Hubbry Logo
DisproportionationDisproportionationMain
Open search
Disproportionation
Community hub
Disproportionation
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Disproportionation
Disproportionation
Disproportionation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In chemistry, disproportionation, sometimes called dismutation (the French word), is a redox reaction in which one compound of intermediate oxidation state converts to two compounds, one of higher and one of lower oxidation state.[1][2] The reverse of disproportionation, such as when a compound in an intermediate oxidation state is formed from precursors of lower and higher oxidation states, is called comproportionation, also known as symproportionation.

More generally, the term can be applied to any desymmetrizing reaction where two molecules of one type react to give one each of two different types:[3]

2 A → A' + A"

This expanded definition is not limited to redox reactions, but also includes some molecular autoionization reactions, such as the self-ionization of water. In contrast, some authors use the term redistribution to refer to reactions of this type (in either direction) when only ligand exchange but no redox is involved and distinguish such processes from disproportionation and comproportionation.
For example, the Schlenk equilibrium

2 RMgX → R2Mg + MgX2

is an example of a redistribution reaction.

History

[edit]

The first disproportionation reaction to be studied in detail was:

2 Sn2+ → Sn4+ + Sn

This was examined using tartrates by Johan Gadolin in 1788. In the Swedish version of his paper he called it söndring.[4][5]

Examples

[edit]
Hg2Cl2 → HgCl2 + Hg
4 H3PO3 → 3 H3PO4 + PH3
  • Desymmetrizing reactions are sometimes referred to as disproportionation, as illustrated by the thermal degradation of bicarbonate:
2 HCO−3 → CO2−3 + H2CO3
The oxidation numbers remain constant in this acid-base reaction.
  • Disproportionation of sulfur intermediates by microorganisms is widely observed in sediments.[6][7][8][9]
4 S0 + 4 H2O → 3 H2S + SO2−4 + 2 H+
3 S0 + 2 FeOOH → SO2−4 + 2 FeS + 2 H+
4 SO2−3 + 2 H+ → H2S + SO2−4
3 Cl2 + 6 OH− → 5 Cl− + ClO−3 + 3 H2O
The chlorine reactant is in oxidation state 0. In the products, the chlorine in the Cl− ion has an oxidation number of −1, having been reduced, whereas the oxidation number of the chlorine in the ClO−3 ion is +5, indicating that it has been oxidized.
3 BrF → BrF3 + Br2
2 O−2 + 2 H+ → H2O2 + O2
The oxidation state of oxygen is −1⁄2 in the superoxide free radical anion, −1 in hydrogen peroxide and 0 in dioxygen.
2 H2O2 → 2 H2O + O2
2 CO → C + CO2
2 NO2 + H2O → HNO3 + HNO2
Under acidic conditions, hydrazoic acid disproportionates as:
3 HN3 + H+ → 4 N2 + NH+4
Under neutral, or basic, conditions, the azide anion disproportionates as:
3 N−3 + 3 H2O → 4 N2 + NH3 + 3 OH−
2 S2O2−4 + H2O → S2O2−3 + 2 HSO−3
3 Na2S2O4 + 6 NaOH → 5 Na2SO3 + Na2S + 3 H2O
2 MnO2 + 3 SO2 → MnS2O6 + MnSO4

Polymer chemistry

[edit]

In free-radical chain-growth polymerization, chain termination can occur by a disproportionation step in which a hydrogen atom is transferred from one growing chain molecule to another one, which produces two dead (non-growing) chains.[15]

Chain—CH2–CHX• + Chain—CH2–CHX• → Chain—CH=CHX + Chain—CH2–CH2X

in which, Chain— represents the already formed polymer chain, and • indicates a reactive free radical.

Biochemistry

[edit]

In 1937, Hans Adolf Krebs, who discovered the citric acid cycle bearing his name, confirmed the anaerobic dismutation of pyruvic acid into lactic acid, acetic acid, and CO2, by certain bacteria according to the global reaction:[16][clarification needed]

2 CH3COCOOH + H2O → CH3CH(OH)COOH + CH3COOH + CO2

The dismutation of pyruvic acid into other small organic molecules (ethanol + CO2, or lactate and acetate, depending on the environmental conditions) is also a key step in fermentation reactions. Fermentation reactions can also be considered as disproportionation or dismutation biochemical reactions. Indeed, the donor and acceptor of electrons in the redox reactions supplying the chemical energy in these complex biochemical systems are the same organic molecules simultaneously acting as reductant or oxidant.[original research?]

Another example of biochemical dismutation reaction is the disproportionation of acetaldehyde into ethanol and acetic acid.[17]

In cellular respiration, electrons are transferred from substrate (electron donor) to an electron acceptor; in fermentation, part of the substrate molecule itself accepts the electrons. Fermentation is therefore a type of disproportionation, and does not involve an overall change in oxidation state of the substrate. Most of the fermentative substrates are organic molecules.[original research?]

Another example involves the disproportionation of inorganic sulfur compounds in certain sulfate-reducing bacteria.[18][how?]

Disproportionation of sulfur intermediates

[edit]

Sulfur isotopes of sediments are often measured for studying environments in the Earth's past (paleoenvironment). Disproportionation of sulfur intermediates, being one of the processes affecting sulfur isotopes of sediments, has drawn attention from geoscientists for studying the redox conditions in the oceans in the past.

Sulfate-reducing bacteria fractionate sulfur isotopes as they take in sulfate and produce sulfide. Prior to 2010s, it was thought that sulfate reduction could fractionate sulfur isotopes up to 46 ‰[19] and fractionation larger than 46 ‰ recorded in sediments must be due to disproportionation of sulfur intermediates in the sediment. This view has changed since the 2010s.[20] As substrates for disproportionation are limited by the product of sulfate reduction, the isotopic effect of disproportionation should be less than 16 ‰ in most sedimentary settings.[9]

Disproportionation can be carried out by microorganisms obligated to disproportionation or microorganisms that can carry out sulfate reduction as well. Common substrates for disproportionation include elemental sulfur (S8), thiosulfate (S2O2−3) and sulfite (SO2−3).[9]

Claus reaction: a comproportionation reaction

[edit]
Main article: Claus process

The Claus reaction is an example of comproportionation reaction (the inverse of disproportionation) involving hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) to produce elemental sulfur and water as follows:

2 H2S + SO2 → 3 S + 2 H2O

The Claus reaction is one of the chemical reactions involved in the Claus process used for the desulfurization of gases in the oil refinery plants and leading to the formation of solid elemental sulfur (S8), which is easier to store, transport, reuse when possible, and dispose of.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Disproportionation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Disproportionation is a reaction in which a single undergoes simultaneous oxidation and reduction, producing two products with the element in higher and lower s, respectively, compared to the reactant. This process, also known as dismutation, typically involves an element in an intermediate that is unstable under certain conditions, such as in or in the presence of catalysts. In , disproportionation is common for and transition metals. For example, gas dissolves in water to form and , where chlorine atoms are reduced from 0 to -1 and oxidized to +1: Cl₂ + H₂O → HCl + HOCl. similarly disproportionates to oxygen and : 2 H₂O₂ → O₂ + 2 H₂O, a reaction that is exothermic and catalyzed by metals or enzymes, with applications in disinfection and . (I) ions in also disproportionate to copper metal and copper(II) ions: 2 Cu⁺ → Cu + Cu²⁺, illustrating instability in certain coordination environments. In , disproportionation occurs in the , a base-promoted transformation of aldehydes lacking alpha hydrogens, such as , into the corresponding alcohol and : 2 PhCHO + OH⁻ → PhCH₂OH + PhCOO⁻. This hydride transfer mechanism is significant in synthetic for converting non-enolizable aldehydes. Biologically, disproportionation plays a key role in enzymatic processes, such as the superoxide dismutase-catalyzed conversion of radicals to and oxygen: 2 O₂⁻ + 2 H⁺ → H₂O₂ + O₂, which protects cells from oxidative damage. Overall, disproportionation reactions are fundamental in redox chemistry, influencing industrial processes, environmental cycles, and metabolic pathways.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

Disproportionation is a specific type of reaction, but to understand it requires familiarity with the foundational concepts of s and processes. The of an atom is defined as the charge it would have if all bonds were ionic, with electrons assigned to the more electronegative atom in heteronuclear bonds and shared equally in homonuclear bonds. reactions involve the transfer of electrons between species, where oxidation corresponds to an increase in (loss of electrons) and reduction to a decrease (gain of electrons), occurring simultaneously in the same system. In disproportionation, a single undergoes simultaneous oxidation and reduction, yielding two distinct products: one with a higher and one with a lower than the reactant. This process requires the reactant to exist in an intermediate , positioned between those of the resulting , enabling the intramolecular ; it occurs when this intermediate state is thermodynamically unstable relative to the products. A general representation of the reaction is 2A→Aox+Ared,2A \rightarrow A^{\text{ox}} + A^{\text{red}}, where AoxA^{\text{ox}} has a higher and AredA^{\text{red}} a lower one compared to the original AA, though coefficients may vary to balance the equation based on the changes. For instance, in the case of (I) ions, 2\ceCu+→\ceCu2++\ceCu,2\ce{Cu+} \rightarrow \ce{Cu^2+} + \ce{Cu}, illustrating the conversion of +1 to +2 and 0. Key characteristics of disproportionation include its potential autocatalytic nature in certain systems, where the oxidized or reduced products accelerate the , as observed in processes like carbon monoxide disproportionation on iron catalysts. Unlike typical reactions involving separate oxidizing and reducing agents, disproportionation features a single reactant species driving both half-reactions. The reverse process, known as , involves two species of differing oxidation states combining to form a product at an intermediate state.

Comparison with Other Redox Processes

Disproportionation differs from conventional reactions in that it involves a single acting simultaneously as both the oxidant and reductant, leading to products with differing s derived from the original species. In contrast, typical reactions require two separate species, where one undergoes oxidation (increase in ) and the other reduction (decrease in ), facilitating between distinct entities. This intramolecular nature of disproportionation highlights its unique self- character within the broader class of processes. Comproportionation serves as the inverse of disproportionation, wherein two species exhibiting different oxidation states of the same element react to yield a single product with an intermediate oxidation state. Unlike disproportionation, which splits one species into two, comproportionation merges two into one, often stabilizing unstable oxidation states through this reductive combination. Both processes are reversible redox equilibria, but their directionality depends on the relative stabilities of the involved oxidation states. Autooxidation represents another related pathway, characterized by the spontaneous oxidation of a substrate by molecular oxygen under mild conditions, typically via radical mechanisms without the dual oxidation-reduction role seen in disproportionation. In autooxidation, the substrate is solely oxidized, with oxygen serving as the ultimate , distinguishing it from the balanced electron exchange intrinsic to disproportionation. Electron transfer in many general reactions may proceed via outer-sphere pathways relying on electrostatic interactions without bond formation or exchange. While outer-sphere transfers can occur in disproportionation under certain conditions, the proximity enforced by the single-species nature often favors mechanisms facilitated by coordination in applicable systems.
Reaction TypeSpecies InvolvedOxidation State ChangesExample
DisproportionationOne speciesPortion oxidized (higher state), portion reduced (lower state)2 Cu⁺ → Cu²⁺ + Cu
ComproportionationTwo species (different states)Both combine to intermediate stateFe³⁺ + H₃AsO₃ → Fe²⁺ + H₃AsO₄ (simplified)
AutooxidationOne species + O₂Substrate oxidized; O₂ reduced to peroxideCumene to
General RedoxTwo distinct speciesOne oxidized, one reducedZn + Cu²⁺ → Zn²⁺ + Cu

Historical Development

Early Observations

The initial observations of processes now recognized as disproportionation emerged in the late through empirical studies of reactive substances. In 1788, Johan Gadolin studied the disproportionation of tin(II) ions in solutions: 2 Sn²⁺ → Sn + Sn⁴⁺, providing one of the earliest detailed examinations of such a reaction. During the , chemists observed the decomposition of hypochlorites into and ions (3 ClO⁻ → 2 Cl⁻ + ClO₃⁻), a classic disproportionation of from +1 to -1 and +5 oxidation states. This phenomenon was noted in contexts, though without the modern theoretical framework of oxidation states. Observations in sulfur chemistry during the also documented transformations of sulfur compounds, such as the reaction of with to form sulfur and , empirically described through experimental manipulations. These early findings were limited by the absence of a formalized concept, resulting in descriptions focused on observable changes in composition and reactivity rather than underlying mechanisms.

Key Milestones

In 1923, developed the concept of oxidation numbers in his book Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules, assigning formal charges to atoms based on distribution to analyze in processes like disproportionation. This framework enabled chemists to quantify changes in oxidation states, distinguishing disproportionation where a single species undergoes both oxidation and reduction. Building on late 18th- and 19th-century empirical observations of such reactions, Lewis's innovation shifted focus toward systematic theoretical prediction. During the 1930s, Wendell M. Latimer developed potential diagrams—now known as Latimer diagrams—that tabulate standard electrode potentials for an element's oxidation states in , facilitating the prediction of disproportionation stability by comparing reduction potentials for adjacent states. If the potential for the higher oxidation state reduction is more positive than that for the lower state oxidation, the intermediate state is prone to disproportionation. Concurrently, advanced through his 1931 seminal paper and 1939 book, applying quantum mechanical principles to describe bond formation and , which provided tools to assess the energetic favorability of different oxidation states and their resistance to disproportionation. The 2000s marked significant progress in computational modeling, with density functional theory (DFT) enabling detailed simulations of disproportionation pathways and stability. For instance, quantum mechanical calculations elucidated the inner-sphere mechanisms of pentavalent actinyl ion disproportionation, revealing activation barriers and transition states that traditional methods could not resolve. Post-2010 quantum mechanical studies have increasingly probed complex disproportionation dynamics, such as non-classical pathways involving photochemical isotope scrambling in organic systems, highlighting radical-mediated mechanisms over simple electron transfer. These investigations, often using advanced DFT and ab initio methods, underscore ongoing research gaps in fully modeling solvent effects and multi-step kinetics. In the 2020s, emerging work has examined disproportionation in nanomaterials, particularly the temperature-dependent processes in lithium nickel oxide nanoparticles for battery applications, where dynamic Jahn-Teller distortions influence phase stability. Such studies reveal incomplete theoretical frameworks for nanoscale effects, pointing to needs for integrated quantum-classical models to predict material degradation.

Reaction Mechanisms

General Mechanism

Disproportionation reactions involve a process in which two identical chemical entities—one acting as the and the other as the —undergo to produce with different oxidation states of the same element. This mechanism typically proceeds through either an inner-sphere pathway, involving between the reacting via a bridged intermediate, or an outer-sphere pathway, relying on electrostatic interactions without covalent bridging. Inner-sphere mechanisms are common in coordination and , where the formation of a transient dimer facilitates the transfer. The step-by-step process in an inner-sphere disproportionation often begins with the association of two molecules or ions to form a cation-cation or analogous dimer complex, stabilizing the interaction between the oxidant and reductant moieties. This is followed by activation, such as at coordinating sites (e.g., axial oxygens in actinyl ions) or input, which alters the electronic structure and enables from the reducing unit to the oxidizing unit. Finally, the complex dissociates, often assisted by solvent molecules, yielding the oxidized and reduced products. In some cases, such as ion disproportionation in aprotic solvents, the mechanism may involve direct bimolecular collision without a stable intermediate, accelerated by trace proton sources that protonate one to form , promoting the . Disproportionation can be classified as symmetrical or unsymmetrical based on the reaction pathway and product . Symmetrical disproportionation typically occurs intramolecularly within a single or via equivalent intermolecular interactions, leading to balanced changes without detectable asymmetric byproducts, as observed in certain organometallic rearrangements. Unsymmetrical disproportionation, in contrast, involves asymmetric structural features in the reactant or pathway, resulting in distinct product distributions influenced by molecular asymmetry. Ligands play a critical role by modulating the mechanism; for instance, imido ligands in uranium(IV) complexes enable proton migration and dimer formation, driving disproportionation to uranium(V) and uranium(III) species. Solvents further influence the process by affecting dimer stability and electron transfer rates—aprotic solvents like DMSO stabilize charged intermediates in systems, while aromatic solvents such as promote thermal activation in metal complexes by serving as reductants or altering shells. The general equation for disproportionation is derived from balancing the corresponding half-reactions of the same , ensuring electron conservation. Consider a M in nn: the oxidation is \ceMn+−>M(n+1)++e−\ce{M^{n+} -> M^{(n+1)+} + e^-}, and the reduction is \ceMn++e−−>M(n−1)+\ce{M^{n+} + e^- -> M^{(n-1)+}}. Adding these yields the overall balanced equation: \ce2Mn+−>M(n+1)++M(n−1)+\ce{2 M^{n+} -> M^{(n+1)+} + M^{(n-1)+}} This derivation highlights how the single provides both the oxidant and reductant, with the coefficients adjusted to cancel s; variations arise for multi-electron processes by scaling the half-reactions accordingly.

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Considerations

The feasibility of disproportionation reactions is fundamentally governed by the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG), which determines whether the process is thermodynamically spontaneous. For a disproportionation involving an element in an intermediate oxidation state, such as 2M^{n+} \rightleftharpoons M^{(n-1)+} + M^{(n+1)+}, the reaction proceeds if ΔG < 0, indicating that the products are more stable than the reactant. This condition arises when the standard reduction potential for the higher oxidation state couple (M^{(n+1)+}/M^{n+}) is more positive than that for the lower couple (M^{n+}/M^{(n-1)+}), yielding a positive cell potential E°_cell > 0 V, since ΔG° = -nFE°_cell, where n is the number of electrons transferred (typically 1 for such couples) and F is the Faraday constant. The stability of intermediate oxidation states plays a central role in dictating disproportionation tendencies, particularly in aqueous systems where influences . Pourbaix diagrams, which plot potential (E) against , delineate regions of predominance for different and highlight areas where intermediate states are thermodynamically unstable, leading to disproportionation. For instance, in regions where the boundaries for adjacent oxidation states overlap or the intermediate lacks a stable predominance area, the species decomposes into higher and lower oxidation states; this is evident for elements like , where (ClO^-) undergoes disproportionation at neutral due to the instability of the +1 state relative to Cl_2 (0) and ClO_3^- (+5). The reverse process, , has an K_c that is the reciprocal of the disproportionation constant K_d (K_c = 1/K_d), reflecting the symmetry of the couples; a large K_d (>1) signifies an unstable intermediate. Kinetically, disproportionation often faces high activation barriers stemming from the need for self-interaction between identical species, which can limit reaction rates despite thermodynamic favorability. These barriers arise from the energy required to form transient intermediates or transition states involving within the same molecule or , typically ranging from 20–100 kJ/mol depending on the ; for example, the disproportionation of HBrO_2 exhibits an of approximately 26 kJ/mol in acidic media. Catalysis by transition metals or pH adjustments can lower these barriers: metal ions like Fe^{3+} facilitate (NH_2OH) disproportionation by coordinating intermediates and enabling inner-sphere , while acidic conditions (low ) accelerate rates by protonating species and stabilizing transition states, as seen in iodous acid (HIO_2) systems where rates double from 20°C to 30°C. Reaction rates generally follow the , k = A e^{-E_a / RT}, with pre-exponential factors A on the order of 10^8–10^{12} s^{-1} for typical uncatalyzed processes, though catalyzed variants show lower E_a (e.g., 10–20 kJ/mol). External factors such as and further modulate both and kinetics of disproportionation. Solvent polarity and coordinating ability influence stability; for instance, promotes U(IV) disproportionation by reducing the energy barrier for (∼28 kcal/mol) through formation, whereas non-reducing solvents like inhibit it by increasing the endothermicity. dependence arises primarily through kinetic effects via the Arrhenius relation, accelerating rates exponentially, but also shifts equilibria if ΔH ≠ 0; endothermic disproportionations become more favorable at higher temperatures. The K for disproportionation derives from the applied to the cell potential: at equilibrium, E = 0, so E°_cell = (RT/nF) \ln K, or K = e^{nFE°_cell / RT}, allowing prediction of K from measured potentials.

Examples in Chemistry

Inorganic Disproportionation Reactions

Inorganic disproportionation reactions involve elements or compounds where a single is simultaneously oxidized and reduced, often observed in aqueous solutions of transition metals, , and sulfur-containing species. These reactions are driven by differences in standard reduction potentials, leading to instability of intermediate oxidation states. Classic examples illustrate how such processes maintain charge balance without external agents. A prominent metal example is the disproportionation of (I) ions in , where Cu⁺ ions decompose into copper(0) metal and copper(II) ions: 2\ceCu+→\ceCu2++Cu2 \ce{Cu+} \rightarrow \ce{Cu^2+ + Cu} This reaction occurs because the for Cu⁺/Cu (E° = +0.52 V) is more positive than that for Cu²⁺/Cu⁺ (E° = +0.16 V), making the overall process spontaneous (ΔE° = +0.36 V)./Descriptive_Chemistry/Elements_Organized_by_Block/3_d-Block_Elements/Group_11:_Transition_Metals/Chemistry_of_Copper) Simple Cu⁺ salts like CuCl are unstable in aqueous media and precipitate copper metal while forming soluble Cu²⁺ species. Similarly, mercury(I) ions, represented as the dimeric Hg₂²⁺, undergo disproportionation to elemental mercury and mercury(II) ions: \ceHg22+−>Hg+Hg2+\ce{Hg2^2+ -> Hg + Hg^2+} This equilibrium favors the products in aqueous solution (K ≈ 170), producing black mercury droplets and soluble Hg²⁺./Qualitative_Analysis/Characteristic_Reactions_of_Select_Metal_Ions/Characteristic_Reactions_of_Mercury_Ions_(Hg%25C2%25B2%25E2%2581%25BA_and_Hg_%25C2%25B2%25C2%25B2%25E2%2581%25BA)) The reaction underlies the instability of mercury(I) compounds in water, though solids like calomel (Hg₂Cl₂) are more stable due to lattice energy. Halogen examples include the disproportionation of ions in basic solution, a key step in decomposition: 3\ceClO−→2\ceCl−+\ceClO3−3 \ce{ClO-} \rightarrow 2 \ce{Cl-} + \ce{ClO3-} Here, changes from +1 in ClO⁻ to -1 in Cl⁻ and +5 in ClO₃⁻, with the reaction accelerating at elevated temperatures and pH > 10. This process is thermodynamically favorable (ΔG° < 0) and contributes to chlorate formation in sodium hypochlorite solutions. Another halogen case is the reaction of iodine with alkali, where I₂ disproportionates to iodide and iodate: 3\ceI2+6OH−−>5I−+IO3−+3H2O3 \ce{I2 + 6 OH- -> 5 I- + IO3- + 3 H2O} Iodine in the zero oxidation state is oxidized to +5 in IO₃⁻ and reduced to -1 in I⁻, with the 1:5 ratio of iodate to iodide reflecting the stoichiometry. This hot alkaline reaction is selective, unlike the cold dilute version yielding hypoiodite. For sulfur intermediates, thiosulfate ions (S₂O₃²⁻) disproportionate in acidic conditions, with the central sulfur (average +2 oxidation state) splitting into elemental sulfur (0) and sulfite (+4): \ceS2O32−+2H+−>S+SO2+H2O\ce{S2O3^2- + 2 H+ -> S + SO2 + H2O} This yields colloidal sulfur and gaseous SO₂, highlighting the instability of mixed sulfur-oxygen species under protonation. Polysulfides, such as Sₓ²⁻ (x > 2), also disproportionate in aqueous media to shorter chains and thiosulfate: \ce2Sx2−−>Sx−12−+Sx+12−\ce{2 S_x^2- -> S_{x-1}^2- + S_{x+1}^2-} These equilibria shift toward decomposition at neutral pH, forming thiosulfate as a stable product. Such reactions are central to sulfur redox cycling in geochemical environments.

Organic Disproportionation Reactions

In , disproportionation reactions often center on carbon-containing functional groups, particularly those that cannot undergo enolization or other competing pathways, leading to processes between identical or similar molecules. The represents a classic example of organic disproportionation, involving the base-induced transformation of two molecules of a non-enolizable into one equivalent of the corresponding and one equivalent of the anion. This reaction is specific to aldehydes lacking α-hydrogens, such as aromatic aldehydes or , as the absence of enolizable protons prevents aldol-type condensations. The general is given by: 2RCHO+OH−→RCH2OH+RCO2−2 \mathrm{RCHO} + \mathrm{OH}^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{RCH_{2}OH} + \mathrm{RCO_{2}^{-}} Discovered in 1853, the reaction proceeds under alkaline conditions and is driven by the formation of stable products, with no net consumption of the base beyond the initial proton abstraction. The mechanism of the Cannizzaro reaction begins with the nucleophilic addition of hydroxide to one aldehyde molecule, forming a tetrahedral gem-diolate intermediate. This adduct then acts as a hydride donor, transferring a hydride ion to a second aldehyde in the rate-determining step, regenerating the first aldehyde as the carboxylate and reducing the second to the alkoxide (which protonates to the alcohol). The hydride transfer occurs via a transition state that can be either linear, resembling an SN2-like process, or bent, involving partial radical character, as determined by computational and kinetic studies. Crossed Cannizzaro variants enhance synthetic utility; when formaldehyde is paired with another non-enolizable aldehyde, the more electrophilic formaldehyde is preferentially oxidized to formate, while the partner aldehyde is selectively reduced to the alcohol, owing to the greater stability of the formaldehyde adduct and its higher hydride-donating ability. This selectivity arises from the differential rates of adduct formation and is commonly applied to convert aryl aldehydes to benzylic alcohols, such as the reduction of benzaldehyde to benzyl alcohol when paired with formaldehyde, which is preferentially oxidized to formate. Enantioselective Cannizzaro reactions have been achieved using chiral catalysts, such as complexes with , yielding products with up to 90% diastereomeric excess by controlling the facial selectivity in the transfer step. This stereochemical control highlights implications for asymmetric synthesis, where the at the carbinol center in the alcohol product is dictated by the geometry, influencing applications in pharmaceutical intermediates. Intramolecular variants occur with dialdehydes, forming lactols or hydroxy acids, further demonstrating the reaction's versatility in cyclic systems. Other notable organic disproportionation processes include the decomposition of s, where two equivalents of an alkyl (ROOH) disproportionate to the corresponding alcohol (ROH) and molecular oxygen, often under catalytic conditions. The initial homolytic cleavage generates alkoxy (RO•) and hydroxy (•OH) radicals: ROOH→RO⋅+⋅OH\mathrm{ROOH} \rightarrow \mathrm{RO^{\cdot}} + ^{\cdot}\mathrm{OH} Subsequent radical recombination or further reactions lead to the net disproportionation, with one molecule oxidized and the other reduced. This process is catalyzed by iron-thiolate complexes or metal salts, proceeding efficiently at room temperature with low catalyst loadings (e.g., Fe:peroxide ratios of 0.01:1), and is relevant in radical chain mechanisms for or oxidant breakdown. The reverse of the , involving cleavage of α-hydroxy ketones back to aldehydes under basic conditions, can intersect with disproportionation pathways in aldehydes prone to Cannizzaro-type , though it primarily serves as a retro-aldol process. The thermodynamic favorability of organic disproportionations like these stems from the stabilization of oxidized and reduced products, as outlined in general reaction mechanisms.

Applications in Specific Fields

Polymer Chemistry

In free radical polymerization, disproportionation acts as a termination mechanism in which two propagating polymer radicals abstract a from one another, yielding one dead chain with a saturated () end group and another with an unsaturated () end group. This is depicted by the equation: 2P∙→P−H+P=CH22 \mathrm{P}^\bullet \rightarrow \mathrm{P - H} + \mathrm{P = CH_2} Unlike , where two radicals couple to form a single longer chain (2P• → P-P), disproportionation does not increase the chain length beyond the kinetic chain length and results in two separate dead chains with distinct end-group functionalities. The relative rates of these termination pathways significantly influence polymer architecture, as disproportionation introduces variability in end-group composition without altering the total number of polymer molecules produced compared to . In the of styrene, disproportionation plays a secondary but notable role in termination kinetics, where typically dominates under standard conditions, with reported disproportionation-to- (D/C) ratios of approximately 15:85 at 25°C. This leads to predominantly coupled chains, but the mechanism can shift dramatically in high-viscosity media, where disproportionation becomes selective (up to 97:3 D/C ratio), altering the end-group distribution and facilitating control over . The effect on molecular is subtle; both mechanisms yield similar polydispersity indices (around 1.5–2.0) in simple kinetic models without transfer reactions, but disproportionation contributes to a higher fraction of chains with termini, which can influence subsequent reactivity or stability in applications like coatings. Seminal studies using organotellurium-mediated have quantified these ratios through end-group analysis via NMR and , confirming the kinetic preference for in low-viscosity styrene systems. The balance between disproportionation and combination is governed by temperature and monomer type. For polystyrene, temperature has a minor impact, with combination slightly favored at higher temperatures due to enthalpic and entropic factors (ΔΔG‡_{d/c} ≈ −2.0 – T × (−20.8 × 10^{-3}) kJ mol^{-1}), though viscosity overrides this at low temperatures to promote disproportionation. Monomer structure exerts a stronger influence: styrenic monomers favor combination owing to resonance stabilization of the radicals, whereas acrylates and methacrylates exhibit higher D/C ratios (e.g., 73:27 for at 25°C), attributed to steric hindrance and radical β-hydrogen accessibility in the . These factors are critical in tailoring polydispersity and end-group fidelity in synthetic design.

Biochemistry

In biological systems, disproportionation reactions play a critical role in managing (ROS), which are byproducts of cellular that can cause oxidative damage if unchecked. These reactions involve the enzymatic conversion of ROS into less reactive products, maintaining cellular balance and preventing toxicity. Key enzymes facilitate this process through metal-catalyzed mechanisms, evolving as adaptations to oxygenic environments while also appearing in ancient anaerobic pathways. One prominent example is (SOD), which catalyzes the disproportionation of anion radicals (O₂⁻•) into (H₂O₂) and molecular oxygen (O₂). The reaction proceeds via a ping-pong mechanism where the enzyme's metal center (such as Cu, Mn, Fe, or Ni) alternates between oxidation states: first, O₂⁻• reduces the oxidized metal to produce O₂, and then a second O₂⁻• oxidizes the reduced metal to yield H₂O₂, with protons sourced from the solvent. 2O2∙−+2H+→H2O2+O22 \text{O}_2^{\bullet-} + 2 \text{H}^+ \rightarrow \text{H}_2\text{O}_2 + \text{O}_2 SODs achieve near-diffusion-limited rates (up to 10⁹ M⁻¹ s⁻¹), ensuring levels remain low (~10⁻¹⁰ M) to protect biomolecules like iron-sulfur clusters from oxidative disruption. Another enzymatic example is , which disproportionates H₂O₂ into and O₂, serving as a primary defense against accumulation from SOD activity or other sources. The heme-containing operates in two steps: the ferric iron (Fe³⁺) reacts with one H₂O₂ to form a high-valent oxyferryl intermediate (Compound I) and , followed by Compound I oxidizing a second H₂O₂ to regenerate the resting state while producing O₂. 2H2O2→2H2O+O22 \text{H}_2\text{O}_2 \rightarrow 2 \text{H}_2\text{O} + \text{O}_2 With turnover rates exceeding 10⁶ s⁻¹ per , catalase efficiently mitigates H₂O₂-mediated damage, such as or protein oxidation, during events like or UV exposure. Cytochrome c oxidase (CcO), the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial , also incorporates disproportionation-like steps during handling. In its resting state, CcO reacts with H₂O₂ via a catalase-mimetic pathway, where the binuclear a₃-Cu_B center facilitates bridge reduction, yielding O₂ and water through transient hydroperoxo intermediates and radical formation on residues (e.g., Tyr-244). This process prevents buildup at the , linking ROS management to ATP synthesis. In metabolic contexts, these enzymes are integral to responses, where elevated ROS from sources like NADPH oxidases or mitochondrial leakage trigger disproportionation to restore . For instance, and coordinate to convert to harmless products, averting formation via Fenton chemistry and enabling cellular recovery during hypoxia-reoxygenation or defense. Beyond damage control, disproportionation products like H₂O₂ serve as signaling molecules in ROS-mediated pathways, modulating processes such as , , and immune responses through reversible oxidation of residues in proteins like kinases. isoforms, localized to specific compartments (e.g., mitochondrial MnSOD), fine-tune H₂O₂ gradients for localized signaling while preventing widespread toxicity. Evolutionarily, disproportionation reactions trace back to anaerobic metabolism, where fermentative pathways in early microbes involved substrate disproportionation—converting organic compounds into reduced (e.g., alcohols) and oxidized (e.g., acids) forms for yield without oxygen. In modern anaerobes, inorganic examples persist, such as disproportionation (S⁰ to HS⁻ and SO₄²⁻) by bacteria like Desulfocapsa thiozymogenes, enabling growth in anoxic sediments and reflecting ancient adaptations predating the ~2.4 billion years ago. These processes highlight how disproportionation facilitated microbial diversification in oxygen-poor environments before aerobic enzymes like emerged as defenses against rising atmospheric O₂.

Industrial Processes

Disproportionation reactions play a crucial role in several , particularly in and chemical , where they enable efficient conversion of raw materials while minimizing waste and emissions. In , disproportionation is applied in hydrometallurgical methods to purify from roasted concentrates and ores. A notable process involves acetonitrile-water leaching of reduced calcines to form (I) solutions, followed by thermal disproportionation of the (I) to yield high-purity via the reaction 2Cu⁺ → Cu + Cu²⁺. This achieves recovery exceeding 99% and silver recovery of at least 80%, with low energy demands (under 6000 kJ/kg Cu when utilizing exothermic roast heat), making it suitable for smaller-scale operations compared to traditional . Another application occurs in the production of (), where derived from reduction undergoes in alkaline media to form the . The core reaction is Cl₂ + 2NaOH → NaCl + NaOCl + H₂O, with Cl oxidized to +1 in and reduced to -1 in ; subsequent handling minimizes further disproportionation to (3NaOCl → 2NaCl + NaClO₃) to maintain stability. This electrolytic or absorption-based process yields 10-15% solutions at low cost (around $0.20-0.50/kg), supporting large-scale disinfection and while complying with purity standards that limit impurities to below 50 ppm for safety.

Comproportionation

Comproportionation, also known as symproportionation, is a reaction in which two compounds containing the same element in different s react to produce a compound with the element in an intermediate . This process is the reverse of , where the general can be expressed as 2A(ox)+A(red)⇌3A(int)2\mathrm{A}^{(\mathrm{ox})} + \mathrm{A}^{(\mathrm{red})} \rightleftharpoons 3\mathrm{A}^{(\mathrm{int})}, with A(ox)\mathrm{A}^{(\mathrm{ox})}, A(red)\mathrm{A}^{(\mathrm{red})}, and A(int)\mathrm{A}^{(\mathrm{int})} representing the oxidized, reduced, and intermediate forms, respectively. The equilibrium constant for comproportionation is the reciprocal of the equilibrium constant for the corresponding disproportionation reaction, directly linking their thermodynamic favorability. The mechanism of comproportionation typically involves direct from the reduced species to the oxidized species, often proceeding through an outer-sphere pathway without the formation of a bridged intermediate. This electron exchange balances the oxidation states to yield the intermediate product. In many systems, such as those involving in , comproportionation exhibits faster kinetics compared to the reverse disproportionation process, attributed to lower activation energies and more favorable diffusion-controlled encounters between reactants. A notable example occurs in geochemistry, where ferric ions react with metallic iron to form ferrous ions via the comproportionation reaction 2Fe3++Fe→3Fe2+2\mathrm{Fe}^{3+} + \mathrm{Fe} \to 3\mathrm{Fe}^{2+}, facilitating processes like mineral weathering and corrosion in aqueous environments. Another common instance is the formation of triiodide in solutions, described by I2+I−→I3−\mathrm{I}_2 + \mathrm{I}^- \to \mathrm{I}_3^-, where diiodine (with iodine at oxidation state 0) and iodide (oxidation state -1) combine to produce triiodide (average oxidation state -1/3), widely observed in analytical chemistry and electrochemical systems.

Claus Process

The Claus process recovers elemental from (H₂S)-containing acid gases, such as those produced in and , through a series of reactions that include the of H₂S and (SO₂). In the initial thermal stage, approximately one-third of the H₂S feed is partially combusted with sub-stoichiometric oxygen in a high-temperature furnace (typically 1000–1200°C) to generate SO₂ and elemental sulfur via gas-phase reactions, represented overall as 2 H₂S + O₂ → 2 S + 2 H₂O. The resulting gas stream, containing unreacted H₂S, SO₂, and sulfur vapor, is then cooled in a waste heat boiler before entering catalytic stages. This comproportionation step, 2 H₂S + SO₂ → 3 S + 2 H₂O, occurs partially as a form of sulfur oxide adjustment but primarily drives sulfur formation. The mechanism involves two main phases: the gas-phase thermal reaction in the furnace, which converts 60–70% of the sulfur, and subsequent catalytic hydrolysis and comproportionation on alumina or titania-based catalysts in 2–4 fixed-bed reactors at progressively lower temperatures (350–220°C). In these stages, water and catalyst surfaces facilitate the conversion of SO₂ and H₂S to sulfur, with equilibrium shifting toward higher yields at reduced temperatures; reheaters maintain optimal conditions between reactors. The process typically achieves 90–98% sulfur recovery efficiency in a standard three-stage configuration, producing molten sulfur collected in condensers after each catalytic step. This high efficiency stems from the exothermic nature of the reactions, which also generates steam for energy recovery. To exceed 98% recovery and comply with stringent emission limits, tail gas—containing residual H₂S (0.5–2%), SO₂, (COS), and (CS₂)—undergoes treatment in units like the Shell Claus Off-gas Treating (SCOT process, which hydrogenates sulfur species to H₂S and absorbs it via amine scrubbing, boosting overall yields to 99.5–99.9%. In the , advancements such as amine-based tail gas oxidation-absorption technologies have been industrially applied to further minimize SO₂ emissions by oxidizing residuals and absorbing them in alkaline solutions, achieving reductions of over 50% compared to untreated streams. These modifications address post-2020 environmental regulations, including U.S. Clean Air Act requirements for sulfur recovery efficiencies approaching 99.9% to limit SO₂ discharges to under 250 ppm in tail gas.

References

  1. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch10/group6.php
  2. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch10/group7.php
  3. https://people.chem.umass.edu/pkhalifah/chem242/242-S2007-EP/2007-1-CuNernst-EP.pdf
  4. https://ursula.chem.yale.edu/~chem220/chem220js/STUDYAIDS/ORGO/aldehydes/ald7a.html
  5. https://faculty1.coloradocollege.edu/~hdrossman/CH345WWW/electro.htm
  6. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/O04365
  7. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/ChemPRIME_(Moore_et_al.)/14%3A_Redox_Reaction_and_Electrochemistry/14.01%3A_Redox_Reaction
  8. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/D01799
  9. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009011422823
  10. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Palomar_College/PC%253A_CHEM100_-_Fundamentals_of_Chemistry/11%253A_Redox_Reactions/11.4%253A_Oxidation_States_and_Redox_Reactions
  11. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2348868
  12. https://chemistry.ucr.edu/sites/default/files/2019-10/Chapter17.pdf
  13. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Inorganic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_and_Websites_%28Inorganic_Chemistry%29/Advanced_Inorganic_Chemistry_%28Wikibook%29/01%253A_Chapters/1.25%253A_Electron_Transfer_Reactions
  14. https://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Disproportionation.html
  15. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed078p1093
  16. https://archive.org/details/valenceandstruc00lewi
  17. https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/2/281/
  18. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ic070235c
  19. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00246a040
  20. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25151-z
  21. https://www.chm.uri.edu/weuler/chm401/studyaids/redoxpracticeproblems_answers.html
  22. https://people.wou.edu/~courtna/ch412/pourbaix.htm
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15479100/
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6994142_Activation_Energy_for_the_Disproportionation_of_HBrO_2_and_Estimated_Heats_of_Formation_of_HBrO_2_and_BrO_2
  25. https://alpha.chem.umb.edu/chemistry/ch371/CH371_Information/CuCl_Pojection.pdf
  26. https://www.chemguide.co.uk/inorganic/transition/copper.html
  27. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3184/095422998782775754
  28. https://chemrevise.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/5-3-group-7.pdf
  29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.18530880114
  30. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817849f
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11196959/
  32. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja409859x
  33. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.8b02882
  34. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01532
  35. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chem.201604659
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304386X81900037
  37. https://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/bleach/bleachh.htm
  38. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/j100165a028
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10591316/
  40. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04332
  41. https://netl.doe.gov/research/coal/energy-systems/gasification/gasifipedia/claus-process
  42. https://www.sulfurrecovery.com/sulfur-recovery-process
  43. https://www.shell.com/business-customers/catalysts-technologies/licensed-technologies/emissions-standards/sulphur-recovery/claus-process.html
  44. https://www.shell.com/business-customers/catalysts-technologies/licensed-technologies/emissions-standards/tail-gas-treatment-unit/scot-process.html
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385520891_Industrial-Scale_Application_of_Amine-Based_Tail_Gas_Oxidation-Absorption_Technology_Combined_with_Claus_Process_for_Lowering_Sulfur_Dioxide_Emission_from_Natural_Gas_Purification
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9895022/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.