Hubbry Logo
Glacial erraticGlacial erraticMain
Open search
Glacial erratic
Community hub
Glacial erratic
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Glacial erratic
Glacial erratic
Glacial erratic
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Glacial erratics from Norway on Schokland in the Netherlands
Glacial erratic boulder in Snowdonia (Eryri), Wales

A glacial erratic is a glacially deposited rock differing from the type of rock native to the area in which it rests. Erratics, which take their name from the Latin word errare ("to wander"), are carried by glacial ice, often over distances of hundreds of kilometres. Erratics can range in size from pebbles to large boulders such as Big Rock (16,500 metric tons) in Alberta.

Geologists identify erratics by studying the rocks surrounding the position of the erratic and the composition of the erratic itself. Erratics are significant because:

  • They can be transported by glaciers, and are thereby one of a series of indicators which mark the path of prehistoric glacier movement. Their lithographic origin can be traced to the parent bedrock, allowing for confirmation of the ice flow route.
  • They can be transported by ice rafting, which allows quantification of the extent of glacial flooding resulting from ice dam failures which release the waters stored in proglacial lakes such as Lake Missoula. Erratics released by ice rafts that were stranded and subsequently melted, dropping their load, allow characterization of the high-water marks for transient floods in areas like temporary Lake Lewis.
  • Erratics dropped by icebergs melting in the ocean can be used to track Antarctic and Arctic-region glacial movements for periods prior to record retention. Also known as dropstones, these can be correlated with ocean temperatures and levels to better understand and calibrate models of the global climate.[1]

Formation of erratics

[edit]
Multiple erratics on the terminal moraine of the Okanogan Lobe. The Cascade Mountains are in the background.

The term "erratic" is commonly used to refer to erratic blocks, which geologist Archibald Geikie describes as: "large masses of rock, often as big as a house, that have been transported by glacier ice, and have been lodged in a prominent position in the glacier valleys or have been scattered over hills and plains. And examination of their mineralogical character leads the identification of their sources...".[2] In geology, an erratic is material moved by geologic forces from one location to another, usually by a glacier.

Erratics are formed by glacial ice erosion resulting from the movement of ice. Glaciers erode by multiple processes including:

  • Abrasion/Scouring – debris in the basal ice scrapes along the bed, polishing and gouging the underlying rocks, similar to sandpaper on wood, producing smaller glacial till.
  • Plucking – pieces of bedrock are cracked off by glaciers, producing larger erratics.
  • Ice thrusting – the glacier freezes to its bed, moving large sheets of frozen sediment at its base along with it.
  • Glacially induced spalling – layers of rock are spalled off the rocks below the glacier during ice lens formation. This provides smaller debris, which is ground into the glacial basal material, to become till.[3][4]
Doane Rock, at Cape Cod National Seashore

Evidence supports another possibility for the creation of erratics as well: rock avalanches onto the upper surface of the glacier (supraglacial). Rock avalanche–supraglacial transport occurs when the glacier undercuts a rock face, which fails by avalanche onto the upper surface of the glacier. The characteristics of rock avalanche–supraglacial transport includes:[5]

  • Monolithologic composition – a cluster of boulders of similar composition are frequently found in close proximity. Commingling of the multiple lithologies normally present throughout the glaciated basin, has not occurred.[5]
  • Angularity – the supraglacially transported rocks tend to be rough and irregular, with no sign of subglacial abrasion. The sides of boulders are roughly planar, suggesting that some surfaces may be original fracture planes.[5]
  • Great size – the size distribution of the boulders tends to be skewed toward larger boulders than those produced subglacially.[5]
  • Surficial positioning of the boulders – the boulders are positioned on the surface of glacial deposits, as opposed to partially or totally buried.[5]
  • Restricted areal extents – the boulder fields tend to have limited areal extent; the boulders cluster together, consistent with the boulders landing on the surface of the glacier and subsequently deposited on top of the glacial drift.[5]
  • Orientations – the boulders may be close enough that original fracture planes can be matched.[5]
  • Locations of the boulder trains – the boulders appear in rows, trains or clusters along the lateral moraines as opposed to being located on the terminal moraine or in the general glacial field.[5]

Glacier-borne erratic

[edit]
Two small icebergs at right clearly retain fragments of the moraine (rock debris) that forms a dark line along the upper surface of the glacier. The inclusion of the moraine illustrates how land-based rocks and sediment are carried by ice.

Erratics provide an important tool in characterizing the directions of glacier flows, which are routinely reconstructed used on a combination of moraines, eskers, drumlins, meltwater channels and similar data. Erratic distributions and glacial till properties allow for identification of the source rock from which they derive, which confirms the flow direction, particularly when the erratic source outcrop is unique to a limited locality. Erratic materials may be transported by multiple glacier flows prior to their deposition, which can complicate the reconstruction of the glacial flow.[6]

Ice-rafted erratic

[edit]

Glacial ice entrains debris of varying sizes from small particles to extremely large masses of rock. This debris is transported to the coast by glacier ice and released during the production, drift and melting of icebergs. The rate of debris release by ice depends upon the size of the ice mass in which it is carried as well as the temperature of the ocean through which the ice floe passes.[7][8]

This photo shows an automobile passing in front of a rock which is essentially fully exposed. The rock has a rough, dark surface indicating it is weathered basalt and is roughly circular in exposed cross-section. The rock is immediately adjacent to a roadway—the road cut removed much of the earth from one side of it exposing it—from the excavation it is evident that the rock sits on a mound of glacial till. The rock is approximately two times the length of the car (i.e., ≈9 metres) in one direction and five times the height of the car in the other direction (i.e., ≈9 metres). Since the rock has not tipped onto the road and no structural support is provided, it must be approximately as deep as it is wide and high. Since the density of basalt is 3 grams per cubic centimetre, this puts the mass of the rock at about 400 to 500 metric tons (consistent with the references).
Yeager Rock, a 400-metric-ton (440-short-ton) boulder on the Waterville Plateau, Washington. Although transported by a glacier, this boulder is not a true erratic because it is of the same lithology as the underlying, till-blanketed bedrock. Note the glacial till below the rock.

Sediments from the late Pleistocene period lying on the floor of the North Atlantic show a series of layers (referred to as Heinrich layers) which contain ice-rafted debris. They were formed between 14,000 and 70,000 years before the present. The deposited debris can be traced back to the origin by both the nature of the materials released and the continuous path of debris release. Some paths extend more than 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi) distant from the point at which the ice floes originally broke free.[7]

The location and altitude of ice-rafted boulders relative to the modern landscape has been used to identify the highest level of water in proglacial lakes (e.g. Lake Musselshell in central Montana) and temporary lakes (e.g. Lake Lewis in Washington state). Ice-rafted debris is deposited when the iceberg strands on the shore and subsequently melts, or drops out of the ice floe as it melts. Hence all erratic deposits are deposited below the actual high water level of the lake; however, the measured altitude of ice-rafted debris can be used to estimate the lake surface elevation.

Angular glacial erratic on Lembert Dome

This is accomplished by recognizing that on a fresh-water lake, the iceberg floats until the volume of its ice-rafted debris exceeds 5% of the volume of the iceberg. Therefore, a correlation between the iceberg size and the boulder size can be established. For example, a 1.5-metre-diameter (5 ft) boulder can be carried by a 3-metre-high (10 ft) iceberg and could be found stranded at higher elevations than a 2-metre (7 ft) boulder, which requires a 4-metre-high (13 ft) iceberg.[9]

Large erratics

[edit]
Glacial erratic Ehalkivi with overground volume 930 cubic metres (1,220 cu yd) (weight approximately 2,500 metric tons or 2,800 short tons) in Estonia
Area exposed by the retreat of Alaska's Steller Glacier in August 1996, the westernmost part of Bering Glacier's piedmont lobe. The ground surface is covered by glacial sediment deposited as lodgement and ablation till. The erratic is an angular, 20-foot-high (6.1 m) piece of gneiss. Bering Glacier, Alaska flows through Wrangell–St. Elias National Park and Preserve.

Large erratics consisting of slabs of bedrock that have been lifted and transported by glacier ice to subsequently be stranded above thin glacial or fluvioglacial deposits are referred to as glacial floes, rafts (schollen) or erratic megablocks. Erratic megablocks have typical length to thickness ratios on the order of 100 to 1. These megablocks may be found partially exposed or completely buried by till and are clearly allochthonous, since they overlay glacial till. Megablocks can be so large that they are mistaken for bedrock until underlying glacial or fluvial sediments are identified by drilling or excavation. Such erratic megablocks greater than 1 square kilometre (250 acres) in area and 30 metres (98 ft) in thickness can be found on the Canadian Prairies, Poland, England, Denmark and Sweden. One erratic megablock located in Saskatchewan is 30 by 38 kilometres (19 mi × 24 mi) (and up to 100 metres or 330 feet thick). Their sources can be identified by locating the bedrock from which they were separated; several rafts from Poland and Alberta were determined to have been transported over 300 kilometres (190 mi) from their source.[10]

Nonglacial erratics

[edit]

In geology an erratic is any material which is not native to the immediate locale but has been transported from elsewhere. The most common examples of erratics are associated with glacial transport, either by direct glacier-borne transport or by ice rafting. However, other erratics have been identified as the result of kelp holdfasts, which have been documented to transport rocks up to 40 centimetres (16 in) in diameter, rocks entangled in the roots of drifting logs, and even in transport of stones accumulated in the stomachs of pinnipeds during foraging.[11]

History

[edit]
Erratic rocks on Estonian northern coast

During the 18th century, erratics were deemed a major geological paradox. Geologists identify erratics by studying the rocks surrounding the position of the erratic and the rock of the erratic itself. Erratics were once considered evidence of a biblical flood,[12] but in the 19th century scientists gradually came to accept that erratics pointed to an ice age in Earth's past. Among others, the Swiss politician, jurist and theologian Bernhard Friedrich Kuhn [de] saw glaciers as a possible solution as early as 1788. However, the idea of ice ages and glaciation as a geological force took a while to be accepted. Ignaz Venetz (1788–1859), a Swiss engineer, naturalist and glaciologist was one of the first scientists to recognize glaciers as a major force in shaping the earth.

In the 19th century, many scientists came to favor erratics as evidence for the end of the ice age 10,000 years ago, rather than a flood. Geologists have suggested that landslides or rockfalls initially dropped the rocks on top of glacial ice. The glaciers continued to move, carrying the rocks with them. When the ice melted, the erratics were left in their present locations.

Charles Lyell's Principles of Geology (v. 1, 1830)[13] provided an early description of the erratic which is consistent with the modern understanding. Louis Agassiz was the first to scientifically propose that the Earth had been subject to a past ice age.[14] In the same year, he was elected a foreign member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Prior to this proposal, Goethe, de Saussure, Venetz, Jean de Charpentier, Karl Friedrich Schimper and others had made the glaciers of the Alps the subjects of special study, and Goethe,[15] Charpentier as well as Schimper[14] had even arrived at the conclusion that the erratic blocks of alpine rocks scattered over the slopes and summits of the Jura Mountains had been moved there by glaciers.

Charles Darwin published extensively on geologic phenomena including the distribution of erratic boulders. In his accounts written during the voyage of HMS Beagle, Darwin observed a number of large erratic boulders of notable size south of the Strait of Magellan, Tierra del Fuego and attributed them to ice rafting from Antarctica. Recent research suggests that they are more likely the result of glacial ice flows carrying the boulders to their current locations.[16]

Examples

[edit]

Glacier-borne erratics

[edit]
Example of mixed erratics. The boulder in the foreground is basalt. The boulder on the other side of the fence is granite.

Australia

[edit]

Canada

[edit]

Estonia

[edit]
Main article: Glacial erratic boulders of Estonia
  • Ehalkivi (Sunset Glow Boulder) near Letipea, Estonia is the largest erratic boulder in the glaciation area of North Europe. Height 7 m, circumference 48.2 m, a volume of 930 m3 and a mass of approx 2,500 tonnes

Finland

[edit]
Kukkarokivi in March 2013

Germany

[edit]

Republic of Ireland

[edit]

Latvia

[edit]
Lauču Stone in Vidzeme coastline, Latvia

Lithuania

[edit]

Poland

[edit]
Devil Stone, Kashubia, Poland

United Kingdom

[edit]
England
[edit]
The Drake Stone near Harbottle, Northumberland, is the height of a double-decker bus.
Scotland
[edit]
  • Jim Crow Rock, glacial erratic in Hunters Quay, situated on the foreshore of the Firth of Clyde. The rock has been the subject of controversy because of an allegedly racist face painted on it.
Northern Ireland
[edit]

United States

[edit]
See also: Category:Glacial erratics of Washington (state)
Bubble Rock, Acadia National Park, Maine
The Glen Rock, in Glen Rock, New Jersey

Flood-borne erratics

[edit]

If glacial ice is "rafted" by a flood such as that created when the ice dam broke during the Missoula floods, then the erratics are deposited where the ice finally releases its debris load. One of the more unusual examples is found far from its origin in Idaho at Erratic Rock State Natural Site just outside McMinnville, Oregon. The park includes a 40-short-ton (36 t) specimen, the largest erratic found in the Willamette Valley.

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Glacial erratic.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Glacial erratic

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A glacial erratic is a or rock fragment of unspecified shape and size that has been transported a significant distance—often tens or hundreds of kilometers—from its origin by a or and subsequently deposited through melting ice or ice-rafting processes, typically differing in composition from the surrounding local or sediments. These erratics range in size from pebbles to massive blocks larger than a house and serve as key indicators of past glacial activity. Glacial erratics form primarily through erosional mechanisms during glacial advance, where moving cracks, gouges, or plucks fragments from the underlying , embedding them within the as it flows. As the glacier retreats due to climatic warming, these entrained rocks are released and left stranded in their new locations, sometimes atop glacial till or outwash deposits. The term "erratic" derives from the Latin errare, meaning "to wander," reflecting their displacement from familiar geological contexts. In geological studies, glacial erratics hold significant value for reconstructing the history and dynamics of ancient ice sheets, as matching their to source units reveals intricate patterns of ice flow, including uphill movements over topographic barriers. Notable examples include house-sized boulders in , transported from distant ranges, and erratics exposed by retreating glaciers in Alaska's Bering region, which highlight the extent of Pleistocene glaciations across . Today, these features not only inform but also appear in modern landscapes, occasionally repurposed for engineering or as natural landmarks.

Introduction and Definition

Definition

A glacial erratic is a rock or boulder of unspecified shape and size that has been transported a significant distance from its bedrock source by glacial action or icebergs and deposited upon melting of the ice, typically exhibiting a lithology distinct from the surrounding terrain. These erratics serve as indicators of past glacial activity, having been displaced far from their origin without significant alteration during transport. Glaciation refers to the processes driven by the movement of large masses of , such as glaciers, which accumulate from compacted and flow under , eroding and entraining from the underlying in the process. This movement is essential for the formation of erratics, as it enables the long-distance relocation of materials that would otherwise remain in place. Erratics vary widely in scale, ranging from small pebbles to massive boulders larger than , with some exceeding 10 in and weighing thousands of tons. For instance, certain erratics in glaciated regions can reach weights of up to 1,400 tons based on their dimensions.

Characteristics and Identification

Glacial erratics exhibit distinctive physical traits resulting from their interaction with glacial ice during transport. These rocks often display striations—linear scratches or grooves formed by abrasion against or other debris embedded in the ice—and polished surfaces due to the grinding action of fine sediments under pressure. may also occur, where flat, angular faces develop from repeated impacts and , while prolonged transport can lead to more rounded shapes. A key trait is the lithological mismatch with surrounding , such as a resting on terrain, indicating displacement from a distant source. Identification of glacial erratics relies on a combination of field observations and analyses to confirm glacial origin and . In the field, geologists look for associated glacial deposits like or moraines, and alignment of striations or facets that correspond to inferred ice flow directions. Petrographic analysis, involving thin-section , examines mineral composition and texture to match the erratic to specific source outcrops; for instance, distinctive or assemblages in granitic erratics can trace origins to formations like the Shap Granite in . Geochemical techniques, such as analysis or isotopic (e.g., Rb-Sr methods), further refine by comparing chemical signatures, enabling identification even for similar rock types. These methods distinguish erratics from locally derived rocks by highlighting compositional anomalies. Erratics vary widely in size, from small pebbles (under 64 ) to massive boulders exceeding 1 m in diameter, with megaboulders—those over 10 m or weighing thousands of tons—being particularly diagnostic due to the immense energy required for their glacial transport. Larger specimens, such as those exceeding 256 classified as boulders, are less prone to confusion with fluvial or colluvial deposits and often preserve clearer evidence of ice entrainment, like deep striations. Typical examples include dispersal trains of boulders up to several meters across, transported tens of kilometers from sources like the granites. This size range underscores their role as reliable indicators, as megaboulders rarely result from non-glacial processes.

Formation and Transport Mechanisms

Glacial Entrainment and Transport

Glacial entrainment begins with the incorporation of fragments into the , primarily through basal plucking, also known as quarrying, where adheres to irregularities such as joints or fractures in the and lifts them as the advances. This process is enhanced by fluctuating water pressures at the bed, which open cracks and facilitate the detachment of cobble- to boulder-sized blocks. Freeze-thaw cycles contribute by repeatedly expanding water in fissures, weakening the rock and promoting shattering, which loosens material for subsequent pickup by the . Subglacial deformation further aids entrainment by shearing soft sediments or at the bed, incorporating debris into a basal layer through plastic flow of the -substrate interface. These mechanisms collectively allow to erode and load rocks ranging from pebbles to massive boulders, setting the stage for their relocation as erratics. Once entrained, rocks are transported within the via three main pathways: basal, englacial, and supraglacial. Basal transport occurs in debris-rich layers at the ice-bed interface, moved by sliding over the substrate or deformation of the underlying , while englacial transport involves debris lodged within the mass through creep, where differential flow elevates fragments upward from the base. Supraglacial positioning happens when debris is exposed on the surface via or falls into crevasses, remaining on or near the top of the . Transport distances can extend to hundreds of kilometers, governed by factors such as velocity (typically 10–100 m/year in temperate glaciers), thickness (up to several kilometers in ice sheets), and the duration of ice flow, with thicker, faster-moving glaciers capable of carrying erratics farther from their source. Deposition of these glacier-borne erratics occurs primarily as the melts at the glacier margin or terminus, releasing embedded or surface to form isolated boulders, till sheets, or accumulations in moraines. During , blocks may drop directly onto the ground or be left stranded as the surrounding ablates, preserving them in their transported positions. While direct transport dominates for many erratics, secondary processes like ice-rafting can contribute in marginal settings.

Ice-Rafting and Meltwater Processes

Ice-rafting occurs when , including large boulders known as glacial erratics, is entrained within glacial ice and subsequently transported by floating ice after calving. Glaciers accumulate along their bases, sides, and surfaces through processes such as subglacial and supraglacial falls; upon reaching marine or lacustrine margins, the ice calves into icebergs or floes that carry this poorly sorted material, ranging from to boulders. During , these floating ice masses drift via ocean or lake currents, releasing erratics through seasonal melting, often depositing them offshore or in proglacial lakes as isolated dropstones within finer s. This mechanism can result in transport distances ranging from tens to thousands of kilometers, depending on currents and drift duration, often comparable to direct glacial entrainment. In sedimentary records, ice-rafted erratics are identified by their association with varves—annual layers of alternating coarse and fine sediments in proglacial lakes—or as dropstones that penetrate underlying laminae, indicating fallout from melting ice overhead. These deposits form chaotic, unsorted accumulations on lake or sea floors, with coarser grains (up to and boulders) showing mechanical features like conchoidal edges from glacial abrasion. Unlike sea-ice rafting, which favors fine, chemically altered particles, glacial ice-rafting produces coarser, angular debris reflective of terrestrial glacial processes. Meltwater processes, particularly glacial outburst floods or jökulhlaups, provide another pathway for erratic transport without sustained glacier contact. These sudden releases of impounded , often from ice-dammed lakes, generate high-velocity flows that entrain and carry boulders as bedload or within rafted icebergs calved during the event. As floodwaters recede, stranded icebergs melt, depositing erratics along flood routes or in valleys, forming features like berg mounds with exotic lithologies. High-energy streams further redistribute erratics as stratified drift in outwash plains, though distances remain limited relative to glacial drag, and deposits often intermix with varved silts in proglacial settings.

Distinction from Non-Glacial Erratics

Glacial erratics must be differentiated from boulders displaced by non-glacial mechanisms to avoid misidentification in geological reconstructions. River-transported boulders, or fluvial erratics, typically exhibit high and rounding from prolonged abrasion in turbulent water flows, and they occur in size-sorted deposits such as bars or channel lags, reflecting hydraulic sorting processes absent in glacial contexts. In contrast, glacial erratics often retain subangular shapes with facets or bullet-nosed forms from pressure melting and within ice, and they lack such sorting when embedded in diamicton . Boulders moved by slope creep or mass-wasting events like landslides generally source from proximal exposures, matching the surrounding , and show angular fractures with minimal transport wear, often associated with colluvial aprons or slump scars rather than widespread dispersal. rarely transport large boulders, but any wind-moved rocks display features like sharp keels and sand-blasted pitting, distinct from the broad, striated surfaces of glacial abrasion. Volcanic erratics, transported via lava flows or pyroclastic debris, exhibit igneous or vesicular textures and are confined to volcanic terrains, without the exotic lithologies indicative of ice-sheet . Diagnostic criteria for confirming glacial origin include the absence of these non-glacial traits, coupled with positive evidence such as linear striations, polish, or chatter marks on the boulder surface from glacial grinding, and a depositional context within unsorted, matrix-supported lacking fluvial or landslide breccias. Matching the erratic's composition to distant sources via petrographic analysis further supports glacial transport over local or fluvial alternatives.

Geological Significance

Role in Reconstructing Glacial History

Glacial erratics play a crucial role in tracing the paths of ancient ice sheets by matching their lithological composition to known source regions, thereby inferring former flow directions. For instance, in northeast England, the presence of Scandinavian indicator erratics, such as igneous and metamorphic rocks transported across the North Sea, within glaciomarine deposits at Warren House Gill, County Durham, indicates southerly ice flow from the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet during the Middle Pleistocene (Marine Isotope Stage 8–12). These erratics, distinct from local bedrock, demonstrate interactions between the British-Irish and Scandinavian ice sheets, refining models of ice dynamics in the North Sea Basin. Similarly, within Britain, erratics of Shap Granite sourced from Cumbria have been traced eastward to sites in Yorkshire, up to 40 km away, revealing localized flow patterns of the British-Irish Ice Sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum. Erratics also delineate the maximum extents of past glaciations by marking the farthest reaches of ice advance, where they were deposited at ice margins. In , quartzite-rich erratics from the Canadian Shield, found in northeast at approximately 39°N , represent the southernmost limit of the Laurentide Ice Sheet during pre-Illinoian glaciations (before 0.78 Ma). These boulders, embedded in weathered till lags, confirm that the extended beyond 38°N during early advances, providing evidence of its vast areal coverage across the . Such distributions highlight how erratics outline terminal positions, contrasting with more proximal glacial features like moraines. The spatial patterns and associated dating of erratics offer insights into paleoclimate by revealing fluctuations in ice volume and the timing of glacial advances and retreats during the Pleistocene. analysis, particularly of ¹⁰Be in quartz-bearing erratics, measures exposure ages post-deposition to date events; for example, erratics in yield ages of 248–75 ka, indicating retreat phases tied to warming. Stratigraphic associations with erratics further constrain timelines, such as linking them to Marine Isotope Stage 2 advances around 20 ka ago. Overall, erratic distributions reflect global ice volume peaks, with widespread dispersal signaling maximum Pleistocene glaciations driven by lowered temperatures and amplified snowfall, while clustered deposits near sources suggest thinner, more localized ice during earlier epochs.

Applications in Modern Research

In modern research, glacial erratics serve as key samples for cosmogenic exposure dating, which employs isotopes such as ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al to quantify the timing of glacial deposition. These nuclides form in minerals at or near the Earth's surface through interactions between cosmic rays and atoms, accumulating in erratics once exposed after ice retreat. Concentrations are measured via , and exposure ages are calculated to date events with uncertainties typically of 5-10% for samples. This method has revolutionized by providing direct ages for landforms previously dated indirectly. The foundational equation for exposure age tt assumes negligible and derives from the balance between nuclide production and : dNdt=P−λN\frac{dN}{dt} = P - \lambda N where NN is the nuclide concentration (atoms/g), PP is the production rate (atoms/g/yr), and λ\lambda is the decay constant (yr⁻¹; 4.62×10−74.62 \times 10^{-7} for ¹⁰Be and 9.83×10−79.83 \times 10^{-7} for ²⁶Al). Integrating from initial N=0N=0 at t=0t=0 yields: N(t)=Pλ(1−e−λt)N(t) = \frac{P}{\lambda} \left(1 - e^{-\lambda t}\right) Solving for tt: t=1λln⁡(1+λNP)t = \frac{1}{\lambda} \ln \left(1 + \frac{\lambda N}{P}\right) This approximation holds because λ\lambda is small over timescales, making e−λt≈1−λte^{-\lambda t} \approx 1 - \lambda t. The production rate PP includes (dominant at surface) and muon-induced components, scaled for site-specific , , and shielding using models like those in Balco et al. (2008). For samples with finite thickness dd (cm) and density ρ\rho (g/cm³), production attenuates exponentially within the sample: Peff=P0e−μd/(2ρ)P_{\text{eff}} = P_0 e^{-\mu d / (2\rho)} where μ\mu is the attenuation coefficient (~150 g/cm² for spallation), averaging over depth; muon contributions are minor but integrated similarly. Shielding from topography or snow cover further reduces PP by a geometric factor SGS_G (0-1). These corrections ensure ages reflect true deposition timing, as applied to erratics in studies of ice retreat. Beyond dating, erratics inform broader environmental research, including relative sea-level changes through glacio-isostatic adjustment (GIA) modeling. Their positions and ages constrain former ice loads, enabling simulations of crustal rebound and eustatic contributions; for instance, erratics on raised beaches in Scandinavia indicate postglacial uplift rates of up to 1 cm/yr, linking ice volume to global sea-level fall of ~120 m since the Last Glacial Maximum. In seismic hazard assessment, precariously balanced erratics act as natural seismoscopes: stable boulders over 10,000 years old imply peak ground accelerations below 0.2-0.5g, constraining earthquake magnitudes in low-seismicity regions like the northeastern U.S. Erratics also influence post-glacial biodiversity by creating microhabitats; in Swiss Jura landscapes, they host specialized saxicolous flora, contributing to landscape biodiversity through unique moisture and light conditions on boulder surfaces. Post-2000 studies exemplify these applications, particularly in , where erratics on nunataks have dated thinning to ~11-14 ka, informing models of West dynamics under warming scenarios with potential sea-level rise of 3-5 m. Integration with geographic information systems (GIS) has advanced mapping; the BRITICE-CHRONO project (2010s) compiled GIS layers of over 20,000 glacial landforms, including erratics and dispersal patterns, across Britain, enabling of ice flow and erosion patterns at 1:50,000 scale. These tools facilitate predictive modeling of responses to .

History of Study

Early Observations and Recognition

In ancient , particularly across Nordic and Germanic regions, glacial erratics were commonly interpreted as massive stones hurled by giants in mythical battles or acts of defiance, a motif preserved in oral traditions that explained their puzzling displacement from native bedrock. These legends, such as those involving Frost Giants carrying or throwing boulders from icy realms, were widespread and later archived in collections of folk narratives from the late 19th and early 20th centuries, reflecting pre-scientific attempts to rationalize anomalies. Indigenous interpretations in North America similarly embedded erratics within cultural narratives. Among tribes like the Blackfeet, Salish, and Ktunaxa in the Glacier National Park area, stories such as "Napi Travels With Fox and Punishes a Rock" portrayed these boulders as objects moved or punished by spirits like Napi, potentially encoding observations of glacial dynamics through animistic lenses, with traditions possibly preserving memories of ice age events over millennia. During the 17th and 18th centuries, European naturalists increasingly documented the transport of such boulders, viewing them as geological curiosities requiring explanation beyond myth. Early diluvialist theories, emerging in the late 18th century and linking to biblical flood narratives, proposed that catastrophic waters from Noah's deluge—sometimes aided by floating ice rafts—carried erratics across landscapes, accounting for their distant origins and surface scratches as evidence of watery scouring. Key sites of early recognition included the , where Swiss naturalist Horace-Bénédict de Saussure observed erratics in the late 1700s far beyond contemporary margins, noting their compositional mismatch with local rocks and attributing their transport to ancient diluvial waters. De Saussure is also credited with introducing the term "erratic" for such displaced rocks in 1779. In , anomalous boulders drew attention by the mid-18th century, exemplified by a lazulite-andalusite-quartz erratic discovered near , , in the 1750s, which highlighted transport from distant sources and fueled debates on landscape formation.

Key Developments in the 19th and 20th Centuries

The scientific understanding of glacial erratics advanced significantly in the 19th century, transitioning from anecdotal observations to a formalized glacial theory. In 1837, Swiss naturalist Louis Agassiz presented his seminal "Discours de Neuchâtel," proposing that erratics—such as those displaced from the Alps to the Jura Mountains—were transported by extensive glaciers during a previous ice age, rather than by diluvial floods or other catastrophic events. This hypothesis, rooted in field evidence from Swiss landscapes including striations and moraines, challenged the dominant uniformitarian views and introduced the concept of cyclical glaciations affecting much of the Northern Hemisphere. British geologist , a proponent of who initially attributed erratics to drift in his "" (1830–1833), gradually incorporated glacial transport mechanisms after collaborating with Agassiz on a 1840 tour of and . Observations of erratics, glacial scratches, and polished during this period convinced Lyell of land-based ice sheets' role, leading him to revise his work in the 1840s to emphasize ongoing glacial processes as key to explaining erratic distributions under uniformitarian principles. By the mid-19th century, this evidence resolved longstanding debates favoring flood theories (such as Noah's deluge or great inundations) for erratic origins, establishing glacial action as the consensus explanation among European and North American geologists. In the 20th century, systematic mapping efforts enhanced the use of erratics for reconstructing past ice dynamics. Scandinavian geologists in the 1920s, building on earlier surveys, traced boulder trains—linear alignments of erratics indicating ice flow paths—across to delineate the extent of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet, aiding mineral exploration and glacial reconstruction. In , studies during the 1930s–1950s focused on Laurentide Ice Sheet erratics; Richard F. Flint's fieldwork and publications, including his 1947 "Glacial Geology and the Pleistocene Epoch," analyzed erratic lithologies and distributions to map ice lobes and retreat patterns across the , providing foundational for Pleistocene chronologies.

Notable Examples

North American Examples

One of the most prominent glacial erratics in is the Okotoks Erratic, also known as Big Rock, located near , , . This massive boulder, part of the Cambrian-age Gog Formation, weighs approximately 16,500 tonnes and measures about 41 meters long, 18 meters wide, and 9 meters high. It originated from the near and was transported at least 260 kilometers eastward by the Laurentide Ice Sheet during the , around 15,000 years ago, as part of the Foothills Erratics Train. In the United States, Plymouth Rock in Plymouth, Massachusetts, serves as a well-known but debated example of a glacial erratic, often highlighted for its historical symbolism despite questions about its precise role in colonial narratives. Composed of Dedham granite formed around 600 million years ago, the boulder was carried by continental glaciers during the Pleistocene and deposited in an area of exotic terrane, far from its source bedrock. Further west, Devil's Doorway in Devil's Lake State Park, Wisconsin, exemplifies regional glacial influences through associated erratics scattered across the park's quartzite bluffs, deposited by the Wisconsin Glacier lobe approximately 15,000 years ago amid moraine formations that shaped the landscape. Sierra Nevada erratics in California provide evidence of Cordilleran glaciation's extent, with weathered boulders scattered across the highlands indicating multiple Pleistocene advances of alpine glaciers that cycled for at least 2.6 million years, distinct from the broader Laurentide system but part of the western cordilleran ice complex. Regional patterns in North America reveal extensive boulder trains originating from the Canadian Shield, where crystalline rocks were eroded and dispersed southward across the Midwest prairies by lobes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, forming linear deposits that trace ice flow directions over hundreds of kilometers. These trains, including the Foothills Erratics in Alberta and similar features in the northern U.S. plains, highlight the ice sheet's vast reach and its role in redistributing Shield-derived materials during deglaciation phases around 15,000–10,000 years ago.

European Examples

In the , the Norber Erratics in exemplify glacial transport during the Late Devensian glaciation, consisting of large boulders perched on pedestals along the Norber ridge west of Crummack Dale. These boulders, some up to 2 meters across, were carried eastward by coalescing ice from the and across the , over distances exceeding 1 kilometer and elevations of 120 meters above their source outcrops. Their perched positions on pedestals 30–50 cm high provide evidence of post-glacial dissolution rates of 30–40 mm per thousand years, while tracing dynamics in approximately 26,000–10,000 years ago. Scottish examples include the Clochodrick Stone near in , a massive lowland erratic of trachytic measuring 6.7 m long, 6.1 m wide, and 4.0 m high. Transported by from the south-west Highlands across the Clyde Estuary, this boulder, with a of 20.6 m, highlights flow directions toward the southeast during the Devensian period and was among the first such features recognized for conservation in 1871 by the Royal Society of Edinburgh's Boulder Committee. In the Baltic and Central European regions, widespread "" deposits—tills rich in Scandinavian erratics—record the advance of the Fennoscandian southward during the . In , these clays, formed by continental ice action, contain erratic boulders derived from the , explaining their distribution and associated ice scratches as products of glacial overriding around 20,000–15,000 years ago. Similar spreads occur in , , , and , where igneous and metamorphic boulders from Swedish and Finnish sources form extensive sheets, as seen in north-western Poland's sites incorporating these erratics into megalithic structures. In , Drenthian boulder clays in the north preserve Scandinavian indicators, evidencing ice lobes extending into the Baltic Basin between 16,000 and 14,000 years ago. Irish erratics, though less extensive, include Scandinavian material transported via the , contributing to regional formations. Alpine erratics in the lowlands of and demonstrate high-elevation transport by piedmont glaciers during the , around 25,000–18,000 years ago. In 's , 17 sampled boulders of Alpine lithologies, such as gneisses from the , were displaced up to 50 km northward by multiple glacier advances, with cosmogenic exposure ages confirming deposition phases at 24,000–22,000 years ago and 19,000–17,000 years ago. A prominent example is the Pierre-à-Bot near , a mega-erratic of 15 m³ from the , carried over 100 km to the Jura lowlands, playing a key role in 19th-century validation of glacial theory by figures like . In , analogous erratics in the Jura and Rhône Valley lowlands, including granites from the , trace ice flows from the western into contiguous French territories, underscoring the extent of LGM piedmont lobes.

Examples from Other Regions

In , glacial erratics provide evidence of Pleistocene glaciations confined primarily to the southeastern highlands and , where local ice caps and valley glaciers operated during cold stages of the . In , the Henty Glacial Erratics State Reserve preserves large boulders, including perched erratics up to several meters in size, transported from the West Coast Range's volcanic (Mt Read Volcanics) during the Henty Glaciation approximately 34,600 years ago. These erratics, deposited as the retreated, mark the western limit of ice advance and contrast with the surrounding softer sedimentary deposits, highlighting localized glacial activity in a otherwise marginal glacial environment. On the Australian mainland, in ' Kosciuszko National Park, erratics occur within basins such as Blue Lake, where they were carried by valley glaciers during the Kosciuszko Glaciation phases, including advances around 19,100 ± 1,600 years ago. These and other igneous boulders, differing from local metasediments, were deposited amid moraines and roches moutonnées, indicating ice flow from higher peaks in the . This glaciation, limited to about 200 km² at its maximum, represents the southernmost mainland evidence of Pleistocene ice in . In , Patagonian erratics from the Andean ice fields illustrate extensive glaciation during the . Notable examples include large erratic blocks in the upper Chubut River valley, transported eastward by outlet glaciers from the , which covered much of the region between 38°S and 56°S around 23,000–19,000 years ago; these were first documented by in 1834 as evidence of former ice action. Such erratics, often quartzite or differing from local volcanics, are scattered across the Patagonian , aiding reconstruction of ice lobes from the North and South Patagonian Ice Fields. Sub-Antarctic islands host erratics from smaller, isolated s during Pleistocene cold periods. On Marion Island (46°S), erratics up to three meters, composed of local and , lie on raised beaches and coastal platforms, deposited by glaciers during Marine Isotope Stage 2 (around 25,000–15,000 years ago) and earlier advances. Similarly, in New Zealand's subantarctic , erratic boulders indicate a small around 384,000 ± 26,000 years ago (Marine Isotope Stage 10), with transport limited to tens of kilometers from upland sources. These examples underscore the role of oceanic influences in sustaining peripheral glaciations. Ice-rafted erratics, distinct from direct glacial transport, occur in proglacial lakes where floating icebergs deposit boulders during meltwater outbursts. In Siberia's West Siberian Plain, large erratic blocks in former ice-dammed lakes, such as those in the Gorny Altai region, were rafted by ice floes in cold freshwater bodies during the (around 50,000–15,000 years ago), with examples including granitic clasts up to several tons amid varved sediments. In New Zealand's , ice-rafted debris, including boulders, is recorded in Lake Pukaki's post-glacial sediments, linked to of the around 18,000–13,000 years ago, where seasonal lake ice facilitated short-distance transport along glacial margins. These features, involving and ice-rafting processes, reveal dynamic interactions between retreating glaciers and lacustrine environments.

References

  1. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1216/e/e.html
  2. https://artsandmuseums.utah.gov/erratics/
  3. https://www.nps.gov/articles/erratics.htm
  4. https://www.dmr.nd.gov/dmr/ndgs/erratics
  5. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-a-glacier
  6. https://www2.tulane.edu/~sanelson/eens1110/glaciers.htm
  7. https://waglacialerratics.ess.washington.edu/intro/
  8. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2213&context=pias
  9. https://www.nps.gov/articles/glacialstriations.htm
  10. https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacial-geology/glacial-landforms/glacial-depositional-landforms/glacial-erratics/
  11. https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/5678/V72N02_087.pdf
  12. https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.38
  13. https://dggs.alaska.gov/webpubs/mirl/report_no/text/mirl_n52.pdf
  14. https://serc.carleton.edu/eslabs/climatedetectives/glossary.html
  15. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/0367/report.pdf
  16. https://www.whoi.edu/cms/files/andrews00ocean_278184.pdf
  17. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/ger_ic90_roadside_floodbasalts_glacierfloods.pdf
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379110000351
  19. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/137/7-8/3199/652554/10Be-exposure-dates-from-pre-Illinoian-glacial
  20. http://noblegas.berkeley.edu/~balcs/pubs/Balco_glaciers_exposure_dating_v1.1.pdf
  21. https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/293/2022/
  22. https://hess.ess.washington.edu/math/docs/al_be_v2/Balcoetal_2008_proof.pdf
  23. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article/114/6/3171/648325/Precariously-Balanced-Rocks-in-Northern-New-York
  24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10592-021-01414-6
  25. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2006.1791
  26. https://sheffield.ac.uk/geography-planning/people/academic-research/chris-clark
  27. https://www.isof.se/other-languages/english/the-map-of-nordic-legends
  28. https://www.heritagedaily.com/2025/04/researchers-study-erratic-boulders-from-frosh-giant-legends/154842
  29. https://www.nps.gov/glac/learn/education/4-6-unit-two-the-ice-spirits.htm
  30. http://shipseducation.net/religion/diluvial.htm
  31. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/lesson/473/Diluvial-Drift-Theory-Teacher-Handout.pdf?rev=17193
  32. http://shipseducation.net/glaciers/EarlyIdeas.htm
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333757198_An_18th_century_find_of_an_erratic_lazulite-andalusite-quartz_boulder_in_Sodermanland_Sweden_and_its_implications
  34. https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/13/23/2022/
  35. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/14/2/642/527068/Can-the-history-of-geology-inform-geoscience
  36. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/SP480.1
  37. https://resource.sgu.se/dokument/publikation/c/c743rapport/c743-rapport.pdf
  38. https://www.geosociety.org/documents/gsa/memorials/v08/Flint-RF.pdf
  39. https://www.alberta.ca/okotoks-erratic-big-rock
  40. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quaternary-research/article/beryllium10-dating-of-the-foothills-erratics-train-in-alberta-canada-indicates-detachment-of-the-laurentide-ice-sheet-from-the-rocky-mountains-at-15-ka/DA75A7DEBB2FC2B214F6B9CFA68B26C4
  41. https://www.edmontongeologicalsociety.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2003_SW_Alberta_Frank_Slide.pdf
  42. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/rosetta-stones/the-real-story-of-plymouth-rock/
  43. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1990/02/26/travels-of-the-rock
  44. https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/parks/devilslake/geology
  45. https://www.devilslakeclimbingguides.com/devils-lake/hiking-trails
  46. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/jsedres/article/94/6/926/650654/A-detrital-signal-of-glaciation-in-the-Sierra
  47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17445647.2018.1478752
  48. https://data.jncc.gov.uk/data/903fd1b7-ebe2-45b8-a69e-8f37934c5560/gcr-v25-quaternary-northern-england-c5.pdf
  49. https://jncc.gov.uk/jncc-assets/GCR/gcr-site-account-380.pdf
  50. https://geoloogia.info/geology/text.html
  51. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1282
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379115301141
  53. https://sjg.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s00015-015-0195-y
  54. https://doc.rero.ch/record/13931/files/PAL_E883.pdf
  55. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/pleistocene-glaciation-in-the-commonwealth-of-australia/942A8464A25297354E1B9E26EE8AD1B3
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033589401922161
  57. https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-149126647
  58. https://revista.geologica.org.ar/raga/article/view/1334/1306
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64614-5
  60. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17445647.2021.1931970
  61. https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/15/423/2019/
  62. http://www.ipgg.sbras.ru/ru/publications/ibc/2025/des-2025-522-06376.pdf
  63. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00288306.2013.847469
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.