Hubbry Logo
Yield (engineering)Yield (engineering)Main
Open search
Yield (engineering)
Community hub
Yield (engineering)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Yield (engineering)
Yield (engineering)
from Wikipedia

Stress–strain curve showing typical yield behavior for nonferrous alloys (stress, shown as a function of strain):
  1. True elastic limit
  2. Proportionality limit
  3. Elastic limit
  4. Offset yield strength
()

In materials science and engineering, the yield point is the point on a stress–strain curve that indicates the limit of elastic behavior and the beginning of plastic behavior. Below the yield point, a material will deform elastically and will return to its original shape when the applied stress is removed. Once the yield point is passed, some fraction of the deformation will be permanent and non-reversible and is known as plastic deformation.

The yield strength or yield stress is a material property and is the stress corresponding to the yield point at which the material begins to deform plastically. The yield strength is often used to determine the maximum allowable load in a mechanical component, since it represents the upper limit to forces that can be applied without producing permanent deformation. For most metals, such as aluminium and cold-worked steel, there is a gradual onset of non-linear behavior, and no precise yield point. In such a case, the offset yield point (or proof stress) is taken as the stress at which 0.2% plastic deformation occurs. Yielding is a gradual failure mode which is normally not catastrophic, unlike ultimate failure.

For ductile materials, the yield strength is typically distinct from the ultimate tensile strength, which is the load-bearing capacity for a given material. The ratio of yield strength to ultimate tensile strength is an important parameter for applications such steel for pipelines, and has been found to be proportional to the strain hardening exponent.[1]

In solid mechanics, the yield point can be specified in terms of the three-dimensional principal stresses () with a yield surface or a yield criterion. A variety of yield criteria have been developed for different materials.

Definitions

[edit]
Material Yield strength
(MPa)
Ultimate strength
(MPa)
ASTM A36 steel 250 400
Steel, API 5L X65[2] 448 531
Steel, high strength alloy ASTM A514 690 760
Steel, prestressing strands 1650 1860
Piano wire   1740–3300[3]
Carbon fiber (CF, CFK) 5650[4]
High-density polyethylene (HDPE) 26–33 37
Polypropylene 12–43 19.7–80
Stainless steel AISI 302 – cold-rolled 520 860
Cast iron 4.5% C, ASTM A-48[5] 172
Titanium alloy (6% Al, 4% V) 830 900
Aluminium alloy 2014-T6 400 455
Copper 99.9% Cu 70 220
Cupronickel 10% Ni, 1.6% Fe, 1% Mn, balance Cu 130 350
Brass 200+ ~ 550
Spider silk 1150 (??) 1400
Silkworm silk 500  
Aramid (Kevlar or Twaron) 3620 3757
UHMWPE[6][7] 20 35[8]
Bone (limb) 104–121 130
Nylon, type 6/6 45 75
Aluminium (annealed) 15–20 40–50[9]
Copper (annealed) 33 210
Iron (annealed) 80–100 350
Nickel (annealed) 14–35 140–195
Silicon (annealed) 5000–9000  
Tantalum (annealed) 180 200
Tin (annealed) 9–14 15–200
Titanium (annealed) 100–225 240–370
Tungsten (annealed) 550 550–620

It is often difficult to precisely define yielding due to the wide variety of stress–strain curves exhibited by real materials. In addition, there are several possible ways to define yielding:[10]

True elastic limit
The lowest stress at which dislocations move. This definition is rarely used since dislocations move at very low stresses, and detecting such movement is very difficult.
Proportionality limit
Up to this amount of stress, stress is proportional to strain (Hooke's law), so the stress-strain graph is a straight line, and the gradient will be equal to the elastic modulus of the material.
Elastic limit (yield strength)
Beyond the elastic limit, permanent deformation will occur. The elastic limit is, therefore, the lowest stress point at which permanent deformation can be measured. This requires a manual load-unload procedure, and the accuracy is critically dependent on the equipment used and operator skill. For elastomers, such as rubber, the elastic limit is much larger than the proportionality limit. Also, precise strain measurements have shown that plastic strain begins at very low stresses.[11][12]
Yield point
The point in the stress-strain curve at which the curve levels off and plastic deformation begins to occur.[13]
Offset yield point (proof stress)
When a yield point is not easily defined on the basis of the shape of the stress-strain curve an offset yield point is arbitrarily defined. The value for this is commonly set at 0.1% or 0.2% plastic strain.[14] The offset value is given as a subscript, e.g., MPa or MPa.[15] For most practical engineering uses, is multiplied by a factor of safety to obtain a lower value of the offset yield point. High strength steel and aluminum alloys do not exhibit a yield point, so this offset yield point is used on these materials.[14]
Upper and lower yield points
Some metals, such as mild steel, reach an upper yield point before dropping rapidly to a lower yield point. The material response is linear up until the upper yield point, but the lower yield point is used in structural engineering as a conservative value. If a metal is only stressed to the upper yield point, and beyond, Lüders bands can develop.[16]

Usage in structural engineering

[edit]

Yielded structures have a lower stiffness, leading to increased deflections and decreased buckling strength. The structure will be permanently deformed when the load is removed, and may have residual stresses. Engineering metals display strain hardening, which implies that the yield stress is increased after unloading from a yield state.

Testing

[edit]

Yield strength testing involves taking a small sample with a fixed cross-section area and then pulling it with a controlled, gradually increasing force until the sample changes shape or breaks. This is called a tensile test. Longitudinal and/or transverse strain is recorded using mechanical or optical extensometers.

Indentation hardness correlates roughly linearly with tensile strength for most steels, but measurements on one material cannot be used as a scale to measure strengths on another.[17] Hardness testing can therefore be an economical substitute for tensile testing, as well as providing local variations in yield strength due to, e.g., welding or forming operations. For critical situations, tension testing is often done to eliminate ambiguity. However, it is possible to obtain stress-strain curves from indentation-based procedures, provided certain conditions are met. These procedures are grouped under the term Indentation plastometry.

Strengthening mechanisms

[edit]

There are several ways in which crystalline materials can be engineered to increase their yield strength. By altering dislocation density, impurity levels, grain size (in crystalline materials), the yield strength of the material can be fine-tuned. This occurs typically by introducing defects such as impurities dislocations in the material. To move this defect (plastically deforming or yielding the material), a larger stress must be applied. This thus causes a higher yield stress in the material. While many material properties depend only on the composition of the bulk material, yield strength is extremely sensitive to the materials processing as well.

These mechanisms for crystalline materials include

Work hardening

[edit]

Where deforming the material will introduce dislocations, which increases their density in the material. This increases the yield strength of the material since now more stress must be applied to move these dislocations through a crystal lattice. Dislocations can also interact with each other, becoming entangled.

The governing formula for this mechanism is:

where is the yield stress, G is the shear elastic modulus, b is the magnitude of the Burgers vector, and is the dislocation density.

Solid solution strengthening

[edit]

By alloying the material, impurity atoms in low concentrations will occupy a lattice position directly below a dislocation, such as directly below an extra half plane defect. This relieves a tensile strain directly below the dislocation by filling that empty lattice space with the impurity atom.

The relationship of this mechanism goes as:

where is the shear stress, related to the yield stress, and are the same as in the above example, is the concentration of solute and is the strain induced in the lattice due to adding the impurity.

Particle/precipitate strengthening

[edit]

Where the presence of a secondary phase will increase yield strength by blocking the motion of dislocations within the crystal. A line defect that, while moving through the matrix, will be forced against a small particle or precipitate of the material. Dislocations can move through this particle either by shearing the particle or by a process known as bowing or ringing, in which a new ring of dislocations is created around the particle.

The shearing formula goes as:

and the bowing/ringing formula:

In these formulas, is the particle radius, is the surface tension between the matrix and the particle, is the distance between the particles.

Grain boundary strengthening

[edit]

Where a buildup of dislocations at a grain boundary causes a repulsive force between dislocations. As grain size decreases, the surface area to volume ratio of the grain increases, allowing more buildup of dislocations at the grain edge. Since it requires much energy to move dislocations to another grain, these dislocations build up along the boundary, and increase the yield stress of the material. Also known as Hall-Petch strengthening, this type of strengthening is governed by the formula:

where

is the stress required to move dislocations,
is a material constant, and
is the grain size.

Theoretical yield strength

[edit]
Material Theoretical shear strength (GPa) Experimental shear strength (MPa)
Ag 1.0 0.37
Al 0.9 0.78
Cu 1.4 0.49
Ni 2.6 3.2
α-Fe 2.6 27.5

The theoretical yield strength of a perfect crystal is much higher than the observed stress at the initiation of plastic flow.[18]

That experimentally measured yield strength is significantly lower than the expected theoretical value can be explained by the presence of dislocations and defects in the materials. Indeed, whiskers with perfect single crystal structure and defect-free surfaces have been shown to demonstrate yield stress approaching the theoretical value. For example, nanowhiskers of copper were shown to undergo brittle fracture at 1 GPa,[19] a value much higher than the strength of bulk copper and approaching the theoretical value.

The theoretical yield strength can be estimated by considering the process of yield at the atomic level. In a perfect crystal, shearing results in the displacement of an entire plane of atoms by one interatomic separation distance, b, relative to the plane below. In order for the atoms to move, considerable force must be applied to overcome the lattice energy and move the atoms in the top plane over the lower atoms and into a new lattice site. The applied stress to overcome the resistance of a perfect lattice to shear is the theoretical yield strength, τmax.

The stress displacement curve of a plane of atoms varies sinusoidally as stress peaks when an atom is forced over the atom below and then falls as the atom slides into the next lattice point.[18]

where is the interatomic separation distance. Since τ = G γ and dτ/dγ = G at small strains (i.e. Single atomic distance displacements), this equation becomes:

For small displacement of γ=x/a, where a is the spacing of atoms on the slip plane, this can be rewritten as:

Giving a value of τmax equal to:

The theoretical yield strength can be approximated as .

Yield point elongation (YPE)

[edit]

During monotonic tensile testing, some metals such as annealed steel exhibit a distinct upper yield point or a delay in work hardening.[20] These tensile testing phenomena, wherein the strain increases but stress does not increase as expected, are two types of yield point elongation.

Yield Point Elongation (YPE) significantly impacts the usability of steel. In the context of tensile testing and the engineering stress-strain curve, the Yield Point is the initial stress level, below the maximum stress, at which an increase in strain occurs without an increase in stress. This characteristic is typical of certain materials, indicating the presence of YPE.[20] The mechanism for YPE has been related to carbon diffusion, and more specifically to Cottrell atmospheres.

YPE can lead to issues such as coil breaks, edge breaks, fluting, stretcher strain, and reel kinks or creases, which can affect both aesthetics and flatness. Coil and edge breaks may occur during either initial or subsequent customer processing, while fluting and stretcher strain arise during forming. Reel kinks, transverse ridges on successive inner wraps of a coil, are caused by the coiling process.[20]

When these conditions are undesirable, it is essential for suppliers to be informed to provide appropriate materials. The presence of YPE is influenced by chemical composition and mill processing methods such as skin passing or temper rolling, which temporarily eliminate YPE and improve surface quality. However, YPE can return over time due to aging, which is holding at a temperature usually 200-400 °C.[20]

Despite its drawbacks, YPE offers advantages in certain applications, such as roll forming, and reduces springback. Generally, steel with YPE is highly formable.[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In materials , yield refers to the stress level at which a transitions from elastic deformation, where it returns to its original shape upon unloading, to deformation, resulting in permanent shape change. This critical property, known as yield strength or yield stress (denoted as σ_y), defines the boundary between recoverable and irrecoverable deformation and is essential for ensuring structural integrity in applications. Yield strength is typically determined through , where a specimen is subjected to increasing uniaxial stress and its corresponding strain is measured to produce a stress-strain curve. For ductile materials like mild steel, the curve may exhibit a distinct yield point, characterized by an upper yield strength followed by a drop to a lower yield strength before sustained flow. However, many alloys and other materials lack a clear yield drop, so yield strength is conventionally defined using the 0.2% offset method: a line parallel to the elastic portion of the curve, offset by 0.002 strain, intersects the actual curve to specify the yield point. This approach ensures a practical and reproducible measure, accounting for microscopic events that precede macroscopic yielding. The significance of yield strength lies in its role in materials selection and design, where engineers apply factors of to operating stresses to prevent yielding and maintain elastic behavior under load. Balancing yield strength with other properties, such as and , is crucial for structural applications, as excessive strength can lead to , while insufficient yield resistance risks failure. Yield strength varies widely across material classes—for instance, it ranges from about 50 MPa for some polymers to over 1000 MPa for high-strength steels—and is influenced by factors like composition, , and temperature. In multiaxial loading scenarios, yield criteria such as the von Mises or Tresca models extend the uniaxial yield strength to predict plastic onset in complex stress states.

Fundamentals

Definitions

In materials engineering, yield refers to the stress level at which a begins to deform , marking the transition from reversible elastic deformation to irreversible deformation. This point indicates the onset of permanent change in the when subjected to sufficient load. Elastic deformation involves a temporary change in that fully recovers upon removal of the applied stress, as the 's atomic bonds stretch but do not break or rearrange. In contrast, deformation results in permanent alteration of the 's structure, where dislocations in the crystal lattice move and multiply, leading to lasting strain without recovery. The concept of yield has roots in 19th-century metallurgy, with early systematic studies on yielding in ductile materials. French engineer Henri Tresca provided early systematic insights in 1864 through experiments on ductile materials, proposing that yielding occurs when the maximum shear stress reaches a critical value. On a stress-strain curve, which plots applied stress against resulting strain, the yield point is identified as the location where the curve deviates from its initial linear region, signaling the end of purely elastic behavior. Yield strength serves as the quantitative measure of this transition stress.

Yield Strength

Yield strength, denoted as σy\sigma_y, is defined as the stress at which a material begins to exhibit significant plastic deformation, specifically the stress corresponding to a 0.2% offset strain for materials lacking a distinct yield point. This 0.2% offset method involves drawing a line parallel to the elastic portion of the , offset by 0.002 strain, and identifying the intersection with the curve to quantify the onset of nonlinearity. In ductile metals exhibiting a clear yield behavior, such as mild steel, the stress-strain curve may show an upper yield point followed by a drop to a lower yield point, where the upper point represents the initial maximum stress for yielding initiation and the lower point indicates the sustained stress during propagation. Proof stress serves as an alternative measure, equivalent to the 0.2% offset yield strength, particularly for materials where plastic strain at a specified level (often 0.1% or 0.2%) defines the yield threshold. Typical yield strengths vary widely by material class; for steels, values range from 250 MPa for mild structural grades to 1000 MPa for high-strength alloys. Aluminum alloys exhibit lower values, typically 50–500 MPa, with pure aluminum around 30 MPa and heat-treated series like 6061 reaching up to 276 MPa. Polymers generally have yield strengths in the 10–100 MPa range, such as nylon at approximately 50–80 MPa, reflecting their molecular chain structures compared to metallic lattices. Yield strength decreases with increasing due to enhanced atomic mobility, which facilitates motion and reduces the stress required for plastic deformation. For instance, in body-centered cubic metals, this temperature dependence arises from thermal activation overcoming barriers like the Peierls stress, leading to a progressive drop in σy\sigma_y.

Engineering Applications

Structural Engineering

In structural engineering, yield strength serves as a critical for maintaining elastic behavior in materials under service loads, preventing permanent deformation and ensuring . By designing components to operate below the yield point, engineers guarantee that structures recover fully after load removal, which is essential for long-term durability in buildings and bridges. Safety factors, typically ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 for building structures, are applied to the yield strength to account for uncertainties in loads, material variability, and construction tolerances, thereby providing a margin against yielding under expected conditions. In beam design, yield strength directly limits the maximum allowable stress to avoid inelastic deformation, guiding the selection of cross-sections and materials for efficient load distribution. For beams, allowable stress is often set at 0.66 times the yield strength (Fy) for compact sections under allowable stress design (ASD), ensuring stresses remain well below the yield threshold even under combined dead, live, and environmental loads. This approach is fundamental in civil structures like girders and columns, where exceeding yield could initiate progressive failure. High-yield strength steels, with minimum yields exceeding 50 (345 MPa), enable the construction of slender, lightweight members in modern skyscrapers, reducing material volume while supporting immense gravitational and wind loads. For instance, in New York utilizes high-strength with yield strengths up to 65 in its core and perimeter columns, allowing the 1,776-foot tower to achieve exceptional height and stability. Similarly, in bridge applications, high-yield steels enhance span capabilities, as seen in long-span suspension bridges where they optimize cable and deck designs against tensile yielding. To prevent failure modes such as and collapse, designs incorporate yield-based limits to keep compressive and shear stresses below critical thresholds, often verified through finite element analysis. , a primary concern in slender elements like columns, is mitigated by ensuring Euler buckling loads exceed service demands by a factor tied to yield strength. The 1940 collapse, though primarily wind-induced aeroelastic flutter, underscores the need for robust yield margins against dynamic loads; excessive torsional oscillations generated stresses approaching yield limits in the girders and cables, leading to catastrophic failure and highlighting the importance of comprehensive load considerations beyond static cases. Integration of yield strength into standards like the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Specification for Structural Steel Buildings ensures consistent application across projects. The AISC ASD provisions specify allowable stresses as fractions of Fy—such as 0.60 Fy for axial tension and 0.66 Fy for —directly linking material properties to safe design values for buildings and bridges. These code-based approaches, as specified in ANSI/AISC 360-22, promote reliability by mandating yield-based checks for all load combinations, facilitating and .

Testing Methods

Experimental Techniques

Tensile testing serves as the primary experimental method for determining the yield strength of metallic materials under uniaxial loading conditions. This technique involves applying a controlled tensile force to a standardized specimen using a , which records the load and corresponding elongation to generate a stress-strain curve. The yield point is identified on this curve, often using the 0.2% offset method for materials without a distinct yield plateau. The ASTM E8/E8M standard governs this procedure for metals, specifying specimen geometries, testing speeds (typically 0.005 to 0.5 mm/s for yield determination), and reporting requirements to ensure reproducibility across laboratories. For materials prone to tensile , compression testing provides an alternative to assess behavior under compressive loads. In this method, cylindrical or cubic specimens are subjected to axial compression between platens on a , measuring the stress-strain response until yielding, nonlinearity, or occurs. This approach is particularly useful for certain alloys that yield in compression, as well as for brittle materials like ceramics and , where may induce premature cracking; for ductile alloys, the yield strength is determined from the deviation from in the compressive stress-strain curve, while for brittle materials, it assesses the onset of nonlinear behavior or . Standards such as ASTM E9 guide specimen preparation and testing parameters for metals, emphasizing reduction at contact surfaces to achieve uniform deformation. Torsion testing evaluates shear yield strength by applying a twisting moment to tubular or solid specimens, which is critical for components like shafts experiencing torsional loads. The test uses a torsion testing machine to measure and , plotting a shear stress-strain curve from which the shear yield point (often at 0.2% offset) is derived. This method reveals material behavior under , complementing tensile data via relations like the von Mises criterion, though it requires careful alignment to avoid bending artifacts. Standards such as ISO 7801 or ASTM A938 (for wires) outline procedures for torsional testing of metals. Hardness testing offers a non-destructive approximation of yield strength through empirical correlations, especially for field assessments or when is impractical. The Rockwell hardness test, for instance, indents the material with a ball or penetrator under specified loads, yielding a hardness number that correlates linearly with yield strength for many steels and alloys (e.g., yield strength ≈ 3.3 × Rockwell C hardness in MPa for certain ranges). Such conversions are validated for work-hardened metals but vary by material class, requiring calibration against tensile data for accuracy. Precise measurement of yield relies on like extensometers and strain gauges attached to the specimen gauge length. Clip-on or non-contact extensometers track axial strain with resolutions down to 0.1% of full scale, enabling accurate plotting of the stress-strain curve and determination of the 0.2% offset yield by drawing a line parallel to the slope at 0.002 strain offset. Strain gauges, bonded directly to the surface, provide localized deformation data via electrical resistance changes, complementing extensometers for heterogeneous materials. These tools adhere to ASTM E83 standards to minimize errors in low-strain regions critical for yield detection. For dynamic yield assessment under high strain rates (e.g., 10² to 10⁴ s⁻¹), the (SHPB) technique simulates impact loading by propagating a stress wave through input and output bars sandwiching the specimen. Incident, reflected, and transmitted waves are measured via strain gauges on the bars, allowing computation of the specimen's dynamic stress-strain curve and yield strength, which often exceeds quasi-static values due to strain-rate sensitivity. This method is widely used for metals and composites in applications like automotive crash simulations, with one-dimensional wave propagation assumptions validated for short specimens. Challenges in these techniques include preventing necking in ductile materials during , which localizes strain and obscures uniform yield behavior beyond the yield point. Video extensometers address this by optically tracking multiple points on the specimen surface without contact, enabling real-time monitoring of strain distribution and correction for necking onset through digital image correlation. is equally critical, with ASTM E8 mandating precise of dogbone-shaped specimens (e.g., 6 mm gauge section for round bars) to ensure uniform stress fields and avoid surface defects that could initiate early yielding. Adherence to these standards, including edge finishing and dimensional tolerances within ±0.025 mm, directly impacts test reliability.

Data Interpretation

In materials testing, the offset method provides a standardized approach to determine approximate yield strength when a distinct yield point is absent from the stress-strain . This involves constructing a line parallel to the initial linear elastic portion of the , offset by a strain of 0.2% (or 0.002 in dimensionless terms), and identifying the point with the actual as the yield strength. The 0.2% offset is the most commonly adopted value across various metals and alloys, as specified in standards like ASTM E8/E8M and ISO 6892-1, ensuring consistency in reporting for ductile materials without pronounced yielding. This method approximates the onset of deformation by accounting for minor deviations from perfect elasticity, though it may slightly overestimate or underestimate the true transition in highly elastic materials. For materials exhibiting a clear yield point, such as mild steel, data interpretation focuses on identifying upper and lower yield points through visual and quantitative analysis of the stress-strain curve. The upper yield point marks the initial peak stress where plastic flow begins, often followed by a drop to the lower yield point, which sustains during localized deformation. This behavior is characteristically linked to the formation and propagation of Lüders bands—visible bands of plastic deformation that traverse the specimen at constant stress, typically observed in low-carbon steels with solute atoms pinning . In some alloys, a double-yield appears, featuring two distinct yielding stages: an initial one due to phase transformations or twinning, followed by a second from conventional glide, as seen in certain metastable where the first yield reaches around 613 MPa. Accurate identification requires high-resolution strain measurement to distinguish these points from or machine compliance effects. Yield data from multiple test samples often exhibit variability due to microstructural differences, surface conditions, or minor compositional inhomogeneities, necessitating statistical for reliable characterization. The is widely applied to model this scatter in yield strength, providing parameters like the shape factor () that quantify the reliability and predictability of failure initiation. For instance, a higher indicates lower variability and greater consistency in yield values across samples, aiding in probabilistic design assessments for components under load. This approach is particularly useful for brittle or semi-brittle materials where yield variability influences safety margins, with the allowing estimation of the probability of yielding below a specified stress. Reporting interpreted yield data must adhere to established standards to ensure reproducibility and context, including that reflect and sample statistics. For example, a 95% around the mean yield strength accounts for both experimental precision and material scatter, as outlined in guidelines for uncertainties. Environmental conditions, such as testing , significantly influence interpreted values and must be explicitly stated; elevated temperatures generally reduce yield strength due to enhanced mobility, with models showing linear declines in normalized strength for structural steels above 200°C. Standards like ISO 6892-1 require documentation of , , and any preconditioning to contextualize the yield point, enabling valid comparisons across studies or applications.

Theoretical Foundations

Theoretical Yield Strength

The theoretical yield strength represents the idealized maximum stress a perfect can withstand before plastic deformation occurs, derived from atomic-scale models that consider the required to shear atomic planes. In the absence of defects, plastic deformation would necessitate breaking and reforming atomic bonds simultaneously across a slip plane, leading to an enormous stress level far exceeding observed values in engineering materials. This upper limit arises from the sinusoidal variation of interatomic forces, where the maximum restoring force defines the theoretical shear strength. The concept of dislocations, linear defects in the crystal lattice, was independently proposed in 1934 by , Egon Orowan, and to resolve the vast discrepancy between this theoretical maximum and the much lower yield strengths exhibited by real crystals. Their work established that plastic deformation proceeds via the collective motion of dislocations rather than wholesale atomic shearing, enabling deformation at stresses orders of magnitude below the ideal limit. This foundational insight shifted the understanding of yield from a brittle, bond-breaking process to one governed by defect dynamics. In dislocation theory, the yield strength is fundamentally limited by the motion of these defects under applied shear stress. For a perfect crystal without dislocations, the theoretical shear strength τmax\tau_{\max} is approximated as τmaxG/30\tau_{\max} \approx G/30, where GG is the shear modulus, reflecting the stress needed to displace one atomic plane over its neighbor by a distance comparable to the atomic spacing. For ideal crystals under certain bonding assumptions, this value can approach G/10\sim G/10. These estimates stem from models treating the crystal as a continuum with periodic potential, where GG typically ranges from 30 to 100 GPa for metals, yielding τmax\tau_{\max} on the order of several GPa. A key component of dislocation motion resistance is the Peierls-Nabarro stress, which quantifies the lattice friction arising from the periodic atomic potential that dislocations must overcome. The original Peierls-Nabarro model derives this as τp=2G1νexp(2πwb),\tau_p = \frac{2G}{1 - \nu} \exp\left( -\frac{2\pi w}{b} \right), where ν\nu is , ww is the dislocation core width (often on the order of several bb), and bb is the magnitude of the . This exponential dependence makes τp\tau_p highly sensitive to w/bw/b; wide dislocations in close-packed metals experience low Peierls stress, facilitating easy glide at . In practice, theoretical yield strengths for metals range from 10 to 20 GPa, but actual values in polycrystalline materials are typically less than 1% of this due to the proliferation of dislocations and other defects that multiply and interact during deformation. Single-crystal whiskers, with minimal defects, can approach these theoretical limits; for instance, iron whiskers have exhibited shear strengths up to approximately G/10G/10, nearing 8 GPa. Grain boundaries further reduce the effective yield in polycrystals by impeding dislocation transmission, though this effect is secondary to intrinsic lattice resistance in defect-free models.

Yield Criteria

Yield criteria provide mathematical models to predict the onset of yielding in materials subjected to multiaxial stress states, extending the concept of uniaxial yield strength to complex loading conditions encountered in engineering components. These criteria are essential for designing structures where stresses arise from combined tension, compression, shear, and hydrostatic pressures, ensuring that the material remains within its elastic limit to avoid permanent deformation. The Tresca yield criterion, also known as the maximum theory, posits that yielding occurs when the maximum shear stress in the material reaches the critical value observed in uniaxial tension. Formulated by Henri Tresca in 1864, it is expressed in terms of the principal stresses σ1σ2σ3\sigma_1 \geq \sigma_2 \geq \sigma_3 as yielding when 12max(σ1σ2,σ2σ3,σ3σ1)=σy2\frac{1}{2} \max(|\sigma_1 - \sigma_2|, |\sigma_2 - \sigma_3|, |\sigma_3 - \sigma_1|) = \frac{\sigma_y}{2}, where σy\sigma_y is the uniaxial yield strength. This criterion is conservative and particularly useful for materials where shear failure dominates, such as in certain brittle-ductile transitions. In contrast, the , or distortion energy theory, predicts yielding based on the accumulation of distortional , which is considered the primary driver of plastic deformation in ductile materials. Developed by in 1913, it defines an effective stress σe=(σ1σ2)2+(σ2σ3)2+(σ3σ1)22=σy\sigma_e = \sqrt{\frac{(\sigma_1 - \sigma_2)^2 + (\sigma_2 - \sigma_3)^2 + (\sigma_3 - \sigma_1)^2}{2}} = \sigma_y
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.