Hubbry Logo
2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference2024 United Nations Climate Change ConferenceMain
Open search
2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Community hub
2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference
2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference
2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Native name Birləşmiş Millətlər Təşkilatının İqlim Dəyişikliyi Konfransı (2024)
Date11–22 November
LocationBaku Olympic Stadium, Baku, Azerbaijan
Organised byAzerbaijan
ParticipantsUNFCCC member countries
PresidentMukhtar Babayev
Previous event← Dubai 2023
Next event→ Belém 2025
Websitecop29.az

The 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference or Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC, more commonly known as COP29, was the 29th United Nations Climate Change conference. It was held at Baku Olympic Stadium[1] in Baku, Azerbaijan, from 11 to 22 November 2024.[2] Mukhtar Babayev presided, while Samir Nuriyev headed the Organising Committee.[3][4]

The conference concluded with an agreement on plans for finance to mitigate the effects of climate change and help developing nations transition to more sustainable energy sources.[5] Rules and a UN registry were agreed to facilitate and record international trading of carbon credits.[6]

The choice of Azerbaijan as the location for the conference was controversial because it is a major oil and gas producer and authoritarian state with extensive corruption,[7][8][9] with several "official partners" of COP29 being businesses directly owned by President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, or tied to the Aliyev family's businesses.[7][8]

Background

[edit]

Azerbaijan signed the Paris Agreement—an agreement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)—on 22 April 2016.[10][11] It was ratified on 9 January 2017,[10] and entered into force on 8 February 2017.

In January 2024, Mukhtar Babayev, a longtime official of Azeri state-owned oil company SOCAR and Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources, was appointed as president of the COP29.[12] Azerbaijan reportedly paid New York-based PR firm Teneo US$4.7 million to manage public relations for the event.[9]

Critique of choice of location

[edit]
Baku Olympic Stadium hosted COP29.
COP29 in Azerbaijan

In December 2023, Azerbaijan was announced as the host of the conference. Held on a rotating schedule, the annual COP summit was set to be hosted by an Eastern European nation. However, Reuters reported that, during the previous COP28 meeting in Dubai, Eastern European countries had agreed to back Azerbaijan's bid for the 2024 edition.[13]

Critics argued that hosting COP29 in Azerbaijan was inappropriate due to the country's poor human rights record and an alleged ethnic cleansing against the Armenian population in the Nagorno-Karabakh region.[14][15] They also highlighted that Azerbaijan was a major fossil fuel producer, with an authoritarian government extensively linked to corruption,[7][16] and saw the choice to assign hosting rights for the COP29 to the country as a way to greenwash its reputation.[17][18]

Additionally, concerns were raised about the government's repression of journalists and environmental activists before the conference, indicating a suppression of free speech and civil society.[19][20][21] Michael Rubin, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote that COP29 risked legitimizing Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev's authoritarian government, comparing the occurrence to the political exploitation of the 1936 Summer Olympics by Adolf Hitler's regime.[22] Reporters and anti-corruption non-profits also criticized extensive corruption occurring in the country, with "official partners" of COP29 being businesses that were either owned directly by or tied to the Aliyev family.[7][23]

Ilham Aliyev with Pedro Sánchez and António Guterres in Baku, Azerbaijan, 12 November 2024

Amnesty International said the Host Country Agreement (HCA) between Azerbaijan and the UNFCCC should include arrangements that guaranteed that "all human rights [were] protected and respected", and must be made public immediately, citing Azerbaijan's human rights violations. The rights group drew a comparison with the situation during COP28, which had been hosted by the United Arab Emirates, stating that it had made multiple efforts to obtain the HCA signed in August 2023. Amnesty received a copy of COP28's HCA in June 2024, and revealed that it had "significant shortcomings and ambiguities" in rights protections offered to the participants in Dubai.[24]

On 11 November 2024, climate activist Greta Thunberg attended a rally in Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia, to protest Azerbaijan's hosting of the COP29. Thunberg and other activists criticized Azerbaijan's repressive government, and use of the summit to "greenwash" human rights abuses. She called it "absurd" to hold climate talks in an "authoritarian petrostate" amid rising emissions and a climate crisis.[25]

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev described the criticism as a "smear campaign" and said it "[could not] derail us from achieving our noble mission to cope with the negative impacts of climate change."[9]

Pre-COP29 negotiations

[edit]
Further information: Baku Communiqué

At the Climate Change Conference in Bonn in June 2024, despite positive outcomes on the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) and adaptation indicators for COP29,[26] limited progress was achieved on the effective implementation of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, with unresolved issues surrounding carbon credit systems and emission avoidance.[27] In the occasion, United Nations Climate Change Executive Secretary, Simon Stiell, stressed the need for further work to address those issues before COP29.[28]

In July 2024, Azerbaijan announced the institution of the Climate Finance Action Fund (CFAF), a fund that aimed to seek US$1 billion in annual contributions from fossil fuel-producing countries and companies, which would then be re-invested in renewable energy and support of climate projects in developing countries; half of the resources from the CFAF would reportedly be allocated to national plans for the fulfillment of the targets set by the Paris Agreement. 20% of the total revenues would be allocated to a Rapid Response Funding Facility (2R2F) for disaster support.[29][30]

On 10 and 11 October, Azerbaijan hosted the annual Pre-COP meeting to initiate discussions ahead of COP29. The conference, centered around the motto "Strengthening Ambitions and Ensuring Action", opened with COP29 President-designate Mukhtar Babayev, COP28 President Sultan Al Jaber, and UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina J. Mohammed.[31] Guests discussed priorities such as the need for a new climate finance goal to replace the former $100 billion target, the full activation of the Loss and Damage Fund —originally established during the COP27 in Sharm El Sheikh—, and wider support of vulnerable communities. Discussions also included updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) from countries and the finalization of guidelines for carbon markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Leaders emphasized the need to cap global warming at 1.5°C, as data from the UN Environment Programme had suggested that existing climate pledges may allow for an overall 2.9°C increase.[32][33]

COP29 Organizing Committee

[edit]

The Organising Committee for COP29 was established by an order of the President of Azerbaijan on 13 January 2024. The committee's composition was subsequently expanded on 19 January and 22 February of the same year. Chaired by Samir Nuriyev, Head of the Presidential Administration of Azerbaijan, the committee comprised 56 members, including ministers, members of the National Assembly, and other heads of state authorities.[34]

The organizing committee originally consisted of 28 men. After criticism voiced by several observers, including Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Christiana Figueres, another two men and eleven women were added to the panel.[35][36]

COP29 Presidency

[edit]

Azerbaijan's Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources, Mukhtar Babayev, served as President of the COP29. Babayev previously worked as Vice President for ecology at state-owned oil company SOCAR.[37] Other members of the COP29 Presidency Team included Yalchin Rafiyev as the lead negotiator, Deputy Minister of Energy Elnur Soltanov as Chief Executive Officer, Narmin Jarchalova as the Chair of the COP29 Azerbaijan Operating Company and Chief Operating Officer, Nigar Arpadarai as the Climate Change High-Level Champion, and Leyla Hasanova as the Youth Climate Champion.[38]

Conference agenda

[edit]

COP29 aimed to implement further measures to limit global warming to 1.5°C, emphasizing the urgent need for investment in climate action.[39][40] The COP29 Presidency stressed the importance of operationalizing the Loss and Damage Fund to support vulnerable communities, particularly in Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and Least Developed Countries (LDCs), while calling for enhanced Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in line with 1.5°C targets and urging the submission of national NDCs by 2025, with a focus on fossil fuel phase-out, increasing renewable energy, and addressing non-carbon-dioxide emissions, such as methane. On adaptation, the Presidency called for all countries to prepare and submit their National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) by 2025 and emphasized the need for scaling up adaptation finance. In addition, COP29 encouraged global financial institutions and the private sector to increase climate finance and foster investment in green innovation. The summit aimed to provide platforms to mobilize business participation and enhance transparency in investment decisions to support climate action.[41]

Climate communication

Venue and zone structure

[edit]
Baku Olympic Stadium in 2015

In April 2024, Azerbaijan announced the Baku Olympic Stadium as the venue for the conference.[42] The city developed a 112,000 m2 (1,206,000 sq ft) venue next to the stadium.[43] The event was expected to welcome around 80,000 attendees, including senior government officials at the venue.[44]

COP29 operated within two main zones: the Blue Zone, dedicated to official negotiations among government delegations, international organizations, and selected NGOs, featuring national pavilions where countries presented climate initiatives; and the Green Zone, which was accessible to the public and resembled a trade fair, with corporate exhibitors showcasing climate-related products and services.[45]

Climate finance

[edit]
Head of the African Development Bank Akinwumi Adesina chats with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks with President of Finland Alexander Stubb, President of the European Council Charles Michel, and Prime Minister of Denmark Mette Frederiksen

At COP29, climate finance was considered to be a central topic, focusing on scaling up resources for developing countries to address climate impacts and transition to low-carbon economies. A key agenda item was the negotiation of the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance, which would set a new financial target to support developing countries after 2025, building on the previous $100 billion annual commitment.[46][47] Proposed solutions included blended finance, which combined public and private investments to amplify funding for climate initiatives, and debt-for-nature swaps, which would allow countries to re-allocate debt repayments toward environmental and climate projects.[47]

Among the major developments, multilateral development banks, including the World Bank and European Investment Bank, pledged to increase climate-related lending to $120 billion annually for low- and middle-income countries, while the Asian Development Bank announced $7.2 billion in additional investments and a $3.5 billion adaptation program targeting glacial melting in Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus. Non-profit investor Acumen pledged $300 million for agricultural adaptation in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, while the Climate Investment Funds launched a $75 billion bond issuance program on the London Stock Exchange. The Association of Banks of Azerbaijan also committed nearly $1.2 billion to support the country's low-carbon transition.[48]

At the conference, world leaders ratified a key framework under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement, establishing a UN-backed body to regulate international carbon credit trading. The decision is expected to unlock billions of dollars in climate finance, mainly destined to developing countries.[49]

Delegations also reached an agreement for a deal that would oblige developed nations to make a $300 billion annual climate finance pledge by 2035, in order to help developing countries get access to wider economic resources to tackle emissions and climate disasters. However, poorer nations criticized the amount as insufficient, with many pushing for a minimum $500 billion target. While the deal was seen as a small step, critics, including UN officials, called it a betrayal, especially due to the lack of mandatory contributions for emerging economies like China.[50]

Key points of tension in the negotiations were the donor base, in which developed economies such as the US and the European Union had insisted that more countries with resources like China and the Gulf Cooperation Council countries should have contributed by default, and the share of funding coming from public budgets, where developing countries had insisted on significant increases in public, non-loan grants.[51] The final $300 billion text stated that climate funding will come from both public and private sources, and encouraged voluntary contributions from developing countries, including China and Middle Eastern countries.[52]

Energy transition

[edit]

Following COP28 in Dubai, COP29 will focus on advancing the energy transition agenda, with particular emphasis on reducing global reliance on fossil fuels and scaling up renewable energy deployment. Key goals include establishing specific timelines for phasing out coal and developing green hydrogen markets, both of which are critical to achieving the Paris Agreement targets. COP29 will also address energy security concerns, especially for economies heavily dependent on fossil fuels, and will support policies that ensure a just and equitable transition for affected communities.[53]

To facilitate these shifts, COP29 is expected to promote collaborative frameworks that enable countries to share technology, expertise, and resources. This includes regional integration of renewable energy grids, which can improve energy access while reducing emissions. By advancing these initiatives, COP29 seeks to create sustainable, resilient energy systems that align with long-term climate goals.[47]

Controversies

[edit]

COP29 Chief Executive, Elnur Soltanov, was secretly recorded discussing potential oil and gas deals during the conference, raising serious concerns about a breach of COP ethics. Critics argued that Soltanov's behavior undermined the conference's goal of transitioning away from fossil fuels, as Soltanov also held a key role in Azerbaijan's energy sector.[54]

EU diplomats criticized Azerbaijan for not putting fossil fuel phase-out on the agenda of the conference, which solely mentioned mitigation.[55] On 31 October 2024, Papua New Guinea's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Justin Tkatchenko, announced that the country would boycott the summit entirely, calling it a "total waste of time".[56]

In October 2024, Human Rights Watch revealed the HCA between the UN and Azerbaijan, which had been signed in August.[57] Although the COP29 HCA was made public prior to the climate conference, unlike COP28, it was described as "disappointing, but not surprising." HRW said the HCA was full of "significant shortcomings and ambiguities on the protections for participants' rights". The agreement was released alongside HRW's report exposing the efforts of Azerbaijan's government to "silence its critics", where several activists and journalists were arrested on baseless and serious criminal charges.[58][59][60]

On 14 November 2024, the UN was forced to respond to complaints about the lack of vegan, vegetarian and plant-based food options at the COP29. Reportedly only a single food stall in the event's food court sold vegan options, whereas the majority of food stalls, including a Domino's Pizza, sold meat-based meals. In response to the controversy, vegan campaigners handed out free sandwiches.[61]

On 15 November 2024, the Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO) coalition, which included Global Witness, Corporate Accountability, and Corporate Europe Observatory, reported that at least 1,773 fossil fuel lobbyists were granted access to the COP29 climate summit in Baku, surpassing the size of nearly each national delegation, except for Azerbaijan (2,229), Brazil (1,914), and Turkey (1,862). According to the KBPO, the report highlighted the "disproportionate presence" of industry representatives in comparison to delegates from the ten most climate-vulnerable nations, which had collectively sent 1,033 participants.[62][63][64]

On 23 November 2024, The Guardian revealed that a Saudi Arabian delegate had allegedly tried to modify an official negotiating text, a type of document that was usually circulated as non-editable PDF by COP presidencies to all countries simultaneously.[65]

The campaign website cop29.com was purchased by Global Witness instead of Azerbaijan's COP29 team and became a focal point of controversy. Backed by notable figures such as actor Jude Law and former UN climate chief Mary Robinson, the site advocated for fossil fuel companies to fund climate damages, highlighting their $4 trillion earnings in 2022 compared to the $702 million pledged at the summit. The website was banned at the summit venue, and, according to the Financial Times, Azerbaijan blocked domestic access to the site in what was described as a "fossil fuel domain name war," intensifying debates over the influence of fossil fuel interests in the COP process.[66]

Frank Pallone recounted an alarming encounter during his visit to the UN-led climate conference in Baku. He was confronted by hostile, coordinated questions from local media, which he believed were orchestrated by the Azerbaijani government to intimidate him. He accused the Azerbaijani government of repressing free speech and using the event to deflect criticism of its human rights record. Ed Markey also faced harassment, calling out Azerbaijan for "greenwashing" its climate and human rights record. Both lawmakers criticized the country’s treatment of political prisoners and its stance on negotiations with Armenia.[67]

On 7 November 2025 the British newspaper The Guardian revealed how more than 5,000 fossil fuel lobbyists were given access to the UN climate summits over four years, including COP29.[68]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference, designated COP29, was the 29th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), held from 11 to 22 November 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan. Hosted and presided over by Azerbaijan, an economy predominantly reliant on oil and gas exports, the summit convened representatives from nearly 200 countries to advance international climate cooperation, with a primary emphasis on establishing a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) for climate finance to aid developing nations in mitigation and adaptation efforts. The conference achieved a key outcome in agreeing that developed countries would mobilize at least US$300 billion annually by 2035—effectively tripling the prior US$100 billion target—for in developing countries, though the deal relies partly on loans and private finance contributions and has been critiqued for insufficient scale relative to estimated needs exceeding US$1 trillion yearly. Negotiators also finalized operational rules for international carbon markets under Article 6 of the , aiming to enhance transparency and environmental integrity in mechanisms. However, progress stalled on strengthening global emissions reduction ambitions, with no renewal of COP28's call to transition away from fossil fuels, amid ongoing rises in worldwide . Azerbaijan's selection as host drew significant for the apparent contradiction of an oil-dependent state leading talks, with its president defending production as essential to national development while Western nations faced accusations of hypocrisy in demanding energy transitions without adequate financial support. The event highlighted persistent divides between developed and developing parties on responsibility for historical emissions and funding mechanisms, underscoring the challenges in achieving consensus on causal drivers of versus geopolitical and economic realities.

Background and Historical Context

Evolution of UNFCCC COP Conferences

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was opened for signature at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, entering into force on March 21, 1994, after ratification by sufficient parties. The inaugural Conference of the Parties (COP1) assembled in , , from March 28 to April 7, 1995, establishing the annual forum for negotiating emission mitigation, adaptation, and support mechanisms under the convention's objective to stabilize concentrations at levels preventing dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Early COPs focused on differentiating responsibilities between developed and developing nations, culminating in COP3 in , , from December 1 to 11, 1997, where the was adopted, imposing legally binding emission reduction targets on Annex I (developed) countries averaging 5% below 1990 levels for 2008–2012, though implementation faced ratification delays and non-participation by major emitters like the . Subsequent conferences shifted toward broader participation, with COP21 in Paris, France, from November 30 to December 12, 2015, producing the Paris Agreement, ratified by 195 parties, which introduced nationally determined contributions (NDCs) from all nations aimed at peaking emissions and pursuing efforts to limit warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, alongside provisions for climate finance and technology transfer to developing countries. Later iterations emphasized fossil fuel phase-outs: COP26 in Glasgow, United Kingdom, in November 2021, secured pledges from over 40 countries to phase down unabated coal power and inefficient fossil fuel subsidies by 2030, alongside commitments to halt deforestation by 2030. COP28 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, in December 2023, marked the first explicit global agreement to "transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems" in a just, orderly manner, accelerating zero- and low-emission technologies, though critics noted ambiguities allowing continued fossil fuel expansion under carbon capture offsets. Empirical trends reveal persistent global CO₂ emissions growth from fossil fuels and industry, rising from approximately 20 billion metric tons in 1990 to over 35 billion metric tons annually by the early , a near 75% increase, despite cumulative of trillions in —estimated at USD 4.8 trillion committed from 2011 to 2020 alone—and repeated pledges. This trajectory underscores the limitations of voluntary frameworks, where economic imperatives for affordable, reliable energy to support development often prioritize fossil fuels over intermittent renewables, compounded by recurring North-South divides over inadequate finance flows (falling short of the USD 100 billion annual target pledged in ) and stalled transfers, as developing nations demand accountability from historical emitters without commensurate burden-sharing. Such dynamics highlight causal factors in policy outcomes, including enforcement gaps and incentives misaligned with rapid decarbonization absent breakthroughs in scalable, dispatchable alternatives.

Specific Lead-up to COP29

Following the 2023 COP28 in , where parties agreed to accelerate a "just, orderly and equitable transition away from s in systems" toward net-zero emissions by 2050, preparatory discussions for COP29 emphasized implementation gaps, with limited advancement in specifying timelines or enforcement mechanisms for the fossil fuel shift. Developing nations criticized the language as insufficiently binding compared to earlier calls for a full phase-out, while -producing states, including host , stressed the need for transitional fuels like to ensure . This tension carried into agenda-setting, where the focus shifted to operationalizing COP28 pledges amid geopolitical strains, including the persistence of high prices from the 2022 , which prompted European reversals on phase-outs and underscored causal dependencies on reliable supplies over accelerated decarbonization. Azerbaijan was selected as COP29 host in November 2021 by UNFCCC parties during COP26 deliberations in Glasgow, amid competition from other nominees, positioning it as the fifth consecutive host from Asia-Pacific and Eastern Europe regions under the rotating presidency formula. Early 2024 intersessional meetings, particularly the Subsidiary Bodies sessions (SB60) in Bonn from June 3-13, highlighted deepening disputes over climate finance, as the 2009 Copenhagen Accord's $100 billion annual pledge from developed to developing countries—only retrospectively met in 2022 via often-disputed accounting of loans and non-grants—was set to expire, with calls for a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) exposing rifts on funding scale, sources (public vs. private), and grant-equivalent portions. Developing country blocs, including the G77+China, demanded trillions in annual support to address adaptation and mitigation needs, while developed nations resisted expansions beyond hundreds of billions, citing fiscal constraints and the need for private sector mobilization. These frictions, compounded by the Ukraine-induced that revealed vulnerabilities in supply chains and boosted global LNG demand by over 50% in 2022-2023, fostered a pragmatic undercurrent in COP29 preparations, tempering ideological pushes for rapid abandonment with realism about transitional requirements for . Diplomatic efforts, including bilateral talks and regional forums in early 2024, aimed to bridge divides but yielded procedural texts rather than substantive breakthroughs, setting a contentious tone for where was framed as the core deliverable to sustain UNFCCC momentum.

Host Country Selection and Venue

Selection Process and Rationale for

The selection of as host for the 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) followed the standard UNFCCC procedure, whereby the COP Bureau consults with to identify candidates and proposes a venue for approval by the . Under rotational guidelines prioritizing regional balance, the was due to host after conferences in (COP27 in ) and the (COP28 in the ). In December 2023, secured consensus from Eastern European nations after negotiations, leading to its formal designation as host by the COP Bureau and subsequent unanimous endorsement by nearly 200 parties. Azerbaijan presented its candidacy emphasizing its strategic position in the Caspian Sea region, which facilitates multilateral discussions on energy security and transition amid the area's role as a key supplier of fossil fuels to Europe and Asia. The country argued that hosting COP29 would advance global energy dialogues, leveraging its experience in regional infrastructure projects like trans-Caspian energy corridors. Azerbaijani officials highlighted commitments to "green growth," including targets for renewable energy expansion, despite the economy's heavy reliance on hydrocarbons, which accounted for over 90% of export revenues in recent years. This profile mirrors precedents such as the UAE's hosting of COP28, where a fossil fuel-dependent nation was selected to preside over transition-focused talks, reflecting patterns in Bureau decisions favoring regional rotation over strict alignment with low-emission profiles.

Venue Details and Logistical Arrangements

The 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) took place from November 11 to 22 at the , located in the capital city of . The primary venue encompassed the stadium and adjacent areas, structured into a secure for official negotiations and plenaries—accessible only to accredited participants via badge-controlled checkpoints—and a for public events, exhibitions, and side activities open to registered attendees. The Blue Zone featured 26 conference rooms and nine spaces for simultaneous sessions, while the Green Zone included meeting rooms with capacities ranging from 70 to 200 participants. Baku's infrastructure supported an estimated capacity of over 80,000 attendees, including delegates, observers, and media, with preparations involving expanded transport hubs and accommodation logistics coordinated by the host government. Logistical support included 24/7 shuttle services between and venue hubs, as well as accessibility provisions for participants with reduced mobility. To facilitate international participation, issued a free COP29 Special Visa to UNFCCC-registered delegates, permitting a single-entry stay of up to 30 days. Enhanced protocols were implemented across venues, mandating for entry and including procedures, amid the host's regional geopolitical . Advance site visits for organizers were scheduled from October 25, 2024, to align with UN logistical policies.

Critiques of Hosting in an Oil-Dependent Nation

Critics highlighted the irony of convening the " COP," focused on mobilizing trillions in for developing nations, in , where the state-owned dominates the energy sector through exploration, extraction, and sales of oil and gas, contributing over 98% to the country's total primary energy supply. Oil and gas accounted for approximately 92% of export revenues and 35.3% of GDP in 2023, with renewables comprising less than 1% of amid ongoing expansion plans. This selection was seen as emblematic of the UN process's credibility issues, as the host petrostate used the platform to pursue new deals, undermining pledges to transition away from hydrocarbons. Human rights organizations raised alarms over Azerbaijan's governance, citing pre-conference arrests of environmental activists, journalists, and critics on fabricated charges, including smuggling and extremism, as documented by and . Restrictions on and expression intensified ahead of COP29, with cases like the detention of climate activist Anar Mammadli in April 2024 and economist Gubad Ibadoghlu, limiting civil society's participation in climate discussions. These actions were viewed as efforts to suppress dissent, contrasting with the summit's themes of global equity and justice. Azerbaijani officials countered that and gas revenues, forming 49.38% of the state , have funded and development in a resource-scarce nation lacking viable alternatives, emphasizing over external dictates. President accused Western critics of hypocrisy, noting that European and U.S. entities continue purchasing Azerbaijani gas and engaging in while condemning the host's reliance, framing such positions as politically motivated double standards. This defense underscored empirical realities of for export-dependent economies transitioning gradually, rather than abrupt decarbonization unattainable without compensatory financing.

Organizational Structure and Leadership

COP29 Presidency and Key Figures

The COP29 Presidency was led by Mukhtar Babayev, appointed as President-Designate on January 4, 2024, by the government. Babayev, born in on October 16, 1967, holds a degree in from and has led Azerbaijan's delegations to the prior five COP conferences. In his role as Azerbaijan's Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources since December 2018, he oversees national environmental policies, including efforts to balance hydrocarbon development with emissions reduction targets. Prior to this appointment, Babayev spent over 20 years at the (), Azerbaijan's state-owned energy giant, culminating in his position as Vice-President for Ecology from 2008 to 2018, where he developed environmental strategies for oil and gas operations. This extensive industry experience positioned him to draw on practical knowledge of energy infrastructure, akin to precedents like former UNFCCC Executive Secretary Patricia Espinosa's diplomatic background in resource-dependent , though Babayev's direct fossil fuel ties more closely resemble those of COP28 President , CEO of ADNOC. Babayev's leadership emphasized equitable climate finance tailored to developing nations' needs, framing COP29 as a platform for "fair" resource allocation that accounts for historical emitters' responsibilities while enabling energy access in oil-producing contexts. He was supported by Parviz Shahbazov, Azerbaijan's Minister of Energy since 2019, who coordinated energy-related agendas, including the promotion of green hydrogen initiatives and renewable energy investment forums during preparatory events. Shahbazov, with a background in Azerbaijan's energy sector spanning regulatory and operational roles, advocated for technology transfers and financial mechanisms to facilitate transitions without disrupting economic dependencies on hydrocarbons, which account for approximately 90% of Azerbaijan's exports. The selection of figures with deep-rooted ties to Azerbaijan's oil-dependent economy—where dominates production and state revenues—prompted scrutiny over impartiality in negotiations on fossil fuel transitions and mitigation targets. Critics, including environmental advocacy groups, highlighted causal risks of industry influence, noting that Babayev's tenure involved advancing extraction projects amid rising global emissions, potentially skewing priorities toward gradual reforms over aggressive phase-outs, as evidenced by the absence of language in the Presidency's initial agenda priorities. Such backgrounds, while providing sector-specific expertise, underscore structural tensions in UNFCCC presidencies hosted by exporters, where empirical data on access and historical negotiation outcomes reveal patterns of moderated ambition in debates.

Organizing Committee and Preparatory Bodies

The COP29 Organizing Committee was established by presidential decree in to coordinate the logistical, operational, and infrastructural preparations for hosting the conference in from November 11 to 22, 2024. Chaired by Azerbaijani officials, the committee focused on executing an approved that encompassed venue setup, participant accommodations, security arrangements, and collaboration with international partners to ensure compliance with UNFCCC protocols. This national body operated under the oversight of the host government, managing decision-making flows for on-site implementation while deferring substantive negotiation agendas to UNFCCC subsidiary structures. The UNFCCC Secretariat provided essential input through technical missions and guidelines, including a preparatory assessment visit to from September 6 to 9, 2024, to evaluate readiness on accreditation, , and systems. Preparatory bodies extended to informal Pre-COP sessions, such as the gathering on October 10–11, 2024, in , which facilitated alignment among parties on procedural matters without delving into policy outcomes. These mechanisms ensured streamlined administrative flows, with the Secretariat acting as a bridge between host logistics and the participation of all 198 UNFCCC Parties. Observer access was granted to accredited intergovernmental organizations, non-governmental organizations, and entities, including representatives, reflecting Azerbaijan's hydrocarbon-based and the presence of interests in conference-side activities. Funding for organizational efforts was predominantly sourced from the Azerbaijani , covering estimated costs for and operations, though exact figures were not publicly detailed beyond host commitments to UNFCCC hosting standards. This setup prioritized efficiency in a compressed timeline, with preparations accelerated after Azerbaijan's selection in November 2023.

Pre-Conference Negotiations

Technical and Political Preparatory Talks

The Bonn Climate Change Conference, held from 3 to 13 June 2024, served as the primary intersessional meeting for technical preparatory work ahead of COP29, involving the 60th sessions of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI 60) and Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA 60). Delegates advanced procedural elements, including initial agreements on reporting formats for nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and some transparency rules under the enhanced transparency framework. However, broader procedural progress was limited, with chairs issuing informal notes to consolidate text on unresolved items for further negotiation in Baku. On carbon markets, parties achieved modest technical breakthroughs under Article 6 of the , including progress on corresponding adjustments to avoid double-counting of emission reductions and guidance for non-market approaches, though contentious issues like the share of proceeds for funding remained deadlocked. These steps built on prior COP decisions but deferred final rules to COP29, reflecting ongoing divisions between market proponents and those wary of environmental integrity risks. Climate finance preparations featured technical expert dialogues under the Standing Committee on Finance's workstream, focusing on mobilizing resources for the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), with discussions emphasizing baselines and leverage but yielding no consensus on target amounts or contributor definitions. Complementing these, political signals emerged from summits: the Leaders' Communiqué in June 2024 urged multilateral development banks (MDBs) to align financing with low-emission pathways and enhance private capital mobilization through instruments. Similarly, environment ministers in October 2024 endorsed a task force for global mobilization against , stressing structural reforms to channel private flows into adaptation and mitigation in developing economies. Efforts to operationalize the Loss and Damage Fund, agreed at COP27, encountered persistent stalemates in pre-COP29 talks, including disputes over board composition, funding eligibility criteria, and disbursement modalities, despite meeting initial institutional milestones like hosting the fund at the World Bank and securing $792 million in pledges by mid-2024. Developing countries criticized delays in scaling contributions to match estimated annual needs exceeding $400 billion, while contributors conditioned further commitments on robust governance to prevent misuse. These bilateral and informal consultations, often outside UNFCCC tracks, underscored procedural hurdles in bridging finance gaps without prejudging substantive outcomes.

Key Sticking Points Entering the Summit

Developing countries, particularly those in the G77+China bloc, entered COP29 demanding at least $1 trillion annually in public by 2030 to address , , and loss and needs, viewing rather than loans as essential for fulfilling historical responsibilities of industrialized nations. In contrast, developed countries emphasized mobilizing trillions through investment and , arguing that public funds alone were insufficient amid fiscal constraints and that leveraging markets could scale resources more effectively without straining taxpayer budgets. This divide highlighted empirical gaps in prior commitments, as the $100 billion annual target from had been met only retrospectively in 2022 and largely through loans rather than , fueling distrust over delivery mechanisms. On fossil fuels, oil-exporting nations including host and resisted calls to strengthen the COP28 language on "transitioning away" from unabated fossil fuels, prioritizing energy export revenues and national development over accelerated phase-out timelines. members and vulnerable small island states pushed for explicit phase-out commitments and eliminations, citing scientific assessments that current trajectories risked exceeding 1.5°C warming limits without deeper cuts in reliance. Azerbaijan's role as a major gas supplier to amid the Russia-Ukraine conflict underscored the tension, as sought to position as a bridge fuel while critics argued such expansions contradicted urgent decarbonization imperatives. Geoeconomic pressures further complicated talks, with post-COVID inflation and the 2022 energy crisis elevating priorities for affordable, reliable power over intermittent renewables in many nations, leading developed economies to advocate pragmatic transitions that maintain grid stability and industrial competitiveness. Russia's invasion of had driven up global energy prices, reinforcing use for security reasons and exposing vulnerabilities in supply chains, which negotiators from energy-importing developing countries cited to justify demands for finance covering both green shifts and transitional fuels. This realism clashed with advocacy for rapid , as empirical data showed renewables' scalability limited by mineral shortages, storage costs, and weather dependency, prompting debates over whether finance goals should subsidize proven dispatchable sources during the interim.

Core Agenda and Negotiation Topics

Climate Finance as the Central Focus

The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on emerged as the dominant negotiation track at COP29, intended to succeed the $100 billion annual pledge made by developed countries in to support mitigation and adaptation in developing nations, a commitment that formally expired at the end of 2022. Official tracking by the indicated that developed countries provided and mobilized $115.9 billion in 2022, surpassing the target for the first time after consistent shortfalls in prior years, with fulfillment averaging around 80% in earlier reporting periods such as 2020's $83.3 billion. However, critics highlighted that much of the mobilized finance consisted of loans rather than grants, and contributions were often counted despite limited direct accountability mechanisms, raising doubts about the goal's effectiveness and scalability to higher volumes. Developing countries, represented primarily through the G77+China bloc, framed their demands for the NCQG around principles of climate justice, arguing that historical emissions from industrialized nations impose a and causal to fund and loss in vulnerable economies disproportionately affected by global warming despite minimal contributions to it. They proposed annual flows in the range of $1-2 trillion, emphasizing grants over loans to prevent exacerbating sovereign debt burdens in low-income states already strained by borrowing for essential development. This stance reflected empirical assessments of needs, with estimates from bodies like the UN suggesting trillions required annually for resilient infrastructure and emissions reductions in the Global South by 2030. In response, developed countries countered with arguments centered on fiscal realism and equitable burden-sharing, asserting that public budgets alone could not sustain trillion-dollar scales without economic disruption, and advocating for expanded mobilization to leverage investment returns and innovation. Proponents of this view, including the and associated think tanks, proposed frameworks where developed nations maintain primary responsibility based on historical emissions and GDP , but called for "burden-sharing arrangements" that might involve contributions from high-income emerging economies while prioritizing catalytic public funds to de-risk private capital. Such proposals faced skepticism from developing parties, who critiqued private finance for its opacity, profit-driven selectivity, and failure to address non-commercial risks like projects in least-developed countries. The grants-versus-loans debate underscored deeper tensions, with developing nations citing evidence that over 70% of prior $100 billion flows were non-concessional loans, effectively transferring burdens rather than enabling genuine without fiscal trade-offs. Developed countries, while acknowledging the need for more concessional terms, argued that a heavy reliance on grants would strain taxpayer resources amid competing domestic priorities, proposing hybrid models where loans form the bulk but with enhanced grant components for the poorest recipients. These positions revealed fundamental disagreements on causal —whether should rectify past emissions externalities or foster forward-looking global partnerships—complicating progress amid verifiable shortfalls in historical delivery.

Energy Transition and Fossil Fuel Debates

Negotiations on at COP29 centered on the pace and feasibility of shifting from , building on the COP28 agreement to "transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems" in a just, orderly manner. Developing nations and fossil fuel exporters resisted proposals for binding phase-out timelines or specific targets for , or gas reductions, arguing that such measures overlooked divergent national circumstances and the need for energy access in low-income regions. In contrast, vulnerable island states and European delegations pushed for stronger reaffirmation of the COP28 language to prevent perceived backsliding, though no new quantitative commitments emerged from the talks. Azerbaijan, as host and a major gas exporter, defended the continued role of in bridging gaps during the transition, with President describing oil and gas as a "gift from " essential for energy security amid geopolitical disruptions like those in and the . Critics of accelerated renewables deployment highlighted issues—such as variable solar and output requiring backup capacity—contrasting this with the baseload reliability of or to maintain grid stability and avert blackouts. Proponents of nuclear energy at side events emphasized its exceeding 90% compared to renewables' lower averages, positioning it as a pragmatic complement to intermittent sources rather than a full replacement for fossils in high-demand scenarios. Empirical trends informed these debates, with the reporting global energy demand growth of 2.2% in 2024—outpacing the prior decade's average—and fossil fuels comprising approximately 80% of primary energy supply despite trillions in subsidies and policy incentives for alternatives. This persistence underscored causal constraints: rising demand in emerging economies for industrialization and electrification, coupled with renewables' current limitations in scalability and storage, limited the efficacy of demand-side policies alone in displacing fossils without risking for over 700 million people lacking reliable access. Delegates from energy-importing developing countries stressed that unsubsidized fossil fuels remained the most dispatchable option for baseload needs, cautioning that overly prescriptive transitions could exacerbate inequalities and hinder adaptation efforts.

Mitigation, Adaptation, and Carbon Markets

Negotiations at COP29 emphasized the need for updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to align with limiting global warming to 1.5°C, with parties urged to submit more ambitious plans by early 2025 that incorporate economy-wide emissions reductions and sector-specific targets. While no binding new targets were adopted, the Baku outcomes called for enhanced transparency in NDC reporting to avoid double-counting of efforts and ensure verifiable progress, building on prior commitments like tripling renewable capacity by 2030. Adaptation discussions highlighted persistent gaps in vulnerable regions, such as small island states and , where empirical data shows increasing climate impacts like sea-level rise and droughts outpacing current plans. Parties advanced support for National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) through a strategy to integrate updated climate data into planning, but outcomes fell short of closing funding shortfalls estimated at tens of billions annually for resilience measures. The Loss and Damage Fund saw initial operationalization with pledges totaling approximately $702 million from donors including the and , enabling early disbursements for immediate relief; however, this represents a fraction of projected needs exceeding $400 billion yearly by 2030, underscoring causal disconnects between pledged amounts and empirically assessed damages from . A major achievement was the finalization of rules under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, completing the international carbon market framework after nine years of talks. Article 6.2 enables bilateral trading of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs) with provisions for corresponding adjustments to prevent double-claiming credits, while Article 6.4 establishes the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism under UNFCCC supervision for standardized offsets, including avoidance and removal activities. These mechanisms aim to enhance mitigation efficiency by allowing cost-effective emissions reductions across borders, potentially mobilizing private investment; yet, critics note risks of greenwashing if verification standards fail to ensure additionality and permanence, as evidenced by integrity issues in prior voluntary markets where over 90% of credits were found non-additional in independent audits. Article 6.8 provisions for non-market approaches, such as technology transfers, were also clarified to complement trading without financialization. Trade-offs emerged, with developing countries securing capacity-building support for participation, but concerns persist over share-of-proceeds funding for adaptation, set at 5% of credits issued under Article 6.4.

Conference Proceedings

Timeline of Key Sessions and Events

The 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) opened on November 11, 2024, at the in , , with the formal inauguration of the 29th session of the (COP), the 19th session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the (CMP), and the sixth session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the (CMA). The opening plenary featured addresses from COP29 President Mukhtar Babayev, UNFCCC Executive Secretary Simon Stiell, and Azerbaijani President , marking the procedural start of negotiations across subsidiary bodies. Initial sessions from November 12 to 18 focused on technical dialogues and working group meetings under the Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI) and Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA), laying groundwork for high-level engagements. The high-level segment resumed on and continued through , 2024, convening ministers and heads of delegation in Plenary Hall Nizami for statements on procedural progress and calls for consensus on outstanding agenda items. Over 50 countries delivered remarks during these sessions, which served as a procedural bridge to finalize draft texts amid intensifying bilateral consultations. Parallel side events included youth-led protests outside main venues, highlighting procedural frustrations over access and representation, though these did not halt core plenaries. Scheduled to conclude on November 22, 2024, the conference extended into overtime as negotiations stalled on procedural adoption of finance-related texts, with a draft proposing $250 billion annually prompting objections and further bilaterals. On November 23, delegations from the (AOSIS) and (LDCs) staged a walkout from finance consultations, suspending participation to signal impasse and press for revised brackets in informal talks. Proceedings concluded in the early hours of November 24, 2024, after 35 hours of overtime, with adoption of the final procedural outcomes following reconciled drafts.

Side Events and Non-State Actor Involvement

Parallel to the main negotiations, COP29 hosted thousands of side events organized by , including non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industry groups, academic institutions, and think tanks, providing platforms for discussions on climate technologies, adaptation strategies, and policy recommendations outside official plenaries. These events, registered through the UNFCCC system, spanned venues like pavilions and the Baku Exhibition Center, enabling diverse stakeholders to showcase initiatives and influence broader discourse. NGOs emphasized immediate action through dedicated pavilions and sessions, such as the NAP Global Network's focus on national adaptation plans and the Environment Institute's (SEI) events on leveraging for non-state accountability in climate governance. Industry representatives countered with exhibits on practical technologies, including UNIDO's hydrogen agenda highlighting low-emission production via public-private partnerships and WTO-IRENA sessions on global trade in renewable derivatives to support energy transitions in sectors like and shipping. Think tanks contributed analytical perspectives, with reports like the Institute's assessment critiquing the conference's outcomes on finance and transitions based on empirical evaluations of ambition levels. Non-state actors announced commitments during these events, including private sector pledges on nature-based solutions and subnational climate investments, though UNFCCC summaries note that such announcements by companies and financial institutions often address justice in transitions without standardized verification. Globally, private climate finance flows exceed public ones but include significant untracked portions, particularly in adaptation for households and consumers, contrasting with more monitored state obligations and underscoring challenges in assessing non-state impact.

Outcomes and Agreements

New Collective Quantified Goal on Finance

The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on , adopted at COP29 on November 23, 2024, commits developed countries to mobilize at least USD 300 billion annually by 2035 to assist developing nations with climate mitigation, , and loss and damage efforts. This target triples the prior USD 100 billion annual pledge from 2009, which expired in 2025, but emphasizes a blend of public grants, concessional loans, and mobilized private investment rather than pure public grants as demanded by many recipients. Developed Annex I countries under the UNFCCC bear primary responsibility for provision, channeling funds through established mechanisms such as the (GCF), bilateral agreements, and multilateral development banks, with provisions for "new and additional" resources to avoid diverting existing aid. The agreement outlines scaling pathways, including doubling contributions to the GCF and enhancing transparency via biennial reports, while encouraging innovative instruments like debt-for-climate swaps and carbon pricing revenues to bridge gaps. It forms part of a broader USD 1.3 trillion annual ambition by 2035, integrating non-grant elements, though core public mobilization remains at USD 300 billion. Negotiations involved significant compromises, as developing countries, including the bloc, pushed for USD 1 trillion in annual but accepted the lower figure amid resistance from providers citing fiscal constraints and leverage potential. The text avoids binding grant ratios or penalties for shortfalls, fueling debates over enforceability and the dilution of "grant-equivalent" emphasis. Immediate reactions were polarized: UNFCCC Executive Secretary Simon Stiell hailed it as a "foundation for future ambition," while representatives from , , and decried it as a "" and "travesty," arguing it perpetuates reliance on loans that burden recipients and falls short of needs estimated at trillions. and officials defended the deal as realistic, noting its scaling mechanism allows review by 2030.

Advancements on Other Commitments

Negotiators at COP29 finalized the rulebook for Article 6 of the , enabling cooperative approaches to international carbon trading and non-market mechanisms after nine years of stalled talks. This included provisions for high-integrity markets under Article 6.2 for bilateral trading, Article 6.4 for centralized crediting, and Article 6.8 for non-market approaches, with safeguards against double-counting emissions reductions and requirements for corresponding adjustments. Parties agreed to initiate dialogues starting in 2025 to share experiences on implementation, though critics noted unresolved risks of greenwashing if national oversight remains weak. On adaptation, parties advanced the UAE Framework for Global Climate Resilience by endorsing indicators and a monitoring framework under the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), building on the UAE-Belém work programme initiated at COP28. This includes thematic targets for resilience in areas like , , , and , with a focus on data-driven progress tracking and minimal reporting burdens for developing nations. The framework aims to enhance measurability of adaptation efforts, though implementation depends on future national adaptation plans (NAPs) and integration with Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). The Baku Climate Summit retained language from the COP28 UAE Consensus on transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, without introducing stronger phase-out commitments or production curbs. Efforts to reaffirm or expand this text faced resistance from fossil fuel-producing states, resulting in no new quantitative targets for emissions reductions or energy shifts. Such reaffirmations echo prior COP outcomes, which have coincided with continued global CO2 emissions growth; for instance, emissions rose from 36.7 billion tonnes in the to projected 41.6 billion tonnes in , despite successive agreements on mitigation pathways.

Areas of Compromise and Deferral

Negotiators at COP29 reached a compromise on the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) for , settling on a target of at least $300 billion annually by 2035 from developed to developing countries, far below the $1 trillion-plus sought by many developing nations to address and needs. This figure triples the prior $100 billion goal but incorporates mobilized funds from private sources and loans alongside public grants, diluting demands for purely concessional aid amid fiscal constraints in donor countries and development imperatives in recipients. Stricter timelines for were deferred, with no binding commitments emerging beyond the COP28 language on transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, as oil-exporting states including , , and blocked advances citing and priorities. These deferrals reflect underlying economic divergences, where developing economies dependent on revenues resisted accelerated divestment without assured alternatives, while developed nations prioritized cost containment over enforcement mechanisms. Compromises on finance transparency involved agreeing to enhanced reporting frameworks under the Enhanced Transparency Framework, yet without fully resolving disputes over verifiable use of funds, as developing countries expressed concerns over potential greenwashing in mobilized private contributions. Core mitigation gaps persisted, with updates to Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) deferred to future cycles despite calls for 1.5°C alignment, underscoring persistent divides between emission reduction ambitions and implementation feasibility driven by varying national capacities. Minor concessions included provisions for gender-responsive climate planning in finance allocations, though these did not bridge broader structural impasses on emissions trajectories.

Controversies and Criticisms

Human Rights and Authoritarian Hosting Concerns

Prior to hosting COP29 from November 11 to 22, 2024, Azerbaijani authorities intensified a crackdown on journalists, activists, and , arresting at least 25 individuals on politically motivated charges in the preceding year, including environmental reporters covering protests against projects. documented 33 cases of such arrests and imprisonments targeting critics, often under fabricated charges like or , as part of a broader pattern that paralyzed independent media and activism. reported hundreds detained for expressing dissent, with at least 11 journalists remanded since November 2023, undermining promises of open dialogue at the climate summit. During the conference, restrictions on protests persisted despite initial calls for a "COP29 truce" to foster unity, with authorities detaining environmental defenders and limiting assembly rights, as reported by monitors on site. The host country agreement with the UNFCCC notably omitted explicit protections for freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, a deficiency highlighted by observers given Azerbaijan's record of using abusive laws to suppress speech. Post-event, on December 6, 2024, seven more journalists were arrested in , signaling no abatement in reprisals against those who covered or critiqued the event. Azerbaijani officials rebutted these concerns, with President dismissing U.S. congressional criticism as "disgusting" and attributing measures to national security imperatives amid regional conflicts, such as tensions with . A presidential aide urged against importing debates to COP29, emphasizing the summit's focus on climate cooperation over domestic politics. State media countered by portraying international critiques as biased interference, though empirical patterns of targeted prosecutions suggest motivations beyond security, including silencing opposition ahead of high-profile events. These issues echoed patterns at prior COPs hosted by authoritarian regimes, such as Egypt's COP27 in 2022, where the government silenced independent environmentalists through arrests and intimidation, restricting activism despite the climate venue's global visibility. The UNFCCC's selection process for hosts, which rotates among parties without mandatory criteria, has drawn calls for reform to include vetting for freedoms essential to participatory conferences, as absent in agreements like that for COP28. This recurring oversight raises questions about the UN's prioritization of logistical feasibility over safeguards against host-induced repression.

Perceived Influence of Fossil Fuel Interests

Azerbaijan's hosting of COP29 highlighted ties between the conference presidency and interests, as the country's economy remains predominantly hydrocarbon-based, with oil and gas comprising over 90% of exports and significant state revenues derived from the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (). , which produced nearly 174 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2023—almost double the output of its primary partner —dominates domestic energy production alongside international consortia like BP-operated fields. COP29 President Mukhtar Babayev, appointed on January 4, , previously served 26 years at , including as vice president for , raising concerns among observers about potential prioritization of oil and gas expansion over rapid decarbonization. At least 1,773 fossil fuel lobbyists, representing coal, oil, and gas interests, gained access to COP29 proceedings in from November 11-22, 2024, exceeding numbers from prior conferences and comprising a notable portion of delegates. Critics, including climate advocacy groups like Kick Big Polluters Out, argued this presence facilitated blocking of ambitious language on , with explicitly opposing such provisions in plenary sessions and contributing to the dilution of commitments beyond the COP28 transition pledge. The delegation warned that omitting reinforced fossil fuel transition language would render COP28 outcomes a failure, pointing to resistance from producer states including the host. Activists labeled these dynamics as greenwashing, accusing interests of undermining substantive action while promoting false solutions like carbon capture to prolong hydrocarbon reliance. In contrast, proponents of pragmatic energy perspectives defended Azerbaijan's role, noting its increased exports to Europe—rising 56% in the first year of the Ukraine conflict—as a realistic bridge fuel amid Russian supply disruptions, with pipeline deals finalized at COP29 to further boost volumes for EU . Such arguments emphasized empirical transition challenges, including estimates of $5.4-11.7 trillion in annual global finance needs to limit warming to 1.5°C and labor reallocations potentially displacing up to 185 million jobs by 2050 in -dependent sectors, underscoring the risks of overly accelerated phase-outs without viable alternatives. Industry representatives contended that fuels remain essential for reliability and affordability, countering activist narratives as disconnected from the trillions in and economic restructuring required for net-zero pathways.

Shortcomings in Finance and Transition Pledges

The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) agreed at COP29 committed developed countries to mobilizing at least $300 billion annually by 2035 for climate action in developing nations, tripling the prior $100 billion target but falling short of estimated needs exceeding $1 trillion yearly. This amount equates to roughly 0.3% of projected global GDP, deemed inadequate by analyses projecting requirements closer to $1.3–1.46 trillion annually to address adaptation, mitigation, and loss in vulnerable economies. Critics, including developing country representatives, highlighted the goal's insufficiency against trillions-scale gaps, with one assessment labeling it a "betrayal" for underdelivering relative to historical emissions responsibilities. The pledge's structure emphasized leveraging public funds to attract private investment, yet historical data shows limited efficacy, with public-to-private leverage ratios rarely exceeding 1:1 in developing contexts due to perceived risks and inadequate de-risking mechanisms. This mirrors failures of the $100 billion goal, unmet until —two years late—and achieved partly through reclassifying existing aid rather than new concessional grants, eroding trust without scaling transformative finance. Transition pledges lacked binding enforcement or verifiable metrics, contributing to persistent emissions growth; global CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels hit a record 37 gigatons in 2023, up over 60% since 1990 despite successive nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Prior commitments similarly failed to curb rises, with greenhouse gases increasing 1.2% from 2021 to 2022 amid unmet targets. The framework overlooked causal links between affordable fossil energy and poverty reduction in low-income nations, where 1.18 billion people face energy poverty limiting electrification and industrial growth essential for lifting billions from extreme deprivation, as evidenced by correlations between rising incomes and fossil-dependent energy access in Asia. Eradicating extreme poverty would add under 5% to global emissions, a modest trade-off against development imperatives that renewables alone cannot yet reliably meet at scale in resource-constrained settings. Least developed countries, holding fossil reserves, risk stranding assets prematurely, hindering growth trajectories seen in emitters like China and India.

Organizational and Procedural Failures

The 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) in , , experienced significant logistical shortcomings, including extended overtime sessions that pushed negotiations past the scheduled closing on November 22, 2024, with key decisions on the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) finalized only on November 24. These delays echoed patterns of disorganization seen in prior summits like COP28, where eleventh-hour bargaining has become routine, contributing to procedural inefficiencies without altering global emission trajectories. Civil society participation faced barriers, including accreditation denials for independent journalists and organizations critical of the host ; for instance, Azerbaijan-based Meydan TV, an opposition outlet, had its timely application rejected, limiting on-site reporting and advocacy. Access to negotiation spaces was further constrained, prompting some activists to and highlighting restricted entry for non-state actors amid the event's scale of over attendees. Facilitation issues compounded these problems, with inconsistent translation services reported across sessions; events advertised in English proceeded in French or Spanish without adequate headsets, forcing attendees to rely on unreliable tools like or peer interpretations. This affected non-native English speakers, including negotiators from developing nations, undermining effective participation in discussions on and . Procedural allegations included favoritism toward fossil fuel-aligned parties, as the Azerbaijani presidency—led by an oil executive—was accused of hastily advancing rules on the conference's first day, bypassing established consultation processes and drawing objections from small island states like . Such maneuvers, described by critics as a "carbon coup," prioritized rapid closure over inclusive deliberation, eroding procedural trust among delegates without yielding verifiable advances in emission reductions.

Post-Conference Reception and Analysis

Immediate International and Media Reactions

Developing countries voiced mixed sentiments toward the COP29 outcomes, acknowledging the new goal of at least $300 billion annually by 2035 from developed nations while decrying it as insufficient to address their needs. highlighted a lack of progress on critical issues for developing nations, criticizing developed countries for inadequate support in discussions on and loss and damage. and other African representatives, alongside , labeled the deal a "" and a , arguing it fell short of the $1 trillion-plus in grants demanded to cover escalating impacts. Western media responses diverged sharply, with left-leaning outlets emphasizing perceived failures and right-leaning ones underscoring practical limitations. The Guardian characterized the finance agreement as a "travesty of " and "stage-managed," citing outrage from vulnerable states over backroom negotiations that prioritized developed nations' preferences. Conversely, framed the summit as "Climate ," noting the $300 billion pledge as a familiar, non-binding repetition unlikely to enforce meaningful emissions reductions or shifts away from fossil fuels. UN Secretary-General welcomed the compromise as a foundational step amid rising global emissions and disasters, calling for swift implementation to underpin future goals. Azerbaijani host officials, despite pre-summit defenses of their oil sector, positioned the outcome as a diplomatic success in bridging divides on .

Empirical Assessment of Potential Impacts

Historical data indicate that the COP29 agreement to mobilize at least $300 billion annually in by 2035 from developed to developing countries faces substantial hurdles, mirroring shortfalls in prior pledges. The preceding $100 billion per year goal, set in for delivery by , was not consistently met, with flows falling short until possibly , and even then relying on expansive accounting methods that included loans and non-concessional finance rather than grants. contributions, emphasized in COP29 outcomes, remain volatile, fluctuating with economic conditions and investor risk perceptions, limiting predictable impacts on or projects. Global greenhouse gas emissions have shown no discernible inflection attributable to COP processes, rising from approximately 35 gigatons of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2e) in 1990 to 51.8 GtCO2e in 2023, a 48% increase, driven primarily by economic growth in emerging economies like and . Despite 29 COP conferences since 1995, annual emissions have grown by an average of 1-2% in recent decades, with no of a sustained downward bend in the trend; for instance, the Protocol's binding targets covered only 25% of global emissions and yielded negligible net reductions due to non-participation by major emitters. COP29's finance and commitment advancements are unlikely to alter this trajectory causally, as emissions decoupling in advanced economies correlates more strongly with technological shifts (e.g., substitution for ) and efficiency gains than with international agreements. Potential benefits from COP29, such as technology diffusion for renewables or infrastructure, hinge on effective fund deployment, yet empirical patterns suggest limited marginal impact; solar and cost reductions stem predominantly from learning curves and scaling rather than subsidized transfers. Unquantified costs, including elevated energy prices from premature transition policies (e.g., Europe's post-2022 spikes exceeding 300% in wholesale gas), often offset gains in adopting regions without proportionally curbing global totals. For , cross-country data reveal that higher GDP —enabling resilient and diversified economies—correlates more robustly with reduced climate vulnerability than inflows, which can be distorted by issues or debt burdens in recipient nations.
YearGlobal GHG Emissions (GtCO2e)Annual Change
1990~35-
2010~49+1.2% avg.
2021~53+0.8% avg.
202351.8+1.2%
This table illustrates the upward trend, sourced from reconciled estimates excluding land-use changes, underscoring the challenge in linking conference outputs to emission divergences.

Broader Implications for Global Climate Policy

COP29 underscored a pivot in UNFCCC negotiations toward mobilizing rather than imposing stringent emission mandates, as evidenced by the adoption of the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) committing developed nations to at least $300 billion annually by 2035 for developing countries' and needs, falling short of the trillions in grants demanded by the Global South. This finance-centric approach reflects growing recognition that mandatory targets have yielded limited global emission reductions since the , with atmospheric CO2 concentrations continuing to rise amid expanding energy demands in emerging economies. However, entrenched North-South divisions persisted, as African nations and others criticized the deal for relying heavily on loans rather than pure grants and excluding broader contributor bases like , exacerbating perceptions of inequity in burden-sharing. The hosting by , a major oil and gas exporter deriving two-thirds of government revenue from fossils, reinforced pragmatic acknowledgment of hydrocarbon realities over idealistic phase-outs, with President defending such resources as a "gift from " and decrying Western in purchasing Azerbaijani exports while critiquing its industry. This stance highlighted causal trade-offs in : rapid decarbonization mandates could hinder alleviation in energy-scarce regions, where fossil fuels have historically enabled and lifted billions from destitution, contrasting with projections from models that carry inherent uncertainties in long-term damage estimates. Empirical data indicate that stringent policies without compensatory mechanisms often exacerbate inequality, particularly in low-income contexts, underscoring the need for first-principles evaluation of development priorities over model-driven scenarios. Looking ahead, COP30 in signals potential for host-driven emphasis on and finance accountability alongside developmental imperatives, including planned oil auctions in the , which prioritize economic and forest-linked growth over absolute emission curbs. Within the UNFCCC framework, COP29 exemplifies these events as diplomatic forums for dialogue rather than enforceable solutions, given non-binding outcomes and the dominance of major emitters like and outside traditional donor obligations, suggesting limited transformative capacity amid geopolitical fragmentation. Policymakers must thus balance uncertain risks against verifiable benefits of affordable energy access, as unchecked policy zeal risks entrenching poverty without commensurate global temperature gains.

References

  1. https://unfccc.int/cop29
  2. https://unfccc.int/cop29/about-cop29
  3. https://cop29.az/en/home
  4. https://unfccc.int/news/cop29-un-climate-conference-agrees-to-triple-finance-to-developing-countries-protecting-lives-and
  5. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/11/1157416
  6. https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/was-cop29-azerbaijan-failure
  7. https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/12/azerbaijan-cop29-new-start
  8. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/cop29-pay-up-or-face-climate-led-disaster-humanity-warns-un-chief-2024-11-12/
  9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/11/18/azerbaijan-cop29-oil-gas/
  10. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/united-nations-framework-convention-on-climate-change
  11. https://unfccc.int/process/bodies/supreme-bodies/conference-of-the-parties-cop
  12. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-kyoto-protocol
  13. https://unfccc.int/event/cop-3
  14. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
  15. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-glasgow-climate-pact-key-outcomes-from-cop26
  16. https://unfccc.int/news/cop28-agreement-signals-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-fossil-fuel-era
  17. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions
  18. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/global-landscape-of-climate-finance-a-decade-of-data/
  19. https://twn.my/title2/climate/info.service/2020/cc200201.htm
  20. https://unfccc.int/cop28/5-key-takeaways
  21. https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/progress-since-cop28-on-transitioning-away-from-fossil-fuels/
  22. https://www.projectstatecraft.org/post/the-impact-of-geopolitical-tensions-on-cop29
  23. https://www.mei.edu/publications/azerbaijan-and-cop29-opportunity-or-challenge
  24. https://enb.iisd.org/bonn-climate-change-conference-sbi60-sbsta60-summary
  25. https://climate-diplomacy.org/magazine/cooperation/bonn-climate-talks-key-outcomes-june-2024-un-climate-conference
  26. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/cop28-cop29-ukraine-front-linking-climate-security
  27. https://caneurope.org/60th-bonn-intersessionals/
  28. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/the-big-picture/what-are-united-nations-climate-change-conferences/how-cops-are-organized-questions-and-answers
  29. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/09/azerbaijan-host-cop29-fraught-negotiations
  30. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/azerbaijan-says-overall-consensus-baku-hosting-cop29-2023-12-09/
  31. https://president.az/en/articles/view/67281
  32. https://www.mei.edu/publications/azerbaijans-green-shift-energy-transition-cop29-commitments-and-us-collaboration
  33. https://bakudialogues.idd.az/articles/azerbaijans-multilateral-green-energy-diplomacy-31-07-2025
  34. https://www.iea.org/reports/azerbaijan-energy-profile/overview
  35. https://2021-2025.state.gov/climate-crisis/cop-29-logistics-faq/
  36. https://unfccc.int/cop29/ifp
  37. https://cop29.az/storage/1361/Delegate_Handbook_-03.pdf
  38. https://caspianpost.com/opinion/baku-ready-to-host-80000-guests
  39. https://www.ieta.org/events/cop29-ieta-business-hub-in-baku
  40. https://amman.mfa.gov.az/en/news/the-cop29-special-visa-regulation
  41. https://azerbaijan-e-visas.org/cop29-special-visa.php
  42. https://cop29.az/storage/286/COP29_Logistics_Presentation.pdf
  43. https://www.iea.org/reports/azerbaijan-energy-profile/energy-security
  44. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/bakus-balancing-act-azerbaijan-between-green-energy-and-oil-rents?lang=en
  45. https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-investment-climate-statements/azerbaijan
  46. https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/PPFF-Briefing-Azerbaijan-Final.pdf
  47. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/fossil-gas/cop-is-for-oil-deals/
  48. https://www.theenergymix.com/cop29-opens-in-azerbaijan-amid-controversy-over-fossil-fuel-ties/
  49. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/08/azerbaijan-vicious-assault-government-critics
  50. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/EUR5587032024ENGLISH.pdf
  51. https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2024/11/cop29-azerbaijans-flagrant-human-rights-abuses-undermine-its-role-as-climate-conference-host/
  52. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq52l95dd3vo
  53. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/11/06/eu-raise-human-rights-crisis-azerbaijan-during-cop29
  54. https://crudeaccountability.org/azerbaijans-energy-paradox-fossil-fuel-expansion-vs-green-commitments/
  55. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/11/12/cop29-host-azerbaijan-brands-oil-and-gas-gift-from
  56. https://www.politico.eu/article/azerbaijan-baku-president-ilham-aliyev-fossil-fuel-western-hypocrisy-cop-29-opener/
  57. https://energynow.com/2024/11/cop29-host-nation-azerbaijan-hits-out-at-critics-political-hypocrisy-in-defence-of-oil-and-gas-industry/
  58. https://cop29.az/en/presidency/cop29-presidency-team
  59. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/05/cop29-will-be-led-by-mukhtar-babayev-azerbaijan-ecology-minister-who-is-oil-industry-veteran
  60. https://live.worldbank.org/en/experts/m/mukhtar-babayev
  61. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67895068
  62. https://dialogue.earth/en/climate/cop29-president-cop-is-the-best-system-we-have-we-cannot-lose-faith-in-it/
  63. https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2024/Sep/IRENA-and-Azerbaijan-COP29-Presidency-to-Hold-Energy-Transition-Investment-Forum-in-Baku
  64. https://minenergy.gov.az/en/xeberler-arxivi/00407
  65. https://www.azerbaycan24.com/en/parviz-shahbazov-highlights-important-initiatives-to-support-at-cop29/
  66. https://www.occrp.org/en/project/know-your-host/azerbaijans-cop29-organizers-criticized-for-oil-ties-other-potential-conflicts-of-interest
  67. https://earth.org/no-mention-of-fossil-fuel-phaseout-in-cop29-presidencys-agenda/
  68. https://www.ucs.org/about/news/fossil-fuel-industry-flexes-its-muscle-cop29-lobbying-greenwashing
  69. https://cop29.az/en/presidency/organising-committee
  70. https://cop29.az/en/media-hub/news/cop29-organising-committee-convenes-sixth-meeting
  71. https://cop29.az/en/media-hub/news/unfccc-technical-mission-visits-azerbaijan-to-asses-cop29-preparations
  72. https://sdg.iisd.org/events/pre-cop-to-the-2024-un-climate-change-conference/
  73. https://trendsresearch.org/insight/the-cop29-legacy-initiatives-and-achievements-shaping-global-climate-goals/
  74. https://unfccc.int/news/june-climate-meetings-take-modest-steps-forward-steep-mountain-still-to-climb-ahead-of-cop29
  75. https://www.carbonbrief.org/bonn-climate-talks-key-outcomes-from-the-june-2024-un-climate-conference/
  76. https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/further-groundwork-article-6-paris-agreement-laid-bonn-climate-change-conference
  77. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2024/241003-environment.html
  78. https://us.boell.org/en/2024/10/09/one-year-new-loss-and-damage-fund-has-met-institutional-deadlines-decisions-elaborating
  79. https://www.c2es.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Loss-and-Damage-at-COP28-and-the-way-forward-for-2024.pdf
  80. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-talks-urged-find-1-trillion-year-poorer-countries-2024-11-14/
  81. https://us.boell.org/en/2024/10/15/decision-new-climate-finance-goal-cop29-will-mark-future-climate-justice-and-equity
  82. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/why-cop29-must-secure-trillion-dollar-climate-finance-goal/
  83. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/draft-of-climate-money-agreement-for-developing-world-leaves-out-how-much-wealthy-nations-will-pay
  84. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/new-report-recommends-cop29-negotiations-on-climate-finance-should-focus-on-mobilising-1-trillion-per-year-for-developing-countries-by-2030/
  85. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-11-16/cop29-clash-brews-as-saudis-resist-restating-fossil-fuel-pledge
  86. https://grist.org/international/cop29-deal-azerbaijan-saudi-arabia-mitigation/
  87. https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/cop29-summit-baku-what-expect
  88. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/21/fossil-fuels-cop29-00190870
  89. https://www.energyconnects.com/news/utilities/2024/november/saudis-resist-restating-fossil-fuel-transition-pledge-at-cop29/
  90. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2024/05/climate-finance-provided-and-mobilised-by-developed-countries-in-2013-2022_8031029a.html
  91. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/news/press-releases/2024/05/developed-countries-materially-surpassed-their-usd-100-billion-climate-finance-commitment-in-2022-oecd.html
  92. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/has-100-billion-climate-goal-been-reached
  93. https://www.wri.org/news/statement-oecd-report-shows-developed-countries-met-100b-goal-first-time
  94. https://india.mongabay.com/2024/11/developing-nations-demand-public-grants-not-loans-at-cop29-finance-talks/
  95. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/climate-finance-how-unblock-ncqg
  96. https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2024-11/A-COP29-Climate-Finance-Target-That-Makes-Economic-Sense.pdf
  97. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/NCQG.pdf
  98. https://www.carbonbrief.org/cop29-what-is-the-new-collective-quantified-goal-on-climate-finance/
  99. https://africaclimateinsights.org/empty-promises-and-battle-for-equitable-finance-at-cop29/
  100. https://www.sciencespo.fr/psia/chair-sustainable-development/2025/02/14/assessing-cop29-did-the-finance-cop-meet-its-lofty-goals/
  101. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2025/01/cop29-climate-finance-scale-logistics?lang=en
  102. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cp2025_05_adv.pdf
  103. https://www.carbonbrief.org/cop29-debriefed-22-november-2024-countries-split-on-climate-finance-fossil-fuel-transition-reaffirmed-latest-texts-analysed/
  104. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyx0xw5vyyo
  105. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/results-of-cop29-small-steps-big-goals
  106. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/cop29-panel-discussion-climate-and-conflict-has-the-energy-transition-become-synonymous-with-energy-security/
  107. https://www.belfercenter.org/research-analysis/why-cop-29-proved-nuclear-energy-essential-green-future
  108. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/key-findings
  109. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024
  110. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/energy-and-materials/our-insights/global-energy-perspective
  111. https://wmo.int/media/news/cop29-ends-compromise-climate-financing
  112. https://www.sei.org/features/cop29-unpacked-eight-critical-topics-driving-the-climate-agenda-in-baku/
  113. https://cop29.az/en/media-hub/news/-1732385682
  114. https://climatenetwork.org/resource/eco-2-cop29/
  115. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/COP29%2520outcomes_A6.2_6.4_6.8.pdf
  116. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/COP29-Article-6-Key-Outcomes.pdf
  117. https://www.c2es.org/2025/02/why-the-cop29-article-6-decision-strengthens-high-integrity-carbon-markets/
  118. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2024/11/06/faq-fixing-article-6-carbon-markets-at-cop29/
  119. https://unfccc.int/cop29/DP-11-nov-2024
  120. https://enb.iisd.org/baku-un-climate-change-conference-cop29-11Nov2024
  121. https://www.eesi.org/newsletters/view/cop29-dispatch-november-11-2024
  122. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/un-climate-change-conference-baku-november-2024/resumed-high-level-segment-hls-at-cop-29
  123. https://unfccc.int/cop29/DP-20-nov-2024
  124. https://www.eesi.org/newsletters/view/cop29-dispatch-november-19-2024
  125. https://enb.iisd.org/baku-un-climate-change-conference-cop29-19Nov2024
  126. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/cop29-host-urges-collaboration-deal-negotiations-enter-final-stage-2024-11-22/
  127. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/11/22/its-a-joke-250bn-climate-finance-offer-met-with-scorn-at-cop29
  128. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpwrlkwz9x9o
  129. https://www.dw.com/en/cop29-climate-vulnerable-nations-walk-out-of-overtime-talks/a-70866984
  130. https://unfccc.int/cop29/DP-21-nov-2024
  131. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/COP_29_Sustainability_Report.pdf
  132. https://napglobalnetwork.org/2024/10/nap-global-network-at-cop-29/
  133. https://www.sei.org/events/sei-at-cop29/
  134. https://hydrogen.unido.org/events/unido-hydrogen-agenda-cop29-industry-solutions-people-and-planet
  135. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/cop29_e/wto_cop29_e.htm
  136. https://wupperinst.org/fa/redaktion/downloads/publications/COP29-Report_en.pdf
  137. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Summary_Global_Climate_Action_at_COP_29.pdf
  138. https://nature4climate.org/n4c-commitment-tracker-cop29/
  139. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Global-Landscape-of-Climate-Finance-2024.pdf
  140. https://www.iisd.org/articles/insight/baku-conference-sets-new-collective-climate-finance-goal
  141. https://unctad.org/news/countries-agree-300-billion-2035-new-climate-finance-goal-what-next
  142. https://www.wri.org/insights/ncqg-climate-finance-goals-explained
  143. https://unfccc.int/NCQG
  144. https://www.mwe.com/insights/bakubreakthrough-cop29-sets-a-300-billion-goal-as-part-of-a-1-3-trillion-climate-finance-ambition/
  145. https://odi.org/documents/9562/The_NCQG_decision.pdf
  146. https://www.sei.org/perspectives/cop29-closes-with-a-climate-finance-deal-but-at-what-cost/
  147. https://earthcommons.georgetown.edu/all/climate-negotiations-at-cop29-financing-a-livable-planet-for-all/
  148. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c8jykpdgr08t
  149. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/24/cop29-climate-finance-deal-criticised-travesty-justice-stage-managed
  150. https://www.government.se/articles/2024/12/new-climate-finance-goal-adopted-at-cop29/
  151. https://cop29.az/en/media-hub/news/cop29-achieves-full-operationalisation-of-article-6-of-paris-agreement-unlocks-international-carbon-markets
  152. https://www.bakermckenzie.com/-/media/files/expertise/sustainability/cop29-key-outcomes-and-looking-ahead-to-cop30.pdf
  153. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/COP-29-Outcomes-on-GGA-Presentation.pdf
  154. https://www.adaptationcommunity.net/news/adaptation-outcomes-at-cop29-key-agreements-and-progress-on-climate-resilience/
  155. https://unfccc.int/topics/adaptation-and-resilience/workstreams/gga
  156. https://www.plan-adapt.org/2024/12/04/cop29-what-has-it-delivered-for-climate-adaptation-and-loss-damage/
  157. https://www.iisd.org/articles/explainer/cop-29-adaptation-progress-uae-belem
  158. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/cop29-key-takeaways-nature-climate-stories-news/
  159. https://wmo.int/media/news/record-carbon-emissions-highlight-urgency-of-global-greenhouse-gas-watch
  160. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  161. https://www.carbonbrief.org/cop29-key-outcomes-agreed-at-the-un-climate-talks-in-baku/
  162. https://www.iisd.org/articles/statement/cop-29-moves-needle-on-finance
  163. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/cop29-4-key-takeaways/
  164. https://www.finnpartners.com/news-insights/cop29-what-was-achieved-after-days-of-fraught-negotiations/
  165. https://www.seforall.org/news/cop29-outcomes-reversal-of-hard-won-gains-creates-an-opportunity-for-the-private-sector-to
  166. https://afripoli.org/a-continent-in-focus-cop29-outcomes-and-implications-for-africa
  167. https://www.laclima.org/publicacoes/summary-of-cop-29
  168. https://www.woodwellclimate.org/key-cop29-outcomes/
  169. https://www.unepfi.org/themes/climate-change/cop29-outcomes-balancing-progress-and-challenges-on-the-road-to-climate-action/
  170. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jun/12/azerbaijan-accused-of-media-crackdown-before-hosting-cop29
  171. https://www.democracynow.org/2024/11/18/cop29_azerbaijan
  172. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/10/cop29-azerbaijan-end-assault-on-civil-society/
  173. https://www.amnesty.eu/news/eu-raise-human-rights-crisis-in-azerbaijan-during-cop29/
  174. https://daviscenter.fas.harvard.edu/insights/human-rights-spotlight-azerbaijan-preps-cop29
  175. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/10/cop29-host-country-agreement-lacks-rights-protections
  176. https://amnesty.ca/urgent-actions/azerbaijan-release-journalists-arrested-after-cop29/
  177. https://www.reuters.com/world/azerbaijan-rejects-disgusting-us-human-rights-criticism-before-cop29-2024-10-04/
  178. https://www.politico.eu/article/azerbaijan-human-rights-critics-cop29-baku-hikmet-hajiyev/
  179. https://eurasianet.org/azerbaijan-state-media-fights-back-against-cop29-critics
  180. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/14/cop27-egypt-host-climate-talks
  181. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/09/12/egypt-government-undermining-environmental-groups
  182. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/05/31/focus-rights-pre-cop29-climate-talks
  183. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/IOR4082162024ENGLISH.pdf
  184. https://www.agbi.com/opinion/oil-and-gas/2025/07/azerbaijan-is-at-the-heart-of-eurasian-energy-development/
  185. https://www.urgewald.org/en/medien/cop29-new-report-socar-highlights-azerbaijans-damning-fossil-fuel-and-human-rights-record
  186. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/15/coal-oil-and-gas-lobbyists-granted-access-to-cop29-says-report
  187. https://kickbigpollutersout.org/COP29KBPOQuotes
  188. https://transform-network.net/blog/working-group/cop29-baku-agreement-is-simply-a-bad-deal/
  189. https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2630671-cop-eu-warns-on-fossil-fuel-ambition-backsliding
  190. https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/cop29-in-azerbaijan-a-compromised-climate-conference/
  191. http://www.robertstavinsblog.org/2024/11/29/what-happened-at-cop29-in-baku/
  192. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/the-cost-of-inaction/
  193. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/the-net-zero-transition-what-it-would-cost-what-it-could-bring
  194. https://odi.org/en/insights/did-cop29-end-with-a-good-new-collective-quantified-goal-decision/
  195. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/new-climate-finance-goal-agreed-cop29-betrayal-developing-countries
  196. https://ieefa.org/resources/new-collective-quantified-goal-climate-finance-existing-issues-must-be-resolved-make
  197. https://www.carbonbrief.org/rich-countries-met-100bn-climate-finance-goal-by-relabelling-existing-aid/
  198. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/climate-finance-and-the-usd-100-billion-goal.html
  199. https://www.statista.com/topics/5770/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions/
  200. https://www.unep.org/interactives/emissions-gap-report/2023/
  201. https://data.undp.org/blog/1-18-billion-around-the-world-in-energy-poverty
  202. https://ourworldindata.org/energy-access
  203. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/climate-implications-ending-global-poverty
  204. https://unctad.org/news/least-developed-countries-cannot-afford-strand-their-assets-given-their-development-challenges
  205. https://www.meydan.tv/en/article/friday-wrap-up-cop29-in-baku
  206. https://olivenetwork.org/Issue/whispers-self-censorship-and-crackdowns-on-free-speech-prevailed-at-cop29/26181
  207. https://www.ids.ac.uk/opinions/another-cop-failure-when-will-there-be-justice-for-marginalised-voices/
  208. https://sites.coloradocollege.edu/blockfeatures/2024/12/18/on-language-barriers-and-translation-at-cop29/
  209. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/cop29-no-progress-at-cop29-in-matters-critical-for-developing-nations-says-india-7040916
  210. https://climatetrackercaribbean.org/cop29/cop29-ends-what-developing-nations-wanted-vs-what-they-had-to-settle-for/
  211. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/26/how-late-deal-left-a-sense-of-dissatisfaction-and-betrayal-at-cop29-baku
  212. https://www.wsj.com/opinion/cop29-climate-groundhog-day-95a416de
  213. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02846-3
  214. https://rhg.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Global-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-1990-2022-and-2023-Estimates.pdf
  215. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/co2-emissions
  216. https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/special-reports/look-forward/investment-in-climate-adaptation-needs-have-high-returns-on-growth
  217. https://theconversation.com/cop29-failed-africa-what-went-wrong-with-the-climate-financing-bid-and-what-happens-next-245300
  218. https://www.csis.org/analysis/experts-react-cop29-highlights-challenges-and-emerging-trends-global-climate-policy
  219. https://climatenetwork.org/2024/11/23/cop29_betrayal_in_baku/
  220. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/climate-change/the-great-escape-from-baku-global-north-abandons-south-denies-adequate-climate-finance-at-cop29
  221. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22315-9
  222. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-024-02151-7
  223. https://fletcher.tufts.edu/news-events/news/cop30-key-issues-and-stakes-global-climate-policy
  224. https://cop30.br/en/brazilian-presidency/letters-from-the-presidency/eighth-letter-from-the-presidency
  225. https://academic.oup.com/wbro/article/39/1/1/7504628
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.