Hubbry Logo
Golden algaeGolden algaeMain
Open search
Golden algae
Community hub
Golden algae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Golden algae
Golden algae
Golden algae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
For the haptophyte species, see Prymnesium parvum.

Golden algae
Dinobryon divergens, a tree like sessile form with cells in the cup-like shells
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Clade: Sar
Clade: Stramenopiles
Phylum: Ochrophyta
Clade: Chrysista
Clade: Limnistia
Class: Chrysophyceae
Pascher, 1914[1]
Orders[2]

Chromulinales
Chrysosphaerales
Hibberdiales
Hydrurales
Phaeothamniales

Synonyms

The Chrysophyceae, usually called chrysophytes, chrysomonads, golden-brown algae, or golden algae, are a large group of algae, found mostly in freshwater.[3]

The Chrysophyceae should not be confused with the Chrysophyta, which is a more ambiguous taxon. Although "chrysophytes" is the anglicization of "Chrysophyta", it generally refers to the Chrysophyceae.

Members

[edit]

Originally they were taken to include all such forms of the diatoms and multicellular brown algae, but since then they have been divided into several different groups (e.g., Haptophyceae,[4] Synurophyceae) based on pigmentation and cell structure. Some heterotrophic flagellates as the bicosoecids and choanoflagellates were sometimes seen as related to golden algae too.

They are now usually restricted to a core group of closely related forms, distinguished primarily by the structure of the flagella in motile cells, also treated as an order Chromulinales. It is possible membership will be revised further as more species are studied in detail.

The Chrysophyceae have been placed by some in the polyphyletic Chromista. The broader monophyletic group to which the Chrysophyceae belong includes various non-algae including the bicosoecids, not the collar flagellates, opalines, oomycete fungi, proteromonads, actinophryid heliozoa, and other heterotrophic flagellates and is referred to as the Stramenopiles.

Description

[edit]
Diagram of Ochromonas sp.

The "primary" cell of chrysophytes contains two specialized flagella. The active, "feathered" (with mastigonemes) flagellum is oriented toward the moving direction. The smooth passive flagellum, oriented toward the opposite direction, may be present only in rudimentary form in some species.

An important characteristic used to identify members of the class Chrysophyceae is the presence of a siliceous cyst that is formed endogenously. Called statospore, stomatocyst or statocyst, this structure is usually globose and contains a single pore. The surface of mature cysts may be ornamented with different structural elements and are useful to distinguish species.[5]

  • Most members are unicellular flagellates, with either two visible flagella, as in Ochromonas, or sometimes one, as in Chromulina. The Chromulinales as first defined by Pascher in 1910 included only the latter type, with the former treated as the order Ochromonadales. However, structural studies have revealed that a short second flagellum, or at least a second basal body, is always present, so this is no longer considered a valid distinction. Most of these have no cell covering. Some have loricae or shells, such as Dinobryon, which grows in branched colonies. Most forms with silicaceous scales are now considered a separate group, the synurids, but a few belong among the Chromulinales proper, such as Paraphysomonas.
  • Some members are generally amoeboid, with long branching cell extensions, though they pass through flagellate stages as well. Chrysamoeba and Rhizochrysis are typical of these. There is also one species, Myxochrysis paradoxa, which has a complex life cycle involving a multinucleate plasmodial stage, similar to those found in slime molds. These were originally treated as the order Chrysamoebales. The superficially similar Rhizochromulina was once included here, but is now given its own order based on differences in the structure of the flagellate stage.
  • Other members are non-motile. Cells may be naked and embedded in mucilage, such as Chrysosaccus, or coccoid and surrounded by a cell wall, as in Chrysosphaera. A few are filamentous or even parenchymatous in organization, such as Phaeoplaca. These were included in various older orders, most of the members of which are now included in separate groups. Hydrurus and its allies, freshwater genera which form branched gelatinous filaments, are often placed in the separate order Hydrurales, but may belong here.

Classifications

[edit]
Some genera of chrysophytes

Pascher (1914)

[edit]

Classification of the class Chrysophyceae according to Pascher (1914):[1][6][7]

Smith (1938)

[edit]

According to Smith (1938):

Bourrely (1957)

[edit]

According to Bourrely (1957):[8]

Starmach (1985)

[edit]

According to Starmach (1985):[9]

Kristiansen (1986)

[edit]

Classification of the class Chrysophyceae and splinter groups according to Kristiansen (1986):[9]

  • Class Chrysophyceae

Margulis et al. (1990)

[edit]

Classification of the phylum Chrysophyta according to Margulis et al. (1990):[10]

van den Hoek et al. (1995)

[edit]

According to van den Hoek, Mann and Jahns (1995):

Preisig (1995)

[edit]

Classification of the class Chrysophyceae and splinter groups according to Preisig (1995):[9]

  • Class Chrysophyceae

Guiry and Guiry (2019)

[edit]

According to Guiry and Guiry (2019):[11]

Ecology

[edit]
Pond of hikarimo ("algae of light") in Hitachi, Japan. Uncertain genus (Chromulina, Ochromonas or Chromophyton).[12][13]

Chrysophytes live mostly in freshwater, and are important for studies of food web dynamics in oligotrophic freshwater ecosystems, and for assessment of environmental degradation resulting from eutrophication and acid rain.[14]

Evolution

[edit]
Fucoxanthin

Chrysophytes contain the pigment fucoxanthin.[15] Because of this, they were once considered to be a specialized form of cyanobacteria.[citation needed] Because many of these organisms had a silica capsule, they have a relatively complete fossil record, allowing modern biologists to confirm that they are, in fact, not derived from cyanobacteria, but rather an ancestor that did not possess the capability to photosynthesize. Many of the chrysophyta precursor fossils entirely lacked any type of photosynthesis-capable pigment. The most primitive stramenopiles are regarded as heterotrophic, such as the ancestors of the Chrysophyceae were likely heterotrophic flagellates that obtained their ability to photosynthesize from an endosymbiotic relationship with fucoxanthin-containing cyanobacteria.

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Golden algae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Golden algae, scientifically classified as the class Chrysophyceae, are a diverse group of primarily freshwater protists renowned for their golden-brown pigmentation imparted by the carotenoid alongside chlorophylls a and c. These algae encompass over 1,200 species distributed across approximately 112 genera, exhibiting a range of morphologies from unicellular flagellates to colonial forms, often featuring two unequal heterokont flagella for and, in many cases, intricate siliceous scales or loricae for protection. As mixotrophs, they combine autotrophy through with heterotrophy via of and other particles, enabling adaptability in nutrient-variable environments. Predominantly inhabiting oligotrophic lakes, , and bogs in cold temperate regions, golden algae are key components of freshwater communities, with a few extending to marine, , or snow habitats. Their is influenced by factors such as , temperature, and silica availability, making them valuable bioindicators for and environmental changes; for instance, certain taxa thrive in acidic conditions while others signal acidification trends in paleoecological records via fossilized stomatocysts—siliceous resting cysts that preserve well in sediments. is mainly asexual through longitudinal , though rare sexual processes occur via formation and encystment, contributing to and survival during unfavorable conditions. Notable genera include Ochromonas, a model for mixotrophic studies, and Dinobryon, which forms stalked colonies in loricae, highlighting the group's morphological versatility. Ecologically, golden algae contribute to , nutrient cycling, and carbon flux in aquatic systems, occasionally forming blooms that impart off-tastes or odors to water supplies, though they generally pose minimal direct threats compared to some marine counterparts. has revealed cryptic speciation within morphotypes, underscoring ongoing taxonomic refinements and the class's evolutionary ties to other stramenopiles like diatoms and .

Description

Morphology

Golden algae, or Chrysophyceae, exhibit a range of morphological forms, predominantly unicellular or colonial, with some species forming simple multicellular structures. Most are flagellated, possessing two heterokont flagella of unequal length inserted apically: the anterior flagellum is longer, tinsel-like with tubular mastigonemes for , while the posterior one is smooth and shorter, functioning as a , often accompanied by a heterokont-type photoreceptor and eyespot. Cells typically lack a rigid or possess only a thin one, frequently covered by intricate siliceous scales or bristles that are characteristic of the class and aid in identification. Cell sizes vary from 2 to 100 μm, encompassing nannoplanktonic to larger forms, with shapes ranging from spherical and ovoid to elongated, amoeboid, or stalked configurations. In certain genera, such as Dinobryon, cells are enclosed in a lorica—a vase-shaped, mucilaginous or siliceous —or surrounded by , facilitating sessile or colonial lifestyles. A defining feature includes statospores, which serve as resting cysts formed endogenously within a silica deposition vesicle during asexual or . These spherical to ovoid structures, typically 3–10 μm in diameter, feature ornate siliceous walls with species-specific patterns of pores, ridges, and spines, often sealed by a plug, making them valuable for taxonomic and paleolimnological studies as durable microfossils.

Pigments and Reproduction

Golden algae, belonging to the class Chrysophyceae, derive their distinctive golden-brown coloration from a suite of photosynthetic pigments that optimize light absorption in aquatic environments. The primary pigments include and chlorophyll c, which facilitate core photosynthetic reactions, alongside the xanthophyll carotenoid , responsible for the characteristic hue by masking the green tones of chlorophyll. These organisms also contain β-carotene as an accessory carotenoid, but notably lack chlorophyll b, distinguishing them from . plays a crucial role in broadening the absorption spectrum, with peaks at 510–525 nm in the blue-green to yellow-green range, enabling efficient harvesting of light in the often dim, freshwater habitats where many golden algae thrive. Complementing their photosynthetic capabilities, most golden algae exhibit mixotrophic nutrition, integrating autotrophy with heterotrophic modes such as phagotrophy—engulfing bacterial prey—or osmotrophy, absorbing dissolved organic compounds. This dual strategy enhances survival in nutrient-variable environments, where light or inorganic nutrients may be limiting, allowing species like Ochromonas to switch between phototrophy and bacterivory based on conditions. Reproduction in golden algae is predominantly asexual, occurring via binary fission in vegetative cells or through the release of motile zoospores that disperse and develop into new individuals. is infrequent and poorly documented across the group, but when observed, it typically involves zygotic with gametes that are isogamous (equal in size) or oogamous (with distinct and forms) in certain . The life cycle encompasses vegetative cells as the active phase, resting cysts (often siliceous stomatocysts) for during adverse conditions, and palmelloid stages where non-motile cells aggregate in a gelatinous matrix for protection and propagation.

Cysts and Identification

Golden algae within the Chrysophyceae produce distinctive endogenous siliceous cysts known as statospores or stomatocysts, which serve as resting stages in their life cycles. These s are typically globose, hollow structures with diameters ranging from 2 to 30 μm, though most fall between 5 and 10 μm, and feature a single pore often surrounded by a collar. The cyst wall forms within a silica deposition vesicle and consists of an inner unornamented layer overlaid by an outer layer exhibiting species-specific ornamentation, such as spines, ridges, , scabrae, or patterns like reticulate and scrobiculate designs that aid in taxonomic differentiation. Cyst formation occurs endogenously under adverse environmental conditions, including nutrient limitation, temperature fluctuations, changes, or increased , acting as a survival mechanism to form a dormant resistant to dissolution. Excystment is facilitated through the pore, allowing the release of viable cells even after prolonged ; for instance, cysts from lake sediments have germinated after at least 60 years. These cysts are taxonomically valuable, with morphology often considered species-specific, though linkages to vegetative stages remain limited for many taxa, leading to an artificial naming system developed by the International Statospore Working Group. Identification of golden algae relies heavily on cyst morphology, particularly through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine fine-scale ornamentation and pore-collar structures, complementing observations of associated silica scales. For example, genera like Mallomonas are distinguished by unique cyst-silica patterns, such as specific spine arrangements or equatorial divisions. Over 200 cyst morphotypes have been described globally, with regional studies documenting up to 253 in Finnish freshwater sediments alone, though many remain unnamed or unlinked to living , which complicates assessments. In paleolimnology, these durable siliceous cysts preserve well in sediments and function as proxies for reconstructing past environmental conditions, such as , , , and levels, with fossil records extending back to the . Their abundance and resistance make them particularly useful for inferring historical aquatic dynamics in oligotrophic or acidic habitats like peatlands and lakes.

Classification

Historical Systems

The classification of golden algae, historically encompassed within the class Chrysophyceae, began with Alfred Pascher's foundational work in , where he established the class based on shared morphological features such as heterokont and the production of siliceous or scales, drawing parallels to series observed in ; he divided it into three subclasses—Chrysomonadineae (two flagella, often scaled), Ochromonadineae (one or two flagella, palmelloid stages), and Aphanomonadineae (amoeboid or plasmodial forms)—primarily using light microscopy to assess flagellar arrangement and cyst formation. Gilbert M. Smith's 1938 system refined Pascher's framework by emphasizing vegetative forms and motility, dividing the Chrysophyceae into two main orders: Chrysomonadales for primarily species with silica scales or cysts, and Heterochloridales for those exhibiting amoeboid stages alongside flagellated ones, such as the colorless heterotrophic forms; this approach highlighted the transitional nature between and amoeboid lifestyles but retained a broad, morphology-driven grouping. Pierre Bourrelly's 1957 revision further organized the class into orders like Ochromonadales, which included non-walled, biflagellate species capable of forming colonies, alongside other orders for coccoid and heterotrophic forms, incorporating observations of colonial aggregations and cyst development to better accommodate diverse life cycles observed under light microscopy. By the 1980s, Kazimierz Starmach's 1985 classification introduced more nuanced subclasses within Chrysophyceae, distinguishing Heterochrysophycidae for flagellate-dominated groups with scales or loricae, and Acontochrysophycidae for non-scaled, often amoeboid or palmelloid taxa lacking prominent flagella, based on detailed microscopic examinations of cell coverings and ; this aimed to reduce overlap in prior schemes by prioritizing absence or presence of scales. Subsequent works, such as Jørgen Kristiansen's review, advanced this by elevating silica-scaled families like Mallomonadaceae to ordinal status as Mallomonadales within Chrysophyceae, separating them from non-scaled ochromonad forms to reflect specialized scale visible under , though still reliant on traditional morphological criteria. Similarly, C. van den Hoek and colleagues in 1995 proposed distinguishing silica-scaled groups like Synurales as a separate order or even class precursor, underscoring shifts toward recognizing scale-based autapomorphies in late 20th-century morphology-based systems. These historical classifications, grounded in and early , often resulted in polyphyletic groupings by conflating convergent traits like and formation across unrelated heterokont lineages. This morphology-centric approach laid the groundwork for later transitions to in the 1990s.

Modern Taxonomy

The modern taxonomy positions golden algae within the class Chrysophyceae, part of the phylum Ochrophyta (synonymous with Heterokontophyta) in the kingdom Chromista. This placement reflects their affiliation with stramenopiles, characterized by heterokont flagellation and chlorophyll c-containing plastids. The class comprises approximately 1,200 species across about 112 genera, predominantly freshwater forms with a few marine and soil representatives. Post-2000 taxonomic revisions, driven by molecular phylogenetics, have refined the hierarchy by excluding unrelated groups such as pedinellids, now classified in the order Pedinellales within the class Dictyochophyceae in Ochrophyta. Nine orders are currently recognized: Ochromonadales (core heterotrophic and mixotrophic flagellates), Chromulinales (organic-scaled monads), Synurales (colonial scaled forms), Phaeothamiales (filamentous heterotrophs), Apoikiales, Hibberdiales, Hydrurales, Paraphysomonadales (siliceous-scaled choanoflagellate-like forms), and Sarcinochrysidales. Family-level organization includes prominent groups like Dinobryaceae (encompassing genera such as Dinobryon) and Synuraceae (including Synura species). In 2023, the class Synurophyceae was formally synonymized with Chrysophyceae, consolidating scaled colonial taxa under a unified framework. Recent updates documented in AlgaeBase since 2019 emphasize integrative approaches, incorporating ultrastructural and genetic data for genus-level delimitations. A key 2022 revision introduced the family Chrysosphaerellaceae (order Chromulinales), based on the species Chrysosphaerella septentrionalis, highlighting adaptations in polar environments and resolving ambiguities in scaled chrysomonad . These changes underscore the class's paraphyletic nature in earlier schemes, now more robustly delineated through multi-gene analyses.

Phylogenetic Advances

Recent advances in have significantly refined the understanding of relationships within the Chrysophyceae, commonly known as golden algae, through the application of genetic markers such as the small subunit ribosomal RNA () and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) genes. These markers have revealed high cryptic diversity and in several orders, including Ochromonadales, by demonstrating that morphologically similar taxa often represent distinct evolutionary lineages. For instance, multigene analyses combining nuclear and plastid sequences have shown that traditional order boundaries do not always reflect monophyletic groups, necessitating taxonomic revisions based on genetic evidence. Phylogenetic studies place Chrysophyceae within the larger Ochrophyta clade, where they share a close relationship with diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) and (Phaeophyceae), forming part of the basal heterokonts. This positioning is supported by analyses of multiple and nuclear genes, highlighting shared evolutionary traits such as secondary endosymbiosis-derived plastids. High-throughput sequencing efforts in 2022 further illuminated the extensive diversity within Ochromonadales, identifying numerous novel lineages in freshwater environments and underscoring the group's ecological adaptability. More recently, a 2025 phylogenetic study on Chrysococcus utilized concatenated and rbcL datasets to establish its loricate position within Chrysophyceae, revealing evolutionary transitions toward colonial forms and implying broader implications for lorica development across the class. Genomic investigations have provided deeper insights into the molecular basis of Chrysophyceae traits, particularly mixotrophy. A 2019 draft genome assembly of the golden alga , combined with data, identified genes associated with phagotrophy and , supporting the prevalence of mixotrophic lifestyles in the group. Comparative pan-genomics of chrysophyte strains, including Ochromonas species, has further shown nutrient-driven expansions in genes for carbon acquisition, reinforcing the adaptive flexibility observed in phylogenetic trees. Additionally, 2024 using , large subunit rRNA (LSU rRNA), and rbcL sequences documented new sites of in Shanxi Province, , refining biogeographic models for benthic chrysophytes in Asian freshwater systems.

Diversity

Major Orders

The major orders within the Chrysophyceae are distinguished primarily by differences in siliceous scale morphology, cell organization, and , reflecting adaptations to varied trophic modes and habitats; the class encompasses approximately 1,274 described (including 58 forms) across 180 genera. The class now comprises nine orders, with ongoing discoveries adding to its diversity. Ochromonadales represent a diverse group of mostly unicellular flagellates, often exhibiting phagotrophic through or direct engulfment, distributed across multiple genera featuring heterokont flagella and occasional loricae or colonies. Synurales comprise colonial forms characterized by intricate siliceous scales covering cells, enabling coordinated swimming in spherical or linear colonies, known for their role in freshwater blooms due to these protective and structural scales. Chromulinales include amoeboid or palmelloid organisms, frequently bearing scales or spines, that alternate between and non-motile stages, emphasizing their transitional morphologies within the class. Other notable orders include Apoikiales, a rare group of parasitic heterotrophs.

Key Genera and Species

Golden algae (class Chrysophyceae) encompass approximately 180 genera and 1,274 , predominantly freshwater organisms, with genera such as Synura (about 57 ) and Mallomonas (over 220 ) representing a substantial portion of the described diversity, together accounting for roughly 20% of all . These taxa illustrate the class's morphological and ecological variety, spanning free-living monads to colonial forms across orders like Ochromonadales and Synurales. The genus Dinobryon, belonging to the order Ochromonadales, consists of colonial loricate flagellates that form branching chains within vase-shaped loricae, often dominating in oligotrophic waters. A representative , Dinobryon divergens, is commonly found in temperate lakes, where it exhibits mixotrophic by combining and bacterivory. Mallomonas, in the order Synurales, includes scaled monads characterized by siliceous scales and bristles that aid in locomotion and protection; these unicellular or loosely colonial forms are widespread in freshwater habitats. For example, Mallomonas caudata features polymorphic scales varying in shape and ornamentation, enabling adaptation to diverse environmental conditions in lakes and ponds globally. The genus Synura, also within Synurales, forms spherical colonies of scaled cells connected by cytoplasmic bridges, creating hollow, rotating balls that propel through water. Synura uvella, a common species in temperate and boreal lakes, is notorious for forming blooms that release volatile organic compounds, imparting a fishy odor to affected waters. Ochromonas species, assigned to Ochromonadales, are typically free-swimming, biflagellate monads that lack scales or loricae, relying on their golden-brown chloroplasts for phototrophy while often engaging in mixotrophic feeding on and . The species Ochromonas danica exemplifies this lifestyle, thriving in freshwater and marine environments as a versatile predator and primary producer. A notable recent addition to the Chrysophyceae is Chrysosphaerella septentrionalis, described in 2022 from a peat bog in the Arctic's Pasvik , ; this colonial , endemic to high-latitude wetlands, forms small spheres of loricate cells and represents a new family, Chrysosphaerellaceae, highlighting ongoing discoveries in extreme environments.

Morphological Variation

Golden algae exhibit a wide range of morphological forms, transitioning between and amoeboid states in certain lineages. Many are primarily biflagellate, with one long heterokont for and a shorter smooth flagellum, enabling motile, planktonic lifestyles. In contrast, amoeboid forms, such as those in the genus Chrysamoeba, feature cells with radiating up to 20 μm long, facilitating substrate attachment and phagotrophy, while retaining the capacity for stages during dispersal or . These transitions highlight adaptive plasticity in locomotion and feeding strategies within the group. A prominent variation involves the presence or absence of scales, with approximately 250 species bearing intricate siliceous scales that cover the cell surface, comprising about 20% of the ~1,300 described Chrysophyceae. These scales, formed via silicification in the Golgi apparatus, range from simple plate-like structures to elaborate forms with ribs, pores, spines, or keels, providing , , or species-specific identification markers visible only under electron microscopy. Unscaled species, predominant in heterotrophic lineages, lack these ornaments and often display smoother, naked protoplasts adapted for rapid movement or osmotrophy. Scale morphology can vary intraspecifically, influenced by environmental factors. Colonial adaptations further diversify golden algae morphology, with cells aggregating into structured assemblages for enhanced survival. Stalked colonies, as seen in genera like Poterioochromonas, feature cells attached via mucilaginous stalks to substrates, forming linear or branched arrays that anchor in benthic environments. Free-floating spherical colonies, typical of Synura species, consist of hundreds to thousands of cells embedded in gelatinous matrices, rotating via coordinated flagellar beats to optimize light exposure or nutrient uptake. These colonial forms contrast with solitary cells, emphasizing collective behaviors in resource-limited habitats. Morphological complexity spans a broad size spectrum, from naked, unicellular flagellates measuring 2–10 μm in diameter to elaborate colonies reaching 1 mm or more in diameter. For instance, individual Chrysamoeba cells are typically 8–10 μm, while Synura colonies can aggregate up to 1 mm, comprising micron-scale cells in dense, spherical clusters. This variation in scale and organization reflects evolutionary trade-offs between mobility, protection, and metabolic efficiency. A study on Synura petersenii demonstrated that under silica-limited stress, scales downsized and became malformed, reducing overall cell ornamentation and highlighting environmental modulation of morphological traits.

Ecology

Habitats and Distribution

Golden algae, belonging to the class Chrysophyceae, are predominantly inhabitants of freshwater environments, comprising nearly all known species in this category, with only a small fraction occurring in marine or brackish settings. They thrive in oligotrophic waters such as clear lakes, slow-flowing rivers, and peat bogs, where nutrient levels, particularly total , remain low (typically below 15 μg L⁻¹). These algae exhibit a preference for soft, dilute waters with low conductivity (less than 50 μS cm⁻¹) and ranges from 5 to 8, often in acidic to circumneutral conditions influenced by in brown waters. Temperature tolerances generally fall between 4°C and 20°C, favoring cold to cool conditions that support their mixotrophic lifestyles. Their distribution is cosmopolitan, recorded on every continent except , though abundance peaks in cold-temperate regions of the , including boreal forests and areas. High diversity is noted in , the , and mountain lakes, where species richness correlates with oligotrophic, low-pH habitats. Benthic forms, such as , are characteristic of fast-flowing, cold rivers during periods, while planktonic genera like Dinobryon and Ochromonas dominate in temperate lakes. Rare brackish occurrences include species like Dinobryon balticum in the . Biogeographically, golden algae show elevated in ancient lakes, such as , where over 25 silica-scaled have been documented, including endemics like Mallomonas kuzminii. Recent studies as of 2025 have expanded the checklist of silica-scaled in to 57 taxa. Recent expansions in known ranges include the 2024 discovery of in the Fenhe River of Province, China, highlighting their presence in East Asian freshwater systems previously underreported. Overall, approximately 90% of Chrysophyceae are confined to freshwater habitats, underscoring their role as indicators of pristine, nutrient-poor aquatic ecosystems.

Ecological Roles

Golden algae, particularly those in the class Chrysophyceae, serve as primary producers and mixotrophs in aquatic ecosystems, often contributing 10–75% of in oligotrophic and dystrophic waters, where their photosynthetic activity supports overall . Mixotrophic species, such as Chrysosphaerella multispina, can dominate exceeding 50% in nutrient-poor conditions by combining autotrophy with heterotrophy, enhancing their resilience and role in carbon flow. A 2022 review highlights Chrysophyceae as key contributors to carbon fixation in humic lakes, where their mixotrophic strategies facilitate efficient nutrient utilization and primary productivity in low-light, organic-rich environments. In food webs, golden algae occupy a versatile position as both prey and predators; they are grazed by zooplankton such as Daphnia, which can assimilate up to 27% of their resources from species like Mallomonas caudata, thereby transferring energy to higher trophic levels. Conversely, mixotrophic forms like Dinobryon spp. act as significant predators on bacteria, with grazing rates that can exceed those of other protists and link bacterial production to the broader planktonic food web, accounting for substantial bacterivory in freshwater systems. Heterotrophic chrysophytes, such as Paraphysomonas, further bridge primary producers and metazoans by consuming organic particles and bacteria. Golden algae contribute to nutrient dynamics through silicon cycling, as silica-scaled species produce biogenic silica structures like scales and stomatocysts, which deposit in lake s and influence local silica availability, though their global impact is minor compared to diatoms. These scales facilitate silica precipitation, altering composition and supporting biogeochemical processes in freshwater habitats. Additionally, their mixotrophic feeding enhances cycling of carbon, , and , with 40–60% of carbon flux passing through bacterial interactions mediated by chrysophytes. Symbioses involving golden algae are rare but documented. Some species also function as epiphytes, attaching to aquatic plants or substrates; for instance, Lagynion spp. occur epiphytically in oligotrophic lakes, contributing to communities and localized . Similarly, Chrysidiastrum epiphyticum exemplifies epiphytic growth on pond substrates, aiding in microhabitat nutrient exchange.

Environmental Interactions

Golden algae, particularly species within the Chrysophyceae, serve as sensitive bioindicators of environmental changes due to their specific tolerances to water chemistry variables. Chrysophyte cysts in lake sediments have been used to reconstruct historical acidification, with studies showing pH declines in approximately 24% of monitored lakes attributed to acidic deposition, alongside shifts in trophic status from cottage development and eutrophication pressures. Silica-scaled chrysophytes exhibit defined responses to eutrophic and acidic conditions, with certain taxa declining in polluted waters where pH drops below 5.5 or nutrient levels exceed oligotrophic thresholds, enabling their use in assessing water quality degradation. While blooms of true Chrysophyceae are rare and generally non-toxic, related golden algae such as Prymnesium parvum (Haptophyta) can form dense, ichthyotoxic blooms in brackish or low- environments, leading to significant kills through prymnesin toxins that disrupt function and . These events, often triggered by moderate environmental stress like salinity fluctuations between 1-10 ppt, have been documented in inland waters, highlighting broader vulnerabilities among golden-pigmented algae to anthropogenic alterations. Climate warming influences golden algae distributions and cyst production, with rising air temperatures altering lake mixing regimes and cyst fluxes in sediments, as observed in northeast Polish lakes where warmer, ice-free winters reduced cyst peaks by limiting nutrient and light availability. Assemblage shifts toward warmth-tolerant morphotypes have been recorded in sediments since the early , with increased cyst concentrations serving as proxies for extended growing seasons and trophic cascades driven by reduced ice cover. Pollution impacts golden algae through heavy metal exposure, where scaled species like Synura echinulata exhibit tolerance and dominance in contaminated sediments, with assemblages reflecting elevated aluminum, iron, and levels up to 5,000 μg/L during industrial emissions. Since the , cyst assemblages of golden algae have been integral to paleoenvironmental reconstructions, providing quantitative insights into past lake , productivity, and climate variability through multivariate analyses of sediment cores from diverse regions.

Evolution

Ancestral Origins

Golden algae, or Chrysophyceae, belong to the heterokont lineage within stramenopiles, where the acquisition of occurred through secondary endosymbiosis involving a red alga. This event is estimated to have taken place between approximately 1300 and 600 million years ago, marking a pivotal step in the of complex s in this group. The secondary plastid, surrounded by four membranes, integrated red algal photosynthetic machinery into a previously non-photosynthetic host, enabling the diversification of ochrophytes, the photosynthetic stramenopiles that include golden algae. The ancestral state of stramenopiles was heterotrophic, with early lineages likely consisting of bacterivorous flagellates that preyed on prokaryotes in aquatic environments. was acquired later in the branch, following the divergence from aplastidic relatives such as and , indicating that phagotrophy preceded integration by at least tens of millions of years. This heterotrophic ancestry underscores the opportunistic nature of evolution, where nutrient acquisition via bacterivory provided a foundational trophic strategy before the endosymbiotic upgrade to autotrophy. A defining feature of pigment evolution is the presence of , a that enhances light harvesting in the 500-550 nm range and photoprotection. This originated in the common ancestor of photosynthetic stramenopiles, distinguishing ochrophytes from other chromalveolate groups and contributing to their golden-brown coloration. 's pathway, involving enzymes like phytoene synthase and cyclase, was retained across diverse ochrophyte lineages, reflecting its adaptive value in variable aquatic light conditions. Within ochrophytes, a key evolutionary event was the divergence of major lineages, including the separation of the chrysophyte line from that leading to diatoms, estimated around 250-370 million years ago based on analyses. This split occurred hundreds of millions of years after plastid acquisition, allowing independent diversification of siliceous (diatoms) and non-siliceous (chrysophytes) forms. Mixotrophy, combining and phagotrophy, represents a primitive trait in Chrysophyceae, retained in most species as an ancestral condition from which full heterotrophy evolved multiple times through gradual plastid reduction and gene loss.

Fossil Record

The fossil record of golden algae (Chrysophyceae) is primarily preserved through siliceous structures such as scales, bristles, and resting cysts (stomatocysts or statospores), which resist degradation in sedimentary environments far better than the fragile organic components of their cells. These silica-based features, often found in lacustrine deposits, provide a robust proxy for reconstructing past algal diversity and , as the soft-bodied vegetative stages rarely fossilize. The earliest unambiguous fossils attributed to Chrysophyceae are statospores from lacustrine sediments in the Ordos Basin, , dating to approximately 228–235 million years ago (Ma). These spherical, siliceous cysts exhibit morphological features consistent with modern chrysophyte resting stages, marking the group's initial appearance in the following the Permian-Triassic extinction. Earlier potential records, such as ambiguous microfossils from the (~450 Ma), have been proposed but remain unconfirmed due to challenges in taxonomic assignment. Diversity peaked during the , particularly in the , with abundant and varied silica scales documented in ancient lake deposits like the Wombat locality in (~83 Ma), where over 100 morphotypes of scales and bristles indicate a thriving scaled-chrysophyte assemblage. Molecular clock analyses estimate the origin of the order Synurales at approximately 157 Ma in the , though the record of scales and bristles begins in the Eocene (~48 Ma), with definitive s more common from the onward, including structures akin to modern genera like Mallomonas and Synura. In the , chrysophyte s are extensively used in sediment stratigraphy to infer environmental changes, including shifts, due to their sensitivity to , pH, and levels. Assemblages from lake cores, for instance, reveal submillennial-scale variations in winter-spring conditions in regions like the northwestern Mediterranean, with cyst morphotypes tracking transitions from cooler, oligotrophic phases to warmer periods. A 2023 of scale-bearing lineages documented 29 distinct evolutionary lines in the fossil record, demonstrating remarkable morphological stability since the (~83 Ma), with many taxa showing little change over tens of millions of years despite environmental upheavals.

Recent Molecular Studies

Recent molecular studies on golden algae (Chrysophyceae) have advanced understanding of their evolutionary dynamics through genomic and phylogenomic approaches. A notable genome project is the 2019 draft assembly of Hydrurus foetidus, a benthic chrysophyte, which produced a 171 Mb genome from hybrid short- and long-read sequencing, achieving 77% completeness based on BUSCO analysis. This assembly provides a foundation for exploring mixotrophic pathways, as H. foetidus exhibits combined phototrophy, phagotrophy, and osmotrophy, with transcriptomic data revealing gene expression patterns linked to nutrient acquisition and environmental adaptation. Complementary transcriptomic studies on related mixotrophic species like Ochromonas spp. have identified upregulated genes for phagocytosis and carbon metabolism under varying light and prey conditions, highlighting evolutionary adaptations in nutritional flexibility. Phylogeographic analyses using high-throughput metabarcoding have uncovered substantial cryptic diversity within inland water populations of Chrysophyceae. A 2022 study analyzing 2,370 environmental sequences from 218 European lakes revealed a large, previously overlooked diversity in unscaled chrysophytes, with phylogenetic affiliations indicating widespread cryptic speciation driven by habitat-specific adaptations. This metabarcoding effort estimated that undescribed diversity could be at least twice the known taxa, emphasizing the role of molecular tools in resolving hidden evolutionary lineages. Similarly, multigene phylogenies in genera like Dinobryon have confirmed cryptic species complexes, with integrative morphological and molecular data describing five new species and suggesting biogeographic patterns tied to freshwater dispersal. Evolutionary implications from recent phylogenomics include insights into morphological innovations, such as scale formation. A 2025 phylogenetic analysis of Chrysococcus, incorporating its C. rufescens, resolved key transitions within Chrysophyceae, implying that silica scale evolution may involve events in structural protein families, though direct genomic remains pending. for (HGT) further shapes these trajectories, with bacterial-derived ice-binding protein genes integrated into chrysophyte genomes, enhancing cold adaptation in like Chloromonas nivalis relatives. Such HGT events, likely from bacterial prey, also support osmotrophic capabilities by bolstering extracellular degradation pathways, as inferred from across protistan osmotrophs. These findings collectively refine post-2020 views on chrysophyte , integrating genomic plasticity with ecological niches.

References

  1. https://botany.natur.cuni.cz/skaloud/soubory/publikace/2017_Kristiansen_Skaloud.pdf
  2. https://protistologists.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/10CHRYSOMONADA.pdf
  3. https://science.umd.edu/labs/delwiche/PSlife/lectures/Heterokonts-2.html
  4. https://shigen.nig.ac.jp/algae_tree/ChrysophyceaeE.html
  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-09006-1
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022532079901151
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0031018288900582
  8. https://naturalhistory.si.edu/research/botany/research/algae/algae-classification
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/chrysophyta
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/fucoxanthin
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5811012/
  12. https://academic.oup.com/ismej/article/11/9/2022/7538007
  13. https://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Chrysophyceae
  14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00226555
  15. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61993-1
  16. https://www.mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=20456
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20310645
  18. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-019-04112-0
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/chrysophyta
  20. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.1500004
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4353302
  22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00071616100650021
  23. https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chrysophyceae
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313861593_Chrysophyta
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=2825
  26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13127-022-00554-y
  27. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.758067/full
  28. https://fottea.czechphycology.cz/pdfs/fot/2023/02/01.pdf
  29. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1150814/full
  30. https://bdj.pensoft.net/article/137389/
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep10134
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395255636_Revisiting_Chrysococcus_Chrysophyceae_new_phylogenetic_evidence_and_evolutionary_implications
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6784874/
  34. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-021-01781-3
  35. https://www.algaebase.org/pages/Journal-of-Phycology-2024-Guiry.pdf
  36. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/20/2990
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318806175_Chrysophyta
  38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32669-6_43-1
  39. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/12/1092
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10672706/
  41. https://www.algaebase.org/search/species/detail/?species_id=32266
  42. https://www.algaebase.org/search/species/detail/?species_id=32303
  43. https://www.glasgownaturalhistory.org.uk/gn28_2/Krokowski_Synura_uvella.pdf
  44. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/bitstream/10214/15533/1/OME_chrysophyte_blooms_plankton92.pdf
  45. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192439
  46. https://www.algaebase.org/search/species/detail/?species_id=59471
  47. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/22/3166
  48. https://www.nies.go.jp/chiiki1/protoz/morpho/flagella/chrysamo.htm
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284402887_Chrysophycean_Algae
  50. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2011/agr/A125-8-1-2011-eng.pdf
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229480810_Siliceous_scale_production_in_Chrysophyte_and_Synurophyte_algae_I_Effects_of_silica-limited_growth_on_cell_silica_content_scale_morphology_and_the_construction_of_the_scale_layer_of_Synura_petersenii
  52. https://www.e-algae.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.4490/algae.2019.34.1.15
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322493201_Silica-scaled_chrysophytes_of_Lake_Baikal
  54. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/14/10/1325
  55. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-022-05075-5
  56. https://www.algaebase.org/search/genus/detail/?genus_id=43781
  57. https://cfb.unh.edu/phycokey/Choices/Chrysophyceae/unicell_chrysophyceae/amoeboid_chryso/LAGYNION/Lagynion_key.htm
  58. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2216/i0031-8884-8-3-199.1
  59. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008036012937
  60. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071618600650491
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2857367/
  62. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=3234
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21010608
  64. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/b01-044
  65. https://www.jlimnol.it/jlimnol/article/view/jlimnol.2012.e29/1074
  66. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstreams/9579ac30-53fc-4ea5-80f8-287ccf266f30/download
  67. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22044-z
  68. https://elifesciences.org/articles/23717
  69. https://academic.oup.com/ismej/article/18/1/wrae150/7723939
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9499517/
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2940848/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6019013/
  73. http://fottea.czechphycology.cz/pdfs/fot/2023/02/02.pdf
  74. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-017-3549-1
  75. https://fottea.czechphycology.cz/artkey/fot-202502-0001_revisiting_chrysococcus_chrysophyceae_new_phylogenetic_evidence_and_evolutionary_implications.php
  76. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02697/full
  77. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24018383/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.