Hubbry Logo
KinesiologyKinesiologyMain
Open search
Kinesiology
Community hub
Kinesiology
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Kinesiology
Kinesiology
Kinesiology
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A series of images that represent research (left) and practice (right) in the field of academic kinesiology

Kinesiology (from Ancient Greek κίνησις (kínēsis) 'movement' and -λογία -logía 'study of') is the scientific study of human body movement. Kinesiology addresses physiological, anatomical, biomechanical, pathological, neuropsychological principles and mechanisms of movement. Applications of kinesiology to human health include biomechanics and orthopedics; strength and conditioning; sport psychology; motor control; skill acquisition and motor learning; methods of rehabilitation, such as physical and occupational therapy; and sport and exercise physiology. Studies of human and animal motion include measures from motion tracking systems, electrophysiology of muscle and brain activity, various methods for monitoring physiological function, and other behavioral and cognitive research techniques.[1][2]

Basics

[edit]

Kinesiology studies the science of human movement, performance, and function by applying the fundamental sciences of cell biology, molecular biology, chemistry, biochemistry, biophysics, biomechanics, biomathematics, biostatistics, anatomy, physiology, exercise physiology, pathophysiology, neuroscience, and nutritional science. A bachelor's degree in kinesiology can provide strong preparation for graduate study in medical school, biomedical research, as well as in professional programs.

The term "kinesiologist" is not a licensed nor professional designation in many countries, with the notable exception of Canada. Individuals with training in this area can teach physical education, work as personal trainers and sports coaches, provide consulting services, conduct research and develop policies related to rehabilitation, human motor performance, ergonomics, and occupational health and safety. In North America, kinesiologists may study to earn a Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, or Doctorate of Philosophy degree in Kinesiology or a Bachelor of Kinesiology degree, while in Australia or New Zealand, they are often conferred an Applied Science (Human Movement) degree (or higher). Many doctoral-level faculty in North American kinesiology programs received their doctoral training in related disciplines, such as neuroscience, mechanical engineering, psychology, and physiology.

In 1965, the University of Massachusetts Amherst created the United States' first Department of Exercise Science (kinesiology) under the leadership of visionary researchers and academicians in the field of exercise science.[3] In 1967, the University of Waterloo launched Canada's first kinesiology department.[4]

Principles

[edit]

Adaptation through exercise

[edit]
Summary of long-term adaptations to regular aerobic and anaerobic exercise. Aerobic exercise can cause several central cardiovascular adaptations, including an increase in stroke volume (SV)[5] and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max),[5][6] as well as a decrease in resting heart rate (RHR).[7][8][9] Long-term adaptations to resistance training, the most common form of anaerobic exercise, include muscular hypertrophy,[10][11] an increase in the physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) of muscle(s), and an increase in neural drive,[12][13] both of which lead to increased muscular strength.[14] Neural adaptations begin more quickly and plateau prior to the hypertrophic response.[15][16]

Adaptation through exercise is a key principle of kinesiology that relates to improved fitness in athletes as well as health and wellness in clinical populations. Exercise is a simple and established intervention for many movement disorders and musculoskeletal conditions due to the neuroplasticity of the brain[17] and the adaptability of the musculoskeletal system.[12][13][14] Therapeutic exercise has been shown to improve neuromotor control and motor capabilities in both normal[18] and pathological populations.[6][19]

There are many different types of exercise interventions that can be applied in kinesiology to athletic, normal, and clinical populations. Aerobic exercise interventions help to improve cardiovascular endurance.[20] Anaerobic strength training programs can increase muscular strength,[13] power,[21] and lean body mass.[22] Decreased risk of falls and increased neuromuscular control can be attributed to balance intervention programs.[23] Flexibility programs can increase functional range of motion and reduce the risk of injury.[24]

As a whole, exercise programs can reduce symptoms of depression[25] and risk of cardiovascular[26] and metabolic diseases.[27] Additionally, they can help to improve quality of life,[28] sleeping habits,[25] immune system function,[29] and body composition.[30]

The study of the physiological responses to physical exercise and their therapeutic applications is known as exercise physiology, which is an important area of research within kinesiology.

Neuroplasticity

[edit]
Main article: Neurobiological effects of physical exercise
Adaptive plasticity along with practice in three levels. In behavior level, performance (e.g., successful rate, accuracy) improved after practice.[31][32] In cortical level, motor representation areas of the acting muscles enlarged; functional connectivity between primary motor cortex (M1) and supplementary motor area (SMA) is strengthened.[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] In neuronal level, the number of dendrites and neurotransmitter increase with practice.[34][40][41]

Neuroplasticity is also a key scientific principle used in kinesiology to describe how movement and changes in the brain are related. The human brain adapts and acquires new motor skills based on this principle.[42] The brain can be exposed to new stimuli and experiences and therefore learn from them and create new neural pathways hence leading to brain adaptation. These new adaptations and skills include both adaptive and maladaptive brain changes.

Adaptive plasticity

Recent[when?] empirical evidence indicates the significant impact of physical activity on brain function; for example, greater amounts of physical activity are associated with enhanced cognitive function in older adults.[43] The effects of physical activity can be distributed throughout the whole brain, such as higher gray matter density and white matter integrity after exercise training,[44][45] and/or on specific brain areas, such as greater activation in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.[46] Neuroplasticity is also the underlying mechanism of skill acquisition. For example, after long-term training, pianists showed greater gray matter density in sensorimotor cortex and white matter integrity in the internal capsule compared to non-musicians.[47][48]

Maladaptive plasticity

Maladaptive plasticity is defined as neuroplasticity with negative effects or detrimental consequences in behavior.[49][50] Movement abnormalities may occur among individuals with and without brain injuries due to abnormal remodeling in central nervous system.[36][51] Learned non-use is an example commonly seen among patients with brain damage, such as stroke. Patients with stroke learned to suppress paretic limb movement after unsuccessful experience in paretic hand use; this may cause decreased neuronal activation at adjacent areas of the infarcted motor cortex.[52][53]

There are many types of therapies that are designed to overcome maladaptive plasticity in clinic and research, such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), body weight support treadmill training (BWSTT) and virtual reality therapy. These interventions are shown to enhance motor function in paretic limbs[54][55][56] and stimulate cortical reorganization[57][58][59] in patients with brain damage.

Motor redundancy

[edit]
Animation illustrating the concept of motor redundancy: the motor action of bringing the finger in contact with a point in space can be achieved using a wide variety of limb configurations.

Motor redundancy is a widely used concept in kinesiology and motor control which states that, for any task the human body can perform, there are effectively an unlimited number of ways the nervous system could achieve that task.[60] This redundancy appears at multiple levels in the chain of motor execution:

  • Kinematic redundancy means that for a desired location of the endpoint (e.g. the hand or finger), there are many configurations of the joints that would produce the same endpoint location in space.
  • Muscle redundancy means that the same net joint torque could be generated by many different relative contributions of individual muscles.
  • Motor unit redundancy means that for the same net muscle force could be generated by many different relative contributions of motor units within that muscle.

The concept of motor redundancy is explored in numerous studies,[61][62][63] usually with the goal of describing the relative contribution of a set of motor elements (e.g. muscles) in various human movements, and how these contributions can be predicted from a comprehensive theory. Two distinct (but not incompatible) theories have emerged for how the nervous system coordinates redundant elements: simplification and optimization. In the simplification theory, complex movements and muscle actions are constructed from simpler ones, often known as primitives or synergies, resulting in a simpler system for the brain to control.[64][65] In the optimization theory, motor actions arise from the minimization of a control parameter,[63] such as the energetic cost of movement or errors in movement performance.[66]

Scope of practice

[edit]

In Canada, kinesiology is a professional designation as well as an area of study.[67] In the province of Ontario the scope has been officially defined as, "the assessment of human movement and performance and its rehabilitation and management to maintain, rehabilitate or enhance movement and performance"[68]

Kinesiologists work in a variety of roles as health professionals. They work as rehabilitation providers in hospitals, clinics and private settings working with populations needing care for musculoskeletal, cardiac and neurological conditions. They provide rehabilitation to persons injured at work and in vehicular accidents. Kinesiologists also work as functional assessment specialists, exercise therapists, ergonomists, return to work specialists, case managers and medical legal evaluators. They can be found in hospital, long-term care, clinic, work, and community settings.[69] Additionally, kinesiology is applied in areas of health and fitness for all levels of athletes, but more often found with training of elite athletes.

Licensing and regulation

[edit]

Canada

[edit]

In Canada, kinesiology has been designated a regulated health profession in Ontario.[70] Kinesiology was granted the right to regulate in the province of Ontario in the summer of 2007[71] and similar proposals have been made for other provinces. The College of Kinesiologists of Ontario achieved proclamation on April 1, 2013, at which time the professional title "Kinesiologist" became protected by law. In Ontario only members of the college may call themselves a Registered Kinesiologist. Individuals who have earned degrees in kinesiology can work in research, the fitness industry, clinical settings, and in industrial environments.[72] They also work in cardiac rehabilitation, health and safety, hospital and long-term care facilities and community health centers just to name a few.

Health service

[edit]
The analysis of recorded human movement, as pioneered by Eadweard Muybridge, figures prominently in kinesiology
  • Health promotion
Kinesiologists working in the health promotion industry work with individuals to enhance the health, fitness, and well-being of the individual. Kinesiologists can be found working in fitness facilities, personal training/corporate wellness facilities, and industry.
  • Clinical/rehabilitation
Kinesiologists work with individuals with disabling conditions to assist in regaining their optimal physical function. They work with individuals in their home, fitness facilities, rehabilitation clinics, and at the worksite. They also work alongside physiotherapists and occupational therapists.
  • Ergonomics
Kinesiologists work in industry to assess suitability of design of workstations and provide suggestions for modifications and assistive devices.
  • Health and safety
Kinesiologists are involved in consulting with industry to identify hazards and provide recommendations and solutions to optimize the health and safety of workers.
  • Disability management/case coordination
Kinesiologists recommend and provide a plan of action to return an injured individual to their optimal function in all aspects of life.
  • Management/research/administration
Kinesiologists frequently fulfill roles in all above areas, perform research, and manage businesses.[73]
  • Health education
Kinesiologists working in health education teach people about behaviors that promote wellness. They develop and implement strategies to improve the health of individuals and communities. Community health workers collect data and discuss health concerns with members of specific populations or communities.[74]
  • Athletic coaches and scouts
Kinesiologists who pursue a career as an athletic coach develop new talent and guide an athlete's progress in a specific sport. They teach amateur or professional athletes the skills they need to succeed at their sport. Many coaches are also involved in scouting. Scouts look for new players and evaluate their skills and likelihood for success at the college, amateur, or professional level.[75]
  • Physical education teacher
Kinesiologists working as physical education teachers are responsible for teaching fitness, sports and health. They help students stay both mentally and physically fit by teaching them to make healthy choices.[76]
  • Physical therapy
Kinesiologists working in physical therapy diagnose physical abnormalities, restore mobility to the client, and promote proper function of joints.[77]

History of kinesiology

[edit]
In 1886, Swedish baron Nils Posse (1862–1895) introduced the term Kinesiology in the US, 1894 he wrote the book "The Special Kinesiology of Educational Gymnastics". Nils Posse was a graduate of the Royal Gymnastic Central Institute in Stockholm, Sweden and founder of the Posse Gymnasium, Boston, MA.

Royal Central Institute of Gymnastics (sv) G.C.I. was founded 1813 in Stockholm, Sweden by Pehr Henrik Ling. It was the first Physiotherapy school in the world, training hundreds of medical gymnasts who spread the Swedish physical therapy around the entire world. In 1887, Sweden was the first country in the world to give a national state licence to physiotherapists/physical therapists.[78]

The Swedish medical gymnast and kinesiologist Carl August Georgii (sv), Professor at the Royal Gymnastic Central Institute GCI in Stockholm, was the one who created and coined the new international word Kinesiology in 1854.[78]
The term Kinesiology is a literal translation to Greek+English from the original Swedish word Rörelselära, meaning "Movement Science". It was the foundation of the Medical Gymnastics, the original Physiotherapy and Physical Therapy, developed for over 100 years in Sweden (starting 1813).[78]

The new medical therapy created in Sweden was originally called Rörelselära (sv), and later in 1854 translated to the new and invented international word "Kinesiology". The Kinesiology consisted of nearly 2,000 physical movements and 50 different types of massage therapy techniques. They were all used to affect various dysfunctions and even illnesses, not only in the movement apparatus, but also into the internal physiology of man. Thus, the original classical and Traditional Kinesiology was not only a system of rehabilitation for the body, or biomechanics like in modern Academic Kinesiology, but also a new therapy for relieving and curing diseases, by affecting the autonomic nervous system, organs and glands in the body.,[78][79]

In 1886, the Swedish Medical Gymnast Nils Posse (1862–1895) introduced the term kinesiology in the U.S.[80] Nils Posse was a graduate of the Royal Gymnastic Central Institute in Stockholm, Sweden and founder of the Posse Gymnasium in Boston, MA. He was teaching at Boston Normal School of Gymnastics BNSG.[81] The Special Kinesiology Of Educational Gymnastics was the first book ever written in the world with the word "Kinesiology" in the title of the book. It was written by Nils Posse and published in Boston, 1894–1895.[82] Posse was elected posthumously as an Honorary Fellow in Memoriam in the National Academy of Kinesiology.[83]

The National Academy of Kinesiology was formally founded in 1930 in the United States. The academy's dual purpose is to encourage and promote the study and educational applications of the art and science of human movement and physical activity and to honor by election to its membership persons who have directly or indirectly contributed significantly to the study of and/or application of the art and science of human movement and physical activity. Membership in the National Academy of Kinesiology is by election and those elected are known as Fellows. Fellows are elected from around the world. Election into the National Academy of Kinesiology is considered a pinnacle achievement and recognition with the discipline.[84] For further information see: National Academy of Kinesiology | National Academy of Kinesiology

Technology in kinesiology

[edit]

Motion capture technology has application in measuring human movement, and thus kinesiology. Historically, motion capture labs have recorded high fidelity data. While accurate and credible, these systems can come at high capital and operational costs. Modern-day systems have increased accessibility to mocap technology.

Adapted physical activity

[edit]

Adapted physical activity (APA) is a branch of kinesiology, referring to physical activity that is modified or designed to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities.[85] The term originated in the field of physical education and is commonly used in the field of physical education and rehabilitation to refer to physical activities and exercises that have been modified or adapted for individuals with disabilities. These activities are often led by trained professionals, such as adapted physical educators, occupational therapists, or physical therapists.[86][87]

In 1973 the Federation Internationale de lʼ Activite Physique Adaptee (International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity - IFAPA) was formed and is described as a discipline/profession that purpose to facilitates physical activity across people with a wide range of individual differences, emphasizing in empowerment, self-determination and opportunities access.[88][89][90]

A common definition of APA is "a cross-disciplinary body of practical and theoretical knowledge directed toward impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in physical activity. It is a service delivery profession and an academic field of study that supports an attitude of acceptance of individual differences, advocates access to active lifestyles and sport, and promotes innovative and cooperative service delivery, supports, and empowerment. Adapted physical activity includes, but is not limited to, physical education, sport, recreation, dance, creative arts, nutrition, medicine, and rehabilitation."[91] This definition aligns with the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health whereby disability is seen as the interaction between impairments or conditions with activity limitations, participation restrictions and contextual factors.[92]

Overview

[edit]

The term APA has evolved in the course of years, and in some countries could be recognized with alternative terms that contain a similar set of constructs, for example, sports for disabled people, sports therapy, and psychomotor therapy.[93] The APA is considered as (i) activities or service delivery, (ii) a profession, and (iii) an academic field of study with a unique body of knowledge that differs from terms such as adapted physical education or para-sport.[94] Principally, APA is an umbrella term that incorporates the mentioned terms considered sub-specializations (i.e., physical education, para-sports, recreation, and rehabilitation).[93] APA is proposed to have close links between the field of practice and the field of study with unique theories and growing bodies of practical and scientific knowledge,[93] where APA practitioners are those who provide the services and activities, while APA scholars generate and promote evidence-based research practices among practitioners.[95]

Adaptation to physical activity opportunities is most often provided in the form of appropriately designed and modified equipment (prosthesis, wheelchairs, mono-ski, ball size), task criteria (e.g., modifying skill quality criteria or using a different skill), instructions (e.g., using personal supports, peer tutors, non-verbal instructions, motivational strategies), physical and social environments (e.g., increasing or decreasing court dimensions; segregated vs. inclusive; type of training climate: mastery-oriented, collaborative or competitive social environment; degree of peer and parental support), and rules (e.g., double bounce rule in wheelchair tennis).[96] In general, the APA presents various sub-specializations such as physical education (e.g., inclusion in physical education, attention to students with special needs, development of new education contents), sports (e.g., development of paralympic sports, activity by sports federations for athletes with disabilities), recreation (e.g., development of the inclusive sport approach and attitudes change programs), and rehabilitation (e.g., physical activity programs in rehabilitation centers, involvement of health-related professionals).[93][94]

Two people (one in a wheelchair) in a practice of karate.
The image represents the practice activity in the field of Adapted Physical Activity (APA).
The image represents research activity in the field of Adapted Physical Activity (APA).

The role of sports and physical activity participation in the population with disabilities has been recognized as a human right in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and declared in other international organization agreements such as:

  • International Charter of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sport (UNESCO).
  • International Conference of Ministers and Senior Officials Responsible for Physical Education and Sport (MINEPS).
  • Marseille Declaration, Universal Fitness Innovation & Transformation - UFIT Launch October 2015. A Commitment to Inclusion by and for the Global Fitness Industry.
  • Sustainable Development Goals, Sports and Physical Activity, United Nations (UN).

In this line, the APA as a discipline/profession plays an essential role in addressing the needs from a theoretical and practical framework to provide full participation access in physical activity to populations with disabilities.[97]

There are many educational programmes offered around the world that specialise in APA, including disability sports, adapted sports, rehabilitation, adapted physical education and parasport management. In Europe there is the European Diploma of Adapted Physical Activity[98] for bachelor's degrees. At the master's degree level, there is the International Masters in Adapted Physical Activity[99] and the master's degree in Adapted Physical Activity offered by the Lithuanian Sports University.[100] A doctoral programme in adapted physical activity can be studied through the Multi-Institution Mentorship Consortium (MAMC).[101] Furthermore, there is offered a Master of Adapted Physical Education in the North American region in Oregon State University (USA).[102] In the South American Region, the San Sebastian University (Chile) offers a Master of Physical Activity and Adapted Sports.[103] The universities Viña del Mar[104] and UMCE[105] in Chile offers a specialization in adapted physical activity.

International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity

[edit]

The International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (IFAPA) is an international scientific organization of higher education scholars, practitioners and students dedicated to promoting APA.[106] IFAPA was founded in 1973 in Quebec, Canada, presenting an original purpose declared "to give global focus to professionals who use adapted physical activities for instruction, recreation, remediation, and research". From these initial times, IFAPA evolved from a small organization to an international corporation with active regional federations in different world regions.[107]

The current purpose of IFAPA are:[108]

  • To encourage international cooperation in the field of physical activity to the benefit of individuals of all abilities,
  • to promote, stimulate and support research in the field of adapted physical activity throughout the world,
  • and to make scientific knowledge of and practical experiences in adapted physical activity available to all interested persons, organizations and institutions.

IFAPA coordinates national, regional, and international functions (both governmental and nongovernmental) that pertain to sport, dance, aquatics, exercise, fitness, and wellness for individuals of all ages with disabilities or special needs. IFAPA is linked with several other international governing bodies, including the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), Special Olympics International and the International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education (ICSSPE). English is the language used for IFAPA correspondence, conferences. Professor David Legg from Mount Royal University is the current president of the International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (IFAPA) since 2019 at the International Symposium of Adapted Physical Activity (ISAPA) hosted by IFAPA Past President Martin Block at the University of Virginia.

Professor David Legg current President of the International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (IFAPA)

The biennial ISAPA scheduled for 2021 was planned to be held at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland.[109] Due to the COVID-19 pandemic it was later announced to be held online only,[110] making it the first Online ISAPA since the first one in 1977.[111] The 2023 ISAPA was awarded to a multi-site organisation by Halberg Foundation in New Zealand and Mooven in France.[112]

Regions

[edit]
  • Africa - no formal organisation
  • Asia - Asian society of adapted physical education - ASAPE[113]
  • Europe - European Federation of Adapted Physical Activity - EUFAPA[114]
  • Middle East - Middle East Federation of Adapted Physical Activity - MEFAPA
  • North America - North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity - NAFAPA[115]
  • Oceania - no formal organisation
  • South and Central America - South American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity - SAPA[116]

Research and dissemination in adapted physical activity

[edit]
European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity

Actually, it is possible to find numerous sports science journals with research papers on adapted sport, while those specific to APA are lesser. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly (APAQ) is the only AFA-specific journal indexed in the Journal Citation Reports Index, appearing in both the Sport Sciences and Rehabilitation directories, which is another example of its interdisciplinarity (Impact Score 2020-2021 = 2.61) (Pérez et al., 2012).[117] Additionally, the European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity (EUJAPA) is another international, multidisciplinary journal introduced to communicate, share and stimulate academic inquiry focusing on APA of persons with disabilities, appearing in the Education directories of Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR). Regarding the dissemination of scientific knowledge generated by the APA, the most relevant international events are described as follows:

  • International Symposium of Adapted Physical Activity (ISAPA), organized by IFAPA on a biannual basis.
  • Vista conference, organized by the International Paralympic Committee on a biannual basis.
  • Paralympic Congress, organized by the International Paralympic Committee every four years.
  • European Conference on Adapted Physical Activity (EUCAPA), organized by European Federation in Adapted Physical Activity on a biannual basis.
  • North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (NAFAPA) Conference, organized by NAFAPA on a biannual basis.
  • South American Adapted Physical Activity Conference, organized by South American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity.

Adapted physical education

[edit]
The image represents activities with students with disabilities associated to the Adapted Physical Education field.

Adapted physical education is a sub-discipline of physical education with a focus on including students with disabilities into the subject.[118] APE is the term used to refer to the physical education for individuals with disabilities that occurs primarily in elementary and secondary schools.[89] According to Dunn and Leitschuh[119] APE is defined as "Adapted physical education programs are those that have the same objectives as the regular physical education program but in which adjustments are made in the regular offerings to meet the needs and abilities of exceptional students". This education can be provided in separate educational settings as well as in general (regular) educational settings.[120] APE is oriented to educate students to lifelong engagement in physical activities and to live a healthy lifestyle offering possibilities to exploit movements, games, and sports and at the same time personal development.[121] Goals and objectives of adapted and general physical education might be the same with some minor differences. For example, learning to push a wheelchair or play wheelchair basketball might be a goal for a child with a spinal cord injury, while running and playing regular basketball is a goal for a child with a disability. In other cases, a child with a disability might focus on fewer objectives or modified objectives within a domain (e.g., physical fitness) compared to peers without disabilities.[118]

Parasport or disability sport

[edit]
Para-archery athlete competing

The APA in this field is oriented principally to the Parasports movement, which organises sports for and by people with disabilities. Examples of para-sports organizations include sports in the Paralympic Games, Special Olympics, Deaflympics as well as Invictus games to name a few. Many para-sports have eligibility criteria according to the characteristics of the participants. In the Paralympics Games, this is known as sport classification, a system that provides a framework for determining who can and who cannot participate according to the impact of the impairments on the outcome of the competition.[122][123]

In the Special Olympics individuals eligible have to meet the following criteria

  • be at least 8 years old
  • have been identified by an agency or professional as having one of the following conditions: intellectual disabilities, cognitive delays (as measured by formal assessment), or significant learning or vocational problems due to cognitive delay that require specially designed instruction.[124]

Another sporting competition for people with intellectual impairments is the Virtus Games (formerly known as International Sports Federation for Persons with Intellectual Disability. This is different from the Special Olympics. Eligibility is based on a master list of

  • II 1 Intellectual Disability
  • II 2 Significant Intellectual Disability
  • II 3 Austism[125]

To be eligible to compete at the Deaflympics, athletes must have a hearing loss of at least 55 decibels in the better ear.[126] The Invictus Games were designed to allow sport competitions between wounded, injured or sick servicemen and women (WIS).[127] Therefore, only people in the military sectors can compete in the Invictus games.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation

[edit]
Adapted Physical Activity in the rehabilitation process of people with disabilities

The results from APA can help the practice of Physical medicine and rehabilitation, whereby the functional ability and quality of life is improved.[128] Rehabilitation is helping the individual achieve the highest level of functioning, independence, participation, and quality of life possible. The APA and sport in rehabilitation for individuals with disabilities is particularly important and is associated with the legacy of the medical rehabilitation specialist Sir Ludwig Guttman who was the founder of the International Stoke Mandeville Games Federation, the basis of the actual Paralympic movement.[129] APA and sports are strongly recommended in rehabilitation programs due to the positive impact and health benefits in people with different disabilities. The APA practitioner provides exercise and training regimens adapted for specific individual needs and works based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health of the World Health Organization, facilitating a common language with other rehabilitation professionals during the rehabilitation process.[129]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Kinesiology

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Kinesiology is the of human movement, encompassing the biomechanical, physiological, and neurological processes that govern and its effects on and function. The discipline integrates empirical data from , , and to analyze how motion occurs and adapts under varying conditions, such as exercise or rehabilitation. Emerging from early programs in the late and formalized as an academic field in the , kinesiology traces its roots to efforts in to systematize through scientific observation of body mechanics. Central to kinesiology are principles like adaptation through exercise, where repeated physical loading induces measurable improvements in strength, , and neural , as demonstrated in longitudinal studies of training responses. enables the brain to reorganize pathways for skilled movement acquisition, while motor redundancy allows multiple muscular strategies to achieve the same task, optimizing amid variability. Applications span sports enhancement, ergonomic design to prevent workplace injuries, and therapeutic interventions for , all validated through controlled trials rather than anecdotal methods. Notably, kinesiology distinguishes itself from , a technique involving manual muscle testing for non-empirical of imbalances, which lacks scientific validation and is critiqued as pseudoscientific. This emphasis on causal mechanisms and replicable evidence underscores kinesiology's role in advancing evidence-based practices for and .

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Kinesiology is the of human movement, addressing the physiological, biomechanical, and psychological mechanisms that enable and influence motion. The term originates from kinēsis, meaning "movement," combined with the -logy, indicating a field of study, and was first coined in during the mid-19th century to describe the systematic analysis of bodily mechanics. This discipline emphasizes empirical observation of how forces, structures, and neural processes interact to produce coordinated actions, distinguishing it from broader by its focus on evidence-based principles rather than instructional methods alone. The scope of kinesiology extends beyond basic motion analysis to encompass the effects of on individual , societal well-being, and performance optimization. It integrates subfields such as , which investigates metabolic and cardiovascular adaptations to activity; , exploring neural pathways for skill acquisition; and , applying movement data to workplace and tool design for . Applications span rehabilitation for injury recovery, athletic training to enhance elite performance, and strategies to combat sedentary lifestyles, with research quantifying outcomes like reduced chronic disease risk through specific activity dosages—e.g., 150 minutes of moderate weekly linked to 30% lower cardiovascular mortality in longitudinal studies. Kinesiology's interdisciplinary nature draws from physics for force dynamics, for tissue responses, and for motivation, enabling causal models of movement efficiency and adaptation. While primarily human-focused, it occasionally extends to comparative for biomechanical insights, though human-centric applications predominate in clinical and educational contexts.

Interdisciplinary Components

Kinesiology encompasses an interdisciplinary framework that synthesizes knowledge from , , , , , and to elucidate the mechanisms and effects of human movement. This integration enables a holistic analysis of how structural, functional, and environmental factors interact to produce motion and influence outcomes. Biomechanics represents a core intersection with physics and , quantifying forces, torques, and motion patterns to optimize movement efficiency, enhance athletic , and mitigate risks through ergonomic designs and modifications. For instance, biomechanical analyses have informed prosthetic limb designs and rehabilitation protocols by modeling joint kinetics and . Exercise physiology bridges kinesiology with medicine and , investigating acute and chronic adaptations to , such as cardiovascular improvements from aerobic training or from resistance exercises. These insights underpin clinical interventions, including personalized fitness regimens that reduce chronic prevalence by promoting metabolic . Neuroscience and contribute to understanding , learning processes, and cognitive influences on movement, revealing how neural plasticity facilitates skill acquisition and how psychological factors like affect performance consistency. Applications extend to sports psychology techniques that build mental resilience, as evidenced by interventions improving focus during high-stakes competitions. Further intersections with rehabilitation sciences and leverage these components for therapeutic exercise programs that restore function post-injury and population-level strategies to combat sedentary lifestyles, such as urban planning for . This multidisciplinary approach drives evidence-based advancements, though challenges persist in coordinating diverse methodologies for cohesive outcomes.

Historical Development

Ancient Origins and Early Observations

Early observations of human and animal movement emerged in , where philosophers integrated empirical study with philosophical inquiry into the mechanics and purposes of locomotion. (c. 460–370 BCE), often regarded as the father of , prescribed exercise as a core component of maintenance, emphasizing that balanced bodily humors and prevented , as detailed in his writings on regimen where he advocated moderate motion to promote , circulation, and overall . This approach marked an initial recognition of movement's causal role in physiological well-being, grounded in direct patient observations rather than abstract theory. Aristotle (384–322 BCE), building on these foundations, conducted the first systematic analyses of motion, earning recognition as a foundational figure in the study of through works like On the Motion of Animals and Progression of Animals. He dissected animal cadavers to examine musculoskeletal structures, classifying locomotion types—such as walking, flying, and swimming—based on limb configurations, articulations, and leverage principles, while attributing movement to intrinsic causes like desire and external factors like resistance./01:_Chapters/1.01:_The_History_of_Kinesiology) Aristotle's method involved first-principles reasoning from observable patterns, such as how quadrupeds alternate limb use for stability, influencing later biomechanical thought without reliance on modern instrumentation. In the Roman era, (129–c. 216 CE) advanced these ideas through vivisections and anatomical experiments on animals, detailing muscle contractions, functions, and respiratory movements tied to diaphragmatic action. His studies, including spinal cord transections to isolate motor responses, demonstrated how neural impulses initiated specific motions and how imbalances led to , providing causal insights into that persisted as authoritative until the . Galen's emphasis on empirical over purely speculative underscored movement as a product of anatomical machinery, though his humoral framework introduced interpretive biases later critiqued for lacking quantitative precision. These ancient efforts laid groundwork for kinesiology by prioritizing verifiable anatomical and observational data over mythological explanations prevalent in contemporaneous cultures.

Modern Foundations (19th-20th Centuries)

The 19th century saw the emergence of systematic approaches to human movement, driven by the formalization of physical education and innovations in visual analysis. Per Henrik Ling founded the Royal Central Institute of Gymnastics in Stockholm in 1813, developing structured systems of exercises categorized into educational, military, medical, and aesthetic gymnastics to promote health, strength, and rehabilitation. These efforts emphasized the therapeutic and preventive roles of movement, influencing modern therapeutic exercise practices. Breakthroughs in motion recording revolutionized empirical study. Eadweard Muybridge's 1878 experiments, using multiple cameras to capture a horse's gallop, resolved debates on locomotion and extended to human subjects in his 1887 work , featuring over 780 photographic sequences that provided foundational data for biomechanical analysis. Concurrently, invented in 1882, superimposing successive motion phases on single plates to quantify physiological aspects of movement, such as and flight, at his Physiological Station. These techniques shifted from qualitative description to quantifiable sequences, enabling precise dissection of . The explicit application of mechanics to gymnastics appeared in Baron Nils Posse's 1894 treatise The Special Kinesiology of Educational Gymnastics, which detailed the anatomical and mechanical effects of Swedish exercises, popularizing the term "kinesiology" in English-language physical education. Posse, a Swedish immigrant and director of the Posse Gymnasium in Boston, advocated for scientifically grounded training systems. In the United States, Dudley Allen Sargent advanced from 1879 as director of the Hemenway Gymnasium at , where he developed over 30 corrective exercise machines calibrated to individual anthropometric data and promoted physical training as preventive medicine based on physiological principles. Sargent's measurements of thousands of students underscored variability in human form and function, informing personalized exercise regimens. The early 20th century integrated these advancements into academic curricula, with physical education programs incorporating and ; for instance, Sargent's influence persisted in evolving departments that measured movement's health impacts through controlled studies. By mid-century, wartime fitness assessments, such as those during , highlighted movement science's practical value, spurring further institutionalization. This era's emphasis on empirical validation and mechanical analysis established kinesiology's scientific bedrock, distinct from earlier prescriptive .

Contemporary Evolution (Post-1960s)

In the , physical education departments in higher education institutions faced a crisis of identity amid broader cultural shifts and increasing emphasis on scientific rigor, prompting a transition toward the systematic study of human movement as a core academic pursuit. This evolution was catalyzed by Franklin Henry's 1964 paper "Physical Education: An Academic Discipline," which argued that the field warranted recognition as a legitimate scholarly domain through into motor , , and , rather than solely practical instruction. Henry's work, often crediting him as the pioneer of motor behavior research, introduced experimental methodologies to quantify learning and control of skilled movements, influencing the establishment of dedicated laboratories and graduate programs. By the late , initiatives like the Big Ten Body of Knowledge Symposium delineated foundational subdisciplines, including the philosophy of , , and growth/motor development, fostering interdisciplinary integration with and . The 1970s and 1980s saw kinesiology solidify as a distinct label, with emerging as a graduate-level specialty amid technological advancements such as (EMG) and early computer-based motion analysis, enabling precise measurement of joint forces and muscle activation patterns. The American Society of , founded in 1977, promoted quantitative modeling of movement dynamics, drawing from principles to analyze loads on musculoskeletal systems during activities like running or lifting. Concurrently, theories advanced beyond reflex-based models toward systems-level frameworks, incorporating feedback loops and , as evidenced by research on adaptability in voluntary actions. This period also witnessed the proliferation of labs, spurred by concerns over sedentary lifestyles and athletic performance demands, with studies quantifying cardiovascular and metabolic responses to training protocols. From the 1990s onward, numerous universities rebranded departments as kinesiology programs to underscore their scientific orientation, reflecting a discipline-wide shift toward evidence-based applications in sports performance, rehabilitation, and . Integration with accelerated via techniques like fMRI, revealing neural plasticity in acquisition, while computational simulations addressed in movement redundancy. The American Kinesiology Association, established in 2011, standardized curricula emphasizing physical activity's health impacts, amid growing recognition of kinesiology's role in addressing chronic diseases through movement interventions. By the , global collaborations and data-driven approaches, including wearable sensors for real-time , further entrenched kinesiology's empirical foundation, prioritizing causal mechanisms over anecdotal practices.

Core Principles

Biomechanics and Movement Analysis

Biomechanics in kinesiology applies mechanical principles from physics and to analyze human movement, focusing on the forces acting on and generated by the body as well as their effects on tissues and structures. This subdiscipline examines how biological systems respond to internal forces like muscle contractions and external forces such as or ground reaction, enabling quantitative assessment of motion efficiency and load distribution. Core to this analysis is the distinction between , which describes the geometric aspects of motion including position, , and without considering causative forces, and kinetics, which quantifies those forces to explain motion production and control. Movement analysis techniques in biomechanics rely on instrumentation to capture and model accurately. Kinematic is often obtained through systems, which trace centers and segment orientations; early methods in the used photogrammetric analysis, evolving to optical marker-based systems by the and markerless approaches in recent decades for non-invasive tracking. Kinetic measurements incorporate force plates to record ground reaction forces—typically ranging from 1-3 times body weight during walking to over 8 times in —and (EMG) to assess muscle activation patterns contributing to torques. These tools allow inverse dynamics computations, where measured kinematics and external forces yield internal moments, revealing causal mechanisms like shear forces implicated in injuries. In sports applications, biomechanical analysis optimizes performance by identifying inefficient patterns, such as excessive rotations exceeding 20-30 degrees in pitching that correlate with overuse injuries, and informs technique modifications to reduce risk. For rehabilitation, it guides protocols by quantifying asymmetries post-injury—for instance, restoring where healthy individuals exhibit less than 5% side-to-side variance in step length—and tracks progress through metrics like peak force generation, which can improve over 60% with targeted interventions. Such evidence-based approaches prioritize causal force-motion relationships over anecdotal adjustments, enhancing outcomes in clinical and athletic contexts.

Physiological Responses to Movement

Movement elicits acute physiological responses across multiple systems to meet escalated metabolic demands, primarily by enhancing oxygen , energy substrate mobilization, and removal while preserving . These responses are triggered by afferent signals from mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors, coupled with efferent activation and humoral factors such as catecholamines. Central to this is the integration of cardiovascular, respiratory, and muscular adjustments, which scale with movement intensity and duration. The cardiovascular system responds by substantially increasing , calculated as multiplied by , to deliver oxygen to working muscles. rises linearly with , advancing by approximately 10 beats per minute for each 3.5 mL/kg/min increment in oxygen uptake, reaching maxima estimated via 220 minus age (with standard deviation of ±12 bpm). augments from resting levels of about 50 mL to 100–175 mL through preload enhancement via the Frank-Starling mechanism and greater contractility from sympathetic beta-adrenergic stimulation, though it often plateaus around 50% of maximal oxygen uptake. Systolic elevates due to higher , while diastolic pressure remains stable or slightly declines from peripheral in active tissues; flow redistributes, prioritizing () at the expense of visceral organs. Respiratory responses amplify to support aerobic metabolism, with surging from roughly 10 L/min at rest to over 100 L/min during high-intensity efforts. This is mediated by central chemoreceptors detecting rising CO₂ and H⁺ levels, peripheral chemoreceptors sensing arterial , and proprioceptive inputs from muscle afferents. and both increase, expanding alveolar surface area for O₂ and CO₂ elimination, thereby elevating pulmonary oxygen uptake toward VO₂ max—the peak rate limited by and peripheral extraction. In the muscular system, responses involve rapid motor unit recruitment following the size principle, transitioning from slow-twitch type I fibers (fatigue-resistant, oxidative) for low-intensity sustained movement to fast-twitch type II fibers (glycolytic, powerful) for explosive actions. Energy provision shifts sequentially: phosphocreatine hydrolysis for immediate ATP replenishment (lasting seconds), anaerobic glycolysis yielding lactate during oxygen deficits (evident above lactate threshold, typically 50–80% VO₂ max), and aerobic oxidation of carbohydrates and fats for prolonged activity. Local hyperemia via and metabolite-induced relaxation supports this, though accumulation of H⁺, inorganic phosphate, and contributes to . Accompanying thermoregulatory adjustments include elevated core temperature prompting cutaneous and eccrine sweating to dissipate heat, preventing .

Motor Control and Neural Mechanisms

![Illustration of motor redundancy in multi-joint movement][float-right] Motor control in kinesiology encompasses the neural processes that enable the planning, execution, and adaptation of voluntary and reflexive movements through hierarchical integration of sensory inputs and descending commands. The coordinates muscle activation via motor neurons, with spinal reflexes providing rapid, automatic responses to stimuli such as stretch or , while higher centers modulate these for purposeful action. This system addresses the complexity of human movement by leveraging synergies—coordinated patterns of muscle activity that simplify control despite the body's numerous . The (M1), located in the , directly influences contralateral muscles by sending signals that specify force and direction, with stimulation thresholds as low as 2-5 microamps eliciting movements in awake humans. Adjacent (PMC) and (SMA) contribute to movement planning and sequencing; PMC integrates sensory cues for externally guided actions, while SMA handles internally generated sequences, as evidenced by increased SMA activity in self-initiated tasks during functional imaging studies. Basal ganglia circuits facilitate movement initiation by disinhibiting thalamocortical pathways, with disruptions like impairing this via depletion, reducing movement amplitude by up to 50% in affected individuals. The refines motor output through predictive error correction, comparing intended versus actual trajectories via inhibition of deep nuclei, essential for timing and coordination in tasks like where it adjusts to perturbations within 100-200 ms. Lesions here, as in , increase movement variability by 2-3 fold, underscoring its role in smoothing multi-joint synergies. Nikolai Bernstein's "degrees of freedom problem," articulated in his 1967 analysis, highlights how the neuromuscular system manages excess variables—e.g., 7 for a 2-link —by constraining them into low-dimensional synergies rather than independent control, supported by electromyographic patterns showing consistent muscle covariation across trials. Sensory afferents, including muscle spindles for and Golgi tendon organs for force feedback, form closed-loop systems that update cortical maps in real-time, with visual inputs from the parietal cortex aiding reach accuracy to within 5-10 cm. Neural plasticity underpins , as repeated practice induces in M1 synapses, expanding representational areas by 20-50% for trained sequences, as mapped in studies since the . ![Brain neuroplasticity changes following motor practice][center]

Adaptation, Plasticity, and Redundancy

The human body exhibits physiological adaptation to mechanical stressors imposed by physical activity, a core concept in kinesiology where repeated exposure to exercise stimuli elicits structural and functional enhancements in tissues to restore homeostasis and improve performance capacity. Endurance training, for instance, increases mitochondrial density and capillary supply in skeletal muscle fibers, boosting oxidative capacity and delaying fatigue during prolonged efforts; studies document these changes as occurring progressively over weeks to months with consistent aerobic loading at intensities above the lactate threshold. Similarly, resistance exercise provokes hypertrophy in type II muscle fibers via satellite cell activation and protein synthesis upregulation, with gains in cross-sectional area measurable after 6-8 weeks of progressive overload, thereby elevating maximal force output. These adaptations are dose-dependent, influenced by factors such as training volume, intensity, and recovery periods, underscoring the principle of overload as essential for progressive improvement. Neural plasticity complements physiological adaptation by enabling the to reorganize in response to motor demands, facilitating skill acquisition and refinement in kinesiological contexts. induces experience-specific patterns of cortical and subcortical plasticity, including expansion of representational maps in the and strengthened corticospinal connections, as evidenced by longitudinal in skilled performers. further amplifies this plasticity through upregulation of (BDNF), which supports dendritic arborization and synaptic efficacy, with acute bouts of shown to elevate serum BDNF levels by 20-30% in healthy adults. In rehabilitation applications within kinesiology, such plasticity allows recovery of movement post-injury via compensatory remapping, though its extent diminishes with age due to reduced neuronal excitability. Motor —or more precisely, motor abundance—refers to the surplus in the musculoskeletal system, where the number of controllable elements exceeds those required for task execution, permitting the to resolve infinite kinematic solutions through synergistic coordination. This abundance, as articulated in Bernstein's degrees-of-freedom problem, enables stabilization of task-relevant variables like endpoint accuracy while permitting variability in joint trajectories, enhancing robustness against perturbations; experimental analyses of reaching tasks demonstrate inter-trial covariation that minimizes endpoint variance. In adaptive contexts, supports rapid recalibration of movements, as seen in visuomotor paradigms where subjects exploit kinematic flexibility to maintain despite rotated visual feedback, with adaptation rates peaking within 100-200 trials. Kinesiological models emphasize that this feature underlies both everyday locomotion efficiency and athletic , though unresolved debates persist on whether selection criteria prioritize energetic optimality or stability. Integration of , plasticity, and forms a resilient framework for human movement, where physiological remodeling and neural rewiring leverage abundant control options to optimize outcomes across diverse demands, from athletic to recovery. from longitudinal studies reveals synergistic effects, such as enhanced excitability correlating with strength gains and redundant pathway recruitment reducing risk during high-load activities. This interplay ensures that kinesiological interventions can exploit inherent system flexibility for targeted enhancements, though individual variability in genetic predispositions and history modulates response magnitudes.

Applications in Practice

Sports Science and Performance Optimization

Kinesiology contributes to by applying biomechanical, physiological, and principles to enhance athletic output and efficiency. Through detailed movement analysis, practitioners identify suboptimal patterns that limit power generation or speed, enabling targeted interventions to refine technique. For instance, biomechanical studies quantify torques and vectors during activities like sprinting or , revealing how alterations in limb positioning can increase by up to 5-10% in athletes. This approach stems from the mechanical analysis of human motion, where external forces such as ground reaction interact with internal muscle actions to determine performance outcomes. Physiological adaptations form a core mechanism for performance gains, with kinesiology-guided training protocols inducing changes in cardiovascular and muscular systems. Resistance training, for example, promotes and neural drive improvements, directly correlating with gains in strength and power metrics like lifts increasing 20-40% over 8-12 weeks in trained individuals. elicits aerobic enhancements, including elevated mitochondrial density and by 10-15%, which sustain higher intensities during competitions. These adaptations arise from principles, where repeated stressors trigger supercompensation, optimizing energy for sport-specific demands. Motor control optimization refines skill execution by leveraging and redundancy in movement systems. Kinesiology research demonstrates that deliberate practice with feedback, such as video analysis or sensor data, accelerates acquisition of complex skills, reducing variability in stroke mechanics for sports like or by standard deviations of 15-25%. Functional training modalities further integrate these elements, improving technical proficiency alongside physical capacities, as evidenced by meta-analyses showing moderate effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 0.5-0.8) on and power in team sports athletes. Kinesiologists contribute to the fitness industry by applying these performance optimization and training strategies to enhance physical conditioning across recreational and athletic populations. Such interventions minimize injury risk—common in high-velocity actions—by balancing muscular activation and joint stability, thereby extending career and peak performance periods.

Rehabilitation and Injury Prevention

Kinesiology contributes to rehabilitation by integrating biomechanical assessments and motor control strategies to restore functional movement following injury. Kinesiologists, as movement specialists, provide exercise-based interventions targeting musculoskeletal conditions, improving joint function, strength, and reducing pain through structured programs supported by clinical evidence. Practitioners use tools like force platforms and dynamometric analysis to evaluate postural stability and joint loading, identifying deficits in sensitive receptors that contribute to conditions such as ankle sprains or knee instabilities. This approach enables targeted interventions, such as progressive resistance exercises, to rebuild muscle activation patterns and minimize compensatory mechanisms that prolong recovery. In sports rehabilitation, kinesiological principles guide the correction of inefficient movement patterns, such as excessive rotations or asymmetries, which are quantified through systems to prevent re-injury. For example, post-ACL reconstruction protocols emphasize neuromuscular retraining to normalize kinematics, reducing the risk of contralateral injuries by addressing underlying risk factors like weak hip stabilizers. Evidence from applied studies supports these methods, showing improved outcomes in force distribution and muscle coordination during return-to-sport phases. Injury prevention strategies rooted in kinesiology focus on preempting risks through screening for muscle imbalances and poor , often via movement analysis to optimize load distribution across joints. Neuromuscular training programs, incorporating and balance exercises, have reduced lower extremity injury incidence by up to 60% in sports, as evidenced by systematic reviews of warm-up interventions that enhance and reactive strength. These protocols target causal factors like inadequate , with longitudinal data indicating sustained reductions in overuse injuries when integrated into routine training. Workplace and clinical applications extend kinesiology to ergonomic redesigns and prehabilitation, where analysis of repetitive motions prevents conditions like tendinopathies by enforcing evidence-based modifications to posture and technique. For instance, kinesiologists prescribe exercises to balance muscle ratios, mitigating cumulative stress that leads to chronic injuries, with studies confirming decreased rates in high-risk occupations following such interventions. Overall, these applications underscore kinesiology's emphasis on causal mechanisms of movement, prioritizing empirical validation over anecdotal methods to achieve measurable reductions in injury burden.

Ergonomics and Workplace Health

Kinesiology applies biomechanical and physiological principles to , optimizing workplace design to align with human movement capabilities and reduce (MSD) risks. By analyzing joint angles, muscle loading, and postural demands, kinesiologists inform interventions that minimize awkward postures, repetitive strains, and excessive force, thereby enhancing worker safety and productivity. Work-related MSDs, including back pain and upper extremity disorders, account for a significant portion of occupational injuries; for instance, U.S. workers' compensation claims data from the early indicated an annual incidence rate of 2.6 cases per 100 full-time workers for upper extremity MSDs alone, with gradual-onset conditions comprising the majority. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) identifies biomechanical factors such as heavy lifting and prolonged static postures as primary causal contributors, supported by epidemiological evidence linking workplace physical demands to elevated MSD prevalence. Ergonomic interventions grounded in kinesiology, such as adjustable workstations and training in proper lifting techniques, demonstrate effectiveness in preventing MSDs. A Cochrane review of randomized trials found that ergonomic programs likely reduce the risk of upper limb and neck MSDs among office workers, with participatory approaches involving worker input yielding stronger outcomes. Similarly, a 2025 meta-analysis of ergonomic interventions across industries reported significant reductions in lower back pain (standardized mean difference -0.45) and overall MSD symptoms, particularly when combining workstation adjustments with movement-based training derived from kinesiological assessments. In manufacturing and healthcare settings, kinesiology-informed tools like the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation quantify safe load limits based on , frequency, and coupling, preventing low-back injuries that affect up to 37% of workers in high-demand roles. Multifaceted programs integrating kinesiology exercises with redesigns have lowered subsequent work-related MSD rates by 20-30% in personnel, as evidenced by controlled intervention studies. These applications underscore causal links between mismatched task demands and injury, prioritizing evidence-based redesign over unsubstantiated assumptions about worker resilience.

Clinical Health Promotion

Clinical health promotion within kinesiology encompasses the application of movement science principles to design and implement evidence-based exercise interventions aimed at preventing progression, managing chronic conditions, and enhancing overall outcomes in clinical populations. Kinesiologists collaborate with healthcare providers to prescribe individualized programs that address physiological adaptations, such as improved cardiovascular function and metabolic regulation, tailored to patients with conditions like , , , and musculoskeletal disorders. These interventions prioritize causal mechanisms, including enhanced insulin sensitivity and reduced , over symptomatic relief alone, with particular emphasis on exercise for musculoskeletal health to preserve joint function and alleviate pain. Empirical data from randomized controlled trials demonstrate that structured exercise programs, informed by kinesiological assessments of and , yield measurable reductions in chronic disease risk factors. For instance, regular aerobic and resistance training has been shown to lower HbA1c levels by 0.5-1.0% in diabetic patients, comparable to pharmacological effects, while decreasing all-cause mortality by up to 30% in cohorts with . In musculoskeletal disorders, such as , kinesiology-guided exercises improve joint mobility and pain tolerance through neuroplastic adaptations and muscle strengthening, with meta-analyses reporting effect sizes of 0.4-0.6 for functional outcomes. These benefits stem from dose-response relationships, where 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity weekly correlates with sustained physiological improvements. Kinesiologists also address mental health comorbidities in clinical promotion by leveraging exercise's role in modulating neural mechanisms, such as increased BDNF expression for , which mitigates symptoms of depression and anxiety in chronic illness patients. Integration into multidisciplinary teams enhances adherence, with studies indicating that kinesiology-led on movement fundamentals boosts long-term compliance rates by 20-40% compared to standard medical advice. However, program efficacy depends on rigorous individualization to avoid overexertion risks, underscoring the need for ongoing biomechanical monitoring in vulnerable populations.

Professional Framework

Education and Training Pathways

Undergraduate education in kinesiology typically begins with a , which serves as the foundational entry point for the field and is required for most roles. Programs emphasize a multidisciplinary including , , , exercise science, and , often culminating in hands-on experiences such as internships or labs. The American Kinesiology Association outlines a core undergraduate comprising four elements: physical activity's role in , wellness, and ; scientific foundations of physical activity; cultural, historical, and philosophical dimensions; and through practical application. These programs, typically lasting four years and accredited by bodies like the National Strength and Conditioning Association for related tracks, prepare graduates for immediate employment as exercise physiologists, rehabilitation specialists, fitness professionals, in fitness, , or as prerequisites for allied graduate studies. Graduate pathways extend specialization, with master's degrees focusing on applied aspects like , sports performance, or clinical kinesiology, often requiring 1-2 years of coursework, , and clinical practicums. These programs build on undergraduate foundations and are essential for roles such as exercise physiologist or , with curricula including advanced , , and intervention design. Doctoral programs (PhD or EdD) demand prior master's completion, relevant experience (e.g., 1-3 years in or clinical settings), and emphasize original in areas like neural control or adaptation mechanisms, typically spanning 4-6 years. Such advanced training is prerequisite for academia, high-level consulting, or leadership in rehabilitation sciences. Professional certification supplements formal education but varies by subdiscipline, as kinesiology lacks a universal licensure akin to . Entry-level certifications, such as the NSCA-Certified Personal Trainer or ACSM Certified Exercise Physiologist, require a , passing exams on exercise prescription and safety, and credits (e.g., 20-45 hours biennially). Specialized tracks like kinesiotherapy mandate core coursework in therapeutic exercise, a minimum GPA (e.g., 2.5), and registration through associations like the American Kinesiotherapy Association. These credentials enhance employability in performance optimization or clinical settings, though links certification to improved client outcomes primarily through standardized validation rather than innate superiority. Pathways often integrate apprenticeships or residencies for practical competency, aligning with evidence-based movement analysis.

Licensing, Regulation, and Certification

In the United States, kinesiology is not a licensed profession at the state or national level, allowing individuals with relevant degrees to practice without mandatory government oversight, though this results in reliance on voluntary credentials to demonstrate competence and limitations to non-diagnostic roles focused on movement and physical activity. Professionals typically hold a bachelor's degree in kinesiology or a related field as a prerequisite for certification, with organizations like the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) offering credentials such as the Certified Exercise Physiologist (EP-C), which requires a bachelor's degree, 600 hours of professional experience, and passing a proctored exam focused on exercise prescription and testing. Similarly, the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) provides the Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS) designation, demanding a bachelor's or master's degree in a related discipline, 10 hours of continuing education annually, and success on an exam emphasizing biomechanics, nutrition, and training program design for athletes. These certifications, while not legally required, are widely recognized in sports performance and clinical settings, with over 50,000 NSCA-certified professionals as of 2023, though critics note variability in enforcement and the potential for unqualified practitioners due to the absence of uniform regulation. Exceptions exist in niche areas, such as Louisiana's licensure for exercise physiologists, which mandates a degree and exam passage, but this does not extend to general kinesiologists. In Canada, differs by province, with kinesiology designated a self-regulated profession in provinces such as (via the College of Kinesiologists of Ontario), , and , where colleges define competencies for prevention, rehabilitation, and exercise prescription under acts like Ontario's Kinesiology Act, 2007, which prohibits unlicensed use of the "kinesiologist" title and requires registration including a , jurisprudence exam, and adherence to standards of practice for assessment and rehabilitation services. As of 2023, registers over 6,000 members, enforcing continuing competency through 20 hours of professional development annually to protect public safety in areas like and injury management. In other provinces, such as , kinesiology remains unregulated, with practitioners voluntarily affiliating through the Canadian Kinesiology Alliance (CKA), a national body established in 2009 that promotes standardized competencies but lacks statutory authority, leading to inconsistent title protection and scope across jurisdictions. The CKA advocates for broader , citing risks from unregulated advice in fitness and rehabilitation, though expansion efforts have stalled outside regulated provinces due to provincial autonomy. Internationally, approaches vary further; for instance, in , kinesiology falls under exercise physiology regulation via Exercise & Sports Science (ESSA), requiring for advanced practitioners, while in the , no unified framework exists, with certifications often tied to national sports bodies rather than mandatory licensing. This patchwork underscores kinesiology's interdisciplinary nature, where certification emphasizes evidence-based skills over prescriptive regulation, though proponents argue for expanded oversight to mitigate pseudoscientific practices infiltrating movement analysis.

Scope of Practice and Ethical Boundaries

The scope of practice for kinesiologists centers on the scientific assessment of human movement, performance evaluation, and the application of evidence-based interventions to rehabilitate, maintain, or enhance physical function through physical activity, including functional movement analyses and prescribing exercise programs tailored to individual needs for injury prevention and rehabilitation. This includes advising on ergonomics or injury prevention strategies, but excludes activities reserved for regulated health professions such as medical diagnosis, ordering diagnostic imaging, or prescribing pharmaceuticals, with practice limited to non-diagnostic roles focused on movement and physical activity. In regulated jurisdictions like Ontario, Canada, this scope is codified under the Kinesiology Act, 2007, which limits practice to non-invasive, movement-focused modalities while requiring delegation for controlled acts like certain wound care or acupuncture. Professional regulation of kinesiologists varies by region; for instance, self-regulation exists in Canadian provinces such as (via the College of Kinesiologists of Ontario since 2013), , and , enforcing standards through registration, , and disciplinary processes, whereas in the United States, kinesiology practice often falls under voluntary certifications from bodies like the American Society of Exercise Physiologists without uniform licensure. Kinesiologists must delineate their competencies, referring clients to physicians or physical therapists for conditions requiring clinical intervention, such as neurological disorders beyond movement mechanics, to avoid overstepping into unauthorized territory. Ethical boundaries are guided by codes emphasizing beneficence, non-maleficence, , and justice, mandating that kinesiologists prioritize client welfare by obtaining , maintaining confidentiality of , and disclosing any conflicts of interest, such as financial incentives from equipment suppliers. These codes, as outlined by organizations like Kinesiology Alliance and the College of Kinesiologists of , prohibit dual relationships that could impair objectivity, including romantic or business entanglements with clients, and require practitioners to uphold professional competence through ongoing to mitigate risks of harm from outdated or unverified methods. Boundary violations, particularly , represent the gravest ethical breaches, with guidelines explicitly prohibiting any exploitative behavior and mandating reporting mechanisms; for example, Ontario's practice standards frame such acts as leading to severe disciplinary actions, including license revocation, to safeguard vulnerable clients in one-on-one settings. Kinesiologists are also ethically bound to , rejecting unsubstantiated claims like unproven therapeutic modalities, and to transparent communication about intervention limitations, ensuring clients understand that outcomes depend on adherence and individual factors rather than guaranteed results. In unregulated contexts, adherence to these voluntary standards remains critical to preserving public trust and professional integrity.

Technological Advancements

Wearables and Sensor-Based Monitoring

Wearable sensors, such as integrating accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, enable non-invasive, real-time capture of kinematic data in kinesiology, quantifying parameters like , , and orientation during activities. These 6- or 9-degree-of-freedom systems, often placed on limbs, , or extremities, support applications in , balance assessment, and recognition by deriving metrics including stride length, joint angles, and postural sway without requiring fixed laboratory setups. Complementary sensors, including (EMG) patches and pressure insoles, extend monitoring to muscle activation and ground reaction forces, facilitating biomechanical evaluations in sports and rehabilitation contexts. In performance optimization and , these technologies track movement quality and training loads, with algorithms achieving accuracies exceeding 95% for activity classification and fall detection in controlled validations. For example, waist- or ankle-mounted have yielded cycle timing errors of 0.02 seconds relative to optical reference systems, while angle estimations maintain errors under 5 degrees, aiding precise feedback on exercise form. In rehabilitation, systems like textile-integrated strain sensors monitor post-stroke motor recovery, correlating sensor-derived with clinical scores such as the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Despite these advances, empirical limitations include reliance on controlled environments, small sample sizes (often under 20 participants), and sensitivities to misalignment or motion, which can inflate errors in dynamic real-world scenarios by up to 10% for posture metrics. Ongoing integrations with AI-driven fusion algorithms aim to mitigate these by improving and personalization, though prospective, large-scale field studies remain scarce to confirm causal links to outcomes like reduced injury rates.

Computational Modeling and AI Integration

Computational modeling in kinesiology employs finite element analysis, multibody dynamics, and musculoskeletal simulations to quantify forces, joint loads, and movement patterns during human locomotion and activities. These models integrate anatomical data, such as muscle architecture and bone geometry, to predict biomechanical outcomes that are difficult to measure invasively. For instance, OpenSim, an open-source platform developed at and released in 2007, enables users to construct subject-specific models of the musculoskeletal system and simulate dynamic movements, including and jumping, by solving inverse and forward dynamics problems. Such simulations have been applied to assess injury risks, as in modeling knee contact mechanics where finite element models reveal stress distributions under various loading conditions, validated against experimental cadaveric data. Multiscale approaches extend this by linking tissue-level mechanics to whole-body dynamics, facilitating analysis of phenomena like muscle-tendon interactions during sprinting. Recent advancements incorporate patient-specific imaging, such as MRI-derived geometries, to enhance model accuracy for clinical applications like post-surgical rehabilitation planning. AI integration augments these models through algorithms that process large datasets from , wearables, and to automate parameter optimization and predict unobserved variables. techniques, including convolutional neural networks, enable real-time human pose estimation from video, classifying movement patterns with accuracies exceeding 95% in controlled settings, thus supporting non-invasive in kinesiology research. In sports , AI-driven predictive modeling identifies injury precursors by analyzing multivariate time-series , such as angles and ground reaction forces, outperforming traditional statistical methods in detecting subtle asymmetries linked to overuse injuries. Hybrid systems combining OpenSim simulations with optimize neuromuscular control strategies, simulating adaptations to training loads and informing personalized interventions. As of 2025, emerging frameworks leverage AI for twins, integrating real-time with biomechanical models to forecast declines, though validation against longitudinal empirical studies remains essential to mitigate risks in high-dimensional datasets.

Virtual Reality and Simulation Tools

Virtual reality (VR) technologies in kinesiology provide immersive environments that replicate real-world movement scenarios, allowing for controlled experimentation in and learning without physical risks. These systems integrate sensory feedback, such as visual and haptic cues, to enhance and skill acquisition, as demonstrated in studies where head-mounted displays improved upper extremity task performance by enabling repetitive, task-specific practice. In educational settings, VR labs have increased student engagement in kinesiology courses by facilitating interactive visualization of biomechanical principles, with reported gains through hands-on of muscle activations and kinematics. In rehabilitation applications, VR supports targeted interventions for musculoskeletal and neurological conditions, including retraining and balance exercises that yield measurable improvements in functional mobility. For instance, VR-based protocols for patients with have shown short- to long-term enhancements in motor skill retention, with effect sizes indicating better outcomes compared to traditional alone in randomized trials involving children. Similarly, immersive VR simulations aid upper recovery post-stroke by exploiting principles like explicit feedback and variable practice, reducing compensatory movements through real-time kinematic corrections. These tools often incorporate gamified elements to sustain patient adherence, with metabolic testing confirming calorie expenditures akin to moderate during virtual sessions. Complementing VR, computational simulation software enables predictive modeling of human kinetics and kinematics in kinesiology research. OpenSim, an open-source platform developed at , allows users to construct and analyze dynamic musculoskeletal models, simulating forces and motions for applications in and injury prediction with validation against experimental data from . The AnyBody Modeling System extends this to full-body simulations, optimizing muscle recruitment patterns for biomechanical evaluations, as used in studies of workplace postures where it accurately predicted joint loads differing by less than 10% from measurements. Such tools facilitate testing in controlled virtual scenarios, bridging gaps in empirical data by iterating simulations based on first-principles mechanics like . Integration of VR with these simulators, as in MovementVR for upper extremity tasks, further advances studies by combining immersive interfaces with precise kinematic logging. Despite efficacy in controlled trials, broader clinical adoption requires larger-scale validation to address variability in user adaptation and hardware accessibility.

Critical Perspectives

Reproducibility Crisis and Research Rigor

The reproducibility crisis in kinesiology, encompassing fields like and , mirrors broader issues in biomedical and social sciences, where a substantial proportion of published findings fail to replicate under similar conditions. A 2025 large-scale replication project targeting applied sports and exercise science studies from quartile 1 journals found that only 28% fully replicated original effect directions and , with replicated effect sizes averaging 75% smaller than originals; just 14% matched original effect sizes within intervals. This low replicability rate, derived from attempting to reproduce 50 randomly selected experiments, highlights systemic vulnerabilities in the field's evidentiary base, particularly for interventions claiming benefits in performance enhancement or . Contributing factors include chronic underpowering of studies, with many exercise science experiments featuring sample sizes below 20 participants, yielding statistical power often under 50% and inflating false positives. exacerbates this, as non-significant results are underrepresented; a 2022 estimated that selective reporting and p-hacking—manipulating to achieve p < 0.05—could account for up to 50% of significant findings in literature. Human subject variability, such as differences in training history, , and , further complicates replication, as protocols rarely standardize these confounders adequately. Surveys of researchers indicate widespread awareness: 78% in one 2025 poll affirmed a exists, yet replication studies remain rare, comprising less than 1% of publications in kinesiology journals. Efforts to enhance research rigor include preregistration of studies to curb hypothesizing after results are known () and mandates for sharing, which a 2022 survey found only 42% of sports scientists consistently practice. Philosophical critiques emphasize that overreliance on significance testing ignores and clinical relevance, while Bayesian approaches could better quantify uncertainty in movement-based outcomes. Despite these, adoption lags; for instance, fewer than 20% of kinesiology trials in major journals from 2020-2024 reported power analyses or priors. Addressing these gaps is critical, as unreliable findings risk misguiding policies on , potentially overestimating benefits of unproven protocols like for metabolic disorders. Initiatives like Science Replication Centre multi-site collaborations to boost sample sizes and transparency, showing preliminary success in replicating effects with 40% higher consistency than single-lab efforts.

Pseudoscience Distinctions and Critiques

Applied kinesiology (AK), developed by chiropractor George Goodheart in the 1960s, employs manual muscle testing to purportedly diagnose structural, chemical, or emotional imbalances and guide treatments such as nutritional supplements or , but it diverges sharply from evidence-based kinesiology, which relies on controlled physiological and biomechanical research. Multiple randomized, double-blind studies have demonstrated that AK's muscle testing fails to reliably detect conditions like nutrient deficiencies or allergies, performing no better than chance or . For instance, a 1988 trial found AK unable to accurately assess status, with results inconsistent across blinded conditions. Critics, including organizations like the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, classify AK as due to its lack of , reliance on subjective operator interpretation, and absence of mechanistic plausibility under established neuromuscular , where arises from verifiable neural or metabolic deficits rather than ideomotor effects or "energy blockages." Practitioner influences outcomes, as demonstrated in experiments where tester expectations alter muscle response without physiological change, undermining claims of diagnostic validity. Despite endorsements in circles, systematic reviews conclude AK lacks empirical support for therapeutic claims, contrasting with mainstream kinesiology's emphasis on replicable data from , , and intervention trials. Other fringe practices, such as psychokinesiology or neuro emotional technique, extend AK principles by incorporating unsubstantiated notions of emotional "blockages" detectable via muscle testing, further blurring lines but failing under scrutiny for reproducibility and causal evidence. In professional kinesiology, distinctions are maintained through adherence to , excluding such techniques from accredited curricula and clinical guidelines, as promoted by bodies like the American Kinesiology Association, to preserve rigor amid wellness industry hype. This separation highlights kinesiology's grounding in causal mechanisms of movement—e.g., force-velocity relationships in muscle fibers—versus AK's non-empirical assertions.

Evidence Gaps in Exercise Interventions

Despite extensive research on exercise interventions in kinesiology, significant evidence gaps undermine the ability to draw robust, generalizable conclusions about their efficacy and mechanisms. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suffer from high or unclear risk of , including inadequate blinding, incomplete outcome reporting, and selective , with a of 340 exercise science studies indicating that over 80% exhibited such issues as of 2024, though recent trials show modest improvements. Methodological limitations, such as underpowered sample sizes and improper handling of confidence intervals or multiple comparisons, further compromise reliability, often leading to inflated effect sizes or failure to detect true differences. Discrepancies between pre-registered protocols and final publications are common, with one analysis of exercise RCTs revealing substantial outcome alterations that could interpretations toward positive results. Inter-individual variability in exercise responses represents a core unresolved gap, with wide heterogeneity in outcomes like cardiorespiratory fitness gains or muscle adaptations challenging one-size-fits-all prescriptions. Systematic reviews highlight inconsistent statistical approaches to identifying "non-responders," where prevalence estimates range from 0% to over 30% depending on dose, duration, and metrics, but true non-response may be overstated due to measurement error, insufficient training volume, or unaccounted confounders like genetics and baseline fitness. For instance, cardiorespiratory non-response declines progressively with weekly exercise exceeding 60 minutes, suggesting many cases reflect suboptimal protocols rather than inherent non-responsiveness, yet causal factors—such as molecular regulators of adaptation—remain poorly elucidated, limiting personalized interventions. Long-term effects of exercise interventions are particularly underexplored, with most studies focusing on short-term physiological proxies rather than sustained outcomes like mortality, hospitalization, or quality-adjusted years. Across 45 long-term conditions, exercise improves capacity and health-related , but evidence on mortality reduction or interactions is sparse, often limited to small cohorts without adjustment for comorbidities. In rehabilitation, RCTs demonstrate cognitive benefits, yet pooling data for non-cognitive outcomes like daily function proves infeasible due to heterogeneous follow-up durations typically under 12 months. Adherence wanes post-intervention, yielding small sustained activity increases, as seen in cancer survivors where effects dissipate within months absent ongoing support. Population-specific gaps exacerbate these issues, particularly in diverse or vulnerable groups where interventions are underrepresented. For older adults, meta-analyses of meta-analyses reveal scant data on group-based or technology-assisted programs, despite potential , with most trials excluding those with multimorbidities that mirror real-world demographics. Community implementation faces barriers like resource constraints and low engagement, hindering translation from controlled settings to everyday practice. In competitive or athletic contexts, RCTs prove infeasible due to ethical and logistical constraints, leaving performance optimization reliant on observational data prone to . Addressing these requires larger, longer-term trials with standardized variability metrics and real-world designs, but funding and design biases toward positive short-term results perpetuate the gaps.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/kinesiology
  2. https://americankinesiology.org/about-us/
  3. https://und.edu/blog/what-is-kinesiology.html
  4. https://www.kines.umich.edu/about/what-kinesiology
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20653114/
  6. https://samples.jbpub.com/9781284034851/Chapter_3.pdf
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11150828/
  8. https://www.keiseruniversity.edu/kinesiology-history-principles-and-more/
  9. https://health.oregonstate.edu/what-is-kinesiology
  10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23036878/
  11. https://www.healthline.com/health/muscle-testing
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128121627000023
  13. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1103&context=kinesiology_facpubs
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258029579_Kinesiology_-_Systematic_review
  15. https://www.etymonline.com/word/kinesiology
  16. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kinesiology
  17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00336297.2012.653268
  18. https://libguides.orangecoastcollege.edu/kinesiology-research
  19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00336297.2015.1017586
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4056176/
  21. https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/exercise-medicine
  22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10671188.1941.10625770
  23. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/ajplung.00123.2014
  24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7744182/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19848036/
  26. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejep/article/view/7
  27. https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/surprising-origins-motion-capture
  28. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/265094
  29. https://numerabilis.u-paris.fr/medica/bibliotheque-numerique/presentations/marey/02-en.php
  30. https://archive.org/details/specialkinesiolo01poss
  31. https://www.academia.edu/23158921/PER_HENRIK_LING_PIONEER_OF_PHYSIOTHERAPY_AND_GYMNASTICS
  32. https://www.bu.edu/sargent/about-us/our-publications/inside-sargent/inside-sargent-2020/a-revolutionary-idea/
  33. https://www.nakhe.org/_Library/_documents/Sargent-Lecturer-Brochure-2018.pdf
  34. https://www.montclair.edu/kinesiology/about-the-department/history/
  35. https://journals.humankinetics.com/downloadpdf/journals/krj/6/2/article-p187.pdf
  36. https://med.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Sports_and_Exercise/Intro_to_KIN/06%253A_Decoding_Dynamics-_The_Physical_Analysis_of_Human_Movement/6.01%253A_Motor_Behavior_and_Development
  37. https://quizlet.com/study-guides/history-and-development-of-kinesiology-from-1820s-to-modern-discipline-08be60d4-30e3-4347-85c1-d13256dd1966
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15805385_KinesiologyBiomechanics_Perspectives_and_Trends
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2759721/
  40. https://med.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Sports_and_Exercise/Intro_to_KIN/01%253A_Exploring_the_Tapestry_of_Kinesiology/1.01%253A_Kinesiology_and_its_Subdisciplines
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5594571/
  42. https://americankinesiology.org/aka-statement-regarding-the-undergraduate-core-curriculum-in-kinesiology/
  43. https://www.albertakinesiology.ca/en/page-news-1/the-history-of-kinesiology
  44. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1345&context=biomechanicsarticles
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10048551/
  46. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Introduction_to_Human_Biomechanics_-_External_Forces
  47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6534225/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1513229/
  49. https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-018-0139-y
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X11001835
  51. https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/en/about/newsroom/articles/biomechanics-in-sports
  52. https://ojs.sin-chn.com/index.php/mcb/article/view/178
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11832503/
  54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482280/
  55. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circresaha.117.305205
  56. https://nba.uth.tmc.edu/neuroscience/m/s3/chapter03.html
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9095426/
  58. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542188/
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8431754/
  60. https://grants.hhp.uh.edu/clayne/HistoryofMC/Turvey1.pdf
  61. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.032682099
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241644798_The_Neural_Basis_of_Motor-Skill_Learning
  63. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/jappl.1984.56.4.831
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5983157/
  65. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Principles_of_Exercise_Physiology_and_Adaptation
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3217208/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7752270/
  68. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.773730/full
  69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10970151/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1945250/
  71. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf00419640
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098220701977X
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5932572/
  74. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/jn.00419.2017
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10295155/
  76. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12409807/
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5407969/
  78. https://www.turkishkinesiology.com/index.php/ahe/article/download/13/12/58
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10443250/
  80. https://bmcsportsscimedrehabil.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13102-024-01040-y
  81. https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review/optimal-performance-and-injury--prevention-through-kinesiology-vHUL.php?article_id=22708
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11843951/
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3797009/
  84. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sports-and-active-living/articles/10.3389/fspor.2025.1556024/full
  85. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11623
  86. https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/58/11/615
  87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40645751/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8872116/
  89. https://www.sportsmed.org/membership/sports-medicine-update/summer-2024/advancement-in-sports-injury-prevention-the-role-of-biomechanics-and-technology
  90. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580551/
  91. https://physioforperformance.com/kinesiology-ergonomics-workplace-injury-prevention/
  92. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222425/
  93. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ergonomics/index.html
  94. https://ergo-plus.com/wp-content/uploads/niosh-musculoskeletal-disorders-workplace-factors.pdf?x42003
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6517177/
  96. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/14/9/3034
  97. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3233/WOR-182782
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9958813/
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11662992/
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9219321/
  101. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.1038119/full
  102. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/12/2/242
  103. https://cehd.gmu.edu/features/2025/01/27/kinesiology-helping-people-with-all-aspects-of-physical-and-mental-health/
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11477259/
  105. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-01841-0
  106. https://americankinesiology.org/the-undergraduate-core/
  107. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00336297.2014.918896
  108. https://www.bestcolleges.com/healthcare/careers/how-to-become-a-kinesiologist/
  109. https://apkmastersonline.hhp.ufl.edu/articles/what-can-you-do-with-a-masters-in-kinesiology/
  110. https://kinesiology.csp.edu/kinesiology/can-you-get-a-phd-in-kinesiology/
  111. https://www.usa.edu/blog/graduate-programs-for-kinesiology-majors/
  112. https://www.atsu.edu/college-of-graduate-health-studies/academics/kinesiology-certificates
  113. https://akta.org/membership/become-registered
  114. https://www.medicaltechnologyschools.com/kinesiologist/how-to-become-a-kinesiologist
  115. https://www.nsca.com/certification/cscs/
  116. https://www.nsca.com/
  117. https://libguides.hiu.edu/c.php?g=970842&p=9550588
  118. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/07k10
  119. https://www.cka.ca/en/kinesiology
  120. https://www.symmetrix.ca/blog/is-kinesiology-regulated
  121. https://americankinesiology.org/
  122. https://coko.ca/coko-resources/scope-of-practice-and-dual-registration/
  123. https://www.cka.ca/en/scope-of-pratice-of-kinesiology
  124. https://coko.ca/coko-resources/practice-advice-scope-of-practice/
  125. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6515482/
  126. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-notes/20021546
  127. https://www.asep.org/about-asep/code-ethics
  128. https://coko.ca/coko-resources/expectations-for-professional-conduct/
  129. https://www.albertakinesiology.ca/en/kinesiology-areas-of-practice
  130. https://www.cka.ca/en/ethics-kins
  131. https://coko.ca/coko-resources/code-of-ethics/
  132. https://coko.ca/coko-resources/practice-guideline-professional-boundaries-and-the-prevention-of-sexual-abuse/
  133. https://nbka-aknb.ca/code-of-ethics/
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8778538/
  135. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/22/9047
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667379723000037
  137. https://simtk.org/projects/opensim
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6061994/
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654124000783
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2854014/
  141. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380876811_The_use_of_AI_in_Human_Pose_Estimation_Applications_in_Kinesiology_Taxonomy_of_Algorithms_Models_and_Evaluation_Methods
  142. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11215955/
  143. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12383302/
  144. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2025.2518694
  145. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11940128/
  146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4348716/
  147. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/virtual-reality/articles/10.3389/frvir.2021.625379/full
  148. https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e42067
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10742848/
  150. https://vrhealth.institute/
  151. https://www.anybodytech.com/software/anybodymodelingsystem/
  152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010482525010935
  153. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.21696
  154. https://www.apta.org/patient-care/interventions/virtual-reality
  155. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24711616.2025.2468459
  156. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-025-02201-w
  157. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40522610/
  158. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.220946
  159. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9748505/
  160. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/krj/14/3/article-p225.xml
  161. https://storkjournals.org/index.php/cik/article/view/53
  162. https://ssreplicationcentre.com/
  163. https://www.painscience.com/articles/applied-kinesiology.php
  164. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3372923/
  165. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24607076/
  166. https://theconversation.com/muscle-testing-kinesiology-panacea-or-placebo-11075
  167. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/understanding-hypnosis/202407/the-fallacy-of-muscle-strength-testing
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2000870/
  169. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/medical-health-and-nutrition-pseudoscience/neuro-emotional-technique-bizarre-hybrid-chiropractic-acupuncture-and-applied-kinesiology
  170. https://americankinesiology.org/kinesiology-review/
  171. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5m4444wv
  172. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10884506/
  173. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sports-and-active-living/articles/10.3389/fspor.2022.981836/full
  174. https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356%2824%2900221-X/fulltext
  175. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34819869/
  176. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.665044/full
  177. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5451738/
  178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155041312300476X
  179. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370%2824%2900178-0/fulltext
  180. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-44771-7
  181. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00520-022-07485-6
  182. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32525097/
  183. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-021-01177-w
  184. https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2023.11824
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.