Hubbry Logo
IntermetallicIntermetallicMain
Open search
Intermetallic
Community hub
Intermetallic
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Intermetallic
Intermetallic
Intermetallic
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cr11Ge19

An intermetallic (also called intermetallic compound, intermetallic alloy, ordered intermetallic alloy, long-range-ordered alloy) is a type of metallic alloy that forms an ordered solid-state compound between two or more metallic elements. Intermetallics are generally hard and brittle, with good high-temperature mechanical properties.[1][2][3] They can be classified as stoichiometric or nonstoichiometic.[1]

The term "intermetallic compounds" applied to solid phases has long been in use. However, Hume-Rothery argued that it misleads, suggesting a fixed stoichiometry and a clear decomposition into species.[4]

Definitions

[edit]

Research definition

[edit]

In 1967 Gustav Ernst Robert Schulze [de] defined intermetallic compounds as solid phases containing two or more metallic elements, with optionally one or more non-metallic elements, whose crystal structure differs from that of the other constituents.[5] This definition includes:

The definition of metal includes:[citation needed]

Homogeneous and heterogeneous solid solutions of metals, and interstitial compounds such as carbides and nitrides are excluded under this definition. However, interstitial intermetallic compounds are included, as are alloys of intermetallic compounds with a metal.[citation needed]

Common use

[edit]

In common use, the research definition, including post-transition metals and metalloids, is extended to include compounds such as cementite, Fe3C. These compounds, sometimes termed interstitial compounds, can be stoichiometric, and share properties with the above intermetallic compounds.[citation needed]

Complexes

[edit]

The term intermetallic is used[7] to describe compounds involving two or more metals such as the cyclopentadienyl complex Cp6Ni2Zn4.

B2

[edit]
Al-Ni B2 structure (lattice parameter: 2.86 A) viewed from [100], [110], [111], and [112] directions.

A B2 (also known as cesium chloride structure type) intermetallic compound has equal numbers of atoms of two metals, such as aluminium-iron, and aluminium-nickel, arranged as two interpenetrating simple cubic lattices of the component metals. [8]

Properties

[edit]

Intermetallic compounds are generally brittle at room temperature and have high melting point, though many also exhibit metallic conductivity or semiconducting behavior depending on the degree of covalent bonding. Cleavage or intergranular fracture modes are typical of intermetallics due to limited independent slip systems required for plastic deformation. However, some intermetallics have ductile fracture modes such as Nb–15Al–40Ti. Others can exhibit improved ductility by alloying with other elements to increase grain boundary cohesion. Alloying of other materials such as boron to improve grain boundary cohesion can improve ductility.[9] They may offer a compromise between ceramic and metallic properties when hardness and/or resistance to high temperatures is important enough to sacrifice some toughness and ease of processing. They can display desirable magnetic and chemical properties, due to their strong internal order and mixed (metallic and covalent/ionic) bonding, respectively. Intermetallics have given rise to various novel materials developments.[citation needed]

Physical properties of intermetallics[1]
Intermetallic Compound Melting Temperature

(°C)

Density

(kg/m3)

Young's Modulus (GPa)
FeAl 1250–1400 5600 263
Ti3Al 1600 4200 210
MoSi2 2020 6310 430

Applications

[edit]

Examples include alnico and the hydrogen storage materials in nickel metal hydride batteries. Ni3Al, which is the hardening phase in the familiar nickel-base super alloys, and the various titanium aluminides have attracted interest for turbine blade applications, while the latter is also used in small quantities for grain refinement of titanium alloys. Silicides, intermetallics involving silicon, serve as barrier and contact layers in microelectronics.[10] Others include:

The unintended formation of intermetallics can cause problems. For example, intermetallics of gold and aluminium can be a significant cause of wire bond failures in semiconductor devices and other microelectronics devices. The management of intermetallics is a major issue in the reliability of solder joints between electronic components.[citation needed]

Intermetallic particles

[edit]
Main article: Intermetallic particle

Intermetallic particles often form during solidification of metallic alloys, and can be used as a dispersion strengthening mechanism.[1]

History

[edit]

Examples of intermetallics through history include:

German type metal is described as breaking like glass, without bending, softer than copper, but more fusible than lead.[13]: 454  The chemical formula does not agree with the one above; however, the properties match with an intermetallic compound or an alloy of one.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Intermetallic

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Intermetallic compounds are solid-state materials formed by the stoichiometric combination of two or more metallic elements, resulting in ordered structures that differ fundamentally from the random atomic arrangements found in alloys. These ordered structures arise from specific interatomic bonding, often involving a mix of metallic, covalent, and ionic character, leading to well-defined stoichiometries and distinct phase diagrams. Unlike conventional alloys, intermetallics exhibit long-range atomic ordering, which is responsible for their unique combination of properties that cannot be achieved by simple mixing of the constituent metals. Key properties of intermetallic compounds include high melting points, often exceeding 1000°C, exceptional thermal stability, and superior resistance to oxidation and , making them ideal for extreme environments. They also demonstrate high and strength at elevated temperatures, though this is frequently accompanied by at due to limited mobility in their ordered lattices. In catalytic applications, their tailored electronic structures—such as shifted d-band centers in intermetallics—enhance selectivity and activity by optimizing adsorbate binding energies, as seen in compounds like GaPd for semi-hydrogenation. Additionally, certain intermetallics, such as those based on rare earth elements, exhibit ferromagnetic behavior with high , contributing to their use in permanent magnets. Intermetallic compounds find diverse applications across industries, including where nickel aluminides (e.g., Ni3Al) and aluminides (e.g., TiAl) serve as lightweight, high-temperature components in blades and engine parts due to their creep resistance. In , they enable selective reactions such as with ZnPd systems achieving over 97% CO2 selectivity, and electrocatalytic processes like oxygen reduction in fuel cells. Other notable uses include for lead-free alloys like Sn-Ag-Cu intermetallics, automotive exhaust systems for corrosion-resistant coatings, and magnetic technologies with Nd2Fe14B for high-performance permanent magnets. Despite these advantages, challenges in synthesis—such as achieving precise via methods like arc melting or chemical reduction—and overcoming through alloying or processing innovations remain active areas of research.

Definitions

Research Definition

In the research context, intermetallics are defined as solid phases containing at least two metallic elements, optionally including non-metallic elements, that form a distinct crystal structure different from those of their constituent elements. This definition, originally proposed by Gustav E. R. Schulze in 1967, emphasizes the compound-like nature of these materials within metallurgical and materials science literature. Key criteria distinguishing intermetallics include long-range atomic order, where atoms occupy specific lattice sites in a periodic ; defined , typically stoichiometric or exhibiting a narrow range of homogeneity; and predominantly , often with contributions from covalent or ionic interactions that enhance stability. These features result in unique phase behaviors, such as limited and sharp phase boundaries, setting intermetallics apart from traditional alloys. Unlike solid solutions, which involve random substitution of atoms on a disordered lattice, intermetallics maintain ordered superlattices that dictate their properties and limit compositional variability. Representative binary examples include Ni₃Al, which adopts the L1₂ (ordered face-centered cubic) structure, and FeAl, which forms the B2 (ordered body-centered cubic) structure; these compounds illustrate how ordering influences mechanical and thermal characteristics, often leading to high melting points and inherent .

Common Usage

In and , the term intermetallic is commonly used in a broader sense than strict academic definitions, often including compounds formed between transition or post-transition metals and metalloids such as carbon or , where ordered atomic arrangements dominate despite deviations from ideal . This inclusive interpretation recognizes phases like (Fe3CFe_3C), an iron essential to steel's hardness and wear resistance, as intermetallics due to their distinct and characteristics. Similarly, silicides involving post-transition elements, such as those in nickel- or iron-based alloys, are treated as intermetallics for their role in high-temperature applications, even when incorporating non-metallic . Non-stoichiometric variants further exemplify this practical usage, referring to phases with compositional flexibility around a nominal ratio while preserving long-range order in their atomic lattice. For example, certain silicides, like θ\theta-Ni2_2Si, exhibit variable silicon content during growth but function as ordered intermetallics in microelectronic contacts and diffusion barriers. These variants highlight how contexts prioritize functional behavior over precise , allowing for tunable properties in alloys. The formation of intermetallics in this applied framework is often rationalized using the , which outline conditions favoring compounds over solid solutions: an atomic size factor where radii differences exceed 15% restricts random mixing and promotes ordered phases; differences greater than about 0.4 units encourage directed bonding typical of intermetallics; and specific concentrations (e.g., 3/2 or 7/4 electrons per atom) stabilize particular structures like those in beta-brass analogs. These guidelines, originally for limits, are inverted in common practice to predict intermetallic stability across diverse systems. Representative applications underscore this broader utility. The ordered intermetallic Cu3_3Au appears in copper-gold alloys for jewelry, enhancing tarnish resistance and achieving reddish hues in 14-18 karat formulations through its L12_2 structure. In lightweight structural materials, Mg2_2Si phases reinforce magnesium- or aluminum-based composites for automotive and aerospace components, offering a low density of 1.99 g/cm3^3 and high specific stiffness to reduce vehicle weight.

Molecular Complexes

Molecular intermetallic complexes are discrete, finite molecular entities featuring direct bonds between atoms of two or more different metals, typically stabilized by organometallic ligands such as cyclopentadienyl or phosphines, which prevent aggregation into bulk phases. These clusters represent molecular analogs of intermetallic compounds, enabling the isolation and study of intermetallic in solution. Unlike extended solid-state intermetallics, they offer atomic precision for probing electronic and structural properties at the nanoscale. The bonding in these complexes often follows Zintl-type models, involving from electropositive to electronegative metals to achieve closed-shell configurations, or delocalized cluster bonding where electrons are shared across multiple metal centers, analogous to polyhedral . For example, in bimetallic clusters, the count can adhere to adapted Wade-Mingos rules, promoting stability through multicenter orbitals. This delocalized contributes to unique electronic structures, such as superatom-like in certain clusters. Synthesis of molecular intermetallic complexes is predominantly achieved through organometallic routes, including the co-reduction of metal salts or organometallics with agents like or alkali metals in coordinating solvents, in the presence of stabilizing ligands to control cluster size and prevent decomposition. A seminal example is the cyclopentadienyl-stabilized nickel-zinc cluster Cp₆Ni₂Zn₄, prepared by heating (Cp₂Ni) with diethylzinc (Et₂Zn) in , yielding an octahedral Ni₂Zn₄ core with six η⁵-Cp ligands and unusually electron-rich metal-metal bonds (average Ni-Zn distance of 2.52 ). These complexes exhibit properties distinct from bulk intermetallics, including high solubility in organic solvents due to the ligand shell, which enables solution-based and manipulation. They also show promise in , leveraging their precise atomic composition for selective reactions; for instance, gold-based clusters facilitate efficient CO₂ reduction or with turnover frequencies exceeding those of heterogeneous analogs. A notable example is the polynuclear cluster [Au₁₃(dppe)₆Cl₂]⁺, synthesized via reduction of Au(I)-dppe precursors with NaBH₄, featuring an icosahedral Au₁₃ core with delocalized 8-electron superatomic orbitals and applications in and sensing.

Crystal Structures

B2 Structure

The B2 structure, also known as the CsCl-type structure, represents a prototypical ordered intermetallic lattice in binary compounds, featuring a body-centered cubic (BCC) arrangement formed by two interpenetrating simple cubic sublattices of the constituent elements. In this configuration, one sublattice consists of atoms of the first element positioned at the corners of the cubic unit cell, while the second sublattice places atoms of the other element at the body center, resulting in a stoichiometry of AB where A and B are the two distinct atomic species. This atomic arrangement ensures that each atom has eight nearest neighbors of the opposite type, promoting unlike-atom bonding that distinguishes the ordered B2 phase from the disordered BCC solid solution. The crystal symmetry of the B2 structure is described by the space group Pm-3m (no. 221), which reflects its high cubic symmetry and primitive unit cell containing two atoms. Lattice parameters vary depending on the specific compound, but for the equiatomic NiAl intermetallic, the parameter is approximately 2.89 , corresponding to nearest-neighbor distances around 2.50 . This compact geometry contributes to the structure's prevalence in systems exhibiting strong directional bonding while maintaining metallic character. The stability of the B2 structure is particularly favored in binary alloy systems where the constituent atoms possess similar atomic sizes (typically with radius ratios close to 1) and comparable (differences often below 0.5 on the Pauling scale), which minimize strain and promote homogeneous electron distribution. These factors enhance the energetic preference for ordering over or alternative lattices, as evidenced in computational studies mapping phase diagrams based on size and electronegativity parameters. Representative examples of stable B2 phases include FeAl, NiAl, and CuZn (commonly known as β-brass), which demonstrate these compounds' utility in high-temperature applications due to their ordered lattice integrity.

Other Common Structures

Intermetallic compounds exhibit a diverse array of crystal structures classified primarily by their , such as AB, AB₂, and AB₃, and by topological features like Frank-Kasper polyhedra, which are coordination polyhedra with 12, 14, 15, or 16 nearest neighbors forming topologically close-packed arrangements. These classifications highlight the ordered atomic arrangements that distinguish intermetallics from disordered solid solutions, with Frank-Kasper phases often featuring tetrahedral close-packing motifs. Among the most prevalent are the , which adopt AB₂ and crystallize in either cubic MgCu₂-type (C15, Fd-3m) or hexagonal MgZn₂-type (C14, P6₃/mmc) structures, both exemplifying Frank-Kasper topology through icosahedral coordination shells. Representative examples include TiCr₂, which forms the cubic MgCu₂ structure and exhibits high with A atoms coordinated to 12 B atoms and 4 A atoms, and NbCo₂, which adopts the hexagonal MgZn₂ variant, featuring layered stacking of kagome nets and tetrahedral clusters. These phases are ubiquitous in binary and ternary systems due to their stability arising from geometric factors like atomic size ratios near 1.225. Heusler alloys represent another key class, typically following X₂YZ stoichiometry in full-Heusler structures (L2₁, Fm-3m), which consist of an ordered face-centered cubic lattice with X atoms at octahedral sites, Y at body-centered positions, and Z (often a ) at cubic corners. A classic example is Cu₂MnAl, a ferromagnetic full-Heusler where the structure enables high spin polarization despite non-magnetic Cu and Al components. Half-Heusler variants (XYZ, C1b structure, F-43m) feature a vacant tetrahedral site, as seen in compounds like NiMnSn, promoting half-metallicity suitable for spintronic applications. Other notable structure types include the DO₁₉ phase, a hexagonal ordered ( P6₃/mmc) common in AB₃ compounds like Ti₃Al, where Ti atoms occupy two distinct sites in a close-packed lattice with Al filling one-third of the octahedral interstices, enhancing phase stability in titanium aluminides. Similarly, the L1₂ structure is an ordered face-centered cubic variant ( Pm-3m) observed in Ni₃Al, featuring a primitive cubic of Al atoms at cube corners surrounded by Ni in face-centered positions, which provides coherent strengthening in superalloys. Many complex intermetallic structures reveal hierarchical relationships built from cluster-based units, such as icosahedral or Mackay clusters that serve as modular building blocks, allowing rational design by stacking these polyhedral motifs to form larger periodic lattices, as evidenced in analyses of over 4,000 compounds. This cluster underscores the topological kinship among diverse phases, from simple binaries to .

Properties

Mechanical Properties

Intermetallic compounds are generally characterized by inherent , manifesting as low at room temperatures, primarily due to their limited number of active slip systems and the presence of strong directional covalent bonding that restricts mobility. This structural rigidity often leads to values below 5 MPa·m^{1/2}, making them prone to under tensile loads. Despite their brittleness, intermetallics demonstrate exceptional strength, particularly at elevated temperatures where many conventional metals soften. For instance, Ni₃Al exhibits high yield strength and maintains structural integrity up to approximately 1000°C, owing to its ordered that suppresses climb and diffusion-mediated deformation. Representative mechanical properties of select intermetallics highlight their high stiffness relative to density, enabling lightweight structural potential:
IntermetallicYoung's Modulus (GPa)Density (kg/m³)
FeAl2635600
Ti₃Al1454200
These values underscore the materials' capacity for load-bearing applications, with Young's moduli comparable to or exceeding those of advanced steels while offering density advantages. Efforts to mitigate have focused on alloying and processing strategies. Microalloying with in Ni₃Al, for example, enhances room-temperature by up to an (from ~1% to ~10% elongation) through segregation that strengthens cohesion and promotes transgranular . Nanostructuring further improves by refining grain sizes to activate multiple deformation mechanisms, such as twinning and activity, while preserving high strength. Intermetallics also offer superior and creep resistance, especially in matrices where phases like Ni₃Al precipitate to hinder motion and void formation under prolonged high-temperature loading. This stability supports their use in demanding environments, complementing their elevated-temperature strength.

Thermal and Electrical Properties

Intermetallic compounds generally exhibit high melting points due to their strong covalent-metallic bonding, often exceeding 1500°C for many structural applications. For instance, (MoSi₂) has a melting point of 2030°C, which enables its use in high-temperature environments. This elevated thermal stability arises from the ordered atomic arrangements that strengthen interatomic interactions compared to disordered alloys. Thermal conductivity in intermetallics is typically moderate, ranging from 10 to 50 W/m·K, which is lower than that of pure metals primarily because of increased and from the complex, ordered structures and differences. Examples include (TiAl) with values around 25-40 W/m·K and ruthenium aluminide variants at 40-80 W/m·K, where microstructural defects like grain boundaries further contribute to scattering. Additionally, in these materials is often anisotropic owing to their ordered lattices, resulting in direction-dependent coefficients that can generate internal stresses during temperature changes; for example, in intermetallics like Zr₅Si₃, the coefficient varies significantly along different crystallographic axes, up to 10-23 × 10⁻⁶/K. Electrically, intermetallics display a range of behaviors from metallic to semiconducting, depending on their electronic structure. (Ni₃Al) behaves metallically with a resistivity of approximately 20-48 μΩ·cm at , reflecting efficient transport in its ordered L1₂ structure. In contrast, iron (FeSi) is semiconducting with a narrow indirect of about 0.05-0.1 eV, leading to temperature-dependent resistivity characteristic of narrow-gap semiconductors. Certain intermetallics also exhibit ; (MgB₂) has a critical temperature (T_c) of 39 K, attributed to its unique two-band superconducting mechanism, while A15-phase compounds like (Nb₃Sn) achieve T_c ≈ 18 K, enabling high-field applications in magnets.

Synthesis and Formation

Formation Mechanisms

Intermetallic phases form through specific thermodynamic pathways dictated by phase diagrams, where the stability and transformation behavior depend on whether the compound exhibits or undergoes peritectic reactions. occurs when an intermetallic compound melts directly to a of the same composition, without decomposition into other phases, allowing for straightforward solidification into the single phase; examples include MgZn₂ in the Mg-Zn system. In contrast, peritectic reactions involve the interaction of a phase with a primary solid phase to produce a new intermetallic phase upon cooling, often leading to incomplete reactions and microstructural complexities; this is prevalent in many binary intermetallic systems, such as those involving Al-Ir where phases like Al₃Ir form via cascades of peritectics at temperatures around 1466°C. For instance, Ni₃Al exemplifies solid-state ordering to form the L1₂ structure below 1395°C, where the disordered FCC transforms into the ordered intermetallic without , driven by the phase diagram's stability field. The primary driving forces for intermetallic formation arise from the minimization of (ΔG = ΔH - TΔS), where negative enthalpies of mixing from strong directional bonding between unlike atoms favor compound stability, while configurational changes from atomic ordering can further lower ΔG despite reducing disorder. Enthalpic contributions dominate in many systems, as the formation of covalent or metallic bonds in intermetallics releases energy, outweighing the entropic penalty of ordering; for example, in Al-Cu joints, thermodynamic driving forces predict intermetallic growth based on phase stability calculations. These forces are visualized in phase diagrams, where the intermetallic's free energy curve dips below those of the terminal solid solutions, promoting or ordering at specific compositions and temperatures. The provide empirical guidelines for phase formation in intermetallics, emphasizing factors like atomic size difference (less than 15% for but influencing compound ), (greater differences promote compounds over solutions), and valence electron concentration (VEC). Specifically, the electron-to-atom ratio governs structural types; gamma-brass phases, such as Cu₅Zn₈, stabilize at a VEC of 21/13 (≈1.615 electrons per atom), where valence effects from transition metals fill electronic bands to specific ratios, dictating complex cubic structures. Valence electron contributions from each element determine the overall e/a, with higher ratios favoring phases like β-brass (e/a ≈ 3/2) over simpler solid solutions. Intermetallic growth is often diffusion-controlled, particularly in binary systems where unequal atomic diffusivities lead to the , causing marker shifts at the interface and vacancy supersaturation that nucleates . In systems like Al-Fe, faster Al diffusion relative to Fe results in void formation within the intermetallic layer, as vacancies flux from the faster-diffusing side condense into pores, impacting mechanical integrity. This effect is prominent during solid-state reactions, where the growing intermetallic consumes parent phases at rates dictated by interdiffusion coefficients. In (HEAs), intermetallic formation deviates from traditional binaries due to multi-element mixing, but rapid solidification suppresses by kinetically trapping high-entropy solid solutions, while subsequent annealing allows ordered intermetallics to emerge if enthalpic driving forces overcome the configurational entropy stabilization. For example, in CoCrFeNi-based HEAs, rapid cooling rates above 10⁵ K/s enable metastable intermetallics like L1₂-ordered phases, altering the landscape compared to equilibrium conditions.

Practical Synthesis Methods

Intermetallic compounds are typically synthesized using a variety of and industrial techniques that address challenges such as achieving compositional homogeneity, controlling phase formation, and mitigating issues like elemental volatility during high-temperature . These methods often require inert atmospheres to prevent oxidation and precise control to ensure uniform distribution of atoms within the crystal lattice. One common approach is melting and casting, particularly arc melting under an atmosphere, which allows for rapid solidification and minimizes contamination. For instance, intermetallics are frequently prepared by arc melting high-purity and aluminum in argon to form homogeneous ingots, followed by annealing to promote ordering. However, this method faces challenges with volatility in aluminide systems, where aluminum loss occurs due to its high at elevated temperatures, leading to off-stoichiometric compositions and reduced homogeneity unless compensated by excess aluminum in the initial charge. Powder metallurgy techniques offer an alternative for producing dense intermetallics with fine microstructures, starting with mechanical alloying to blend elemental powders and induce initial reactions, followed by consolidation via or advanced . A representative example is the synthesis of Ti3AlTi_3Al (alpha-2 phase titanium aluminide) through mechanical alloying of and aluminum powders, then spark plasma at temperatures around 1000–1200°C under vacuum or , which achieves near-full (>98%) while preserving homogeneity by limiting distances. This method is particularly useful for intermetallics, though it requires careful control of powder and parameters to avoid agglomeration and ensure uniform phase distribution. For thin-film applications, such as in , intermetallics like TiSi2_2 are deposited using techniques, including , where titanium and targets are co-sputtered onto a substrate in an plasma, followed by annealing to form the low-resistivity C54 phase. (CVD) provides another route, employing precursors like TiCl4_4 and SiH4_4 at 600–800°C to grow epitaxial TiSi2_2 films directly, offering better conformality for complex device geometries but challenging control over film stress and phase purity due to precursor decomposition kinetics. These vacuum-based methods ensure atomic-scale homogeneity but are limited to thin layers (typically <1 μm). Solid-state diffusion methods involve annealing multilayered or bilayered structures to promote interdiffusion and ordered phase formation without melting, ideal for sensitive substrates. For example, alternating layers of aluminum and nickel deposited on a substrate are annealed at 400–600°C, allowing diffusion to form ordered phases like NiAl through Kirkendall void-controlled growth, resulting in sharp interfaces and high phase purity. Similarly, Fe-Al bilayers annealed at 450–600°C yield intermetallic phases such as Fe2_2Al5_5 via solid-state reactions, with homogeneity improved by extended annealing times to equilibrate composition gradients. This technique minimizes volatility issues but can introduce Kirkendall porosity if diffusion rates differ significantly between elements. Advanced methods like additive manufacturing have emerged post-2010 for fabricating intermetallics with complex geometries, using techniques such as laser powder bed fusion or electron beam melting to build parts layer-by-layer from pre-alloyed powders. For Ti-based intermetallics like TiAl, electron beam melting enables crack-free components with intricate shapes by rapid solidification that refines microstructure, though post-processing heat treatments are needed to achieve full homogeneity and eliminate residual stresses. These approaches expand design freedom for aerospace parts but require optimized scan strategies to prevent compositional segregation during melting. Recent advances as of 2025 include wet-chemical and plasma-assisted synthesis of high-entropy nanoparticles, enabling precise control over size, composition, and ordered structures for applications in electrocatalysis.

Applications

Structural Applications

Intermetallic compounds play a crucial role in structural applications where high strength-to-weight ratios and elevated-temperature performance are essential, particularly in aerospace and automotive sectors. These materials are employed in load-bearing components that must endure extreme thermal and mechanical stresses, leveraging their ordered crystal structures for enhanced stability. In superalloys, the Ni₃Al phase serves as a primary strengthening constituent in nickel-based alloys used for turbine blades in jet engines, enabling operation at temperatures up to 1100°C while maintaining structural integrity under centrifugal and thermal loads. Similarly, gamma-TiAl intermetallics are utilized in aerospace components such as low-pressure turbine blades and compressor stages, offering a density of approximately 4 g/cm³ that results in about 20% weight savings compared to traditional nickel alloys, thereby improving fuel efficiency. Alnico alloys, composed of aluminum, nickel, cobalt, and iron, form intermetallic phases that contribute to permanent magnets with an energy product around 10 MGOe, providing structural stability in high-temperature magnetic assemblies for motors and actuators in demanding environments. Intermetallic matrix composites, such as those based on Ti₃Al reinforced with SiC fibers, enhance stiffness and creep resistance for automotive engine parts like pistons and valves, where the low-density matrix supports higher operating temperatures without excessive deformation. Recent post-2020 research has explored high-entropy refractory alloys, such as the nitride-reinforced NbMoTaWHfN, for hypersonic vehicle leading edges and thermal protection systems, capitalizing on their multi-principal element compositions for superior high-temperature strength and oxidation tolerance. A key advantage of many intermetallics in these roles is their inherent oxidation resistance, achieved through the formation of protective Al₂O₃ scales on surfaces like NiAl, which act as diffusion barriers to prevent further degradation at elevated temperatures. This property, combined with notable creep resistance, underpins their suitability for prolonged structural service in oxidative atmospheres.

Functional Applications

Intermetallics find extensive use in microelectronics as low-resistivity contacts and interconnects, leveraging their stable silicide phases for efficient charge transport in integrated circuits. Tungsten disilicide (WSi₂) and cobalt disilicide (CoSi₂) are particularly valued for forming ohmic contacts to silicon, with CoSi₂ exhibiting bulk resistivity as low as 15 μΩ·cm, enabling sheet resistances below 10 Ω/sq in thin films for source/drain and gate electrodes. These materials reduce contact resistance in metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) devices, improving overall device performance and power efficiency in ultra-large-scale integration (ULSI) technologies. In catalysis, intermetallics enable selective chemical reactions by tuning surface electronic properties and active site geometries. Nickel-gallium (NiGa) intermetallics, such as those with (111) surface facets, promote semihydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene with high selectivity (>90%) and stability under industrial conditions, attributed to isolated Ni sites that suppress over-hydrogenation. Platinum-based intermetallics, including ordered Pt₃Co, enhance (ORR) kinetics in fuel cells (PEMFCs), achieving mass activities of 0.92 A/mg_Pt at 0.9 V versus while maintaining durability over 30,000 cycles. These catalysts outperform pure Pt by modifying d-band centers for optimal oxygen binding. Shape memory alloys represent another key functional application, where intermetallics exploit reversible phase transformations for actuation and sensing. Equiatomic nickel-titanium (NiTi), known as nitinol, undergoes a diffusionless martensitic transformation from the high-temperature (B2) phase to the low-temperature (B19') phase, enabling shape recovery strains exceeding 8% upon heating above the austenite finish temperature (typically 50–100°C). This thermoelastic behavior arises from twinned variants that detwin under stress, powering applications in biomedical stents and actuators. Intermetallics also play a vital role in , particularly for -based systems. The magnesium-nickel Mg₂NiH₄ facilitates reversible absorption and desorption at moderate temperatures (250–350°C), with a storage capacity of up to 3.5 wt% H₂, due to its complex structure that stabilizes in octahedral sites. Nanostructured variants improve kinetics, achieving full reversibility over multiple cycles for potential use in nickel-metal batteries and solid-state tanks. Despite these advantages, functional applications of intermetallics face challenges from imbalances during processing and operation. In gold-aluminum (Au-Al) bonds used for wire interconnects, unequal atomic diffusivities lead to Kirkendall voids at the interface, forming the brittle AuAl₂ phase known as purple plague, which causes electrical failures after prolonged exposure to temperatures above 150°C. These voids, often exceeding 10% of the bond volume, degrade contact reliability in microelectronic packaging.

Intermetallic Particles

Role in Alloys

Intermetallic particles within multiphase alloys typically form during solidification or subsequent , influencing the overall microstructure and phase distribution. During solidification, these particles often emerge from eutectic reactions in the melt, as seen in Ni-based superalloys where develop via the (γ + Laves) eutectic at approximately 1150 °C, resulting in inter-dendritic segregation of elements like Nb and Ti. can further promote their formation or evolution, such as through from supersaturated solutions, where solute partitioning drives according to principles like the for limits. These particles are categorized as primary or secondary based on their formation timing and morphology. Primary intermetallics, which and grow directly from the liquid phase during initial solidification, often exhibit dendritic structures and serve as heterogeneous nucleation sites for the matrix. In contrast, secondary intermetallics form as fine precipitates during solid-state , arising from -controlled processes in the supersaturated matrix. Typical sizes for both types range from 0.1 to 10 μm, with primary particles tending toward the larger end due to slower in the melt. The spatial distribution of intermetallic particles is largely governed by processing parameters, particularly cooling rates during solidification. Slower cooling permits greater solute , leading to coarser, more segregated particles concentrated in interdendritic regions, while rapid solidification—achieving rates of 10³–10⁵ K/s—restricts and suppresses coarse particle growth, yielding a finer, more uniform dispersion that enhances homogeneity. Notable examples illustrate these roles in common alloy systems. In Al-Cu alloys, the θ-phase (Al₂Cu) forms as secondary precipitates during aging heat treatments, providing dispersion strengthening through coherent or semi-coherent interfaces with the aluminum matrix. Similarly, in Inconel 718 superalloys, γ' (Ni₃Al) precipitates develop during heat treatment as ordered, cuboidal particles that maintain structural integrity at elevated temperatures by impeding dislocation motion. In contemporary processing techniques like additive manufacturing, intermetallic particles pose challenges if not controlled, as rapid thermal cycles can induce brittle phases that promote cracking due to residual stresses and low at grain boundaries. Effective management, such as through alloy composition adjustments or process parameter optimization, is essential to mitigate these defects and achieve viable components. Recent advances as of include the use of models to predict and control intermetallic formation in AM processes.

Effects on Performance

Intermetallic particles can significantly enhance the mechanical strength of alloys through dispersion hardening, primarily via the Orowan mechanism, where dislocations bow around non-shearable particles, impeding their motion and increasing the yield strength. In oxide-dispersion-strengthened (ODS) intermetallic alloys, such as Al-Ti-Cr strengthened with nano-scaled and aluminum oxides, this mechanism contributes to substantial yield strength increments, depending on and . For instance, in aluminum-based composites with fine intermetallic dispersions, Orowan strengthening provides notable increases in yield strength compared to unreinforced matrices. This effect is particularly pronounced in high-temperature applications, where the thermal stability of intermetallic particles maintains strengthening over extended service times. However, coarse intermetallic particles often exert detrimental effects on performance, notably by inducing embrittlement and reducing . In ferritic stainless steels like AISI 441, the formation of coarse Fe₂Nb particles along grain boundaries leads to a significant decrease in Charpy impact toughness after aging at 600–800°C, due to crack initiation and propagation at particle-matrix interfaces. This embrittlement arises from the brittle nature of the particles and their role in , limiting without substantially benefiting strength at ambient temperatures. In superalloys, fine γ' intermetallic particles (Ni₃Al) provide exceptional creep resistance by pinning and preventing climb or glide under sustained loads at elevated temperatures. These particles create high back stresses that resist deformation, allowing alloys like single-crystal nickel-based superalloys to exhibit significantly extended creep lives compared to γ'-free variants under conditions such as 700–900°C and 100–200 MPa stress. The effectiveness stems from the coherent interface between γ' particles and the γ matrix, which hinders dislocation networks and , thereby preserving structural integrity in components. Intermetallic particles can also accelerate through galvanic coupling, acting as cathodic sites that drive anodic dissolution of the surrounding . In aluminum alloys, Cu-rich intermetallics such as Al₂Cu serve as preferential cathodic areas, promoting localized pitting and trenching by accelerating oxygen reduction reactions and increasing the overall rate in environments. This micro-galvanic effect is exacerbated in multiphase alloys, where the nobility of intermetallics relative to amplifies attack at interfaces, leading to premature failure in marine or atmospheric exposures. Optimization of intermetallic particle effects on performance often involves alloying strategies to refine particle size and distribution, mitigating detrimental aspects while enhancing benefits. In , additions of (e.g., 5–10 wt.% Zr) promote refinement of intermetallic phases like Ti₃Al or silicides during processing, reducing average particle diameters from microns to sub-micron scales and improving both strength and by minimizing stress concentrations. This refinement, achieved through effects and altered kinetics, enhances creep resistance and in near-α Ti alloys without introducing excessive .

History

Early Observations

Natural Fe-Ni intermetallics, primarily composed of the phases (high-nickel, face-centered cubic) and kamacite (low-nickel, body-centered cubic), were among the earliest recognized metallic materials utilized by humans. These alloys occurred naturally in iron meteorites and were forged into tools and weapons due to their malleability and superior hardness compared to terrestrial iron sources. Archaeological evidence includes a dagger from Tutankhamun's tomb (circa 1330 BCE), confirmed to be made from meteoritic iron containing approximately 11.8% , exhibiting the characteristic of alternating and kamacite lamellae. Similarly, early Chinese bronze weapons from the early (ca. 1000 BCE) incorporated meteoritic iron blades with Fe-Ni phases, demonstrating prehistoric awareness of these intermetallics' utility despite limited technology. In ancient , intermetallic phases appeared in engineered alloys like , a Cu-Sn system dating back to around 3000 BCE in the and . The δ-phase, an intermetallic compound approximated as Cu₃₁Sn₈, formed in higher-tin bronzes (10–20 wt% Sn) during solidification, contributing to enhanced hardness and castability essential for tools, ornaments, and weapons. Microstructural analyses of artifacts reveal dendritic structures with δ-phase precipitates at grain boundaries, which improved wear resistance but could induce brittleness if not controlled. This empirical exploitation of intermetallics predated systematic phase studies, with bronze's widespread adoption marking a foundational use of such compounds in human technology. By the , intermetallic precipitates were observed in practical alloys like , a Sn-Pb-Sb ternary used in since the but refined in German formulations. Compositions typically included 10–20% Sb, 10–20% Sn, and the balance Pb, where Sb formed hard, brittle intermetallics such as SbSn, enhancing type durability for repeated casting. This brittleness, while limiting machinability, ensured sharp impressions in hot-metal presses. Early 20th-century observations further underscored intermetallics' ordered phases in functional applications, as seen in the discovery of magnets in the 1930s. Japanese researcher Tokushichi Mishima developed the first (Al-Ni-Co-Fe) in 1931, revealing magnetically ordered intermetallic structures like NiAl and FeCo phases that provided high (up to 400 Oe). These ordered phases, formed via controlled , balanced strength and magnetic performance, revolutionizing permanent magnets.

Theoretical Developments

The theoretical understanding of intermetallics began to take shape in the early with the formulation of empirical rules governing their phase formation. In 1926, William Hume-Rothery proposed guidelines linking the occurrence of specific intermetallic phases to factors such as atomic size differences, , and concentration, emphasizing how electron-to-atom ratios of approximately 7/8, 3/2, or 21/13 electrons per atom stabilize particular structures like β-brass or γ-brass. These rules, refined through via experimental observations in copper-based , provided a foundational framework for predicting solid limits and compound stability without relying on thermodynamic derivations, influencing subsequent alloy design strategies. A more formal definition emerged in 1967 when Gustav Ernst Robert Schulze characterized intermetallics as ordered solid phases comprising two or more metallic elements, often with distinct crystal structures differing from those of the constituent metals, and potentially including non-metallic components while maintaining characteristics. This definition shifted focus from mere to structural order and electronic interactions, enabling clearer distinctions from solid solutions and paving the way for systematic classification of intermetallic families based on their formations. During the 1980s and 1990s, theoretical efforts increasingly addressed the inherent brittleness of intermetallics, particularly in ordered phases like L1₂-structured Ni₃Al, through studies on defect engineering and environmental effects. A pivotal discovery in 1979 demonstrated that microalloying with boron (approximately 0.1 at.%) dramatically enhanced room-temperature ductility in polycrystalline Ni₃Al by segregating to grain boundaries, reducing intergranular fracture propensity without altering bulk ordering, as confirmed by subsequent atomistic models exploring boron-nickel interactions. This work spurred theoretical advancements in dislocation dynamics and grain boundary cohesion, highlighting how trace dopants could mitigate Peierls stress barriers in ordered lattices, thus broadening intermetallics' potential beyond niche applications. The marked a transition to computational approaches, with accelerating the discovery of novel phases by mining structural databases for correlations between composition, symmetry, and stability. A landmark application in 2017 used on existing crystallographic data to predict and experimentally verify the CsCl-type RhCd intermetallic, the first new binary AB compound identified in over 15 years, underscoring the efficiency of data-driven methods in uncovering thermodynamically stable structures overlooked by traditional synthesis. Post-2020 developments have integrated intermetallics into (HEAs), leveraging to predict ordered phases within multi-principal-element systems and elucidate structural hierarchies. Analysis of over 4000 intermetallic prototypes revealed nested relationships where simpler prototypes like B2 evolve into complex derivatives via atomic substitutions, informing HEA design for enhanced phase stability. Concurrently, supervised models have classified high-entropy intermetallic phases by training on thermodynamic features, enabling predictions of formation in HEAs and guiding experimental validation for applications requiring balanced strength and .

References

  1. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/14/8/538
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5090519/
  3. https://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/intermetallic-compounds-properties-applications-and-challenges-17203.html
  4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/14356007.e14_e01.pub2
  5. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520617015888
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/iron-carbide-fe3c
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/intermetallics
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032591016305149
  9. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/accountsmr.3c00126
  10. https://deringerney.com/hume-rothery-rules-and-the-solid-solubility-of-binary-systems/
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226052386_A_survey_of_gold_intermetallic_chemistry
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359646203002410
  13. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/cs/d1cs00286d
  14. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01874
  15. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/om00123a011
  16. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00726
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Cubic-B2-CsCl-crystal-structure-type-of-RM-intermetallics-in-space-group-The-positions_fig2_281260614
  18. https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-1487
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10658-2
  20. http://www.mmm.psu.edu/CJiang2005ActaMater.pdf
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-016-0001-z
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966979512001161
  23. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA274700.pdf
  24. https://academic.oup.com/book/27883/chapter/203817677
  25. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1408678111
  26. https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-1038
  27. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/14/6/688
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-42870-y
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51204-0
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127522007286
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/092150939290375B
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921509397005777
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5455558/
  34. https://www.memsnet.org/material/titaniumaluminumti3albulk/
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272461571_An_Overview_of_the_Mechanical_Properties_of_FeAl
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/092150939409598Q
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002007116000277
  38. https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/sadh/028/03-04/0695-0708
  39. https://www.tms.org/superalloys/2020/Superalloys2020_185_195.pdf
  40. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/9/1772
  41. https://open.uct.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/c81b2670-c4ce-4495-99fc-32d21e88661f/content
  42. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/matertrans/43/12/43_12_3167/_article
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0966979596801932
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257426074_Study_on_thermal_expansion_of_intermetallics_in_multicomponent_Al-Si_alloys_by_high_temperature_X-ray_diffraction
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0025541671900942
  46. https://niobium.tech/-/media/niobiumtech/attachments-biblioteca-tecnica/nt_fabrication-and-application-of-nbti-and-nb3sn-superconductors.pdf
  47. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35457-1
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smll.202408889
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966979511003852
  50. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/13/3/435
  51. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/10/8/1080
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785424007348
  53. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.1390934
  54. https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/chemical-vapor-deposition-of-tisisub2sub-using-sihsub4sub-and-tic/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966979503000220
  56. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.235413
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273089188_Solid-State_Diffusion_Reaction_and_Formation_of_Intermetallic_Phases_in_the_Fe-Al_System
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589152923000741
  59. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40846-022-00753-0
  60. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cc/d5cc00993f
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225247310_Intermetallic_Ni3Al-Base_Alloy_a_Promising_Material_for_Turbine_Blades
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/titanium-aluminide
  63. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1321911
  64. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA284984.pdf
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809923002849
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096697951200221X
  67. https://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0509/chen-0509.html
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433208004376
  69. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/dt/c7dt04726f
  70. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2104026118
  71. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/shape-memory-alloys-featuring-nitinol
  72. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.144108
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352152X24004675
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785424019082
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9100133/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838817330980
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/104458039090062O
  78. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11661-021-06295-5
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0257897216312853
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1567539417304103
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838825002762
  82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921509304003909
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921509324017076
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950431724000777
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921509323009759
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921509310004557
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966979599001144
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966979513002008
  89. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.13787
  90. https://asia.si.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/gettens-clarke-chase-earlybronze.pdf
  91. https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/metallography.pdf
  92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24099424
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316482289_Post-medieval_printing_type_from_Mainz_and_Oberursel_Germany_and_the_composition_of_early_German_type_metal
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/alnico-magnets
  95. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/116/17/173908/281387/The-distribution-alloying-elements-in-alnico-8-and
  96. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/7/1/9
  97. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.113604
  98. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02141
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.