Hubbry Logo
Daoguang EmperorDaoguang EmperorMain
Open search
Daoguang Emperor
Community hub
Daoguang Emperor
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Daoguang Emperor
Daoguang Emperor
Daoguang Emperor
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

This article contains Manchu text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Manchu alphabet.

The Daoguang Emperor (16 September 1782 – 26 February 1850), also known by his temple name Emperor Xuanzong of Qing, personal name Minning, was the seventh emperor of the Qing dynasty, and the sixth Qing emperor to rule over China proper. His reign was marked by "external disaster and internal rebellion". These include the First Opium War and the beginning of the Taiping Rebellion which nearly brought down the dynasty. The historian Jonathan Spence characterizes the Daoguang Emperor as a "well meaning but ineffective man" who promoted officials who "presented a purist view even if they had nothing to say about the domestic and foreign problems surrounding the dynasty".[1]

Early years

[edit]
The Daoguang Emperor in his study

The Daoguang Emperor was born in the Forbidden City, Beijing, in 1782, and was given the name Mianning (绵宁; 綿寧; Miánníng; Mien-ning). It was later changed to Minning (旻宁; 旻寧; Mǐnníng; Min-ning) when he became emperor. The first character of his private name was changed from Mian to Min to avoid the relatively common character Mian. This novelty was introduced by his grandfather, the reigning Qianlong Emperor, who thought it was inappropriate to use a common character in the emperor's private name due to the longstanding practice of naming taboo.

Mianning was the second son of Prince Yongyan, the 15th son and heir of the Qianlong Emperor. Even though he was Yongyan's second son, he was first in line after Prince Yongyan to his grandfather's throne. This was because according to the dishu system, his mother, Lady Hitara, was Yongyan's primary spouse whereas his elder brother was born to Yongyan's concubine. Mianning was favored by his grandfather, the Qianlong Emperor. He frequently accompanied his grandfather on hunting trips. On one such trip, at the age of nine, Mianning successfully hunted a deer, which greatly amused the Qianlong Emperor. The emperor would abdicate five years after that incident, in 1796, when Mianning was 14. Mianning’s father Prince Yongyan was then enthroned as the Jiaqing Emperor, after which he made Lady Hitara (Mianning's mother) his empress consort. The elderly Qianlong would live three more years in retirement before dying in 1799, aged 87, when Mianning was 17.

In 1813, while he was still a prince, Mianning also played a vital role in repelling and killing Eight Trigrams invaders[clarification needed] who stormed the Forbidden City.

Reign

[edit]
The Daoguang Emperor inspecting his guards at the Meridian Gate of the Forbidden City
One Cash coin struck in the name of Daoguang, emperor of the Qing dynasty, minted in Boo-guwang.

Khoja rebellion in Xinjiang

[edit]
The Daoguang Emperor is presented with prisoners of the campaign to pacify rebels in Xinjiang at the Meridian Gate in 1828

In September 1820, at the age of 38, Mianning inherited the throne after the Jiaqing Emperor died suddenly of unknown causes. He became the first Qing emperor who was the eldest legitimate son of his father. Now known as the Daoguang Emperor, he inherited a declining empire with Westerners encroaching upon the borders of China. His era name, "Daoguang", means "radiant path". The Daoguang Emperor had been ruling for six years when the exiled heir to the Khojas, Jahangir Khoja, attacked Xinjiang from Kokand in the Afaqi Khoja revolts. By the end of 1826, the former Qing cities of Kashgar, Yarkand, Khotan, and Yangihissar had all fallen to the rebels.[2][3] After a friend betrayed him in March 1827, Khoja was sent to Beijing in an iron litter and subsequently executed,[4] while the Qing Empire regained control of their lost territory. The Uyghur Muslim Sayyid and Naqshbandi Sufi rebel of the Afaqi suborder, Jahangir Khoja was sliced to death (Lingchi) in 1828 by the Manchus for leading a rebellion against the Qing.

First Opium War

[edit]
Main article: First Opium War

During the Daoguang Emperor's reign, China experienced major problems with opium, which was imported into China by British merchants. Opium had started to trickle into China during the reign of the Yongzheng Emperor, but was limited to approximately 200 chests annually. By the time of the Qianlong era, this amount had increased to 1,000 chests, 4,000 chests by the Jiaqing era and more than 30,000 chests during the Daoguang era.[citation needed]

Destruction of Chinese war junks during the First Opium War

The Daoguang Emperor issued many imperial edicts banning opium in the 1820s and 1830s, which were carried out by Lin Zexu, whom he appointed as an Imperial Commissioner to Canton.[5] Lin Zexu's efforts to halt the spread of opium in China led directly to the First Opium War. With China losing the war, Lin Zexu was made a scapegoat. The Daoguang Emperor removed his authority and banished him to Yili. During the war, the Daoguang Emperor ordered 187 British and Indian prisoners of war held captive in Taiwan Prefecture to be summarily executed in 1842 in retaliation for the Chinese defeat at the Battle of Ningpo; the executions were carried out on 10 August by Chinese officials. The Chinese defeat in the war exposed Qing China's technological and military inferiority to European powers, which led China in being forced to cede Hong Kong to the British in the Treaty of Nanjing in August 1842, and also pay a hefty indemnity which left the treasury desperate for funds.[6][5] Meanwhile, in the Himalayas, the Sikh Empire attempted an occupation of Tibet but was defeated in the Sino-Sikh war (1841–1842).

Anti-Christianity

[edit]

In 1811, a clause sentencing Europeans to death for spreading Catholicism had been added to the statute called "Prohibitions Concerning Sorcerers and Sorceresses" (禁止師巫邪術) in the Great Qing Legal Code.[7] Protestants hoped that the Qing government would discriminate between Protestantism and Catholicism, since the law mentioned the latter by name, but after Protestant missionaries gave Christian books to Chinese people[who?] in 1835 and 1836, the Daoguang Emperor demanded to know who were the "traitorous natives" in Guangzhou who had supplied them with books.[8][page needed]

Noble titles

[edit]

The Daoguang Emperor granted the title of "Wujing Boshi" (五經博士; Wǔjīng Bóshì) to the descendants of Ran Qiu.[9]

Death and legacy

[edit]

The Daoguang Emperor died on 26 February 1850 at the Old Summer Palace, 8 km/5 miles northwest of Beijing, being the last Qing emperor to pass away in that Palace before it was burnt down by Anglo-French troops during the Second Opium War, a decade later. He was succeeded by his eldest surviving son, Yizhu, who was later enthroned as the Xianfeng Emperor. The Daoguang Emperor failed to understand the intention or determination of the Europeans, or the basic economics of a war on drugs. Although the Europeans were outnumbered and thousands of miles away from logistical support in their native countries, they could bring far superior firepower to bear at any point of contact along the Chinese coast. The Qing government was highly dependent on the continued flow of taxes from southern China via the Grand Canal, which the British expeditionary force easily cut off at Zhenjiang.[citation needed]

The Daoguang Emperor ultimately had a poor understanding of the British and the Industrial Revolution that Britain and Western Europe had undergone, preferring to turn a blind eye to the rest of the world, though the distance from China to Europe most likely played a part. It was said that the emperor did not even know where Britain was located in the world. His 30-year reign saw rising economic tensions, sectarian instability and foreign interventions which would eventually lead to the collapse of the Qing dynasty in 1911.[citation needed]

The Daoguang Emperor was interred in the Mu (慕; lit. "Longing" or "Admiration") mausoleum complex, which is part of the Western Qing Tombs,[10] 120 km southwest of Beijing.

Family

[edit]
See also: Consorts of the Daoguang Emperor
From top to bottom, left to right: Empress Xiaoquancheng, the Daoguang Emperor, Princess Shou'an, Yizhu, a lady-in-waiting, Yixin, Noble Consort Jing and Noble Consort Tong (c. 1837)
From left to right: Yixin, Yizhu, Yihe, Yihui, Yixuan, the Daoguang Emperor, Princess Shou'an and Princess Shou'en (c. 1848)

Empress

  • Empress Xiaoquancheng (孝全成皇后) of the Niohuru clan (鈕祜祿氏; 24 March 1808 – 13 February 1840)
    • Miscarriage (2 January 1824)
    • Princess Duanshun of the First Rank (端順固倫公主; 8 April 1825 – 27 December 1835), third daughter
    • Princess Shou'an of the First Rank (壽安固倫公主; 12 May 1826 – 24 March 1860), fourth daughter
      • Married Demchüghjab (德穆楚克扎布; ? – 1865) of the Mongol Naiman Borjigin clan on 15 November 1841
    • Yizhu (奕詝), the Xianfeng Emperor (咸豐帝; 17 July 1831 – 22 August 1861), fourth son
  • Empress Xiaojingcheng (孝靜成皇后) of the Khorchin Borjigin clan (博爾濟吉特氏; 19 June 1812 – 21 August 1855)
    • Yigang (奕綱), Prince Shunhe of the Second Rank (順和郡王; 22 November 1826 – 5 March 1827), second son
    • Miscarriage at four months (28 June 1828)
    • Yiji (奕繼), Prince Huizhi of the Second Rank (慧質郡王; 2 December 1829 – 22 January 1830), third son
    • Princess Shou'en of the First Rank (壽恩固倫公主; 20 January 1831 – 15 May 1859), sixth daughter
      • Married Jingshou (景壽; 1829–1889) of the Manchu Fuca clan in May/June 1845 and had issue
    • Yixin (奕䜣), Prince Gongzhong of the First Rank (恭忠親王; 11 January 1833 – 29 May 1898), sixth son

Imperial Noble Consort

Noble Consort

  • Noble Consort Tong (彤貴妃) of the Šumuru clan (舒穆魯氏; 3 June 1817 – 9 November 1875)
    • Seventh daughter (30 July 1840 – 27 January 1845)
    • Princess Shouxi of the Second Rank (壽禧和碩公主; 7 January 1842 – 10 September 1866), eighth daughter
      • Married Jalafungga (扎拉豐阿; ? – 1898) of the Manchu Niohuru clan in November/December 1863
    • Tenth daughter (4 May 1844 – 26 February 1845)

Consort

  • Consort He (和妃) of the Hoifa-Nara clan (輝發那拉氏; ? – 18 May 1836)
    • Yiwei (奕緯), Prince Yinzhi of the Second Rank (隱志郡王; 16 May 1808 – 23 May 1831), first son
  • Consort Xiang (祥妃) of the Niohuru clan (鈕祜祿氏; 9 February 1808 – 15 February 1861)
    • Second daughter (2 March 1825 – 27 August 1825)
    • Princess Shouzang of the Second Rank (壽臧和碩公主; 15 November 1829 – 9 August 1856), fifth daughter
      • Married Enchong (恩崇; ? – 1864) of the Manchu Namdulu clan on 3 January 1843
    • Yicong (奕誴), Prince Dunqin of the First Rank (惇勤親王; 23 July 1831 – 18 February 1889), fifth son

Concubine

  • Concubine Tian (恬嬪) of the Fuca clan (富察氏; 15 April 1789 – 21 August 1845)
  • Concubine Shun (順嬪) of the Hoifa-Nara clan (那拉氏; 21 March 1809 – 11 April 1868)
  • Concubine Yu (豫嬪) of the Shang clan (尚氏; 20 December 1816 – 24 September 1897)
  • Concubine Heng (恆嬪) of the Cai clan (蔡氏; ? – 28 May 1876)

Noble Lady

  • Noble Lady Ping (平貴人) of the Zhao clan (趙氏; ? – 5 May 1823)
  • Noble Lady (貴人) of the Li clan (李氏; 25 November 1827 – 26 March 1872)
  • Noble Lady Na (那貴人) of the Hoifa-Nara clan (輝發那拉氏; 5 August 1825 – 9 September 1865)
  • Noble Lady Ding (定貴人) of the Sun clan (孫氏; ? – 24 January 1843)

Second Class Attendant

  • Second Class Attendant Mu (睦答應) of the Hešeri clan (赫舍里氏; ? – 2 June 1832)

Lady-in-waiting

  • Lady-in-waiting (劉官女子) of the Liu clan (劉氏; ? – 1843)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Daoguang Emperor

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Daoguang Emperor (Chinese: 道光帝; pinyin: Dàoguāng Dì; 1782–1850), personal name Minning (綿寧; Miánníng), was the seventh emperor of the Manchu Qing dynasty and the sixth Qing ruler over China proper. He ascended the throne on 3 October 1820 following the death of his father, the Jiaqing Emperor, and reigned until his own death on 25 February 1850. Minning, born in the in as the second son of the , received a traditional Confucian education emphasizing frugality and moral governance. Upon taking the , he adopted the reign name Daoguang, meaning "path of light," reflecting his initial intent to guide the empire toward renewal amid signs of fiscal strain and bureaucratic corruption inherited from the late Qianlong and Jiaqing eras. His rule emphasized cost-cutting measures, such as reducing court expenditures and imperial tours, in response to silver outflows from imports and natural disasters like floods. Despite personal diligence and efforts to curb official malfeasance through audits and dismissals, the Daoguang Emperor's reign saw the acceleration of Qing decline, marked by internal unrest precursors to the and external confrontation in the (1839–1842). The war, triggered by his commissioner Lin Zexu's opium destruction at Canton, ended in military defeat against British forces, leading to the (1842) that ceded , opened , and imposed indemnities, exposing the dynasty's technological and organizational vulnerabilities. These events underscored causal factors in Qing weakening, including overreliance on outdated , fiscal mismanagement, and resistance to adaptive reforms, though the emperor's indecision between suppression and appeasement in foreign policy contributed to the outcome.

Early Life and Ascension to the Throne

Birth, Family Background, and Education

The Daoguang Emperor, originally named Mianning (綿寧), was born on 16 September 1782 in the , . He was the second surviving son of the (born Yongyan, r. 1796–1820) and his consort from the Kitala clan, who was posthumously honored as (孝淑睿皇后; 1760–1797). Mianning belonged to the Aisin Gioro clan, the Manchu lineage that had founded and ruled the since its conquest of in 1644, establishing a hereditary imperial system blending Confucian with Manchu martial traditions. His early family environment reflected the hierarchical structure of the imperial household, where princely sons competed for favor amid political intrigues, though his father's reign emphasized frugality and administrative efficiency following the Qianlong Emperor's excesses. As an imperial son (A-ge), Mianning began formal around age six, adhering to the standardized for Qing princes designed to instill , erudition, and governance skills. This regimen spanned roughly nine years until age fifteen and encompassed daily sessions of about ten hours, from 5 a.m. to 3 p.m., covering Confucian classics (such as and Five Classics), Chinese literary composition, and script, history, , , and practical Manchu heritage elements like , , and statecraft. Instruction occurred under imperial tutors in palace study halls, emphasizing moral cultivation and imperial duties over speculative , with periodic examinations to assess progress.

Rise Within the Qing Court and Succession

Mianning, the second son of the , held the position of a prince within the imperial household before his ascension, demonstrating early competence in court affairs. In 1813, at the age of 31, he played a crucial role in defending the against an incursion by Eight Trigrams rebels, personally participating in repelling and eliminating the attackers, which highlighted his loyalty and martial ability to the court. As the eldest legitimate son under the Qing dishu inheritance system—wherein the primary wife's eldest son held precedence—Mianning was positioned as the natural successor, marking the first instance of direct lineal succession in the dynasty without overt fraternal competition. His mother, , as the principal consort, further solidified his claim amid the absence of a publicly designated heir during Jiaqing's later years. The Jiaqing Emperor died suddenly on September 2, 1820, at the Rehe Traveling Palace (present-day ), approximately 230 kilometers northeast of , under circumstances reported as unknown but prompting immediate court action. Mianning, then 38 years old, ascended the throne on October 3, 1820, assuming imperial authority without delay as the pre-selected heir, and later adopted the reign era name Daoguang in 1821 to formalize his rule. This transition occurred amid the Qing tradition of secret imperial edicts for succession, ensuring continuity despite the unexpected nature of Jiaqing's demise.

Domestic Governance and Internal Challenges

Economic Policies and Fiscal Management

![Daoguang Tongbao cash coin][float-right] The Daoguang Emperor's reign (1820–1850) confronted acute fiscal strains from a massive silver outflow, driven by imports from British India, which multiplied twentyfold during his rule and triggered deflationary pressures across the economy. This silver drain, estimated at 170–180 million taels annually from Daoguang 3 to 11 (1823–1831) and exceeding 200 million taels thereafter, eroded the , causing copper cash to depreciate by over 76% relative to silver and fostering widespread . The resulting of silver hampered , inflated prices in terms of cash, and intensified rural distress, as silver's role in tax payments amplified the crisis's reach. To counter these imbalances, the emperor pursued stringent austerity policies, drastically curtailing imperial court expenditures to historically low levels, encompassing reductions in personal imperial outlays and broader governmental spending. These measures extended to suspending public contributions from salt syndicates after , aiming to enforce fiscal discipline amid mounting deficits. Despite such efforts, chronic budget shortfalls persisted, undermined by entrenched bureaucratic and that diverted funds from essential like flood control, where officials siphoned repair allocations without proportional workforce reductions. The Daoguang regime's conservative fiscal approach eschewed structural overhauls, such as comprehensive tax reforms or monetary adjustments, prioritizing over in a context of declining revenues from traditional sources like land taxes and salt monopolies. This inertia, coupled with the opium-induced silver hemorrhage, precluded effective stabilization, setting the stage for deepened fiscal vulnerability as external pressures mounted.

Anti-Corruption Campaigns and Bureaucratic Reforms

The Daoguang Emperor inherited a plagued by entrenched , exacerbated by low official salaries, in office sales, and in key fiscal systems like grain transport and the salt monopoly. Recognizing these issues as threats to state revenue and administrative efficiency, he pursued targeted reforms rather than sweeping purges, focusing on restructuring vulnerable sectors to minimize opportunities for graft. His personal and emphasis on moral governance informed these efforts, though conservative adherence to Manchu traditions and resistance from vested interests limited their scope and long-term impact. A primary initiative addressed in the Grand Canal grain tribute system, where officials and middlemen siphoned funds meant for maintenance, leading to , floods, and supply disruptions. In 1824, following a severe canal breach, Daoguang demanded "concrete, corruption-free plans" from ministers, rejecting proposals that preserved the . By , he authorized partial shift to sea transport for rice from southern provinces, bypassing the canal's multilayered and reducing risks; this innovation successfully delivered during subsequent crises but faced logistical challenges and did not eliminate canal reliance entirely. To bolster revenues depleted by and corrupt salt merchants, Daoguang appointed the reformist Tao Shu as commissioner of the Lianghuai salt administration in 1832. Tao enforced rigorous inspections, cracked down on illicit trade networks, and reorganized distribution to curb merchant-official collusion, yielding a notable increase in salt gabelle collections—estimated at several million taels annually by mid-decade. These measures exemplified Daoguang's preference for appointing capable provincials over systemic overhaul, yet policies, including salary freezes, often intensified under-the-table extortion, underscoring the reforms' incomplete success against deeper structural incentives for corruption.

Suppression of Internal Rebellions and Social Unrest

During the Daoguang Emperor's reign, the encountered sporadic peasant uprisings and ethnic revolts amid economic distress, including grain transport disruptions, famines, and heavy taxation burdens exacerbated by silver outflows from imports. These incidents, though not on the scale of later mid-century rebellions, reflected underlying social tensions from population pressures and administrative inefficiencies, with local officials often resorting to that further incited unrest. The emperor emphasized centralized oversight, instructing viceroys and governors to deploy garrisons and militias to quell disturbances while investigating root causes like corrupt local practices. ![The Emperor is presented with prisoners at the Wu-men 1828.jpg][float-right] A notable episode of social unrest arose from the Grand Canal's silting, culminating in the 1824–1826 crisis when the waterway became impassable for grain shipments from southern provinces to . This shift to costlier sea routes displaced thousands of canal boatmen and porters in northern , sparking riots and banditry as unemployed workers turned to violence amid food shortages. The Daoguang Emperor coordinated suppression through edicts demanding provincial authorities restore order, disperse crowds, and redirect laborers to alternative public works, averting escalation into broader rebellion while acknowledging the fiscal strain on the treasury. In Xinjiang, the 1826–1828 Jahāngīr Uprising posed a more structured threat, as Āfāqī Khoja Jahāngīr, exiled from the khoqandate, invaded from with backing, rallying Muslim communities against Qing rule and capturing and Yarkand. Qing forces, under General Changling, recaptured the oases by 1828 after fierce fighting that killed thousands, with Jahāngīr captured and executed in 1828; the emperor's strategy involved reinforcing garrisons, leveraging intelligence from local allies, and executing ritual executions of captives to deter future incursions. This suppression restored nominal control but highlighted vulnerabilities in frontier administration amid fiscal constraints. Smaller-scale peasant revolts erupted in interior provinces, such as and during the 1830s droughts, where floods and crop failures prompted armed resistance against tax collectors; these were contained by regional armies numbering in the thousands, with the court prioritizing rapid deployment to prevent coalescence into larger movements. Similarly, ethnic tensions flared in 1821 near resource-rich areas, pitting Han settlers against Hui communities in riots over land and mosques, suppressed through mediation and punitive arrests. Overall, the Daoguang regime's responses relied on traditional and Green Standard troops, though strained and limited effectiveness, foreshadowing greater instability post-1850.

Foreign Policy and the Opium Crisis

Initial Responses to Western Trade Pressures

The Daoguang Emperor, upon ascending the throne in 1820, inherited and maintained the established under his predecessors, which restricted all foreign to the single and mandated mediation exclusively through the state-sanctioned guild of merchants, thereby limiting Western access to Chinese markets and enforcing Qing sovereignty over commercial interactions. This policy reflected a broader Qing that positioned foreign entities as peripheral tributaries rather than equals deserving reciprocal privileges, with Daoguang issuing edicts reinforcing restrictions on unauthorized contacts and to preserve fiscal inflows of silver from exports like and . British merchants, facing a growing imbalance—exporting increasing volumes of to offset deficits in legal goods—pressured for expansion, but Daoguang's court consistently rebuffed petitions for additional ports or direct negotiations, viewing such demands as encroachments on imperial authority. A pivotal early confrontation occurred in 1834 with the arrival of Lord Napier, appointed by Britain as of Trade to circumvent the and secure freer access to inland markets through direct diplomacy. Qing officials in , acting under Daoguang's directives, refused to acknowledge Napier's diplomatic credentials, insisting on adherence to protocol by routing all communications through the Hoppo (customs superintendent) and intermediaries, which Napier rejected as humiliating. The standoff escalated when Napier ordered a British naval blockade of the Pearl River to coerce compliance, prompting Qing countermeasures including a counter-blockade and cessation of supplies to foreign factories; Napier, weakened by illness amid the humid conditions, withdrew to in December 1834 and died shortly thereafter, an outcome the Daoguang court hailed as vindication of its unyielding stance. This "Napier Fizzle," as termed in British accounts, reinforced Daoguang's commitment to the status quo, deterring immediate further British initiatives while exposing underlying frictions over trade liberalization. Throughout the and early , Daoguang's responses prioritized internal stability over accommodation, as evidenced by sporadic edicts tightening oversight of foreign vessels and prohibiting the export of strategic goods like during famines, even as British silver reserves dwindled from payments—reversing the prior favorable balance where netted approximately 10-16 million taels annually in the late . Courtiers debated limited reforms, such as taxing to capture , but Daoguang deferred aggressive changes, opting instead for enforcement of existing bans on the drug's import, which had been reiterated since but proved ineffective against networks. This conservative approach stemmed from a causal assessment that expanding risked cultural and fiscal dependency, privileging amid domestic rebellions and shortfalls, though it inadvertently heightened tensions as Western powers sought to impose "" principles incompatible with Qing norms.

Opium Eradication Efforts and Lin Zexu's Role

In response to the escalating trade, which had led to significant silver outflows from —estimated at over 10 million taels annually by the late —the Daoguang Emperor issued edicts reinforcing the long-standing ban on imports and consumption, originally decreed in 1729 but increasingly evaded through primarily by British merchants. Amid court debates between hardliners advocating strict and reformers proposing and taxation to capture , Daoguang rejected the latter, opting for vigorous to preserve moral order and , as was undermining readiness and societal productivity. On December 31, 1838, Daoguang appointed , then Viceroy of Huguang and a respected known for his integrity and administrative competence, as Imperial Commissioner with powers to eradicate the trade centered in (Canton). Lin arrived in on March 10, 1839, and immediately implemented stringent measures, including confining foreign traders to their factories, severing their food and water supplies until compliance, and securing written pledges from over 300 merchants to cease future imports. By late May 1839, these efforts yielded the surrender of approximately 20,000 chests of stockpiled by British and American firms, valued at roughly 7 million taels of silver. The destruction commenced on June 3, 1839, at (Bogue) under Lin's direct supervision, where 500 laborers mixed the —totaling over 1,150,000 kilograms—with lime, salt, and water before flushing it into the estuary over 23 days to ensure complete dissolution and prevent reuse. This methodical process, documented in Lin's own reports to the throne, marked the largest single eradication in history up to that point and temporarily disrupted networks, though it provoked British retaliation by highlighting the Qing's resolve against what Lin termed the "poisonous trade" draining China's vitality. Daoguang initially praised Lin's success, promoting him, but later scapegoated him for ensuing diplomatic breakdowns as British forces mobilized.

Outbreak and Conduct of the First Opium War

In March 1839, the Daoguang Emperor appointed Lin Zexu as imperial commissioner to eradicate the opium trade in Guangzhou, leading to the confiscation and destruction of approximately 20,000 chests of British opium between June 3 and June 25. British superintendent Charles Elliot, representing the merchants, demanded compensation for the destroyed opium valued at over £2 million, while refusing to compel traders to sign bonds pledging to cease future imports. The Daoguang Emperor rejected these demands, viewing them as extortion by "barbarians" and upholding the prohibition policy, which escalated tensions. The formally erupted on September 4, 1839, when British forces clashed with Qing ships at the Battle of Chuanpi following Elliot's ultimatum for unrestricted trade access. In response, Daoguang ordered coastal defenses reinforced and prohibited all foreign trade, prompting to approve a in February 1840 under Elliot's command. British naval superiority, including steam-powered warships, overwhelmed Qing forces; key actions included the capture of Dinghai on July 5, 1840, and blockades of northern ports to pressure the emperor directly. Daoguang initially pursued a defensive , relying on outdated fortifications and wooden junks ill-equipped against modern artillery, while appointing negotiators like Qishan in 1841 to seek truces amid mounting defeats. British advances continued, seizing key sites such as , , , and by 1842, with Qing casualties exceeding 20,000 due to technological disparities and logistical failures. The emperor's vacillation between war and appeasement—dismissing for perceived leniency in July 1839 before reinstating hardline policies—reflected internal court divisions but ultimately failed to halt British momentum. Hostilities concluded with the on August 29, 1842, imposed after Daoguang authorized peace talks to avert further catastrophe.

Military Affairs and Defense Strategies

Handling of Border Conflicts in Xinjiang

During the early years of the Daoguang Emperor's reign, southern faced incursions from Jahangir Khoja, an exiled Afaqi Khoja leader based in the Khanate, who launched an uprising in late 1826 backed by forces and local Muslim dissidents seeking to overthrow Qing authority. Rebels quickly captured key oases including and Yarkand, slaughtering Qing officials, soldiers, and Han settlers while exploiting grievances over taxation and labor. The Daoguang Emperor responded decisively by mobilizing approximately 36,000 troops from garrisons across and inner China, dispatching an expeditionary force exceeding 20,000 soldiers in spring under imperial command to reclaim the region. Qing forces, leveraging superior and , defeated rebel armies in clashes through summer and fall , recapturing lost cities by September and forcing to flee into the Pamirs where Kyrgyz tribes captured him in early 1828 and extradited him to Qing custody at Kokand's insistence to avoid escalation. The campaign cost the treasury around 10 million taels, reflecting the logistical strain of distant frontier warfare, yet succeeded in restoring order without broader escalation. Jahangir was transported to , interrogated, and executed by (death by a thousand cuts) in 1828, a fate the viewed as essential for symbolic deterrence against future challengers, as initial suppression without his capture had left Daoguang dissatisfied. Post-uprising measures included bolstering garrisons—such as stationing 8,000 troops in —forming local Muslim militias loyal to the throne, and imposing trade restrictions on merchants while demanding tribute and the handover of remaining exiles to curb further incursions. These actions stabilized the border, preventing immediate recurrence of large-scale threats from during the reign, though underlying tensions over caravan trade and nomadic raiding persisted.

Attempts at Military Modernization and Naval Preparedness

The Qing military under the Daoguang Emperor (r. 1820–1850) exhibited limited and largely unsuccessful attempts at modernization, constrained by the emperor's fiscal conservatism and preference for traditional structures over radical overhaul. The Eight Banners system, once the dynasty's elite force, had deteriorated into an ineffective hereditary institution plagued by corruption and poor training, while the Green Standard Army relied on outdated matchlock muskets and bows against emerging threats. Despite reports from coastal officials highlighting British steamship superiority as early as the 1830s, Daoguang prioritized budget cuts, allocating minimal funds for equipment upgrades amid broader economic strains from silver outflows. Naval preparedness remained particularly deficient, with the Qing fleets comprising wooden junks armed with short-range cannons, incapable of matching Western ironclads or even early steam vessels. Proposals to purchase foreign steamships or build domestic equivalents surfaced during escalating trade disputes, but Daoguang rejected major expenditures, viewing them as unnecessary luxuries amid internal fiscal austerity campaigns. For instance, in the lead-up to the (1839–1842), officials like advocated enhanced coastal defenses, including the experimental casting of heavier artillery based on disassembled British guns at arsenals; however, production delays, inferior metallurgy, and lack of systematic training rendered these efforts ineffective, as demonstrated by British naval dominance in battles like Chuenpi (1841). Post-initial defeats, ad hoc measures included authorizing limited imports of Western firearms for elite units and fortifying key ports with purchased cannons from traders, yet these were reactive and underfunded, totaling fewer than 100 modern pieces by 1842. Daoguang's reluctance stemmed from a causal in moral suasion and traditional tactics prevailing over technological parity, a stance reinforced by conservatives wary of "barbarian" influences eroding Manchu martial heritage. This inertia contributed decisively to Qing vulnerabilities, as British forces exploited naval mismatches to dictate terms, underscoring the emperor's policy as a missed opportunity for preemptive .

Personal Character and Court Life

Daily Routines, Frugality, and Moral Stance

The Daoguang Emperor (r. 1820–1850) exemplified personal through a routinized schedule focused on and , often involving extended periods of reading memorials and historical texts to inform his decisions. His daily life emphasized Confucian virtues of restraint and moral introspection, contrasting with the opulence typical of . Historical accounts describe him maintaining a structured routine that included early morning audiences and administrative reviews, aimed at upholding imperial responsibilities amid growing fiscal pressures. In terms of , the emperor implemented severe measures, slashing court expenditures to unprecedented levels, including reductions in personal imperial outlays, as a response to the depleted inherited from previous reigns. He continued and intensified his predecessor Jiaqing's policies of thrift, issuing pleas to the to adopt to counteract economic decay, though these efforts yielded limited systemic impact. This personal stinginess extended to rejecting extravagant imperial provisions, prioritizing resource conservation over luxury to sustain the state's finances during crises like the Daoguang depression. The emperor's stance centered on a purist Confucian ethic, viewing not merely as fiscal but as essential to and preventing the of ambition through . He led a moralized campaign to bureaucratic excesses, promoting officials aligned with ideals of integrity and , in an to restore ethical order amid internal strife and external threats. Despite these intentions, contemporaries noted that his exhortations for societal thrift often failed to permeate beyond the , highlighting the limits of top-down in addressing deeper structural weaknesses.

Family Dynamics and Noble Conferrals

The Daoguang Emperor adhered to Qing traditions in managing his , promoting consorts to noble ranks such as consort or noble consort primarily upon the birth of imperial offspring, reflecting the emphasis on progeny in imperial hierarchy. For instance, Imperial Noble Consort Zhuangshun of the Uya clan was elevated from imperial consort to noble consort following the birth of the emperor's ninth daughter, Kurun Princess Shouzhuang, in 1842. Such conferrals underscored the causal link between and status elevation within the inner court, where Manchu and Mongol women predominated to preserve ethnic cohesion. Family dynamics centered on the emperor's rigorous evaluation of his sons' character, informed by Confucian virtues of humility and amid succession deliberations. After Empress Xiaoquancheng's death in 1840, her son Yizhu—then under nine years old—was placed under the tutelage of Noble Consort Jing (later Imperial Noble Consort Jing), a Borjigit, who assumed the harem's senior role as no new empress was appointed. This arrangement highlighted interdependent caregiving among consorts but did not sway the emperor's preference; he selected Yizhu over his younger half-brother Yixin—Noble Consort Jing's son—despite the latter's perceived talents. The choice hinged on tests devised by the , where Yizhu exhibited restraint by crediting his tutor, Du Shoutian, for successes in scholarly and strategic exercises, whereas Yixin appropriated , clashing with Daoguang's prioritization of self-effacement over ability. Daughters received Gurun titles upon maturity, enabling alliances through marriages to elites, while sons were provisioned with stipends, households, and preliminary ranks, subject to imperial recall to maintain centralized control. These practices reinforced paternal authority while navigating rivalries and heir presumptions.

Death, Succession, and Immediate Aftermath

Final Years, Health Decline, and Death

In the closing years of his reign, following the humiliating in 1842 and subsequent agreements that ceded and opened , the Daoguang Emperor grappled with mounting fiscal strains and administrative challenges, which contemporaries linked to his growing despondency and physical frailty. Historical records indicate that by the late , the emperor's health had steadily declined under the cumulative burdens of defeats, scandals, and failed reform attempts, though no single precipitating ailment is definitively documented in primary Qing court annals. By the first lunar month of 1850 (corresponding to February in the ), the emperor's condition had worsened critically, rendering him bedridden and unable to conduct routine audiences. He succumbed to illness on 26 February 1850 at the (), approximately 8 kilometers northwest of , marking the last imperial death there before its destruction in 1860. At age 67, his passing coincided precisely with the nascent stirrings of the in southern , exacerbating the dynasty's vulnerabilities without his direct oversight.

Succession to the Xianfeng Emperor

The Daoguang Emperor designated his fourth son, Yizhu (born 17 July 1831), as during the later years of his reign, selecting him over other surviving sons including the more intellectually gifted Yixin (born 1833), later . Yizhu, whose mother was Quan (d. 1840), had become the eldest surviving son following the early deaths of his three elder half-brothers. This choice adhered to Qing traditions favoring the eldest capable son while avoiding potential rivalry from a prince deemed overly ambitious or capable of challenging imperial authority. Daoguang died on 25 February 1850 at the in , aged 67, from complications related to long-term health decline exacerbated by the stresses of the and internal rebellions. Yizhu, then 18 years old (19 in Chinese reckoning), ascended the throne as the shortly thereafter, marking the first direct primogeniture-style succession among adult sons in the without adoption or lateral branching to uncles or cousins. The transition proceeded smoothly under the guidance of senior court officials and Manchu nobles, with no recorded challenges or coups, reflecting Daoguang's prior secretive preparations to ensure stability amid dynastic weakening. Yizhu's enthronement ceremony followed Qing ritual protocols, including imperial edicts announcing the accession and the adoption of the reign era "Xianfeng" (Manifest Prosperity) effective from 1851, though retroactively dated to align with traditional practices. Key figures such as were promptly elevated to advisory roles, with Yixin appointed as a junior guardian of the heir (now emperor) and later , fostering alliance rather than factionalism in the early court. This succession preserved the Manchu Aisin Gioro clan's direct line but inherited a treasury depleted by war indemnities—over 21 million silver taels from the 1842 alone—and simmering unrest, setting the stage for intensified crises under the new reign.

Legacy and Historical Evaluation

Short-Term Impacts on Qing Decline

The Daoguang Emperor's reign witnessed the (1839–1842), a conflict precipitated by his administration's aggressive suppression of smuggling, including Commissioner Lin Zexu's destruction of over 20,000 chests of British-held in 1839. This , intended to curb the silver drain and moral decay from addiction affecting millions, provoked British retaliation with superior naval technology, exposing the Qing military's obsolescence, including opium-compromised troops and outdated junks against steam-powered warships. The resulting Treaty of Nanjing, signed on August 29, 1842, compelled the Qing to cede perpetually to Britain, open five coastal (Guangzhou, Xiamen, Fuzhou, Ningbo, and Shanghai) to foreign residence and trade, and grant and most-favored-nation status to Britain, fundamentally eroding imperial sovereignty in coastal regions within years of the war's end. Financially, the imposed an of 21 million silver dollars—equivalent to roughly 15 million taels—payable in installments: 6 million within the first year for destroyed , 3 million for Hong merchant debts, and 12 million for expenses, with 5% annual interest on delays. These payments, commencing in 1842 and extending through the , strained the Qing , which collected only a of nominal land taxes due to (with just one-third to one-fifth reaching ), diverting funds from internal relief and exacerbating fiscal fragility amid ongoing silver outflows from unchecked imports that surged post-war. Militarily, the defeat highlighted chronic underfunding and disrepair, with no immediate reforms undertaken, leaving forces demoralized and vulnerable, as evidenced by the rapid British occupation of key sites without effective resistance. These short-term setbacks accelerated Qing decline by undermining central authority and prestige, fostering domestic unrest through economic disruptions like unemployment in former Canton trade networks and heightened activity near . Daoguang's conservative adherence to traditional governance, despite recognizing as a "great harm" and bureaucratic "traitors," failed to address underlying rot—such as straining resources (from 200 million in 1770 to higher by 1840) and ineffective tax collection—allowing the war's humiliations to compound internal fragmentation, setting the stage for rebellions like the Taiping uprising immediately after his death in 1850.

Achievements in Moral Governance Versus Policy Failures

The Daoguang Emperor exemplified moral governance through personal austerity and , seeking to restore imperial finances depleted by prior reigns. He implemented cost-cutting measures at , such as simplifying rituals and reducing expenditures on luxuries, while urging officials to emulate his modest to curb extravagance and preserve resources. These efforts aligned with Confucian virtues of self-restraint and , positioning him as a ruler intent on modeling integrity amid fiscal strain from and silver outflows. In and moral campaigns, the emperor took decisive stands, notably against the opium trade, which he viewed as a profound ethical and societal threat. He issued edicts banning importation and , labeling officials who accepted bribes from traffickers as "" and imposing severe punishments on users and sellers to uphold moral order. Complementing this, he pursued internal reforms, including adjustments to and charity to enhance relief efficiency during famines, reflecting a commitment to benevolent rule over predecessors' laxity. A concrete demonstration of adaptive moral governance occurred during the 1824–1826 Grand Canal crisis, where flooding disrupted grain transport; the emperor actively coordinated central-provincial efforts, innovatively pivoting to sea routes for supply continuity, thereby averting shortages without rigid adherence to tradition. Despite these moral initiatives, policy execution faltered due to entrenched and inflexible strategies, undermining their impact. The ban, while principled, collapsed under bureaucratic complicity—many officials were addicted, profited from , or evaded enforcement—exacerbating silver drainage without viable alternatives like and taxation, which might have neutralized British smugglers through competition. This rigidity culminated in the 1839 destruction of over 20,000 chests of British at Canton, provoking the (1839–1842); military unpreparedness and underestimation of British naval superiority led to decisive defeats, forcing the Treaty of (1842), which imposed a 21 million silver indemnity, ceded , and opened five ports to foreign trade. Internally, moral exhortations against graft yielded limited results, as systemic patronage and fiscal dependencies perpetuated inefficiencies, highlighting a disconnect between the emperor's virtuous intent and the dynasty's structural decay under mounting external pressures.

Historiographical Debates on Internal Weaknesses Versus External Aggression

Historians have long debated the relative weight of internal weaknesses within the Qing and during the Daoguang Emperor's reign (1820–1850) against external pressures, particularly British commercial and aggression culminating in the (1839–1842). Traditional , influenced by nationalist narratives, often attributes the dynasty's accelerated decline to foreign , portraying the war as an unprovoked act of British greed driven by the opium trade to reverse trade imbalances, with Daoguang's defensive policies representing moral resistance to external predation. However, this view overlooks systemic internal failures, such as rampant that eroded fiscal capacity; by the 1820s, bureaucratic graft had intensified, contributing to treasury deficits amid rising domestic rebellions and silver outflows from unchecked opium imports, which Qing officials tolerated despite repeated bans. Scholars emphasizing internal factors argue that Daoguang's inability to curb the principal-agent problems in the late imperial administration—where local officials prioritized personal gain over imperial directives—undermined state responsiveness to both domestic crises and foreign threats. Economic analyses highlight how expanded strained administrative oversight, fostering that depressed revenues to as low as 3–4% of GDP equivalents by the mid-19th century, leaving the underfunded and technologically stagnant against industrialized navies. Daoguang's personal and attempts at reform, such as edicts against graft in the , proved insufficient against entrenched networks inherited from the Jiaqing era, rendering the Qing vulnerable to exploitation rather than causing decline solely through external aggression. unpreparedness, evidenced by the rapid defeat of outdated junks by British steamships in 1840–1841, stemmed from decades of neglected modernization, not merely British superiority. Revisionist interpretations, such as those in Stephen R. Platt's analysis of the Opium War's prelude, reject monocausal narratives of either pure internal decay or imperialist determinism, positing instead a "blundering" into conflict driven by mutual miscalculations: Daoguang's escalation via Lin Zexu's 1839 opium destruction provoked British retaliation, but this was amplified by Qing trade restrictions that fueled and silver drain, creating a self-reinforcing crisis. Platt contends the war marked not an inevitable clash but the end of a "golden age" of localized Sino-Western commerce, where internal Qing policy indecision—debating legalization versus for years—interacted with British merchants' opportunistic defiance, rather than orchestrated aggression from . These views critique earlier "victim" framings as overlooking agency, noting that Qing rates, estimated at 4–12 million users by 1839, reflected governance failures in enforcement, enabling the crisis. Empirical assessments favor internal weaknesses as the primary causal enablers, with external aggression acting as a catalyst; without corruption-weakened institutions and fiscal rigidity, the Qing might have negotiated trade reforms or bolstered defenses, as partial successes in suppressing White Lotus remnants earlier demonstrated administrative potential under stronger oversight. Recent cautions against overemphasizing Daoguang's personal failings, attributing decline to structural imperial overextension, yet concurs that external threats like British naval incursions exposed, rather than originated, these vulnerabilities, shaping historiographical consensus toward a causal interplay where endogenous rot predetermined diminished resilience.

References

  1. https://www.minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/93260/Zeng_uwm_0263M_13436.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  2. https://visualizingcultures.mit.edu/opium_wars_01/ow1_essay01.html
  3. https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/autocracy_ada-ns.pdf
  4. https://olemiss.edu/courses/inst203/schirokauerclark04.pdf
  5. https://earlham.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/the-qing-and-the-first-opium-war.pdf
  6. https://www.geni.com/people/Daoguang-Emperor-of-Qing-China-%25E6%25B8%2585%25E9%2581%2593%25E5%2585%2589%25E5%25B8%259D/6000000008737149905
  7. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/218857678
  8. http://en.pgm.org.cn/2018-08/21/c_770934.htm
  9. https://theme.npm.edu.tw/EducationofA-ge/en/page-2
  10. http://en.qingxiling.com/?p=534&a=view&r=672
  11. https://totallyhistory.com/qing-dynasty-emperors/
  12. https://social.vcoins.com/twih/death-of-daoguang-emperor-february-26-1850-r471/
  13. https://realrareantiques.com/qing-dynasty-emperors/daoguang-emperor/
  14. https://realrareantiques.com/qing-dynasty-emperors/jiaqing-emperor/
  15. http://www.nouahsark.com/en/infocenter/culture/history/monarchs/daoguang_emperor.php
  16. https://www.lse.ac.uk/asset-library/information/wp173.pdf
  17. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004293311/B9789004293311_006.pdf
  18. https://cissr.uchicago.edu/directory/xiaoyu-gao
  19. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-4053-5_5
  20. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/D453C871DA6187673346EEC9F212B92D/core-reader
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/financial-history-review/article/austerity-in-times-of-war-government-finance-in-early-nineteenthcentury-china/786CA3B86A8A76FE0BFB9FEF28F591A3
  22. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Daoguang
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-economic-history-of-china/economic-transition-in-the-nineteenth-century/8A73E62E2F34C9D7887134C745702A05
  24. https://brill.com/view/journals/tpao/98/1-3/article-p217_7.xml
  25. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004384583/9789004384583_webready_content_text.pdf
  26. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/396982/summary
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394544293_A_Review_of_Research_on_Tao_Shu%27s_Economic_Thought_from_a_Global_Perspective
  28. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/1874/387552/1/institutionaldevelopmentandchangeinthemanagementofthegrandcanal.pdf
  29. http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-econ.html
  30. https://www.academia.edu/103288447/Controlling_from_Afar_The_Daoguang_Emperors_Management_of_the_Grand_Canal_Crisis_1824_1826
  31. https://ceascollections.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/portfolio/1838-edict-of-the-daoguang-emperor/
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02549948.2017.1393979
  33. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/emperor-manchu-daoguang.htm
  34. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=history_honors
  35. http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event-opiumwar.html
  36. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12002
  37. https://visualizingcultures.mit.edu/opium_wars_01/ow1_essay.pdf
  38. https://www.schaab-hanke.de/lehrveranstaltungen/SS2003/texte/ob35.html
  39. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/3d6113d2-1f6f-43a3-ac65-3c91309fb418/download
  40. https://scispace.com/pdf/prelude-to-the-opium-war-british-reactions-to-the-napier-ssqpod0s91.pdf
  41. https://visualizingcultures.mit.edu/rise_fall_canton_01/cw_essay01.html
  42. https://www.manchesterhive.com/view/9781526133434/9781526133434.00011.xml?rskey=UNherR
  43. https://moodle2.units.it/mod/resource/view.php?id=35104
  44. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/meta/2017-v62-n2-meta03191/1041026ar/
  45. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/east-asia-in-the-world/opium-wars-of-18391860/AD17DC6F9A101C669032E9913B24ADCA
  46. https://www.lhistoire.fr/english-version/the-%25E2%2580%2598century-of-humiliation%25E2%2580%2599
  47. https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/the-burning-of-opium-at-humen/AR2zugte
  48. https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/contributors/zexu
  49. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/hong-kong-and-the-opium-wars/
  50. https://asiapacificcurriculum.ca/sites/default/files/2021-11/Opium%2520War%2520-%2520Updated%2520Nov.%25202021.pdf
  51. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/china-1
  52. https://asiapacificcurriculum.ca/learning-module/opium-wars-china
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321726465_The_Daoguang_Response_to_the_Afaqi_khoja_Jahangir_during_the_1826-1828_Jahangir_Uprising
  54. https://brill.com/display/book/9789047415336/B9789047415336_s013.pdf
  55. https://san.beck.org/21-1-QingDecline1799-1875.html
  56. https://www.his.ntnu.edu.tw/publish03/show_paper_detail.php?locale=en&issue_id=30&paper_id=184
  57. https://brill.com/display/book/9789047415336/B9789047415336_s015.pdf
  58. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-chinese-history/article/qing-military-institutions-and-their-effects-on-government-economy-and-society-16401800/E1FDAA965C5B67C12274B2B3408AE206
  59. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1997/april/navy-almost-was
  60. https://www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/drugs-gunboats-and-china-s-score-to-settle-by-minxin-pei-2018-08
  61. https://www.quora.com/Why-did-the-Qing-dynasty-of-China-fail-to-fully-modernize-its-military-even-when-they-traded-for-advanced-weaponry
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00094633.2024.2439729
  63. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/economic-thought-in-modern-china/scarcity-revisited-population-growth-frugality-and-selfstrengthening-18001911/229C091ADBE590F7CB1D2B93B24BA22A
  64. https://faroutliers.com/2022/04/
  65. http://nouahsark.com/en/infocenter/culture/history/monarchs/imperial_noble_consort_zhuangshun.php
  66. https://california.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1525/california/9780520212893.001.0001/upso-9780520212893-chapter-5
  67. http://en.pgm.org.cn/2022-06/15/c_770940.htm
  68. https://www.atuwen.com/en/gushi/192
  69. https://en.zhihu.com/article/617255408
  70. https://gotheborg.com/marks/qingmarks.shtml
  71. https://en.satoe3.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-prince-gong-a-dynastys-twilight-through-three-generations/
  72. https://en.numista.com/catalogue/ruler.php?id=49
  73. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/ps/china/nanjing.pdf
  74. https://worldjpn.net/documents/texts/pw/18420829.T1E.html
  75. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29404/w29404.pdf
  76. https://earlham.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ehj-spring-2020-1.pdf
  77. http://cnsubsites.chinadaily.com.cn/2023wacsen/att/site17/20240222/1708583757228.pdf
  78. https://www.academia.edu/11959985/Officials_and_Money_in_Late_Imperial_China_State_Finances_Private_Expectations_and_the_Problem_of_Corruption_in_a_Changing_Environment
  79. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00094633.2024.2439754
  80. https://pandaist.com/blog/en/chinese-dynasty-how-did-the-prosperous-qing-empire
  81. http://www.ralfmeisenzahl.com/uploads/7/6/8/1/76818505/sng_decline.pdf
  82. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2019/06/06/blundering-into-opium-war/
  83. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/03/world/asia/opium-war-book-china-britain.html
  84. https://ces.fas.harvard.edu/uploads/files/Working-Papers-Archives/CES_WP136.pdf
  85. http://conference.nber.org/confer/2011/CE11/Sng.pdf
  86. https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526133434/9781526133434.00012.xml
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.