July 2016 Dhaka attack
July 2016 Dhaka attack
Main page
329741

July 2016 Dhaka attack

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
July 2016 Dhaka attack
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Operation Thunderbolt 2016
Part of Terrorism in Bangladesh

Location of the attack within Dhaka
Date1–2 July 2016
Location
Holey Artisan Bakery
Road No 79, House 5, Gulshan 2
Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
23°48′09″N 90°25′00″E / 23.8025°N 90.4167°E / 23.8025; 90.4167
Result Bangladeshi victory, execution of terrorists
Belligerents
Bangladesh Islamic State
Units involved

Bangladesh Armed Forces

  • Islamic State – Bengal Province
    • Casualties and losses
    2 police officers killed, 40+ wounded 5[1]
    29 civilians killed[2][3]
    Map
    This article is part of
    a series about
    Sheikh Hasina
    First Premiership (1996–2001)
    Opposition Leader (2001–2009)
    Second Premiership (2009–2024)
    • Parties and Alliances

    Elections

    Ministries

    National Projects
    Others
    Gallery: Picture, Sound, Video

    On the night of 1 July 2016, at 21:20 Bangladesh Standard Time (UTC+06:00),[4] five Islamic State (IS) terrorists took hostages and opened fire on the Holey Artisan Bakery[5] in Gulshan Thana jurisdiction in Dhaka, Bangladesh.[6] The militants entered the bakery with crude bombs, machetes, pistols, and took several dozen hostages, including foreign nationals as well. In the immediate response, while Dhaka Metropolitan Police tried to regain control of the bakery, two police officers were shot dead by the assailants.[7]

    By the end of the security forces' operation, 29 people were killed, including 20 hostages (17 foreigners and 3 Bangladeshis), two police officers, five terrorists, and two bakery staff.[8][9] After the police failed to breach the bakery and secure the hostages, they set up a perimeter along with the Rapid Action Battalion and Border Guard Bangladesh. Very early on 2 July (around 03:00), it was decided that the Bangladesh Armed Forces would launch a counter-assault named Operation Thunderbolt.[10] The assault was led by the 1st Para-commando Battalion, an elite force in the Bangladesh Army under the leadership of operational commander Brigadier General Mujibur Rahman, and began at 07:40.[11] According to Bangladesh's Inspector General of Police, all[1] of the attackers were Bangladeshi citizens.[12] IS claimed responsibility for the incident and released photographs of the gunmen, but then- Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan stated that the perpetrators belonged to Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen and were not affiliated with IS.

    The incident was described by BBC News as the "deadliest Islamist attack in Bangladeshi history."[13] The local media referred to it as the 7/16 attack.[14]

    Background

    [edit]

    The Constitution of Bangladesh declares secularism as one of the four fundamental principles of the country but also recognises Islam as the state religion. Around 91% of Bangladeshis are Muslims, with the rest being Hindus, Buddhists, Christians and others.[15]

    The militant Islamic organisation Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen was founded in 1998 and outlawed in 2005 when it committed a series of bombings, but later took up activities again. Bangladesh government later tried and hanged Shaykh Abdur Rahman and Siddiqur Rahman, two leaders of the organisation.[16]

    Some attacks came from another Islamic terrorist group outlawed in 2005 named Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami, including the 2004 Dhaka grenade attack[17] and 2001 Ramna Batamul bombings.[18] Mufti Hannan, the leader of the terrorist group was sentenced to death on 23 December 2008.[17]

    Since 2013, Muslim-majority Bangladesh has experienced an increase in Islamist attacks on religious minorities, secularist and atheist writers and bloggers, LGBT rights activists and liberal-minded Muslims.[19][20] Since September 2015, there have been over 30 such attacks, and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant claimed responsibility for 21 of them.[21] Ansarullah Bangla Team, another terrorist group outlawed on 25 May 2015, also claimed responsibility for some of them.

    In November 2015, the IS magazine Dabiq published an article calling for the "revival of jihad in Bengal".[22]

    Gulshan is a well off, upscale residential neighbourhood of Dhaka and is home to many foreign embassies.[6]

    Attack and hostage

    [edit]
    Gulshan 2. Bangladeshi joint forces restricted the movement in area at the time of Operation Thunderbolt during the hostage crisis at the area's Holey Artisan Bakery. Police had earlier beefed up security around the Dhaka Westin based on intelligence reports of a forthcoming attack.[23]

    The attack started at about 21:40 local time.[24] Five attackers entered the restaurant armed with bombs, pistols, and assault rifles. One attacker also had a sword. They opened fire indiscriminately and detonated several of the bombs. Several patrons dove under their tables, while panicked staff members ran onto the stairs. An Argentinian-Italian chef named Diego Rossini bolted upstairs, while several restaurant employees followed him. They then jumped onto the rooftops of nearby buildings.[25][26]

    Staff on the second floor ran and hid inside a restroom. A total of 8 staff members were hiding inside the restroom. The restroom was warm and cramped, as it was storing yeast and flour. The attackers then went upstairs and walked in front of the door, shouting "Bengali people, come out," "If you're Muslims, come out." Because there was no answer, the gunmen thought that there was no one inside the restroom, and locked the restroom's door. The staff members inside the restroom began to text their relatives, stating that they were inside the restroom and pleaded for help. The attackers then took many hostages, almost all foreigners. Reports indicate that the attackers were "unfailingly polite and solicitous" with the restaurant staff and other Bangladeshis. They took the staff into their confidence, complaining that foreigners, with their skimpy clothes and taste for alcohol, were impeding the spread of Islam. "Their lifestyle is encouraging local people to do the same thing," a militant said.[27][28]

    Alerted by the gunfire, police detective Rabiul Karim and officer-in-charge Salauddin Khan started to investigate. Other police officers responded, arriving at the restaurant. The attackers then engaged in a shootout with the police. Police cordoned off the area around the restaurant and planned a rescue raid. The attackers however threw grenades and fired, killing officers Karim and Khan.[25][29]

    DMP Commissioner, Asaduzzaman Mia, and several officers struck inside and opened fire on the terrorists in an attempt to rescue civilians from the site. 9 people were brought back from the site in the attempt. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was briefed by the Commissioner and she instructed him to move away with his men and informed him the Army Chief Belal Shafiul Huq was on his way from Sylhet.[30]

    The attackers then spotted one member of staff, named Miraj, who hid in the corner. One of the gunman told Miraj: "Everyone else ran away but you couldn't make it, that means God wants you to die." The gunman then strapped him to a chair with explosives, creating their human shield. The gunmen then separated the Muslims from the non-Muslims. The Muslims were given food and water, while the non-Muslims, were not. On the early morning of 2 July, the attackers began releasing hostages. A group of women wearing hijabs were released by the attackers; they offered a young Bangladeshi man, Faraaz Hossain, the opportunity to leave as well. However, Hossain refused their offer and refused to leave his friends, who were prohibited from leaving by the gunmen.[25][31][32]

    Pictures allegedly taken from inside the restaurant were circulated on Twitter by pro-IS accounts and show several bodies and pools of blood on the floor.[citation needed] The daily Kaler Kantho reported that the militant group Ansar al-Islam announced the upcoming attack via a tweet almost 10 hours before the actual attack took place.[33]

    Rescue operation

    [edit]

    The rescue operation was ordered by the Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and was named Operation Thunderbolt. The planning of the Operation was finalized at a meeting between the Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and Armed forces chiefs and top officials of different law enforcement agencies. The operation was led by 1st Para-Commando Battalion under the leadership of Operational Commander Brigadier General Mujibur Rahman of the Bangladesh Army's 46 Independent Infantry Brigade .[34][35] Members of the Bangladesh Army, Navy, Air Force, Border Guard Bangladesh, Police, Rapid Action Battalion, and SWAT started the rescue operation at 07:40 local time.[36] Commandos stormed into the bakery with nine APCs acting in support, smashing through the wall.[37] A man, living next to the restaurant, took a video of the operation and tweeted it on internet. Within 12 to 13 minutes, they took control over the area.[37] The rescue operation lasted around 50 minutes. Bangladesh Army chief General Abu Belal Muhammad Shafiul Huq and Bangladesh Navy chief Admiral Mohammad Nizamuddin Ahmed were present in the area during the raid.[38]

    Thirteen hostages were rescued. Five of the attackers were killed exchanging fire with the commandos, while the sixth was captured alive.[5][39] During the operation one of the bakery's chefs was mistakenly identified as an attacker by the commandos and shot dead.[5][40]

    Two of the hostages, Tahmid Hasib Khan and Hasnat Karim, were taken by police for questioning, and subsequently vanished amidst confusion about whether they had been released or not.[41][42]

    Casualties

    [edit]
    A memorial plaque at the Metro Rail Exhibition and Information Centre, Diabari, honours the seven Japanese MRT Line 6 officials who were killed in the attack

    Twenty-two civilians, five terrorists, and two police officers were confirmed killed, while 50 others, mostly police personnel, were injured.[5][1][43][44][45] The two dead police officers included Rabiul Islam, Assistant Commissioner of Detective Branch of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police, and Salahuddin Ahmed, officer-in-charge of the nearby Banani police station.[46][47][48] Nine Italian citizens were among the victims.[49] The Bangladesh Army initially announced that all 20 hostages killed in the attack were foreigners, and that they were "killed brutally with sharp weapons" by the perpetrators.[45] Those who could recite a verse from the Quran from memory were spared in an effort to only kill non-Muslims.[50][51][52] Later a chef of the bakery was identified among the dead bodies.[5][1] An injured staff of the bakery died at Dhaka Medical College Hospital on 8 July 2016.[43]

    Among the dead were seven Japanese citizens – five men and two women – who were associated with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). One of the women was pregnant at the time.[53] Tarishi Jain, a 19-year-old female student of the University of California, Berkeley, of Indian nationality, was also killed. She was the only Indian killed in the attack.[54]

    Deaths by nationality
    Country Number
    Bangladesh Bangladesh 7
    India India 1
    Italy Italy 9
    Japan Japan 7
    Total 24[5][43]

    The dead included:[5][1][43][55][56]

    • Faraaz Ayaaz Hossain (Bangladeshi)
    • Ishrat Akhond (Bangladeshi)
    • Rabiul Karim (Bangladeshi)
    • Salauddin Khan (Bangladeshi)
    • Saiful Islam Chowkidar (Bangladeshi)
    • Zakir Hossain Shaon (Bangladeshi)
    • Abinta Kabir (Bangladeshi)
    • Cristian Rossi (Italian)
    • Marco Tondat (Italian)
    • Nadia Benedetti (Italian)
    • Adele Puglisi (Italian)
    • Simona Monti (Italian)
    • Claudia Maria D'Antona (Italian)
    • Vincenzo D'Allestro (Italian)
    • Maria Rivoli (Italian)
    • Claudio Cappelli (Italian)
    • Hideki Hashimoto (Japanese)
    • Nobuhiro Kurosaki (Japanese)
    • Koyo Ogasawara (Japanese)
    • Makoto Okamura (Japanese)
    • Yuko Sakai (Japanese)
    • Rui Shimodaira (下平瑠衣 Shimodaira Rui;[57] Japanese)
    • Hiroshi Tanaka (田中宏 Japanese)
    • Tarishi Jain (Indian)

    The five terrorists who died during rescue operation by military and joint forces are:[1]

    • Nibras Islam
    • Rohan Imtiaz
    • Meer Saameh Mubasheer
    • Khairul Islam
    • Shafiqul Islam

    Among the injured were 25 police personnel[58] there were several higher-ranking officers of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police including an Additional Commissioner, two Additional Deputy Commissioners, the Officer-in-charge of the Gulshan police station and an Inspector.[59]

    The Italian Deputy Foreign Minister Mario Giro had attended a meeting in Bangladesh and visited the attack site. He then took the bodies of 9 Italian victims and carried them to their homeland in Italy. The plane carrying the bodies landed on 5 July at Ciampino Military Airbase south of Rome, Italy. Autopsy shows that all nine Italians were tortured in the attack. Several of them were slashed with knives and several of them were mutilated. Authorities confirmed that the nine Italian victims suffered "slow and agonizing death".[49][60][61]

    Relatives of the seven Japanese victims in the attack were flown to Bangladesh to view and identify the bodies, accompanied by Senior Vice Foreign Minister Seiji Kihara, Foreign Ministry and the Japan International Cooperation Agency. A ceremony for the repatriation of the bodies were held at a stadium in Dhaka, which was attended by the Japan's Ambassador to Bangladesh, Masato Watanabe. The bodies of the seven Japanese victims were flown to Tokyo on 5 July. The plane took off from Shahjalal International Airport at 8:40 pm local Bangladesh time.[62]

    Survivors recalled that the attackers had no mercy to the foreigners. One of the survivors stated that an Indian woman, identified as Tarishi Jain, who had been badly injured was moaning in agony but a perpetrator took a sword to her and killed her without mercy.[63]

    Responsibility

    [edit]

    An initial report from Amaq News Agency, which is affiliated with the Islamic State, said the group claimed it had killed 24 people and wounded 40 others.[64] A second report, issued directly by ISIL a few hours later, said the group had killed "22 crusaders" and was accompanied by photos of the attackers, standing in front of IS banners.[65]

    According to The New York Times, citing Bangladesh police, the attackers were named Akash, Badhon, Bikash, Don, and Ripon. IS referred to the five men by their kunya which were Abu Omar al-Bengali, Abu Salmah al-Bengali, Abu Rahim al-Bengali, Abu Muslim al-Bengali and Abu Muharib al-Bengali. According to The New York Times, pictures of the bodies of the five men, released by Bangladeshi police, matched five photographs of the men released by ISIL.[66]

    Nevertheless, the home minister of Bangladesh, Asaduzzaman Khan, stated that the perpetrators belonged to Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen and were not affiliated with IS. They were well-educated and mostly from rich families.[67][68] Bangladeshi politicians also blamed opposition groups, like those within the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, of plotting to destabilize the country by supporting Islamic extremists like the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen. The opposition denied such claims.[69][70] Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's political adviser Hossain Toufique Imam claimed that Bangladesh authorities who monitored social media saw several messages on Twitter on Friday (1 July 2016) saying there would be an attack; however, police believed that the attack would target embassies or major hotels and restaurants instead.[1]

    The attackers, all in their late teens or early 20s, were identified as wealthy men from Bangladesh's elite, having attended top private schools and universities in Bangladesh and abroad.[71][72] It was revealed that three of the attackers came from a privileged background, educated with western curricula. Police named the five gunmen who attacked the restaurant as Nibras Islam, Rohan Imtiaz, Meer Saameh Mubasheer, Khairul Islam and Shafiqul Islam.[1] One of them Nibras Islam was known as a "fun-loving, in and out of love, and keen on sport". He attended Monash University in Malaysia and returned because "he didn't like it in Monash". Nibras' father was a businessman with two houses in Dhaka, and one of his uncles was a Deputy Secretary to the Bangladesh Government. It was revealed that Nibras was following a Twitter account belonged to an Islamic State propagandist named Mehdi Masroor Biswas, who was arrested in Bangalore in 2015.[73]

    Two gunmen were identified as Meer Sameh Mubashir and Rohan Imtiaz. Both went to Scholastica School which follows Cambridge International Examinations curriculum. Local newspapers reported that both of them had gone missing long before the attack.[72] Rohan Imtiaz has been identified as the son of a politician in Bangladesh's ruling party Awami League.[74] Police then identified another gunman, named as Shafiqul Islam Ujjal from Koiyagarhi village, Bogra District. He enrolled at Government Azizul Haque College in Bogura for graduation after passing higher secondary examinations. He had left the college later and took up a teaching job at a kindergarten school in Shajahan Market area in Dhaka.[75]

    On 6 July 2016, a video was released by IS from Syria through SITE intelligence website, where three Bengali speakers warned the Bangladeshi Government saying "What you witnessed in Bangladesh...was a glimpse. This will repeat, repeat and repeat until you lose and we win and the sharia is established throughout the world. The jihad that is waged today is a jihad under the shade of the Caliphate."[76][77]

    Suspects, arrests and convictions

    [edit]

    On 16 July 2016, Police arrested three people for renting out a flat to the attackers in Bashundhara Residential Area. One of them was Gias Uddin Ahsan, a professor of North South University. The other two were his nephew Alam Chowdhury and the manager of the building Mahbubur Rahman Tuhin. Police found sand-filled cartons, which police suspect to be used to carry grenades thrown during the attack and used clothes in the flat. Police also suspect that the attackers and their associates stayed in the flat during Ramadan, and the attack plan was drafted there.[78][79]

    On 26 July 2016, police raided an apartment in Kallyanpur chasing 10 suspects, all of whom are believed to be part of the same group that carried out the Holey Artisan Bakery attack, and who were planning another large-scale attack; they killed nine and arrested one.[80] It is reported that the police were directing vigilantes organised as a "citizen's committee" by the local MP for Dhaka-14, Aslamul Haque. Participants included members of the Awami League, Jubo League, and Chhatra League.[81]

    On 27 August 2016, Tamim Chowdhury, the supposed mastermind of the attack, was killed in a raid on an IS safehouse in Dhaka by Bangladeshi forces.[82] On 2 September his deputy Murad was killed in another raid in Dhaka's Rupnagar area.[83]

    On 6 January 2017, Bangladeshi police shot dead two Islamist terrorists including Nurul Islam Marjan, a commander of a splinter group of the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) which is the prime suspect and was on a police wanted list for his role in the attack since July 2016.[84]

    On the night of 13 January 2017, Bangladeshi counterterrorism forces arrested Jahangir Alam, man suspected of being a key planner of the attack in Tangail District.[85]

    In December 2018, the trial of eight people accused of being Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh who were suspected of helping plan and supply weapons for the attack opened before a special tribunal in Dhaka. In November 2019 seven were convicted and sentenced to death while one was acquitted.[86][87] After a 4 year period their death sentences were commuted down to life sentences until natural death, "Considering the brutality of the murder, the overall cruel behavior of the terrorists on the spot at the time of the incident and the tarnishing of the image of Bangladesh in the outside world, we think that justice will be ensured if each of them (seven convicts) is sentenced to life imprisonment (till natural death) in the case," the bench said in the full text of the verdict uploaded on the SC website on June 17 of 2025.[88] On the 2nd of July 2025, DMP commissioner Sheikh Md. Sajjad Ali said "Mentionable, Holy Artisan incident was a terrorist attack and after appropriate investigations the people involved were by now exposed to justice.” He also highlighted police’s challenges in the country’s current situation and some irregularities during the subsequent governments.[89]

    Zakir Naik and Peace TV

    [edit]

    After revealing the investigations of the attack in July 2016 published by The Daily Star that a terrorist involved in the brutal killings followed Zakir Naik's page on Facebook and was influenced[90] by Naik's speeches.[91] The terrorist had posted sermons of Zakir Naik on social media where Naik urged "all Muslims to be terrorists"[92][93] Indian Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren Rijiju said, "Zakir Naik's speech is a matter of concern for us. Our agencies are working on this."[94] He was then termed a controversial as well as a popular figure by the media.[92][95] After 2 days in investigation, the Maharashtra State Intelligence Department (SID) gave a clean chit to Zakir Naik and said that Naik would not and cannot be arrested on his return to India as the probe ordered by the Maharashtra government did not find any other strong evidence to link Naik to terror-related activities.[96] The Daily Star apologized to Naik over the Dhaka Terror Attack controversy and stated that they never blamed him for the attack.[97] The newspaper quoted that it only reported how youth were misinterpreting his speeches.[97][98][99] However, soon thereafter the Bangladesh Government banned the broadcast of Naik's Peace TV channel.[100] Hasanul Haq Inu, the Information Minister, reasoned that "Peace TV is not consistent with Bangladeshi society, Bangladesh's constitution, our culture, customs and rituals".[4]

    Reactions

    [edit]
    • Bangladesh Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina condemned the killings and hostage crisis and stated that Islamic terrorists were maligning the name of Islam[101][102][103] and assured that the government will do everything to restrain militancy and extremism in the country.[104] President Mohammad Abdul Hamid also condemned the terrorist attack and expressed deep shock at the death of the hostages and police officials.[105] Two days of national mourning was observed in the memory of the deceased victims.[106]
    • India Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned the attack and said, "the attack in Dhaka has pained us beyond words."[107] He also telephoned his Bangladeshi counterpart.[108] President Pranab Mukherjee wrote on Twitter that he was "deeply saddened at the loss of life and injuries caused to innocent civilians."[109]
    • Italy Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi offered condolences to the families of the victims, saying, "our values are stronger than hatred and terror."[110] He also said that the nation had suffered "a painful loss."[111] The Italy national football team wore black armbands during their Euro quarter final match against Germany. Both teams held a moment of silence in memory of the victims before the game.[112]
    • Japan Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe telephoned his Bangladeshi counterpart and commanded the Embassy of Japan in Bangladesh to rescue the Japanese alive from the crisis, labeling the incident as "unfortunate".[108][113] Some other Japanese government officials and agencies including Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida, Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Koichi Hagiuda, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga, Japan International Cooperation Agency expressed their concern over the incident and condemned the killings.[114]

    Organisations

    [edit]
    • European Union EU Chief of Foreign Policy Federica Mogherini issued a statement expressing 'solidarity' with Bangladesh. The statement said that the EU stands with the people of Bangladesh and offered their deepest condolences to the dead and to the wounded.[115]
    • Organisation of Islamic Cooperation The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, as shocked to hear the attack and condemned the attack in its strongest terms, and offered their condolences to the victims of the attack.[116]
    • United Nations The United Nations Security Council strongly condemned the terrorist attack and said, "the members of the Security Council reaffirmed that terrorism in all its forms and manifestations constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security".[117][118]

    Legacy

    [edit]
    Dipto Shopoth

    Two years after the attack, a memorial sculpture named "Dipto Shopoth" by Mrinal Haque was inaugurated in Gulshan in memory of the two policemen AC Rabiul and OC Salahuddin who were killed in the incident.[119]

    Ambassador's from various different nations to Bangladesh paying tribute to the victims at the 5th anniversary of the attack

    After the resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the sculpture was demolished on 29 August and replaced with posters of the banned Islamist organization Hizb ut-Tahrir Bangladesh.[120]

    [edit]

    2019 Bangladeshi-German-Russian co-production film Shonibar Bikel and 2022 Indian film Faraaz are based on the event. The latter is an adaptation of Nuruzzaman Labu's 2017 non-fiction book Holey Artisan: A Journalistic Investigation.[121]

    See also

    [edit]

    • List of hostage crises

    • Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki, the leader of Islamic State – Bengal Province at the time of the attack

    •September 11 attacks

    •Terrorism in Bangladesh

    •Jihadism

    References

    [edit]
    [edit]
    Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

    July 2016 Dhaka attack

    View on Grokipedia
    from Grokipedia
    The July 2016 Dhaka attack was a terrorist siege perpetrated by six Islamist militants affiliated with the neo-Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (neo-JMB), who pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, at the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka's Gulshan diplomatic enclave on 1 July 2016, resulting in 22 civilian deaths, primarily foreigners hacked with machetes after failing to recite Quranic verses from memory.[1][2] The attackers, young middle-class Bangladeshis radicalized through local networks and online propaganda, stormed the popular expatriate cafe around 9:20 PM, armed with assault rifles, pistols, and cleavers, taking dozens hostage and selectively executing non-Muslims while sparing those who demonstrated Islamic knowledge, a tactic echoing ISIS operational patterns.[3][4] The 12-hour standoff, which drew international condemnation and exposed vulnerabilities in Bangladesh's counterterrorism posture despite government crackdowns on domestic extremists, ended in the early hours of 2 July when army commandos from the 46th Independent Infantry Brigade raided the site, killing five attackers and capturing the sixth alive after intense gunfire and grenade exchanges that also claimed two police officers.[5][6] The Islamic State promptly claimed responsibility through its Amaq News Agency, releasing hostage photos and attributing the operation to its Bengal Province, though Bangladeshi authorities, wary of reputational damage to foreign investment and tourism, downplayed transnational links and framed it as purely homegrown JMB terrorism without direct ISIS command.[2][7] Among the victims were nine Italians, seven Japanese, one Indian, and others from various nationalities, highlighting the attack's aim to target Western and secular influences in a nation grappling with rising jihadist recruitment amid political suppression of Islamist opposition.[8][6] In the aftermath, the incident spurred intensified security operations, leading to hundreds of arrests and extrajudicial killings of suspects, while a 2019 tribunal convicted seven plotters—including financiers and coordinators—to death for masterminding the assault, underscoring persistent ideological threats from Salafi-jihadist factions despite official narratives minimizing global jihadist infiltration.[5][1] The attack marked a escalation in ISIS-inspired violence in Bangladesh, challenging the government's secular credentials and prompting debates over radicalization drivers like madrassa indoctrination and online self-recruitment over state-sponsored terror.[2][9]

    Historical and Ideological Context

    Rise of Islamist Extremism in Bangladesh

    The roots of Islamist extremism in Bangladesh lie in the erosion of the country's secular foundations post-independence. Although the 1972 constitution emphasized secularism, nationalism, democracy, and socialism, subsequent amendments under military-backed regimes shifted toward Islamization for political legitimacy. In 1977, President Ziaur Rahman excised secularism and inserted absolute trust in Allah, while in 1988, President Hossain Mohammad Ershad formally declared Islam the state religion via the Eighth Amendment, enabling Islamist groups to challenge secular governance and advocate for Sharia-based rule.[10][11] Militant Islamist networks coalesced in the 1990s, fueled by returnees from Afghan jihad training camps and transnational funding. Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HuJI), operational since the mid-1990s with links to Osama bin Laden's 1998 fatwa, sought to overthrow secular authorities and establish an Islamic caliphate, conducting early attacks such as a 1999 plot against U.S. interests. Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), formed in 1998 under Shaykh Abdur Rahman, marked a surge in domestic terrorism with its August 17, 2005, operation detonating over 450 synchronized low-explosive devices across all 63 districts, killing two and injuring dozens while distributing 400,000 leaflets demanding Sharia implementation and the end of man-made laws. JMB followed with suicide bombings in November 2005 targeting courts in Dhaka and Chittagong, killing three judges and aides, demonstrating tactical evolution toward deadlier methods inspired by global jihadism.[12][13] Intense counterterrorism operations, including the 2007 executions of JMB's top six leaders, fragmented but did not eradicate these networks, allowing splinter factions to regroup underground. The 2010s saw a dual rise: mass-based Islamist mobilization via Hefazat-e-Islam, a Deobandi alliance of over 10,000 madrasas, which on May 5, 2013, rallied up to 200,000 in Dhaka's Motijheel demanding 13 points including capital punishment for "blasphemers," abolition of women's employment in certain sectors, and curbs on intermingling of sexes—clashes with security forces ensued, resulting in at least 61 protester deaths per human rights documentation. This event, triggered partly by Shahbagh secular protests against 1971 war criminals, highlighted patronage politics sustaining fundamentalist currents despite the Awami League's secular rhetoric.[14][15] Concurrently, low-level ideological violence escalated through targeted killings of secular voices, with Islamist militants assassinating at least seven bloggers and publishers between February 2013 and October 2015 using machetes—victims included Ahmed Rajib Haibaz (February 15, 2013), Avijit Roy (February 26, 2015), Washiqur Rahman (May 12, 2015), Ananta Bijoy Das (May 12, 2015), AKM Shafiul Islam (August 7, 2015), and Niladri Chattopadhyay Niloy (August 7, 2015). These attacks, often claimed by Ansarullah Bangla Team (ABT) or "Caliphate Soldiers in Bengal" with ties to al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent and Islamic State propaganda, enforced taboos against perceived apostasy and criticism of Islam, exploiting political polarization and weak enforcement of blasphemy laws.[16][17] By mid-2016, these strands—historical Islamization, resilient militant cores, mass fundamentalist mobilization, and jihadist-inspired killings—had cultivated a permissive environment for spectacular operations, as evidenced by Bangladeshi recruits to Syria and Afghanistan (estimated 100+ by 2015) and ISIS's declaration of a Bengal "province," underscoring causal links between domestic grievances, ideological indoctrination via madrasas, and global networks over state suppression alone.[18][19]

    Precursors to the Attack

    In the decade prior to the July 2016 attack, the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), founded in 1998 and responsible for over 500 coordinated bombings across 63 of Bangladesh's 64 districts on August 17, 2005, had been significantly weakened by government crackdowns and the 2007 executions of its top leaders, including founder Shaykh Abdur Rahman and military commander Bangla Bhai.[13] Despite this, JMB remnants persisted underground, evolving into splinter networks that drew inspiration from global jihadist ideologies, particularly after the Islamic State's (ISIS) territorial gains in Iraq and Syria beginning in 2014. These groups increasingly targeted individuals perceived as threats to Islamist orthodoxy, shifting from mass bombings to selective assassinations amid political tensions following the disputed 2014 national elections, which saw opposition boycotts and heightened repression of Islamist parties like Jamaat-e-Islami.[7] A key precursor was the emergence of Neo-JMB around 2014–2015, led by foreign operatives including Tamim Ahmed Chowdhury, a Bangladeshi-origin militant from Canada who relocated to Bangladesh and forged operational links with ISIS, including pledges of allegiance (bay'ah) to its caliphate. Neo-JMB, ideologically aligned with ISIS's emphasis on punishing "apostates" and establishing wilayat (provinces) in South Asia, recruited from urban, educated youth radicalized via online propaganda, contrasting with JMB's earlier rural, madrassa-based base. This faction rejected negotiations with the state, viewing Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's Awami League government—accused by militants of secular authoritarianism and collaboration with India—as legitimate targets for takfiri violence.[20][7] Escalating violence in 2015 underscored the growing threat, with at least five machete attacks on secular bloggers in Dhaka and Sylhet between February and August, including Avijit Roy on February 26, Washiqur Rahman on May 12, Ananta Bijoy Das on May 12, and Niloy Neel on August 7—killings claimed by ISIS via its Amaq agency but attributed by Bangladeshi authorities to JMB/Neo-JMB operatives. Foreign victims followed, with Italian aid worker Cesare Tavella stabbed to death on September 28 near Dhaka and countryman Claudio Casulli killed on October 8 in Dinajpur, alongside failed kidnappings of Japanese nationals in October that resulted in two deaths. These low-tech, symbolic strikes—often involving young attackers interrogating victims on religious knowledge—signaled a tactical evolution toward high-visibility operations against "infidels" and regime symbols, setting the stage for coordinated sieges while the government denied significant ISIS footholds, focusing instead on domestic networks.[21][7]

    Planning and Execution of the Assault

    Militant Preparation and Target Selection

    The militants responsible for the attack, directed by Tamim Ahmed Chowdhury—a Canadian-Bangladeshi ISIS operative who had established a local network—initiated preparations in June 2016, coinciding with the onset of Ramadan. Chowdhury proposed the operation to his ISIS contact, Abu Terek Mohammad Tajuddin Kausar, explicitly seeking authorization to target foreigners in Dhaka as a means to advance the group's global caliphate ambitions. This proposal received approval from ISIS leadership, reflecting the group's strategy of inspiring and guiding local affiliates to conduct high-impact assaults on Western expatriates and perceived apostates.[22] Target selection focused on the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka's Gulshan-2 diplomatic enclave, an upscale café known for attracting expatriates, diplomats, and affluent locals during evening hours. The site's choice was driven by its symbolic value: as a venue symbolizing Western cultural influence and secular leisure in a Muslim-majority country, it offered opportunities to maximize hostage-taking, media attention, and ideological enforcement against those failing ISIS-mandated religious tests. Low visible security and the venue's isolation within a residential block further facilitated the planned breach and prolonged siege.[22][23] Operational logistics included renting a safe house apartment in the nearby Basundhara residential area by local facilitator Tanvir Kaderi, providing proximity for coordination and potential reconnaissance without drawing suspicion. Recruitment drew from radicalized youth within Bangladesh's Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) splinter faction, Neo-JMB, using indoctrination tools such as jihadist videos and ISIS propaganda like the Dabiq magazine to align operatives with the attack's objectives. While specific weapons training details remain limited in available investigations, the group's prior low-level assaults indicate rudimentary familiarity with small arms and blades, emphasizing surprise and ideological intimidation over sustained combat.[22][23]

    Initial Breach and Hostage Seizure

    At approximately 21:20 Bangladesh Standard Time on July 1, 2016, five to six armed militants dressed in casual clothing, including jeans and T-shirts, stormed the entrance of the Holey Artisan Bakery located at Road No. 79, House 5, Gulshan-2, Dhaka.[24][25][26] The assailants, armed with automatic rifles, pistols, machetes, and possibly grenades, immediately opened fire indiscriminately while shouting "Allahu Akbar," targeting staff and patrons inside the cafe.[25] This sudden breach followed reports of the militants killing two police officers at a nearby checkpoint shortly before entry, securing their approach to the target in the diplomatic enclave.[26] The militants rapidly seized control of the single-story premises, which was popular among expatriates and locals for its Western-style baked goods and dining. Diners dove under tables for cover, while some staff attempted to flee through a rear exit or hide in restrooms and ceiling spaces. The attackers killed at least two bakery employees on the spot and herded the remaining approximately 35 individuals present—comprising patrons, staff, and possibly a few early arrivals—into hostage groups, initiating a prolonged standoff.[25][27][28] During the initial chaos, a small number of people escaped undetected, including one waiter who climbed to the roof despite sustaining injuries. The breach exploited the cafe's lack of fortified security typical for such civilian establishments, allowing the militants to establish positions barricaded with furniture and hostages within minutes.[25]

    Siege Dynamics and Militant Behavior

    Ideological Enforcement During Captivity

    During the siege at the Holey Artisan Bakery on July 1, 2016, the militants imposed strict ideological tests on captives to distinguish between those deemed sufficiently observant Muslims and others targeted for execution, aligning with jihadist doctrines that prioritize ritual knowledge as a marker of faith. Hostages were interrogated on their ability to recite specific verses from the Quran, such as surahs from the opening chapter Al-Fatiha; those who complied were segregated into a separate room and largely spared immediate violence, while the remainder—primarily non-Muslims or Muslims unable to demonstrate proficiency—were herded into another area and methodically killed with machetes and cleavers.[29][30] This enforcement extended beyond initial screening to ongoing coercion, with survivors recounting how militants lectured captives on Islamic texts and theology throughout the night, attempting to proselytize or reinforce submission to their interpretation of Sharia. In one account, a Bangladeshi student survived by repeatedly reciting Quranic passages under duress, even as militants executed others nearby for failing similar tests or refusing to convert. The killings were not indiscriminate; of the 20 hostages slain, most were foreigners unable to pass the religious litmus, hacked to death in a manner evocative of ISIS propaganda videos emphasizing brutal retribution against perceived infidels.[31][32] Militant behavior reflected a calculated ideological purity, sparing at least 10 Bangladeshi Muslims who proved their orthodoxy through recitation, while torturing and murdering those who could not, including slashing throats and dismembering bodies to underscore divine judgment. This selective clemency, claimed by ISIS as targeting "crusaders and their apostate allies," underscored the group's global narrative of enforcing caliphate loyalty via scriptural fidelity, though Bangladeshi authorities attributed the acts to local networks like Neo-Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) rather than direct ISIS command. Eyewitness reports confirmed no firearms were used on hostages, emphasizing melee weapons to prolong suffering and symbolize ritual purification.[6][33]

    Communications and Standoff Tactics

    The militants initiated the standoff by segregating hostages immediately after seizing the Holey Artisan Bakery around 8:45 p.m. on July 1, 2016, using religious recitations from the Quran as a litmus test to distinguish Muslims from non-Muslims.[25] Muslims were provided food and water and confined separately, while non-Muslims faced interrogation and execution, primarily by machete or cleaver strikes rather than gunfire, resulting in 20 hostage deaths through slashing and stabbing.[25] This selective enforcement served as both a tactical delay mechanism and ideological assertion, with survivors reporting gunmen shouting phrases like "Allahu Akbar" and declaring intent to identify and eliminate "infidels."[25] Authorities attempted negotiation by establishing phone contact with the militants shortly after cordoning the site, but these efforts were rebuffed, with gunmen refusing dialogue and focusing instead on internal control and executions.[25] No explicit demands for ransom, prisoner releases, or policy changes were communicated to security forces, deviating from conventional hostage negotiation protocols and underscoring the attackers' emphasis on demonstrative violence over bargaining.[24] The absence of responsive communication prolonged the siege, which lasted roughly 10 hours until the Rapid Action Battalion's assault at approximately 6:00 a.m. on July 2, during which militants detonated suicide vests and engaged in close-quarters resistance.[6] Externally, the gunmen leveraged digital tools for propaganda, compelling bakery staff to provide Wi-Fi passwords to upload images and updates to ISIS-affiliated online channels, thereby amplifying the attack's visibility without direct interaction with media or officials on-site.[25] Tactically, they barricaded interiors, used hostages as human shields rigged with gas canisters and explosives, and conducted phased killings to sow terror, locking groups in restrooms while systematically eliminating others unable or unwilling to comply with religious tests.[25] These methods fortified their position against the surrounding security perimeter, which included power cutoffs and sniper oversight, but ultimately failed to prevent the resolution through force.[24]

    Security Response and Confrontation

    Deployment of Forces

    Following the initial breach at approximately 9:20 PM on July 1, 2016, local police units and the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), Bangladesh's elite paramilitary counter-terrorism force, were the first responders, arriving within 30 minutes to establish a cordon around the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka's Gulshan diplomatic enclave.[34] [35] Gunfire from the militants killed two police officers during this early containment phase, highlighting the immediate risks to frontline responders.[34] By 3:00 AM on July 2, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina convened senior officials from military, paramilitary, and police commands to coordinate a unified response, shifting from containment to operational planning amid ongoing hostage negotiations via phone and social media.[25] [34] Preparations intensified between 5:00 and 6:00 AM, involving elite commandos drawn from the Bangladesh Army, Navy, Air Force, police special weapons and tactics (SWAT) teams, Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB), and RAB, forming a joint task force for a high-risk assault.[34] This multi-agency deployment reflected the siege's complexity in a high-profile area with foreign hostages, necessitating specialized units trained for urban counter-terrorism operations.[35] At 7:40 AM, the forces launched "Operation Thunderbolt," a coordinated storming of the bakery involving army and navy commandos supported by police and paramilitary elements, who used explosives and gunfire to breach entry points.[34] [35] The operation secured the site by 8:15 AM, rescuing 13 hostages while neutralizing six militants, though 20 hostages had already been killed by the attackers.[34] This deployment underscored the integration of Bangladesh's security apparatus but also exposed delays in escalation, as initial police efforts proved insufficient against heavily armed militants equipped with automatic weapons and cleavers.[25]

    Tactical Resolution and Casualties

    The siege concluded after approximately 12 hours when Bangladeshi security forces initiated a coordinated assault on the Holey Artisan Bakery around 5:30 a.m. on July 2, 2016. Army commandos from specialized units, supported by police rapid action teams, cut power to the building to disorient the militants, breached entry points using explosives and ladders to access upper floors, and conducted room-to-room clearance operations involving intense close-quarters combat.[33][36] This tactical intervention followed unsuccessful negotiation attempts, during which the militants had refused to release hostages and continued executing captives. During the raid, five of the six attackers were killed by security forces in firefights, while the sixth, a 17-year-old militant named Hasnat Mohammad Murad, surrendered without resistance after hiding and was taken into custody alive. Thirteen hostages were rescued from the premises, many having been confined in a back room separated by the militants based on their ability to recite Quranic verses. No additional security personnel casualties occurred during the storming operation itself, though two police officers had been killed earlier in the evening of July 1 during initial exchanges of fire outside the cafe.[25][37] The militants had already inflicted the majority of the fatalities prior to the raid, killing 20 hostages—primarily through machete attacks on those unable to demonstrate sufficient Islamic knowledge—leaving a total death toll of 27, comprising 20 civilian hostages, five attackers, and two police officers. Among the deceased hostages were nationals from Italy, Japan, the United States, and Bangladesh, underscoring the targeted nature of the assault on foreigners and perceived non-adherents. The operation's success in rescuing survivors and neutralizing the threat highlighted the effectiveness of the combined forces' preparation, despite the high prior hostage losses attributable to the militants' ideological vetting and execution tactics.[6][33]
    Casualty TypeNumberDetails
    Hostages killed20Executed by militants with machetes and gunfire before raid[6]
    Hostages rescued13Freed during storming operation[37]
    Attackers killed5Neutralized by security forces in combat[25]
    Attacker captured1Surrendered alive[25]
    Security personnel killed2Police officers in initial response[33]

    Attribution and Organizational Responsibility

    ISIS Claim and Verification

    The Islamic State (ISIS) claimed responsibility for the July 2016 Dhaka attack shortly after it began, announcing via its Amaq News Agency on July 1, 2016, that "soldiers of the Caliphate" had targeted a restaurant in Dhaka frequented by citizens of "crusading" countries, killing over twenty people.[38][39] The claim aligned with ISIS's pattern of publicizing operations through its propaganda arm to assert global reach, particularly in South Asia via its self-proclaimed Bengal Province.[40] Bangladeshi officials, including Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, immediately dismissed the ISIS attribution, insisting the assault was executed by local militants from the banned Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) or its splinter Neo-JMB, without direct foreign orchestration, as part of a broader government narrative minimizing transnational jihadist presence to avoid perceptions of security failures.[41][5] Subsequent investigations provided evidence supporting deeper ISIS ties: interrogations of captured militant Hasnat Abdul Hadi revealed he sought and received operational approval from an ISIS handler in Syria via encrypted communications prior to the attack; digital forensics uncovered pledges of allegiance (bay'ah) to ISIS by several perpetrators, including leader Nibras Islam; and the militants' tactics—separating Muslims from non-Muslims, quizzing hostages on Quranic verses, and executing failures—mirrored ISIS protocols documented in prior claims.[42][43] Neo-JMB, the executing faction, functioned as an ISIS-affiliated offshoot, with members trained in Libya and influenced by ISIS propaganda, confirming the claim's validity beyond mere opportunism despite local operational autonomy.[21][44]

    Involved Local Networks

    The attackers in the July 1, 2016, assault on the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka's Gulshan neighborhood were primarily members of local Bangladeshi militant cells, organized under the Neo-Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (Neo-JMB), a splinter faction of the original Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) that had adopted ISIS-inspired tactics and ideology since around 2014.[40][1] These networks recruited from urban, educated youth in Dhaka and surrounding areas, including affluent families, through online radicalization via ISIS propaganda and local mosque networks, rather than direct foreign training.[5] The five assailants—Rohan Imtiaz, Nibras Islam, Ripon Mia, Murshid Bin Osman, and one unidentified—were all Bangladeshi nationals in their early 20s, with prior involvement in low-level JMB activities like machete attacks on secular bloggers.[45] Neo-JMB's operational structure relied on decentralized local cells for logistics, including arms smuggling from domestic black markets and safe houses in Dhaka's outskirts, coordinated by figures like Tamim Ahmed Chowdhury, a Bangladeshi-origin operative based in the city who facilitated weapon procurement and target scouting.[46] Support networks extended to extended family ties and sympathetic sympathizers providing funding through extortion of local businesses and small donations, enabling the group to evade detection despite Bangladesh's counterterrorism raids that had dismantled original JMB leadership by 2006.[5] Investigations post-attack identified over 80 arrests linked to these cells, revealing connections to JMB holdouts in northern Bangladesh districts like Sylhet and Rajshahi, where recruits underwent basic explosives training.[47] Bangladeshi authorities, emphasizing domestic culpability over foreign direction, attributed the plot's execution to these indigenous networks, with court evidence from 2019 trials showing no direct ISIS operatives on site but shared ideological alignment via Amaq News Agency propaganda.[48] Seven Neo-JMB affiliates received death sentences in November 2019 for roles in financing, arms supply, and reconnaissance, underscoring the local ecosystem's self-sufficiency in planning the 12-hour siege that killed 22 civilians.[1][5] This local focus contrasted with ISIS's global claim, which Bangladeshi officials dismissed as opportunistic branding to inflate foreign influence, based on forensic analysis of attackers' communications showing primarily domestic coordination.[33]

    Legal Proceedings and Accountability

    Investigation and Key Arrests

    The investigation commenced immediately after the Bangladesh Army's raid on July 2, 2016, which neutralized five of the attackers at the Holey Artisan Bakery. Bangladesh Police's Counter Terrorism and Transnational Crime (CTTC) unit led the probe, employing forensic analysis of the site, including CCTV footage, seized weapons, and digital devices recovered from the militants. The deceased attackers were identified as Bangladeshi nationals—Nibras Islam, Rohan Imtiaz, Ripon Rahman, Hasnat Karim, and Murad—previously known to authorities for suspected radicalization and monitored under anti-terrorism surveillance.[49] Intelligence gathering revealed a local network inspired by ISIS ideology, with attackers radicalized via online propaganda and trained in firearms and explosives handling domestically. CTTC operations in July and August 2016 targeted suspected safe houses, resulting in the elimination of key figures and arrests of accomplices. On August 27, 2016, a raid in Narayanganj killed Tamim Ahmed Chowdhury, a Canadian-Bangladeshi operative identified as the attack's chief planner who had pledged allegiance to ISIS and coordinated logistics for the Neo-Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (Neo-JMB) faction.[50][51] Additional arrests dismantled support cells, including six Neo-JMB militants in August 2016 and four female members involved in recruitment and propaganda. Jahangir Alam, alias Rajib, another Neo-JMB leader implicated in planning the assault, was apprehended by CTTC in Dhaka division. These actions, based on confessions, phone intercepts, and recovered documents, linked the plot to local fabrication of improvised explosives and arms procurement, underscoring operational autonomy despite ISIS claims of direction.[52][53] By late 2016, the investigation had yielded over 100 arrests across related terror modules, informing subsequent trials. In November 2019, a Dhaka anti-terrorism tribunal convicted seven individuals—accused of supplying arms, training recruits, and facilitating communications—for their roles, sentencing them to death, while acquitting one.[5][1]

    Trials, Convictions, and Sentences

    In November 2019, an Anti-Terrorism Special Tribunal in Dhaka convicted seven members of Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) of planning and facilitating the July 1, 2016, attack on the Holey Artisan Bakery, sentencing them to death; an eighth defendant was acquitted due to insufficient evidence of direct involvement.[45][1][54] The convicted individuals, identified as Mohammad Jaijul Hasan, Mohammad Jashim Uddin, Mohammad Sazzad, Mohammad Nizam, Mohammad Shafiqul Islam, Mohammad Abdul Jalil, and Mohammad Imran, were charged with conspiracy, murder, and terrorism under Bangladesh's Anti-Terrorism Act, based on confessions, digital forensics linking them to recruitment and logistics, and witness testimonies from investigations by the Counter Terrorism and Transnational Crime Unit.[1][54] The direct perpetrators—five gunmen who stormed the bakery—were killed during the security forces' raid on July 2, 2016, precluding trials for them; a sixth assailant reportedly surrendered but faced separate proceedings tied to the Neo-JMB network, though outcomes remain limited to broader JMB cases.[45] Appeals against the 2019 verdicts proceeded through Bangladesh's judicial system, culminating in October 2023 when the High Court Division of the Supreme Court commuted the seven death sentences to life imprisonment, citing procedural irregularities in evidence handling and witness coercion allegations, while upholding the convictions.[55][56][57] This commutation drew criticism from victims' families and security analysts for potentially undermining deterrence against Islamist militancy, as life terms in Bangladesh have historically allowed parole or remission under political pressures.[55] Related probes into Neo-JMB operatives yielded additional convictions, including death sentences in 2017 for five individuals linked to the murders of Japanese hostages during the siege, though these were ancillary to the core bakery attack case.[58] By 2025, no executions from the incident had occurred, reflecting Bangladesh's uneven enforcement of capital penalties amid ongoing appeals and prison overcrowding, with the commuted lifers held in high-security facilities under the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence oversight.[56]

    External Ideological Influences

    The perpetrators of the July 1, 2016, attack on the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka were members of a splinter faction known as Neo-Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (Neo-JMB), which had pledged allegiance (bay'ah) to the Islamic State (ISIS) and adopted its Salafi-jihadist ideology emphasizing the establishment of a global caliphate through indiscriminate violence against perceived apostates, secularists, and non-Muslims.[21][59] This external doctrinal shift marked a departure from Neo-JMB's roots in the original JMB's more localized Deobandi-influenced militancy, as the group integrated ISIS's transnational narrative of targeting "gray zones"—Western-style establishments symbolizing cultural contamination—to maximize media impact and recruit globally.[40] ISIS's propaganda apparatus, including Dabiq magazine and Amaq News Agency, explicitly endorsed the attack as an operation by its Bengal Province, aligning it with the group's broader strategy of inspiring lone actors and cells in South Asia via online dissemination of beheading videos, fatwas against Shia and Sufi Muslims, and calls for hijra (migration to the caliphate) or local emulation.[60][61] Radicalization among the attackers, who included affluent, English-speaking youth from elite Dhaka families, was facilitated by ISIS's digital outreach, which bypassed traditional madrasa networks in Bangladesh by leveraging encrypted apps like Telegram and Surespot for sharing ideological materials translated into Bengali.[62] Key figures, such as Roiel Phillip (alias "Shafi"), had reportedly trained in ISIS-controlled territories in Libya or Syria, returning to indoctrinate local recruits with tactics like hostage separation based on Quranic recitation proficiency—a hallmark of ISIS's takfiri enforcement distinguishing "true" Muslims from others.[3] This external infusion contrasted with indigenous Bangladeshi Islamist strains, such as those from Hefazat-e-Islam or Jamaat-e-Islami, which prioritize political agitation over spectacular violence, underscoring ISIS's role in escalating operational sophistication.[19] Bangladeshi authorities initially attributed the ideology solely to domestic JMB revivalism to minimize perceptions of foreign penetration, but U.S. intelligence assessments confirmed the attackers' operational alignment with ISIS directives, including the use of AK-47s, cleavers, and suicide vests modeled on caliphate precedents.[63][7] Broader external vectors included funding and ideological priming from Gulf-based Salafi networks, which had historically amplified Wahhabi literalism in Bangladeshi expatriate communities, priming receptivity to ISIS's apocalyptic eschatology over Al-Qaeda's more strategic, anti-occupation focus.[64] While Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) competed for influence in Bangladesh through publications like Nawa-i-Afghan Jihad, the Dhaka attackers' rejection of AQIS in favor of ISIS reflected the latter's appeal via graphic media and promises of immediate divine reward, as evidenced by their pre-attack social media posts echoing ISIS slogans like "remaining and expanding."[21] Post-attack analyses by counterterrorism experts highlight how ISIS's decentralized franchise model empowered peripheral provinces like Bengal without requiring direct command, enabling local adaptation while importing core tenets such as enmity toward "crusaders" (targeting the 20 foreign victims from Japan, Italy, and elsewhere).[40][65] This ideological export persisted, with ISIS inspiring subsequent low-level IED claims in Bangladesh through 2019, despite territorial losses in the Levant.[63]

    Immediate Reactions and Critiques

    Bangladeshi Government Handling

    The Bangladeshi government under Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina initiated a security cordon around the Holey Artisan Bakery immediately after the attack began on July 1, 2016, involving police, Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), and army units in negotiations and eventual storming of the site approximately 24 hours later.[33] [66] The operation resulted in the deaths of six attackers and rescue of 13 hostages, though authorities later admitted that security forces may have inadvertently killed one Italian hostage, Abul Quasem, during crossfire in the raid.[67] Hasina addressed the nation on July 2, 2016, declaring the following day as one of national mourning and vowing to eradicate militancy.[68] In attributing responsibility, officials including Hasina insisted the perpetrators were exclusively Bangladeshi nationals affiliated with domestic groups like Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), who received training within the country and had no operational links to ISIS, despite the group's prompt claim of responsibility via its Amaq agency.[66] [69] This position framed the incident as a homegrown threat amenable to internal crackdowns, with Hasina linking the militants to opposition parties such as the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) for allegedly sheltering extremists.[70] [71] Critics, including analysts from international think tanks, argued that the government's denial of ISIS influence overlooked evidence of ideological inspiration from transnational jihadism, such as the attackers' use of ISIS-style execution methods and prior propaganda outreach in Bengali, potentially hindering a fuller assessment of external threats.[40] [70] The delayed storming—after extended negotiations—drew rebuke for prolonging the siege and increasing hostage risks, with some attributing it to caution over potential suicide bombings or inadequate intelligence on the attackers' capabilities.[72] [73] In the aftermath, the administration launched widespread arrests of suspected Islamists, but reports highlighted extrajudicial measures by security forces, including maiming of detainees, raising concerns over accountability in the broader counter-terrorism drive.[74]

    International and Domestic Responses

    The Bangladeshi government under Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina responded to the July 1-2, 2016, attack by authorizing a special forces operation involving army commandos from the 46th Independent Infantry Brigade, who stormed the Holey Artisan Bakery early on July 2, ending the siege after approximately 12 hours and rescuing 13 hostages while killing six of the attackers.[67] Hasina publicly declared a policy of zero tolerance for terrorism, stating that the nation would "hunt down" militants and their supporters, which prompted a nationwide security sweep resulting in over 300 arrests of suspected extremists in the immediate aftermath.[75] The government attributed the assault primarily to domestic networks like the Neo-Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (Neo-JMB), downplaying direct operational control by ISIS despite the group's claim of responsibility, a stance critics argued reflected reluctance to acknowledge transnational jihadist influences amid domestic political sensitivities.[76] Domestically, the attack elicited widespread public outrage and grief, particularly in Dhaka, where media reports documented vigils and calls for stricter counter-radicalization measures, though some analysts noted underlying societal divisions exacerbated by politicized narratives blaming opposition Islamist parties for fostering extremism.[40] Opposition figures, including those from the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, condemned the violence but accused the ruling Awami League of intelligence failures and using the incident to justify crackdowns on political rivals, highlighting pre-existing polarization that hindered unified national responses.[73] Internationally, the assault prompted immediate condemnations from global bodies and affected nations, underscoring concerns over ISIS's expanding reach in South Asia. The United Nations Security Council issued a statement on July 2, 2016, strongly condemning the "heinous and cowardly" attack and affirming support for Bangladesh's sovereignty in combating terrorism.[77] United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described it as a "reprehensible act of terror" and urged international cooperation against violent extremism.[78] The United States, through President Barack Obama and congressional leaders, denounced the killings—particularly of American citizens—and emphasized the need for enhanced global intelligence sharing to counter ISIS affiliates, with subsequent visits by U.S. officials like Secretary of State John Kerry focusing on bolstering bilateral anti-terrorism ties.[79][80] India's President Pranab Mukherjee issued a strong condemnation on July 2, 2016, expressing solidarity with Bangladesh over the loss of Indian nationals among the victims and reiterating commitment to regional counter-terrorism collaboration.[81] The United Kingdom's Minister for Asia Hugo Swire labeled the attack "despicable" on July 3, 2016, offering condolences and underscoring the UK's resolve against Islamist terrorism.[82] Italy, mourning nine citizens killed, saw Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni demand justice and later organize commemorations, while Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe conveyed condolences during a July 2016 summit with Hasina and pledged support for Bangladesh's security efforts amid the deaths of Japanese hostages.[83][84] The European Union echoed these sentiments through parliamentary resolutions highlighting the threat to diplomatic areas and calling for reinforced measures against jihadist networks.[85] These responses facilitated post-attack diplomatic engagements, including offers of technical assistance in investigations and a broader push for intelligence cooperation, though Bangladesh's initial minimization of foreign jihadist involvement strained some partnerships.[75]

    Controversies Surrounding the Event

    Disputes Over Global vs. Local Attribution

    The Islamic State (ISIS) publicly claimed responsibility for the July 1–2, 2016, attack on the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka through its Amaq News Agency, stating that its operatives had targeted non-Muslims and killed 22 people, including foreigners, in a siege that involved separating victims based on their ability to recite Quranic verses.[29] This claim aligned with ISIS's broader pattern of publicizing attacks to assert global reach, including the publication of images purportedly from the scene.[4] Bangladeshi authorities, including the police and government officials, rejected the ISIS attribution, insisting the assault was orchestrated solely by domestic militants affiliated with Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), a banned local group previously linked to earlier bombings but lacking prior high-profile international attacks.[86] Officials argued that the perpetrators were Bangladeshi nationals radicalized locally, with no evidence of direct foreign command or training, emphasizing homegrown factors like political grievances and secularist crackdowns over transnational jihadist direction.[48] This stance was motivated in part by economic concerns, as acknowledging ISIS involvement risked deterring Western investment in Bangladesh's garment sector, which relies heavily on buyers wary of terrorism risks.[48] Counter-evidence emerged pointing to deeper ISIS ties, including the role of Tamim Ahmed Chowdhury, a Bangladeshi-origin Canadian who led ISIS's Bengal Province operations and reportedly sought and received approval from ISIS leadership for the plot before his 2016 arrest and later killing by security forces.[87] Investigations revealed communications between attackers and ISIS handlers, as well as pledges of allegiance from splinter groups like Neo-JMB to ISIS, suggesting a hybrid model where local networks executed operations under global ideological inspiration and logistical support rather than pure autonomy.[4] U.S. assessments corroborated ISIS's operational involvement, contrasting with Dhaka's narrative.[88] The dispute persisted in legal proceedings, where 2019 convictions of seven JMB-linked individuals for masterminding the attack focused on local culpability without addressing ISIS coordination, despite the group's claims and forensic links like weapon sourcing potentially tied to broader networks.[5] Analysts noted that while JMB provided the foot soldiers—many young, educated locals radicalized via online propaganda—the attack's sophistication and targeting of foreigners mirrored ISIS tactics, fueling debates over whether downplaying global attribution served short-term stability at the expense of addressing transnational threats.[87]

    Failures in Intelligence and Prevention

    Bangladeshi intelligence agencies possessed information indicating an imminent major terrorist attack targeting foreigners in Dhaka's diplomatic zone, Gulshan, but failed to identify the Holey Artisan Bakery as the specific venue.[89] This critical gap in actionable intelligence prevented the prepositioning of sufficient security forces to thwart the assault on July 1, 2016.[89] Monirul Islam, chief of the Counter Terrorism and Transnational Crime (CTTC) unit, stated at a police chiefs' conference that the absence of precise target details severely hampered preventive operations.[89] Social media warnings circulated on the day of the attack, signaling an impending strike, yet authorities misassessed the risk, prioritizing embassies and large hotels over smaller establishments like the bakery.[67] Prime ministerial advisor H.T. Imam acknowledged this oversight, noting, "They didn’t think at all it can be this place," reflecting a broader underestimation of the threat's scope in a novel scenario for Bangladesh.[67] Officials later initiated probes into potential systemic intelligence failures, amid admissions of inadequate preparedness for such coordinated violence.[67][90] Surveillance protocols exacerbated vulnerabilities, as monitoring emphasized vehicular incursions while neglecting pedestrian approaches; the five attackers thus entered undetected, armed with three AK-47 rifles, five pistols, ammunition, and grenades.[89] Local law enforcement in Gulshan lacked specialized counter-terrorism training, leaving the site exposed despite its location in a high-security enclave frequented by expatriates.[89] Investigators later determined the militants selected the bakery partly due to these security lapses, which facilitated potential escape routes.[91] These shortcomings occurred against a backdrop of escalating domestic militancy, including prior secularist killings and bombings attributed to ISIS-inspired groups, yet intelligence prioritization remained fragmented, with insufficient focus on online radicalization of affluent local youths who formed the assault team.[92] The government's initial reluctance to fully acknowledge transnational jihadist influences, often framing attacks as politically motivated by opposition elements, may have further constrained proactive threat assessment.[40]

    Long-Term Impact and Lessons

    Reforms in Counter-Terrorism

    In response to the July 1, 2016, attack at the Holey Artisan Bakery, the Bangladeshi government expanded the Counter Terrorism and Transnational Crime (CTTC) unit within the Dhaka Metropolitan Police, increasing its personnel to over 600 armed officers by mid-2017 and granting it direct reporting authority to the Prime Minister's office to bypass local bureaucratic delays.[9] This reform aimed to enhance operational autonomy and rapid response capabilities, building on the unit's prior establishment in 2014. Additionally, civilian police were authorized to use lethal force against suspected militants without due process, facilitating aggressive raids such as Operation Storm 26 in late July 2016, which resulted in the deaths of eight militants in Kalyanpur, and subsequent operations like Thunderbolt targeting neo-Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (neo-JMB) hideouts.[9] [75] These measures led to over 11,000 arrests in an initial nationwide anti-militancy drive, with 164 detentions specifically in July 2016 alone, though many individuals were later released as non-militants.[93] [75] Security protocols were further strengthened through enhanced inter-agency coordination, including quicker deployment of the army's 1st Para-commando Battalion—trained by U.S. Special Operations Command—for high-threat incidents, and international partnerships with Indian agencies and the FBI for forensic equipment, cyber surveillance training, and intelligence sharing.[9] [93] The government also imposed stricter monitoring of educational institutions and religious leaders, tightened bail conditions for extremism-related cases, and provided augmented protection, such as deploying 500 soldiers for international events like the 2016 cricket series.[75] On the ideological front, reforms included a nationwide fatwa issued by over 100,000 Islamic scholars and clerics condemning ISIS and terrorism as un-Islamic, alongside mandatory training programs for imams to promote tolerance and the banning of foreign channels like Peace TV accused of spreading radical content.[93] [75] A de-radicalization initiative launched in late 2016 offered financial incentives to militants who surrendered and renounced violence, coupled with education reforms emphasizing critical thinking to counter online recruitment.[75] These efforts contributed to a decline in reported extremist incidents from 57 in July 2016 to 37 by September, though the government maintained that attacks were primarily driven by local groups like neo-JMB rather than direct foreign orchestration.[75]

    Persistent Extremist Threats

    Despite intensified counter-terrorism operations following the July 2016 attack, Islamist extremist groups in Bangladesh, including the Neo-Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (Neo-JMB)—the primary perpetrators—have demonstrated resilience through splinter networks, online recruitment, and low-level violence. Neo-JMB, which orchestrated the Holey Artisan Bakery siege, adapted by decentralizing into smaller cells, enabling sporadic attacks such as the February 2018 lone-actor stabbing in Dhaka that targeted foreigners, reflecting a shift toward indiscriminate violence against perceived "infidels."[20][94] Security forces dismantled several cells and arrested hundreds, yet recruitment persists via digital propaganda and radicalized madrasas, with Neo-JMB leveraging female operatives for logistics and ideological dissemination to evade male-focused surveillance.[59] The Islamic State's Bengal Province (IS-BP), which claimed the 2016 attack, maintains an ideological foothold, inspiring affiliates despite territorial losses elsewhere. IS-BP propaganda continues to glorify the Dhaka assault as a model for targeting Western expatriates and secular locals, fostering lone-wolf radicalization among educated youth disillusioned by socioeconomic grievances and perceived state secularism.[61] Foiled plots, including bomb-making arrests in 2019-2020, underscore ongoing operational capacity, with U.S. intelligence assessing IS-BP's threat as persistent due to cross-border links with Indian modules.[95] Government attribution of attacks to local actors like JMB factions, rather than global jihadists, has been critiqued for understating transnational influences, allowing ideological undercurrents to simmer amid political instability.[40] By 2025, amid post-Hasina political flux, extremist threats have escalated, with reports of heightened intolerance, vigilante violence against minorities, and regrouping of dormant networks exploiting governance vacuums. Small-scale incidents, such as arson on secular targets and online fatwas, indicate that while large-scale spectacles like Dhaka 2016 are rarer due to fortified intelligence, the radicalization ecosystem—fueled by Salafi interpretations rejecting Bangladesh's syncretic Islam—poses enduring risks to stability.[96][59] Comprehensive deradicalization remains challenged by incomplete ideological rebuttals, as state programs focus more on enforcement than countering narratives of global ummah supremacy.[21]

    Insights into Radicalization Mechanisms

    The attackers in the July 2016 Dhaka assault were predominantly young men in their late teens to early twenties from affluent, urban backgrounds, having attended elite English-medium private schools and universities in Bangladesh or abroad.[97][3] One perpetrator was the son of a former Awami League city leader, underscoring their integration into secular, privileged societal strata rather than marginalized communities.[97] This profile challenged prevailing assumptions linking radicalization primarily to socio-economic deprivation, as the assailants enjoyed material comfort and educational opportunities typically associated with deradicalizing influences.[98] Radicalization appeared driven by exposure to ISIS propaganda disseminated via social media and encrypted apps, which framed participation in jihad as a transcendent religious imperative and path to heroism, appealing to identity-seeking youth amid Bangladesh's secular governance.[62][61] Local networks affiliated with Neo-Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (Neo-JMB), an ISIS-aligned splinter of the original JMB, facilitated operational training, including weapons handling and tactical preparation, often in hidden urban cells.[40] At least three attackers had prior involvement in Ansarullah Bangla Team cells in Malaysia, indicating transnational exposure that blended global Salafi-jihadist narratives with localized grievances against perceived anti-Islamic state policies.[40] The incident illuminated causal pathways where ideological immersion—via online content glorifying violence against "infidels" and apostate regimes—outweighed personal hardships, fostering a worldview that justified targeting civilians in upscale venues symbolizing Western influence.[99] Family and peers expressed bewilderment, with no evident prior behavioral red flags, suggesting covert progression from curiosity to commitment through peer validation in small groups.[97] This underscores the potency of digital echo chambers in accelerating radicalization among educated demographics, where abstract doctrinal appeals to purity and martyrdom supersede empirical realities of prosperity.[62] Broader mechanisms evident included rejection of Bangladesh's constitutional secularism as equivalent to religious persecution, amplified by ISIS's portrayal of a besieged global ummah requiring defensive aggression.[99] Empirical patterns post-attack revealed sustained online recruitment targeting similar demographics, with Neo-JMB leveraging encrypted platforms to evade monitoring, highlighting vulnerabilities in countering virtual ideological pipelines despite physical security gains.[59]

    References

    1. Holey Artisan cafe attack: Dhaka court sentences seven to death
    2. Country Reports on Terrorism 2016 - State Department
    3. Dhaka attack: Who were the Bangladesh terrorists? - CNN
    4. The nexus of local and international extremist networks in Bangladesh
    5. Bangladesh Islamists sentenced to death for 2016 attack - BBC
    6. Bangladesh attack: Twenty hostages killed, army says | ISIL/ISIS News
    7. Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board
    8. Victims in Bangladesh Restaurant Attack Came From Countries ...
    9. A Year of Bangladesh's War on Terror - The Diplomat
    10. What does Bangladesh's constitution state about religious freedom?
    11. Bangladesh court considers revoking Islam's state religion status
    12. Harkat-ul-Jihad-al Islami Bangladesh (HuJI-B) Terrorist Group ...
    13. The Threat from Jamaat-ul Mujahideen Bangladesh
    14. Blood on the Streets - Human Rights Watch
    15. Hefazat-e-Islam and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in Bangladesh
    16. Inside Bangladesh's killing fields: bloggers and outsiders targeted ...
    17. These Bangladeshi bloggers were murdered by Islamist extremists ...
    18. How Bangladesh Became Fertile Ground for al-Qa`ida and the ...
    19. The Persistent Challenge of Extremism in Bangladesh
    20. Neo-Jama'at Mujahideen Bangladesh - Australian National Security
    21. Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Bangladesh - State Department
    22. New evidence shows deep Islamic State role in Bangladesh massacre
    23. Tamim Ahmed Chowdhury | Counter Extremism Project
    24. Gunmen take hostages in Bangladeshi capital Dhaka - BBC News
    25. 'God wants you to die': Dhaka's long night of terror | CNN
    26. Gunmen Kill 4 Officers, Take Dozens Hostage in Bangladesh
    27. 20 hostages killed, 13 saved in Bangladesh restaurant attack - 6ABC
    28. At least 20 killed in Dhaka restaurant attack - France 24
    29. Islamic State says it singled out non-Muslims for death in Dhaka attack
    30. Militants Kill 20 Hostages in Bangladesh, Spare Those Who Could ...
    31. 'I escaped death by reciting from the Koran' - BBC News
    32. Bangladesh Attack Is New Evidence That ISIS Has Shifted Its Focus ...
    33. Dhaka cafe attack ends with 20 hostages among dead - The Guardian
    34. Timeline: Holey Artisan Bakery attack - Dhaka Tribune
    35. Holey Artisan Bakery: Bangladesh forces rescue hostages in Dhaka ...
    36. 20 Hostages Killed, 13 Saved in Bangladesh Restaurant Attack
    37. Bangladesh Army: 20 Hostages Killed, 13 Rescued In Dhaka Attack
    38. ISIS claims responsibility for Dhaka attack - CNN
    39. ISIS claims responsibility for Dhaka hostage situation | FOX 5 San ...
    40. Countering Jihadist Militancy in Bangladesh
    41. ISIS claims responsibility of Dhaka attack, government says it was ...
    42. New evidence shows deep Islamic State role in Bangladesh massacre
    43. Evidence shows deep ISIS role in Bangladesh attack - Al Arabiya
    44. Bangladesh suspects two 'Neo-JMB' leaders hid in India | World News
    45. Bangladesh Sentences 7 to Death Over 2016 Bakery Attack
    46. Bangladesh police 'kill main Dhaka cafe attack suspect' - Al Jazeera
    47. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2016/
    48. Bangladesh, Blaming Local Groups for Attacks, Seeks Suspects ...
    49. Bangladesh attack: Dhaka's Holey cafe attackers were known to police
    50. Bangladesh 'cafe attack planner killed' in police raid - BBC News
    51. Bangladesh Police Kill Man Suspected of Planning Dhaka Bakery ...
    52. Bangladeshi police arrest six suspected Islamic militants
    53. Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) , South Asia Terrorism Portal
    54. Bangladesh sentences seven militants to death for 2016 cafe attack
    55. Bangladesh court commutes death sentences of 7 militants ...
    56. Bangladesh High Court commutes death sentence to life ...
    57. Bangladesh court commutes death sentences of 7 militants ...
    58. Death sentences for five over murder of Japanese farmer - BBC News
    59. [PDF] SPECIAL REPORT - United States Institute of Peace
    60. ISIS-Bangladesh - National Counterterrorism Center | Terrorist Groups
    61. Islamic State Ideology Continues to Resonate in Bangladesh
    62. The Radicalization of Bangladeshi Cyberspace - Instituto Igarapé
    63. Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Bangladesh - State Department
    64. Al Qaeda vs. ISIS: Goals and Threats Compared - Brookings Institution
    65. [PDF] The ISIS Model and its Influence Over Global Terrorism | TraCCC
    66. Cafe attackers were Bangladeshi, authorities say - CNN
    67. Bangladesh police say may have shot hostage, missed attack ...
    68. Bangladesh PM Hasina decrees mourning after cafe attack
    69. Bangladesh still denies ISIS role in Dhaka hostage horror - CBS News
    70. Bangladesh's Homegrown Problem | Foreign Affairs
    71. Divisive politics set the stage for Dhaka attack | Sheikh Hasina
    72. How Will Bangladesh Respond to the ISIS-Inspired Attack in Dhaka?
    73. Bangladeshi Leaders Must Stop Politicizing Counterterrorism
    74. “No Right to Live”: “Kneecapping” and Maiming of Detainees by ...
    75. Deciphering Bangladeshi Terror: Fallout and Response to the Holey ...
    76. Bangladesh's Homegrown Problem - Foreign Policy Research Institute
    77. The Latest: UN Security Council condemns Dhaka attack
    78. UN officials condemn terrorist attack in Bangladesh
    79. US Lawmakers Condemn Dhaka Terror Attack - NDTV
    80. Bangladesh, US Agree to Enhance Cooperation to Fight Terrorism
    81. President of India Strongly Condemns Terrorist Attack in Dhaka
    82. Minister for Asia condemns attack in Bangladesh - GOV.UK
    83. Commemoration ceremony for the victims of the 1 July 2016 attack
    84. Japan-Bangladesh Summit Meeting
    85. Dhaka massacre and escalation of Islamic terrorist attacks against ...
    86. Dhaka attack: Bangladesh police blames homegrown JMB terror ...
    87. New Evidence Reveals Deep ISIS Involvement in Bangladesh ...
    88. 2016 Report on International Religious Freedom: Bangladesh
    89. Intel laps led to Gulshan café tragedy: CTTC chief
    90. Bangladesh attack: Police say hostage mistaken for gunman - BBC
    91. 8 chargesheeted in Holey Artisan bakery attack - India Today
    92. (PDF) The Dhaka Attack: Lessons for Bangladesh - ResearchGate
    93. After the Dhaka Attack: Countering Terrorism in Bangladesh
    94. Neo-Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh's Female Members Further ...
    95. Bangladesh: Extremism and Terrorism
    96. Bangladesh's Evolving Security Crisis: The Rise of Religious ...
    97. After Slaughter, Bangladesh Reels at Revelations About Attackers
    98. Dhaka café attack: don't blame private education for radicalisation in ...
    99. The Dynamics of Islamic Radicalization in Bangladesh - MDPI
    User Avatar
    No comments yet.