridge classical harmony with , their naturalistic presence grounding the ethereal vision. Albrecht Dürer's woodcuts further illustrate the influence of classical texts on animal portrayal, particularly Pliny the Elder's (c. 77–79 CE), which Renaissance artists consulted for accurate zoological details and artistic ideals. In (c. 1497–1498), Dürer depicts the lion's muscular with precise linework, symbolizing raw strength subdued by —foreshadowing Christ's triumph over evil—while adhering to Pliny's emphasis on empirical study over fantasy. Dürer's approach, informed by direct and classical precedents, elevated animal figures from mere symbols to convey both physical and spiritual power in Protestant-leaning Christian narratives. This period marked a tension between enduring symbolism and emerging scientific accuracy, evident in Nativity scenes where the ox and ass—rooted in medieval precedents from Isaiah 1:3—retained roles as emblems of Jewish and Gentile recognition of the Messiah but gained lifelike textures and behaviors. Artists like Leonardo and Dürer prioritized dissection and fieldwork, influenced by Pliny's encyclopedic method, to depict animals as integral to sacred realism, yet without fully abandoning their typological significance.

Symbolic Continuity in Narrative Scenes

In the Renaissance period, artists preserved medieval animal symbolism within intricate biblical narratives, integrating these motifs into dynamic compositions that blended spiritual with emerging humanist perspectives. This continuity ensured that animals served as enduring visual cues for theological concepts, such as , , and , even as scenes grew more complex and populated. By embedding these symbols into visionary and dramatic elements, painters like and reinforced doctrinal continuity while adapting forms to convey deeper emotional resonance. Raphael's Vision of Ezekiel (c. 1518), part of his exploration of prophetic themes during the same era as his Transfiguration (1516–1520), exemplifies this symbolic persistence in visionary contexts. The painting depicts the prophet surrounded by the —the four living creatures from and 4—comprising an angel (for Matthew), a (for Mark), an (for Luke), and an eagle (for John), which traditionally symbolize the Evangelists' gospels. These animals encircle Ezekiel in a swirling, dynamic arrangement, emphasizing divine revelation and the harmony of scripture, a motif rooted in medieval iconography but rendered with Raphael's balanced composition to heighten the mystical encounter. The eagle, in particular, soars as a of St. John's elevated, divine perspective on Christ, linking the vision to fulfillment. Michelangelo's Sistine Ceiling (1508–1512) similarly upholds medieval temptation symbolism in the narrative panel of the Temptation and Expulsion from Paradise. The central serpent, depicted with a female human torso and coiled form, embodies the deceptive allure of , drawing directly from Genesis 3 and earlier artistic traditions where the reptile signifies Satan's cunning inducement to disobedience. This anthropomorphic serpent, grasping the toward , perpetuates the motif of primal temptation as a cautionary , integrated into the ceiling's broader Genesis sequence to underscore humanity's fall and need for redemption. Michelangelo's rendering maintains the serpent's coiled form, echoing patristic on evil's nature, while fitting it into the vault's illusionistic architecture. In altarpieces like Jan van Eyck's (1432), animals reinforce sacrificial themes within Eucharistic narratives, bridging detail with symbolic depth. The central Adoration of the Mystic Lamb features a wounded lamb on an altar, its blood flowing into a chalice as a direct emblem of Christ's atoning sacrifice, derived from John 1:29 and medieval lamb denoting innocence and redemption. Above, a dove hovers, radiating light as the , symbolizing and the Trinitarian completion of the sacrificial act, with worshippers converging from all directions to adore the lamb. This integration sustains medieval associations—lamb for meekness, dove for purity—within a panoramic scene of universal salvation. Renaissance humanism further adapted these symbols by humanizing animals to evoke emotional responses, aligning spiritual motifs with relatable sentiments. In Nativity scenes, the ox—traditionally linked to Luke's gospel and sacrificial endurance from Isaiah 1:3—is often portrayed with a gentle, compassionate gaze toward the Christ child, transforming the static medieval beast into an expressive witness of humility and empathy. This shift reflects humanism's emphasis on human (and by extension, creaturely) emotion, as seen in works where the ox's warm proximity to the manger conveys protective tenderness, blending allegory with naturalistic warmth to draw viewers into the incarnation's intimacy.

Mannerist Developments

In the Mannerist period of the mid-to-late , animal depictions in continued the trend toward naturalism but often became more stylized and subordinate to human figures, serving as decorative elements rather than central symbols. This shift reflected Mannerism's emphasis on elegance, distortion, and complexity over balanced realism. For instance, in works by artists like or , animals such as birds or hounds appear in religious scenes like the Deposition or Visitation, adding graceful movement or emotional accent but with elongated forms and artificial poses that prioritize aesthetic innovation over theological depth.

Baroque to Modern Eras

Counter-Reformation Intensity

The , particularly through the decrees of the (1545–1563), emphasized the role of in instructing the faithful, clarifying Catholic doctrines such as the sacraments, and countering Protestant critiques by evoking intense emotional responses. Animal symbols, drawn from biblical and traditional , were amplified in works to make abstract theological concepts vivid and accessible, reinforcing Catholic orthodoxy against perceived heresies. This approach transformed animals from subtle motifs into dynamic elements that stirred piety and devotion, often portraying them with heightened realism and drama to underscore themes of sacrifice, divine intervention, and spiritual ecstasy. In ' altarpieces, such as the dramatic Daniel in the Lions' Den (c. 1615), lions embody both the ferocity of and the of divine protection, symbolizing the triumph of amid martyrdom—a key theme promoting Catholic resilience. These snarling, life-sized beasts, rendered with anatomical precision, heighten the emotional intensity, inviting viewers to empathize with the saint's peril and God's mercy, much as in Rubens' scenes where animal motifs indirectly evoke sacrificial themes. Eagles, as symbols of ascension and evangelist St. John, appear in related compositions to signify Christ's and the soul's elevation, further aligning with Tridentine calls for art that illuminates salvation doctrines. Gian Lorenzo Bernini's (1647–1652) exemplifies this symbolic intensity in sculpture, where a dove representing the hovers in the ceiling above the central marble group, illuminating the mystic's vision of divine love piercing her soul like an arrow. This avian emblem, bathed in golden rays from hidden windows, dynamically conveys the of spiritual union, evoking overwhelming emotion to affirm Catholic against Protestant . The dove's presence ties the work to ideals of sensory engagement in worship, making the invisible grace of God palpably real. The global dissemination of these intensified symbols occurred through , adapting European to local contexts in colonial .

19th-21st Century Interpretations

In the , the sought to revive medieval artistic techniques and spiritual intensity, reintroducing animal symbols into Christian to convey themes of innocence and divine purity within the Victorian era's moral and religious landscape. Dante Gabriel Rossetti's (1850), depicting the , prominently features a white dove perched on a ladder, symbolizing the Holy Spirit's descent and Mary's purity. This approach contrasted with academic classicism, emphasizing symbolic animals to evoke a direct, contemplative faith responsive to industrial-era anxieties. Transitioning into the 20th century, modernist artists adapted animal imagery to express existential dimensions of Christian belief, often through distorted forms that reflected personal turmoil and redemptive hope. , influenced by medieval , created works in the 1940s such as his biblical illustrations and religious panels, channeling post-war into a faith-centered vision. Similarly, Marc Chagall's paintings from the 1950s and 1960s, including series on biblical narratives, integrated hybrid beasts—such as floating goats and fish-like creatures—drawing from while incorporating Christian motifs like the , to foster reconciliation between traditions amid Holocaust recovery. These innovations departed from literalism, using animals to symbolize the interplay of chaos and grace in modern spiritual life. In contemporary Christian art from the late 20th to 21st centuries, animals have evolved into vehicles for exploring , , and cultural hybridity, often in installations that address global crises through biblical lenses. Kiki Smith's sculptural works of the 1990s, such as her and patinated pieces featuring hybrid human-animal forms like women entwined with wolves or birds, delve into themes of bodily vulnerability and environmental interconnectedness, echoing Christian ideas of creation's sanctity and redemption. In African contexts, 21st-century Nigerian artists have incorporated local fauna into Christian carvings, as seen in Yoruba-influenced thornwood nativities that blend indigenous animals like goats with traditional scenes of the and ass, symbolizing divine within postcolonial spiritual narratives. Broader themes in this period include animals as central to eco-theology, where motifs recur in artworks responding to , portraying animals not merely as saved creatures but as co-sufferers in a disrupted creation calling for . For instance, contemporary installations reinterpret the ark as a for , urging Christian environmental action through depictions of boarding vessels amid rising waters. Interfaith dialogues further enrich this symbolism, with artists like Chagall and later syncretic practitioners using shared animal archetypes—such as the dove or —to bridge Christian, Jewish, and Islamic traditions, promoting mutual understanding in diverse societies. As of 2025, artists continue this trend, with works like those by integrating animal motifs in eco-spiritual paintings to address ongoing environmental and interfaith concerns.

References

  1. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/animals-in-medieval-art
  2. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/post-biblical-period/early-christian-art-symbols-endure-after-iconoclast-attack/
  3. https://fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/explore-our-collection/highlights/context/sign-and-symbols/the-symbols-of-the-evangelists
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290276320_Domestic_animals_as_symbols_and_attributes_in_Christian_iconography_Some_examples_from_Croatian_sacral_art
  5. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/early-europe-and-colonial-americas/renaissance-art-europe-ap/a/drer-adam-and-eve
  6. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/2015/04/day398028
  7. https://rsc.byu.edu/behold-lamb-god/behold-lamb-god
  8. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol28/iss1/2/
  9. https://www.gotquestions.org/four-living-creatures.html
  10. https://www.archspm.org/what-are-the-symbols-of-the-holy-spirit/
  11. https://rsc.byu.edu/isaiah-prophets/jonah-testimony-resurrection
  12. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/animal-imagery-in-apocalyptic-literature/
  13. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12068a.htm
  14. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EECO/SIM-051054.xml?language=en
  15. https://www.hprweb.com/2025/06/theological-reflections-on-man-from-the-hexameron-of-st-ambrose-of-milan/
  16. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004409422/BP000009.xml?language=en
  17. https://bestiary.ca/beasts/beast140.htm
  18. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_commissions/archeo/inglese/documents/rc_com_archeo_doc_20011010_cataccrist_en.html
  19. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-near-eastern-world/borrowing-from-the-neighbors/
  20. https://www.bluffton.edu/courses/humanities/art/ech/post313/
  21. https://smarthistory.org/sarcophagus-of-junius-bassus/
  22. https://depts.washington.edu/hrome/Authors/calaroni/Enterintotheunderground/pub_zbarticle_view_printable.html
  23. https://www.ravennamosaici.it/en/dolphins-shells-and-fishes-in-the-mosaics-of-ravenna/
  24. https://www.turismo.ra.it/en/myravenna/sea-and-nature/peacocks-doves-guinea-fowls-birds-mosaics-ravenna/
  25. https://www.christianiconography.info/Venice%202018/Aquileia/jonahMosaicsAquileia.html
  26. https://www.orthodoxartsjournal.org/the-mosaic-apse-of-santapollinaire-in-classe-ravenna/
  27. https://smarthistory.org/san-vitale/
  28. https://www.ravennamosaici.it/en/thursdaycoffee-il-cristo-guerriero/
  29. https://smarthistory.org/santapollinare-nuovo/
  30. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/icons-and-iconoclasm-in-byzantium
  31. https://iconreader.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/the-divinely-revealed-appearance-of-angels-in-icons/
  32. https://www.christianiconography.info/john.html
  33. https://smarthistory.org/mosaics-and-microcosm/
  34. https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/TheologyoftheIcon
  35. https://www.medievalists.net/2021/04/double-headed-eagle-byzantine/
  36. https://mkaf.journals.ekb.eg/article_259479_77d05269a34c6809d486ef1a336d79ec.pdf
  37. https://core.ac.uk/download/482029784.pdf
  38. https://vemjournal.org/en/archives/8137
  39. https://www.academia.edu/104466405/The_Attributes_of_Sacredness_of_Animals_on_the_Reliefs_of_Armenia_and_Georgia_6th_14th_cc_pp_240_262
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332119816_The_senmurv_and_Other_Mythical_Creatures_with_Sasanian_Iconography_in_the_Medieval_Art_of_Armenia_and_Transcaucasia_Fabulous_Creatures_and_Spirits_in_Ancient_Iranian_Culture_ed_by_Matteo_Compareti_Bol
  41. https://syriacpress.com/blog/2025/09/14/syriac-icons-an-art-that-narrates-faith-and-preserves-spiritual-memory/
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/957
  43. https://www.medart.pitt.edu/menufrance/vezelay/capitals/vezcap74.html
  44. https://smarthistory.org/chartres-cathedral-last-judgment-portal/
  45. https://bestiary.ca/intro.htm
  46. https://digital.kenyon.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1221&context=perejournal
  47. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/bestiary/ms24/f10v
  48. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/bestiary/ms24/f73r
  49. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/records/rochester-bestiary-bee
  50. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/records/rochester-bestiary-tawny-owl
  51. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/92788/Kittell_uwm_0263M_13102.pdf?sequence=1
  52. https://www.christianiconography.info/goldenLegend/jerome.htm
  53. https://www.christianiconography.info/jerome.html
  54. https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/object/109F1Y
  55. https://www.wga.hu/html_m/g/giotto/assisi/upper/legend/franc15.html
  56. https://www.franciscanmedia.org/st-anthony-messenger/st-francis-and-the-taming-of-the-wolf/
  57. https://www.christianiconography.info/margaret.html
  58. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004721708/BP000021.pdf
  59. https://catholicmoraltheology.com/pope-francis-biblical-dominion-and-the-saints-on-non-human-animals/
  60. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/leonardo-da-vinci-1452-1519
  61. https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-leonardo-da-vinci-animal-lover
  62. https://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/virgin-rocks
  63. https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/sandro-botticelli-the-mystical-nativity
  64. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/336212
  65. https://orthodoxartsjournal.org/why-an-ass-and-an-ox-in-the-nativity-icon/
  66. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/renaissance-quarterly/article/animal-imagery-in-renaissance-art/2A1533248C9ED64AE5288F16FBAFE1CD
  67. https://www.artbible.info/art/large/182.html
  68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23202629
  69. https://smarthistory.org/van-eyck-the-ghent-altarpiece/
  70. https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/c047_MysticLamb.htm
  71. https://www.athenaartfoundation.org/festive-beasts
  72. https://wanderlust-tours.com/picturing-christmas/
  73. https://www.thegreatcat.org/the-cat-in-mannerist-and-religious-paintings/
  74. https://smarthistory.org/the-council-of-trent-and-the-call-to-reform-art/
  75. https://smarthistory.org/bernini-ecstasy-of-st-teresa/
  76. https://smarthistory.org/rossetti-ecce-ancilla-domini/
  77. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/rossetti-ecce-ancilla-domini-the-annunciation-n01210
  78. https://rossettiarchive.iath.virginia.edu/docs/s44.rap.html
  79. https://www.artic.edu/artworks/262335/georges-rouault-collection
  80. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/art
  81. https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Art/A_World_Perspective_of_Art_History%253A_1400CE_to_the_21st_Century_%28Gustlin_and_Gustlin%29/05%253A_A_World_in_Turmoil_%281900-1940%29/5.12%253A_Surrealism_%281920-1950%29
  82. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/17/arts/design/17kiki.html
  83. https://www.neprajz.hu/en/gyujtemenyek/artefact-of-the-month/2016_12_nigerian_nativity.html
  84. https://www.patheos.com/blogs/ecopreacher/2017/07/noah-ark-climate-change/
  85. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-935
  86. https://www.makotofujimura.com/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.