Hubbry Logo
DictionDictionMain
Open search
Diction
Community hub
Diction
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Diction
Diction
Diction
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Diction (Latin: dictionem (nom. dictio), "a saying, expression, word"),[1] in its original meaning, is a writer's or speaker's distinctive vocabulary choices and style of expression in a piece of writing such as a poem or story.[2][3] In its common meaning, it is the distinctiveness of speech:[3][4][5] the art of speaking so that each word is clearly heard and understood to its fullest complexity and extremity, and concerns pronunciation and tone, rather than word choice and style. This is more precisely and commonly expressed with the term enunciation or with its synonym, articulation.[6]

Diction has multiple concerns, of which register, the adaptation of style and formality to the social context, is foremost. Literary diction analysis reveals how a passage establishes tone and characterization, e.g. a preponderance of verbs relating physical movement suggests an active character, while a preponderance of verbs relating states of mind portrays an introspective character. Diction also has an impact upon word choice and syntax.

Aristotle, in The Poetics (20), defines the parts of diction (λέξις)[7] as the letter, the syllable, the conjunction, the article, the noun, the verb, the case, and the speech (λόγος),[8] though one commentator remarks that "the text is so confused and some of the words have such a variety of meanings that one cannot always be certain what the Greek says, much less what Aristotle means."[9]

In literature

[edit]

Diction is usually judged in reference to the prevailing standards of proper writing and speech and is seen as the mark of quality of the writing. It is also understood as the selection of certain words or phrases that become peculiar to a writer or character.[10]

Example:

Certain writers in the modern day and age use archaic terms such as "thy", "thee", and "wherefore" to imbue a Shakespearean mood to their work.

Forms of diction include: archaic diction (diction that is antique, that is rarely used), high diction (lofty sounding language), and low diction (everyday language). Each of these forms is meant to enhance the meaning or artistry of an author's work.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Diction

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Diction is the deliberate selection and arrangement of words in speech or writing, particularly in literary, rhetorical, or communicative contexts, where it influences the tone, mood, clarity, and overall effectiveness of expression. This choice of reflects the speaker's or writer's attitude, background, and intended audience, shaping how ideas are conveyed and perceived. In literature, diction serves as a tool for revealing character identities, worldviews, and subtle ironies through variations in formality and . Key elements of diction include denotation, the literal dictionary meaning of words, and connotation, the associated emotional or cultural implications that add nuance and depth. Effective diction enhances and engagement by aligning word choices with the text's purpose, avoiding overly complex or simplistic that could obscure meaning. Diction is often categorized into three levels: high diction, which employs formal and elevated suitable for academic or ceremonial contexts; middle diction, a neutral style common in essays and ; and low diction, featuring informal, colloquial, or terms for casual or relatable communication. Beyond written forms, diction encompasses the clarity of and enunciation in oral , such as in theater, , or , ensuring words are articulated distinctly for audience comprehension. In these settings, precise diction prevents misinterpretation and amplifies expressive impact, distinguishing it from broader stylistic elements like or . Overall, strong diction contributes to the authenticity and persuasiveness of communication across genres and media.

Etymology and Definition

Etymology

The term diction derives from the Latin dictiō (nominative dictio), denoting "a saying," "expression," or "word," which is the noun of action from the past-participle stem of dicere, meaning "to say," "to speak," or "to pronounce." This Latin traces back further to the Proto-Indo-European deyḱ-, signifying "to show" or "to point out." The word entered English via diccion (also spelled diction), which carried meanings of "speech," "expression," or "word," and first appeared in around 1416 as diccion, initially referring to a single word or . The earliest recorded use occurs in a grammatical text: "Of efter a dicion synfyyt fulnesse or foydnesse schal cerue to genityf case." This is evidenced in 15th-century English writings, particularly religious and legal texts, where it denoted verbal elements like sayings or locutions. From the 16th to 18th centuries, diction evolved beyond isolated words to signify the overall style or manner of verbal expression in and , setting it apart from alone. For instance, by 1563, it was used to describe "phrase and dictioun" in written works, emphasizing artistic choice over mechanical delivery. A significant development in the saw diction applied in to refer specifically to the vocabulary of , highlighting selections that convey tone, register, or elevation. This usage gained prominence through William Wordsworth's Preface to (1800), which advocated for a natural diction drawn from everyday to replace the ornate conventions of prior poetic traditions.

Core Concepts

Diction, in its primary sense, refers to the deliberate selection and arrangement of words in writing or speech to effectively convey meaning, tone, or stylistic intent. This linguistic choice shapes how ideas are expressed, influencing clarity, , and emotional impact in communication. In a secondary sense, especially within and performance contexts, diction pertains to the clarity and manner of vocal enunciation or of words. This aspect emphasizes the articulation required for intelligibility, particularly in fields like , , or , where precise delivery enhances comprehension and expressiveness. Key components of diction include the level of , which can vary from simple and everyday terms to sophisticated or specialized ones, thereby affecting the text's and depth. While —the structural arrangement of words—influences how these choices are organized, diction focuses primarily on the lexical selections themselves. Additionally, contextual adaptation ensures that word choices align with the , purpose, and cultural setting, optimizing and effectiveness. Diction is distinct from related concepts such as , which governs sentence and grammatical order, and tone, which captures the emotional or attitude implied by the expression. The term derives from the Latin dictio, meaning "a saying" or "word," underscoring its in verbal expression.

Types of Diction

Formal and Informal Diction

Formal diction refers to the use of sophisticated, precise that adheres to standard grammatical rules, avoiding contractions, , or colloquial expressions to convey and clarity. This style is commonly employed in , legal documents, and formal speeches, where elevated language such as "commence" instead of "begin" or "inquire" instead of "ask" enhances the perceived authority and objectivity of the text. For instance, in a scholarly article, a sentence might read: "The investigation revealed that the was substantiated," rather than a more casual phrasing. In contrast, informal diction employs casual, conversational language, incorporating contractions like "don't," idioms, and everyday words to create a relaxed and relatable tone. It is suitable for personal letters, posts, or informal dialogues, such as using "gonna" instead of "going to" or "hang out" instead of "socialize." An example appears in everyday : "Hey, let's grab coffee later—I'm free around 3," which fosters immediacy and warmth but may not suit professional contexts. The choice between formal and informal diction is primarily influenced by the , purpose, and of communication; for example, a persuasive aimed at experts requires formal diction to elevate , while a targeting general readers benefits from informal diction to build relatability. Formal diction advantages include establishing and precision, though it can appear distant or overly rigid, potentially alienating readers seeking approachability. Conversely, informal diction promotes connection and , making complex ideas accessible, but it risks or undermining perceived expertise in serious settings.

Specialized Types

Specialized types of diction encompass niche variants that deviate from standard formal or informal usage, often serving specific rhetorical, cultural, or professional purposes in and communication. These forms include pedantic, and colloquial, abstract versus concrete, and , each tailored to evoke precision, authenticity, or exclusion within particular contexts. Pedantic diction employs overly scholarly, academic, or bookish to demonstrate erudition, frequently using obscure or archaic terms that prioritize precision over . This style is characterized by an excessive focus on detail and technicalities, often rendering the text pretentious or tedious for general readers. For instance, substituting "pulchritude" for "" exemplifies pedantic diction, as it draws on rare to impress rather than clarify. In literature, such as Shakespeare's , pedantic elements appear in the speech of characters like to satirize overly learned figures. Critics often view pedantic diction as counterproductive, as it can alienate audiences and obscure meaning despite its intent to showcase intellectual depth. Slang and colloquial diction represent informal, group-specific that infuses writing with cultural immediacy and regional flavor, evolving quickly within subcultures or communities. consists of trendy, non-standard terms restricted to particular social groups, such as "lit" to describe something exciting or "dope" for something excellent, which can date rapidly as trends shift. Colloquial diction, a broader category, incorporates everyday conversational phrases tied to or , like "y'all" in Southern U.S. speech or Britishisms such as "posh" in Mary Casey's The Class Game. These forms build relatability and authenticity in , as seen in Simon Armitage's I’ve Made Out a Will; I’m Leaving Myself, where casual references to the ground the poem in British . While rooted in informal diction, and colloquial variants heighten specificity but risk incomprehensibility outside their originating contexts. Abstract diction contrasts with concrete diction by employing words that denote intangible ideas, emotions, or qualities rather than sensory specifics, fostering conceptual depth but potentially reducing vividness. Terms like "," "," or "" exemplify abstract diction, as they evoke broad, subjective interpretations without physical referents, allowing for philosophical exploration in writing. In contrast, concrete diction utilizes precise, tangible descriptors that appeal to the senses, such as "rusted chain" to symbolize or "red apple" to depict a , enhancing clarity and immersion for readers. This is crucial in literary craft; for example, converting abstract notions like "passion" into concrete images—fiery glances or racing hearts—strengthens descriptive power and reader engagement. Effective writers balance both to avoid vagueness in abstract usage or overly literal in concrete applications. Jargon refers to specialized inherent to a profession, field, or activity, designed for and accuracy among insiders while often excluding outsiders through its opacity. In , for instance, "bandwidth" denotes data transmission capacity rather than physical width, streamlining communication for experts. Literary uses of jargon can underscore character expertise or critique institutional barriers, as in Charles Dickens's , where bureaucratic jargon in the Circumlocution Department satirizes governmental inefficiency, or Harper Lee's , where young Jem deploys legal terms like "corroborating evidence" to mimic adult authority. While jargon enhances precision in technical contexts, its overuse in general writing can hinder accessibility and foster .

Diction in Literature and Rhetoric

In Literature

In literature, diction plays a pivotal role in establishing the narrative voice and tone, allowing authors to convey the speaker's attitude and personality through deliberate word choice. Simple diction, characterized by straightforward and accessible vocabulary, enhances readability and immediacy in modern novels, fostering an intimate or democratic tone that draws readers into the story without barriers. For instance, Ernest Hemingway's use of concise, everyday words in works like The Old Man and the Sea creates a sparse, resilient voice that mirrors the protagonist's unyielding struggle against nature. In contrast, ornate diction, with its elaborate and elevated vocabulary, suits by evoking a sense of grandeur or antiquity, as seen in Dickens's intricate phrasing in , which establishes a formal, reflective tone attuned to Victorian social complexities. Diction further contributes to character development by employing or to reflect , regional background, or personal traits, thereby adding authenticity and depth to portrayals. In Mark Twain's , Huck's informal, unpolished diction—marked by grammatical irregularities and colloquialisms like "" and "reckon"—underscores his low social standing and lack of formal , distinguishing him from more refined characters and highlighting his independent, skeptical worldview shaped by a rough upbringing. This linguistic choice not only humanizes Huck but also critiques societal norms, as his evolving speech patterns reveal his growth and toward Jim, the enslaved character whose own signifies cultural and racial marginalization. Such techniques ground characters in their environments, making their voices resonate with historical and . Thematic impact arises from diction's ability to evoke mood through targeted word selection, particularly sensory diction that engages readers' perceptions to deepen emotional . Sensory diction, incorporating vivid appeals to sight, sound, touch, taste, or smell, intensifies themes of isolation or turmoil; for example, in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's The Yellow Wallpaper, phrases like "smouldering, unclean yellow" and "sickly sulphur tint" use visual and olfactory cues to amplify the theme of psychological oppression, immersing readers in the protagonist's descending madness and heightening the mood of claustrophobic dread. Similarly, tactile elements in Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre, such as "rain still beating" and "cold as a stone," reinforce themes of emotional hardship, evoking a chilling isolation that mirrors Jane's internal conflicts and fosters reader . By layering connotations—implied emotional or symbolic meanings—over denotations, authors like these use diction to subtly advance motifs of confinement and resilience without overt exposition. Literary critics analyze diction through techniques that evaluate its clarity, , and cultural to uncover how word choices enhance narrative intent. Clarity is assessed by examining whether diction employs precise, concrete terms—such as "thuds" instead of "shuts"—to avoid and ensure the text's , preventing misinterpretation of key events or emotions. analysis involves dissecting the emotional undertones of words, identifying patterns like recurring motifs of decay (e.g., "thirsting for " over "want ") to reveal an author's attitude toward themes or characters. Cultural is probed by considering how colloquial or elements anchor the narrative in a specific or , as in dialectal variations that reflect class divides or regional identities, thereby enriching interpretations of . These methods, applied systematically, illuminate diction's subtle power in shaping interpretive layers within and .

In Rhetoric

In rhetoric, diction plays a pivotal role in persuasive communication by enabling speakers to select words that align with the goals of , , and , thereby influencing audience perception and response. , in his (Book III), identifies lexis—translated as style or diction—as a core element of oratory, emphasizing that effective word choice must be clear, appropriate, and vivid to convey arguments persuasively without obscurity or excess ornamentation. This tradition underscores diction's function in adapting language to the , ensuring that verbal expression supports the overall aim of , forensic, or discourse. A key aspect of rhetorical diction involves balancing —the literal dictionary meaning of words—with , the implied emotional, cultural, or associative layers that evoke specific responses. Rhetoricians advise choosing words whose connotations amplify , such as selecting terms that stir inspiration or urgency to heighten audience engagement. For example, in persuasive contexts, "freedom" often carries a broader, more emotionally charged connotation of liberation and aspiration compared to "liberty," which may evoke a narrower legal or formal sense; this distinction allows orators to tailor language for greater inspirational impact. Adapting diction to the is essential for rhetorical success, with speakers employing elevated or formal language in structured debates to convey , while opting for relatable, rhythmic phrasing in public addresses to foster connection. Martin Luther King Jr. exemplified this in his 1963 "" speech, where he used metaphorical and anaphoric diction—repeating phrases like "" with vivid of and equality—to resonate with a diverse civil rights , blending biblical allusions and everyday vernacular for emotional and unity. Such choices transform abstract arguments into accessible, motivating narratives, enhancing the speech's persuasive power. In modern applications, diction continues to shape in political and , where subtle word selection influences attitudes without overt . Politicians leverage connotative diction to frame issues favorably, such as using "opportunity" over "entitlement" to evoke positive associations in debates. Similarly, advertisers employ precise diction to to desires, choosing words like "empower" in product slogans to imply transformation and status , thereby driving subtle behavioral influence. These practices highlight diction's enduring role in ethical , provided it avoids manipulative extremes.

Diction in Poetry

Characteristics

Poetic diction often employs elevated vocabulary to heighten the aesthetic and emotional impact of verse, drawing on archaic, Latinate, or rare words that evoke grandeur and timelessness. For instance, classical poets like and incorporated terms such as (sword) or letum (death), which were displaced from everyday prose to lend majesty to the language, as noted in analyses of Latin poetic registers. This selection of uncommon lexicon creates a sense of elevation, distinguishing poetic expression from prosaic simplicity and amplifying the work's thematic depth. However, critiqued such "" in his Preface to (1800) as artificial and contrived, arguing that it imposed "arbitrary and capricious habits of expression" that distanced from genuine human experience and emotion. A core characteristic of poetic diction is its integration with sound and rhythm, where word choice facilitates devices like , , and to produce musicality and reinforce meaning. Alliteration, the repetition of initial sounds, such as in Catullus's odi et amo ("I hate and I love"), binds phrases cohesively and underscores emotional intensity. Assonance, involving echoed vowel sounds, enhances rhythmic flow, as seen in Lucretius's maternurn nomen adepta, where it mirrors thematic harmony. Onomatopoeia, though less frequent, imitates sensory experiences, exemplified by Virgil's quadrupedante putrem sonitu quatit ungula campum ("with four-hoofed thunder the hoof shakes the crumbling plain"), evoking the thunderous gallop through phonetic mimicry. These sonic elements, tied directly to diction, elevate the auditory texture of poetry beyond mere . Precise diction in further amplifies figurative elements, such as metaphors and symbols, to evoke vivid and layered interpretations. Metaphors rely on carefully selected words to forge direct equivalences, like Horace's depiction of the as vomiting into the salty sea (Tiberis flumen... uomit in mare salsum), transforming natural description into symbolic commentary on and dissolution. Symbols, enhanced by evocative , convey abstract universals through concrete terms, enabling readers to access deeper emotional resonances. This precision in word choice ensures that figurative language not only adorns but intensifies the poem's . Ultimately, these characteristics serve to differentiate from , fostering emotional depth and universality by inviting readers into a heightened, imaginative . Elevated and sonic features, combined with figurative precision, allow to transcend literal communication, evoking shared human sentiments while preserving individual nuance, as Wordsworth emphasized in advocating for that aligns with "the real of men" to achieve authentic passion. This purposeful stylization underscores 's role in exploring profound truths inaccessible to everyday .

Historical Development

The historical development of poetic diction reflects evolving cultural and aesthetic priorities, beginning with the formulaic grandeur of classical epics and progressing toward more naturalistic and inclusive expressions in later eras. In the classical period, poetic diction in emphasized elevated, formulaic language to evoke grandeur and facilitate oral performance. Homer's and employed stock epithets, repeated phrases, and rhythmic patterns, such as "swift-footed Achilles" or "wine-dark sea," which served both mnemonic and stylistic purposes in an . This approach created a sense of timeless heroism and divine scale, influencing subsequent . Similarly, Virgil's adopted and adapted Homeric formulas in Latin, using and archaic diction to blend grandeur with Roman imperial themes, as seen in epithets like "" to underscore epic destiny. The Romantic era marked a significant against the neoclassical adherence to ornate, artificial diction inherited from classical and Augustan models, favoring instead the natural of everyday . Samuel Taylor Coleridge, in his (1817), critiqued the "gaudiness and inane phraseology" of prior poetic conventions while engaging with William Wordsworth's advocacy for "the real of men," particularly from rustic sources, to achieve authenticity in . This shift prioritized spontaneity and individual voice over formulaic elevation, as exemplified in Wordsworth's (1798), which sought to strip away "" in favor of plain, sincere expression to connect profoundly with readers. In the 20th-century modernist period, poetic diction fragmented further, incorporating colloquialisms, multilingual elements, and a deliberate mix of high and low registers to mirror societal dislocation. T.S. Eliot's (1922) exemplifies this through its abrupt shifts from literary allusions to slang and fragmented dialogue, such as the pub scene's vernacular ("Well now that's done: and I'm glad it's over"), juxtaposed against mythic grandeur, to convey the alienation of post-World War I Europe. This innovative diction broke from Romantic naturalism, embracing discontinuity to reflect modern fragmentation. Contemporary poetic diction continues this evolution by embracing inclusivity and , drawing on diverse linguistic heritages to address identity and migration. Ocean Vuong's work, such as in Night Sky with Exit Wounds (2016), integrates Vietnamese influences, bilingual echoes, and intimate, hybrid phrasing to explore and immigrant experiences, fostering a diction that challenges monolingual norms and promotes cultural . This trend underscores poetry's role in amplifying marginalized voices amid .

Diction in Performing Arts

In Music

In music, diction refers to the precise enunciation and articulation of sung , aiming to convey text intelligibly while integrating seamlessly with the melodic line and vocal tone. This process, often termed lyric diction, balances the natural rhythms of speech with the sustained, resonant demands of , requiring singers to adapt for optimal audibility and expressiveness. Key techniques for achieving effective diction include vowel shaping to sustain pure tones over longer durations—typically around 0.8 seconds in compared to 0.3 seconds in speech—along with clear articulation executed rapidly, often in under 0.1 seconds, to avoid interrupting . Breath control plays a crucial role in maintaining phrasing, as singers must energize consonants without halting the breath stream, while modifying elements like diphthongs in higher registers to prevent vocal strain and ensure smooth transitions. For instance, in English diction, diphthongs such as [aɪ] in words like "while" are often simplified to prioritize purity on ascending pitches. The importance of diction lies in its ability to enhance emotional delivery and facilitate audience comprehension of the lyrics' meaning, thereby strengthening the overall communicative impact of the performance. In and classical genres, precise diction—often using the International Phonetic Alphabet for languages like Italian, German, and French—is vital for narrative clarity and dramatic authenticity, as mandated in vocal standards since the mid-20th century. In contrast, genres prioritize diction for relatable lyric interpretation, though with less emphasis on multilingual precision and more on natural, conversational flow to connect with listeners. Challenges in musical diction arise from the inherent tension between achieving crystalline articulation and preserving unstrained vocal technique, particularly when over-emphasizing risks introducing rigidity or disrupting tone quality on demanding high notes. Pedagogical approaches address this by prioritizing dominance for beauty while strategically "fudging" less critical , though variations in language-specific rules and singer continue to demand individualized training.

In Theater

In theater, diction plays a crucial role in performance by ensuring the clarity and expressiveness of spoken lines, allowing actors to convey character emotions, intentions, and the plot effectively to the . Precise enunciation, particularly of consonants, is essential for projection in large venues, where subtle vocal nuances can otherwise be lost, enabling the to grasp the dramatic arc without distraction. For instance, actors must articulate each to maintain rhythmic flow in verse, as emphasized in Konstantin Stanislavski's teachings, where diction serves as the foundation for truthful emotional delivery. Training methods for diction in acting focus on exercises that enhance articulation and vocal clarity without causing strain. Tongue twisters, such as "She sells seashells by the seashore," are commonly used to improve precision and speed, helping actors overcome mumbling or slurring. drills, involving sustained sounds like /ɑ/, /ɛ/, and /ɪ/ to explore , build control over pitch and , while exercises—such as or "ng" sounds—promote efficient voice placement in the chest, mask, or head to project clearly over distances. These techniques, drawn from Kristin Linklater's vocal pedagogy, prioritize natural voice freeing through body awareness, ensuring diction supports rather than hinders expressive range. Actors adapt diction to specific characters by incorporating dialects or accents that define social background, era, or personality, enhancing authenticity in roles. In Shakespearean verse plays, for example, performers employ elevated diction with iambic rhythms and archaic pronunciations—such as elongating vowels in "thou" or crisply enunciating plosives—to evoke Elizabethan formality and heighten poetic intensity. This adaptation requires rigorous phonetic study to avoid caricature, as outlined in dialect coaching manuals that stress cultural sensitivity and consistency to immerse audiences in the character's world. The impact of diction on is profound: poor diction can lead to miscommunication of key plot points or emotional beats, fracturing audience immersion and weakening the overall coherence. Conversely, masterful diction amplifies dramatic tension, as clear articulation allows subtle shifts in tone to conflict or , elevating the production's emotional depth. Stanislavski warned that faulty speech equates to a physical flaw, impeding the actor's ability to fully inhabit the role and connect with viewers.

References

  1. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/writing_style/diction/diction_introduction.html
  2. https://liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/wlf/what-diction-literature-definition-examples
  3. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/writing_style/diction/levels_of_diction.html
  4. https://tedb.byu.edu/page-id-4652
  5. https://www.wheaton.edu/academics/services/writing-center/writing-resources/style-diction-tone-and-voice/
  6. https://www.farmingdale.edu/writing-center/pdfs/diction.pdf
  7. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/diction_n
  8. https://www.etymonline.com/word/diction
  9. https://anthologydev.lib.virginia.edu/work/Wordsworth/wordsworth-preface
  10. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/diction
  11. https://literarydevices.net/diction/
  12. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/literary-devices/diction-in-writing/
  13. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/diction
  14. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-lit/diction-and-syntax
  15. https://pressbooks.pub/readingandwriting/chapter/grammar-syntax/
  16. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/what-is-diction-learn-8-different-types-of-diction-in-writing-with-examples
  17. https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/examples-formal-informal-diction
  18. https://quillbot.com/blog/rhetoric/diction/
  19. https://www.touro.edu/departments/writing-center/tutorials/formal-vs-informal-language/
  20. https://ai.stanford.edu/~csewell/culture/litterms.htm
  21. https://literarydevices.net/jargon/
  22. https://poemanalysis.com/diction/colloquial-diction/
  23. https://human.libretexts.org/Courses/Evergreen_Valley_College/Integrated_Reading_and_Writing/04%253A_Finding_the_Right_Words_to_Write/4.02%253A_Abstract_and_Concrete_Diction
  24. https://www.supersummary.com/jargon/
  25. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/huckfinn/character/huckleberry-huck-finn/
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354781588_Dialect_Characters_Analysis_In_Twain%27s_Huckleberry_Finn
  27. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/sensory-imagery-in-creative-writing
  28. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_literature/literary_terms/index.html
  29. https://il49000007.schoolwires.net/cms/lib/IL49000007/Centricity/Domain/303/319-Summer-Reading-Rhetorical-Analysis-Packet.pdf
  30. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/
  31. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/
  32. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=emergingwriters
  33. https://thedecisionlab.com/insights/society/political-persuasion-rethinking-the-rhetoric
  34. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/3898/93p021.pdf
  35. https://viscomi.sites.oasis.unc.edu/viscomi/coursepack/wordsworth/Wordsworth-1800_LB_Preface.pdf
  36. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstreams/481107cc-1135-4a19-b97e-4b3335b78587/download
  37. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Homer-Greek-poet/Poetic-techniques
  38. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-virgil/virgils-style/70D443DEC0B25616DC6C24472A54A619
  39. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/6081/6081-h/6081-h.htm
  40. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0950236X.2022.2041714
  41. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/ww72bj363
  42. http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~jones/Shirlee/diction.pdf
  43. https://nats.org/_Library/JOS_On_Point/JOS-081-4-2025-419.pdf
  44. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500330/m2/1/high_res_d/1002778891-Barber.pdf
  45. https://www.actorhub.co.uk/1185/stanislavski-and-torstov-on-diction-for-actors
  46. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/11-articulation-exercises-for-actors
  47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23268263.2021.1892960
  48. https://www.backstage.com/magazine/article/conquer-shakespeare-4378/
  49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23268263.2020.1760492
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.