Hubbry Logo
Clarifying agentClarifying agentMain
Open search
Clarifying agent
Community hub
Clarifying agent
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Clarifying agent
Clarifying agent
Clarifying agent
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Clarifying agents are used to remove suspended solids from liquids by inducing flocculation, causing the solids to form larger aggregates that can be easily removed after they either float to the surface or sink to the bottom of the containment vessel.

Process

[edit]

Particles finer than 0.1 μm (10−7m) in water remain continuously in motion due to electrostatic charge (often negative) which causes them to repel each other.[citation needed] Once their electrostatic charge is neutralized by the use of a coagulant chemical, the finer particles start to collide and agglomerate (collect together) under the influence of Van der Waals forces. These larger and heavier particles are called flocs.

Flocculants, or flocculating agents (also known as flocking agents), are chemicals that promote flocculation by causing colloids and other suspended particles in liquids to aggregate, forming a floc. Flocculants are used in water treatment processes to improve the sedimentation or filterability of small particles. For example, a flocculant may be used in swimming pool or drinking water filtration to aid removal of microscopic particles which would otherwise cause the water to be turbid (cloudy) and which would be difficult or impossible to remove by filtration alone.

Many flocculants are multivalent cations such as aluminium, iron, calcium or magnesium.[1] These positively charged molecules interact with negatively charged particles and molecules to reduce the barriers to aggregation. In addition, many of these chemicals, under appropriate pH and other conditions such as temperature and salinity, react with water to form insoluble hydroxides which, upon precipitating, link together to form long chains or meshes, physically trapping small particles into the larger floc.

Long-chain polymer flocculants, such as modified polyacrylamides, are manufactured and sold by flocculant producers. These can be supplied in dry or liquid form for use in the flocculation process. The most common liquid polyacrylamide is supplied as an emulsion with 10-40% actives and the rest is a non-aqueous carrier fluid, surfactants and latex. This form allows easy handling of viscous polymers at high concentrations. These emulsion polymers require "activation" — inversion of the emulsion so that the polymer's molecules form an aqueous solution.

Agents

[edit]

The following natural products are used as flocculants:[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Clarifying agent

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A clarifying agent, also known as a fining agent, is a processing aid employed in the food and beverage industry to eliminate suspended solids, haze, and impurities from liquids, thereby improving clarity, stability, and overall product appeal. These agents operate through mechanisms such as flocculation—where particles aggregate into larger, separable masses—adsorption of unwanted compounds like proteins and polyphenols, enzymatic degradation of pectins, or ionic bonding to precipitate turbidity-causing elements.

Historical Context

Fining, the traditional term for clarification, is an ancient practice dating back to Roman times, where substances like whites and blood were used to clear wine by binding to suspended particles. Over centuries, techniques evolved, with milk punches employing for clarification documented as early as the in beverages. Modern synthetic and plant-based agents emerged in the to improve efficiency and accommodate dietary preferences. Primarily utilized in the production of wines, beers, juices (such as apple, , and ), and other beverages, clarifying agents prevent , reduce astringency from , and enhance visual and sensory qualities without alone. Common types include protein-based options like and , which carry positive charges to bind negatively charged particles; mineral-based agents such as clay, which adsorbs proteins; and enzymatic agents like , which hydrolyze components to release and clarify juices. Other notable examples encompass (derived from shells), (PVPP) for removal, and silica-based colloids for fine haze elimination. While highly effective—often achieving up to 95% in treated juices and extending refrigerated to 49 days—the application of clarifying agents requires careful dosing (e.g., 1–2 mg/mL for or ) to minimize nutrient losses, such as or antioxidants, and avoid over-fining that could strip desirable flavors. Regulatory bodies like the FDA classify them as processing aids, ensuring their use aligns with standards. In recent years, the industry has increasingly adopted natural and vegan alternatives to meet consumer demand for plant-based products.

Introduction

Definition

A clarifying agent is a substance or material added to liquids to remove , , or impurities by promoting the aggregation and of particles, thereby improving overall clarity and purity. These agents function primarily by destabilizing colloidal suspensions, where fine particles are initially stabilized by electrostatic repulsion; the agents neutralize surface charges, reducing this repulsion and enabling particles to collide and form larger aggregates. This enhances the liquid's visual and functional quality without altering its core composition significantly. The key property of clarifying agents lies in their ability to induce , a mechanism where destabilized fine particles coalesce into larger clumps known as flocs. These flocs are denser and more readily separated from the liquid through methods such as , , or , allowing for efficient removal of turbidity-causing materials. Flocculation typically occurs in stages: initial charge neutralization followed by bridging or sweep , resulting in settleable aggregates that clarify the suspension over time, often within minutes to hours depending on conditions like and dosage. In practice, clarifying agents encompass general categories such as fining agents employed in to remove or coagulants utilized in to eliminate suspended matter, serving essential roles in achieving transparent liquids for various industrial and consumer applications.

Historical Context

The use of clarifying agents dates back to ancient civilizations, where natural substances were employed to purify and clarify beverages. In around 1500 BCE, records indicate the application of , a naturally occurring mineral, to coagulate suspended particles in cloudy , facilitating and improving clarity for purposes. This early technique marked one of the first documented uses of chemical agents in , relying on alum's ability to aggregate impurities for easier removal. While direct evidence for clarification in is sparse, ancient practices across the and Mediterranean involved natural fining agents like resins to stabilize and clear fermented beverages, laying foundational methods for later developments. During the in , winemaking and techniques advanced with the incorporation of animal-derived fining agents, such as from animal and from fish swim bladders, to remove and improve beverage stability. These organic materials were introduced to European as monasteries and trade routes facilitated knowledge exchange, enhancing clarification processes in both wine and production. By the post-Industrial Revolution era in the , industrial-scale production of emerged, enabling its widespread adoption as a clarifying agent in , including wine fining to bind and proteins. This period saw a shift toward more efficient, large-scale applications, with gelatin's proving effective for removing in juices and wines. A key milestone in municipal occurred in the 1880s, when was systematically adopted in European water works, such as in , , where it was integrated into filtration systems to treat for public supply. This innovation expanded coagulation to urban scales, addressing turbidity in rivers like the , where had been experimentally used since the 1820s but gained prominence in the late . The brought a synthetic shift, particularly post-World War II, as advanced polymers for ; , first commercialized in the 1950s, revolutionized by forming larger aggregates for in and processes. clay also gained traction in from the 1930s, valued for its protein-binding properties in clarifying white wines. The 1970s marked a regulatory turning point with the enactment of the in 1974, which established national standards for contaminants and prompted scrutiny of treatment chemicals like coagulants, leading to the development of safer alternatives to reduce risks such as disinfection byproducts and . These regulations, enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency, encouraged innovations in polymer-based flocculants and non-toxic agents, balancing efficacy with environmental and health safety in both and beverage industries.

Types of Clarifying Agents

Natural Agents

Natural clarifying agents are derived from biological or mineral sources and have been employed in for centuries due to their compatibility with organic production standards. These agents typically work by interacting with suspended particles to promote clarity without introducing synthetic residues. Protein-based agents include , which is extracted from animal found in skins, bones, and connective tissues. adsorbs and haze-forming proteins, particularly in wine production. Another example is , derived from the dried swim bladders of such as sturgeon, which similarly targets and proteins through adsorption. , a milk-derived protein, is commonly used in fining to achieve brightness. Mineral-based agents encompass clay, primarily composed of , a known for its high swelling capacity and protein-binding properties. is effective for removing heat-unstable proteins from fruit juices. , produced from natural carbonaceous materials like shells or wood, serves as a clarifying agent by adsorbing colorants and compounds in beverages and oils. Polysaccharide-based agents include , obtained from in shells or fungal cell walls, which functions through positive charge interactions to neutralize negatively charged particles. Alginates, extracted from brown seaweed such as species, promote clarity via gel formation when cross-linked with divalent cations like calcium. Enzymatic agents, such as , are derived from microbial sources and used primarily in processing. hydrolyzes pectins in cell walls, reducing and facilitating the release of suspended particles for clarification. These natural agents offer advantages such as biodegradability, which supports sustainable in , and long-standing acceptance in traditional industries for maintaining product purity. In contrast to synthetic alternatives, they align with requirements but may require higher dosages for equivalent efficacy.

Synthetic Agents

Synthetic clarifying agents are laboratory-produced compounds designed to enhance the removal of suspended particles from liquids through targeted chemical interactions, offering scalability and precision in industrial applications. These agents primarily include inorganic salts, polymeric flocculants, and silicon-based compounds, each engineered for specific and roles in processes like and wastewater management. In food and beverage applications, synthetic agents such as (PVPP) are used to remove polyphenols and reduce astringency in wine and , while silica-based colloids (e.g., ) target fine protein hazes. Inorganic salts such as , or aluminum potassium sulfate (AlK(SO₄)₂·12H₂O), function by hydrolyzing in water to release positively charged aluminum species that neutralize the negative charges on colloidal particles, promoting their aggregation and . This charge neutralization mechanism makes a staple in for clarifying turbid sources by destabilizing fine . Polyaluminum chloride (PAC), a pre-hydrolyzed variant with the general formula [Al₂(OH)ₙCl₆₋ₙ]ₘ, improves upon by providing higher and faster floc formation, often requiring 30-50% lower dosages while generating less and maintaining broader pH compatibility for efficient removal in . Polymeric flocculants, particularly polyacrylamides (PAMs), are high-molecular-weight synthetic classified as anionic, cationic, or non-ionic based on their charge properties, enabling customizable interactions with particles of varying surface charges. These , with molecular weights reaching up to 10⁷ Da, primarily operate via bridging, where extended polymer chains adsorb onto multiple particles to form larger flocs that settle more readily. Cationic PAMs, for instance, are effective for negatively charged inorganic colloids, while anionic variants suit positively charged or organic-laden suspensions, allowing tailored selection for optimal particle destabilization and clarification. Silicon-based agents like sodium silicate (Na₂SiO₃) contribute to coagulation by adjusting pH to alkaline levels, which enhances the solubility and reactivity of metal coagulants while forming silica gels that entrap impurities in wastewater treatment. At dosages of 15-20 mg/L as SiO₂, sodium silicate promotes floc stability and aids in removing silicates and other dissolved solids, particularly in high-pH environments where it acts as both a pH buffer and coagulant aid. Compared to natural clarifying agents, which served as historical precursors derived from plant or animal sources, synthetic agents provide advantages including higher efficiency in particle removal, adjustable charge densities through polymer modification, and reduced dosage requirements that minimize operational costs and residual impacts. A key innovation in this domain is the development of polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (polyDADMAC) in the 1950s, a cationic polymer that emerged as a non-toxic alternative to metal-based coagulants for potable water treatment, offering effective flocculation without introducing heavy metals.

Mechanisms of Action

Flocculation and Coagulation

Coagulation is the initial process in clarification where suspended particles, typically stabilized by electrostatic repulsion due to their surface charges, are destabilized by the addition of clarifying agents. These agents, such as , introduce positive charges that neutralize the negative charges on particles like and proteins, reducing the —the effective at the particle-liquid interface—to near zero. This neutralization diminishes the repulsive barrier between particles, allowing attractive van der Waals forces to dominate and promote initial aggregation. The ζ\zeta quantifies this charge stability and is calculated using the Smoluchowski equation under conditions of high : ζ=μEηε\zeta = \frac{\mu_E \eta}{\varepsilon} where μE\mu_E is the electrophoretic mobility, η\eta is the of the medium, and ε\varepsilon is the dielectric constant. As ζ\zeta approaches zero, colloidal stability decreases, facilitating particle collisions and coalescence. Flocculation follows coagulation, involving gentle mixing to form larger aggregates known as flocs. In this stage, polymeric clarifying agents like promote bridging, where long-chain molecules adsorb onto multiple particles, linking them into extended networks that increase floc size and density. Alternatively, agents like can adsorb proteins and polyphenols directly, contributing to aggregation through surface interactions rather than solely charge . In juice clarification, enzymatic agents such as degrade pectins, reducing and promoting particle coalescence by breaking down stabilizing . The underlying particle interactions are described by , which models the total interaction energy as the sum of attractive van der Waals forces and repulsive electrostatic forces. At optimal conditions, the potential energy curve exhibits a secondary minimum, enabling reversible aggregation into flocs without overcoming the primary energy barrier. Several factors influence the efficacy of coagulation and flocculation. The pH of the solution affects particle charge and agent performance, with optimal ranges for gelatin in wine typically around 3 to 4 to maximize binding with tannins via hydrogen bonding and charge neutralization. Ionic strength modulates the thickness of the electrical double layer around particles, compressing it at higher concentrations to reduce repulsion. Dosage is determined experimentally via bench trials, where gelatin concentrations of 10-150 mg/L are commonly evaluated for wines to achieve clarity without over-fining.

Sedimentation and Separation

is a fundamental physical process in the clarification of liquids, where flocculated particles settle under the influence of gravity in dedicated tanks or basins, allowing the denser aggregates to separate from the clearer supernatant liquid. This gravity-driven relies on the principles outlined in , which governs the terminal velocity of spherical particles in a viscous . The settling velocity vv is given by the equation: v=g(ρp−ρf)d218ηv = \frac{g (\rho_p - \rho_f) d^2}{18 \eta} where gg is the acceleration due to gravity, ρp\rho_p and ρf\rho_f are the densities of the particle and fluid, respectively, dd is the particle diameter, and η\eta is the fluid viscosity. This relationship highlights how larger, denser flocs settle more rapidly, enabling efficient separation in industrial settling tanks designed to minimize turbulence and promote laminar flow. Following sedimentation, filtration methods are employed to capture any remaining fine flocs or that do not settle completely. (DE) filtration, a common depth filtration technique, involves pre-coating a filter septum with a porous layer of DE, a siliceous , which traps particles as the liquid passes through, achieving high clarity without significant pressure loss. Membrane , such as or systems, provide an alternative by using semi-permeable barriers with pore sizes typically ranging from 0.1 to 10 micrometers to retain particulates, often preferred in sterile environments for their and ease of validation. For high-speed separation in viscous liquids, applies centrifugal forces to accelerate particle ; in industrial juice , disc-stack centrifuges can generate forces up to 10,000g, rapidly clarifying large volumes by forcing solids to the periphery while the clarified liquid is discharged centrally. In more delicate applications like , and serve as gentle separation techniques, where the clarified liquid is carefully poured or siphoned off the settled to avoid disturbing the lees at the bottom of the vessel. This process, repeated as needed, not only removes solids but also prevents off-flavors from prolonged contact with deposits. Overall, these and separation methods, often applied sequentially after , can reduce from over 100 NTU in raw liquids to less than 1 NTU in the final product, ensuring visual clarity and stability in beverages and treated waters.

Applications

In Beverages

Clarifying agents play a crucial role in beverage production to achieve visual clarity without compromising sensory qualities, particularly in alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks where can detract from appearance and stability. In , is widely employed post-fermentation to prevent protein haze by binding and precipitating heat-unstable proteins in white wines. Typical addition rates range from 60 to 1,800 mg/L, determined through bench trials to minimize excess that could strip desirable compounds. serves as a fining agent for management in red wines, reducing astringency by forming insoluble complexes with large-molecular-weight at dosages of 30–240 mg/L, followed by 2–3 days of settling. In , , derived from fish swim bladders, facilitates removal to enhance clarity before packaging. Its positively charged binds to negatively charged cell walls, promoting and rapid in as little as 2 hours when added at 0.25–0.5% of volume during transfer. This process reduces conditioning time to about 3 days while preserving foam stability by eliminating head-negative phospholipids. For and production, enzymes are combined with to address fruit-derived hazes caused by . break down molecules, enabling fruit particles to flocculate and settle compactly in the lees, often added during pressing with a minimum 2-hour contact time to achieve juice clarity of 80–120 NTU. Supporting such as or then accelerate this settling, with compacting lees at 20–100 g/hL in must, though timing is critical to avoid enzyme inactivation. A key challenge in beverage clarification is preserving flavor integrity, as over-fining can adsorb volatile compounds essential for aroma. For instance, excessive application reduces esters like ethyl hexanoate by up to 50% and eliminates such as , diminishing fruity and floral notes in wines. Cold stabilization addresses tartrate instability by chilling wine to 0–4°C for 2–3 weeks, inducing crystal precipitation to prevent post-bottling formation, though it requires prior clarification to optimize . In via the , finings like act as riddling aids added at bottling (up to 6 g/100 L) to compact , facilitating its collection in the bottle neck during remuage and easier removal during disgorging. Other agents, such as or , similarly enhance cohesion for aged wines, reducing riddling time and minimizing wine loss, though overuse may affect or .

In Water Treatment

In processes, clarifying agents play a crucial role in municipal and industrial purification by removing , , and contaminants from sources such as s. The conventional treatment sequence begins with , where agents like aluminum () are dosed into rapid mix tanks to destabilize colloidal particles, followed by to form larger flocs, and then to allow these flocs to settle out. Typical dosing for in water clarification ranges from 10 to 50 mg/L, depending on parameters like and , to achieve effective particle aggregation without excessive chemical use. In applications, clarifying agents such as ferric chloride are employed for targeted removal in , where it precipitates as insoluble ferric phosphate, aiding compliance with discharge limits. This process also generates a that can be dewatered more efficiently compared to untreated , reducing disposal volumes in systems. For instance, ferric chloride dosing facilitates the formation of denser flocs that enhance and subsequent mechanical through or belt pressing. Advanced clarification techniques, such as ballasted systems, incorporate microsand as a weighting agent to accelerate floc in high- waters, enabling shorter retention times in clarifiers—often reducing them to 10-20 minutes versus hours in conventional setups. These systems are particularly effective for variable or seasonal high- inflows, like stormwater-influenced rivers, by the microsand to maintain process efficiency. Overall, effective use of clarifying agents in these processes routinely achieves below 0.3 NTU, aligning with WHO guidelines for optimal quality to ensure removal and aesthetic clarity.

In Other Industries

In sugar refining, and lime are commonly employed as clarifying agents during the processing of to remove impurities such as waxes, proteins, and fibers. The addition of reacts with lime ( or ) to form , which acts as an effective adsorbent, facilitating the and of these contaminants for subsequent . This process, often enhanced with flocculants, occurs after juice evaporation and involves to promote separation, ensuring clearer for further refining. In the processing of oils and fats, activated clay serves as a key clarifying agent for bleaching vegetable oils by adsorbing pigments such as and , which contribute to undesirable coloration. The bleaching process involves mixing the heated oil with acid-activated clay, allowing the porous structure of the clay to selectively bind and remove these pigments along with trace metals and oxidation products, followed by to yield a lighter, more stable oil. Optimization of clay dosage and contact time is critical to balance pigment removal efficiency, typically achieving significant color reduction without excessive oil loss. Within the , activated is utilized for decolorizing syrups and other liquid formulations by adsorbing unwanted pigments and impurities, enhancing product clarity and purity. This adsorption process leverages the high surface area of the charcoal to capture color-causing compounds without altering the active ingredients, commonly applied in the purification of oral syrups during . Additionally, synthetic polymers function as flocculants in purification, aiding the clarification of harvest broths by aggregating cellular debris and host cell proteins for easier separation via or , thereby improving yield and efficiency. In dyeing operations, flocculants are applied to treat containing , promoting and to remove colorants before discharge. These agents, often polymeric, destabilize colloidal dye particles, forming larger flocs that settle out, achieving color removal efficiencies exceeding 70% in real under optimized conditions such as adjustment and dosage. This treatment mitigates environmental release of persistent , supporting compliance with standards.

Safety and Regulations

Health Considerations

Animal-derived clarifying agents pose allergen risks to sensitive individuals; for example, can trigger adverse reactions, including , in those allergic to proteins, while may pose risks for allergies to mammalian proteins such as in . In the , mandatory labeling of allergens like (including ) and egg derivatives in foodstuffs has been required since Directive 2003/89/EC, which amended earlier regulations to ensure clear declaration on packaged products, though exemptions applied to certain processing aids in wine until 2012. In the United States, allergen labeling for fining agents in wine is currently voluntary under Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau regulations, but in January 2025, the agency proposed mandatory disclosure of major food allergens (including , eggs, , and others potentially from clarifying agents) on labels for wines and other alcoholic beverages, with a proposed compliance period of five years following finalization. Toxicity concerns arise from residues of inorganic clarifying agents like , which can introduce aluminum into treated or beverages; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets a secondary maximum contaminant level of 0.05 to 0.2 mg/L for aluminum in to prevent aesthetic issues and potential health effects from chronic exposure. Mineral-based clarifying agents, such as clay, may contain residual like lead and , raising concerns for human exposure through contaminated beverages; the U.S. has issued warnings about elevated lead levels in certain products, which could lead to neurological damage with prolonged intake. To address dietary restrictions and allergen avoidance, vegan alternatives like plant-derived proteins (e.g., or protein) and non-animal substances such as or are increasingly promoted, enabling clarification without animal-derived risks. Post-clarification testing protocols in the beverage industry include sensory evaluations for off-flavors and analytical methods like chromatography and mass spectrometry to detect contaminants or residual agents, ensuring compliance with safety standards and preventing consumer exposure. A notable case study from 2009-2010 involved a Canadian Food Inspection Agency targeted survey of retail wines for undeclared milk (casein) and egg allergens from fining agents, analyzing over 100 samples; while no detectable levels were found, the initiative highlighted the need for vigilance during the transition to stricter labeling, underscoring potential risks from incomplete removal of allergenic proteins.

Environmental Impacts

The use of clarifying agents in processes generates significant as a byproduct, particularly from alum-based , where the resulting typically comprises 1-3% solids by volume relative to the treated . This low-solids material poses disposal challenges, often requiring or to manage volume and prevent environmental release, contributing to landfill burdens and potential emissions from . Non-biodegradable synthetic polymers, such as used as flocculants in clarification, exhibit high environmental persistence, leading to accumulation in waterways and raising microplastic concerns identified in studies from the onward. These polymers degrade slowly under natural conditions, potentially releasing toxic monomers like and forming persistent microplastic fragments that disrupt aquatic ecosystems. Production of natural clarifying agents like involves that disrupts habitats through land excavation and , altering local and water flows in extraction areas. In response, there has been a shift toward bio-based alternatives, such as flocculants derived from , , or , which offer greater by reducing reliance on non-renewable resources and minimizing long-term ecological footprints. Mitigation strategies include recycling fining lees—sediments from clarifying agents in —into , which repurposes organic waste into nutrient-rich amendments and reduces disposal needs. Additionally, the EU's REACH regulation, implemented since 2007, imposes controls on chemical emissions from substances, promoting safer alternatives and limiting environmental releases of persistent clarifying agents. A specific concern is arising from -bound sludges in plants, where improper disposal of byproducts can release bound into water bodies, fueling algal blooms and oxygen depletion.

References

  1. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-170/section-170.3
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10084989/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10815077/
  4. https://www.britannica.com/topic/fining-wine-making
  5. https://talesofthecocktail.org/history-science-clarification/
  6. https://www.food-safety.com/articles/8647-vegan-clean-label-fining-agent-for-clarifying-beverages
  7. https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/Permits/WaterManagementPermits/Documents/Chemical-Additives/Additive-Review-Procedure.pdf
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/clarification-process
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4819912/
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214714416300976
  11. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-170
  12. https://clearlyfiltered.com/articles/when-did-water-filtration-begin
  13. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=200024H9.TXT
  14. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/whats-in-your-wine
  15. https://www.darlingii.com/fr-ca/media/blogs/rousselot-a-brief-history-of-gelatin-manufacturing
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9963746/
  17. http://www.waterworkshistory.us/bio/Baker/1948Coagulation.pdf
  18. http://www.roads.maryland.gov/opr_research/md-06-sp508b4j-polyacrylamide-use-for-sediment-reduction-in-construction-site-stormwater-discharge-report.pdf
  19. https://winehistory.com.au/wiki/Wine_History/Bentonite_for_wine_clarification
  20. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/safe-drinking-water-act-1974-and-its-role-providing-access-safe-drinking-water-united-states/2017-10
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4440624/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6600255/
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6332064/
  24. https://www.awri.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/stockley-w36-awitc15.pdf
  25. https://www.enology.fst.vt.edu/downloads/bentonite01.pdf
  26. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa2e/334886fb483a51dc2cd03f431dd2a1dc9131.pdf
  27. https://www.kimica-algin.com/products/NaAlgin/
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309193796_The_Use_Of_Chitosan_As_Clarification_Agent
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40828-023-00182-9
  30. https://www.awri.com.au/industry_support/winemaking_resources/frequently_asked_questions/fining_agents/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10688212/
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272026283_Noninvasive_Measurement_of_Particle-Settling_Velocity_and_Comparison_with_Stokes%27_Law
  33. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf060008d
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4685141/
  35. https://www.oiv.int/node/2317/download/pdf
  36. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/fs/fs-53-w.pdf
  37. https://home.sandiego.edu/~josephprovost/fining.pdf
  38. https://rahrbsg.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ClearBeerTechnology.pdf
  39. https://scottlab.com/cider-clarification-101
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7321132/
  41. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/wine/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Methods-for-Tartrate-Stabilization-of-Wine-PDF.pdf
  42. https://www.enology.fst.vt.edu/downloads/wm_issues/MethodeChampenoise.pdf
  43. https://scottlab.com/content/files/Documents/Handbooks/SparklingHandbook1819.pdf
  44. https://www.cdc.gov/drinking-water/about/how-water-treatment-works.html
  45. https://www.epa.ie/publications/compliance--enforcement/drinking-water/advice--guidance/EPA_water_treatment_mgt_coag_flocc_clar2.pdf
  46. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-wwtp9-02.pdf
  47. https://www.veoliawatertechnologies.com/en/solutions/technologies/actiflo
  48. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-FWC-WSH-17.01
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49837418_Improved_Sugar_Cane_Juice_Clarification_by_Understanding_Calcium_Oxide-Phosphate-Sucrose_Systems
  50. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/c9s10-1a.pdf
  51. https://www.aocs.org/resource/optimization-of-bleaching-process/
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643823005376
  53. https://www.carbonactivo.com/en/decolorization-with-activated-carbon-in-the-pharmaceutical-industry/
  54. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c05637
  55. https://dcvmn.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/3._article_-_clarification_of_vaccines.pdf
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653519315206
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3339366/
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321536380_European_Regulations_for_Labeling_Requirements_for_Food_Allergens_and_Substances_Causing_Intolerances_History_and_Future
  59. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/17/2025-00955/major-food-allergen-labeling-for-wines-distilled-spirits-and-malt-beverages
  60. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/secondary-drinking-water-standards-guidance-nuisance-chemicals
  61. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-consumers-not-use-best-bentonite-clay
  62. https://www.enartis.com/en-us/news-trends/plant-based-fining-agents-free-of-animal-proteins/
  63. https://www.eurofinsus.com/food-testing/resources/foreign-material-and-off-odor-and-flavor-testing/
  64. http://inspection.canada.ca/en/food-safety-industry/food-chemistry-and-microbiology/food-safety-testing-reports-and-journal-articles/fining-agents
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0956053X14005753
  66. https://water.mecc.edu/courses/ENV295Residuals/lesson3b.htm
  67. https://www.waterandwastewater.com/sludge-disposal-methods-efficient-and-sustainable-practices/
  68. https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/pdf1995/scott95g.pdf
  69. https://www.oekotoxzentrum.ch/media/194999/2019_dellambrogio_polyacryl.pdf
  70. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.8b05297
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014765139791527X
  72. https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/nepa/70121/106187/129755/BPM_A7_Plan_EA_WYW-165988_2017May9.pdf
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7559979/
  74. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3454
  75. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/reach-regulation_en
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10924021/
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135401005085
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.